New American Dream is Needed!: Celente, Austin-Fitts, Ure agree

[GuyFox]

A New American Dream is Needed!
Richard Sands, a "virtual politician" (see post #5), is fighting the good fight.

IVdfJtmdFgk

A New American Dream for 2016: Stop the Two Party Duopoly

Corporate elites have taken over the government of the US. The middle class has been getting squeezed for decades, without seeming to care. But this is beginning to change. A recent C2C show brought together a panel of three astute observers of the American scene: Gerald Celente, Catherine Austin-Fitts, and George Ure. In this 21 minute excerpt out of a three hour show, they talk about their Visions for a better America, why we need to get past the Bush and Clinton dynasties, and move back to a government for and by the American people.

At the end: "God Bless America" was sung by Kate Smith, as was heard at the end of a wonderful film, Once Upon a Time in America. Are the people of America ready to move decisively to restore their country's Greatness?
Let's join in that cause.

People want something different.
Recent Poll: Performance of Congress : Jan.2014
Excelllent -: 2%
Good ----- : 6%
Fair ------ : 24%
Poor------ : 66%

Celente: "If we had someone of credibility... Perot kept talking about: 'What's good for All the people.'"
==
Hear the whole 4 hours on C2C, 7 May 2014:
Economy Roundtable : http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/20...

[gripreaper]

Catherine Austin Fitts has been saying for some time now, how complicit we American's are in supporting the current structure because, if we attempt to overthrow it, we would be slitting our own throats, since our bank accounts and retirement accounts and our entitlements are so intricately intertwined in this corrupt system.

I've made this point here and the feeling I get is "not us Avalonians", but we ALL are complicit and support this system whether we do it willingly or unwittingly, with knowledge, bias or ignorance. Very few are willing to risk it all at this point to overthrow the current system.

This is why I get somewhat puzzled by the notion that there are nations who claim to be challenging the dollar and the current structure, when if fact, they support it! The military industrial complex and the illicit drug running are the commodities which we ultimately produce which supports this corrupt system. Basically war and drugs.

[GuyFox]

This complicit support of Military over-reach (for example) has allowed it to continue, I reckon, because most Americans believe that the strength of the US military has allowed the country to:

http://blog.forex4you.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/united-states-balance-of-trade.png

+ Maintain the spending power of the US Dollar, even though the balance of trade, and balance of payments has been negative for decades
+ And thanks to the above, keep the oil imports flowing at a price that most Americans can afford (even though a $3-4 per gallon gasoline price may seem "high", it is lower than the $8-10 per gallon you find in other countries.

I have always regarded the policy (low oil price, propped up dollar) as long term Madness for the country because of its adverse Long Term effects:

+ The industrial manufacturing base of the country has been gutted - jobs were moved overseas to place like China and India, where the cost base is lower
+ The suburban living arrangement is a highly wasteful luxury, that the country can no longer easily afford - if the oil price had been doubled, then Americans would have been quicker to find housing closer to their places of work, and insist that cars and highways become a much smaller part of American life

Americans are now waking up to various realities. You could say: they are now bearing the adverse Long Term consequences, of their selfish Short Term thinking. Isn't it possible (and also necessary!) that they realize that they cannot afford to squander their remaining (depleted) wealth on a military machine and a living arrangement that is unsustainable?

To me, these policies look as though they were designed to waste cash, and deplete wealth. Had we had stronger political leadership, thinking about what is the long term "best" for the country, then the policies would have been changed decades ago, as they were in most other countries on the planet. Some think that the elites wanted to impoverish the middle class. The argument is: people who are poor, and dependent on government, are easier to control. Is that the box that Americans truly want to be in? I think not.

Had Catherine Austin-Fitts put her question differently, she might have had a different response. And many now, in our changed reality, the answer would be something else.

THANK GOODNESS - Americans are now turning against Suburban Living.

The suburbs are dying, so let's create a new American Dream: Leigh Gallagher at TEDxMidAtlantic
FyhCyB4oXXQ
"Suburbia is?: Hell, boring, dead..." (if you Google the question)
But there's a new trend afoot: Densification, creating gathering spaces where CARS are not needed.

If they can get rid of the cars, they can get rid of the reliance on the expensive and destructive military machine.

But it would have happened much faster and more dramatically, if the US had put gasoline prices up to the levels of other advanced countries.

[spiritguide]

Local control with the states keeping the Feds out of their business. The fallacy that folks would not press the red button is that they are watching their pensions and retirement accounts dissolving in front of themselves anyway. The American Dream of turning guns into plowshares is subtle but ever present. Leaders are not elected they are followed through their service to the good through the masses. There is a tide engulfing the shore where selfless activity is overcoming selfish programming. " He Ain't Heavy He's My Brother!" In any case meek is not a label for weak. If you don't stand for something decent, then you will fall for anything.
IMHO

Peace!

