Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate? [Archive] - Page 2

Hervé

6th January 2018, 18:54

One FDA scientist could end the autism epidemic (https://medium.com/@jbhandley/a-lone-fda-scientist-could-end-the-autism-epidemic-d98f26fc1b53)

J..B. Handley Jr. Medium (https://medium.com/@jbhandley/a-lone-fda-scientist-could-end-the-autism-epidemic-d98f26fc1b53)
Sat, 06 Jan 2018 15:53 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s22/443008/large/Screen_Shot_2018_01_06_at_11_0.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s22/443008/full/Screen_Shot_2018_01_06_at_11_0.png)
One guy could end all the madness. Really.

In a brand new published study, the only science vouching for the "safety" of injected aluminum adjuvant has come under extreme criticism by heavyweight scientists. Dr. Robert J. Mitkus - author of the misleading aluminum safety study from 2011 - could change the autism debate forever by telling the truth.

BY J.B. Handley January 5, 2018

While you were (hopefully) enjoying the winter holidays, a study (http://vaccinesafetycommission.com/pdfs/Aluminum-Toxicokinetics.pdf) was published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162013417303380) (it went online on December 27th) that could change the autism debate permanently. In fact, this new study (http://vaccinesafetycommission.com/pdfs/Aluminum-Toxicokinetics.pdf) placed the burden of proof for the safety of aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines so squarely on the shoulders of a lone FDA scientist - Dr. Robert J. Mitkus - that he alone could permanently change the outcome of the autism debate. Forever.

Aluminum science is moving at light speed
Science moves at a glacial pace. By scientific standards, what has been learned about the aluminum adjuvant from vaccines in just the past few years has been genuinely revolutionary, and should scare the daylights out of every parent on the planet. Mystifyingly, the first time ANYONE decided to test the impact, biologically, of aluminum adjuvant was 2007, where it was pioneered by Dr. Christopher Shaw at the University of British Columbia. I'll let him explain:

HK-93SHnTFk
It's hard to put Dr. Shaw's work in proper context. Our public health officials, signing off on a massive growth in the number of vaccines given to children, and therefore massive growth in the amount of injected aluminum, had never conducted biological studies to assess the safety of aluminum, which allowed Dr. Shaw to do something groundbreaking in 2007.

It also raises an obvious question: what have our regulatory agencies been relying upon to assess the safety of injected aluminum?

The answer: a single study (https://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/FDA-aluminum-paper.pdf) published in 2011 by Dr. Robert J. Mitkus in the journal Vaccine.

About Dr. Mitkus
Dr. Robert J. Mitkus is a Computational Toxicologist in the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA. He's held that position since 2010. He's also an adjunct professor (https://sph.umd.edu/people/robert-mitkus) in the School of Public Health at the University of Maryland. Previously, Dr. Mitkus was a "Mammalian Toxicologist" for the EPA, he received a Ph.D. in Toxicology from the University of Maryland in 2004.

Dr. Mitkus' published study, "Updated aluminum pharmacokinetics following infant exposures through diet and vaccination (https://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/FDA-aluminum-paper.pdf)" from 2011 is the Gold standard and the primary document the FDA relies upon to declare injected aluminum safe for use in infants. It is, quite literally, the SOLE defense the FDA and CDC cite for any concerns raised about injected aluminum. In fact, Dr. Mitkus' study was in part a response to safety concerns about aluminum, as he writes in the Abstract of his study:
"Because concerns have been expressed by the public that aluminum in vaccines may pose a risk to infants, we developed an up-to-date analysis of the safety of aluminum adjuvants." As you can guess, Dr. Mitkus' paper gave aluminum the "all clear" sign.
"...for infants, our study demonstrates that there is little risk for aluminum toxicity following immunizations administered according to ACIP recommendations even with maximal exposures to aluminum adjuvant. For the general population of infants, who receive less than the maximal dose, the risk is even lower." To the layperson, this study would probably be reassuring. To scientists who are closely studying the issue of injected aluminum adjuvant, and particularly to scientists who are doing their own biological studies of aluminum adjuvant, Dr. Mitkus' study is somewhere between a professional disgrace and a fraudulent disaster, but I'll let them explain.

Aluminum: A Primer
Recent science, completed all over the world, is pointing the finger at aluminum adjuvant injected into newborns as the probable cause of autism. Here's a simple graphic to explain what has been learned:

https://www.sott.net/image/s22/443006/large/Screen_Shot_2018_01_06_at_10_5.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s22/443006/full/Screen_Shot_2018_01_06_at_10_5.png)
© Vaccine Papers

I have written extensively about this topic, most recently just a few weeks ago, right here (https://medium.com/@jbhandley/did-british-scientists-just-solve-the-autism-puzzle-5a7eacc77415).

In a nutshell, scientists all over the world have learned the following about aluminum adjuvant, most of it since 2010 (not a single one of these new discoveries or published studies was considered in Dr. Mitkus' paper).

From Canada (http://vaccinesafetycommission.org/pdfs/22-2012-Lupus-Aluminum-Shaw.pdf), 2012: "Aluminum (Al) is highly neurotoxic and has been shown to impair both prenatal and postnatal brain development in humans and experimental animals."
From France (http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/slow-ccl2-dependent-translocation-of-biopersistent-particles-from-muscle-to-brain.pdf), 2013 : "However, continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier..."
From France (http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/Biopersistence-and-brain-translocation-of-aluminum-adjuvants-of-vaccines.pdf), 2015: "Thus alum and other poorly biodegradable materials taken up at the periphery by phagocytes circulate in the lymphatic and blood circulation and can enter the brain using a Trojan horse mechanism similar to that used by infectious particles. Previous experiments have shown that alum administration can cause CNS dysfunction and damage, casting doubts on the exact level of alum safety."
From France (http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/Non-linear-dose-response-of-aluminium-hydroxide-adjuvant-particles-Selective-low-dose-neurotoxicity.pdf), 2016: "We conclude that Alhydrogel [aluminum adjuvant] injected at low dose in mouse muscle may selectively induce long-term Al cerebral accumulation and neurotoxic effects."
From England (https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/Mold-2017-Aluminum-in-Brain-Tissue-and-Autism.pdf), 2017: "The amount of aluminum in the brain tissue was, I would say, extraordinarily high. Very high. My group has measured the aluminum content of probably more than one hundred human brains, and these brain tissues taken from the individuals with a diagnosis of autism were some of the highest we've measured bar none. The only ones we've seen that are similar were a recent study of familial Alzheimer's. This in itself is a very important finding."

So, versus ten years ago, scientists now know that aluminum adjuvant, when injected, can
1) impair brain development,

2) remain in the brain much longer than thought,

3) is brought into the brain by macrophages that grab the aluminum from the vaccine injection site and recirculate it,

4) may actually be worse when injected in small doses repeatedly (like it's done during vaccination), and

5) there's remarkably high levels of aluminum in the brains of people diagnosed with autism.
Dr. Chris Exley, the author of this most recent study (#5, and the subject of my recent article) was so moved by the results of his study he said the following:
"I did not see a role for aluminum in autism. And I didn't see a role for aluminum in vaccines in autism. I have to change my mind now on both of these. I have to change my mind that aluminum has a role in autism, I believe it now does. Now, because I have seen the same cells that we will see at an injection site carrying a cargo of aluminum into the brain tissue of individuals who died with autism I would now say that we have to think very carefully about who receives a vaccine that includes an aluminum adjuvant. We need to think carefully, is this vaccine a life-saving vaccine or not? If it isn't, don't have it with an aluminum adjuvant." That's Dr. Chris Exley. He's arguably the world's leading expert on aluminum neurotoxicology. He just said he'd shy away from any vaccines containing aluminum. He now also believes "aluminum has a role in autism." These are revolutionary things for scientists to be saying, and they're being said by the leading scientists in their field.

One of the other leading aluminum scientists, Dr. Romain Gherardi, went on T.V. in France recently to talk about his work, the work that found vaccine aluminum showing up in the brain, and staying there. He was a lead or co-author of all three of the papers from France I cited above. Just listen:

Syabv4Vsrpg

I wanted you to get a feel for Drs. Gherardi and Exley, and to hear from them directly. I want you to understand that these are two of the leading aluminum scientists in the world. I need you to appreciate the "weight" of their words, because then my comment makes more sense:
If science were pro wrestling, then Drs. Gherardi and Exley just body-slammed Dr. Robert Mitkus and his 2011 study so badly, he may never get up off the canvas. Dr. Mitkus' Paper - scientists are "empty handed"
What would be lost on the average layperson trying to make some sense of Dr. Mitkus' work is the reality that the only biological science Dr. Mitkus considered in making his safety assessment was a single study that infused (rather than injected) aluminum citrate (rather than aluminum hydroxide) into adults (rather than babies). At least Mitkus acknowledges this difference in the paper, noting
"The determinations of the kinetics of aluminum retention by Priest were based on experiments where human volunteers were given an intravenous injection of aluminum citrate. For vaccines, the injection is intramuscular, the aluminum is in an insoluble form (e.g., as the phosphate or hydroxide of aluminum), and muscle at the site of injection is considered to be a storage depot for aluminum."

It's hard to put this seemingly minor detail in proper context:

In no other drug on the planet (except for vaccines) would safety standards ever be determined without using the actual product (aluminum hydroxide) administered in the proper way (intramuscular injection), into the proper patient population (infants). Of course, we now know that doing so has triggered devastating results (just ask Dr. Shaw, above).

Vaccine Papers (http://vaccinepapers.org/debunking-aluminum-adjuvant-part-2/), an excellent resource on this topic, provides some additional perspective on Dr. Mitkus' study, citing one of its "fatal flaws":
"The MRL [minimal risk level for aluminum] is derived from feeding experiments with aluminum salts, not experiments with injected aluminum adjuvant. The safety of injected aluminum adjuvant must be determined from experiments with injected aluminum adjuvant (insoluble and persistent), not ingested, water-soluble aluminum. Scientific studies have established that injected aluminum adjuvant has unique toxic properties and ways of moving around the body ("kinetics") that are not the same as ingested water-soluble aluminum."
And, Vaccine Papers provides a final refutation:
"Mitkus 2011 is the best scientific evidence vaccine promoters have for defending Al adjuvant safety. It is fatally flawed and incredibly bad. It is not based on any toxicity experiments with actual Al adjuvant. It ignores key studies that contradict the assumptions it is based on. And yet, government agencies (FDA, CDC) and vaccine promoters cite it as powerful and conclusive evidence of safety. Aluminum adjuvant nanoparticles are very different from dissolved aluminum ions. Consequently, the only scientifically-valid way to establish the safety of injected aluminum adjuvant, is by experiments with injected aluminum adjuvant. Studies of ingested, soluble aluminum salts cannot establish the safety of Al adjuvant. Models of only dissolved aluminum cannot be used to determine the toxicity of the particles. Ignoring the toxicity of Al adjuvant particles is scientifically indefensible. Why do the vaccine promoters rely on oral-ingestion studies to defend Al adjuvant safety? It is because they have no experimental research showing that injecting Al adjuvant is safe! They are empty-handed."
In 2016, Neil Miller published a study in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons called "Aluminum in childhood vaccines is unsafe (http://www.jpands.org/vol21no4/miller.pdf)" where he too disassembled Dr. Mitkus' study, stating it had "major flaws" including the fact that Dr. Mitkus studied "dietary aluminum fed to mice" and reiterated that, "to determine the safety of injected aluminum, scientists must conduct experiments with injected - not ingested - aluminum." Miller concluded:
"Aluminum adjuvants are added to several vaccines to elicit a more robust immune response and increase vaccine efficacy. Infants and young children throughout the world receive high quantities of aluminum from multiple inoculations. Incremental changes to the vaccination schedule during the past several years significantly increased the quantity of aluminum in childhood shots. Numerous studies provide compelling evidence that injected aluminum can be detrimental to health. Aluminum is capable of remaining in cells long after vaccination and may cause neurologic and autoimmune disorders. During early development, the child's brain is more susceptible to toxins and the kidneys are less able to eliminate them. Thus, children have a greater risk than adults of adverse reactions to aluminum in vaccines."

The Body-Slam: "Critical analysis of reference studies on the toxicokinetics of aluminum-based adjuvants"
Just one week ago, this highly critical study of the safety standards used for vaccine aluminum adjuvant was published in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162013417303380). The study, "Critical analysis of reference studies on the toxicokinetics of aluminum-based adjuvants (http://vaccinesafetycommission.com/pdfs/Aluminum-Toxicokinetics.pdf)" addressed the limitations of studies relied upon, in particular Dr. Mitkus' study, by both the FDA and the CDC, to declare vaccine aluminum "safe" to be injected into children. The study authors included the aforementioned Dr. Romain Gherardi, and Dr. Chris Exley. They explained:
"To date, aluminum adjuvants per se have, perhaps surprisingly, not been the subject of any official experimental investigation, and this being in spite of the well-established neurotoxicity of aluminum." The study authors also mention a laundry list of countries who have produced studies implicating aluminum-containing vaccines in chronic illness:
"The occurrence of myalgia and arthralgia, chronic fatigue and neurological disorders following multiple injections of aluminum-containing vaccines against hepatitis B, tetanus and human papilloma virus (HPV) has been reported in many countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Israel, Japan, Mexico, Portugal, and USA."
The study authors made many of the same criticisms of Dr. Mitkus' work that I have shared with you above from Vaccine Papers and Neil Miller. But, they did so in a prestigious journal, and they did so with the weight of their collective backgrounds. It would be a bit like Warren Buffet telling you that your business is a poor investment. The gist of their paper? None of the studies done to date on aluminum safety would properly answer if aluminum is in fact safe. (Remember, in all cases, the study authors of this paper have done their own biological studies of aluminum adjuvant, and found it to be highly neurotoxic.) Their conclusion:
"Both paucity and serious weaknesses of reference studies strongly suggest that novel experimental studies of Al adjuvants toxicokinetics should be performed on the long-term, including both neonatal and adult exposures, to ensure their safety and restore population confidence in Al-containing vaccines." Words like "paucity" and "serious weaknesses" are not words you want to hear when you are the CDC or the FDA, certifying that something is safe when it appears that's not remotely true. Dr. Mitkus, are you listening?

The "Big 6" of aluminum science have stepped forward, changing everything
At great potential cost to their careers, it appears that six scientists - none American - have stepped forward to sound the alarm loudly about the extreme danger of aluminum, and perhaps initiate a reckoning of the true cause of the autism epidemic once and for all. Dr. Chris Exley of Keele University; Drs. Romain Gherardi and Guillemette Crepea of Université Paris Est Créteil; Drs. Christopher Shaw and Lucija Tomljenovic of the University of British Columbia; and Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld of Tel Aviv University have all contributed to the understanding we now have of aluminum, and the way it appears uniquely able to trigger immune activation events in the brains of certain children, leading to autism. Looking at some of their quotes collectively will help you appreciate how bold their statements really are. This new scientific understanding of aluminum changes everything. For me personally, I feel like I finally have a plausible explanation for what happened to my son.
"Now, because I have seen the same cells that we will see at an injection site carrying a cargo of aluminum into the brain tissue of individuals who died with autism I would now say that we have to think very carefully about who receives a vaccine that includes an aluminum adjuvant. We need to think carefully, is this vaccine a life-saving vaccine or not? If it isn't, don't have it with an aluminum adjuvant." - Dr. Chris Exley, Keele University (England), 2017

"Concerns about its [alum's] safety emerged following recognition of its unexpectedly long-lasting biopersistence within immune cells in some individuals, and reports of chronic fatigue syndrome, cognitive dysfunction, myalgia, dysautonomia and autoimmune/inflammatory features temporally linked to multiple Al-containing vaccine administrations...In the context of massive development of vaccine-based strategies worldwide, the present study may suggest that aluminium adjuvant toxicokinetics and safety require reevaluation." - Dr. Guillemette Crépeaux, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (France), 2016

"Thus alum and other poorly biodegradable materials taken up at the periphery by phagocytes circulate in the lymphatic and blood circulation and can enter the brain using a Trojan horse mechanism similar to that used by infectious particles. Previous experiments have shown that alum administration can cause CNS [central nervous system] dysfunction and damage, casting doubts on the exact level of alum safety."- Dr. Romain K. Gherardi, Université Paris-Est Créteil (France), 2015

"...it is somewhat surprising to find that in spite of over 80 years of use, the safety of Al adjuvants continues to rest on assumptions rather than scientific evidence. For example, nothing is known about the toxicology and pharmacokinetics of Al adjuvants in infants and children...Yet, in spite of these observations children continue regularly to be exposed to much higher levels of Al adjuvants than adults, via routine childhood vaccination programmes." - Dr. Chris Shaw, University of British Columbia (Canada), 2012

"continuously escalating doses of this poorly biodegradable adjuvant in the population may become insidiously unsafe, especially in the case of overimmunization or immature/altered blood brain barrier." - Dr. Romain Gherardi, Université Paris-Est Créteil (France), 2013

"Experimental research has showed that alum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. Thus, efforts should be put in clarifying the potential threat of alum-containing vaccines."- Dr. Yehuda Shoefeld, Tel-Aviv University (Israel), 2013

"The problem with vaccine- derived aluminum is really twofold: It drives the immune response even in the absence of a viral or bacterial threat and it can make its way into the central nervous system. It is not really a matter of much debate that aluminum in various forms can be neurotoxic."
- Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, University of British Columbia (Canada), 2013
What can Dr. Robert J. Mitkus do?
I firmly believe that Dr. Robert J. Mitkus, a federal employee of the FDA, can help unravel the autism mess. All he needs to do is tell the truth. He needs to admit that these scientists are right, that the paper being relied upon to vouch for the safety of injected aluminum that he wrote in 2011 is inadequate, in light of much more recent science about aluminum adjuvant, and that the regulatory agencies need to heed the warnings of these scientists, as they explained so eloquently in their recently published paper. It's time for honest scientists to step up and do the right thing.

Addendum:
Please find two slides developed by the website Vaccine Papers (http://vaccinepapers.org) that help explain the aluminum-autism connection, you can get your own copy right HERE (http://vaccinepapers.org/autism-brochure/).

https://www.sott.net/image/s22/443007/large/Screen_Shot_2018_01_06_at_11_0.png (https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2000/1*M9EB-u4KZc4pQevMqXa45Q.jpeg)
(click on picture for larger version)

Second page: link (https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2000/1*kGG0zhGYyJ-nDHA5KL00fw.jpeg)

And another video from Professor Exley back in 2011 discussing aluminum toxicity:

Xleocy6karo

norman

14th January 2018, 14:37

A short pep talk in between the heavy posts :)

KkPY03ugNXs
https://yt3.ggpht.com/-wXuQRIySky4/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAAA/fvz_hmx6w-Q/s88-c-k-no-mo-rj-c0xffffff/photo.jpg (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFRE6ojweBbb_sMZSlGM54g)The Sacred Plant (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFRE6ojweBbb_sMZSlGM54g)
Uploaded on 8 Jan 2018

Register for Ty's docuseries for free here: http://bit.ly/2DbuMzh (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?v=KkPY03ugNXs&redir_token=2w9lpgPMYbfCfKmwDbqNAKJ0Xst8MTUxNjAyNjc1M0AxNTE1OTQwMzUz&q=http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F2DbuMzh&event=video_description)

Are vaccines really safe and beneficial? Are they dangerous? Is the truth somewhere in between?

In this interview, John Malanca asks health researcher Ty Bollinger some hard questions. You’ll want to hear the answers.

We can all agree that we just want our children to be safe, and that we don’t want to take chances with their health. Vaccine safety is a topic every parent, grandparent and even every person needs to be informed and educated about

-- pros and cons --

in order to make the best possible decision for your family and for your life. Sign up free here to watch the 7-part docuseries The Truth About Vaccines, starting January 25, 2018: http://bit.ly/2DbuMzh (https://www.youtube.com/redirect?v=KkPY03ugNXs&redir_token=2w9lpgPMYbfCfKmwDbqNAKJ0Xst8MTUxNjAyNjc1M0AxNTE1OTQwMzUz&q=http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2F2DbuMzh&event=video_description)

onawah

20th January 2018, 18:09

President Trump Drops NUCLEAR BOMB on Vaccine Mandates…
Let's hope that the author is right about this...
http://bolenreport.com/president-trump-drops-nuclear-bomb-vaccine-mandates/

Wars are won by making political alliances. If our side EVER wants to win we need to understand that simple fact.
By Kent Heckenlively, JD

It’s not the differences with your allies which should worry you, but the DESTRUCTION your common enemy has planned for everybody who is even remotely on your side.

With the establishment on Thursday of the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division in the Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights, Trump has laid the groundwork to smash every single vaccine mandate as well as turn BIG PHARMA into little pharma.

Don’t think this new division of Conscience and Religious Freedom at HHS is a big deal?
THINK AGAIN. It gives many different groups a BIG TENT under which to fight. I think it is time that Christians and Libertarians, and people of other religious faiths realize that we have a COMMON INTEREST in fighting against a FASCIST HEALTH ESTABLISHMENT.

Yes, we should protect Catholic nuns who don’t want to buy an insurance plan that provides for birth control. And we should protect nurses who don’t want to take part in abortions. And we should protect those who do not want vaccines with aborted human tissue injected into their children, Muslims and Orthodox Jews who do not want vaccines with pig products, vegans who do not want vaccines made with ANY animal products, or the conscientious parent who does their own research and comes to the conclusion that ALL VACCINES ARE A REALLY BAD IDEA.

Is it clear by this time I believe all of you are capable of coming to your own conclusions about vaccines? I have my own opinion and I am happy to share, but I will not impose my will upon any other person.

Here’s why this is such a BIG DEAL.

The House Majority Leader, Kevin McCarthy (R – California) is one of the people who worked on this project. Do you think he is unaware of the draconian mandatory vaccine law in California which took away religious and philosophical (conscience) exemptions?

This new division at HHS is a HOME RUN for all those who believe in HEALTH FREEDOM.

In a press release put out on Thursday by the HHS Office for Civil Rights, Director Roger Severino said,

“Law protecting religious freedom and conscience rights are just empty words on paper if they aren’t enforced. No one should be forced to choose between helping sick people and living by one’s deepest moral or religious convictions, and the new division will help guarantee that victims of unlawful discrimination find justice. For too long, governments big and small have treated conscience claims with hostility instead of protection, but change is coming and it begins here and now.”

In an article for TownHall, House Majority Leader, Kevin McCarthy was very explicit.

“In the past this office sent the message, now is not the time for freedom, it is time for you to conform. What a difference one year makes.”

Dr. Everett Piper of Oklahoma Wesleyan University echoed these comments and brought a laugh to the group by noting what a difference it was to be thanking Health and Human Services rather than suing them.

The acting Health and Human Services Secretary, Eric Hargan, also had some remarkable words:

“For too long too many of these healthcare practitioners have been bullied and discriminated against because of their religious beliefs and moral convictions leaving many of them to wonder whether they have a future in our healthcare system. When faithful Americans are bullied out of the public square and out of public service, when bigotry is allowed to flourish, we all lose.”

(“Members of Congress Explain Need for New HHS Conscience and Religious Freedom Division,” By Lauretta Brown, TownHall, January 18, 2018.)

The lawyer in me recognizes expansive legal language and my little litigator’s heart rejoices with the arguments I can spin from it.

What about the HIPPA Privacy rights of nurses who decline the flu vaccine and are required to wear masks, thus broadcasting their vaccination status? What of nurses who are given the choice of getting a vaccine or losing their job?

The new web-site for the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division even has a convenient portal to file a complaint and encourages ANYBODY who feels their religious rights or conscience have been violated to file a complaint.

What about all those California parents living under the mandatory childhood vaccine law? Aren’t their religious and conscience rights being violated?

President Trump has given us a tool to use against tyranny. My dear brothers and sisters, it is time to pick up this weapon and use it against our common enemy.

THE STORM HAS ARRIVED!!!!

By Kent Heckenlively, JD

onawah

21st January 2018, 17:08

Manmade Polio Virus Vaccine Created Cancer
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/manmade-polio-virus-vaccine-created-cancer/#comment-16372
5vN6SXe7hbU

Simian virus 40 (SV40) was first identified by Ben Sweet and Maurice Hilleman in 1960 when they found that between 10-30% of polio vaccines in the US were contaminated with SV40. In 1962, Bernice Eddy described the cancer-inducing function of SV40 in hamsters injected with monkeys cells infected with the virus in a peer-reviewed paper. She had been aware of the problem since 1954, when she tested the first polio vaccines from five different cmpanies while working at the National Insitutes of Health but her findings were ignored by then-NIH director William Sebrell.

Many believe that part of the current cancer epidemic that we’re seeing today is a result of polio vaccines tainted with SV40 and administered to 98 million American children between 1955 and 1961. This is what doctors Fisher, Weber and Carbone at Chicago’s Loyola University determined to find out in 1999 and they published their findings in the peer-reviewed paper, “Cancer risk associated with simian virus 40 contaminated polio vaccine.”

The authors analyzed the incidence of brain tumors, bone tumors, and mesotheliomas from 1973-1993 and the possible relationship of these tumors with the administration of the SV40-contaminated vaccine. They found increased rates of intracranial cancers (37%), bone cancers (26%), other bone tumors (34%) and mesothelioma (90%) among those exposed as compared to the unexposed birth cohort.

ThePythonicCow

27th January 2018, 04:49

.
A powerful speech about vaccines, from the former Medical Director and Chief Operating Officer of the Cleveland Clinic Wellness Institute, medical doctor Daniel Neides, who was fired for writing this article: Make 2017 the year to avoid toxins (good luck) and master your domain: Words on Wellness (http://www.cleveland.com/lyndhurst-south-euclid/index.ssf/2017/01/make_2017_the_year_to_avoid_to.html), questioning vaccines:

vMJ6AaugP5w

onawah

27th January 2018, 19:46

Federal Register: The New HHS Religious and Conscience Rights Office WILL Include Vaccine Protections
by Ginger Taylor

http://www.ageofautism.com/2018/01/federal-register-the-new-hhs-religious-and-conscience-rights-office-will-include-vaccine-protections.html

Federal Register: The New HHS Religious and Conscience Rights Office WILL Include Vaccine Protections
by Ginger Taylor

Yesterday, the federal register published the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), Office of the Secretary, HHS, A Proposed Rule by the Health and Human Services Department called, "Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care; Delegations of Authority." It is the full rules that they are proposing to guide the office that they announced last week, that offer protections for those people who must decline to participate in a health care process or procedure due to their conscience or religious beliefs.

Their press conference on the office last week: https://www.pscp.tv/w/1vOGwNMgjXMKB

This begins a 60 day period of public comment on the new measures.

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/01/26/2018-01226/protecting-statutory-conscience-rights-in-health-care-delegations-of-authority

While the previous announcement and discussions from HHS on this new office did not mention vaccines, the proposed rules mention them TEN TIMES. And while we were a bit disheartened that vaccine coercion for students was not mentioned, we now see that the office recognizes that vaccine coercion is occurring:

"Despite the longstanding nature of the Federal health care conscience and associated anti-discrimination laws that this rule proposes to enforce, discrimination and coercion continue to occur. Relevant situations where persons, entities, and health care entities with religious beliefs or moral convictions may be coerced or suffer discrimination include:

Being asked to perform, participate in, pay for, counsel or refer for abortion, sterilization, euthanasia, or other health services;

engaging in health professions training that pressures students, residents, fellows, etc., to perform, assist in the performance of, or counsel for abortion;

considering a career in obstetrics, family medicine, or elder care, when one has a religious or moral objection to abortion, sterilization, or euthanasia;

raising religious or moral objections to participating in certain services within the scope of one's employment; and,

being required to administer or receive certain vaccinations derived from aborted fetal tissues as a condition of work or receipt of educational services."

It encourages, and even supports, families abilities to find physicians who share their vaccine point of view:

"PATIENT BENEFITS FROM CONSCIENCE PROTECTIONS

In supporting a more diverse medical field, the proposed rule would create ancillary benefits for patients. The proposed rule would assist patients in seeking counselors and other health-care providers who share their deepest held convictions. Some patients will appreciate the ability to speak frankly about their own convictions concerning questions that touch upon life and death and treatment preferences with a doctor best suited to provide such treatment. A pro-life woman may seek a pro-life ob-gyn to advise her on decisions relating to her fertility and reproductive choices. A pro-vaccination parent may seek a pediatrician who shares his views. Open communication in the doctor-patient relationship will foster better over-all care for patients."

This is great news. We didn't know if vaccines and students would be covered. The door is now officially all the way open for our community.

We will, no doubt, all be digesting this and planning on the best way to approach this new avenue in the next few days and weeks. But right off the bat I have a recommendation for comments that I would love to see submitted, so that this rule making truly gives us all religious freedom and freedom to act on conscience.

One of my long standing complaints is that in funding vaccine programs for states that do not offer a religious exemption, California, West Virginia, and Mississippi, the federal government is supporting the violation of the First Amendment Rights of millions of Americans.

The document does address federal funding in this section, saying:

"Third, providers of pediatric vaccines funded by Federal medical assistance programs must comply with any State laws relating to any religious or other exemptions."

However, I don't believe that this goes far enough. States that do not offer an unrestricted, unreviewable, unrejectable religious vaccine exemption, should not be given federal vaccine funding. Period.

I encourage to begin drafting your wise and eloquent comments to submit to HHS, and I hope you will include in your comments the urging that this section be amended so that not only do providers have to comply with state laws on religious exemptions, but that states MUST offer a religious exemption in order to receive vaccine funding.

So today is the day to share this post in all your groups, and to organize your comment submission. We do not yet know how HHS and the Trump administration will respond, and government/has a long and upsetting history of being able to follow a line of reasoning right up until it reaches the vaccine issue and then goes bonkers, but they said, "Vaccine" ten times. So they know it is part of the package that is coming.

If you don't vaccinate on religion or conscience:

Were you denied schooling if you didn't vaccinate yourself and your child?

Were you denied entry to school events?

Were you denied a job or discriminated against at work? Had to wear a mask?

Were you tricked into a vaccine you never would have allowed to be administered if you knew it contained pork products, bovine products or aborted fetal cell line products?

COMPLAIN!

And start submitting your comments on their new complaint department. We need to push them to set the rules that protect us.

What are your suggestions on the new rules for the new office?

UPDATE:

There has been some confusion on what this means for us, so allow me to clarify further what this is and what it is not.

The federal government cannot change state law. This office does not suddenly allow religious vaccine exemptions for those in MS, WV and CA. It does not have that power. It is not a panacea for our exemption problems.

The feds can't force entities to respect the religious and conscience rights of entities that are coercing vaccination, but it can stop funding those entities.

What this does is sets up a complaint process for entities that receive federal funding, and are coercing vaccination and other morally objective behavior, or discriminating against those who are conscientious objectors. The feds, if they found cause, could remove that funding for such entities.

This also does not currently apply to educational institutions. Why not? Good question. It should. We need a explanation and justification from the federal government as to why they are funding state education programs that are violating 1st Amendment rights. They have admitted it is a problem, after all (see above.)

So for those who were under the impression that their kids were going to get to go back to school next week in California because of this, sorry that is not what this does. It does open up a venue for you to ask, "Why are you funding a state program that violates my civil rights?" And you are owed an answer on that question.

This is not an immediate end to the problem. But we have been staring at a brick wall, and a door has suddenly appeared. To get through that door and to the other end of the maze to true vaccine choice, informed consent, and an end to the 1986 National Childhood Injury Act is still a ways off, but suddenly... there is a door.

Sherri Tenpenny asked some good questions in the comments that I would like to answer:

"How will this apply for:
1. flu shots/ healthcare workers
2. college entrance requirements
3. medical school/chiropractic school/veterinarian school applicants?
4. What about the military!?!"

My answers are:
1. It might help.
2. It may not help.
3. Who knows.
4. No way it will help.

If you are a healthcare worker of a federally funded entity, then you have a complaint that they will hear. But this is a new office, we don't know what they will ACTUALLY do, and how strong their political will is. What government says and what it actually does in the face of opposition, is two different things. I want people to use this tool, but be realistic that at best HHS is going to war with itself if they process our complaints and actually take any action. HHS drives vaccine uptake and holds vaccine patents.

College requirements are set by states, and the statute does not seem to apply to educational institutions, so it may not help. But it should, and we need to push this office to begin to consider this problem that again... they have already admitted exists. (see above) Same with med school, etc.

The military? That is the worst. They own you, body and soul. Conscientious objection in the military is a whole different animal, and they have a process. Some have been able to do it, but very few.

But the good news is that a door has appeared. And we can begin the process, perhaps even a good faith process, of raising all the questions that need to be properly addressed, even if most of the individual cases we want fixed don't have a formal pathway to justice.

This is a beginning, not a fix. Cautious optimism is recommended. As is action.

Posted by Age of Autism on January 27, 2018 at 02:53 AM in Ginger Taylor |

President Trump Drops NUCLEAR BOMB on Vaccine Mandates…
Let's hope that the author is right about this...
http://bolenreport.com/president-trump-drops-nuclear-bomb-vaccine-mandates/

Wars are won by making political alliances. If our side EVER wants to win we need to understand that simple fact.
By Kent Heckenlively, JD

It’s not the differences with your allies which should worry you, but the DESTRUCTION your common enemy has planned for everybody who is even remotely on your side.

With the establishment on Thursday of the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division in the Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights, Trump has laid the groundwork to smash every single vaccine mandate as well as turn BIG PHARMA into little pharma.

Don’t think this new division of Conscience and Religious Freedom at HHS is a big deal?
THINK AGAIN. It gives many different groups a BIG TENT under which to fight. I think it is time that Christians and Libertarians, and people of other religious faiths realize that we have a COMMON INTEREST in fighting against a FASCIST HEALTH ESTABLISHMENT.

Yes, we should protect Catholic nuns who don’t want to buy an insurance plan that provides for birth control. And we should protect nurses who don’t want to take part in abortions. And we should protect those who do not want vaccines with aborted human tissue injected into their children, Muslims and Orthodox Jews who do not want vaccines with pig products, vegans who do not want vaccines made with ANY animal products, or the conscientious parent who does their own research and comes to the conclusion that ALL VACCINES ARE A REALLY BAD IDEA.

Is it clear by this time I believe all of you are capable of coming to your own conclusions about vaccines? I have my own opinion and I am happy to share, but I will not impose my will upon any other person.

Here’s why this is such a BIG DEAL.

The House Majority Leader, Kevin McCarthy (R – California) is one of the people who worked on this project. Do you think he is unaware of the draconian mandatory vaccine law in California which took away religious and philosophical (conscience) exemptions?

This new division at HHS is a HOME RUN for all those who believe in HEALTH FREEDOM.

In a press release put out on Thursday by the HHS Office for Civil Rights, Director Roger Severino said,

“Law protecting religious freedom and conscience rights are just empty words on paper if they aren’t enforced. No one should be forced to choose between helping sick people and living by one’s deepest moral or religious convictions, and the new division will help guarantee that victims of unlawful discrimination find justice. For too long, governments big and small have treated conscience claims with hostility instead of protection, but change is coming and it begins here and now.”

In an article for TownHall, House Majority Leader, Kevin McCarthy was very explicit.

“In the past this office sent the message, now is not the time for freedom, it is time for you to conform. What a difference one year makes.”

Dr. Everett Piper of Oklahoma Wesleyan University echoed these comments and brought a laugh to the group by noting what a difference it was to be thanking Health and Human Services rather than suing them.

The acting Health and Human Services Secretary, Eric Hargan, also had some remarkable words:

“For too long too many of these healthcare practitioners have been bullied and discriminated against because of their religious beliefs and moral convictions leaving many of them to wonder whether they have a future in our healthcare system. When faithful Americans are bullied out of the public square and out of public service, when bigotry is allowed to flourish, we all lose.”

(“Members of Congress Explain Need for New HHS Conscience and Religious Freedom Division,” By Lauretta Brown, TownHall, January 18, 2018.)

The lawyer in me recognizes expansive legal language and my little litigator’s heart rejoices with the arguments I can spin from it.

What about the HIPPA Privacy rights of nurses who decline the flu vaccine and are required to wear masks, thus broadcasting their vaccination status? What of nurses who are given the choice of getting a vaccine or losing their job?

The new web-site for the Conscience and Religious Freedom Division even has a convenient portal to file a complaint and encourages ANYBODY who feels their religious rights or conscience have been violated to file a complaint.

What about all those California parents living under the mandatory childhood vaccine law? Aren’t their religious and conscience rights being violated?

President Trump has given us a tool to use against tyranny. My dear brothers and sisters, it is time to pick up this weapon and use it against our common enemy.

THE STORM HAS ARRIVED!!!!

By Kent Heckenlively, JD

onawah

31st January 2018, 16:49

CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald resigns
By Debra Goldschmidt and Ben Tinker, CNN
Updated 11:21 AM EST, Wed January 31, 2018
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/01/31/health/cdc-director-fitzgerald-resigns-bn/index.html

Fitzgerald bought tobacco stock after she took the position, Politico reports
She later sold the holdings, Health and Human Services says
(CNN) Dr. Brenda Fitzgerald, director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, resigned Wednesday, a day after Politico reported Fitzgerald's purchase of tobacco stock after she took the position at the nation's top public health agency.

Such an investment is obviously at odds with the mission of the CDC, considering cigarette smoking will result in the deaths of nearly half a million Americans this year. Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the United States.

The CDC's slogan is "24/7: Saving Lives, Protecting People." But Fitzgerald bet against that mission just one month into her tenure at the agency, when she purchased stock in a tobacco company -- one of the very drugs she is supposed to be leading the crusade against.

The news of her stock purchases was first reported Tuesday. According to that report, Fitzgerald "bought tens of thousands of dollars in new stock holdings in at least a dozen companies," including Japan Tobacco, one of the largest tobacco companies in the world. It sells four brands in the US: Export "A," LD, Wave and Wings.

The day after the purchase, Fitzgerald "toured the CDC's Tobacco Laboratory, which researches how the chemicals in tobacco harm human health," according to Politico.

In a statement in November, Fitzgerald highlighted CDC data that illustrated the extent of tobacco use among US adults, stating, "Too many Americans are harmed by cigarette smoking, which is the nation's leading preventable cause of death and disease." She then vowed to "continue to use proven strategies to help smokers quit and to prevent children from using any tobacco products."

Concerns about potential conflicts related to Fitzgerald's financial interests were already under the microscope.

Fitzgerald also invested in pharmaceutical companies Merck and Bayer, as well as health insurance company Humana, according to Politico.

The CDC referred requests for comment to the Department of Health and Human Services.

"Like all Presidential Personnel, Dr. Fitzgerald's financial holdings were reviewed by the HHS Ethics Office, and she was instructed to divest of certain holdings that may pose a conflict of interest," the latter agency said. "During the divestiture process, her financial account manager purchased some potentially conflicting stock holdings. These additional purchases did not change the scope of Dr. Fitzgerald's recusal obligations, and Dr. Fitzgerald has since also divested of these newly acquired potentially conflicting publicly traded stock holdings."

Last month, Sen. Patty Murray said Fitzgerald's ability to do her job was hindered by "ongoing conflicts of interest."

"On at least three occasions since Director Fitzgerald's appointment in July, CDC has sent Fitzgerald's deputies to testify at Congressional hearings, alongside the heads of other government agencies, that explored the federal response to the opioid crisis," said Murray, D-Washington.

"Dr. Fitzgerald owns certain complex financial interests that have imposed a broad recusal limiting her ability to complete all of her duties as the CDC Director. Due to the nature of these financial interests, Dr. Fitzgerald could not divest from them in a definitive time period," a statement from the Department of Health and Human Services said Wednesday.

Fitzgerald, an obstetrician/gynecologist from Georgia, was selected for the position in July by Health and Human Services Secretary Dr. Tom Price. Price was forced to resign in September amid a scandal involving his use of private planes.

Fitzgerald's resignation was accepted Wednesday morning by Secretary Alex Azur, who assumed that role just last week.

onawah

31st January 2018, 16:56

Action Alert

The President didn't mention autism or vaccines last night
It is time to make autism and vaccines top priorities
Action Alert
http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=79625626&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]

The President didn't mention autism or vaccines last night
It is time to make autism and vaccines top priorities
President Trump didn't mention autism or vaccine issues last night in his first State of the Union Address. It is time for the President to produce on the promises he made as a candidate. Please click on the Take Action Link to send a message asking the President to make autism and vaccine issues a top priority. And please call the White House and politely tell the staffer you want the President to make autism and vaccine issues top priorities.

White House: 202-456-1111

Recent numbers from the National Center for Health Statistics show that 1 in 36 American children now have autism. By any standard that is a public health catastrophe, and the response to it is wholly inadequate. Federal research budgets on autism are tiny, and misspent. The obvious environmental origin of most autism is ignored. The medical needs of people with autism are neglected. Special education resources are inadequate. Little planning or preparation has been done for the tidal wave of young adults in need of employment, housing and daycare.

The safety and efficacy of vaccines are evaluated by institutions dedicated, first and foremost, to protecting and promoting the vaccine industry. The evidence linking vaccines to autism is credible and in need of further honest research. The President has admitted as much multiple times. In the meantime, the right of parents and individuals to control what is injected into our bodies, and our children's bodies, is under continual assault by a rapacious vaccine industry. We need the President to use his executive authority to begin a complete overhaul of the federal response to autism and vaccine issues. It is too late for millions of young Americans. How many more lives will be needlessly thwarted before real action is taken?

¤=[Post Update]=¤

US Take Action: Kennedy bill threatens Religious Exemptions
Take Action!
Autism Action Network
http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=79624626&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]

Oppose H. R. 3222 Do No Harm Act

Perhaps you saw Rep. Joseph P. Kennedy (D-MA-4) deliver the Democrats response to the President's first State of the Union Address last night. Kennedy has legislation in the House of Representatives that threatens all Americans' religious exemptions from vaccine mandates. Kennedy's H. R. 3222 seeks to limit The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, purportedly to prevent discrimination against one person by another person for religious reasons. But the bill is so broadly drawn that any exercise of religious belief that conflicts with any federal policy, whether based on law, regulation or executive order, could be considered discrimination and therefore illegal. Kennedy's bill in effect repeals the idea that, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Please Take Action to send a message to your member of the House of Representatives expressing your opposition to H. R. 3222:
http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=79624626&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]

In what can only be a perverse pun, Kennedy named the bill the "Do No Harm Act," turning on its head the proscription to physicians associated with the Hippocratic oath to "First, do no harm" to patients under their care.

Among other provisions, H. R. 3222 prohibits using religious reasons as a basis to deny "access to, information about, provision of or coverage for, any healthcare item." There is no reason why this language could not be used to argue that a religious exemption is an illegal use of religious beliefs as a basis to deny a child a "healthcare item."

Kennedy's bill would allow anyone who feels threatened, or even offended, by anyone else's child (or an adult) foregoing a vaccine for a religious reason to claim the exemption is a form of discrimination. The bill states religious freedom "should not be interpreted to authorize an exemption from generally applicable law that imposes meaningful harm, including dignitary harm, on a third party. " "Dignitary harm," we believe this term is so vague that your First Amendment rights could take a backseat to some busybody getting in a snit.

Forty-seven still states have religious exemptions. Rep. Kennedy's bill may provide the grounds to challenge state exemption laws in federal courts as a form of religious discrimination. Kennedy's bill has gathered 111 co-sponsors so far. All Democrats. No similar legislation has been introduced in the US Senate yet. You can read the bill here: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3222

Please share this message with friends and family, and post to social networks.

onawah

31st January 2018, 17:21

This is the study that the CDC uses to back their claims that thimerosal is different than methyl mercury, and therefore is safe.

Lead investigator on the study, Thomas Burbacher, PhD, disagrees:

"...Data from the present study support the prediction that...with repeated vaccinations, accumulation of Hg in the brain of infants will occur.

“Thus, conclusion regarding the safety of thimerosal drawn from blood Hg clearance data in human infants receiving vaccines may not be valid..."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1280342/
Environ Health Perspect. 2005 Aug; 113(8): 1015–1021.
Published online 2005 Apr 21. doi: 10.1289/ehp.7712
PMCID: PMC1280342
Research
Comparison of Blood and Brain Mercury Levels in Infant Monkeys Exposed to Methylmercury or Vaccines Containing Thimerosal

Abstract
Thimerosal is a preservative that has been used in manufacturing vaccines since the 1930s. Reports have indicated that infants can receive ethylmercury (in the form of thimerosal) at or above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for methylmercury exposure, depending on the exact vaccinations, schedule, and size of the infant. In this study we compared the systemic disposition and brain distribution of total and inorganic mercury in infant monkeys after thimerosal exposure with those exposed to MeHg. Monkeys were exposed to MeHg (via oral gavage) or vaccines containing thimerosal (via intramuscular injection) at birth and 1, 2, and 3 weeks of age. Total blood Hg levels were determined 2, 4, and 7 days after each exposure. Total and inorganic brain Hg levels were assessed 2, 4, 7, or 28 days after the last exposure. The initial and terminal half-life of Hg in blood after thimerosal exposure was 2.1 and 8.6 days, respectively, which are significantly shorter than the elimination half-life of Hg after MeHg exposure at 21.5 days. Brain concentrations of total Hg were significantly lower by approximately 3-fold for the thimerosal-exposed monkeys when compared with the MeHg infants, whereas the average brain-to-blood concentration ratio was slightly higher for the thimerosal-exposed monkeys (3.5 ± 0.5 vs. 2.5 ± 0.3). A higher percentage of the total Hg in the brain was in the form of inorganic Hg for the thimerosal-exposed monkeys (34% vs. 7%). The results indicate that MeHg is not a suitable reference for risk assessment from exposure to thimerosal-derived Hg. Knowledge of the toxicokinetics and developmental toxicity of thimerosal is needed to afford a meaningful assessment of the developmental effects of thimerosal-containing vaccines.

Keywords: brain and blood distribution, elimination half-life, ethylmercury, infant nonhuman primates, methylmercury, thimerosal
Much more at the link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1280342/

onawah

1st February 2018, 00:39

CDC Director Resigns, but CDC Conflicts of Interest are Par for the Course
JANUARY 31, 2018
By the World Mercury Project Teamhttps://worldmercuryproject.org/news/cdc-director-resigns-but-cdc-conflicts-of-interest-are-par-for-the-course/

Media outlets are announcing the abrupt resignation of Brenda Fitzgerald, the physician appointed in July, 2017 to head the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The resignation follows on the heels of reporting by Politico, which uncovered conflicts of interest pertaining to dubious investment decisions made by Fitzgerald after she became the nation’s top public health official—including the purchase of thousands of dollars of tobacco, pharmaceutical and health care stocks. Individuals interviewed by Politico describe the trading decisions as “sloppy” and “ridiculous” at best and “legally problematic” at worst.

Most headlines are focusing exclusively on the CDC director’s investments in tobacco companies, which strike observers as hypocritical in light of Fitzgerald’s prioritization of tobacco prevention initiatives while serving as public health commissioner for the state of Georgia prior to joining CDC. However, Fitzgerald’s sizeable investments in the pharmaceutical and chemical giants Merck and Bayer, among others, should raise just as many red flags.

The CDC has its own lengthy history of corruption and deceit and has routinely turned a blind eye to conflicts of interest while it works to “protect the private good.”
Both Merck and Bayer have a pattern of wreaking havoc on human health while striving to bury the evidence. Merck, for example, manufactures the top-selling but devastating Gardasil vaccine and used statistical gimmicks and other deceptive tactics to conceal Gardasil’s risks. Whistleblowers also have accused Merck of falsifying its mumps vaccine data. Bayer, too, has a track record of “scandal and marketing fraud,” having once paid out millions to the U.S. government in a medical fraud settlement after admitting to overcharging for Bayer’s antibiotic Cipro. Bayer also settled tens of millions after having persisted in selling contaminated blood products to hemophiliacs. At present, Bayer is poised to close a “mega-deal” to merge with Monsanto, which manufactures the glyphosate-containing herbicide RoundUp—both glyphosate and RoundUp’s other ingredients have been shown to be highly toxic.

The CDC has its own lengthy history of corruption and deceit and has routinely turned a blind eye to conflicts of interest while it works to “protect the private good.” Although the agency owns 56 patents applicable to vaccines, it has no problem shredding vaccine safety data it doesn’t like, while continuing to serve as the nation’s powerful (and ostensibly “independent”) arbiter of vaccine policy. Julie Gerberding, the doctor who led the CDC from 2002 to 2009 (the time period when the Food and Drug Administration approved Gardasil without proper safety testing), left CDC to become president of Merck Vaccines and subsequently became Merck’s executive vice president for global strategic communications. Gerberding has benefited handsomely from her shares of Merck stock.

Thus, Brenda Fitzgerald’s personal financial stake in companies such as Merck and Bayer only illustrates, in microcosm, the CDC’s longstanding willingness to cozy up to Big Pharma and Big Health Care in defiance of ethics rules. What the United States urgently needs—and taxpayers firmly deserve—is ethical leadership across the board at CDC, provided by individuals who are free from financial conflicts both before and after taking office. The far-reaching health decisions made by CDC officials need to be driven by solid and truly independent science, not by officials’ pocketbooks.

CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald resigns
By Debra Goldschmidt and Ben Tinker, CNN
Updated 11:21 AM EST, Wed January 31, 2018
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/01/31/health/cdc-director-fitzgerald-resigns-bn/index.html

Fitzgerald bought tobacco stock after she took the position, Politico reports
She later sold the holdings, Health and Human Services says
(CNN) Dr. Brenda Fitzgerald, director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, resigned Wednesday, a day after Politico reported Fitzgerald's purchase of tobacco stock after she took the position at the nation's top public health agency.

Such an investment is obviously at odds with the mission of the CDC, considering cigarette smoking will result in the deaths of nearly half a million Americans this year. Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the United States.

The CDC's slogan is "24/7: Saving Lives, Protecting People." But Fitzgerald bet against that mission just one month into her tenure at the agency, when she purchased stock in a tobacco company -- one of the very drugs she is supposed to be leading the crusade against.

The news of her stock purchases was first reported Tuesday. According to that report, Fitzgerald "bought tens of thousands of dollars in new stock holdings in at least a dozen companies," including Japan Tobacco, one of the largest tobacco companies in the world. It sells four brands in the US: Export "A," LD, Wave and Wings.

The day after the purchase, Fitzgerald "toured the CDC's Tobacco Laboratory, which researches how the chemicals in tobacco harm human health," according to Politico.

In a statement in November, Fitzgerald highlighted CDC data that illustrated the extent of tobacco use among US adults, stating, "Too many Americans are harmed by cigarette smoking, which is the nation's leading preventable cause of death and disease." She then vowed to "continue to use proven strategies to help smokers quit and to prevent children from using any tobacco products."

Concerns about potential conflicts related to Fitzgerald's financial interests were already under the microscope.

Fitzgerald also invested in pharmaceutical companies Merck and Bayer, as well as health insurance company Humana, according to Politico.

The CDC referred requests for comment to the Department of Health and Human Services.

"Like all Presidential Personnel, Dr. Fitzgerald's financial holdings were reviewed by the HHS Ethics Office, and she was instructed to divest of certain holdings that may pose a conflict of interest," the latter agency said. "During the divestiture process, her financial account manager purchased some potentially conflicting stock holdings. These additional purchases did not change the scope of Dr. Fitzgerald's recusal obligations, and Dr. Fitzgerald has since also divested of these newly acquired potentially conflicting publicly traded stock holdings."

Last month, Sen. Patty Murray said Fitzgerald's ability to do her job was hindered by "ongoing conflicts of interest."

"On at least three occasions since Director Fitzgerald's appointment in July, CDC has sent Fitzgerald's deputies to testify at Congressional hearings, alongside the heads of other government agencies, that explored the federal response to the opioid crisis," said Murray, D-Washington.

"Dr. Fitzgerald owns certain complex financial interests that have imposed a broad recusal limiting her ability to complete all of her duties as the CDC Director. Due to the nature of these financial interests, Dr. Fitzgerald could not divest from them in a definitive time period," a statement from the Department of Health and Human Services said Wednesday.

Fitzgerald, an obstetrician/gynecologist from Georgia, was selected for the position in July by Health and Human Services Secretary Dr. Tom Price. Price was forced to resign in September amid a scandal involving his use of private planes.

Fitzgerald's resignation was accepted Wednesday morning by Secretary Alex Azur, who assumed that role just last week.

onawah

2nd February 2018, 00:29

The HPV Debacle: Suppressing Inconvenient Evidence
By Vera Sharav
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/betrayal-public-trust-institutional-corruption-part-4/
Note from the World Mercury Project Team: Following is Part Four in Vera Sharav’s seven-part exposé of the complex and widespread corruption that exists in the vaccination program, the deceptive practices by officials of “authoritative” international public health institutions and further evidence of the callous disregard for the plight of thousands of children and young adults who suffer irreversible harm. Sharav’s research is a must-read by those in our community.
[/QUOTE]Japan Has Become Ground Zero Where The HPV Vaccine Debacle Is Unfolding In Public View
In Japan, young women and girls suffering from severe chronic generalized pain following vaccination with Merck’s Gardasil® or GSK’s Cervarix®, are speaking out and have organized. The issues are being debated at public hearings at which scientific presentations have been made by independent medical experts who validated the women’s suffering, with documented evidence of the severe nature of the pain related to the HPV vaccine. The opposing view, presented by scientists aligned with the vaccine establishment, disregarded the scientific plausibility of the evidence, and declared the pain was a “psychosomatic reaction.”[41]

Such public debates do not take place where vaccine stakeholders are in full control of vaccine safety information.

Following a public hearing (February 2014) at which scientific evidence was presented by independent scientists[42] the Japanese government, not only rescinded its recommendation that girls receive the HPV vaccine, Japan established guidelines and special clinics for evaluating and treating illnesses caused by the vaccine. It is a scenario that Merck, GSK, and vaccine stakeholders globally are extremely anxious to suppress.

The Merck-commissioned, CSIS report co-authored by Dr. Larson, paints a picture of an all-out war over media coverage – not over the high rate of serious adverse reactions. The authors resort to the usual tactic of discrediting vaccine-injured individuals; they dismissed the serious health effects suffered by girls and young women following vaccination, as trivial. The CSIS report presents the entire issue as an epidemic fueled by Internet rumors and “vaccine hesitators”.

“Over the last year, controversy within the Japanese medical and political arenas over the HPV vaccine has touched the public at large. Through social media and highly publicized events, anti-vaccine groups have gained control of the narrative surrounding the HPV vaccine.”

Global Collaborators in Action: Trash Honest Scientists to Suppress Inconvenient Evidence
The following case demonstrates how the global network of government/academic and industry stakeholders suppresses information about genuine scientific findings and when needed is engaged in corrupt practices to thwart the airing of information about vaccine safety issues. This case involves inconvenient scientific laboratory findings in post-mortem tissue samples, showing that the HPV vaccine was contaminated with foreign HPV DNA fragments. The case also involves evidence (contained in internal correspondence) of deceptive practices by officials of “authoritative” international public health institutions.

In January 2016, pathologist Dr. Sin Hang Lee, MD, Director of Milford Medical Laboratory sent an open letter of complaint to the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr. Margaret Chan, in which he challenges the integrity of the GACVS Statement on the Continued Safety of HPV Vaccination (issued March 2014), and charges professional misconduct on the part of the following individuals (and suggests that others may have also been actively involved) in a scheme to deliberately mislead the Japanese Expert Inquiry on human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine safety before, during and after the February 2014 public hearing in Tokyo”

Dr. Lee challenged the integrity of the GACVS Statement on the Continued Safety of HPV Vaccination written by Dr. Pless, accusing him of deliberately misrepresenting his scientific findings in order to mislead non-scientific readers and those who set vaccination policies. Dr. Pless is accused of deliberately conflating two unrelated articles, dealing with two different chemicals, written by different authors “apparently to create a target to attack.” Furthermore, Dr. Lee notes that the GACVS Statement relied on an unpublished 12-year old “Technical Report” written by an unofficial, unnamed “group of participants” (according to CDC’s disclaimer).

These are the facts:
In 2011, Dr. Lee found that every one of the 13 Gardasil samples that he examined contained HPV L1 gene DNA fragments. He also found that the HPV DNA fragments were not only bound to Merck’s proprietary aluminum adjuvant but also adopted a non-B conformation, thereby creating a new chemical compound of unknown toxicity. This non-B conformation, Dr. Lee believes, is responsible for the array of autoimmune illnesses experienced by children and young women following vaccination with Gardasil.

In 2012, Dr. Lee testified at a coroner’s inquest of the death of a New Zealand teenager, 6 months after receiving 3 Gardasil vaccine injections. He then published his case report in the open access journal, Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology (2012).Dr. Lee was a presenter at the Tokyo hearing (2014) at which he disputed those who claimed the young women weren’t really suffering severe pain; they were having “psychosomatic reactions”. He stated:

“I do not believe psychosomatic reactions can cause sudden unexpected death in sleep, or inflammatory lesions in the brain as demonstrated by the MRI images and the brain biopsy histopathology with perivascular lymphocytes and macrophages and demyelination.”

Following the public hearing, GAVC issued a statement (March 12, 2014) aimed at discrediting Dr. Lee’s research by conflating his research with the research of other scientists who presented at the Tokyo hearing. This case should have been prominently reported in the medical journals and by the mass media, and the allegation should have been investigated. Mainstream publications have been silent; the case was reported only in alternative news outlets.[43]

HPV vaccine Controversy Erupts in the Streets of Columbia
In March 2015, hundreds of parents marched in streets of Bogota demanding treatment for their daughters who suffer from serious medical conditions following the second dose of Gardasil.

The marchers demanded that government health officials should:

Provide adequate treatment for the 800 girls known who are affected to date;
Suspend the use of HPV vaccines in Colombia until such time as the safety issues are resolved;
Conduct adequate studies to determine the exact cause(s) of the serious adverse effects following the HPV vaccine;
The parents challenged the Colombian National Institute of Health (INS) for its statement dismissing the connection between the vaccine and these diseases, which they, like the other collaborating institutions, attributed to psychosomatic hysteria.
The young girls and their parents, however, have the world’s foremost expert on autoimmune disorders on their side. Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld shocked the audience of the III Colombian Symposium on Autoimmunity by stating he would not recommend HPV vaccines for his own daughter. When asked about the mass psychosomatic theory used to explain the newly emerged medical conditions shortly after HPV vaccinations, Dr. Shoenfeld replied:

Although it is known that there are sometimes panic reactions, especially among women, it is very unlikely that the symptoms presented after receiving the vaccine are due to psychological reasons, especially if one takes into account that it is happening in different parts of the world with the same signs and symptoms.

When we administered HPV vaccines to mice, they had the same symptoms as girls affected. I don’t believe the mice bewitched each other. As with any drug prescribed to a patient, we must consider whether certain vaccines are needed. If the negative effects outweigh the benefits, the vaccine should not be prescribed.”

Dr. Shoenfeld further stated that in Colombia hundreds of children are suffering from autoimmune disorders that emerged directly after HPV vaccination:

“If there is a case, or an avalanche of cases, this must be investigated in the proper way. To say it is something psychological or viral is not enough. You need scientists from different disciplines to analyze it.

We believe aluminum is a toxic substance for the brain. It accumulates, continues this for weeks and months. It’s like a Trojan Horse for the brain. Aluminum is a neurotoxin. Experimental research shows clearly that aluminum adjuvants have a potential for inducing serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum adjuvants carry a risk for autoimmunity, inflammation of the brain and neurological long-term complications and therefore can have profound and widespread consequences for health.”

In July 2016, a victims’ group filed a multi-plaintiff lawsuit in the district courts of Tokyo, Nagoya, Osaka, and Fukuoka against the Japanese government and the two pharmaceutical companies that had produced these vaccines. Furthermore, in December of the same year, additional victims joined the multi-plaintiff lawsuit, bringing the total number of plaintiffs to 119 (Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 2017).

Journal Editors With Financial Conflicts of Interest Have Enormous Power
Two studies confirm that: Most Editors of Top Medical Journals Receive Industry Payments (Retraction Watch, Nov. 2017) The following case is an example of how tightly controlled publication channels have utterly corrupted science. The case demonstrates the great difficulty encountered by independent scientists who have not sold their integrity to the highest bidder.

The study, Behavioral Abnormalities In Young Female Mice Following Administration Of Aluminum Adjuvants And The Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Gardasil, was conducted in Israel. The senior author, Professor Yehuda Schoenfeld is an internationally recognized authority, who is considered to be the pillar in the field of autoimmunity. The focus of his research, however, threatens the vaccine industry by examining “the roles and mechanisms of action of different adjuvants which lead to autoimmune/inflammatory response.” Indeed, Dr. Shoenfeld identified a new syndrome ASIA (Autoimmune/Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants).

The HPV-mouse study was published in the journal Vaccine in January 2016. It was summarily withdrawn a month later following orders by the Editor-in-Chief, Gregory Poland.[44]

Dr. Poland’s direct conflicts of interest [45] include those disclosed on the Mayo Clinic website: “Dr. Poland is the chairman of a safety evaluation committee for investigational vaccine trials being conducted by Merck Research Laboratories. Dr. Poland offers consultative advice on new vaccine development to Merck & Co., Inc.” [Dr. Robert Chen is an Associate Editor of Vaccine]

Before the publication withdrawal by the editor of Vaccine, the article had languished for 8 months at the Journal of Human Immunology and was then rejected by that journal’s Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Michael Racke. According to the American Academy of Neurology:

“Dr. Racke has received personal compensation for activities with EMD Serone, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Genentech, and Amarantus as a consultant.” [EMD Serono, Inc. is a subsidiary of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.]

How is it that this incestuous relationship did not raise loud cries of foul play? Those rejections by editors who had deep vested financial interest in protecting vaccination rates, whose own financial interest was intertwined with vaccine manufacturers, elicited no protest from the scientific academic community.

Instead, these rejections were followed by vicious attacks against two of the scientists, by industry’s cyber hit-squads that are hired to attack independent scientists whose honest research contradicts vaccine orthodoxy/ That is viewed as a heresy inasmuch as it poses a financial threat.[46] [Read Appendix 10]

The study was revised, again peer-reviewed, and published in the journal Immunological Research (Nature-Springer) (2017).[47]

The reported findings remained the same:

“Vaccine adjuvants and vaccines may induce autoimmune and inflammatory manifestations in susceptible individuals. To date most human vaccine trials utilize aluminum (Al) adjuvants as placebos despite much evidence showing that Al in vaccine-relevant exposures can be toxic to humans and animals…It appears that Gardasil via its Al adjuvant and HPV antigens has the ability to trigger neuroinflammation and autoimmune reactions, further leading to behavioral changes…

In light of these findings, this study highlights the necessity of proceeding with caution with respect to further mass-immunization practices with a vaccine of yet unproven long-term clinical benefit in cervical cancer prevention”.

The basis for those findings was deemed to be scientifically sound by three sets of peer-reviewers, at three different journals.

The debate about the safety of the HPV vaccine was the subject of a documentary on TV2 Denmark, aired in March 2015. The Danish Health and Medicines Authorities requested the European Medicines Agency to assess the whether a causal link exists between HPV-vaccines and Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) and/ or Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS).

The EMA published its report absolving the vaccine and denigrating the clinical findings by Louise Brinth, MD, PhD, and colleagues at the Frederiksberg Hospital whose retrospective case series of 39 patients, was published in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination (2015)

Dr. Peter Gøtzsche, Director of the Nordic Cochrane Center, and author of Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime: How Big Pharma Has Corrupted Healthcare, took a leading role in the battle for truth about the HPV vaccine. In May 2016, Dr, Gøtzsche, and colleagues, sent a scathing letter of complaint to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), challenging that institution’s very legitimacy.

The letter cites EMA’s failure to comply with the EU Treaty and Charter mandating “openness [to] enable citizens to participate“; its failure to “live up to the professional and scientific standards…when evaluating the science and the data related to the safety of the HPV vaccines.” And the letter cites the wide disparity between EMA’s secret, internal (256 p) HPV safety report and the official, misleading EMA report that disparages and misrepresents clinical evidence documenting serious health hazards following the HPV vaccination:

“The official EMA report gives the impression of a unanimous rejection of the suspected harms. However, only seven months earlier, the EMA had resolved that “’ causal relationship between the dizziness and fatigue syndrome, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) and Gardasil [one of the HPV vaccines] can neither be confirmed nor denied’”. “The EMA’s official 40-page report is misleading, as it gives the citizens the impression that there is nothing to worry about in relation to vaccine safety and that the experts consulted by the EMA agreed on this. However, the EMA’s internal report reveals that several experts had the opinion that the vaccine might not be safe and called for further research, but there was nothing about this in the official report.”

The letter cites EMA’s opaque, secretive modus operandi; the mandated, life-long confidentiality agreements signed by EMA panelists and scientific experts; the EMA’s failure to evaluate the safety of vaccines in accordance with scientifically legitimate procedures; failure to identify the experts selected by the EMA; EMA’s reliance on vaccine manufacturers’ safety assessment of their own products, disregarding their “huge financial interests“; and the letter cites undisclosed financial conflicts of interest of EMA administrators and the conflicts of interest of panelists upon whom the EMA relies for safety assessments.

Dr. Gøtzsche affirms that: “All available material about suspected harms of a public health intervention directed towards healthy children should be accessible to anyone“.
It should be of concern to Dr. Gøtzsche and others who uphold the right of the public to honest safety assessments of medical interventions that CDC internal documents reveal that CDC officials purposely concealed data about suspected serious harms following the administration of multi-virus vaccines to infants in accordance with CDC childhood vaccination schedules.

WMP NOTE: This concludes Part Four. Part Five of the seven-part series will be entitled: Internal CDC Email Correspondence Reveals a Corrupt Culture.

Previously published articles: Sharav’s Introduction to the full article, L’affaire Wakefield: Shades of Dreyfus & BMJ’s Descent into Tabloid Science, outlines her well-researched and documented belief that, “Public health officials and the medical profession have abrogated their professional, public, and human responsibility, by failing to honestly examine the iatrogenic harm caused by expansive, indiscriminate, and increasingly aggressive vaccination policies.” Part One focuses on how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the vaccine industry control vaccine safety assessments, control the science of vaccines and control the scientific and mass channels of information about vaccines. In Part Two Ms. Sharav interprets the complex web of internal CDC documents, revealing how key CDC studies and CDC-commissioned studies were shaped by use of illegitimate methods. Part Three takes a closer look at the Brighton Collaboration and the extraordinary influence these stakeholders have in the business of vaccines and their power to control the science and research and manipulate reports to further their own interests.

More about the author: Vera Sharav is a Holocaust survivor and a fierce critic of the medical establishment. This article was originally published at www.ahrp.org. Stat news recently published an article about her and her work. [QUOTE]

East Sun

3rd February 2018, 22:49

How would surgeons be persuaded to implant micro-chips into patients? There's the usual--money
of course, but there has to be more than that as we all know.
People who are victims should be made aware of the facts.

Genocide is very real even if you think you can avoid it. It has been going on in many ways in the USA. for the longest time.

Because of overpopulation which is very real "they" have plans for you and me. I'm in my seventies so I'm thinking of the young and others.

The question is, What can we do?
Don't just do nothing.

Pay attention and "think."

onawah

5th February 2018, 17:31

What are Little Boys Made of? Too Many Chemicals!
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/little-boys-made-many-chemicals/

FEBRUARY 05, 2018
By the World Mercury Project Team

At least one in six American children (roughly 17%) has a diagnosed developmental disability. No matter which once-rare disorder one considers—learning disabilities, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), tics, obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or emotional disturbances—each has witnessed a dramatic escalation over the past several decades. A systematic literature review recently published in Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis contends that these trends are at crisis proportions. The crisis is spiraling out of control, with society-wide impacts on services, institutions, families and, especially, boys.

There are at least two boys for every girl with a neurodevelopmental disorder. For ASD and ADHD, the male-to-female ratio is roughly four and five to one, respectively. Genetics cannot explain this consistent sex-specific pattern. What can explain it is children’s vastly increased exposure to and bioaccumulation of chemical neurotoxins at the same time that the explosion in neurodevelopmental disorders has unfolded. The studies examined in the systematic review indicate that males are more vulnerable to leading environmental toxins—and there are plausible biological mechanisms to explain this heightened vulnerability. In fact, the skewed sex ratio is, in and of itself, a vital clue that can help pinpoint major causes of neurodevelopmental disorders.

The primary chemical culprits
The review’s authors examined over four decades’ worth of studies (1970–2016) covering roughly 16 types of neurotoxicants. They used a six-point scoring system to categorize research that involved either humans, animal models or tissue cultures. The review identified a number of sex-dependent effects, some of which were clear-cut and others somewhat less so:

Seven neurotoxins had more adverse effects for males, including extremely consistent effects for ethylmercury-containing thimerosal, lead, some organochlorine pesticides (dieldrin, endosulfan and heptachlor) and air pollution (including automotive exhaust and airborne toxic metals). Male-specific effects were present but somewhat less consistent for three other neurotoxins: elemental mercury vapor, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and organophosphate pesticides (OPPs).
Two organochlorine pesticides (DDT and DDE) affected more females.
For three categories of neurotoxins—inorganic mercury salts, methylmercury and endocrine disruptors such as phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA)—there were gender-specific neurotoxic effects but it was not possible to determine whether males or females were more adversely affected.
There was either insufficient or no research to draw conclusions about gender-specific neurotoxic effects for six types of neurotoxins: aluminum adjuvants in vaccines, arsenic, glyphosate, perfluorinated compounds, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). The authors remind us, however, that “the lack of findings cannot be taken as a priori evidence of no gender-specific neurotoxic effects.”

…studies are needed to understand whether combined neurotoxic exposures (such as receiving both thimerosal-containing and aluminum-containing vaccines) provoke gender-specific effects.
The shortage of research on whether aluminum adjuvants are associated with gender-specific neurotoxic effects is particularly disturbing, given the ease with which injected aluminum particles enter the brain. Evidence indicates that the increased use of aluminum adjuvants is having serious neurological consequences and correlates with the rise in ASD. Moreover, a groundbreaking study that recently examined brain tissue from deceased ASD individuals found unprecedented levels of aluminum, particularly in male brains.

Male vulnerabilities
The review’s authors discuss half a dozen plausible reasons why neurotoxins encounter increased susceptibility in males—particularly during sensitive developmental stages. These include biological mechanisms that protect females, such as greater availability in females of glutathione and sulfate (both of which are critical for detoxification); less vulnerability to oxidative stress and free-radical-mediated damage; and more neuroprotection from female hormones, which help “deactivate” inflammatory processes and suppress neuronal hyperexcitability.

Males, in contrast, tend toward a greater neuroinflammatory response, and testosterone appears to enhance and “potentiate” neurotoxicity. Illustrating this point, the authors cite work showing that “thimerosal toxicity to neurons was significantly increased by co-exposure with testosterone, whereas estrogens significantly reduced the toxicity of thimerosal to neurons.”

In 2013, the federal government awarded more than 38 times as much funding ($291 million) to ASD researchers studying genetics as to those studying ASD’s environmental aspects ($7.5 million)—even though genetics “only addresses at best about 20% of the ASD population.”
Addressing the crisis
The systematic review concurs with several other consensus papers (from 2006, 2014 and 2016) that link neurodevelopmental disorders to environmental toxins. According to the 40 years of research examined in the review, four neurotoxins (thimerosal, lead, air pollutants and some organochlorine pesticides) stand out in exhibiting consistent male-specific effects. These toxins likely have played “a leading role in the recent and dramatic increase in neurodevelopmental disorders.”

The review’s authors spell out several important areas for further research. For example, studies are needed to understand whether combined neurotoxic exposures (such as receiving both thimerosal-containing and aluminum-containing vaccines) provoke gender-specific effects. In addition, the authors note the many other variables that can come into play and contribute to toxic effects, including age and timing of exposure; dose; absorption and transport of toxins within the body; and the strength of the individual’s detoxification, cellular repair and compensation systems. Unfortunately, research funding priorities in the U.S. are highly distorted, as the field of ASD research illustrates. In 2013, the federal government awarded more than 38 times as much funding ($291 million) to ASD researchers studying genetics as to those studying ASD’s environmental aspects ($7.5 million)—even though genetics “only addresses at best about 20% of the ASD population.”

Emphasizing the high cost of inaction, the authors outline steps that can be taken immediately. Stating that “a true preventive program would address the exposure-related issues by reducing or stopping the causative exposures to the identified neurotoxicants” [emphasis added], the authors recommend:

Banning (once and for all) thimerosal as a vaccine ingredient and in the manufacture of vaccines
Eliminating toxic metals from all makeup and cosmetics
Banning organochlorine pesticides
Using existing technologies to reduce air pollution
Perhaps most importantly, they call for the formation of an independent scientific task force—meaning one without any ties to industry—to study neurodevelopmental toxicity and “make recommendations to effect legislation that would address and reduce toxic exposures among pregnant women, infants and children.” Surely there is no shortage of scientists who would embrace the task of protecting our most vulnerable boys and girls.

onawah

6th February 2018, 18:58

Court Awards $2.5 Million to Vaccine Critic Dr. Mark Geier…

By Kent Heckenlively, JD
http://bolenreport.com/court-awards-2-5-million-vaccine-critic-dr-mark-geier/

We all know that small victories herald the larger victories to come.We also know that when we talk about “Medical Boards,” we’re really talking about the stalking horses for pharma. These are where the great battles are truly fought, among relatively small groups of people, having an enormous impact on the rest of us. The good things are killed in the dark, away from the prying eyes of the public.

From the work I did covering the Autism Omnibus Hearings, and my later work detailed in the book, INOCULATED: How Science Lost its Soul in Autism, it’s clear that if the CDC whistle-blower, Dr. William Thompson had just a little more courage, or if Dr. Frank De Stefano or the head of the CDC at that time, Dr. Julie Gerberding were really interested in public health, we would be living in a completely different world with much more hope for our children.

That’s why the recent news that Dr. Mark Geier, one of the truly courageous people involved in the Autism Omnibus Hearing who was unfairly sidelined, had won a $2.5 million dollar suit against the Maryland Board of Physicians, is so deeply satisfying.

As reported in The Washington Post, ““But the regulators who stripped Geier’s credentials are now in the hot seat, ordered to each personally pay tens of thousands of dollars in damages by a judge who says the board abused its power in an attempt to humiliate the doctor and his family.” (“Regulators Who Targeted Anti-Vaccine Doctor May Pay Million for Humiliating Him,” By Fenit Nirappil, The Washington Post, February 3, 2018)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/md-politics/regulators-who-targeted-anti-vaccine-doctor-may-pay-millions-for-humiliating-him/2018/02/03/b63ea6dc-faf8-11e7-ad8c-ecbb62019393_story.html?utm_term=.f135da8809c0
That’s really got to annoy the “skeptics,” or the pharma-mafia cheiftans like Dr. Paul Offit or Tony Faucci. They never liked lawyers to begin with, which is why people like them spear-headed the removal of lawyers from vaccine liability with the passage of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

But justice is slowly finding its way back. Just ask all those sexually harassing Congressmen who are suddenly deciding not to run for re-election because they want to “spend more time with their families.” If you believe that explanation I’ve got a story to tell you about the Easter Bunny laying candy eggs.

How hard did the judge slap the Maryland Board of Physicians?
“But Montgomery County Circuit Court Judge Ronald B. Rubin sided with the Geiers, awarding them $2.5 million in damages. He called the order a significant breach of medical privacy and accused the board and its staff of failing to preserve emails related to the case and pleading ignorance about the order on the witness stand.”

“If their testimony were to be believed, which the court does not, it is the worst case of collective amnesia in the history of the Maryland government and on par with the collective memory failure on display at the Watergate hearings,” Rubin wrote in a December opinion.

“He ordered 14 board appointees, the board’s lead attorney and the lead investigator on the Geier case to pay half of the damages out of their own pockets, between $10,000 and $200,000 apiece, depending on their net worth.”

WOW. THAT’S A BEAT-DOWN.

I have NEVER heard of a case of government abuse in which the judge ordered the officials involved to pay personally for the damage from their own pockets. Usually it’s the taxpayers left footing the bill.

But what the officials of the Maryland Board of Physicians did was not in pursuit of the people’s business. It was for PHARMA profit.

More info – For a history of the conflict inflicted on the Geiers, click here.
http://bolenreport.com/category/importantlegal/geier-versus-maryland/
By Kent Heckenlively, JD

onawah

6th February 2018, 19:09

The Vaccine Program: Betrayal of Public Trust & Institutional Corruption—Part 5 of 7.
FEBRUARY 06, 2018
MIND BLOWING REPORT!!
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/part-5-betrayal-public-trust-institutional-corruption/

Internal CDC Email Correspondence Reveals a Corrupt Culture
By Vera Sharav

Note from the World Mercury Project Team: Following is Part Five in Vera Sharav’s seven-part exposé of the complex and widespread corruption that exists in the vaccination program, the deceptive practices by officials of “authoritative” international public health institutions and further evidence of the callous disregard for the plight of thousands of children and young adults who suffer irreversible harm. Sharav’s research is a must-read by those in our community.

The internal correspondence between CDC officials and the authors of the Danish epidemiological studies reveal a culture of corruption. CDC officials are intent on shielding vaccines and the childhood vaccination schedule at any cost — including outsourcing dubious epidemiological studies that have no relevance to the vaccination exposure of U.S. children. These documents confirm that CDC and its commissioned scientists resorted to all manner of subterfuge and deception, in their concerted effort to subvert bona fides safety assessments.

Dr. Edward Yazbak,[48] a pediatrician, referred to CDC’s epidemiological studies “just a distraction. They hope to bury evidence of the dangers of vaccines. At the same time, they have waged a misinformation campaign in making claims that skyrocketing Autism/ASD rates are due to better diagnostics.”

An email exchange (2001) between Dr. Verstraeten, Dr. Chen and Dr. Elizabeth Miller (a consultant epidemiologist to the WHO, previously headed the UK Immunisation Department for 15 years) discussed the national differences in infants’ exposure to thimerosal. They all acknowledged that the U.S. vaccination schedule exposes American infants to much higher doses of thimerosal than babies in Europe, including the U.K. They further acknowledged that Danish babies’ exposure to thimerosal does not come close to the exposure of U.S. babies – Danish babies received 75% less thimerosal than U. S. babies. That difference in exposure to mercury-laced vaccines renders the Danish studies non-comparable to U.S. children, and, therefore of no value toward ascertaining the risk posed by thimerosal-laced vaccines.

CDC officials disregarded the incompatibility of Danish vs. U.S. infants’ exposure to 75% higher doses of thimerosal; despite the incongruity, they chose Denmark as a population study comparator.
CDC officials selected a Danish network of scientists who were either employed by the Danish vaccine manufacturer, Statens Serum Institut (SSI), or worked at institutions closely connected to SSI, such as the Danish Epidemiology Science Center, and Aarhus University. The details of how the studies’ results were premeditated are revealed in internal CDC email correspondence .

The Danish studies were crafted to deliver “proof of innocence” to offset Dr. Verstraeten’s evidence documenting a disturbing Thimerosal-autism risk; and they were crafted to refute Dr. Wakefield’s suggestion of an autism-MMR connection.

CDC disregarded the scientific reservations about comparing “apples to pears”
Dr. Verstraeten expressed concern about scientific dishonesty in an email (dated July 14, 2000) addressed to Harvard professor, Dr. Philippe Grandjean, an expert in heavy metals toxicity, (copies addressed to Chen, DeStefano, and four other CDC scientists) he stated:

“many experts looking at this thimerosal issue, do not seem bothered to compare apples to pears… I do not wish to be the advocate of the anti-vaccine lobby and sound like being convinced that thimerosal is or was harmful, but at least I feel we should use sound scientific argumentation and not let our standards be dictated by our desire to disprove an unpleasant theory.”

CDC officials sought to obtain reports that would provide the appearance of scientific evidence that thimerosal, the mercury-based vaccine additive is safe, the MMR is safe, and that vaccines do not cause autism.

Dr. Diane Simpson, the CDC official tasked with obtaining proof to offset Dr. Verstraeten’s demonstrated thimerosal-autism risk,[49] traveled to Denmark in 2001 where she met with a network of Danish scientists. CDC provided tens of millions of dollars in grants to a Danish team at the University of Aarhus in Denmark; the management of the grants was entrusted to psychiatrist Poul Thorsen, who had been a CDC “visiting scientist” in 1990.

At Thorsen’s recommendation, Simpson recruited Kreesten Madsen, a doctoral candidate, who was listed as the lead author on several pivotal Danish studies. However, the principal scientist who co-authored those studies was, in fact Thorsen.

Beyond the continued influence of fraudulent CDC and CDC-sponsored Danish epidemiological studies, Thorsen was a participant in a pivotal Working Group of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), which led to the controversial re-defining of the criteria for an autism diagnosis in the DSM-5, psychiatry’s diagnostic “bible”; the new DSM-5 criteria reduced the autism prevalence rate substantially.

In another email addressed to Dr. Chen (2001), Dr. Verstraeten expressed serious doubts about the reliability of the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD)[50] which numerous authors[51] have continued to rely on, to support the claim that there is “no evidence of a causal association between thimerosal and autism”.

“I think two issues are important in assessing the potential strength of the GPRD study:.1. Maximum exposure and 2. Unbiased controls.

I’m not sure if the GPRD is that reliable that you can be sure that low exposure is really low exposure and not underascertainment in the database. I hate to say this, but given these concerns, it may not be worth doing this after all. On the other hand, maybe the [WHO] grant can be given to Herald in Sweden to do a follow-up of the DTaP trial.” (June 26, 2001)

Dr. Verstraeten’s criticism of the GPRD alarmed Dr. Miller who expressed her concern (in an email to Chen): “Do I have to give my GPRD grant money from WHO back”?

The CDC VSD study (1999) led by Dr. Verstraeten, underwent a series protocol manipulations and statistical tricks aimed at eliminating the 7.6 relative increased risk of autism from exposure to thimerosal.
During a four year “evolution”, the study’s original conclusion – an increased risk factor of 7.6 – a risk that Dr. Verstraetn had indicated in 1999 – “it just won’t go away” – was systematically reduced at each phase in a series of 5 protocol modifications – even after his departure from CDC for GSK in June 2001. In phase 2, infants’ exposure to Thimerosal was compared at 3 months rather than 1 month – when infants are their most vulnerable; the original 400,000 records from the 4 HMOs, were reduced to 124,170 records from 2 HMOs, with the addition of records from the Harvard Pilgrim HMO – which used different diagnostic codes than the other two – (and whose records’ accuracy was in doubt).

These changes reduced the relative risk to 2.48. In phase 3, the age criteria of the children included, was changed from (0 to 6 years) to (0 to 3). A cut off at age 3 eliminated a significant number of children who were subsequently diagnosed, but not counted in the study. This was acknowledged by Dr. Coleen Boyle in an internal email to Dr. Frank DeStefano (April, 2000):

“For me the big issue is the missed cases — and how this relates to exposure. Clearly there is gross underreporting… Considering that the average age of diagnosis of autism in the VSD database was 44 to 49 months it is easy to see that almost half of the children in the database were too young to be diagnosed.”

This dubious cut-off resulted in reducing the relative risk 1.69. A manuscript was submitted for publication but was rejected by the journal Epidemiology. Two more “modifications” wiped the risk out of existence. The study was then submitted for publication to Pediatrics (2003).[52] The study’s illegitimate, manipulated findings exonerating Thimerosal were widely publicized.

In October, 2003, Congressman Dave Weldon, MD raised serious concerns in a letter to CDC Director, Julie Gerberding, citing specific issues undermining the scientific integrity of the CDC Pediatric study, and CDC’s undue influence on the IOM report:

“I found a disturbing pattern which merits a thorough, open, timely, and independent review by researchers outside of the CDC, HHS, the vaccine industry, and others with a conflict of interest in vaccine related issues (including many in University settings who may have conflicts)… A review of these documents leaves me very concerned that rather than seeking to understand whether or not some children were exposed to harmful levels of mercury in childhood vaccines in the 1990s there may have been a selective use of the data to make the associations in the earliest study disappear.

Furthermore, the lead author of the article, Dr. Thomas Verstraeten worked for the CDC until he left over two years ago to work in Belgium for GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) a vaccine manufacturer facing liability over TCVs [thimerosal containing vaccines]. In violation of their own standards of conduct, Pediatrics failed to disclose that [serious conflict of interest].

“In reviewing the study there are data points where children with higher exposures to the neuortoxin mercury had fewer developmental disorders. This demonstrates to me how excessive manipulation of data can lead to absurd results.” [Highlight added]

Internal email correspondence reveal a culture at CDC that is intent on shielding vaccines and the childhood vaccination schedule at any cost. That culture was the subject of a follow up letter by Congressman Weldon to CDC Director, Dr. Julie Gerberding (January 2004):

“For too long, those who run our national vaccination program have viewed those who have adverse reactions, including those with severe adverse reactions, as the cost of doing business… It appears to me not only as a Member of Congress but also as a physician that some officials within the CDC’s NIP may be more interested in a public relations campaign than getting to the truth about thimerosal.”[53]

Public distrust in government vaccine safety pronouncements is validated in documented evidence showing that CDC-sponsored published reports are the product of scientific fraud, in violation of legally mandated, ethical requirements, and malfeasance by high level CDC officials.

In 2011, Poul Thorsen was indicted by a federal grand jury on 22 criminal counts of forgery, money laundering, embezzlement, among others, whereupon he fled the country to Denmark and remains a fugitive from justice. In 2012, Thorsen was added to the Office of Inspector General’s “Most Wanted” list of criminals.

At the very least, Thorsen’s documented criminal actions clearly call into question the validity of those CDC-sponsored Danish epidemiological reports whose inordinate influence continues to permeate the vaccine literature and vaccination policies. Yet, the academic community, and the medical journals – with the exception of Nature Online – have maintained a deafening silence – even as the evidence of fraud and criminality by the principal scientist of the Danish studies was laid bare.

What was also laid bare in internal correspondence is that CDC officials colluded with Thorsen’s Danish team in deception and fraud in the preparation of autism research studies for publication.

In January 2011, BMJ Editor-in-chief, Dr. Fiona Godlee, reignited and intensified the campaign against Andrew Wakefield, by launching an unprecedented assault that declared his research to be “fraudulent”, and Dr. Wakefield guilty of “elaborate fraud.”

Was the timing of BMJ assault a coincidence?
The BMJ assault was launched at the very moment that conclusive evidence of far-reaching, elaborate scientific fraud was uncovered in CDC internal documents. These documents also provided the US Inspector General with evidence of elaborate criminal actions committed by Poul Thorsen, MD, PhD (dubbed “Master Manipulator” in a book by James Grundvig, 2016). Thorsen was the principal investigator of the pivotal CDC-commissioned Danish studies that declared that neither thimerosal nor the MMR posed a risk of autism.[54] CDC relies on those studies to dismiss evidence of serious risks posed by the MMR and thimerosal for young children.

Whereas Poul Thorsen’s extensive fraud and malfeasance was substantiated by evidence; Dr. Godlee’s charge of fraud against Andrew Wakefield was made without a shred of evidence.

Internal correspondence document that the CDC commissioned Danish studies were designed and manipulated to provide the pre-determined exoneration of Thimerosal as a causative trigger for autism. The authors delivered the “evidence” that CDC sought (and paid millions to obtain) in its effort to quell public suspicions that an autism epidemic has been triggered by (a) vaccines laced with mercury (thimerosal) and/or (b) the combined measles/mump/ rubella (MMR) vaccine.

The six Danish studies are:[54]

Madsen KM, Hviid A, Vestergaard M, Schendel D, Wohlfahrt J, Thorsen P, Olsen J, Melbye M, New England Journal of Medicine, 2002;
Hviid A, Stellfeld M, Wohlfahrt J, JAMA 2003;
Madsen KM, Lauritsen, MB, Pedersen CB, Thorsen P, Plesner AM, Andersen PH and Mortensen PB, Pediatrics, 2003;
Stehr-Green P, Tull P, Stellfeld M, Mortenson PB, Simpson D. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2003;
Larsson HJ, Eaton WW, Madsen KM, Vestergaard M, Olesen AV, Agerbo E, Schendel D, Thorsen P, Mortensen PB. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2005;
Lauritsen MB, Jørgensen M, Madsen KM, Lemcke S, Toft S, Grove J, Schendel DE, Thorsen P. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2010
The foundation for CDC’s public assurances that “conclusive” evidence shows that vaccines, with or without mercury are safe, relies on invalid, fraudulent studies.

The authors of the “the definitive Madsen MMR Study” sent a letter to the editor-in-chief of The New England Journal of Medicine (2002) to persuade him to accept their study for publication. They emphasized the political value of their study and claimed their study refuted Wakefield and provided strong support for the MMR vaccine program:

“It has been suggested that the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine may cause autism.

If true, this could jeopardize the MMR vaccine program in children.

The debate was initiated by research in Britain [Wakefield] provided suggestive evidence of an association between the MMR vaccine and autism…

In addition, Uhlmann recently published a study where they found measles in the gut in patients with developmental disorders but not I controls. So far, no study has had sufficient power to address the topic.. Our study gave no support for an association between MMR vaccination and autism or autism-like conditions.” [Emphasis added]

Evidently, the editor, Dr. Jeffrey Drazen, was persuaded and the article was published in the NEJM (2002). Dr. S. Suissa, an epidemiologist at McGill University, questioned the statistical analysis in this large population-based epidemiological study. However, his letter to the editor was not published. In 2004, Gary Goldman, PhD and F. Edward Yazbak, MD submitted their detailed scientific critique of the same study; their critique was not published in the NEJM; it was published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons.

The emails document how the Danish studies were manipulated to exonerate the MMR vaccine and thimerosal in vaccines. They misclassified children, masked the association of autism, and deleted portions of the data. This constitutes fraud.

Principal CDC insiders who colluded with Thorsen in deception and fraud include:

Dr. Coleen Boyle, Director of National Center for Birth Defects & Developmental Disabilities [Boyle was the lead investigator of the Congressional investigation of Agent Orange in 1984-1987. She and her team reported, “no association” between the defoliant dioxin and the inventory of cancers and autoimmune diseases that sickened tens of thousands of US troops. Her exoneration of Agent Orange deprived those veterans of getting compensated].

Dr. Marshalyn-Yeargin-Allsopp, Head of Developmental Disabilities Branch; Dr. Joanne Wojcik, Procurement and Grants Office, CDC; Epidemiologist, Dr. Diana Schendel, was the senior CDC scientist directly involved in the Danish project. She was Thorsen’s longtime girlfriend who co-authored more than three dozen studies with Thorsen, including the “definitive” NEJM (2002) study. In 2009, she was officially reprimanded for the conflict that her intimate relationship posed. In 2014, she moved to Denmark, taking a position in the epidemiology department at Aarhus University.

Internal correspondence provides a record showing that the authors knew that the results that they reported in the Pediatrics (2003) were contradicted by the data from the Danish Psychiatric registry. The actual data confirmed that following the removal of thimerosal in 1992, the “incidence and prevalence” rate of autism in Denmark decreased.[55]

The study, “Thimerosal and the Occurrence of Autism”, was published in the journal Pediatrics, (2003). The first named author was Madsen; however the principal investigator was psychiatrist Poul Thorsen and a team of six co-authors at Aarhus University. The study was presented as an analysis of the Danish Psychiatric Registry from 1971 – 2000. The ostensible, stated purpose of the study was to determine whether the removal of Thimerosal from children’s vaccines in Denmark (in 1992) decreased the incidence of autism.

The report they submitted for publication claimed that the prevalence of in autism in Denmark increased after thimerosal was removed from childhood vaccines in 1992. Figure 1 in the published report in Pediatrics shows a 20-fold increase in autism. The authors stated:

“From 1991 until 2000 the incidence (of autism) increased and continued to rise after the removal of thimerosal from vaccines, including increases among children born after the discontinuance of thimerosal …The discontinuation of thimerosal-containing vaccines in Denmark in 1992 was followed by an increase in the incidence of autism. Our ecological data do not support a correlation between thimerosal-containing vaccines and the incidence of autism.”

Despite the implausibility of such a correlation, no one within the medical establishment questioned or critically examined this study or any of the Danish epidemiological studies. The first detailed critique of the Madsen / Thorsen Pediatrics study (2003) was by Mark Blaxill; it was posted on Safe Minds, September 2003. Blaxill, who is a business analyst, not a medical scientist, identified inconsistencies with the previous study (NEJM, 2002) by the same Danish authors who used the same Danish dataset.

Blaxill’s analysis showed that the claimed findings in the Pediatrics report were invalidated by their biased methodology. Blaxill identified the scientifically illegitimate methods the authors used to arrive at their predetermined CDC-commissioned “findings” exonerating vaccines and thimerosal. He did so – even without the benefit of the incriminating internal CDC documents that provide evidence of fraud.

Inconsistent inclusion criteria: Prior to 1993, only inpatient autism cases were reported in the Danish registry; representing only 10% of autism cases. Following the removal of Thimerosal from childhood vaccines in 1992, patients from a large Copenhagen outpatient clinic were added. But the authors excluded these cases from the report. In 1995, a new Danish registry was introduced to include all outpatients. These existing, previously unregistered patients were counted by the investigators as new—thereby artificially increasing the number of reported autism cases significantly.
Inconsistent diagnostic criteria: In 1994, Denmark changed the diagnostic criteria for autism from “psychosis proto-infantilis” to the more commonly used “childhood autism” to determine a diagnosis. The diagnostic criteria require autism to be identified before a child is three years old. But the authors misrepresented newly registered outpatient cases – many of who were children between the ages of 7 and 9 as “newly diagnosed.”
Deletion of data: The authors also deleted the entire year 2001 data for seven year old children from the final published report. This constitutes flagrant research fraud. Blaxill also invalidated the Danish mercury vaccine exposure experience as not a proper comparator:
“The context for the early mercury exposures was completely different in Denmark when compared to any other country, and particularly compared to the U.S. and U.K., where autism rates are being watched most closely. The Danish report describes a different world of vaccine exposures and ignores exposures that are present today that were not present in Denmark in the 1970s. Autism onset has been reliably associated with exposure to viruses.

In the cases where increasing thimerosal exposures have accompanied autism increases, numerous additional confounders were present that were not present in Denmark. Between 1970-92, the only childhood vaccine given in Denmark until 5 months of age was the monovalent pertussis vaccine. In the United States in the 1990s, children were exposed to multiple doses of diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio, hepatitis B and haemophilus influenza B (Hib) vaccines before five months of age.

In the United Kingdom, injections before age 5 months included multiple doses of meningitis C, polio, diphtheria, tetanus, Hib, and pertussis vaccines. Increasing autism rates there were accompanied by earlier thimerosal exposures due to schedule changes, new exposures to MMR and Hib vaccines, and stringent on-time compliance procedures. Denmark did not administer thimerosal-containing Rho D immunoglobulin during pregnancy.”

This is the pivotal study that CDC has relied on as “scientific evidence” of the innocence of thimerosal. The only in-depth critical analyses of the Madsen/ Thorsen Danish studies has been by vaccine safety advocacy groups, independent scientists, and alternative news sources. But these valid critiques analyzing the methodology of the Danish studies did not make it into “high impact” journals where the Danish studies were published. The independent analyses were ignored by the medical establishment and by the media as well.

By burying the criticism, this study not only “enjoyed a prolonged period of acceptance: It influenced the outcome of the IOM Immunization Safety Review Committee of February 9, 2004 and helped sabotage the MMR litigation in the United Kingdom.”[50]

In 2014, a review by a group of independent scientists examined the six studies that CDC continues to cite as evidence in support of its claim, that there is “no relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism rates in children”, was published in Biomed Research International.[59] Dr. Brian Hooker and colleagues identified more than 165 published studies that refute CDC’s claim that thimerosal is safe.

Of these 165 studies, 16 studies specifically examined the effects of Thimerosal on infants / children. Among the adverse effects, the studies documented following exposure to Thimerosal, include: one death, 4 allergic reactions, 5 malformations, 6 autoimmune reactions, 8 developmental delay, 9 neurodevelopmental disorders, including tics, speech delay, language delay, ADHD, and autism.

CDC’s childhood vaccination policy rests on the denial of the existence of evidence documenting safety hazards posed by the vaccines in the CDC Vaccination Schedule. CDC uses its influence with the gatekeepers of “high impact” medical journals, who reject scientific studies that contradict the sacrosanct vaccine safety mantra. Although a body of scientific studies documenting serious vaccine-related ill effects, has accumulated in the scientific literature, CDC and those “high impact” journal editors invoke their authority to declare: “there is no evidence of a risk from thimerosal or MMR”.

WMP NOTE: This concludes Part Five. Part Six of the seven-part series will be entitled: A Foolish Faith in Authority.

Previously published articles: Sharav’s Introduction to the full article, L’affaire Wakefield: Shades of Dreyfus & BMJ’s Descent into Tabloid Science, outlines her well-researched and documented belief that, “Public health officials and the medical profession have abrogated their professional, public, and human responsibility, by failing to honestly examine the iatrogenic harm caused by expansive, indiscriminate, and increasingly aggressive vaccination policies.” Part One focuses on how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the vaccine industry control vaccine safety assessments, control the science of vaccines and control the scientific and mass channels of information about vaccines. In Part Two Ms. Sharav interprets the complex web of internal CDC documents, revealing how key CDC studies and CDC-commissioned studies were shaped by use of illegitimate methods. Part Three takes a closer look at the Brighton Collaboration and the extraordinary influence these stakeholders have in the business of vaccines and their power to control the science and research and manipulate reports to further their own interests. Focusing on the HPV vaccine, in Part Four Ms. Sharav explores how a global network of government/academic and industry stakeholders can suppress information about genuine scientific findings and, when needed, engage in corrupt practices to thwart the airing of information about vaccine safety issues.

More about the author: Vera Sharav is a Holocaust survivor and a fierce critic of the medical establishment. This article was originally published at www.ahrp.org. Stat news recently published an article about her and her work.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/

onawah

7th February 2018, 20:58

Smokin’ New Technology to Produce Flu Vaccines
By the World Mercury Project Team
FEBRUARY 07, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/disgraced-cdc-director-tobacco-investments-overlap-with-vaccine-investments/?utm_source=mailchimp

WMP NOTE: After the recent media uproar about the CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald’s resignation, which focused on the inappropriateness of her ownership in tobacco stock, the WMP team decided to investigate further. What we uncovered is new technology that utilizes tobacco leaves to produce vaccines in a much shorter time frame and clinical trials are already underway using this new technology to produce flu vaccines here in the US. So maybe Fitzgerald’s stocks had nothing to do with smoking tobacco cessation and everything to do with vaccine production?

By nearly everyone’s admission, this year’s influenza vaccine has been a colossal flop. In any given year, flu shot effectiveness in the United States varies widely anyway, but this year’s estimates point to rock-bottom effectiveness of 10%. The previous low over the past five years was an estimated 19% for the 2014-2015 influenza season, when public health researchers concluded that the shot “offered little protection” against the predominant influenza strain. (This does not even take into account research showing that individuals who get the flu shot year after year have diminished protection and are at greater risk of spreading the flu to others.) The figure below shows the flu vaccine’s inconsistent levels of effectiveness since 2004.

Influenza vaccine effectiveness, 2004-2017 (Source: CDC)
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/02-07-Tobacco-seasonal-flu-vaccine-effeciveness-1.jpg

Pharmaceutical companies and public health officials acknowledge the issue of “suboptimal” influenza vaccine effectiveness and blame it on a variety of factors, including the conventional flu vaccine production process that uses eggs or cultured mammalian cells and requires a six-month lead time. With the exponential growth of the biotechnology industry, a search has been underway to genetically engineer vaccines that are less cumbersome and more cost-effective to make.

…interest in molecular farming strategies has skyrocketed in the past decade alongside the push to develop ever more vaccines.
The emerging technology of plant-based vaccine production, or “molecular farming,” inserts viral vectors that contain specific genetic information into plants; these genetic instructions tell the plants to produce target proteins that later are harvested to make vaccines. This is called recombinant protein production. Although initial attempts to produce vaccines in plants date back to the early 1990s, interest in molecular farming strategies has skyrocketed in the past decade alongside the push to develop ever more vaccines.

The pivotal role of military dollars
Interestingly, one of the parties most invested in the plant-based model of vaccine production is the US military. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) funded trials that showed plant-based vaccine production to be capable of making 10 million doses of flu vaccine in 30 days while bearing infrastructure costs that reportedly were 10 times lower than for other vaccine manufacturing methods. DARPA was enthusiastic about these results.

DARPA views potential pandemics and biodefense as matters of national security and—guided by its strategic objective of “harnessing biology as technology”—has sought to acquire capability for quick, on-demand production of vaccines to “enable [an] agile, robust, and rapid surge response.” After launching an Accelerated Manufacturing of Pharmaceuticals program in 2005 to begin studying plants as a vaccine manufacturing platform, DARPA began pouring additional millions into these efforts in 2009 when the H1N1 influenza virus appeared on the scene.

…consumers seemingly “like the idea of creating something positive from a plant with such negative stigma.”
Rehabilitating tobacco—and tobacco stocks
Various properties of tobacco make it an excellent vehicle for molecular farming and for influenza vaccines, in particular. Proponents of tobacco-based vaccine production cite tobacco’s “winning attributes” (including the fact that it is “robust and hearty” and grows to maturity quickly) and also report that consumers seemingly “like the idea of creating something positive from a plant with such negative stigma.”

The mention of tobacco’s public relations problems is noteworthy in the context of Brenda Fitzgerald’s January 31, 2018 resignation from her post as director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Media reports embarrassed the nation’s top public health official into resigning when it became apparent that she had financial conflicts of interest, including sizeable investments in both the tobacco and vaccine industries, among others. Fitzgerald’s published tobacco investments include holdings in Japan Tobacco (JT), the world’s third largest and fastest growing tobacco company (with one-third ownership by the Japanese government). Japan Tobacco makes leading cigarette brands such as Camel and Winston and boasts of having “roots in many of the most famous tobacco companies around the world,” including RJ Reynolds in the US and Gallaher Group in the UK.

Although the media uproar about the CDC director’s resignation focused mostly on the inappropriateness of Fitzgerald’s tobacco investments, the news reports ignored the increased blurring of distinctions between the tobacco and pharmaceutical sectors. For example, recognizing the limited prospects for growth in traditional tobacco sales, Japan Tobacco launched a pharmaceutical division in 1987, which develops, manufactures and sells prescription drugs for metabolic and autoimmune diseases as well as “viral infection.” Even as JT’s tobacco market “struggles amid a tough business climate,” its pharmaceutical arm is “growing rapidly” and shareholders are pushing for it to become a “core operation.” JT also has been forging strategic partnerships with biotechnology and biopharmaceutical companies for many years, including obtaining exclusive rights in 1999 to market eventual lung cancer vaccines. All of this exemplifies two converging global trends toward the pharmaceuticalization of the tobacco industry and reliance by the pharmaceutical sector on vaccines as their engine for growth. Given the CDC’s central role in vaccine production and distribution, these types of overlapping relationships cast Fitzgerald’s financial commitments to companies like JT in an even more questionable light.

Reflecting a similarly dizzying entanglement between pharmaceutical and tobacco ambitions, another Japanese company—Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation (MTPC)—is one of the industry leaders in the tobacco-to-vaccine technology. MTPC acquired the technology in 2012-2013 when it partnered with the Quebec-based biotech firm Medicago to develop and commercialize influenza and other vaccines. It went on to purchase most of Medicago the following year—with the exception of roughly 38% of the company already owned by the tobacco giant Philip Morris! Medicago perfected the plant-based vaccine production technology at a deluxe 97,000 square foot DARPA-funded greenhouse in North Carolina.

MTPC expects to bring the tobacco-based vaccine technology to market in the US (where approval standards are less rigorous than in Japan) in fiscal 2018 or 2019. With DARPA and US Army funding and Medicago sponsorship, the results of pre-clinical studies and Phase I clinical trials that examined the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines already have been published. Poised to finalize its clinical trials this year in the U.S., MTPC anticipates over $700 million in annual sales by fiscal 2020, a sales target that, if achieved, would represent nearly one-fifth (18.4%) of the estimated $3.8 billion annual market for flu shots globally.

It is difficult to ascertain whether JT and MTPC are competitors or collaborators, but the two certainly frequent many of the same circles. For example, Japanese drug researchers often disclose financial and research support from both companies, and the two businesses both are members of the Japan Microbiome Consortium. Both also have drug development and distribution agreements with the same third parties.

Will more collaboration be in the two companies’ future, as JT seeks to build up its vaccine business and MTPC looks for tobacco producers with the expertise to help tobacco-based vaccine manufacturing come fully online? And how much of all this did Dr. Fitzgerald know when she purchased Japan Tobacco stock shortly after her appointment to direct the CDC’s four-billion-dollar-a-year vaccine program?

Note: A follow-up World Mercury Project article will examine safety considerations pertaining to these newer vaccine technologies.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project: https://worldmercuryproject.org/

onawah

8th February 2018, 18:59

Diseases with Unknown Etiology Trace Back to Mass Vaccination Against Influenza in 1976 (https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/diseases-with-unknown-etiology-trace-back-to-mass-vaccination-against-influenza-in-1976/)

By James Lyons-Weiler
FEBRUARY 08, 2018

Crohn’s. Lupus. Autism. ADHD. Food allergies. Celiac disease. Sjögren’s syndrome. Polymyalgia rheumatica. Multiple sclerosis. Anklyosing spondylitis. Type 1 diabetes. Vasculitis. Peripheral neuropathy. The list goes on, and on, and on. We are being increasingly diagnosed with these conditions and diseases of unknown origin, and science has very little to say – why would autoimmune diseases and mysterious diseases of inflammation be so prevalent? When did this increase start?

As an observer and participant in modern biomedical research, and a lover of deep history, I tend to focus not on the immediate or last few years, but look for trends of accumulating risk over longer periods of time. Seeking an answer to the question of “when”, I used Pubmed to estimate, per yer, the number of studies and papers discussing diseases and conditions of unknown origin. I search for the term “unknown causes”, and also for the term “journal” to get some idea of the percentage of studies, papers and editorials discussing disease of unknown causes. I had no idea what to expect.

Looking at a trend of topics per year, one has to correct for some estimate of the total number of articles published, because a mere count would, in part, reflect the overall trend in the explosion of total articles published. I chose as my control term the word “journal”, because many titles of publications include that term (e.g., “Journal of Nephrology). Here is the control result, which is not surprising, and completely expected:

https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/02-07-Weiler-1-journaltrend.jpg

Again, this merely reflects the trend in the increase in publications in Pubmed, and so using it would provide a relative control for that trend.

Next I searched for “Unknown Causes”, and calculated the number of articles citing unknown causes per 10,000 articles (again, relative denominator term).

What I found is shocking. Here is a graph of the number of articles per 10,000 discussing “unknown causes” (Y = #articles mentioning “unknown causes” / #articles mentioning “journal”, as in the title of journals).

https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/02-07-Weiler-2-journaltrend.jpg

Because the studies in Pubmed include all sorts of journals studying all sorts of things, the actual number is not as important as the trend. The signature is undeniable. Something changed dramatically in 1976. To the skeptic: the increase is greater if one does not correct for total publications.

What changed was national mass vaccination against influenza.

The follow section is excerpted from “Reflections on the 1976 Swine Flu Vaccination Program” by David Sencer and J. Donald Millar:
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/12/1/05-1007_article

Swine Flu at Fort Dix
On February 3, 1976, the New Jersey State Health Department sent the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in Atlanta isolates of virus from recruits at Fort Dix, New Jersey, who had influenza-like illnesses. Most of the isolates were identified as A/Victoria/75 (H3N2), the contemporary epidemic strain. Two of the isolates, however, were not typeable in that laboratory. On February 10, additional isolates were sent and identified in CDC laboratories as A/New Jersey/76 (Hsw1N1), similar to the virus of the 1918 pandemic and better known as “swine flu.”

A meeting of representatives of the military, the National Institute of Health, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the State of New Jersey Department of Health was quickly convened on Saturday, February 14, 1976. Plans of action included heightened surveillance in and around Fort Dix, investigation of the ill recruits to determine if contact with pigs had occurred, and serologic testing of recruits to determine if spread had occurred at Fort Dix.

Surveillance activities at Fort Dix gave no indication that recruits had contact with pigs. Surveillance in the surrounding communities found influenza caused by the current strain of influenza, A/Victoria, but no additional cases of swine flu. Serologic testing at Fort Dix indicated that person-to-person transmission had occurred in >200 recruits (4).

In 1974 and 1975, 2 instances of humans infected with swine influenza viruses had been documented in the United States. Both persons involved had close contact with pigs, and no evidence for spread of the virus beyond family members with pig contact could be found (5).

The National Influenza Immunization Program
On March 10, 1976, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the United States Public Health Service (ACIP) reviewed the findings. The committee concluded that with a new strain (the H1N1 New Jersey strain) that could be transmitted from person to person, a pandemic was a possibility. Specifically, the following facts were of concern: 1) persons <50 years of age had no antibodies to this new strain; 2) a current interpandemic strain (A/Victoria) of influenza was widely circulating; 3) this early detection of an outbreak caused by A/New Jersey/76/Hsw1N1 (H1N1) provided an opportunity to produce a vaccine since there was sufficient time between the initial isolates and the advent of an expected influenza season to produce vaccine. In the past when a new pandemic strain had been identified, there had not been enough time to manufacture vaccine on any large scale; 4) influenza vaccines had been used for years with demonstrated safety and efficacy when the currently circulating vaccine strain was incorporated; 5) the military vaccine formulation for years had included H1N1, an indication that production was possible, and no documented adverse effects had been described.

ACIP recommended that an immunization program be launched to prevent the effects of a possible pandemic. One ACIP member summarized the consensus by stating “If we believe in prevention, we have no alternative but to offer and urge the immunization of the population.” One ACIP member expressed the view that the vaccine should be stockpiled, not given.

Making this decision carried an unusual urgency. The pharmaceutical industry had just finished manufacture of the vaccine to be used in the 1976–1977 influenza season. At that time, influenza vaccine was produced in fertilized hen’s eggs from special flocks of hens. Roosters used for fertilizing the hens were still available; if they were slaughtered, as was customary, the industry could not resume production for several months.

On March 13, an action memo was presented to the Secretary of the Department of Health Education and Welfare (DHEW). It outlined the problem and presented 4 alternative courses of action. First was “business as usual,” with the marketplace prevailing and the assumption that a pandemic might not occur. The second was a recommendation that the federal government embark on a major program to immunize a highly susceptible population. As a reason to adopt this plan of action, the memo stated that “the Administration can tolerate unnecessary health expenditures better than unnecessary death and illness if a pandemic should occur.” The third proposed course of action was a minimal response, in which the federal government would contract for sufficient vaccine to provide for traditional federal beneficiaries—military personnel, Native Americans, and Medicare-eligible persons. The fourth alternative was a program that would represent an exclusively federal response without involvement of the states.

