PDA

View Full Version : 'Biggest dinosaur ever' discovered in Argentina....



Cidersomerset
17th May 2014, 09:22
http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/2.60.9/desktop/3.5/img/blq-blocks_grey_alpha.png

17 May 2014 Last updated at 01:50

'Biggest dinosaur ever' discoveredBy James Morgan

Science reporter, BBC News

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/74905000/jpg/_74905253_9l0a5935.jpg
Fossilised bones of a dinosaur believed to be the largest creature ever to walk the
Earth have been unearthed in Argentina, palaeontologists say.

Based on its huge thigh bones, it was 40m (130ft) long and 20m (65ft) tall.

Weighing in at 77 tonnes, it was as heavy as 14 African elephants, and seven
tonnes heavier than the previous record holder, Argentinosaurus.Scientists believe
it is a new species of titanosaur - an enormous herbivore dating from the Late
Cretaceous period.A local farm worker first stumbled on the remains in the desert
near La Flecha, about 250km (135 miles) west of Trelew, Patagonia.


pU7-GjZND40


Dr Diego Pol explains how the weight of the dinosaur was calculated

The fossils were then excavated by a team of palaeontologists from the Museum of
Palaeontology Egidio Feruglio, led by Dr Jose Luis Carballido and Dr Diego Pol.

They unearthed the partial skeletons of seven individuals - about 150 bones in total
- all in "remarkable condition".


http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/74905000/jpg/_74905247_9l0a5919.jpg

Site
A film crew from the BBC Natural History Unit was there to capture the moment the
scientists realised exactly how big their discovery was.By measuring the length and
circumference of the largest femur (thigh bone), they calculated the animal
weighed 77 tonnes.

"Given the size of these bones, which surpass any of the previously known giant
animals, the new dinosaur is the largest animal known that walked on Earth," the
researchers told BBC News.

"Its length, from its head to the tip of its tail, was 40m.

"Standing with its neck up, it was about 20m high - equal to a seven-storey
building."

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/74905000/jpg/_74905252_e4460505-argentinosaurus_dinosaur-spl.jpg

Sauropod The new dinosaur is a type of sauropod similar to Argentinosaurus,
illustrated here This giant herbivore lived in the forests of Patagonia between 95
and 100 million years ago, based on the age of the rocks in which its bones were found.

But despite its magnitude, it does not yet have a name.

"It will be named describing its magnificence and in honour to both the region and
the farm owners who alerted us about the discovery," the researchers said.

Measuring
There have been many previous contenders for the title "world's biggest dinosaur".

The most recent pretender to the throne was Argentinosaurus, a similar type of
sauropod, also discovered in Patagonia.

Originally thought to weigh in at 100 tonnes, it was later revised down to about 70
tonnes - just under the 77 tonnes that this new sauropod is thought to have
weighed.The picture is muddied by the various complicated methods for estimating
size and weight, based on skeletons that are usually incomplete.Argentinosaurus
was estimated from only a few bones. But the researchers here had dozens to work
with, making them more confident that they really have found "the big one".

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/74905000/jpg/_74905250_9l0a5931.jpg

Dr Paul Barrett, a dinosaur expert from London's Natural History Museum, agreed
the new species is "a genuinely big critter. But there are a number of similarly sized
big sauropod thigh bones out there," he cautioned.

"Without knowing more about this current find it's difficult to be sure. One problem
with assessing the weight of both Argentinosaurus and this new discovery is that
they're both based on very fragmentary specimens - no complete skeleton is
known, which means the animal's proportions and overall shape are conjectural.

"Moreover, several different methods exist for calculating dinosaur weight (some
based on overall volume, some on various limb bone measurements) and these
don't always agree with each other, with large measures of uncertainty.

"So it's interesting to hear another really huge sauropod has been discovered, but
ideally we'd need much more material of these supersized animals to determine
just how big they really got."


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-27441156

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It could be Freds 'Dino Dozzer'...LOL


WAfR7bR0Np4

bogeyman
17th May 2014, 10:01
How little we know about our past

778 neighbour of some guy
17th May 2014, 11:32
I used to think taking calcium supplements were important, I need to eat more leaves and branches by the looks of it, they seem to do the job just fine, I am going to ask a rhino, a hippo, an elephant, a chicken and a blue whale for advice, they are probably on to something. Worst of all, I am being serious here.:( .

pixiestix
17th May 2014, 14:04
Don't forget this fuzzy little fellow

25881

Mercedes
17th May 2014, 21:02
How little we know about our past

And how much they keep for themselves.

DeDukshyn
17th May 2014, 23:23
I used to think taking calcium supplements were important, I need to eat more leaves and branches by the looks of it, they seem to do the job just fine, I am going to ask a rhino, a hippo, an elephant, a chicken and a blue whale for advice, they are probably on to something. Worst of all, I am being serious here.:( .

Human digestive system is poor at digesting leaves and branches -- likely what our appendix used to help with at some point or before we got hybridized.
Blue whales are omnivores -- plankton is made from tiny animals and plants. Chickens are full on omnivores and will readily eat only meat if that's their only choice.

Not trying to dissuade your point, just clarifying ;)

BTW most calcium supplements do as much harm as good, due to very poor forms, and calcification that arises due to high acidity.

