The Crucial Battle against Political Correctness (a new trend)

[GuyFox]

The Crucial Battle against Political Correctness (a new trend)

// stories about pushback - against the destruction of Western culture //

http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj235/jimolsen2/balance1_zps9ec05775.jpg

Program: In the event that You are called a : "Rascist", here's what to do...

De-programming:
"You are only calling me that because I am White...
"Racism is a codeword used to attack white people."

(Stop there - No need to say anything else - Act like you have WON the debate.)

This strategy comes from:
> LINK: http://www.redicecreations.com/radio3fourteen/2014/R314-140507.php

[Soup]

yeah but..but...man, sheesh... de-program and then run another program set to reaction mode? LOL come on.... seriously? Think for yourselves people and stop this addiction to absorbed opinion and meme feasting...

Listen to the intro at 3.10 where she doubts that non-whites can name 2 countries in Europe and refers to immigrants as being the lowest of the low.

Seriously? This reactionary swing so perfectly represented by that picture of heavy balls slamming into each other is retrograde, mere conservatism shrouded in rhetoric and a very thinly veiled inability to 'not react' to changes in the make-up of the morphing world. I tell you, it is the reactors (who's that?) who are the most easily herded...heed this or spin yourselves into pens. Your choice to pin yourself to tradition.

By all means, highlight the woeful performance of the media and look at who is responsible, but don't think for a minute that presenting what you call a conspiracy for the infiltration of the Western system is anything other than system-clinging arrogance that insists that your vision of ratios of culture in communities should forever be set at the limits you grew up with.

The world is changing, there is no attack on this apparently never-to-be-augmented Western system. You are simply absorbing yet another program by taking this stuff in. If you see something you feel is a 'freak', that isn't compatible with your program of 'shoulds', I suggest a clean re-install with an updated program...for those that cannot run without them, obviously. Other than that, don't use any...it helps you 'think'.

[GuyFox]

Thanks for the post, Soup.
But I think you missed the point of "White Rabbit".

He's got it right, IMO.
The "Rascist" label was created by those seeking to Mind control citizens in Western countries.
By tossing out the charge of Rascism, they have been destroying anyone who wishes to Debate policies like:

+ Affirmative action
+ Amnesty for Illegal immigrants
+ Hate-crime laws

These policies NEED full debate, and should not be "forced down our throats" by elites-with-an-agenda.

Redice / Link: http://www.RedIceCreations.com
... has been on the case, examining the policies and the agendas behind them.

Once you look into what is happening, you can spot a pattern. Western civilization and traditional values are being undermined.

Redice guests have argued that Elite members who have been driving this agenda see Whites and White culture as a threat to their agenda of control. TPTB want to weaken their potential opposition by "blending" down White DNA, and mixing it with the DNA of other races. They seem to think that a (confused?) multi-racial society will be easier to control than one with well-educated people with pride in their ethnic and cultural identities, and especially if they have European roots and centuries of cultural achievements behind them. (The only predominantly-white society that still believes strongly in those historical roots is in Putin's Russian. And that is why the NWO-controlled countries are working so hard to marginalise and isolate Russia - but they are not succeeding... yet.)

I think this argument makes some real sense. And if you look at historical events of the least few decades using this narrative, more clarity may be revealed - and that is what this thread is about.

How to stop this dangerous march off a cliff?
White Rabbit argues that you need to attack them head on, by using "sound vibration to fight sound vibration", and that means when you are called a "Rascist" when you try to initiate a debate, you need to "LOOP" the concept back to them, by using a quick and clear response, like:
"You are only calling me that because I am White...
"Racism is a codeword used to attack white people."

If a charge of Rascism meets this response again-and-again, by many people in many circumstances, then the cabal-controlled weaponized speech will begin to lose its power. And as the power of that label fades, we may be able to move to a period where these ill-conceived and dangerous policies can be debated, and maybe reversed.

Your attack on this strategy makes little sense to me. Why are you against Debate of these policies?