The proposal recommended by the director of CDC was the second course, namely, for the federal government to contract with private pharmaceutical companies to produce sufficient vaccine to permit the entire population to be immunized against H1N1. The federal government would make grants to state health departments to organize and conduct immunization programs. The federal government would provide vaccine to state health departments and private medical practices. Since influenza caused by A/Victoria was active worldwide, industry was asked to incorporate the swine flu into an A/Victoria product to be used for populations at high risk.

Before the discussions with the secretary of DHEW had been completed, a member of his staff sent a memo to a health policy advisor in the White House, raising the specter of the 1918 pandemic, which had been specifically underemphasized in the CDC presentation. CDC’s presentation highlighted the pandemic potential, comparing it with the 1968–69 Hong Kong and 1957–58 Asian pandemics. President Gerald Ford’s staff recommended that the president convene a large group of well-known and respected scientists (Albert Sabin and Jonas Salk had to be included) and public representatives to hear the government’s proposal and make recommendations to the president about it. After the meeting, the president had a press conference, highlighted by the unique simultaneous appearance of Salk and Sabin. President Ford announced that he accepted the recommendations that CDC had originally made to the secretary of DHEW. The National Influenza Immunization Program (NIIP) was initiated.

The proposal was presented to 4 committees of the Congress, House and Senate authorization committees and House and Senate appropriation committees. All 4 committees reported out favorable legislation, and an appropriation bill was passed and signed.

The estimated budgeted cost of the program was $137 million. When Congress passed the appropriation, newspapers mischaracterized the cost as “$1.9 billion” because the $137 million was included as part of a $1.9 billion supplemental appropriation for the Department of Labor. In the minds of the public, this misconception prevailed.

Immediately after the congressional hearing, a meeting of all directors of state health departments and medical societies was held at CDC. The program was presented by CDC, and attendees were asked for comments. A representative from the New Jersey state health department opposed the plan; the Wisconsin state medical society opposed any federal involvement. Otherwise, state and local health departments approved the plan.

Within CDC, a unit charged with implementing the program, which reported to the director, was established. This unit, NIIP, had complete authority to draw upon any resources at CDC needed. NIIP was responsible for relations with state and local health departments (including administration of the grant program for state operations, technical advice to the procurement staff for vaccine, and warehousing and distribution of the vaccine to state health departments) and established a proactive system of surveillance for possible adverse effects of the influenza vaccines, the NIIP Surveillance Assessment Center (NIIP-SAC). (This innovative surveillance system would prove to be NIIP’s Trojan horse.) In spite of the obstacles discussed below, NIIP administered a program that immunized 45 million in 10 weeks, which resulted in doubling the level of immunization for persons deemed to be at high risk, rapidly identifying adverse effects, and developing and administering an informed consent form for use in a community-based program.

Obstacles to the Vaccination Plan
The principal obstacle was the lack of vaccines. As test batches were prepared, the largest ever field trials of influenza vaccines ensued. The vaccines appeared efficacious and safe (although in the initial trials, children did not respond immunologically to a single dose of vaccine, and a second trial with a revised schedule was needed) (6). Hopes were heightened for a late summer/early fall kickoff of mass immunization operations.

In January 1976, before the New Jersey outbreak, CDC had proposed legislation that would have compensated persons damaged as a result of immunization when it was licensed by FDA and administered in the manner recommended by ACIP. The rationale given was that immunization protects the community as well as the individual (a societal benefit) and that when a person participating in that societal benefit is damaged, society had a responsibility to that person. The proposal was sent back from a staff member in the Surgeon General’s office with a handwritten note, “This is not a problem.”

Soon, however, NIIP received the first of 2 crippling blows to hopes to immunize “every man, woman, and child.” The first was later in 1976, when instead of boxes of bottled vaccine, the vaccine manufacturers delivered an ultimatum—that the federal government indemnify them against claims of adverse reactions as a requirement for release of the vaccines. The government quickly capitulated to industry’s demand for indemnification. While the manufacturers’ ultimatum reflected the trend of increased litigiousness in American society, its unintended, unmistakable subliminal message blared “There’s something wrong with this vaccine.” This public misperception, warranted or not, ensured that every coincidental health event that occurred in the wake of the swine flu shot would be scrutinized and attributed to the vaccine.

On August 2, 1976, deaths apparently due to an influenzalike illness were reported from Pennsylvania in older men who had attended the convention of the American Legion in Philadelphia. A combined team of CDC and state and local health workers immediately investigated. By the next day, epidemiologic evidence indicated that the disease was not influenza (no secondary cases occurred in the households of the patients). By August 4, laboratory evidence conclusively ruled out influenza. However, this series of events was interpreted by the media and others as an attempt by the government to “stimulate” NIIP.

Shortly after the national campaign began, 3 elderly persons died after receiving the vaccine in the same clinic. Although investigations found no evidence that the vaccine and deaths were causally related, press frenzy was so intense it drew a televised rebuke from Walter Cronkite for sensationalizing coincidental happenings.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome
What NIIP did not and could not survive, however, was the second blow, finding cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) among persons receiving swine flu immunizations. As of 1976, >50 “antecedent events” had been identified in temporal relationship to GBS, events that were considered as possible factors in its cause. The list included viral infections, injections, and “being struck by lightning.” Whether or not any of the antecedents had a causal relationship to GBS was, and remains, unclear. When cases of GBS were identified among recipients of the swine flu vaccines, they were, of course, well covered by the press. Because GBS cases are always present in the population, the necessary public health questions concerning the cases among vaccine recipients were “Is the number of cases of GBS among vaccine recipients higher than would be expected? And if so, are the increased cases the result of increased surveillance or a true increase?” Leading epidemiologists debated these points, but the consensus, based on the intensified surveillance for GBS (and other conditions) in recipients of the vaccines, was that the number of cases of GBS appeared to be an excess.

Had H1N1 influenza been transmitted at that time, the small apparent risk of GBS from immunization would have been eclipsed by the obvious immediate benefit of vaccine-induced protection against swine flu. However, in December 1976, with >40 million persons immunized and no evidence of H1N1 transmission, federal health officials decided that the possibility of an association of GBS with the vaccine, however small, necessitated stopping immunization, at least until the issue could be explored. A moratorium on the use of the influenza vaccines was announced on December 16; it effectively ended NIIP of 1976. Four days later the New York Times published an op-ed article that began by asserting, “Misunderstandings and misconceptions… have marked Government … during the last eight years,” attributing NIIP and its consequences to “political expediency” and “the self interest of government health bureaucracy” (7). These simple and sinister innuendos had traction, as did 2 epithets used in the article to describe the program, “debacle” in the text and “Swine Flu Fiasco” in the title.

On February 7, the new secretary of DHEW, Joseph A. Califano, announced the resumption of immunization of high-risk populations with monovalent A/Victoria vaccine that had been prepared as part of the federal contracts, and he dismissed the director of CDC.

Lessons Learned
NIIP may offer lessons for today’s policymakers, who are faced with a potential pandemic of avian influenza and struggling with decisions about preventing it (Table). Two of these lessons bear further scrutiny here.

Media and Presidential Attention
While all decisions related to NIIP had been reached in public sessions (publishing of the initial virus findings in CDC’s weekly newsletter, the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR); New York Times reporter Harold Schmeck’s coverage of the ACIP sessions, the president’s press conference, and 4 congressional hearings), effective communication from scientifically qualified persons was lacking, and the perception prevailed that the program was motivated by politics rather than science. In retrospect (and to some observers at the time), the president’s highly visible convened meeting and subsequent press conference, which included pictures of his being immunized, were mistakes. These instances seemed to underline the suspicion that the program was politically motivated, rather than a public health response to a possible catastrophe.Annex 11 of the draft DHEW pandemic preparedness plan states, “For policy decisions and in communication, making clear what is not known is as important as stating what is known. When assumptions are made, the basis for the assumptions and the uncertainties surrounding them should be communicated” (11). This goal is much better accomplished if the explanations are communicated by those closest to the problem, who can give authoritative scientific information. Scientific information coming from a nonscientific political figure is likely to encourage skepticism, not enthusiasm.

Neither CDC nor the health agencies of the federal government had been in the habit of holding regular press conferences. CDC considered that its appropriate main line of communication was to states and local health departments, believing that they were best placed to communicate with the public. MMWR served both a professional and public audience and accounted for much of CDC’s press coverage. In 1976, no all-news stations existed, only the nightly news. The decision to stop the NIIP on December 16, 1976, was announced by a press release from the office of the assistant secretary for health. The decision to reinstitute the immunization of those at high risk was announced by a press release from the office of the secretary, DHEW. In retrospect, periodic press briefings would have served better than responding to press queries. The public must understand that decisions are based on public health, not politics. To this end, health communication should be by health personnel through a regular schedule of media briefings.

Decision To Begin Immunization
This decision is worthy of serious question and debate. As Walter Dowdle (12) points out in this issue of Emerging Infectious Diseases, the prevailing wisdom was that a pandemic could be expected at any time. Public health officials were concerned that if immunization was delayed until H1N1 was documented to have spread to other groups, the disease would spread faster than any ability to mobilize preventive vaccination efforts. Three cases of swine influenza had recently occurred in persons who had contact with pigs. In 1918, after the initial outbreak of influenza at Fort Riley in April, widespread outbreaks of influenza did not occur until late summer (13).

The Delphi exercise of Schoenbaum in early fall of 1976 (13) was the most serious scientific undertaking to poll scientists to decide whether or not to continue the program. Its main finding was that the cost benefit would be best if immunization were limited to those >25 years of age (and now young children are believed to be a potent source of spread of influenza virus!). Unfortunately, no biblical Joseph was there to rise from prison and interpret the future.

As Dowdle further states (12), risk assessment and risk management are separate functions. But they must come together with policymakers, who must understand both. These discussions should not take place in large groups in the president’s cabinet room but in an environment that can establish an educated understanding of the situation. Once the policy decisions are made, implementation should be left to a single designated agency. Advisory groups should be small but representative. CDC had the lead responsibility for operation of the program. Implementation by committee does not work. Within CDC, a unit was established for program execution, including surveillance, outbreak investigation, vaccine procurement and distribution, assignment of personnel to states, and awarding and monitoring grants to the states. Communications up the chain of command to the policymakers and laterally to other directly involved federal agencies were the responsibility of the CDC director, not the director of NIIP, who was responsible for communications to the states and local health departments, those ultimately implementing operations of the program. This organizational mode functioned well, a tribute to the lack of interagency jealousies.

[End of Excerpt]

This history is fascinating. But the conclusions of those involved in the decision-making about risk is telling: even though they observed Guillain-Barré syndrome in a significant number of individuals, they forged ahead with ACIP telling them it was more important to conduct mass vaccinations.

In 1986, the The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) established the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Guillain-Barré Syndrome was added to the table of vaccine injuries for which compensation is awarded in 2017. It took thirty-one years to add GBS to the table, and they knew about the assocation for ten years before the 1986 act.

When assessing risk, there are the knowns, the unknowns, and the unknowns one does even know to look for. The “Reflections” article, on the CDC website, shows that knowledge of risk of autoimmune disorders like Guillain-Barré Syndrome and deaths from vaccination was present from the beginning.

Serious side effects in a minority of patients is rationalized by the benefits of the flu vaccine, and vaccine risk denialism perpetuates the regulation of perception necessary for continuation of the view that the benefits outweigh the risks.

But, at a population level, evidence is mounting that, due to numerous reasons, mass influenza vaccination is self-defeating.

The facts in the scientific literature that must be considered include:

(1) A/H3N2 disease vaccinated individuals were significantly more likely to report myalgias (OR 3.31; 95% CI [1.22, 8.97]) than vaccinated individuals. [Vaccine-associated reduction in symptom severity among patients with influenza]

(2) Vaccination with Thimerosal induces immunological damage. Specifically, Thimerosal inhibits the protein ERAP1, which shortens proteins headed for the cell surface of MHC Class 1 [“Stamogiannos et al., 2016 Screening Identifies Thimerosal as a Selective Inhibitor of Endoplasmic Reticulum Aminopeptidase 1″]

(3) Vaccination against Influenza with thimerosal-containing vaccines is associated with an increase in non-influenza respiratory infections [“Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine“]

(4) Repeated vaccination at a young age substantially increases the risk of influenza in older age, by a factor ranging between 1. 2 (vaccination after 50 years) to 2. 4 (vaccination from birth) [“Repeated influenza vaccination of healthy children and adults: borrow now, pay later?“]

(5) B-cells activated by flu vaccine crowds out B-cells for other viruses [“Why Flu Vaccines So Often Fail, Science Magazine“]

(13) The evidence that heterologous immunity and very limited efficacy makes universal vaccination against the flu will create more disease than it prevents is impressive. [Why do people get the flu after getting the flu shot?]

(8) The rate of aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season is higher than that in people with no vaccination in those two seasons. [“Infectious virus in exhaled breath of symptomatic seasonal influenza cases from a college community“]

(10) Repeated flu shots may blunt effectiveness [“Repeated flu shots may blunt effectiveness“]

These observations also exist at the population level. CDC annually reports both the influenza vaccine uptake and estimates of the adjusted vaccine efficacy (AVE). If the AVE of two years following the efficacy of a given year is regressed, the annual loss in efficacy in the flu vaccine due to the flu vaccine is 1.167 units of AVE per percentage increase in flu vaccine uptake:

https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/02-07-Weiler-3-journaltrend.jpg

These result are from CDC’s own data, and reflect population effects. They are robust to the low coverage value ‘outlier’, data provided here for the interested skeptic. seasonal-flu-vaccine-effectiveness .

Repeated calls for addressing these conundrums fall on deaf ears. The explosion of diseases of mysterious origin – the cost of morbidity and mortality – means there is no excuse for sloppy, lazy vaccinology. The changes needed are known, and there is no excuse. Unsafe epitopes that match human proteins must be removed. Thimerosal must be removed. Aluminum exposure must be minimized.

We desperately need a new generation of technologies for artificial immunization, and those products should (a) not be contracted via the CDC at all, (b) subjected to the same rigorous standards of evidence of safety required of drugs with long-term safety outcomes (total health outcome awareness), (c) vaccine risk denialism must be stopped immediately.

The 1976 risk policy assumptions are summarized by Sencer and Millar:

“Decision-making” Risks

When lives are at stake, it is better to err on the side of overreaction than underreaction. Because of the unpredictability of influenza, responsible public health leaders must be willing to take risks on behalf of the public. This requires personal courage and a reasonable level of understanding by the politicians to whom these public health leaders are accountable. All policy decisions entail risks and benefits: risks or benefits to the decision maker; risks or benefits to those affected by the decision. In 1976, the federal government wisely opted to put protection of the public first.” (emphasis added)

At this point, in 2018, one must ask: when will protection from vaccine-induced immunological and neurological damage become a factor in the risk equations, or better yet, a priority? When will it be seen as more important than the management of the perception of risk?

—

Additional Considerations
A minority of ‘flu’ cases involve influenza [“Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease“] Very few “flu deaths” involve influenza virus infection [“Are US flu death figures more PR than science?”]

Many of the deaths attributed to infuenza may be due to “sudden deterioration” observed due to Tamiflu treatment. [“Oseltamivir and early deterioration leading to death: a proportional mortality study for 2009A/H1N1 influenza“]

The arguments for uniform healthcare worker influenza vaccination are not supported by existing literature. [What, in Fact, Is the Evidence That Vaccinating Healthcare Workers against Seasonal Influenza Protects Their Patients? A Critical Review]

The number needed to treat to prevent one infection is 71, and vaccination has no net positive effect on working days or hospitalization. [“Vaccines to prevent influenza in healthy adults“].

ACIP selectively picks results of science to support influenza vaccine and ignores results that question efficacy and safety. [Guidelines in disrepute: a case study of influenza vaccination of healthcare workers ]

Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have Three Times Risk Of Hospitalization For Flu, Study Suggests [LINK1] [LINK2]

Antivirals if used early can reduce pneumonia and bronchitis, but appear to come with a risk of psychiatric episodes. [Narayana Manjunatha, N et al. 2011. The neuropsychiatric aspects of influenza/swine flu: A selective review Ind Psychiatry J. 20(2): 83–90.]

Studies are needed to determine if “flu infection” after influenza vaccination followed by Tamiflu treatment is a recipe for mortality. [Pediatric advisory committee briefing for Tamiflu – Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. ] FDA Posts Tamiflu Warning.Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project:https://worldmercuryproject.org/

Flash

11th February 2018, 02:50

this video may be somewhere in this long thread, but if it is, it deserves anyhow to be repeated

thanks Bob for having put this video into your Magnesium bicarbonate thread, where I took it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IFZvm6Pssw

Hervé

11th February 2018, 16:14

From Jim Stone (http://82.221.129.208/.zg8.html):
Trump probably just killed vaccine mandates (http://82.221.129.208/.zg8.html)

After taking care of his first batch of issues, he progressed onto the next by establishing a new federal office for vaccine freedom, which has the purpose of providing people a way out of vaccination easily via religious preference.

OH MY GOD, READ THE TEXT.

The legal text uses the words "unalienable rights", rather than "inali[e]nable rights" which means this agency will operate under actual law, rather than legalese. This is a topic covered in Wayne's book Its Not the Law. (http://82.221.129.208/http//www.itsnotthelaw.com) It does make a difference, because if this wording is being used it probably means Trump's next step will be to kill off false statutes that operate under the color of law, rather than actual law. AWESOME. Bye bye asset forfeiture!

Take a look at this! HA HA HA HA HA, he's delivering!

The Dems and the American bar association are going to puke.

http://82.221.129.208/unalienablerights.png
Ok, so, here's the difference:
If the word "inali[e]nable" is used, it means you are (basically) in a maritime court that can walk all over you. But just switching one letter, the "i" to a "u", suddenly you have constitutionally enforceable rights that the court can't simply walk all over.

This is EPIC, I cannot believe Trump did this so well. Let's see this sweep across all legislation. If it does, Americans won't be peons anymore!

Foxie Loxie

11th February 2018, 18:22

Whopee!! :dance:

onawah

12th February 2018, 23:19

Deadly Deception, Exposing the Dangers of Vaccines, a film by Gary Null
Uploaded on Jan 17, 2018
oQmfKvV3qzk

There is an epidemic, the likes that we have never seen in the history of this country. One in 6 children in America is learning disabled, one in 9 has asthma, one in 48 are becoming autistic, and millions more are suffering with brain and immune dysfunction, which can not be explained. Children are now exposed to more vaccinations than earlier generations. The number of vaccines is expected to increase dramatically with over 250 new vaccines in the pipeline. While there is an untold number of children and adults that have been injured from vaccines, most Americans remain skeptical of the fact that vaccines can and do cause injury, disability and death.

What will happen when vaccine-injured children, with brain and immune system dysfunction, reach adulthood and are unable to function in society? It is a tremendous cost burden to care for someone with a disability over their lifetime and the American healthcare system is incapable of handling the larger cataclysm that awaits as vaccines become mandated.

Conventional medicine claims that vaccines prevent infectious diseases and are proven to be effective and safe. We are that these diseases can be eradicated if the population is fully vaccinated to achieve “herd immunity.” However, does the science support these claims?

Flash

12th February 2018, 23:26

This is already happening, the impossibility to care for those children, and to care for their neglected siblings, whose parents have no more time to be with, for their mothers who had to live in poverty while taking care of the disable children, and whom 80% of dads have abandoned. And this is for 1in6 children. It basically touches all families, all societies already.

The cost is just unbelievable already.

The children whom some are in the early 20’s, are already dysfunctional and the Clinton-Bush syndicate make sure drugs cover the market to make everything yet more dysfunctional

Deadly Deception, Exposing the Dangers of Vaccines, a film by Gary Null
Uploaded on Jan 17, 2018
oQmfKvV3qzk

There is an epidemic, the likes that we have never seen in the history of this country. One in 6 children in America is learning disabled, one in 9 has asthma, one in 48 are becoming autistic, and millions more are suffering with brain and immune dysfunction, which can not be explained. Children are now exposed to more vaccinations than earlier generations. The number of vaccines is expected to increase dramatically with over 250 new vaccines in the pipeline. While there is an untold number of children and adults that have been injured from vaccines, most Americans remain skeptical of the fact that vaccines can and do cause injury, disability and death.

What will happen when vaccine-injured children, with brain and immune system dysfunction, reach adulthood and are unable to function in society? It is a tremendous cost burden to care for someone with a disability over their lifetime and the American healthcare system is incapable of handling the larger cataclysm that awaits as vaccines become mandated.

Conventional medicine claims that vaccines prevent infectious diseases and are proven to be effective and safe. We are that these diseases can be eradicated if the population is fully vaccinated to achieve “herd immunity.” However, does the science support these claims?

onawah

13th February 2018, 02:51

The extent of the damage already done is more than most can or are willing to comprehend.
There are ways to minimize the damage through diet, supplements, homeopathy, etc. but for most families dealing with this, the remedies are out of reach unless assistance becomes available, and the government in the US is denying every kind of assistance they can, including refusal to admit that the problem even exists.
It will take a gigantic shift before that changes.

This is already happening, the impossibility to care for those children, and to care for their neglected siblings, whose parents have no more time to be with, for their mothers who had to live in poverty while taking care of the disable children, and whom 80% of dads have abandoned. And this is for 1in6 children. It basically touches all families, all societies already.

The cost is just unbelievable already.

The children whom some are in the early 20’s, are already dysfunctional and the Clinton-Bush syndicate make sure drugs cover the market to make everything yet more dysfunctional

onawah

13th February 2018, 03:15

The Vaccine Program: Betrayal of Public Trust & Institutional Corruption—Part 6 of 7.
FEBRUARY 12, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/vaccine-program-betrayal-public-trust-institutional-corruption-part-6-7/?utm_source=mailchimp

“A Foolish Faith In Authority Is The Worst Enemy Of The Truth”– Albert Einstein
By Vera Sharav

Note from the World Mercury Project Team: Following is Part Six in Vera Sharav’s seven-part exposé of the complex and widespread corruption that exists in the vaccination program, the deceptive practices by officials of “authoritative” international public health institutions and further evidence of the callous disregard for the plight of thousands of children and young adults who suffer irreversible harm. Sharav’s research is a must-read by those in our community.

This recourse to authority is an attitude reminiscent of the American eugenics movement, when public health officials and academics at elite universities, embraced the pseudo-scientific tenets of eugenics, which were the basis for abhorrent discriminatory policies, including forced sterilization policies that were launched in the USA.[60]

The internal CDC documents reveal that in addition to major methodological flaws and inconsistencies, CDC scientists and Danish scientists collaborated in outright fraud. Thorsen and his co-authors manipulated the results by excluding the largest outpatient clinic in Copenhagen – comprising 20% of autism cases in Denmark – from the pre-1992 cohort – thereby artificially inflating the autism incidence in Denmark after 1992 when thimerosal had been eliminated from children’s vaccines.

Furthermore, the authors of the Pediatrics (2003) article falsified their findings by omitting the 2001 data from their published report. The published report claims an astoundingly high (implausible) increase in the autism prevalence rate in Denmark after the phase-out and removal of thimerosal between 1990 and 1999.

This case reveals much about the corrupted vaccine literature. Indeed, the research community has not only failed to examine Thorsen / CDC research fraud, journal editors are knowingly facilitating fraudulent research articles to influence vaccination policies that put thousands of children at risk, depriving them of living normal lives.

The publicly accessible, internal CDC correspondence[1] allows anyone to trace the underhanded route that led to the publication of the Madsen/Thorsen/ et al report in the journal Pediatrics – after it was rejected by the Lancet and by JAMA. A written communication between Dr. Thorsen and high ranking CDC official, Coleen Boyle (2003) reveals that when the paper was first submitted to Pediatrics with the 2001 data included; it was criticized by one peer-reviewer:

“The drop of incidence shown for the most recent years is perhaps the most dramatic feature of the figure, and is seen in the oldest age group as well as the youngest.” The reviewer questions the authors’ failure to discuss “the possibility that this decrease might have come about through elimination of [T]himerosal.”

The internal CDC documents further show that CDC brought pressure to bear on journal editors to publish the Danish studies. Dr. Cordero, Assistant Surgeon General, National Center on Birth Defects & Developmental Disabilities used his influence to persuade Dr. Lucey to publish the Madsen / Thorsen study, “Thimerosal and the Occurrence of Autism”

“I am writing in support of an expedited review and consideration of the enclosed manuscript… Specific aspects of vaccinations have been subject to inquiry includ[ing] the MMR vaccine and thimerosal…For thimerosal there are limited data…The Danish study is a powerful epidemiologic study …a key strength of the study is the ability to examine rates of autism prior to and after the discontinuation of vaccines containing thimerosal in Denmark in 1992. Contrary to what would be expected if thimerosal was linked to autism, the authors did not observe a decline in the rate of autism with the removal of thimerosal…

Its findings provide one strong piece of evidence that thimerosal is not causally linked to autism.” [Exhibit V: Cordero letter to Lucey]

How is it that even as thousands of journal papers are retracted from the scientific record – Retraction Watch counted more than 14,000 retractions– some are retracted for spurious reasons, others provide no explanation – yet, deliberately manipulated, fraudulent reports that were crafted to conceal vaccine safety hazards, have never been removed from the scientific literature. In fact, they continue to influence public health policy inasmuch as they were published in “authoritative” “high impact” journals.

In the case of Pediatrics, a fraudulent study was published despite the fact that its editors knew that the 2001 data was omitted from the final version.
US public health officials not only failed to disavow the fugitive’s research, federal officials have continued to collaborate and to co-author papers with him.
Dr. Thorsen continues to collaborate with the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network.
Federal dollars continued to flow to studies in which he was or is involved.
Thorsen is the named author of at least 19 reports following his fugitive status – “after his “disappearance”. The journals include: Pediatric Neurology (2016), PLoS One (2015), Pediatric Research (2014), Journal of Autism Development (2013), PLoS One (2013) (NCBI search)
Both the HHS and DOJ continue to use his research as grounds to reject vaccine injury claims in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation.
No retraction of the articles he was associated with during and subsequent to his 2004 to 2010 alleged criminal activities has occurred.
The entire US public health machine acts as if the indictment never occurred.
Public health officials and the news media are using fear and exaggeration about the risks of infectious disease in the U.S., as well as the risks posed by un-vaccinated children, which is pitting neighbor against neighbor and parent against parent. They use the classic divide and conquer strategy.

Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), responded to Thorsen’s indictment stating:

“even if the allegation against Thorsen is true, it does not mean his science is bad… Let’s assume it is true that he embezzled money, the notion that it casts the science into question is false. For these big epidemiological studies, it is hard to believe that one person could effectively change the data.” (Philadelphia Inquirer, March 2010)

Dr. Offit is considered to be a leading authority, an ardent and outspoken vaccine defender/ promoter. This statement encapsulates the low regard that vaccinologists have for the integrity of vaccine science. Of course, like most vaccine promoters, Dr. Offit’s blatant conflicts of interest have enabled him to “vote himself rich”. [61]He is quoted in Newsweek (2008) stating that the millions he made from the rotavirus vaccine patent: “was like winning the lottery.” http://www.newsweek.com/dr-paul-offit-debunking-vaccine-autism-link-91933

I believe that even if the allegations of embezzlement are not true, the evidence is indisputable that the studies produced by Poul Thorsen, and published in premier medical journals, are fatally flawed. By altering the inclusion criteria, excluding data that contradicted the authors’ claimed conclusion relegated the study to the ash heap of fraudulent junk science.

Furthermore, the following two studies “were conducted and results published without legally–required ethics clearances.”

A Population-Based Study of Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccination and Autism” was published by The New England Journal of Medicine (2002);
The validity of Childhood Autism in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register (co-authored by CDC scientist Diana Schendel) was published in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (2010).
“CDC officials knew that the psychiatric registry records were reviewed without required permissions and they covered it up. In what are completely unethical acts by all involved, the team members went into damage control mode and decided that they likely could obtain permission for ongoing and future studies.

They concluded that it would probably be impossible to get permission for research that was already finalized (and published). It is absurd that experienced federal grants management officials even discussed the idea of seeking a human subject safety review retroactively. These are serious ethical violations. [sic] they shed light on the pervasive culture of corruption at the CDC.”[62]

In January 2013, a Congressional hearing on autism[63] convened by the Government Oversight Committee.

Dr. Coleen Boyle (had by then been promoted to) Director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, and Dr. Alan Guttmacher, Director of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver Institute of the National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD) defended their agencies but provided no substantive information.

Boyle and Guttmacher evaded pertinent questions. When asked about why the number of children with autism has surged, they testified that autism has no known cause or cure; their focus was statistical tracking and detection tools.

When asked if CDC had sought constituent input?
Are there studies looking at the very aggressive way that we’re over-vaccinating our children”?
Are you looking at the impacts of combinations of vaccines”?
Boyle responded, “We know that vaccines save lives.”
No response was given to the following questions:
What steps were taken to ensure the integrity of the studies in which Thorsen was involved?
Why did the FDA and HHS take thimerosal out of all children’s vaccines except just the one or two or three, if there was no problem?
Both Republicans and Democrats were exasperated by the evasive responses.
Dr. Boyle finally acknowledged: “We have not studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated [children]”.
Dr. Guttmacher tried to impress the committee with non-specific claims of accomplishments: the NIH $169 million budget allocation for autism in 2011; he claimed “effective interventions…recent advances in networks” but could not give an example of an effective autism treatment resulting from the last 10 yrs in which the NIH had spent $500 million dollars on autism research, Dr. Guttmacher responded that progress had been “elusive” due to lack of funding. He did not wish to respond to the question, why thimerosal was still used in multi-vial vaccinations?

“I’m just sitting here, and I’m listening to all this. There’s something wrong with this picture. There’s something wrong… When you’ve got this combination of shots, and you go from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 88, it seems to me somebody would say, wait a minute, let’s put the brakes on this, and at least let’s try to figure out whether the multiple-shot situation is causing this —

If I’m giving a baby nine shots in a day whether that—I mean, how much impact that’s having… you said there’s a body of evidence with regard to vaccines…

Mr. Chairman, I don’t know where we go from here… if we’re going to err, let’s err on the side of keeping children safe even if we have to [sic] do a pause and give one shot a day.”

Mark Blaxill, the author of The Age of Autism (2010), which documents that autism did not exist before the introduction of vaccines in the 1930s. Blaxill presented testimony on behalf of Safe Minds:

“Autism is a public health crisis of historic proportions. Autism is a public health crisis of historic proportions. Worse than poliomyelitis. It’s devastating a generation of children and their families. We need to face up to the reality Autism is a national emergency. Autism rates didn’t just rise, they multiplied.The old surveys didn’t just miss 99% of children with autism.

It’s horrible but true; reported rates of autism have risen simply because there are more cases of autism. In the midst of this crisis, the federal agencies responsible for the health of our nation’s children have failed in their duty. CDC’s negligence has led the way. Many believe CDC has actively covered up the evidence surrounding autism’s environmental causes.

NIH has received the lion’s share of Congressional funding, money they have wasted on status quo research and gene studies. It’s absurd to focus on genetic research in this crisis, there’s no such thing as a genetic epidemic. In the financial world, the result of the pressure to manipulate numbers to provide the answers bosses want has a name – securities fraud…what CDC has given us is the medical equivalent of securities fraud. All to avoid the inconvenient reality of the autism epidemic.

In 2006, Congress gave the NIH a mission to “combat autism.” You authorized $850 million for that mission… NIH spent most of that money on the great autism gene hunt while blackballing environmental researchers and defying parent concerns. It’s been a colossal waste of money and time. Not a single case of autism has been prevented. Not a single child received improved treatments. We need to conduct independent research into the great unmentionables, mercury, and vaccines, connections that we’ve documented in the earliest cases.

We need accountable new leadership. Please root out the failures, the waste, the fraud, the negligence and the abuse of these agencies that aren’t doing their jobs.” Blaxill’s latest book, co-authored by Dan Olmsted is DENIAL: How Refusing to Face the Facts about Our Autism Epidemic Hurts Children, Families, and Our Future (2017)

Cong. Bill Posey made an announcement, and submitted new information for the Congressional Record: “I have information that the fugitive doctor had been involved in [sic] 21 of the 24 studies with CDC”.

Another Major Episode of CDC Fraud & Scientific Malfeasance Came to Light
In 2014, Dr. William Thompson, the senior CDC epidemiologist who co-authored the 2004 study published in Pediatrics blew the whistle and revealed that fraud had been committed by CDC authors (himself included) to conceal the higher risk of autism for African American baby boys who were vaccinated prior to 36 months and prior to 24 months of age. Beginning in 2013, in taped conversations with Dr. Brian Hooker, Dr. Thompson revealed how CDC destroyed evidence of the risk for autism. He provided primary documented evidence – a copy of data that had been deleted from the published article in Pediatrics (2004) the journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics.[64]

“We hypothesized that if we found statistically significant effects at either the 18-month or 36-month threshold, we would conclude that vaccinating children early with the MMR vaccine could lead to autism-like characteristics or features.”

https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/CDC-vaccine-Fraud-study-2-1.jpg

When CDC scientists did find a statistically significant causal relationship between MMR and autism in African American boys, according to Dr. Thompson’s eyewitness account, CDC removed 260 black baby boys from the dataset and destroyed the data. The analysis in the published report in Pediatrics misrepresents the risk of having eliminated data from the dataset. That constitutes fraud.

https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/CDC_deleted-MMR-data_Thompson-768x434.png

Dr. Thompson stated that he wrote a letter alerting Dr. Julie Gerberding to the findings and suggested that the Institute of Medicine safety review committee should be informed of the risk, prior to its consequential February 2004 meeting. Dr. Thompson was reprimanded for contacting Dr. Gerberding and was put on administrative leave. He was threatened with being fired. In his taped conversation with Dr. Hooker – which was central in the film Vaxxed – he expressed shock by his own action:[65]

“Oh my God. I cannot believe we did what we did. But we did.” “It’s the lowest point of my career, when I went along with that paper. I went along with this, and we didn’t report significant findings.”

“I am completely ashamed of what I did. I have great shame now. I was complicit, and I went along with that paper. I have great shame now, when I meet families with kids with autism, because I have been part of the problem.”

Dr. Hooker re-analyzed the complete CDC dataset in 2014, including the data that had been omitted from the published study in Pediatrics (2004). It showed statistically significant adverse effects at both 24 months and 36 months (RR 3.36, 95% CI 1.50-7.51, p = 0.0019). The higher relative risk of autism for African American infant boys, vaccinated with MMR prior to 36 months, was (330%) compared to other babies. His re-analysis was published online by Translational Neurodegeneration on August 8, 2014:[65]

“The present study provides new epidemiologic evidence showing that African American males receiving the MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age or 36 months of age are more likely to receive an autism diagnosis.

The results show a strong relationship between child age at the administration of the first MMR and autism incidence exclusively for African American boys which could indicate a role of the vaccine in the etiology of autism within this population group. The particular analysis was not completed in the original Destefano et al (CDC) study… the CDC study limited the total African American cohort to include only those individuals who possessed a valid State of Georgia birth certificate which decreased the statistical power of their analysis.”

However, Dr. Hooker’s article came under attack; pressure from the shadowy cyber enforcement squads,[66] that act as a police force to suppress every independent vaccine study that challenges the mantra: “there is no link to autism… vaccines are safe and effective”.

On August 27, the journal removed Hooker’s article with the statement: “This article has been removed from the public domain because of serious concerns about the validity of its conclusions. The journal and publisher believe that its continued availability may not be in the public interest”. There was no specific fault or mistake cited.[68]

On the same day that Dr. Hooker’s article was removed from the journal’s website, Dr. Thompson acknowledged the following in a statement issued by his lawyer (August 27, 2014):

“I regret that my co-authors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.”

“My concern has been the decision to omit relevant findings in a particular study for a particular subgroup for a particular vaccine. There have always been recognized risks for vaccination and I believe itis the responsibility of the CDC to properly convey the risks associated with receipt of those vaccines.

I have had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker over the last 10 months regarding studies the CDC has carried out regarding vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes, including autism spectrum disorders. I share his belief that CDC decision-making and analyses should be transparent.”

Dr. Thompson then forwarded the documents to a U.S. Congressman William Posey who has repeatedly requested a congressional investigation.[69]

“Mr. Speaker, I believe it is our duty to insure that the documents that Dr. Thompson are not ignored. Therefore I will provide them to members of Congress and the House Committees upon request. Considering the nature of the whistleblower’s documents as well as the involvement of the CDC, a hearing and a thorough investigation is warranted.“So I ask, Mr. Speaker, I beg, I implore my colleagues on the appropriations committees to please, please take such action.”

On August 26, 2014, Sharyl Attkisson, an investigative journalist who earned numerous awards as CBS science correspondent (1993-2014), conducted taped telephone interviews with Dr. Frank DeStefano,[70] Director of CDC Immunization Safety, who co-authored the Pediatrics (2004) study.

He confirmed the verity of the confessions of CDC whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson about the omission from the published Pediatrics report, of children in the dataset, for whom there were no birth certificates here.

In a telephone interview, DeStefano defended the study and reiterated the commonly accepted position that there’s no “causal” link between vaccines and autism. But he acknowledged the prospect that vaccines might rarely trigger autism.

“Wouldn’t say it’s a myth, I’d say[sic] all the evidence, thus far, points to that there’s not a causal association between vaccines and autism…It’s a theoretical possibility…It’s hard to predict who those children might be, but certainly, individual cases can be studied to look at those possibilities.”

Attkisson writes, “They’re not even trying. A CDC spokesman told me that:

“the agency is not currently investigating the relation between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Further, CDC does not have any planned research addressing vaccines and autism. CDC believes that this topic has been thoroughly studied and no causal links have been found. Current CDC ASD related research focuses on determining how many people have ASD and understanding [other, not vaccine-related] risk factors and causes for ASD”.[71]

When Dr. Thompson attempted to leave, CDC gave him a $24,000 bonus – a retention fee. Apparently, CDC continues to employ Dr. Thompson, because they feel more secure with him as an agency employee, enabling them to scrutinize his activities. Clearly, they feared his being outside the agency, which would risk that he might disclose additional CDC secrets.

CDC Continues to Conceal the Authentic 1999 Verstraeten VSD Study Findings.
When a request was filed with CDC to provide Dr. Verstraeten’s original dataset for independent analysis, CDC officials claimed the data were “lost.” Even after approval was granted, Dr. Mark Geier was blocked from gaining access to CDC’s Vaccine Safety Dataset which is the data CDC relied upon its study published Pediatrics. CDC continues to disseminate false reassurances in its “Science Summary Fact Sheet” claiming: “The evidence is clear: thimerosal is not a toxin in vaccines… there is no relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism in children.” As its “evidence,” CDC cites the Danish studies.

In January 2017, the President and Executive Vice President of the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a press release in opposition to a federal vaccine commission on immunizations.

Fernando Stein, MD, FAAP and Karen Remkey, MD, MBA, MPH, FAAP stated: since we already know that: “vaccines are safe. Vaccines are effective. Vaccines save lives.” AAP declared that there is no need for further examination pf vaccine safety:

Vaccines prevent forms of cancer.
Claims that vaccines are linked to autism have been disproven by a robust body of medical literature.
Claims that vaccines are unsafe when administered according to the [CDC’s] recommended schedule have likewise been disproven by a robust body of medical literature”.
However, when asked to provide citations to any peer-reviewed study that supports AAP’s claim that “vaccines prevent forms of cancer” or to cite the “robust body of medical literature” that supports its claims, the AAP declined, with a “no comment” response. (Immunization News, 2017)

WMP NOTE: This concludes Part Six. The final segment of this series will be entitled: Multiple Industry-Saturated Collaborating Partners Set the Agenda for Vaccination Policies.

Previously published articles: Sharav’s Introduction to the full article, L’affaire Wakefield: Shades of Dreyfus & BMJ’s Descent into Tabloid Science, outlines her well-researched and documented belief that, “Public health officials and the medical profession have abrogated their professional, public, and human responsibility, by failing to honestly examine the iatrogenic harm caused by expansive, indiscriminate, and increasingly aggressive vaccination policies.” Part One focuses on how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the vaccine industry control vaccine safety assessments, control the science of vaccines and control the scientific and mass channels of information about vaccines. In Part Two Ms. Sharav interprets the complex web of internal CDC documents, revealing how key CDC studies and CDC-commissioned studies were shaped by use of illegitimate methods. Part Three takes a closer look at the Brighton Collaboration and the extraordinary influence these stakeholders have in the business of vaccines and their power to control the science and research and manipulate reports to further their own interests. Focusing on the HPV vaccine, in Part Four Ms. Sharav explores how a global network of government/academic and industry stakeholders can suppress information about genuine scientific findings and, when needed, engage in corrupt practices to thwart the airing of information about vaccine safety issues. CDC’s childhood vaccination policy rests on the denial of safety hazards posed by vaccines and CDC officials are intent on shielding the policy and vaccination schedule at any cost. Part Five examines documentation and internal correspondence that reveals how CDC used its influence and subsequently rejected scientific studies that contradicted the sacrosanct vaccine safety mantra.

More about the author: Vera Sharav is a Holocaust survivor and a fierce critic of the medical establishment. This article was originally published at www.ahrp.org. Stat news recently published an article about her and her work.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/

onawah

14th February 2018, 21:29

Related Epidemics? Teen Mental Health Crisis & Neurodevelopmental Disorders
By the World Mercury Project Team
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/twin-epidemics-among-our-teens/?utm_source=mailchimp
2/14/18

It has never been easy to be an adolescent, but by the look of things, twenty-first century teenagers may be having a harder time than ever. One contributing factor—the one that public health agencies and the media seem most willing to discuss—is a ballooning epidemic of mental health problems in teens. Meanwhile, an equally grim developmental disability crisis has been unfolding for years, affecting at least one in six American children and teens but receiving little attention.

Officialdom’s subtle sidelining of developmental disorders in favor of a focus on mental health is somewhat baffling, given that researchers frequently use the terms “neuropsychiatric” and “neurodevelopmental” interchangeably. This is particularly the case when they refer to diagnoses such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and other behavioral disorders. In fact, one of the most credible national surveys cited as evidence of the teenage mental health crisis (called the NCS-A and published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry in 2010) defines three behavior disorders (ADHD, conduct disorders and oppositional defiant disorders) as “mental disorders.”

…half (49.5%) of U.S. teens ages 13-18 suffered from at least one mental disorder…
The NCS-A was conducted with over 10,000 teens from 2001-2004. The survey found that half (49.5%) of U.S. teens ages 13-18 suffered from at least one mental disorder (see chart), including one in five with behavior disorders and three in ten with anxiety disorders. The age of onset for the disorders often preceded adolescence by many years (for example, half of affected adolescents developed their anxiety disorders at age 6). Additionally, the impairments were often severe, ranging from 22.2% to 27.6% of teens, which is striking given that the survey measured “higher thresholds of impairment that required endorsement of ‘a lot’ or ‘extreme’ impairment in daily activities, or ‘severe or very severe’ distress.” Acknowledging that its own mental health surveillance data have significant limitations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) praised the NCS-A because of its unique focus on childhood mental disorders and its inclusion of disorders not measured in other studies.

https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/02-14-chart_155772.png

What are the likely culprits?

Regardless of specific terminology, one burning question arises: why do children and teens currently have such high levels of mental and neurologic dysfunction? Although the pro-Pharma health care system in the U.S. makes it socially taboo to say so, vaccines and other pharmaceutical products are some of the most likely culprits. As has been discussed in other World Mercury Project articles about children’s health, this supposition is backed by sound science.

For example, two epidemiological studies from 2017 are suggestive of temporal associations between vaccines and subsequent pediatric disorders:

Researchers from the Yale Child Study Center published a retrospective case-control study in Frontiers in Psychiatry that considered whether prior vaccination in a national sample of privately insured children and adolescents (ages 6-15) was associated with increased incidence of seven neuropsychiatric disorders. For the time period from January 2002 through December 2007, the Yale researchers found that children with four diagnosed disorders—anorexia nervosa (AN), anxiety disorder, tic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)—were more likely than matched controls to have received a flu shot in the preceding 12 months. There were also associations between prior receipt of several other vaccines (hepatitis A, meningococcal and Td) and some of the neuropsychiatric diagnoses.
A prospective case-control study published in Brain Injury used the Vaccine Safety Datalink database to zero in on the relationship between thimerosal-containing vaccines given in the first six months of life (for children born between 1991 and 2000) and the long-term risk of diagnosis with “disturbance of emotions specific to childhood and adolescence,” a diagnostic category abbreviated as ED. The results showed a significant relationship between vaccine-related mercury exposure and the subsequent risk of an ED diagnosis, with a notable dose-response effect. As a side comment, the authors note that occupational health specialists have recognized depression and other psychological disturbances as symptoms of mercury poisoning for decades.
Other recent research observes that exposure to neurotoxic and excitotoxic vaccine ingredients (such as thimerosal, aluminum adjuvants and monosodium glutamate) can lead to changes in the brain, adversely affecting the long-range connectivity that makes it possible to pay attention and engage in big-picture thinking. This abnormal connectivity is a key feature not only of ADHD but of leading neurodevelopmental conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and tic disorders.

The pharmaceutical connection
A TIME article on the “startling” rise in teen depression laments the fact that there has not been “a corresponding increase in mental health treatment for adolescents and young adults.” This prospect of a vast untapped market for greater pharmaceutical sales may offer one clue as to why many powerful organizations are focusing on the mental health aspects of teenagers’ wider health crisis.

However, other evidence indicates that some pharmaceutical products (in addition to vaccines) may be contributing to mental health problems. A Psychology Today report notes that “aggressive marketing by drug companies…has transformed mild depression and even sadness into a disease of ‘serotonin deficiency.’” At the same time, there has been growing awareness of “the potential for certain prescription medications to increase the risk of psychiatric symptoms and suicidality.” Classes of medications that come with black box warnings mandated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) include some of the very drugs used to address both psychiatric and neurological conditions, such as antidepressants and antiepileptics. In 2009, the FDA added warnings for the class of drugs known as leukotriene inhibitors (LTIs), which clinicians recommend for the control of allergies and asthma. Although sales of LTIs abruptly dropped as soon as the warnings appeared, the cautions did not manage to save an 18-year-old asthmatic who recently committed suicide after taking an LTI.

The CDC tells us that “mental disorders among children are an important public health issue because of their prevalence, early onset, and impact on the child, family, and community.” When an adolescent is too incapacitated by a mental or neurological disorder to pursue his or her education or a career, the whole country loses. Young people’s brains and emotions get plenty of a workout just by engaging in the process of growing up. Piling on more brain-scrambling pharmaceutical products to treat conditions that are often iatrogenic to begin with is probably not what most teenagers need.

In Part Two, World Mercury Project will look at some of the factors currently being offered as explanations for the epidemics of mental and neurological disorders in adolescents.
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project: https://worldmercuryproject.org/

Rebecca

15th February 2018, 20:14

YES, vaccines play a huge role in the development of autism. My brother has autism and was given all of the standard vaccinations.

https://www.naturalnews.com/049458_autism_Infanrix_vaccine_GlaxoSmithKline.html

I'm not sure if anyone else has said this already, but Mike Adams of Natural News goes into this subject extensively.

onawah

15th February 2018, 20:31

Right, Dr. Mercola as well.

https://www.naturalnews.com/049458_autism_Infanrix_vaccine_GlaxoSmithKline.html

I'm not sure if anyone else has said this already, but Mike Adams of Natural News goes into this subject extensively.

norman

17th February 2018, 15:32

New Vaccines Still Cause Autism and Our Government Knows.

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/ckeditor/lrossi/images/vaccine_autism_government_greenmedinfo.jpg

Posted on:
Thursday, March 16th 2017 at 3:45 pm
Written By:
Gary Null, PhD and Richard Gale (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/gmi-blogs/rgale)

Today in the US and a growing number of other countries, the official policy is that any scientific study, regardless of its methodology, quality, author credentials, and peer-reviewed process is summarily dismissed as incomplete, irrelevant or unsupported if it finds a connection between any vaccine or combination of vaccines and autism spectrum disorder.

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/new-vaccines-still-cause-autism-and-our-government-knows

onawah

20th February 2018, 18:01

Related Teen Epidemics? Looking for Answers in All the Wrong Places. Part 2 of 2.
FEBRUARY 20, 2018
By the World Mercury Project Team
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/related-teen-epidemics-looking-for-answers-in-all-the-wrong-places-part-2-of-2/?utm_source=mailchimp

As discussed in Part One, American teenagers are drowning in a rising tide of disorders: behavioral issues, sensory problems, depression, self-harm and more. The medical-pharmaceutical industry has rushed to brand all of these problems as mental health conditions treatable with profit-generating drugs. Few are talking about the broader neurodevelopmental crisis—triggered in part by environmental toxins such as the mercury and aluminum in vaccines—that is sabotaging children’s neurodevelopment and sapping adolescent resilience.

Age of Autism’s media editor Anne Dachel deconstructs this disproportionate focus on mental health, suggesting that the underlying aim of proclaiming half of American children mentally subpar may be to mask the real and serious neurological issues affecting children. As Dachel explains, “If every other child is ‘mentally ill,’ the ones with autism…and a host of developmental problems won’t matter.” In short, mental illness will become “a normal and acceptable part of childhood,” conveniently letting the manufacturers and purveyors of environmental toxins off the hook.

Blame the parents—for everything

Dachel astutely observes that some of the trendiest explanations for teen distress are inherently victim-blaming—or, more precisely, parent-blaming. Chief among these is the suddenly ubiquitous notion that teens’ problems are all due to “adverse child experiences” (ACEs), a vaguely conceptualized term comprising early-life trauma or abuse and household dysfunction. The sweeping line of reasoning underlying ACE research is that experiences such as “trauma exposure, parent mental health problems and family dysfunction put children at risk for disrupted brain development and increased risk for later health problems and mortality.” In response, researchers are calling for a more “trauma-informed and trauma-focused” approach to psychiatric diagnosis and treatment. Investigators also have begun holding ACEs responsible for a wide range of health behaviors and outcomes, including “depressive symptoms, ADHD symptoms, cigarette use, alcohol use, marijuana use, and BMI, in addition to lower levels of fruit and vegetable intake, and sleep.”

Without discounting the potential mental and physical health impacts of trauma and abuse, there are two problems with using ACEs as a catch-all explanation for young people’s mental and neurodevelopmental woes. First, a large body of scientific evidence clearly indicates that the neurodevelopmental disorders disabling today’s youth are multifactorial in origin. ACEs are only one component of a much longer list of likely environmental factors—including chemical pollutants and drugs—that can “interfere with typical brain developmental trajectories, eventually increasing the risk of either subclinical neuropsychological alterations or…clinical conditions such as learning disabilities, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).”

Unhelpful victim-blaming explanations serve corporate interests, allowing powerful medical and pharmaceutical entities to shirk their ethical responsibilities.
Second, it is hard to explain why ACEs suddenly should result in sky-high rates of intellectual disabilities and developmental delays (including autism) when, historically, even the most extreme forms of adversity have not been predictive of neurodevelopmental disorders. As Dachel observes, “Adversities and stress are nothing new. Somehow, everyone’s buying into the idea that kids today are falling apart because of the stress of modern life.” Dachel describes her grandfather’s family, which left Northern Ireland after going through a lot in the struggle for independence. She observes, “He and his siblings were working at a very young age when they got to North America. Although no one went beyond the fourth grade and they were as poor as one can imagine, all these kids were normal, intelligent and functional. They had to function in the adult world, and they did it.”

As with refugees from the Northern Irish “troubles,” there is no evidence that Holocaust survivors had (or have, for those still alive today) higher rates of ADHD, Asperger’s, autism, learning disabilities, sensory processing disorders or dyslexia, despite undergoing extreme trauma. Violinist Alison Fujito notes that Holocaust survivors “were tortured and suffered emotional and physical agony, and most had severe nutritional deficiencies. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is the norm for a Holocaust survivor, not the exception.” Yet after Fujito’s father escaped Nazi-occupied Austria, leaving “his home and his entire family at age 14, not knowing if he’d ever see his parents, aunts, uncles or cousins again—talk about stress!—he hardly ever got sick, and it certainly didn’t affect him neurologically. He earned top honors in an English-language school though his first language was German and went on to not one but two successful careers. And he was always happy and cheerful—this was not an act, he was just a positive force.” Fujito noted that Holocaust survivors also “didn’t have fidget toys.”

If it’s not the parents, it’s the smartphones

Dachel’s commentaries note that, in addition to ACEs, a growing number of celebrities and academics are blaming smartphones and social media for adolescents’ plummeting mental health. Again, without discounting this still-emerging body of research, the chronological sequence of events suggests that this can only be a partial answer at best. The first mass-market-oriented smartphone did not appear on the scene until 2007, and widespread smartphone ownership did not take off until some years later. However, rates of neurodevelopmental disorders started climbing in the 1990s, and the widely cited national survey that first highlighted the astoundingly high prevalence of teenage mental health disorders was conducted in 2001-2004.

Unhelpful victim-blaming explanations serve corporate interests, allowing powerful medical and pharmaceutical entities to shirk their ethical responsibilities. Instead of telling parents they are doing everything wrong, we should immediately be looking to reduce children’s and teens’ exposure to neurotoxins and other damaging chemical concoctions. Otherwise, families, schools and communities increasingly will find themselves hard-pressed to fulfill their task of safely guiding adolescents into a healthy and happy adulthood.

onawah

21st February 2018, 19:30

Multiple Industry-Saturated Collaborating Partners Set the Agenda for Vaccination Policies
By Vera Sharav
The Vaccine Program: Betrayal of Public Trust & Institutional Corruption—Part 7 of 7
2/21/18
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/the-vaccine-program-betrayal-of-public-trust-institutional-corruption-part-7-7/?utm_source=mailchimp

Note from the World Mercury Project Team: This article concludes our seven-part serialization of Vera Sharav’s exposé on the complex and widespread corruption that exists in the vaccination program, the deceptive practices by officials of “authoritative” international public health institutions and further evidence of the callous disregard for the plight of thousands of children and young adults who suffer irreversible harm. As one reads all seven parts, it becomes abundantly clear that the revolving door between regulators (charged with protecting the health of citizens) and pharmaceutical companies should close. Links to previously published parts one through six are at the bottom of this segment.

European Commission boosts vaccine research with £30 Million projects: ADITEC
“Advanced Immunization Technologies will accelerate the development of novel and powerful immunization technologies for the next generation of human vaccines. €30 Million of European Commission co-funding will enable ADITEC to establish a strong platform for innovation in a key area for human health.

A consortium of scientists from 42 research and industry bodies in 13 countries will work together on the project, which will work on a wide range of crucial aspects of vaccination; from basic research and new technologies to clinical trials and public health. The support for this project underlines the importance of the vaccine sector in effective healthcare, and gives a boost in a key innovation area for the European health industry.” (News Alert: Brussels, September 2011)

Accelerated development of vaccine benefit-risk collaboration in Europe (ADVANCE) (2013)
“Vaccines are one of the most effective public health measures…Immunisation prevents two to three million deaths worldwide every year from diseases such as diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough) and measles. In Europe, one of the greatest barriers to the wider uptake of immunisation is distrust, among some sections of the public, of immunisation programmes. This is due largely to fears surrounding vaccine safety…resulting in outbreaks of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases that had almost disappeared.

ADVANCE brings together the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and the European Medicines Agency, as well as national public health and regulatory bodies, vaccine manufacturers and academic experts, the ADVANCE project will develop and test methods and guidelines in order to pave the way for a framework capable of rapidly delivering reliable data on the benefits and risks of vaccines that are on the market.”

The UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) chaired by Professor Andrew Pollard, has recommended that the UK switch to hexavalent vaccines for babies. This recommendation disregards the risks for babies – including the risk of sudden infant deaths that have been linked to multi-valent vaccines, [see Appendix 8] Prof. Pollard is Director of the Oxford Vaccine Group, noted for its active role in vaccine development and testing on behalf of industry. He is also a Trustee of the Jenner Vaccine Foundation. Dr. Norman Begg, Vice-President and Chief Medical Officer of GSK Biologicals, the manufacturer of Infanrix Hexa, is also a Trustee of the Jenner Foundation.

The common thread and longstanding intertwined connections that bind vaccine stakeholders is demonstrable in the case of Dr. David Salisbury, former Director of Immunisation at the Department of Health, who was the chief architect of the UK children’s vaccination program from 1986 to 2013, was a leading promoter of Pluserix in 1988. In 2013, Dr. Salisbury chaired the panel that appointed Prof. Pollard to chair the JCVI.

He then left to become chair of the Jenner Vaccine Foundation on which he sits with Prof. Pollard and Dr. Norman Begg – GSK Chief, Scientific Affairs, and Public Health. He is President of the International Association of Immunization Managers (IAIM). (Read more: Not published in the British Medical Journal: the dangers and conflicts of Infanrix Hexa, 2017)

A Concerted Push For Compulsory Childhood Vaccination Is Fueled By Fear-Mongering

A headline in The Guardian (July 2017) announced a Small Decline In MMR Vaccination Rates Could Have Dramatic Effect, Experts Warn. It went on to declare: a 5% drop in measles, mumps and rubella vaccinations could cause a threefold increase of measles cases, costing the public sector millions, US study shows.” The article quotes Professor Andrew Pollard, Director of the Oxford Vaccine Group and Chair of the JCVI who stated:

“Immunisation is something that many people think of as personal, but it is actually part of being in a society.” A similar view was expressed by BMJ Editor-in-chief Dr. Fiona Godlee in a BBC interview (2017),[74] when she invoked “the need for herding as opposed to individual choice.”

The Supreme Court has ruled (2011) that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe”[75]
The US National Vaccine Injury Program has adjudicated 5,581 vaccine-caused injuries – including 1,234 claims for vaccine-related deaths from vaccines recommended by CDC’s Childhood Vaccination Schedule, and plaintiffs received compensation. [See Appendix 4]
If, as the Supreme Court determined, that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe”, it is morally abhorrent to coerce parents who are rightly concerned about exposing their babies and young children to possible serious adverse effects – including deaths.
The CDC vaccination schedule is particularly aggressive compared to all other national policies. The CDC 2017 schedule requires U.S. children – from birth to age 6 – to receive 50 doses of 14 vaccines. Infants in the US are exposed from birth to age 2, to 24 vaccine doses, combining 8-in-1 vaccines to be given to infants 2, 4, and 6 months in a single visit. Babies receive 36 vaccine doses before they are 18 months old. The schedule includes vaccines against diseases that rarely occur in developed nations.

Notwithstanding CDC assurances to doctors and the public that these combinations are perfectly safe, none of the combinations in the CDC childhood vaccination schedule have ever undergone proper safety studies — as was acknowledge by the Institute of Medicine Report (2013):[77]

“key elements of the entire schedule—the number, frequency, timing, order, and age at administration of vaccines—have not been systematically examined in research studies… to consider whether and how to study the safety and health outcomes of the entire childhood immunization schedule, the field needs valid and accepted metrics of the entire schedule [sic] and clearer definitions of health outcomes linked to stakeholder concerns (the “outcomes”) in rigorous research that will ensure validity and generalizability. ” [Highlight added]

What’s more, a report by CDC and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Mixed Exposures Research Agenda (2014) acknowledges that:

“Mixed exposures may produce acute or chronic effects or a combination of acute and chronic effects, with or without latency. Other exposures in combination with certain stressors may produce increased or unexpected deleterious health effects… exposures to mixed stressors can produce health consequences that are additive, synergistic, antagonistic, or can potentiate the response expected from individual component exposures.”

If mixed environmental exposures to toxins pose serious risks to adults, how can CDC claim that the mixture of toxins injected into infants poses no risk?

The truth is that CDC’s childhood vaccination schedule was configured to promote industry’s financial interest in maximizing vaccination utilization. However, CDC recommendations violate medicine’s foremost precautionary principle “First, do no harm.” The evidence of infants being harmed following administration of multiple vaccines has been uncovered in CDC documents.

The following CDC acknowledgment of the possible lifelong debilitating brain damage following vaccination with the CDC-recommended DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis) should give pause. It appears on CDC’s otherwise upbeat website assurances about the safety of all vaccines.

Any child who had a life-threatening allergic reaction after a dose of DTaP should not get another dose.

Any child who suffered a brain or nervous system disease within 7 days after a dose of DTaP should not get another dose.

Several severe problems have been reported after a child gets MMR vaccine, and might also happen after MMRV. These include severe allergic reactions and problems such as:

Deafness
Long-term seizures, coma, or lowered consciousness
Permanent brain damage

However, public health, and medical “authorities” who pretend that no evidence of harm due to vaccines exists; they continue to deceive the public with reassuring propaganda. The media continues to disseminate “fake news” about the life-saving attributes and safety of all vaccines; promotional campaigns push the flu vaccine, the HPV vaccine, and the ever inflated CDC childhood vaccination schedule.

IOM Report (2013): “…key elements of the entire schedule—the number, frequency, timing, order, and age at administration of vaccines—have not been systematically examined in research studies… to consider whether and how to study the safety and health outcomes of the entire childhood immunization schedule…”
National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was created in 1988 because there were so many vaccine-related injuries and lawsuits against manufacturers. Congress absolved vaccine manufacturers from all liability and created the NVICP to compensate vaccine-injured children.

Since its inception, the NVICP received 1,234 claims for vaccine-related deaths; of these 696 deaths were linked to the DTP vaccine, 127 deaths to the flu vaccine, 81 deaths were attributed to the DTaP, and 61 deaths were linked to the MMR.

https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/111.jpg

The Drumbeat Toward Mandatory Vaccination: A Most Sinister Public Policy Direction
It is especially troubling to note the sinister direction that our “democracies” are headed towards. The position of both Professor Pollard and Dr. Godlee are antithetical to the moral stand articulated by Dr. Hamish Meldrum, the chairman of the British Medical Association, who called proposals for compulsory vaccination “a Stalinist approach.” He stated (in 2008) that forcing parents to vaccinate their children, by eliminating free choice was “morally and ethically dubious.”

Currently, government regulators in Italy, France, Germany, Poland and Australia have embarked on an aggressive drive to eliminate parental choice by adopting mandatory vaccination policies. A case involving compulsory vaccination was filed with the European Court by the European Centre for Law & Justice.

It would appear that those in positions of influence in academia and journalism /media, and those in positions of authority in government, have learned nothing from 20th century history of coercive public health policies – forced sterilization, forced abortions – that were enacted across Europe and the US, ostensibly for “the greater good”.

Have we learned nothing about the debasement of medicine by the willing participation of medical doctors from elite universities, who formulated and implemented the medicalized mass murder of disabled children?

It was doctors who declared those children to be “unfit” to live.

“Aktion T4 could not have happened without the willing participation of German doctors”.

That history cannot be erased from memory or from the historical record.[81]

(Read: The Nazis’ First Victims Were the Disabled, The New York Times, Sept. 13, 2017)

If, as the Supreme Court determined, that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe”, it is morally abhorrent to coerce parents who are rightly concerned about exposing their babies and young children to possible serious adverse effects – including deaths.
WMP NOTE: This concludes of our seven-part series of Vera Sharav’s exposé. Previously published articles: Sharav’s Introduction to the full article, L’affaire Wakefield: Shades of Dreyfus & BMJ’s Descent into Tabloid Science, outlines her well-researched and documented belief that, “Public health officials and the medical profession have abrogated their professional, public, and human responsibility, by failing to honestly examine the iatrogenic harm caused by expansive, indiscriminate, and increasingly aggressive vaccination policies.” Part One focuses on how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the vaccine industry control vaccine safety assessments, control the science of vaccines and control the scientific and mass channels of information about vaccines. In Part Two Ms. Sharav interprets the complex web of internal CDC documents, revealing how key CDC studies and CDC-commissioned studies were shaped by use of illegitimate methods. Part Three takes a closer look at the Brighton Collaboration and the extraordinary influence these stakeholders have in the business of vaccines and their power to control the science and research and manipulate reports to further their own interests. Focusing on the HPV vaccine, in Part Four Ms. Sharav explores how a global network of government/academic and industry stakeholders can suppress information about genuine scientific findings and, when needed, engage in corrupt practices to thwart the airing of information about vaccine safety issues. CDC’s childhood vaccination policy rests on the denial of safety hazards posed by vaccines and CDC officials are intent on shielding the policy and vaccination schedule at any cost. Part Five examines documentation and internal correspondence that reveals how CDC used its influence and subsequently rejected scientific studies that contradicted the sacrosanct vaccine safety mantra. From major methodological flaws and inconsistencies, to outright fraud, in Part Six of this 7-part series, Vera Sharav reveals much about corrupted vaccine literature including journal editors who knowingly facilitated fraudulent research articles to influence vaccination policies that put thousands of children at risk, and depriving them of living normal lives.

More about the author: Vera Sharav is a Holocaust survivor and a fierce critic of the medical establishment. This article was originally published at www.ahrp.org. Stat news recently published an article about her and her work.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/

Introduction:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/betrayal-of-public-trust-institutional-corruption-vaccine-safety-ratings-vaccine-science-falsified-intro/
Part one:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/.../vaccine-program.../
Part two:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/.../vaccine-program.../
Part three:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/.../vaccine-program.../
Part four:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/.../betrayal-public.../
Part five:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/.../part-5-betrayal.../
Part six:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/.../vaccine-program.../
Part seven:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/.../the-vaccine.../...

Part One focuses on how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the vaccine industry control vaccine safety assessments, control the science of vaccines and control the scientific and mass channels of information about vaccines. In Part Two Ms. Sharav interprets the complex web of internal CDC documents, revealing how key CDC studies and CDC-commissioned studies were shaped by use of illegitimate methods. Part Three takes a closer look at the Brighton Collaboration and the extraordinary influence these stakeholders have in the business of vaccines and their power to control the science and research and manipulate reports to further their own interests. Focusing on the HPV vaccine, in Part FourMs. Sharav explores how a global network of government/academic and industry stakeholders can suppress information about genuine scientific findings and, when needed, engage in corrupt practices to thwart the airing of information about vaccine safety issues. CDC’s childhood vaccination policy rests on the denial of safety hazards posed by vaccines and CDC officials are intent on shielding the policy and vaccination schedule at any cost. Part Fiveexamines documentation and internal correspondence that reveals how CDC used its influence and subsequently rejected scientific studies that contradicted the sacrosanct vaccine safety mantra. From major methodological flaws and inconsistencies, to outright fraud, in Part Six of this 7-part series, Vera Sharav reveals much about corrupted vaccine literature including journal editors who knowingly facilitated fraudulent research articles to influence vaccination policies that put thousands of children at risk, and depriving them of living normal lives.

onawah

22nd February 2018, 19:39

The Special Ed Epidemic: Burying Our Heads and Crippling Our Economy. Part 2 of 4.
2/22/18
By Sheri A. Marino, MA, CCC-SLP, from WMP Partner: Focus for Health
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/the-special-ed-epidemic-burying-our-heads-and-crippling-our-economy-part-2-of-4/?utm_source=mailchimp

WMP Note: In this 4-part series, World Mercury Project partner, Focus For Health, examines the special needs epidemic and its effects on schools, the US economy, life after age 21 and the many theories that point to potential causes of the explosion of chronic disease and disability in our children.

A recent survey of early childhood teachers asked “What is your greatest concern?” The majority of teachers reported “Managing challenging behaviors in our classroom,” according to Mary Ann Hansen, the director of First 5 Humboldt, a county-based commission in California which provides programs for children under age 5. She went on to say “We hear this over and over again, that teachers are struggling.” Sadly, many students are also struggling as their needs are unable to be met in a classroom environment that lacks support, proper teacher training, and the funding necessary to provide a quality education which addresses their varying needs.

With an increasing number of children requiring special education services in the schools, significant demands are being placed on both special and regular education teachers. Learners with differing educational, behavioral, and medical needs are both financially and emotionally challenging for both their school districts and teachers alike. School budgets are being depleted rapidly as districts attempt to provide a free and appropriate education (FAPE) for all, especially when Individualized Education Plans (IEP) require extensive special services including speech, physical, occupational therapy, nursing, counseling, behavioral services, in-class support, and personal aides.

Providing for the many needs of children classified in special education costs our nation an estimated $50 billion annually, and that number is likely outdated as it is based on data from the 1999-2000 SEED study, which doesn’t reflect the rise in students requiring special education since 2000.

The average annual cost for a general education student is $7,552, while the average cost per special education student is $16,921. However, approximately 330,000 students with exceptionally high-needs cost their districts $100,000 or more on an annual basis.

Students identified with one of 13 disabilities listed under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) are classified in school and provided with an IEP identifying learning goals, necessary accommodations, and describes the special services to be provided by the school, free of charge to the families. Students who do not qualify for an IEP may receive a 504 plan. This plan may provide specific accommodations, supports, or services for a child with any disability which can include learning or attention issues. It has a broader definition of a disability, but it does not have to be a written document.

The number of students ages 6-21 with disabilities rose to 5.83 million by fall 2014. Chronic health issues such as epilepsy, mental health disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and mobility impairments, classified in school as “other health impaired,” increased nearly 51%, between 2005-06 and 2014-15 school years. In the same age group, students classified with autism spectrum disorder had risen 165% nationwide. Children classified with “autism” or “other health impaired” account for more than 1 in 5 school-aged children covered under IDEA nationwide.

The least restrictive environment (LRE) mandate within IDEA requires that all students in special education be educated with typical peers to the greatest extent possible to prevent segregation, while still providing a free and appropriate education. This means children with IEP’s or 504 plans and their typical peers are integrated in one classroom with a general education teacher when possible. While some students receive in-class support with the help of an aid and sometimes a special education teacher, many general education teachers report they lack the support, training, and resources necessary to teach classified students appropriately.

Chronic health issues such as epilepsy, mental health disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and mobility impairments, classified in school as “other health impaired,” increased nearly 51%, between 2005-06 and 2014-15 school years.
In addition, some children presenting with emotional and behavioral issues, who have not been identified or classified at all, do not receive any accommodations for educational or behavioral support. As a result of limited funding and teacher shortages, general education teachers are often challenged to divide their time and attention teaching the curriculum to general education students while managing classified as well as unclassified students with attentional, emotional and behavioral issues at once. These issues affect the quality of education for all students.

MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES IN THE SCHOOLS
Mental health problems often develop during childhood and adolescence and are treatable if recognized and diagnosed. Students with mental health issues present challenges to teachers and commonly have social-emotional issues affecting peer relationships. Studies show that mental health disorders are at the root of some bullying behavior occurring in schools. School nurses report frequent complaints of “stomach aches” and “headaches” because an individual’s mental health is intertwined with their physical being. Yet research shows most children who need a mental health evaluation do not receive services. Because schools are often understaffed with social workers, counselors, and school nurses, the burden is placed on the classroom teachers who are with the students throughout the school day.

Educating children with mental health issues is not the only challenge for general education teachers. More and more teachers are reporting explosive outbursts by students including hitting, scratching, and flipping desks, putting teachers at risk, while at the same time they are trying to protect other students in the classroom. Disciplinary actions including suspensions are on the rise across the nation. Classified students with behavior issues are frequently sent home from school when teaching assistants are not available to shadow them. For students with autism who have complex behavior issues, physical restraints have become commonplace and can occur daily. Add to it the significant rise in self-harm and teen suicides; schools are being forced to look at this epidemic and to provide solutions at all costs. Some schools are attempting to mitigate the issues by creating sensory rooms and calming stations, while others have even created new mental health clinics on site to help manage the behavioral issues.

Compared to the national average, only 40% of students with emotional, behavioral, and mental health disorders graduate.

Studies looking at teacher job stress in early childhood education show that teacher-child conflicts are more common where workplace stress is higher. Essentially, this reduces the ability of the teachers to work effectively with students with emotional and behavioral problems. These teachers also report they felt mentally, emotionally, or physically exhausted or overwhelmed by working with these children, ultimately leading to burnout and staff turnover.

WHAT ABOUT THE SEVERELY DISABLED?
Children with severe disabilities have even more difficulty getting their needs met in district as the school may not have the resources on site to accommodate their various educational and healthcare needs. In such cases, these high-needs students may be offered placements in private schools for the disabled outside of the local school district. Children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, and other medically complex disabilities require services beyond what most districts can afford to provide because they require specialized training and care. This can include nursing, advanced technologies for communication and learning, special transportation, and more. While providing out of district placement can cost an average of $10,000 more per student than placements within district for similar students, keeping them in-district may not be cost effective if they need to hire staff and purchase equipment for just a few high-needs individuals.

ACCOMMODATING CHRONICALLY ILL KIDS
The number of children in the US with chronic health conditions has dramatically increased in the past 4 decades, doubling from 12.8 percent in 1994 to 26.6 percent in 2006.

With chronic health conditions on the rise, schools are faced with additional challenges of providing for the medical needs of children with severe health issues. Food allergies now affect 1 in 13 children, and asthma affects 1 in 10 children, requiring nursing staff on site to help care for these students. In addition, juvenile diabetes increased 23% between 2001 and 2009, while epilepsy/seizures affect 1 in 20 children. Some schools are opening health clinics on site to manage the medical needs of the student population. Unfortunately, the cost of building and staffing such clinics is prohibitive for most districts which already lack funding to meet the basic needs of special education students.

WHO PAYS FOR ALL OF THIS?
https://www.focusforhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/iStock-Special-Education-4-e1513795013429.jpg
You do. We all do. Federal, state and local governments all contribute to fund K-12 public special education. IDEA was established to provide the bulk of federal funding contribution for special education and governs how states and public agencies provide early intervention, special education, and related services. The states distribute funds to local agencies to be used in accordance with state and federal law, and allocation is based upon the local district’s tax structure. The local district budgets vary greatly and are dependent on local revenues resulting, however, in significant disparities.

Unfortunately, Congress historically fails to fully fund IDEA. While they have authorized special education funding equal to 40% of the national average per pupil expenditure (APPE), spending typically ranges between 10-20% per child.

This leaves the burden on the states to make up the difference. IDEA funding is based on FY 1999. This formula was derived from the number of children identified with disabilities in each state in relation to total state population. However, populations within states have increased or decreased, as have the number of children with disabilities within each state yet the base award has not changed. This creates a wide disparity in funding across the US. Additionally, when a state decides to accept federal funds, mandates apply in association with those programs. Despite this funding, many states find it insufficient to cover the local costs of meeting those program’s requirements. Consequently, districts are often compelled to tap into their general education funds to meet those requirements.

The number of students with disabilities and chronic health issues are rising across the nation while programs and services are being cut to save money. Currently, all taxpayers are bearing the financial burdens of the local school districts as property taxes help fund special education programs. Although Medicaid helps to offset the gap by covering health-related expenses for students with disabilities, cuts in Medicaid funding are frequently threatened. Without appropriate education, therapies, and medical services, these children will grow up to be adults who may not reach their full potential. In turn, employability will decrease, and without sustainable jobs, they may not become productive, self-sustaining adults. 1 in 36 children between 3-17 yrs. of age have ASD now; this means in the next 1-15 years, these individuals will become adults. Individuals with ASD have a normal life expectancy, and many will outlive their parents, requiring other family members to take care of them, if willing and able. And if not, tax-payers will be responsible for funding supportive housing and living costs, including health care, for those unable to live and care for themselves.

The prevalence of ASD in the US reportedly increased from 2.24% to 2.76%…indicating 1 in 36 children have autism, up from 1 in 45 in 2014; however, the CDC has not released a statement acknowledging this increase.
This system is unsustainable, and it is spiraling out of control, yet few people are talking about it. More importantly, nobody is asking “What is happening to our children?” In fact, the latest report just released by The National Center for Health Statistics within the US Department of Health and Human Services, does the opposite. Authors of the 2017 report “Estimated Prevalence of Children with Diagnosed Developmental Disabilities in the United States, 2014-2016” point out the prevalence of children aged 3-17 years who had ever been diagnosed with a developmental disability has increased from 5.76% to 6.99%. This increase of 1.23% is STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT. The prevalence of autism spectrum disorder in the US reportedly increased from 2.24% to 2.76%, a difference of .52%. According to NCHS, this increase is not statistically significant. While the article failed to disclose the sample size, the fact is, both increases are alarming.

According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) “The mission of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) is to provide statistical information that will guide actions and policies to improve the health of the American people. As the Nation’s principal health statistics agency, NCHS leads the way with accurate, relevant, and timely data.” The first step to making change is acknowledging we have a problem. A .52% rise in ASD indicates I in 36 children have autism, up from 1 in 45 in 2014; however, the CDC has not released a statement acknowledging this increase. The CDC must stop burying its head and work to address this problem first, by admitting we have one, and second, by identifying the causes with trustworthy science so that we may stop this epidemic. Until then, this and many other systems are destined to fail, affecting not only those individuals with special needs and their families, but every citizen in our nation.

REFERENCES
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/804334/
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/su6202.pdf
https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1548
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22550686
https://www.nimh.nih.gov/news/science-news/2011/majority-of-youth-with-mental-disorders-may-not-be-receiving-sufficient-services.shtml
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6433a11.htm
https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2016/08/31/464727159/mental-health-in-schools-a-hidden-crisis-affecting-millions-of-students
http://www.acmh-mi.org/get-help/navigating/problems-at-school/
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/01/the-charade-of-special-education-programs/421578/
https://edsource.org/2017/addressing-early-childhood-trauma-requires-shift-in-policy-more-training-for-teachers/587756/
http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/04/20/number-of-us-students-in-special-education.html
https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2016/04/20/number-of-us-students-in-special-education.html/a>
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/one-five-children-mental-illness-schools-often-dont-help/
https://www.usnews.com/news/healthcare-of-tomorrow/articles/2017-09-29/improving-care-of-the-medically-fragile-child/
http://www.asha.org/Advocacy/schoolfundadv/Overview-of-Funding-For-Pre-K-12-Education/
https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/medicaid-helps-schools-help-children
https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/special-services/504-plan/the-difference-between-ieps-and-504-plans
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/mission.htm
https://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1548
This concludes Part Two: “The Special Ed Epidemic: Burying Our Heads and Crippling Our Economy.” Part Three, “What Happens When They Age Out of School?” will explore the exploding financial burdens to taxpayers as the children exit school and looks deeply into the options for individuals who have aged out of IDEA, which only mandates services be provided until age 21. So what happens next?
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/

onawah

25th February 2018, 17:10

SIDS is linked to acute infantile scurvy
The connection between sudden infant death, vaccines and vitamin C
Posted by: Lori Alton February 24, 2018
https://www.naturalhealth365.com/vaccines-sids-2470.html

(Naturalhealth365) Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) is defined as the ‘unexplained death’ – usually during sleep – of an infant under a year old. And, although (conventionally speaking) many experts say the cause is ‘a combination of physical and sleep environmental factors,’ others blame this tragic event on the toxicity of vaccines.

The peak age for SIDS occurs at a time when infants are undergoing many vaccinations, giving rise to concerns that vaccines and SIDS may be linked. Of course – citing many studies – government health agencies deny this connection. But, there are still heartbreaking accounts that exist of SIDS occurring within hours or days of a vaccination.

As the controversy continues: cardiologist Thomas Levy, MD, JD points to vitamin C as a natural intervention that could potentially protect our children from a vaccine injury or premature death.

Medical doctor says: SIDS is linked to acute infantile scurvy
SIDS, the leading cause of mortality in infants between one month and one year old, claims the lives of 2,300 infants in the United States every year.

Western medicine is at a loss to explain SIDS, but points the finger at a variety of possible factors – including respiratory infections, brain defects, low birth weight, bed-sharing, and babies sleeping on their stomachs or sides.

However, the late Australian physician Dr. Archie Kalokerinos postulated the theory that the primary culprit in SIDS is severe vitamin C deficiency – or acute scurvy.

Determined to reduce the rate of SIDS among Aboriginal people (which was a shocking 50 percent in the 1950s and 1960s) Dr. Kalokerinos noted that almost all of the victims were severely deficient in vitamin C. After supplementing with vitamin C, or ascorbic acid, he reported that the incidence of SIDS fell to zero.

Vitamin C corrects depletion caused by vaccine administration
Dr. Kalokerinos noted that many of the infants had died immediately after being vaccinated, and that almost all were so low in vitamin C that only trace amounts of the nutrient could be detected. He declared that this was due to the fact that the body needs extra vitamin C in order to counter the toxic effects of vaccines.

Massive amounts of vitamin C are utilized during times of sickness, injury, and other forms of immune system stress. As vaccines force a hyper-immune response, Dr. Kalokerinos reasoned that they create a similar demand for vitamin C.

Whereas vitamin C deficiencies put infants at risk of developmental problems and even death, prenatal supplementation with vitamin C helps prevent the onset of SIDS.

In addition to poor diet, the use of infant formulas can contribute to low levels of vitamin C. Saying there is “no acceptable substitute for breastfeeding,” Dr. Kolakerinos points out formula lacks the essential vitamins and minerals found in human breast milk – and increases the likelihood of childhood health catastrophes.

(Note: although Western medicine tends to not embrace some of Dr. Kalokerino’s findings, they do agree with him on this point. Mayo Clinic advises breastfeeding for the first six months to lower the risk of SIDS.)

Dr. Levy weighs in: Vitamin C can prevent vaccine harms
In an article published in Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, board-certified cardiologist and high-dose vitamin C advocate, Dr. Thomas Levy endorses vitamin C as an effective antidote to adverse effects from vaccines.

Referencing Dr. Kalokerino’s work, Dr. Levy noted that deaths rates from SIDS fell dramatically when the infants were dosed with vitamin C before and after vaccination.

Dr. Levy reports that vitamin C helps to neutralize and detoxify mercury – a neurotoxin used in the vaccine preservative thimerosol. Animal studies have shown that vitamin C can counteract even lethal dosages of the most toxic organic forms of mercury – including mercury chloride.

Another benefit of high-dose vitamin C before and after immunizations is that it stimulates production of antibodies, thereby making the vaccine more effective.

Although Dr. Levy advises high-dosage vitamin C before and after vaccinations, even a one-time dosage of vitamin C – given before the injections – can still have a significant toxin-neutralizing and antibody-stimulating effect.

The takeaway is obvious: there is no (good) reason not to give vitamin C in order to restore depleted levels, and to protect against SIDS and toxic effects from vaccines.

Vitamin C, arguably the most non-toxic nutrient on the planet, not only protects against toxins and oxidative damage, but also stimulates antibody production – the whole point, Dr. Levy comments, of vaccines.

Check out the video (below) from World Mercury Project, an organization that works to raise public awareness of the dangers and sources of mercury.
noTBCFJdBs4

CDC: “Nothing to see here” on vaccines and SIDS (go back to sleep)
Naturally, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continue to insist that there is no connection between vaccines and SIDS – and to maintain that immunization actually lowers the risk.

And the agency has a pat on the back for medical associations and governmental authorities, saying that the declining rate in SIDS comes from a 1992 recommendation from the American Academy of Pediatrics that babies be placed on their backs to sleep – and a 1994 campaign by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to publicize it.

Obviously, many natural health experts and integrative healers beg to differ with the CDC. But, says Dr. Levy, amidst all the controversy, there is one virtual certainty. Giving vitamin C before and after vaccinations for infants and children can only protect them.

Sources for this article include:

MayoClinic.org
HealthWyze.org
Orthomolecular.org
CDC.gov

Hym

25th February 2018, 19:44

Thanks Onawah for all of the research and comments on this long-lived thread.

Common sense would say give those babies Vitamin C instead of the vaccine.

Large mercury molecules in the very small capillaries of infants creates a tremendous immune response. Coupled with the forced pseudo-immunization protocol that combines a large number of toxic immuno-stimulants and unnecessary adjuvants (additives, preservatives), attacking the immune systems over such a short period of time with no rest time in between separate attacking pathogens, it can be expected that autism itself, in it's wide array of disorders, is a probable outcome. Remember that in some instances death itself is an immune response from a system overwhelmed by chemical attack.

Also take into account that ethics are antithetical to the treatments, products and protocols imbedded within many of the "accredited" teaching institutions and the corporate monsters that dominate much of modern medicine. Can anyone imagine teaching the use of so many pharmaceuticals while at the same time teaching the necessary human ethics that would naturally question the immune response of the use of those same compounds? The bottom line of most corporate medical models is the repression and control of curative methods, beginning at the level of the intern and enlivened by the deeply systematic practice of creating a continuing customer/victim base to purchase it's wares. Snake oil salesmen indeed. There is no oil that treats the bite of a snake oil salesman, hidden under a doctor's robe or a corporate logo, but knowledge and the tenacity to be treated honestly.

Lost in much of institutional medicine is the power of the immune system to respond and react positively to very small amounts of external stimuli, as well represented by the use of homeopathy in proving that effective treatment improves the more it is based on that subtle interaction of the all the parts human, interconnected and communicating with each other. It is the nature of the human system to grow into the power of subtlety as it's culmination, it's continuation not it's end, in going back to the source of it's life here, lessons learned, shared and taught within the Oneness that bodily separation strives to end.

onawah

1st March 2018, 03:59

Childhood Cancers, Autism and Environmental Toxins
By the World Mercury Project Team
2/28/18
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/childhood-cancers-autism-environmental-toxins/?utm_source=mailchimp
(There is a chart at the link which I was unable to paste here that shows which vaccines contain:
(inactivating ingredient) Polysorbate 80
(surfactant) Aluminum
(adjuvant) Thimerosal (preservative)
...but you can see the chart at the link https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/childhood-cancers-autism-environmental-toxins/?utm_source=mailchimp )

The incidence of childhood cancers has been steadily rising for several decades, to such an extent that cancers in young people now have their very own day in the limelight: International Childhood Cancer Day (February 15). For American children ages one through 14, cancer is the top disease-related cause of death, second only to accidents among all causes of childhood mortality. Leukemia and malignancies of the central nervous system are the most common types of childhood cancers.

A recent opinion piece in The Hill points out that autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) have increased in lockstep with pediatric cancers. One in thirty-six (2.76%) children aged three-17 had an ASD diagnosis as of 2016, compared to one in 10,000 children in the 1970s. The parallel rise in the two conditions is not a fluke—environmental toxins are widely known to “initiate or aggravate various neurological disorders [and] carcinomas.” Although the National Cancer Institute (NCI) views environmental causes of childhood cancers as “difficult to identify,” one route of exposure to heavy metals and other toxic substances that begins prenatally and continues through adolescence is sitting in plain sight: the bloated U.S. vaccine schedule.

How autism and cancer overlap
The Hill commentary points readers to a 2017 article published by Harvard researchers in Medical Hypotheses that spells out numerous commonalities between ASD and cancer. Drawing on the disparate fields of genetics, bioinformatics and epidemiology, the Harvard authors describe autism and cancer as conditions that, on the surface, display quite different “deviations in development and function,” but at a deeper level, these differences derive from overlapping genes and pathways.

In support of this position, they note that a “remarkable” number of genes are associated with both ASD and cancer, and many of the cancer-associated genes also play key roles in neural development. In addition, autism and cancer share common signaling pathways involved in mitochondrial function and metabolic modulation. Mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic problems are features of cancer, ASD and other neurodegenerative diseases. In addition, ASD researchers have noticed how mitochondrial dysfunction frequently is present in conjunction with a toxic metal burden, and other investigators have demonstrated mercury– and aluminum-related mitochondrial toxicity in connection with various neuropathologies. There is also evidence linking heavy metal exposure to metabolic disorders.

…investigators have demonstrated mercury – and aluminum-related mitochondrial toxicity in connection with various neuropathologies.
How vaccines tie in
In 2010, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims handed down a landmark decision that conceded a clear association between autism, mitochondrial dysfunction and vaccines. The Court awarded the petitioning family compensation after concurring that vaccines against nine diseases administered in a single doctor’s visit had exacerbated an undetected mitochondrial disorder in an 18-month-old, resulting in autism.

Many of the vaccines in question (and still in use) contain carcinogenic and neurotoxic ingredients, such as formaldehyde (carcinogenic in humans), polysorbate 80 (a possible carcinogen based on animal data) and aluminum adjuvants (linked to numerous neurological diseases) (see table). Injected aluminum is particularly prone to accumulating in the brain and other organs, where it can remain for years. Likewise, injected thimerosal (about half of which is ethylmercury) moves rapidly into the organs and has a half-life spanning years or even decades. Although thimerosal is only present as an explicit ingredient in a few U.S. vaccines, its inclusion in the vaccine manufacturing process also leaves residual mercury in some vaccines. Outside of Europe and the U.S., thimerosal-containing vaccines are still the norm.Monosodium glutamate (MSG) and other forms of excitotoxic glutamate are another far-from-reassuring vaccine ingredient, present in some influenza vaccines as well as in measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and varicella vaccines. Neonatal exposure to MSG has the potential to modify blood-brain barrier permeability. Glutaraldehyde (included in DTaP and Tdap vaccines) is a chemical disinfectant that also has industrial applications as a tanning agent, a component of embalming solutions, a cosmetics preservative and a paper industry “slimicide.”

Vaccine manufacturers disclose all of the just-described ingredients. However, Italian researchers have discovered that vaccines also are almost universally contaminated with metal debris and biological contaminants not declared in the package inserts. Many of these contaminants are nanosized. In light of these findings, it is disturbing that vaccine scientists are gung-ho about expanding use of still largely untested nanotechnologies to develop nanovaccines. Many existing vaccines also use recombinant DNA technology to genetically modify vaccine components, with more of these non-traditional vaccines in the pipeline.

Italian researchers have discovered that vaccines also are almost universally contaminated with metal debris and biological contaminants not declared in the package inserts.
Researchers agree that viruses and infections or immune responses to infections represent triggers for childhood leukemia and other childhood cancers. Likewise, “uncommon” viral infections “have been conclusively linked to autism causation.” Given that next-generation vaccines, in particular, genetically engineer their bacterial and viral components and use ever-more-powerful adjuvants, one would expect intense scrutiny to assess the potential cancer and other health risks of these newer technologies. Instead, entities with a vested interest in the status quo continue to ensure that vaccines get a free pass.

onawah

1st March 2018, 16:22

Some great vaccine related posts here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?101912-Another-missing-doctor-and-this-time-vaccines-are-involved&p=1211095&viewfull=1#post1211095

Rebecca

2nd March 2018, 05:28

My son who is about 2 1/2 years old has never been vaccinated. He's sick now and never has needed drugs or over the counter medicines.

He gets treatments like:

Ginger in his smoothies, chopped organic onions in his socks, lots of vitamin C (from oranges, lemon, kale and other greens), peppermint tea... all plants nothing artificial. He's been sick 3 times in his life and so far this has been working out

onawah

4th March 2018, 20:48

Australian anti-vaxxers provide new model for the world 3/4/18
by Jon Rappoport
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/03/04/australian-anti-vaxxers-provide-new-model-for-the-world/

Out of the ashes of government tyranny comes a solution.

In the Australian state of Queensland, childcare facilities can refuse to allow unvaccinated children to attend, so…

Parents there have formed their own community, which has already grown to 800 members. As ABC (Australia) reports:

“Sunshine Coast vaccine refuser and leader of the Natural Immunity Community, Allona Lahn, said her anti-vaccine network had grown to 800 members and was becoming stronger since the regulations were introduced.”

“’Out of sheer necessity we’ve created a community base to support families — we’ve had no choice other than to start our own social services’.”

“Ms Lahn said the network with like-minded families included their own childcare, schools and health services away from the mainstream.”

“’We organise group childcare arrangements and we’re now devising our own combined homeschooling system,’ she said.”

“’We use health practitioners within the anti-vaccine networks around Australia and ‘anti-vaccination-friendly’ doctors in the community’.”

“Ms Lahn said network members were turning away from mainstream health services because they faced intimidation and coercion.”

This is decentralization par excellence.

If like-minded parents in other countries take notice and launch their own communities, who knows how strong this movement could become?

Islands of resistance—but more than that. New answers, new strategies, new victories. And ongoing proof that parents can raise healthy children without vaccinations.

That proof is the dagger to the incessant lies about vaccines being absolutely necessary. Mainstream media promote those lies day and night—but the truth is, parents can and do raise unvaccinated children with strong immune systems, which is the natural defense against harm from disease.

The medical establishment has done NO proper, long-term studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children’s health outcomes. And the real reason is: they don’t want to face the results of such studies. They rightly fear the facts that would emerge.

I’m sure Allona Lahn, the leader of the Queensland network, doesn’t think of herself as a hero. She’s just doing what she knows is right, and she and her compatriot parents are, above all, protecting their children from the well-established toxic effects of vaccines. But she is a hero.

Every aware parent should salute her.

Also see: Australia: jail young children without charges; they wouldn't do that; oh yes they would
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/10/16/australia-jail-young-children-without-charges-they-wouldnt-do-that-oh-yes-they-would/

Australia: refuse vaccination, lose $15,000
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/04/14/australia-refuse-vaccination-lose-15000/

Does the push for mass vaccination point toward a staged bioterror event?
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/12/04/does-the-push-for-mass-vaccination-point-toward-a-staged-bioterror-event/

onawah

7th March 2018, 02:27

Toxic Vaccine Ingredients: The Devil is in the Details
MARCH 06, 2018
By Deirdre Imus
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/toxic-vaccine-ingredients-the-devils-in-the-details/?utm_source=mailchimp

Toxins surround us in many forms, but those found in vaccines are of increasing concern among parents, and rightfully so. As the World Mercury Project continues to advocate for transparency and sound science in our nation’s vaccine program, it’s important to note that mercury, still found in some flu shots and other vaccines, isn’t the only substance standing in the way of a safer vaccination schedule. Other dangerous substances abound in the vaccines that our government agencies continue to insist are safe. No one challenges parents for researching the safest car seats, cribs, or infant carriers for their children. The same should hold true when parents want to be fully informed about what makes up the vaccines intended for their children.

Beyond the mercury-based preservative thimerosal, a known neurotoxin that has been linked to many serious health conditions including autism, vaccines are rife with other often questionable components, such as:

Aluminum
Antibiotics
Egg protein
Formaldehyde
Monosodium glutamate (MSG)
Squalene
Gelatin
Polysorbate 80
Aborted human fetal tissue

…no studies have been done to determine potential synergistic effects of multiple vaccine ingredients given in combination.
An extensive list of all ingredients in all vaccines can be found here, but it’s important to highlight (or lowlight, if you will) what some of the most potent components actually are, and what impact they may have on the health of our children.

Thimerosal

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) claims thimerosal was removed from childhood vaccines as a precautionary measure in 2001, but the last batches of routine childhood vaccines with thimerosal did not actually expire until January 2003. We were led to believe thimerosal was eliminated from all vaccines, but it wasn’t. It’s in some flu shots—including some given to infants and pregnant women—the tetanus toxoid vaccine (Tt), and meningococcal vaccines. More than 80 studies compiled by the World Mercury Project show that the health effects of human exposure to mercury include cognitive difficulties (such as autism), memory and vision loss, coordination issues, tremors, skin rashes and mood instability. Mercury is a known neurotoxin, yet it’s still injected into people of all ages with alarming regularity.

Aluminum

The CDC explains that aluminum gels or salts are added as adjuvants to help the vaccine stimulate a better immune response, i.e. be more effective. Without aluminum, more doses of a vaccine might be required to provide adequate protection, according to the AAP. Aluminum is a toxic metal, and one to which we are already routinely exposed through food, air, and water, given its natural occurrence in the earth’s crust. While most in mainstream medicine insist it poses no problems, many independent researchers are suspicious of aluminum’s supposed safety. The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), a nonprofit founded in 1982 to prevent vaccine injuries and deaths through public education, highlights on its website the shocking lack of scientific evidence that injected aluminum is safe. And parents need to be aware that the amount of aluminum babies and young children are exposed to via vaccines has risen substantially in recent years. According to medical research journalist Neil Z. Miller, “Vaccines containing aluminum were added to the childhood immunization schedule when some vaccines containing mercury were removed. Prior to the mercury phase-out (pre-2000), babies received 3,925 mcg of aluminum by 18 months of age. After pneumococcal and hepatitis A vaccines were added to the schedule, babies began receiving 4,925 mcg of aluminum during the same age period—a 25% increase.”

Antibiotics

The antibiotics added to vaccines are there to prevent the growth of germs during production and storage of the vaccine. There has been much debate lately over the risks of exposing children to antibiotics too early in life. One recent study in particular found that multiple antibiotic use in early childhood may lead to weight gain, increased bone growth, and altered gut bacteria.

Egg Protein

Flu vaccines are most commonly made using an egg-based manufacturing process, which is used to make both the inactivated vaccine (the flu shot) and the live attenuated vaccine (usually called the “nasal spray”), according to the CDC. The yellow fever vaccine is also made this way, putting anyone with an egg allergy at risk if they receive either of these vaccinations, regardless of how low the level of actual egg protein is.

Formaldehyde

Formaldehyde is added to vaccines to kill unwanted bacteria and viruses that might contaminate the vaccine during production. The CDC insists most formaldehyde is removed from the vaccine before it is packaged, which is just another way of saying that all of it is not removed. Formaldehyde is a human carcinogen according to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Monosodium Glutamate (MSG)

More commonly known as a food additive, MSG is also used as a stabilizer to help vaccines remain unchanged when exposed to heat, light, acidity or humidity, according to the CDC. MSG consumption is notorious for causing headaches in some people. It can also cause fatigue, disorientation and heart palpitation, per the Mayo Clinic. MSG has been called an “excitotoxin,” which is a term used to describe a class of chemicals (usually amino acids) that over-stimulate neuron receptors in the brain, causing them to die.

Squalene

The World Health Organization (WHO) describes squalene as “a component of some adjuvants that is added to vaccines to enhance the immune response.” It’s a naturally-occurring substance derived primarily from shark liver oil, found in foods, cosmetics, over-the-counter medications, and supplements. When combined with other ingredients it becomes an adjuvant, which, like aluminum, is added to vaccines to elicit a stronger immune response from the body. The WHO notes that most people who have received squalene-containing vaccines are in older age groups, and that we don’t really know how this component might impact younger people. A 2000 study found that a single injection of squalene adjuvant produced arthritis in rats, and, although more research is needed, many believe squalene-containing anthrax vaccine to be the main culprit in triggering Gulf War Syndrome among American troops who served in the Persian Gulf War in the early 1990s.

Gelatin

This commonly used vaccine ingredient is made by boiling skin or connective tissue, typically from a pig. Gelatin is used as a stabilizer to protect the viruses in vaccines from adverse conditions. It is a concerning additive because some people have gelatin allergies, and receiving a vaccine with gelatin can provoke an allergic response, possibly even triggering anaphylaxis. Depending on its source, gelatin may also be a religious concern for Jews and Muslims.

Polysorbate 80

The HPV vaccine is administered mainly to teenagers to protect against the human papilloma virus (HPV), which has been strongly linked to cervical cancer, anal cancer, and even some mouth cancers. This vaccine and a few others contain a stabilizer known as polysorbate 80, an emulsifier used in some foods and cosmetics. While there have been reports of the HPV vaccine causing premature ovarian failure in girls, research is needed to determine if there is a link between this phenomenon and polysorbate 80 and/or other HPV vaccine ingredients such as aluminum. The safety of using this chemical in vaccines has been poorly studied, and according to the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for Polysorbate 80, it may cause adverse reproductive effects and cancer based on animal testing data. The MSDS also indicates that no safety testing has been done in humans.

Aborted Human Fetal Tissue

A number of vaccines—including varicella, rubella, hepatitis A, shingles, and rabies—are made using fetal embryo cells, and have been for decades. The reason given is that the viruses tend to grow better in these cells, and fetal cells can divide for a long time before dying. However, the use of actual human fetal cells poses the question of how the fetal DNA will interact with the virus and, eventually, the human into which it is injected. It remains unclear what kind of dangerous immune response this has been provoking, but according to the Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, a biomedical research organization, there have been distinct spikes in autism rates in the years when vaccines grown in human fetal cells were introduced. In my opinion, the moral implications here are huge.

As troubling as each of one these chemicals may be in its own right, parents need to also keep in mind that no studies have been done to determine potential synergistic effects of multiple vaccine ingredients given in combination. Safety concerns are further compounded when considering that infants and young children commonly receive multiple vaccines during the same office visit. Amid relentless claims by drug companies and conflict-ridden health agencies that vaccines are “safe and effective” (despite the fact than nearly $4 billion has been paid out by taxpayers to victims of vaccine injury) parents are wise to do their own research before making decisions about vaccines for their kids—and to understand that where there’s risk, there must be choice.

WMP NOTE: In Part 2 of Toxic Vaccine Ingredients, World Mercury Project will examine vaccine contaminants such as animal viruses, glyphosate and more.

Deirdre Imus is a New York Times bestselling author.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project
https://worldmercuryproject.org/

onawah

9th March 2018, 17:18

MUST READ!!The Third Digital Revolution to Unleash the Power of Anti-Censorship
MARCH 07, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/the-third-digital-revolution-to-unleash-the-power-of-anti-censorship/?utm_source=mailchimp
By James Grundvig

Last week, the Italian police raided the home and science laboratory of Drs. Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari. The police snatched all of the digital assets owned by the husband and wife team of nanopathologists, grabbing laptops, computers, and flash-drives—and with it, years of work and research.

Because Gatti and Montanari had taken their research of nanodust and nanoparticles, from in-vivo (performed in a living organism) and in-vitro (performed in a test tube) to what unseen contamination might reside in vaccines in 2016, they came under the microscope of the United States, European, and Italian authorities. They had touched the third rail of medicine. They had crossed the no-go zone with the purported crime being scientific research and discovery. By finding nano-contamination in random vaccines, Gatti and Montanari revealed, for the first time, what no one knew: Vaccines had more than aluminum salts adjuvants, Polysorbate-80, and other inorganic chemicals in them, they also harbored stainless steel, tungsten, copper, and other metals and rare elements that don’t belong in shots given to fetuses, pregnant women, newborns, babies and toddlers developing their lungs, immune and nervous systems.
http://https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/03-07-Capture.jpg
When the scientists published their findings in January 2017, New Quality‐Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro‐ and Nanocontamination, the logical next step for the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) should have been to open an investigation into their claims, hire independent scientists to run their own lab tests to confirm or refute the findings. If confirmed, then the healthcare agencies would enact new policies on safety of the vaccine supply chain, and enforce strict quality control and quality assurance programs.

But none of that happened. A year went by. It was cheaper for the authorities to attack the Italian scientists than upset the vaccine gravy train that supports the politicians.

Safety improvements are what ultimately happened to the motor vehicle and tobacco industries. But none of that has taken place with vaccine safety. Why? The so-called gatekeepers of healthcare are in bed with Big Pharma and mainstream media—which Pharma owns through its powerful advertising purchases—and vaccines have become a taboo subject. The media simply won’t investigate any negative vaccine stories.

Today, debating vaccines in public is frowned upon and demonized. Add to that the failure to inform the consumer of the 2018 censorship by algorithm in Silicon Valley from Facebook, Twitter, and Google/YouTube and the next bulwark that consumers, concerned doctors and scientists have to overcome in sharing information and scientific data is firmly in place.

Pile on the opioid crisis and millions of children overmedicated, and the death of logic is unabridged.

What can be done to bring transparency to the murky world of Big Pharma medicine and vaccine manufacturing, with government agencies failing to address real concerns and social media deleting free speech and public discourse?

The answer: Blockchain technology.

Blockchain Born out of Crisis
In the fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, trust between consumers and the big banks and the federal government was broken. Satoshi Nakamoto published a nine-page brief, Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, (https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf), that challenged the century-old policies of the Federal Reserve and central banks plying people and businesses with debt like a cheap drink.

Bitcoin, along with other cryptocurrencies, is upending the old way of big banks conducting business.

The underlying technology of Bitcoin is blockchain—a distributed public ledger of peer-to-peer transactions. Coming into its own as the Web 3.0, blockchain will transform every business process and sector in the Digital Age. It’s efficient in that it will eliminate the middleman, from fine art and diamonds, to purchasing houses and motor vehicles.

Like bitcoin, the democratization and decentralization of data by blockchain will empower consumers and small to medium size businesses to bypass the gatekeepers of an industry, government agency, central bank, corporation or social media platform. They will no longer hold exclusive control on data and information. Transparency is king. Everyone will reap the costs and time savings of radical efficiency. (Learn more about the blockchain by listening to Andreas Antonopoulos on Understanding The Blockchain.)

Blockchain Projects for Healthcare
Today, there are several health projects launched on the blockchain. They are industry-driven, from insurance and healthcare providers, yet are not drilling down to individuals. Why do hospitals, doctors, and dentists hold their patients’ healthcare records in separate databases, but not the people who generate that information?

A Google offshoot, Gem, announced last fall that it was working with the CDC and the Norwegian enterprise software company Tieto in building a blockchain-based platform for healthcare in the U.S. In attending a blockchain conference last fall in Dublin, I listened to a presentation on a blockchain project of “informed consent” that Tieto was building for the European Commission. When I asked the speaker if the “informed consent” platform would be the same project being built in the U.S. with the CDC, he flatly said, “No. It is a different platform.”

Not trusting the CDC, for its deliberate cover-up of the Agent Orange studies in the 1980s and hiring of mercenary scientists to cook vaccine safety data, it’s time for individuals to stand up and create their own blockchain projects, free from government interference, free from medical institutions beholden to Big Pharma, and free from the mainstream and social media’s censorship practices.

Blockchain Use Cases in Science
After being shell-shocked by the Mussolini-like dictatorship—a declining “flawed democracy” according to The Economist Democracy Index 2017: Free Speech Under Attack report —Dr. Antonietta Gatti responded to an email conversation, and agreed that “distributed ledger of the blockchain is needed in the healthcare industry.”

The blockchain use case for scientists like Gatti and Montanari in the future would be to keep their critical digital assets in an outside digital vault so that the next time scientists are raided by the police, their lifetime of work wouldn’t be lost…
Other blockchain use cases would trace the origins of vaccines from raw materials, such as the incubation of eggs and media that viruses are grown on, to every step in the manufacturing process and supply chain down to the local doctor’s office or pharmacist, who administers the inoculation.

Perhaps the biggest blockchain use case would be for individuals, while maintaining their privacy, to upload adverse reactions to vaccines and medicines, including follow ups and treatments for their injuries. That blockchain project would fill a massive void in the absence of such data, since more than 90 percent of doctors and hospitals don’t enter that information even when it’s reported.

The revolution isn’t confined to banking. Blockchain will transform how people collect, track, and share their health data around the globe. And that will frighten the healthcare gatekeepers, showing they are no longer the sole arbiters of their personal information.

James Grundvig is an author, investigative journalist, and COO and founder of a blockchain startup Myntum Ltd., based in Dublin, Ireland. As an author, his debut book Master Manipulator: The Explosive True Story of Fraud and Embezzlement at the CDC, breaks open the Poul Thorsen circle of corruption.

© 02.26.18 GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfoLLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here http://www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter”

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/

onawah

9th March 2018, 19:12

Incentivizing Pediatricians to Follow the CDC Vaccine Schedule
MARCH 08, 2018
By the World Mercury Project Team
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/incentivizing-pediatricians-to-be-vaccine-bullies/?utm_source=mailchimp

Most American families use pediatricians—rather than generalist family doctors—as their frontline children’s health care provider. With the backing of its trade organization, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the field of pediatrics has been booming for some years, ensuring current and future demand for the many doctors-in-training who are choosing pediatrics as their specialty. Pediatricians’ average annual salary (roughly $200,000) may not be competitive with some of the more specialized medical domains, but pediatrics appears to offer high career satisfaction and inducements such as flexibility and part-time work opportunities.

In addition, the 11 well-child visits recommended by the AAP over a child’s first 30 months (with annual visits thereafter through age 21) ensure a steady stream of repeat customers and revenue for pediatricians. In accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) vaccine schedule, pediatric practices are expected to administer vaccines (often as many as six at a time) at about half of well-child visits through the adolescent years, making vaccination a foundational bread-and-butter component of pediatricians’ job description. The one problem with this rosy pediatric picture is that some parents do not want to go passively along for the ride.

Rather than recognize the validity of parents’ safety concerns or admit to their own ambivalence about some of the newer vaccines, many pediatricians—nearly two in five according to some estimates—choose to boot uncooperative families out of their practice.
Partners or adversaries?
It is quite common for pediatricians (and family doctors) to encounter parents who refuse one or more infant vaccines, most often due to safety concerns. These concerns also mean that pediatricians frequently get requests to modify or delay the vaccine schedule—nearly three-fifths (58%) of pediatricians reported such requests in a 2014 AAP survey. One-size-fits-all vaccine proponents argue that families who question any aspect of the CDC party line are confronting pediatricians with an “alarmingly untenable dilemma” between either “continu[ing] to provide substandard care by foregoing many or most of the infant’s highly recommended protective vaccines” or “dismiss[ing] from the practice the family who refuses vaccines.” Rather than recognize the validity of parents’ safety concerns or admit to their own ambivalence about some of the newer vaccines, many pediatricians—nearly two in five according to some estimates—choose to boot uncooperative families out of their practice.

A recent Medscape survey indicates that one of the main things that pediatricians dislike about their job is “dealing with difficult patients.” However, when pediatricians dismiss families whose only crime is the desire to make informed and individualized health care decisions on behalf of their children, the doctors are doing more than just unprofessionally dumping “difficult” patients—they also are protecting their bottom line. Increasingly, insurers and provider organizations are collaborating in a “value-based” approach whereby insurers give bonus payments to doctors and other providers who achieve specified quality of care targets.

A widely reported example of this type of pay-for-performance model is the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan “Performance Recognition Program,” which uses “meaningful” payments to reward Blue Care Network (BCN) health maintenance organization (HMO) providers “who encourage their patients to get preventive screenings and procedures.” For vaccination, providers receive $400 for each eligible two-year-old who has received all 24-25 vaccines shown below, but only if the provider manages to administer each and every shot to at least 63% of his or her patients. Thus, there is a formidable incentive not to let any patients slip through the cracks.

https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/03-08-Capture-2.jpg
Dr. Bob Sears confirms that HMO plans use incentive practices, conducting year-end chart reviews and awarding large bonuses to pediatric practices that score well. Dr. Sears explains:

“This bonus varies depending on the number of patients the doctor sees. One of the requirements for a patient’s chart to pass the test is that they are fully vaccinated. […] Such incentives…end up forcing a doctor to consider the financial implications of accepting patients who even just want to opt out of one vaccine. …Maybe a few such families wouldn’t make them fail the chart reviews, but if they have too many, there goes their year-end bonus.”

Under a watchful eye
For some vaccines especially, such as the preadolescent vaccine for human papillomavirus (HPV), researchers have attributed “suboptimal” vaccination rates to “inadequate physician adherence to guidelines.” However, because insurer-provider contracts rely on extensive reporting and sharing of medical and clinical information (including immunization data), participating physicians increasingly may be subjected to a unique form of social comparison. As insurers and practices publish data openly showing “how the care…each [physician] give[s] to kids compares with the care given by their peers,” no one will want to be the pediatrician who stands out.

The AAP has long recommended repeatedly measuring practice-wide vaccination rates as a strategy to improve pediatricians’ “effectiveness” in garnering vaccine acceptance. Researchers who ponder policy responses to the problem of “vaccine refusal” argue that insurance payment incentives aimed at health care providers are a legitimate and valuable policy tool in this regard. Ultimately, these subtle and not-so-subtle financial incentives and social pressures are likely to maintain widespread adherence by pediatricians to the vaccine schedule—even in instances where contraindications are present. Although pediatricians have a legal duty to fully inform patients about vaccine risks and side effects, the lure of monetary perks and the desire to fit in may lessen their motivation to do so.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/

Flash

11th March 2018, 14:52

Here in this video (thanks to Joe here ) and in this MP3 (thaniks to ) you find the synergie for causing autism between glycophase (round up) and vaccines (aluminum and other metals)

The video is more comprehensible for the layman

The MP3 is extremely interesting for the more scientifically inclined.