My 2 cents ;)

Ellisa
18th May 2014, 01:52
How would this gigantic animal have moved? I thought that the largest dinosaurs were thought to live in water to help support their muscles. In the photos the area appears arid. Was it always so dry there? Gravity would be the same as now, I assume, so these enormous creatures would have had to make a huge effort to walk at all, let alone run, or fight to attack or defend themselves. It's very puzzling I think.

778 neighbour of some guy
18th May 2014, 10:03
I consider every green veggie a leaf or a branch and I was aware of the chickens being omnivores, what just amazes me is it ejects enough calcium in the form of eggs to turn into a land slithering jellychick with osteosquidosis in about a week, yet this does not happen, does this mean we have calcium over unity chickens, the output outweighs the input many many times. Does that mean us humans being omnivores as well could excrete chalk as well ( in nice stick form of course to make the sidewalks happy)?? So far, nothing rattled its way down through my sewer, so wazzup with that, just a question that came up in my mind.

Apologies for once again taking a perfectly good thread of topic at light speed.

thanks for the reply Duk

DeDukshyn
18th May 2014, 18:09
I consider every green veggie a leaf or a branch and I was aware of the chickens being omnivores, what just amazes me is it ejects enough calcium in the form of eggs to turn into a land slithering jellychick with osteosquidosis in about a week, yet this does not happen, does this mean we have calcium over unity chickens, the output outweighs the input many many times. Does that mean us humans being omnivores as well could excrete chalk as well ( in nice stick form of course to make the sidewalks happy)?? So far, nothing rattled its way down through my sewer, so wazzup with that, just a question that came up in my mind.

Apologies for once again taking a perfectly good thread of topic at light speed.

thanks for the reply Duk

Not really totally an invalid thought -- (although off topic, and my apologies for continuing ..), one of the greatest medical mysteries is where a human zygote gets enough energy to replicate trillions of times, forming into already a humanoid fetus a million times the size of the two celled zygote -- without any energy input at all. Not until the fetus attaches to the placenta does it begin to receive energy and nutrients from its mother. Where did the energy and nutrients come from before this point?

Cardillac
18th May 2014, 21:41
with all due respect to Cidersomerset's very interesting posting-

if these remains were discovered in Argentina they must be the collective remains of Juan and Eva Peron; weren't they both monsters?- ohh, forget it...

Larry :-)

P.S.- I figure one has to have a sense of humor in life in order to survive...

Milneman
19th May 2014, 21:54
I just keep thinking....WOW that's a lot of poop!!!

Cidersomerset
19th May 2014, 22:22
I just keep thinking....WOW that's a lot of poop!!!


There an old English saying..." Where's there's muck , there's Brass "...... meaning money.


http://www.airphotona.com/stockimg/images/10757.jpg
Copralite (Fossil Dinosaur Dung
Petrified dinosaur dung from near Hanksville, UT. CA 150 million years BC. This piece is 4" across (10 cm).

This Dino Dung pendent can be yours for £ 14.99p.....LOL

http://www.shpangle.co.uk/images/fossil_dinosaur_necklace.JPG

A pendant / necklace formed from real fossil Jurassic Dinosaur Poop (Ichthyosaur dung).
This specimen of Dino dung comes from the Jurassic period some 148-170 millions of
years ago, and is from a special marine Dinosaur called an Ichthyosaur.

Discovered along the Dorset coastline in the UK, this Dino dung fossilised over millions
of years to form Marcasite, which is especially known for its healing properties and is
used in Reiki healing. The Dinosaur poop pendant measures approximately 30mm (l)
x 15mm(w) x 10mm(d), has been protected with clear resin and hand polished with
a museum quality wax.Attached to a sterling silver bell cap and hung from a 2mm
thick black leather thong style necklace chain. The leather thong necklace chain
measures 18” with a 1.75” silver plated extension chain and lobster clasps.

The fossil Dinosaur Poop necklace is also supplied with a certificate of Authenticity
making this a unique and special gift.Please click on the additional images below
to view the reverse side of the Dinosaur poop necklace / pendant and to see
a jewellery bust image of the Dinosaur poop jewellery.

If you would like to find out more about our fossil Dinosaur poop jewellery and gifts please
visit our Poop Gifts website page.

http://www.shpangle.co.uk/shopping/pgm-more_information.php?id=178


Dino Dung watch....

http://www.foxnews.com/static/managed/img/Scitech/Dung%20watch_doomsday_604x341.jpg

http://www.armchairgeneral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=90640

or a sphere...

http://fototime.com/6015FCBA3D009C4/standard.jpg

Quite pretty stuff actually..LOL

http://208.109.209.137/DSCOP91c.jpg

Cidersomerset
19th May 2014, 22:30
I started watching this movie the other night, it sounded promising with
a star cast. I did not finish it, apparently the book is better.The city
CGI scenes are cartoonish and the plot got muddled, but if you like
dinasaurs and a devolving planet due to contaminating the time line,
well you might enjoy it...LOL


A Sound Of Thunder (2005) Full Movie

iG7-iFy9QME

Published on 22 Feb 2014


A Sci-Fi Time-Travel Thriller Starring Sir Ben Kingsley & Edward Burns. (There Are Reasons Why We Shouldn't Go Back In Time)

Ewan
15th December 2023, 20:57
Largest marine predator ever, a Plesiosaur

PDMIFXW5QB0