[Milneman]

Aw man, I was coming into this as a former English major thinking it might be....well intelligent.

In tried listening to the interview, I start hearing bias literally 1-2 minutes in. Guy, you're right that political correctness is a hinderance, but the interview is actually harming the cause instead of helping it. At 4:00 I had to turn it off because it was making me sick.

If the game is broken from the start and is designed to create victims as capital (hello western society!), then every time you create a model that uses victimhood as capital you're going to need to promote victimhood as a positive thing, and create a perp to be the bad guy. So we set up things like social welfare, affirmative action, with the best of intentions only to later get screwed, as the voice said, up the "ass". Guess what. 'Whitey' is holding the dildo. But we have to conform to the victim mentality, so we blame it on...yep, the victims.

We're all responsible.

You know how I handle political correctness? I say it like it is. At first, this was a scary thing to do because of the backlash and looks of shock. But if you back up what you're saying by walking people through the steps of the truth as it is, not as we want it to be, or as they want it to be, they slowly realize that what you're saying is true and they've been just as guilty as you have.

Take the welfare system. How is it helping people by promoting single parent families, promoting people to have more children to get more money, which in turn creates larger families that require either an expensive daycare or in-home sitter to look after the kids while one or both (usually one) parent either goes to work at a minimum wage job, or tries to find work, which will pay for the sitter and that's about it? The system is designed to keep people under the yolk of victimhood because we have created (everyone...the victims, the victimizers, and the helpers) an industry. Medicare state-side. Why are two and three year olds getting treated for ADHD? Dispensary fee, doctor visit fee, and a kid who is two or three who is naturally hyper (this is normal remember) gets drugged and all the side effects.

We wanted this, remember? We created it. Not some zionist plot or overlords from corporate america. We wanted this. We agreed to it.

That's the truth you start from. That's the truth you explain to people. Then you ask them, how do we stop it? The answer is really, really scary. You just eliminate government involvement in welfare and the social experiment. The hardest time will be had by people who have been using the system...and I'm using the word "using" with precision here....who really don't need to, but don't know any other way. Throw the money from welfare into schools, roads. Or something even more radical. And I shudder at this idea, but in ways it makes a lot of sense.

Make citizenship a privilege, not a right. We all used to work for it. You helped your neighbour, you took part in plebecites...remember those, back when people helped government make decisions about major issues like taxation? People aren't involved because the idea behind political correctness makes it easy to sit back, say "oh yeah, I was wrong, or I wasn't empowered correctly." and not do anything--and justify that by saying someone else told me I didn't have to.

Political Correctness will no longer be necessary when every human being can approach life honestly. We're going to be waiting a long, long time.

[GuyFox]

Thanks for the comment Milneman.

Have you heard of Redice Radio?
What you may not know is that Lana Lokteff, who did the interview with "White Rabbit" is an American (of Ukrainian? extraction) who is married to Henrik Palmgren, who founded Redice. I have listened to several of Lana's interviews and found her to be intelligent and aware.

Redice has had a bit of an obsession recently, about how aggressive social engineering has been destroying sexroles and traditional culture in Sweden and other Scandinavian countries. I have heard many of those podcasts. I also speak (some) Swedish and have visited the country, and so am aware of the penchant towards social engineering. I tend to agree with the thesis, and have wondered who is behind it, because the "engineering" trend seems to have gone well beyond any "natural" turning point, and is now doing the country grave damage IMHO - so it must be PUSHED by someone. This latest podcast "fingers" a possible puppet master.

" how do we stop it? The answer is really, really scary. You just eliminate government involvement in welfare and the social experiment. "
Easier said than done.
Before STOPPING government, we need to get people informed to the point where even the average person realises that he/she is being programmed. I suggest you give the podcast another chance. It does have a rocky moment or two, but I think that "White Rabbit" makes many valid and powerful points.