THOSE ARE A MUST LISTEN, ABSOLUTE MUST LISTEN FOR ALL HUMANS ON THE PLANET.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYC6oyBglZI

https://media.sott.net/srn/20180309hws-interview-with-brilliant-researcher-dr-stephanie-seneff.mp3

onawah

13th March 2018, 19:48

HEROIC presentation to Congress from RFKennedy Jr.!!
Congress Receives Vaccine Safety Project Details Including Actions Needed for Sound Science and Transparency
MARCH 13, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/congress-gets-vaccine-safety-project-details-including-actions-needed-for-sound-science-and-transparency/?utm_source=mailchimp
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/number-of-vaccines-vs-chronic-illness-prevalence.png

World Mercury Project Note: Last week, 15 dedicated children’s health and medical choice advocates joined Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on Capitol Hill to fulfill our promise to the community to provide crucial vaccine safety information to every member of Congress. Meetings with Congressional Members, Senators, and staff took place over a four-day time period to explain WMP’s six-step Vaccine Safety Project that details the actions necessary to introduce sound science and transparency to our vaccination program. Federally elected officials can no longer ignore the chronic health conditions—tied in no small part to adverse vaccine reactions—that currently affect over half of our nation’s children. Not only are these officials now aware of the conflicts of interest and inadequate science upon which the vaccine program is built, but they have been given a common-sense plan for enacting desperately needed changes that puts children’s health first.

By the World Mercury Project Team
The long-term health effects of our vaccine program are inadequately studied and our regulatory bodies are conflicted. Childhood health epidemics have mushroomed along with the childhood vaccine schedule.

Vaccines contain many ingredients, some of which are known to be neurotoxic, carcinogenic and cause autoimmunity. Vaccines injuries can and do happen. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program of Health and Human Services (HHS) has awarded almost $4 billion for vaccine injuries since 1988.

Common sense dictates that these actions must be taken:

Subject vaccines to a scientifically rigorous approval process.
Require reporting of vaccine adverse events. Automate Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) databases for research.
Ensure all parties involved with federal vaccine approvals and recommendations are free from conflicts of interest.
Reevaluate all vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) prior to the adoption of evidence-based guidelines.
Study what makes some individuals more susceptible to vaccine injury.
Support fully-informed consent and individual rights to refuse vaccination.
The Six Steps to Vaccine Safety
The details regarding each of the six steps to vaccine safety were discussed with members of Congress, Senators and staff to help them understand why they must act now to stop the childhood epidemics.

#1: Subject vaccines to a scientifically rigorous approval.
Vaccines are regulated by the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) division as “biologics” and are not always put through the same level of safety testing as new pharmaceuticals, which are regulated under the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER.)
Vaccines, which are given to healthy patients, should be tested more rigorously than drugs because they are not given to treat an existing disease.
Inadequate testing currently ensures that the true risk/benefit assessments for the safety and cost of vaccines are impossible to calculate accurately.
These vaccines are given to about 4 million American infants annually.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/03-13-VSP-Chart-1.jpg
#2: Require reporting of vaccine adverse events. Automate Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) databases for research.
Reporting and study of adverse events after receipt of vaccines is currently haphazard and antiquated. Since these two databases are the primary sources of U.S. post-licensure surveillance, serious side effects of vaccination that were unclear or not seen in clinical trials will be missed.

The VAERS is the online system into which doctors and patients report adverse events after vaccination. HHS admits that the system likely records only about 1% of the actual adverse events but even after a three-year HHS/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) study showed the feasibility of automating reports using electronic medical records, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has been non-responsive to “multiple requests to proceed with testing and evaluation.”

Clinical trials for vaccines typically only enroll a few thousand patients in total. When vaccines are subsequently approved for use in populations of millions of healthy individuals, it is imperative that rates of known adverse events and any new or rare adverse events are monitored.
Without adequate safety follow-up, serious side effects may be missed entirely putting the public at risk (examples of the past importance of safety follow-up include hormone replacement therapy, Vioxx and amphetamines).
There has never been a comparative study of broad health outcomes in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated populations.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) requires healthcare providers to report:

Any adverse event listed by the vaccine manufacturer as a contraindication to further doses of the vaccine; or
Any adverse event listed in the VAERS Table of Reportable Events Following Vaccination that occurs within the specified time period after vaccination.
But, in practice, this doesn’t happen. There is no consequence for failing to report an injury. There is no mechanism for prosecution of non-compliance and, therefore, no incentive for a busy doctor to report vaccine safety problems.

The VSD is a collaborative project between CDC’s Immunization Safety Office and eight private health care organizations. The VSD was started in 1990 to monitor safety of vaccines and conduct studies about rare and serious adverse events following immunization. However, research is currently hampered by lack of broad access to this publicly-funded database, variability of reporting and the statistical structure of the database.

#3: Ensure all parties involved with federal vaccine approvals and recommendations are free from conflicts of interest.
FDA’s Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) is responsible for licensing vaccines. CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is responsible for adding vaccines to the recommended schedules.

CDC or NIH Employees whose names appear on vaccine patents can receive up to $150k in licensing fees per year (in perpetuity).
Regarding VRBAC, a House OGR Committee Report found that the “overwhelming majority of members, both voting members and consultants have substantial ties to the pharmaceutical industry,” and “committee members with substantial ties to pharmaceutical companies have been given waivers to participate in committee proceedings.”
A similar report on the ACIP found that, “The CDC grants blanket waivers to the ACIP members each year that allow them to deliberate on any subject, regardless of their conflicts, for the entire year.”
A 2009 HHS Office of the Inspector General report found that:

“CDC had a systemic lack of oversight of the ethics program.”
97 percent of committee members’ conflict disclosures had omissions.
58 percent had at least one unidentified potential conflict.
32 percent had at least one conflict that remained unresolved.
CDC continued to grant broad waivers to members with conflicts.
All vaccine regulatory agencies must rigorously enforce their ethics policies to ensure that our vaccine program is free from financial conflicts of interest.

#4 Reevaluate all vaccines recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) prior to the adoption of evidence-based guidelines.
A yes vote by ACIP results in:

Mandating the vaccine to millions of children.
Immunity from liability for the manufacturers.
Inclusion in the Vaccines for Children program.
However, prior to 2012, ACIP did not use evidence-based guidelines to evaluate their vaccine recommendations. Evidence Based Practice is “the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of the individual patient. It means integrating individual clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research.” The final ACIP guidelines published in November of 2013 outlined clearly, for the first time, a standardized plan to evaluate the quality and strength of the research behind each recommendation for a vaccine for each population. ACIP’s recommendations include the populations, timing, spacing, number of doses, boosters and appropriate ages for each vaccine to be administered.

The CDC’s infant schedule, given to approximately 4 million babies a year, was largely adopted before these guidelines were in place. Vaccines recommended before the adoption of evidence-based guidelines should not have been “grandfathered” in. Earlier ACIP recommendations should be thoroughly reviewed in light of the new guidelines and current research.

#5 Study what makes some individuals more susceptible to vaccine injury.
The Institute of Medicine (now National Academy of Medicine) has issued three disturbing reports on the evidence for suspected and/or reported vaccine adverse events.

For 80% of the suspected vaccine adverse conditions investigated, there wasn’t enough research evidence to accept or reject vaccine causation. Of the reviews with sufficient evidence, 72% found that the vaccine did likely cause the injury.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/03-13-VSP-Chart-2.jpg
In 2013, the IOM studied the entire Childhood Immunization Schedule and stated:

“No studies have compared the differences in health outcomes… between entirely unimmunized populations of children and fully immunized children… Furthermore, studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted.”
The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has paid out over $3.8 billion in compensation to victims of vaccine injury. The children and adults who have been compensated for injuries have never been studied to determine why they were injured, in an effort to make vaccines safer for everyone. Preventing vaccine injuries should be tackled as zealously as we tackle preventing infectious diseases.

Vaccine safety science, particularly long-term safety science, is inadequate to ensure children’s safety or to accurately assess risks for purposes of informed consent.

#6 Support fully-informed consent and individual rights to refuse vaccination.
The American Academy of Pediatrics statement on the ethics of informed consent includes the following stipulation, “patients should have explanations, in understandable language, of …; the existence and nature of the risks involved; and the existence, potential benefits, and risks of recommended alternative treatments (including the choice of no treatment).”

In the case of vaccination, informed consent is often ignored completely in real world settings.

By law, “all health care providers in the United States who administer, to any child or adult, any of the following vaccines – diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, measles, mumps, rubella, polio, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), influenza, pneumococcal conjugate, meningococcal, rotavirus, human papillomavirus (HPV), or varicella (chickenpox) – shall, prior to administration of each dose of the vaccine, provide a copy to keep of the relevant current edition vaccine information materials that have been produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to the parent or legal representative of any child to whom the provider intends to administer such vaccine, or to any adult to whom the provider intends to administer such vaccine.”

In practice, particularly when multiple vaccines are administered on the same day, many parents report that they received the Vaccine Information Sheet (VIS) as they left and there was no explanation of information before a vaccine was given. It is also rare that medical history is thoroughly discussed to identify contraindications to a vaccine. For example, a patient with a family history of autoimmunity is likely at increased risk for an autoimmune reaction after vaccination.

The following are examples of the types of information that patients may learn after the fact from the Vaccine Information Sheets:

“Severe events have very rarely been reported following MMR vaccination, and might also happen after MMRV. These include: Deafness, long-term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, brain damage.”
Or this from the Polio VIS and several others: “As with any medicine, there is a very remote chance of a vaccine causing a serious injury or death.”
Lack of informed consent encompasses vaccine advertising as well. While television drug ads disclose the side effect risks of that drug at length, vaccine advertising does not. The patient, again, is at a disadvantage.

World Mercury Project won’t stop until decisive action is taken.
Insistence on fully-informed consent and individual rights to refuse a vaccination become imperative given the lack of long-term follow-up and surveillance; only 1% adverse events are captured and reported; vaccine recommendations are tainted by financial conflicts of interest of regulators; the current childhood vaccine schedule was not approved using evidence-based science and policy; the childhood vaccine schedule has never been tested on fully vaccinated vs. unvaccinated; and there is sparse research into which patients are likely to experience an adverse event.

America is in the midst of many childhood epidemics. Over 50% of our children are chronically ill. We owe it to our children to examine what is happening to their health and correct it as soon as possible.

Watch this 8 minute trailer of RFK, Jr.’s Vaccine Safety Project video. The longer 45 minute version is accessible in the members-only section of the World Mercury Project website. A lifetime membership to WMP is only $10 which helps us achieve our goal of ending the childhood epidemics and working for families across the globe.

nXFNhcdO7RM
THE VACCINE SAFETY PROJECT
The Vaccine Safety Project addresses the most important issue of our lifetime because it involves the health and well-being of our children. With 54% of America’s children suffering from a chronic health condition, we don’t have a moment to waste.

World Mercury Project has released the above 8-minute excerpt from the longer 45-minute version of the Vaccine Safety Presentation.

On May 31st 2017, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. delivered the entire 45-minute presentation in person to National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director, Dr. Francis Collins. Also in the meeting were the Directors of these institutes: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute of Mental Health. They have all been alerted to the monumental problems affecting our children’s health.

We have also hand delivered this presentation and supporting materials to every member of Congress to help them understand the gravity of the facts presented. We won’t stop until decisive action is taken to meaningfully address the serious health issues affecting over half of our country’s children!

According to HHS’s own estimates, about six million people may suffer from a vaccine reaction each year. This is unacceptable. Neurotoxins don’t belong in vaccines. Our children deserve better.

Thank you!

The World Mercury Project Team

onawah

19th March 2018, 22:03

BOOM! – How to DESTROY a CORRUPT Vaccine Program…
Trump is doing it right now . . .
By Kent Heckenlively, JD
http://bolenreport.com/boom-destroy-corrupt-vaccine-program/

I’m going to talk about something many people may find boring – STRATEGY.

President Trump may be the best long-term strategist we have ever had in the White House . . . and it is clear to me he wants to DESTROY THE CHILDHOOD VACCINE PROGRAM WHICH HAS GENERATED UNTOLD SUFFERING TO A GENERATION OF CHILDREN AND THEIR PARENTS.

The other day I just happened to be surfing through the Code of Federal Regulations, when something caught my eye. (Yeah, I do that sometimes.)

Video Player

00:00
01:15

A new regulation which took effect on March 15, 2018 should have everybody in our community jumping up and down for joy.

The regulation is entitled Final Revised Vaccine Information Materials for Varicella Vaccine (Chickenpox). [Docket No. CDC-2016-0029]

I didn’t have any expectations when I started reading, other than a sense of impending dread. But very early on I realized this regulation was RADICALLY DIFFERENT.

In the summary section it read: “Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), CDC must develop vaccine information materials that all health care providers are required to give to patients/parents prior to administration of specific vaccines.”

Okay, since 99% of American parents don’t even know that something like the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act exists, much less the completely ineffective Vaccine Court, this sounded promising.

Further on in the document it detailed four requirements which must be contained in the vaccine information materials.
(1) A concise description of the benefits of the vaccine.

(2) A concise description of the risks of the vaccine.

(3) A statement of the availability of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and

(4) Such other relevant information as may be determined by the Secretary.

My mind started to explode at this moment. Every parent before every vaccine will be given an informational handout by their child’s pediatrician talking about the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program? I’m sure that will start the thinking process of many parents.

I explained this to my lovely wife, but she was unmoved.

“So a parent is going to get one of those forms with extremely small type?” she asked.

I printed out the new vaccine information sheet for the varicella vaccine. It was all there in easy-to-read twelve-point font.

“Chickenpox is usually mild, but it can be serious in infants under 12 months of age, adolescents, adults, pregnant women, and people with weakened immune systems.”

In what looked like 18 point font was the following warning:

“Some people should not get this vaccine”

Tell your vaccine provider if the person getting the vaccine:

Has any severe, life-threatening allergies. A person who has ever had a life-threatening allergic reaction after a dose of chickenpox vaccine, or has a severe allergy to any part of this vaccine, may be advised not to be vaccinated. Ask your health care provider if you want information about vaccine components.
Is pregnant, or thinks she might be pregnant. Pregnant women should wait to get chickenpox vaccine until after they are no longer pregnant. Women should avoid getting pregnant for at least 1 month after getting chickenpox vaccine.
Has a weakened immune system due to disease (such as cancer or HIV/AIDS) or medical treatments (such as radiation, immunotherapy, steroids, or chemotherapy).
Has a parent, brother, or sister with a history of immune system problems.
Is taking salicylates (such as asprin). People should avoid using salicylates for 6 weeks after getting varicella vaccine.
Has recently had a blood transfusion or received other blood products. You might be advised to postpone chickenpox vaccination for 3 months or more.
Has tuberculosis.
Has gotten any other vaccines in the past 4 weeks. Live vaccines given too close together might not work as well.
Is not feeling well. A mild illness, such as a cold, is usually not a reason to postpone a vaccination. Someone who is moderately or severely ill should probably wait. Your doctor can advise you.”
I believe Trump’s plan is to introduce instability into the vaccine program, protect the rights of those who might object (like parents and forward-thinking medical professionals) and then let a fair fight ensue.

Just briefly, let’s think of the ways a hypothetical patient or parent of a child might object to a vaccine.
Could I see a list of vaccine components? Oh, I don’t do very well with aborted human fetal tissue, mercury, aluminum, or animal tissue since I’m a vegan.
My father has immune system problems. No, thank you.
His sister has immune system problems. No, thank you.
I have immune system problems. No chickenpox vaccines for my kids, thank you.
He’s not feeling well today. No vaccine today. Maybe next time.
And on the information packet under the section More serious events is the following:

Seizure (jerking or staring) often associated with fever
Infection of the lungs (pneumonia) or the brain and spinal cord coverings (meningitis).
I think of that hypothetical mother in the pediatrician’s office being handed a form just like this for EVERY SINGLE VACCINE THE PEDIATRICIAN WANTS TO ADMINISTER. What thoughts will cross the mind of that mama bear?

Let’s get this straight, Doctor. The chickenpox vaccine, which is given for what is normally a mild illness, might give my kid seizures, pneumonia, or meningitis?

What other wonderful information is contained in this document that starting on June 1, 2018, doctors MUST give to their patients BEFORE a vaccine is given?

Glad you asked. Again this is direct from the CDC’s own handout. If you suspect an allergic reaction, “the reaction should be reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). Your doctor should file this report or you can do it yourself through the VAERS website, (www.vaers.hhs.gov), or by calling 1-800-822-7967.”

And right after that section is this one:

“The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) is a federal program that was created to compensate people who may have been injured by certain vaccines.

Persons who believe they may have been injured by a vaccine can learn about the program and about filing a claim by calling 1-800-338-2382 or visiting the VICP website (www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/index.html). There is a time limit to file a claim for compensation.”

I think Trump believes the concerns of vaccine-safety community have been viciously suppressed. He wants to make sure we get a fair fight.
And finally, I’m going to make one final appeal before March 27, 2018 for everybody to leave a comment on the newly proposed regulations for Conscience and Religious Freedom in Health-Care to make sure that the regulations include SPECIFIC LANGUAGE COVERING VACCINE SITUATIONS.

It will only take a few minutes. We already have more than 30,000 comments. Let’s see if we can get over 50,000.

1. Go to: www.FederalRegister.gov https://www.federalregister.gov/

2. Insert into search bar, cut/paste: HHS-OCR-2018-0002

3. Click on green “Submit a Public Comment Button”

4. Insert your PUBLIC COMMENT, “Expand the Categories to include parents, adults, children, caregivers, legal guardians, and employees to file complaints regarding vaccine situations.”

5. Add your information, your organization or USHealthConsortium.org

5. Click the SUBMIT button on your form. Thank you for helping to make a difference!

6. You can also go to the USHealthConsortium.org website https://www.ushealthconsortium.org/ – under TAKE ACTION, file your own individual complaint (see CRF Division’s SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS for filing vaccine situations).

STAY TUNED . . .

By Kent Heckenlively, JD

onawah

22nd March 2018, 19:07

Vaccine Injury Payouts: Taxpayers on the Hook for over $3.8 Billion as Vaccine Makers Rake in Profits
MARCH 22, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/vaccine-injury-payouts-taxpayers-on-the-hook-for-over-3-8-billion-as-vaccine-makers-rake-in-profits/?utm_source=mailchimp

By the World Mercury Project Team
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) that went into effect in 1988 stipulated that vaccine manufacturers cannot be held liable for injuries or deaths that occur from use of their vaccines which are recommended for every child in America by the Centers for Disease Control. The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) or “vaccine court” created with this Act is not a court at all but actually a taxpayer funded government claims program that uses special masters, employees of Health and Human Services (HHS), rather than judges to make decisions on compensation to victims. The vaccine manufacturers are defended by taxpayer-funded, Department of Justice lawyers. The petitioners on the other hand, while suffering from and paying for their or their child’s injuries, become embroiled in a litigious system where cases, according to the U.S. Government Accounting Office, are known to drag on for years.

Vaccine makers are in a win-win position that no other industry in America enjoys. While profits go to vaccine companies, the monetary amounts awarded to the vaccine-injured from “vaccine court” are paid for by taxpayers. As vaccine makers aren’t held accountable for unsafe products intended for children, there’s no incentive for them to ensure the vaccines they manufacture are safe.

If the numbers from VAERS and HHS are correct – only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported and only 1/3 of the petitions are compensated – then up to 99% of vaccine injuries go unreported…
The total awards distributed to vaccine injury victims are updated monthly by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). World Mercury Project will be sharing these updates with our followers.https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/03-22-chart.jpgSince 1988, over 19,178 petitions have been filed to HHS. Over that 30-year time period, 17,079 petitions have been adjudicated, with 5,928 of those determined to be compensable (approximately 30%), while 11,151 were dismissed. Total compensation paid for by taxpayers over the life of the program is over $3.8 billion. This amount does not cover the cost to taxpayers for the program itself, nor for the HHS and DOJ employees who defend the vaccine products. As astronomical as the monetary awards are, they’re even more alarming considering HHS claims that only an estimated 1% of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). If the numbers from VAERS and HHS are correct – only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported and only 1/3 of the petitions are compensated – then up to 99% of vaccine injuries go unreported and the families of the vast majority of people injured by vaccines are picking up the costs, once again, for vaccine maker’s flawed products.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project. https://worldmercuryproject.org/

onawah

27th March 2018, 05:09

Over-vaccinated Children and the Allergy Epidemic
MARCH 26, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/over-vaccinated-children-and-the-allergy-epidemic/?utm_source=mailchimp

By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
The global prevalence of allergic diseases is skyrocketing, affecting 30% to 40% of the world’s population. Allergic conditions include food allergies, anaphylaxis, asthma, eczema, allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis and reactions to drugs and insects. Often, these burdensome conditions start young, are overlapping and have the potential to be severe or fatal. A study of children with peanut allergy, for example, found that the median age of onset was 12 months; 40% to 60% of peanut-allergic children had concurrent asthma, atopic dermatitis, and/or other food allergies; and over a third (35%) had experienced anaphylaxis upon initial peanut exposure. Anaphylactic outcomes are worse when multiple allergic conditions are present.

…an escalating number of children have been hospitalized for food allergies or have visited an emergency department for primarily food-related anaphylaxis over the past couple of decades.
In the U.S., food allergies are widespread and are the most common cause of anaphylaxis in children. One in 13 American children—about two per classroom—has at least one food allergy, and food allergies increased by 50% from 1997 to 2011. An analysis of New York City school system data showed that the incidence of epinephrine administration for severe food allergy increased threefold from 2007 to 2013. Likewise, an escalating number of children have been hospitalized for food allergies or have visited an emergency department for primarily food-related anaphylaxis over the past couple of decades. Similar trends are playing out all over the world.

As each new decade ushers in higher childhood allergy rates, researchers mostly have scratched their heads, citing the poorly operationalized “hygiene hypothesis” or feebly asserting that the reasons for the increase remain “unclear.” A few investigators have pointed to possible risk factors such as cesarean delivery and novel food technologies. However, given that the hallmark of allergic disease is an altered immune response, it stands to reason that vaccines— which purposefully set out to “reprogram immunity”—are major contenders as allergy triggers.

A perfect storm
In her 2011 book, The Peanut Allergy Epidemic, Heather Fraser assembles persuasive scientific and historical evidence that lays the blame for the mass peanut allergy phenomenon (and the steep rise in childhood allergies of all types) on the “extensive and sudden” changes made to childhood vaccine programs in the U.S. and elsewhere in the late 1980s. According to Fraser, a series of critical factors synergistically converged during this time period to create a perfect storm and launch the allergy and chronic illness epidemics that have been ongoing ever since. These factors include:

Abrupt and massive expansion of the childhood vaccine schedule: In the U.S., the schedule went from three recommended vaccines in the mid-1980s to fifteen different vaccines currently.
Initiation of vaccination on the day of birth: This includes both the hepatitis B vaccine and synthetic vitamin K injection.
Changes in vaccine technology: Changes include production of recombinant (genetically engineered) vaccines and conjugate vaccines (which couple a weak vaccine antigen to a protein carrier), both of which actively go after “immunologic memory” and non-antibody immune response.
Vastly increased use of aluminum adjuvants, which stimulate a stronger immune response that can easily veer into the realm of “immune dysregulation.”
Increased vaccine coverage: Only about half of American two-year-olds in the late 1980s had completed their recommended series of vaccines, but a decade later, about nine in ten 19-35-month-olds were receiving all or most recommended vaccines.
…vaccinated children had a significantly greater odds of having a diagnosed allergic condition compared to unvaccinated children
A study conducted in 2012 and published in 2017 in the Journal of Translational Science compared chronic health problems in vaccinated and unvaccinated 6-to-12-year-olds—in other words, children born between 2000 and 2006. The results lend credence to Fraser’s thinking about vaccination and allergy trends. Among many striking results, the authors found that vaccinated children had a significantly greater odds of having a diagnosed allergic condition compared to unvaccinated children: 10.4% versus 0.4% for allergic rhinitis, 22.2% versus 6.9% for “other” allergies and 9.5% versus 3.6% for eczema and other forms of atopic dermatitis. Other studies also have linked vaccines to atopic conditions and allergic sensitization.

Allergy as an inevitable response to vaccination
To grasp how the chain of vaccine-related events initiated roughly 30 years ago has bred today’s worldwide allergy epidemics, one has to understand that vaccines, by their very nature, induce an unnatural immune response. This property of vaccines is called “immunogenicity.” Pharmaceutical researchers note that it can be tricky to achieve “wanted” immunogenicity while avoiding “unwanted” immune responses that later result in “clinically adverse consequences.”

Considering this question, Fraser calls attention to an important 1991 paper in The Quarterly Review of Biology that put forth the plausible view of allergy as an evolutionary form of immunological defense against “commonly allergenic” toxins, including metals and carcinogens. From this perspective, allergy symptoms (such as vomiting, sneezing and decreased blood pressure) are logical bodily responses intended to expel toxic substances or slow their circulation in the body.

Fraser elegantly connects vaccines to this view of allergy as an evolved immunological response to toxins. She and other writers have pointed out that awareness of the association between injected toxins and allergic reactions goes back to at least the early 20th century, when a French physiologist coined the term “anaphylaxis” to describe what happened to a dog injected twice with a hive-inducing marine toxin; the dog died within minutes of the second injection, administered three weeks after the first. Later, a 1940s study described how tetanus vaccine could induce allergy in humans. In fact, the medical literature is replete with terms such as “bystander effects” and vaccine-induced allergic responses to “non-target antigens,” all of which describe vaccines’ almost guaranteed ability to produce unwanted immunogenicity in the form of allergy. Notwithstanding the fact that vaccines also contain a plethora of worrisome ingredients—“immunogens, preservatives, adjuvants, antibiotics and manufacturing by-products” in addition to carrier proteins and live or inactivated viruses and toxins—Fraser believes that vaccines’ skewing of the immune system as a whole is the most significant contributor to subsequent allergy.

The era of food allergy began with the post-millennial generation, the same faction who received new immunizations during early childhood.
The role of aluminum
Because of its powerful immune-stimulating effects, aluminum is the one vaccine ingredient that perhaps should be singled out for its pivotal role in creating allergies. As one research group recently noted, aluminum adjuvants induce “Th2 responses to coadministered antigens and potentially to unrelated environmental allergens, thus providing bystander…responses that contribute to allergic disease.” The probability of sensitization may be even greater with simultaneous administration of multiple aluminum-containing vaccines. Another study from 2016 bluntly stated: “The era of food allergy began with the post-millennial generation, the same faction who received new immunizations during early childhood. Many of these vaccines contain alum, an adjuvant known to induce allergic phenotypes.”

A recent case report measured serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels in two children before and after the children received aluminum-containing vaccines. (IgE are the immune system antibodies that, together with histamine-storing white blood cells called mast cells, “contribute substantially to disease development, progression and…pathology in many people afflicted with…allergic disorders.”) In both cases, children’s levels of total IgE and food allergen-specific IgE increased following vaccination.

In another aluminum-related study, 64 Swedish children who received diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccines containing aluminum adjuvants experienced persistent vaccine-induced itching nodules (with a median duration of five years), and 95% developed a contact allergy to aluminum.

Disturbing trends
As if the rise of food and other allergies were not bad enough, studies are documenting a qualitative shift in the “natural history” of food allergy toward a “more frequently…persistent rather than…transient” condition. Moreover, dangerous manifestations of allergy such as anaphylaxis may be even more widespread than we know, because anywhere from 21% to 57% of cases of anaphylaxis are misclassified and given a less severe diagnostic code. As a result, children’s quality of life suffers, and once-rare items like epinephrine autoinjectors are becoming a fixture at schools and summer camps.

Although many researchers recognize the importance of avoiding “excessive activation” of the immune system in early life, the rush to overload the vaccine schedule continues unchecked. It is time to look at the scientific evidence and strengthen children’s immune systems in ways that do not result in massive collateral damage.

onawah

28th March 2018, 21:42

MARCH 28, 2018
The Tail Wagging the Dog: Death Categorization Drives Healthcare Decisions
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/the-tail-wagging-the-dog-death-categorization-drives-healthcare-decisions/?utm_source=mailchimp

By World Mercury Project Guest Contributor Joy M. Fritz

I work with doctors, coroners and the local county registrars every day to create death records. It’s what I do for a living and I wanted to share my thoughts on the mortality rates being thrown around on mainstream and social media regarding the influenza epidemic. Please note: This information I am sharing is not limited to influenza reporting, but rather, serves as a case study of how the mortality rate recording system (mal)functions at large.

I am sorry to say that death rates are NOT as simple or as valid as every news broadcaster with perfectly-trained vocal delivery makes them sound, and they are absolutely not the infallible pillar of medical history that the CDC purports.

This failed mechanism in the mortality rate ‘generator’, if you will, is the same for the hotly debated adverse vaccine reactions. This is the reason you see horrible adverse vaccine reactions and deaths being claimed by parents on social media, but no line item for them in national statistics.
An Imperfect System
Our current system for capturing mortality rates can and does provide a mostly uninvestigated and inaccurate picture of what causes a death. The process for creating and registering causes of death for public records is a complicated, convoluted, and politicized one. It is completely open to both ignorance and the manipulations of personal, professional, and governmental interests.

I have come to realize how greatly this reality becomes a public health issue during this current flu season when every major media outlet is providing us with live updates on the accruing death toll. Seeing these reports caused me concern for my family. My husband and I discussed what preventive treatment we might consider. I started reading the FDA package inserts for different flu immunization options to get informed on which might be safest for our infant and six-year-old. What I ultimately wanted to investigate was the risk of death. My kids getting sick is just part of life; other people getting sick is just part of life; lowering the risk of death to my family and the people around me is what I cared about when it came specifically to the seasonal flu.

The process for creating and registering causes of death . . . is completely open to both ignorance and the manipulations of personal, professional, and governmental interests.
I started researching mortality rates to find the line item in the CDC reports for “deaths due to influenza” vs. “adverse reaction to influenza medications and immunizations”. I found influenza rates, no problem. Flu medications and shots? No deaths reported. Awesome. What a simple decision to make! But, being in the mortuary industry and curious about how they get these reports, I looked at the last full report for 2014, dug deeper, and eventually found that they simply code and reorganize the data that they receive from death records—the very death records that I am typing up and registering every day.

So my head started to explode. And I felt, and still feel, sick. I realized that without being aware of it, I knew exactly how influenza deaths are recorded, and why there was no line item in the CDC’s mortality rates for adverse reactions to common medical treatments.

Before I continue, please know that I will not be explaining all the ins and outs of my job, nor the incredibly rare reality that medication complications and adverse reactions do get captured (usually in box 112 of the death record, not as the primary underlying cause). Those exceptions are made possible by exceptional, and likely, very principled people, choosing individually to go above and beyond the call of protocol, whether that be the family that is aware of the impact of the legal documentation that occurs after death and stays level-headed and involved mere hours after the death of their loved one, or an insanely humble and honest doctor, in conjunction with the coroner medical-legal officer who trusts and cooperates with the honest doctor and vigilant family to think outside the box of their standard procedures. Almost five years and nearly 5,000 death certificates later, I can say with confidence that that kind of post-death communication concoction is at a statistical percentage point that even the CDC would consider insignificant.

What most people don’t know is that doctors are not allowed to attest to anything that is not a strictly NATURAL cause of death.
Core Considerations
So, in the spirit of very uncomfortable truthfulness, I will share a snapshot of the core issues embedded in the daily procedures of creating the death statistics that we so desperately need to make prudent health decisions for ourselves and our families. I will also include some examples of how these core issues would manifest into faulty statistical analysis at the level of our public health and lead to the miscalculation of the benefits and risks surrounding our individual medical choices.

Core Issue A: Doctors who provide causes have not all been trained the same way, and therefore do not provide standardized responses. This may at first glance seem minor, as it always has to me, but this directly affects the cause that the doctor lists on the death certificate. Some doctors prefer listing the underlying cause of death as the recent complications that occurred in the last days or weeks before death, such as pneumonia or influenza, while leaving out the more chronic illnesses that had led to the decline in health. Other doctors decide they will provide the more long-standing health conditions as the cause of death (for instance, diabetes, asthma or congenital abnormality) while leaving out the more immediate illnesses. Some doctors include both the short-term and long-term diagnoses.

Many factors play a role in which approach doctors choose. These include in what capacity the doctor saw the patient (hospital vs. hospice care for example) or the immediate availability of the complete medical record within the time frame being impressed by the mortuary due to upcoming funeral or cremation services, or simply the way the doctor personally prioritizes information. Furthermore, doctors feel limited as to what they can provide for a cause by the professional context in which they saw the patient, as determined by their specialty. For example, a primary care physician might provide a cause of death as “coronary artery disease” since that was what he/she was prescribing medication to the patient for, whereas the patient could simultaneously be being treated for stage four chronic kidney disease and be on dialysis. In this case, rather than the objectively more serious health condition being listed on the death certificate, the health condition that the doctor is most comfortable attesting to is listed. Again, way too many factors to go into in this piece, but the basic issue of the lack of standardization in cause of death diagnosis and reporting remains.

In the case of a patient who dies after contracting influenza, this patient could have all of the above-mentioned conditions on his/her medical record simultaneously, from influenza to asthma, pneumonia, congenital abnormality, coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease. Any ONE of those conditions listed is correct and valid, and could be entered as a stand-alone cause which would then be registered by me and the local and state registrar’s offices without a query. It’s the doctor’s preference and his medical opinion—yet the national attention given, medical research dollars, and yearly health choices we all make are swayed by whichever cause this particular doctor, with his/her own particular training and personality, decides to jot down on the worksheet and send back to me to enter into the official record.

CORE ISSUE B) What most people don’t know is that doctors are not allowed to attest to anything that is not a strictly NATURAL cause of death. Falls, medication complications or overdoses, causes with the word “injury” in it, anything that is considered an unnatural or external cause is outside the realm of their jurisdiction as far as the death record is concerned. The coroner would need to be contacted and agree to certify or co-certify a death record that has an unnatural or external cause listed. This is a whole other, very complicated reporting issue that I will not get into in this post. I will say, however, from the perspective of a mortuary representative, that everyone involved (doctor, coroner, registrar and myself) understands that the delay caused by any coroner involvement is highly dreaded and avoided if at all possible due to the amplified grief it can cause the family if they do not want an autopsy or investigation done or have to suffer a delay in services and/or an upset in their own personal closure process.

However, the majority of doctors are aware of their own limitation to certify only natural causes of death. And usually in the interest of serving the grieving family, they will provide the simplest natural cause that they know will quickly pass the approval of the local registrar’s office, fulfill their duty as a signing physician, and enable the grieving family to move forward with their scheduled burial or cremation services. It should be noted here that doctors are under an additional pressure since they have a limited time set out by their State Health and Safety Codes to provide causes of death to a funeral home. In California, it is within 15 hours of death, although that is rarely achieved. Delays of more than a few days after death would risk them getting their license reported to the state medical board for lack of compliance.

What Works About This System?
The system is created in such a way that naturally occurring infectious disease (such as influenza) can be and is being reported and recorded in national mortality rates. However, the lack of standardization in the way doctors report it creates an unreliable number to set as the threshold for what constitutes an epidemic.

What Does NOT Work About This system?
It does not report on the true consequential timeline of the patient’s medical treatment, including unnatural and external complications and errors in their medical care and is therefore woefully inadequate as the basis for ANY medical claims or recommendations.

The first example to illustrate the impact of this issue is as follows:

I read a post from a nurse the other day that shared her story of being hospitalized due to complications of the flu. Even though she had gotten the flu shot every year, she had only gotten influenza this year. Five days after experiencing flu symptoms, she went to her medical provider and was prescribed Tamiflu. She went through her course of medication. Her flu symptoms eased but she started getting a tightness in the chest, which further worsened until she needed to be hospitalized for pneumonia and a close call with sepsis. The conclusion of her post—and her medical opinion as a nurse—was that this year’s flu was very dangerous and anyone less healthy than she could have easily died with her symptoms, so she urged everyone to please get the flu shot to prevent the flu from spreading.

The saddest part about reading her story was discovering that she must not have read the Tamiflu manufacturer’s insert, which states that “No influenza vaccine interaction study has been conducted” and “Efficacy of TAMIFLU in patients who begin treatment after 40 hours of symptoms has not been established” and furthermore, “Events reported more frequently in subjects receiving TAMIFLU compared to subjects receiving placebo in prophylaxis studies, and more commonly than in treatment studies, were aches and pains, rhinorrhea, dyspepsia and upper respiratory tract infections.” (emphasis added)

This would lead to an alternate, very feasible medical conclusion that her hospitalization and pneumonia was the result of using a medication that has not been tested on a population of her vaccination status and symptoms duration, which also has the adverse reaction of a URTI.

…the likelihood of influenza causing the death is greater than the medication causing the death because of mortality rates—but they are the ones creating the mortality rates…
But what if someone less healthy than herself with her exact symptoms and medication course HAD died? Her medical opinion, and many other medical care providers’ opinions would have been that it was influenza that had caused the death, instead of the complications of the medication. In the medical provider’s mind, the likelihood of influenza causing the death is greater than the medication causing the death because of mortality rates—but they are the ones creating the mortality rates—so what is considered reasonable likelihood is being created in a closed loop, a regurgitating cycle.

So, whether the attending physician at the hospital was aware of this medical misstep by the other medical provider or not, in this case the hospital physician could simply put “Influenza” on the causes of death worksheet and send it back to me. Influenza would be entered in the death record and be reported in the state and then national database as such with no question from me or the government registrars.

A Public Health Reporting Conundrum
What this has created, then, is a serious public health reporting conundrum. Death due to complications of improperly prescribed medications are NOT being calculated into the national reporting agencies in a real-time setting. Neither would they be communicated in real-time to the public. Instead, people would simply hear of the rising influenza death toll and run for more medication (and likely not be reading the manufacturer’s insert either to verify if they truly are good candidates for that medication).

I have many friends and family in the medical industry and it is easily admitted that legal and personal liability is a factor in the considerations of proper reporting.
In this medication example, as you can imagine, even IF the recorders realize that the medication was prescribed erroneously, it would not be in the professional best interest of the medical provider or medical facility to report this prescription error and its possibly fatal complications to the family or public health officials. I have many friends and family in the medical industry and it is easily admitted that legal and personal liability is a factor in the considerations of proper reporting. However, if and when this possibly fatal prescription misstep was ever reported, it would be in some very passive EMR analysis many months or years later, with no urgency or real-time public health warning. The ability for government to cross-check and minutely examine nearly three million decedent medical records of varying electronic availability—annually—is just not there.

This failed mechanism in the mortality rate “generator”, if you will, is the same for the hotly debated adverse vaccine reactions. This is the reason you see horrible adverse vaccine reactions and deaths being claimed by parents on social media, but no line item for them in national statistics. It is not because they don’t exist or don’t happen. The real-time data reporting system of death recording is not set up to calculate these deaths. The families that become aware of the adverse reactions in time to request investigation (<24 hours after death), and are able to request any relevant pathological specimens to be procured before the burial or cremation of their loved one, would then need to have the time and resources to go through the lengthy reporting and court procedures through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the National Vacine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP). A very few families do, and if they can establish enough scientific evidence (like pathology reports) and find and produce enough experts and professional support, they MIGHT eventually get the causes of death amended and compensation for their loss paid out by the allotted government fund. And after five, 10, 15 or 20 years, this passive data capture system might accrue enough statistical information to be reported back to the medical community so that they adjust their recommendations. However, with the HHS claim that only around 1% of vaccine injuries are reported to VAERS, even this may not be realistic.

So, just like in the medication example, any death due to an adverse reaction to the flu shot or for ANY regularly scheduled wellness immunization, would similarly not be captured in the standard process of death recording. As before, the doctor can still provide either influenza or any other natural-occurring immune response as the only cause of death. He would send it to me and I would enter it in, get the state to approve it, and “Voila!”—a thoroughly inaccurate mortality rate reporting.

Impacting Informed Consent
One of the most difficult realities for me to recognize in examining the mortality rate reporting system that I am a part of, is that the medical community itself is suffering from the ignorance that this kind of circular mortality rate generating system creates. Doctors and coroners are limited by the already existing mortality rates to gauge the likelihood of what caused death. That kind of system can only regurgitate the same causes of death over and over again by forcing its reporters to use the same types of “acceptable” death diagnoses that already exist.

And these are the statistics the medical community uses to educate themselves and provide informed consent to the patient on what the most prudent option is for medical care to safeguard health and prevent death.

And, yes, I will take the opportunity here to say that we can logically apply this critical analysis of the lack of proper data capture to those reluctant to vaccinate or use medications. There is no current national data capture system that records the morbidity or mortality rates of those who choose less medical intervention or choose to not vaccinate themselves or their kids. We don’t know what their life expectancy, quality of life or mortality rate is in our modern day, with the advancements in hygiene, technology and post-disease-diagnosis medical care availability being considered. It could absolutely be worse, statistically, but we wouldn’t know.

For nationally reported statistics, we are left then with bad data on one side, and no control group data on the other. Hardly the recipe for safe or settled scientifically guided medical care.

Now where does that leave you and me? Our highly subjective—yet somehow infallible—weaponry of mortality rates, whether from national statistics or the social media horror stories, has us and all our friends and family swinging the manic flag of “People are dying!”

This flu season, for example, some of our friends are saying, “People are dying from flu! Get vaccinated! Take medication!” while other friends are saying, “People are dying from adverse reactions to medications and shots! Don’t get vaccinated! Drink elderberry!” And we are all running for the nearest remedies that we are sure will help us because of statistics—OR because we don’t see statistics reflecting our lived reality, so we do the best we can to discern our health without statistics.

But I’m the one creating these statistics and I offer you this: If you take one thing away from this, take away a healthier skepticism about even the most accepted mainstream, nationally reported, CDC or other “scientific” statistics. Humans who had no concept of their widespread impact made them. The numbers are not hard—they are very, very fluid. And conversely, have a healthier skepticism about all the alternative remedies we welcome as hopeful scientific-ish options. There is no unbiased, century-long, data capture system set up for these choices either.

As a parent, the most painful part of taking a step back and looking at all this, is having to humbly admit—I don’t know what the right thing to do is.

I don’t have the unbiased data I need to make the safest decision for my children.

I don’t know what the right thing to do is for myself, or for my husband.

I don’t know what side of the fence to stand on in the vaccination and mainstream medicine battlefield, and I don’t want to stand on a side: I just want the unbiased, uncorrupted and standardized data needed to accurately assess the benefits vs. the ultimate risks for my family’s health.

For nationally reported statistics, we are left then with bad data on one side, and no control group data on the other. Hardly the recipe for safe or settled scientifically guided medical care.
A Self-Reporting System
In the face of this fallible data capture system, my own resolution that I am willing to publicly recommend—no matter what medical choices you decide are best—would be:

Become self-reporters. Keep a health journal for each family member complete with dates and times and severity of symptoms of illness, and track dates and dosages of any medical treatment administered. Track degree of fevers, severity of migraines, frequency of ear infections, changes of behavior, hospitalizations, medication dosages and immunization combinations, etc.
Think critically and ask questions when you see inconsistencies in any health recommendations offered to you or your family. Request and encourage a satisfactory discussion of benefits and risks with your medical provider.
Download and thoroughly read the manufacturer’s insert provided on the FDA’s website for any medication or immunization you are considering, and verify that you are a good candidate for that medication. If you decide to use that medical treatment, record any minor reactions in the health journal, immediately report any somewhat severe reactions to your medical provider, and ask for that information to be added to your electronic medical record so that it might inform any future medical provider on your individual contraindications you may have in other medication courses. Remember that each of us is liable for our own health choices; you cannot expect a medical provider to be a perfect assessor of what’s best for you.
Follow up and make sure proper reporting was done on the medical provider’s part to the appropriate national databases, or report it yourself: MedWatch reports for medications and VAERS reports for vaccines. This recommendation is less for you and more for others and for the sake of having the appropriate authorities informed so they can eventually take medical treatments off the market and create the demand for safer ones. Those kind of databases can only function well for the populations they serve if they are being used by everyone.
Yes, people are dying. Each and every day. I do their death records every flu season or surfing season. And try as hard as we do—and no matter how absolutely shredded inside I am, especially when I do an infant or child’s death certificate—we will never eradicate death. We CAN work to slowly eradicate and reform bad systems and misinformation. And even though there is no immediate gratification in it, we will probably save more lives when we work intelligently, truthfully and ethically towards a better future. That usually starts with a lot of humility and admitting that change is needed.

onawah

29th March 2018, 18:28

A universal flu vaccine: the mad science solution
March 29 2018
by Jon Rappoport
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/03/29/a-universal-flu-vaccine-the-mad-science-solution/

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) has launched efforts to create a vaccine that would protect people from most flu strains, all at once, with a single shot.

Over the years, I’ve written many articles refuting claims that vaccines are safe and effective, but we’ll put all that aside for the moment and follow the bouncing ball.

Massachusetts Senator and big spender, Ed Markey, has introduced a bill that would shovel no less than a billion dollars toward the universal flu-vaccine project. You like something, it sounds good, you know nothing about the details, throw money at it.

Here is a paragraph from an NIAID press release that mentions one of several research approaches:

“NIAID Vaccine Research Center scientists have initiated Phase 1/2 studies of a universal flu vaccine strategy that includes an investigational DNA-based vaccine (called a DNA ‘prime’)…”

This is quite troubling, if you know what the phrase “DNA vaccine” means. It refers to what the experts are touting as the next generation of immunizations.

Instead of injecting a piece of a virus into a person, in order to stimulate the immune system, synthesized genes would be shot into the body. This isn’t traditional vaccination anymore. It’s protective gene therapy.

In any such method, where genes are edited, deleted, added, no matter what the pros say, there are always “unintended consequences,” to use their polite phrase. The ripple effects scramble the genetic structure in numerous unknown ways.

Here is the inconvenient truth about DNA vaccines—

They will permanently alter your DNA

The reference is the New York Times, 3/15/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” It describes the frontier of research—the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:

“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”

“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”

“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.” [That was three years ago.]

“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”

Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.”

Alteration of the human genetic makeup.

Not just a “visit.” Permanent residence. And once a person’s DNA is changed, he will live with that change—and all the ripple effects in his genetic makeup—for the rest of his life.

The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:

“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”

Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.

This is genetic roulette with a loaded gun. Anyone and everyone on Earth injected with a DNA vaccine will undergo permanent and unknown genetic changes…

And the further implications are clear. Vaccines can be used as a cover for the injections of any and all genes, whose actual purpose is re-engineering humans in far-reaching ways.

If you’re going to alter humans, for example, to make many of them more docile and weak, and some of them stronger, in order to restructure society, you want everyone under the umbrella. No exceptions. No exemptions.

The emergence of this Frankenstein technology is paralleled by a shrill push to mandate vaccines, across the board, for both children and adults. The pressure and propaganda are planet-wide.

The freedom and the right to refuse vaccines has always been vital. It is more vital than ever now.

It means the right to preserve your inherent DNA.

onawah

29th March 2018, 18:49

Vaccination MADNESS: Idaho Shakespeare Festival sings a song to brainwash children in grades K-6
Posted by: Dena Schmidt, staff writer in Vaccine Dangers
March 27, 2018
https://www.naturalhealth365.com/vaccination-propaganda-2506.html

Over 30,000 children in more than 100 schools are set to receive a heavy dose of vaccination propaganda in the coming months. An updated version of the classic work “80 Days Around the World” is set to be performed by the Idaho Shakespeare Festival (ISF). See:
https://healthfreedomidaho.org/idaho-shakespeare-festival-turns-classic-into-vaccine-propaganda-piece
This musical, penned for Youth Company Performances, includes a very strangely tacked on five minutes of vaccine propaganda that ought to have every parent very concerned. (to say the least!)

The song section, in question, talks about vaccines you “have to” receive in order to travel and depicts administering vaccines, calling it “not a big deal” and saying that receiving them “doesn’t hurt.” The play also invokes Elon Musk as a “super-smart scientist friend who says vaccines are safe!”

As expected, there is never a mention of the possible (negative) vaccine side effects in the lyrics.

Exposing K-6 schoolchildren to vaccination propaganda is just plain wrong
Parents who have seen the play have said they were shocked at how overtly pro-vaccine the play seemed with the tacked-on scene. Keep in mind, the original work has absolutely nothing to do with vaccines.

It’s unclear if the play’s director, Tom Ford, added this scene willingly or submitted to pressure from an outside force to include this scene. It also includes a creepy song about forced vaccines set to a catchy tune.

The sponsor of the tour, the Idaho Theater for Youth, brings professional productions to close to 30,000 K-6 students across the state of Idaho. Boise Weekly reports the musical was written by Alex Syiek at the request of director Tom Ford – just for Idaho Theater for Youth.

Whether you live in Idaho or have school-age children or not, consider voicing your opinion on this matter. Children at this impressionable age should not be subjected to vaccination propaganda (or any propaganda.)

Email the director: Tom Ford tom at idahoshakespeare.org

Call & Email the Education Manager Veronica Von Tobel
(208) 429-9908 Ext. 206
veronica at idahoshakespeare.org

And, this is their Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/IdahoShakespeareFestival

If you are a parent, it wouldn’t hurt to double-check to make sure this play (or anything similar) isn’t coming to your child’s school district.

At this time, ISF seems to be deflecting feedback questioning this propaganda elements of the play. People who have made respectful, questioning comments on their Facebook page have had these comments ignored and deleted.

Vaccine side effects speak to the dangers of vaccines
Interestingly, Idaho has one of the highest vaccine exemption rates in the country. If you were pro-vaccine and wanted to wage a propaganda campaign, this would certainly be the place to start.

The current generation of children suffer more health problems than ever and are receiving 300 percent more vaccines. With so many reported vaccine side effects, many parents are opting to exempt their children from receiving them.

And, remember, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) has paid out almost $4 billion to victims and families of persons who have suffered ill health or death from vaccines. It’s almost hard to believe that they call this medical intervention, “safe and effective.”

Some of the play’s creepy song lyrics are as follows:

“There are so many diseases you need to be protected against if you are going around the world
By injecting you with a small sample of each of the diseases your body will be able to fight those pesky illnesses away”

As the patient protests, the vaccine administrator pushes them to take the shot:

“Relax, it’s not like it’s Euthanasia
Don’t Cry
Just Comply”

And the song finishes with something along the lines of: “my super smart, rich, scientist friend Elon Musk told me vaccines were OK!”

Listen and decide for yourself – in this video below:

9NiWdNVULRs

onawah

29th March 2018, 20:01

MARCH 29, 2018
A Matter of Right and Wrong: The CDC’s Troubling Lack of Research Ethics
By Brian S. Hooker, Science Advisor, Focus for Health and Board Member, World Mercury Project
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/a-matter-of-right-and-wrong-the-cdcs-troubling-lack-of-research-ethics/?utm_source=mailchimp

Documents obtained by the Freedom of Information Act indicate that Centers for Disease Control (CDC) officials gave preferential treatment to the Danish grantees (including Dr. Poul Thorsen) at Aarhus University, and took no apparent action to evaluate the veracity of any of the study data when theft of over $1 million of grant money by Thorsen was made known. Furthermore, in 2009, when CDC officials including Dr. Coleen Boyle (Director of the National Center for Birth Defects and Development Disabilities [NCBDDD]), Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp (Chief of the Developmental Disabilities Branch), Joanne Wojcik (Public Health Analyst, Developmental Disabilities Branch), and Diana Schendel (former CDC NCBDDD senior epidemiologist) became aware that Thorsen failed to obtain legally required ethics permissions for the autism bio and genetic data projects, these CDC employees worked with the Danish grantees to hide this fact.

…studies were conducted and results published without legally-required ethics clearances.
These officials have never made public that both the validity of childhood autism in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register (Lauritsen et al. 2010 Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders) and the population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism (Madsen et al. 2002 New England Journal of Medicine) studies were conducted and results published without legally-required ethics clearances. They knew that the psychiatric registry records were reviewed without required permissions, a serious ethical violation.

On the 30th of November 2009, Coleen Boyle, Diana Schendel, Joanne Wojcik, and Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp, along with Danish grantees, failed to report this serious ethical violation in previously published research, as well as a study near publication. They sought to cover their tracks on their failure to ensure Poul Thorsen had obtained all the needed ethical approvals for autism bio and genetic studies. Two studies were published in which legally required ethical permissions were apparently never applied for and granted, according to their notes. When repeatedly asked to provide them, Thorsen did not.

These acts were a clear violation of both ethical and legal standards.
It appears that the biggest concern the CDC-Danish collaborators had at that point was getting ethical coverage for Diana Schendel’s paper on autism and inflammatory markers that was about to be published. They decided to extend the permissions obtained by another researcher (Dr. Rikke Maimburg from Aarhus) to Schendel’s work because Maimburg had been approved in 2000 for an unrelated study entitled ‘Obstetric factors and autism’. Their thinking was that since Diana’s study used mothers’ obstetric files, the 2000 Ethics Committee approval could be extended to her study (even though the committee never reviewed Schendel’s study design.) However, permissions for child records, which were also reviewed, were never obtained. These acts were a clear violation of both ethical and legal standards.

Thorsen, the principle investigator for the granted CDC funds, failed to provide evidence after the fact that he had obtained ethical committee permissions for his research on bio and genetic markers and autism. The team eventually determined no requests had ever been submitted. By all appearances, they found that studies related to the two papers, one previously published, were done without legally-required ethical approval. The two papers in question are:

A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism. Madsen KM, Hviid A, Vestergaard M, Schendel D, Wohlfahrt J, Thorsen P, Olsen J, Melbye M., 2002, New England Journal of Medicine 347:1477
Validity of childhood autism in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register: findings from a cohort sample born 1990-1999. Lauritsen MB, Jørgensen M, Madsen KM, Lemcke S, Toft S, Grove J, Schendel DE, Thorsen P., 2010, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 40:139
…the seminal Denmark study on the MMR and autism, used to “debunk” the vaccine-autism hypothesis both in the Institute of Medicine’s 2004 report “Vaccines and Autism” as well as in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program’s Omnibus Autism Proceedings, is an illegal study.
Notes from the Nov. 30, 2009 phone call between the CDC officials and Danish grantees include:

We have not been able to find a permission from ethical committee that covers both bio and genetic markers and autism. As far as we understand only one paper has been published using these data and Diana will soon be submiting (sic) another. Apart from the letter from the EC in our region (attached) we have not been able to locate the permission for abstraction of the psychiatric records, and it is likely that it does not exist.

Dr. Coleen Boyle, current Director of NCBDDD at CDC, should have shut this grant down immediately upon being informed that ethical clearances were not in place. She should have immediately contacted the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity as well as the Office of Inspector General. Funding should have been discontinued. She should have led the charge to have these papers retracted. There should have been, at a minimum, a press release from the CDC to inform the public. Instead, Dr. Boyle along with Dr. Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp, Joanne Wojcik and Dr. Diana Schendel worked with their Danish Grantees to ‘fix it’ and retrospectively apply ethics approvals. Their next call on 14 December 2009 closed the case on Poul providing information to Aarhus.

Poul Thorsen’s reply from the Dec. 14, 2009 conference call was:

“As I have stated before to Carsten and Erik, I have not been able to locate the ethical approval for the autism pilot study. I recommend that new approvals are requested just as stated in the notes from the last conference call.”

Not only is this egregious behavior for government officials, but it also points to poor grant management by CDC staff. The CDC staff responsible for this multimillion dollar grant, starting with Diana Schendel, should have had copies of all the legally required ethics permissions in hand before the Danish grantees were allowed to get started, and before the first US taxpayer dollar was sent to Denmark.

Also, most notable is the fact that the seminal Denmark study on the MMR and autism, used to “debunk” the vaccine-autism hypothesis both in the Institute of Medicine’s 2004 report “Vaccines and Autism” as well as in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program’s Omnibus Autism Proceedings, is an illegal study. Without proper ethics approval, it should have never been published and indeed should be retracted from the New England Journal of Medicine. This is one of two studies that the CDC has completed regarding the MMR vaccine and autism. Of course, the other study was completed by DeStefano et al. (2004 Pediatrics 113:259) and showed a statistically significant relationship between MMR timing and the incidence of autism, specifically in boys, despite the fact that the authors erroneously dismissed the relationship as evidence that individuals with autism had to get early vaccines to enroll in special education programs.

CDC officials in the Immunization Safety Office and the Developmental Disabilities Branch have repeatedly omitted data and manipulated statistical results to deny any relationship between vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders.
How can the CDC be trusted with stewarding vaccine safety for the U.S. if this is an example of how ethics are regarded within their ranks? Unfortunately, this is just one of many instances of research fraud and malfeasance within the CDC. CDC officials in the Immunization Safety Office and the Developmental Disabilities Branch have repeatedly omitted data and manipulated statistical results to deny any relationship between vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders. These same officials have covered up the embezzlement of Federal funds by CDC grantee, Dr. Poul Thorsen as well as the romantic relationship between Thorsen and his CDC grant supervisor, Dr. Diana Schendel. As described by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., this agency is truly “a cesspool of corruption” and should be disqualified from protecting the health of our children.
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project. https://worldmercuryproject.org/

Flash

29th March 2018, 20:04

Thank you Onawah for taking care of this thread. I always read it, even if I have no comments to add.

The video you posted last is not working anymore, for your information - it did not take time for it to be deleted probably from Youtube censors.

onawah

29th March 2018, 22:58

Thanks Flash, Did you mean this one?:
9NiWdNVULRs
It's still working for me--maybe it's being censored in Canada? :noidea:
So glad to hear you are reading this thread.
There is so much precise, well documented coverage of vaccine issues out there now, it hasn't been hard to compile some of the best of it here.
Hopefully this helps to reduce if not eliminate the justifications for the continuing murderous practice of vaccinations for those who are still supporting it.
It never should have started in the first place.
Just another way the human race has been used as guinea pigs for profit.

Thank you Onawah for taking care of this thread. I always read it, even if I have no comments to add.

The video you posted last is not working anymore, for your information - it did not take time for it to be deleted probably from Youtube censors.

Flash

29th March 2018, 23:01

yes, this video, it is written "cette vidéoi n'est pas accessible" this video is not accessible. It might be in Canada, I don't know,, but I cannot access it.

Thanks Flash, Did you mean this one?:
9NiWdNVULRs
It's still working for me--maybe it's being censored in Canada? :noidea:
So glad to hear you are reading this thread.
There is so much precise, well documented coverage of vaccine issues out there now, it hasn't been hard to compile some of the best of it here.
Hopefully this helps to reduce if not eliminate the justifications for the continuing murderous practice of vaccinations for those who are still supporting it.
It never should have started in the first place.
Just another way the human race has been used as guinea pigs for profit.

Thank you Onawah for taking care of this thread. I always read it, even if I have no comments to add.

The video you posted last is not working anymore, for your information - it did not take time for it to be deleted probably from Youtube censors.

onawah

29th March 2018, 23:39

Maybe just as well... it would sicken and infuriate you if you saw it, most likely! :facepalm:

yes, this video, it is written "cette vidéoi n'est pas accessible" this video is not accessible. It might be in Canada, I don't know,, but I cannot access it.

onawah

30th March 2018, 17:04

This is from a Facebook post about the video in question, including the lyrics from the song about vaccines in the play:

Krissy Dawn Fulton reviewed Idaho Shakespeare Festival —
March 13 at 11:41am ·
I have never given a poor review before on Facebook and I'm deeply saddened to do so now.

I attended the premier preformance of "80 Days Around the World" play at the Morrison Center. The singing was amazing! The ASL interpreters were BRILLIANT! The actors were lively and the use of stage and props were fantastic! Thank you!

Sadly, I have to say though, that as a child development professional, teacher, and mother, the doctor office scene was very distressing (please see below for the lyrics to the song to judge for yourself). The actors told the adult doctors, "No" not once but TWICE and finally, a plea of "Don't put that inside us" and their good words were not honored. On the contrary, their words were ignored, they were told to relax then the message of "Do not cry just comply" was emphatically stated as the adults continued to move forward with their agenda anyway. It was heartbreaking and quite frankly a terrifying precedence to set for children!

I know it’s theater and it was presented as a 'funny' scene but kiddos take a lot of things at face value and that is NOT A MESSAGE WE SHOULD GIVE OUR CHILDREN!!! I was appalled. Additionally, they had to go out of their way to add this scene to the play as it strays 100% from the book or movie.

I’m glad I was there with my child to discuss the situation as it unfolded... to remind him that "NO means NO!" and that SAFE adults listen to good words! Parents who send your kiddos to their camps, workshops, or have them in your children’s school, please be aware and prepared to talk to your children.

I did reach out to Idaho Shakespeare Festival in private message, facebook and via email. The first response I received was that the information was accurate and that was what mattered. Even from that limited scope of objection, I highlighted, that there were no mandatory vaccines for the countries visited in the play and I did so using the information from the World Health Organization link they sent me.

Next, I was told that regardless of the information being accurate or not it's just a play and it wasn't their intent. AKA, we are not responsible for the content or potential harm, if we didn't 'mean it. ' How can we teach our children that words have meaning and power and that we must wield them responsibly with this modeling. This response from Idaho Shakespeare Festival sets the standard deplorably low for our educational system.

Regardless of whether Idaho Shakespeare Festival intended to put forth a horrifying model or misinform, I expected a higher ethos from an educational program. I honestly had hoped for a Maya Angelou ethic response to my email. An, " I did then what I knew how to do. Now that I know better, I do better." response. Sadly, my comments were erased. My emails were left unanswered and my FB message was given a cut and paste stock reply. I hope to change this review in the future as I am confident Idaho Shakespeare Festival will 'do better' and regain my trust.

*****

Welcome to the doctor's office
Welcome to your waking nightmare
Welcome why the frown
Welcome now sit down
You're going around the world

But first, you are going to need something
Yeah first you're going to feel a sting
A sting
There are so many diseases you need to be protected against if you are going around the world
By injecting you with a small sample of each of the diseases your body will be able to fight those pesky illnesses away
"No Thank you I'm fine."
Sit
Ready
No
Time to begin the vaccine
There's
tetanus and polio
stab the skin and there you go
diphtheria and hepatitis A and B (Whee)
Japanese encephalitis
"Don't you dare put that inside us!"
Well, Good Luck getting through Asia
Relax it's not like it's Euthanasia
If you want to avoid infection make sure you get your typhoid injection
And don't go playing with hyena babies or else you end up with a case of rabies
The two of you will not achieve a record time with yellow fever
Close your eyes and count to three 1, 3 Ha Whee
That will just about be it
These Vaccinations will permit you both to travel
At your own accord
But just to be safe we will stop the itching and chaffing with a couple of more to leave you tired and sore
Don't Cry
Just Comply
And you're done
So goodbye, goodbye, goodbye
And all aboard.

And After the song finishes the main character says something to the effect of: "my super smart, rich, scientist friend Elon Musk told me vaccines were OK... or I wouldn't have gotten them."

yes, this video, it is written "cette vidéoi n'est pas accessible" this video is not accessible. It might be in Canada, I don't know,, but I cannot access it.

Thanks Flash, Did you mean this one?:
9NiWdNVULRs
It's still working for me--maybe it's being censored in Canada? :noidea:
So glad to hear you are reading this thread.
There is so much precise, well documented coverage of vaccine issues out there now, it hasn't been hard to compile some of the best of it here.
Hopefully this helps to reduce if not eliminate the justifications for the continuing murderous practice of vaccinations for those who are still supporting it.
It never should have started in the first place.
Just another way the human race has been used as guinea pigs for profit.

Thank you Onawah for taking care of this thread. I always read it, even if I have no comments to add.

The video you posted last is not working anymore, for your information - it did not take time for it to be deleted probably from Youtube censors.

Hervé

30th March 2018, 17:10

Autoimmune diseases tied to yeast in vaccines (https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/yeast-in-vaccines-tied-to-autoimmune-diseases/)

Heidi Stevenson World Mercury Project (https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/yeast-in-vaccines-tied-to-autoimmune-diseases/)
Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:44 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s22/459249/large/03_28_Vaccine_syringes_orange_.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s22/459249/full/03_28_Vaccine_syringes_orange_.jpg)

It's well-recognized that the incidence of autoimmune diseases has been rising at an enormous rate. A study indicates that a significant factor in causing them may be the common bakers or brewers yeast, Sacccharomyces cerevisiae (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23292495)[1] used in many vaccinations, including HepB, which is given to nearly all newborn babies in the United States before they're a day old.

The specific part of S. cerevisiae that's of concern is mannan, which is found in the cell walls of yeasts and also in mammalian glycoproteins. These glycoproteins are found in cell walls, connective tissues like collagen, gastrointestinal mucous secretions, and blood plasma. They perform many functions. Obviously, if the immune system goes on the attack against mannan, it can be devastating. Yet, that appears to be happening in many autoimmune diseases.

These diseases happen when the body's own defense system turns on itself, resulting in life-eroding conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, anti-phospholipid syndrome, multiple sclerosis, diabetes mellitus type 1, and even heart disease.

Both the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) are aware of the increase in autoimmune diseases (https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/246960.php)[2] . Autoimmune disease research is now included in chapter 3 of the NIH Biennial Report (https://report.nih.gov/biennialreport/)[3] which discusses their approach to dealing with the issue, including the type of research they're supporting. Nowhere is there any indication that vaccinations are being considered as a potential cause.

Of course, if you don't look for it, you are not likely to find it. Clearly, they are not promoting a genuine investigation into finding the causes of autoimmune disorders, as they're willing to consider anything and everything ... except the elephant in the room named vaccination. As is the case with autism, the primary focus is on genetics, with environment also considered-as long as the term environment doesn't include vaccines. As with autism, that focus completely ignores the outright absurdity of blaming genetics for new non-infectious disease phenomena.

How Can Yeast Cause Such Terrible Diseases?
Yeast is, of course, used to make bread rise and create the alcohol in beer. So how can it suddenly turn into an enemy? The answer is in how it enters the body, and what enters with it. The purpose of a vaccine is to create a localized storm in the immune system so that it will respond to a co-injected substance, which may be a weakened microbe or a small bit of a microbe, by creating antibodies to it.

An irritant, called an adjuvant, is what causes the immune system storm, and the microbe is called an antigen. The catch is that other substances injected with the antigen and adjuvant may also be seen as antigens. If one of those substances is similar to something that naturally exists in the body, then the immune system may create antibodies to part of its own body, creating an autoimmune disease.

Parts of the mannan in yeast are similar or identical to parts of the human body. So S. cerevisiae-yeast-used in vaccines has the potential of causing autoimmune disorders. In fact, S. cerevisiae is used in a variety of ways in vaccines. It is, when used whole, a potent adjuvant (https://microbialcellfactories.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-2859-6-32)[4]. On top of that, genetic manipulation is now being used on it to create artificial antibodies (https://microbialcellfactories.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1475-2859-6-32)[4], so S. cerevisiae is becoming more common in vaccines.

Autoantibodies of S. cerevisiae
The researchers who focused on autoimmune aspects of S. cerevisiae (yeast) found significant correlations between yeast's mannan and known autoimmune antigens in several autoimmune diseases. They found close and, in some instances, exact matches of the genetic sequences. For example, in the case of rheumatoid arthritis, the percent found to match were:

Rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatoid factor: 60%
Bip/GRP78: 71%
gp130-RAPS: 80%
EIF4G1: 88%
Anti-citrullinated collagen type 2: 100%

Not only were there significant sequence matches with four known rheumatoid arthritis auto-antigens, there was a perfect match with one. In other conditions, they found:

Lupus erythematosus

SmN: 53%
SSA (Ro): 60%
snRNP-SmD3: 64%
SSB (La): 69%
U2 snRNP B": 83%

Heart disease

P-selectin (protein on surface of blood vessels & platelets): 80%
Myosin (involved with muscle contraction): 88%
Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (inflammatory response molecules): 100%

Anti-phospholipid syndrome

β2-Glycoprotein-1 precursor: 56%
Annexin A5: 63%
Anti-CL/β-2GPI Ig light chain variable region: 73%

AIDs-associated antigens

Thyroglubulin: 52%
GAD65: 57%
Zinc transporter 8: 57%
Transglutaminase: 60%
Thyroid peroxidase: 71%
Soluble liver/pancreas antigen: 80%
Calprotectin (protein S100-A8): 100%

Sclerosis-associated antigens

Major centromere autoantigen B: 57%
RNA polymerase III: 67%
U3-snRNP fibrillarin: 75%
U3-snRNP MPP10: 75%
hU3-55kDA: 86%
Nucleophosmin B23: 88%

A perfect match with a molecule may not be necessary to result in an autoimmune response, so percentages of less than 100% may not indicate lack of an autoimmune response. However, the closer the match between a molecule and an antigen, the more likely it is that an autoimmune response will occur.

Although you may not generally think of heart disease as an autoimmune disorder, certain forms of it, such as rheumatic heart disease, are known to be-and as this study seems to indicate, others may be, too.

Vaccine Risks

https://www.sott.net/image/s22/459251/full/03_28_Vaccines_containing_S_ce.jpg

It should be noted that anti-phospholipid syndrome was originally associated with the tetanus vaccine (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235053). Referring to the table on the right of vaccines containing S. cerevisiae, you can see that the first vaccine listed is DTaP. The T stands for tetanus.

Do we know for certain that vaccinations containing S. cerevisiae cause these autoimmune diseases? No, we don't. However, we now have information that strongly links yeast-containing vaccines to autoimmune disorders-and we have absolutely nothing to suggest that they don't cause them.

In fact, not only do we now have the strong association between S. cerevisiae auto-antibodies (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23292495) and mannan-containing proteins, we also have a history of increasing rates of autoimmune disorders that, at a casual look, can be seen to correlate with the expanding vaccination schedules in countries around the world.

Autoimmune disorders are devastating our health and a huge percentage of us suffer from a severely diminished quality of life. These disorders aren't happening because of genetic defects, and to suggest that they are is an insult to our intelligence-though that seems to be the goal of our health agencies.

The cost to us as individuals and as a society is enormous. Surely it's past time to take a serious and honest look at vaccine risks, including the use of yeast as an ingredient.

Instead, we have a mad rush to create ever-more yeast-related vaccines, because modern recombinant DNA technologies have made it so much easier, faster, and cheaper to produce them. Unfortunately, though, to step back and apply the precautionary principle isn't profitable. So, you can expect to see more and more of them, no matter how much harm they produce.

Sources:

Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Diseases: from Bread Baking to Autoimmunity (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23292495); Clinical Reviews in Allergies and Immunology;Maurizio Rinaldi, Roberto Perricone, Miri Blank, Carlo Perricone, & Yehuda Shoenfeld; DOI 10.1007/s12016-012-8344-9
Autoimmune Disease Rates Increasing (http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/246960.php)
Autoimmune disease research, Chapter 3, NIH Biennial Report (https://report.nih.gov/biennialreport/).
Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a versatile eukaryotic system in virology (http://www.microbialcellfactories.com/content/6/1/32); Microbial Cell Factories; Rui P Galao, Nicoletta Scheller, Isabel Alves-Rodrigues, Tanja Breinig, Andreas Meyerhans and Juana Díez; doi:10.1186/1475-2859-6-32

onawah

30th March 2018, 18:25

CDC Delays Release of New Autism Report As Internal Battles Rage
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/cdc-delays-release-new-autism-report-internal-battles-rage/
3/29/18 by Patrick Howley

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is delaying the release of its highly-anticipated new autism report, Big League Politics has exclusively learned.

The CDC “autism prevalence report” was set to come out Friday, but has now been pushed back as people within the agency battle among themselves. The report MIGHT now come out in late April or May, but there are no assurances of that.

The previous two CDC reports have stated that 1 in 68 children in the United States suffer from autism, but independent reports place the figure at 1 in 36.

The new delayed report is now expected to change the criteria for judging what constitutes autism. The numbers currently rely on so-called DSM IV codes for determining mental health disorders. The new report is set to switch to using updated DSM V codes, according to insiders.

Nicole Dowling, who recently took over the CDC-funded Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network, is already leaving that branch and going to a different department within CDC. Insiders say she is “running like Hell.” The ADDM now does not have a permanent leader.

CDC director Brenda Fitzgerald resigned her position in January after it was revealed that she purchased tobacco stocks despite her agency’s business pertaining to the regulation of cigarettes.

The new incoming CDC director, Robert Redfield, is being criticized by Democrats and liberal outlets for allegedly not having enough experience to lead a federal agency and for his onetime relationship with the pro-Christian Children’s AIDS Fund. President Trump seems to trust Redfield when it comes to battling the opioid crisis.

CDC is aware of our press inquiry but did not immediately return a request for comment.

onawah

4th April 2018, 01:18

Is the MMR Vaccine a Fraud or Does It Just Wear Off Quickly?
by Dr. Mercola
4/3/18
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2018/04/03/mmr-vaccine-fraud-or-not.aspx?utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20180403Z1_UCM&et_cid=DM197261&et_rid=265035995
[/QUOTE]Story at-a-glance
Ninety-five percent of children entering kindergarten have received two doses of MMR vaccine, as have 92 percent of school children ages 13 to 17 years. In some states, the MMR vaccination rate is near 100 percent
Despite achieving a vaccination rate that theoretically should ensure vaccine-acquired herd immunity, outbreaks of mumps keep occurring, primarily among those who have been vaccinated
Mumps is making a strong comeback among college students, with hundreds of outbreaks occurring on U.S. campuses over the past two decades
Recent research suggests the reemergence of mumps among young adults is due, at least in part, to waning immunity; protection from the vaccine is wearing off quicker than expected
According to a still-ongoing lawsuit filed in 2010, Merck is accused of falsifying efficacy testing of its mumps vaccine to hide its poor effectiveness. So, resurgence of mumps may be the result of using a vaccine that doesn’t offer much in terms of protection
In 1986, public health officials stated that MMR vaccination rates for kindergarten children were in excess of 95 percent and that one dose of live attenuated measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) would eliminate the three common childhood diseases in the U.S. In 1989, parents were informed that a single dose of MMR vaccine was inadequate for providing lifelong protection against these common childhood diseases and that children would need to get a second dose of MMR.

Today, 95 percent of children entering kindergarten have received two doses of MMR vaccine, as have 92 percent of school children ages 13 to 17 years.

In some states, the MMR vaccination rate is approaching 100 percent. Despite achieving the sought-for MMR vaccination rate for more than three decades, which theoretically should ensure “herd immunity,” outbreaks of both measles and mumps keep occurring — and many of those who get sick are children and adults who have been vaccinated.

Mumps Is Making a Comeback
As recently reported by Science Magazine and The New York Times, mumps is making a strong comeback among college students, with hundreds of outbreaks occurring on U.S. campuses over the past two decades. Last summer, the Minnesota Department of Health reported its largest mumps outbreak since 2006.

According to recent research, the reason for this appears to be, at least in part, waning vaccine-acquired immunity. In other words, protection from the MMR vaccine is wearing off quicker than expected. Science Magazine writes:

“[Epidemiologist Joseph Lewnard and immunologist Yonatan Grad, both at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston] compiled data from six previous studies of the vaccine’s effectiveness carried out in the United States and Europe between 1967 and 2008. (None of the studies is part of a current fraudulent claims lawsuit against U.S. vaccine maker Merck.)

Based on these data, they estimated that immunity to mumps lasts about 16 to 50 years, or about 27 years on average. That means as much as 25 percent of a vaccinated population can lose immunity within eight years, and half can lose it within 19 years ... The team then built mathematical models using the same data to assess how declining immunity might affect the susceptibility of the U.S. population.

When they ran the models, their findings lined up with reality. For instance, the model predicted that 10- to 19-year-olds who had received a single dose of the mumps vaccine at 12 months were more susceptible to infection; indeed, outbreaks in those age groups happened in the late 1980s and early 1990s. In 1989, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention added a second dose of the vaccine at age 4 to 6 years. Outbreaks then shifted to the college age group.”

A Third Booster Shot May Be Added
According to public health officials, the proposed solution to boosting vaccine-acquired mumps immunity in the U.S. population is to add a third booster shot of MMR vaccine at age 18.

Unfortunately, adding a booster for mumps means giving an additional dose of measles and rubella vaccines as well, as the three are only available in the combined MMR vaccine or combined MMR-varicella (MMRV) vaccine. At present, a third MMR shot is routinely recommended during active mumps outbreaks, even though there is no solid proof that this strategy is effective.

Considering two doses of the vaccine are failing to protect young adults from mumps, adding a third dose, plus two additional doses of measles and rubella vaccines, seems like a questionable strategy, especially in light of evidence that the mumps vaccine’s effectiveness may have been exaggerated to begin with.

According to a lawsuit filed eight years ago, the manufacturer of mumps vaccine — which is also the sole provider of MMR vaccine in the U.S. — is accused of going to illegal lengths to hide the vaccine’s ineffectiveness. So, might this resurgence of mumps simply be the result of using a vaccine that doesn’t provide immunity to begin with? And, if so, why add more of something that doesn’t work? After all, the MMR vaccine is not without its risks, as you’ll see below.

Still-Pending Lawsuit Alleges MMR Fraud
In 2010, two Merck virologists filed a federal lawsuit against their former employer, alleging the vaccine maker lied about the effectiveness of the mumps portion of its MMR II vaccine. The whistleblowers, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, claimed they witnessed “firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine's efficacy findings.”

According to Krahling and Wlochowski, a number of different fraudulent tactics were used, all with the aim to “report efficacy of 95 percent or higher regardless of the vaccine’s true efficacy.” For example, the MMR vaccine’s effectiveness was tested against the virus used in the vaccine rather than the natural, wild mumps virus that you’d actually be exposed to in the real world. Animal antibodies were also said to have been added to the test results to give the appearance of a robust immune response.

For details on how they allegedly pulled this off, read Suzanne Humphries’ excellent summary, which explains in layman's terms how the tests were manipulated. Merck allegedly falsified the data to hide the fact that the vaccine significantly declined in effectiveness. By artificially inflating the efficacy, Merck has been able to maintain its monopoly over the mumps vaccine market.

This was also the main point of contention of a second class action lawsuit, filed by Chatom Primary Care16 in 2012, which charged Merck with violating the False Claims Act. Both of these lawsuits were given the green light to proceed in 2014, and are still pending.

In 2015, Merck was accused of stonewalling, “refusing to respond to questions about the efficacy of the vaccine,” according to a court filing by Krahling and Wlochowski’s legal team. “Merck should not be permitted to raise as one of its principal defenses that its vaccine has a high efficacy … but then refuse to answer what it claims that efficacy actually is,” they said.

There’s No Such Thing as Vaccine-Acquired Herd Immunity
This certainly isn’t the first time vaccine effectiveness has been questioned. While herd immunity is thrown around like gospel, much of the protection vaccines offer has actually been shown to wane rather quickly. The fact is, vaccine-acquired artificial immunity does not work the same way as the naturally-acquired longer-lasting immunity you get after recovering from the disease.

A majority of adults do not get booster shots, so most of the adult population is, in effect, “unvaccinated.” This calls into question the idea that a 95 percent-plus vaccination rate among children achieves vaccine-acquired “herd immunity” in a population. While there is such a thing as naturally acquired herd immunity, vaccine-induced herd immunity is a total misnomer.

Vaccine makers have simply assumed that vaccines would provide the same kind of longer-lasting natural immunity as recovery from viral and bacterial infections, but the science and history of vaccination clearly shows that this is not the case.

Vaccination and exposure to a given disease produce two qualitatively different types of immune responses. To learn more about this, please see my previous interview with Barbara Loe Fisher, cofounder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC). As explained by Fisher:

“Vaccines do not confer the same type of immunity that natural exposure to the disease does ... [V]accines only confer temporary protection… In most cases natural exposure to disease would give you a longer-lasting, more robust, qualitatively superior immunity because it gives you both cell mediated immunity and humoral immunity.

Humoral is the antibody production. The way you measure vaccine-induced immunity is by how high the antibody titers are. (How many antibodies you have.) The problem is, the cell mediated immunity is very important as well. Most vaccines evade cell mediated immunity and go straight for the antibodies, which is only one part of immunity."
TFWBelim1Hw
MMR Does Not Work as Advertised
It’s quite clear the MMR vaccine does not work as well as advertised in preventing mumps, even after most children in the U.S. have gotten two doses of MMR for several decades. Public health officials have known about the problem with mumps vaccine ineffectiveness since at least 2006, when a nationwide outbreak of mumps occurred among older children and young adults who had received two MMR shots.

In 2014, researchers investigated a mumps outbreak among a group of students in Orange County, New York. Of the more than 2,500 who had received two doses of MMR vaccine, 13 percent developed mumps — more than double the number you’d expect were the vaccine to actually have a 95 percent efficacy.

Now, if two doses of the vaccine have “worn off” by the time you enter college, just how many doses will be needed to protect an individual throughout life? And, just how many doses of MMR are safe to administer in a lifetime? Clearly there is far more that needs to be understood about mumps infection and the MMR vaccine before a third dose is added to the already-packed vaccine schedule recommended by federal health officials for infants, children and adolescents through age 18.

Mumps Virus May Have Mutated to Evade the Vaccine
Poor effectiveness could also be the result of viral mutations. There are a number of different mumps virus strains included in vaccines produced by different vaccine manufacturers in different countries. The U.S. uses the Jeryl-Lynn mumps strain in the MMR vaccine developed and sold in the U.S. by Merck. There's significant disagreement among scientists and health officials about whether the mumps virus is evolving to evade the vaccine.

Two years ago, Dr. Dirk Haselow, an epidemiologist with the Arkansas Department of Health said, "We are … worried that this vaccine may indeed not be protecting against the strain of mumps that is circulating as well as it could. With the number of people we've seen infected, we'd expect 3 of 400 cases of orchitis, or swollen testicles in boys, and we've seen 5."

A 2014 paper written by U.S. researchers developing a new mumps vaccine also suggested that a possible cause of mumps outbreaks in vaccinated Americans could be due to " ... the antigenic differences between the genotype A vaccine strain and the genotype G circulating wild-type mumps viruses."

Be Aware of MMR Vaccine Risks
If a vaccine is indeed highly effective, and avoiding the disease in question is worth the risk of the potential side effects from the vaccine, then many people would conclude that the vaccine's benefits outweigh the risks. They may even be in favor of an additional dose.

However, if the vaccine is ineffective, and/or if the disease doesn't pose a great threat to begin with, then the vaccine may pose an unacceptable risk. This is particularly true if the vaccine has been linked to serious side effects. Unfortunately, that's the case with the MMR vaccine, which has been linked to thousands of serious adverse events and hundreds of deaths. According to NVIC:

"As of March 1, 2018, there had been 1,060 claims filed in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program for injuries and deaths following MMR or MMR-Varicella (MMRV) vaccinations … Using the MedAlerts search engine, as of February 4, 2018, there had been 88,437 adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in connection with MMR or MMRV vaccines since 1990.

Over half of those MMR and MMRV vaccine-related adverse events occurred in babies and young children 6 years old and under. Of the MMR and MMRV vaccine related adverse events reported to VAERS, 403 were deaths, with over 60 percent of the deaths occurring in children under 3 years of age."

Keep in mind that less than 10 percent of vaccine adverse events are ever reported to VAERS. According to some estimates, only about 1 percent are ever reported, so all of these numbers likely vastly underestimate the true harm.

A concerning study published in Acta Neuropathologica in February 2017 also describes the first confirmed report of vaccine-strain mumps virus (live-attenuated mumps virus Jeryl Lynn, or MuVJL) found in the brain of a child who suffered "devastating neurological complications" as a result. According to the researchers:

"This is the first confirmed report of MuVJL5 associated with chronic encephalitis and highlights the need to exclude immunodeficient individuals from immunization with live-attenuated vaccines. The diagnosis was only possible by deep sequencing of the brain biopsy."
[/QUOTE]

Tintin

6th April 2018, 13:10

This is a very very interesting and absorbing thread and I really do need to make more time to digest its contents more fully. Now on my to do list :thumbsup:

In the wake of the tragic news of Dr. Timothy J. Cunningham's death received in the last day I'm motivated to make a small contribution to the thread, and hope that this may not have been posted before - I've linked it on the specific thread on TJC here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?102348-CDC-s-Timothy-Cunningham-s-body-found-in-the-river

I've also tidied up some spelling errors and syntax anomalies on this article for digestion here. Again, apologies if this has surfaced already on this thread.

I've appended William Thompson's letter as well at the end of this article.

From Dr. Andrew Wakefield:

“I’m twenty years into this battle, and it could have continued the way it was going, until one man stepped forward, [William Thompson] a senior scientist, a CDC insider saying, “I was in charge of a study where we tested a hypotheses and we found the MMR vaccination was causally associated with autism and we hid the findings. We hid it for fourteen years and we have know for fourteen years that this vaccine is causally associated with autism and we have concealed it. We’ve put millions of Americas children in harms way and I can live with that no longer.”

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CDC whistleblower: “We were ordered to cover up vaccine-autism link” (VIDEO)

Friday, April 29, 2016 by D. Samuelson

This video (http://govtslaves.info/2016/04/top-cdc-whistle-blower-we-were-ordered-to-cover-up-vaccine-autism-link/) contains an extraordinary conversation for extraordinary times. Biblical times, really. When the lie becomes the truth and the truth becomes a lie. These days, lying is not just okey dokey, nor is it an occasional little white one – there’s no such thing. It is not merely the flavor for the month.

It is all of the above, and so much more. It’s the new American tradition. Now it’s politically correct to remove Native American names from sports teams. Don’t talk about small pox blankets and decimating buffalo from the windows of steam engine trains. Just remove a word, no worries. No harm done. Withholding evidence is also a lie.

Change the message, bury the truth.

Like around fourteen years ago, when men and women destroyed the evidence of Merck’s MMR vaccine showing a causal relationship with autism, with increased risk reserved for African American male children.

Corrupted souls filled with fraud, deception, flat out lying to Congress and themselves did not have the mindset of “do no harm.” CDC scientists destroyed the proof that children injected with the MMR vaccine could very well have a full cognitive life taken from them via autism. If truth were told, their profits and brotherhood would suffer, so, no worries, just destroy the evidence and go on your merry way. Change a word or two. Allow another slaughter of the innocents to begin. And when the truth starts to trickle out it is ignored, suppressed or mocked. But the truth cannot be contained.

Here’s an except from the Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s interview with Alex Jones:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-u0UnOF5xU

“I’m twenty years into this battle, and it could have continued the way it was going, until one man stepped forward, [William Thompson] a senior scientist, a CDC insider saying, “I was in charge of a study where we tested a hypotheses and we found the MMR vaccination was causally associated with autism and we hid the findings. We hid it for fourteen years and we have know for fourteen years that this vaccine is causally associated with autism and we have concealed it. We’ve put millions of Americas children in harms way and I can live with that no longer.”

It’s a note of hope that a man no longer can live with his lie. So he turns away and walks a new direction. That’s called repentance. America must follow suit.

You must see the movie VAXXED and spread the truth [Note from Tintin Q: I have posted up several compelling Jon Rappoport blogs concerning this film available on the forum]

Andrew Wakefield made the film featuring William Thompson, a former CDC senior scientist turned whistleblower. Thompson has provided the world 100% proof that even the then top dog of the CDC, Judy Gerberding, M.D., knew Merck’s MMR vaccine would harm children. Back in 2004, Ms. Gerberding was too busy vying for her new revolving door job as President of the Vaccine Division of Merck. Call those revolving doors kickbacks, bribery or sociopathic fascism, whatever the monogram, autism has skyrocketed, parents are grieving and our nation is killing it’s young, not just the 60 million in the womb, but the infants who are born healthy, have a vaccination and never speak again.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

William Thompson's letter

37509

Tintin

6th April 2018, 14:25

Referencing Herve's historical Jon Rappoport blog entry from 2014 here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=881045&viewfull=1#post881045 and extracting, here, William Thompson's February 2004 letter to Dr. Gerberding.

37510

onawah

6th April 2018, 14:50

Thanks TinTin. Wakefield's testimony was covered pretty well on this thread at the time, but you have added to it, and it's good to keep on drawing attention to the matter, because I don't think many people really understand how dire the situation is--that if things don't change, one out of two US children will be autistic by 2032. Along with 5G, it's the issue that concerns me most.

Tintin

6th April 2018, 14:56

Thanks TinTin. Wakefield's testimony has been covered pretty well on this thread at the time, but you have added to it, and it's good to keep on drawing attention to the matter, because I don't think many people really understand how dire the situation is--that if things don't change, one out of two US children will be autistic by 2032. Along with 5G, it's the issue that concerns me most.

My pleasure and I am glad that this sits okay with you. I'm very careful always to try and avoid duplicating others' contributions, and aim for meaningful continuity.

Yes, these are both serious issues and do demand our attention and continuing vigilance.

Michelle Marie

7th April 2018, 03:37

I read this post AFTER reading about Poul Thorsen in relation to Dr. Cunningham's death and CDC nefarious schemes:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=1217305&viewfull=1#post1217305
____________
https://realfarmacy.com/cdc-researcher-dead/

From article link above:

"The CDC is also tied to international fugitive Poul Thorsen, a fraudulent data manipulator who fabricated fake science claiming vaccine ingredients were safe. When federal authorities began to look more closely at the serious fraud committed by Thorsen, he fled to Europe and remains an international fugitive from justice to this day, taking millions of taxpayer dollars with him in a massive international science funding fraud scheme. The CDC and the corrupt vaccine-pushing media continue to cite Thorsen's "scientific" studies to this day."
_________________
MM :sun:

onawah

8th April 2018, 19:22

BOMBSHELL: ALL TESTED VACCINES REVEAL TOXIC SUBSTANCES LINKED TO AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE
Posted by: Lori Alton, staff writer in Vaccine Dangers April 6, 2018 4
(Bold, underlined and red letters my emphasis)
https://www.naturalhealth365.com/vaccines-metals-2517.html

(Naturalhealth365) According to the National Institutes of Health, up to 23.5 million Americans suffer from autoimmune disease – and the number is increasing steadily. Unfortunately, Western medicine continues to ignore the impact of vaccines on this growing health crisis.

In addition, rates of cancer, diabetes, autism and other neurodevelopmental diseases continue to soar – a disease (and disability) epidemic that has researchers baffled. Yet, many integrative healthcare providers have warned the general public that vaccines – already known to contain neurotoxic metals like, lead and chromium – are a fundamental trigger for these so-called ‘mysterious’ health issues.

Now, a pair of Italian scientists are reporting unsafe levels of contaminants in human vaccines, further raising the concern over these negative (and avoidable) health outcomes.

WARNING about vaccines: Sophisticated new method of analysis reveal extensive contamination
The study was conducted by a husband and wife research team, Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari. Antonietta Gatti, a selected expert of the World Health Organization (WHO) for the safety of nanotechnological food, is a member of the National Council of Research of Italy and the scientific director of Nanodiagnostics.

Using electron-microscopy, the researchers examined 44 samples of 30 different human and veterinary vaccines, including those for influenza, meningitis, allergies, cervical cancer and hepatitis.

And what they found was disturbing. The pair identified contaminants in all tested vaccines – but for one. (The lone vaccine to test free of inorganic contaminants was Feligen, produced for use on cats).
When it comes to vaccine safety, humans didn’t fare as well.

In the study, published in 2017 in International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccinations, the researchers reported that they found both single particles and aggregates – or assemblages – of a variety of bizarre and toxic substances in the vaccines.

Researchers “baffled” by the composition of the contaminants
The researchers described the contaminants as “micro- and nano-sized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements not declared in the products’ ingredients lists.”

The vaccines were found to contain “red cells” – of human or possibly animal origin – along with metals such as lead, tungsten and chromium. (Chromium, found in 25 of the tested human vaccines, has been linked to autoimmune disease and leukemia).

In fact, when it came to heavy metals, vaccines feature a veritable “Russian roulette.” Other metals identified included silver, gold and platinum – precious metals when found in the form of jewelry, but not so precious (in fact, toxic) when injected into the human body.

Specifically, lead particles were found in the cervical cancer vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix, as well as in the seasonal flu vaccine Aggripal and in the meningitis vaccine Meningetec.

An infant vaccine called Infarix Hexa – intended to protect against DPT and other diseases – contained stainless steel, tungsten and a gold-zinc aggregate. Another flu vaccine, marketed for children three years and older, contained 11 different metals and aggregates of metals.

The scientists reported that they were “baffled” by the unusual chemical composition of the foreign bodies and pollutants, which they called “non-biodegradable” and “non-biocompatible.” Likening the substances to “products generated by burning waste,” the team said the substances had no technical use and could not be found in any material handbook.

The team concluded that the contaminants’ presence was accidental, and possibly a result of inadequate filtration. They called for purification of vaccines to improve their quality and decrease the number and seriousness of adverse effects.

The scientists emphasized that these substances should not be present in any vaccine – in particular, those meant for infants.

Researchers: Adverse effects are “possible and credible”
The researchers identified some possible immune responses to the contaminants.

The immune system, they wrote, could react by dispensing microphages to engulf the foreign bodies. This action could contain the contaminants, as swellings or granulomas at the injection site. Alternately, they could be ferried in the bloodstream to other sites in the body, with unknown consequences.

The foreign bodies could also precipitate the release of a flood of cytokines – inflammatory substances – that could then trigger autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis and diabetes. (The researchers noted that the pro-inflammatory chemical Interleukin-6 has already been incriminated in autism).

Finally, the foreign nano-particles are so small that they are capable of interacting with cell DNA – with unforeseen consequences.

Due to their smaller size, children are particularly vulnerable to damage from vaccine contaminants.
Reported side effects from vaccines include headaches, fatigue, seizures, muscle pain, paralysis and even sudden infant death syndrome.

Of course, this latest study highlighting contaminants doesn’t represent the only evidence of lapses in vaccine safety. In the 1960s, polio vaccine was contaminated with a simian virus from monkey kidney cells – which is now linked to the growing epidemic of cancer.

In 2007, 1.2 million doses of Hib vaccine were recalled due to contamination with cereus, a bacterium that causes food poisoning. And, in 2009, a meningitis vaccine for babies was contaminated with S. aureus bacteria.

From the U.S. CDC and WHO: Nothing but “crickets” in response to this alarming news
A reasonable response to the findings of Drs. Gatti and Montanari would have been for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to begin an investigation – using independent scientists to either confirm or refute the findings.

But medical and governmental authorities in the United States appear to have taken no notice of the pair’s findings. A year after the publication of the study, no such investigation has been launched.

And the explosive research has not been widely covered in the media. (Natural health advocates maintain that the mainstream media’s ties to big pharma cause them to be reluctant to investigate, or even publicize, negative vaccine stories – a disgraceful state of affairs).

Note: a type of digital ledger known as blockchain is gaining traction as a way to collect, track and share data on vaccines and adverse reactions.

To learn more about blockchain, visit: the World Mercury Project web site. https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/the-third-digital-revolution-to-unleash-the-power-of-anti-censorship/

Update: According to news reports, Italian police raided the home and laboratory of Drs. Gatti and Montanari last month, seizing laptops, computers, documentation, data and flash-drives. Vaccine safety advocates say this is a blatant attempt to silence the scientists – while other sources say the raid is due to a dispute surrounding the ownership and use of an electron microscope.

In any case, the timing certainly seems highly suspicious.

Sources for this article include:

CMSRI.org http://info.cmsri.org/the-driven-researcher-blog/dirty-vaccines-new-study-reveals-prevalence-of-contaminants
Medcraveonline.com http://medcraveonline.com/IJVV/IJVV-04-00072.pdf

onawah

9th April 2018, 17:41

FDA Acknowledged That Vaccine Technology Outpacing Ability to Predict Adverse Eventshttps://worldmercuryproject.org/news/fda-acknowledged-that-vaccine-technology-outpacing-ability-to-predict-adverse-events/?utm_source=mailchimp
APRIL 09, 2018
By Lyn Redwood, R.N., M.S.N., Executive Director, World Mercury Project

Recently, top-tier autoimmunity researchers described vaccine safety science as a “hazardous occupation.” In their view, this is because uncompromising vaccine proponents are instantly ready to mount vociferous personal attacks on anyone who raises questions about any aspect of vaccine safety, even if the questions are buttressed by impeccable, high-quality science. Vaccine safety was not always such a taboo topic. In 1961, a leading polio researcher put forth the view in Science that “even after licensing, a new vaccine product must be considered to be on trial” because of the many “new variables” that accompany large-scale vaccine production and rollout.

uncertainties about new vaccine technologies could easily result in a “black box” situation of unforeseen and unpredictable vaccine outcomes.
A leading Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official contended in 1999 that modern advances in vaccine technology were rapidly “outpacing researchers” ability to predict potential vaccine-related adverse events” and argued for closer attention to safety issues from the earliest stages of vaccine development. “One of the important things is that the technology used to make these vaccines actually exceeds the science and technology to understand how these vaccines work and to predict how they will work,” stated Dr. Peter Patriarca, MD, Director of the Viral Products Division of the FDA Center for Biological Evaluation and Research (CBER). “So this has the potential for ending up in a situation which I call a “black box” vaccine” referring to a situation of unforeseen and unpredictable vaccine outcomes.”

Dr. Patriarca also voiced concerns that with live attenuated vaccines “there is the potential for these vaccines, many of which have been poorly characterized to recombine with viruses that may be present in the vaccine. Some of these viruses are latent and persist for a while, so it is very important to assure that these things are safe before they are given to people.”

In the two decades since the FDA official’s prescient words of warning, numerous published studies have highlighted vaccine safety concerns that were either unexplored or neglected prior to the introduction of the vaccines in question. Troubling issues have included the presence of adventitious agents and contaminants in vaccines and the rise of new allergies associated with synthetic vaccines. Studies also highlight major gaps in the methods, protocols and timelines used to assess vaccine safety.

First rotavirus vaccine debacle
The checkered history of rotavirus vaccines in the U.S. confirms the vital need for new vaccines to remain “on trial” after their launch in the general population. In 1998, the U.S. government licensed the first rotavirus vaccine, RotaShield, a tetravalent live-attenuated vaccine that used a genetically engineered rhesus monkey rotavirus along with three rhesus-human reassortant viruses. Other rhesus-based rotavirus vaccines previously had “failed to prove safe for administration in infants.” According to a detailed account of RotaShield in the Milbank Quarterly, the vaccine’s manufacturer, Wyeth, bragged about the vaccine as one of its “new, breakthrough therapies” and expressed the hope of establishing a large, profitable market in the U.S. as a prelude to marketing RotaShield in developing countries.

…reports to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) pointed to a substantially increased risk of bowel intussusception, a potentially fatal (though usually rare) condition involving intestinal enfolding and obstruction.
Despite the initial optimism, Wyeth had to commercially withdraw RotaShield one year later, when reports to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) pointed to a substantially increased risk of bowel intussusception, a potentially fatal (though usually rare) condition involving intestinal enfolding and obstruction. For infants in their first year of life, intussusception risks increased 20 to 30 times within two weeks of receiving the first dose of RotaShield.

According to the Milbank Quarterly description, a 1997 pre-licensing regulatory review meeting led by the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee had given Wyeth’s hired hand (a university professor) “a minute or two maximum” to discuss intussusception risks. There were “no follow-up questions…and no further discussion…during the remainder of the meeting,” despite the scientist’s expressed concern that “with larger numbers perhaps a causal relationship might emerge.” Nor did attendees consider intussusception at subsequent meetings of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), where, despite the professor sharing her intussusception data, vaccine cost-effectiveness was the focus of discussion. It was not until an estimated 500,000 children received at least one million doses of RotaShield that the FDA suspended the vaccine, at first temporarily and then permanently, without ever explaining the “precise mechanism” by which RotaShield caused intussusception. Ironically, the government subsequently trumpeted the RotaShield story as proof that “the systems established to detect and respond to vaccine safety concerns are effective.”

The second rotavirus vaccine debacle
Two new genetically engineered oral rotavirus vaccines entered the vaccine marketplace in 2006 and 2008, respectively: RotaTeq, a pentavalent (five-strain) bovine-human reassortant rotavirus vaccine made by Merck, and Rotarix, a live-attenuated single-human-strain rotavirus vaccine manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Although pre-licensure trials found no evidence of an association between the two vaccines and intussusception, post-licensure monitoring later indicated a statistically significant increased risk of intussusception events for all rotavirus vaccines. Unlike with RotaShield, FDA merely instructed Merck, in 2013, and GSK, in 2014, to update their labeling and prescribing information to include brief statements about increased intussusception risks but otherwise allowed the two vaccines to remain on the market.

…the researchers discovered that RotaTeq and Rotarix were contaminated with DNA from two porcine circoviruses—PCV1 (in Rotarix) and both PCV1 and PCV2 (in RotaTeq). Both GSK and Merck later confirmed these findings. The PCV2 pathogen is associated with severe wasting and immunodeficiency in pigs.
Meanwhile, the much-vaunted industry and governmental safety systems that ushered the two rotavirus vaccines to market failed to detect an additional and highly concerning problem, which an academic research team “unexpectedly” identified in 2010. While conducting “a novel, highly sensitive analysis not routinely used for adventitious agent screening,” the researchers discovered that RotaTeq and Rotarix were contaminated with DNA from two porcine circoviruses—PCV1 (in Rotarix) and both PCV1 and PCV2 (in RotaTeq). Both GSK and Merck later confirmed these findings. The PCV2 pathogen is associated with severe wasting and immunodeficiency in pigs.

Although the short- and long-term dangers from PCV1 and PCV2 are as yet unknown, the pioneers of genetic engineering foresaw horizontal gene transfer—the direct uptake and incorporation of genetic material from unrelated species—as a clear risk of genetically engineered vaccines. Unlike chemical pollutants, nucleic acids are infectious and can invade cells and genomes, multiplying, mutating and recombining indefinitely. Potential hazards of horizontal gene transfer include generation of new disease-causing viruses and bacteria (or reactivation of dormant viruses); spread of drug and antibiotic resistance genes among viral and bacterial pathogens; and random insertion into genomes of cells resulting in cancer.

If this contamination had been discovered prior to licensure of the rotavirus vaccines, FDA would not have licensed the vaccines—why should it be any different now?
At issue, in the example of RotaTeq and Rotarix, are the dangers of incorporation of adventitious PCV contaminants from live rotavirus vaccines into the human host or host-related bacteria (such as the gut flora)—dangers unrecognized and, therefore, unexplored before the two vaccines went to market. There is also additional cause for concern based on research demonstrating that the pathogenic potential of PCV2 to cause an AIDS-like disease in pigs is unleashed when there is simultaneous vaccine-induced immune system activation. In light of this research, the current recommendation to administer PCV2-contaminated rotavirus vaccine along with five other vaccines—hepatitis B (HepB), diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), pneumococcal conjugate (PCV) and inactivated poliovirus (IPV)—represents a high-risk scenario for disease in humans. If the contamination had been discovered prior to licensure of the rotavirus vaccines, FDA would not have licensed the vaccines—why should it be any different now?

At a 2010 meeting convened by FDA to discuss the PCV contamination, a GSK executive went so far as to concede that “evolving technologies can lead to new findings that were not known at the time of licensure.” Nonetheless, the GSK researchers expressed little worry, having framed the presence of the PCV DNA in their vaccine as a simple “manufacturing quality issue” rather than a safety risk. GSK even put a positive spin on the matter, suggesting that the PCV investigation “could serve as a model for risk assessment in the event of new technologies identifying adventitious agents in the manufacturing of other vaccines.”

Are unforeseen outcomes inevitable?
Shortly after the GSK discovery, FDA recommended that physicians temporarily suspend use of Rotarix and switch to RotaTeq, but when Merck’s vaccine was found to contain similar contaminants, FDA reversed course and allowed continued use of both. Instead of calling for new safety studies and completing a new risk-benefit analysis (taking into consideration that mortality from rotavirus disease in the U.S. is very low), the FDA once again reassured the public that the benefits of rotavirus vaccination outweighed any “hypothetical” health risks of PCV contamination. The agency’s sole follow-up action was to rubber-stamp updates to the Merck and GSK package inserts to “reflect the presence of Porcine Circovirus Type-1 and -2 DNA in the vaccine[s].”

Can the assertion that the benefits outweigh the risks be taken at face value? Consider the history of the oral polio vaccine, which has used seed stocks contaminated with multiple strains of simian virus 40 (SV40) for over four decades. SV40 has been detected in the brains of deceased cancer patients who received the oral polio vaccine, and a 2002 Institute of Medicine report cited strong biological evidence that SV40 can transform normal cells into malignant cells. Whether the porcine circovirus contamination that afflicts the two current—and highly engineered—rotavirus vaccines will turn out to have insidious long-term health effects remains an unanswered question. Nonetheless, history indicates that we should not be surprised when novel and difficult-to-control vaccine technologies generate unforeseen outcomes.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/

Michelle Marie

9th April 2018, 18:07

It is my sincere hope and wish, and inner conviction, that people of integrity and ethical values that care about people's well-being, people of "goodwill", replace those that have abused their power to attain personal gain while motivated by greed.

The FDA has long since been compromised. And until these fundamental values are instilled and people held accountable, the damage to human health and human lives will continue. The light that is shining, are these people who are professional, ethical, and moral that continue to stick their necks out to stake a claim for truth and for doing the right thing.

Even sharing this information, right here, right now, is shining this light of awareness. This awareness will spread and grow. The strength of the light of conscious humans with big hearts and wise minds will prevail.

The times of veiling the dark profit-driven deeds in the darkness of secrets, lies, and deception is coming to a close. The evidence is people stepping down after conflicts of interest coming to light, like that woman from the CDC who was shown to have Merck stocks. Those pharmaceutical billions of dollars need to start flowing to the families who have suffered at their hands.

I can hardly watch the videos of all of the health damages and deaths children and adults have suffered. The prevalence of this is overwhelming. Our feelings of compassion make a difference; and I do sense that this rise in the tide of awareness and compassion is creating the tsunami of energy that will force a reversal--the change that is so necessary at this time.

So, thank you, Onawah, for sharing this information. It does my heart :heart: good to know the truth is expanding the light of awareness for so many of us. :sun:

Really...thank you!
:bearhug:
Michelle Marie

onawah

9th April 2018, 18:15

Most welcome, Michelle.
The Truth and the Light must go hand in hand.
And there are ways that children and adults both can heal from the ravages of vaccine injuries.
Homeopathy in conjunction with diet, herbs, etc. can make a lot of difference.
A subject for another thread!

avid

9th April 2018, 19:10

Flash

9th April 2018, 22:16

Mercury poisoning was not just to do with vaccines, I am a Pinks Disease http://www.pinkdisease.org/PDpamphlet041108.doc survivor, poisoned by mercury in teething powders in the early 1950’s. Many nasty side-effects to this day, lung problems and many other upsetting health issues. I almost died. Lots of issues throughout my life now being explained by research and support groups.

very interesting to read the description of the pind disease symptoms and consequences. thank you Avid.

I did recognised about half the symptoms in my daughter when she was a baby and a toddler. This means that she would have been affected by mercury probably. Which was in vaccines. I do not see any other place where she could have gotten poisoned with mercury, I was quite attentive to those chemicals in the house (mercury, lead, etc).

A Voice from the Mountains

9th April 2018, 22:26

Hey onawah. It's been a while since we last talked!

What do you think about the FDA coming out with this stuff recently?:

FDA Announced That Vaccines Are Causing Autism

The FDA has published conclusive proof on their website that the DTap vaccine can cause autism.

According to the FDA’s online Biologics Blood Vaccines document, a vaccine manufacturer admits on its package insert that their vaccination can cause autism as one of many adverse reactions.

These adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting. Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine.

https://i0.wp.com/inshapetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/print-vaccines.jpg

http://inshapetoday.com/now-official-fda-announced-vaccines-causing-autism/

Maybe a sign of some positive changes to come for once?

They have a cancer vaccine with over 90% success rate in lab rats that's moving to human trials now too. Good timing huh?

Flash

9th April 2018, 22:39

This was in 1999 and the vaccine has been discontinued.

Please check your facts A Voice, it took me 5 minutes to find out.

I give that to my step son (if he ever has babies with my daughter) and with his scientific background I would be immediately discredited, forever, which I do not want at any cost.

Hey onawah. It's been a while since we last talked!

What do you think about the FDA coming out with this stuff recently?:

FDA Announced That Vaccines Are Causing Autism

The FDA has published conclusive proof on their website that the DTap vaccine can cause autism.

According to the FDA’s online Biologics Blood Vaccines document, a vaccine manufacturer admits on its package insert that their vaccination can cause autism as one of many adverse reactions.

These adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting. Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine.

https://i0.wp.com/inshapetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/print-vaccines.jpg

http://inshapetoday.com/now-official-fda-announced-vaccines-causing-autism/

Maybe a sign of some positive changes to come for once?

They have a cancer vaccine with over 90% success rate in lab rats that's moving to human trials now too. Good timing huh?

avid

9th April 2018, 23:56

Flash

10th April 2018, 00:15

the symptoms my daughter had as a baby and a child

Muscle weakness and flaccidity (atonia)

Clumsiness (ataxia)

Digestive problems including loss of weight,
loss of appetite, vomiting and constipation

Convulsive seizures and petit mal attacks
General excess sensitivity of the skin to touch, temperature, water and UV light
Excess nasal discharge
Cold, clammy, swollen pink or bluish hands and feet
Abnormal skin and muscle sensations

at 2 years old above:

Abnormal skin and muscle sensations
• Coldness and moistness of the extremities is evident.
• Lack of muscle tone and high blood pressure are detectable.
• The child becomes listless, doesn’t smile, and doesn’t want to play anymore and may simply sit around and rest all day.
plus definitive pronounced language disabilities

You would not imagine how many bio-chemical treatments she had to enhance her body biology and how many physiotherapies sessions she had to recuperate muscle tone and muscle coordination.
Plus speech therapies and more..

The mothers and other care-givers of babies with Pink Disease suffered severe exhaustion from lack of sleep, severe stress and loss of weight. Family life was generally disrupted by the baby's constant crying.

exactly except that I gain weight instead of losing when under stress, plus I had been poisoned in another situation myself with something else.

My daughter is pretty healthy nowadays, good teeth and gum, just the normal cold, but running nose in winter pretty constant. Her hands and feet are still cold but not as much as they used to be.

Gosh, I should have read that 15 years ago - how come the pediatrician did not ask or suspect this??

A Voice from the Mountains

10th April 2018, 03:50

This was in 1999 and the vaccine has been discontinued.

Please check your facts A Voice, it took me 5 minutes to find out.

So the info is older than I thought it was. I see it was discontinued in 2011. Only one lot of it was recalled in 1999.

It's still the first time I've ever seen the FDA actually put on a warning label that there were reported cases of autism linked to the use of a vaccine.

