cursichella1
13th May 2014, 17:57
This is an interesting trailer from a forthcoming documentary on chemtrails and geo-engineering. This video shows network TV meteorologists explaining away chemtrails as enemy radar-confusing military chaff. A Florida weatherman also says the metal particulates have no known harmful effects to humans and gives an example of how some handy software removes the evidence of the chaff from satellite images.
So, this technology probably does exist, (but seems a bit impractical and definitely 'dated' - certainly by now we're capable of manufacturing stealthy weaponry using Stealth technology, or non-HAARP over the horizon communication via satellites?), but this isn't the same "testing" we're seeing overhead every day now. So, are these meteorologists passing on some disinfo (in the form of an up-front 'logical explanation') to further muddy the waters?
More confusing, and concurrently, we being drawn in to believing that geo-engineering (of course, just some scientists' "proposed solution"...uh huh) via reflective metals is being done to save the planet from 'global warming'. More muddying in the form of being a simple concept the public can co-rationalize while also getting us used to the idea.
According to der Spiegel (http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/scientist-david-keith-on-slowing-global-warming-with-geoengineering-a-934359.html) in an article on Canadian Scientist-Harvard Professor (and geo-engineering solution advocate) David Keith "the concept of geo-engineering has increasingly won over supporters, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) even grappled with the issue in its most recent report."
Grappling, my a$$, but whether or not the spraying is indeed to halt 'global warming' or is a solution for some secret and more sinister reason is worthy of serious (and honest) study and exposure.
I've read theories explaining the spraying is to alter our atmosphere so it'd be physically more hospitable to other beings, that it is to alter the earths frequency for similar or dimensional reasons, and, of course, there are the more outspoken theories involving global population culling, etc. All lovely scenarios that the peons are too primitive in mind to be able to handle emotionally.
Anyway, here's the video and now I'll shut up, because ultimately what matters is that planes are bombarding our skies with poisons which are toxic to earth and all life on it, and none of us recall being asked if we were 'ok' with it.
dkxN-UFGLdM
So, this technology probably does exist, (but seems a bit impractical and definitely 'dated' - certainly by now we're capable of manufacturing stealthy weaponry using Stealth technology, or non-HAARP over the horizon communication via satellites?), but this isn't the same "testing" we're seeing overhead every day now. So, are these meteorologists passing on some disinfo (in the form of an up-front 'logical explanation') to further muddy the waters?
More confusing, and concurrently, we being drawn in to believing that geo-engineering (of course, just some scientists' "proposed solution"...uh huh) via reflective metals is being done to save the planet from 'global warming'. More muddying in the form of being a simple concept the public can co-rationalize while also getting us used to the idea.
According to der Spiegel (http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/scientist-david-keith-on-slowing-global-warming-with-geoengineering-a-934359.html) in an article on Canadian Scientist-Harvard Professor (and geo-engineering solution advocate) David Keith "the concept of geo-engineering has increasingly won over supporters, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) even grappled with the issue in its most recent report."
Grappling, my a$$, but whether or not the spraying is indeed to halt 'global warming' or is a solution for some secret and more sinister reason is worthy of serious (and honest) study and exposure.
I've read theories explaining the spraying is to alter our atmosphere so it'd be physically more hospitable to other beings, that it is to alter the earths frequency for similar or dimensional reasons, and, of course, there are the more outspoken theories involving global population culling, etc. All lovely scenarios that the peons are too primitive in mind to be able to handle emotionally.
Anyway, here's the video and now I'll shut up, because ultimately what matters is that planes are bombarding our skies with poisons which are toxic to earth and all life on it, and none of us recall being asked if we were 'ok' with it.
dkxN-UFGLdM