[Milneman]

I can't do it Guy. The bottom line is this: if a human being isn't able to articulate themselves in a reasonable, rational way I find it difficult to take anything they say seriously. And that's an example of me being not politically correct. ;)

[GuyFox]

Okay
Everyone is entitled to make up their own mind.
Neither of us can tell others what to think.

For those who are open to it, here's a short video from "White Rabbit" / Tim Murdock

M9RL2-8aFX8

The video is exaggerated, sure. But some may think that present trends could lead us there.

Personally, I think the anti-political correctness message could have been delivered in a more humorous and subtle way.

In this second one, the tables are turned on those who have been pushing diversity:

lKDeyuM0-Og

I think it works better than the Johnny Rascist video

[Milneman]

Now....THIS is something that makes the point that I can relate to. ;)

bs5_E1J_9hY

[GuyFox]

Sure.
Many of us enjoyed that series. But it may not last long.
Thanks to politically correct multiculturalism, and the concurrent dumbing down,
you will see LESS of that, and MORE of THIS:

wzjBcFwlKKM

Better get used to: Ellen, Snookie, and Reality TV

I cannot bear any of it, and rarely turn on my tellie, except to watch some news (less and less) or a film.

[Milneman]

I doubt it, Guy.

But by all means, keep on keeping on.

[GuyFox]

The Beginning to the End of Political Correctness in the UK ?

UKIP, which had been seen as a "Fringey" Fourth party - has triggered an Earthquake.
In the election for EU representatives, UKIP has done the unthinkable:

Result : the "upstart" 4th Party wins the Most Votes !

UKIP--- : 28. %
Labour- : 25.7%
Tories-- : 24.5% (PM David Cameron is in this party)
Liberals : 07. % (Deputy PM Nick Clegg is now in trouble (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hkhtn_NtDZM))
== source: http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/may/26/ukip-european-elections-political-earthquake

You can learn more about Nigel Farage's views here:
UKIP Nigel Farage - Four against one, BBC Question time May 2014
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_v-3-PEWbzA

What does it mean? - Here's one comment from Youtube:

1963MAN / 1 week ago:
" I think that people (mainly UKIP voters) are waking up to the fact that political correctness has been used as a tool for far too long to silence and stifle debate. Subjects such as gay marriage, feminism and multiculturalism have been used to undermine the traditional family unit and the cohesion of the nation state. This is a typical collectivist policy driven by successive UK governments and the EU. UKIP have got the balls to talk about these topics and as a consequence are taking a lot of flak. VOTE UKIP."

Yes. This big and shocking UKIP vote, can be read as a rejection of Political Correctness.

[GuyFox]

It (multi-culturalism) is Failing

H-eNXWtXRQI
Uploaded on Jun 7, 2010
http://www.politisktinkorrekt.info/
Mark Steyn talking about the fraud of multiculturalism, which he calls "a cult of ignorance", on The Michael Coren Show.

[ThePythonicCow]

From Death by Political Correctness (ClubOrlov) (http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2014/05/death-by-political-correctness.html):

============



While it is the entire country that is being victimized by this system of governance based on the principle of social divide and conquer, it is women and minorities that are the pawns in this game, and the biggest losers, with some of the worst outcomes out of all of the developed countries. The US has the largest number of children born into poverty and leads the world in teenage pregnancy and the rate of sexually transmitted disease infection among teenage girls.

In spite of what's been called “progress,” the effect of women working outside the home has been to halve family incomes. American women never got equal rights: the Equal Rights Amendment died a painful death in 1982, when the final deadline for its ratification expired. (Compare that to the Russia, where the equal rights of women, including equal pay for equal work, was enshrined in Article 122 of the Constitution of the USSR in 1936, and has been a fixture of the political landscape ever since.)

As for minority rights, there are more black slaves in America today than there were before the Civil War—they used to work on plantations, but now they work in prisons, many of which are privately owned, where they make money for their politically connected owners. With regard to the rights of sexual minorities, it needs to be noted that not only does the US lead the developed world in rape, but that here rape is evenly distributed between men and women, male rape being most prevalent, again, among the prison population.