One lot recalled in 1999 for reasons unrelated to its potential side effects:

On January 27, 1999, the Food and Drug Administration initiated a voluntary recall of Tripedia(TM) diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP), lot number 0916490, manufactured by Pasteur Merieux Connaught USA. * Routine post-release stability testing completed in January 1999 indicated that the potency of the diphtheria toxoid component of this lot was below specification.

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00056589.htm

The important part is that they actually put this on a warning label for the stuff:

These adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathy, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea. Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting. Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequencies or to establish a causal relationship to components of Tripedia vaccine.

This is like those commercials on TV (illegal in many other countries) where they try to sell you a drug, not because it works the best, but because it's their newest product, and then after some happy music and vacation scenes they start reading off a list of terrible side-effects as if there is nothing odd about selling insomnia medicine that causes bleeding from the anus etc.

Except in this case the FDA put a warning for autism on a vaccine.

onawah

12th April 2018, 06:16

This article from the blog of J.B. Handley is too long to be posted in its' entirety here, but it's certainly worth reading:
https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2018/4/1/international2018

International scientists have found autism's cause. What will Americans do?
BY J.B. HANDLEY April 2, 2018

Five clear, replicable, and related discoveries explaining how autism is triggered have formed an undeniably clear picture of autism’s causation, and possibly ways to alleviate the symptoms, too. Most of the research that has created this understanding has been published in the last 36 months, and largely from international scientists in the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Israel, and China. The American media, public health authorities, and Autism Speaks? Silent.

STAFFORDSHIRE, England —In early December 2017, Dr. Chris Exley of Keele University in England and his colleagues published a paper that for the first time looked at the brain tissue of subjects with autism to determine the level of aluminum (note: they spell “aluminum” as “aluminium” in the United Kingdom) found within their brain tissue. For anyone trying to convince the world that “the science is settled and vaccines don’t cause autism,” the study’s findings are deeply contradictory to that statement. In a blog post written by Professor Exley on the day his study was published, he explained the groundbreaking results:

“…while the aluminium content of each of the 5 brains [of people with autism] was shockingly high it was the location of the aluminium in the brain tissue which served as the standout observation…The new evidence strongly suggests that aluminium is entering the brain in ASD [autism spectrum disorders] via pro-inflammatory cells which have become loaded up with aluminium in the blood and/or lymph, much as has been demonstrated for monocytes at injection sites for vaccines including aluminium adjuvants.”
Dr. Chris Exley of Keele University
Dr. Chris Exley of Keele University

Dr. Exley’s quote includes a reference to “monocytes at injection sites” and the fact that the interaction between these monocytes and aluminum has been demonstrated in previous published science. I know, that sounds pretty technical, but bear with me. A “monocyte” is a type of white blood cell, of which one form of monocyte is a “macrophage.” A macrophage can be thought of as the garbage man of the immune system, eating up foreign substances, cell debris, etc. As you will see in a moment, macrophages appear to be playing a critical and devastating role in triggering autism, serving to escort aluminum injected from a vaccine directly into the brain, where it can disrupt brain development and trigger autism.

Dr. Exley’s study — “Aluminium in brain tissue and autism” — is the final piece of a puzzle that first started to come together in 2004, and picked up steam since 2010, that has dramatically furthered the scientific understanding of exactly how a vaccine can trigger autism. This timeline is critical to recognize, because the Vaccine Court in the United States dismissed the vaccine-autism hypothesis in 2009, long before most of what I’m about to explain even existed. Science is a continuum, an emergence of truth through many different studies that often have to be pieced together before the picture becomes clear. And, scientific progress can sometimes move slowly until that moment when an emerging truth presents itself in such a way that it can no longer be denied. In my opinion, Dr. Exley’s study provided the only data missing from an airtight explanation of what happened to my son and so many other children.

For Americans, the race to discover what’s causing all this autism will likely be won on foreign shores. As you’ll soon see, ALL of the science explaining how autism can be caused has come from other countries, even though a Caltech scientist pushed the first domino back in 2006.
etc.
See the rest at: https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2018/4/1/international2018

onawah

12th April 2018, 06:23

Regulators Remain Indifferent to Unsafe Levels of Aluminum in Vaccines
APRIL 11, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/regulators-remain-indifferent-to-unsafe-levels-of-aluminum-in-vaccines/?utm_source=mailchimp

By the World Mercury Project Team

Vaccines are complex laboratory creations designed for one seemingly simple purpose: to stimulate a theoretically protective immune response. However, some vaccines are not as likely to have their intended effect without an “adjuvant” to amplify the vaccinated individual’s response. Aluminum salts are the most common type of vaccine adjuvant in use, despite abundant science establishing aluminum as a neurotoxin.

In 2002, only two childhood vaccines contained aluminum adjuvants, but the aluminum picture had changed dramatically by 2016, when children received five aluminum-containing vaccines from birth to age three and at least two more in the teenage years. Two independent researchers are raising important questions about the wisdom of this ramped-up use of injected aluminum in young children. In a study published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology (JTEMB) and a related online article, the researchers methodically show that current levels of aluminum in vaccines—wrongly termed “safe” by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—derive from “outdated information, unwarranted assumptions and errors.”

…the levels of aluminum currently present in individual vaccines and in the modern vaccine schedule as a whole are “problematically high.”
Missing science: counting the ways
According to the two researchers, current aluminum amounts in vaccines lack the rigorous scientific underpinning ordinarily required to make a proper determination of toxicity and dosing. One of the largest gaffes is that “the entire paradigm to aluminum dosing in vaccines [was not] determined considering body weight.” The researchers note that whereas dosage should be expressed in terms of micrograms per kilogram of body weight per day (and should consider all injected and ingested sources of aluminum on that day), the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) simply references aluminum amounts in terms of micrograms per dose. As a result, aluminum amounts do not appropriately adjust for toxicological differences between adults and children, males and females or normal-birthweight versus low-birthweight infants.

Unfortunately, the sobering bottom line of this ‘mathematical gerrymandering’ is that ‘we are almost certainly looking at a global neurotoxicity disaster.’
The JTEMB article describes a number of other startling research omissions that have done a major disservice to infants and young children who receive aluminum-containing vaccines. For example:

Regulators based their inadequate aluminum safety thresholds on studies of adult mice.
The mice in question received “poorly absorbed, ingested aluminum” rather than “highly absorbed injected aluminum,” but the toxicity of ingested doses of other forms of aluminum has little to do with the toxicity of injected doses of aluminum salts.
Regulators and scientists relied for decades on a mistaken calculation of the “provisional tolerable weekly intake,” resulting in “overestimation of safe exposure levels.”
Dose-related toxicity has been ignored despite routine administration of multiple aluminum-containing vaccines at a single health care visit.
Although clearance rates of injected doses of aluminum are “not well characterized,” other researchers have suggested that vaccine forms of aluminum are not rapidly eliminated. At least “15% of injected aluminum goes to the brain and stays there.”
Regulators do not factor this issue of body burden into their equations, even though “the accumulated aluminum body burden at each vaccination interval will be higher than an individual aluminum level in a single vaccine.”
Using a more rigorous and extensively justified methodology, the two researchers offer their own calculations of provisional “safe” levels of aluminum in childhood vaccines. These calculations unequivocally show that the levels of aluminum currently present in individual vaccines and in the modern vaccine schedule as a whole are “problematically high.”

Aluminum in the brain can trigger chronic brain inflammation and a cascading series of other events that have all the hallmarks of autism and other neurodegenerative conditions.
Why baseline assumptions matter
In a related online commentary by one of the two researchers, the latter makes no bones about the low credibility of current regulatory thresholds for aluminum—shaped as they have been by “serious historical missteps,” “unfounded assumptions,” “rationalization,” “muddy calculations” and “misrepresentations of past science.” Unfortunately, the sobering bottom line of this “mathematical gerrymandering” is that “we are almost certainly looking at a global neurotoxicity disaster.” Aluminum in the brain can trigger chronic brain inflammation and a cascading series of other events that have all the hallmarks of autism and other neurodegenerative conditions. Is it any surprise, then, that researchers have confirmed massive aluminum accumulation in the brains of children with autism?

Unfortunately, the types of safety calculation errors and unjustified assumptions described by the two researchers will sound only too familiar to those who have followed the lengthy and disturbing saga of neurotoxic ethylmercury in the vaccine preservative thimerosal. In fact, both thimerosal and aluminum adjuvants have a longstanding role as “dominating interventional exposures encountered by fetuses, newborns and infants.” Despite the urgent need to minimize (if not eliminate) the neurotoxic effects of both substances, regulators appear satisfied to continue propagating errors and misplaced reassurances.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project. https://worldmercuryproject.org/
7S5lJ_DKrXw

Pam

12th April 2018, 14:36

onawah

20th April 2018, 04:08

Enough Already: Autism Needs to Be Declared a National Health Crisis
APRIL 19, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/enough-already-autism-needs-to-be-declared-a-national-health-crisis/?utm_source=mailchimp

The CDC is due to release its latest ADDM surveillance numbers. Will our federal health agencies continue to downplay the numbers’ significance, as they have done each time the data show a rise in ASD prevalence? Or will they finally sound an alarm and make it a top priority to find out what is causing this epidemic in our children?

By the World Mercury Project Team

It is both astonishing and insulting that, nearly three decades in, federal agencies and public health experts persist in denying and refusing to tackle our nation’s staggering autism epidemic. With typical dismissiveness (and a straight face), one group of pediatric researchers recently had the temerity to put the word “epidemic” in quotes while endorsing the charade that the rising prevalence of autism is attributable to broader diagnostic criteria, increased awareness and “the inclusion of milder neurodevelopmental differences bordering on normality.”

Over the first decade of surveillance, the CDC reported that Autism Spectrum Disorder prevalence rose by 123%.
The government’s own surveys—as well as parents, school systems and municipal budgets—tell an entirely different story, however. Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) began skyrocketing in the late 1980s, concurrent with a massive expansion of the childhood vaccine schedule and a corresponding increase in children’s exposure to neurotoxic vaccine ingredients such as mercury and aluminum. Using data from the U.S. Office of Special Education Programs, a 2005 study published in Pediatrics reported that autism prevalence went from roughly 1 in 2,850 ten-year-olds born in 1982 (0.035%) to about 1 in 550 ten-year-olds born in 1990 (0.183%).

In the early 2000s, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) began monitoring ASD prevalence (and changes in prevalence over time) through its Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network, an active surveillance system that gathers data from roughly a dozen sites around the U.S. to ascertain ASD prevalence in 8-year-olds. Over the first decade of surveillance, the CDC reported that ASD prevalence rose by 123%.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/04-19-Chart-Birth-Year.jpgs the above table illustrates, the ADDM program has one major shortcoming, which is the lag time between data collection, analysis and publication of prevalence data. For example, the data published in 2014 took four years to analyze and captured ASD prevalence for the cohort born 12 years earlier (i.e., children born in 2002 who were eight years old in 2010). CDC did not report the prevalence estimates for children born in 1992 until 2007.

The ADDM program has other acknowledged limitations as well, including:

Constant changes in the number and location of surveillance sites
A reliance on educational records that are not consistently available at all surveillance sites (which would tend to underestimate true prevalence)
Failure to differentiate between ASD subgroups as an indicator of severity (but with differentiation by IQ, with 70 as the cutoff)
For these reasons, some observers believe that data routinely published by the National Center for Health Statistics more accurately represent the true autism picture. The Center’s prevalence data are based on parental reports from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). As of 2014, NHIS data indicated that 1 in 45 children aged 3-17 years had been diagnosed with ASD (2.24%), and by 2016 this number was 1 in 36 (2.76%)—a 23% increase over the two-year period—and a far cry from the 1 in 550 reported from other data sources in 1990.

A study that compared individuals with autism to the general population found elevated death rates in the ASD group…
A health care and education burden
At a societal level, ASD imposes a substantial economic burden, especially on the health care and education sectors. A study by Harvard researchers found that ASD was associated with over $17,000 more in health care and non-health-care costs annually per child. School systems (and thus taxpayers) carry a large portion of this additional financial burden to cover the special education services used by 76% of ASD children versus 7% of children without ASD. Over the decade from 2005-2015, the number of students with ASD (ages 6-21) rose by 165% nationally. At the family level, the average lifetime cost of caring for a child with autism (including the cost of lost wages) ranges from an estimated $1.4 to $2.4 million (depending on the level of intellectual disability), representing “a huge hit on families.”

Individuals with ASD also face vastly increased risks of medical comorbidities, including atopic disorders such as allergies and asthma, seizures, gastrointestinal problems, cancer and decreased life expectancy. A study that compared individuals with autism to the general population found elevated death rates in the ASD group for causes of death such as seizures and accidental drowning or suffocation and noted overall reduced life expectancy “even for persons who are fully ambulatory” and have only “mild” intellectual disability.

An urgent situation
Over the years, many of the CDC’s bulletins about ASD prevalence have placidly reported that “ASDs are more common than was believed previously.” However, the continued dramatic rise in ASD prevalence and autism’s heavy burden on individuals, families, schools and wider society call for a far greater sense of urgency. Autism must be recognized as a national crisis.

As of this writing (April 2018), the CDC is due to release its latest ADDM surveillance numbers. Will our federal health agencies continue to downplay the numbers’ significance, as they have done each time the data show a rise in ASD prevalence? Or will they finally sound an alarm and make it a top priority to find out what is causing this epidemic in our children? No one—and not least the agencies that are supposed to be looking out for children’s best interests—can afford to be complacent any longer about this unjustifiably neglected public health emergency.

onawah

25th April 2018, 19:56

Meta-Analysis Madness in Vaccine-Autism Science
APRIL 25, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/meta-analysis-madness-in-vaccine-autism-science/?utm_source=mailchimp

By World Mercury Project Board Member JB Handley, Co-Founder, Generation Rescue

Inexplicably, a 2014 “meta-analysis” of published science exploring the relationship between vaccines and autism has become the evidence du jour to prove “vaccines don’t cause autism.” The inadequacies of the 2014 paper are simple to understand, and reveal much about the current environment.

SYDNEY, Australia —Luke E. Taylor, a “Pediatric Registrar” at the Children’s Hospital at Westmead in Sydney, Australia, may not realize that his surname has been co-opted by many in the vitriolic vaccine-autism science debate. A college graduate in 2009, Mr. Taylor (he’s not a doctor) was only one year removed from getting his Master’s Degree in Medicine in 2014 when he authored the only research paper he’s ever published, Vaccines are not associated with autism: An evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Today, his paper is commonly referred to as the “Taylor study” and it has become, surprisingly, the evidence du jour that “vaccines don’t cause autism.”
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/04-23-Luke-E.-Taylor.jpg
Roughly one month ago, Mr. Taylor’s 2014 paper was being widely circulated on Facebook, and I heard from many asking me to comment on the study. Worse, the link many were sharing actually came from a summary of the study provided by Autism Speaks, who treated the Taylor study (back in May 2014) as a nail in the coffin on the vaccine-autism debate.

I’m perpetually disappointed in Autism Speaks, and the way they framed this study was no exception. Here’s a quote from their summary of the Taylor paper:

“Meta-analysis can be a powerful research approach,” comments epidemiologist Michael Rosanoff, Autism Speaks associate director for public health research. “It assesses the quality of data across multiple studies and combines the highest-quality data to give us a ‘higher definition picture’ of the relationship between potential risk factors and autism.”

Two more reasons to write
In just a moment, I will explain to you how absurd it is to treat this meta-analysis as anything more than a “garbage in-garbage out” study, but before I do, I want you to understand why I’m actually taking the time to write this article. Like you, I’m a busy parent, I’m not paid to write these articles, and I can’t waste my time on every topic in this debate, but two things recently happened that pushed me over the edge:

1. Quick story: some leading activists in the autism community met with one of the most senior members of the National Institutes of Health. They pressed this newly-appointed person that the science on whether or not vaccines cause autism remained wide open. He disagreed. They asked him for his evidence. He said he would follow up with the studies he relied upon to convince him this debate is settled. Later, an email arrived. He sent a single link. To the Taylor study!

2. Four days ago, and this was really the final straw for me, my own State Senator here in Portland, Oregon, Elizabeth Steiner-Hayward, posted the Taylor study on her Facebook page, and referred to it as an “Important new study” despite the fact that it’s four years old…and added the deeply galling hashtag “#sciencematters.” Many of you might recognize Senator Steiner-Hayward’s name, as she was the cranky sponsor of a 2015 bill that would have made vaccines mandatory here in Oregon. Her mean-spirited campaign cratered, but not before she proved to many that her mastery of the vaccine-autism debate involved copying and pasting anything that exonerated vaccines, sort of like her recent Facebook post. While it’s not entirely germane to the topic at hand, there’s never a bad time to share this short video of Senator Steiner-Hayward, who happens to also be a “family doctor” who vaccinates children for a living:

gMHk5aryn30

The Taylor Study: Fundamental Flaw
I’m going to start with the punchline. It’s maddening, really, how often I have to explain this simple concept to people. I guess it speaks to what a great job P.R. firms have done convincing the public that the “science is settled” about whether or not vaccines cause autism. Here’s an image, and by itself, it pretty much renders the Taylor study useless:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/04-23-chart-IMG_4896.jpg

So what are you looking at? This is a simple table that shows three things:
1. Column A shows 38 separate ingredients that are included in AT LEAST two vaccines given to children in the United States.

2. Column B shows the first 25 vaccines given to American children in the first 15 months of their life, if they follow the CDC’s recommended schedule.

3. Column C shows my son’s progression into autism over time. Note that he was very sick long before he received the MMR vaccine, which American children typically get at their 12 month vaccine appointment.

Finally, the red circles show something very important. And, this is really the point.

The red circles show the two things that the Taylor Study actually considered in relation to autism: the MMR vaccine, and the mercury-based ingredient Thimerosal. That’s it.
But what about all the other things injected into children when they get vaccinated? What about the 37 other ingredients and what about every other vaccine except MMR? The Taylor “meta-analysis”–which only analyzed studies looking at the MMR vaccine or Thimerosal–would provide no answers. Don’t believe me? As you probably know, a “meta-analysis” is an analysis of other studies. The conclusions and data of each study are aggregated, and the hope is that by comparing all these studies, the conclusions reached will be even more robust. It makes sense, and is often helpful. But, it can’t be helpful if the group of studies in your “meta-analysis” only looked at one ingredient and one vaccine. If you actually read the details of the Taylor Study itself, the authors are quite clear about how narrow the scope of the studies they included in their meta-analysis really were:

“Studies were included that looked at either MMR vaccination, cumulative mercury (Hg) or cumulative thimerosal dosage from vaccinations…”

The Meta-Analysis Studies
Since the authors just affirmed that they only compared autism rates to either Thimerosal (mercury) or MMR, I won’t belabor this point, but here are the actual studies that were included in their meta-analysis, all 10 of them, the titles reveal what was actually looked at:
MMR Studies: 6
1. “A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism.”
2. “MMR-vaccine and regression in autism spectrum disorders: negative results presented from Japan.”
3. “Age at first measles–mumps–rubella vaccination in children with autism and school- matched control subjects: a population-based study in metropolitan Atlanta.”
4. “Lack of association between measles–mumps–rubella vaccination and autism in children: a case-control study.”
5. “MMR vaccination and pervasive developmental disorders: a case-control study.”
6. “The combined measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines and the total number of vaccines are not associated with development of autism spectrum disorder: the first case-control study in Asia.”

Thimerosal Studies: 4

1. “Thimerosal exposure in infants and developmental disorders: a retrospective cohort study in the United Kingdom does not support a causal association.”
2. “Safety of thimerosal containing vaccines: a two-phased study of computerized health maintenance organization databases.”
3. “Association between thimerosal-containing vaccine and autism.”
4. “Prenatal and infant exposure to thimerosal from vaccines and immunoglobulins and risk of autism.”

Importantly, every single child in every single study included in this meta-analysis HAD BEEN VACCINATED. Really.

Before I move on, I want to mention one other study that often gets thrown in my face as “proof” vaccines don’t cause autism. It’s often called the “Sibling MMR” study, and it was created by a consulting firm to pharmaceutical companies, The Lewin Group. In the study, the authors misappropriate the word “unvaccinated” which confused many. I do my best to explain in this article:

https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/04-23-Lewin-Group-Capture-1.jpg

An excellent website, Vaccine Papers: https://vaccinepapers.org/ also debunked : https://vaccinepapers.org/review-of-jain-et-al-jama-2015-and-comments-on-mmr-autism/The Lewin Group’s study. Here’s a quote:

“The Jain [Lewin Group] study only looked at MMR. Media reports about this study have falsely and deceptively asserted that the Jain study shows that “vaccines” in general do not cause autism. In reality, the Jain study says nothing about other vaccines. The MMR vaccine is the only vaccine that has been much studied in relation to autism, and all of the MMR-autism studies suffer from HUB. The other likely more dangerous aluminum-containing vaccines, given at younger ages, have hardly been studied at all. It is a blatant lie to claim that the science shows “vaccines” in general do not cause autism.

The science actually shows the opposite. Controlled animal experiments overwhelmingly prove that immune activation (i.e., interleukin-6) in the developing brain causes autism. Animal experiments also prove that aluminum adjuvant causes brain damage, at dosages human infants routinely receive from vaccines.”

VAERS Madness
There are two excerpts from the study itself that simply need to be seen to be believed. One of the study authors actually witnessed his two children experience seizures after their vaccines, including one that was a “serious event.” His solution? Give vaccines in the morning so you can watch for seizures.

He recommends reporting adverse events to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (“VAERS”). At the same time, any studies that included VAERS data were excluded from consideration for the meta-analysis…you can’t make this stuff up! (Some unsolicited parenting advice: If your child has a seizure after you give them something, maybe don’t give them that thing again?)

https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/04-23-3-ScreenShot2018-04-19at8.20.52AM.jpg
http://https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/04-23-3-ScreenShot2018-04-19at8.20.52AM.jpg

“Saddest paper I’ve ever seen”
Dr. William Thompson, a CDC scientist and head epidemiologist of the National Immunization Program, has become well-known in the autism community for his decision to blow the whistle about the MMR #3 study above, stating that, “I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics.” Dr. Thompson had multiple phone conversations recorded while speaking with an autism dad, Dr. Brian Hooker. In one of those conversations, Dr. Thompson, the leading autism-vaccine epidemiologist in the world at the time, had this to say about the Taylor study:

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ac13fe59f8770748856dca7/t/5ad94a55562fa7843a6ebf82/1524189790976/Screen+Shot+2018-04-19+at+6.55.53+PM.jpg?format=750w
Epidemiology vs. Biology
All the science included in the Taylor study, as narrow as the scope of the studies are, was epidemiology. Scientists are looking at data, in this case medical records and vaccination records of children, and they’re analyzing them to look for patterns and relationships. But, there’s a different kind of science that’s more revealing. It’s biological science, the kind Vaccine Papers referred to in the above quote. It’s science looking at living things and how they actually respond to other things. In the vaccine-autism debate, we have a growing body of biological science. It’s compelling, and it’s all very recent. We have mice studies where the mice are injected with vaccine ingredients, producing devastating results. And, we have clear biological plausibility for how, exactly, a vaccine can cause autism in a child. That’s not the point of this post, but it is the point of an article I wrote a few weeks ago, and you can read about it right here:
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/04-23-Autism-Cause-Capture.jpg

Needless to say, the Taylor study didn’t contemplate ANY of the compelling biological science linking vaccines to autism.

Asking the Right Question
If science doesn’t ask the right question, the answer a study produces is useless. Perhaps the biggest issue with the science done to date to assess the relationship between vaccines and autism is that it doesn’t reflect the real world of how vaccines are administered and the feedback from parents on how this impacts their children.

In 1983, the maximum number of separate vaccines a child would receive by the age of five was 10. Today, that number is 38. By the time a child is five years old, if their parents follow the CDC’s recommended schedule, they will have received the following vaccines, many in multiple doses (the doses are what get you from 11 to 38: you get DTaP 4 times, for example):

Hepatitis B
Rotavirus
DTaP
Hib
Pneumococcal
Polio
Flu
MMR
Varicella
Hepatitis A
Meningococcal
Of the 11 separate diseases covered above, there are actually 34 separate vaccines licensed with the FDA. For example, your child might receive either Rotateq or Rotarix, each of which has been developed in a separate and unique way to address the disease Rotavirus. The possible combinations of total vaccines your child might receive are almost infinite: my child got the Merck Hep B, but the Sanofi Flu, etc, etc. So, in a single two-month-old visit, the average American child will receive six separate vaccines in about five minutes (or less, if you can stomach watching this video–PTSD warning for autism parents):
kERvQ6muKW8
Hepatitis B
Rotavirus
DTaP
Hib
Pneumococcal
Polio
Two months later, at four months of age, most children in America will again receive the same six vaccines, all administered at the same time:

Hepatitis B
Rotavirus
DTaP
Hib
Pneumococcal
Polio
Two months later, at six months of age, most children in America then receive seven vaccines, all administered at the same time:

Hepatitis B
Rotavirus
DTaP
Hib
Pneumococcal
Polio
Flu
So, by six months of age most American children receive 19 vaccines through three visits to the doctor. (It’s worth noting that many kids also receive a birth dose of Hepatitis B, boosting this number to 20 vaccines.)
6oEtF8FdqpA

So, of the first 20 shots given to kids, how many have been studied for their relationship to autism? As you know from the Taylor study, the answer is ZERO, because only one vaccine, the MMR, has ever been studied for its relationship to autism. The MMR is first administered to American children at 12 months of age. I explained this to Dr. Stork on a memorable appearance I made on The Doctors, I think his reaction shows you what happens when you show up a doctor on his TV show.

They keep trying to tell us “vaccines don’t cause autism” without doing the actual science with the proper control groups …
But what about the two, four, and six month well-baby visits where children receive so many vaccines? They have never been studied or considered, so no one has any idea. This would be like trying to identify the source of a plane crash, suspecting mechanical failure, solely analyzing one of the wings, and then declaring the entire airplane free of culpability. But, that’s exactly what has happened. They keep trying to tell us “vaccines don’t cause autism” without doing the actual science with the proper control groups (fully unvaccinated children) and asking the right question, that goes something like this:

Our children receive 38 vaccines by the time they are five, including 20 by their first birthday. Is the administration of so many vaccines causing autism in certain children?
That question, so important to the health of our children and our nation, has never been asked, so it can’t be answered. which begs the question:

Have scientists ever compared vaccinated children to unvaccinated children for ANY vaccine or ANY negative outcome?
In fact, they have. You just haven’t heard about these studies because the answers challenge the current narrative that vaccines are “safe and effective” and don’t cause autism. Read on.

Unvaccinated Studies
The first study that compared children who had received a vaccine to children that hadn’t was actually published in 2000. Although autism wasn’t something the study considered, it was still revealing. Titled “Effects of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis or Tetanus Vaccination on Allergies and Allergy-Related Respiratory Symptoms Among Children and Adolescents in the United States,” this study from the UCLA school of public health did look specifically at the DTP vaccine to see if it might be responsible for allergies and allergy-related symptoms, like asthma. Looking at more than 13,000 children, the study found that:

“DTP or tetanus vaccination in US children is associated with lifetime history of asthma or other allergies and allergy- related symptoms… assuming that the estimated vaccination effect is unbiased, 50% of diagnosed asthma cases (2.93 million) in US children and adolescents would be prevented if the DTP or tetanus vaccination was not administered.”

So, the first study to ever compare a group that received a vaccine to a group that didn’t found a dramatic difference in rates of asthma and allergies amongst the vaccinated group, so much so that they thought not getting the DTP vaccine might reduce cases of asthma by 50%! Note that many children with autism suffer from what are known as “co-morbid” conditions like asthma, allergies, and other auto-immune conditions.

In 2008, in the second study ever looking at a group of children who didn’t receive a vaccine, public health researchers Carolyn Gallagher and Melody Goodman from SUNY-Stony Brook looked at the possible relationship between the Hepatitis B vaccine and special education. Were children who received the full series of Hepatitis B vaccines (three separate vaccines, the first one often given on Day 1 of life) more likely to end up in special education classes than children who didn’t receive any Hepatitis B vaccines? The study, “Hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in US children aged 1-9 years,” was published in the journal Toxicological and Environmental Chemistry, and the results were clear, the full series of Hepatitis B led to a nine-fold greater likelihood of receiving special education:

“This study found statistically significant evidence to suggest that boys in United States who were vaccinated with the triple series Hepatitis B vaccine…were more susceptible to developmental disability than were unvaccinated boys…The odds of receiving EIS [special education] were approximately nine times as great for vaccinated boys (n = 46) as for unvaccinated boys (n = 7), after adjustment for confounders.”

The same researchers from SUNY-Stony Brook published another study in 2010, this time looking at the relationship between receiving the Hepatitis B vaccine and autism. Published in the prestigious Journal of Toxicological and Environmental Health, “Hepatitis B Vaccination in Male Neonates and Autism Diagnosis” once again reached very clear conclusions: “Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life.” Journalist David Kirby appreciated the significance of the new findings, writing in the Huffington Post:

“[the study] will be among the first university-based population studies to suggest an association between a vaccine and an increased risk for autism. And that would be in direct contradiction to all those MMR and thimerosal studies that purportedly found no such link.”

(The two Goodman and Gallagher articles about Hepatitis B raise many concerns. I’ve met pediatricians who feel that the Hepatitis B vaccine specifically has triggered the epidemic of neurological disorders and autoimmunity we now see in our children. Hepatitis B was the first vaccine introduced after Congress indemnified vaccine makers from liability in 1986. The vaccine has a high dose of aluminum, which the new biological science is proving is likely a primary culprit of autism, and it’s often given to babies on Day 1 of life, which many doctors feel is a huge mistake.)

In 2017, another study revealed that the DTP vaccine in Africa killed more children than it helped. Published in the peer-reviewed journal EBioMedicine, the study is titled, “The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis and Oral Polio Vaccine Among Young Infants in an Urban African Community: A Natural Experiment.”

Researchers from the Center for Vitamins and Vaccines, Statens Serum Institut (Denmark), and Bandim health project looked closely at data from the West African nation of Guinea-Bissau and found that the data for children who had been vaccinated with the DTP vaccine

“was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP…DTP is the most widely used vaccine…All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis. Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.”

The scientists in this study closely explored the concept of “NSEs” which are “non-specific effects” of vaccines, which is a fancy way of saying vaccines may make a child more susceptible to other infections, explaining that although “protective against the target diseases, DTP may increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.” What we learn from the African study is that children going through the artificial disease process triggered by a vaccine are actually more susceptible to suffer from (and sometimes die) from other diseases, because their immune system is weakened and compromised in ways we really don’t yet understand. This was a “natural” experiment looking at vaccinated children versus unvaccinated children, and Dr. Aaby doubled-down on this study by recently publishing a follow up paper this month titled, “Evidence of Increase in Mortality After the Introduction of Diphtheria–Tetanus–Pertussis Vaccine to Children Aged 6–35 Months in Guinea-Bissau: A Time for Reflection?” Dr. Aaby, a highly respected international vaccine researcher, asks questions in this brand new paper few are willing to ask:

“Given the threat from diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis and the less-effective acellular pertussis vaccine used in many countries, it is understandable that there has been reluctance in accepting that DTP could have negative effects for overall health in low-income countries. However, the studies from low-income countries have been consistent in showing deleterious effect of DTP…Hence, it would seem to be high time to settle whether DTP has negative effects on overall child health and if it has negative effects to explore whether alternative vaccination schedules could remove the problem.”

Also in 2017, something amazing happened. Two separate studies comparing vaccinated and completely unvaccinated children actually got published. Unlike the Goodman and Gallagher studies above, which only explored a single vaccine, Hepatitis B (the rest of a child’s vaccine status was simply not considered), these two new studies met the “gold standard”—they found children who had never received any vaccines, and looked at their health outcomes in a variety of ways versus their vaccinated peers. The public health researchers from Jackson State University originally planned to publish a single study, until they looked at the data on children born prematurely, noting the data on the difference in health outcomes for vaccinated versus unvaccinated premature infants was so dramatic it deserved its own separate study.

…its results were so devastating to the U.S. vaccine program, there wasn’t a single media outlet in the country that covered its release.
Published in the Journal of Translational Science, the first groundbreaking study was called “Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12-year-old U.S. children,” and its results were so devastating to the U.S. vaccine program, there wasn’t a single media outlet in the country that covered its release. Comparing vaccinated children to completely unvaccinated children, the results were no surprise to me, my wife, or any of the autism parents I know, but perhaps would surprise others:

“The vaccinated were less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NDD. After adjustment, vaccination, male gender, and preterm birth remained significantly associated with NDD [neurodevelopmental disorders].” Specifically, vaccinated children were found to have a 4-fold higher likelihood of having autism. I’m reminded of a quote by Dr. Daniel Niedes of the Cleveland Clinic who said, “Some of the vaccines have helped reduce the incidence of childhood communicable diseases [like chickenpox and pertussis from the study above]…but not at the expense of neurologic diseases like autism and ADHD increasing at alarming rates.”

Simultaneously, the Jackson State authors published a study just looking at children born prematurely in the same journal titled “Preterm birth, vaccination and neurodevelopmental disorders: a cross-sectional study of 6- to 12-year-old vaccinated and unvaccinated children.” The results were disturbing, as the researchers found children born prematurely and vaccinated were 14-times more likely to develop a neurodevelopmental disorder! The authors were appropriately concerned:

“Preterm birth coupled with vaccination, however, was associated with a synergistic increase in the odds of NDD, suggesting the possibility that vaccination could precipitate adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. These results provide clues to the epidemiology and causation of NDD but question the safety of current vaccination programs for preterm infants.”

Conclusion
The ongoing use of the Taylor study meta-analysis to “prove” that vaccines and autism are unrelated is scientifically dishonest and a distraction. The ten studies in the meta-analysis only consider a single vaccine ingredient (thimerosal) and a single vaccine (MMR). Every child in every study they analyzed had been vaccinated. They don’t consider the obvious question: do vaccinated children have higher rates of autism than unvaccinated children? People who post this study as proof that vaccines don’t cause autism are either uninformed on this topic or looking to mislead.

Meanwhile, the biological evidence, through peer-reviewed, published studies is mounting that vaccines trigger immune activation events in the brains of babies that lead to autism. (Here’s an excellent 20 page paper with 97 references explaining exactly how this happens.) The fact that Autism Speaks and one of the most senior leaders of the National Institutes of Health (and a doctor-turned-senator from Oregon) consider the Taylor study proof of anything tells me that many people just want this topic to go away, because facing the emerging science, and the endless stories of devastated families who watched their children regress into autism after vaccine appointments, is too overwhelming for many who have stood by and allowed the autism epidemic to happen. Worse, a manipulative and dishonest study like the Taylor study falsely reassures parents, leading to the ongoing and unnecessary path to autism so many of our children are placed on by a vaccine schedule that’s so harmful to so many.

When will the madness end?
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project: https://worldmercuryproject.org/

onawah

27th April 2018, 17:13

U.S. AUTISM PREVALENCE RATE SOARS TO 1 IN 59 CHILDREN
National Autism Organization Demands Emergency Meeting with Secretary of Health and Human Services and Federal Autism Coordinator in May to Address Crisis
http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/autism-prevalence-rate-soars-1-59/
April 26, 2018 by Thinking Moms' Revolution

The Thinking Moms’ Revolution joins SafeMinds and TACA in demanding action NOW from the Department of Health and Human Services to address the rapidly rising autism rate. We also want to express our fury at the bogus “autism rates are stabilizing” rhetoric that the CDC has been promoting since January, while knowing full well that they are doing nothing of the sort. A prevalence of 1 in 59 represents a 15% increase in just the last two years, up from 1 in 68. And a close analysis of data from a CDC survey released in December reveals that in 2016 the autism rate was already closer to 1 in 36 American children. If this were any other disorder, there would be widespread alarm in the medical community. The following is a press release issued today by SafeMinds.

Baltimore, MD, April 26, 2018 – SafeMinds, a national autism advocacy organization, today sent a letter to Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) officials, demanding a meeting in May to discuss the creation of a Federal Autism Strategic Plan to address the Nation’s autism crisis, following the release of a report this afternoon by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). The CDC report found that autism is now diagnosed in 1 in every 59 American children, representing a 150 percent increase in 18 years.

Lisa Wiederlight, executive director of SafeMinds, stated, “The alarming increase in autism prevalence over the past 10 years signals the need for a significant change in the federal response to addressing autism in the United States. A more accountable, effective, and strategic plan is necessary to meet the needs of those with autism and their caregivers today. We’re hoping for a major overhaul of the current response as the Autism CARES Act is reauthorized.”The CDC report, “Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders Among Children Aged 8 Years—Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United States, 2014,” states that in some of the communities represented in the network, nearly three percent of eight year-olds had an autism diagnosis in 2014. It uses the same methodology that produced the CDC’s 2010 prevalence findings of 1 in 68 children with autism.

The extraordinary cost of autism care is expected to escalate dramatically as prevalence continues to increase. University of California Davis health economists estimate the national cost of caring for all people with autism in the billions, heading towards $1 trillion. Their forecasts for autism-related medical, nonmedical, and productivity losses were $268 billion for 2015, and $461 billion for 2025. The researchers noted that if ASD prevalence continues to increase as it has in recent years while effective interventions and preventive treatments are not identified and made widely available, the costs could reach $1 trillion by 2025.

Notably, the economic and social costs related to the autism crisis will continue to impact every American taxpayer as funding and priorities are redirected into areas, including, but not limited to:

Medical and other health insurance expenditures for co-occurring conditions. Research shows that 47 percent of children with autism had at least one co-occurring condition
Increased funding of social security disability and SSI benefits
Training of public safety resources to manage the explosive increase in wandering and elopement cases, as 49 percent of children with autism wander/elope
Programs addressing the needs of adults with autism including employment, housing, and community integration

Hervé

28th April 2018, 13:37

Alfie Evans is dead (http://82.221.129.208/.yy9.html)

Last night, before he died, I posted something similar to the following and then got trolled out of it. Well, as it turns out this is true so I re-typed it. If you see anything to the contrary, it is British government trollage.

Alfie Evans was born perfectly normal, and got his condition at a year old, after receiving six vaccines in one doctor's visit. The vaccines triggered an auto immune disorder that caused his immune system to destroy his brain. They are saying he had defective genes which caused him to waste away but that is the unilateral universal excuse fronted for vaccine damage every single time. They always blame it on "defective genes".

UNDENIABLE FACT: The British government really does not pay out if the kid dies before age 2, (https://www.gov.uk/vaccine-damage-payment/how-to-claim) and for Alfie, age 2 was coming up in 14 days. HERE IS THE CAPTURE:

http://www.jimstone.is/pages/alfieproof.gif

FACT: Vaccines screwed up alfie, caused a brain wasting disorder, (all kids get knocked down by vaccines now, which are eugenics weapons) and the ones who take it worst die like Alfie. Only Alfie did not die from the vaccine itself, he died because they cut off food. They cut off food, because once he hit age 2, he had rights! They could not have that happening.

I don't think the British government was worried about the payout for damage, and they probably will pay out because this is such a high profile story. I believe the british government was in fact worried because this was such obvious vaccine damage, and they don't want anyone investigating a weapon they want to keep on using. If Alfie hit 2, he'd have crossed that threshold.

Jim Stone 28th April, 2018 (http://82.221.129.208/.yy9.html)

ThePythonicCow

28th April 2018, 21:24

They always blame it on "defective genes".
From the perspective of the elite bastards and their overlords, perhaps Alfie's genes were defective. He was a genetic human, like you and me.

We are the defectives, or as the inestimable Hillary Clinton would say, the deplorables.

onawah

4th May 2018, 04:25

Vaccine Mandate Efforts in Europe Get Pushback
MAY 03, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/vaccine-mandate-efforts-in-europe-get-pushback/?utm_source=mailchimp

By the World Mercury Project Team

In Part One, World Mercury Project reported on the European Parliament’s March 2018 resolution to promote tight Europe-wide coordination of vaccination policies and go after the so-called phenomenon of “vaccine hesitancy.”

In March and April, The British Medical Journal (BMJ) published short news summaries about the European Parliament’s resolve to shore up the European Union’s (EU’s) “fragile” vaccination programs. According to the BMJ reporter (Brussels-based journalist Rory Watson), the Parliament’s March 2018 resolution represented a blanket denunciation of “unreliable, misleading and unscientific information on vaccination.” Seven individuals—scientists, retired health professionals and journalists from England, Scotland, Wales, South Africa and the U.S.—immediately wrote to The BMJ to set the record straight.

Is the European Parliament itself guilty of spreading misinformation? The 15 referenced letters suggest that this may be the case, focusing, in particular, on flawed scrutiny of vaccine risks and rampant conflicts of interest.
In 15 published letters to the editor now indexed in PubMed, the letter-writers argue that “it is…well beyond the brief of the European Union Parliament, or even good sense, to assert that an entire class of products is safe as an absolute truth, and without any qualification.” Is the European Parliament itself guilty of spreading misinformation? The 15 referenced letters suggest that this may be the case, focusing, in particular, on flawed scrutiny of vaccine risks and rampant conflicts of interest.

Letters on hidden vaccine risks
Many of the BMJ-published letters refer to the failure of pre-licensure clinical trials and short-term post-marketing surveillance to detect serious problems with vaccines. To show that the “rigorous testing” cited by the European Parliament as evidence of vaccine safety is not “infallible,” a letter-writer cites two examples. First, “post-marketing surveillance failed to detect the scale of the problem” (an excess risk of aseptic meningitis) associated with the Urabe-strain measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine introduced in the United Kingdom (and other countries) in the 1980s and 1990s—and the delay in removing the vaccine from the market caused harm to many. Second, thousands of children and adolescents developed narcolepsy after receiving the Pandemrix “swine flu” vaccine in 2009-2010; neither the clinical trials nor post-marketing studies in children had identified the safety signal. Another letter-writer comments, “If vaccine regulators were serious about safety, the entire vaccine fleet would have been grounded following the Pandemrix narcolepsy disaster, to check for the same mechanism of failure in other vaccines. But nothing of that sort happened.”

…subjects vaccinated with the newly approved SHINGRIX vaccine (versus placebo) disproportionately experienced cardiac serious adverse events (SAEs), but the package insert for the vaccine (dated Oct. 2017) makes no mention of any cardiac risks.
The letters’ authors mince no words when calling out the duplicity of much vaccine safety science. One common tactic involves manipulation of study designs and statistics. For example, small safety studies can be designed such that they are prone to false negatives (meaning that they fail to observe a difference between groups when in truth there is one)—this allows vaccine manufacturers “to say that any increases in adverse events are ‘not significant.’” Another way to avoid looking head-on at critical safety issues is to ignore mechanistic evidence in favor of dubious epidemiology, or sideline important research topics—such as the immunotoxicity of aluminum adjuvants, the prospect of immune overload with increasing numbers of vaccines and antigens or the role of molecular mimicry in vaccine-induced autoimmunity.

Yet another letter describes recent shenanigans that had the effect of suppressing relevant safety information. In September 2017, an FDA document indicated that subjects vaccinated with the newly approved SHINGRIX vaccine (versus placebo) disproportionately experienced cardiac serious adverse events (SAEs), but the package insert for the vaccine (dated October 2017) makes no mention of any cardiac risks. The letter’s author concludes that “doctors who administer this vaccine are being kept in the dark about these SAEs,” limiting their ability to recognize or report adverse events when they occur.

Letters on conflicts of interest
Several letter-writers to BMJ call attention to the conflicts of interest that prevail among leading vaccine policy-makers in Europe. For example, one writer understatedly asks whether Oxford University professor Andrew Pollard may be in an “ambivalent position” when it comes to discussing vaccine side effects and risks. Pollard directs the Oxford Vaccine Group and chairs the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), which advises UK health departments on vaccination. As the letter-writer points out, “minutes of recent JCVI meetings show that [Pollard] is involved with, amongst others, the Gates Foundation, GAVI [global vaccine alliance], and the European Medicines Agency [EMA].” (For example, see page 17 of the JCVI’s February 7, 2018 minutes.)

…the BMJ letters raise questions about “the very objectivity of European institutions,” highlighting the European Medicines Agency’s disproportionate funding (90%) from pharmaceutical companies…
The EMA is responsible for “ensuring that all medicines available on the EU market are safe, effective and of high quality.” However, the BMJ letters raise questions about “the very objectivity of European institutions,” highlighting the EMA’s disproportionate funding (90%) from pharmaceutical companies and noting the Nordic Cochrane Centre’s scathing condemnation of the EMA’s lack of independence from industry. (The Nordic Cochrane Centre is part of the independent Cochrane Collaboration that produces “gold standard” systematic reviews.) One of the Nordic Cochrane Centre’s many critiques is that the EMA allowed Andrew Pollard to chair a committee on HPV vaccine safety despite conflicts of interest with HPV vaccine manufacturers—and his a priori public declaration that there was “no evidence of safety problems.” In short, says one of the letter-writers, “it is not really clear…that the EMA has a culture of ensuring things are safe, rather than just a culture of saying things are safe, and standing on their dignity” (emphasis added).

Letters explaining what’s needed
Instead of skullduggery and “window dressing research,” entities such as the European Parliament could be of actual service to the public if they adopted “a more realistic, open and transparent approach” and facilitated a “disinterested, comprehensive exchange of information between all parties, ensuring fully informed consent, or dissent, to vaccination.” As one of the BMJ-published letters states:

“They would do well to legislate for safer vaccines, more extensive clinical trials and studies prior to licensing with a robust and very sensitive heightened post marketing surveillance system to instantly detect any adverse reactions (which might not have been detected in the trials due to the size of the cohort) and respond immediately with the removal of the product from the market for further investigation. All too often reports of adverse events are dismissed as being in line with what was statistically expected and not indicative of a serious problem or denied altogether on the argument that there is no evidence of causation. Acknowledgements of adverse events in hindsight (sometimes many years later) are of no consolation to the victims.”

Another letter suggests that if members of the European Parliament “research[ed] the subject thoroughly and from a neutral position,” they would understand “why there is this ‘vaccine hesitancy.’” Otherwise (and only slightly tongue in cheek), this author concludes that “parents and the informed public will have to unite and devise a strategy to tackle [the] ‘Vaccine Study Reluctance,’ ‘Vaccine Ineffectiveness Denial,’ ‘Vaccine Injuries & Deaths Disassociation Complex’ and ‘Obsessive Coincidence Disorder’ that are now rife within the medical and science profession!”

World Mercury Project applauds the fact that BMJ published letters that air an open and honest debate on a topic more often denied the opportunity for open debate. The letters go beyond soundbites to provide information that the public needs to make truly informed vaccine decisions. It is highly unlikely that these same letters would have been published in the American media or in virtually any other academic journal. Not only do journals (and the media) financially rely on the pharmaceutical industry as leading advertisers, but journals also depend on the industry to purchase thousands of reprints and sponsor pricey subscriptions. Describing the “hijacking” of policy by a complicit industry and captured agencies, a letter-writer cautions that “if as result of these institutional movements to suppress debate we end up not being able to discuss vaccine risks at all, we will be in a pretty poor place.” America might already be in that place.

onawah

4th May 2018, 17:45

Hydrogen Treatment for Autism
(It's Autism Awareness Day, but with the increasing numbers of autism cases, it should be every day!
The prevailing ignorance about the causes of autism is equaled only by the ignorance of the effective treatments.
On Facebook today, Dr. Sircus posted this in response to a post from Autism Speaks:)

Fifteen years ago I wrote the Terror of Pediatric Medicine, and I guess it was about ten years ago I published an essay entitled the multiple causes of autism. Today I want this to be the first group to receive a gift of love and hope in this freely given revolutionary information about autism and some very new treatments for it. I believe this will give the fullest presentation though more can always be said.

http://drsircus.com/free-ebook/hydrogen-treatment-for-autism.pdf

onawah

11th May 2018, 05:19

The Special Ed Epidemic: Uncovering the Answers Part 4
MAY 10, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/part-4-the-special-ed-epidemic-uncovering-the-answers/?utm_source=mailchimp
By Sheri A. Marino, MA, CCC-SLP for Focus for Health, World Mercury Project Partner

In this four-part series, World Mercury Project’s partner, Focus for Health (FFH), examined the special education epidemic, its crippling effects on the US economy, as well as housing and employment issues for individuals with disabilities once they age out of school. Now, let’s look at what could be causing this epidemic, and unlike the broken regulatory agencies and healthcare system, put an end to this crisis by empowering the public with the knowledge to help make informed decisions.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has just announced that autism prevalence is up 16% with new data showing that 1 in 59 US children have autism. Autism, developmental delays, and chronic illnesses including allergies and asthma are at an all-time high, affecting 1 in 6 children across the US. The CDC reports that disability costs our nation $400 billion annually in healthcare expenditures. Autism alone is on track to cost the US $460 billion dollars annually by 2025. Genetic studies have failed to turn up genes responsible for allergies, asthma, autism, or ADHD, yet funding for research identifying environmental causes pales in comparison to funding for genetic studies.

Although genetics plays a role in many disease processes, environmental influences can be triggers that turn on those genes. Known as epigenetics, gene expression can be altered from exposures to environmental toxins which can lead to negative health outcomes.

While we may not be able to control our genetic make-up, knowing how certain genetic conditions may affect us and our offspring allows us to take every precaution possible to manage those conditions. Likewise, we may not be able to avoid all environmental toxins, however, if given essential information, individuals can make choices about what environmental risks they are willing to take to keep their total toxic load at a minimum.

A combination of genetic vulnerability and environmental exposures creates susceptibilities for oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, endocrine disruption, and chronic inflammation ultimately leading to immune disregulation.

Toxins are found in the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat, the products we use, and the vaccines we inject.

If manufacturers like Monsanto (being purchased by Bayer for $62.5 billion) monopolize the food industry, our right to make healthy food choices free of toxins such as pesticides and herbicides is significantly reduced.

If the pharmaceutical industry is not effectively managed by regulatory agencies, we will continue to be manipulated by advertisements for those very same medications which are responsible for poor health outcomes in our children.

If our state governments continue on the path of mandating vaccines, we lose our choice to say no to medical procedures which contain neurotoxins such as mercury and aluminum.

Taking control of our health and the destinies of our offspring starts with having the basic human right to do so. That begins with having essential information which empowers us to make the best decisions for ourselves and our children, and that ends when our basic human rights are taken from us. For all medical procedures, this is the basis of informed consent.

WHAT DOES THE SCIENCE SAY?
Through an extensive review of the research, FFH presents a collection of science-based theories on the causation of chronic disease and developmental disability. Individuals are not always informed of their risks by the medical community. While some risks are unavoidable, FFH believes knowledge is power and with access to information, individuals can learn what their risks are to make better healthcare decisions to potentiate positive outcomes, and ultimately protect vulnerable children.…children who were exposed to more toxins in the womb had more autistic-like behaviors.

What the Science Says on Environmental Exposures
Toxins exist naturally in the environment, however, toxin exposure has increased in developed countries due to the increased use of pesticides and production of synthetic chemicals to manufacture foods and other products. Studies show environmental toxins result in epigenetic alterations to DNA leading to many chronic health issues and disorders.

Toxins can affect the functioning of the brain, heart, lungs, nervous system, and can also alter the bacteria that compose an individual’s microbiome. Furthermore, some toxins act as endocrine disruptors, meaning that they interfere with the body’s biological signals and hormonal system.

The toxins a mother encounters throughout her life will accumulate in her body. This is known as her “body burden.” A mother’s body burden will affect the environment of her womb, which may have a direct impact on the development of her baby. A fetus is particularly susceptible to toxicity because its organs are developing and it has not yet developed its brain-blood barrier.

One study from the Journal Environmental Health Perspectives, has found that children who were exposed to more toxins in the womb had more autistic-like behaviors. Another study found that close proximity to certain pesticides during pregnancy increases the risk of having a child with autism by 60%. Toxin exposure during pregnancy is also associated with high blood pressure, ADHD, heart disease, and various mental disorders. The Environmental Working Group identified 287 toxins in an umbilical cord. Of these chemicals, 180 are known carcinogens to humans and animals, 217 are toxic to the nervous system, and 208 are known to cause birth defects in animal tests. Studies also show that pesticide exposure impacts sperm quality in men, which can affect pregnancy outcomes.

What the Science Says on Diet
According to the CDC, more than half of children worldwide ages 6 months to 5 years suffer from one or more micronutrient deficiencies. Studies have found that micronutrient deficiencies can negatively impact growth, cognitive ability, neurological, and immune system functioning. One study has found that individuals with ASD are more likely to have micronutrient deficiencies. Another study found that children who consume diets high in fats are more likely to have cognitive impairments. Other studies have found that children who eat more fruits and vegetables have better cardiovascular health compared to those who do not, and they have better health outcomes as adults. Their findings indicate what people eat when they are young is more important for achieving good health outcomes than what people eat when they are older.

Chemical pesticides such as glyphosate are used in agriculture to protect produce against weeds, insects, and other plant diseases.

Pesticides may be toxic to humans, and regular consumption of pesticides from a young age can heighten an individual’s risk for various health problems. Pesticides have been linked to respiratory problems, immune system problems, gastrointestinal issues, impaired cognition and memory, neurological diseases, and various cancers.

There is mounting evidence that suggests gestational pesticide exposure can lead to developmental delays or autism.

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) are an additional dietary concern for children and adults. Crops which are genetically modified to withstand pesticides, to self-produce insecticides, or to exhibit other desirable traits, are claimed to be harmless to humans, however, comprehensive long-term studies are lacking and some studies show that GMO’s may be hazardous. One study has found that the increasing incidence of 22 different chronic diseases can be linked to the increased use of GMOs in agriculture.

There is a lack of studies that examine the relationship between EMF exposure, autism, and other health conditions. However, some reports suggest that EMF exposure increases the risk for autism and can increase the severity of autism symptoms.

What the Science Says on Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)
Electromagnetic radiation exists naturally in the environment. However, the expansion of technology in the 20th Century has introduced an increasing number of manmade electromagnetic field sources into the environment. Today, 100% of the population is exposed to EMF. The 5 most common sources of EMF include electric fields, magnetic fields, power lines, metal plumbing, and wireless communication.

There appears to be a subset of the population that is more susceptible to EMF than the majority of the population. These individuals are proposed to have “electromagnetic hypersensitivity”. They may experience skin conditions (redness, tingling), fatigue, dizziness, nausea, digestive disturbances, and concentration issues. This condition is somewhat akin to multiple chemical sensitivities.

One study suggests there are “remarkable similar biological features between EMF exposure and ASD from cellular oxidative stress to malfunctioning membranes, channels and barriers to genotoxicity, mitochondrial dysfunction, immune abnormalities, inflammatory issues, neuropathological disruption and electrophysiological dysregulation”. This study also suggests the rise in ASD is parallel with the increase in electromagnetic and radio frequency exposures over the past few decades.

There is a lack of studies that examine the relationship between EMF exposure, autism, and other health conditions. However, some reports suggest that EMF exposure increases the risk for autism and can increase the severity of autism symptoms.

"…calculations show that the levels of aluminum suggested by the World Health Organization place infants at risk of acute, repeated, and possibly chronic exposures of toxic levels of aluminum in modern vaccine schedules."
What the Science Says on Aluminum
Aluminum is neurotoxic. Aluminum exposure has been associated with disorders including Alzheimer’s and autism. This metal is found in foods we eat, the water we drink, products we use on our bodies, and it is used as an adjuvant in vaccines to enhance immunogenicity. Neurotoxic effects of aluminum are controversial however, a study of human brain tissue from donors with autism showed consistently high levels of aluminum content present in microglia like cells and cells in the meninges, vasculature, and grey and white matter. While regulatory agencies determine how much aluminum is needed to enhance antigenicity and effectiveness of vaccines, they do not take into account safety considerations. In fact, no known published studies have determined levels of aluminum in vaccines based on safety studies.

A new report titled “Reconsideration of the immunotherapeutic pediatric safe dose levels of aluminum” states “When aluminum doses are estimated from Federal Regulatory Code given body weight, exposure from the current vaccine schedule are found to exceed our estimate of a weight corrected Pediatric Dose Limit. Our calculations show that the levels of aluminum suggested by the World Health Organization place infants at risk of acute, repeated, and possibly chronic exposures of toxic levels of aluminum in modern vaccine schedules.”

There is no safe level of mercury exposure.
What the Science Says on Mercury
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), mercury is considered to be among the top ten chemicals of major public health concern. It is known to impact the brain, heart, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, and immune system. There is no safe level of mercury exposure.

Dental Amalgams

Dental amalgams have been used for the past 150 years by the dental industry to fill cavities. Dental amalgams contain mercury, a known neurotoxin dangerous to humans even in trace amounts. Mercury vapor leaks from dental amalgams and accumulates in various body tissues or organs. Therefore, the fetus of a mother with dental amalgams will be exposed to mercury for the entire duration of the pregnancy. Mercury is known to cross the placenta, and directly impact the fetus, where it can interfere with the development of the fetus’ brain and central nervous system. The child may continue to be exposed after birth through the mother’s breast milk. One study found 6 or more dental amalgams in the mother raises the risk of having a child with autism 3.2-fold. Furthermore, the severity of autistic behaviors increases with the number of a mother’s dental amalgams.

Other sources of mercury include some over the counter medications, personal care products, and certain fishes such as tuna. In addition, some vaccines still contain mercury.

Mercury in thimerosal has been linked to tics, speech delay and language delay in children (Thompson et al. 2007 NEJM, Barile et al. 2013 J Pediatr Psychol, Verstraeten et al. 2003 Pediatrics, Andrews et al. 2004 Pediatrics) and many published studies also show a relationship with autism and ASD (Geier et al. 2013 Translational Neurodegeneration 2:25, among others).

The CDC recommends pregnant women receive the flu shot, however, if the shot comes from a multi-dose vial, it also contains mercury from the preservative thimerosal. Multi-dose vials are often provided to clinics and pharmacies in lower socio-economic areas. It is estimated that during the 2017-2018 flu season, 20-30 million of the influenza vaccines distributed will contain thimerosal. Thimerosal-containing vaccines (TCV’s) may expose pregnant women to 25 micrograms of mercury. With no blood-brain barrier, the fetus is also exposed as the mercury accumulates in the placenta and cord blood. Furthermore, as indicated in the vaccine manufacturer’s product inserts, no safety or efficacy studies have been conducted on pregnant women or their infants.

"…women receiving the seasonal flu shot in the first trimester of pregnancy had 25% greater odds of having a child with ASD."
What the Science Says on Maternal Immune Activation (MIA)

During pregnancy, the developing fetus is vulnerable to the mother’s normal biological response to immune challenge. Recent epidemiological studies indicate that prenatal exposure to inflammatory signals from parasitic, bacterial and viral pathogens including the flu, shows significant correlations with neurological and immunological abnormalities, like autism spectrum disorder. Termed maternal immune activation (MIA), the role of inflammatory mediators during critical gestational periods has been shown to have adverse effects on fetal development.

There are many ways in which the maternal immune system can be activated. A study titled “Prenatal Fever and Autism Risk”supports the hypothesis that maternal fever in pregnancy, regardless of trimester and cause of the fever, is associated with increased risk of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) among offspring. While earlier studies found that prenatal exposure to infectious agents increased the risk of ASD in offspring, this study supports more recent findings that activation of the maternal immune system has deleterious effects on fetal brain development and plays a role in neurodevelopmental consequences. In this study, fever-associated ASD risk increased markedly with fever frequency particularly after 12 weeks gestation. Acetaminophen worked minimally to mitigate the risks for fevers occurring in the second trimester. Of the 538 cases, ASD was five times more prevalent in boys than girls. The authors’ findings support the hypothesis that in a subset of ASD cases, fever and associated immune disturbances may be implicated.

Vaccines are designed and intended to produce the same biological immune response as natural infection. When a person gets a vaccine, whether during pregnancy or at any other time, an immune response to that vaccine occurs.

Studies show that roughly 5% of the general population will acquire the influenza virus annually, however, if the influenza vaccine does its job, immune activation will occur in 100% of pregnant women who receive the flu shot. Although the Zerbo et al. paper did not show a correlation between the actual flu in pregnancy and ASD, it did show women receiving the seasonal flu shot in the first trimester of pregnancy had 25% greater odds of having a child with ASD.

What the Science Says on Autoimmune Disease
Autoimmunity occurs when the immune system mistakenly targets the body’s own cells, tissues, or organs as opposed to foreign antigens invading the body. These self-destructive antibodies create inflammation processes ultimately causing organ damage. Autoimmunity is a result of defects in the B and/or T cells of the immune system and is believed to result from the interplay of genetics, infections, and other environmental exposures.

Mothers with abnormal autoimmune antibodies have a greater risk of poor pregnancy outcomes. There is mounting evidence that shows a mother with autoimmune antibodies is more likely to produce anti-brain antibodies that can cross the placenta and attack the fetal brain, inducing fetal brain inflammation. One study shows mothers of children with autism are 4 times more likely to carry brain reactive antibodies than mothers of typically developing children. Mothers with brain-reactive antibodies were also likely to have an increased prevalence of autoimmune diseases, especially rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Mother’s with celiac disease have a particularly high risk of bearing children with autism or other chronic illness. Celiac disease, a genetic disorder of the small intestine triggered by dietary exposure to gluten (a protein found in wheat), is associated with inflammation, diarrhea, malabsorption, and other gastrointestinal issues. Untreated celiac disease may result in impaired fertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes from autoimmune related mechanisms or nutrient deficiencies. According to this study, “Celiac disease, especially if untreated, appears to increase the risk of repeated miscarriages and premature deliveries, and impaired fetal growth with reduced birthweight.” Additionally, the rate of cesarean delivery was increased if the parents had celiac disease.

Other autoimmune diseases that appear to increase the risk of ASD in offspring include lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and type 1 and type 2 Diabetes. Women with rheumatoid arthritis were 80% more likely to have a child with ASD, while children born to diabetic mothers are 4 times more likely to develop autism.

What the Science Says on MTHFR Mutations
Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a gene that is responsible for producing an enzyme that converts folic acid to methylfolate, a bioavailable form of vitamin B9. Nutrient deficiencies of Vitamin B6, B12, and folate increase homocysteine levels which cause inflammation in the body. The ability of this gene to turn this switch on or off is crucial for the production of glutathione, the body’s most important antioxidant.

Glutathione plays a major role in the body’s detoxification of harmful, disease causing toxins. When the body’s ability to produce glutathione is decreased, secondary to genetic mutations like an MTHFR mutation, the disease process is enhanced due to the build-up of toxicity in the body. Disorders such as autism, ADHD, autoimmune diseases, multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia, heart disease, addiction, miscarriages, and neural tube defects have been linked to MTHFR mutations. Mutations in MTHFR may lead to a condition called homocystinuria, a disorder where there are abnormal levels of homocysteine and methionine in the body which may lead to eye problems, cognitive issues, abnormal blood clotting, skeletal and congenital heart abnormalities.

Glutathione’s key role is the maintenance of intracellular redox balance (oxidation-reduction) and the detoxification of xenobiotics (a chemical or substance foreign to the body). A defective MTHFR gene creates a vulnerability to disease processes as detoxification is impaired, leaving the body more susceptible to oxidative stress, and less tolerant of toxins such as heavy metals.

In children with ASD, the heterozygous allele frequency occurred in 56% of children, whereby the frequency was significantly lower in the control group (41%). This could indicate that there is a genomic vulnerability in the folate pathway to environmental risk factors. Although a review of the research indicates conflicting analysis, some studies show an association exists between MTHFR polymorphisms and an increased risk of ASD, suggesting the modulating role of folate may be affected by the MTHFR genotype. Another study suggests that the enhanced maternal folate status before and during pregnancy may alter natural selection by increasing survival rates of fetuses who have an MTHFR mutation. Presumably, infants with an MTHFR polymorphism cannot maintain the higher folate status after birth, affecting neurodevelopment from the inability to detoxify environmental toxins. For example, individuals with ASD have been shown to have higher levels of heavy metals in their blood, leading researchers to believe that the MTHFR polymorphisms may be partly responsible for increasing their toxicity. While an association is likely, it is unlikely that this mutation is solely responsible for complex neurodevelopmental disorders and more probable that influencing co-factors exist.

Furthermore, only 2 out of the 54 most commonly used prescription and over-the-counter medications have enough data available to determine how they can impact a pregnancy.
What the Science Says on Medication Use During Pregnancy
Prescription drugs may impact the fetus through several mechanisms. They can directly damage the fetus by crossing the placenta, alter the functioning capacity of the placenta so that the fetus’ oxygen and nutrient supply is reduced, induce forceful uterine contractions which can injure the fetus, or indirectly harm the fetus by affecting the internal environment of the mother.

The CDC reports that prescription and over-the-counter medication use during pregnancy has increased by 70% over the past 3 decades. Less than 10% of all medications approved by the FDA since 1980 have been studied well enough to assess their risk for birth complications, and, pregnant women are not included in drug safety trials because of liability concerns. Furthermore, only 2 out of the 54 most commonly used prescription and over-the-counter medications have enough data available to determine how they can impact a pregnancy.

There have been many studies conducted over the years that have examined how specific prescription medications taken during pregnancy may affect the health outcomes of children. Prescription medications that have been associated with an increased risk of birth defects or other childhood health complications include antidepressants, hypertension medications, mycophenolate mofetil (for treating autoimmune diseases), anti-epileptic medications, clomiphene citrate (to treat infertility), sulfonamide and nitrofurantoin (to treat infections), and opioids.

A study from JAMA found that taking antidepressants during the second or third trimester of a pregnancy increased the risk of having a child with autism by 87%, and that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) taken at any point during the pregnancy were associated with an even greater risk of having a child with autism. These researchers note that SSRIs can cross the placenta and impact the development of the fetus. There is also evidence that autistic individuals have high levels of serotonin in their blood platelets and that their brains synthesize serotonin atypically. Another study found that the asthma drugs- beta-2 adrenergic receptor (B2AR) agonists taken 90 days before pregnancy or during pregnancy increase the risk of having a child with autism.

Antibiotic use both medically and agriculturally is a major health concern. The CDC states that approximately 29% of antibiotic prescriptions in the United States in 2015 for children 0-19 years of age were unnecessary. Excessive antibiotic use puts the recipients at risk for adverse reactions or infection and can result in long-term alterations to the recipient’s microbiome. A healthy microbiome is essential for regular metabolism, vitamin production, and homeostasis regulation. Furthermore, babies born vaginally receive their mother’s microbiome as they pass through the birth canal. A mother’s microbiome will be altered when she takes antibiotics before or during pregnancy and can pass this altered microbiome to her child during childbirth.

One study has found that the antibiotics amoxicillin and clavulanate specifically may be contributing to the rise of autism. According to the study, after the introduction of these antibiotics in 1987, the state of California reported an increase in the rate of autism by 273% in a single year. The study proposes that the production of these antibiotics may yield high levels of urea/ammonia in the child. Another study found evidence that taking antibiotics during pregnancy can induce neurodevelopmental changes in the fetus in utero.

Agricultural antibiotics account for approximately 80% of all antibiotic usage in the United States. Animals are treated with low dose antibiotics to prevent the spread of disease and to promote growth. These antibiotics are transferred to humans through the meat we consume, as well as through the crops that were fertilized with the animals’ waste. Consumption of food contaminated with antibiotics can induce the same health consequences as prescribed antibiotics.

"…acetaminophen use during pregnancy was associated with a 50% increase in the risk of having a child with autism and hyperkinetic disorder."
Specific over-the-counter medications have also been found to impact the health of the fetus. The commonly used drugs Ibuprofen, ketoprofen, and naproxen are some examples. Acetaminophen has long been considered relatively safe to take during pregnancy, however, acetaminophen use during pregnancy was associated with a 50% increase in the risk of having a child with autism and hyperkinetic disorder. Also, a longer duration of acetaminophen use resulted in a 2-fold increase in the risk of having a child with autism.

Since pregnant women are excluded from trials, some drugs are tested on pregnant animals instead. However, animal studies should not be considered reliable in determining the safety of a drug, as exemplified by the thalidomide incident in the 1950s. Thalidomide was a drug that was intended to treat morning sickness in pregnant women. Although it did not have any adverse effects on the pregnancy outcomes of rats during animal studies, it was found to cause severe and often fatal birth defects in infants and is now recognized as one of the most hazardous known human teratogens.

Although many studies have found associations between medications taken during pregnancy and poor childhood health outcomes, researchers state in their discussions that the exact mechanism through which the drug impacts the fetus remains uncertain.

What the Science Says on Chronic Ear Infections
Ear infections are bacterial or viral infections that occur in the middle ear. Children who experience chronic ear infections should be treated with caution as this could be an indication of a weak, dysregulated, or overactive immune system.

They may be more susceptible to infections, or their immune systems may respond abnormally to environmental triggers. In addition, ear infections are associated with auditory processing problems, which can contribute to learning disabilities or cognitive impairments. Studies have found that children with autism experience chronic ear infections more frequently than their non-autistic counterparts, which may be because individuals with ASD often have dysregulated immune systems.

Ear infections are typically treated with antibiotics. However, antibiotics can alter a child’s gut flora, which may also result in long-term health consequences. A study by B.E. Haley, suggested that the antibiotics ampicillin and tetracycline, which are used to treat such infections, can increase susceptibility to mercury poisoning. Therefore, there is potential for increased risk of vaccine related adverse events.

One study led by Eileen Curran has found that CD’s increase the risk of autism or autism-related symptoms in a child by as much as 23%.
What the Science Says on Cesarean Deliveries
Cesarean deliveries (CD’s) have risen by 48% since 1996, and now account for 32% of all births in the U.S. The trend of elective CD’s continues to increase. While some CD’s are unavoidable, many are scheduled out of convenience for the family or physician. CD’s are associated with negative health outcomes for the baby and there are multiple mechanisms for these outcomes.

Researchers believe Cesarean deliveries can alter an infant’s microbiome by depriving him or her of the beneficial bacteria he or she receives while passing through the birth canal in a vaginal delivery. A compromised microbiome can lead to impaired immunity and metabolic dysregulation.

Several studies have found an association between Cesarean deliveries and autism. One study led by Eileen Curran has found that CD’s increase the risk of autism or autism-related symptoms in a child by as much as 23%.

In another study, researchers found approximately 40% greater risk of developing immune defects and a 10% greater risk of developing juvenile rheumatoid arthritis when born by CD. Additionally, the study shows children are more frequently hospitalized due to asthma, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disorder, immune system defects, leukemia, and other tissue disorders.

What the Science Says on Breast Feeding
Breastfeeding is important for a baby’s health. It provides the baby with necessary nutrients, helps to strengthen the baby’s immune system, and promotes growth. Various studies have found that children who were breastfed exclusively for the first 6 months of life were less likely to contract an infection, develop diseases, or develop allergies. Furthermore, breastmilk is more easily digested, promotes digestive health, and helps to establish and maintain the child’s microbiome.

A study from Science Daily has found that breastfeeding reduces the chance that a mother’s child will develop autism. According to this study, a child may develop autism because his brain neurons are unmyelinated. Demyelination may occur because the child has an inadequate supply of insulin-like growth factor (IGF), which is due to a combination of environmental and genetic factors. The study proposes that breast milk, which contains IGF, increases deficient IGF levels in susceptible children and helps to prevent the onset of autism.

A mother’s breast milk, however, can also create vulnerability in her child. There is mounting evidence that shows toxins in a mother’s breastmilk increases the chances that a child will develop autism or other health complications. A mother may be exposed to toxins through her environment or diet.

Babies are particularly susceptible to toxin exposure because they are at a stage of rapid physical development and their immune systems are not fully developed. Breastfeeding provides the most health benefits for the child if the mother’s diet is healthy and clean.

What the Science Says on Low Birth Weight
The average baby weighs 8 pounds. Any baby born less than 5 pounds and 8 ounces is considered low birth weight. Low birth weight is associated with various health complications such as poor growth, increased susceptibility to infection, and a higher risk of developing neurological problems.

The two main causes of low birth weight include preterm birth and intrauterine growth restriction. Risk factors for low birth weight include poor maternal health, toxin exposure, nutrient deficiency, preexisting chronic or autoimmune disease, and low socioeconomic status. According to the CDC, mothers without a college education are 29% more likely to have underweight babies.

One study found that low birth weight was associated with irregular brain structure development and smaller total brain volume. The finding indicates that birthweight can have a profound influence on health outcomes later in life. Another study found that 5% of babies born weighing less than 4.7 pounds developed autism, while 11% of babies born weighing less than 3.5 pounds developed autism. The researchers believe that the risk for autism increases with decreasing birth weight.

What the Science Says on Chronic Stress During Pregnancy
Since maternal immune response, absent of infection in the fetus, can cause harm to the fetal brain, maternal stress therefore creates vulnerability. Studies have shown that prenatal maternal stress (PNMS) increases the production of stress hormones like cortisol which prepares individuals to deal with stress. Cortisol plays a role in the development of the fetus and in preparing the mother’s body for childbirth. However, attenuations of elevated maternal cortisol from chronic stress can cause immune dysregulation and chronic inflammation which greatly increases the risk of poor health outcomes in the fetus. Research suggests that offspring of mothers who experience high levels of stress during pregnancy are more likely to have problems in neurobehavioral development including autism and ADHD and have an increased risk for childhood behavior and emotional problems, language delay, cognitive problems, mixed handedness, and later onset disorders such as schizophrenia.

Additionally, maternal stress as a social determinant of health creates vulnerability in children as it is associated with low birth weight, diminishes innate immunity, and increases the likelihood of neurological dysfunction.

What the Science Says on High Testosterone
Hormones play a central role in body functions and processes, including growth and development, behavior, metabolism, reproduction, and fetal development. Fetal and maternal hormone levels are required in precise amounts at different points during the pregnancy to dictate the migration of fetal cells and mediate fetal growth. Any alterations in these hormone levels can impact the development of the fetus.

Amniotic fluids of mothers whose children developed autism were found to have elevated levels of testosterone, other sex hormones, and cortisol compared to the amniotic fluids of mothers whose children developed normally.

Male fetuses are particularly susceptible to sex hormones, and overexposure to sex hormones in the womb has been linked to reproductive malformations. It has been found that every one-percent increase in reproductive malformations in a given area is associated with a 283% increase in the rate of autism and a 94% increase in intellectual disability.

Testosterone works synergistically with mercury to enhance its toxicity. This may contribute to poor pregnancy outcomes in mothers who receive certain vaccinations during pregnancy or in those who are exposed to mercury from other sources.

What the Science Says on Advanced Parental Age
Researchers believe there are many associations with parental age at the time of conception and its deleterious effects on children’s health. Studies have shown advancing paternal and maternal age were both associated with poor pregnancy outcomes.

In one study, fathers over 50 years of age had a 66% higher chance of having a child with autism. This same study also found mothers over age 40 and under age 20 increased the risk of autism. A second study shows father’s over age 45 at time of conception, when compared with fathers between 20-24 yrs. of age, had a heightened chance of having offspring with autism, ADHD, bipolar disorder, and other psychiatric and academic morbidities. The effects of advanced paternal age on semen quality are controversial. However, the literature strongly points to issues with spermatogenesis, specifically epigenetic changes, and DNA mutations associated with increased paternal age.

Women, born with a set number of eggs, may be more susceptible to de novo mutations when an older egg is fertilized. These first time mutations are believed to be influenced by epigenetic changes affecting DNA replication, thereby increasing the rate of autism and other chronic health issues in the offspring. Epigenetic alterations associated with age can result from long-term exposures to environmental toxins, substance abuse, prescription medication usage, and diet. While younger moms have had less exposure to environmental toxins, researchers speculate their associated risk may be related to immature reproductive systems. Researchers also suggest disparity of more than 10 years between parents’ ages has also been shown to increase the risk of autism, although the mechanism is unknown.

There is contradictory evidence to support to what extent the age of the parents affects the health outcomes of their children. For example, a study published in Evolution, Medicine and Public Health, found that while children of older parents are more likely to have autism, they are not more likely to have other neurological disorders such as schizophrenia. However, another study by Nature Genetics, finds older fathers have a higher risk of psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia. Furthermore, many studies draw contradictory conclusions as to which age brackets pose the highest risk for poor health outcomes of children. Ultimately, researchers believe there are underlying reasons as to why older parents are more likely to have children with autism, however, the exact mechanisms are unknown.

Many theories above are controversial because scientific studies sometimes contradict each other. This could be due to many factors including sample size, bias, and sometimes interpretation. When studies continue to show evidence supporting both sides, the science is not settled. When it comes to protecting our children’s health, minimizing risks should be the only thing that is mandatory.

onawah

16th May 2018, 05:11

HPV Vaccine’s Likely Contribution to Sweden’s Spike in Cervical Cancer
By the World Mercury Project Team
MAY 15, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/hpv-vaccines-likely-contribution-to-swedens-spike-in-cervical-cancer/?utm_source=mailchimp

When the U.S. introduced the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in 2006, cervical cancer rates had been steadily declining for several decades, in large part due to successful and routinized cervical cancer screening. A similar trend also was underway in Europe, including in Scandinavia. Within that region, Sweden stood out as having the lowest levels of cervical cancer.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/05-15-Cervical-Cancer-.jpg
Sweden now appears poised to lose this distinction. Sweden’s Center for Cervical Cancer Prevention reported in 2017 that the incidence of invasive cervical cancer has reversed course and is climbing in nearly all counties. The increase was particularly steep (20%) over the two-year period from 2013 to 2015. Neither the Center, health authorities nor the media offered any explanation for the turnaround in the country’s long-established cervical cancer trends.

An independent Swedish researcher decided to take a closer look. On April 30, 2018, the researcher proposed in the Indian Journal of Medical Ethics that the HPV vaccine may be causing rather than preventing cervical cancer in some women. This assertion directly threatens the status quo marketing of HPV vaccines as universally safe and effective. For this reason, the author chose to publish under a pseudonym—in the belief that “the use of his real name would have invited personal repercussions from those opposed to any questioning of vaccines”—but did not inform the journal that the published name and affiliation were fictitious. A week later, this omission became known to the journal’s editors, who were affronted and immediately published a correction. However, the editors also took the unusual and courageous step of keeping the article on the journal’s website because “the issues raised by it are important and discussion on it is in the public interest.”

Young women and the HPV vaccine
As a first step in assessing the unexpected uptick in Sweden’s cervical cancer incidence, the anonymous researcher’s simple analytic strategy was to parse, by age group, the same national data that informed the 2017 report. When the researcher compared cervical cancer rates in younger women (ages 20-49) to rates for older women (over age 50), he found that age made a big difference: “The increase in the incidence of cervical cancer was shown to be most prominent among women 20–49 years of age while no apparent increase was observed among women above 50” [emphasis added]. When he compared changes in invasive cervical cancer incidence in 2006 versus 2015, he again found that the increase mostly affected younger women—and especially women in their twenties. Why should this be the case, when we are told that HPV-induced cervical cancer “often takes years, even decades, to develop after a person gets HPV”?

As one answer, the Swedish researcher points out that the slow-simmer timeline does not apply to all women who get cervical cancer. In fact, rapid onset characterizes roughly 25% of cases, with “a short interval of less than 3 years from negative…screenings to finding of cancer.” This means that an increase in cervical cancer incidence could very well be discernable within the short period of time observed in Sweden:

The country approved the Gardasil vaccine in 2006.
By 2010, about four-fifths (80%) of 12-year-old girls were given the vaccine, and about three-fifths (59%) of 13–18-year-old girls were vaccinated through a “catch-up” program.
By 2012-2013, “most young girls were vaccinated.”
By 2015, the oldest girls in the “catch-up” group (ages 15-18) had reached their early twenties and thus were “well within” the 20-29-year-old cohort that displayed the greatest increase in cervical cancer incidence.
Gardasil vaccination in this subgroup produced a higher level of premalignant cell changes than did placebo.
Disease enhancement and viral reactivation
The Swedish researcher offers two additional (and potentially overlapping) explanations for the surge in invasive cervical cancer in younger women. First, he explains that seven in ten cases of cervical cancer are linked to just two “target” HPV strains (HPV 16 and 18), and the vaccine is useless—and even damaging—to individuals who have been exposed to those strains prior to vaccination. In fact, he shows that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognized this problem in its clinical review of Gardasil in 2006, which euphemistically described the “potential for disease enhancement” in Gardasil-vaccinated individuals who had been exposed to HPV 16/18 before vaccination compared to individuals with no HPV 16/18 exposure (p. 359). Gardasil vaccination in this subgroup produced “a higher level of premalignant cell changes than did placebo.”

To account for the differential subgroup effects, the researcher points to the phenomenon (well recognized in the peer-reviewed literature) of vaccine-induced viral “reactivation,” whereby a vaccine triggers a latent virus to manifest “severe reactivation symptoms.” With over 200 known strains of the ubiquitous human papillomavirus (and over a dozen that are associated with cervical cancer), it is fully plausible that the HPV vaccine could reactivate cancer-causing HPV strains (both “target” and “non-target”) in previously HPV-infected young women. The Swedish researcher concludes:

“The increased incidence among young females, the possibility of virus reactivation after vaccination, the increase in premalignant cell changes shown by the FDA for women who were already exposed to oncogenic [tumor-inducing] HPV types and the time relationship between the start of vaccination and the increase in cervical cancer in Sweden could support [the] view” that the HPV vaccine is “caus[ing] an increase in invasive cervical cancer instead of preventing it among already infected females.”

An appalling record

From their inception, the two HPV vaccines (Merck’s Gardasil and, outside the U.S., GlaxoSmithKline’s Cervarix) have been aggressively marketed, with their potential benefits oversold and their many risks disguised, particularly through the use of inappropriate placebos. It has been left to independent researchers to critique the regulatory apparatus’s whitewashed evidence. Recent letters published in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) have brought forward some stark numbers that illustrate the vaccine’s appalling record:

A serious adverse event rate of 1 in 15 (7%) and a death rate among the vaccinated (14 per 10,000) that far exceeds the risk of dying from cervical cancer (23 per 10,000) (BMJ letter, May 2018).
Reports to the World Health Organization’s global adverse drug reactions database—conservatively estimated to represent 10% of actual reactions—of over 305,000 adverse reactions where the HPV vaccine “is believed to have been the cause,” including 445 deaths (23 of which were sudden) and over 1,000 cancerous tumors (including 168 cervical cancers), among other serious reactions (BMJ letter, December 2017).
…from an individual perspective, “a healthy 16-year-old is at zero immediate risk of dying from cervical cancer but is faced with a small but real risk of death or serious disability from a vaccine that has yet to prevent a single case of cervical cancer.”
Even in countries where the burden of cervical cancer is far higher, researchers are eyeing the HPV vaccine’s dismal performance and are reaching the conclusion that “proven and cost effective methods” of cervical cancer screening “remain the most feasible prevention strategies in low resource countries.”

One group of Indian researchers argues that from an individual perspective, “a healthy 16-year-old is at zero immediate risk of dying from cervical cancer but is faced with a small but real risk of death or serious disability from a vaccine that has yet to prevent a single case of cervical cancer.” From a programmatic perspective, they state that “there is no data in the literature to suggest that vaccination can replace cervical cancer screening. For any population coverage, cervical screening will always detect more pre-cancers and cancers than vaccination can prevent. Cost-effectiveness analyses have shown that cervical screening is more cost-effective than either vaccination alone or vaccination with screening.”

Returning to Sweden, researchers at the Uppsala Monitoring Center have described how easy it is for risks to “escape epidemiological detection.” The implications, according to this group, are that “case reports and case series can no longer be discarded simply as ‘anecdotes’ or ‘coincidence,’ and their contribution to the evidence base should not be ‘trumped’ by the findings of an epidemiological study.” The bottom line is that a corrupt vaccine approval process should not be allowed to sacrifice young women on the altar of industry profits.

sanma

16th May 2018, 22:10

Bill Ryan

16th May 2018, 22:14

http://vaxxedthemovie.com/screening-event/

Apologies if this has already been posted; I looked back through the thread and didn't see it.

I wish I could have posted it earlier, but I just ran across it today, it was for a week, May 10-17.

The english-only version requires registration with vimeo, but if you need or appreciate, or don't mind, subtitles in french, italian, or spanish along with the english audio, it is registration-free.

Yes, many thanks... see this thread: :thumbsup:

VAXXED: From Cover-Up To Catastrophe (Video) (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?89642-VAXXED-From-Cover-Up-To-Catastrophe--Video-)

onawah

17th May 2018, 04:35

Autoimmunity and Metal Implants, Devices, and Vaccine Adjuvants
By Amanda Just, MS, and Jack Kall, DMD, MIAOMT, World Mercury Project Partner
MAY 16, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/autoimmunity-and-metal-implants-devices-and-vaccine-adjuvants/?utm_source=mailchimp

Autoimmune diseases are on the rise, with more and more people being stricken with these illnesses each year. The fact that the average person’s overall exposure to chemicals, including metals, has drastically increased over the past century cannot be overlooked when discussing the synonymous rise of autoimmune illnesses.

It is generally agreed that autoimmune conditions are related to a combination of genetic traits and environmental factors. “Environmental factors” is a phrase that encompasses all aspects of the environment with which humans interact, including bacteria, viruses, chemicals, etc.

Even trace amounts of metals can potentially cause a reaction.
Metals have been recognized as one of the environmental factors capable of contributing to autoimmune disease, and metals have also been recognized as one of the triggers capable of producing inflammation. Reactions are more likely to occur for individuals who are genetically predisposed to having lower excretion rates of metals, as well as other individualized factors. Even trace amounts of metals can potentially cause a reaction.

Autoimmune Conditions Associated with Metals
While numerous health conditions have been related to the presence of metals in the body, scientific research has clearly shown that autoimmune diseases can be associated with metals used in dentistry and medicine, including metals in implants, devices, and vaccine adjuvants/preservatives (such as aluminum and mercury). Several of the autoimmune conditions studied scientifically for their relation to metal exposure in this regard include the following:

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (Lou Gehrig’s Disease)
Autoimmune Thyroiditis
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Crohn’s Disease
Diabetes (Type 1 Mellitis)
Fibromyalgia
Gulf War Syndrome
Lupus (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus)
Macrophagic Myofasciitis
Multiple Sclerosis
Oral Lichen Planus
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Some metals are recognized as essential to human life and serve important roles within the human body. However, the beneficial effects of trace elements are based on safe and adequate intake levels, with too little resulting in deficiencies and too much resulting in toxicities. Many of the metals used in dentistry and medicine have no established function in the human body, such as aluminum, which is both a neurotoxin and an immune stimulator, and mercury, which is recognized as being toxic even in low doses.

Onset of Symptoms Can Be Delayed
An issue with calculating the number of patients who have adverse reactions to metals is that the onset of symptoms can be delayed and therefore might not be associated with the implant, device, or vaccine adjuvant. Another issue is that there may not be any local reaction on the skin or in the mouth to help the patient and doctor identify the metal as the culprit in ill health. Even if hypersensitivity reactions are noticed, they can be misdiagnosed as infection.

In some genetically susceptible individuals, metals can trigger allergies, and recent studies and reports tend to agree that metal allergies are on the rise. Clinical screening for metal allergy has been recommended, but the importance of patients reporting reactions to metals to their doctors has also been emphasized.

…sensitization to metal can develop years after an implant or device has been placed…
In addition to reporting any rashes from jewelry, watches, or other metal exposures, it is essential for each patient to recognize the gamut of symptoms that can be related to the presence of a metal implant, device, or adjuvant in their body, such as the development of an autoimmune disease. It is also vital for patients to remember that sensitization to metal can develop years after an implant or device has been placed and that adverse effects can occur with or without the sign of a rash or eruption on the skin or in the mouth.

Improving or Recovering After Removal of Metals
Removal of metal implants and devices is an obvious course of action when adverse effects occur. Indeed, the scientific literature is abundant with cases of individuals improving or recovering from autoimmune diseases usually within a year or two after removal of the offending metal. Examples of health conditions related to metal implants, devices, and vaccine adjuvants that improved (or from which patients even recovered) upon removal of metals in the body include autoimmune thyroiditis, chronic fatigue syndrome, Crohn’s disease, fibromyalgia, multiple sclerosis, oral lichen planus, Sjögren’s syndrome, and systemic lupus erythematosus.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/05-15-Research-Documenting-Improvement-in-Autoimmunity-upon-Metal-Implant.jpg

Source: https://thesmartchoice.com/wp-content/uploads/Table-Autoimmunity-Metal-Removal.pdf

It is important to note that many factors can influence whether or not a patient improves after the removal of a metal implant or device. While many patients improve or even recover, there are some who do not. One obvious reason for this is if the patient is still being exposed to the metal or a different sensitizer through another implant, device, vaccine adjuvant, or other source. Additional impediments in achieving improved health can include the presence of another illness and/or allergy, exposure to certain pesticides, solvents, molds, and foods, hormonal imbalances, stress, a sedentary lifestyle, and countless other circumstances.

Meanwhile, even though alternatives are available, millions of people are being exposed to metals used in dentistry and medicine. Simultaneously, millions of people are suffering from autoimmune diseases, with substantial numbers of new patients being diagnosed each year. For all these reasons and more, it is imperative to recognize that metal implants, devices, and vaccine adjuvants can be a contributing factor to ill health.

A more detailed version of this article (Autoimmune Diseases and Metal Implants and Devices) can be found on the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology’s SMART website: https://thesmartchoice.com/wp-content/uploads/Metal-Implants-and-Autoimmunity.pdf

Author Bios:
These writers co-authored a chapter about the health risks of dental mercury that was published in a textbook about epigenetics from Springer in 2016.

Amanda Just, MS: Ms. Just is the Program Director of the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology. She is also a freelance writer and dental consumer who has shared her writings about the impact of dental mercury amalgam fillings with the United Nations Environment Programme, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and various NGOs.

John Kall, DMD: Dr. Kall serves as the Chairman of the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology’s Board of Directors. He is a member of the American Dental Association, a fellow of the Academy of General Dentistry (AGD), Past President of the KY Chapter of the AGD, a member of the Louisville Dental Society, and a member of the Kentucky Dental Association

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the World Mercury Project. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.
KENNEDY NEWS &

onawah

18th May 2018, 19:53

Higher rates of autism found in areas where vaccination rates are higher, Canadian data reveals
https://www.naturalhealth365.com/autism-news-vaccination-2563.html
May 17, 2018

Autism rates continue to surge worldwide, especially within “developed” countries with robust (conventional) healthcare systems. For example, Canada is a fully “developed” country, with around 1 in 66 children afflicted with autism as of comprehensive reports from 2015. This puts Canada in the top 10 countries in the Americas, Europe and Asia with the highest autism rates. (By the way, the U.S. is no better)

The Public Health Agency of Canada is set to release first-ever nationally representative data related to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) since the year 2016. It comes from the National ASD Surveillance System (NASS), which is intended to pinpoint how many young people are diagnosed with ASD both over time and across regions.

Undeniable connection between vaccinations and autism rates
The Agency’s report shows both notable differences across regions and steady increases in ASD prevalence since 2003. However, the document doesn’t speculate on the factors that might account for the regional differences.

So, what explains why some Canadian regions have markedly higher rates of autism than others? It turns out the prevalence of autism is highest in areas where vaccine rates are highest.

The Canadian NASS compiles administrative data related to education, health and social services for children age 5 to 17 years with a confirmed autism diagnosis. Seven of the 13 Canadian territories and provinces provided information for 2015.

Autism rates varied, with the highest prevalence in Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island and Quebec. Rates in the Yukon territory were substantially lower, correlating with lower vaccination rates.

Autism-related vaccine side effects in parts of Canada have increased up to 349 percent in around a decade
There were also sizeable jumps in autism from 2003 in the six to 12 years following, with anywhere from a 227 percent increase to a 349 percent increase in autism rates in a very short period of time. Again, there is clearly a link between these rates and an increase in the administering of vaccinations in these areas.

The evidence related to vaccine coverage is from a 2013 survey from the Public Health Agency of Canada – which tracks province/territory and vaccines given.

While “correlation is not causation,” this certainly seems like more than a coincidence.

Additional evidence includes tens of thousands of parental reports of normal, healthy children suddenly regressing into autism after receiving a vaccine. Sadly, Canadian parents with vaccine-injured children have nowhere to turn, as Canada still denies the reality of vaccine injuries.

And, unlike the court system in the United States, there is no available (legal) option to be compensated for victims and their families in Canada. (of course, the U.S. legal system tends to favor the pharmaceutical industry – most of the time – for obvious reasons)

Vaccine side effects like autism have become an epidemic worldwide
As evidence like this continues to be released in Canada and countries across the world, it’s time to sound the alarm. We must face reality about the vaccine side effects that’s afflicting so many children and placing tremendous stress on families throughout the world.

Genetic factors, environmental toxicity issues and nutritional deficiencies must be addressed to reduce the risk of neurological disorders or any other chronic disease condition.

Whether you suspect a nefarious agenda by the pharmaceutical industry and the interests behind them or believe it’s just gross medical (and political) negligence, this problem must be resolved. The future of humanity depends on it.

Sources for this article include:

WorldMercuryProject.org
DrZimmermann.org

Hervé

19th May 2018, 14:51

Media remains silent on Vax-Unvax study of mice implicating Hepatitis B vaccine (https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/vax-unvax-study-of-mice-implicates-hepatitis-b-vaccine-media-silent/?utm_source=mailchimp)

JB Handley World Mercury Project (https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/vax-unvax-study-of-mice-implicates-hepatitis-b-vaccine-media-silent/?utm_source=mailchimp)
Thu, 17 May 2018 12:49 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s23/468360/large/05_17_Shh_Featured_Image.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s23/468360/full/05_17_Shh_Featured_Image.jpg)

Sun Yat-sen University's (a Top 10 (https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/china) university in China) Dr. Zhibin Yao is not a household name in the American autism community, but perhaps he should be. Not only is he American-educated (University of Pittsburgh) and the author of 33 peer-reviewed studies, but he's also the lead author of two of the most important biological studies ever done analyzing how, exactly, a vaccine can cause autism.

In 2015, Dr. Yao was the lead author of "Neonatal vaccination with bacillus Calmette-Guérin and hepatitis B vaccines modulates hippocampal synaptic plasticity in rats (http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/BCGhepB-vaccines.pdf)," the first study that ever looked at the impact ANY vaccine might have on the brains of rats. I discussed this study in detail in an extensive article I wrote in April titled, "International scientists have found autism's cause. What will Americans do?." (https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2018/4/1/international2018) Vaccine Papers, a website dedicated to a rigorous, science-based analysis of the risks and benefits of vaccines, explained the paper this way:
"This is the first study to test the effects of immune activation by vaccination on brain development. All other studies of immune activation have used essentially pathological conditions that mimic infection and induce a strong fever. A criticism I have heard often from vaccine advocates is that the immune activation experiments are not relevant to vaccines because vaccines cause a milder immune activation than injections of poly-IC or lipopolysaccharide (two types of immune system activators). This new study demonstrates that vaccines can affect brain development via immune activation. Hence, the immune activation experiments are relevant to vaccines...The hep B vaccine increased IL-6 in the hippocampus (the only brain region analyzed for cytokines)." Despite its importance, explaining Dr. Yao's 2015 paper to the average person wasn't easy, partly because his study covered a number of other topics, meaning you had to isolate the data that implicated the Hepatitis B vaccine, and then explain it. With his next paper, however, Dr. Yao and his team made explaining everything much easier, and left very little to interpretation.

The authors noted that the HBV [Hepatitis B vaccinated] mice showed 'significantly increased' IL-6, which we know is a biomarker for autism.

So much bigger than Wakefield, and zero media coverage
In 1998, Dr. Andrew Wakefield ended up crucified for a paper that only noted what some parents had reported -- namely, that their children regressed into autism after the MMR vaccine. Dr. Yao's second paper, on the other hand, conducted a thorough study of the Hepatitis B vaccine's impact on the brains of mice, and did so versus a control group of mice who received a saline placebo. This is a "gold standard" animal study that you would typically do BEFORE a drug was introduced to the human population. In a world where vaccines were treated like other prescription drugs, Dr. Yao's study would have sent up a giant red flag about the neurotoxicity of the Hepatitis B vaccine. Of course, that didn't happen, and this is the first time you've probably ever heard of this study (http://vaccinesafetycommission.com/pdfs/Neonatal-hepatitis-B-vaccination-impaired-the-behavior-and-neurogenesis-of-mice-transiently-in-early-adulthood..pdf):

https://www.sott.net/image/s23/468345/full/05_17_ScreenShot2018_05_10at6_.jpg (http://vaccinesafetycommission.com/pdfs/Neonatal-hepatitis-B-vaccination-impaired-the-behavior-and-neurogenesis-of-mice-transiently-in-early-adulthood..pdf)

As you can see, this study was actually published in late 2016. I saw it for the first time two weeks ago, and almost couldn't believe what I was reading. Dr. Yao and his colleagues open with a statement that should make every American parent shudder:
"The hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) is administered to more than 70% of neonates worldwide. Whether this neonatal vaccination affects brain development is unknown." Given the "unknown" of whether or not Hepatitis B impacts brain development, Dr. Yao and his colleagues then set about answering the question, and their answers are disturbing on so many levels, let me try and summarize:
1. The HBV vaccine negatively impacted the behavior of mice.

Specifically, the HBV mice (those that were vaccinated with Hepatitis B vaccine) showed a "significant decrease in locomotion" and "increased anxiety."

2. The HBV vaccine mice experienced a spike in the cytokine IL-6.

The authors noted that the HBV mice showed "significantly increased" IL-6, which we know is a biomarker for autism (http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/Brain-IL-6-elevation-causes-neuronal-circuitry-imbalances-and-mediates-autism-like-behaviors.pdf).

3. It took time for the neurological impact of HBV vaccine to manifest.

This troubled the study authors.They discussed the "latency," meaning the extensive time between when the mice were vaccinated and when the neurological disorders presented themselves (note that Hepatitis B vaccine trials in infants typically followed the infants for one week or less to monitor adverse events):
"...the significant difference found in the present study is between the immunized mice and the control mice, rather than between the mice of 8-week-old and the mice of another age. Therefore, this difference does reflect the effects of the neonatal vaccination. The mechanism underlying the latency and transient phenomenon is very complex and needs further studies for well understanding, because such latency involves many aspects of the immune responses in the periphery and CNS as well as neural plasticity." 4. They concluded with a statement that, in a sane world, would prompt the immediate cessation of Hepatitis B vaccine administration to babies.

What can I say, just read what they wrote for yourself:
"This work reveals for the first time that early HBV vaccination induces impairments in behavior and hippocampal neurogenesis. This work provides innovative data supporting the long suspected potential association of HBV with certain neuropsychiatric disorders such as autism and multiple sclerosis." Conclusion
It's all there, in black and white. A growing, compelling body of work tying vaccinations to autism through biological science. Dr. Yao's paper requires little interpretation, and it's just sitting there, hiding in plain sight (this is the first time anyone in America has ever written about this paper.) Recently, a group of scientists published an editorial emphasizing how important animal studies are (http://vaccinesafetycommission.com/pdfs/Animal-Studies.pdf) to understanding the neurotoxicity of aluminum adjuvant used in vaccines. They noted that "multiple vaccine administrations and neuro/immunologic adverse effects is difficult to establish by epidemiology." Epidemiology, the study of large numbers of people and health outcomes using a spreadsheet, is rife with potential for abuse, manipulation, and missing signals. That's why biological science is so important, and that's why this new study from Dr. Yao and his colleagues provides a devastating blow to anyone who claims a vaccine couldn't possibly cause brain damage or autism. As Dr. Yao and his colleagues concluded:
"This study used the same vaccine and a similar time schedule to those used for human infant vaccination in China. Therefore, these findings suggest that there may be similar effects of neonatal HBV vaccination on brain development and behavior in humans."

onawah

21st May 2018, 02:57

The big vaccine-autism lie
5/20/18 by Jon Rappoport
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/05/20/the-big-vaccine-autism-lie/

“How is a self-contained world built? Well, you can take a major situation which has an obvious cause, and then relabel the situation with a new name and say the cause is unknown. Then you can claim you’re looking for the cause, and you can keep looking and stalling for 50 years.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
First of all, there is NO definitive evidence that autism is a specific condition with a single cause.
If you doubt this, look up the definition of autism in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and try to find a definitive lab test that leads to a diagnosis of autism. There is no such test.
That means there is no confirmed cause of autism. And THAT means there is no proof autism is a single and specific condition.
Like other so-called developmental disorders or neurological disorders, autism is a collection of behaviors and symptoms, clustered together by committees of psychiatrists.
Basically, what is being called autism is DAMAGE. Various forms of neurological damage. This means the cause(s) could be coming from a variety of places.
For example, vaccines can and do cause damage.
Neurological damage, brain damage.
Parents of damaged children know this. There were there. They saw their children before vaccination and after vaccination.
Everything else claimed about these children is diversion. High-class sophisticated deceptive diversion.
For example: shuffling various disease and disorder labels; studies claiming there is no link between vaccines and autism; the hoops the government makes parents jump through, in order to try to obtain financial compensation for their damaged children; the legal deal allowing vaccine manufacturers to avoid law suits; the invented cover stories claiming autism begins in utero or is a genetic disorder; the pretension that autism has even been defined—
All lies. All avoidances.
A child gets a vaccine. The child suffers brain damage. That happens.
That’s the truth which the government buries in a mountain of obfuscation.
In general, how much damage do vaccines cause every year in the US?
Unsurprisingly, there is no reliable count.
For a sane reference, see “In the Wake of Vaccines,” by Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the private National Vaccine Information Center. Her article was published in the Sept./Oct. 2004 issue of Mothering Magazine.
Gathering information from several sources, Fisher makes a reasonable estimate of vaccine damage—actual figures are not available or carefully tracked or vetted. The system for reporting adverse effects is broken.
Fisher: “But how many children have [adverse] vaccine reactions every year? Is it really only one in 110,000 or one in a million who are left permanently disabled after vaccination? Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler observed in 1993 that less than 1 percent of doctors report adverse events following prescription drug use. [See DA Kessler, ‘Introducing MEDWatch,’ [JAMA, June 2, 1993: 2765-2768]”
“There have been estimates that perhaps less than 5 or 10 percent of doctors report hospitalizations, injuries, deaths, or other serious health problems following vaccination. The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act contained no legal sanctions for not reporting; doctors can refuse to report and suffer no consequences.”
“Even so, each year about 12,000 reports [of vaccine damage] are made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System; parents as well as doctors can make those reports. [See RT Chen, B. Hibbs, ‘Vaccine safety,’ Pediatric Annals, July 1998: 445-458]”
“However, if that number represents only 10 percent of what is actually occurring, then the actual number may be 120,000 vaccine-adverse events [damage]. If doctors report vaccine reactions as infrequently as Dr. Kessler said they report prescription-drug reactions, and the number 12,000 is only 1 percent of the actual total, then the real number may be 1.2 million vaccine-adverse events annually.”
Then why does the government say, over and over, that vaccines are safe?
Because they want to lie.
What about all the studies that show this vaccine and that vaccine are safe?
The following quote will give you a clue. The writer is an insider’s insider, and a doctor. She’s scrutinized more published medical studies than all the “highly educated” science-blog writers in the world put together.
Dr. Marcia Angell, for 20 years, was the editor of the most prestigious medical journal in America.
On January 15, 2009, the NY Review of Books published Dr. Angell’s devastating assessment of medical literature:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (Marcia Angell, MD, “Drug Companies and Doctors: A story of Corruption.” NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)
Vaccine damage is being called autism.
It diverts attention from the grave harm vaccines are causing.
Autism is essentially any kind of severe neurological damage a child suffers from unknown causes.
When the cause is obvious and known—as in the case of vaccines—the names and labels are changed:
To protect the guilty.

onawah

24th May 2018, 00:15

Not Born With Autism
MAY 22, 2018
By Brian S. Hooker, Science Advisor, Focus for Health and Board Member, World Mercury Project
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/not-born-with-it/?utm_source=mailchimp

Recently, the newest U.S. autism prevalence numbers were released by the CDC. It was not good news. Among children born in 2004 and 2006, the prevalence of autism had increased from 1 in 68 to 1 in 59, respectively. Leading the nation in terms of autism prevalence was New Jersey with a rate of 1 in 35 children and 1 in 22 boys. In other words, nearly 5% of boys in New Jersey have autism spectrum disorder as defined by the new DSM V criteria. Of the children with autism in the U.S., 56% had an evaluated IQ of 85 or less, meaning they possessed intellectual disability, with the majority of those children having an IQ of less than 70.

Many in the scientific community have posited that autism is genetically determined, and researchers have searched the genome looking for the cause of this disorder. However, the over 400 genes that have been attributed to autism risk were found to contribute to only a fraction of autism cases. Climbing down this flimsy branch of genetics, researchers and lauding media contrived the phrase “individuals born with autism.”

Looking at prevalence alone, we are seeing a dramatic and chilling increase in numbers of autism cases, especially in the past 18 years since CDC started to officially count autism numbers in the U.S. In 2000, the prevalence was 1 in 250, then 1 in 133 (2006) followed by 1 in 88 (2012), 1 in 68 (2014) and now 1 in 59. Historic data also consistently show that the rate of autism in the 1980’s was near 1 in 2000 children. It is clear that we are in an ever-increasing epidemic of this often profoundly debilitating developmental disorder, where the majority of these children will never be able to live independently throughout their lifetime.

…these wonderful kids were born normally, developed normally for the first one year to 18 months of life, and then regressed into the isolated, painful and disabling world of autism.
Let’s go back to the “individuals born with autism” phrase that I take issue with. It is the experience of my family and many, if not most families of children with autism, that these wonderful kids were born normally, developed normally for the first one year to 18 months of life, and then regressed into the isolated, painful and disabling world of autism. They were not born with it but experienced a significant decline in function after an environmental stressor.

Just prior to the release of the CDC’s autism prevalence numbers, an important paper by Dr. Sally Ozonoff and her colleagues at the prestigious UC Davis MIND Institute was quietly published in the journal Autism Research. The paper, entitled “Onset Patterns in Autism: Variation across Informants, Methods, and Timing” was the culmination of a prospective study tracking the onset of autistic symptoms as evaluated by special education practitioners and parents. This was done with the gold standard autism assessment instrument Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), including assessments of frequency and quality of eye contact, shared affect, and overall social engagement by highly trained examiners.

Among those children diagnosed with autism, 88% showed a decline of function (i.e., regression) from an average to above average performance during the first assessments, as compared to those children who did not end up with an autism diagnosis.
147 infants with a family history of ASD and 83 without such a history were evaluated during 7 extensive practitioner assessments held periodically within the first three years of life. If these children were born with autism they would have shown signs at the very beginning of life. But they did not.

Among those children diagnosed with autism, 88% showed a decline of function (i.e., regression) from an average to above average performance during the first assessments, as compared to those children who did not end up with an autism diagnosis. In addition, the examiners saw a higher rate of regression than that reported even by parents (88% compared to 69%, respectively), using assessment instrument findings that were based on parental ratings and interviews. Also, when retrospective instruments were used for reporting (which are hampered by recall bias), incidence of regression was roughly 40%, much lower than that seen in the arguably more accurate prospective study.

The conclusion of this research, the first of its kind, is critically important for future research and further dialogue about the role of genes vs. environment in autism causation.
Out of a sampling of 230 children followed for the first three years of their lives, fully 88% of those who were diagnosed with autism started at average and above average social engagement scores, and then regressed prior to ultimately being diagnosed with autism. In other words, nearly all of the children followed in the study who developed autism had regressive autism. They were not born with it.

Resources must be allocated to understanding the environmental stressors that cause regression, and to identify the children most vulnerable to these environmental stressors. Let’s take this new information and use it wisely: acknowledge that many individuals with autism were not born that way, and work to identify any potential environmental exposures that led to neurological and behavioral regressions and a lifetime of disability for these wonderful children and their families.

onawah

25th May 2018, 22:50

The U.S. Needs an Independent Vaccine Safety Organization
MAY 23, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/the-u-s-needs-an-independent-vaccine-safety-organization/?utm_source=mailchimp
(I included most of the hyperlinks from this article, which I don't usually do since there are so many of them, but this will show you what well-researched articles the World Mercury Project is putting out. This article by itself would make a great introduction for someone who is new to the dangers of vaccines, and would be difficult to refute, considering all the well known and reputable sources of info.)

By the World Mercury Project Team

Most Americans are oblivious to the huge annual burden of chronic illness, injuries https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/over-vaccinated-children-and-the-allergy-epidemic/
and deaths https://worldmercuryproject.org/what-we-do/hiding-vaccine-related-deaths-semantic-sleight-hand/
linked to vaccines. Some of the blame for the public’s ignorance belongs to a complicit media... https://www.aim.org/aim-column/can-you-handle-the-truth-about-vaccines/ that “pretends that vaccine-related injuries do not occur.” However, the lion’s share of culpability for the buried story likely rests with the two federal agencies charged with vaccine oversight—the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)—both of which regularly engage in various forms of deception https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4065774/
to uphold their bland narrative that vaccines are unambiguously safe.

The two agencies claim https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/safetyavailability/vaccinesafety/ucm298181.pdf
that they only license vaccines and allow them to remain on the market if the vaccines’ benefits outweigh their potential risks. Yet credible accusations have surfaced for years—aired by legislators, researchers, watchdog groups and many others https://www.forbes.com/forbes/welcome/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/2005/02/24/cx_mh_0224fda.html&refURL=https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/the-u-s-needs-an-independent-vaccine-safety-organization/?utm_source=mailchimp&referrer=https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/the-u-s-needs-an-independent-vaccine-safety-organization/?utm_source=mailchimp#78e6fc9f21bd
—that both the FDA and CDC lack the impartiality required to make accurate judgments about vaccine safety. How can they, when the CDC’s dual mandate is both to monitor vaccine safety and promote vaccines?

Recognizing that this represents an “enormous” and “inherent” conflict of interest, a few gutsy legislators periodically have attempted to establish an “objective and non-conflicted office,” https://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/weldon-maloney-introduce-vaccine-safety-bill the sole purpose of which would be “to address, investigate, and head off potential vaccine safety problems.” Thus far, these efforts have gone nowhere, but even a cursory look at the agencies’ capture by industry confirms that it is time to stop allowing the fox to guard the hen house.

The congressional committee noted that FDA and CDC advisory committee members and chairpersons own stock in the vaccine companies under consideration as well as owning vaccine patents.
Self-interested experts
There are many reasons why the public needs and deserves an independent vaccine safety organization. One of the most significant criticisms has to do with the FDA’s and CDC’s business-as-usual reliance on external experts with financial ties https://ethics.harvard.edu/conflicts-interest-health-policy-problem-industry-ties-and-bias-drug-approval
to the pharmaceutical companies and/or products that they are evaluating. Little has changed since a congressional Committee on Government Reform outlined this problem nearly two decades ago. The Reform Committee examined the doings of the FDA’s Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC)
https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/BloodVaccinesandOtherBiologics/VaccinesandRelatedBiologicalProductsAdvisoryCommittee/default.htm which determines whether new vaccines should be licensed, and the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/index.html... which recommends vaccines for inclusion in the childhood vaccine schedule.

