The Indian Vedic Text are Right, Jesuit/Freemason backed Evolutionist are so wrong...

[sigma6]

Evolution may comprise a small subset of biological divergence, but is so misleading and inaccurate in how it is portrayed, as to be an embarrassment to the seekers of truth, and logical scientific methodology. A political sham. Yet as much as they control the University system, The Smithsonian Institute, have hidden thousands of artifacts. The truth of people like Michael Cremo, who will someday be heralded as a great visionary, and man of intellectual courage of his time. He always stated he believed that man has been on this planet millions of years. Maybe it wasn't the same "man" But someone lived and worked and made tools just like us. ... Yet one more of the thousands and thousands of artifacts that the Jesuits, Smithsonian, and Church of Evolution are obligated to deny...


300-Million-Year-Old Man-Made Tools?
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/690133-300-million-year-old-man-made-tools/

Oopart (out of place artifact) is a term applied to dozens of prehistoric objects found in various places around the world that seem to show a level of technological advancement incongruous with the times in which they were made. Ooparts often frustrate conventional scientists, delight adventurous investigators open to alternative theories, and spark debate.

Workers at a stone quarry near Aix-en-Provence, France, in the 18th century came across a find that remains a mystery.

They dug down through layer upon layer of limestone. In a stratum of sand between the 11th and 12th layers, they found man-made objects that seemed to flout the commonly held timeline for human existence on Earth. The find was recorded in the American Journal of Science and Arts in 1820 by T. D. Porter, who was translating Count Bournon’s work, “Mineralogy.” The article is available online through the Internet Archive, a non-profit organization that makes digital copies of print works.

[Milneman]

Simple solution. And it's logically backed actually.

Evolution is not an unguided or random process.

[sigma6]

Simple solution. And it's logically backed actually.

Evolution is not an unguided or random process.

That's because they keep changing the definition... so in essence they can now pick and choose what they want to fall back on, like people who speak out of both sides of their mouths. When it suits them it's random, when it doesn't it's non random, choose your pick... If you recall the fundamental original interpretation. It was clearly RANDOM... So it has changed... As long as they keep the politic moving forward. And the professors keep getting their fat pay checks. And the people keep double guessing themselves... They will keep redefining it with a new level of sophistication. Today it's more about political agendas...

Mutation of genes is random... of course nowadays you don't hear that particular interpretation anymore, since it sounds so profoundly simplistic and untenable within the larger context of other genetic theories. But it supported professors and managed to push the whole agenda forward for countless decades... Before that it was Piltdown man. Which pushed the agenda forward for over 4 decades, until that was proven to be an INTENTIONAL HOAX by a Professor of a University, then championed by a Jesuit Priest after his "untimely" death four years later... (the birth of secular evolution?) These thing can't even support their own weight and they are now onto much more convoluted, sophisticated interpretations.

Point is, this is not science... You don't go into scientific investigation with pre-conceived notions. You don't tell investigators that if they come upon information that clearly shows information, design, complex non-random design. etc, then MUST find alternative ways to interpret it... and so on and so on... Information cannot derive from nothing this has never been proven. In fact it's a scientific maxim. Given the amount of money spent on propaganda campaigns, this is quite the gaping whole, but also not really that hard to grasp logically. So of course I would expect them to tact on the word non-random... what of it...?

Like I said there is a small subset of functions that would give the appearance of what "Evolutionist" will describe as "Evolution" but if you give it more study and look at the larger context. It has been explained using other terminology other then "evolution". Randomness and non-randomness itself is not proof for or against evolution or intelligent design, multi-universe theory, creation, etc... There still has to be a context... They have done the same thing with "cancer" It's just a meaningless word that the public identifies with that means some kind of disease. That Big pharma finds different examples of and different cures and it makes it's controllers billions and trillions. Same thing for "evolution" It means what you want it to mean... big deal.

When I was taking courses. The idea that consciousness existed was dismissed out of hand, you were considered superstitious, uneducated, unscientific, a religious nut, etc.. all the usual pre-meditated ridicule propaganda that all these weak minded professors themselves must have been subjugated to (in order for them to be parroting the same self superior high moral ground) I never doubted it then, but I had no frame of reference to study it, until I started reading on my own. Today of course (not more then a few decades...) voila... it's bad memory, a thing of the past, a bad dream. Let's pretend we never even mentioned it... Today it CAN'T BE DENIED... Experimental evidence clearly showing consciousness affects external reality (as if this is new evidence) explanation by quantum physics, multiple levels of existence, and full circles back to ancient wisdom of Eastern Philosophies ... again this isn't new this is just hidden information that was known by both the East and West... The West just has a harder time since their whole empire is based on suppressing supernatural phenomena, as a control measure... Oppenheimer clearly references Eastern Philosophy in all his public appearances.

Don't get caught in overly complicated interpretations that have much more basic, older, proven explanations, look to the politics, agenda, and motivation. It's getting to the point where the word "scientist" is starting to sound equivalent to the "whore". Who'da a thunk? Corporations controlling scientific institutions was never supposed to happen. Now it is the rule. Expect politics and contamination of reason to support the agendas of higher organizations and entities... I'm rather glad this is happening, politics always surrounded Universities, now we can see that it goes farther then just competition, it's about money, secret society agendas, global carbon tax agendas, big pharma medical agendas, the Cancer agenda, the Evolution agenda is just one more example. Each one is a multi multi billion dollar commerce generator.

And we all know what some people will do for a dollar. Imagine if it was thousands and thousands... I might be willing to believe it too... (NOT! I think I already had that "opportunity"...)

[Milneman]

Or imagine if it's not about money, secret society agendas, global carbon tax agendas, big pharma medical agendas, the Cancer agenda, the Evolution agenda, or any other agenda except the collective agenda of every individual human being who says, quite innocently as an individual, I don't want to give up the degree of my comfort that would make me uncomfortable beyond what I consider normal so that those who are in difficulty, pain, or suffering, can have that condition eased. And then consider that's the only agenda that matters. And the 1% is simply catering to the 99% monster...because if they don't, they're in trouble. Is it our problem they're filthy rich? Why? We want to pay them for what they give us.

Sigma, in order for victimhood to exist as a group/individual who is perpetrated against, against their will, there can't be an agreement for the conditions to exist in the first place, agreed upon by both sides. What I argue is that agreement has been made. It's a simple fix: just stop playing the game, stop greasing the wheels with misery, and start living in honesty. If you don't believe me, just try it for six months and see. Complete honesty in every facet of your life. If there's no improvement, I'll refund your misery.

As for evolution being a guided and non-random process, I'm a Christian Theist. So it's an easy solution for me. It's the naturalists and the conspiracists that can't separate the wheat from the chaff of organizations, or those who get hung up on the panic rush of conspiracy, or the fear high of possible outcomes that have problems.

Have a glass of water, watch the sunset. You'll feel better. Or, you won't. Either way, it's going to come up again tomorrow.