This vast landscape of societal failure is obscured behind a verbal veil of political correctness. Never mind the fact that the nirvana of progressive race and gender politics only exists on television (where it is faked) and among a few of the continuously shrinking remnants of the middle class—we are still required to pay lip service to it. Elite universities have evolved an entire gender-neutral, racially bland system of circumlocution, which is now mandatory for everyone to learn and use: say “he” instead of “she,” and suddenly you are a sexist.

Calling a spade a spade is forbidden: idiots no longer exist—now every one of them is “mentally challenged,” nor do senile old fools—who are now “Alzheimer's sufferers.” Scores of people are required to undergo mandatory sensitivity training, where they are brainwashed until they are no longer capable of telling other people exactly what they think of them. Thus, hypocrisy has been promoted from a character flaw to a national requirement. (By the way, this inability to communicate effectively takes a terrible toll on national productivity, but that's a side matter.)

The important point is that those who insist on acting as willing pawns in this game are choosing a specific path for themselves. I like to call it the path of voluntary extinction—the guaranteed end result of endlessly plastering societal failure over with bull****.
============

[GuyFox]

Hey, Paul -
I wonder if you can you tell me what the One Star is about on this thread??

Who assigns that rating?

If Project Avalon is a highly politically correct place (which I have NOT found so far),
then I think I might not get along here.

Because I will not stop opposing that way of thinking.

Here's another bit on non-political correct "theatre":
MOjmsKr2S0w

Some of the comments were interesting:

(1)
Why do you never make a video about male violence (that is not the fault of females)?

(2) (- a great response):
It's on every network every night.

Haha !
I am convinced there is a culture-destroying agenda at work in much political correctness.
It needs to be opposed and fought in the same way as any enemy that is threatening our future.

[ThePythonicCow]

Hey, Paul -
I wonder if you can you tell me what the One Star is about on this thread??

Who assigns that rating?
Any member can rate any thread. See "Rate This Thread", near the top of each page of the thread. The average rating shows.

I guess someone didn't like this thread so rated it one star :).

[jerry]

LOL You think that's sad ...let me share this bit of political correctness conspiracy ? you tell mefmO-ziHU_D8

[ThePythonicCow]

From Death by Political Correctness (ClubOrlov) (http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2014/05/death-by-political-correctness.html):
Another such contrary view, this time casting doubts on multi-culturalism, in a Red Ice interview of 3 days ago: Frank Salter - War on Human Nature, Replacement Level Migration in the West & Crime of Diversity (http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/06/RIR-140604.php).

From the blurb for that interview:
We begin by defining genetic interests and talk about kin selection and W.D. Hamilton. Frank says there is a huge misunderstanding when it comes to how media, education and modern mainstream cultural elites deal with the subject of race and ethnicity. We’ll discuss how social sciences have turned their back on nature, biology and evolution. Salter calls this the “war on human nature.”

[GuyFox]

From Death by Political Correctness (ClubOrlov) (http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2014/05/death-by-political-correctness.html):
Another such contrary view, this time casting doubts on multi-culturalism, in a Red Ice interview of 3 days ago: Frank Salter - War on Human Nature, Replacement Level Migration in the West & Crime of Diversity (http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/06/RIR-140604.php).

From the blurb for that interview:
We begin by defining genetic interests and talk about kin selection and W.D. Hamilton. Frank says there is a huge misunderstanding when it comes to how media, education and modern mainstream cultural elites deal with the subject of race and ethnicity. We’ll discuss how social sciences have turned their back on nature, biology and evolution. Salter calls this the “war on human nature.”

The interview with Salter is excellent.
What an articulate guy!
In the interview he pulls apart the confusions that Political Correctness, and Multiculturalism relies upon.