The congressional committee noted that FDA and CDC advisory committee members and chairpersons own stock in the vaccine companies under consideration as well as owning vaccine patents. https://www.scribd.com/document/87934557/Vaccine-development-and-conflicts-of-interest
The CDC “grants conflict of interest waivers to every member of their advisory committee a year at a time and allows full participation in the discussions leading up to a vote by every member,” even if a member has a financial stake in the decision.

The Reform Committee also discussed the example of the FDA’s vote to approve the ill-fated rotavirus vaccine. https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/fda-acknowledged-that-vaccine-technology-outpacing-ability-to-predict-adverse-events/
Ten of the fifteen VRBPAC members were either absent or were excluded from the vote, whereas five “temporary” members parachuted in to join the remaining five in voting to license the vaccine. Moreover, “three out of the five [permanent] members…who voted for the rotavirus vaccine had conflicts of interest that were waived.”

Overall, the congressional review sketched a portrait of an “old boys network” of experts and advisors who “rotate between the CDC and FDA, at times serving simultaneously.” In one case, after finding that an expert had served continuously for 16 years, the chairman asked, “With over 700,000 physicians in this country, how can one person be so indispensable that they stay on a committee for 16 years?”

A 2009 report…determined that CDC continued to display “a systemic lack of [ethics] oversight.”
Despite stern rebukes, CDC and FDA don’t fix the problems
Unfortunately, there is no grounds for assuming that the two agencies have fixed these rampant conflict-of-interest problems. A 2009 report by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) at the Department of Health and Human Services determined that CDC continued to display “a systemic lack of [ethics] oversight.” Virtually all (97%) of the individuals sitting on CDC advisory committees, including ACIP, omitted relevant financial disclosure information from their required ethics form, and CDC rarely complied with the requirement to “identify and resolve all conflicts of interest…before permitting [those individuals] to participate in committee meetings.” Although the OIG sternly rebuked the CDC to do its job in obtaining complete financial disclosures, the CDC balked at “fully implementing” the recommendation, describing it as “impractical.”

In 2014, a Drexel University researcher examined 15 years’ worth of conflicts of interest at the FDA, framing them as a significant “health policy problem” driven by both financial ties and “selection” mechanisms (that is, committee members who are “predisposed to favor pharmaceutical companies”). A 2015 article in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) illustrates the ongoing magnitude of the problem, showing how drug and device companies paid roughly $3.7 billion to U.S. physicians and teaching hospitals over just one half-year period; as the BMJ incisively states, “financial conflicts of interest in medicine are not beneficial, despite strained attempts to justify them and to make a virtue of self-interest.” https://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h2942

Not serious about serious adverse events
Although the FDA and CDC claim to take vaccine safety seriously, another favorite tactic is to downplay actual and potential vaccine risks. This is particularly apparent when the two agencies denigrate the very surveillance system that they co-administer. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) carries out spontaneous surveillance, meaning that “no active effort is made to search for, identify and collect information, but rather information is passively received...https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632204/... from those who choose to voluntarily report their experience.” Because of these features, FDA and CDC authors readily admit that their system has “inherent limitations,” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632204/ and Harvard researchers agree, noting... https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2213485/ ...that VAERS is subject to “incomplete recognition of potential adverse events, administrative barriers to reporting, and incomplete case documentation.” The VAERS capture rate of as little as one percent https://healthit.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system...of actual vaccine-related adverse events “preclude[s] or delay[s] the identification of ‘problem’ vaccines”—“potentially endangering the health of the public.” https://healthit.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system

Even with the massive underreporting, VAERS receives approximately 30,000 reports annually, up to 4,500 of which the CDC characterizes as serious https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/index.html —meaning that “the adverse event resulted in permanent disability, hospitalization, life-threatening illness, or death.” Lest the public worry about these thousands of reported injuries, the CDC has a ready answer. The agency asserts https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/index.html
(without the slightest hint of irony) that “while these problems happen after vaccination, they are rarely caused by the vaccine.” Both the CDC and FDA shore up this oddly unconcerned attitude by regularly publishing boilerplate agency-authored VAERS analyses that declare “no new or unexpected [adverse events] patterns.”https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26407428

Circumvention and circumlocution
“Cozy corporate alliances” http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/301432-the-cdc-is-being-being-influenced-by-corporate-and-political ... and an emphasis on public-private partnerships https://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h2362... tilt the CDC’s and FDA’s actions in favor of industry in numerous ways.
For example, the CDC and vaccine manufacturers co-fund a variety of “sock-puppet mouthpieces” disguised as independent non-profits; these front groups make it possible for the CDC to circumvent lobbying restrictions and support a compulsory vaccination agenda.
http://vaccinesafetycommission.org/pdfs/bmj.j5104.full.pdf
World Mercury Project has described numerous other examples of bias and wrong-doing at both agencies. The CDC, for example, has:

Resolutely and repeatedly denied any association between vaccine ingredients such as thimerosal and pervasive development disorders
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/science-confirms-again-pervasive-developmental-disorder-mirrors-mercury-poisoning/
and even shredded unflattering data.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Dr_BrianHooker_statement_regarding_Vaccine_Whistleblower_William_Thompson.pdf
Worked to conceal unwanted outcomes caused by the highly profitable varicella vaccine.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/the-varicella-vaccine-skyrocketing-shingles-and-cdc-chicanery/
Aggressively recommended flu shots in pregnant women
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/that-was-then-this-is-now-open-season-on-vaccinating-pregnant-women/
...without a sound research basis for doing so, while making light of serious influenza vaccine injuries in the general population.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/caveat-emptor-science-versus-cdc-on-scary-flu-shot-promotions/
Allowed studies to be conducted and published without legally required ethics clearances.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/a-matter-of-right-and-wrong-the-cdcs-troubling-lack-of-research-ethics/
Ignored whistleblowers and blocked them from testifying about vaccine injuries.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/cdc-blocks-testimony-vaccine-whistleblower-medical-malpractice-case-2/
Sent top executives through the revolving door to work with industry.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-merck-gerberding/former-cdc-head-lands-vaccine-job-at-merck-idUSTRE5BK2K520091221
Meanwhile, the FDA has:

Refused to give “any serious consideration to the abundant and mushrooming evidence of thimerosal’s profound toxicity.”
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/fdas-cber-asleep-switch-ongoing-saga/
Relied on “outdated information, unwarranted assumptions and errors”
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/regulators-remain-indifferent-to-unsafe-levels-of-aluminum-in-vaccines/ and published misleading safety studies to allow unsafe levels of aluminum to remain in childhood vaccines.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/a-lone-fda-scientist-could-end-the-autism-epidemic/
Ignored advice from within its own ranks to pay closer attention to vaccine safety so as to avoid “a situation of unforeseen and unpredictable vaccine outcomes.”
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/fda-acknowledged-that-vaccine-technology-outpacing-ability-to-predict-adverse-events/
Permitted vaccine manufacturers to use phony placebos to conceal vaccine risks.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/new-study-vaccine-manufacturers-fda-regulators-used-statistical-gimmicks-hide-risks-hpv-vaccines/
With the FDA and CDC having repeatedly demonstrated their prioritization of industry profits over public safety, the time is past due for creating an independent agency that takes vaccine safety seriously.
Enough is enough
Two to four million individuals suffer “serious, disabling, or fatal injury” associated with prescription drugs each year (including an estimated 128,000 deaths), but these incidents tend to remain outside the public eye. Even with the opioid epidemic, it took over a decade for the media to begin reporting the story and even longer (until 2017) for the government to declare the epidemic a national health emergency.

It is unconscionable that vaccines with doubtful safety data continue to be rushed onto the market while the ensuing injuries and deaths remain in the shadows. With the FDA and CDC having repeatedly demonstrated their prioritization of industry profits over public safety, the time is past due for creating an independent agency that takes vaccine safety seriously. A former program director at the National Institutes of Health wrote a couple of years ago about the role of vaccines in creating a powerful medical establishment—supported by drug-profit-hungry businessmen and philanthropists.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5138175/ In that author’s words, “improved public health is possible only by switching the current corruptive and abusive culture of ‘who you know’ to a culture of ‘what you know.”

onawah

31st May 2018, 16:04

CDC SCANDAL: The link between chickenpox vaccine and skyrocketing rates of shingles in adults revealed
(Naturalhealth365)by Lori Alton May 31, 2018
https://www.naturalhealth365.com/cdc-vaccine-dangers-2579.html

It’s almost impossible to peruse online or cable news without seeing some reference to the term “collusion.” But, wherever you stand on this issue, you should be aware that a claim of “collusion” is also reverberating throughout the federal public health field – and it has to do with the chickenpox (varicella) vaccination instituted in 1995 by the CDC (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

An explosive article published in March in Annals of Clinical Pathology claims that the CDC colluded with the Los Angeles Department of Health Services (LADHS) to suppress research findings involving its Universal Varicella Vaccination Program – and a link with the increasing nationwide incidence of shingles.

The author alleges that the CDC pulled several dirty tricks – including manipulating data – to hide an undesirable outcome. Sound familiar? (They did the same thing with the MMR vaccine)

What the CDC fails to appreciate: Widespread incidence of chickenpox virus caused protection against shingles
Chickenpox is usually a mild disease when it occurs in children. Following infection with chickenpox, or varicella zoster, the virus remains latent in the body – although it can be reactivated later in the form of shingles, or herpes zoster.

Prior to the vaccination program instituted in the mid-1990s by the CDC, 95 percent of adults in the United States had experienced chickenpox as children. Because long-term immunity was received as a result, having chickenpox was considered a sort of immune system “rite of passage.”

In other words, because having chickenpox boosts cell-mediated immunity, the high prevalence of chickenpox as a childhood disease helped to ward off shingles in adults.

In 1995, the CDC added chickenpox vaccine to the recommended vaccine schedule for 12- to 15-month olds. In 2006, the CDC upped the ante, saying that 4- to 6-year old children needed a chickenpox booster shot as well.

Unfortunately, adults who had natural immunity in the pre-vaccination era are now compromised by decreasing immunity to chickenpox, due to the mass vaccination program (which provides only temporary immunity).

Many natural health experts feel that because the CDC’s mass varicella vaccination caused a reduction in circulating wild-type varicella zoster virus, the increased reactivation of shingles is now occurring.

Researcher says: Vaccine increases likelihood of shingles both in childhood and later life
The article’s author, Gary S. Goldman, worked as a research analyst in the mid-1990s at the Los Angeles Department of Health. Because of his work on the Varicella Active Surveillance Project, or VASP, he was able to monitor the introduction of the chickenpox vaccine – and assess its outcomes.

In 2000, Goldman began to hear anecdotal accounts from school nurses about the inexplicable increase in cases of herpes zoster among school-aged children – and decided to take a closer look.

He concluded that the chickenpox vaccine had two negative outcomes – it accelerated the recurrence of shingles in children who had already had natural chickenpox, and it increased the likelihood of shingles in adults.

The CDC is advising the shingles vaccine as a way to prevent the painful disease of shingles. But, Goldman points out that the vaccine – intended to provide the protection people would normally receive from childhood chickenpox for free – costs $200 a dose.

In addition, the shingles vaccine appears not to work very well – or for long.

One study conducted from 2009 to 2016 among a large group of adults over age 50 showed that the shingles vaccine is only 50 percent effective the first year – and decreases to “no effect” by the fifth year post-vaccination.

Researcher admits: CDC manipulated data to mask deleterious outcomes
According to Goldman, the CDC fought his attempts to publicize his data – every inch of the way. The researcher lists 23 different actions the agency took in order to distort and suppress his findings.

Among the tactics the CDC utilized, Goldman says, were attempting to statistically disguise his findings, robbing findings of meaning by attributing them to the incorrect subgroups, manipulating their own data to imply that the chickenpox vaccine worked better than it did, publishing selective studies, aggressively blocking Goldman’s attempt to publish undesirable trends and outcomes and pressuring journal editors to delay publication of his work.

For example, the CDC conducted a study of shingles incidence in a population where the chickenpox vaccine had not been widely administered – in order to misleadingly produce evidence that the program had no effect on the higher rates of shingles.

And, Goldman alleges that the CDC masked the alarming trends by averaging vaccine effectiveness over several years – instead of stratifying it year by year.

The CDC also directed Goldman not to pursue further analysis of trends in shingle cases, and attempted to systematically discredit him.

Truth EXPOSED: Shingles epidemic predicted by earlier research
In a 2002 study published in Vaccine, the authors stated that natural chickenpox was highly protective against shingles – and warned that mass chickenpox vaccination would likely cause a major shingles epidemic.

They even presented a statistic, predicting that 50 percent of those who were 10 to 44 years at the time of the chickenpox vaccine’s introduction would develop shingles.

The researchers also predicted that the existence of the vaccine would have the effect of lowering the average age of shingles infection, while moving the average age of chickenpox infection higher. This is disturbing, because chickenpox is much more severe in adults. In fact, the disease is 25 times more likely to lead to death in someone over 50 than someone under four years old.

Sixteen years later, Goldman’s findings are confirming this early forecast. Yet the powers-that-be seem intent on concealing anything that hints at a downside to vaccination.

Goldman, who has since resigned from his job with the LADHS, insists that mass chickenpox vaccination has caused a “fabricated cycle of disease and treatment.” It is one that the CDC appears determined to cover-up.

Sources for this article include:

WorldMercuryProject.org
ScienceDirect.com
JSCIMedCentral.com

onawah

6th June 2018, 04:25

Are Cochrane Reviews Truly “Independent and Transparent”?
JUNE 05, 2018
By the World Mercury Project Team
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/are-cochrane-reviews-truly-independent-and-transparent/?utm_source=mailchimp

Policy-makers often attach considerable importance to systematic reviews when they make decisions about health care strategies and future policy directions. A systematic review is a “study of studies” that reviews the available body of evidence for a given disease or health topic in a “standardized and systematic way.”

…a look at Cochrane’s disclosed funding sources raises the question of whether the organization’s vaunted independence may be more talk than substance.
The London-based Cochrane organization (formerly the Cochrane Collaboration) bills its Cochrane Library as the “international gold standard for high quality, trusted information,” a characterization with which many researchers agree. Cochrane is prolific, publishing over 5,000 reviews in its first two decades. In addition to featuring a noble-sounding tagline (“trusted evidence, informed decisions, better health”), Cochrane burnishes its reputation through its avowed unwillingness to accept any “conflicted funding” and its professed freedom from “commercial sponsorship and other conflicts of interest.”

In fact, according to Cochrane’s website, no-strings-attached funding is “vital” in allowing the organization’s global network of reviewers to “generate authoritative and reliable information, working freely, unconstrained by commercial and financial interests.” Precisely how Cochrane defines “conflicted funding” is not readily apparent. And a look at Cochrane’s disclosed funding sources raises the question of whether the organization’s vaunted independence may be more talk than substance.

Funders with agendas
Cochrane’s top funders (in terms of amounts donated) feature some of the world’s largest government health agencies, including the research arm of the UK’s National Health Service as well as the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID); the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the U.S.; Australia’s National Health and Medical Research Council; and health ministries all over the world. These powerful agencies are no strangers to quid pro quo funding arrangements—for example, the NIH cancelled research on alcohol marketing to underage drinkers because it was “wooing the alcoholic beverage industry to contribute tens of millions of dollars” for research on alcohol’s purported heart health benefits.

Desirous of extending the reach of its information globally, Cochrane also receives funding from and works in partnership with the World Health Organization (WHO); in 2016, Cochrane bragged that its systematic reviews had been included in 90% of WHO’s guidelines that year. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), which happens to be the largest non-government funder of WHO, is also a Cochrane donor. Curiously, BMGF’s contribution to Cochrane in late 2016 and a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) in early 2017 were shared only in fleeting press releases rather than on the permanent donor list on Cochrane’s website.

As Cochrane accepts more funding from foundations with highly partisan vaccination and Big Data agendas, what are the implications for its “gold standard” reviews?
Why might these two large U.S. foundations be interested in supporting Cochrane? According to the press releases, the foundations’ targeted pots of money appear to be helping Cochrane build a “next-generation evidence system” that will use technological advances and machine learning to maximize the impact of “Big Data.” Vaccination is one of the policy arenas where the rollout of Big Data is being most enthusiastically embraced, with researchers acclaiming Big Data’s potential to streamline the delivery of “rationally designed vaccines” and to “track the success of vaccination campaigns.” Both U.S. foundations are “all in” in this regard.

BMGF is actively promoting Big Data as a vaccination tool in the developing world, where it can “track pandemics” and help vaccine workers “determine what percent of a region they have immunized from a disease.” As a major funder of the GAVI Alliance, BMGF also is supporting the use of comprehensive medical digital databases in remote developing country regions to boost vaccine coverage by closely tracking “when and where” children receive vaccines.

In the U.S., the RWJF has been partnering with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on a “500 Cities Project,” which is busily monitoring health data and health objectives down to the “small area” neighborhood level, including tracking compliance with vaccine recommendations. RWJF’s president was formerly a top CDC official and served as acting CDC director during the 2009 H1N1 influenza scare. (Some Europeans criticized that episode as an exaggerated and even “false pandemic” that ensured millions in windfall profits for vaccine manufacturers.)

Cochrane’s 2018 HPV review
As Cochrane accepts more funding from foundations with highly partisan vaccination and Big Data agendas, what are the implications for its “gold standard” reviews? A recent Cochrane review highly favorable to the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine—one of the most disastrous vaccines ever rushed onto the market—suggests that the foundations are getting plenty of bang for their charitable buck. Despite ample indications that manufacturers used phony placebos and other statistical gimmicks to hide the serious risks of HPV vaccines, and mounting evidence of other “deceptive practices by officials of ‘authoritative’ international public health institutions,” the May 8 Cochrane review of HPV vaccines reported no increased risk of serious adverse effects and concluded that deaths reported in HPV studies “have been judged not to be related to the vaccine.” These conclusions likely were well received by RWJF, which routinely promotes the HPV vaccine in its Culture of Health blog and supports studies assessing how best to implement HPV vaccine mandates—and by BMGF, which has supported the HPV vaccine’s introduction around the world (although BMGF’s reputation has been tarnished by controversy in India, where reportedly unethical HPV vaccine trials supported by the foundation resulted in children’s deaths).

…it would be inappropriate to assume all Cochrane reviews are good quality and are at low risk of bias.
Criticisms of Cochrane reviews have surfaced since not long after the organization’s inception. In 2001, for example, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) questioned the reliability of some Cochrane reviews, describing the implications for Cochrane’s reputation as “serious.” The BMJ authors suggested that “the Cochrane Collaboration needs to clarify [explain] how it discharges its responsibilities for the quality of reviews published under its imprimatur, and how it responds when they are shown to have come to unjustified conclusions.”

A more recent examination of Cochrane reviews in 2016 concluded that while “the methodological quality of Cochrane reviews is good compared to…non-Cochrane reviews, …it would be inappropriate to assume all Cochrane reviews are good quality and are at low risk of bias.” Cochrane’s new and chummy partnership with Wikipedia to include “relevant evidence within all Wikipedia health articles,” announced in early 2017, also may raise some eyebrows given Wikipedia’s reputation for bias. All of these factors suggest that it might be time to take Cochrane’s supposedly neutral relationship with its funders with a grain of salt.

Hervé

7th June 2018, 15:10

Police raid scientists who discovered new vaccine dangers (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/06/07/police-raid-scientists-who-discovered-new-vaccine-dangers/)

by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Jun 7 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/06/07/police-raid-scientists-who-discovered-new-vaccine-dangers/), 2018
—Two scientists discover that vaccines are contaminated, in the manufacturing process, with many small particles of metals that are toxic to humans when injected. Alarming.
The published research is ignored. Then the scientists are raided by police.

James Grundvig, at GreenMedInfo.com and the World Mercury Project, reports (3/17/18) (https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/the-third-digital-revolution-to-unleash-the-power-of-anti-censorship/):
“Last week, the Italian police raided the home and science laboratory of Drs. Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari. The police snatched all of the digital assets owned by the husband and wife team of nanopathologists, grabbing laptops, computers, and flash-drives—and with it, years of work and research.”

“Because Gatti and Montanari had taken their research of nanodust and nanoparticles…to what unseen contamination might reside in vaccines in 2016, they came under the microscope of the United States, European, and Italian authorities. They had touched the third rail of medicine. They had crossed the no-go zone with the purported crime being scientific research and discovery. By finding nano-contamination in random vaccines, Gatti and Montanari revealed, for the first time, what no one knew: Vaccines had more than aluminum salts adjuvants, Polysorbate-80, and other inorganic chemicals in them, they also harbored stainless steel, tungsten, copper, and other metals and rare elements that don’t belong in shots given to fetuses, pregnant women, newborns, babies and toddlers developing their lungs, immune and nervous systems.”

“When the scientists published their findings in January 2017, ‘New Quality‐Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro‐ and Nanocontamination,’ the logical next step for the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) should have been to open an investigation into their claims, hire independent scientists to run their own lab tests to confirm or refute the findings. If confirmed, then the healthcare agencies would enact new policies on safety of the vaccine supply chain, and enforce strict quality control and quality assurance programs.”

“But none of that happened. A year went by. It was cheaper for the authorities to attack the Italian scientists than upset the vaccine gravy train that supports the politicians.”
This is an official form of research: censorship by raiding the researchers.

Note that the two Italian scientists weren’t simply testing a batch of one vaccine from one manufacturer. There were looking at random vaccines.

Suppose this chilling disaster turns out to be endemic to all vaccine manufacturing?

For the ubiquitous “all vaccines are safe” pronouncement, substitute: “dangerous across the board.”

Jon Rappoport

onawah

7th June 2018, 21:19

20 Reasons Why We Need A Vaccine Safety Commission…
By Celina Trevino
(This sums it up pretty well!!!!!)
http://bolenreport.com/20-reasons-why-we-need-a-vaccine-safety-commission/

The United States is in desperate need of an independent Vaccine Safety Commission, whose task would be:

“to ensure safe vaccines and to protect the citizens of the world from death, or a lifetime of disability from vaccination.”

Why Do We Say That? Here Are Twenty Very Good Reasons…
(1) There is no enforcement of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act regarding physicians who fail to report adverse events from vaccination. So while they are required to report, no one is making sure they actually are. A task force assigned to regulate and check up on physicians to ensure they are indeed reporting all adverse events properly would put some teeth in the law.

(2) At the time of this writing, the US government has paid out to victims, through the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: 3.6 billion dollars[i]

(3) Physicians are not taught how to diagnose vaccine injury in medical school curriculums. Mandatory vaccine education could be brought about by a Commission.

(4) Currently, our Medical Examiners do not test and do not know how to test for vaccines as a cause of death in an autopsy toxicology report. A Vaccine Safety Commission could provide the data for a new testing standard. Currently, a parent has to tell the Medical Examiner what to look for.

(5) The Vaccine Safety Datalink[ii], part of America’s vaccine safety surveillance system, does not allow public access to their data. Their data is private, so the only way scientists and physicians can use their data is by conducting their own study.

https://i0.wp.com/bolenreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/vaccine-damaged2.jpg?resize=768%2C512

(6) The list of reportable events on VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) is incomplete and limited.[iii]

Vaccine manufacturers continuously update the adverse event section of their package inserts based on new data. 37 years after the MMR was introduced, adverse events such as acute hemorrhagic edema of infancy and transverse myelitis are being added to the package insert .[iv] This shows an inadequate surveillance system is in place to protect the public.

(7) Vaccine package inserts are not given to parents before or after vaccination. Parents should be given the package inserts with ample time to read before making the choice to vaccinate.

(8) The first textbook on Vaccines and Autoimmunity has come out recently: Vaccines and Autoimmunity by ‪Yehuda Shoenfeld, ‪Nancy Agmon-Levin, ‪Lucija Tomljenovic in 2015[v].

(9) There is no prescreening in vaccination. Currently our medical system does not have a way to check whether babies are healthy or could be immune-compromised, so the baby is assumed healthy. Only those with cancer, HIV or on immune suppressant drugs are considered immune suppressed, and yet physicians have different standards of care for who is considered immune compromised.

(10) When making the decision to vaccinate, family history is not regularly taken into account by the physician. Even a family history of severe reactions or death from vaccines, is rarely considered as part of the decision to vaccinate.

(11) We are vaccinating babies at the same specific time when it is known that they are most susceptible to death and neurological injury.[vi]

(12) The CDC has never done a vaccinated vs unvaccinated study due to the assumption that all vaccines are safe and effective. They purport that long-term studies “aren’t practical” and those for the un-vaccinated are “unethical”.[vii]

(13) Pregnant women are increasingly advised by the CDC to take vaccines: currently a Tdap and Flu vaccine for each pregnancy.[viii]

!14) Some cases in the Vaccine Injury Court Program are settled out of court, therefore, we will and can never know the true injuries that occur. This is because all the files become confidential and plaintiffs sign non-disclosure agreements, promising never to talk about details of the case in return for a sum of money.

(15) The Hepatitis B vaccine is given to infants at 12 hours old even though their mothers are pre-screened[ix] for it before giving birth, and determined to be negative. There is an unnecessary and over vaccination of infants with the Hepatitis B vaccine.

(16) Kaiser, whose data is part of the Vaccine Safety Datalink, recently (allegedly) did not follow two safety protocols[x]. How can we be sure they are keeping accurate records that the public depends on for safety assurance? A Vaccine Safety Commission would make sure the same people responsible for ensuring safety are actually following vaccine safety policies.

(17) The CDC uses the study of Dr. Paul Thorsen, a wanted criminal, as a standard for autism.
uNWTOmEi_6A
In a hearing of the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee, Congressman Posey questions officials from the CDC over Autism research and vaccinations…
qxr-cv-JuI8
FL Representative Bill Posey mentions Paul Thorsen here at the 2:46 mark.

FL Representative Bill Posey addresses Congress with CDC Whistleblower Dr. William Thompson’s statement:

Congressman Posey speaks on the House floor about a CDC whistleblower exposing deception at the CDC. July 29, 2015:

Despite Bill Posey’s requests, the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee has refused to look into Dr. William Thompson’s claims.

(18). Girls in Colombia are suing Merck with a class action lawsuit, due to injuries from Gardasil.[xi] More studies need to be done on this vaccine before it is added to the Childhood Vaccine Schedule.

(19) Independent labs recently tested vaccines for heavy metals[xii] and glyphosate[xiii]. Test results were sent to the CDC, who has refused to acknowledge the findings or suggest their own investigation.

(20) The CDC’s pediatric vaccination schedule exceeds the FDA’s limit of Aluminum in infants.[xiv] [xv]

The Situation Is Getting Worse, Not Better…
With the CDC’s most recent figures of Autism incidence in the U.S. being 1 in 59[xvi], how much longer can physicians and scientists say to parents:

“It’s a coincidence.”

“We don’t know why this happened.”

“It can’t be the vaccines.”

The science on vaccines is clearly not settled.
Let’s protect our country and put us on the track towards prosperous health.

By Celina Trevino

————————————————-

Bibliography:

[i] https://www.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/hrsa/vaccine-compensation/data/monthly-stats-may-2018.pdf

Data & Statistics – hrsa.gov
www.hrsa.gov

Data & Statistics The United States has the safest, most effective vaccine supply in history. In the majority of cases, vaccines cause no side effects, however they can occur, as with any medication—but most are mild.

[ii]https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vsd/index.html

Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) VSD | Monitoring | Ensuring …
www.cdc.gov

The VSD is a collaborative project that exists to monitor vaccine safety and conduct studies about rare and serious adverse events following immunization.

[iii]https://vaers.hhs.gov/docs/VAERS_Table_of_Reportable_Events_Following_Vaccination.pdf

VAERS Table of Reportable Events Following Vaccination …
vaers.hhs.gov

death) of above events (interval – not applicable) D. Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine

[iv]https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm094050.htm

[v] https://www.amazon.com/Vaccines-Autoimmunity-Yehuda-Shoenfeld/dp/1118663438

[vi] https://vaers.hhs.gov/data/dataguide.html

[vii] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/tools/parents-guide/parents-guide-part4.html

[viii] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pregnancy/pregnant-women/index.html

[ix] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pregnancy/pregnant-women/index.html

[x] http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/marcos-breton/article173211321.html

[xi] https://www.nvic.org/nvic-vaccine-news/september-2017/forced-vaccination-unconstitutional-in-colombia.aspx

[xii] http://info.cmsri.org/the-driven-researcher-blog/dirty-vaccines-new-study-reveals-prevalence-of-contaminants

[xiii]https://www.momsacrossamerica.com/glyphosate_found_in_childhood_vaccines

[xiv]https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17300950#fig0020

[xv] https://healthfreedomidaho.org/aluminum-in-vaccines-history-and-toxicity97

[xvi] https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html

onawah

10th June 2018, 19:21

THE CRIMINALIZATION OF SCIENCE WHISTLEBLOWERS: JUDY MIKOVITS, PHD
June 8, 2018
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/the-criminalization-of-science-whistleblowers-an-interview-with-judy-mikovits-phd/

https://vimeo.com/274114936

NaturalNews reports on one of the most heartbreaking and upsetting science videos you may see this year: Molecular biologist Judy A. Mikovits, PhD, recounts the story of how she ended up in prison after she blew the whistle on the viral contamination of human vaccines.

Dr. Mikovits had been working at the National Cancer Institute, with a focus on immunotherapy and human retroviruses, including HIV.

In 2009, while working on autism and -related neurological diseases, when she found that many of the study subjects had cancer, motor-neuron disorders and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). Believing that a virus was responsible for these symptoms, she worked to isolate the viruses involved in a mouse model.

She soon realized that these protein and viral contaminants were being introduced into the human population via contaminated vaccines. She states, “Twenty-five million Americans are infected with the viruses that came out of the lab… into the humans via contaminated blood and vaccines.”

As reported by NaturalNews:

“In response to this discovery, she was fired from her job, indicted, prosecuted, jailed and ordered to retract her research and publicly claim she ‘made it all up.’ She refused to cover up the scientific evidence and was targeted and punished by the ‘vaccine deep state’ establishment. She was actually thrown in prison. ‘Just dragged out of my house in shackles… I refused to denounce the data… we have the data… they basically said, ‘Tell everybody you made it all up and you can go home. If you don’t, we’ll destroy you’. And they did.”

This is the point at which modern medicine has arrived. Watch this astonishing video and check out Dr. Mikovits’ book, Plague: One Scientist’s Intrepid Search for the Truth about Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Autism, and Other Diseases.

onawah

12th June 2018, 05:58

Dr. Rima's book on autism
http://drrimatruthreports.com/dr-rima-autism-book-on-amazon/
http://my.officevp.com/library/members/officevp/drlaibow/autism-ebook-banner.jpg

Here is one review posted on Amazon: “I’ve known Dr. Rima for decades and am aware of her world-renowned reputation as a healer. This book is extraordinary! Dr. Rima exposes the falsehood that “autism is the new normal” and then shows how parents can retrieve their autistic children. This book is a clear guide for care-givers, and has access to an updating web page. The chart of common autism drugs and the nutrients they deplete is ‘worth the price of the book.'”

Hervé

19th June 2018, 15:14

International scientists have found autism's cause while American media and public health officials remain silent (https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2018/4/1/international2018)

J.B. Handley jbhandleyblog.com (https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2018/4/1/international2018)
Mon, 02 Apr 2018 20:03 UTC

In early December 2017, Dr. Chris Exley of Keele University (https://www.keele.ac.uk/aluminium/groupmembers/chrisexley/) in England and his colleagues published a paper that for the first time looked at the brain tissue of subjects with autism to determine the level of aluminum (note: they spell "aluminum" as "aluminium" in the United Kingdom) found within their brain tissue. For anyone trying to convince the world that "the science is settled and vaccines don't cause autism," the study's findings are deeply contradictory to that statement. In a blog post (https://www.hippocraticpost.com/infection-disease/aluminium-and-autism/) written by Professor Exley on the day his study was published, he explained the groundbreaking results:
"...while the aluminium content of each of the 5 brains [of people with autism] was shockingly high it was the location of the aluminium in the brain tissue which served as the standout observation...The new evidence strongly suggests that aluminium is entering the brain in ASD [autism spectrum disorders] via pro-inflammatory cells which have become loaded up with aluminium in the blood and/or lymph, much as has been demonstrated (https://www.nature.com/articles/srep31578) for monocytes at injection sites for vaccines including aluminium adjuvants."
https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473603/medium/_Vaccines_01.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473603/full/_Vaccines_01.jpg)
Dr. Chris Exley of Keele University

Dr. Exley's quote includes a reference to "monocytes at injection sites" and the fact that the interaction between these monocytes and aluminum has been demonstrated in previous published science. I know, that sounds pretty technical, but bear with me. A "monocyte" is a type of white blood cell, of which one form of monocyte is a "macrophage." A macrophage can be thought of as the garbage man of the immune system, eating up foreign substances, cell debris, etc. As you will see in a moment, macrophages appear to be playing a critical and devastating role in triggering autism, serving to escort aluminum injected from a vaccine directly into the brain, where it can disrupt brain development and trigger autism.

Dr. Exley's study - "Aluminium in brain tissue and autism (https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0946672X17308763/1-s2.0-S0946672X17308763-main.pdf?_tid=66f3f5a2-e4c5-43ac-bb75-c0b77d9ad2d7&acdnat=1522699448_2ebd97923dde70532ba84258d1a161e3)" - is the final piece of a puzzle that first started to come together in 2004, and picked up steam since 2010, that has dramatically furthered the scientific understanding of exactly how a vaccine can trigger autism. This timeline is critical to recognize, because the Vaccine Court in the United States dismissed the vaccine-autism hypothesis in 2009, long before most of what I'm about to explain even existed. Science is a continuum, an emergence of truth through many different studies that often have to be pieced together before the picture becomes clear. And, scientific progress can sometimes move slowly until that moment when an emerging truth presents itself in such a way that it can no longer be denied. In my opinion, Dr. Exley's study provided the only data missing from an airtight explanation of what happened to my son and so many other children.
For Americans, the race to discover what's causing all this autism will likely be won on foreign shores. As you'll soon see, ALL of the science explaining how autism can be caused has come from other countries, even though a Caltech scientist pushed the first domino back in 2006. Why is aluminum in vaccines at all?
Aluminum is a critical component of most vaccines given to children. It serves as an "adjuvant" meaning the aluminum serves to "wake up" the immune system, provoking the immune system to recognize the "antigen" within the vaccine for whatever disease the vaccine serves to protect against. The amount of aluminum in vaccines given to children skyrocketed beginning in the early 1990s for two reasons: 1), more vaccines were added to the children's vaccine schedule and, 2), the vaccination rate for all vaccines given to children rose (from 50-60% of children vaccinated in the mid-1980s to over 90% today). A child in the mid-1980s would have received 1,250 micrograms of aluminum from their vaccines by their 18-month birthday if they were fully vaccinated. Today, that number is 4,925 micrograms, a near-quadrupling of total aluminum. You can read more about this in an excellent study (http://www.jpands.org/vol21no4/miller.pdf) published by Neil Miller, here's an image from the study:

https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473604/large/_Vaccines_02.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473604/full/_Vaccines_02.jpg)

Mystifyingly, aluminum has never experienced biological testing to consider its safety for being injected into babies, having been "grandfathered" into our modern safety standards. Canadian scientists Dr. Chris Shaw and Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic addressed this omission in a critical study they published in 2011 in Current Medicinal Chemistry titled, "Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe?" They wrote:
"Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science's understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences." I wrote an extensive article in January about the way aluminum's safety has been mismanaged, you can read that article right here:
A lone FDA scientist could end the autism epidemic (https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/a-lone-fda-scientist-could-end-the-autism-epidemic)

Ground zero at Caltech
See: Aluminum adjuvant, cytokines, brain inflammation, autism: Did China discover the missing piece of the autism puzzle? (https://www.sott.net/article/344048-Aluminum-adjuvant-cytokines-brain-inflammation-autism-Did-China-discover-the-missing-piece-of-the-autism-puzzle)

The three letters
In the middle of 2017, three of the most important scientists in the field of aluminum adjuvant toxicity - Dr. Christopher Shaw of Canada, Dr. Chris Exley of England, and Dr. Romain Gherardi of France - took the extraordinary step of writing letters of caution to our American public health authorities. I provide their letters below.

Dr. Christopher Shaw:

https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473637/large/Shaw_Letter.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473637/full/Shaw_Letter.jpg)

Dr. Romain Gherardi:

https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473634/large/Gherardi_Letter.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473634/full/Gherardi_Letter.jpg)

Dr. Chris Exley:

https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473636/large/Exley_Letter.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473636/full/Exley_Letter.jpg)

https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473635/large/Exley_Letter_2.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s23/473635/full/Exley_Letter_2.jpg)

About the author
J.B. Handley is the proud father of a child with Autism. He and his wife co-founded Generation Rescu (http://www.generationrescue.org/)e, a national autism charity, in 2005. He spent his career in the private equity industry and received his undergraduate degree with honors from Stanford University in 1991. His first book, "How to End the Autism Epidemic," will be published in September 2018 by Chelsea Green Publishing and is available for pre-order on Amazon (http://bit.ly/jbhandley).

He is also the author of "A lone FDA scientist could end the autism epidemic." (https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/a-lone-fda-scientist-could-end-the-autism-epidemic) Learn more here (https://jbhandleyblog.com/about/).

onawah

20th June 2018, 18:14

Declining IQ: A Race to the Bottom?
JUNE 19, 2018
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/childrens-health/declining-iq-a-race-to-the-bottom/?utm_source=mailchimp

In the U.S., plummeting SAT scores are one proxy indicator of cognitive fallout; the scores have been falling for over a decade and are at historically low levels, reflecting an across-the-board worsening in critical reading, math and writing performance. A report in 2013 suggested that almost three-fifths (57%) of graduating high school seniors were not ready for college. And a new study that reports “large changes in average cohort intelligence” in recent years has the answer—the turnaround in IQ is due to environmental factors.
By the World Mercury Project Team

Over the past several decades, American children’s physical and mental well-being has steadily deteriorated. Over half (54%) of all U.S. children (as of 2007) had a chronic health condition—with developmental and behavioral problems, obesity, allergies, asthma and mental health conditions leading the pack—and the prevalence of many of these conditions doubled from 1988 to the mid-2000s. Federal reporting on pediatric health indicators in 2017 showed that one in five children (kindergarteners through adolescents) were obese, one in ten had activity limitations resulting from chronic health problems, and one in seventeen (more males than females) had, according to a parent, “serious difficulties with emotions, concentration, behavior or getting along with other people.” In addition, 12% of adolescents suffered a major depressive episode in the previous year, with the prevalence of teenage depression rising continuously since 2004 and suicide representing the second leading cause of death for both teens and young adults.
https://worldmercuryproject.org/wp-content/uploads/06-19-ICROPPED-SAT-Scores-Drop.jpg
A converging body of evidence calls attention to a consistent decline in basic cognitive abilities and ‘mental speed,’ particularly in young males, beginning in the mid-to-late 1990s.
Mild and serious developmental disabilities are one of the most prominent faces of the health crisis affecting American children (and, increasingly, children in other countries as well). These disabilities have obvious and sobering implications for individual children’s learning trajectories and future cognitive achievements—but also for society as a whole. In the U.S., plummeting SAT scores are one proxy indicator of the cognitive fallout; the scores have been falling for over a decade and are at historically low levels, reflecting an across-the-board worsening in critical reading, math and writing performance. A news report in 2013 suggested that almost three-fifths (57%) of graduating high school seniors were not ready for college.

In Europe, researchers have been systematically assembling other types of cognitive data to examine intelligence quotient (IQ) trends over time. A converging body of evidence calls attention to a consistent decline in basic cognitive abilities and “mental speed,” particularly in young males, beginning in the mid-to-late 1990s. An article in the British popular press noted the falling IQ scores in 2014 and pointedly asked, “Are we becoming more STUPID?” Ignoring the belligerent tone of the journalist’s question, it seems logical to follow up with another question: what is causing the decline in measured intelligence? A new study that reports “large changes in average cohort intelligence” in recent years has the answer—the turnaround in IQ is due to environmental factors.

A new study that reports ‘large changes in average cohort intelligence’ in recent years has the answer—the turnaround in IQ is due to environmental factors.
The European IQ studies

In the mid-1980s, a New Zealand professor named James Flynn reported that Americans’ IQs rose by approximately three points per decade from the 1930s through the 1970s. This rise in standardized intelligence test scores—documented year after year and decade after decade in numerous countries—has come to be known as the Flynn effect. Since the early 2000s, however, researchers in Scandinavia and Western Europe have been publishing accounts of a “negative” Flynn effect—or a Flynn effect “gone into reverse.” Five of the studies are worth summarizing due to their striking timeline similarities. (Note: Because short-term military service is compulsory for young able-bodied men in many of these countries, some researchers have taken advantage of data from cognitive tests administered to prospective conscripts.)

Norway: A 2004 study reviewed “general ability” (which included measures of language and math) in male conscripts tested from the mid-1950s to 2002. Following substantial gains over the first three decades, the gain rate began decreasing and then came to “a complete stop from the mid-1990s.”

Denmark: A Danish assessment in 2008 of 18-year-old males appearing before the draft board described falling cognitive test scores from 1998 to 2004, with the abrupt decline representing a loss of about 1.5 IQ points. This pattern held true in young men planning to pursue higher education and in those not continuing their education.

United Kingdom: In a British study published in 2009, the investigators compared test results for 13- and 14-year-olds in 2006-2007 with data collected from the same age group in 1976. The researchers discovered a “narrowing” in the young people’s range of performance, with “far fewer go[ing] on to develop the interpretative and evaluative level of thinking characteristic of formal operations” [emphasis in original]. (The researchers are referring to Piaget’s theory that describes a formal operational stage of cognitive development from about age 12 that allows adolescents “do mathematical calculations, think creatively, use abstract reasoning, and imagine the outcome of particular actions.”)

Finland: In 2013, researchers with access to data from three tests administered to 18- to 20-year-old male conscripts (N=25,000) reported that whereas IQ increased from 1988 to 1997, there were “declines in all three tests averaging 2.0 IQ points a decade” from 1997 to 2009.

Austria and Germany: A 2015 meta-analysis of dozens of studies involving over 13,000 subjects from schools, universities and the general population (with an average age of 22 years) pulled together data collected from the late 1970s until 2014. Examining one domain of IQ (spatial perception), the researchers documented a “robust” pattern of “initial increases, followed by stagnation (with performance peaking around the mid-1990s), and subsequent decreases of task performance.”

It goes without saying that these general population studies of intelligence trends do not begin to capture the tragic circumstances of children with specific intellectual disabilities such as, in some cases, autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or fragile X syndrome (FXS). A recent study by neuroscientists at the University of California-Davis rhetorically posed the parental question, “What will my child’s future hold?” After assessing the IQs of children with ASD at ages two and eight, the Davis researchers found that IQ declined in about 25% of the children over the six years. Studies of children with FXS also have shown that IQ may decline over a relatively short period of time.

And the possible causes of falling IQ are…

Although researchers have speculated on possible contributors to the disquieting IQ trends, few have come up with any meaningful answers. The puzzled investigators of the 2008 Danish study stated, “the declines…seem to be real,” but “it is not easy to account for them.” Another group of authors vaguely discussed four causes ranging from the “cultural-environmental,” to statistical, biological or “hybrid” explanations.

In addition to prevalent toxins such as flame-retardant chemicals, heavy metals such as mercury and aluminum represent another category with documented detrimental effects on intelligence.
There is another far more concrete possibility, which is the impact of environmental toxins on IQ. In addition to prevalent toxins such as PBDEs (flame-retardant chemicals), heavy metals such as mercury and aluminum represent a category with documented detrimental effects on intelligence. Vaccines are one of the most widespread and ongoing sources of prenatal and childhood exposure to these metals. Prenatal exposure—as occurs with the mercury-containing flu shots and aluminum-containing pertussis vaccines now routinely administered to pregnant women—is particularly dangerous as early exposure can impair subsequent growth and development of neurons. The U.S. requires the largest number of vaccines for school entry of any developed nation, although compulsory vaccination has been trending upward in Europe as well.

Childhood brain disorders can have subclinical effects at the individual level that translate into large population-level effects.
Future challenges

Childhood brain disorders can have subclinical effects at the individual level that translate into large population-level effects. Harvard researcher David Bellinger believes (as quoted previously by World Mercury Project) that “Even a modest impact that does not push a child’s neurodevelopment into the range of clinical concern cannot be dismissed as benign because, if the exposure is prevalent, the total number of IQ points lost in the population as a whole might be large, and the reduction in the intellectual resources available to a society substantial.” Researchers already are openly expressing concern about the potential for a mismatch between available cognitive abilities and “the expected larger demand for non-routine analytical-cognitive jobs,” noting that “cognitive tasks at the workplace as well as in daily life and in organization, maintenance and especially innovation are rising.” Predictions that the U.S. is “on the decline” may come true unless decisive action is taken to ensure safe vaccines and eliminate children’s cradle-to-adulthood exposure to the intelligence-harming toxins contained in vaccines.

Hervé

11th July 2018, 12:58

Anti-Vaxxers provide new model for the world in Australia (https://www.naturalblaze.com/2018/07/australian-anti-vaxxers-provide-new-model-for-the-world.html)

Jon Rappoport Natural Blaze (https://www.naturalblaze.com/2018/07/australian-anti-vaxxers-provide-new-model-for-the-world.html)
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s23/477697/large/australia_vaccine_law.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s23/477697/full/australia_vaccine_law.jpg)

As the Australian bureaucrats double-down on their de-facto forced vaccination schemes (see ZeroHedge's latest article "Australia Will Now Fine Parents Twice a Month If They Don't Vaccinate Their Kids" (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-07/australia-will-now-fine-parents-twice-month-if-they-dont-vaccinate-their-kids)), I'm re-posting this piece I wrote in March as a testament to all those throughout the Western world who fight for health freedom...

And, for all the latest on Australian medical tyranny and more, it's imperative you go to Cazzfiles.com (http://crazzfiles.com/). The talks from "The 2018 Sydney Vaccination Conference - The Censorship of the Vaccination Debate in Australia" are now posted there (see here (http://crazzfiles.com/17026-2/) and here (http://crazzfiles.com/16735-2/)).

Jon Rappoport

March 4, 2018

Out of the ashes of government tyranny comes a solution.

In the Australian state of Queensland, childcare facilities can refuse to allow unvaccinated children to attend, so...

Parents there have formed their own community, which has already grown to 800 members. As ABC (Australia) reports (http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-02-28/anti-vax-network-sets-up-own-social-groups-no-jab-no-play/9491054):
"Sunshine Coast vaccine refuser and leader of the Natural Immunity Community, Allona Lahn, said her anti-vaccine network had grown to 800 members and was becoming stronger since the regulations were introduced."

"'Out of sheer necessity we've created a community base to support families - we've had no choice other than to start our own social services'."

"Ms Lahn said the network with like-minded families included their own childcare, schools and health services away from the mainstream."

"'We organise group childcare arrangements and we're now devising our own combined homeschooling system,' she said."

"'We use health practitioners within the anti-vaccine networks around Australia and 'anti-vaccination-friendly' doctors in the community'."

"Ms Lahn said network members were turning away from mainstream health services because they faced intimidation and coercion." This is decentralization par excellence.

If like-minded parents in other countries take notice and launch their own communities, who knows how strong this movement could become?

Islands of resistance -but more than that. New answers, new strategies, new victories. And ongoing proof that parents can raise healthy children without vaccinations.

That proof is the dagger to the incessant lies about vaccines being absolutely necessary. Mainstream media promote those lies day and night-but the truth is, parents can and do raise unvaccinated children with strong immune systems, which is the natural defense against harm from disease.

The medical establishment has done NO proper, long-term studies comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children's health outcomes. And the real reason is: they don't want to face the results of such studies. They rightly fear the facts that would emerge.

I'm sure Allona Lahn, the leader of the Queensland network, doesn't think of herself as a hero. She's just doing what she knows is right, and she and her compatriot parents are, above all, protecting their children from the well-established toxic effects of vaccines. But she is a hero.

Every aware parent should salute her.

Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/07/09/australian-anti-vaxxers-provide-new-model-for-world/)

Related:

Australia vaccine war update: The people, slaves to the State (https://www.sott.net/article/295570-Australia-vaccine-war-update-The-people-slaves-to-the-State)

Australia determined to vaccinate by release of aerosolized GMO vaccine (https://www.sott.net/article/269791-Australia-determined-to-vaccinate-by-release-of-aerosolized-GMO-vaccine)

Hervé

14th July 2018, 13:26

...

:jaw: :faint: :faint2:

... floored:

VACCINE LAWSUIT LOST - HHS NEVER DID MANDATORY VACCINE SAFETY TESTS FOR 32 YEARS, NOT EVEN ONCE (http://82.221.129.208/.yl6.html)

Of course they never checked the vaccines, they were part of the plan to destroy the United States and Western civilization, in part via vaccines that were nothing but weapons.

If they destroy the intellect of, or otherwise maim enough generations, the entire society will be erased from the history books. That was the plan all along, and they have succeeded at this long enough to seriously maim, but not quite destroy everything (yet).

Let's see what comes of this.

HOWEVER, "they" treasure their weapon so much I doubt they will back down, they will do the necessary killings, bribes, and cover ups and it will be business as usual if people do not push back hard, and I MEAN NOW.

SEE THIS. (http://icandecide.org/government/ICAN-HHS-Stipulated-Order-July-2018.pdf)

Thanks to Houman for the tip (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit&p=1235302&viewfull=1#post1235302).

Flash

16th July 2018, 00:34

to regroup all information about autism into one thread, I am posting here what I think is one of the most compelling article on the cause of autism and the link to glycophase.

Although not directly related to vaccines, it is related to proteins changes due to glycophase and to intestinal leaky guts syndromes, which is found in most autistic people. My take is that this poisoning is compounded with the poisoning found in vaccines to create the worst soup for autism in children.

here the article source and the post where I first found it:http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/how-glyphosate-poisoning-explains-peculiarities-autism-gut

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?43548-The-gut-of-most-disease...-NOT-what-you-think-&p=1235639&viewfull=1#post1235639

Thanks Hervé and sorry for the duplicate - I intend to have the whole thread read by some acquaintances hence the cross posting.

And a copy of the article so that if the link breaks, we will still be able to read it:

How Glyphosate Poisoning Explains the Peculiarities of the Autism Gut
858
Shares
616
37
Posted on: Thursday, June 7th 2018 at 11:15 am
Written By: Stephanie Seneff
This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2018
Visit our Re-post guidelines

Children with autism have a peculiar digestive system disorder, as was recently eloquently described by Dr. Arthur Krigsman at the AutismOne conference. How might glyphosate (Roundup) cause this?

In May of 2018 I had the opportunity to attend the AutismOne conference in Chicago, Illinois [1]. As in previous years, it was an exciting event where many experts, mostly alternative medicine practitioners, gave impassioned presentations offering their latest insights into various features of autism or biometrics linked to autism or treatment programs that they found to be beneficial. As in the past, I came away with increased optimism that we might finally solve the autism puzzle, along with many new leads on research topics that I needed to dig into more thoroughly, and renewed hope that autism can in fact be reversed.

One talk in particular really grabbed my attention, a presentation by Dr. Arthur Krigsman providing a detailed depiction of the distinct pathology that characterizes the autism gut. I took copious notes, and I was thrilled to see how well his observations matched my predictions in terms of how glyphosate could be predicted to affect the gut. Glyphosate is the active ingredient in the pervasive herbicide Roundup. It is used extensively on the core Roundup Ready crops of the processed food industry -- corn, soy, canola, sugar beets – and also sprayed on many other common crops right before harvest as a desiccant or ripener -- wheat, oats, legumes, sugar cane, etc. The United States government has not considered it to be necessary to test for the levels of glyphosate in food, because they consider it to be nontoxic to humans. An ever increasing body of research by independent scientists, however, has proven otherwise [2]. In fact, I now believe that glyphosate is the main factor causing the autism epidemic.

Myosin and the Gut

Dr. Krigsman’s findings have been published in the research literature, and two recent publications provide considerable detail about the unique features of the gut dysbiosis linked to autism [3, 4]. In his talk, Dr. Krigsman said that 50% to 80% of autistic children have gut symptoms, and they seem to have a unique form of enterocolitis, characterized by a peculiar kind of constipation that is entirely not due to an obstruction. Their feces can pile up over days or even a week as soft stools that comes out after an accumulation of enough water eventually allows the contents to be flushed as diarrhea. As the feces pile up, their abdomen becomes bloated and tender to the touch. They are often described as experiencing alternating constipation and diarrhea, which seems contradictory at first but makes sense if you describe it this way. He explained it mostly as a motility problem: impaired peristalsis causes the feces to remain stagnant rather than being slowly pushed forward through the radial contractions of smooth muscle cells lining the abdominal wall that propagate in a wave down the tube. All I could think of was that the gut appeared to be paralyzed. Of course, this also leads to the build-up of excessive bacteria in the upper gut feasting on the immobilized feces, explaining a condition linked to autism called Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth (SIBO).

I was very excited when I heard this, because I had been predicting that glyphosate would cause impaired peristalsis, if in fact my theory that it substitutes by mistake for glycine during protein synthesis is correct. I had supportive evidence from a paper describing a case study of a woman who tried to kill herself by drinking a glyphosate-based formulation. She survived the ordeal, but a striking observation by the team who treated her was that her gut became paralyzed [5].

The protein in the smooth muscle cells lining the gut that is responsible for contraction is called myosin. Myosin molecules typically are assembled from heavy chains and/or light chains, but the type of myosin in smooth muscle cells is made up only of heavy chains. The myosin heavy chain has a highly conserved glycine residue at location 699 in the sequence. Elegant experiments have shown that, if this glycine is replaced by alanine, the protein loses 99% of its ability to contract [6]. Glycine is the simplest amino acid with no side chains. Alanine has just a methyl group as its side chain, and is the amino acid that is most similar to glycine. So this is a very small change, but it has a dramatic effect on the protein’s function.

Glyphosate is also an amino acid, and, in fact, it is a complete glycine molecule except that a hydrogen atom normally attached to the nitrogen atom in glycine has been replaced by a much bulkier methyl phosphonyl group. Substituting glyphosate at location 699 would have a much more dramatic effect, due to the bulky side group as well as its characteristic negative charge. It would almost certainly destroy any ability to contract. In the experiment, they showed that if only 2% of the molecules of myosin in a muscle fiber had alanine in place of glycine, the muscle could only contract to 50% of its normal capacity.

What is even more intriguing is that the gall bladder also depends on myosin to contract in order to release bile acids. Bile acids are essential for the digestion of fats. Bile also acts as a detoxifying surfactant and it has antimicrobial properties [7]. Dr. Krigsman showed many photos illustrating the very pale color of stool samples from autistic children, and he pointed out that this implied low levels of bile acids. I have previously written about defective production of bile acids in the liver due to impairments in cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes that are essential for bile synthesis [8]. CYP enzymes all contain a highly conserved short peptide motif FxxGxRxCxG that always has two and often has three glycine residues, with the amino acids indicated as “x” representing wild cards (many different possibilities) [9]. Glyphosate’s disruption of CYP enzymes could be due to substituting for glycine in this motif. But the release of bile acids can also be impaired if glyphosate is getting inserted into the myosin molecules in the gall bladder. This would also predictably cause cholestasis and the build-up of gall stones, eventually requiring the gall bladder to be removed.

Another feature that Dr. Krigsman talked about is that the autism stools often contained clear evidence of undigested food particles. This can easily be explained through glyphosate’s expected impact on digestive enzymes, particularly trypsin, pepsin and lipase. Trypsin and pepsin digest proteins, and lipase digests fats. My colleague Anthony Samsel ordered samples of porcine trypsin, pepsin and lipase from a lab and had them tested for glyphosate. All three were found to have high levels of glyphosate contamination [10]. Trypsin has three highly conserved glycine residues that form “glycine hinges,” each of which is critical for trypsin activation [11]. Undigested proteins induce an inflammatory response in the gut that opens up the tight junctions, leading to leaky gut syndrome [12], and subsequently opening up the brain barrier as well, allowing toxic metabolites to enter the brain and cause a neuroinflammatory response. A recent study has shown that glyphosate disrupts the tight junctions in the gut epithelial wall and opens up the gut barrier [13].

Dr. Krigsman also said that the older autistic children had evidence of skeletal muscle wasting, particularly their upper arms and upper legs, which were abnormally thin, almost resembling what’s seen in kwashiorkor, the protein malnutrition condition that afflicts starving children in Africa. With an impaired ability to digest food, as seen from the food particles showing up in the stool, the body starts to break down its own muscle tissue as a source of energy, processing glutamate, derived from muscle breakdown, through the citric acid cycle to generate ATP. A study on 18 adults with autism found that they had abnormally high levels of glutamate in their blood, with high statistical significance (p < 0.001) [14]. Glutamate is neuroexcitotoxic, and the levels found in the autistic patients were found to correlate with autism severity. The skeletal muscles might also be disturbed by glyphosate poisoning in the same way as the smooth muscles in the gut: myosin is the most common protein in skeletal muscles. This would cause the muscles to be very weak due to an inability of myosin to contract.

Does Glyphosate Substitute for Glycine During Protein Synthesis?

Protein synthesis is a fascinating “manufacturing” process that works by assembling “coding” amino acids like beads on a string, according to the famous four-letter DNA code (AGCT). Each three letter sequence codes for a particular amino acid, choosing among 20 or so options. The amino acids “join hands” like paper dolls through peptide bonds. When the synthesis machinery sees “GGC,” for example, it “knows” to look for a glycine unit. Glyphosate is a complete glycine molecule with an extra attachment on the nitrogen atom, which the matching program could overlook because it sits outside of the pocket where glycine fits snugly. Protein synthesis is inherently an errorful process, and the strategy is to fully assemble the protein, let it go through its sophisticated folding process, and then discard it if it appears to be defective once completed.

If it can be proven that glyphosate substitutes by mistake for glycine during protein synthesis, it is “game over” for glyphosate. Anthony Samsel suggested to me that this might be happening in December of 2015, and we published our first paper on this idea the following March [15]. I have since published several other papers, together with colleagues, showing how this concept can elegantly explain the disease process in multiple diseases and conditions whose rate is rising alarmingly in the past two decades. These include diabetes and obesity [15], Alzheimer’s disease [15], autism and multiple sclerosis [10], amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [16], anencephaly (child born with a missing cerebral cortex) [17], and Mesoamerican Nephropathy, the life-threatening kidney disease that is now rampant among sugar cane workers in Nicaragua and El Salvador [18]. In each case, specific proteins whose defective function is linked to the disease are shown to have strong glycine dependencies that would lead to dysfunction if glyphosate substitutes for these critical glycine residues.

Glyphosate is not unique in its property as an analogue of a coding amino acid. Actually, there are several naturally produced amino acids that are insidiously cumulatively toxic like glyphosate, that work their destruction through substitution by mistake in place of a specific coding amino acid. You can read more about these other toxins in several of the papers mentioned above and the references therein. They cause debilitating diseases like ALS and multiple sclerosis. In fact, glufosinate is a natural non-coding amino acid analogue of glutamate [19], and it is used as an herbicide that is gaining popularity now that so many weeds are becoming resistant to glyphosate. As the use of glufosinate accelerates, we can expect to see a growing incidence of a new list of currently unidentified diseases and conditions that will be due to disruption of critical highly conserved glutamate residues in various proteins.

It is a straightforward process to search the research literature looking for highly conserved regions of specific proteins where glycines are absolutely required for proper protein function, similar to the situation with myosin as described above. Again and again, you find that displacement of these glycine residues with glyphosate, a bulkier and negatively charged molecule, can explain the pathology of a specific disease or condition that is currently on the rise.

Most people are inclined to believe that this can’t possibly be true, since glyphosate has been on the market for such a long time and we are repeatedly assured by governmental regulators that it is perfectly safe for human consumption. The highly significant correlations between the rise in glyphosate usage on core crops and the rise in a long list of debilitating neurological and autoimmune disorders [20] are often dismissed with the convenient adage, “correlation does not necessarily mean causation.” Yet there is no other chemical being used in agriculture today that comes anywhere close to matching as well as glyphosate does. The fact is that all these diseases are alarmingly on the rise, and, I would rather ask the question, “If not glyphosate, what?”

Much of the Research has already been Done

It is widely acknowledged that some if not much of glyphosate’s toxicity comes from its property as an amino acid analogue of glycine. For example, it is known that glyphosate excites NMDA receptors, probably by mimicking glycine, which normally binds to and excites these receptors [21]. But most experts are assuring us that it is not possible that it could actually substitute for glycine during protein assembly. However, such a substitution within the protein EPSP synthase is by far the most plausible explanation for how it disrupts this critical enzyme in the shikimate pathway in plants. Disruption of this enzyme is acknowledged by Monsanto as being the most damaging effect that it has on weeds.

A paper from 2006 by T. Funke et al. is very revealing in this respect [22]. This paper discusses the mutation in the DNA code for EPSP synthase in the microbe whose mutated code was inserted into genetically modified plants in order to afford resistance to glyphosate. The modification is very simple: it results in a substitution of alanine for glycine at residue 100 in the protein sequence. Glycine is the simplest amino acid, with no side chain. Alanine is the amino acid that is closest to glycine, and therefore the least disruptive change. It has a methyl side chain. Residue 100 is situated within a very important amino acid sequence that folds into a shape that creates a pocket where the substrate phosphoenol pyruvate (PEP) fits snugly. The currently held belief as to how glyphosate disrupts this protein is that it fits snugly into the pocket as well, displacing PEP. However, a much more plausible explanation is that it displaces glycine at residue 100, and its extra methylphosphonyl group then protudes into the space where PEP should fit, preventing it from entering the pocket.

Alanine also disrupts the fit of PEP, causing a significant reduction in enzyme activity. But it affords remarkable protection from glyphosate poisoning, up until very high concentrations. The obvious reason for this is that it has changed the DNA code so that it no longer recognizes glycine, and therefore also no longer recognizes glyphosate. Funke et al. were particularly surprised that glyphosate stood out as having a much more damaging effect on the activity of EPSP synthase compared to all the other molecules that were tested. They wrote: “More than 1,000 analogs of glyphosate have been produced and tested for inhibition of EPSP synthase, but minor structural alterations typically resulted in dramatically reduced potency, and no compound superior to glyphosate was identified.” This is because glyphosate is the only one among these modified molecules that is an amino acid, and can therefore be inserted into the peptide sequence during protein synthesis.

Strong evidence of a very different sort supporting glyphosate incorporation into proteins comes from a paper where rabbits were exposed to glyphosate directly applied to their eyes [23]. After a period of time, the rabbits were sacrificed and their retinas were analyzed to determine the distribution of different types of folded proteins. Remarkably, glyphosate at the two highest concentrations caused a marked reduction of the percentage of the proteins in the eyes that folded into alpha helices, and a corresponding increase in the percentage that folded as beta sheets. A sharp fold referred to as a “beta turn” was also reduced in the glyphosate-exposed retinas. Multiple studies on the roles of glycine residues in proteins have shown that glycines are crucial for maintaining the stability of alpha helices, and glycine residues are also commonly found at sharp bends because it has no side chains and therefore affords flexibility. So it can be anticipated that glyphosate substitution for such critical glycine residues would cause proteins that should fold into alpha helices to instead misfold into beta sheets.

It has been demonstrated that amyloid beta, the protein that misfolds in association with Alzheimer’s disease, has a highly conserved motif in its transmembrane segment, containing a GxxxGxxxGxxxG pattern (four highly conserved glycines regular spaced by “wild cards”). It has been discovered that this transmembrane alpha helix misfolds into a water-soluble beta sheet that eventually precipitates out as the fibrils that build up in the Alzheimer’s brain. Such misfolding can easily be expected if glyphosate substitutes for glycine within this motif. Amyloid beta is also present in the retina, and its misfolding there is linked to macular degeneration [24]. Macular degeneration is one of the most common causes of blindness, and it affects nearly 50 million people worldwide.

Finally, a completely different type of experiment involving radiolabelled glyphosate has provided strong evidence that glyphosate is incorporating into proteins, and such an experiment was carried out by Monsanto researchers in an unpublished report from 1989 [25]. Anthony Samsel gained access to this report through the Freedom of Information Act, and we summarized its findings in our Glyphosate VI paper on amyloidoses and autoimmune neurological diseases [10]. These authors exposed bluegill sunfish to radiolabelled glyphosate and then measured the amount of radiolabel in various tissue samples. They also measured for glyphosate using standard techniques, and they found that the amount of glyphosate detected fell far short of the total radiolabel, accounting for only up to 20% of the radioactive carbon present in the tissue sample. They then got the idea to apply enzymes (proteinase K) to the sample, in order to break down the protein into individual amino acids, and after this the amount of glyphosate detected rose to 70% of the radiolabel. They wrote: “Proteinase K hydrolyses proteins to amino acids and small oligopeptides, suggesting that a significant portion of the 14C activity residing in the bluegill sunfish tissue was tightly associated with or INCORPORATED INTO protein.” [25] (emphasis added). This comes extremely close to admitting that glyphosate incorporates into proteins by mistake in place of glycine during protein synthesis.

It is also worth noting that this means that any foods containing significant amounts of protein will likely have hidden glyphosate contamination that will be missed if the food is not subjected to significant proteolysis prior to measurement. And even after proteolysis there was still a stubborn 30% of the radiolabel that remained undetected, suggesting that glyphosate makes proteins difficult to break down, which is not surprising to me, but is also ominous in terms of the build-up of amyloid beta plaque in association with macular degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease, both of which are rising alarmingly in frequency in the industrialized world.

Conclusion

You have a choice. You can continue to put toxic food on your family’s dinner plate, and wait to see what happens after you have randomly barraged the proteins throughout your body with glyphosate bullets, one by one. Once you or a close family member is diagnosed with a debilitating and painful disease, you can deal with all the medical expenses in a seemingly hopeless quest for recovery. Or you can make a pledge to switch to purchasing only certified organic food when you shop at the grocery story. It is satisfying to me to see the steady growth in the percentage of shelf space devoted to organic foods in grocery stores around the country over the past decade. Your choice to feed your family only organic foods will help to encourage the farmers to grow only organic food, and increased demand will drive down the prices. Together we can create a movement that can reverse the destructive path we are currently on towards a path where sustainable organic agriculture heals the soil as well as the human body. All the other organisms that share this planet with us, such as the bees and the butterflies, will be very grateful that we have finally stopped poisoning them as well.

References

[1] http://www.autismone.org/content/autismone-2018-conference-say-yes-recovery-may-23-27-2018. Last accessed June 6, 2018.

[2] Vandenberg LN, Blumberg B, Antoniou MN, Benbrook CM, Carroll L, Colborn T, Everett LG, Hansen M, Landrigan PJ, Lanphear BP, Mesnage R, Vom Saal FS, Welshons WV, Myers JP. Is it time to reassess current safety standards for glyphosate-based herbicides? J Epidemiol Community Health 2017; 71(6): 613-18.

[3] Krigsman A, Boris M, Goldblatt A, Stott C (2010) Clinical presentation and histologic findings at ileocolonoscopy in children with autistic spectrum disorder and chronic gastrointestinal symptoms. Autism Insights 2010; 1: 1-11.

[4] Walker SJ, Fortunato J, Gonzalez LG, Krigsman A. Identification of unique gene expression profile in children with regressive autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and ileocolitis. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3): e58058.

[5] Nakae H, Kusanagi M, Okuyama M, Igarashi T. Paralytic ileus induced by glyphosate intoxication successfully treated using Kampo medicine. Acute Med Surg 2014 Dec 11; 2(3): 214-218.

[6] Kinose F, Wang SX, Kidambi US, Moncman CL, Winkelmann DA. Glycine 699 is pivotal for the motor activity of skeletal muscle myosin. J Cell Biol 1996; 134(4): 895-909.

[7] Kalambaheti T, Cooper GN, Jackson GD. Role of bile in non-specific defence mechanisms of the gut. Gut 1994; 35(8): 1047-52.

[8] Samsel A, Seneff S. Glyphosate’s suppression of cytochrome P450 enzymes and amino acid biosynthesis by the gut microbiome: pathways to modern diseases. Entropy 2013; 15: 1416-1463.

[9] Syed K, Mashele SS. Comparative analysis of P450 signature motifs EXXR and CXG in the large and diverse kingdom of fungi: identification of evolutionarily conserved amino acid patterns characteristic of P450 family. PLoS One 2014; 9(4): e95616.

[10] Samsel A, Seneff S. Glyphosate pathways to modern diseases VI: Prions, amyloidoses and autoimmune neurological diseases. Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry 2017; 17: 8-32.

[11] Gombos L, Kardos J, Patthy A, Medveczky P, Szilágyi L, Málnási-Csizmadia A, Gráf L. Probing conformational plasticity of the activation domain of trypsin: the role of glycine hinges. Biochemistry 2008; 47(6): 1675-84.

[12] Shen L, Turner JR. Role of epithelial cells in initiation and propagation of intestinal inflammation. Eliminating the static: tight junction dynamics exposed. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006; 290: G577-G582.

[13] Gildea JJ, Roberts DA, Bush Z. Protective effects of lignite extract supplement on intestinal barrier function in glyphosate-mediated tight junction injury. J Cin Nutr Diet 2017; 3:1.

[14] Shinohe A, Hashimoto K, Nakamura K, Tsujii M, Iwata Y, Tsuchiya KJ, Sekine Y, Suda S, Suzuki K, Sugihara G, Matsuzaki H, Minabe Y, Sugiyama T, Kawai M, Iyo M, Takei N, Mori N. Increased serum levels of glutamate in adult patients with autism. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2006; 30(8): 1472-7.

[15] Samsel A, Seneff S. Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases V: Aminos acid analogue of glycine in diverse proteins. J Biol Phys Chem 2016; 16: 9-46.

[16] Seneff S, Morley W, Hadden MJ, Michener MC. Does glyphosate acting as a glycine analogue contribute to ALS? J Bioinfo Proteomics Rev 2016: 2(3): 1-21.

[17] Seneff S, Nigh G. Glyphosate and Anencephaly: Death by A Thousand Cuts. J Neurol Neurobiol 2017 3(2).

[18] Seneff S, Orlando L. Glyphosate substitution for glycine during protein synthesis as a causal factor in Mesoamerican Nephropathy. Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology 2018; 8(1): 100541.

[19] Hoerlein G. Glufosinate (phosphinothricin), a natural amino acid with unexpected herbicidal properties. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 1994;138:73-145.

[20] Swanson NL, Leu A, Abrahamson J, Wallet B. Genetically engineered crops, glyphosate and the deterioration of health in the United States of America. Journal of Organic Systems 2014; 9(2): 6-37.

[21] Cattani D, de Liz Oliveira Cavalli VL, Heinz Rieg CE, Domingues JT, Dal-Cim T, Tasca CI, Mena Barreto Silva FR, Zamoner A. Mechanisms underlying the neurotoxicity induced by glyphosate-based herbicide in immature rat hippocampus: involvement of glutamate excitotoxicity. Toxicology 2014; 320:34-45.

[22] Funke T, Han H, Healy-Fried ML, Fischer M, Schönbrunn E. Molecular basis for the herbicide resistance of Roundup Ready crops. PNAS 2006; 103(35): 13010-13015.

[23] Morsy SA, Aly EM, Ibrahim AM, Mahmoud SS, Kamala GM. Potential hazards of glyphosate on rabbit retina. J Arab Soc Med Res 12:92-98.

[24] Ratnayaka JA, Serpell LC, Lotery AJ. Dementia of the eye: the role of amyloid beta in retinal degeneration. Eye 2015; 29: 1013-1026.

[25] Ridley WP, Chott KA. Uptake, depuration and bioconcentration of C-14 glyphosate to bluegill sunfish (Lepomis machrochirus) Part II: Characterization and quantitation of glyphosate and its metabolites. St Louis, Missouri: Monsanto Agricultural Company (unpublished study) August, 1989.

Stephanie Seneff is a Senior Research Scientist at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. She received the B.S. degree in Biophysics in 1968, the M.S. and E.E. degrees in Electrical Engineering in 1980, and the Ph.D degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in 1985, all from MIT. For over three decades, her research interests have always been at the intersection of biology and computation: developing a computational model for the human auditory system, understanding human language so as to develop algorithms and systems for human computer interactions, as well as applying natural language processing (NLP) techniques to gene predictions. She has published over 170 refereed articles on these subjects, and has been invited to give keynote speeches at several international conferences. She has also supervised numerous Master's and PhD theses at MIT. In 2012, Dr. Seneff was elected Fellow of the International Speech and Communication Association (ISCA).
Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.
Internal Site Commenting is limited to members.
Disqus commenting is available to everyone.

Hervé

21st July 2018, 17:04

'Putting conscience before career' - Dr. Bob Sears emerges with full license to practice and no admission of wrongdoing (https://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/dr-sears-emerges-with-full-license-to-practice-no-admission-of-wrongdoing)

Jefferey Jaxen jeffereyjaxen.com (https://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/dr-sears-emerges-with-full-license-to-practice-no-admission-of-wrongdoing)
Fri, 29 Jun 2018 14:57 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s23/479365/large/Bob_Sears_701x466.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s23/479365/full/Bob_Sears_701x466.png)

Bob Sears, MD faced down the Medical Board of California (MBC) and has come through with his license to practice fully intact. There was no admission of wrongdoing by Dr. Sears, the case never went to trial and hence there was no hearing.

The end result of an investigation spanning several years yielded a record-keeping issue and Dr. Sears being put on probation. In a recent Facebook post, he explains:
"A child and his mother came to me for help. The mom described how her baby had suffered a moderate to severe neurologic reaction to vaccines almost three years prior, and she was afraid a judge in her upcoming hearing was going to force her to resume vaccines now. Medical records of the reaction were not available yet, and I gave the patient a letter of opinion to show the judge that the reaction was severe enough to justify not doing any more vaccines." The lack of sweeping disciplinary action in the case against Dr. Sears ran counter to the continued mainstream media narrative of an anti-vax doctor on trial for his anti-science beliefs. As media outlets beat the drums of an inevitable medical license removal spelling doom for any pediatrician who dare write vaccine medical exemptions in California, an unsensational reality has just came into focus.

You may be wondering, who is Dr. Sears? If you have been reading the reporting of outlets like the Los Angeles Times, Forbes or Jezebel, you may not have a wider, balanced understanding of Dr. Sears or his practice. A California pediatrician for two decades, Dr. Sears has been out-front in promoting a more patient-centered approach to pediatrics appearing on the Dr. Phil show, the Ellen DeGeneres show, CNN's House Calls with Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CBS and PBS among others.

Publicly confronting the conflicting science and inherent risks of a one-size-fits-all vaccine schedule, Dr. Sears has been a vocal, early adopter in respecting parental choice and giving his patients full informed consent. He is the co-author of six books as well as his Amazon Best Seller solo work titled The Vaccine Book - Making the Right Decision for your Child (https://www.amazon.com/Vaccine-Book-Decision-Parenting-Library/dp/0316180521). The Vaccine Book, which aimed to provide parents with a fair and objective look at childhood vaccines, coupled with Dr. Sears' growing mainstream popularity appeared to be the transition point in which both corporate media and the orthodox medical community began to turn on him.

Despite being on-record admitting vaccines work, Dr. Sears was, and has been continually, labelled anti-vaccine and a quack. His implicit guilt throughout much of the media appears to stem from his offering of an alternative vaccine schedule, for publicly opposing mandatory vaccination and for questioning the conflicting science underpinning the current US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's vaccine schedule.

The national mood and discussion about vaccines changed in July of 2016 when California enacted one of the most aggressive mandatory vaccine laws in the nation. Passed in the face of large, sustained public protests against the legislation, California Senate Bill 277 (SB277) was the wake-up call for all American families who thought forced medicine couldn't happen to their children in this country.

Although Dr. Sears' MBC case started before SB277 took effect, the media jumped at the opportunity to use his case as an example to create a chilling effect for other pediatricians with concerns about vaccines. Leading the pack was the Los Angeles Times, now owned by a pharmaceutical company billionaire, who targeted Dr. Sears with bias reporting while simultaneously using his ongoing case as a symbolic springboard to float headlines like 2017's Why hasn't California cracked down on anti-vaccination doctors?

Often using nebulous groups to insert talking points, writers for the Los Angeles Times used catch-all phrases like 'experts' and 'vaccination advocates.' For example, 2016 Los Angeles Times articles stated, "Vaccination advocates see the medical board's action [against Sears] as essential to enforcing a new California law..." and "Public health experts say fears about vaccine safety are rooted in a report linking vaccines to autism..." Such sweeping statements, all too common in media today, only serve to muddy the waters of legitimate debate taking place in public and professional settings. Improper media polarization has also led to the the unfair persecution of parents with appropriate and logical concerns surrounding their child's vaccinations.

Comprised of physicians, scientists, and attorneys, the advocacy group Physicians for Informed Consent released the following statement in response to Dr. Sears and the current MBC probationary action against him:
Physicians for Informed Consent stands with Dr. Sears. The patient's mother described two severe vaccine reactions, and Dr. Sears had an ethical obligation to protect the two-year-old child from further harm. It's not clear why the Medical Board of California disregarded the mother's statements about the severe vaccine reactions that her child survived as an infant. Too often, patient medical histories get disregarded, and it's rare to find a physician who listens carefully to the patient. It is even more outstanding to find a pediatrician who not only listens to the patient (or patient's parents) and acts in accordance with the Hippocratic Oath, but also keeps up-to-date with current vaccine research and is knowledgeable about severe vaccine side-effects. In the end, after all the suggestive headlines and leading rhetoric, Dr. Sears' uneventful MBC disciplinary action showed the lengths at which some media outlets will go to provide sustained, unbalanced coverage towards influential people who champion parental choice, extol informed consent and question the incomplete science of pharmaceutical products.

At this stage, the public is no further along in understanding how the MBC feels about vaccine medical exemptions and the California doctors who write them. As it stands now, patient-centered pediatricians appear to have been given encouragement to continue their collaboration with parents while upholding the tenet of informed consent and their oath to do no harm. The green light also signals a continued opening for pediatricians to exert their honest medical judgement while focusing on the care and needs of each individual child.

Related:
California doctor Bob Sears under review for putting 'conscience before career' (http://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/california-moves-to-end-doctor-patient-relationship-as-people-activate)

Hervé

9th August 2018, 14:42

In historic vote, Italy dumps mandatory vaccination (https://vaxxter.com/italy-dumps-mandatory-vaccination-in-historic-vote/)

Vaxxter (https://vaxxter.com/italy-dumps-mandatory-vaccination-in-historic-vote/)
Wed, 08 Aug 2018 00:01 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s24/482318/large/italy_mandatory_vaccines.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s24/482318/full/italy_mandatory_vaccines.jpg)

League leader Matteo Salvini called required vaccines "useless" and said they were "in many cases dangerous, if not harmful".

Now, they won't be required.

By a vote of 148 to 110 in the upper house of parliament, Italy has squashed mandatory vaccine laws and aims to be "more inclusive."

The 10 required vaccinations for preschools or nurseries are now suspended, at least in terms of mandatory laws.

The Democratic party passed the original mandatory vaccine law in June of 2017, but now, a year later and in the midst of a revolution in Italy, parents will no longer have to comply. The Democrats originally used a measles outbreak as the fuel for the law's passage.

The Five Star Movement and the League, both political parties that are often considered to have grown on the heels of Trump's rise, said they were concerned about children being excluded in communities.

Roberto Burioni, a microbiologist, voiced his displeasure on CNN (https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/07/health/italy-anti-vaccine-law-measles-intl/index.html). CNN's article says that the decision has "sent shockwaves through the scientific community" and one of their headings read, "why it's dangerous." Point being, the mainstream media is not handling this well, at all.

CNN wasn't the only mainstream outlet or pro-mandatory-vaccine advocate melting down, not by a long shot.

===============================================

"sent shockwaves through the scientific community" should read:

"sent shockwaves through the profit making Fatpharma community"

ThePythonicCow

9th August 2018, 18:49

"sent shockwaves through the profit making fatpharma community"
:bigsmile: .

onawah

5th September 2018, 19:07

VACCINE LICENSE TO KILL THE UNBORN W/ FEWER RESTRICTIONS
That's what this bill proposes.
Take Action!: New Reg. allows legal protection for untested vaccines in pregnant women
TAKE ACTION HERE:
http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=80542656&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]

"Safety and efficacy unknown in pregnant women and their babies

The Federal government is pushing through a new regulation that would give complete legal liability protection to vaccines makers, and the physicians who administer them, for vaccines given to pregnant women, even though vaccines are not evaluated for efficacy or safety in pregnant women or their babies. This regulation would close a current loophole in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and open-up a whole new market for the vaccine industry. The regulation would allow the CDC to confer liability protection upon issuing a recommendation that pregnant women get a vaccine. This regulation will allow all children in the womb to be used as subjects for what amounts to medical experiments. We are now at the point where we will not require even the most minimal safety measures to protect children in the womb.

Before you Take Action on this issue, if you value the information and advocacy provided by the Autism Action Network please make it possible for us to continue to do so by supporting our one fundraiser of the year we do in conjunction with the Autism Community Walk and Resource Fair by donating here:

https://grouprev.com/autismactionnetwork2018

All federal regulations have a public comment period so please click on the Take Action Link to send a message to the Department of Health and Human Services, your members of Congress, and the White House demanding the rejection of this reckless regulation.

Currently, flu shots and the diptheria/pertussis/tetanus (DPT) are recommended for pregnant women by the CDC, even though they exist in a legal gray area this regulation is intended to resolve. The package inserts required and approved by the FDA of all flu shots and DPT shots clearly state that the safety and efficacy of the product on pregnant women is not known.

“Safety and effectiveness of Adacel vaccine have not been established in pregnant women. (8.1)” according to the package insert for Sanofi’s Adacel DPT shot, currently recommended for pregnant women. See it here: https://www.fda.gov/…/vaccin…/approvedproducts/ucm142764.pdf

Similarly, the package insert for Fluzone, the most commonly used flu shot in the US, states, “Safety and effectiveness of Fluzone Quadrivalent have not been established in pregnant women or children less than 6 months of age.” See it here: https://www.fda.gov/…/vaccin…/approvedproducts/ucm356094.pdf

One study, however, found a significant correlation between autism in children (20% increase) and their mother getting a flu shot in the first trimester of pregnancy. The vaccine industry chose to disregard this alarming finding by claiming the rate was not statistically significant when spread over all three trimesters. Interestingly, DPT shots are not recommended in the first trimester. So much for the precautionary principle.

https://jamanetwork.com/…/jamapedi…/article-abstract/2587559

This regulation represents a new level of cynicism by the vaccine industry. They want to use their products in a vulnerable population even though they don’t know if the product is either safe or effective, yet they demand complete legal immunity for their actions. And they want to do this to people when they are at their the most fragile phase of life: in utero.

The public comment period is open through October 1, and you can see the proposed regulation (83 FR14391) here: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/…/FR-2018-04-04/pdf/2018-06770.pdf

Please share this message with friends and family and please share on social networks."

onawah

16th September 2018, 21:47

How to End the Autism Epidemic
September 16, 2018
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2018/09/16/how-to-end-the-autism-epidemic.aspx?utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20180916Z1_UCM&et_cid=DM234436&et_rid=421004696
b6nwXs8yFcc

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In 1985, children routinely received 23 doses of seven vaccines: diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP), oral polio (OPV) and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), and the autism rate was between 1 in 5,000 or 1 in 10,000 (depending on the data source)
Today, the CDC recommends that infants and children receive 49 doses of 14 vaccines by age 6, and there are estimates that 1 in 35 children develop autism
The National Childhood Vaccination Injury Act was passed in 1986, largely due to lawsuits over brain damage caused by DTP vaccine. The law gave vaccine manufacturers partial product liability protection when a CDC recommended childhood vaccine causes injury or death and, in 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court gave the vaccine industry a total liability shield
Many pediatricians are incentivized by insurance company bonuses to maintain high vaccination rates with all federally recommended vaccines. This hidden conflict of interest may place your child’s health in jeopardy
In depositions to the CDC, scientists from the Kennedy Krieger Institute at Johns Hopkins University make it clear that children really should be screened before their first vaccination. If screening for individual susceptibility were done, many vulnerable children would be spared from being harmed by vaccines
By Dr. Mercola

In this interview, J.B. Handley, founder of Generation Rescue, discusses autism and what he believes can be done to help turn this tragic trend around. This is also the topic of his book, "How to End the Autism Epidemic."

A Parent's Worst Nightmare
Handley's son has autism, and his personal experience ultimately motivated him to write this book. He describes the family's experience, and what led them to take a nonconventional approach to their son's treatment:

"My wife and I were what I would characterize as very mainstream parents, which meant that when our second son was born in 2002, we basically handed him to our pediatrician and did whatever he told us to do, which meant following the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) recommended [vaccine] schedule.

We started to watch our son decline physically after every vaccine appointment at 2 months, at 4 months, at 6 months and at 12 months. He got eczema. His belly became distended. He had sleep disturbances. He had dark circles under his eyes. We kept going back into the doctor and saying, 'What's going on? What's happening with him? Where is this coming from?'

We could never get a plausible explanation for what was happening. Then, shortly after my son turned 1 year old, he started to decline neurologically. He lost his words. He lost many of his normal mannerisms. He started doing these really unusual behaviors.

He started craving certain foods — all these things that somebody like you knows are red flags for a child heading towards autism. But at the time, we were ignorant to this and our pediatrician didn't help us at all.

We were living in Northern California. We took our son to University of California San Francisco (UCSF) where they diagnosed him with severe autism. At the same time, we visited a Defeat Autism Now! (DAN!) doctor in Pleasanton … Dr. Lynne Mielke.

We were presented with two completely different worlds. At UCSF, autism was genetic. It was lifelong. He was likely to be institutionalized. There was nothing we could do about it, except to prepare ourselves.

But in Pleasanton, thirty miles away, autism was triggered by vaccines. It was an environmental illness. If you vetted the diet and started to do things differently, some of these children recovered completely. Here's my wife and I, both educated at Stanford, both very mainstream, and we're put at these crossroads for what to do for our son …

In our case, we went to the facts. We went to the reality of how our son had declined after being on a normal path of development. We ultimately made a decision that we did believe that the vaccines triggered our son's autism. We did believe that biomedical interventions could work for him.

That opened a whole new door to us. Soon after that, in '05, my wife and I founded Generation Rescue. The reason that we founded it was to share the information that we had learned with other parents. That's where our journey began."

Recovery Is Possible
Today, Handley's son is 16, and has made dramatic improvement through biomedical intervention. He regained his speech, learned to read, and can go on long family trips without incident.

Still, he continues to be affected by autism, and this is a reality for many parents. While some children are able to make a complete recovery, others do not. Most, however, can make improvements. Even at 16, Handley's son continues to improve, and new biomedical interventions are becoming available. Prevention is key, though, and making vaccination decisions are an important part of that.

"I think, in many ways, that the jury is in on this. My book is bolstered by the fact that two of the titans of the mainstream autism medical community have changed their tune through depositions, and now support the things that parents have been saying for decades.

I think that those two scientists [Dr. Andrew Zimmerman and Dr. Richard Kelley], who people don't know about, and the way they've changed their tune are going to have a dramatic impact on this debate.

We're talking about scientists from the Kennedy Krieger Institute at Johns Hopkins University, arguably the pre-eminent institution in the country focused on autism, who are saying exactly what parents are saying — that in a vulnerable subset of children, vaccines are, in fact, the trigger of autism."

Autism Triggers Are Pernicious
Like Handley, I believe vaccines can play a role in autism, although it's certainly not the sole factor or trigger. In the last half of the 20th century, not only has the vaccine schedule grown, with many vaccines being added, but our food supply has also been inundated with glyphosate, and there's been a radical increase in the exposure to electromagnetic fields.

All three of these factors are pernicious, and there's evidence showing all three can play a role in autism development. Heavy metal exposure is another factor.1 That said, the connection between autism and the introduction of vaccines in many children is quite clear.

"The interesting science that's come about since the mid-2000s and beyond concerns this notion of an immune activation event in the brain of a child. We believe that immune activation events are actually what causes autism. The question is, 'What's the trigger for those immune activation events?' because there could be a myriad of triggers.

In the emerging science, which has largely been developed in other countries, it shows us how aluminum, specifically — aluminum, which the whole purpose of it being in a vaccine is to hyperstimulate the immune system — in certain vulnerable kids, can create a persistent immune activation event, sort of a simmering inflammatory event in the brain.

That simmering inflammatory event, if it happens during critical phases of brain development, can cause a child to head into autism. Those analysis models, unlike the epidemiology the CDC did that was not that helpful trying to discern causation, most analysis models are showing us, with some very specific data about the brain, just how a vaccine can trigger an immune activation event that then leads to autism," Handley says.

Aluminum Hyperstimulates the Immune System
Aluminum is a known neurotoxin, and in vaccines, the aluminum is in a nanoparticulate form, which when injected makes it all the more problematic. When injected, macrophages, which are part of your immune response, are sent to the injection site, where they gobble up some of that aluminum.

"The [macrophages] grab the aluminum that they don't know what to do with. Some portions of those macrophages end up in the brain. They sit there, and it's called biopersistence. The aluminum just sits in the brain and the body doesn't know how to get it out," Handley says.

There's also evidence that aluminum exposure may be, at least in part, responsible for the massive rise in autoimmunity among children as well. In short, the aluminum hyperstimulates the immune system, causing it to overreact to proteins that otherwise would not cause a reaction.

Vaccine Makers Are Not Liable for Harm
Today, children routinely receive 49 doses of 14 vaccines by age 6, and there are estimates that 1 in approximately 35 children develop autism. That's nearly 3 percent of the U.S. population. In 1985, children received 23 doses of seven vaccines: diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP), oral polio (OPV) and measles-mumps-rubella (MMR).

The autism rate was also vastly lower. Depending on the data source, the autism rate in 1985 was between 1 in 5,000 or 1 in 10,000. In 1986, in large part due to the brain damage being caused by the DTP vaccine, the National Childhood Vaccination Injury Act (NCVIA) was passed, which partially indemnified vaccine makers from liability for CDC recommended vaccines for children.

Later, in 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court insulated vaccine manufacturers from all liability when someone is harmed or killed by a childhood vaccine.

"When you go to vaccine court in Washington D.C., the lawyers who are paid money to fight your claim are Department of Justice (DOJ) employees. The judge who's there to adjudicate your claim is a special master who has full control over the proceeding. You have no jury. You have no normal judicial process. That 1986 [law] ushered in a rapid introduction of many different vaccines.

Today, I would argue — and I do quite strongly in the book — we're simply giving too many vaccines for too many diseases that are not that dangerous. In return, we have this massive explosion in chronic disease. It's a trade. We're slightly reducing certain acute illnesses. We're having an explosion of many chronic illnesses.

I think the question for Americans and the question for parents is, 'Is it worth it? Is the reduction in disease worth the trade-off?' That's actually the conversation I wish we could have. We don't have a realistic risk-reward conversation. Vaccines are portrayed cartoonishly as offering you instant protection from whichever disease you get vaccinated for. The truth is more complicated than that."

Evaluate Risks Versus Rewards
Handley suggests that parents need to weigh the pros and cons, and ask themselves which health risks they're willing to take to protect their child against any given disease.

"Do I want [my child] to get a rotavirus vaccine if the risk is asthma? Do I want [them] to get a Haemophilus influenza type B (Hib) vaccine if the risk is a lifetime of diabetes or some other autoimmunity and a much higher risk of autism?

By not acknowledging the very real risks of these vaccines, parents aren't in a position to make an informed decision about whether or not they're worth it for them," Handley says.

"I personally would support an immediate return to the 1985 schedule. Children were not dying in the streets. It wasn't the Dark Ages. We have to do something radical if we're going to change this chronic disease epidemic …

Autism, for a family, is devastating. I think one of the things that really frustrates me about this epidemic is the whitewashing of autism … The truth is most children with autism can't speak … [they] will never live alone … [they] will never have a job. Most children with autism require daily and hourly care [and] die early.

We can never look away from the severity of this epidemic or this disability for most of the children affected by it. It's because of the devastating nature of the disability that it puts such a strain on families.

My heart goes out to families that are lower income, work two jobs or they're struggling to make ends meet, and then autism gets dropped into their lives. It's simply devastating and untenable. We've got to do something about it."

Do Your Homework
One of the most questionable vaccines, in my view, is the hepatitis B vaccine, which is given on the day of birth. Not only does it contain aluminum, there's simply no real justification for administering it to all healthy newborns, as hepatitis B can only be contracted from IV drug abuse, sexual activity with an infected partner, a blood transfusion using contaminated blood, or from an infected mother.

It would be far more sensible to simply screen pregnant women for the disease, and only give the vaccine to infants whose mothers actually test positive for hepatitis B.

The Hib vaccine also contains aluminum, and it, too, is given very early on, the first dose usually administered at 2 months old. Handley points out that parents should do their own research and make an informed vaccination decision for their child.

"You need to gather data on each vaccine and decide for yourself, 'Is the risk-reward there for me?' If you do that research and you decide it's there for you, all the more power to you. This is a free country. I believe in medical freedom. I believe that everybody should use whatever intervention they think is appropriate for their child.

What I don't believe in is that a parent should walk into an office with a child who's 2 months old, having not done the research, hand your child over to the pediatrician and they stick the child with six vaccines and you can't name what any of them are. By the way, that's a mistake I made.

That's the message I try to send to other parents: 'Be way more informed. Be way more vigilant.' There are pediatricians in every market who are more open. Find those pediatricians and work with them. Focus on the health of your child, not on implementing the CDC's vaccine schedule.

Recognize that there are many pediatricians who are motivated by their insurance company to have really high vaccination rates. Because of that, they may not have your child's best interests at heart. They may have the bonus that they're getting from their insurance company at heart. That's really inappropriate but happens all the time …

I have is a singular motivation: to tell the truth and to save as many children as possible from the fate that befell my son … Guilt wrote this book, if you will. The two ways that I found to deal with that guilt is, one, to focus on my son in helping him get better, and, two, to warn as many parents as possible."

Vaccine Experts Call for Vulnerability Screening Prior to Vaccination
In depositions in a trial in Tennessee, Zimmerman and Kelley make it clear that children really should be screened before their first vaccine. If screening for individual susceptibilities were in fact done, many or most vulnerable children would be spared from being harmed by vaccines.

"They bring up specifically in their depositions things like the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) mutation, a gene that can limit the ability of the body to detoxify," Handley says. "They bring up maternal autoimmunity history as a potential risk. Any signs of food allergies, any signs of other illnesses, obviously.

But there's this list of screens that you could do in advance that might save a meaningful portion of these children from harm. What's so frustrating about that is, in order for those screens to be put into place, there has to be an acknowledgment of causation."

The Lies Being Told
Handley spends an entire chapter tackling the mainstream notion that the science on vaccines is "settled;" that the studies have been done and no harm could be found. "It's simply a lie," Handley says. To be convinced, however, you may need to actually read through the studies yourself. If you do, you'll find the "evidence" that vaccines don't cause autism is based on a single vaccine, the MMR, and they only looked at a single ingredient, thimerosal.

"Anybody with the willingness to spend a little bit of time on this topic will grow disenchanted with the things they're saying because they're unsupportable. They're lies. They're propaganda. I find it deeply disturbing that our public health officials will lie that blatantly," Handley says.

"When you have people like Zimmerman and Kelley from Kennedy Krieger, who are now supporting what the parents are saying, I think the lie falls down even further. I think they're going to really have to answer to this book and explain why they're saying the things they're saying …

[Three] of the scientists who've done some of the most amazing work on aluminum, and how it biologically causes autism, wrote letters to [the CDC] … [saying]:

'Based on the work that I have done with aluminum, I think that the words on your website saying vaccines don't cause autism [aren't] true. I encourage you to look closer at the aluminum science that I'm including here in my letter. This is a devastating crisis that I think we have answers for.'

These are international renowned scientists writing to our CDC and saying that, 'The things you're representing to the public aren't true. You need to look at this topic again.' This is not parents versus the CDC. These are esteemed international scientists. These are clinicians from Kennedy Krieger …

The gig is up. The truth is there for anybody willing to look. I really hope that groups of people will come together and say, 'Enough is enough. Enough with the lies. There is 1 in 36 children [with autism]. It's unacceptable. We have a clear answer for at least the primary trigger of what's going on. We need to start saving children, moving those with great risks out of harm's way to help end the autism epidemic.'"

A major part of the problem is the fact that the CDC has been captured by the drug industry. Not only is the CDC in charge of implementing and promoting the vaccine program, it also holds dozens of vaccine patents,2,3 while simultaneously being in charge of vaccine safety and tracking autism rates!

Add to that the revolving door between the CDC and the vaccine industry — the transition of Julie Gerberding from being director of the CDC to being an official in Merck's vaccine division is one of the most egregious ones — and you have a situation in which the agency charged with safety simply will not lift a finger to fulfill that responsibility.

Join Us at Generation Rescue's Autism Education Summit
Handley cofounded Generation Rescue with his wife in 2005. Actress Jenny McCarthy is the president. The organization assists parents who want to initiate biomedical intervention for their autistic child, and hold an annual Autism Education Summit. This year, it's held September 28 through 30 in Dallas. I'm scheduled to be keynote speaker.

This summit is a wonderful opportunity for parents to hear what's new directly from the cutting-edge doctors who are treating children with autism biomedically.

You can also learn more in Handley's book, "How to End the Autism Epidemic," which includes depositions from Zimmerman and Kelley — two pre-eminent members of the Kennedy Krieger Institute, the leading autism institution in the country — in which they unequivocally state that vaccines are causing autism.

A third deposition covered in the book is by Dr. Stanley Plotkin, by many considered the godfather of the vaccine industry. Dr. Paul Offit brought him into Voices for Vaccines, a pharma front group, as an expert witness for a legal case in which a husband and wife were in disagreement as to whether or not to vaccinate their child.

"[Plotkin] sat through an eight-hour deposition [and] was destroyed by the opposing council. What was revealed was many of the tricks, false narratives and disturbing ways of thinking that people in the vaccine industry think through, because Plotkin was one of the thought leaders of that.

We learned everything from the fact that he tested vaccines on mentally retarded children — his words, not mine — babies in prisons and orphans. We learned the ugly history of vaccine trials.

But he clearly acknowledges that the DTP vaccine doesn't really work, and that the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine trials were in fact quite faulty, because they had no placebo group. They received an aluminum-containing vaccine … His conflicts of interest are also spelled out in detail.

He's literally making millions of dollars a year from vaccine makers, yet projects himself as this independent spokesperson for vaccines. He bailed on the trial the next morning after giving his deposition.

He refused to be an expert witness. Luckily, we were able to obtain that deposition in a public manner. It's not sealed. I think anybody who reads his words in that deposition will be blown away by how the, arguably, default leader in the vaccine industry actually thinks. It's very damning and very disturbing," Handley says.

More Information
Lastly, you can also follow Handley on his blog, JBHandleyBlog.com. Among his most recent articles is "Did Vaccines Save Humanity?" in which he reviews disease statistics and vaccine data to answer that question.

Between 1900 and today, there's been a massive decline in mortality, especially mortality from infectious diseases, and mandatory vaccination advocates are often quick to attribute that to the success of mass vaccination programs. However, scientists have identified a number of many other factors that contributed to lower mortality rates.

Things like improved standards of living, clean water, refrigeration, sewage, less crowded living quarters and so on have all contributed to fewer complications from infectious diseases. Importantly, the data show dramatic declines in mortality from infectious diseases occurred well before the introduction of vaccines against the disease in question. According to Handley:

"They estimate that vaccines' role in the overall decline in mortality from 1900 to today was somewhere between 1 and 3.5 percent of the total decline [in mortality] …

Facts are facts. Data is data. Anybody who tells you that billions of lives have been saved because of vaccines, or whatever number they try to use, or that it's the primary driver [of infectious disease reduction] is insane. Because the facts don't support them and say differently.

If you go to Africa, where they're still living in crowded conditions and still have horrible water, and they still don't have sanitation or refrigeration, and you vaccinate every kid, you might kill more children than you help because the other conditions haven't been bolstered.

We actually learned that through … a study4 by Dr. Peter Aaby, a renowned epidemiologist of vaccines. What he found is that in [Guinea-Bissau] … children who got the DTP vaccine were five times more likely to die than those who didn't.

The reason for that, as far as he could explain, was that it weakened their system so much that they were far more susceptible to other infections, because they were living in a highly infectious environment.

So, if you go after public health and you don't do it with totality, and you think vaccines are going to solve the problem, they're not going to solve the problem. There's no data that says they would."

Patient

16th September 2018, 22:43

2 of my children were vaccinated and are now autistic. My other children were not vaccinated due to our early research into this. My other children are fine.

The result of this situation has been very difficult for my family. Many people refuse to believe the problems caused by vaccinations and when they learn that I have not vaccinated all of my children, well, let's just say that many people quickly display their ignorance. The public school system frowns on us. One response that I have received a couple of times when people have been in a position to voice their concerns over my decision, "How dare you not vaccinate your kid. My child is now at risk of catching polio if your kid gets it!" ...I had to answer with "Well, if your child is vaccinated against it, what are you worried about?" So yeah, I always look for a bit of humour to help me to keep going. But it is not funny, really. People need to learn the truth. The programming that has been done to the public is really effective.

We need to keep trying to find ways to wake people up to what is really going on around them. With the rate of autism and other disorders increasing, what future awaits our children?

onawah

16th September 2018, 22:53

Exactly! There is plenty of information on this thread alone that can make people think twice, if they will allow themselves the space. The problem is that they don't want to leave their comfort zone, and all too often it takes a disaster to kick them out of it.
In my area (and no doubt in others) there is a Facebook page for parents who are concerned, and it seems to be a good source of support. They share all kinds of info, such as names of sympathetic doctors, healing techniques, etc. There's plenty wrong with FB in general, but it can still be used for good in focused ways.
I hope things will improve soon, especially for families like yours, Patient. :nod:

We need to keep trying to find ways to wake people up to what is really going on around them. With the rate of autism and other disorders increasing, what future awaits our children?

Flash

1st October 2018, 23:07

If you do not mind, members, I will regroup here the information of vaccines and on autism (all info gleaned by members).

My objective is to have one main thread for members and non members to read, for parents, for health professionals, for teachers, for researchers, and more so that they do not have to search through the forum.

When I try to convince parents or health care workers, it is very difficult, mostly when it is related to one's own children. So I want them to read the thread and make up their own mind.

To start with, much information on vaccines is also found on this thread:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91081-The-poisoning-of-America-Glyphosate-Statins-and-Vaccines

Flash

1st October 2018, 23:18

From this thread, http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit&p=1250268&viewfull=1#post1250268
thanks Houman

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pz_td2pcMco

"THE BRAVE ONES"

On the new book by JB Handley, How to End the Autism Epidemic, and the fraud in the Department of Justice concerning the vaccine safety studies

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeORYSHoRUc

Del Bigtree of Highwire interviews Prof Christopher Exley, following the 2018 11th Autoimmunity Congress held in Lisbon, Portugal.

Flash

1st October 2018, 23:25

Here some information from Houman's thread: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit&p=1250268&viewfull=1#post1250268

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vkWebSiB1g

From what I understand it is the Fluoride that causes the body to retain aluminum in the tissue.

Fluoride and aluminum are usually found together in mining deposits and bond together due to their chemical properties.

As word to the wise mature tea (black tea) holds a huge amount of Fluoride in it.

Most salts that are non-caking use Fluoride as well, as a result you want to use kosher salt. As far as tea is concerned if you are going to drink it white tea is the youngest tea and green after that.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit&p=1232279&viewfull=1#post1232279

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHmTU-HVHc8

Flash

1st October 2018, 23:30

From Houman, in this thread: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit&p=1231813&viewfull=1#post1231813

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xleocy6karo

The role of silicic acid in the renal excretion of aluminium.

Dr Christopher Exley. Lecture on the Mechanism of toxicity of aluminum-based adjuvants.

Bellia JP, Birchall JD, Roberts NB.

Abstract

The chemical affinity of silicic acid for aluminium (AI) has been shown to reduce the bioavailability of AI in studies of human gastrointestinal (GI) absorption. Investigations were carried out to ascertain whether or not similar interactions may also enhance the renal excretion of AI by assessing the urinary output of both elements. Healthy individuals given monosilicic acid as naturally found in beer, excreted the majority of the silicic acid content (mean 56 percent) within 8 hours, concomitant with a significant increase in AI excretion (P < 0.05). Ingestion of increasing doses of silicic acid resulted in dose related increases in excretion of Si. Excretion of AI reached a maximum and then declined, consistent with depletion of AI body stores. This was confirmed using the 26AI isotope. The low serum but high urine concentration of Si suggests that if AI and Si interact to form an excretable species they do so in the kidney lumen such that Si limits the reabsorption of AI. Silicic acid's effect on the depletion of aluminium stores and reduced GI absorption suggest its addition to municipal water supplies may be a low risk public health measure to reduce the AI burden in the general population.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xleocy6karo

Flash

1st October 2018, 23:35

From this thread: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit&p=1231367&viewfull=1#post1231367

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jKrbcoOcEg

The scientific method has long been regarded as the ‘gold standard’ in scientific analysis. Today, more and more members of the scientific community are abandoning the scientific method in favor of science ‘ideology’, making modern science more like a religion, based in faith and strongly held beliefs. This phenomenon, this ‘Religion of Science’, has become common practice in mainstream the scientific community, especially in the area of vaccine safety and efficacy.

Del Bigtree
Del Bigtree has been an Emmy Award winning producer on the daytime talk show THE DOCTORS for over six years. With a background both as a filmmaker and an investigative medical journalist, Del is best known for combining visually impactful imagery, raw emotional interviews and unbiased investigative research into stories that push the envelope of daytime television. When Del began investigating the story of the CDC Whistleblower and the fraud perpetrated by the CDC making the film Vaxxed: From Coverup to Catastrophe, he soon realized that he had stumbled upon a story of corruption and deception beyond any he had ever seen. Since then, Del has been traveling the nation, meeting with politicians and standing with parents in their fight to maintain our freedom of choice while delving deeper in his investigation into vaccine safety and policy in America. He is the host of The High Wire, a show that finds the answers to the questions everyone else is afraid to ask and also is the founder and CEO of the Informed Consent Action Network which is dedicated to the eradication of man-made disease.

Flash

1st October 2018, 23:44

I was talking with a young researcher about adjuvant in vaccines and specifically about aluminum. He was telling me that without aluminum, the vaccines would have no effect, the body has to be attacked with something that will greatly awaken the immune system for the vaccine to be efficient.

I was telling him that I thought it was precisely the aluminum that was the overload children could not eliminate. Hence autism and a row of other neurological diseases.

I was telling him that we now find aluminum in our food, in our lands, from the sky and in the vaccines. Adding to it poisoning with glyphosate, fluoride, and many more, the culprit was when the nano aluminum was administered to children, in heavy dosage for their little body, all within 6 years. It was triggering a massive response from the body and an inability to get rid of the last toxic material, namely aluminum.

He was not convinced.

So I sent him few extract of videos and posts here and had many counter arguments.

I then realized everything should be regroup so that this independent mind could read to his leisure and his curious spirit search later on.

I felt he need to regroup the information.

I talk to another professor as well, from another university, and even if his grand children were both autistic, he did not believe in the vaccine craze of parents. I thought he should read this thread as well.

Then, a pediatrician referred me some parents. For them I needed this thread to be thorough and information regrouped.

Therefore, what I just did previously, regrouping what our great members are posting regarding this topic.

Thanks everyone, and particularly Onawah and Houman, regarding their posts on autism and vaccines and other toxics.

onawah

4th October 2018, 18:40

TAKE ACTION! Investigate autism cover-up in the Vaccine Court
Autism Action Network
10/4/18

"Last week we sent out an action alert about Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and attorney Rolf Hazlehurst's petition to the Inspector General of the Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate possible legal misconduct by two federal government lawyers who they allege withheld and misrepresented evidence in the Autism Omnibus Proceeding (AOP), provided by Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, a key government witness, that showed that vaccines can cause autism. We asked you to call Michael Horowitz, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice.

The Autism Omnibus Proceeding (AOP) was an action by the vaccine court that lumped together more than 5000 claims that autism was caused by vaccine injury. All 5000 cases were to be decided by 6 selected test cases. Nearly all the cases in the AOP were dismissed in 2009. Zimmerman, who is regarded as perhaps the world's leading pediatric neurologist in autism research, had provided a report on Child Doe 77, one of the test cases in the Omnibus Proceeding, stating that in his professional opinion, vaccines caused Child Doe 77's autism, and could cause autism in other children who had a pre-existing mitochondrial condition. Subsequently, the Child Doe 77 case was settled by the government, and it did not serve as a precedent for any other cases, even though it had been specifically selected as a test case.
Attorneys Vincent Matanoski and Lyn Ricciardella represented the DOJ in the AOP and never disclosed the analysis prepared by Zimmerman of Child Doe 77 to the attorneys for the 5000+ petitioners as required by the rules of the vaccine court. Matanoski and Ricciardella are alleged to have engaged in additional actions to keep the Zimmerman report and settlement of the Child Doe 77 case hidden from the petitioners and the public.
The alleged cover-up was revealed by Dr. Zimmerman in a deposition taken for a medical malpractice case against the doctor who administered vaccines to Yates Hazlehurst, the child of Rolf Hazlehurst. Yates Hazlehurst was one of the test cases in the AOP. In the Hazlehurst malpractice suit deposition Zimmerman revealed that Yates Hazlehurst's regression into autism mirrored that of Child Doe 77 and would have been germane to deciding the Hazlehurst case in the AOP. If the allegations are founded there would be grounds to reopen the cases dismissed in the AOP, and other cases dismissed in the vaccine court.
Please share this message with friends and family, and please post to social networks."
Take Action here: Here's the link to send messages:
http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=80555896&queueid=11750030191

Flash

12th October 2018, 21:11

Another gem found by Houman here http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit

I would also like to take this opportunity to thanks Onawah for her very hard and steady work in finding information on the vaccine and autism topics.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9bVeEwyxXk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61MjmbELI84

onawah

19th October 2018, 03:33

Thanks Flash! It's rewarding to know that you are making use of it, and hopefully others. I think it must be helpful to have the best recent news all compiled in one place like this. I often refer my local anti-vaccine FB group here for info.

I would also like to take this opportunity to thanks Onawah for her very hard and steady work in finding information on the vaccine and autism topics.

onawah

19th October 2018, 03:41

Vaccine shill Paul Offit says that Barron Trump is autistic because of DT's age.
j5s0TQxU-JY

Offit has got to be a paid shill for vaccine manufacturers, because he has made a career of constantly posting in multiple places online about how the anti-vaccine stance is insane, and how vaccines are saving humanity, etc. etc. I wonder what the karmic price for that will be, when the time comes to balance out the scales...

Innocent Warrior

24th October 2018, 02:06

I only just learned about Judy Mikovits today. This is so disturbing but important to know, bumping for anyone who may have missed it.

THE CRIMINALIZATION OF SCIENCE WHISTLEBLOWERS: JUDY MIKOVITS, PHD
June 8, 2018
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/the-criminalization-of-science-whistleblowers-an-interview-with-judy-mikovits-phd/

https://vimeo.com/274114936

NaturalNews reports on one of the most heartbreaking and upsetting science videos you may see this year: Molecular biologist Judy A. Mikovits, PhD, recounts the story of how she ended up in prison after she blew the whistle on the viral contamination of human vaccines.

