Top billionaires meet in NYC discuss population control

[bogeyman]

"News flash: the "Billionaires Club" knows: Bill Gates called billionaire philanthropists to a super-secret meeting in Manhattan last May. Included: Buffett, Rockefeller, Soros, Bloomberg, Turner, Oprah and others meeting at the "home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University, in Manhattan," reports John Harlow in the London TimesOnline. "

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/wwiii-population-wars-a-12-bomb-equation-2009-09-29

Well the issue has to be tackled. It was said many years ago that wars and disease were started deliberately to reduce the population. In South Africa during Apartheid, the security chiefs stated they use to make naturally occurring diseases worse to affect those that opposed the regime at the time, and it would blend in with the background so appeared to be naturally occurring.

[jake gittes]

The solution for the "population problem" would have been for a drone to hit that meeting. Period.

[Carmody]

My observation on the topic of reproduction and stressing, is that almost any given species, given range of contact (population density), and ability to breed....that the given species will respond to stressing by over-breeding.

The result is that any form of applied stressing to humans causes them to overbreed.

So they shoot themselves in the foot via wars, disease, plague, weather, environment, etc.

Until humans are in an extremely difficult environment that is too far apart (distances between individuals) for individuals to have strong contacts (and in severe decay)..... until then, humans will overbreed.

If left in a low stress environment, with excellent future prospects, after a few generations at most....humans cease overbreeding. Populations being to go into decline. Naturally.

[Flash]

My observation on the topic of reproduction and stressing, is that almost any given species, given range of contact (population density), and ability to breed....that the given species will respond to stressing by over-breeding.

The result is that any form of applied stressing to humans causes them to overbreed.

So they shoot themselves in the foot via wars, disease, plague, weather, environment, etc.

Until humans are in an extremely difficult environment that is too fat apart for individuals to have strong contacts, until then, humans will overbreed.

If left in a low stress environment, with excellent future prospects, after a few generations at most....humans cease overbreeding. Populations being to go into decline. Naturally.

Exactly right, and numerous research and history of non starving countries has proven this. Which tells me that population control is about control and fear, not about betterment for the human race or the planet. If it were about betterment, wealth distribution would happen and starvation would be eradicated in order to help the planet.

Survival of the strongest, we encourage natural diseases to spread more than they should naturally, this is truly an control freak behavior and thinking. And i believe it is done. Never give for improvement, take and kill, this is our psychopaths elite ways of doing.

Jake Gitties, you are funny in your comment.

[Krist]

My observation on the topic of reproduction and stressing, is that almost any given species, given range of contact (population density), and ability to breed....that the given species will respond to stressing by over-breeding.

The result is that any form of applied stressing to humans causes them to overbreed.

So they shoot themselves in the foot via wars, disease, plague, weather, environment, etc.

Until humans are in an extremely difficult environment that is too far apart (distances between individuals) for individuals to have strong contacts (and in severe decay)..... until then, humans will overbreed.

If left in a low stress environment, with excellent future prospects, after a few generations at most....humans cease overbreeding. Populations being to go into decline. Naturally.

So if we leave the billionaires alone they could go into decline and quit breeding.:cool:

[Flash]

My observation on the topic of reproduction and stressing, is that almost any given species, given range of contact (population density), and ability to breed....that the given species will respond to stressing by over-breeding.

The result is that any form of applied stressing to humans causes them to overbreed.

So they shoot themselves in the foot via wars, disease, plague, weather, environment, etc.

Until humans are in an extremely difficult environment that is too far apart (distances between individuals) for individuals to have strong contacts (and in severe decay)..... until then, humans will overbreed.

If left in a low stress environment, with excellent future prospects, after a few generations at most....humans cease overbreeding. Populations being to go into decline. Naturally.

So if we leave the billionaires alone they could go into decline and quit breeding.:cool:

No, they know about this secret and do not stop breeding with wife, mistresses, etc. They want to protect themselves lol. But have you noticed that they do not overbreed, unless they are Sultans or Pachas. They are in a constant state of fear of losing what they have, or fear of being discovered for what they are. It is fear that causes overbreeding. So no, they are in fact the only ones that would need culling because they are fear breeders as well.

[Krist]

Ok,order the the drone strike jake gittes.

Thank you Flash! I need you as a friend.;)

[ghostrider]

The solution is every one on earth changing their thinking about our connection with earth and nature ...

[pyrangello]

Jack , funny morning comment, just like the iron mountain report and henry Kissinger suggests we get to 500 million , great comment followed " YOU FIRST HENRY" . The world can feed itself 3 times the size it is now, however just as in nature everything has an elastic limit. My buddy who is a surgeon told me every 100 years or so something comes along and wipes out a bunch of people . Said it just like we were sitting at a bar having a beer like nothing . He sees people pass away everyday, has done over 20,000 surgeries. Kids passing impact him , but to him it's the cycle of life and the deck of cards we are dealt. However that deck didn't include dealers like the group that met. Ah to be a human being these days , what a burden it is to some. If the curriculum in schools was taught to be fantastic and respectful Stuart's of the earth , I'd say that would be the best start. Maybe getting us off fossil fuel might be another good start and get us on hydrogen free energy and or natural gas .

[yelik]

Hi
interesting article. well if we think the worst and then some, we can get a little closer to how these morons think. So, thinking like a person hell bent on significantly reducing populations I would look at what had caused such events in the past, then I would look at ways to encourage or enhance such events, or even a combination of coincidences.

[Carmody]

Watch the temptation to lose control being placed as an enticement/offer. Watch how close run a thing it is. Watch and learn. Listen carefully how it had to be handled:

FKFJEqaSSwk

(go to 54:00)

It's never simple, it's a complex affair, with many pitfalls - in any given direction. You are given an opportunity to look in, as it were, to an unscripted moment of how these people work. If you listen and watch carefully you will see the very shape of what you are dealing with and how it operates. (at least in the one specific situation)

This one actually made it into the public eye. The average person never gets to see these things, so I very much suggest that you watch, learn, and remember. When a person is 'coming up', so to speak... the temptations, pitfalls, offers, mechanisms, methods....that whole pile of stuff is very much as Wade Frazier says it is. Each person experiences it slightly differently.

[Pam]

I know this response will not be popular and I am not stating that any elites should be in charge of population control, but is it really such a bad idea? I've heard the argument over and over that there is abundance on this earth and the earth can easily accommodate many more , it is just the inequality and greed of the few that ruins everything. I also think this is true to some degree. But the truth of the matter is that we are not currently living in a world of equality. Less humans in certain areas would be a blessing to those living. Birth control to those that have none will also be beneficial. Its easy to bash population control when we have adequate food, shelter and money to spare, when we have access to birth control when we want it. Will population control be abused by some? Absolutely, everything that humans are a part of eventually becomes corrupted to varying degrees. Anyway, that is my 2 cents worth.

[Wookie]

The idea is bad because the ones that had and promote it are also the ones creating the inequality.

Peaceful Journeys Wookie