So We Tried Dr. Emoto's Rice Experiment...

[TruthSeekah]

It Worked.
QPfSWAs4fXU

[DeDukshyn]

Excellent stuff!

Personally, I would have done a few of these experiments because it can be really easy to have a small variation in starting factors that can lead to drastically different results over time (chaos factor). But still, I really do understand Emoto's work, vibrational physics is incredibly fascinating for me, especially when you consider anything we can possibly perceive in this physical realm, is merely a vibration of some sort. And with water being a "form" of liquid crystal, and crystals with their fascinating properties to absorb or transform high frequency energy, it really makes one consider the possibilities ...

I had some glasses reversed etched with positive words and affirmations (so the word was facing into the glass - local engraving shop had a machine that had no trouble with this request) -- produced the best tasting water ever. Just pour some water in, wait about ten minutes and it seemed to be transformed. Rather fascinating actually. They all since broke -- this reminded me to get some more done. Thanks!

[Nick Matkin]

Sorry, one test is not statistically significant. We can all appreciate that it's 50-50 which one will go bad.

Do it dozens of times, sterilizing the jars after each time, sourcing rice from the same place.

I think the mathematicians/statisticians on the forum (what - there aren't any?!) will explain how you conduct such tests so that the results can convince even the toughest sceptics.

Nick.

[13th Warrior]

Sorry, one test is not statistically significant. We can all appreciate that it's 50-50 which one will go bad.

Do it dozens of times, sterilizing the jars after each time, sourcing rice from the same place.

I think the mathematicians/statisticians on the forum (what - there aren't any?!) will explain how you conduct such tests so that the results can convince even the toughest sceptics.

Nick.

I believe statistical analysis is irrelevant in this case. The demonstration is about intent. If intending a positive/negative outcome influences the out come (whether conscious or unconscious) and the desired outcome is achieved; this is all that really matters.

[DeDukshyn]

Sorry, one test is not statistically significant. We can all appreciate that it's 50-50 which one will go bad.

Do it dozens of times, sterilizing the jars after each time, sourcing rice from the same place.

I think the mathematicians/statisticians on the forum (what - there aren't any?!) will explain how you conduct such tests so that the results can convince even the toughest sceptics.

Nick.

I believe statistical analysis is irrelevant in this case. The demonstration is about intent. If intending a positive/negative outcome influences the out come (whether conscious or unconscious) and the desired outcome is achieved; this is all that really matters.

The statistical significance isn't as much relevant to people like me or you who may understand the principles behind Emoto's work, but there's a lot of people who would need a bit repeatability demonstrated to be remotely convinced, as Nick said; It would be good to be able to reach those people as well. Any scientist wouldn't give a single experiment like this much thought, but even half a dozen might begin to raise some eyebrows in the skeptics. Its the skeptics who have most to gain from seeing this in action -- not the people who already support intent driven results.

My 2 cents ;)

[TruthSeekah]

There are hundreds of videos of people trying this same experiment and getting similar results.

[enfoldedblue]

We tried it too. However as we progressed we realized that because the jars couldn't be in the exact same location there were so many factors that had to be controlled for...eg light, temperature, humidity etc. We finally realized that we would have to do the experiment many times over to get meaningful results.

We haven't yet continued the experiment...though to me Dr. Emoto's findings make sense :)

[Hervé]

Duplicating experimental conditions is actually not the hardest part to replicate for a statistically significant result...

... an example of that hardest of factors to replicate is given via a yoghourt's interview...

See this thread:

Life! Or What's A Yoghourt's Got To Do With Nature & Nurture. (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71453-Life--Or-What-s-A-Yoghourt-s-Got-To-Do-With-Nature-Nurture.)

Hence, indeed, orgone/orgonite devices may mitigate that experimental, human wild card :)

[vilcabamba]

I wonder how your music effects the rice. Because your music makes me super high.

[TruthSeekah]

hehe, music has a huge impact as well. Theres even more research out there to back this notion up.

[kirolak]

I wonder how this would tie in with Isaac's drones in the so-called Caret project; the influence of symbols inscribed into metal to influence its function. To me it makes sense.

http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/isaac-and-the-drones/

There are many more reports of this series of events, I've just posted the fist link to hand & apologise if it's out of place in this thread.