Dr. Mikovits had been working at the National Cancer Institute, with a focus on immunotherapy and human retroviruses, including HIV.

In 2009, while working on autism and -related neurological diseases, when she found that many of the study subjects had cancer, motor-neuron disorders and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). Believing that a virus was responsible for these symptoms, she worked to isolate the viruses involved in a mouse model.

She soon realized that these protein and viral contaminants were being introduced into the human population via contaminated vaccines. She states, “Twenty-five million Americans are infected with the viruses that came out of the lab… into the humans via contaminated blood and vaccines.”

As reported by NaturalNews:

“In response to this discovery, she was fired from her job, indicted, prosecuted, jailed and ordered to retract her research and publicly claim she ‘made it all up.’ She refused to cover up the scientific evidence and was targeted and punished by the ‘vaccine deep state’ establishment. She was actually thrown in prison. ‘Just dragged out of my house in shackles… I refused to denounce the data… we have the data… they basically said, ‘Tell everybody you made it all up and you can go home. If you don’t, we’ll destroy you’. And they did.”

This is the point at which modern medicine has arrived. Watch this astonishing video and check out Dr. Mikovits’ book, Plague: One Scientist’s Intrepid Search for the Truth about Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Autism, and Other Diseases.

Hervé

13th November 2018, 17:20

China plans to let victims sue vaccine makers for punitive damages after string of scandals (https://sg.news.yahoo.com/china-plans-let-victims-sue-103906973.html)

Zhuang Pinghui Yahoo! (https://sg.news.yahoo.com/china-plans-let-victims-sue-103906973.html)
Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:01 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s24/497026/large/chinese_vaccine.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s24/497026/full/chinese_vaccine.jpg)
China plans to let victims sue vaccine makers for punitive damages after string of scandals

China is planning new laws that would allow people to sue drug makers for punitive damages in cases of death or serious illness caused by faulty vaccines.

The draft Vaccine Management Law, posted online for public consultation on Sunday night, follows the country's largest vaccine safety scandal earlier this year.

The State Administration for Market Regulation said past scandals have exposed numerous flaws in supervision and in vaccine production and distribution.

The new legislation is designed to establish a long-term supervision system by integrating articles from different pieces of legislation.

The new legislation allows patients and families to sue vaccine makers and distributors for punitive damages if they knowingly sell faulty vaccines that cause death or serious illness.

"This is the first time punitive damages have been introduced in civil cases relating to health," said Zhu Yonggen, a Beijing-based medical lawyer.

"Victims have never been awarded compensation higher than the actual amount of financial losses, including funeral fees, hospital bills and compensation for pay during sick leave."

Zhu also said the Supreme People's Court would need to issue guidelines before local courts can give any ruling on punitive damages.

China has been hit by a string of vaccine safety scandals in recent years, although there have no officially confirmed reports of deaths of serious injuries caused by faulty vaccines.

Currently if it is proved that a vaccine caused adverse health effects, victims will be liable for compensation from the local health authority if the vaccine was part of a national immunisation programme or from the drug makers if it is outside the scope of such programmes.

The level of compensation depends on the economic status of the area where the vaccine is administered.

The legislation is being introduced months after China's second largest rabies vaccine maker Changchun Changsheng Life Sciences was found to have falsified its production records, used out-of-date materials, mixed different batches of products and failed to test them properly.

Fourteen company executives and staff members were detained over the scandal and senior officials were sacked.

Although the company was fined 9.1 billion yuan (US$1.3 billion) and ordered to set up a compensation scheme to pay victims up to 650,000 yuan, demands for tougher regulations have been mounting.

Previous scandals have included the case of a major drug maker which was found to have sold 400,520 inferior DPT vaccines and a public outcry the previous year when it emerged that 570 million yuan of improperly stored or expired vaccines had been illegally sold across the country for years.

The new law identifies some violations as "serious breaches of the law", such as fabricating production inspection logs, changing batch numbers, filing fake data for lot releases, failing to recall substandard vaccine.

Such violations could see firms losing their licences and subject to fines worth five to 10 times the value of the products in question.

Legal representatives and staff holding key posts in the companies involved are liable to have their profits confiscated and be barred from the industry for 10 years.

Meanwhile, officials who fail in their regulatory responsibilities or are found to be involved in cover-ups or interfering with investigations will be punished "severely".

Related:

Bad rabies vaccine prompts scare in China - government halts production, launches investigation (https://www.sott.net/article/391748-Bad-rabies-vaccine-prompts-scare-in-China-government-halts-production-launches-investigation)

Government's position on vaccine safety betrayed by Vaccine Court Stats on injuries and deaths (https://www.sott.net/article/319124-Governments-position-on-vaccine-safety-betrayed-by-Vaccine-Court-Stats-on-injuries-and-deaths)

Small newspaper reports about vaccine-damaged children receiving financial compensation from the federal vaccine court (https://www.sott.net/article/294221-Small-newspaper-reports-about-vaccine-damaged-children-receiving-financial-compensation-from-the-federal-vaccine-court)

Vaccine risk deniers target First Amendment (https://www.sott.net/article/399842-Vaccine-risk-deniers-target-First-Amendment)

Vaccine-sensible Japan has world's lowest child death rate and highest life expectancy (https://www.sott.net/article/397599-Vaccine-sensible-Japan-has-worlds-lowest-child-death-rate-and-highest-life-expectancy)

Hervé

18th November 2018, 16:20

From "Educate Yourself" (http://educate-yourself.org/cn/index.shtml#Latest) Latest:

Healing from Vaccines Masterclass ~ Encore Weekend
All 9 Episodes Online FREE until Sunday midnight (EDT)
Record While Available
https://tinyurl.com/y7j8g324 (https://tinyurl.com/y7j8g324)

onawah

21st November 2018, 18:03

Super-high levels of toxic aluminum found in brains of autistic patients: aluminum is present in many vaccines
by Jon Rappoport
November 21, 2018
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/11/21/super-high-levels-of-toxic-aluminum-found-in-brains-of-autistic/

"Here I am printing the abstract of a new study: “Aluminium in brain tissue in autism.” The publication is Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763

The authors of the study are associated with The Birchall Centre, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK; Life Sciences, Keele University; and the Department of Clinical Neuropathology, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.

The findings? Shockingly high levels of aluminum were found in these brain samples. It’s widely acknowledged that aluminum can enter the brain and disrupt its functions.

Of course, aluminum is present in many vaccines.

Here is the abstract of the study. I’ve put several statements in caps for emphasis:

“Autism spectrum disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder of unknown aetiology. It is suggested to involve both genetic susceptibility and environmental factors including in the latter environmental toxins. Human exposure to the environmental toxin aluminium has been linked, if tentatively, to autism spectrum disorder. Herein we have used transversely heated graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry to measure, for the first time, the aluminium content of brain tissue from donors with a diagnosis of autism. We have also used an aluminium-selective fluor to identify aluminium in brain tissue using fluorescence microscopy. THE ALUMINIUM CONTENT OF BRAIN TISSUE IN AUTISM WAS CONSISTENTLY HIGH. The mean (standard deviation) aluminium content across all 5 individuals for each lobe were 3.82(5.42), 2.30(2.00), 2.79(4.05) and 3.82(5.17) μg/g dry wt. for the occipital, frontal, temporal and parietal lobes respectively. THESE ARE SOME OF THE HIGHEST VALUES FOR ALUMINIUM IN HUMAN BRAIN TISSUE YET RECORDED AND ONE HAS TO QUESTION WHY, FOR EXAMPLE, THE ALUMINIUM CONTENT OF THE OCCIPITAL LOBE OF A 15 YEAR OLD BOY WOULD BE 8.74 (11.59) μg/g dry wt.? Aluminium-selective fluorescence microscopy was used to identify aluminium in brain tissue in 10 donors [10 donors or 5, as mentioned above?]. While aluminium was imaged associated with neurones it appeared to be present intracellularly in microglia-like cells and other inflammatory non-neuronal cells in the meninges, vasculature, grey and white matter. The pre-eminence of intracellular aluminium associated with non-neuronal cells was a standout observation in autism brain tissue and may offer clues as to both the origin of the brain aluminium as well as a putative role in autism spectrum disorder.”

The study authors mention “clues.” What about the many aluminum-containing childhood vaccines now on official schedules?

Worldmercuryproject.org writes:

“What does this mean for today’s generation of children who receive 5,000 mcg of aluminum in vaccines by the age of 18 months and up to 5,250 additional mcg if all recommended boosters, HPV and meningitis vaccines are administered.”

This might well constitute a “clue,” pointing to where at least some of that highly toxic aluminum in autistic brains comes from.

As “the experts” deny this vaccine-aluminum-autism connection, I would suggest they back up their “science” by stepping forward themselves and taking ALL the vaccines on the official schedule, including boosters, in order to catch up with their shots. They should do this in the limited time recommended by public health agencies.

After all, if aluminum (and other toxic substances) in vaccines aren’t a problem, what do they have to lose?

They’re desperate to mandate the full load of vaccines for every man, woman, and child—so they should start with themselves.

Otherwise, they have no standing to make claims.

Neither do “science bloggers” who embrace every official mainstream study as if it were manna from heaven. To them, I offer the following quotes from two famous medical-journal editors, who have pored over more studies than these bloggers have dreamed of.

Marcia Angell, former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, in the NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption”:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”

Here is Richard Horton (another pro’s pro), editor-in-chief, The Lancet, in The Lancet, 11 April, 2015, Vol 385, “Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma?”:

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness…

“The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of ‘significance’ pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale…Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent…”

I want to see more on the new study showing shocking levels of aluminum in autistic people. I want to see funding provided to other researchers—INDEPENDENT RESEARCHERS with no ties to drug companies or government agencies—so they can follow up on the new study and come to their own conclusions.

And I want to see common sense applied to aluminum toxicity.

As in: why would anyone want to inject children with a known neurotoxin?

Would you be willing to spin the roulette wheel on YOUR child’s life and future and brain?

Well, would you?"

(Flashback: “Vaccines-aluminum-autism: but don’t worry, go back to sleep”.
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/02/06/vaccines-aluminum-autism-but-dont-worry-go-back-to-sleep-2/)

avid

21st November 2018, 19:14

This is terrible. Yet injecting ‘clean’ faecal human solution back into autistic sufferers’ bowels could cure them...? Get on with it immediately.
I have been irreperably damaged by mercury poisoning in my first year of life, Pinks Disease, resulting in COPD symptoms, always rhinitis, necessitating adenoid and tonsil removal (that should never have been done, as adenoids are necessary filters for one’s immunine system).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173747/
However, lots of us are well, within reason. I am angry, but dealing with everything is everyone’s challenge, some a wee bit more diverse than others.

Hervé

22nd November 2018, 11:12

Scientist jailed after discovering deadly viruses are delivered through vaccines (https://explainlife.com/scientist-jailed-after-discovering-deadly-viruses-are-delivered-through-vaccines-2841/)

Explain Life (https://explainlife.com/scientist-jailed-after-discovering-deadly-viruses-are-delivered-through-vaccines-2841/)
Sat, 17 Nov 2018 00:01 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s24/498392/large/Dr_Judy_A_Mikovits.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s24/498392/full/Dr_Judy_A_Mikovits.jpg)

Molecular bioloist Dr. Judy A. Mikovits was thrown in prison after discovering evidence that deadly retroviruses are transmitted through vaccines given to humans.

In a disturbing true story first published by Natural News (https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-06-08-the-criminalization-of-science-whistleblowers-a-mind-blowing-interview-with-judy-mikovits-phd.html), Dr. Mikovits found evidence "that deadly retroviruses have been transmitted to 25 million Americans through vaccines."

Dr. Mikovits worked with human retroviruses and focused on immunotherapy research and HIV. In 2009, she was doing research on neurological diseases, including autism, when she discovered many of her study subjects were suffering from serious medical issues. These issues included cancer, motor-neuron disorders and chronic fatigue Syndrome (CFS).

Collective-evolution.com (https://www.collective-evolution.com/2018/11/06/researcher-jailed-after-uncovering-deadly-virus-delivered-through-human-vaccines/) reports:
She believed a virus may have been responsible for these symptoms, and through her research, she isolated the viruses that turned out to come from mice.
It looked like a virus, it smelled like a virus, a retrovirus, because those are the types of viruses that disrupt the immune system. And several other investigators back in the 90s had actually isolated retroviruses from these people but the government called them 'contaminants,' that they weren't real and that they didn't have anything to do with the disease. Well, we isolated a new family of viruses that were called xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus. So these viruses were murine leukemia viruses, mouse viruses.

So spin forward two years, our paper published in one of the best scientific journals in the world in Science, October 8th, 2009. Usually that makes one's career, in my case it ended my life as a scientist as I knew it. Virus Delivered Through Vaccines
Dr. Mikovits' paper, in and of itself, did not immediately bring the wrath of the powerful pharmaceutical industry. However, when a paper published 2 years later made the connection between this new virus and vaccines, then Mikovits' research findings became too dangerous for the Deep State. Here is how Mikovits explains it in the video:
So in 2011, another AIDS researcher in a journal called Frontiers in Microbiology wrote a paper that really cost me a lot; I didn't know that he was going to write this paper, but it basically said the most likely way that these murine leukemia virus-related viruses, these types of viruses, entered humans, was through vaccines.

So when did we start vaccines? 1953, 1934, right in the 30s with the polio, and what we were doing to attenuate, to make the virus less pathogenic, less toxic, is we were passing them through mouse brains, so we were passing them through the brains of mice, and every scientist who works with these viruses, and worked at the National Cancer Institute recognized the possibility that if you put human tissue and mouse tissue together the possibility is that you're going to pick up a virus that is silent, in the mouse, that is it doesn't hurt the mouse, but it kills the human, or causes serious disease in the human. Deep State Comes Knocking
It was not long after the implications from the paper became clear and the Deep State saw the threat that was being posed to the vaccine industry that their powerful mechanisms of cover-up, obfuscation, and deception were activated:
I was fired, jailed, without cause, without hearing, without any civil rights at all, just drug out of my house in shackles one day, on November 18th, 2011, I refused to denounce the data, I refused to say it was a mistake, we have the data, I showed the data, I showed all of the data, and I just refused, they basically said tell everybody you made it all up, and you can go home. And if you don't, we'll destroy you. And they did. She was arrested without a warrant and held in jail for 5 days without the opportunity for bail as a fugitive from justice, and was given a 4-year gag order. Her career was destroyed. Her story is documented in the book Plague: One Scientist's intrepid Search For the Truth about Human Retroviruses and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Autism, and Other Diseases (https://www.amazon.com/Plague-Scientist%C2%92s-Intrepid-Retroviruses-Syndrome/dp/1510713948/).

Ironically, the FDA has now approved a testing protocol to detect retroviruses in the U.S. blood supply which is worth millions of dollars, and based in large part on Dr. Mikovits' research, but it is being managed by Big Pharma. So while this distinguished scientist is now bankrupt and without employment, others are allegedly capitalizing on her research to earn millions of dollars to clean up the U.S. blood supply.

https://vimeo.com/274114936

Related:

Retroviral Plague: An interview with molecular biologist Judy Mikovits (https://www.sott.net/article/281463-Retroviral-Plague-An-interview-with-molecular-biologist-Judy-Mikovits)

Is a lethal mouse virus contaminating the US blood supply? (https://www.sott.net/article/302772-Is-a-lethal-mouse-virus-contaminating-the-US-blood-supply)

Virus Is Found in Many With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (https://www.sott.net/article/194490-Virus-Is-Found-in-Many-With-Chronic-Fatigue-Syndrome)

Hervé

22nd November 2018, 14:25

Super-high levels of toxic aluminum found in brains of autistic patients: aluminum is present in many vaccines (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/11/21/super-high-levels-of-toxic-aluminum-found-in-brains-of-autistic/)

by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Nov 21 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/11/21/super-high-levels-of-toxic-aluminum-found-in-brains-of-autistic/), 2018

Here I am printing the abstract of a new study: “Aluminium in brain tissue in autism.” (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763) The publication is Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology.

The authors of the study are associated with The Birchall Centre, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK; Life Sciences, Keele University; and the Department of Clinical Neuropathology, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.

The findings? Shockingly high levels of aluminum were found in these brain samples. It’s widely acknowledged that aluminum can enter the brain and disrupt its functions.

Of course, aluminum is present in many vaccines.

Here is the abstract of the study. I’ve put several statements in caps for emphasis:
“Autism spectrum disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder of unknown aetiology. It is suggested to involve both genetic susceptibility and environmental factors including in the latter environmental toxins. Human exposure to the environmental toxin aluminium has been linked, if tentatively, to autism spectrum disorder. Herein we have used transversely heated graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry to measure, for the first time, the aluminium content of brain tissue from donors with a diagnosis of autism. We have also used an aluminium-selective fluor to identify aluminium in brain tissue using fluorescence microscopy. THE ALUMINIUM CONTENT OF BRAIN TISSUE IN AUTISM WAS CONSISTENTLY HIGH. The mean (standard deviation) aluminium content across all 5 individuals for each lobe were 3.82(5.42), 2.30(2.00), 2.79(4.05) and 3.82(5.17) μg/g dry wt. for the occipital, frontal, temporal and parietal lobes respectively. THESE ARE SOME OF THE HIGHEST VALUES FOR ALUMINIUM IN HUMAN BRAIN TISSUE YET RECORDED AND ONE HAS TO QUESTION WHY, FOR EXAMPLE, THE ALUMINIUM CONTENT OF THE OCCIPITAL LOBE OF A 15 YEAR OLD BOY WOULD BE 8.74 (11.59) μg/g dry wt.? Aluminium-selective fluorescence microscopy was used to identify aluminium in brain tissue in 10 donors [10 donors or 5, as mentioned above?]. While aluminium was imaged associated with neurones it appeared to be present intracellularly in microglia-like cells and other inflammatory non-neuronal cells in the meninges, vasculature, grey and white matter. The pre-eminence of intracellular aluminium associated with non-neuronal cells was a standout observation in autism brain tissue and may offer clues as to both the origin of the brain aluminium as well as a putative role in autism spectrum disorder.”
The study authors mention “clues.” What about the many aluminum-containing childhood vaccines now on official schedules?

Worldmercuryproject.org (https://worldmercuryproject.org/) writes:
“What does this mean for today’s generation of children who receive 5,000 mcg of aluminum in vaccines by the age of 18 months and up to 5,250 additional mcg if all recommended boosters, HPV and meningitis vaccines are administered.”
This might well constitute a “clue,” pointing to where at least some of that highly toxic aluminum in autistic brains comes from.

As “the experts” deny this vaccine-aluminum-autism connection, I would suggest they back up their “science” by stepping forward themselves and taking ALL the vaccines on the official schedule (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/11/25/australia-vaccination-all-doctors-under-the-gun-minister-of-health-keeps-lying/), including boosters, in order to catch up with their shots. They should do this in the limited time recommended by public health agencies.

After all, if aluminum (and other toxic substances) in vaccines aren’t a problem, what do they have to lose?

They’re desperate to mandate the full load of vaccines for every man, woman, and child—so they should start with themselves.

Otherwise, they have no standing to make claims.

Neither do “science bloggers” who embrace every official mainstream study as if it were manna from heaven. To them, I offer the following quotes from two famous medical-journal editors, who have pored over more studies than these bloggers have dreamed of.

Marcia Angell, former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, in the NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption”:
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”
Here is Richard Horton (another pro’s pro), editor-in-chief, The Lancet, in The Lancet, 11 April, 2015, Vol 385, “Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma?”:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness…

“The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of ‘significance’ pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale…Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent…”
I want to see more on the new study showing shocking levels of aluminum in autistic people. I want to see funding provided to other researchers—INDEPENDENT RESEARCHERS with no ties to drug companies or government agencies—so they can follow up on the new study and come to their own conclusions.

And I want to see common sense applied to aluminum toxicity.

As in: why would anyone want to inject children with a known neurotoxin?

Would you be willing to spin the roulette wheel on YOUR child’s life and future and brain?

Well, would you?

(Flashback: “Vaccines-aluminum-autism: but don’t worry, go back to sleep” (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/02/06/vaccines-aluminum-autism-but-dont-worry-go-back-to-sleep-2/).)

Jon Rappoport

amor

23rd November 2018, 00:41

Vaccines as currently composed and prescribed are the invention of the hundreds of Nazis brought over to the USA in project Paper Clip. From what I have read on the internet father Bush is all tied up with them. When the institute a program, they have tested and already know what they are doing, such as planetary GENOCIDE, working with those who research Death by Cancer and who have outlawed any cures other than their death cocktails. If you wish to kill your children immediately or progressively, just continue to vaccinate them. One vaccination turns to 37 and soon it will be 100. Why not? Fools never learn. I bypassed the polio shot offered in school because intuitively, I knew it was death. Decades later, Cancer was linked with the polio shot in those who took it. People like the Rockefellers have used and abused resources such as oil which belongs to all people to secure great wealth for themselves which they use to buy influence and power over research, manufacturing, etc. Their connection to the Population Council certainly suggests their interest in world GENOCIDE. I suggest they take their own medicine and rid us all of themselves. Vaccines are designed to KILL.

Hervé

24th November 2018, 13:43

Study: Can toxic aluminum be removed from the body by drinking water containing silicon?
(https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/11/23/can-toxic-aluminum-be-removed-from-the-body-by-drinking-water-containing-silicon/)
by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Nov 23 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/11/23/can-toxic-aluminum-be-removed-from-the-body-by-drinking-water-containing-silicon/), 2018

(For Part-1, click here (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/11/21/super-high-levels-of-toxic-aluminum-found-in-brains-of-autistic/).)

I’m not recommending a treatment for aluminum here. I’m reporting on a very interesting preliminary study.

First of all, there is widespread agreement that aluminum is a neurotoxin. Whether it enters the body through vaccination, environmental pollution, geoengineering, or any other route, it can pass through the blood-brain barrier and wreak havoc.

The study I’m quoting is, “Silicon-rich mineral water as a non-invasive test of the ‘aluminum hypothesis’ in Alzheimer’s disease.” (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22976072) (The citation is J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(2):423-30. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-121231. PMID 22976072)

Here is the abstract. I’ve highlighted key passages in caps:
“THERE HAS BEEN A PLAUSIBLE LINK BETWEEN HUMAN EXPOSURE TO ALUMINUM AND ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE FOR SEVERAL DECADES. We contend that the only direct and ethically acceptable experimental test of the ‘aluminum hypothesis’, which would provide unequivocal data specific to the link, is to test the null hypothesis that a reduction in the body burden of aluminum to its lowest practical limit would have no influence upon the incidence, progression, or severity of Alzheimer’s disease. Herein we are testing the hypothesis that silicon-rich mineral waters can be used as non-invasive methods to reduce the body burden of aluminum in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and a control group consisting of their carers and partners. WE HAVE SHOWN THAT DRINKING UP TO 1 L [LITER] OF A SILICON-RICH WATER EACH DAY FOR 12 WEEKS FACILITATED THE REMOVAL OF ALUMINUM via the urine in both patient and control groups without any concomitant affect upon the urinary excretion of the essential metals, iron and copper. WE HAVE PROVIDED PRELIMINARY EVIDENCE THAT OVER 12 WEEKS OF SILICON-RICH MINERAL WATER THERAPY THE BODY BURDEN OF ALUMINUM FELL IN INDIVIDUALS WITH ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE AND, CONCOMITANTLY, COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE SHOWED CLINICALLY RELEVANT IMPROVEMENTS IN AT LEAST 3 OUT OF 15 INDIVIDUALS. This is a first step in a much needed rigorous test of the ‘aluminum hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease’ and a longer term study involving many more individuals is now warranted.”
The reduction of aluminum in the body, plus improved cognitive ability in several patients in this small group, is a promising start.

Obviously, the cost is very low, because we’re talking about water.

If this study had used a drug, you would have read about it in the mainstream press. The drug company would have trumpeted the results as a potential breakthrough.

But pharmaceutical companies, and their medical and press and government allies, put up barriers against all natural solutions…

An historical example—Consider Pellagra. In the first half of the 20th century, in the US, there were three million cases. 100,000 people died. Researchers at health agencies insisted there had to be germ at the bottom of it. They looked and looked and looked.

Meanwhile, other researchers found out Pellagra was mainly a deficiency of niacin. They were pushed into the background.
“A bunch of whackos. Pay no attention to them.”
Finally, after 100,000 deaths, most of which were unnecessary, the “experts” grudgingly admitted,

“Yes, it’s niacin.”
Jon Rappoport

Hervé

24th November 2018, 16:11

Baby monkeys given standard doses of MMR vaccines develop symptoms of autism (https://www.newstarget.com/2016-07-12-baby-monkeys-given-standard-doses-of-popular-vaccines-develop-symptoms-of-autism.html?fbclid=IwAR3CKm2oYSwis4swRCHAwRhjsclKwxWzu55Bk5wHzXP-NLDF5uCMwJUn9l8)

Vicki Batts Newstarget (https://www.newstarget.com/2016-07-12-baby-monkeys-given-standard-doses-of-popular-vaccines-develop-symptoms-of-autism.html?fbclid=IwAR3CKm2oYSwis4swRCHAwRhjsclKwxWzu55Bk5wHzXP-NLDF5uCMwJUn9l8)
Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:00 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s24/498712/large/Monkey_Food.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s24/498712/full/Monkey_Food.jpg)

The mainstream media and conventional medicine (https://www.medicine.news/) have done everything in their power to convince the world that vaccines don't cause autism. But if that's really true, then why are the very same vaccines that are given to people causing autism in primates? A recent study conducted by researchers from the University of Pennsylvania found that some of the most commonly administered vaccines caused autism in monkeys. The monkeys were given standard doses that simulated the same doses given to children - the researchers naturally adjusted the vaccine doses based on the monkeys' weights to keep everything on an even keel.

The team, led by researcher Laura Hewitson, conducted the type of analysis on regularly-used vaccine regimens that should be done before they are given to children, of all people. This was the kind of experiment that should have been conducted by the Centers for Disease Control, but naturally, they have never conducted such a study before. What are they doing with our tax dollars again?

What Hewitson and her team discovered has completely destroyed the myth that vaccines are harmless and well worth their salt. Their findings showcased how what were considered "appropriate" doses for the monkeys' weights and sizes still led to the development of symptoms characteristic of autism. The monkeys' unvaccinated counterparts did not develop any signs of autism or exhibit any similar symptoms of vaccinated monkeys. The researchers analyzed the effects of several vaccines, including flu shots and the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine.

The MMR vaccine has been scrutinized for its potential to cause harm to its recipients. Natural News reports:
As of March 1, 2012, nearly 900 claims have been filed in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) for injuries and deaths associated with MMR vaccination. Meanwhile, there have been zero reported deaths from natural measles infection for more than a decade. Of course, vaccine enthusiasts would just say no one has died of measles recently because of the vaccines. However, even before the measles vaccine was developed, death from measles was quite rare. Getting the MMR vaccine (https://www.vaccines.news/) could actually be more dangerous than not getting it at all. The MMR vaccine has been documented as being a potential cause for measles occurrence, and it is associated with other severe side effects such as encephalopathy, seizures, nerve pain, gastrointestinal disorders and much, much more. Fortunately, there are plenty of natural solutions for boosting immunity (https://superfood.naturalnews.com/superfood.html) and protecting your body that don't involve needles or brain damage.

Source: NaturalNews.com (https://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html) (May 06, 2012 )
(https://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html)

suwesi

25th November 2018, 22:19

Looking at the japanese vaccine schedule: (https://www.jpeds.or.jp/uploads/files/20180801_JPS%20Schedule%20English.pdf) I do not think that could be the reason for low infant mortality rates in japan.
It looks like „in spite of“ instead of „because of“ :confused:

Japan has high iodine intake and generally less junk food than the US - maybe that makes the difference?
(Japan also has the lowest rates for hormonal cancers - breast, ovaries, prostate... - again: iodine!!...)

greetings
s.

onawah

29th November 2018, 06:06

New Report: 1 in 40 Kids Has Autism
NOVEMBER 28, 2018
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/new-report-1-in-40-kids-has-autism/?utm_source=mailchimp
"Using data collected from parents of more than 43,000 children from the 2016 HRSA National Survey of Children’s Health, researchers are now estimating as many as 1 in 40 children ages 3 to 17 in the U.S. have been diagnosed with autism. This is a huge increase from April 2018 when the CDC reported 1 in 59 children are on the spectrum.

Published online in the journal Pediatrics, the new HRSA study looked at a wider age range of children and used data collected from parents nationally vs. the CDC’s more narrow review of medical and school records of 8-year-olds living in 11 residential areas.

This article from UPI:
https://www.upi.com/Health_News/2018/11/26/US-autism-rate-up-to-1-in-40-children-CDC-says/4701543270985/
...provides additional insights from the researchers and more specific details about the results."
HEALTH NEWS NOV. 26, 2018 / 6:26 PM
U.S. autism rate up to 1 in 40 children, CDC says
ByAlan Mozes, HealthDay News
"MONDAY, Nov. 26, 2018 -- A new government study finds that roughly 1 in 40 American children has autism, a huge jump from the previous estimate of 1 in every 59 children.

The survey asked parents of more than 43,000 children between the ages of 3 and 17 whether or not their children had ever been diagnosed with autism or an autism spectrum disorder, or ASD, and whether the child in question still struggled with an ASD.Study author Michael Kogan offered several explanations for the discrepancy between the previous figure from the U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the new figures from the 2016 National Survey of Children's Health.

First, he noted that "because there is no biological test for ASD, it is difficult to track." And he added that different data collection methods can produce very different results.

RELATED Biomarker panel can detect autism earlier in children using saliva
For example, Kogan pointed out that the CDC only collected information on 8-year-olds living in 11 residential areas. By comparison, the latest survey looked at a far wider age range, and is the first such effort to be national in scope.

The latest figure is also based on a more recent time frame than the CDC's last review in 2014, he noted. And his team's conclusions stem from information collected from parents, while the CDC conducted a review of medical and school records.

"I don't know if 'surprised' is the word I would use," Kogan said about his team's findings. "We began the study knowing that the prevalence of ASD had been increasing for the last 30 to 40 years."

RELATED Study confirms zinc deficiencies' link to early development of autism
Kogan serves as director of the Office of Epidemiology and Research in the Maternal and Child Health Bureau of the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration.

Apart from arriving at an estimate for autism prevalence, the investigators noted that more than a quarter of children with ASD (27 percent) were taking some type of medication to tackle the disorder's symptoms. Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) had been receiving behavioral treatment in the year leading up to the survey.

But parents of children with autism indicated that their children had greater care needs -- and had more trouble getting that care -- relative to those struggling with other comparable conditions such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression and anxiety, Down syndrome, behavioral or conduct problems, intellectual or learning disabilities, and/or Tourette syndrome.

RELATED Prenatal exposure to antidepressants, antipsychotics not linked to autism risk
Specifically, parents said they were 44 percent more likely to have trouble getting mental health care, 24 percent less likely to get care coordination help, and 23 percent less likely to have a "medical home" for their child, meaning a single team of caregivers.

The findings were published online Nov. 26 in the journal Pediatrics.

Thomas Frazier, chief science officer at Autism Speaks, expressed little surprise at the findings.

"They are generally consistent with previous parent surveys and other direct prevalence studies where researchers directly screen for and attempt to identify autism," he said, adding that the CDC numbers are "probably a bit conservative."

As to why estimates have generally been rising in recent years, Frazier dismissed the idea that the overall share of American children who have autism is growing that rapidly, suggesting instead that analysis methods have become "more liberal and inclusive."

As to the broader question of access to care, Frazier agreed that there is an urgent need to provide better access to early screening and subsequent treatment, particularly for low-income families.

"At Autism Speaks, we have attempted through our Autism Treatment Network to increase pediatricians' and family practice doctors' awareness and ability to screen," in addition to providing "gold-standard" medical care, he said.

And Frazier added that "early, intensive developmental and behavioral interventions are effective," especially when parents get the training they need to be better positioned to help their child.

According to Autism Speaks, autism spectrum disorder refers to a "broad range of conditions characterized by challenges with social skills, repetitive behaviors, speech and nonverbal communication." "

onawah

5th December 2018, 19:55

AutismOne conference hosts International HPV Vaccine Education Symposium this May In Chicago
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. will deliver Keynote
Autism Action Network
12/5/18
http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=80580761&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]
"Nation’s Most-Comprehensive Autism Conference Welcomes Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and Speakers from Over Ten Countries in Unprecedented Educational Event. The 4th Annual International HPV Vaccine Education Symposium will be held in Chicago during the AutismOne 2019 Conference.
AutismOne, the nation’s largest and most-comprehensive annual autism conference announced today that it will host the proceedings of the 4th Annual International HPV Vaccine Education Symposium.
Presenters from countries around the globe will speak at this symposium that runs Wednesday, May 22, 2019, through Friday, May 24, 2019, with a keynote address from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Esq., champion of environmental and children’s health causes.
Chairperson of the Symposium, Robert J. Krakow, Esq., stated: “This will be an unprecedented scientific gathering where international experts from more than ten countries will share their research and explain why they believe there are multiple unanswered questions regarding HPV vaccine safety, efficacy, and need.”
Co-chairperson of the Symposium, Norma Erickson, continued: “The public is told on a regular basis that all vaccines are proven safe, affordable, necessary, and effective prior to FDA approval. Unfortunately, that may not be the case with HPV vaccines. As questions surrounding HPV vaccines and vaccination programs intensify around the world, there is an ever-growing need for accurate information, which this symposium endeavors to provide.”

onawah

6th December 2018, 22:16

Primate Vaccination’s Impact on Gut Flora
DECEMBER 06, 2018
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/research-reviews/primate-vaccinations-impact-on-gut-flora/?utm_source=mailchimp
"A recent study published in Nature investigated the gut flora of infant macaques vaccinated with different vaccine schedules. The text of “Microbial structure and function in infant and juvenile rhesus macaques are primarily affected by age, not vaccination status” is available at this link:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-34019-0
However, the usefulness of this study in assessing the gut microbiome as it relates to vaccination impacts on children with autism is limited as outlined in the review below by Children’s Health Defense board member, Dr. Brian Hooker."
Critique by Brian Hooker, Ph.D.
Hasegawa et al.,2018:
"This particular study was focused on the intestinal microbiome of infant and juvenile macaques who were exposed to either the 1990s or the 2008 vaccination schedule, including thimerosal-containing vaccines. Unfortunately, this study contributes nothing in terms of understanding intestinal health differences in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children.

First, the sample size of each group was insufficient to develop clear differences in the gut microbiome for the different vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. The experimental groups (receiving either the 1900s vaccination schedule or the 2008 vaccination schedule) consisted of just 12 animals each and the control group (receiving no vaccines) consisted of just 16 animals. To pick up a “signal” for a gut microbiome presumably for autism, which has a prevalence of approximately 1 in 36 children in the U.S., each group would need at least 36 subjects. Thus, this study was woefully “under-powered” to find such a signal and it would be rare that with these small groups, such a microbiome would exist. It is therefore logical that there would be no differences in the microbial community among the different groups studied.

Second, the indicators of “gut health” were insufficient to assess a condition that could be consistent with autistic intestinal dysbiosis. The study authors merely looked at the structure of the gut microbial community at the genus level using genetic probes targeted at 16S rRNA sequences (i.e., a genetic signature for the type of bacteria that exist in the macaque’s feces). The method used was not quantitative; thus the relative abundance of microorganism species, relative to each other was never assessed. The authors do call out different genera and families of bacteria typical to the gut but no attempt was made to correlate these to overall intestinal health. To get any quantitative information on microbial species, one needs to run what is called a GI panel, which is the gold standard at identifying gut dysbiosis via microbial species that are problematic, for example, clostridium bacteria or candida yeast. This was not completed on any of the groups of macaques.

Other intestinal markers that would be helpful include parameters of intestinal immune function including total secretory antibody lining the gut mucosa, lysozyme and chymotrypsin enzymes which may be present in quantities to fight intestinal pathogens. These tests were simply not done, leaving a very limited snapshot of some bacteria and other organisms that may be present in significant quantities in the gut. Again, this does not give any type of picture of overall intestinal health, especially conditions associated with neurodevelopmental disorders including autism."

Delight

7th December 2018, 18:11

Referring to interview segment 1:24:52 in Del Bigtree's latest VLOG. This segment VERY IMPORTANT IMO. All his information is valuable.

FS4UkVpYkdo

by: Celeste McGovern, Ghost Ship Media

NOVEMBER 13, 2018
Vaccines Induce Bizarre Anti-Social Behaviour in Sheep

Just seven injections of vaccines or the aluminum salt added to vaccines caused alarming behavioral changes linked to a fatal nervous system disorder in sheep, a new study from Spanish veterinary researchers shows.

Vaccinated lambs and lambs that received injections of aluminum that is used in human vaccines as well, began aggressively biting the wool from other sheep, pacing restlessly and overeating, according to the study published this week in the journal Pharmacological Research.

Researchers from the Universities of Zaragoza and Navarra, Spain separated 21 male lambs into three groups. These received either common sheep vaccines, an aluminum ingredient called Alhydrogel used in many human as well as animal vaccines, or saline placebo. All other conditions were controlled. The researchers noted that the vaccinated and Alhydrogel animals became more solitary and anti-social than those injected with placebo. “In general, sheep are gregarious, and have a strong drive to be in the company of flock mates,” they said. Antisocial behavior is “uncommon and readily detected by an observer.” Fewer interactions with other animals “might indicate a deleterious effect on animal welfare,” the vets explained.

As well as interacting less with their flock, the vaccinated and aluminum- treated animals were notably more aggressive than untreated animals and began to bite wool off of their pen mates. Wool-biting is a well-documented, serious and relatively common abnormal behavior in sheep that causes significant harm to both the injured animals, and potentially the animal ingesting wool, but there is no accepted explanation for it in the veterinary literature. Within months of their first seven injections, five of seven vaccinated lambs had multiple areas of wool loss on their rumps and withers as a result of wool-biting.

Sheep exhibit a consistent and synchronous pattern of activity and resting, which the inoculations appeared to have altered.
Restless, repetitive behavior
The Spanish vet researchers noticed that the vaccinated and aluminum-treated animals spent less time lying down than did the lambs in the control group. “The changes in the treatment groups reflect restless or excitatory behavior because resting patterns can be used to identify social stress in animal husbandry,” the study says. “Sheep exhibit a consistent and synchronous pattern of activity and resting, which the inoculations appeared to have altered.”

The lambs in the vaccinated and aluminum groups were more inclined to restless pacing and random repetitive behaviors compared to controls as well. These “stereotypies” can be indicators of animal stress or of damage to the central nervous system.

“They also exhibited a significant increase in excitatory behavior and compulsive eating,” the study, led by Lluís Luján, a professor of veterinary pathology at the University of Zaragoza, concluded.

In general, the researchers reported, the uncommon behavior changes were more pronounced in the lambs that received the vaccines rather than those given the aluminum vaccine ingredient only, though both groups were clearly affected while the control group was not.

Some changes were readily apparent in the animals at their first assessment in summer, when they had received only seven injections. Overall, the animals received an accelerated schedule of 16 vaccines over 12 months to study the effects.

Stressed lambs
Blood tests showed that cortisol levels in the vaccinated and aluminum treated sheep were elevated during winter when cortisol levels fell in control sheep. “Cortisol is a good indicator of stress in animals that are exposed to adverse situations,” the researchers noted. As well, white blood counts (WBC) of the vaccinated animals were significantly higher than those of both other groups -another indicator of stress. “In our study, conditions were not stressful, which suggests that the vaccination was responsible for the increase in the WBC in the Vaccine Group.

Aluminum-loaded granulomas
The researchers published a separate study on October 31, in the journal Autoimmunity Reviews, which looked at tissue samples of the sheep post mortem following the experiment.

Microscopic examination revealed that the vaccinated and aluminum treated animals had numerous “granulomas” – lumpy, cheese-like nodules up to two cm in diameter under their skin and in lymph nodes far from the injection sites. These nodules were found to contain macrophages – a type of white blood cell that engulfs pathogens, loaded with tiny shards of the toxic metal aluminum. The jagged edges of the aluminum had pierced sacs inside some of the macrophages, spilling out and apparently, triggering programmed cell death responses in the surrounding tissue.

Granulomas, the researchers noted, were more lumpy and prevalent in the vaccinated animals and tended to be flatter in the aluminum-only treated animals. None of the placebo animals had these bodies under their skin.

Post mortem exams revealed the animals’ nervous tissue was riddled with the toxic metal aluminum.
Fatal disease
The experiment was part of a research effort to understand a mysterious new disease that had decimated the Spanish sheep industry between 2008 and 2010 following a government-mandated bluetongue vaccine campaign.

Prof. Luján was approached by farmers at the time who were losing entire flocks to the disease. Animals were affected in two phases: in the first acute phase, only a few animals in a flock became nearly unresponsive with an acute meningoencephalitis, and a second chronic phase, sometimes months later and frequently triggered by an exposure to cold weather, affected up to 100 percent of flocks. The sheep became restless and anxious, then showed extreme weight loss and neurological damage. Eventually, all four limbs were paralyzed and they dropped to their front quarters, comatose, and died.

The disease was reproduced experimentally by repetitive vaccination of sheep. Post mortem exams revealed the animals’ nervous tissue was riddled with the toxic metal aluminum.

Ovine ASIA, as Luján’s team called it, is an animal version of Autoimmune/Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (ASIA)– an immune system disease first clearly defined in humans in 2011. Immunologists, including leading Israeli immunologist Yehuda Shoenfeld, recognized that adjuvants – foreign substances in the human body including vaccine adjuvants designed to evoke a powerful immune response – can in some individuals hyper-stimulate the immune system into self-attack mode. Autoimmune diseases that are an expression of self attack can manifest as everything from atopic dermatitis and arthritis to severe nervous system disorders including Guillain Barre Syndrome and multiple sclerosis. These diseases now affect up to one in five Americans and are a growing global health concern.

Public health agencies have been aware of problems with aluminum adjuvants since at least 2002…
Many of these conditions have repeatedly been linked in medical literature to vaccination. Public health agencies have been aware of problems with aluminum adjuvants since at least 2002 when a public health symposium overseen by Mayo Clinic vaccine researcher Gregory Poland, heard French doctors describe a new disease, Macrophagic Myofasciitis (MMF) which developed after intramuscular injection with vaccines containing aluminum. Patients presented with extreme muscle fatigue and cognitive impairment and one fifth of them developed overt autoimmune diseases. Biopsies of their deltoid tissue revealed granulomas of aluminum in macrophages, much like those found recently in the Spanish sheep.

More recent studies from the French and English researchers studying MMF revealed that in mice, injected aluminum migrates to lymph nodes – as was seen in the Spanish sheep – and to distant sites including brain where it persists for up to a year, activating the immune system in a persistent inflammatory state.

In 2015, more than 75 immunologists and medical doctors and researchers collaborated on a medical textbook, Vaccines and Autoimmunity, which overviews the research strongly suggesting that vaccine ingredients can induce autoimmune diseases.

They focused on aluminum, with more than 1,100 papers documenting its neurotoxicity. Aluminum strongly provokes the immune system and sets off poorly understood chains of immune reaction. It is added to numerous human vaccines including those for hepatitis A, hepatitis B, diptheria-tetanus, meningitis and HPV.

Prominent defenders of injecting aluminum in children include Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia pediatrician and vaccine promoter Paul Offit who tells parents that the neurotoxic metal is not injected in sufficient quantities to cause harm.

Health agencies have largely ignored the issue and vaccine manufacturers have proceeded as usual. The Gardasil 9 vaccine introduced in 2015, for example has twice the level of aluminum of its predecessor.

Childhood OCD and anxiety disorders
Yet anxiety and compulsive disorders like those seen in the Spanish sheep – and like autoimmune diseases—have increased in children dramatically in recent years without satisfactory explanation.

A 2017 Yale/Pennsylvania State University study reported, for example, that pediatric patients diagnosed with neuropsychiatric disorders like obsessive-compulsive disorder and anorexia nervosa were more likely to have received vaccinations three months prior to their diagnoses.

Using health insurance claims data, pediatrics professor James Leckman and four other researchers found that significantly higher numbers of vaccinated children were found among those who were diagnosed with anorexia, OCD, anxiety disorder and ADHD as soon as three months after their vaccinations compared to controls.

The anxious, repetitive and aggressive behaviour documented in this latest study of sheep experimentally may provide clues to the pathogenesis of neurological psychiatric disorders.

“In our opinion, all these behavioral changes exhibited by the Vaccine and Adjuvant only lambs in our study are of outmost importance, as they are the first scientific explanation of some of the previously observed behavioral changes in flocks affected by the chronic phase of ovine ASIA syndrome,” the researchers conclude. “Indeed, these changes can be undoubtedly detected by veterinarians and farmers in field conditions but they have never been scientifically linked to vaccination and/or Al inoculations.”

Until now. Why the researchers were unable to re-induce the full-blown ASIA syndrome they had previously described remains a partial mystery. “Ovine ASIA is a multifactorial process where vaccines (or other immune system stimulators) are necessary but many times not totally enough,” Prof. Luján explained. “Clearly, our animals showed behavioral changes similar to spontaneous occurring ASIA (clearly seen in the paper) but to get the full-blown clinical appearance you need some factor we did not have:”

Unlike in the field, all of the experimental animals were young and male and treated well under controlled conditions. “You need external factors, such as cold (a type of stress),” Luján explained, “and we did not have a cold winter that year.”

“Even in these unsuitable conditions that we could not control,” Luján added, “we clearly saw neurological affection, which is the key step. Imagine if you do this with adult sheep under stress in the field…”

And imagine, as clearly public health and oversight agencies have not, that similar pathological mechanisms may be occurring in vaccinated children.https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccines-induce-bizarre-anti-social-behaviour-in-sheep/

Delight

8th December 2018, 23:32

I wish that more people looked at this thread. This for instance is not directly related to autism but explains a very important concept... natural immunity that is acquired by exposure to disease enhances the immune system's response to a strain that makes a "leap" such as flu strains that mutate. The flu vaccine (and others) may actually prime the population to succomb to a pandemic.

The speaker also addresses health care workers who are losing jobs over vaccine refusal. There is a hysteria based on hear-say about "protecting patients". The stigma of "not caring about our patients" prevents healthcare workers form speaking up. Those who do speak up are attacked by colleagues who have bought into the belief that vaccines are necessary to protect patients. And all along, the probability is that the vaccines will someday be the cause of wholesale death in a population with no natural immunity.

PI1JP0CyxLg

onawah

9th December 2018, 00:17

I think perhaps it's just too depressing and frightening a subject (even for most conspiracy theorists) to dwell on for long, but that kind of denial is taking a terrible toll on our young. People need to wake up and protest before it's too late.
You wrote: "I wish that more people looked at this thread." I certainly agree!
I was impacted as a child by the SV40 polio vaccine, infected with live Rhesus monkey viruses, which caused huge numbers of people to die later in their 40s of cancer, lupus, chronic fatigue. I knew immediately after getting the shot there was something terribly wrong with it.
I had to go into a state of deliberate forgetfulness and denial to go on with life, and it wasn't until I was in my 50s that a compassionate doctor finally put me on the trail to the truth.
Part of the therapy of my own devising has been to be a whistleblower and compiler of data about the dangers of vaccines ever since.
And I agree with what you expressed about natural immunity. Tying it all together, See: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?103674-Worldwide-Engineered-Weather-Catastrophe&p=1260813&viewfull=1#post1260813
TvZpHTR8Lhs

I wish that more people looked at this thread. This for instance is not directly related to autism but explains a very important concept... natural immunity that is acquired by exposure to disease enhances the immune system's response to a strain that makes a "leap" such as flu strains that mutate. The flu vaccine (and others) may actually prime the population to succomb to a pandemic.

The speaker also addresses health care workers who are losing jobs over vaccine refusal. There is a hysteria based on hear-say about "protecting patients". The stigma of "not caring about our patients" prevents healthcare workers form speaking up. Those who do speak up are attacked by colleagues who have bought into the belief that vaccines are necessary to protect patients. And all along, the probability is that the vaccines will someday be the cause of wholesale death in a population with no natural immunity.

PI1JP0CyxLg

onawah

9th December 2018, 00:20

See Agape's post here for a broader view of viruses and what they can do: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?105284-What-happened-to-Omni&p=1262983&viewfull=1#post1262983

ThePythonicCow

9th December 2018, 01:21

Part of the therapy of my own devising has been to be a whistleblower and compiler of data about the dangers of vaccines ever since.
Thank-you.

Delight

9th December 2018, 02:01

I think perhaps it's just too depressing and frightening a subject (even for most conspiracy theorists) to dwell on for long, but that kind of denial is taking a terrible toll on our young. People need to wake up and protest before it's too late.

I am listening to this now. I feel strong on this issue and appreciate the thead.

hc5yHU61jVk

kCysY-q1vvU

I worked at Emory hospital in my nursing career and studied at Emory. Emory was one of the first to insist staff be vaccinated (for hep B and the flu) in 2010 OR BE FIRED. That year one could still get a religious exemption without proof of one's religious affiliation. That was going to change later.

I was enraged that nurses seemed to be completely willing to be the handmaidens of a system growing ever more divorced form Florence Nightengale's beginning. also, for the sake of a "job", people were forced against their own inclinations to accept vaccination and afraid to say No. I left at that time in complete disgust at all this move implied about my profession. I left nursing as I was able to leave with "retirement" funds and counted myself lucky.

Persoanlly I think that this issue is important and I also think it is important to look at our complex system of mind/body which seems to have paradox iand maybe that IS the point...all sides exist of every potential. I do think that I am able to heal myself (in the context of being a physical being). I think that deep belief in this ability (without contradiction) is absolutely foundational to have this ability. It is the cutting edge IMO of the "super" natural potential we have as humans.

Once accepted as a possibility much METAphysical work is vital to have sovereignty of our reality. Honestly I think this is the cutting edge to over rule the collective "fence' and our birth right. It is our SELF assignment to stretch our limits IMO.

I am open to questionning self healing but since it has happened over and over for me, I think it is real.

I am familiar with the expression that any "problem" needs "solutions" at a more encompassing level from the level of their creation.The problem of the fact that we are NOT a single unit but a relationship of many living organisms means a whole new over view. When looking at ourselves, we have awareness of existing but have hardly begun to know what that means.

I respect the organic world's "lawfulness" of interacting COMMUNITy of cooperative organisms (fungi, virus, bacteria). The symbiosos is vast and we really do not understand much about our body community yet. I have lots of questions.

For instance, I read about the decimation of whole peoples when unfamiliar organisms are introduced such as the native American populations. Why this occurred "one way" (as we don't hear about early visitors/settlers to the Americas dying en masse when meeting the indigenous groups) is strange?

The human is caught in a mentally created matrix of collective belief IMO and this is ongoing. I do think we have created a poor substitute for te wonder of nature. If "nature" means us to be able to self heal, I am aware that the system of "medicine" denies that is possible. This intention cannot help us.

Then there is the way that "medicine" is a business model which has as its product "illness". It is probable IMO that we "buy" the true intention with the "medicine" unconsiously.

So I don't see this whole subject of health as "done". IMO the fruit of vaccination has been rotten. I KNOW it is not necessary, safe or relaible. Let's refuse to accept this imposition.

I recall the horror of being a child and forced to have injections. I was a fighter and it was a trauma to be held down and injected. I never liked doing this to others. I think it is barbaric to give doizens of painful injections NO MATTER. If children and adults are suffering harm from them and if the collective is being epigenetically manipulated to become less "hardy" in immunity, it is disasterously evilly criminal.

For certain, I am unraveling all that this issue means to me still.

onawah

15th December 2018, 05:36

New US Congressman says CDC handles vaccine data "fraudulently"
Links vaccines to autism. Corporate media explodes
(From Autism Action Network's email update today)
http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=80584661&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]
Autism Action Network
Dec 13, 2018

"Mark Green, a currently a State Senator in Tennessee and a newly-elected member of the US House of Representatives, said in town hall meeting on Tuesday, that the CDC has "fraudulently" handled data on autism and vaccines, and that he intends to "stand on the CDC's desk and get the real data on vaccines. As could be expected Green's honest and accurate statements have brought down the wrath of the vaccine industry upon him. And the corporate media has launched a full assault against him.

We need Green's courageous and honest voice in Washington, and if we are going to prevent him from being silenced like so many others, you need to speak loudly and let him know you appreciate his courage and you have his back.

Please click on the Take Action link: http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=80584661&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]
...to send an email to Green. All our email messages can be edited by you, this time please include your own story of vaccine injury. But be brief, our technology limits these messages to maximum of about 300 words.

Green is a West Point graduate. He is also a war hero, he won the Bronze Star and numerous other decorations for his service in the Middle East, including serving in the operation to capture Osama Bin Laden. He will need that courage to withstand what is coming at him.

The vaccine industry has a bigger problem though with Rep. Green because he is also Dr. Green, MD, with a long career as an emergency care physician. The vaccine industry is relentless and will do everything they can to silence Green. If we are going to keep this new and courageous voice in Congress he needs your vocal support NOW!

Call and thank him at the number below at his Tennessee State Senate office:

(615) 741-2374

Like him and follow him on Facebook:

https://www.facebook.com/Dr.MarkGreen4TN/

Send letters to his State Senate Office:

425 5th Avenue North

Suite 748, Cordell Hull Bldg.

Nashville, TN 37243

Fax: (615) 253-0193

Here is the transcript of what Green said:

"Let me say this about autism. I have committed to my people in my community up in Montgomery County, to stand on the CDC's desk and get the real data on vaccines. Because there is some real concern that the rise in autism is the result of preservatives that are in our vaccines.

As a physician, I can make that argument and take a look at it academically and make the argument against the CDC, if they really want to engage me on it. But it appears that some of the data, honestly, has been fraudulently managed. So we got to go up there and stand against that and make sure we get that fixed." "

See video of Green's statement here:

https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2018/12/12/tennessee-mark-green-vaccine-autism-cdc-congressman-anti-vax/2288164002/

http://www.autismactionnetwork.org.

Delight

21st December 2018, 02:58

Another excellent discussion.

AywJg3XV07U

onawah

22nd December 2018, 00:37

Pinterest Bans GreenMedInfo for Posting Natural Health & Vaccine Safety Info
by Sayer Ji
Published December 20, 2018

Article posted here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?104753-Has-Alternative-Media-been-Compromised....&p=1265305&viewfull=1#post1265305

Flash

22nd December 2018, 09:56

http://https://www.corvelva.it/speciali-corvelva/analisi/vaccingate-initial-results-on-infanrix-hexa-chemical-composition.html

Vaccinegate: Initial results on Infanrix Hexa chemical composition
LE ANALISI
STAFF CORVELVA
16 DICEMBRE 2018
VISITE: 48490

Vaccinegate: Initial results on Infanrix Hexa chemical composition
When we started these analysis, from the metagenomics to the chemical ones, we had a lot of questions and we were only looking for answers… After these first results, more questions have arisen and so did the concerns!

The quali-quantitative analysis of organic compound is of great importance in the pharmacological field, as potential safety problems arise from the new production processes of biological drugs and from the complex structural and biological characteristics of these products.

In Infanrix Hexa we found

chemical contamination from the manufacturing process or cross-contamination with other manufacturing lines;
chemical toxins;
bacterial peptide toxins;
insoluble and indigestible macromolecule that reacts to the protein assay, but cannot be recognized by any protein databases.
We have not found:

Protein antigens of diphtheria toxoids, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, haemophylus influenzae B, Poliomyelitis 1-2-3;
Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, phenoxyethanol, antibiotic residues indicated in the composition;
In Infanrix Hexa there are six antigens
Tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis toxoids, D antigens of Poliomyelitis 1-2-3, hepatitis B proteins obtained with genetic engineering and Haemophylus polysaccharides chemically linked to tetanus toxoid as carrier. Toxoids are created by treatments with formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde that should remove toxicity keeping intact their ability to stimulate protective antibodies against original toxins.

We were expecting to find the three toxoids and the other antigens not modified by treatment with formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, to separate the antigens from each other and to be digestible by the enzyme specific for proteins (trypsin). We have found instead a real polymer, insoluble and indigestible, that we supposed to be the set of antigens chemically bound together (has to be defined if this is present as an aggregate of the individual antigens or a single macromolecule), on which we can find in literature partial information regarding the single antigens.

This macromolecule could not be recognized in any way by the protein databases, and in fact it turned out to be a solid compound of an unknown chemical structure.

Proteins solubility and their digestion (i.e. the capacity to divide them into small peptide fragments) are two typical proteins characteristics that not only makes it possible to study them through some specific analysis methods but are also fundamental for the interaction with the immune system to create protective antibodies, because if the protein structure is heavily altered from the original one, the new antibodies result completely different from those that are able to attack the original antibodies causing illnesses. 

Since this polymer we have encountered, derived from the antigenic mix, is not only different for its spatial conformation but it’s chemically different, so we can state that we are not facing antigens similar to the original ones but in the form of a compound with an unknown and unpredictable toxicity and efficacy.

Not only vaccine antigens have been not detected, there were also 65 signs of chemical contaminants of which only 35% is known, there are among these various processing residues and cross-contaminations from other manufacturing lines, and their identification will be checked during the second level of the analytical study (i.e. with standard controls).

7 chemical toxins among these signals have also been identified, probably deriving from chemical contaminants of the manufacturing process or other manufacturing lines at the vaccine manufacturing site; these toxins have a structure that could probably be partially derived from the formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and cyanogen bromide reaction with other chemical contaminants in the vaccine. We’d like to point out that the toxicity of many of these toxins have been confirmed and published in Pubchem or Toxnet and this poses important safety problems, issues and concerns.

From the protein and peptide fraction study, various free peptides of bacterial origin have been obtained probably coming from the bacterial culture cells used for the antigen extraction. Literature reports bacterial peptides as potential allergens 5 and also as capable of inducing autoimmune reactions 6 and these too put a safety issue that needs to be further clarified with the regulatory bodies.

Coming back to the two basic principles that have been our topic on this analysis path, we reaffirm what we have said in the recent interview on the scientific journal Nature: we are inquiring the vaccines efficacy and safety and we can't quite understand how it is possible to claim that this vaccine is even able to generate the 6 protective antibodies - reason why it is designed for - and furthermore to understand how this cluster made of 6 neurotoxic antigens bound together can be claimed as not toxic for newborns.

Infanrix Hexa hexavalent, as for the method we have commissioned, casts major doubts on both its effectiveness and on its safety…

One thing is for sure: we will not stop to proceed.

Download: CORVELVA-Study-on-the-chemical-composition-profile-of-Infanrix-Hexa.pdf

References
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2017 Jun 1;1054:80-92 - The combined use of analytical tools for exploring tetanus toxin and tetanus toxoid structures.
Vaccine. 2007 Mar 8;25(12):2213-27. - Investigation of the detoxification mechanism of formaldehyde-treated tetanus toxin.
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/
https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/
Int J Med Microbiol. 2018 Aug;308(6):738-750. - The quest for bacterial allergens.
Front Microbiol. 2017 Oct 9;8:1938 - Morbid Sequences Suggest Molecular Mimicry between Microbial Peptides and Self-Antigens: A Possibility of Inciting Autoimmunity.
Vaccinegate: Initial results on Infanrix Hexa chemical composition
LE ANALISI
STAFF CORVELVA
16 DICEMBRE 2018
VISITE: 48490

Vaccinegate: Initial results on Infanrix Hexa chemical composition
When we started these analysis, from the metagenomics to the chemical ones, we had a lot of questions and we were only looking for answers… After these first results, more questions have arisen and so did the concerns!

The quali-quantitative analysis of organic compound is of great importance in the pharmacological field, as potential safety problems arise from the new production processes of biological drugs and from the complex structural and biological characteristics of these products.

In Infanrix Hexa we found

chemical contamination from the manufacturing process or cross-contamination with other manufacturing lines;
chemical toxins;
bacterial peptide toxins;
insoluble and indigestible macromolecule that reacts to the protein assay, but cannot be recognized by any protein databases.
We have not found:

Protein antigens of diphtheria toxoids, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, haemophylus influenzae B, Poliomyelitis 1-2-3;
Formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, phenoxyethanol, antibiotic residues indicated in the composition;
In Infanrix Hexa there are six antigens
Tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis toxoids, D antigens of Poliomyelitis 1-2-3, hepatitis B proteins obtained with genetic engineering and Haemophylus polysaccharides chemically linked to tetanus toxoid as carrier. Toxoids are created by treatments with formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde that should remove toxicity keeping intact their ability to stimulate protective antibodies against original toxins.

We were expecting to find the three toxoids and the other antigens not modified by treatment with formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, to separate the antigens from each other and to be digestible by the enzyme specific for proteins (trypsin). We have found instead a real polymer, insoluble and indigestible, that we supposed to be the set of antigens chemically bound together (has to be defined if this is present as an aggregate of the individual antigens or a single macromolecule), on which we can find in literature partial information regarding the single antigens.

This macromolecule could not be recognized in any way by the protein databases, and in fact it turned out to be a solid compound of an unknown chemical structure.

Proteins solubility and their digestion (i.e. the capacity to divide them into small peptide fragments) are two typical proteins characteristics that not only makes it possible to study them through some specific analysis methods but are also fundamental for the interaction with the immune system to create protective antibodies, because if the protein structure is heavily altered from the original one, the new antibodies result completely different from those that are able to attack the original antibodies causing illnesses. 

Since this polymer we have encountered, derived from the antigenic mix, is not only different for its spatial conformation but it’s chemically different, so we can state that we are not facing antigens similar to the original ones but in the form of a compound with an unknown and unpredictable toxicity and efficacy.

Not only vaccine antigens have been not detected, there were also 65 signs of chemical contaminants of which only 35% is known, there are among these various processing residues and cross-contaminations from other manufacturing lines, and their identification will be checked during the second level of the analytical study (i.e. with standard controls).

7 chemical toxins among these signals have also been identified, probably deriving from chemical contaminants of the manufacturing process or other manufacturing lines at the vaccine manufacturing site; these toxins have a structure that could probably be partially derived from the formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde and cyanogen bromide reaction with other chemical contaminants in the vaccine. We’d like to point out that the toxicity of many of these toxins have been confirmed and published in Pubchem or Toxnet and this poses important safety problems, issues and concerns.

From the protein and peptide fraction study, various free peptides of bacterial origin have been obtained probably coming from the bacterial culture cells used for the antigen extraction. Literature reports bacterial peptides as potential allergens 5 and also as capable of inducing autoimmune reactions 6 and these too put a safety issue that needs to be further clarified with the regulatory bodies.

Coming back to the two basic principles that have been our topic on this analysis path, we reaffirm what we have said in the recent interview on the scientific journal Nature: we are inquiring the vaccines efficacy and safety and we can't quite understand how it is possible to claim that this vaccine is even able to generate the 6 protective antibodies - reason why it is designed for - and furthermore to understand how this cluster made of 6 neurotoxic antigens bound together can be claimed as not toxic for newborns.

Infanrix Hexa hexavalent, as for the method we have commissioned, casts major doubts on both its effectiveness and on its safety…

One thing is for sure: we will not stop to proceed.

Download: CORVELVA-Study-on-the-chemical-composition-profile-of-Infanrix-Hexa.pdf

References
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2017 Jun 1;1054:80-92 - The combined use of analytical tools for exploring tetanus toxin and tetanus toxoid structures.
Vaccine. 2007 Mar 8;25(12):2213-27. - Investigation of the detoxification mechanism of formaldehyde-treated tetanus toxin.
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/
https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/
Int J Med Microbiol. 2018 Aug;308(6):738-750. - The quest for bacterial allergens.
Front Microbiol. 2017 Oct 9;8:1938 - Morbid Sequences Suggest Molecular Mimicry between Microbial Peptides and Self-Antigens: A Possibility of Inciting Autoimmunity.

Pam

22nd December 2018, 12:44

We were expecting to find the three toxoids and the other antigens not modified by treatment with formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, to separate the antigens from each other and to be digestible by the enzyme specific for proteins ( We have found instead a real polymer, insoluble and indigestible, that we supposed to be the set of antigens chemically bound together (has to be defined if this is present as an aggregate of the individual antigens or a single macromolecule), on which we can find in literature partial information regarding the single antigens.

This macromolecule could not be recognized in any way by the protein databases, and in fact it turned out to be a solid compound of an unknown chemical structure

I had to read this a couple times to make sure I was understanding it because it seems so horrific. This is just beyond nightmarish. And to think this stuff is being injected into the body of a baby with a perfectly healthy immune system, repeatedly.

Frenchy

22nd December 2018, 13:35

How encouraging to learn there are still Scientist, Honest and Couragous...

For they surely know, of all those who have been ' Suicided ', or placed in great
Danger, like Jane Burgermeister et al..

This report mentions Formaldehyde, (mentioned on other threads ), I wonder if years of drinking Beers, where the Grain had been treated with Formaldehyde, accumulates in the body, and whether this too, will work with other Toxins, to produce even more adverse effects... ? ?

Deux Corbeaux

22nd December 2018, 16:57

Unvaccinated children are healthier.

Are poisons good or bad for the body? Are neurotoxins good or bad for the brain?
Ask any parent who has a vaccinated and unvaccinated child which one is healthier.

You don't need science...you need common sense.

http://i67.tinypic.com/5a0pom.jpg

ThePythonicCow

22nd December 2018, 20:14

Frenchy

22nd December 2018, 20:37

Firstly folks, A disclaimer : Although I copied this from http://www.christianmediadaily.com/ , I don't want you folks here to think I frequent such sites, all the time ! !

But, although it's not a vaccine, thought I could put here ? /CENTER]

[CENTER]FLASHBACK: WHEN THE US GOVERNMENT FED PLUTONIUM TO KIDS & PREGNANT WOMEN

Bill Clinton humbly apologized to America for human experiments 50-years earlier where the U.S. government injected people with plutonium, and fed it to children & over 800 pregnant women.

Don’t worry, “we don’t do that anymore,” he said as he gave immunity to telecommunications companies to radiate Americans, as they’re about to step it up with 5G.

David Knight

PS., I don't like using the expression ' Kids ', for children..... ( Sacrificial Origins,,, )

Frenchy

22nd December 2018, 20:49

I'd better go and have a wee dram ! My Brain can't do the Maths ! :o !

Please correct me, but isn't 5 000 mcg [ of Alu ], Five Grammes ?

Even if it's 1/2 a gramme, look at the devastating effect...

Hervé

22nd December 2018, 22:46

Psssttt... "Micro-" is one millionth of (whatever); hence, 5000 micrograms (μg or mcg) = 0.005 grams or 5 milligrams (mg).

Flash

24th December 2018, 16:47

.
May the God Damn Bastards behind vaccines burn in hell for all eternity.
GPHZFQFpZrY

VaxXed Stories: The McDowell Triplets in Michigan -- VAXXED TV

Published on Dec 22, 2016

Brenda and David McDowell visit the VaxXed bus while in Detroit Michigan to the story of all three of their triplets vaccine injury stories following the pneumococcal vaccine. Interview by Polly Tommey with camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.

P.S. -- Oops - I see onawah posted this a couple of years ago, in Post #157, above (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=1128391&viewfull=1#post1128391). It's worth a repost however.

This is so hard and devastating for me to listen to.

My daughter was born 3 weeks early, with a difficult pregnancy and difficult birth. She would barely sleep.

at 3 months old, she had a vaccine. Right after, she started to have spasms in her stomach, shaking her whole little body. I brought her to the ostheopath, thinking it was muscular. I never made the relation between the vaccine and the spasms.

At 8 month she said her first words, which is normal. Went to the pediatrician who told me "wow look at those bright lively eyes".

At 12 month she had the MMR vaccine, lost eye contact, would not listen to the daycare stories, could not speak any words nor walk. She finally walk at 15 months, but with much gross and fine motor skills impairment, and never really gained much in speech.

She regained eye contact at around 7 years old, after years of therapies, and constant efforts on my part to bring her back, some straight official therapies, and much alternative ones. She regained her motor abilities, but not entirely (still has some light troubles) at 14. After soooo much physiotherapies, excessive sport I put her in, etc, despite her being unable for years to do the sports. That kid has so much will, working soooo hard, it is unbelievable. Same heavy therapies involvement for speaking to improve, speech therapists, ortho pedagogist, signing teacher, etc. Most in private from out of mom's pocket money.

By then, I knew the vaccines made her dive into a close world.

She regained some basic speaking abilities at around 8 years old, but truly expressed herself with more ease at around 14, when she finally could tell me what she was feeling like when 6-7-8 years old. It was horrendous, she was conscious all the time of her impediment but could not do anything to counter it. She felt like in jail in her own body.

She was lucky, she had me, who knew what to do to enhance the brain capacity and create the neuronal pathways that would compensate for those lost. And could work enormously with her, and outside to make enough money to pay for those treatments. Most parents can't.

That story in this video brakes my heart. This is sooooooo incredibly hard, for these kids and their parents.

Those imposing the vaccines on our sensitive children, they may rot in hell.

Frenchy

27th December 2018, 11:27

from Jim Stone -

Midnight masterpiece!
I woke up at 1, could not get to sleep, started looking into what looked like rumor, and discovered it was not rumor. Read it and weep folks, this one's a doozie!

If it is not too late for your children, do not weep, instead, protect them by avoiding ALL shots at ALL cost.
BLOCKBUSTER: ITALY SACKED IT'S ENTIRE VACCINE ADVISORY BOARD
They APPOINTED A NEW ONE, AND THE NEW BOARD HAS DISCOVERED THAT AT LEAST SOME OF THE CHILDHOOD VACCINES HAVE ABSOLUTELY NONE OF THE ANTIGENS FOR ANY OF THE DISEASES THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO PREVENT

http://82.221.129.208/.xu6.html { Jim Stone }

Ramus, I did not want to start a new thread, thought yours could take this ?

Delight

29th December 2018, 00:03

Dr. Andrew wakefield has been vilified by the pro-vaccine establishment. This interview details the history of what occurred after he was given case reports from parents who saw a correlation between the MMR vaccine and gastro-intestinal issues and autism symptoms in their children.

PLjqIL7sdus

Tintin

10th January 2019, 12:32

Medical experts silenced when it comes to effects of vaccines on kids?
Jan 8 by Jon Rappoport

Enter Dr Andrew Zimmerman on the vaccine-autism connection

“Vaxxed, the sequel”

Linked from Jon Rappoport's blog (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2019/01/08/enter-dr-andrew-zimmerman-on-the-vaccine-autism-connection/) is a must read update on this development.

“…a respected pro-vaccine medical expert [Dr Andrew Zimmerman] used by the federal government to debunk the vaccine-autism link, says vaccines can cause autism after all. He claims he told that to government officials long ago, but they kept it secret.”
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's Sharyl Atkisson's video referenced in that article linked via the FullMeasure site (http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/the-vaccination-debate).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Vaccination Debate
BY FULL MEASURE STAFF SUNDAY, JANUARY 6TH 2019

Today we investigate one of the biggest medical controversies of our time: vaccines. There’s little dispute about this much-- vaccines save many lives, and rarely, they injure or kill. A special federal vaccine court has paid out billions for injuries from brain damage to death. But not for the form of brain injury we call autism. Now—we have remarkable new information: a respected pro-vaccine medical expert used by the federal government to debunk the vaccine-autism link, says vaccines can cause autism after all. He claims he told that to government officials long ago, but they kept it secret.

Yates Hazlehurst was born February 11, 2000. Everything was normal, according to his medical records, until he suffered a severe reaction to vaccinations. Rolf Hazlehurst is Yates’ dad.

Rolf Hazlehurst: And at first, I didn't believe it. I did not think that, I did not believe that vaccines could cause autism. I didn't believe it.

But there's a hard reality for Yates. The trademark brain disease, pain and inability to communicate that’s common with severe autism.

In 2007, Yates’ father sued over his son’s injuries in the little known Federal Vaccine court. It was one of more than 5000 vaccine autism claims.

Congress created vaccine court in 1988, in consultation with the pharmaceutical industry. In the special court, vaccine makers don’t defend their products—the federal government does it for them, using lawyers from the Justice Department. Money for victims comes from us, not the pharmaceutical industry, through patient fees added onto every vaccine given.

Denise Vowell: Our hearings are all closed to the public. And that’s statutory.

In 2007, Yates’ case and nearly all the other vaccine autism claims lost. The decision was based largely on the expert opinion of this man, Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, a world-renowned pediatric neurologist shown here at a lecture.

Dr. Zimmerman was the government’s top expert witness and had testified that vaccines didn’t cause autism. The debate was declared over.

But now Dr. Zimmerman has provided remarkable new information. He claims that during the vaccine hearings all those years ago, he privately told government lawyers that vaccines can, and did cause autism in some children. That turnabout from the government’s own chief medical expert stood to change everything about the vaccine-autism debate. If the public were to find out.

Hazlehurst: And he has come forward and explained how he told the United States government vaccines can cause autism in a certain subset of children and United States government, the Department of Justice suppressed his true opinions.

Hazlehurst discovered that later when Dr. Zimmerman evaluated Yates as a teenager. That’s when he partnered with vaccine safety advocate Robert F. Kennedy, Junior—who has a voice condition.

Kennedy: This was one of the most consequential frauds, arguably in human history.

Kennedy was instrumental in convincing Dr. Zimmerman to document his remarkable claim of the government covering up his true expert opinion on vaccines and autism.

Dr. Zimmerman declined our interview request and referred us to his sworn affidavit. It says: On June 15, 2007, he took aside the Department of Justice—or DOJ lawyers he worked for defending vaccines in vaccine court. He told them that he’d discovered “exceptions in which vaccinations could cause autism.” “I explained that in a subset of children, vaccine induced fever and immune stimulation did cause regressive brain disease with features of autism spectrum disorder.”

Kennedy: This panicked the two DOJ attorneys and they immediately fired Zimmerman. That was on a Friday and over the weekend they called Zimmerman and said his services would no longer be needed. They wanted to silence him.

Days after the Department of Justice lawyers fired Dr. Zimmerman as their expert witness, he alleges, they went on to misrepresent his opinion to continue to debunk autism claims. Records show that on June 18, 2007, a DOJ attorney Dr. Zimmerman spoke to told vaccine court, “We know [Dr. Zimmerman’s] views on the issue...There is no scientific basis for a connection” between vaccines and autism. Dr. Zimmerman now calls that “highly misleading.”

The former DOJ lawyer didn’t return our calls and emails. Kennedy has filed a fraud complaint with the Justice Department Inspector General, who told us they don’t “comment on investigations or potential investigations.”

Meantime, CDC—which promotes vaccines and monitors vaccine safety-- never disclosed that the government’s own one-time medical expert concluded vaccines can cause autism - and to this day public health officials deny that’s the case.

Dr. Anne Schuchat: “Based on dozens of studies and everything I know as a physician and a scientist, there’s no link between autism and vaccines.”

CDC declined our interview request. In addition to filing a fraud complaint, Kennedy has delivered Dr. Zimmerman’s affidavit to leaders on Capitol Hill. But there he claims, is another key part of this story: roadblocks set up by the pharmaceutical industry—or PhRMA.

Kennedy: But everybody takes money from PhRMA so they've all been corrupted. And it's almost impossible to get anything done on Capitol Hill.

Kennedy, a Democrat, isn’t the only one claiming vaccine industry money rules the day. We spoke to 11 current and former members of Congress and staff who claim they faced pressure, bullying or threats when they raised vaccine safety questions. Several of them agreed to appear on camera.

Burton: There's no question in my mind whatsoever that the pharmaceutical industry had a great influence with people over at the CDC and FDA. There's no question in my mind.

Republican Dan Burton—former Chairman of the House Oversight Committee—has an autistic grandson.

Burton: I am not against vaccinations.

He pursued vaccine investigations in the early 2000s. Beth Clay was one of his staffers.

Clay: There was a lot of pressure from people on the Hill.

When you say people on the hill were exerting pressure, what kind of people? Colleagues?

Clay: Colleagues, there were pharmaceutical lobbyists. The pharmaceutical lobbyists had, you know, they are the same people that have been entrenched. They can walk into any office in Capitol Hill, and they'll talk to staff, they'll talk to members and they'll encourage them to discourage, our investigation.

Sharyl: At the risk of stating the obvious why did they have that kind of access to members?

Clay: It's money. And if you look at the donations over the last 20 years, the pharmaceutical industry, and Republican and Democrat, they're nonpartisan. They put money everywhere.

Former Congressman, Dr. Dave Weldon, a Republican, says he got the message loud and clear.

Sharyl: If you would want to hold a hearing on an issue like vaccines and autism, your own leadership might fight you on that because of the financial influence, the pharmaceutical industry

Dave Weldon: They wouldn’t fight you. They’d kill it. It's dead. They don't even want to discuss it. It's dead on arrival. If you, if you as an individual member want to take on the pharmaceutical industries. It's forget it.

Sharyl: Can you describe an incident or just how it, how that would go?

Weldon: It would typically be in a hallway or the street and people would come up to you and say, “You know, you really need to, you know, back off on this. It could be, it could be bad for the community or bad for the country or bad for you.”

Weldon says he’s generally pro-vaccine, depending on the patient and the shot—and gives flu shots to adults. We asked him to review Dr. Zimmerman’s new affidavit.

Weldon: I found his affidavit and testimony through that affidavit to be consistent with my opinions. That some children can get an autism spectrum disorder from a vaccine.

Republican Bill Posey is a current member of Congress.

Rep. Bill Posey: I don’t have to tell you that industry is a very, very powerful industry. Matter of fact, I don’t know of anyone more powerful than that industry.

Posey says his own party leaders twice promised to hold hearings on the topic, only to scuttle them in the end.

Hazlehurst – who happens to be a criminal prosecutor-- was scheduled to be a witness at one such Congressional hearing. Two weeks before the hearing in 2013, he briefed Congressional staff.

Hazlehurst: I presented at that Congressional briefing and I explained in that hearing, if I did to a criminal in a court of law what the United States Department of Justice did to vaccine injured children, I would be disbarred and I would be facing criminal charges. I think that scared the hell out of them.

The hearing was abruptly cancelled. Meantime, Dr. Zimmerman – the one-time expert used to debunk vaccine autism claims—now says several of his own patients got autism from vaccines. They include Yates Hazlehurst.

Today, with intensive treatment, Yates is doing better. His dad hopes the new testimony from a most unlikely source will get new attention.

Hazlehurst: A child that was unnecessarily sacrificed and hopefully some good, will come from his suffering.

The lobby group representing the pharmaceutical industry wouldn’t agree to an interview but told us they’re working with Congress and other stakeholders on the importance and safety of vaccines to support the health and safety of individuals and communities.

Hervé

11th January 2019, 16:15

Attkisson Report reveals threats against congressmen investigating autism-vaccine link (https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/01/attkisson-report-reveals-threats-against-congressmen-investigating-autism-vaccine-link/)

Barbara Loe Fisher The Vaccine Reaction (https://thevaccinereaction.org/2019/01/attkisson-report-reveals-threats-against-congressmen-investigating-autism-vaccine-link/)
Wed, 09 Jan 2019 00:01 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/505277/large/Sharyl_Attkisson.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s25/505277/full/Sharyl_Attkisson.jpg)

A Jan. 6, 2018 news report produced by investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson for Sinclair Broadcast Group revealed that retired congressmen Dan Burton (R-IN) and Dr. Dave Weldon (R-FL) and current Rep. Bill Posey (R-FL) were pressured by colleagues or threatened by PhRMA lobbyists to back away from examining vaccine safety issues, including the reported link between vaccines and autism.1 The report also revealed that, in 2007, federal government officials suppressed and then misrepresented the expert opinion of pediatric neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman that vaccines can cause autism during U.S. Federal Court of Claims hearings evaluating vaccine-related autism claims filed in the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP).2

"You really need to... back off on this"
The "Vaccination Debate" report was featured on "Full Measure," Sinclair's investigative news show anchored by Attkisson, who said, "We spoke to 11 current and former members of Congress and staff who claim they faced pressure, bullying or threats when they raised vaccine safety questions." Physician and former Rep. Dave Weldon commented, "It would typically be in a hallway or the street and people would come up to you and say, "You know, you really need to, you know, back off on this. It could be, it could be bad for the community or bad for the country or bad for you."

Attkisson also interviewed Rolf Hazelhurst, whose now 18-year old son, Yates, suffered severe vaccine reactions as a child and regressed into chronic poor health that was eventually diagnosed as autism. Hazelhurst, a criminal prosecuting attorney, said, "And at first, I didn't believe it. I did not think that, I did not believe that vaccines could cause autism. I didn't believe it."

US Government Suppresses Pediatric Neurologist's Expert Opinion on Autism-Vaccine Link
After Rolf Hazelhurst learned that Dr. Zimmerman's expert opinion was discounted and misrepresented by federal government officials for the purpose of denying federal vaccine injury compensation to his son3 and thousands of other children with vaccine related autism,4 Hazelhurst told congressional staffers at a 2013 briefing, "If I did to a criminal in a court of law what the United States Department of Justice did to vaccine injured children, I would be disbarred and I would be facing criminal charges." He and environmental activist attorney Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. have filed a fraud complaint with the Justice Department Inspector General about the withholding of Zimmerman's expert opinion on vaccine-induced autism in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims proceedings.

The "Vaccine Court" and the Class Action Omnibus Autism Proceeding
The Secretary of Health and Human Services is legally represented by Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ("Vaccine Court") when federal health officials contest vaccine injury compensation claims filed under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, a law that was passed by Congress in 1986 and substantively altered by congressional amendments between 1987 and 2016.5 The 1986 Act gave partial liability protection to vaccine manufacturers but protected a vaccine injured person's right to file a vaccine injury lawsuit in civil court if federal compensation was denied or was inadequate to provide for lifetime needs or if it could be proven that the vaccine manufacturer could have made a vaccine safer (design defect). In a split decision in 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court effectively barred all vaccine injury lawsuits, including for manufacturer design defect.6 7

Under the 1986 Act, special masters are appointed by the U.S. Court of Federal Claims to adjudicate federal vaccine injury compensation claims. The "Vaccine Court" oversaw a seven-year class action type Omnibus Autism proceeding that concluded in 2009 and threw out more than 5,500 vaccine injury claims for children with vaccine-related autism.8 The Court rejected the argument made by plaintiff's lawyers that vaccine-related autism is caused by mercury preservatives in vaccines and/or MMR vaccine or a combination of both.9

The gutting of the 1986 Act's safety and compensation provisions by congressional amendments, the Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Supreme Court has been strongly criticized by the National Vaccine Information Center for many years.10 11 12 The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report in 2014 analyzing the VICP's operation and was critical of how long it took for compensation claims to be resolved, primarily because most vaccine injury claims are contested by DHHS.13

Sharyl Attkisson: The Reporter Who Goes Where No One Else Will
A CBS correspondent for more than 20 years, Sharyl Attkisson is a five-time Emmy Award winner and recipient of the Edward R. Murrow award for investigative reporting and Pillar Human Rights Journalism Award for "Fearless Reporting in the Face of Government Retaliation." From 1996-2001, she hosted a half-hour weekly medical news magazine on PBS entitled "Health Week." She is the best-selling author of the books Stonewalled (2014) and The Smear (2017). After leaving CBS in 2014, Attkisson joined Sinclair to head up the investigative journalism team staffing "Full Measure" to explore government waste, national security and whistleblower reports on government and corporate abuse.14

For more than a decade, Attkisson has authored and produced reports on a number of vaccine safety issues, including these:

Vaccine Case: An Exception or A Precedent? (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/vaccine-case-an-exception-or-a-precedent/) Mar. 6, 2008

How Independent Are Vaccine Defenders? (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-independent-are-vaccine-defenders/) July 25, 2008 and Orange County Register Correction (https://www.ocregister.com/2011/04/18/corrections-for-april-18-2/) Apr. 18, 2011

Leading Dr: Vaccines-Autism Worth Study (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/leading-dr-vaccines-autism-worth-study/) July 28, 2008

Court Links Hepatitis B Vaccine to A Death (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/court-links-hepatitis-b-vaccine-to-a-death/) May 12, 2009

Swine Flu Cases Overestimated? (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/swine-flu-cases-overestimated/) Oct. 27, 2009.

CDC: "Possibility" That Vaccines Rarely Trigger Autism (https://sharylattkisson.com/2018/12/10/cdc-possibility-that-vaccines-rarely-trigger-autism/) Sept. 2, 2014 (republished Dec. 10, 2018)

Fact Check: Anne Schuchat's Claim That Vaccines Can't Cause Brain Damage (https://sharylattkisson.com/2015/02/24/fact-check-anne-schuchats-claim-that-vaccines-cant-cause-brain-damage/) Feb. 24, 2015.

She presented a Ted Talk on "Is Fake News Real?" in February 2018.15 Currently, she has a lawsuit pending against the DOJ and FBI based on First and Fourth Amendment rights alleging improper government surveillance of a private citizen journalist, including electronic surveillance of her computer, cyber stalking and cyber attacks.16

View the "Full Measure" report on The Vaccination Debate here (http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/the-vaccination-debate)

References:

1 Attkisson S. The Vaccination Debate (http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/the-vaccination-debate). "Full Measure" Sinclair Broadcast Group Jan. 6, 2019.

2 Attkisson S. Dr.Andrew Zimmerman's full Affadavit on alleged link between vaccines and autism that U.S. government covered up (https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/01/06/dr-andrew-zimmermans-full-affidavit-on-alleged-link-between-vaccines-and-autism-that-u-s-govt-covered-up/). SharylAttkisson.com Jan. 6. 2019.

3 U.S. Court of Claims. Hazelhurst v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/vaccine_files/Campbell-Smith_Hazlehurst_Decision.pdf). Decision: Feb. 12, 2009.

4 U.S. Court of Claims. Docket of Autism Omnibus Proceeding. (http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/docket-omnibus-autism-proceeding) Jan. 12, 2011.

5 National Vaccine Information Center. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (https://www.nvic.org/injury-compensation/origihanlaw.aspx).

6 Supreme Court of the United States. Bruesewitz v. Wyeth No. 09-152. Justice Sotomayor with whom Justice Ginsberg joins, dissenting (http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf) Feb. 22, 2011.

7 National Vaccine Information Center. National Vaccine Information Center Cites "Betrayal" of Consumers by U.S. Supreme Court Giving Total Liability Shield to Big Pharma (https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20110223005581/en/National-Vaccine-Information-Center-Cites-%E2%80%9CBetrayal%E2%80%9D-Consumers). NVIC Press Release Feb. 23, 2011.

8 U.S. Court of Claims. Docket of Autism Omnibus Proceeding. (http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/docket-omnibus-autism-proceeding) Jan. 12, 2011.

9 Hitt M. Vaccine Court Rejects Autism Claims (https://www.webmd.com/brain/autism/news/20090212/vaccine-court-rejects-autism-claims#1). WebMD Feb. 12, 2009.

10 Fisher BL. Compensating Vaccine Injuries: Are Reforms Needed? (https://www.nvic.org/injury-compensation/congresstestimony.aspx) U.S. House Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources Sept. 28, 1999.

11 Fisher BL, Williams K, Wrangham TK. Statement for Government Accountability Office (GAO) Inquiry on the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) Operation. (https://www.nvic.org/cmstemplates/nvic/pdf/vicp/nvic-gao-response-on-vicp-07112014.pdf) National Vaccine Information Center July 11, 2014.

12 Fisher BL. End Pharma Liability Shield Endangering Public Health and Human Rights. (https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/November-2016/end-pharma-liability-shield-protect-human-rights.aspx) National Vaccine Information Center Nov. 8, 2016.

13 Government Accountability Office. Vaccine Injury Compensation: Most Claims Took Multiple Years and Many Were Settled through Negotiation (https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-142). Nov. 21, 2014.

14 Attkisson S. Bio. (https://sharylattkisson.com/sharyl-attkisson/)

15 Attkisson S. Is Fake News Real? (https://sharylattkisson.com/2018/02/13/is-fake-news-real-watch-my-tedx-talk-and-find-out/) Ted Talk Feb. 13, 2018.

16 Attkisson S. Counting down to oral arguments in government computer intrusions. (https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/01/05/counting-down-to-oral-arguments-in-government-computer-intrusions/) SharylAttkisson.com Jan. 5, 2019.

Related:

James Corbett: Vaccination propaganda in overdrive as vaccine/autism link is further confirmed (https://www.sott.net/article/404653-James-Corbett-Vaccination-propaganda-in-overdrive-as-vaccine-autism-link-is-further-confirmed)

Are doctors actually giving patients any up-to-date vaccine safety information? (https://www.sott.net/article/403733-Are-doctors-actually-giving-patients-any-up-to-date-vaccine-safety-information)

Is there a middle ground in the vaccine-autism debate? (https://www.sott.net/article/403560-Is-there-a-middle-ground-in-the-vaccine-autism-debate)

Vaccine vs. Disease Trade-offs: Cheating children's immune systems (https://www.sott.net/article/402978-Vaccine-vs-Disease-Trade-offs-Cheating-childrens-immune-systems)

Italian scientists protest funding for vaccine-safety investigation (https://www.sott.net/article/402921-Italian-scientists-protest-funding-for-vaccine-safety-investigation)

Former 'Vaccine bully' pediatrician now claims unvaccinated children are healthiest (https://www.sott.net/article/402705-Former-Vaccine-bully-pediatrician-now-claims-unvaccinated-children-are-healthiest)

Roll up your sleeves folks: Big Pharma's vaccine pipeline (https://www.sott.net/article/402429-Roll-up-your-sleeves-folks-Big-Pharmas-vaccine-pipeline)

CDC claims flu shots reduce deaths in the elderly; so why have mortality rates substantially increased along with increases in vaccine uptake? (https://www.sott.net/article/402175-CDC-claims-flu-shots-reduce-deaths-in-the-elderly-so-why-have-mortality-rates-substantially-increased-along-with-increases-in-vaccine-uptake)

onawah

11th January 2019, 19:28

Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Used Forced Vaccination Laws to Justify Forced Sterilization Laws
by Ginger Taylor, MS
Posted by Age of Autism on January 11, 2019

"The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes."
- Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr, Buck v. Bell, 1927
https://www.ageofautism.com/2019/01/supreme-court-justice-oliver-wendell-holmes-used-forced-vaccination-laws-to-justify-forced-steriliza.html
"In the horrifying 1927 case, Buck V. Bell, the Supreme Court ruled, in an 8 to 1 decision, that it was constitutional for Virginia to perform forced sterilization on its citizens.
https://www.rescuepost.com/.a/6a00d8357f3f2969e2022ad3ccc383200b-250wi
OWHWikipedia:
"Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927),is a decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell."

This, many of us have heard of, as it is our children that the states would be targeting if this policy of Nazi eugenics was being carried out today as it was in the 20th century, both in Nazy Germany and the US during the "Progressive Era," which was embracing the idea of creating a superior society.

The case of Buck v. Bell was the atrocious matter in which Dr. Albert Sidney Pridd (and his successor, Dr. John Hendren Bell) Superintendent of The Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded, decided that one of his patients, an 18 year old rape-victim with a sixth grade education, should not be able to give birth again. Her mother was also "feebleminded" you see, and the good doctors believed society should be rid of their kind.

Again with the Wikipedia (yes I know I being lazy by quoting the Wiki but I have to get back to my kids homework):

"The concept of eugenics had been put forward in 1883 by Francis Galton, who also coined the name. The trend first became popular in the United States, and found proponents in Europe by the start of the 20th century; 42 of the 58 research papers presented at the First International Congress of Eugenics held in London in 1912, were from American scientists. Indiana passed the first eugenic sterilization statute (1907), but it was legally flawed. To remedy this situation, Harry Laughlin of the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, designed a model eugenic law that was reviewed by legal experts. In 1924 the Commonwealth of Virginia adopted a statute authorizing the compulsory sterilization of the intellectually disabled for the purpose of eugenics. This 1924 statute was closely based on Laughlin's model. Looking to determine if the new law would pass a legal challenge, on September 10, 1924 Dr. Albert Sidney Priddy, superintendent of the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded, filed a petition to his Board of Directors to sterilize Carrie Buck, an 18-year-old patient at his institution who he claimed had a mental age of 9. Priddy maintained that Buck represented a genetic threat to society."

But even those who know about poor Carrie Buck may not know that the mandatory vaccine laws were the justification for this decision. They used our old friend Jacobson, the Massachusetts minister who refused to pay a five dollar fee imposed by the state on those rejecting the smallpox vaccine during a deadly outbreak in 1905, and took it all the way to the Supreme Court.

The venerated Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote the decision upholding the Virginia law that ended a woman's right to be a mother, by saying it was no different than vaccination:

"The judgment finds the facts that have been recited and that Carrie Buck 'is the probable potential parent of socially inadequate offspring, likewise afflicted, that she may be sexually sterilized without detriment to her general health and that her welfare and that of society will be promoted by her sterilization,' and thereupon makes the order. In view of the general declarations of the Legislature and the specific findings of the Court obviously we cannot say as matter of law that the grounds do not exist, and if they exist they justify the result. We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 , 25 S. Ct. 358, 3 Ann. Cas. 765. Three generations of imbeciles are enough."

[emphasis mine]

Thus we can see that Jacobson v. Massachusetts is used to justify all manner of horrors in the name of "societal good." Poor Carrie Buck was not even given the option of paying a five dollar fine to prevent her forced sterilization, as Jacobson was to get out of taking the smallpox vaccine.

And we see in both cases, as we are living through now, these unwanted procedures that cause permanent and detrimental changes to the human body, are simply declared "safe," and "for our own good," just as this human rights atrocity inflicted on an innocent young woman was when it was declared to be, "without detriment to her general health" and that, "her welfare... will be promoted by her sterilization."

Almost a hundred years later and some evil arguments never die.

NYU legal scholar and member of the Supreme Court Bar, Professor Mary Holland, in her article "Compulsory Vaccination, the Constitution, and the Hepatitis B Mandate for Infants and Young Children," in Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics, follows up on Buck in her discussion of the history of vaccine mandates:

"Although Buck v. Bell has never been formally overruled, the Colorado Supreme Court summarized the contemporary view that "since Skinner, commentators generally have concluded that compulsory sterilization laws, no matter what their rationale, are unconstitutional in the absence of evidence that compulsory sterilization is the only remedy available to further a compelling governmental interest."

(As a side bar, doesn't that preclude NY from mandating the flu shot in the absence of evidence that it is the only remedy available to getting the flu? We have not even compared vitamin D to flu shot in prevention of the infection.)

(As another sidebar, the Skinner ruling is interesting to me, because we have to fight again in Maine to keep our liability-free vaccine exemption rights, in a state that can't even claim a "compelling government interest" in removing them, because we don't have a problem that will be addressed by removing exemptions. Maine does not have a disease problem. We have not even had a case of measles in Maine in more than 20 years. We even had someone from Mass in 2015 and someone from Canada in 2017, come into Maine with the measles, and still no Mainer caught measles. Is the "compelling government interest" perhaps achieving less than zero measles cases? Negative measles? But I digress. Again.)

Since Buck v. Bell is still established law in the US, and as Holmes has tied forced vaccination to forced sterilization, using the legitimacy of the first to justify the second, can we not now in our new understanding of the human rights atrocity of the second, reject the first?

Kevin Barry, Esq., the author of "Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC," has observed that, "Informed consent to vaccination vs. coerced/mandated vaccination is analogous to choosing to use birth control vs. forced sterilization." A forced medical procedure is a forced medical procedure.

No sane person today would argue that forced sterility on the developmentally disabled is anything more than a vile human rights abuse. Forced sterilization is now a WAR CRIME under Article 7 (Crimes Against Humanity) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court established in 1998. Yet the Buck v. Bell SCOTUS ruling is still on the books, and this war crime did not become outlawed in every state in the US until the 1980s. (Except for California, which didn't end the coerced sterilization of female prisoners until 2014.)

So if SCOTUS views forced vaccination and forced sterilization as the same, then either Holmes right, and BOTH are justified by a "compelling state interest," or NEITHER is justified by a "compelling state interest."

Buck v. Bell is both a Constitutional violation, and morally evil. So is Jacobson.

All medical procedures require free, prior and informed consent.

So we can be clear that there are still some at the top of the medical profession that hold, and act on, this "Nazi Philosophy", I will leave you with Stanley Plotkin's testimony from just a year ago today, admitting to his own human rights abuses by experimenting on developmentally disabled children in creating the (now liability-free) rubella vaccine that we are being mandated into taking today:

yevV_slu7Dw

“The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential? It may be objected that this question implies a Nazi philosophy, but I do not think that it is difficult to distinguish non-functioning persons from members of ethnic, racial, economic, or other groups.”
- Dr. Stanley Plotkin, world renowned vaccinologist and co-inventor of the rubella vaccine, in a letter to the editor of "Ethics on Human Experimentation."

AutumnW

11th January 2019, 19:48

An infant or young child's immune system can't stand up to this kind of bombardment without it having an effect. It seems like common sense to me. What child, in the past, had their immune system's exposed simultaneously to measles, small pox rubella? No way in hell I would ever have had my child vaccinated, if I'd had kids.

Seabreeze

11th January 2019, 21:57

:( vaccines today often have thiomersal inside which is a mercury-containing organic compound. Mercury is the most strong poison, not radio active element, which does exist on earth. It can cause many illnesses in the long term run (mercury works slowly but surely). The body can not reduce it out of the cells anymore, this is why it gets stored in the organs and often in the brain, where it causes damages. I got this from a medical toxicologe who knows all of the poisons and bad stuffs, which can effect humans.

So if any vaccine...you should always make sure there is no thiomersal inside.

There was mercury found in the brain of many alzheimer cases after they passed away...they try to hide this information also.

http://amalgam.org/education/scientific-evidenceresearch/alzheimers-disease-autoimmune-degenerative-conditions-mercury-connection/

They force people to take vaccines or have the children vaccined. Children which did not get a vaccine are not allowed to go to school, for example.

It happened to me too. Take the vaccine or your application won't qualify.

Or you have to make certain other, no good threatments, if not your health insurance does not cover you anymore.

It is all about control, weaken and sorry if I say what I think.....to ........:raining: :silent:

ThePythonicCow

12th January 2019, 01:37

:( vaccines today often have thiomersal inside which is a mercury-containing organic compound. Mercury is the most strong poison, not radio active element, which does exist on earth.
The aluminum can be just as dangerous as the mercury, and the combination of both metals can be many times more dangerous than the same amount of either one by itself.

In their own ways, there are many other toxins found in some vaccines, including glyphosate, msg, formaldehyde, and ethylene glycol. Moreover, as found by a recent Italian investigation, sometimes vaccines do NOT even contain any of the actual, claimed, vaccinating (claimed to be) biological material they claim to contain.

Perhaps far more serious are the deeply powerful, persistent, entwined, and pervasive fraudulent institutions, practices and dominant beliefs in our society, corporations, governments, schools, media and other institutions that are entangled with the mass control and disempowerment efforts that motivate the wide spread administration of such physical, mental and spiritual toxins as vaccines.

Simply removing (or claiming to have removed, as we can't trust either the pharmaceutical companies making them, nor their cat's paws, the regulatory agencies) the mercury from vaccines will provide little gain, if these vastly larger problems remain unsolved.

onawah

12th January 2019, 01:59

The whole "science" behind vaccines is false.
It was supposedly based on homeopathy, but the principles of homeopathy are actually in opposition.
The claim that the decline in diseases was due to vaccines is also false.
The decline has been due to the gain in the better understanding of bacteria, fungi and viruses, the importance of hygiene, improvements in public water accessibility, waste disposal, food preservation, etc..

onawah

12th January 2019, 19:22

Important!! US Take Action: News report on fed's cover-up of vaccines causing autism
In today's email update from :Autism Action Network.org

"Take Action here: http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=80596771&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]
Send to your elected representatives

Please watch this news report from the Full Measure program by journalist Sheryl Attkisson on the federal government's cover-up of evidence linking vaccine injury to autism."
(Continued below after youtube description)

1XUM2gvfbW8
From the youtube page:
"Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson
Published on Jan 7, 2019
Today we investigate one of the biggest medical controversies of our time: vaccines.
There’s little dispute about this much-- vaccines save many lives, and rarely, they injure or kill.
A special federal vaccine court has paid out billions for injuries from brain damage to death.
But not for the form of brain injury we call autism. Now—we have remarkable new information: a respected pro-vaccine medical expert used by the federal government to debunk the vaccine-autism link, says vaccines can cause autism after all.
He claims he told that to government officials long ago, but they kept it secret.
---------
Full Measure is a weekly Sunday news program focusing on investigative, original and accountability reporting.
The host is Sharyl Attkisson, five-time Emmy Award winner and recipient of the Edward R. Murrow award for investigative reporting.
She is backed by a team of award winning journalists.

Each week, we have a cover story that explores untouchable topics in a fearless way including: immigration, terrorism, government waste, national security and whistleblower reports on government and corporate abuse and misdeeds.

Full Measure is broadcast to 43 million households in 79 markets on 162 Sinclair Broadcast Group stations, including ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CW, MyTV, Univision and Telemundo affiliates.
It also streams live Sunday mornings at 9:30 a.m. ET."

(Continued from Autism Action Network): " And please click on the Take Action Link to send a link to the video to your state and federal elected representatives.
http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=80596771&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]
In the early 2000s more than 5000 claims of vaccine injury leading to autism filed in the federal "vaccine court" were consolidated into one large case called the "Autism Omnibus Proceeding (AOP)."
A group of cases were selected to test three theories of how vaccines could cause autism. If the court found in favor of those cases that decision would serve as a precedent for deciding similar cases.

The government's key witness was Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, the leading pediatric neurologist on autism in the US. Zimmerman shocked the Department of Justice lawyers representing the federal government by letting him know that he believed that vaccines could cause autism in some children.
The government attorneys were legally obligated to provide that information to the lawyers for the 5000 families, but they didn't.
They covered it up, and they fired Zimmerman.
They did however use Zimmerman's testimony to decide one of the test cases for Hannah Poling, but then refused to use the Poling case as a precedent for other cases, which was the whole point of the AOP.
We know this happened because Zimmerman provided that sequence of events in a deposition in another federal lawsuit.

Please share this message with friends and family and please post on social networks. " http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=80596771&queueid=[capwiz:queue_id]

ThePythonicCow

15th January 2019, 20:23

Who is one of the strongest advocates for vaccines in the world:
Bill Gates
Who refused to vaccinate his children:
Bill Gates

From Bill Gates’ Former Doctor Says Billionaire ‘Refused to Vaccinate His Children’ (https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2019/01/11/bill-gates-former-doctor-says-billionaire-refused-to-vaccinate-his-children/):

=============

The physician who served as Bill Gates’ private doctor in Seattle in the 1990s says the Microsoft founder and vaccine proponent “refused to vaccinate his own children” when they were young.

“I don’t know if he had them vaccinated as adults, but I can tell you he point blank refused to vaccinate them as children,” the physician said at a behind closed doors medical symposium in Seattle, adding “They were gorgeous kids, really smart and vivacious, and he said they would be OK as it was, they didn’t need any shots.”
=============

ThePythonicCow

15th January 2019, 21:12

From Bill Gates’ Former Doctor Says Billionaire ‘Refused to Vaccinate His Children’ (https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2019/01/11/bill-gates-former-doctor-says-billionaire-refused-to-vaccinate-his-children/)
Ah - this was a repost of the following year-old newspunch.com (aka yournewswire.com) article: Bill Gates’ Former Doctor Says Billionaire ‘Refused To Vaccinate His Children’ (https://newspunch.com/bill-gates-doctor-vaccinate/)

Hervé

17th January 2019, 15:17

Vaccine skepticism in Australia now punishable by 10 years in jail (https://explainlife.com/vaccine-skepticism-in-australia-now-punishable-by-10-years-in-jail-6460/)

Chief Editor (https://explainlife.com/author/chief-editor/) Explain Life (https://explainlife.com/vaccine-skepticism-in-australia-now-punishable-by-10-years-in-jail-6460/)
Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:01 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/506186/large/vaccine_jail_australia_678x381.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s25/506186/full/vaccine_jail_australia_678x381.jpg)

Australian nurses and midwives who dare to speak out against the dangers of vaccinations on social media or in person will be prosecuted, the Australian government has warned, urging members of the public to report vaccine skeptics to the authorities.

Medical professionals face a jail sentence of 10 years for expressing doubt about the effectiveness of vaccinations or urging further studies into vaccine safety. Opponents of the new law claim free speech and scientific integrity is under attack in Australia by a government that has been bought and paid for by Big Pharma.
"With no exceptions we expect all registered nurses, enrolled nurses and midwives to use the best available evidence in making practice decisions. This includes providing information to the public about public health issues," Chair of the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA) Dr. Lynette Cusack said (https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/oct/20/australian-nurses-who-spread-anti-vaccination-messages-face-prosecution) in a statement.
The NMBA has called on Australians to report nurses or midwives promoting anti-vaccination - 'anti-vaxxers', as they're known colloquially.
"The board will consider whether the nurse or midwife has breached their professional obligations and will treat these matters seriously," the statement said.

"Any published anti-vaccination material and/or advice which is false, misleading or deceptive which is being distributed by a registered nurse, enrolled nurse or midwife (including via social media) may also constitute a summary offence under the National Law and could result in prosecution by AHPRA [Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency.]"
One of the strongest supporters of vaccination, Victoria's Health Minister Jill Hennessy, has no time for parents who believe vaccine safety requires further study in order to ensure they are safe for our children.

Describing vaccine skeptics as "brain dead sheep", the politician said:
"They are an organized movement, largely stemming from the United State of America that are hell bent on misleading parents that vaccinations are unsafe.

"That's a dangerous message and one I'm going to continue to fight. Vaccinations save lives," the minister concluded.
According to the new laws, parents who don't immunize their kids may stop receiving childcare benefits. Only people with solid medical reasons are exempt from the crackdown.

Related:

Australia: Mandatory vaccines and the secret treaty (https://www.sott.net/article/296327-Australia-Mandatory-vaccines-and-the-secret-treaty)

'No Jab, No Pay' Australia policy ends payouts to citizens who refuse vaccines (https://www.sott.net/article/295383-No-Jab-No-Pay-Australia-policy-ends-payouts-to-citizens-who-refuse-vaccines)

Vaccine shot killed famed cancer doctor in minutes from "total organ failure", state-run media desperately tries to cover it up (https://www.sott.net/article/404720-Vaccine-shot-killed-famed-cancer-doctor-in-minutes-from-total-organ-failure-state-run-media-desperately-tries-to-cover-it-up)

Attkisson Report reveals threats against congressmen investigating autism-vaccine link (https://www.sott.net/article/404661-Attkisson-Report-reveals-threats-against-congressmen-investigating-autism-vaccine-link)

James Corbett: Vaccination propaganda in overdrive as vaccine/autism link is further confirmed (https://www.sott.net/article/404653-James-Corbett-Vaccination-propaganda-in-overdrive-as-vaccine-autism-link-is-further-confirmed)

Are doctors actually giving patients any up-to-date vaccine safety information? (https://www.sott.net/article/403733-Are-doctors-actually-giving-patients-any-up-to-date-vaccine-safety-information)

Hervé

14th February 2019, 18:52

Doctors admit vaccines are harmful and turn our immune systems against us (https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-02-13-doctors-admit-vaccines-are-harmful-immune-systems.html?fbclid=IwAR1Bs2DoxPWNW2a07wJmkU5WJ5FgNGyuflUH3rP9sgNz1slh3Ufq70vnoS4)

Tracey Watson Natural News (https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-02-13-doctors-admit-vaccines-are-harmful-immune-systems.html?fbclid=IwAR1Bs2DoxPWNW2a07wJmkU5WJ5FgNGyuflUH3rP9sgNz1slh3Ufq70vnoS4)
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 14:52 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/510115/large/Autoimmune_Disease_Vaccine_Art.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s25/510115/full/Autoimmune_Disease_Vaccine_Art.jpg)
© Natural News

The World Health Organization (WHO) recently included vaccine skeptics - people who are hesitant to vaccinate themselves or their children because they are concerned about the potential health risks - on their annual list of "global health threats," (https://www.vaccines.news/2019-01-30-vaccine-deep-state-declares-vaccine-skepticism-a-global-health-threat.html) along with serious dangers like superbugs, climate change, the Ebola virus, HIV and air pollution. The WHO claims that "vaccine hesitancy" increases the risk of a resurgence in diseases they claim are fully preventable through vaccination.

The WHO is by no means alone in its position. Many governments, medical professionals and members of the mainstream media have attacked anti-vaxxers - as they are known - claiming that they are selfish people who put the health of the greater majority at risk. These pro-vaccine groups and individuals like to infer that to question vaccines is both unscientific and dangerous.

In recent years, however, a growing number of highly respected scientists and doctors have started questioning mainstream vaccine propaganda as the results of their own, unbiased studies raise alarming questions about the long-term safety of vaccines. These issues particularly relate to the volume of vaccinations administered to small children and the adjuvants and ingredients used in the manufacture of these vaccines (https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-10-16-adjuvants-found-in-vaccines-increase-autoimmune-disease.html). The latest such study was recently published in the journal Pharmacological Research, warning that many, many people are at increased risk of developing autoimmune diseases after receiving vaccinations (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25277820).

Weaponizing our own immune systems
Celeste McGovern, an award-winning journalist writing for Green Med Info (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/attacking-ourselves-top-doctors-reveal-vaccines-turn-our-immune-system-against-us), noted that the study's lead author, Yehuda Shoenfeld, is a highly respected scientist in the field of human immunity. Shoenfeld is the author of multiple papers and textbooks, some of which are viewed as the very cornerstones of autoimmunological clinical practice. Unsurprisingly, Shoenfeld has become known as the "Godfather of Autoimmunology."

Autoimmunology is the study of how the body's own defense system sometimes turns against itself, resulting in the development of diseases like multiple sclerosis, arthritis, Guillain-Barre syndrome and others.

One of the causes of this immune system malfunction is vaccination. As the authors note in the study abstract:
Vaccinations have been used as an essential tool in the fight against infectious diseases, and succeeded in improving public health. However, adverse effects, including autoimmune conditions may occur following vaccinations (autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants-ASIA syndrome). It has been postulated that autoimmunity could be triggered or enhanced by the vaccine immunogen contents, as well as by adjuvants, which are used to increase the immune reaction to the immunogen. The research team defined those who are at increased risk of such autoimmune conditions developing after vaccination as follows:
Learn more at Vaccines.news (http://vaccines.news/).
[W]e defined four groups of individuals who might be susceptible to develop vaccination-induced ASIA: patients with prior post-vaccination autoimmune phenomena, patients with a medical history of autoimmunity, patients with a history of allergic reactions, and individuals who are prone to develop autoimmunity (having a family history of autoimmune diseases; asymptomatic carriers of autoantibodies; carrying certain genetic profiles, etc.). The study's authors went at pains to stress that these potential groups of individuals represent only a small percentage of the population and that vaccines are generally safe. However, as noted by McGovern, this is simply not true because of the sheer volume of people who fall into one or more of these categories, including:

Anyone who has a preexisting autoimmune condition;

People who have had previous reactions to vaccines (which doctors almost always overlook);

Patients with a history of allergic reactions, particularly to eggs (something which nurses and others who administer vaccines hardly ever check with vaccine recipients); and

People prone to developing autoimmunity. This is where it gets really interesting, because this would include smokers (about 18 percent of all Americans), people with high estrogen levels (anyone on the contraceptive pill or hormone replacement therapy), and people with low vitamin D levels (studies indicate that three quarters of all American teens and adults are vitamin D deficient).