He believes that a society works better, when affiliation bonds are in place, and these can be based upon:
+ Shared ethnic background,
+ Shared values (religious or otherwise)

He finds it surprising that Western civilisations are the only ones who have permitted immigration at "replacement levels".
He thinks it is madness.

I live in Hong Kong, and I can promise you that neither China, nor HK, is mad enough to have their dominant populations,
stand aside, and give advantages to ethnically dissimilar foreigners. If anything, it is harder for a Western Europe type person
like myself to get a decent job in this town.

The long term impact looks like China and HK will zoom right past the West in their economic growth, and remain puzzled
why America and Northern Europeans allows their countries to be ruined.

The answer is a dark one -
But before I give it I need to remind people of an old truth:
"If you want to know who really runs things, then see who you are not allowed to criticise."

If this does not point the readers to the obvious answer, then just ask me...

[aheb]

From Death by Political Correctness (ClubOrlov) (http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2014/05/death-by-political-correctness.html):
Another such contrary view, this time casting doubts on multi-culturalism, in a Red Ice interview of 3 days ago: Frank Salter - War on Human Nature, Replacement Level Migration in the West & Crime of Diversity (http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/06/RIR-140604.php).

From the blurb for that interview:
We begin by defining genetic interests and talk about kin selection and W.D. Hamilton. Frank says there is a huge misunderstanding when it comes to how media, education and modern mainstream cultural elites deal with the subject of race and ethnicity. We’ll discuss how social sciences have turned their back on nature, biology and evolution. Salter calls this the “war on human nature.”

The interview with Salter is excellent.
What an articulate guy!
In the interview he pulls apart the confusions that Political Correctness, and Multiculturalism relies upon.

He believes that a society works better, when affiliation bonds are in place, and these can be based upon:
+ Shared ethnic background,
+ Shared values (religious or otherwise)

He finds it surprising that Western civilisations are the only ones who have permitted immigration at "replacement levels".
He thinks it is madness.

I live in Hong Kong, and I can promise you that neither China, nor HK, is mad enough to have their dominant populations,
stand aside, and give advantages to ethnically dissimilar foreigners. If anything, it is harder for a Western Europe type person
like myself to get a decent job in this town.

The long term impact looks like China and HK will zoom right past the West in their economic growth, and remain puzzled
why America and Northern Europeans allows their countries to be ruined.

The answer is a dark one -
But before I give it I need to remind people of an old truth:
"If you want to know who really runs things, then see who you are not allowed to criticise."

If this does not point the readers to the obvious answer, then just ask me...

I would be interested to know who you think it is.

[aheb]

I'll continue this thread.
There is so much to think about "political correctness" I mean what a stupid term!!, but is it stupid or is it a very clever way to brainwash people? I remember a journalist commenting at the beginning of "new labour" in the UK saying how deep it went......a bit like cancer...........and it was a great way to shut up your opponents, they seemed to love to change the meaning of a word or it's inference if you were homophobic it didn't mean that you were opposed to homosexuality, rather it meant that you didn't promote it, similarly with racism, you were racist if you even opposed the immigration of the same race into your country.....maybe "Ethnicisist" didn't sound as good as "racist"...............and you had the profound stupity of these people
In the UK they wanted to bann the nurseryrhym " Baa Baa Black sheep"...............when asked why one activist said that it promoted the times when black slaves picked cotton in the fields for their white slave masters...............they were too stupid to realise that cotton doesn't come from sheep........or maybe brainwashed sheeple.
Now you have the same stupidity in the US banning the word "redskins".........http://blogs.seattletimes.com/take2/2014/06/18/why-were-banning-the-redskins-nickname-in-the-seattle-times/..how did the term redskins develop?? ( although I found this definition seems to have dsappeared from the internet )..... a certain tribe of native Americans used to paint their skin red, soo it's a bit like calling someone "tatooed" it's a statement of fact rather than a derogatory racist term.but notice how much more coverage this gets than the ethnic murder of christians in certain arab countries by US backed factions.