In other words, based on this study's findings, the vast majority of us are at increased risk of developing an autoimmune disease after being vaccinated. But nobody will warn you about that, and if you dare to question the vaccine status quo you'll be branded a quack or a "global health threat."

Learn more at Vaccines.news (http://vaccines.news/).

Sources include:

GreenMedInfo.com (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/attacking-ourselves-top-doctors-reveal-vaccines-turn-our-immune-system-against-us)

NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25277820)

NCBI.NLM.NIH.gov (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20708902)

Hervé

16th February 2019, 15:12

...

Practically all epidemics in autoimmune diseases today are linked back to Roundup.

QTgGjp3ryPI
Dr Stephanie Seneff Presents Roundup, MMR and Autism A Toxic Connection

Angels1981

22nd February 2019, 19:59

I am not allowed the MMR jab and they all go on about how your child has to have it or else. Maybe I am lucky but I've never gave it a thought and I know I am free from having any symptoms or measles. So I know each person is different and may react but it is still saying for example that I have come away free from measles so far.
I am curious as to why vaccinations don't state the ingredients before we decide to have them.
Look at the flu vaccination I don't believe in it full stop personally. I can't back you up scientifically but the amount of times my friends and family have had the needle and they did get the flu really bad afterwards. HMMMMMMM!!!!

ThePythonicCow

23rd February 2019, 07:33

From Good Morning America Pinterest blocks vaccination searches to avoid spreading anti-vaccination information (https://www.goodmorningamerica.com/wellness/story/pinterest-blocks-vaccination-searches-avoid-spreading-anti-vaccination-61210992), via ABC News (https://abcnews.go.com/wellness/story/pinterest-blocks-vaccination-searches-avoid-spreading-anti-vaccination-61210992?cid=social_twitter_abcn). via The Blaze (https://www.theblaze.com/news/pinterest-reveals-crack-down-on-anti-vaccination-misinformation), via Q Research on 8 Chan (https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/5312828.html#5313057):

Pinterest reveals crackdown on anti-vaccine posts and searches

Good grief - now Facebook may soon join in the anti-vax banning.

From Mark Zuckerberg goes all-in with the deadly vaccine industry in sweeping new plan to censor ALL posts that question Big Pharma’s vaccine dogma (NaturalNews.com) (https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-02-22-mark-zuckerberg-goes-all-in-with-deadly-vaccine-industry-censorship.html):

==============

At the request of California Leftist, Democratic cult leader, and American traitor Adam Schiff, Facebook has announced that it may soon implement new policies to actively censor content on its platform that goes against the official narrative that all vaccines are 100 percent “safe and effective.”

Blaming several recent outbreaks of measles on the prevalence of “anti-vaccine information” online, Schiff believes that it’s now Facebook’s job to actively steer users towards only pro-vaccine content in order to keep people “protected.”

“There is strong evidence to suggest that at least part of the source of this trend is the degree to which medically inaccurate information about vaccines surface (sic) on the websites where many Americans get their information,” Schiff is quoted as saying, providing absolutely none of the supposedly “strong evidence” that he says proves that disease outbreaks are caused by people reading alternative information about vaccines on Facebook.

“The algorithms which power these services are not designed to distinguish quality information from misinformation or misleading information, and the consequences of that are particularly troubling for public health issues,” he added, inferring that the “all vaccines are safe and effective” narrative represents the only “quality information” about vaccines.
Facebook capitulates to Schiff’s demands, says it’s working on new ways to “combat the problem”

In response to Schiff’s poorly-worded letter of warning to Facebook Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook reportedly released a statement in response, indicating that the company is “exploring additional measures to best combat the problem.”

These “measures” apparently include “reducing or removing this type of content from recommendations, including Groups You Should Join, and demoting it in search results, while also ensuring that higher quality and more authoritative information is available.”

For related news, be sure to check out VaccineJihad.com and VaccineHolocaust.org.
YouTube actively demoting videos that tell the other side of the vaccine story

Google, which also received the same letter from Schiff, did not immediately respond with a statement like Facebook did. However, the Google-owned YouTube platform last month took action to demote videos that promote “misinformation” about vaccines, using the example of videos that promote “a phony miracle cure for a serious illness.”

Keep in mind that Schiff, the ringleader in all this, is the same tool bag that’s been parroting the “Russian collusion” conspiracy theory any chance he gets. Despite a total lack of evidence that the Trump campaign in any way conspired with Vladimir Putin to “steal” the 2016 election, Schiff continues to tout it as though it were undeniable fact.

And now with vaccines, Schiff wants all Americans to be forced to consume only pro-vaccine propaganda, citing the “dangers” of online free speech. It’s an Orwellian nightmare that Schiff and his fellow Democrats believe is necessary to promote the “greater good” – even though numerous outbreaks in the past occurred in populations that were fully vaccinated.
==============

Is there a vaccine for tyrannical stupidity? If so, Adam Schiff needs a booster shot of it badly.

Hervé

25th February 2019, 16:32

Arizona lawmakers pass vaccine parental rights bills in face of criticism (https://prepforthat.com/arizona-vaccine-house-bills-approval/)

Jim Satney Prep For That (https://prepforthat.com/arizona-vaccine-house-bills-approval/)
Sun, 24 Feb 2019 00:01 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/511648/large/nancy_barto_vaccines_arizona_1.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s25/511648/full/nancy_barto_vaccines_arizona_1.jpg)
© Gage Skidmore

“Vaccines have a place, but it’s every parent’s individual right to decide the vaccine’s place in the child’s life,” Rep. Nancy Barto, the bills’ sponsor, says.
The Arizona The House Health and Human Services Committee approved three contentious vaccine-related House Bills. Each of the bills loosens government authority over parental immunization matters. Critics believe the measures may lower vaccination density in the state. Republicans and Democrats split the vote, with Republicans mostly siding with approval.

The first measure of importance, House Bill 2470, allows parents to opt their children out of vaccines without having to sign a state health department form. Committee chairwoman Rep. Nancy Barto, R-Phoenix, who supports and sponsors all three bills, says this measure is about protecting parents from government coercion.

"When a parent only has a government statement that they have to sign in order to qualify for an exemption that they don't agree with, that is coercion. This allows them to either sign that or make their own statement," said committee chairwoman Rep. Nancy Barto, R-Phoenix, who sponsored all three bills. "We are talking about a policy decision now for parents and we should attribute the best expectations on parents, not the worst."

The second measure, House Bill 2472, applies directly to doctors. According to the bill, doctors will need to offer parents an "antibody titer" blood test for their children. The blood test is used to determine if the child needs the vaccine.

The third bill, House Bill 2471, is an informed consent bill that gives parents information regarding vaccine ingredients. Additionally, it explains the vaccine court process, in the event, a vaccine injury occurs.

SOTT Comment (https://www.sott.net/article/407991-Arizona-lawmakers-pass-vaccine-parental-rights-bills-in-face-of-criticism):
This is a huge win for freedom in the US. In the face of growing calls for mandatory vaccination, to put forward a law that not only allows parents to make their own health decisions for their children, but forces doctors to offer a test to see if they even need the vaccine, and give parents information about vaccine ingredients, is massive. It's nice to see Arizona believes their citizens are capable of making their own informed decisions.
Related:

If only 1% of all vaccine injuries are reported, the $4 billion paid out is just the tip of the iceberg (https://www.sott.net/article/407599-If-only-1-of-all-vaccine-injuries-are-reported-the-4-billion-paid-out-is-just-the-tip-of-the-iceberg)

Dr. Brian Hooker's bombshell testimony before Congress reveals how MMR vaccines INCREASE deaths from measles (https://www.sott.net/article/407717-Dr-Brian-Hookers-bombshell-testimony-before-Congress-reveals-how-MMR-vaccines-INCREASE-deaths-from-measles)

Do vaccines really prevent 2.5 million children from dying each year? (https://www.sott.net/article/407362-Do-vaccines-really-prevent-2-5-million-children-from-dying-each-year)

Doctors admit vaccines are harmful and turn our immune systems against us (https://www.sott.net/article/407216-Doctors-admit-vaccines-are-harmful-and-turn-our-immune-systems-against-us)

Vaccines distributed in Kentucky, Ohio and Indiana causing infections (https://www.sott.net/article/406837-Vaccines-distributed-in-Kentucky-Ohio-and-Indiana-causing-infections)

Yale Researchers continue to promote vaccines after discovering a correlation between vaccinations and mental illness (https://www.sott.net/article/406302-Yale-Researchers-continue-to-promote-vaccines-after-discovering-a-correlation-between-vaccinations-and-mental-illness)

onawah

26th February 2019, 00:15

Urgent! Congressional hearing Wed. on measles, Pretext to eliminate exemptions nationally!
Autism Action Network
2/25/19
Take action at :
http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=80616671&queueid=11814036736

"The following message is from our colleagues at Children's Health Defense and supported by scores of health rights and safety organizations across the US too numerous to list in this message.

Threats to end religious and philosophical vaccine exemptions have just been ratcheted up to an unprecedented federal level. If parents and caregivers are stripped of the ability to make health care decisions for their children, reinstating that ability may be nearly impossible. We need to take action now to prevent the government from dictating what is injected into our children.
On Wednesday, FDA Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb hinted in a CNN interview that if non-medical vaccine exemptions were not abolished at the state level, federal health agencies may intercede. This is especially ominous considering two critical upcoming vaccine-related hearings recently announced on Capitol Hill:
Wednesday, February 27, 10:00 a.m. The Energy & Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee will hold a hearing on the current measles outbreak and response efforts.
Tuesday, March 5, 10:00 a.m. The HELP Committee (Health, Education, Labor and Pensions) will hold a hearing, Vaccines Save Lives: What is Driving Preventable Disease Outbreaks?
Please click on the Take Action link below to send an email message to your Representative and both US Senators from your State calling upon them to assure that the hearings are more than just a pretext to eliminate vaccine rights in every state.
http://capwiz.com/a-champ/issues/alert/?alertid=80616671&queueid=11814036736

Please call your two US Senators and your Representative in the House at their Washington DC offices, and let them know politely that you want religious and secular exemptions preserved and strengthened, not eliminated. Their names and numbers should be below.And in this age of electronic communications old-fashioned letters have grown in the amount of influence they have. Please write to your elected officials in Washington and explain how important religious and secular exemptions are to your family. We absolutely must have representation at these hearings. It’s crucial that we have as many parents and advocates as possible in attendance at both. And if your Senator or Congressional representative is on one of these committees, it is critical that they hear from you! Click here for the House Energy & Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee members https://energycommerce.house.gov/subcommittees/oversight-and-investigations-116th-congress and here for the Senate HELP Committee members. https://www.help.senate.gov/about/members
Every single one of us needs to contact our Congressional representatives https://www.house.gov/representatives and Senators https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm starting right now. In your communications, be sure to emphasize that:
These hearings need to be fair, balanced, and include opposing viewpoints. We have many highly qualified individuals to present those viewpoints.
Issues related to vaccines should be governed by the states.
Over $4 billion has been paid out for vaccine injuries and deaths and HHS estimates less than 1% of adverse events are reported. Mandating any procedure involving such risks is unethical.
HHS has failed in its Congressional directive to study vaccine safety for 30 years.
Mandating liability-free vaccines that have not been properly safety tested is in direct opposition to the first tenet of the Nuremberg Code: The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
If you have a vaccine-injured child, tell your story. This personal input to those who represent you in our nation’s capital illustrates the harsh reality of a vaccine program geared towards industry profit rather than public health.
We have much more information on all the many ways our government has failed to protect our children here https://childrenshealthdefense.org/seeking-justice/righting-the-wrongs/ and factual information that may aid in the defense of health freedom and pushing back mandates here. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/protecting-our-future/health-freedom/mandates-toolbox/
The future of medical freedom is at stake. Ensuring that our federally elected representatives hear from all of us through emails, faxes and phone calls to both their DC and district offices has never been more important than it is at this moment. If we are to maintain medical freedom and protect the health of generations to come, we need to raise our united voices now!"
Please share this alert with friends and family and urge them to do the same, and please post to social networks to support the work of the Autism Action Network www.autismactionnetwork.org

ThePythonicCow

26th February 2019, 03:06

Another heart breaker - mother of three children who are now about 20 years old, and will need 24 hour a day care for the rest of their lives:
IkyvD-XofHg

onawah

26th February 2019, 04:59

Vaccine Guide

This guide was originally created for those who are already vaccine risk-aware but wanted a place to store and organize studies/links/references in order to quickly grab and share with others. It was for those who wanted a “vaccine binder” and didn’t have time to make it themselves.

https://vaccine.guide/

onawah

26th February 2019, 05:13

Much more here (the Vaxxed youtube channel) :https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwZDSEpPvE398OLazdituKQ
What would it take for people like these parents, both professionals, to really examine the information about the damage that vaccines cause, and not just to certain vulnerable children.
How many more children will be sacrificed to the God that has been made of Big Pharma?

Another heart breaker - mother of three children who are now about 20 years old, and will need 24 hour a day care for the rest of their lives:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkyvD-XofHg

Gaia

1st March 2019, 19:32

conk

1st March 2019, 20:54

DNA

2nd March 2019, 16:22

That really makes the globe look unbalanced (structurally)

Where would these 'Blobs' fit into the Flat Earth Society's world ? hehe 0.o :)

The only valid answer to my eyes after more than 20 years has a web user is the following conclusion: Social media simply acts as a magnifying glass. People who believe in the flat earth have been caught with all the subterfuges that have been deployed to make them believe in this possibility. The same flawed psychology that fuels the flat Earth theory fuels anti-vaxxers and climate-change deniers.
Hi Gaia
I'm no flat earther, but vaccinations and the damage they do are well documented and the correlations between vaccinations and vaccine related deaths is a pretty easy connection to substantiate. Folks often talk about the thousands of deaths a year that the CDC admits vaccinations are responsible for, of equal or greater damage would be the millions of people who have been affected by severe autism. I work with severely affected autistic teens, it is a sight nothing can prepare you for. These kids are trapped within a world of obsessive compulsions and are so oblivious to society they speak in one word requests, lack any and all empathy and will play with and eat their own feces. I dare say a life of severe autism could be said to be worse than death for the individual and the family associated with the affected individual. Once you start down the road of hearing the folks who have done studies linking vaccinations with death and autism and seeing how these folks are routinely losing their medical practice and even arrested and jailed. Folks researching vaccine damage are also routinely suicided, this is an area of research that is not allowed and or encouraged and career threatening and life ending dangers are presented regularly to folks who pursue this information.

onawah

3rd March 2019, 00:44

Gaia, if you really think anti-vaxxers are guilty of using flawed psychology, I would highly recommend that you read these threads: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&highlight=vaccines
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91081-The-poisoning-of-America-Glyphosate-Statins-and-Vaccines&highlight=vaccines
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?70016-Agenda-21-Vaccines-The-Female-Of-The-Species&highlight=vaccines

To say that the evidence of harm caused by vaccines is well-documented is an understatement.

To the Mods: That said, why is the post from Gaia , which appears to be from the thread "Re: Earth Blobs!" in the "Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?" thread?

That really makes the globe look unbalanced (structurally)

Where would these 'Blobs' fit into the Flat Earth Society's world ? hehe 0.o :)

The only valid answer to my eyes after more than 20 years has a web user is the following conclusion: Social media simply acts as a magnifying glass. People who believe in the flat earth have been caught with all the subterfuges that have been deployed to make them believe in this possibility. The same flawed psychology that fuels the flat Earth theory fuels anti-vaxxers and climate-change deniers.

Hervé

3rd March 2019, 01:07

[...]
To the Mods: That said, why is the post from Gaia , which appears to be from the thread "Re: Earth Blobs!" in the "Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?" thread?
[...]
I moved these posts that didn't have anything to do with Earth Blobs to this thread since they happily derailed that other thread into vaccines...

onawah

3rd March 2019, 02:54

OK. Thanks Herve

Tintin

13th March 2019, 13:41

Jon Rappoport: Interview with a Retired Vaccine Researcher (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2019/03/13/interview-with-a-retired-vaccine-researcher/)

"Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?

A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

Q: Why?

A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent."

________________________________________________________________________________

by Jon Rappoport, March 13, 2019

INTERVIEW WITH A RETIRED VACCINE RESEARCHER

Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.

Mark retired in the 1990s. He says he was "disgusted with what he discovered about vaccines."

As you know, since the beginning of NoMoreFakeNews, I continue to launch attacks against non-scientific and dangerous assertions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.

Mark was one of my early sources.

At the time this interview was originally published -- in January 2002, Mark was a little reluctant to speak out, even under the cover of anonymity. But, with the push to make vaccines mandatory and with penalties like quarantine lurking in the wings (even back then), he decided to break his silence.

Like many of my sources, he developed a conscience about his former work. Mark was well aware of the scope of the medical cartel and its goals of depopulation, mind control, and general debilitation of populations.

________________________________________________________________________________

(Q) Jon Rappoport

(A) Retired Vaccine Researcher(given the pseudonym of "Dr. Mark Randall")

________________________________________________________________________________

Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.

A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.

Q: Why not?

A: I want to preserve my privacy.

Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?

A: I believe I could lose my pension.

Q: On what grounds?

A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.

Q: Harassed by whom?

A: The FBI.

Q: Really?

A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.

Q: So much for free speech.

A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.

Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?

A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.

Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?

A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.

Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.

A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.

Q: Why?

A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.

Q: And then?

A: I did my own investigation.

Q: What conclusions did you come to?

A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.

Q: What conditions?

A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't contract the diseases as easily.

Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?

A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.

Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?

A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

Q: Why?

A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.

Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?

A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.

Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.

A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.

Q: Which is?

A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.

Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.

A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.

Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.

A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.

Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.

A: Well yes, that happened. But that's not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I'm talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors -- that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don't know are in those kidneys.

Q: Okay, but let's ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?

A: All right. I'll give you some of what I came across, and I'll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here's a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba.

Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.

Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.

A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.

Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.

A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.

Q: How were your findings received?

A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.

Q: This information is pretty staggering.

A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea. We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.

Q: And beyond the purity issue?

A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."

Q: The immune system is?

A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.

Q: So the level of general health is important.

A: More than important. Vital.

Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?

A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.

Q: And that happens?

A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the disease.

Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?

A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.

Q: What was the turning point for you?

A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.

Q: Did you investigate?

A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.

Q: What do you mean?

A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.

Q: Why doesn't it make sense?

A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?

Q: And that is what you found?

A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time.Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.

Q: Has it been enough?

A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.

Q: Which is?

A: The people doing the investigation are not really interested in looking at the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate, they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, "This vaccine is safe." But what do they base those judgments on? They base them on definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.

Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.

A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored. It's discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.

Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?

A: Yes I did.

Q: What happened?

A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with "guilt by association." All in all, though, I behaved myself.I made sure I didn't create problems for myself.

Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?

A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.

Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?

A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.

Q: This network you speak of.

A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue.

Q: And in the industrialized nations?

A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.

Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.

A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine-and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles -- is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from "unknown causes," and that's why every baby must have the vaccine. I dispute that 20,00 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.

Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.

A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his "personal and family life." In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.

Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.

A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.

Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.

A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.

Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.

A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.

Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?

A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don't need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers -- a few -- might start leaking information.

Q: A good idea.

A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people. Poor people. All sorts of people.

Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?

A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.

Q: Then we have the fall flu season.

A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.

Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?

A: Yes. But after this interview, I'll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.

Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?

A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there.

Q: The things that are not there.

A: Yes.

Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.

A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.

Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?

A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I'm saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don't get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe.In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings.They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.

Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn't get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?

A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.

Q: How long did you work with vaccines?

A: A long time. Longer than ten years.

Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?

A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.

Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.

A: The operative word is "appear." What about all the children who can't focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.

Q: So we come to the level playing field.

A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.

Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.

A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.

ThePythonicCow

13th March 2019, 15:19

________________________________________________________________________________

by Jon Rappoport, March 13, 2019

INTERVIEW WITH A RETIRED VACCINE RESEARCHER

Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.

Mark retired in the 1990s. He says he was "disgusted with what he discovered about vaccines."

A powerful interview; well worth the read. Thanks.

Sandy123

13th March 2019, 20:02

Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.

A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.
This was a quote from John Rappaport blog about aborted human fetuses being used in vaccines. Why would they use fetuses, why? Who even first thought about using fetuses, they are sick! Mkz2cWleGh44_Kn5SbcMDQ

They are also using aborted fetuses for HIV research.https://www.wnd.com/2019/02/baby-body-parts-in-humanized-mice-experiments/#lbkWi7GgladwKW18.99

Delight

15th March 2019, 03:14

Yeah... vaccine choice is only the tip of the iceberg

8Wh3a6nhpKM

ThePythonicCow

19th March 2019, 21:38

...

Practically all epidemics in autoimmune diseases today are linked back to Roundup.

Dr Stephanie Seneff Presents Roundup, MMR and Autism A Toxic Connection
Here's a more recent presentation by Stephanie Seneff, from just last year. She continues to learn more and more about the roles of glyphosate and vaccines in causing autism, and of the synergistic (in a harmful way) roles of glyphosate, aluminum, mercury, and glutamate, all of which are in various vaccines.

She talks a mile-a-minute of the various research results of herself and others in this area, barely able to cram an overview of her knowledge into a one hour talk. Some of her answers to questions at the end of the talk display her uncanny ability to instantly cite relevant papers by author, title and date that are relevant to answering a question.

You will have to follow along separately on her PowerPoint slides available at https://www.dropbox.com/s/aob2x2sumj8wyq3/Seneff_Stephanie_052618.pptx, as the slides are not shown in this Youtube video. For the amount of biochemical detail contained in her talk, it is as usual for Seneff remarkably clear.

OL9mr599hb0

Glyphosate + aluminum + mercury + glutamate = autism - Seneff

waves

20th March 2019, 20:13

Very informal recording, but I'm so proud of this medical professional who sure knows all the most important bullet points backed with experience and can't be silent.

She also mentions knowing that in the near future unvaccinated people will not be allowed driver's licenses!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zJ88013-GA

halcyon026

25th March 2019, 21:50

"The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone.

In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime." - CBS

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m-plus-in-first-ever-vaccine-autism-court-award/?fbclid=IwAR1anJ1JPSOQthSCPdgPXwr7cUR5ZoM0SNy4ZlTF1fAAGoiMvpqZu_AY_L4

Tintin

27th March 2019, 09:28

This from Mike Adams today in my inbox.

Before the article itself, a quick recap from my earlier post here (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=1280587&viewfull=1#post1280587) from Jon Rappoport's 2002 interview:

Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?

A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.

And the article (https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-03-26-medical-martial-law-rolled-out-in-new-york-unvaccinated-citizens-banned.html), here:

MEDICAL MARTIAL LAW rolled out in New York; unvaccinated citizens banned from all public places, including schools, churches, malls, sidewalks, public transit and voting locations

Tuesday, March 26, 2019 by: Mike Adams

Health Freedom Alert: Medical martial law has been rolled out in Rockland County, New York, where unvaccinated citizens are now barred from all public places — including schools, sidewalks, malls, churches and public transportation — all under the absurd quack science fraud that claims measles is only spread by unvaccinated people. In truth, the measles vaccine spreads the measles through “viral shedding” and improperly weakened viral strains. If the measles vaccine really worked, why would vaccinated people have anything to fear from the unvaccinated, anyway?

“Effective at the stroke of midnight, Wednesday, anyone who is under 18 years of age and unvaccinated against the measles will be barred from public places until this declaration expires in 30 days or until they receive the MMR vaccination,” reports NBC New York (https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Rockland-County-State-Emergency-Measles-507672921.html). County officials told NBC New York that they would “not chase people down,” yet are threatening six months of jail for anyone found to be in violation of the tyrannical declaration.

This declaration of medical martial law would ban unvaccinated people from public transit and voting locations. With Democrats now pushing to lower the voting age to 16, this medical police state declaration would bar unvaccinated youth from being able to vote unless they are vaccinated. They are also being denied access to public education, public transit and entering all government buildings.

Notably, the government can mandate new vaccines at any time, then claim those new vaccines must also be injected into everyone at gunpoint, then banning those who don’t comply from leaving their own homes. Effectively, this new mandate makes people prisoners in their own homes unless they obey the government’s insane, anti-science vaccination mandates rooted in Big Pharma corruption and the routine bribery of doctors and public health officials.

Measles hysteria is the “Russia collusion hoax” of the vaccine industry

With this declaration of medical martial law in New York, measles has become the latest mass hysteria media fraud, following in the footsteps of the now-imploding Russia collusion hoax. As always, the media is lying to everyone, and government bureaucrats are going along with the lie to terrorize their own citizens into compliance.

Vaccine compliance will now be enforced essentially at gunpoint in Rockland County, with those who violate the medical martial law being subject to arrest and six months in prison. No doubt the government there will soon announce “snitch rewards” for citizens who call the police on unvaccinated residents, turning them in for food stamps or whatever else the government is giving away to those who service as the “vaccine secret police” snitch brigade.

It’s also clear that citizens will soon be required to carry “vaccine ID cards” to prove their compliance with ever-expanding government mandates that now threaten the health and safety of tens of millions of children in the USA alone. “Show me your vaccine papers” is the new mantra, and this pilot program in Rockland will be rolled out across the entire country unless there is strong push back against it.

You are now a prisoner in your own home, thanks to the medical police state

In effect, the new vaccine martial law decree makes non-vaccinated people prisoners in their own home, denying them access to all the public services their own tax dollars have helped fund, including roads, sidewalks, public transportation, sports stadiums and even government offices.

Taking a cue from Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich, non-vaccinated citizens are now being “un-personed” in Rockland County, essentially labeled as non-persons who have no access to society. This is the medical police state at work, denying citizens the right to exist if they do not agree to be injected with every toxic substance the misinformed bureaucracy demands be injected into children and adults alike.

If you thought the Russia collusion hoax was a massive fraud, what you’re seeing now with collusion between the vaccine deep state and government regulators puts all that to shame. These are serious tyrants who respect no liberty, no life and no individual rights whatsoever. They will declare any emergency that’s required to place their own citizens under the thumb of a tyrannical government regime that demands you be injected at gunpoint with a toxic cocktail of dangerous chemicals.

If you’ve ever wondered why New York, Connecticut, Maryland, California, Colorado, Illinois and other liberal-run states are desperately trying to take away your guns, it’s because they don’t want you to fight back when they come for your children.

Remember: Vaccines are a form of medical violence against children. And this violence is wielded by scientifically illiterate government officials who literally know nothing at all about vaccine ingredients, vaccine risks, or the statistics that are published by Health and Human Services (https://vaers.hhs.gov/) [1] which describe the thousands of children who are harmed, maimed and killed by FDA-approved vaccines.

[1] Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website: https://vaers.hhs.gov/

Hervé

2nd April 2019, 19:17

Neurologist Andrew Moulden - Vaccination Causes Many Sicknesses (https://www.henrymakow.com/2019/04/Andrew-Moulton-MD.html)

Henry Makow henrymakow.com
April 2, 2019

fGYJeI_5lEM

(Andrew Moulden, PhD. MD 1964-2013. Moulden understood the central banking fraud and how it relates to healthcare)

Often a comet will streak across the night sky and we will miss it. So our true champions are murdered and flushed down the memory hole while scoundrels and traitors get Nobel Prizes.

The healthcare industry cannot leave sickness to chance. Healthcare is a bigger business than war.

---------------------------------------

by Henry Makow PhD
April 2, 2019

Andrew Moulden should have been awarded a Nobel Prize for showing how the "healthcare industry" is poisoning the general population with vaccines. He showed how vaccines were responsible for causing "microscopic strokes" by limiting the flow of oxygen in the bloodstream reaching capillaries.

In his 2009 interview on vactruth.com, Moulden stated:
"I have now conclusively shown that ALL vaccines, from infancy to geriatric, are causing the exact same brain damages irrespective of what disease or disorder comes out. The damages are specific to end vascular "mini-strokes" that are beneath the resolution of our neuroimaging, but measurable in a before/after vaccination protocol. They are also directly measurable in real time - however, this involves techniques and technology I have not disclosed to the public as yet."
AND
"The evidence is now self-evident. All you have to do now is receive the education you need to appreciate and see what is before your very eyes - layperson and Doctor."
AND
"It is no longer an opinion as I now have conclusive evidence to show that ALL vaccines are causing the exact same damages for us all in the exact same manner that wild poliovirus caused paralysis, respiratory failure, death, bleeding into the brain, and more."
AND
"Remarkably, I have made the evidence so glaringly obvious, that you can quite literally now see for yourself, in the here and now, and going back 70 years ago if damages happened then."

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/andrew.jpeg

For revealing the truth and trying to save innocent millions from sickness and death, which enrich the health care industry and their accomplices in government and media, Moulden died prematurely in 2013 supposedly of suicide. They claimed he was bipolar but the videos show a very competent and credible young neurologist. He joins the scores of holistic doctors reported murdered in recent years. (https://www.facebook.com/notes/gail-l-fitches/death-of-doctors-that-come-out-against-the-pharmaceutical-industry/861836610530988)

A colleague of Dr. Moulden who wishes to remain anonymous reported to Health Impact News that he/she had contact with him two weeks before he died in 2013. Dr. Moulden told our source and a small number of trusted colleagues in October of 2013 that he was about to break his silence and would be releasing new information which could have destroyed the vaccine model of disease management, destroyed a major source of funding for the pharmaceutical industry, and at the same time seriously damaged the foundation of the germ theory of disease. He was ready to come back. Even though he had been silenced, he had never stopped his research.

Then, two weeks later, Dr. Moulden suddenly died.

I know Moulden represented a real challenge because of the unforgivable smear that appears in this rationalwiki article: (https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Andrew_Moulden)
Andrew Moulden (c. 1964-2013) was a Canadian quack who pushed an extreme form of anti-vaccine woo, claiming that vaccines are the causes of most illnesses and diseases, including autism. In addition to his anti-vaccine ideology (which is frequently too extreme even for other anti-vaxers) Andrew Moulden was a germ theory denialist, a conspiracy crank, a 9/11 truther, a failed politician, and a snake oil salesman offering an Internet-based magical procedure that will uncover the true causes of everything from shaken baby syndrome and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) to dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Moulden claimed several academic degrees, including a medical degree, but he was not licensed to practice medicine anywhere. In fact, there were apparently restraining orders to keep him out of major medical conferences -- according to him, anyway.
Moulden didn't practise medicine because he was a neurologist. The article challenges his credentials but they are all authentic. He held a PhD and an MD and had studied the effect of vaccines on the brain in a clinical setting for 20 years.

He wrote: (http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/Moulden-Biography.pdf)
As many know, I officially quit my medical career in 2007. I did this in order to travel around North America to do research into vaccine safety and to present my research on vaccine safety across Canada and the United States. I only spoke the truth. I was not well received. I only tried to help you save yourselves from where you are right now...Harm's way, you ARE in it. It IS in ALL of you. Like a ticking bomb, it is about to go off.

Where have I been? In 2010-11 I returned to my PhD training to complete a full year accredited Clinical Neuropsychology internship at the Baycrest Center for Geriatric Care in Toronto. During this time I also taught a University course on Health Medicine at York University in Toronto. I stopped talking about my research and vaccines...

The Public Health Department advocated that I NOT be allowed to return to clinical medicine as they were incensed by the message (truth) of my lectures and teaching prior to 'disappearing.' The only way I was allowed to return to organized medicine to work with medical patients was if I signed a contract drawn up by the public health department which states: 1) I am mentally ill and therefore my research and teachings on vaccine safety were delusional. 2) I am not allowed, whatsoever, to speak or present my research or views on vaccine safety, in public, at all, as a condition of being allowed to return to clinical medicine, receiving a medical license, and for maintaining that license.

At this junction, the contract the Public Health Department has me shackled to (it is like my mind and freedom of will and thought and speech is in prison) states that they can take my medical license away and expel me from the University of College of Medicine for which I am employed by. I am about to break my silence. In order to bring my truth forward, for you, I am once again, taking a form stand. I will ONLY stand for Truth and speak the Truth, so help me God.
Rationalwiki claims Moulden presented no proof when, in fact, he released a six-hour presentation. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhnImVnAwYs)

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/bigtree.jpeg
(Del Bigtree is producer and director of Vaxxed) (http://vaxxedthemovie.com/producers-statement-the-making-of-vaxxed/)

He writes: (http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/Moulden-Biography.pdf)
"The end-result of my focused, and dogged investigations, born only of a mind that "enjoys figuring neurobiological enigmas out", has been the discovery not only of the cause of vaccine-induced autism and other medical morbidities but the means to demonstrate this to everyone on a case by case basis. Moreover, the answers that have emerged have also solved several other medical enigmas and has culminated in a re-write of Louis Pasteur's, and contemporary Western style allopathic medicines', entire medical model - "The Germ Theory" of human disease. As it turns out, the reason we have made a "mess of it" with one size fits all vaccines specifically, and antibiotics and pharmaceutical counter-attack measures, in general, is that the Germ Theory was just that - a theory, which has turned out to be wrong, in very fundamental ways. I look forward to sharing what I have discovered with the world.

"The medical establishment is very protective of "core dogma" and reluctant and slow to accept change. Recognizing this, I have elected to release what I have discovered, to the lay and the scientific communities, as well as the criminal justice system, in short succession - beginning August of 2008. THE WORLD IS NOT FLAT!

"The tide of acceptance and change may be slow. However, with the confidence of Columbus, I can now definitively say "the world of human disease is "round" not flat, and it is not so much the substance placed in the body that causes disease. Remarkably, irrespective of the triggering "substance", toxin, metal, particulate, living or dead "bug", or portions thereof, the response of the body is the same across many disease categories, and ultimately medical diagnoses, and remarkably from infancy to adulthood -the pathophysiological mechanism is the same. Having solved this medical mystery, has resulted in the solution not only for cause of autism, by for many other mammalian ailments, "diseases" , and the mechanism by which many infectious diseases, including tetanus, smallpox, Spanish flu, rubella, measles, and others, have been causing damage and disease to the human body. As it turns out, it is not the Germs that have been our foe, for which we "attack" with vaccines and drugs, it is something in the bodies' defence systems itself. I look forward to revealing this medical mystery, which has been shrouded in darkness, to the world. I see the truth. Come see for yourself - I have made it that simple for you (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re8UI8aCLpM) "
CONCLUSION
I urge you to watch the short video above because it demonstrates Moulden's awareness that the central banking fraud begets all other frauds, (https://www.savethemales.ca/310702.html)including war and healthcare. They have to sicken and enslave us to protect this monopoly. Moulden was active in a number of political parties attempting banking reform.

The takeaway is that the world is divided between a relatively small number of people who profit from the central banking fraud and the sheeple who are exploited by it. The former include our traitorous political, cultural and business leaders. Whether it is sugar, chemtrails, gender dysphoria or vaccines, we are being poisoned. A satanic cult such as Western society has become controls and exploits its members by perverting, corrupting and making them sick.

Moulden reminds me of Larry McDonald (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_McDonald), the dynamic leader of the John Birch society who died when a Korean Air flight was shot down by Russians in 1983. When they are not killing them in gratuitous wars, this is what they do to potential leaders.

Related:
Taking No Prisoners - The Vaccine Culture War (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/04/02/taking-no-prisoners-vaccine-culture-war.aspx?utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20190402Z1&et_cid=DM278272&et_rid=582147732)

Vaccinated Children have 2-5 Times More Disease (https://endalldisease.com/study-vaccinated-children-have-2-to-5-times-more-diseases-than-non-vaccinated-children/)

J & J Baby Shampoo Causes Cancer? (https://www.livemint.com/companies/news/johnson-and-johnson-baby-shampoo-fails-watchdog-s-quality-tests-1554051753137.html)

http://vaccinepapers.org/wp-content/uploads/Moulden-Biography.pdf

https://www.drandrewmoulden.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re8UI8aCLpM

Dr. Moulden's 6-Hour Proof: Tolerance lost

Part 1 -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhnImVnAwYs

Part 2 - Continuation of the video above (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP3NnuHXPBc)

Part 3 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhnImVnAwYs
http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-andrew-moulden/

Hervé

3rd April 2019, 14:14

...
Neurologist Andrew Moulden - Vaccinations Cause Many Sicknesses (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=1283854&viewfull=1#post1283854)

April 2, 2019

When truth hit:

Published on Dec 3, 2010

EhmD6F5t73A
Canadian neurologist Andrew Moulden, PhD. MD 1964-2013 explains it all here in 20 six-minute segments. He was told to play ball or have the ball taken away.

8TR25uLHX9c
dqL-la1ML18
3yktA2KH1qQ
XJKcNsB7J8c
x9SjbdMC4AQ
Zyb0fABBZFk
58itUKTQAV0
4RnWPsJWev0
fOzKFmK1bmo
PuppFzLHwHg
VvUab1y8938
7klYqrmwCN0
yRoeLznv1no
nVHYa1PnASw
Ml9RX4BUO8o
BvpDvJy-pS4
8mCAtqAlF9k
_qFk-eY_4lQ
lnumAY1hCRU

... one knows it indeed hit!

onawah

3rd April 2019, 14:46

This image with info about Dr. Andrew Moulden is at the end of each news update from Vaccine Impact http://vaccineimpact.com/. One cannot help but suspect his death was planned and executed by his enemies. A true hero to the cause!
Much more here: https://medicalveritas.org/tribute-to-dr-andrew-moulden/
...about his work including this:
" Doctor Andrew Moulden MD, PhD Is Dead (Murdered Probably) at age 50
The death of Andrew Moulden is shrouded in mystery. Some sources say he had a heart attack and others say he committed suicide. A colleague of Dr. Moulden who wishes to remain anonymous reported to Health Impact News that he/she had contact with him two weeks before he died in 2013. Dr. Moulden told our source and a small number of trusted colleagues in October of 2013 that he was about to break his silence and would be releasing new information that would be a major challenge to the vaccine business of big pharma. He was ready to come back. Even though he had been silent, he had never stopped his research. Then, two weeks later, Dr. Moulden suddenly died. Dr. Moulden was about to release a body of research and treatments, which could have destroyed the vaccine model of disease management, destroyed a major source of funding for the pharmaceutical industry, and at the same time seriously damaged the foundation of the germ theory of disease.”
https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/02/andrew_moulden_every_vaccine_produces_harm_ebook2.jpg
...
Neurologist Andrew Moulden - Vaccinations Cause Many Sicknesses

Hervé

3rd April 2019, 19:56

According to Jim Stone, squalene is what they use to get nerves to be damaged:

THEY ARE PISSED ABOUT YESTERDAY'S VACCINE REPORTS (which got re-posted everywhere)

If anything is wrong with the top set of reports below (before all the repeats start) including obvious HTML errors, grammar errors or spelling errors, including missing words it only means they nailed it again, I cannot keep ahead of it, I give up.

MAJOR PROBLEMS WITH THE SITE TODAY

I will probably re-do yesterday's vaccine reports to make them more cohesive, but this is the gist of it:

What is being peddled as vaccines now are in fact biological weapons, that turn your immune system into a weapon against YOU.

The purposes are profit and debilitation of an enemy, and that enemy is YOU.

If you are going to destroy western civilization without actually shooting people with bullets, the best method is to take trusted institutions and use them to destroy people.

It will take people decades to believe it actually happened and by then it will be too late. They are three decades into this now.

The shots are damaging everyone via various adjuvants that trick the body into attacking itself. The shots are hurting white males more than any other group, because in addition to the adjuvants, all those DNA tests everyone submitted to sites like 23andMe (https://www.23andme.com/) were combed for genetic traits that were specific to the exact groups the elite want destroyed most, and the vaccines have, in addition to the adjuvants, the exact materials needed in the presence of these adjuvants (squalene is becoming a main one now) to kick off the destruction a lot worse in white males. This is why boys are getting autism a lot more frequently than girls, and WHITE boys are getting it far more frequently than other boys.

The affliction itself is not autism, it is nerve damage that manifests the traits of autism.
They are not sparing the adults anymore
All the vaccines except for the SINGLE SHOT tetanus are not as advertised, even the three shot tetanus shot is sabotage because tetanus has always been a single shot with no boosters. If you got a preventive tetanus shot with boosters despite not being injured, you did not get a tetanus shot at all and are not protected. The purpose of the tetanus shots with boosters is to prevent pregnancy.

Obviously "THEY" know they are on the verge of total and complete conquest. They have maimed 30 years of children. Not all are totally dysfunctional but NONE that got the shots are going to be what they could have been.

There is an antidote
They have a vaccine that can reverse the damage. As it turns out, the damage is 100 percent reversible, all you have to do is tell the immune system to stop destroying squalene. And this can be done via a secondary shot that tells the immune system to destroy the antibodies for squalene. Anyone that got such a shot would come out of a fog in about two weeks with proper nutrition.

So once the elite can declare total victory, they can fix the right people with a shot and work them as slaves in positions they can't find the talent for among their own ranks.

If we don't stop this NOW, and I mean RIGHT NOW, we are in for a hideous future, and your guns are not going to save you.

They could not get rid of the second amendment, so they got around it via trusted institutions and destroy us anyway, with shots we thought were real but were not for their stated purpose.

They blamed the parents for all deaths via their "shaken baby syndrome" scam and all brain damage on "bad genes".

They claimed the white race was "suddenly getting stupid" but did not tell us they knew why. They pointed the finger at anyone who figured it out, calling the brightest people who could see it "anti science". They used embarrassment and degradation to maintain control of those who knew something was amiss with the shots, and when that did not work, they resorted to murder.

They are the world's most despicable cretins, who stand as proof mankind is not ready to have technology because too much filth still exists that will, as soon as it is able, use that tech to destroy everyone.

Squalene is a natural oil your nervous system depends upon. If it does not have it, your nerve endings break down and you have all kinds of neurological disorders, including brain dysfunction. This oil has been chosen as the go to adjuvant for vaccines, and could have only been chosen as an adjuvant by a willful decision to destroy people.

What is an adjuvant?
An adjuvant is a material put in the presence of an antigen your body is supposed to gain an immunity against, to make the reaction to the antigen stronger. But in the process of making the reaction to the antigen stronger, the immune system also sees the adjuvant as the enemy of the body, and will react against anything similar to that adjuvant that happens to be in the body.

Since squalene is precisely what your nervous system uses as the primary oil in nerve endings, which it needs there to prevent the nerve endings from dissolving, having the immune system see it as an enemy and subsequently attack it has devastating consequences and the vaccine manufacturers know it.

It is no secret. It is well known (and has been known for over 100 years) that the presence of ANY oil at all in a vaccine, including even totally non-biological mineral oils, will trick the immune system into attacking ALL oils and even mineral oil based adjuvants were considered too devastating to use even in animal experiments because it caused too much suffering of animals.

Now the vaccine pushers are taking this knowledge, and using the worst possible oil that will cause the most possible damage as the adjuvant in vaccines, and they KNOW DAMN WELL what they are doing. It is an act of war pure and simple, they are knowingly maiming society and they KNOW IT.

The following report has an error where I made too much text large and bold, I'll fix that later.

Update to below:

There is proof just in the "disease" name (in the report below) that vaccines are causing it. And the medical system has to know it, because it is too obvious and I found proof in a single search.

The so-called illness is called "Acute Flaccid Myelitis".

From that name, I knew that a lack of squalene in the child's nerves would cause this, without looking anything up I also knew the adjuvants in vaccines contain squalene, which is needed to build the myelin in the nerves.

If the immune system is programmed to attack squalene (as will happen if it is an adjuvant in a vaccine, AND THEY KNOW IT) any kid who gets such a shot will have his immune system attack and squalene removed from his nervous system to whatever extent it can, until the vaccine wears off. The kid will be totally screwed up by this. So I did a search to see if this had been censored. It was not censored yet. Here is a great run-down on this topic:
DON'T WORRY, SQUALENE IS BANNED IN THE U.S., RIGHT? NOPE. SEE THIS (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/vaccine/adjuvant.htm) There's your "acute flaccid myelitis, And here is an experiment where they injected it into rats (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0940299399800724) to see what would happen. Here is the key quote from that experiment:
"The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of squalene on the central and peripheral nervous systems in rat at the ultrastructural level. Squalene was administered at a dose of 20 g/kg body weight, once daily for 4 days, and the animals were sacrificed 7 days and 30 days after the initiation of the experiment.

After 7 days a mild swelling of mitochondria and dilation of the Golgi complex cisterns in few neurons in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus were observed. The swelling of astrocytes and their processes was also seen.

Some myelin sheaths in the cerebral white matter were disintegrated.

In the peripheral nervous system (the sciatic nerve), a damage of the Schwann cells, a destruction of the myelin sheaths, and lipid-like deposits between myelin lamellae causing a secondary compression of axons were present.
And this is in the vaccines now and is likely to be what is destroying our kids. A destruction of myelin sheaths is what mercury does, and Squalene will trick the immune system into doing it also.

Unlike mercury which will eventually go out of the system, triggering an immune response to destroy myelin will have the effect of eating mercury every day. All get hit, some get totally destroyed.

They can't possibly not know what they are doing, this is intentional and they intend to ram it down your throat via mandate. See the report below.

"VACCINE" TESTING IS PROBABLY BEING DONE FOR THE NEXT LEVEL OF INTENTIONAL NERVE DAMAGE

Drudge had a headline that reads "Officials worry that a paralyzing illness may become more common (https://www.apnews.com/2b43b0f510a1419d8c436e13d082dafa)". Evidently, there's a new debilitating thing "going around" that is paralyzing little white boys. No girls mentioned. Mostly - if not all - white. That's a race-specific bioweapon type of problem.

No doctors have any answers, and I believe if they did, their careers would be over.

Just like autism, any doctor who finds the reason for "autism" is instantly flushed out of the system, it is a career busting no-go zone.

Meanwhile the so-called elite formulating the childhood shots know damn well what it is.

I think something needs to be explained here - Autism as expressed after eugenics shot damage is not actually real autism, it is instead brain damage that manifests itself with the symptoms of autism.

Because of this detail, the people claiming "vaccines" do not cause autism can sit there all day, and drill to bedrock about how vaccines are not causing autism and be right about it because the shots the kids get are not vaccines at all, and the damage is not autism, and they know it.

Italy proved the shots were not vaccines in Dec 2018 by testing the childhood MMR shot and finding none of the ingredients and none of the antigens it was supposed to have, the shot simply was not a vaccine.

So, since the people doing the eugenics KNOW it is not a vaccine, they can again rightfully claim that vaccines are not causing any damage, instead falsely labeled injections that are being called vaccines but are not vaccines are doing the damage, which is not autism, it is instead nervous system damage that has the symptoms of autism.

It is all a bunch of pathetic, amoral wordplay from the worst type of scammers the world has to offer, stated in a way that allows them to sleep at night. After all, they "never lied."

No, they have obviously refined their eugenics shot down to targeting white boys better, and REALLY wiping them out, and they are testing it every other year to avoid having shots be blamed.

No one told me this, but logical deduction certainly points to something of this sort. And I'd like to make a salient point:

All the recent outbreaks of various childhood illnesses have been taking place AMONG THE VACCINATED, not the un-vaccinated.

Why would this be?

Obvious answer: Because the people who were supposed to have been vaccinated instead got a scam shot that not only took them down a notch intellectually, it also damaged their immune systems, making them less able to resist whatever they came across.
Seriously. Supposedly the "vaccine" was supposed to protect them, and then they get the disease? Much much later, not after the shot? You can explain getting the disease after a shot if the shot is legit, by having a defective batch that did not have the disease it was supposed to prevent killed off enough, but you can't explain having the kid come down with it a year later unless the shot was not legit at all.

Italy's bust of the childhood vaccines proves this is what the case really is.

SO HEADS UP: Rather than back off after being busted, they are doubling down and making the eugenics shots a lot more target specific, with the goal of creating a sub class of people who are irrelevant and easily controlled. Little white boys are getting slammed down to zero like a heavyweight champion bashing their heads against a steel pillar. One good whack. Most won't die. All will be wrecked for life.

They intend to get it accomplished via the cover of "mandatory preventive medicine, " administered via shots that are pushed as vaccines but are absolutely not vaccines in any way whatsoever. That way, since they know the shots are not really vaccines, and the brain damage really is not autism but only looks like autism, they can, in their demented and sick way walk through life saying they never lied, because vaccines really never did a thing and no vaccine ever really caused autism. And by the way, your kid is not vaccinated but we would like you to think your kid is.

onawah

3rd April 2019, 22:23

Well said, Herve'. Here is some good news, about natural remedies that can help alleviate some of the damage caused by vaccines, including glutathione, iodine,and other supplements, infra-red, sodium bicarbonate, and hydrogen therapy:
https://drsircus.com/free-ebook/hydrogen-treatment-for-autism.pdf

Hervé

4th April 2019, 12:18

Vaccines for profit and destruction (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2019/04/03/vaccines-for-profit-and-destruction/)

by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Apr 3 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2019/04/03/vaccines-for-profit-and-destruction/), 2019
“Whatever else modern medicine has wrought—and it has given birth to some impressive technical fixes and pinpoint trauma care—it has produced an unprecedented transformation of society into a universal hospital. Medicine, Rockefeller motivated, makes disease, and then treats what it has made. There is no other commercial operation on the planet that exceeds its reach or profit. Create an endless problem, and then pretend to solve it: that is the secret mission. Make the solution a new problem begging for more answers: that is the strategy. Reduce vitality and life-force: that is the objective. Control of the disabled is far easier than control of the robustly healthy.”
(Notes on Vaccines, Jon Rappoport)
I point your attention to a recent riveting article, “Vaccines: Gateway Drugs by Design,” (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/vaccines-gateway-drugs-by-design/) at Robert Kennedy, Jr.’s World Mercury Project. The author of the article is Kristina Kristen.

Kristen lays out a case for drug companies as creators of disease, via their childhood vaccines—which diseases they then treat with their own hugely profitable drugs. A closed circle.

Key quotes from the article:
“The main vaccine producing companies, the ‘BIG 4’, Merck, GSK, Pfizer, Sanofi, who make all our children’s vaccines, list the very illnesses now seen in epidemic numbers in our children, in their own vaccine inserts, as potential adverse effects.”

“The drug ‘treatment’ side of the equation, which is substantially more lucrative than the ‘gateway’ vaccine side the BIG 4 already monopolized, now also increased substantially. The vaccine manufacturers began to capitalize on the known adverse effects of their vaccines, and have since created drugs for the ‘treatment’ side of the equation as well. The lack of incentive to make safe products, which created the bloated vaccine schedule, became the gateway to the lucrative drug treatment side for these companies. Today, the BIG 4 monopolize vaccines as well as the drug ‘treatments’ for chronic illnesses known to be induced by vaccines. First, vaccines push kids off the cliff, and then vaccine makers profit from ‘rescuing’ those they don’t kill.”

“It is NOT A COINCIDENCE that the same BIG 4 companies, GSK, Merck, Sanofi and Pfizer, the largest manufacturers of vaccines in the U.S., happen to also produce the top grossing drugs that treat the most common side effects from their own vaccines: Autoimmunity, asthma, anaphylaxis, allergies, ADHD, rheumatoid arthritis, epilepsy, etc.”

“Vaccines, in fact, make up the foundation of the BIG 4 trillion-dollar drug skyscrapers [companies] built on treating the chronic illnesses they KNOWINGLY create with their vaccines (again, the adverse effects are written in their vaccine inserts).”
One example among many: Advair, a drug for asthma, manufactured by vaccine giant GSK, which brought in $4.36 billion in sales, in 2017. Asthma is a common effect of childhood vaccinations.

Author Kristen is documenting the charge that medical drug producers are essentially creating the diseases they then “treat” with their own medicines.

From my own experience with hospitals and doctors, I can say that, for the most part, medical personnel are unaware of any possible connection between vaccines, childhood diseases, and drugs purportedly designed to reduce the effects of the vaccines. These doctors and nurses would never believe there is a closed circle based on profits.

But there is more. The drugs used to treat the adverse effects of vaccines cause their own expanding disease outcomes—and then new drugs are developed to treat these illnesses.

The federal government, in collusion with media networks, has covered up the disastrous death numbers resulting from medical care. For years I’ve been documenting the research that reveals those numbers. For instance, see “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?” (https://www.jhsph.edu/research/centers-and-institutes/johns-hopkins-primary-care-policy-center/Publications_PDFs/A154.pdf) This review was written in 2000 by Dr. Barbara Starfield, at the time a revered expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. It was published on July 26, 2000, in the Journal of the American Medical Association. Starfield concluded that, every year in the US, the medical system killed 225,000 people. That would be 2.25 million deaths per decade. In a 2009 interview (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/an-exclusive-interview-with-dr-barbara-starfield-medically-caused-death-in-america/), Starfield told me that 225,000 was a conservative estimate…

Jon Rappoport

Hervé

4th April 2019, 13:09

...

Eustace Mullins - Murder by Injection (Full Length) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=IWkqSncY3fg)
IWkqSncY3fg

https://yt3.ggpht.com/a-/AAuE7mCzZJ45XTrCNFv1lahstrBciguUPpejzn5S7Q=s48-mo-c-c0xffffffff-rj-k-no (https://www.youtube.com/user/TruthViews) TruthViews (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV96CnGDqpMuVLrn9Iy3odw) Published on Jan 11, 2011

Eustace Mullins (1923-2010), discusses one of his best-selling books; 'Murder by Injection' exposing the unholy dynasty of the big drug companies, the medical establishment, the Rockefeller syndicate and the evils of the cut-slash-and-burn cancer racket that has killed millions in the name of 'fighting cancer.'

While there are many books on the corruption of modern medicine, there is no other book out there that so effectively tells the whole story as does this seminal volume, laying bare the criminal machinations of those who profit in the name of "promoting good health." The federal bureaucracy that ostensibly "regulates" the big drug companies is all part and parcel of the problem.

Bill Ryan

5th April 2019, 22:37

Hervé

5th April 2019, 22:51

...
Neurologist Andrew Moulden - Vaccinations Cause Many Sicknesses (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=1283854&viewfull=1#post1283854)

Here are all 20 parts, stitched together into one video:

http://avalonlibrary.net/Vaccination_Causes_Many_Sicknesses_(Neurologist_Andrew_Moulden).mp4 (2 hrs, 426 Mb)

Thank you Bill!

This is a landmark discovery about the root cause of many of the symptoms of the autism spectrum.

In the middle of it all Moulden lays out why and how it is the "Terrain (http://maronewellness.com/pasteur-vs-bechamp-an-alternative-view-of-infectious-disease/)" that gets fertile for "bugs/microbes" to concentrate and grow in it... compelling!

waves

6th April 2019, 06:30

1,000,000+ THANKS for highlighting Dr. Moulden.

You'll find numerous posts of mine over the years trying to tell people about Dr. Moulden.

More than any other Doctor and/or vaccine whistleblowers I've come across I always thought he isolated and nailed the central issues regarding exactly why vaccines do the damage they do.

His research answers many (supposed) medical mysteries and puts succinct explanations on many 'syndromes' that were just given names without telling doctors the real cause like SIDS.

The variety of damages caused by vaccine triggered ischemia - too many fat white blood cells stimulated by a way too over stimulated immune system in a not ready for direct blood stream injections of toxins yet (if any of us ever are) in a baby/child body which blocks capillaries causing loss of oxygen to the brain cannot be underestimated.

There's a HUGE difference between the toxins our body fights off from ingestion or air, and the bizarre foreign toxins in vaccines that our immune system would NEVER have to deal with in the bloodstream our whole lives.

Yes, that and the other root causes he defined are stunning.

His info needs it's own thread flashing in gold somehow.

Thanks again.

Hervé

10th April 2019, 18:08

Fecal transplants yield MASSIVE breakthrough for child autism, 50% reduction in severity (https://www.rt.com/news/456148-fecal-transplants-autism-breakthrough/)

RT (https://www.rt.com/news/456148-fecal-transplants-autism-breakthrough/)
Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:24 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/517542/large/aut.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s25/517542/full/aut.jpg)
The study involved 18 autistic children © Pixabay

Scientists are celebrating a "world-first discovery" which shows the "highest improvement" in child autism patients, using fecal transplants to massively curtail symptoms and greatly reduce suffering.

The results of the initial study involving 18 children show great promise: 83 percent of the children had "severe" autism symptoms, but just two years later, only 17 percent had "moderate" symptoms, while 44 percent fell below the threshold for "mild" autism.

The team recorded a roughly 45-percent drop in language, social, and behavioral issues in the children over the course of the study (https://biodesign.asu.edu/news/autism-symptoms-reduced-nearly-50-two-years-after-fecal-transplant).

The initial success of the microbiota or 'fecal transfer' therapy adds further weight to the theory this, and many other, neurological conditions may be strongly connected to the gut rather than the brain.

UEOtCT8cohE

"We are finding a very strong connection between the microbes that live in our intestines and signals that travel to the brain," Dr. Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown, a microbiologist at Arizona State University who jointly led the study, said (https://biodesign.asu.edu/news/autism-symptoms-reduced-nearly-50-two-years-after-fecal-transplant), adding that,

"Two years later, the children are doing even better, which is amazing."
In the US, one in every 59 children is diagnosed with some form of autism, which is a spectrum disorder, a vast increase in diagnosis from just one in every 150 in 2000. This means that half a million people on the autism spectrum will become adults in the next decade, "a swelling tide for which the country is unprepared," according to the researchers.

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/517543/full/Au.jpg
© Shireen Dooling / Arizona State University

In children with autism, gastrointestinal symptoms such as constipation and diarrhea can cause irritability, decreased attention span, and negatively impact behavior, exacerbating other symptoms and making treatment and condition management far more difficult.

The regimen consists of pre-treatment with a bowel cleanse, administering a stomach acid suppressant and fecal transplants for between seven and eight weeks. The 'donation' of more diverse gut bacteria greatly boosts overall health and wellbeing in the patients.

Much larger trials are required before the treatment is officially approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

The treatment was originally pioneered by Dr. Thomas Borody, an Australian gastroenterologist, who has hailed the results as a significant breakthrough.

"This is a world-first discovery... I would call it the highest improvement in a cohort that anyone has achieved for autism symptoms," he said.

Related:

Fecal transplant therapy in kids has reduced their autism severity by 47% (https://www.sciencealert.com/autism-severity-cut-in-half-in-kids-who-underwent-radical-faecal-transplant-therapy)

When an FDA ruling curbed fecal transplants, I performed my own (https://www.sott.net/article/400453-When-an-FDA-ruling-curbed-fecal-transplants-I-performed-my-own)

Can a 'fecal transplant' help people lose weight? (https://www.sott.net/article/351050-Can-a-fecal-transplant-help-people-lose-weight)

Research into alternatives to fecal microbiota transplant (https://www.sott.net/article/347542-Research-into-alternatives-to-fecal-microbiota-transplant)

Good Poop! Autism symptoms show improvement from donor viruses in fecal transplants (https://www.sott.net/article/340609-Good-Poop-Autism-symptoms-show-improvement-from-donor-viruses-in-fecal-transplants)

Fecal Transplantation: Ancient remedy used to restore gut bacteria and treat clostridium difficile infection (https://www.sott.net/article/329229-Fecal-Transplantation-Ancient-remedy-used-to-restore-gut-bacteria-and-treat-clostridium-difficile-infection)

Fecal transplant more effective than antibiotics for bacterial infection: study (https://www.sott.net/article/256490-Fecal-transplant-more-effective-than-antibiotics-for-bacterial-infection-study)

Fecal transplant - cure of the future? (https://www.sott.net/article/254678-Fecal-transplant-cure-of-the-future)

Constance

11th April 2019, 09:46

Vaxxed TV (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwZDSEpPvE398OLazdituKQ)

The parents stories.

This mother is a physician.

rJR2zoouMH0

This mother has a degree in toxicology

mxne1v0ZD_0

This father is a surgeon

FoIoERWVHgg

DNA

11th April 2019, 11:21

Hervé

13th April 2019, 15:12

The little fascists of California (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2019/04/12/the-little-fascists-of-california/)

by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Apr 12 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2019/04/12/the-little-fascists-of-california/), 2019

First, in 2015, there was SB277 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/06/30/mandatory-vaccination-california-is-ordering-genetic-alteration/), a bill that was passed into law by the CA state legislature and signed by California Governor Jerry Brown—fascists all. Under the guise of protecting children’s health, the law canceled all vaccine exemptions except one issued by a medical doctor. But “the note from the doctor” was just a temporary stopgap and diversion away from the bottom-line agenda: vaccinate all kids and put the practice of vaccination into the hands of the State—not individual doctors. Making this into law is the job of SB276 (https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB276), a new CA bill now up for consideration.

If it passes, all attempts to win exemptions from vaccination will be henceforth submitted by a doctor, on a single standard form, to a State Public Health Officer, who will decide whether to approve or deny them. A doctor’s word will no longer be sufficient. The State will rule.

State scrutiny of doctors, already at an all-time high in California, will escalate. Applying for a vaccine exemption will itself constitute evidence of professional malpractice.

This is how fascism works in a “modern democracy.” All repressive edicts and laws are undertaken “for the good of the people,” “for the children,” etc.—as rights and freedoms are sucked away by elected and appointed officials.

When necessary, science is bent and twisted and reversed, to give credence to “new progressive laws.”

In California, when SB276 passes, a whole new bureau of State Health will be created. Little corrupt officials will be on the hunt for “law-breaking doctors.”

Picture this:

little Jimmy’s mother, who has educated herself on the truth about toxic vaccines, finally finds an MD who is willing to submit a standard form seeking an exemption for her son. The reason? Generalized lowered immunity. A State officer turns it down. Jimmy’s mother talks to her husband about moving out of California. He has a decent job. He tells her his prospects in another state would be dim. After much discussion, they decide to stay where they are. On the occasion of Jimmy’s sixth vaccination, he suffers brain damage. He will never be the same again. The diagnosis is autism.
This is life in the fascist state of California.

Jon Rappoport

onawah

27th April 2019, 05:18

New Treatment Slashes Autism Symptoms
https://anh-usa.org/new-treatment-slashes-autism-symptoms/
BY ANH-USA Alliance for Natural Health
APRIL 25, 2019
STOP CRONY HEALTHCARE
"A promising treatment has shown remarkable success in treating autism—but will the FDA turn it into a Big Pharma blockbuster? Action Alert!
Take action here: https://secure3.convio.net/aahf/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=3352

Recently we reported on the advancements in research regarding fecal microbiota transplants (FMT), which harness the power of the gut microbiome to treat illness. A recent study has found that FMT reduced autism symptoms by 50%. This is a stunning finding that provides further evidence of the incredible potential of FMT, but the FDA is on the verge of turning this affordable treatment into an expensive drug and thus potentially putting the treatment out of reach for many patients.

Part of what makes these findings so remarkable is the lasting effect of FMT. The improvement in gut health and autism symptoms persisted long after FMT was administered—up to two years later in the study. Similar effectiveness was found when FMT was used to treat an antibiotic-resistant bacterial infection that kills 30,000 Americans a year—most patients required just a single dose of FMT to fully recover. It is a testament to the power of the gut microbiome.

There is sound logic behind using FMT to treat autistic patients. Many autistic children have gastrointestinal (GI) problems. These children tend to have the worst autism-related symptoms: chronic GI discomfort can cause irritability and negatively impact behavior. Relieving GI discomfort through FMT can thus go a long way in improving autism symptoms.

Autism is one of the potential applications of FMT, but there are many more. It is being studied for a wide variety of indications, including ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s Disease, Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, childhood regressive autism, metabolic disorders, diabetes, and others. FMT could lead to the next generation of medicines that utilize the trillions of microbes living within us to heal.

Currently, the pioneers behind FMT have a non-profit stool bank, OpenBiome that supplies most of the fecal matter for transplants in the US. Why, after all, should human feces carry an exorbitant price tag?

Yet apparently that is exactly what the FDA thinks should happen. As we reported previously, the agency is on the verge of deciding the future of FMT. The agency is deciding whether to regulate FMT like a new drug, or more along the model of donated organs, tissues, and blood products that are transferred from a healthy donor to a sick one. (Read our previous coverage for a more detailed discussion of the distinction between these two models.)

The drug model would of course allow Big Pharma to create monopoly drugs and charge a fortune for them, so we believe that is exactly what the FDA will do. It is what the agency has already done to a number of natural supplements such as CBD oil, L-glutamine, and the pyridoxamine form of vitamin B6.

It’s unfortunate that the FDA seems more committed to guaranteeing Big Pharma profits than looking out for public health. The decisions the agency is making are driving up the costs of healthcare for Americans. The benefits of FMT should be available to everyone, not just those who can afford to pay Big Pharma’s monopoly prices.

Action Alert! Write to Congress and the FDA, urging the agency NOT to regulate FMT like a drug. Please send your message immediately."
https://secure3.convio.net/aahf/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=3352

Hervé

27th April 2019, 16:16

A case study of how Pharma is killing science (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/anatomy-of-a-science-study-censorship/)

Celeste McGovern World Mercury Project (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/anatomy-of-a-science-study-censorship/)
Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:32 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/518914/large/12_21_Featured_Image.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s25/518914/full/12_21_Featured_Image.jpg)

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Note:
Even the editors of the leading medical and scientific journals admit that Pharmaceutical companies have taken control of the medical publication industry so completely that most peer-reviewed articles about pharmaceutical products are the product of manipulation and fraud.

In 2003, Dr. Richard Horton, the editor-in-Chief of The Lancet, the world's most prestigious medical journal acknowledged that peer-reviewed journals have
"devolved into information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical industry.
"Science, he added

"has taken a turn toward darkness."
The BMJ (British Medical Journal) editor Dr Peter Doshi concurred, adding that data cited in many articles "is insufficient to the point of being misleading." Former New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) editor, Marcia Angel observes that: "It is no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians...I take no pleasure in this conclusion which I reached reluctantly over my two decades as editor of the New England Journal of Medicine."

Medical journals are today utterly dependent on pharmaceutical industry advertising which can account for up to 99% of revenues. Journal editors routinely accept kickbacks from Pharma. This power has given Pharma the capacity to plant fraudulent studies about vaccine safety and to kill or force retraction of peer-reviewed studies that raise questions about vaccine safety and efficacy. The latest casualty in Pharma's war against truth is an alarming 2019 study showing grotesque behavioral abnormalities in sheep injected with aluminum adjuvants similar to those found in Merck's Gardasil and Hepatitis B vaccines.
Elsevier's "withdrawal" of a small veterinary study breaks all the rules of scientific publishing. The biggest name in scientific literature has produced fake medical journals for Merck's advertisers before, so yanking a study that doesn't pass the vaccine industry's sniff test would be nothing. Celeste McGovern looks at a case study of how Pharma is killing science.

It's not often that veterinary research is so controversial that it falls into the jaws of censorship zealots. That is exactly what happened recently, however, when editors at a science journal suddenly turned on a small Spanish sheep study which they had already peer-reviewed and published and stamped it: "WITHDRAWN" - the equivalent of a scarlet letter "A" in the science publishing world. This was not about shoddy science or ethical breaches; an editor tried to soothe the outraged veterinary professor at the head of the research. But the focus was "delicate" and "controversial" and someone - some anonymous letter-writer - had wanted the study removed, and the journal acquiesced.

[...]

Full article: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?89230-When-Vested-Interests-Take-Education-over...&p=1288785&viewfull=1#post1288785

Hervé

10th May 2019, 20:43

The evisceration of Dr. Andrew Wakefield: Vicious attacks against doctor who dared question the safety of vaccines (https://in-this-together.com/wakefield/)

Iain Davis In This Together (https://in-this-together.com/wakefield/)
Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521605/large/AWAKE.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521605/full/AWAKE.jpg)

We are told that to question vaccines makes you a baby killer (https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/stupid-parents-who-dont-vaccinate-14703705). Quite often this baseless alarmism pumped out by the MSM is littered with disinformation. For example in the recent Mirror article published by the anonymous FleetStreetFox (Susie Boniface) she, or her editors, provided us with this distressing image.

https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521606/large/distressingimage_1.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521606/full/distressingimage_1.jpg)

The article calls for any who refuse to vaccinate their child to be imprisoned for 'child abuse' and decries 'the spread of anti-vax propaganda.' Which is ironic because the headline image, chosen to drive this critical message into your consciousness, is pure propaganda of the very silliest and sickest kind.

https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521607/large/distressingimage002.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521607/full/distressingimage002.jpg)
If you question which way the photo-shopping went consider if it is likely a medical professional would handle an infectious baby without gloves.

Elsewhere we read about the 'disgraced' Dr Andrew Wakefield who made 'bogus claims' about the measles vaccine in 1995. Other than the fact that FleetStreetFox has got both the year and the type of vaccine wrong, she is right about the disgraced part. Though, given her inability to report even basic facts accurately, and her apparent reliance upon photo-shopped images to support her serious analysis, we might question the veracity of some other statements in her diatribe.

I've explored some of the evidence (https://in-this-together.com/vaccines-part-1/) which does raise questions about both the efficacy and safety of some vaccines. As a person who is not medically qualified I am certainly not advising anyone to avoid vaccination. Presumably 'FleetStreetFox' isn't a doctor either, yet she is seemingly content to dish out medical advice.

Everyone deserves an opportunity to be informed. So we will look at the evisceration of Dr Wakefield, not particularly for the evidence he highlighted, which has been more thoroughly explored by others, but because it reveals the reason why the vaccine debate has become little more than an adversarial 'slanging match.'

Whenever you mention any concerns about possible vaccine safety the Wakefield case is immediately thrown in your face as 'proof' that such apprehensions are baseless. For millions, the story of Dr Wakefield is about as far as their knowledge goes on vaccines. This is understandable as it is constantly reinforced by the mainstream media (MSM.) For most people it is the episode which defines the stupidity of the 'anti-vaxxers.'

I recommend that everyone looks at his case in detail. Because, if you do, Wakefield's professional assassination actually demonstrates one of the main reasons why we should perhaps be more sceptical about vaccines.

https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521608/large/measles001.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521608/full/measles001.png)

The eradication of measles due to vaccines is a common claim. However, that is not what the data necessarily demonstrates.

We are currently in a situation where the state is rapidly moving towards compulsory vaccination (https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/may/04/matt-hancock-wont-rule-out-compulsory-vaccinations) virtually unchallenged. It enjoys the overwhelming support of the population it intends to forcibly inject, because they think the Wakefield debacle tells them everything they need to know about the 'anti-vaxxers' who are imploring them to wake up. The science is beyond question. All vaccines are all equally brilliant and anyone who questions the certain science is an idiot. Pointing out that certainty is the antithesis of the scientific method (https://in-this-together.com/why-is-the-scientific-method-important/) just shows what a dingbat 'anti-vaxxer' you are. Consequently, the projected corporate profit growth is mind bending.

Understanding how Dr Wakefield was publicly humiliated and destroyed should raise significant questions for any capable of critical thought. In 1998 Dr Andrew Wakefield, a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons, was one of three leaders of a case series study which was published in the British medical journal the Lancet (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2897%2911096-0/fulltext#section-7c530872-6235-4433-899c-b3f276970189). Case series studies are called for when it is suspected a group of patients had a near uniform but unexpected response to treatment. They are a specific type of study and do not require control groups nor a double blind approach to research, prior to publication.

In this case series the question was why, following an MMR vaccination, did these children all show symptoms of severe gastrointestinal problems and thereafter developmental delays. The study indicated that the children had severe digestive system damage and possible mitochondrial dysfunction.

Of the twelve children studied, all of whom had been diagnosed with either Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD,) encephalitis or full Autism, eight first exhibited bowel symptoms within two weeks of receiving the MMR vaccine, with three showing an almost instant reaction. Of the other four, three developed symptoms within two months. All had demonstrated normal development prior to receiving the vaccine. Two of the children experienced other medical problems, causing some developmental delays, which were corrected before both resumed normal development, prior to vaccination.

https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521609/large/vaccinationAct.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521609/full/vaccinationAct.jpg)
The ‘anti-vaxxer’ is nothing knew. Following the 1867 Vaccination Act the people of Leicester rioted after the smallpox death rate went up following compulsory vaccination.

Dr Wakefield's and his team were looking specifically at the children's gastrointestinal symptoms. They found what they suspected was a previously unknown disorder which they hypothesised, could be linked to ASD and Autism. Given the reason for the case series study, it would have been nonsensical for Dr Wakefield to have reported the results without mentioning the MMR vaccine. Some of the children's parents were angered when Dr Wakefield concluded there was no proof of a link and further investigation was required. He stated:
"We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described. Virological studies are underway that may help to resolve this issue." Dr Wakefield did not claim that ASD, encephalitis or Autism were caused by the MMR vaccine. Quite the opposite, he stated the study did not prove any link. However, as part of his previous research, Dr Wakefield made a detailed review of the MMR safety studies. He concluded they were inadequate, especially in comparison to the safety studies carried out for the individual measles, mumps and rubella vaccines. Therefore, in light of both the Lancet case series study and his separate review of the medical literature, Dr Wakefield stated the following:
"We have identified a chronic enterocolitis in children that may be related to neuropsychiatric dysfunction. In most cases, onset of symptoms was after measles, mumps, and rubella immunisation. Further investigations are needed to examine this syndrome and its possible relation to this vaccine." Something rarely mentioned, and certainly never by the MSM, about Dr Wakefield's findings in relation to his separate review of the MMR vaccine safety studies is that they were fully corroborated by the leading systemic scientific review journal the Cochrane Review (https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004407.pub3/full?highlightAbstract=withdrawn%7Cmmr%7Csafety%7Csafeti) who stated:
"The design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies, both pre‐ and post‐marketing, are largely inadequate. The evidence of adverse events following immunisation with the MMR vaccine cannot be separated from its role in preventing the target diseases." When Dr Wakefield released the Lancet study, in February 1998, parents could choose to opt for the individual or 'monovalent' vaccines in preference of the combined MMR. This had become an increasingly popular choice since 1992 when the previous MMR vaccine Pluserix was withdrawn after it was found it could cause aseptic meningitis (https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/165/6/704/63700). In 1998 Dr Wakefield recommended only that parents continued to be offered the choice. He had made this abundantly clear (https://www.bmj.com/content/329/7477/1293.1/rapid-responses) to the then UK Health Minister, Tessa Jowell and the UK Chief Medical Officer, Sir Kenneth Calman, in a private meeting in October 1997.

Never, at any stage, did he recommend parents avoid vaccinating their child. Many took his suggested preferable alternative of the monovalent vaccine and their children were vaccinated, as normal, just not with the MMR.

It therefore seemed odd to many why, in September 1998, as MSM driven fears rose, the UK Government decided to withhold the import license for the monovalent vaccines. MMR vaccine rates were already in decline (https://web.archive.org/web/20040506090135/http://www.publications.doh.gov.uk/public/imunstat.htm) prior to the release of Dr Wakefield's findings but overall coverage remained quite high, as parents opted for the single vaccines. However, when the UK State withheld the monovalent licenses, denying parental choice, not only did MMR uptake decrease more sharply it ended any possibility of children receiving the alternative.

SmithKline Beecham's (SKB) new MMR vaccine Priorix coincidentally came on to the market in 1998. SKB became GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) two years later.

https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521660/large/MMRvaccinerates.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521660/full/MMRvaccinerates.png)

Consequently overall infant measles vaccination rates dropped from nearly 92% in 1996/7 to its lowest level of 79% in 2003/4. If the UK state had any concern at all for the welfare of British children they would not have withdrawn the monovalent licenses. Their decision was obviously not based upon any consideration for child infection rates. The sharp decrease in overall measles protection for British children started only after the government decided not to offer the monovalent option. Many parents were never going to opt for the MMR, because the Urabe strain variant had already been proven to give children brain damage (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1544592/Vaccine-officials-knew-about-MMR-risks.html), but they were content to use the monovalent, seemingly safer alternatives.

Wakefield was simply the patsy, blamed for the decline, while the population were forcibly transitioned onto accepting the new MMR vaccine. The fact that he never, at any stage, said there was a proven link between MMR and Autism was ignored completely.

The obliteration of Dr Andrew Wakefield's reputation and career is an object lesson in how this feudalistic system actually works. Almost immediately the MSM started making false statements. 'Fake news' in other words. In February 1998 the BBC made the following claim "Child Vaccine Linked To Autism (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/60510.stm)" The Independent wrote " Doctors Link Autism To MMR Vaccination (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/doctors-link-autism-to-mmr-vaccination-1147081.html)." Virtually the entire MSM wrote and broadcast similar headlines, declaring a link between the MMR vaccine and Autism. A link which Dr Wakefield specifically stated was unproven.

He acted with honesty and integrity (https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/10/30/mmr-and-single-measles-mumps-and-rubella-vaccines-real-facts) throughout. His destruction largely, but certainly not exclusively, came from the 'award winning' investigative journalism of Brian Deer (http://briandeer.com/wakefield-deer.htm). Deer apparently used the private investigative firm Medico Legal Investigations (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MedicoLegal_Investigations_Ltd) to uncover the 'evidence' to expose Dr Wakefield. Medico Legal Investigations are almost exclusively funded by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI). ABPI is an immensely wealthy lobby group for Big Pharma.

Deer has strenuously denied this but there seems little doubt. In their own publication MLI stated (http://www.whale.to/vaccine/walker9.html#_ftnref19):
"The extraordinary tale of the problems found in the paper by Dr Andrew Wakefield (as published in the Lancet) concerning MMR and autism were shared with MLI in strict confidence whilst Brian Deer's fine piece of investigative journalism was underway. We were asked to advise on matters that were clearly quite alarming."
https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521662/medium/Deer.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521662/full/Deer.jpg)
Brian Deer – Award winning investigative journalist.

Deer worked for Rupert Murdoch's News International empire. His 'freelance' work has allowed some to claim he was not associated with News International. So presumably he wasn't paid for his work which was almost exclusively published by the Sunday Times managed by James Murdoch. The Murdoch family is heavily invested in vaccine development. They run the Murdoch Children's Research Institute which receives considerable funding from GSK, of which they are major shareholders.

In 2009 James Murdoch became a non-executive director on the Board of GSK who manufactured and profited from the Priorix MMR vaccine. Deer not only 'uncovered' the evidence to destroy Wakefield, he brought the case against him to the General Medical Council and then reported his interpretation of those proceeding to the British public and the rest of the world. This clear conflict of interest in Deer's so called 'journalism' was never questioned throughout his long running, single minded destruction of Dr Wakefield.

I reference the Andrew Wakefield Wikipedia page here because it more or less describes the narrative we have all been told to unquestioningly accept. It reads as follows:
"He [Dr Wakefield] was a gastroenterologist until he was struck off the UK medical register for unethical behaviour, misconduct and dishonesty for authoring a fraudulent research paper that claimed a link between the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism and bowel disease." So firstly we note the lie that Dr Wakefield claimed a link between the MMR vaccine and Autism. He did no such thing. He merely recommended further research and the continued use of the monovalent vaccine, in the meantime, while further study could be undertaken into the possible MMR risks. Which wouldn't have been the first time such risks had emerged.

It is true that he was struck off for unethical behaviour in 2010 by the UK's General Medical Council (GMC.) Claims that he was unfit to practice all originated from Brian Deer, who, at the time, was working for the GSK's board member (https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/GlaxoSmithKline#James_Murdoch) who had the specific remit for 'corporate responsibility.'

The allegation of unethical behaviour, which Deer 'uncovered' and reported to the GMC, alleged that Wakefield didn't disclose the fact that he had been paid by the legal team representing some of the children's families in a group action law suit against the vaccine manufacturer. Specifically Deer alleged that this undermined the Lancet study, because it was a clear conflict of interest which Wakefield didn't disclose to the Lancet before they published. This was all absurd tripe that Deer seemingly 'made up' while he fastidiously didn't disclose his own enormous conflict of interest.

The slight problem with Deer's fantasy was that he appeared to be conflating two distinctly separate studies. In 1996 Wakefield met with and agreed to be an expert witness for a class action lawsuit brought by some of the parents legal team. We might indeed question if medical experts should be paid by law firms as expert witnesses (https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1246&context=faculty_scholarship). Does this represent a clear conflict of interest, perhaps so?

However, it is extremely common practice and the pharmaceutical industry pay whole teams of such 'medical expert witnesses' vast sums to 'represent' them in court. For example another harsh critic of Dr Wakefield's was Dr Paul Offit, who even wrote a book (of sorts) vilifying his fellow professional researcher. Not only has Offit been paid by Merck, and others, to represent them in court he is actually a patent holder for the Merck licensed rotavirus vaccine Rotateq. That he sat on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advisory panel during their oversight of the clinical trials of his own vaccine and then inaccurately and incorrectly criticised Wakefield for doing something far less contentious is stomach churning. Of course, Rotateq was approved by the CDC, with Offit's advice, and entered onto the U.S vaccine Schedule without any question at all.

The questionable activities of people like Offit are rarely, if ever, questioned by the MSM who destroyed Dr Wakefield. Clearly it wasn't because he was acting as an expert witness but rather that he was acting as an expert witness for the wrong side.

The notion that the Lancet study was funded by law firms was total bilge. The study was awarded £55,000 from the Legal Aid Board. This did raise concerns at the Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust because the directors were concerned that a study, which could potentially lead to legal action against the NHS, was funded by Legal Aid. In response Dr Wakefield sent an email to the Chief Executive which stated:
"There are no preconditions to our grant. Furthermore, there is no intention whatsoever on behalf of the Legal Aid Board or its agent to take action against the National Health Service; it is against the manufacturers of vaccine that any future action will be taken if and when our studies indicate that is a valid strategy." The allegation, made by Deer and others, that Dr Wakefield was being deliberately evasive or 'hiding' a financial conflict of interest was either the result of shoddy journalism or a lie. While Dr Wakefield was paid as an expert witness at other times, the clinical protocols for the entirely separate Lancet study had been written and created by Wakefield's colleague Professor John Walker-Smith. It had been he, not Wakefield, who had selected the children for the case series study. Wakefield's role in the Lancet study was to collate and finalise the research for publication, he was not the clinical director.

https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521667/medium/walker_smith.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521667/full/walker_smith.jpg)
Prof. Walker-Smith [Clinical Director]

Professor Walker-Smith, a renowned paediatric gastroenterologist and an esteemed scientific researcher, had "blanket ethical clearance (https://web.archive.org/web/20160303203015/http://www.wesupportandywakefield.com/documents/AutismFile_US31_Wakefield.pdf)" to conduct research. As the clinical director of the Lancet study ethical clearance was largely assured. The colonoscopies, lumbar punctures, MRI scans, and other invasive procedures were all ethically considered to be appropriate clinical indicators by Professor Walker-Smith. Dr Wakefield wanted further ethical clearance to carry out additional blood work and Professor Walker-Smith requested and received this additional clearance from the Ethical Practices Committee of the Royal Free School of Medicine in January 1997.

The Wikipedia entry, based mainly on Deer's evidence free accusations, states:
".....children with autism were subjected to unnecessary invasive medical procedures such as colonoscopies and lumbar punctures ....... Wakefield acted without the required ethical approval from an institutional review board." This is a wholly inaccurate statement and is wrong in every single respect. Wakefield did not need ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board because he wasn't the clinical director. Professor Walker-Smith had ultimate ethical oversight of the Lancet study which he devolved to others, including Wakefield, as necessary. However, Walker-Smith did have ethical approval, so the claim was false on that basis too.

Deer wasn't the only one, involved in Dr Wakefield's destruction, with unexplained memory lapses when it came to disclosing conflicts of interests. For example The British Medical Journal, often referenced as authoritative by many who accuse 'anti-vaxxers' of child abuse, also suffered financial amnesia. If we look at the Wikipedia page on Dr Wakefield we learn:
"In January 2011, an editorial accompanying an article by Brian Deer in BMJ described Wakefield's work as an elaborate fraud." The British Medical Journal were syndicating articles, written by an employee of one of GSK's board members, without bothering to mention that relationship. Similarly they didn't mention that they were themselves financial partners of Merck (https://ahrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/MSD-Partnership-With-BMJ-Group_Univadis_2008.pdf) who, like GSK, as manufacturers of the MMR vaccine 'MMRII,' had a lucrative incentive to discredit Dr Wakefield's published study.

In response to the complete and utter failure to disclose this vital and highly relevant conflict of interest, the BMJ's Editor in Chief Fiona Godlee (https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/03/response-john-stone) said:
"We didn't declare these competing interests because it didn't occur to us to do so." If Dr Wakefield had unethical conflicts of interest, which he didn't, I wonder if saying "oh well, I forgot," would have worked for him. Somehow I doubt it.

Much has also been made of the Lancet's retraction of the 1998 study. Perhaps this was based upon their evaluation of the 'da science' but they too just couldn't remember who paid them. The Lancet received payment from the Merck subsidiary Univadis who proudly announced:
"Through a unique global medical literature service called Just Published, clinical specialists regiseterd on Univadis will receive free access to the full texts of recently published articles from the Lancet. This new service will be available on [the Univadis website]. We also learn from the Wikipedia page:
"In April 2010, Deer expanded on laboratory aspects of his findings in a report in the BMJ, recounting how normal clinical histopathology results (obtained from the Royal Free hospital) had been subjected to wholesale changes, from normal to abnormal, in the medical school and published in The Lancet." At the risk of repeating myself this wasn't true either. Deer made these allegations after his previous unsubstantiated allegations had seen Dr Wakefield struck off the medical register by the GMC. Possibly emboldened by his success, he really went for it by trotting out more nonsense.

His claim that Dr Wakefield had made 'wholesale changes' were examined by microbiologist David Lewis. Dr Wakefield didn't even complete the histopathology reports. They were submitted by his pathologist colleagues Amar Dhillon and Andrew Anthony. Upon reviewing these original reports David Lewis concluded (https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/09/re-how-case-against-mmr-vaccine-was-fixed):
"I do not believe that Dr. Wakefield intentionally misinterpreted the grading sheets..... they suggest that he diagnosed "colitis" in a number of the children........The grading sheets and other evidence in Wakefield's files clearly show that it is unreasonable to conclude, based on a comparison of the histological records, that Andrew Wakefield 'faked' a link between the MMR vaccine and autism." Wikipedia also informs us:
"other researchers were unable to reproduce Wakefield's findings or confirm his hypothesis of an association between the MMR vaccine and autism." Remarkably this information is actually accurate, though misleading. Many of the Big Pharma funded follow up studies were 'unable' to find evidence of a possible link. Many others did.

For example in 2006 (before Wakefield's GMC hearing) U.S researchers (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058058) found that bowel inflammation was possibly associated with children who went on to develop Autism. Again, like Wakefield, they stressed this did not prove MMR was associated to ASD, but they did corroborate the potential link between ASD and gastrointestinal problems, which was the core finding of the Lancet study. Similarly the American Society for Microbiology (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22233678) stated:
"Many children with autism have gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances that can complicate clinical management and contribute to behavioral problems.....Here we describe an association between high levels of intestinal, mucoepithelial-associated Sutterella species and GI disturbances in children with autism." There are many more, which I discuss elsewhere, broadly supporting The Lancet study findings. The Wikipedia contributors must have just forgotten to mention them.

The other main allegation made by Deer, which the evidence roundly rebuts, was that Wakefield was intending to cash in on his own vaccine alternative to the MMR. The obvious point that this rather contradicts his prevailing narrative that Wakefield is an 'anti-vaxxer' appears to have eluded him. However, seeing as Wakefield was actually working on a vaccine follow up medication, the patent for which (https://ahrp.org/significant-shadowy-financial-conflicts-of-interest-behind-persecution-of-andrew-wakefield/) was held by the Royal Free Hospital, not Dr. Wakefield, this doesn't really matter because that claim wasn't true either.

However it did matter to the unfortunate Dr. Wakefield. It was Deer who launched the original complaint with the GMC that lead to him losing his medical license. Deer has flatly denied this, claiming it is all part of a smear campaign by loony 'anti-vaxxers.' You can view a copy of his original submission the GMC here (https://www.rescuepost.com/files/deer1st_complaint1.pdf).

Prior to Deer making the formal complaint, not a single person associated with the Lancet study had felt the need to report Dr Wakefield, or anyone else, to the GMC. No one at the Royal Free, none of the parents nor any of his colleagues, even the Lancet found both his study and conduct perfectly acceptable. They didn't retract the study until after the GMC hearing decision. Only Deer, a journalist who worked for a GSK board member in cooperation with Big Pharma's private investigators, backed by their own industry lobby group, thought Wakefield needed to be made an example of.

Given how woeful his evidence was, it seems astounding that the GMC accepted his complaint, even more so that they thought it sufficient to strip Wakefield of his licence. However, perhaps the apparent fact that the Chairman of the GMC Fitness to Practice Panel, Dr. Surendra Kumar, was a GSK shareholder may have helped. Dr Kumar is also a prominent supporter of compulsory vaccination. It could boost his dividend no end.

https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521669/large/anti_vax.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s26/521669/full/anti_vax.jpg)
The anti-vaxxer is, quite literally, insane. It’s like a proper disorder. Massive financial corruption does not exist. It will all be fine.

The anti-vaxxer is, quite literally, insane. It's like a proper disorder. Massive financial corruption does not exist. It will all be fine.

Of all the disinformation and deception in the Wikipedia record of the official narrative, that everyone, other than stupid 'anti-vaxxers,' seemingly accepts without reservation, one stands head and shoulder above the rest.
"A British Administrative Court Justice noted in a related decision-There is now no respectable body of opinion which supports (Dr. Wakefield's) hypothesis, that MMR vaccine and autism/enterocolitis are causally linked". Ignoring the fact the 'administrative court justice' was basing his opinion only on the science he did know about, the cringing duplicity in this Wikipedia misinformation would make Smeagle baulk. That 'justice' was Sir John Edward Mitting and the 'administrative court' was the High Court of Justice In England. The High Court of Appeal overruled only by the Supreme Court. What this stunning propaganda piece in Wikipedia desperately doesn't mention is the vast bulk of his ruling. He completely exonerated the clinical director of the Lancet study Professor Walker-Smith.

In what can only be described as one of the worst GMC decisions in history, one clearly riven with highly questionable conflicts of interest, a strong whiff of corporate corruption and borderline criminality, GSK shareholder Surendra Kumar had also led the decision to strike off Professor Walker Smith. That was a mistake. Had he not, perhaps some could still legitimately claim reason to question Dr. Wakefield today. Given, Sir John Mitting's ruling they absolutely cannot.

He ruled that the GMC's decision demonstrated "inadequate and superficial reasoning," they reached the "wrong conclusions" and added:
"The panel's determination cannot stand. I therefore quash it." The clinical director of the Lancet study, for which Dr Andrew Wakefield lost his medical license, was not guilty of any scientific malpractice at all. As the lead of that study, it stands.

Therefore, the idea that Dr Andrew Wakefield was struck off for "unethical behaviour, misconduct and dishonesty for authoring a fraudulent research paper that claimed a link between the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine," is quite simply false.

His behaviour was provably ethical, he was neither dishonest nor engaged in any misconduct. The paper he published was not fraudulent and it made no claim that there was a proven link between ASD and the MMR. He was quite clearly 'struck off' because he had the bravery and ethical fortitude to question Big Pharma. It is clear that his colleagues urged caution and, in hindsight, rightly warned him not to even suggest the need for further research. Unlike Dr Wakefield, they had not reviewed the MMR vaccine safety studies to the same extent. So Dr Wakefield, genuinely concerned for the welfare of children, spoke out, urged caution and called for further research.

Of course Dr Wakefield was denied legal aid and was not represented at the High Court. Had he been, given all the other evidence we have explored here, it is practically beyond reasonable doubt that he too would have been exonerated.

But that was never going to be allowed. He is the sacrificial lamb and a stark warning to any scientist, medical practitioner or researcher who dares to challenge the corporate dictatorship. The MSM's annihilation of Dr. Wakefield served two purposes. Firstly to convince a misinformed public that any who suggest vaccines may not all be wonder drugs are 'evil' and also to put the fear of God into the scientific community.

Any doctor, researcher or scientists has to think long and hard before they ever consider going against the edicts of the pharmaceutical corporations. If they decide to rock the boat they do so knowing they will be publicly demolished by the court of the MSM. The state will then use that MSM created narrative and Big Pharma's bought and paid for research, to destroy their careers, reputations and livelihoods in court. The scientific evidence is irrelevant. They now know this because they stood by helpless and witnessed the destruction of some of their most respected and esteemed colleagues based upon nothing but smears and false allegations.

Any research department that stands up against Big Pharma risks financial ruin. Funding for independent research is miniscule compared to the billions invested by Big Pharma in academia. Corporations now invest more in biological and pharmaceutical R&D than governments. Traditionally major drug research has been funded via the state and philanthropic foundations. Especially in the early stages of development.

Many of these foundations, such as the Murdoch Children's Research Institute, are operated by individuals with major shareholdings in the pharmaceutical corporations. State funding too, often comes from surprising sources. For example the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK50972/) (DARPA) have been major investors in pharmaceutical research, including vaccines (https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2019-02-19).

Thanks to the ubiquitous promotion of the utterly incoherent Wakefield narrative, scientific researchers and medical professionals are well aware of the threat. Both to themselves and their employers.

Merck were forced to withdraw their arthritis control drug Vioxx after it was found to cause heart attacks. They settled a $4.85 billion law suit in the U.S and were being pursued by victims' families around the world. Emails were entered into evidence in the Australian Federal Court (https://web.archive.org/web/20090403181052/http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25272600-2702,00.html) which revealed their corporate policy for dealing with medical professionals, or scientists, who dared to question their authority, threaten their profit margins or undermine 'public trust.' Merck created hit lists of professionals to be 'discredited' or 'neutralised.' For example one Merck executive wrote:
"We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live." This is why it is now impossible to have a sensible discussion about vaccine safety. The nexus between the pharmaceutical corporations (Big Pharma,) the mainstream media (MSM) and the state is designed to ensure the corporate hegemony of all health care. It is this corporate control mechanism which pollutes objective science, obfuscating and destroying any that threatens its business model. While science still produces the evidence, which brings some vaccines into question, this is not reported by the MSM and is ignored by the state, who have a symbiotic relationship with Big Pharma.

The vast majority of people who are certain that all vaccines are safe have absolutely no idea at all about how this system works. They are predominantly the hapless victims of state run MSM disinformation. More concerned with the footy or the latest celebrity 'news,' they live in a cozy bubble where the state wraps its loving arms around them. They actually appear to believe that the state, which is an amalgam of profiteering corporations, corrupt officials, puppet politicians and a compromised judiciary, has their best interests at heart and would never knowingly harm them or their children. The naiveté in this puerile faith is staggering.

As Mark Twain allegedly observed, "it is easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled." Consequently anyone who questions vaccine efficacy or safety has to accept the inevitable backlash. The state don't care and aren't really interested, they intend to compulsory vaccinate everyone no matter what. If it harms people, that's none of their concern.

The tragedy is that people, who rely solely on what they are told by their nanny state and its MSM propagandists, have been so easily convinced to accuse their fellow citizens, who are merely trying to alert them to a potential risk, of being 'child abusers.'

It seems the psychological risk is too great for many of these individuals to ever contemplate any suggestion that all is not as they have been indoctrinated to believe. Despite blatant corporate corruption at the very highest level, doing so could presumably shatter their fragile delusions, leaving them lost and bewildered in a frightening world they cannot face. This is called cognitive dissonance.

On the back of their ignorance, intolerance and refusal to even look at the mountain of evidence that justifies some skepticism, it appears the rest of us may very well face compulsory injection at the hands of ruthless multinational corporations based upon research partly funded by the military industrial complex.

I, for one, am opposed.

Related:

An interview with Dr. Andrew Wakefield: Why we need safe vaccines immediately (https://www.sott.net/article/329099-An-interview-with-Dr-Andrew-Wakefield-Why-we-need-safe-vaccines-immediately)

Interview: Dr. Andrew Wakefield discusses his discredited study on the vaccine-autism link (https://www.sott.net/article/327042-Interview-Dr-Andrew-Wakefield-discusses-his-discredited-study-on-the-vaccine-autism-link)

Dr. Andrew Wakefield breaks silence on CDC scientist's admission of vaccine research fraud (https://www.sott.net/article/284929-Dr-Andrew-Wakefield-breaks-silence-on-CDC-scientists-admission-of-vaccine-research-fraud)

Dr Wakefield demands retraction from BMJ after documents prove innocence from allegations of vaccine autism data fraud (https://www.sott.net/article/222197-Dr-Wakefield-demands-retraction-from-BMJ-after-documents-prove-innocence-from-allegations-of-vaccine-autism-data-fraud)

Big Pharma Smear: Dr. Wakefield Accused of Further Vaccine Fraud (https://www.sott.net/article/221140-Big-Pharma-Smear-Dr-Wakefield-Accused-of-Further-Vaccine-Fraud)

===============================================

"We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live." ... the "irritating obstructionists" (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?106964-Anti-Zionism-is-anti-Semitism--Discuss-sensibly-&p=1290877&viewfull=1#post1290877) kind...

Franny

11th May 2019, 22:22

It looks like President Trump has decided that measles vaccines are necessary. Please see the first 15 seconds or so of this video.

qqIIXr405I0

Hervé

13th May 2019, 23:03

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/576473535767392256/Bk1sON2J_bigger.jpeg Forrest Maready‏ @forrestmaready (https://twitter.com/forrestmaready)

17) It should strike anyone as remarkable that the two countries which launched nationwide diphtheria immunization campaigns in the 1930s using a new aluminum-containing shot were the very two countries where autism was first noticed & documented.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D5qL99PXsAYwErl.png

10:27 AM - 3 May 2019
8 replies 172 retweets 253 likes

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/576473535767392256/Bk1sON2J_bigger.jpeg Forrest Maready‏ @forrestmaready (https://twitter.com/forrestmaready)

1) One of the most jaw-dropping discoveries I made while researching “The Autism Vaccine” took place in Austria. I was initially intrigued by the autism story when I realized that the first time aluminum had been used in a U.S. pediatric vaccine was 1932.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D5qDLHiXsAI7O9f.jpg

9:49 AM - 3 May 2019
35 replies 444 retweets 567 likes

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/576473535767392256/Bk1sON2J_bigger.jpeg Forrest Maready‏ @forrestmaready (https://twitter.com/forrestmaready)

The year was 1932. Vaccines got a new ingredient. Two countries. Two children. Two doctors. Within years, a new disorder appeared—something they'd never seen before. Both countries. Both doctors. Both children. "The Autism Vaccine" now available. http://www.theautismvaccine.com (https://t.co/AfxR8Sv5FU)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D5e5MEcWwAAcaUm.jpg

5:50 AM - 1 May 2019
51 replies 228 retweets 357 likes

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/576473535767392256/Bk1sON2J_bigger.jpeg Forrest Maready‏ @forrestmaready (https://twitter.com/forrestmaready)

People are getting censored/banned for seemingly anything these days and I won't be surprised if I'm one of them. Sign up here so we can keep in touch: http://www.forrestmaready.com (https://t.co/bicoc5R7Wa) (at the bottom) Or DM me your email if you're as lazy as me!

12:56 PM - 13 May 2019
0 replies 9 retweets 26 likes

Hervé

24th May 2019, 15:32

a followup to post # 465 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate&p=1290924&viewfull=1#post1290924):

Merck made a "hit list" of doctors who criticized Vioxx, according to testimony in a Vioxx class action case in Australia. The list, emailed between Merck employees, contained doctors' names with the labels "neutralise," "neutralised" or "discredit" next to them.

http://i.bnet.com/blogs/crosshairs.jpg (http://i.bnet.com/blogs/crosshairs.jpg)

According to The Australian (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25272600-2702,00.html), Merck emails from 1999 showed company execs complaining about doctors who disliked using Vioxx. One email said:
"We may need to seek them out and destroy them where they live ..."The plaintiffs' lawyer gave this assessment:
It gives you the dark side of the use of key opinion leaders and thought leaders ... if (they) say things you don't like to hear, you have to neutralise them ... It does suggest a certain culture within the organisation about how to deal with your opponents and those who disagree with you.The Australian:
The court was told that James Fries, professor of medicine at Stanford University, wrote to the then Merck head Ray Gilmartin in October 2000 to complain about the treatment of some of his researchers who had criticised the drug.
"Even worse were allegations of Merck damage control by intimidation," he wrote, ...

"This has happened to at least eight (clinical) investigators ... I suppose I was mildly threatened myself but I never have spoken or written on these issues."
The allegations come on the heels of revelations that Merck created a fake medical journal (http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10001791/new-merck-allegations-a-fake-journal-ghostwritten-studies-vioxx-pop-songs-pr-execs-harass-reporters/?tag=content;col1) -- the Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine -- in which to publish studies about Vioxx; had pop songs commissioned about Vioxx to inspire its staff, and paid ghostwriters to draft articles about the drug.

Related:
New Merck Allegations: A Fake Journal; Ghostwritten Studies; Vioxx Pop Songs; PR Execs Harass Reporters (http://industry.bnet.com/pharma/10001791/new-merck-allegations-a-fake-journal-ghostwritten-studies-vioxx-pop-songs-pr-execs-harass-reporters/)

Hervé

29th May 2019, 20:04

...

From Jim Stone:

I have noticed an ABRUPT shift in Mexico - to kids NOT getting vaccine damaged (http://82.221.129.208/.wk2.html)

I do not know if this is observable in the United States, but it was VERY observable here:

Suddenly, (at least in my area) autism vanished and there are practically no kids with obvious signs of vaccine damage.

Even three years ago, every time you went to Wal Mart there would be enormous numbers of totally vax-whacked kids in shopping carts, drooling, moaning, spinning, vacant and delirious, totally screwed up kids, at least 3 or 4 every time at Wal Mart.

That all faded away about a year ago, and now you do not see even one, across multiple trips to Wal Mart, I have not seen a single one in the last six months. I think the eugenicists knew they were cornered and figured it would be best to at least temporarily back off on Mexico, or at least temporarily reduce the amount of damage they figured the vaccines ought to do. And I think that for the later shots, for kids aged 3 and up, they actually put the cure to autism that I have spoken about on this forum in the shots, to clear it up.

In case you are new to this, let me explain:

Autism-like symptoms were inflicted intentionally by shots that were called "vaccines" but were not.

One thing I'll throw in here is that doctors in Mex started noticing the "vaccinated" kids got the illnesses the vaccines were supposed to prevent as much as the kids who were never vaxxed. There's no question the shots were fraudulent.
And now I will once again explain the MOA behind how the shots that were called vaccines (but were not vaccines at all) worked, because some readers may have missed this.

The phony vaccines that were really a eugenics type of tool, rather than trigger immune responses against the diseases they were supposed to prevent, triggered immune responses against the body itself, primarily the nervous system.

This was accomplished several ways, a big one was by using squalene - which is a key component of the nervous system - as a so called "adjuvant" in the "vaccine". Only, you can't use squalene as an adjuvant unless you intend to do direct harm to the recipient of a shot that has it.

Squalene is used by the body in many different ways but the key use - the "vaccines" targeted - was in the myelin sheaths in the nerve endings of the nervous system. A properly "vaxxed" white boy would be enormously knocked back - there was talk about how the vaccines affected the black population but it hit the whites 10X worse, and filled the shopping carts at Wal Mart with bumbling drooling zombies, which if capable of walking ran around moaning and dropping to the floor spinning. You have all seen this, EVERYONE has seen this, and it was not by accident that it happened.

Many people have pointed towards aluminum and mercury in the shots, but compared to squalene those are NOTHING.

An additional way the shots were formulated to destroy the kids was by growing them in human tissue cultures which should never be done (it should be grown in animal tissue, and subsequently at worst trigger an allergy towards whatever animal tissue it was grown in.)

The vaccines that are cultured in GMO yeast get no free ride away from accountability either, because once you go GMO the yeast could be 50 percent human. When vaccines are grown in the wrong tissue culture they can easily trigger auto immune disorders, including autism, despite manufacturer's claims they "got all of it out". They never get it all, and they never intended to.

Here is how they had to have fixed the autism problem in Mexico, before they got finally busted and had their asses fried:

You can program the immune system to do practically anything with the right shot, including re-programming it to not remove squalene, or whatever proteins or whatever else the damaging shots told the immune system to do, and I am CERTAIN, BEYOND-A-DOUBT CERTAIN that in Mex they integrated the antidote shots into the medical system to un-do the effect the original shots purposefully had, during the next round of scheduled childhood vaccines.

They did it because too many families noticed the kids were F***ED UP after vaccinations and with high suspicions already circulating, it was not difficult at all to spot when it happened. Subsequent mommy freakouts were too hard to stifle due to the quantity of occurrence, though I am sure they'd have murdered every single mommy that noticed just to silence her if they could have. But obviously that was a step too far, so they backed off and covered their tracks by silently switching the vaccine formulations to reverse and subdue the damage.

FACT: THERE HAS TO BE A REASON WHY ALL THE FOUR YEAR OLDS AND UP, WOKE UP AT LEAST PARTIALLY, AND [.?.] ENOUGH TO ELIMINATE THE YOWLING MOANING WAL MART SPINNERS.

THAT DID NOT HAPPEN BY ACCIDENT. THE SHOTS ARE STILL DAMAGING THE BABIES TO SOME DEGREE BUT IT IS NOT ANYWHERE NEAR WHAT IT WAS. THAT "IMPROVEMENT" DID NOT HAPPEN BY ACCIDENT EITHER.

And my final statement: To the people running the vaccine eugenics plot: Even if you start dishing out the perfect fixer formulations, that un-do all the damage totally, you will never be forgiven. I know what you intended and I know what you will do all over again the second the storm has cleared. I KNOW WHO YOU ARE. You can't hide. You definitely backed off in Mexico, but I doubt you backed off in the United States.

I SAW IT HAPPEN, I SAW THE TRANSFORMATION WITH MY OWN EYES TO KIDS TURNING NORMAL AGAIN AND KNOW DAMN WELL WHAT WAS DONE TO SCREW THEM TO BEGIN WITH. And there will be vengeance.

TomKat

30th May 2019, 00:48

Anything can contribute to autism. The MMR vaccine, by interfering with the digestive system, has been shown to be very effective in contributing to autism. Andrew Wakefield was never against vaccines. Just the MMR. They took the standalone measles vaccine, which Wakefield approves of, off the market to force children to get the MMR. It's not about disease control, it's some other, bigger, agenda.

Delight

31st May 2019, 05:15

Flash

31st May 2019, 06:02

you have to register to read the rest

Autism-spectrum disorder
More evidence that autism is linked to gut bacteria
Understanding that link may be crucial to treatment
May 30th 2019 | PHOENIX, ARIZONA (https://www.economist.com/science-and-technology/2019/05/30/more-evidence-that-autism-is-linked-to-gut-bacteria)

Paradigm shift is an overused term. Properly, it refers to a radical change of perspective on a topic, such as the move from the physics of Newton to the physics of Einstein, or the introduction of plate tectonics into geology. Such things are rare. Something which history may come to regard as a true paradigm shift does, however, seem to be going on at the moment in medicine. This is a recognition that the zillions of apparently non-pathogenic bacteria on and in human bodies, hitherto largely ignored, are actually important for people’s health. They may even help to explain the development of some mysterious conditions.

One such condition is autism—these days often called autism-spectrum disorder (asd). asd is characterised by repetitive, stereotypical and often restricted behaviour such as head-nodding, and by the difficulties those with it have in reading the emotions of, and communicating with, other people. These symptoms are noticeable in children from the age of two onwards. Currently, in America, about one child in 59 is diagnosed with asd.

My guess for many years have been, after studying neurological disorder in children including autism for the last 17 years, that autism is created by the impact of adjuvant (to boost the immune system) in the vaccines on one hand, destroying the immune system, and the pesticides/herbicides found in our food, destroying the guts bacteria, plus some GMO (few are not that bad, but those improving resistance to pesticides - 90% of GMO's - are terrible for the gut bacteria).

Diabetis is also related to pesticide/herbicide in our foods, killing the guts bacteria. IMO

This toxic soup is killing us and our children. The most sensitive are the canary in the mine. We should take the increase in neurological problems in children extremely seriously.

So, we should not vaccinate as long as there is this toxic combination in the environment and as long as we do not find non damaging ways to boost the immune system. My opinion.

Edit: I was aware of Dutch studies linking autism with guts bacteria and correcting 30% of autism cases with fecal transplant more than 10 years ago.

onawah

31st May 2019, 06:21

Dr. Rebecca Carley developed a lot of effective homeopathic protocols for healing autistic kids, and got her career destroyed for her efforts.
But her work can still be found online if you look for it, sandwiched in between all the libel.

Hervé

1st June 2019, 16:52

...

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D7_IuXxW4AApm1R.jpg:large

Hervé

13th June 2019, 14:42

Delight

14th June 2019, 01:15

From Jim Stone:

New York just shut down the TENTH Jewish Orthodox school over vaccine refusal (http://82.221.129.208/.wi9.html)

Yes, not a rumor. A while ago DeBlasio ordered all New Yorkers, including Jews, to get the MMR shot. But the orthodox community has REFUSED, and has chosen to instead accept getting their schools shut down. This story developed a LOT under the radar.

OK THEN:

QUESTION:

WHY IS THE ORTHODOX COMMUNITY REFUSING "VACCINES" FOR THEIR KIDS? . . . . . . .

ANSWER: Because they know what the shots really are, and what is really in them. How come they get to know, and CNN won't tell the rest of us?

I am not sure that the Orthodox community is unanimous in refusing to vaccinate. I also think there is an insinuation here that is less than humane concerning the people who have chosen to cling to the religion they follow. I am concerned that for many many reasons, the scapegoating of those who follow their religion continues. In Israel, orthodox and religious jews are a segment of a secular state. It is IMO a sign of a low brow to continue to scapegoat the jewish people.

I think I understand the fear and the focus on increasing their numbers to resist genocide behind this ultra conservative closed community. As a woman, I would be expected to be a mother and subjugated by a patriarchal structure. If I were an artist or free thinker, even if male, I would be outcast. I would leave the community if I had been born into it. That said, they have a right to their path. Fear is generational and unfortunately people form barriers that do imprison THEM. From all walks of life people in fear are ready to hate the "other" ones.

I am appalled that from every angle, the present mode of many is to blame others, select them for scapegoating as a way to deal with personal fear and try to gather others for a "lynch mob" (not necessarily physical but intellectual and emotional). I agree that Jim Stone has a right to speak but I also HOPE that people will develop a clear mind and not fall into the kind of angry paranoia that he has demonstrated in his views.

TomKat

15th June 2019, 18:48

The MMR shot was likely, without any question whatsoever, developed in Dimona and THEY KNOW IT. They are not going to get shot with their own weapon. The mayor is a DUFUS for not just shutting the hell up, he blew their cover BIG TIME. .

You're saying that the Jews developed the MMR as a bioweapon to use against non-Jews and now they have accidentally been forced into a position of refusing it?
Wouldn't it be smarter for them to develop a bioweapon based on DNA?
No answer needed, it's all bigoted fantasy...

Hervé

5th September 2019, 13:15

Dr. Suzanne Humphries: How a $10 Billion Investment by Bill Gates Changed Vaccination Policy Worldwide
(https://healthimpactnews.com/2019/dr-suzanne-humphries-how-a-10-billion-investment-by-bill-gates-changed-vaccination-policy-worldwide/)

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2014/09/Bill-gates-GAVI-Vaccines.jpg

Health Impact News
September 5, 2019

Dr. Suzanne Humphries gave a lecture in Denmark in 2015 titled: Manufactured Consent.

She explains how “informed consent” today regarding vaccines is really “manufactured consent” as a unified voice presenting only what they want the public to know regarding vaccines was crafted in 2010 when the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation invested 10 billion dollars in global vaccination initiatives through the World Health Organization.

From Dr. Humphries:
I spent a couple of years creating this video series. The corruption, mythology, and medical theory are broken down step-by-step in this series. It’s a very important video for today and it was anticipating the current climate that we are now living in. Please watch it carefully and share it.

IXK-Dr7Kjp47UbKE2q9HTs

Gwin Ru

20th May 2020, 13:29

Forgotten moments from the history of vaccines; yes, history matters (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/05/19/forgotten-moments-from-the-history-of-vaccines-yes-history-matters/)

by Jon Rappoport (https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/author/jonrappoport/)
May 19, 2020

Scientific propaganda about vaccines has reached dizzying heights, as officials point the uninformed public toward the Day of Liberation, when a COVID shot, otherwise known as God, will rescue Earth.

Here, from a chapter in my 1988 book, AIDS INC., is an excerpt exposing some of the infamous moments in vaccination history—hidden by the press, or simply forgotten.

For those denialists who cling to the notion that vaccines are remarkably safe and effective, this article is a pill you can swallow, bitter to be sure, but immunizing against the effects of bald lies from the bent medical establishment.

Understand: this is only a partial history of disasters and revelations, and it stops at 1988.

“The combined death rate from scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization. In part, this recession may be attributed to improved housing and to a decrease in the virulence of micro-organisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition.” Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis, Bantam Books, 1977

“In a recent British outbreak of whooping cough, for example, even fully immunized children contracted the disease in fairly large numbers; and the rates of serious complications and death were reduced only slightly. In another recent outbreak of pertussis, 46 of the 85 fully immunized children studied eventually contracted the disease.”

“In 1977, 34 new cases of measles were reported on the campus of UCLA, in a population that was supposedly 91% immune, according to careful serological testing. Another 20 cases of measles were reported in the Pecos, New Mexico, area within a period of a few months in 1981, and 75% of them had been fully immunized, some of them quite recently. A survey of sixth-graders in a well-immunized urban community revealed that about 15% of this age group are still susceptible to rubella, a figure essentially identical with that of the pre-vaccine era.”

“Finally, although the overall incidence of typical acute measles in the U.S. has dropped sharply from about 400,000 cases annually in the early 1960s to about 30,000 cases by 1974-76, the death rate remained exactly the same; and, with the peak incidence now occurring in adolescents and young adults, the risk of pneumonia and demonstrable liver abnormalities has actually increased substantially, according to one recent study, to well over 3% and 2%, respectively.” Richard Moskowitz, MD, The Case Against Immunizations, 1983, American Institute of Homeopathy.

“Of all reported whooping cough cases between 1979 and 1984 in children over 7 months of age – that is, old enough to have received the primary course of the DPT shots (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus) – 41% occurred in children who had received three or more shots and 22% in children who had one or two immunizations.”

“Among children under 7 months of age who had whooping cough, 34% had been immunized between one and three times…”

“… Based on the only U.S. findings on adverse DPT reactions, an FDA-financed study at the University of California, Los Angeles, one out of every 350 children will have a convulsion; one in 180 children will experience high-pitched screaming [can indicate brain damage]; and one in 66 will have a fever of 105 degrees or more.” Jennifer Hyman, Democrat and Chronicle, Rochester, New York, special supplement on DPT, dated April, 1987.

“A study undertaken in 1979 at the University of California, Los Angeles, under the sponsorship of the Food and Drug Administration, and which has been confirmed by other studies, indicates that in the U.S.A. approximately 1,000 infants die annually as a direct result of DPT vaccinations, and these are classified as SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) deaths. These represent about 10 to 15% of the total number of SIDS deaths occurring annually in the U.S.A. (between 8,000 and 10,000 depending on which statistics are used).” Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company Limited, Saffron Walden, Essex, England, 1987.

“Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, rounded… figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot among America’s children every year.” DPT: A Shot in the Dark, by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

“While 70-80% of British children were immunized against pertussis in 1970-71, the rate is now 39%. The committee predicts that the next pertussis epidemic will probably turn out to be more severe than the one in 1974/75. However, they do not explain why, in 1970/71, there were more than 33,000 cases of pertussis with 41 fatal cases among the very well immunized British child population; whereas in 1974/75, with a declining rate of vaccination, a pertussis epidemic caused only 25,000 cases with 25 fatalities.” Wolfgang Ehrengut, Lancet, Feb. 18, 1978, p. 370.

“… Barker and Pichichero, in a prospective study of 1232 children in Denver, Colorado, found after DTP that only 7% of those vaccinated were free from untoward reactions, which included pyrexia (53%), acute behavioral changes (82%), prolonged screaming (13%), and listlessness, anorexia and vomiting. 71% of those receiving second injections of DTP experienced two or more of the reactions monitored.” Lancet, May 28, 1983, p. 1217

“Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children.” Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 58.

“Pertussis (whooping cough) immunization is controversial, as the side effects have received a great deal of publicity. The counter claim is that the effectiveness and protection offered by the procedure far outweigh the possible ill effects… annual deaths, per million children, from this disease over the period from 1900 to the mid-nineteen seventies, shows that from a high point of just under 900 deaths per million children (under age 15) in 1905, the decline has been consistent and dramatic. There had been a lowering of mortality rates of approximately 80% by the time immunization was introduced on a mass scale, in the mid-nineteen fifties. The decline has continued, albeit at a slower rate, ever since. No credit can be given to vaccination for the major part of the decline since it was not in use.” Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 63.

“… the swine-flu vaccination program was one of its (CDC) greatest blunders. It all began in 1976 when CDC scientists saw that a virus involved in a flu attack outbreak at Fort Dix, N.J., was similar to the swine-flu virus that killed 500,000 Americans in 1918. Health officials immediately launched a 100-million dollar program to immunize every American. But the expected epidemic never materialized, and the vaccine led to partial paralysis in 532 people. There were 32 deaths.” U.S. News and World Report, Joseph Carey, October 14, 1985, p. 70, “How Medical Sleuths Track Killer Diseases.”

“Despite (cases) in which (smallpox) vaccination plainly failed to protect the population, and despite the rampant side-effects of the methods, the proponents of vaccination continued their attempts to justify the methods by claims that the disease had declined in Europe as a whole during the period of its compulsory use. If the decline could be correlated with the use of the vaccination, then all else could be set aside, and the advantage between its current low incidence could be shown to outweigh the periodic failures of the method, and to favour the continued use of vaccination. However, the credit for the decline in the incidence of smallpox could not be given to vaccination. The fact is that its incidence declined in all parts of Europe, whether or not vaccination was employed.” Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, pp. 6-7.

“Smallpox, like typhus, has been dying out (in England) since 1780. Vaccination in this country has largely fallen into disuse since people began to realize how its value was discredited by the great smallpox epidemic of 1871-2 (which occurred after extensive vaccination).” W. Scott Webb, A Century of Vaccination, Swan Sonnenschein, 1898.

“In this incident (Kyoto, Japan, 1948) – the most serious of its kind – a toxic batch of alum-precipitated toxoid (APT) was responsible for illness in over 600 infants and for no fewer than 68 deaths.”

“On 20 and 22 October, 1948, a large number of babies and children in the city of Kyoto received their first injection of APT. On the 4th and 5th of November, 15,561 babies and children aged some months to 13 years received their second dose. One to two days later, 606 of those who had been injected fell ill. Of these, 9 died of acute diphtheritic paralysis in seven to fourteen days, and 59 of late paralysis mainly in four to seven weeks.” Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization, Athone Press, University of London, 1967.

“Accidents may, however, follow the use of this so-called killed (rabies) vaccine owing to inadequate processing. A very serious occurrence of this sort occurred at Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil, in 1960. No fewer than 18 out of 66 persons vaccinated with Fermi’s carbolized (rabies ) vaccine suffered from encephalomyelitis and every one of the eighteen died.” Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization.

“At a press conference in Washington on 24 July, 1942, the Secretary of War reported that 28,585 cases of jaundice had been observed in the (American) Army between 1 January and 4 July after yellow fever vaccination, and of these 62 proved fatal.” Wilson, Hazards of Immunization.

“The world’s biggest trial (conducted in south India) to assess the value of BCG tuberculosis vaccine has made the startling revelation that the vaccine ‘does not give any protection against bacillary forms of tuberculosis.’ The study said to be ‘most exhaustive and meticulous,’ was launched in 1968 by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) with assistance from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, Georgia.”

“The incidence of new cases among the BCG vaccinated group was slightly (but statistically insignificantly) higher than in the control group, a finding that led to the conclusion that BCG’s protective effect ‘was zero.'” New Scientist, November 15, 1979, as quoted by Hans Ruesch in Naked Empress, Civis Publishers, Switzerland, 1982.

“Between 10 December 1929 and 30 April 1930, 251 of 412 infants born in Lubeck received three doses of BCG vaccine by the mouth during the first ten days of life. Of these 251, 72 died of tuberculosis, most of them in two to five months and all but one before the end of the first year. In addition, 135 suffered from clinical tuberculosis but eventually recovered; and 44 became tuberculin-positive but remained well. None of the 161 unvaccinated infants born at the time was affected in this way and none of these died of tuberculosis within the following three years.” Hazards of Immunization, Wilson.

“We conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy of the 14-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine in 2295 high-risk patients… Seventy-one episodes of proved or probable pneumococcal pneumonia or bronchitis occurred among 63 of the patients (27 placebo recipients and 36 vaccine recipients)… We were unable to demonstrate any efficacy of the pneumococcal vaccine in preventing pneumonia or bronchitis in this population.” New England Journal of Medicine, November 20, 1986, p. 1318, Michael Simberkoff et al.

“But already before Salk developed his vaccine, polio had been constantly regressing; the 39 cases out of every 100,000 inhabitants registered in 1942 had gradually diminished from year to year until they were reduced to only 15 cases in 1952… according to M. Beddow Baylay, the English surgeon and medical historian.” Slaughter of the Innocent, Hans Reusch, Civitas Publish ers, Switzerland, and Swain, New York, 1983.

“Many published stories and reports have stated, implied and otherwise led professional people and the public to believe that the sharp reduction of cases (and of deaths) from poliomyelitis in 1955 as compared to 1954 is attributable to the Salk vaccine…That it is a misconception follows from these considerations. The number of children inoculated has been too small to account for the decrease. The sharp decrease was apparent before the inoculations began or could take effect and was of the same order as the decrease following the immediate post-inoculation period.” Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, vol. 20, no. 1, 1987.

“So far it is hardly possible to gain insight into the extent of the immunization catastrophe of 1955 in the United States. It may be considered certain that the officially ascertained 200 cases (of polio) which were caused directly or indirectly by the (polio) vaccination constitute minimum figures… It can hardly be estimated how many of the 1359 (polio) cases among vaccinated persons must be regarded as failures of the vaccine and how many of them were infected by the vaccine. A careful study of the epidemiologic course of polio in the United States yields indications of grave significance. In numerous states of the U.S.A., typical early epidemics developed with the immunizations in the spring of 1955…The vaccination incidents of the year 1955 cannot be exclusively traced back to the failure of one manufacturing firm.” Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, 1980, vol. 19, no. 4, “Story of the Salk Vaccine (Part 2).”

“Suffice it to say that most of the large (polio) epidemics that have occurred in this country since the introduction of the Salk vaccine have followed the wide-scale use of the vaccine and have been characterized by an uncommon early seasonal onset. To name a few, there is the Massachusetts epidemic of 1955; the Chicago epidemic of 1956; and the Des Moines epidemic of 1959.” Dr. Herbert Ratner, Child and Family, 1980 vol. 19, no. 4.

“The live (Sabin) poliovirus vaccine has been the predominant cause of domestically arising cases of paralytic poliomyelitis in the United States since 1972. To avoid the occurrence of such cases, it would be necessary to discontinue the routine use of live poliovirus vaccine.” Jonas Salk, Science, March 4, 1977, p. 845.

“By the (U.S.) government’s own admission, there has been a 41% failure rate in persons who were previously vaccinated against the (measles) virus.” Dr. Anthony Morris, John Chriss, BG Young, “Occurrence of Measles in Previously Vaccinated Individuals,” 1979; presented at a meeting of the American Society for Microbiology at Fort Detrick, Maryland, April 27, 1979.

“Prior to the time doctors began giving rubella vaccinations, an estimated 85% of adults were naturally immune to the disease (for life). Because of immunization, the vast majority of women never acquire natural immunity (or lifetime protection).” Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, Let’s Live, December 1983, as quoted by Carolyn Reuben in the LA WEEKLY, June 28, 1985.

“Adminstration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened susceptibility.” JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such falsely protected children can come down with “an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is characterized by fever, headache… and a diverse rash (which)… may consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules… ”

The above quotes reflect only a mere fraction of an available literature.

It is criminally deceiving to say, “Vaccines are simple; they stimulate the immune system and confer immunity against specific germ agents.”

Official reports on vaccine reactions are often at odds with unofficial estimates because of the method of analysis used. If adverse vaccine-reaction is defined as a small set of possible effects experienced within 72 hours of an inoculation, then figures will be smaller. But doctors like G.T. Stewart, of the University of Glasgow, have found through meticulous investigation, including visits to hospitals and interviews with parents of children vaccinated, that reactions as severe as brain-damage (e.g., from the DPT vaccine) can be overlooked, go unreported and can be assumed to have come from other causes.

—Well, that was my finding, in 1988, when I looked beneath the surface of the vaccine question.

Now we are in very deep waters. COVID-19 hysteria has been tuned up to the NEED for a vaccine.

WE need to slough off this promoted bad dream and stand firm against the little gods who traffic their vials in every doctor’s office, hospital, school, drug store, and tented parking lot—making them into shooting galleries.

We already have natural immune systems. They work.
http://jonrappoport.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/matrixrevealed3.jpg (http://marketplace.mybigcommerce.com/the-matrix-revealed/)

Jon Rappoport

Tintin

20th May 2020, 18:18

The following article may need to be cross posted to another thread, perhaps the Bill Gates one, but, I'll ponder that all in good time.

For a future look at vaccination methods, which kind of answers the OP questions by dint of its content, the following from MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology published back in December 2019:

By selectively loading microparticles into microneedles, the patches deliver a pattern in the skin that is invisible to the naked eye but can be scanned with a smartphone that has the infrared filter removed. The patch can be customized to imprint different patterns that correspond to the type of vaccine delivered.

Source: https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218

https://news.mit.edu/sites/mit.edu.newsoffice/files/styles/news_article_image_top_slideshow/public/images/2019/MIT-Vaccine-Tattoos-01_0.jpg?itok=XZaI2Dgx

Storing medical information below the skin’s surface
Specialized dye, delivered along with a vaccine, could enable “on-patient” storage of vaccination history.

Anne Trafton | MIT News Office
December 18, 2019

Every year, a lack of vaccination leads to about 1.5 million preventable deaths, primarily in developing nations. One factor that makes vaccination campaigns in those nations more difficult is that there is little infrastructure for storing medical records, so there’s often no easy way to determine who needs a particular vaccine.

MIT researchers have now developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine.

“In areas where paper vaccination cards are often lost or do not exist at all, and electronic databases are unheard of, this technology could enable the rapid and anonymous detection of patient vaccination history to ensure that every child is vaccinated,” says Kevin McHugh, a former MIT postdoc who is now an assistant professor of bioengineering at Rice University.

The researchers showed that their new dye, which consists of nanocrystals called quantum dots, can remain for at least five years under the skin, where it emits near-infrared light that can be detected by a specially equipped smartphone.

McHugh and former visiting scientist Lihong Jing are the lead authors of the study, which appears today in Science Translational Medicine. Ana Jaklenec, a research scientist at MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, and Robert Langer, the David H. Koch Institute Professor at MIT, are the senior authors of the paper.

An invisible record

Several years ago, the MIT team set out to devise a method for recording vaccination information in a way that doesn’t require a centralized database or other infrastructure. Many vaccines, such as the vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), require multiple doses spaced out at certain intervals; without accurate records, children may not receive all of the necessary doses.

“In order to be protected against most pathogens, one needs multiple vaccinations,” Jaklenec says. “In some areas in the developing world, it can be very challenging to do this, as there is a lack of data about who has been vaccinated and whether they need additional shots or not.”

To create an “on-patient,” decentralized medical record, the researchers developed a new type of copper-based quantum dots, which emit light in the near-infrared spectrum. The dots are only about 4 nanometers in diameter, but they are encapsulated in biocompatible microparticles that form spheres about 20 microns in diameter. This encapsulation allows the dye to remain in place, under the skin, after being injected.

The researchers designed their dye to be delivered by a microneedle patch rather than a traditional syringe and needle. Such patches are now being developed to deliver vaccines for measles, rubella, and other diseases, and the researchers showed that their dye could be easily incorporated into these patches.

The microneedles used in this study are made from a mixture of dissolvable sugar and a polymer called PVA, as well as the quantum-dot dye and the vaccine. When the patch is applied to the skin, the microneedles, which are 1.5 millimeters long, partially dissolve, releasing their payload within about two minutes.

By selectively loading microparticles into microneedles, the patches deliver a pattern in the skin that is invisible to the naked eye but can be scanned with a smartphone that has the infrared filter removed. The patch can be customized to imprint different patterns that correspond to the type of vaccine delivered.

“It’s possible someday that this ‘invisible’ approach could create new possibilities for data storage, biosensing, and vaccine applications that could improve how medical care is provided, particularly in the developing world,” Langer says.

Effective immunization

Tests using human cadaver skin showed that the quantum-dot patterns could be detected by smartphone cameras after up to five years of simulated sun exposure.

The researchers also tested this vaccination strategy in rats, using microneedle patches that delivered the quantum dots along with a polio vaccine. They found that those rats generated an immune response similar to the response of rats that received a traditional injected polio vaccine.

“This study confirmed that incorporating the vaccine with the dye in the microneedle patches did not affect the efficacy of the vaccine or our ability to detect the dye,” Jaklenec says.

The researchers now plan to survey health care workers in developing nations in Africa to get input on the best way to implement this type of vaccination record keeping. They are also working on expanding the amount of data that can be encoded in a single pattern, allowing them to include information such as the date of vaccine administration and the lot number of the vaccine batch.

The researchers believe the quantum dots are safe to use in this way because they are encapsulated in a biocompatible polymer, but they plan to do further safety studies before testing them in patients.

“Storage, access, and control of medical records is an important topic with many possible approaches,” says Mark Prausnitz, chair of chemical and biomolecular engineering at Georgia Tech, who was not involved in the research. “This study presents a novel approach where the medical record is stored and controlled by the patient within the patient’s skin in a minimally invasive and elegant way.”

The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Koch Institute Support (core) Grant from the National Cancer Institute. Other authors of the paper include Sean Severt, Mache Cruz, Morteza Sarmadi, Hapuarachchige Surangi Jayawardena, Collin Perkinson, Fridrik Larusson, Sviatlana Rose, Stephanie Tomasic, Tyler Graf, Stephany Tzeng, James Sugarman, Daniel Vlasic, Matthew Peters, Nels Peterson, Lowell Wood, Wen Tang, Jihyeon Yeom, Joe Collins, Philip Welkhoff, Ari Karchin, Megan Tse, Mingyuan Gao, and Moungi Bawendi.

Gwin Ru

22nd May 2020, 13:41

Did Psychopath Rockefeller Create the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918? (https://www.fort-russ.com/2020/05/did-psychopath-rockefeller-create-the-spanish-flu-pandemic-of-1918/)

By Dr. Gary G. Kohls, MD

https://www.fort-russ.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/FRN-1-150x150.jpg
(https://www.fort-russ.com/author/guestauthor/)By Guest Author
(https://www.fort-russ.com/author/guestauthor/)Last updated May 22, 2020

https://www.fort-russ.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/spanish-flu-744x430.jpg

“The Truth About The 1918 ‘Viral Influenza’ Pandemic”

https://www.fort-russ.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/dr-kohls.jpg (https://www.fort-russ.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/dr-kohls.jpg)
By Dr. Gary G. Kohls, MD –

It Started with the Rockefeller Institute’s Crude Bacterial Meningitis Vaccination Experiment on US Troops. The 1918-19 bacterial vaccine experiment may have killed 50-100 million people.
“During the war years 1918-19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas. The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.”

“During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.”

“The Rockefeller Institute and its experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine, contrary to the accepted mythology may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-1919.”

“The crude anti-bacterial vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in horses.”

“According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7% of the 1918-19 Pandemic autopsies reviewed.”

“Clean water, sanitation, flushing toilets, refrigerated foods and healthy diets have done and still do far more to protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program.”

“In 1918, the vaccine industry experimented on soldiers…with disastrous results—but in 2018, the vaccine industry experiments on infants every day. The vaccine schedule has never been tested as it is given. The results of the experiment are in: 1 in 7 of America’s fully vaccinated children is in some form of special education and over 50% have some form of chronic illness.”The “Spanish Flu” killed an estimated 50-100 million people during a pandemic 1918-19.”
What if the story we have been told about this pandemic isn’t true? What if, instead, the killer infection was neither the flu nor Spanish in origin?

Newly analyzed documents reveal that the “Spanish Flu” may have been a military vaccine experiment gone awry.

Summary
The reason modern technology has not been able to pinpoint the killer influenza strain from this pandemic is because influenza was not the killer.

More soldiers died during WWI from disease than from bullets.

The pandemic was not flu. An estimated 95% (or higher) of the deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia, not an influenza virus.

The pandemic was not Spanish. The first cases of bacterial pneumonia in 1918 trace back to military bases, the first one in Fort Riley, Kansas.

From January 21 – June 4, 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New York was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley.

During the remainder of 1918 as those soldiers – often living and traveling under poor sanitary conditions – were sent to Europe to fight, they spread bacteria at every stop between Kansas and the frontline trenches in France.

One study describes soldiers “with active infections (who) were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)

The “Spanish Flu” attacked healthy people in their prime. Bacterial pneumonia attacks people in their prime. Flu attacks the young, old and immunocompromised.

When WW1 ended on November 11, 1918, soldiers returned to their home countries and colonial outposts, spreading the killer bacterial pneumonia worldwide.

During WW1, the Rockefeller Institute also sent its experimental anti-meningococcal serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries, helping spread the epidemic worldwide.

During the pandemic of 1918-19, the so-called “Spanish Flu” killed 50-100 million people, including many soldiers.

Many people do not realize that disease killed far more soldiers on all sides than machine guns or mustard gas or anything else typically associated with WWI.

I have a personal connection to the Spanish Flu. Among those killed by disease in 1918-19 are members of both of my parents’ families.

On my father’s side, his grandmother Sadie Hoyt died from pneumonia in 1918. Sadie was a Chief Yeoman in the Navy. Her death left my grandmother Rosemary and her sister Anita to be raised by their aunt. Sadie’s sister Marian also joined the Navy. She died from “the influenza” in 1919.

On my mother’s side, two of her father’s sisters died in childhood. All of the family members who died lived in New York City.

I suspect many American families, and many families worldwide, were impacted in similar ways by the mysterious Spanish Flu.

In 1918, “influenza” or flu was a catchall term for disease of unknown origin. It didn’t carry the specific meaning it does today.

It meant some mystery disease which dropped out of the sky. In fact, influenza is from the Medieval Latin “influential” in an astrological sense, meaning a visitation under the influence of the stars.

Why is What Happened 100 Years Ago Important Now?
Between 1900-1920, there were enormous efforts underway in the industrialized world to build a better society. I will use New York as an example to discuss three major changes to society which occurred in NY during that time and their impact on mortality from infectious diseases.
1. Clean Water and Sanitation
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built an extraordinary system to bring clean water to the city from the Catskills, a system still in use today. New York City also built over 6000 miles of sewer to take away and treat waste, which protects the drinking water. The World Health Organization acknowledges the importance of clean water and sanitation in combating infectious diseases. (2)

2. Electricity
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York built a power grid and wired the city so power was available in every home. Electricity allows for refrigeration. Refrigeration is an unsung hero as a public health benefit. When food is refrigerated from farm to table, the public is protected from potential infectious diseases. Cheap renewable energy is important for many reasons, including combating infectious diseases.

3. Rockefeller’s Pharmaceutical Industry
In the late 19th century through the early 20th century, New York became the home of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (now Rockefeller University). The Institute is where the modern pharmaceutical industry was born. The Institute pioneered many of the approaches the pharmaceutical industry uses today, including the preparation of vaccine serums, for better or worse. The vaccine used in the Fort Riley experiment on soldiers was made in horses.
US Mortality Rates data from the turn of the 20th century to 1965 clearly indicates that clean water, flushing toilets, effective sewer systems and refrigerated foods all combined to effectively reduce mortality from infectious diseases BEFORE vaccines for those diseases became available.

Have doctors and the pharmaceutical manufacturers taken credit for reducing mortality from infectious disease which rightfully belongs to sandhogs, plumbers, electricians and engineers?

If hubris at the Rockefeller Institute in 1918 led to a pandemic disease which killed millions of people, what lessons can we learn and apply to 2018?

The Disease Was Not Spanish
While watching an episode of American Experience on PBS a few months ago, I was surprised to hear that the first cases of “Spanish Flu” occurred at Fort Riley, Kansas in 1918. I thought, how is it possible this historically important event could be so badly misnamed 100 years ago and never corrected?

Why “Spanish”?
Spain was one of a few countries not involved in World War I. Most of the countries involved in the war censored their press.

Free from censorship concerns, the earliest press reports of people dying from disease in large numbers came from Spain. The warring countries did not want to additionally frighten the troops, so they were content to scapegoat Spain. Soldiers on all sides would be asked to cross no man’s land into machine gun fire, which was frightening enough without knowing that the trenches were a disease breeding ground.

One hundred years later, it’s long past time to drop “Spanish” from all discussion of this pandemic. If the flu started at a United States military base in Kansas, then the disease could and should be more aptly named.

In order to prevent future disasters, the US (and the rest of the world) must take a hard look at what really caused the pandemic.

It is possible that one of the reasons the Spanish Flu has never been corrected is that it helps disguise the origin of the pandemic.

If the origin of the pandemic involved a vaccine experiment on US soldiers, then the US may prefer calling it Spanish Flu instead of The Fort Riley Bacteria of 1918, or something similar. The Spanish Flu started at the location this experimental bacterial vaccine was given making it the prime suspect as the source of the bacterial infections which killed so many.

It would be much more difficult to maintain the marketing mantra of “vaccines save lives” if a vaccine experiment originating in the United States during the years of primitive manufacturing caused the deaths of 50-100 million people.
“The American Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research and its experimental bacterial meningococcal vaccine may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-19” is a far less effective sales slogan than the overly simplistic ‘vaccines save lives’.” – Kevin Barry
The Disease Which Killed so Many was not Flu nor was it a Virus. It was Bacterial
During the mid-2000’s there was much talk about “pandemic preparedness.” Influenza vaccine manufacturers in the United States received billions of taxpayer dollars to develop vaccines to make sure that we don’t have another lethal pandemic “flu,” like the one in 1918-19.

Capitalizing on the “flu” part of Spanish flu helped vaccine manufacturers procure billion-dollar checks from governments, even though scientists knew at the time that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer.

It is not my opinion that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer – thousands of autopsies confirm this fact.

According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper, bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7% of the 1918-19 autopsies reviewed. It is likely higher than 92.7%.

The researchers looked at more than 9000 autopsies, and “there were no negative (bacterial) lung culture results.”
“… In the 68 higher-quality autopsy series, in which the possibility of unreported negative cultures could be excluded, 92.7% of autopsy lung cultures were positive for ≥1 bacterium. … in one study of approximately 9000 subjects who were followed from clinical presentation with influenza to resolution or autopsy, researchers obtained, with sterile technique, cultures of either pneumococci or streptococci from 164 of 167 lung tissue samples.

“There were 89 pure cultures of pneumococci; 19 cultures from which only streptococci were recovered; 34 that yielded mixtures of pneumococci and/or streptococci; 22 that yielded a mixture of pneumococci, streptococci, and other organisms (prominently pneumococci and nonhemolytic streptococci); and 3 that yielded nonhemolytic streptococci alone. There were no negative lung culture results.” (3)
Pneumococci or streptococci were found in “164 of (the) 167 lung tissue samples” autopsied. That is 98.2%. Bacteria was the killer.

Where Did the Spanish Flu Bacterial Pneumonia of 1918-19 Originate?
When the United States declared war in April 1917, the fledgling Pharmaceutical industry had something they had never had before – a large supply of human test subjects in the form of the US military’s first draft.

Pre-war in 1917, the US Army was 286,000 men. Post-war in 1920, the US army disbanded, and had 296,000 men.

During the war years 1918-19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas. The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.

A Report on Anti-meningitis Vaccination and Observations on Agglutinins in the Blood of Chronic Meningococcus Carriers as Recorded by Frederick L. Gates, MD in 1918

From the Base Hospital, Fort Riley, Kansas and The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York. Received July 20, 1918

(Author note: Please read the Fort Riley paper in its entirety so you can appreciate the carelessness of the experiments conducted on these troops.)

Between January 21st and June 4th of 1918, Dr. Gates reports on an experiment where soldiers were given 3 doses of a bacterial meningitis vaccine. Those conducting the experiment on the soldiers were just spit-balling dosages of a vaccine serum made in horses.

The vaccination regime was designed to be 3 doses.

4,792 men received the first dose, but only 4,257 got the 2nd dose (down 11%), and only 3702 received all three doses (down 22.7%).

A total of 1,090 men were not there for the 3rd dose. What happened to these soldiers? Were they shipped East by train from Kansas to board a ship to Europe? Were they in the Fort Riley hospital? Dr. Gates’ report doesn’t tell us.

An article accompanying the American Experience broadcast I watched sheds some light on where these 1,090 men might be. Gates began his experiments in January 1918.

By March of that year, “100 men a day” were entering the infirmary at Fort Riley.

Are some of these the men missing from Dr. Gates’ report – the ones who did not get the 2nd or 3rd dose?
“… Shortly before breakfast on Monday, March 11, the first domino would fall signaling the commencement of the first wave of the 1918 influenza.

“Company cook Albert Gitchell reported to the camp infirmary with complaints of a “bad cold.”

“Right behind him came Corporal Lee W. Drake voicing similar complaints.

“By noon, camp surgeon Edward R. Schreiner had over 100 sick men on his hands, all apparently suffering from the same malady…” (5)
Gates does report that several of the men in the experiment had flu-like symptoms: coughs, vomiting and diarrhea after receiving the vaccine.

These symptoms are a disaster for men living in barracks, travelling on trains to the Atlantic coast, sailing to Europe, and living and fighting in trenches.
https://www.fort-russ.com/2020/05/did-psychopath-rockefeller-create-the-spanish-flu-pandemic-of-1918/

The unsanitary conditions at each step of the journey are an ideal environment for a contagious disease like bacterial pneumonia to spread.

From Dr. Gates’ report:
“Several cases of looseness of the bowels or transient diarrhea were noted. This symptom had not been encountered before. Careful inquiry in individual cases often elicited the information that men who complained of the effects of vaccination were suffering from mild coryza, bronchitis, etc., at the time of injection.

“Sometimes the reaction was initiated by a chill or chilly sensation, and a number of men complained of fever or feverish sensations during the following night.

“Next in frequency came nausea (occasionally vomiting), dizziness, and general “aches and pains” in the joints and muscles, which in a few instances were especially localized in the neck or lumbar region, causing stiff neck or stiff back. A few injections were followed by diarrhea.

“The reactions, therefore, occasionally simulated the onset of epidemic meningitis and several vaccinated men were sent as suspects to the Base Hospital for diagnosis.” (4)
According to Gates, they injected random dosages of an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine into soldiers. Afterwards, some of the soldiers had symptoms which “simulated” meningitis, but Dr. Gates advances the fantastical claim that it wasn’t actual meningitis.

The soldiers developed flu-like symptoms. Bacterial meningitis, then and now, is known to mimic flu-like symptoms. (6)

Perhaps the similarity of early symptoms of bacterial meningitis and bacterial pneumonia to symptoms of flu is why the vaccine experiments at Fort Riley have been able to escape scrutiny as a potential cause of the Spanish Flu for 100 years and counting.

How did the “Spanish Flu” Spread so Widely and so Quickly?
There is an element of a perfect storm in how the Gates bacteria spread. WWI ended only 10 months after the first injections. Unfortunately for the 50-100 million who died, those soldiers injected with horse-infused bacteria moved quickly during those 10 months.

An article from 2008 on the CDC’s website describes how sick WWI soldiers could pass along the bacteria to others by becoming “cloud adults.”
“Finally, for brief periods and to varying degrees, affected hosts became “cloud adults” who increased the aerosolization of colonizing strains of bacteria, particularly pneumococci, hemolytic streptococci, H. influenzae, and S. aureus.

“For several days during local epidemics—particularly in crowded settings such as hospital wards, military camps, troop ships, and mines (and trenches)—some persons were immunologically susceptible to, infected with, or recovering from infections with influenza virus.

“Persons with active infections were aerosolizing the bacteria that colonized their noses and throats, while others—often, in the same “breathing spaces”—were profoundly susceptible to invasion of and rapid spread through their lungs by their own or others’ colonizing bacteria.” (1)
Three times in his report on the Fort Riley vaccine experiment, Dr. Gates states that some soldiers had a “severe reaction” indicating “an unusual individual susceptibility to the vaccine”.

While the vaccine made many sick, it only killed those who were susceptible to it. Those who became sick and survived became “cloud adults” who spread the bacteria to others, which created more cloud adults, spreading to others where it killed the susceptible, repeating the cycle until there were no longer wartime unsanitary conditions, and there were no longer millions of soldiers to experiment on.

The toll on US troops was enormous and it is well documented. Dr. Carol Byerly describes how the “influenza” traveled like wildfire through the US military. (substitute “bacteria” for Dr. Byerly’s “influenza” or “virus”):
“… Fourteen of the largest training camps had reported influenza outbreaks in March, April, or May, and some of the infected troops carried the virus with them aboard ships to France …

“As soldiers in the trenches became sick, the military evacuated them from the front lines and replaced them with healthy men.

“This process continuously brought the virus into contact with new hosts—young, healthy soldiers in which it could adapt, reproduce, and become extremely virulent without danger of burning out.

“… Before any travel ban could be imposed, a contingent of replacement troops departed Camp Devens (outside of Boston) for Camp Upton, Long Island, the Army’s debarkation point for France, and took influenza with them.

“Medical officers at Upton said it arrived “abruptly” on September 13, 1918, with 38 hospital admissions, followed by 86 the next day, and 193 the next.

“Hospital admissions peaked on October 4 with 483, and within 40 days, Camp Upton sent 6,131 men to the hospital for influenza. Some developed pneumonia so quickly that physicians diagnosed it simply by observing the patient rather than listening to the lungs…” (7)

“The United States was not the only country in possession of the Rockefeller Institute’s experimental bacterial vaccine.

“A 1919 report from the Institute states: “Reference should be made that before the United States entered the war (in April 1917) the Institute had resumed the preparation of anti-meningococcic serum, in order to meet the requests of England, France, Belgium Italy and other countries.”

“The same report states: “In order to meet the suddenly increased demand for the curative serums worked out at the Institute, a special stable for horses was quickly erected …” (8)
An experimental anti-meningoccic serum made in horses and injected into soldiers who would be entering the cramped and unsanitary living conditions of war … what could possibly go wrong?

Is the bacterial serum made in horses at the Rockefeller Institute which was injected into US soldiers and distributed to numerous other countries responsible for the 50-100 million people killed by bacterial lung infections in 1918-19?

The Institute says it distributed the bacterial serum to England, France, Belgium, Italy and other countries during WWI. Not enough is known about how these countries experimented on their soldiers.

I hope independent researchers will take an honest look at these questions.

The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions
I do not believe that anyone involved in these vaccine experiments was trying to harm anyone.

Some will see the name Rockefeller and yell. “Illuminati!” or “culling the herd!”
I do not believe that’s what happened.

I believe standard medical hubris is responsible – doctors “playing God”, thinking they can tame nature without creating unanticipated problems.

With medical hubris, I do not think the situation has changed materially over the past 100 years.

What Now?
The vaccine industry is always looking for human test subjects. They have the most success when they are able to find populations who not in a position to refuse.

Soldiers (9), infants, the disabled, prisoners, those in developing nations – anyone not in a position to refuse.

Vaccine experimentation on vulnerable populations is not an issue of the past. Watch this video clip of Dr. Stanley Plotkin where he describes using experimental vaccines on orphans, the mentally retarded, prisoners, and those under colonial rule.

The deposition was in January 2018. The hubris of the medical community is the same or worse now than it was 100 years ago.

Watch as Dr. Plotkin admits to writing:
“The question is whether we are to have experiments performed on fully functioning adults and on children who are potentially contributors to society or to perform initial studies in children and adults who are human in form but not in social potential.”
Please watch the horrifying video clip of Dr. Stanley Plotkin testifying under oath about the experiments that the pharmaceutical industry has done on unaware, uninformed patients. https://youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw (10)

In part because the global community is well aware of medical hubris and well aware of the poor record of medical ethics, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights developed international standards regarding the right to informed consent to preventative medical procedures like vaccination.

The international community is well aware that the pharmaceutical industry makes mistakes and is always on the lookout for human test subjects. The Declaration states that individuals have the human right to consent to any preventative medical intervention like vaccination.

Article 3 – Human Dignity and Human Rights
1. Human dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms are to be fully respected.

2. The interests and welfare of the individual should have priority over the sole interest of science or society.
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice. (11)
Clean water, sanitation, flushing toilets, refrigerated foods and healthy diets have done and still do far more to protect humanity from infectious diseases than any vaccine program.

Doctor and the vaccine industry have usurped credit which rightfully belongs to plumbers, electricians, sandhogs, engineers and city planners.

For these reasons, policy makers at all levels of government should protect the human rights and individual liberties of individuals to opt out of vaccine programs via exemptions.

The hubris of the medical community will never go away. Policy makers need to know that vaccines like all medical interventions are not infallible.

Vaccines are not magic. We all have different susceptibility to disease. Human beings are not one size fits all.

In 1918-19, the vaccine industry experimented on soldiers, likely with disastrous results.

In 2018, the vaccine industry experiments on infants every day. The vaccine schedule has never been tested as it is given. The results of the experiment are in: 1 in 7 of America’s fully vaccinated children is in some form of special education and over 50% have some form of chronic illness. (12)

In 1918-19, there was no safety follow up after vaccines were delivered.

In 2018, there is virtually no safety follow up after a vaccine is delivered.

Who exactly gave you that flu shot at Rite Aid? Do you have their cell number of the store employee if something goes wrong?

In 1918-19, there was no liability to the manufacturer for injuries or death caused by vaccines.

In 2018, there is no liability for vaccine manufacturers for injuries or death caused by vaccines, which was formalized in 1986. (13)

In 1918-19, there was no independent investigative follow up challenging the official story that “Spanish Flu” was some mystery illness which dropped from the sky. I suspect that many of those at the Rockefeller Institute knew what happened, and that many of the doctors who administered the vaccines to the troops knew what happened, but those people are long dead.

In 2018, the Pharmaceutical industry is the largest campaign donor to politicians and the largest advertiser in all forms of media, so not much has changed over 100 years.

This story will likely be ignored by mainstream media because their salaries are paid by pharmaceutical advertising.

The next time you hear someone say “vaccines save lives” please remember that the true story of the cost/benefit of vaccines is much more complicated than their three-word slogan. Also remember that vaccines may have killed 50-100 million people in 1918-19. If true, those costs greatly outweighed any benefit, especially considering that plumbers, electricians, sandhogs and engineers did, and continue to do, the real work which reduces mortality from disease.

Vaccines are not magic. Human rights and bioethics are critically important. Policy makers should understand the history of medical hubris and protect individual and parental human rights as described in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.

——

Kevin Barry is the President of First Freedoms, Inc. a 501.c.3. He is a former federal attorney, a rep at the UN HQ in New York and the author of Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC. Please support our work at www.firstfreedoms.org (http://www.firstfreedoms.org/) Originally published at FirstFreedoms.org. Reprinted with permission.

References
1. Deaths from Bacterial Pneumonia during 1918–19 Influenza Pandemic
John F. Brundage* and G. Dennis Shanks†
Author affiliations: *Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA; †Australian Army Malaria Institute, Enoggera, Queensland, Australia
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/8/07-1313_article

2. World Health Organization: Unsafe drinking water, sanitation and waste management
http://www.who.int/sustainable-development/cities/health-risks/water-sanitation/en/

3. J Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 1; 198(7): 962–970.
Predominant Role of Bacterial Pneumonia as a Cause of Death in Pandemic Influenza: Implications for Pandemic Influenza Preparedness
David M. Morens, Jeffery K. Taubenberger, and Anthony S. Fauci
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599911/

4. PDF of Fort Riley Study (1918)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2126288/pdf/449.pdf

5. American Experience, “The First Wave”, PBS
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/influenza-first-wave/

6. Mayo Clinic: Meningitis
www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/meningitis/symptoms-causes/syc-20350508 (https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/meningitis/symptoms-causes/syc-20350508)

7. Public Health Rep. 2010; 125(Suppl 3): 82–91.
The U.S. Military and the Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919
Carol R. Byerly, PhD
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2862337/

8. Rockefeller Institute pamphlet PDF (1919)
https://digitalcommons.rockefeller.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=rockefeller-institute-descriptive-pamphlet

9. Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans’ Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century, A Staff Report Prepared for the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, United States Senate, December 1994
https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=438835

10. Dr. Stanley Plotkin: vaccine experiments on orphans, the mentally retarded, and others (January 2018)
https://youtu.be/yevV_slu7Dw

11. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (19 October 2005)
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

12. CDC Offers New Stats On Disability Prevalence
https://www.disabilityscoop.com/2016/03/14/cdc-disability-prevalence/22034/

13. 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act
https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/childhood-vaccine-injury-act-protect/
About the author: Dr. Gary G. Kohls is a medical doctor working for most of his career as a rural, full-service family practice physician. In 1984 he was awarded a Bush Foundation Medical Fellowship. In the early 1990s Dr. Kohls worked at a Regional Treatment Center as a physician for psychiatric inpatients and later worked at a psychological services clinic. Now retired, he continues to present lectures and seminars to healthcare professionals and the general public, as well as editing the popular e-newsletter Preventive Psychiatry E-Newsletter (PPEN).

greybeard

22nd May 2020, 14:15

Gwin Ru -- you sure post some interesting information
Thank you
Chris

onawah

28th May 2020, 03:49

Autism Numbers Increase by 10 Percent in U.S.
by TVR Staff
Published May 24, 2020
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/05/autism-numbers-increase-by-10-percent-in-u-s/

"According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the number of children diagnosed with autism in the United States continues to increase. In a report published on Mar. 27, 2020, the CDC estimated the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the country is now one in 54 children—up from one in 59 reported by the agency in April 2018, for an increase of nearly 10 percent.1 2 3

The new rate is based on a 2016 survey of eight-year-old children across 11 residential communities in the U.S. that are part of an active ASD surveillance program known as the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) network in the states of Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Tennessee and Wisconsin.1

The old rate was based on a similar survey done in 2014.4

Autism Prevalence in U.S. Could be Higher Than One Child in 54
The one in 54 rate does not account for the number of eight year old children with an ASD diagnosis in 2017, 2018 and 2019, so the actual rate may be higher. In 2017, the National Health Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), which is the U.S. government’s principal health statistics agency, published health data for 2014-2016, which estimated autism prevalence for children aged 3-17 years at 1 in 36 in 2016, compared to 1 in 43 in 2015 and 1 in 45 in 2014.4

The newly published CDC report said that boys were four times more likely to be diagnosed with autism than girls—the same ratio as in previous reports. It also found that ASD rates varied across the ADDM communities, with the highest registered in New Jersey (one in 32) and the lowest in Colorado (one in 76). It also found no difference in ASD rates for black and white children.1 2 3

According to Stuart Shapira, MD of the CDC, “Some of the increase in autism prevalence might be due to the way children are identified, diagnosed and receiving services in their communities. The increase may also reflect reductions in racial differences in identification of autism.”3

In the 1990s, One Child in 2,500 Had Autism in the U.S.

In a 2018 article in The Vaccine Reaction, Rishma Parpia and Barbara Loe Fisher noted that autism was once a rare brain and immune system disorder but now has become common among children. They wrote: “In the 1990s, autism prevalence estimates ranged from one in 2,500 to one in 1,000 children. By 2000, the CDC estimated ASD prevalence was one in 150 children and, by 2006, it had increased to one in 110 children.”5 "

References:

ADDM, ASD, autism, Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring, autism spectrum disorder, Barbara Loe Fisher, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Colorado, Marco Cáceres, National Health Center for Health Statistics, National Vaccine Information Center, NCHS, New Jersey, NVIC, Rishma Parpia, Stuart Shapira, The Vaccine Reaction

Gwin Ru

10th June 2020, 11:41

The Truth About Vaccines - All Nine Episodes.

The Truth About Vaccines Episode 1 | Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Interview (1:57:24)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/anVJq5mffggl (https://www.bitchute.com/video/anVJq5mffggl)

The Truth About Vaccines Episode 2 | What's In A Vaccines? Are Vaccines Effective? (1:32:55)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WslPQ9HCCkAf (https://www.bitchute.com/video/WslPQ9HCCkAf)

The Truth About Vaccines Episode 3 | Vaccinating For The Greater Good? (1:26:23)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jmHynqlAMKYG (https://www.bitchute.com/video/jmHynqlAMKYG)

The Truth About Vaccines Episode 4 | HIB And Pneumococcal Vaccines And Herd Immunity (1:27:14)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fEuuobohEjc9 (https://www.bitchute.com/video/fEuuobohEjc9)

The Truth About Vaccines Episode 5 | HPV And Hepatitis B Vaccines (1:23:21)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/69szcoASWtN8 (https://www.bitchute.com/video/69szcoASWtN8)

The Truth About Vaccines Episode 6 | CDC, Chicken Pox, Rotavirus Vaccines (1:28:39)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/qsWrRHQGexCT (https://www.bitchute.com/video/qsWrRHQGexCT)

The Truth About Vaccines Episode 7 | Natural Immunization, Homeoprophylaxis, Freedom Of Choice (1:49:45)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/f01N41Hobfuo (https://www.bitchute.com/video/f01N41Hobfuo)

The Truth About Vaccines Episode 8 | Censorship And Suppression (1:08:40)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CIpSOtpr8UUF (https://www.bitchute.com/video/CIpSOtpr8UUF)

The Truth About Vaccines Episode 9 | W.H.O.'s Not Telling the Truth? (1:19:09)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vTtPxkszNeWe (https://www.bitchute.com/video/vTtPxkszNeWe)

Cosmored

14th June 2020, 19:57

I haven't read the whole thread so there might be some repeated stuff here.

This is some of the info I've found on this subject.

Controversy Over Vaccine Research
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTh97pANTxc

Review Of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoT10nxZrVo

https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/387/364/b3a.jpeg

Vaxxed From Cover Up to Catastrophe 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGxrjDOcZh0&feature=emb_title

VAXXED2
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=vaxxed2&&view=detail&mid=2F344DE0F97F169B3A802F344DE0F97F169B3A80&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=/videos/search?q=vaxxed2&qs=n&form=QBVDMH&sp=-1&pq=vaxxed2&sc=3-7&sk=&cvid=94E23B5DBBF44A6CB176F8A88F074947

Nurse Knows The Truth About Vaccines
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=vaxxed2&ru=%2fvideos%2fsearch%3fq%3dvaxxed2%26qs%3dn%26form%3dQBVDMH%26sp%3d-1%26pq%3dvaxxed2%26sc%3d3-7%26sk%3d%26cvid%3d94E23B5DBBF44A6CB176F8A88F074947&view=detail&mid=0714FC1A7CFEBE7B04810714FC1A7CFEBE7B0481&&FORM=VDRVRV

https://www.projectcensored.org/us-media-blackout-italian-courts-rule-vaccines-caused-autism/
(excerpt)
---------------------------------------------------------
US Media Blackout: Italian Courts Rule Vaccines Caused Autism
April 1, 2015
Like the U.S., Italy has a national vaccine injury compensation program, giving financial support to those people injured by vaccinations. On September 23, 2014, an Italian court in Milan awarded compensation to a previously healthy boy for vaccine-induced autism after receiving three doses of GlaxoSmithKline’s Infanrix Hexa, a hexavalent vaccine administered in the first year of life to protect children from polio, diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, pertussis and Haemophilus influenza type B. In addition to these antigens, however, the vaccine also contained thimerosal, the mercury-containing preservative, aluminum, an adjuvant, as well as other toxic ingredients. The child regressed into autism shortly after receiving the three doses.

Based on expert medical testimony, the court concluded that the child more than likely suffered autism and brain damage because of the neurotoxic mercury and aluminum in the vaccine as well as his particular susceptibility from a genetic mutation. Presiding Judge Nicola Di Leo considered another piece of damning evidence, a 1271-pageconfidential GlaxoSmithKline report. This industry document provided ample evidence of adverse events from the vaccine, including five known cases of autism resulting from the vaccine’s administration during its clinical trials.

Two years earlier, an Italian court found that a Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine (MMR) had caused autism in a 15-month-old boy. Taken together, the court found that both the MMR and the hexavalent thimerosal and aluminum-containing vaccine could trigger autism. These court decisions flatly contradict the decisions from the U.S. vaccine court based on similar claims. The Italian press has devoted considerable attention to this decision and its public health implications, while the U.S. press has been silent.

------------------------------------------------

It's really hard to find something objective on YouTube now. Here are some good alternatives.

https://altcensored.com/search?q=vaccines
https://search.bitchute.com/renderer?query=Vaccines+Autism
https://archive.org/search.php?query=vaccines%20autism

This is a must-see.

Doctors Who Discovered Cancer Enzymes In Vaccines All Found Murdered
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6wudTuFr35ZP/

Delight

17th June 2020, 00:40

Poison poison poison equals catastrophe.

id7CL09XuIc

Cosmored

17th June 2020, 18:16

The video at the bottom of post #485 only works some of the time so here are some other links to it.

Doctors are Being Killed for Saving Your Children ~ Most Urgent!!!
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Doctors+are+being+killed+for+saving+your+children&&view=detail&mid=02993AEAACB44A83F34802993AEAACB44A83F348&&FORM=VRDGAR&ru=%2Fvideos%2Fsearch%3Fq%3DDoctors%2Bare%2Bbeing%2Bkilled%2Bfor%2Bsaving%2Byour%2Bchildren%26FORM%3 DHDRSC3

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Doctors+are+being+killed+for+saving+your+children&ru=%2fvideos%2fsearch%3fq%3dDoctors%2bare%2bbeing%2bkilled%2bfor%2bsaving%2byour%2bchildren%26FORM%3 dHDRSC3&view=detail&mid=909EB958C61580EA4D45909EB958C61580EA4D45&&FORM=VDRVRV

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYvLPCze_So

It has a part 2.

Doctors are Being Killed for Saving Your Children part 2
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=Doctors+are+being+killed+for+saving+your+children&ru=%2fvideos%2fsearch%3fq%3dDoctors%2bare%2bbeing%2bkilled%2bfor%2bsaving%2byour%2bchildren%26FORM%3 dHDRSC3&view=detail&mid=A75E30FAC6B83319F1FBA75E30FAC6B83319F1FB&&FORM=VDRVRV

Part 2 seems a little far-fetched. Should this be taken seriously? What does everybody think?

I googled the title of the video and got some articles.

https://freedomoutpost.com/doctors-who-discovered-cancer-enzymes-in-vaccines-all-found-murdered/?__cf_chl_captcha_tk__=e57ad2787b0c8f42d86b3e2ee0813c8e5efd05bb-1592417344-0-AYY2_BlsV77dtxVadTOe3nl4jFuaHrxiDA8EO4kmaPBH5zB1iW0LMbnAfQHOKcnupB1TwUI0bC_w9m-w68n0GHaSPxNwyty_O0XAnPRcZCpX67KpqtQcTbkIK7aj4wdYENOas-RhhtnsJY9BeO8Xv_LqXbZxK0i7KzFNrAwyXIzbXfI_nB0DunAyyeSDCmJCm_gMS-QyJkUQoN49zEaj3RlLdUPqnLc3a4HEJgpgahFrQvX_1j1NPWbSF7fK4qcxgE_qDSh5ogBZegOvZGWylmqxSdy9Rfi-rc9z5Ihu9YppmIk7u6qzg9hFA7CT0Ke6kkUuoNNribuzRq1qn1NVpUKnDrKdb3oeQuhLEuUheVV4VHVCCJRw31L8ExVBPWTYDpPO l83ULDxh69bgXXJAbPKGMMVEESRKGhDA2EDIgxbbdfA3LU-PLP9hPTCNDPrOv-H4Q64fZx_vCXQ2xLSmJ0cPxVWtZGmhvsZiZhHqZGQoBE9imn-aJUpBv0L4bxM8dgcm2TAvMqxL__-tURaJCz8Vg7rO3UeuzDiFc9xzebVpb_ycFpiDxQEDhbgCgBQ46k5hWpToRmHp3J-AhS3uHY8
(excerpt)
-----------------------------------------------------
Nagalese prevents vitamin D being produced In the body
Not long ago, Neon Nettle reported on the epidemic of doctors being murdered, most of which were in Florida, U.S. The scientists all shared a common trait, they had all discovered that nagalase enzyme protein was being added to vaccines which were then administrated to humans.(SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO)

Nagalese is what prevents vitamin D from being produced in the body, which is the body’s main defence to naturally kill cancer cells.
According to Thebigriddle.com: Nagalase is a protein that’s also created by all cancer cells. This protein is also found in very high concentrations in autistic children. And they’re PUTTING it in our vaccines!!
Trending: CIA Whistleblower Kevin Shipp: ‘Hillary Clinton Was And Is Running A Global Financial Criminal Syndicate’
This prevents the body from utilizing the Vitamin D necessary to fight cancer and prevent autism. Nagalese disables the immune system. It’s also known to cause Type 2 Diabetes. So basically…they weren’t killing these doctors because they had found the cure to cancer or were successfully treating autism… they’re killing them because these Dr’s had been researching and had the evidence that the vaccines they’re injecting our precious children with are CAUSING our current cancer and autism crisis!!

And that it’s obviously being done knowingly and on purpose! The Dr’s they killed in FL had been collaborating and were getting ready to go public with the information.
Depopulation 101..add poison to vaccines…make it law that all children must be injected to attend school. Slow kill methods. They think they’re being fair w/ their “survival of the fittest” type mentality. Only the best genes survive? These people have no souls.
Dr Ted Broer broke it on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report and it took them a whole hour just to get him on air b/c their 3 hour show was brought down and every line they tried to use kept disconnecting…and then their servers were brought down.

They asked a bunch of ppl to pray against the attack and then finally got him on a secured line..and so a full hour into the show they were finally back on the air and connected to Dr Broer and the first thing he said was “I am in no way suicidal.” He was super nervous holding onto this info…afraid he’d be taken out Hastings style before he got a chance to say it publicly. So listen to this short clip of him breaking the story.
It’s a 19 min clip but the most important info is heard within the first 10 min. It is def some of the most important news I've ever heard. And it needs to go viral.

palehorse

18th June 2020, 04:51

onawah

11th July 2020, 00:29

TRUTH with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Episode 7
7/9/20
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/truth-with-robert-f-kennedy-jr-episode-7/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=a395f6e2-7587-4568-888d-e952f4666aec

"In Episode 7 of our weekly “TRUTH” series, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. talks with J.B. Handley, Author of “How to End the Autism Epidemic” about two of his recently CHD published articles “Lockdown Lunacy” and “Lockdown Lunacy 2.0”. The discussion tackles the herd immunity threshold of COVID and many other subjects of the day."
OHeP7nJA9MY

Gwin Ru

12th September 2020, 10:23

Growing Fear of Vaccines is Justified (https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/09/growing-fear-of-vaccines.html)

by Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz (http://drlenhorowitz.com/)
(henrymakow.com)
September 11, 2020

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/vir-vac.jpg
Vaccine hesitancy has gone mainstream. Less than 25% of Americans polled near the time of this writing stated they would get the approved vaccinations.

"No vaccine containing genetic materials are safe, even if they were cleansed of poisonous heavy metals and toxic chemicals. VACCINES CAN NEVER BE MADE 'SAFE' BY REASON OF THEIR TOXIC INGREDIENTS. The evasion of this fact makes one complicit in genocide (besides demonstrating boundless stupidity)."

Hijacked by the pharmaceutical industry, the field of medicine is now in the business of poisoning us. The mass media and government are accessories to this crime. Everyone concerned will make a bundle.

Vaccine Hesitancy Goes Mainstream: Politicians and Drug Companies Go Bonkers!

by Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz (http://drlenhorowitz.com/)
(henrymakow.com)

As a world-leading 'anti-vaccinationist'-an honorable distinction denied me by vaccination proponents who prefer to evade and conceal my decades-long influence, and the vast majority of "anti-vaxxers" too who lamely proclaim "we're not opposed to vaccines, we just want to make them safer"-I declare victory over pandemic insanity and political hypocrisy.

The absurdity that "fast-tracked" COVID-19 vaccines might be proved "safe" before, or soon after, the 2020 presidential election exceeds credulity. My allies' efforts to expose the delinquency in this delusion, and the 'unconscious' politicians promoting COVID-19 vaccines, are obviously succeeding 'against all odds.'

The 'politicization' of COVID-19 vaccinationsdramatically exposes endemic stupidity and lethal fraud characterizing this entire industry and its political influence.

For example, the vice-presidential candidate, Kamala Harris, classically demonstrated such unconscionable ignorance and official malfeasance on CNN (https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/05/politics/kamala-harris-not-trust-trump-vaccine-cnntv/index.html) when asked whether she would get a vaccine that was approved and distributed before the election. Harris replied,
"Well, I think that's going to be an issue for all of us."

"I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he's talking about," she continued.

"I will not take his word for it."
Notice the word "safety" was not part of her vocabulary. Notice too that Harris omitted even the word vaccine from her diatribe smearing Trump, as though he was administering the injection.

Harris deceptively evaded the most critical issue. The hypocrisy of considering "efficacy" and "reliability" without safety is absurd.

But that's what's happening across the political spectrum. Pure deadly madness.

REALITY CHECK
NO VACCINE containing genetic materials are safe, even if they were cleansed of poisonous heavy metals and toxic chemicals. VACCINES CAN NEVER BE MADE 'SAFE' BY REASON OF THEIR TOXIC INGREDIENTS. The evasion of this fact makes one complicit in genocide (besides demonstrating boundless stupidity).

But the wholesale undermining of intelligence in this field is clear and convincing of mass mind control. Politicizing red herrings, diversions that evade poisonous realities, generates campaign financing especially from Big Pharma and Big Biotech companies.

Notice that synchronous with this stupidity and insanity spreading mainstream, 'damage control' was issued in a joint statement assuring COVID-19 vaccines will be safe and effective (https://www.statnews.com/2020/09/08/pharma-pledge-reassure-covid-19-safety/). Leading industrialists banking on genocide, the companies given billions of dollars in government grants, making trillions from vaccine injuries, genetic damage, and cancers-the world's leading moneymakers and population controllers-assured us by stating an impossibility!

Their "vaccine safety and efficacy" is an oxymoron.

DEADLY DESPICABLE PHARMA
The group of nine leading companies that pledged to approve only "safe and effective" COVID-19 vaccines are full of the same monkey feces AstraZenca, Oxford, and Johnson & Johnson uses to make their false promises.

Their obvious propaganda responds to unprecedented public distrust. Vaccine hesitancy has gone mainstream. Less than 25% of Americans polled near the time of this writing stated they would get the approved vaccinations.

This new, monumental, life-saving victory for yours truly and my extended family of activists derives from the now widely held view that "the Covid-19 vaccine development process is politically tainted," press reports heralded.

"Politically tainted?" Is this really news?

Leading vaccine industrialists and propagandists have always been "politically tainted. The entire vaccine industry sources from the same political financiers that brought you all the world's wars. If you don't believe that, study political science and banking history to reprogram your brain.

According to the industry's press release, the PhRMA giants pledged to "make the safety and well-being of vaccinated individuals our top priority."

THIS PROMISE IS STUPID and DECEPTIVE beyond belief.

Would any reasonably informed and intelligent person believe top executives at Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi, Novavax, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and BioNTech would actually prioritize consumer health and safety above corporate profits?

OF COURSE NOT!

ASSURING SAFETY
The PhRMA cartel assured civilization that the new vaccine developers would "continue to impose high ethical and scientific standards on the vaccine-testing process." They would apply for government authorizations only "after demonstrating safety and efficacy through a Phase 3 clinical study."

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/cus1597189772627.jpg

The word "continue" is curious. The prospective pledge is dubious. Especially because network television already shows (in September 2020) mass production of COVID-19 labeled vials full of the not-yet-proven "safe and effective" vaccine that is being stockpiled and distributed to satisfy the "authorized" billion-dollar grants for "fast-tracked" orders. (https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/11/trump-says-us-has-reached-deal-with-moderna-for-100-million-doses-of-coronavirus-vaccine.html)

What's wrong with that picture?

These "high ethical" concerns and "scientific standards" are reminiscent of previous disasters and scandals.

Recall that AstraZeneca's "FluMist" nasal spray (https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/flumist-nasal-flu-vaccine-can-come-back-vaccine-advisers-say-n849986) was similarly touted "safe and effective" before it was pulled from the market in 2016 for killing more people than it supposedly helped.

Recall the FluMist vaccine's three percent efficacy. That did not surpass the double-digit percentage of people sickened and killed by this "injection-free" H1N1 Swine Flu remedy.

Remember medical history. Merck's highly publicized polio vaccines produced masses of paralyzed polio victims, and their subsequent 'attenuated' virus caused pandemic cancers. If that's not bad enough Merck's hepatitis B vaccine (https://medicalveritas.org/origin-of-aids/) given to gay volunteersin Greenwich Village, blacks in Central Africa, and Willowbrook State School mentally retarded children on Staten Island, delivered HIV/AIDS to the world.

Was this "ethical" and "safe"? Was this "authorized"?

--

Bill Ryan

22nd September 2020, 10:27

In this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?10672-WADE-FRAZIER-A-Healed-Planet&p=1379384#post1379384) of a few hours ago, Wade Frazier highly recommended (and reviewed) this book:

http://libgen.rs/covers/2501000/29bc848a374667c170761e090c09889d-g.jpg

Here it is: :thumbsup:

Vaccines: A Reappraisal, by Richard Moskowitz, MD
http://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Richard%20Moskowitz%2C%20MD%20-%20Vaccines%2C%20a%20Reappraisal.pdf

Here's a copy of his excellent post:

~~~

Hi:

I have read many books over the years that challenge vaccination (http://ahealedplanet.net/forum/threads/80-Vaccination?p=184&viewfull=1#post184), and I just finished what may be the best I have read so far, by an MD in general practice, titled Vaccination: A Reappraisal (https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36266133-vaccines). Like that women’s death camp book (http://ahealedplanet.net/forum/threads/142-The-NASA-Nazis/page2?p=2476&viewfull=1#post2476) that I recently read, it is hard to know where to start. One day, I will update my medical racket essay again, and the vaccination section (http://ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#vaccination) will get a little more work. The book did not tell me much that I was not already aware of, to one degree or another, but it was a tour de force in summarizing the issues, and it got pretty deeply into the details.

The bottom line is that vaccination can’t take credit for vanquishing any disease, just like fluoridation’s (http://ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm#compulsory) promoters can’t make any credible claims as to its safety and efficacy. The author, Richard Moskowitz, made the standard observation that the childhood diseases that children are vaccinated against today - measles, mumps, chickenpox – have denied children’s immune systems the chance to use those diseases to develop. People who had those mild childhood diseases, like I did, got a lifetime benefit of a healthy immune system. Those who got vaccinated for them were doomed to a lifetime of chronic diseases. The reactions of the body to the real disease, versus the ersatz versions from vaccination, are completely different. With the real disease, the body reacts “acutely,” with fever and rashes, and when it is over, the body’s immune response ends, but it will never get those illnesses again. It learned from the experience. With vaccination, the body continues to put out antibodies as if it still has the illness, the immune system is tricked and overworked and, eventually, it begins to attack normal cells, which leads to autoimmune disorders. There is a great deal of evidence for that.

Vaccination: A Reappraisal is essentially a more professional version of my medical racket essay (http://ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm), written by an MD. He cited a lot of the same authors and evidence that I do. Moskowitz wrote at length on the corruption of the CDC, and how Big Pharma is a pure racket anymore.

Anybody who denies the link between vaccination and autism is ignorant, gullible, or lying. Autism is only one of many neurological disorders linked to vaccination. Of the many incredible statistics in Vaccination: A Reappraisal, the most shocking may have been that more than 25% of all American adolescents and young adults have some form of brain damage, per the CDC’s own statistics. Autism incidence has increased 40-fold in the past 40 years, and the largely unvaccinated Amish have less than 2% the rate of autism that the general American population does. There have been several studies of unvaccinated populations, and they have greatly reduced chronic conditions, of anywhere from half to 10% of the vaccinated population or less, such as in a study in New Zealand, while 5% of the vaccinated surveyed had their tonsils removed, none of the unvaccinated did.

In the end, Moskowitz said that the issue was largely one of capitalism run amuck, with this kind of religious faith among the proponents of vaccination, when they did not have awesome conflicts of interest. As with alternative cancer treatment (http://ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm#racket), the racket is alive and well, and witch hunts are mounted on doctors and scientists who dissent from the dogma, some of which Moskowitz chronicled. Since the medical racket is one of the global cartels (http://ahealedplanet.net/forum/forums/21-The-rackets), the “capitalism on steroids” aspect of it is very familiar (http://ahealedplanet.net/humanity.htm#steroids). :)

I won’t be lining up to get my COVID-19 vaccine. :)

Best,

Wade

Franny

4th October 2020, 04:16

Very interesting they have a major mainstream study. It will be interesting to see if the information goes mainstream news as well.

Large study concludes mercury can now be listed “as a cause of autism”

In Brief

The Facts: A new study published in Pediatric Health Medicine and Therapeutics concludes that there is "as significant relationship between mercury and autism." Enough for it to be listed as a cause of autism.

Reflect On: Why is our environment so polluted with mercury and other toxic substances and heavy metals? Why do we use mercury in some of our health products and services?

What Happened: A new study published in Pediatric Health Medicine and Therapeutics has concluded that there is “as significant relationship between mercury concentration and autism. Thus, the concentration of mercury can be listed as a pathogenic cause (disease-causing) for autism. The study also found significant amounts of lead exist within the brains of people with autism.

As the study explains: In this study, searching Scopus, PubMed, and Science Direct databases, 18 articles conducted in different countries from 1982 to 2019 were collected. Studies’ heterogeneity was investigated using the I2 index. The data were analyzed using R and STATA software.

In these 18 studies, 1797 patients (981 cases and 816 controls) aged 2 to 16 years were examined. Concentration of the samples (blood, hair, and nails) for both case and control groups was evaluated. There was no significant relationship between copper concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 0.02 (− 1.16,1.20); I2=97.7%; P=0.972); there was a significant relationship between mercury concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 1.96 (0.56,3.35); I2=98.6%; P=0.006); there was also a significant relationship between lead concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 2.81 (1.64,3.98); I2=97.8%; P=0.000).

This is quite a significant finding, and complements other large studies. For example, a 2013 Meta-Analysis published in the Journal Bio Med Research International found that:

“The studies upon which the CDC relies and over which it exerted some level of control report that there is no increased risk of autism from exposure to organic Hg in vaccines, and some of these studies even reported that exposure to Thimerosal appeared to decrease the risk of autism. These six studies are in sharp contrast to research conducted by independent researchers over the past 75+ years that have consistently found Thimerosal to be harmful. As mentioned in the Introduction section, many studies conducted by independent investigators have found Thimerosal to be associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Considering that there are many studies conducted by independent researchers which show a relationship between Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders, the results of the six studies examined in this review, particularly those showing the protective effects of Thimerosal, should bring into question the validity of the methodology used in the studies.”

Here’s a video (https://youtu.be/85tgwh3HpsM) from the University of Calgary showing how mercury damages the brain.

In nature, toxic metals generally are bound with other elements rather than being present in their pure form. However, with the advent of large-scale industrial processes to extract metals from naturally occurring compounds, humans let the genie out of the bottle, contributing significantly (http://www.inchem.org/documents/cicads/cicads/cicad50.htm#2.1) to the distribution of mercury, aluminum and other heavy metals in the environment. When released from nature’s semi-protective hold, these “invariably toxic (https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2014/491316/)” metals wreak havoc on living systems, including humans, animals and plants alike.

Modern-day scientists have been amassing evidence of mercury’s toxicity for decades, with a growing focus in recent years on the metal’s association with neurodevelopmental disorders (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733900), including autism spectrum disorder (http://www.ane.pl/pdf/7212.pdf) (ASD). A new review article (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28889024) in the multidisciplinary journal Environmental Research pulls together a wide body of literature with the aim of summing up current research and emerging trends in mercury toxicology. Geir Bjørklund (http://www.conem.org/people/bjorklundbio/), the study’s lead author, is the founder of Norway’s non-profit Council for Nutritional and Environmental Medicine (http://www.conem.org/) and has published prolifically on topics related to heavy metals, autoimmune disorders and ASD. – Robert F Kennedy Jr (https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/interwoven-global-epidemics-mercury-toxicity-autism/).

Mercury is not the only issue.

A paper published in 2018 (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763) discovered high amounts of aluminum in the brain tissue of people with autism. That particular paper has now been downloaded more than 1 million times (https://www.instagram.com/p/CDyPyCCHPbt/). The study was conducted by Dr. Christopher Exley, considered to be one of the world’s leading experts in aluminum toxicology. He has looked at more than 100 brains, and the aluminum content in those with autism doesn’t compare at all to “normal” brains.

He and a team of scientists from multiple countries recently published a paper (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X20301978) in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology titled “The role of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines raises issues that deserve independent, rigorous and honest science.” In their publication, they provide evidence for their position that “the safety of aluminium-based vaccine adjuvants, like that of any environmental factor presenting a risk of neurotoxicity and to which the young child is exposed, must be seriously evaluated without further delay, particularly at a time when the CDC is announcing a still increasing prevalence of autism spectrum disorders, of 1 child in 54 in the USA.”

Why This Is Important: Some people diagnosed with autism may be gifted, it’s a wide spectrum, and others may have suffered actual brain damage and other changes due to environmental factors. Autism has longed thought to be due to predominately genetic factors, but science and the growing prevalence of autism has show that heavy metals, herbicides, pesticides and more and should be strongly considered and looked into further.

The Takeaway: Why does humanity live in a way that severely pollutes our environment? Is healthcare really bout healthcare, or does profit come first? What time of influence does the pharmaceutical industry have on medical policy and medical education? Why do we obey instructions handed down from something that has been exposed as extremely corrupt? Why do rely on others to solve our health problems instead of ourselves? How much of what we use as ‘medicine’ is actually necessary? Why do we live the way we live on our planet?

By Arjun Walia / Collective Evolution Reporter

Bill Ryan

7th October 2020, 14:27

onawah

11th October 2020, 19:12

"Truth About Vaccines" three new episodes will be playing free online along with the whole series from Oct.13-23
New episodes entitled:
"Censorship & Suppression"
"W.H.O.'s Not Telling the Truth?"
"Vaccines 101 (Vanquishing the 'Vaccinati' with Veracity)"
Register here: https://go.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/ttav/#registernow

Bill Ryan

14th October 2020, 12:02

onawah

12th December 2020, 18:02

There was no autism in Vietnam before Bill Gates brought his vaccines
Dr Anthony Phan, MD
300,281 views•Apr 18, 2020
3.8KAndré Levy
dnOW4gBbKfE

(It doesn't make mathematical sense that "there was no autism before, and now there's a 300% rise", but that there is autism now and there wasn't before the vaccines certainly does. No doubt the real numbers will be shared at some point.

Cosmored

1st January 2021, 13:44

I found some good info.
https://vaccinetruth.org/index.html

edit
--------------------------

I just came across this.
http://www.chiropractic.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/1200-studies-The-Truth-Will-Prevail-3.pdf

I've only scanned it but I'm posting it anyway. It looks promising.

Gwin Ru

25th January 2021, 22:33

Blockbuster: CDC quietly removes website headline that claimed "Vaccines do not cause autism" (https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/01/cdc-quietly-removes-website-headline-claiming-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/)

Sharyl Attkisson
sharylattkisson.com (https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/01/cdc-quietly-removes-website-headline-claiming-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/)
Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:18 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s29/596975/large/Screen_Shot_2021_01_22_at_8_33.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s29/596975/full/Screen_Shot_2021_01_22_at_8_33.png)

After a court challenge questioning the scientific support behind the claim that "vaccines do not cause autism," the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has removed that headline from its website.

The blockbuster change was made quietly last August, and went largely unnoticed, with no public announcement.

The CDC Vaccine-Autism page goes on to state in many different ways that parents should not be concerned about vaccines and autism, and "there is no link," while at the same time acknowledging a link cannot be ruled out.

In a Question and Answer post (https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/topics.html), CDC says "more research is needed" on the question as to whether vaccines can trigger autism in children with "mitochondrial disorders." Scientists say many people have mitochondrial disorders but do not know it.
More research is needed to determine if there are rare cases where underlying mitochondrial disorders are triggered by anything related to vaccines. According to CDC, mitochondria are like tiny power houses of almost all cells in the body, turning sugar and oxygen into energy needed to function.

Read CDC vaccine safety information here (https://www.cdc.gov/patientsafety/features/vaccine-safety.html).

CDC Immunization Safety Official Acknowledged Possible Vaccine-Autism Link
In an interview with me in 2014, CDC's head of immunization safety, Dr. Frank DeStefano, acknowledged it's possible that vaccines rarely trigger autism (https://sharylattkisson.com/2018/12/cdc-possibility-that-vaccines-rarely-trigger-autism/) in some children, and said "somebody" should do research to identify why that might be. However, there is no easily-found record of CDC encouraging or funding any such research.

Listen to Dr. DeStefano's interview here, and read a transcript (https://sharylattkisson.com/2018/12/cdc-possibility-that-vaccines-rarely-trigger-autism/#audio).

CDC and The Department of Justice Secretly Settled and Paid a Landmark Vaccine-Autism Claim
In 2008, CDC secretly settled and paid a landmark vaccine-autism claim, acknowledging that vaccines triggered autism in a child named Hannah Poling, while publicly telling parents and the rest of the public there was no link. Poling's father is a pediatric neurologist. In paying the claim, CDC demanded the case be sealed. But the news leaked out.

Hannah developed autism quickly after a doctor's visit where she received five shots-- - nine doses of vaccines. She quickly came down with a fever, seizures and severe health problems.

Read more about Poling's story here (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/vaccine-case-an-exception-or-a-precedent/)

The Government's Own Expert At The Time says Vaccines Can Cause Autism, After All
We only learned recently that the government's own one-time lead expert in defending vaccine-autism claims in court, the world renowned pediatric neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, changed his expert opinion based on new science and concluded vaccines can-- and do -- cause autism, after all, in "exceptional" cases.

In a sworn affidavit, Dr. Zimmerman says that when he informed the government (through Department of Justice attorneys who defend vaccine companies in court) that vaccines can cause autism, the government fired him as an expert witness and misrepresented his opinion in court to use against cases alleging vaccine-autism injuries.

Dr. Zimmerman had treated Hannah Poling, the daughter of his colleague Dr. Jon Poling, and said the science he learned, in that case, was part of how he came to understand that vaccines can cause autism.

Read Dr. Zimmerman's affidavit here (https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/01/dr-andrew-zimmermans-full-affidavit-on-alleged-link-between-vaccines-and-autism-that-u-s-govt-covered-up/).

CDC Senior Scientist Gave a Sworn Statement saying He and His Colleagues Committed Scientific Fraud to Coverup Vaccine-Autism Link
In 2014, a senior CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, blew the whistle and said he and his colleagues covered up a vaccine-autism association, particularly among African-American boys, identified in a study published in Pediatrics.

Thompson testified in a sworn statement that he was present when his CDC colleagues and coauthors met and literally threw some of the data into a trash can. He says he saved original copies and put them in a safe, believing they had committed a crime by destroying the material. Others at CDC deny it.
At the bottom of Table 7 it also shows that for the non-birth certificate sample, the adjusted race effect statistical significance was huge. All the authors and I met and decided sometime between August and September '02 not to report any race effects for the paper. Sometime soon after the meeting, we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. However, because I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retained all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper.

From sworn statement by CDC's Dr. William Thompson After the controversy, CDC insiders say the agency quickly sought reanalyses to try to counter Dr. Thompson.

At the same time, propagandists who write on point with the vaccine industry, such as Seth Mnookin, Dr. Gorski of Scienceblogs.com ("Respectful Insolence"), and authors at Snopes, Vox, Wikipedia and even The Washington Post attacked and controversialized Dr. Thompson, implying the well-regarded CDC scientist was actually an anti-vaccine nut.

Read more reporting on vaccine safety and other medical issues here (https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/04/resource-links-to-vaccine-and-medical-stories/).

Dr. Thompson and the controversy, along with secretly recorded audiotapes, are the subject of the documentary VAXXED (http://fullmeasure.news/news/cover-story/screen-censors).

VAXXED has largely been censored from the Internet, and controversialized by propaganda groups such as Media Matters, which is aligned with the interests of the vaccine industry, and smears scientists and journalists who are off the narrative.

VAXXED was also widely attacked by authors and publications on point with the vaccine industry, such as Michael Hiltzik of the LA Times, and Deadline.com.

Though Dr. Thompson, one of the study's authors, admitted or claimed he and his colleagues had committed scientific fraud, the journal Pediatrics declined to retract the questioned study, or even note the fraud what one of the authors was claiming.

A Pediatrics spokesman told me, when I asked, that since Dr. Thompson's CDC co-authors had denied committing scientific fraud, there was no need to retract the article.

The journal said it did not contact or interview Dr. Thompson about his claims.

A CDC post about the controversy acknowledges the study's findings that found an association between vaccines and autism, without addressing Dr. Thompson's data and claims. But the official CDC position theorizes that the apparent association was just coincidental.
The findings revealed that vaccination between 24 and 36 months was slightly more common among children with autism, and that association was strongest among children 3-5 years of age. The authors reported this finding was most likely a result of immunization requirements for preschool special education program attendance in children with autism.

CDC on 2004 study controversy in which a co-author admitted fraud Read more on the study from CDC and the controversy at the link below:

CDC Statement: 2004 MMR and Autism Study (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism/cdc2004pediatrics.html)

CDC Blocks Dr. Thompson's testimony (https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cdc-blocks-testimony-of-vaccine-whistleblower-says-world-mercury-project-300347376.html)

Read the correction of a story (https://www.ocregister.com/2011/04/18/corrections-for-april-18-2/) regarding government vaccine expert and vaccine inventor Dr. Paul Offit, who made false claims about a CBS report exposing industry ties to Every Child By Two and other groups.

Read (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-independent-are-vaccine-defenders/) the CBS story Dr. Offit made false claims about.

Watch the video here.

K1Hw-Q23S_s

Read the account below of "Informed Consent Action Network" (ICAN) regarding its lawsuit to stop CDC from claiming "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism."
ICAN, through its attorneys led by Aaron Siri, has been relentless in its legal demands and actions to compel the CDC to remove its blanket claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" from its website.

We are excited to report that the CDC has finally capitulated to those demands! It has removed this claim from its website! CDC's Autism-Vaccine Page (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html)

https://www.sott.net/image/s29/596976/large/New_vs_Old.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s29/596976/full/New_vs_Old.png)
Old Version vs. New Version

The more than three-year journey for how ICAN, and its legal team, achieved this result is a story of determined persistence. Here are the highlights.

ICAN's Opening Salvo (Oct. 12, 2017 - Dec. 31, 2018)
The journey began with a letter (https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ICAN-HHS-Notice-1.pdf) sent to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) on October 12, 2017. That letter explained why the CDC cannot scientifically claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" on its website. ICAN then ended with the following demand:
"Please confirm that HHS shall forthwith remove the claim that 'Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism' from the CDC website, or alternatively, please identify the specific studies on which HHS bases its blanket claim that no vaccines cause autism?" To put HHS and the CDC (an agency within HHS) on their heels, mere days after sending this letter, ICAN also sent a FOIA request (https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/FOIA-CDC-0001.pdf) on November 1, 2017, demanding: All reports, scientific studies, and any other documents the CDC relied upon to support the assertion "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" located on its website (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html)

The CDC quickly called ICAN's counsel, Aaron Siri, regarding this request. After some negotiations, the CDC formally responded (https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/20171107-Response-Copy.pdf) on November 7, 2017, stating that "A search of our records failed to reveal any documents beyond the records hyperlinked in the specific web site" to support the claim that vaccines do not cause autism.

The CDC had thus revealed a truth, one that HHS could not run from in its response to ICAN's letter. On January 18, 2018, HHS responded to ICAN's October 12th letter. In that letter (https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/HHS-Response-1.pdf), HHS provided a list of studies it said supported the conclusion on its website that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism." All of the studies cited related either to a single vaccine, MMR, or to a single vaccine ingredient, thimerosal. None of these studies support the claim that vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Given that HHS failed to support its claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism," ICAN responded by letter (https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ICAN-Reply-1.pdf) dated December 31, 2018 wherein ICAN asserted that "HHS cannot scientifically claim that 'Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism'" and "must therefore remove this claim from the CDC website until it can produce the studies to support the claim."

ICAN's Pincer Maneuver (Jan. 1, 2019 to June 18, 2019)
In order to keep the pressure on to force the CDC to be honest with the public, during the first six months of 2019, ICAN submitted numerous requests for communications among key personnel within the CDC relating to autism. Some of these requests sought emails going back decades. The key players within the CDC with regard to vaccines and autism now knew we were watching, and that we would have their unvarnished, internal emails related to autism.

ICAN Drops the Gauntlet (June 19, 2019 to Dec. 30, 2019)
Now that ICAN had gathered the proof in the form of evidence and admissions it needed to hold the CDC's feet to the fire, on June 19, 2019, ICAN demanded that the CDC produce copies of the studies it relies upon to claim that all the vaccines given during the first six months of life "Do Not Cause Autism." These vaccines include DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV. ICAN also demanded that the CDC produce studies to support that the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life "Do Not Cause Autism."

ICAN, of course, already had the CDC's admissions on these points from its prior FOIA request in November 2017, the HHS letter exchange, and the CDC's internal emails. The CDC had nowhere to hide and no way to dissemble. As expected, it responded to ICAN's request with the same list of studies involving MMR or thimerosal. Not a single study supported that DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV do not cause autism.

ICAN Battles the CDC in Court (Dec. 31, 2019 to March 5, 2020)
ICAN then put the pressure directly on the CDC. Instead of walking away after the CDC effectively admitted it did not have the studies ICAN sought, ICAN sued the CDC (https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/001-COMPLAINT-against-Centers-for-Disease-Control-and-Prevention.pdf) in federal court. The suit focused on the CDC's claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" on the basis that the CDC had not specifically listed the precise studies that it asserts support that claim.

This lawsuit also quoted from the deposition (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFTsd042M3o) of Dr. Stanley Plotkin, the godfather of vaccinology, who admitted under oath that he was
"okay with telling the parent that DTaP/Tdap does not cause autism even though the science isn't there yet to support that claim."
After a lot of wrangling between ICAN's counsel Aaron Siri, and the Department of Justice, which was representing the CDC, the CDC finally capitulated and signed a stipulation (https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Stipulation-and-Order-Fully-Executed.pdf) that was entered as an order of the court on March 2, 2020in which the CDC identified 20 studies as the universe of support it relies upon to claim that DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV do not cause autism.

Here is a summary of the vaccines these studies cover:
1 relating to MMR (not a vaccine ICAN asked about);· 13 relating to thimerosal (not an ingredient in any vaccine ICAN asked about);· 4 relating to both MMR and thimerosal;· 1 relating to antigen (not a vaccine) exposure; and· 1 relating to MMR, thimerosal, and DTaP. Incredibly, the one study relating to DTaP on the CDC's list was a recent review (https://www.nap.edu/read/13164/chapter/12?term=autism#545) by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), paid for by the CDC, which conducted a comprehensive review looking specifically for studies relating to whether DTaP does or does not cause autism. The IOM concluded that it could not identify a single study to support that DTaP does not cause autism.

Instead, the only relevant study the IOM could identify found an association between DTaP and autism. In other words, the only study the CDC listed that actually looked at any of the vaccines given to babies during the first six months of life concluded that there are no studies to support that DTaP does not cause autism.

Yet, the CDC chose that study as one of the few that supports its claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism"! This reality is truly incredible because, when it comes to autism, vaccines are the one suspected culprit that the CDC claims to have exhaustively investigated but, yet, the CDC could not provide a single study to support its conclusion that the vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism. The CDC regularly complains that those raising concerns about vaccine safety are unscientific and misinformed. It is therefore truly stunning that when we asked the CDC for studies to support its claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism," the March 2, 2020 stipulation and order made it abundantly clear that it was the CDC's own claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" that was unscientific.

ICAN's Coup de Grâce (Mar. 6, 2020 to Aug. 26, 2020)
And now for the coup de grâce. ICAN's demands at the end of 2019 and over which it took the CDC to court in early 2020 were for the studies the CDC "relied upon" to claim that Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism. ICAN now had a court ordered stipulation that specifically listed the twenty studies the CDC "relied upon" to support this claim - none of which supported that the vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism.

To assure that the CDC understood ICAN was never, ever, ever, letting this issue go, on March 6, 2020 (days after concluding the federal lawsuit) ICAN submitted the following FOIA demand to the CDC: "All studies supporting the claim that DTaP does not cause autism" and days later requested "Studies created or retained by CDC to support the claim that DTaP does not cause autism." The difference between this and ICAN's prior requests is subtle but powerful.

Instead of asking for the studies, the CDC "relied upon" to support that DTaP does not cause autism (as it did previously), ICAN was now seeking the studies that in fact support that DTaP does not cause autism. In response to this request, the CDC could not list its MMR or thimerosal studies - its hands were tied. It understood there was nowhere left to hide its unsupported claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism." And it knew that ICAN would again take it to court, and this time the outcome could be even harsher.

The CDC Capitulates
On the heels of the foregoing, and dozens of related demands regarding autism that ICAN continued to press, in the dead of the night, and without any fanfare or announcement, on August 27, 2020 (https://web.archive.org/web/20200827173042/https:/www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html), the CDC website removed the claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" from its website!

The CDC had finally capitulated to the truth! Compare for yourself the CDC's autism-vaccine webpage on August 26, 2020 (https://web.archive.org/web/20200826160313/https:/www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html) versus August 27, 2020 (https://web.archive.org/web/20200827173042/https:/www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html). You may be wondering why we waited until now to announce this amazing news. Well, ICAN and its legal team have been so busy fighting on dozens of vaccine related fronts (mandatory MMR vaccines, flu shot requirements, improper COVID vaccine trials, etc.) that we only realized the CDC's vaccine-autism claim had been removed when we recently turned back to that front! Like a Mayan temple hidden in plain sight for hundreds of years, ICAN only recently discovered the CDC's silent capitulation.

The Future
The most recent data (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db291.htm) from CDC shows that 1 in 36 children born this year in the United States will develop autism. This is a true epidemic. If the CDC had spent the same resources studying vaccines and autism as it did waging a media campaign against parents that claim vaccines caused their child's autism, the world would be a better place for everyone.

To their credit, parents with autistic children have never backed down. In the face of incessant brow beatings by public health authorities, studies have found between 40% and 70% of parents with an autistic child continue to blame vaccines for their child's autism, typically pointing to vaccines given during the first six months of life. These parents know what they experienced, what their parental instincts tell them, and no amount of shaming can change that truth. With the removal of the claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism," it is ICAN's sincere hope that our public health authorities have turned or will soon be turning the corner on this issue.

That they will fund independent scientists to conduct the desperately needed studies of autism and the cumulative impact of the vaccines given during the first six months of life. The cries of parents who know that vaccines caused their child's autism should no longer be ignored. The science must be done. And ICAN will continue to fight to make sure that that it is done.

Epilogue
The CDC's website does continue to claim that "Vaccine ingredients do not cause autism" and so ICAN's fight continues! Our next step will be to force the CDC to admit whether or not they are also making this claim for aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines. And if so, to produce the studies to support this claim. (See ICAN's white paper on aluminum adjuvants and autism here (https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ICAN-AluminumAdjuvant-Autism-2.pdf).)

Of course, whether one or more ingredients, like water used in vaccines, does not cause autism is not really the issue. The question is whether the vaccine, the product itself as formulated, causes autism. And we now know that the CDC finally understands that it can no longer claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism."

Related:

The Autism-Vaccine Debate: Anything But Over (https://www.sott.net/article/144669-The-Autism-Vaccine-Debate-Anything-But-Over)

Hepatitis B Vaccine Triples the Risk of Autism in Infant Boys (https://www.sott.net/article/341511-Hepatitis-B-Vaccine-Triples-the-Risk-of-Autism-in-Infant-Boys)

Government Concedes Vaccine-Autism Case in Federal Court - Now What? (https://www.sott.net/article/149896-Government-Concedes-Vaccine-Autism-Case-in-Federal-Court-Now-What)

Autism, Vaccines and the CDC: The Wrong Side of History (https://www.sott.net/article/174259-Autism-Vaccines-and-the-CDC-The-Wrong-Side-of-History)

The Vaccine-Autism video the CDC, Big Pharma doesn't want you to see (https://www.sott.net/article/268145-The-Vaccine-Autism-video-the-CDC-Big-Pharma-doesnt-want-you-to-see)

Federal Members of Advisory Committee Block Vaccine-Autism Research, Defy Wishes of Its Own Scientists, Autism Community, and Congress (https://www.sott.net/article/173310-Federal-Members-of-Advisory-Committee-Block-Vaccine-Autism-Research-Defy-Wishes-of-Its-Own-Scientists-Autism-Community-and-Congress)

Is Autism caused by the MMR vaccine? (https://www.sott.net/article/318136-Is-Autism-caused-by-the-MMR-vaccine)

Court hears claim linking vaccines to autism (https://www.sott.net/article/156317-Court-hears-claim-linking-vaccines-to-autism)

Vaccines and autism? Parents contend one causes the other (https://www.sott.net/article/140608-Vaccines-and-autism-Parents-contend-one-causes-the-other)

Gwin Ru

16th February 2021, 16:04

CDC admits 98 million Americans were given cancer virus via the polio shot (https://breaking-news.ca/cdc-admits-98-million-americans-were-given-cancer-virus-via-the-polio-shot/)

Author Q (https://breaking-news.ca/author/q/)
Posted on February 10, 2021 (https://breaking-news.ca/cdc-admits-98-million-americans-were-given-cancer-virus-via-the-polio-shot/)
The CDC has admitted that between 1955–1963 over 98 million Americans received one or more doses of a polio shot which was contaminated with a cancer-causing virus called Simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40). The CDC quickly took down the page, along with Google, but the site was luckily cached and saved to symbolize this grand admission.

http://www.vaccines.news/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/CDC_Polio.png

To further confirm this unbelievable admission, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago Dr. Michele Carbone has been able to independently verify the presence of the SV40 virus in tissue and bone samples from patients who died during that era.

He found that 33% of the samples with osteosarcoma bone cancers, 40% of other bone cancers, and 60% of the mesothelioma’s lung cancers all contained this obscure virus.

This leaves the postulation that upwards of 10–30 million actually contracted and were adversely affected by this virus, to be deadly accurate.

onawah

23rd February 2021, 05:51

Nonprofit to File Lawsuit Against CDC Over Statement That Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism
BY MEILING LEE
February 21, 2021
https://www.theepochtimes.com/nonprofit-to-file-lawsuit-against-cdc-claims-statement-that-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism-is-misleading_3705000.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-02-21-2
https://img.theepochtimes.com/assets/uploads/2021/02/21/Del-Bigtree-Courtesy-of-icandecide.org_-700x420.jpg
Del Bigtree, founder of ICAN, says the nonprofit will file a lawsuit against the CDC regarding the claim that vaccines do not cause autism. (Courtesy of icandecide.org)

"Del Bigtree, founder of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) said his organization will file a lawsuit against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to request the federal agency take down its statement that claims vaccines do not cause autism from its webpage on autism and vaccines.

“There is no science to back up the statement as far as what the CDC’s provided to say that vaccines, plural, do not cause autism,” Bigtree told The Epoch Times. “This is a false statement.”

“We will bring a case against the CDC to remove that from the website because it is actually inaccurate,” he added.

Bigtree says that the CDC has not been able to provide his organization studies that concretely show vaccines given to infants in the first six months of life do not cause autism, a neurological and developmental disorder that may be diagnosed as early as six to 12 months.

“If vaccines contribute to the issue, certainly we can isolate it inside of the vaccines given in the first six months of life because autism is appearing at six months,” Bigtree said.

The United States has seen an increase in children diagnosed with autism. In 2000, there were only 1 in 150 children with autism. By 2016, the CDC estimated that 1 in 45 children had autism, with 1 in 32 children diagnosed in New Jersey.A spokesperson from the CDC said the health agency has always been upfront about its position on vaccines and autism. “CDC is and has always been clear on this subject: vaccines do not cause autism,” the spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email.

In August 2020, the federal agency said it was doing an update to its website and temporarily took down the statement causing a misunderstanding that the CDC may have changed its stance on the issue.

“As for the statement you reference, in the fall of 2020, as part of routine website updates to ensure consistent website formatting, CDC updated its page on vaccines and autism,” the spokesperson said. “Recently, this change has been misinterpreted on social media and among some organizations as a change in CDC’s position.”

“The headline has been added back to our website to ensure there is no confusion around CDC’s position,” she added.

According to Bigtree, the statement was taken down from the CDC website on Aug. 27, 2020, and added back again shortly after ICAN issued a press release about the change on Jan. 25.

Mark Sadaka, a vaccine injury lawyer who has handled over 180 vaccination cases, said the CDC “will never” remove the statement since the health agency is making that claim based on its own research and the recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) that “meet regularly and vote on all kinds of issues, including safety concerns and recommendations on who should get vaccinated and when.”

“The CDC is the U.S. premier public health agency, and like what the ACIP did, it can take currently available information and issue statements related to public health,” Sadaka told The Epoch Times in an email. “That is what the CDC is charged to do and that is what they did here.”

Sadaka said that ICAN’s lawsuit should instead focus on having the CDC “add qualifying language to the information presented to the public.”

“The best that could happen [for ICAN’s lawsuit] is the addition of qualifying language that says ‘six effects of vaccines within the first six weeks of life have not been studied’ or something like that,” Sadaka said.

“As a lawyer for people injured by vaccines, I can say that vaccines can hurt and kill. But when it comes to autism specifically, the science is just not there right now. It may come one day,” he added.

Lack of Studies to Support ClaimIn 2019, ICAN and the Institute for Autism Science submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting the health agency provide all of the studies it relied upon to determine that the five vaccines given during the first six months of an infant’s life do not cause autism.

The vaccines: diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTaP), hepatitis B, polio (IPV), Haemophilus Influenzae type B (Hib), and pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13), are each “injected into the babies three times during the first six months of life,” the complaint [pdf] filed against the CDC in December 2019 reads.

The CDC eventually provided ICAN with 20 studies in March 2020 [pdf] after it was forced to submit to the FOIA request.

Of the 20 trials provided by the CDC, 18 did not address any of the five vaccines that ICAN challenged.

Instead, they were related to either the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella), thimerosal, or both. Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative widely used to prevent bacterial and fungal growth in vaccines until 2001, when it was “removed from or reduced in all vaccines for children 6 years of age” except for the flu shot, according to the CDC.

Bigtree said two of the remaining studies—the 2012 report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the 2013 antigen exposure trial, both funded by the CDC—still did not answer whether vaccines given from birth until six months cause autism.

The antigen study [pdf] published in the Journal of Pediatrics looked specifically at the number of antigens—a substance that can induce an immune response—in vaccines given in the first two years of life in children with autism spectrum disorder and those without. It did not examine the effects of other substances in the vaccines such as adjuvants and other chemicals.

The CDC says adjuvants are ingredients in vaccines that “help create a stronger immune response” or helps “vaccines work better” but “can cause more local reactions (such as redness, swelling, and pain at the injection site) and more systemic reactions (such as fever, chills and body aches) than non-adjuvanted vaccines.” A common adjuvant used in many vaccines is aluminum.

The authors of the study found no evidence to indicate an association between exposure to antigens in the vaccines and autism, or in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with regression, although, “It can be argued that ASD with regression, in which children usually lose developmental skills during the second year of life, could be related to exposures in infancy, including vaccines.”

The IOM report was the only study to address one of the vaccines, the DTaP that ICAN inquired about. The study analyzed over 12,000 peer-reviewed trials to examine whether certain vaccines caused the 158 recognized adverse effects.

Based on the available scientific literature, the IOM found only five of the 158 adverse events were not associated with vaccinations, 18 were associated with vaccines, and for the remaining 135 adverse effects, there was inadequate evidence to “accept or reject a causal relationship.”

For the DTaP vaccine, the report concluded that “the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between diphtheria toxoid-, tetanus toxoid-, or acellular pertussis-containing vaccine and autism.”

The only relevant study reviewed by the IOM but “was not considered in the weight of epidemiologic evidence” found an association between autism and DTaP. The study was rejected because “it provided data from a passive surveillance system and lacked an unvaccinated population.”

To date, no study has been conducted on overall health effects between a vaccinated and a placebo or an unvaccinated group because of ethical concerns about withholding vaccines from children in the placebo group.

But Bigtree says the CDC can still do a retrospective and comparative study on vaccinated vs unvaccinated children using data from its Vaccine Safety Datalink that monitors “safety of vaccines and conduct studies about rare and serious adverse events following immunization.”

Bigtree alleges that the federal health agencies refuse to do this type of study, saying it was confirmed in a meeting he and Robert Kennedy Jr. had with officials from the National Institute of Health (NIH), including Director of the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Disease Anthony Fauci, to discuss vaccine safety on May 30, 2017. The meeting was set up by President Donald Trump.

“That’s all we asked for, just do a comparative study with your database, vaccinated versus unvaccinated,” Bigtree said. “And they essentially said to us, ‘We will never do that study.’”

The NIH did not respond to an email from The Epoch Times for comment.

“That study could answer this question once and for all,” Bigtree said. “Which means, if they knew they were right and they knew that vaccines made people healthier, they would do that study.”

The IOM has also suggested that a study be done between “those who receive no vaccinations and those who receive the full currently recommended immunization schedule” to address “all health outcomes and safety concerns” in its 2013 report on vaccine schedule safety.

The CDC’s recommended vaccine schedule includes 50-54 doses of 13 vaccines when the flu shot is given annually beginning at one year of age and if the combination vaccines (DTaP and MMR) are not counted separately.

The United States recommends the most vaccines to children and adolescents compared to other Western countries. In Sweden, vaccinations are voluntary, and the first dose is offered at six weeks instead of immediately after birth like in the United States. Sweden offers 22 doses of seven vaccines."

onawah

19th March 2022, 04:10

Urgent call to action! We have 26 days to convince the FDA to reject the Pfizer mRNA shot in kids under 5.
Autism Action Network <jgilmore@autismactionnetwork.org>
3/18/22

https://ci6.googleusercontent.com/proxy/mjEgEQM_nEwUb9pVX6v7-NoOgOQy0eL3nNcB6Ri634MuIFs32ASpdcDepzeLJ4cVOIkMBkMaRPJMahczK5ypRUBUgB8cew2qPOJufCkzPG_5MNFAPqmUBpjP7 hSd1XBCNoAumkh57nYyxzRrwdY=s0-d-e1-ft#https://votervoice.s3.amazonaws.com/groups/autismaction/images/autismactionnetwork_logo.png

TAKE ACTION--it's easy!: https://www.votervoice.net/BroadcastLinks/0DdlIXYis2oghQ-YM-S4LQ

"Autism Action Network is joining Toby Rogers, Ph.D. in his call to stop the FDA from issuing an Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer mRNA shot for kids under 5. Rogers offers some of the most incisive analysis of Covid, autism, the medical products and services industry, and politics in his column uTobian on Substack which you can read and subscribe to here: https://tobyrogers.substack.com/

On February 10, we achieved a remarkable victory — Pfizer was forced to withdraw its Emergency Use Authorization application to inject kids 6 months to four years old because the data was so terrible. But it was a temporary reprieve. Even though Pfizer’s clinical trials of the genetically modified mRNA shot have already failed twice in this age group, Pfizer is planning to submit another application for Emergency Use Authorization in early April — just under 30 days from now.

This is one of the last battles in this phase of the war. There are 18 million children under five who are potentially impacted by this decision. But Pfizer’s real goal is to achieve permanent liability protection. Currently, Pfizer shots are authorized for emergency use and given liability protection under the PREP Act. But emergency use authorization expires, usually after a year, so Pfizer must apply for full approval — which is not difficult because they control the FDA. Once the shot has full approval, Pfizer loses the liability protection offered by the PREP Act and is potentially exposed to billions of dollars of injury claims for their faulty product. However, if Pfizer can get the mRNA shot added to the childhood vaccine schedule, then it will enjoy permanent liability protection under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. So that’s what this fight is all about.

We absolutely must find a way to defeat the upcoming Pfizer EUA application in kids 6 months to 4 years old.

So here’s the plan. A group of allies will put out a call to action once a week from now until the FDA meets to consider this application. Each week we are going to focus on a different pillar of the corrupt system. We need you to dedicate one hour a week to sending out 25 emails, making 25 calls, send 25 letters, or sending 25 faxes. It seems like a big ask until you realize that the alternative is to live under Pharma tyranny for the rest of our lives. The momentum is on our side, the data is on our side, every day more politicians come over to our side, we are the majority, this is our moment, we must embrace our responsibility to stop this insanity.

Many of you have participated in my calls to action before. What’s new or different about this call to action? I’ve got much better talking points. There is a new FDA Commissioner, Robert Califf, who we need to educate about these matters. We are reaching deeper inside the bureaucracy to educate some of the staffers who write the reports that are part of the evaluation process. And there are several new members of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee who need to hear from us as well.

Please click here:
https://www.votervoice.net/BroadcastLinks/0DdlIXYis2oghQ-YM-S4LQ
...to send email messages to the key decision makers below calling for the denial of an emergency use authorization for the Covid MRNA injection for children under 5.

If you value the information and advocacy brought to you by the Autism Action Network please support us by donating here: https://grouprev.com/AutismActionNetwork2021

Please share the following link to this message: https://www.votervoice.net/AUTISMACTION/campaigns/93159/respond

Talking Points

Feel free to compose your own message or share your story with the federal officials listed below.

Subject line: please REJECT the Pfizer EUA application to inject mRNA into kids 6 months to 4 years old when it returns in April

1. There is no Covid emergency for children under five years old.

Children have a 99.995% recovery rate and a body of medical literature indicates that almost zero healthy children under five years old have died from Covid.

• A large study conducted in Germany showed zero deaths for children under 5 and a case fatality rate of three out of a million in children without comorbidities.

•A Johns Hopkins study monitoring 48,000 children diagnosed with Covid showed a zero mortality rate in children under 18 without comorbidities.

•A study in Nature demonstrated that children under 18 with no comorbidities have virtually no risk of death.

2. The Pfizer mRNA shot does not work very well in kids.

The Pfizer clinical trial in kids 6 months to four years old failed in December 2021 and failed again in February 2022. Adding a third dose is not going to solve the underlying problems with this vaccine in this age group.

The FDA and CDC claimed that the Pfizer shot was 90% effective in kids 5 to 11. Recently released data show that it was only 12% effective against the Omicron variant. So all of the FDA and CDC risk benefit calculations were wrong.

By contrast, there are more than 1,500 studies in connection with about twenty off-the-shelf medicines that are safe and effective. Prophylaxis and early treatment with these medicines offer a better alternative than risky mRNA shots.

3. The harms from the Pfizer mRNA shot in children are catastrophic.

There are now 4,376 VAERS reports of adverse events in children following Covid shots. These reports likely understate harms by a factor of 41 to 100.

There are troubling reports of fatalities in children following Covid shots:
https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-reports/1975356
https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-reports/2109625
https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-reports/2152560
https://www.icandecide.org/ican_press/report-of-toddlers-death-disappears-from-vaers-and-cdc-has-no-records-as-to-why/

Everyone knows that FDA approval = CDC adding it to the childhood schedule = liability protection forever = mandates = widespread iatrogenic injury.

You have a professional and moral obligation to reject Pfizer’s EUA application for kids 6 months to 4 years old.

People to contact:

Please reach out and find a way to awaken the moral core of these 24 people in key policy making positions. Please be respectful and courteous. The fate of our nation is at stake.

Rochelle Walensky
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Roybal Building 21, Rm 12000
1600 Clifton Rd
Atlanta, GA 30333
phone: (404) 639-7000
Aux7@cdc.gov
https://twitter.com/CDCDirector

Xavier Becerra
Secretary, Health & Human Services
200 Independence Avenue S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20201
c/o Sean McCluskie
sean.mccluskie@hhs.gov
https://twitter.com/XavierBecerra

Robert Califf
FDA Commissioner
FDA Mail stop: HF-1
Parklawn Building
12420 Parklawn Drive
Rockville, Maryland, 20852
phone: (301) 796-5400
fax: (301) 847-8752
commissioner@fda.hhs.gov
https://twitter.com/DrCaliff_FDA

Peter Marks
Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
FDA, Mail stop: HFM-2
10903 New Hampshire Ave., WO71-7232
Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
phone: (240) 402-8116
fax: (301) 595-1310
Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov

Hong Yang
Biologist, FDA/CBER/OBE
Building WO71, Room 5338
Mail stop: HFM-210
Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
phone: (240) 402-8836
fax: (301) 595-1240
Hong.Yang@fda.hhs.gov

Richard Forshee
Associate Director, FDA/CBER/OBE
Building, WO71, Room 5342
Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
phone: (240) 402-8631
fax: (301) 595-1240
Richard.Forshee@fda.hhs.gov

Hui-Lee Wong
Associate Director for Innovation and Development,
Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology,
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
White Oak Building 71, Room 5222
Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
phone: (240) 402-0473
Huilee.Wong@fda.hhs.gov

Leslie Ball
Office of Vaccines Research and Review
Division of Vaccines and Related Products Applications,
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
Building WO22, Room 6156
Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
phone: (301) 796-3399
Leslie.Ball@fda.hhs.gov

Doran L. Fink
Deputy Director – Clinical,
Division of Vaccines and Related Products Applications
Office of Vaccines Research and Review, CBER
Mail stop HFM-475
Building WO71, Room 3314
Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
phone: (301) 796-1159
Doran.Fink@fda.hhs.gov

VRBPAC Members:

Hana El Sahly, M.D., Chair VRBPAC
Associate Professor
Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology
Department of Medicine
Section of Infectious Diseases
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, TX 77030
713-798-2058
hanae@bcm.edu

Paula Annunziato, M.D.
Vice President and Therapeutic Area Head
Vaccines Clinical Research
Merck
North Wales, PA 19454
paula.annunziato@merck.com

Adam C. Berger, Ph.D.
Director, Division of Clinical and Healthcare Research Policy
Office of Science Policy
Office of the Director
National Institutes of Health
6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 630
Bethesda, MD 20892
(301) 827-9676
adam.berger@nih.gov

Henry H. Bernstein, D.O.
Professor of Pediatrics
Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
Department of Pediatrics
Cohen Children’s Medical Center
New Hyde Park, NY 11042
phone: (516) 838-6415 (office)
fax: (516) 465-5399
hbernstein@northwell.edu

Captain Amanda Cohn
Chief Medical Officer
National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Rd
Atlanta, GA 30333 MS C-09
phone: (404) 639-6039
fax: (404) 315-4679
acohn@cdc.gov

Holly Janes, Ph.D.
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division
1100 Fairview Avenue North,
M2-C200
P.O. Box 19024
Seattle, Washington 98109 U.S.A.
phone: (206) 667.6353
hjanes@fredhutch.org

Hayley Gans, M.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
Department of Pediatrics
Stanford University Medical Center
Stanford, CA 94305
phone: (650) 723-5682
fax: (650) 725-8040
hgans@stanford.edu

David Kim, M.D.
CAPT, U.S. Public Health Services
Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
330 C Street SW, Suite L600
Washington, DC 20024
phone: (202) 795-7636
david.kim@hhs.gov

Arnold Monto, M.D.
Professor Emeritus
Department of Epidemiology
University of Michigan School of Public Health
Ann Arbor, MI 48109
phone: (734) 764-5453
fax: (734) 764-3192
asmonto@umich.edu

Paul Offit, M.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
Division of Infectious Diseases
Abramson Research Building
The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, PA 19104
phone: (215) 590-2020
offit@chop.edu
https://twitter.com/DrPaulOffit

Steven Pergam, M.D.
Medical Director
Infection Prevention
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, WA 98109
phone: (206) 667-7126
spergam@fredhutch.org
https://twitter.com/PergamIC

Jay Portnoy, M.D.
Director, Division of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
Children’s Mercy Hospitals & Clinics
2401 Gillham Road
Kansas City, MO 64108
phone: (816) 960-8885
fax: (816) 960-8888
Jportnoy@cmh.edu

Eric Rubin, M.D., Ph.D.
Editor-in-Chief
New England Journal of Medicine
Adjunct Professor
Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health
665 Huntington Ave
Building 1, Room 811
Boston, MA 02115
phone: (617) 432-3335
erubin@hsph.harvard.edu
erubin@nejm.org

Andrea Shane, M.D.
Professor of Pediatrics
Emory University School of Medicine
2015 Uppergate Drive NE, Rm. 504A
Atlanta, GA 30322
phone: (404) 727-9880 (direct)
(404) 727-5642 (main)
fax: (404) 727-8249
ashane@emory.edu

Geeta K. Swamy, M.D.
Senior Associate Dean
Vice Chair for Research & Faculty Development
Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Duke University
Box 3967 Med Ctr,
Durham, NC 27710
phone: (919) 681-5220
swamy002@mc.duke.edu

Please share this message with friends and family and please post on social networks while we still can.

Click the link below to log in and send your message:
https://www.votervoice.net/BroadcastLinks/0DdlIXYis2oghQ-YM-S4LQ