[GuyFox]

(A "Virtual Presidential Candidate" whose policies are Open for discussion)

Richard Sands*, the political ideas of...
http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj235/jimolsen2/RichardSands2_zpse6764175.jpg

"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

Sands' motto is : All Americans should be Free and Equal, under Fair laws.

He believes that the present system of government favors the rich and powerful, who have "bought" control of the machinery of government, and are using it to drain the wealth of the middle class, and concentrate wealth in a tiny elite.

+ Without going into detail yet, he sees Five main factors draining cash from the Middle class:
: Military overspending, inefficient healthcare, energy waste, financial speculation, and excessively wasteful governance paired with over-taxation on earned income

+ His main goal is: taking back power from the 1%, and restoring a Republic of Equals

+ He wants changes in campaign funding, and would not allow dual citizens into government
: "A split loyalty is a partial loyalty. We want a government FOR America, not a foreign country"

+ He is emphatically in favor of Rule of Law and property rights, but wants to change the nature of land ownership within the US, to one in line with Georgist principles

+ "The laws that exist must be enforced, and the wealthy cannot expect to escape justice"

+ He wants to tighten immigration. And at a time when many citizens are without jobs, we cannot have illegal immigrants taking jobs, and free-riding on social services

=====
*Richard Sands is a "virtual politician", with REAL POLICIES that could help America,
and if pushed would enrichen the political debate in the USA

[ThePythonicCow]

This is why I get somewhat puzzled by the notion that there are nations who claim to be challenging the dollar and the current structure, when if fact, they support it!
This is similar to a quandary that many a married woman has faced, who has an abusive husband that is their only or primary source of income.

[GuyFox]

People used to say:
China needs the US, because the US is its best customer.

Back then, the Chinese were taking all the US dollars they gained from trade with America, and investing them back in US T-Bonds. That mean the money was going in a circle, and each time the circle turned, US consumers had more Chinese manufactured goods, and the Chinese had more T-Bonds. In effect, the Chinese were giving "vendor finance" to their US customers. Now that may makes sense, if the creditworthiness of your customer is not an issue. But at some point, when the stack of T-Bonds hit a high enough level (was it $2 Trillion or so?), the Chinese decided they had enough, and no longer wanted to add to their holdings. So they began to aggressively swap their T-Bonds for US property, and other things they were allowed to buy with their dollars.

http://people.hofstra.edu/jean-paul_rodrigue/images/perpetualmotion.gif
> source: http://people.hofstra.edu/jean-paul_rodrigue/jpr_blogs.html
(and, hey, he borrowed the idea from me, months earlier,
but drew a better diagram.)

In fact, there is nothing special about the US as a customer. Anyone can be a big customer of China if they are getting EZ-terms, vendor finance. Chinese in China can be customers for Chinese factories, if they can find a sensible way to give them credit - that is happening, but not fast enough.

Russia could be a great customer for China, since the Chinese can sell them manufactured goods, and get gas in return. That will cut down on their need for coal, and maybe help clean-up the air. There's plenty of long term potential in the arrangement, and some have called the signing of the gas deal, the beginning of the Eur-Asian Century.

The US is going to have to face a major problem soon. As fewer countries see the US as a reliable business partner, demand for the dollar will shrink, and those huge overseas holdings of dollars will find their way home, pushing inflation up for US consumers. They may not react well if.when their living standard is cut in half. That's what Americans are facing, and it will take a very special politician to tell them the sad truth and still get elected.

[gripreaper]

The US is going to have to face a major problem soon. As fewer countries see the US as a reliable business partner, demand for the dollar will shrink, and those huge overseas holdings of dollars will find their way home, pushing inflation up for US consumers. They may not react well if.when their living standard is cut in half. That's what Americans are facing, and it will take a very special politician to tell them the sad truth and still get elected.

And this is part of the problem, with the inertia of inflation and deflation pushing against each other, it "flatlines" until the static finally forces our hand, and deflation takes hold. Deflation first, inflation second. Cannibalize and eat the host first, and then beat the dead horse.

[Milneman]

BrhA0sEkuaM

It's a few years old but the sentiment is the same....pay attention. :)

M7PcVKuP6cM

[GuyFox]

What the USA needs, just Happened in the UK
(and France, and before that in India...)

Ukip wins European elections with ease to set off political earthquake

For the first time in modern history, neither Labour nor Conservatives have won a British national election
theguardian.com, Monday 26 May 2014 02.21 BST

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/5/26/1401062782172/-Nigel-Farage-011.jpg
Ukip leader Nigel Farage at the European parliamentary elections count at the Guildhall in Southampton

Nigel Farage has unleashed his much-promised political earthquake across British politics as Ukip stormed to victory in the European elections, performing powerfully across the country.

The Eurosceptic party's victory marked the first time in modern history that neither Labour nor the Conservatives have won a British national election.
In a stunning warning to the established political parties, Ukip was on course to win as much as 28% of the national poll. That is a near doubling of the 16.5% it secured in the last European elections in 2009, when it came second to the Tories with 13 seats.

Twenty years ago, in its first European election, Ukip managed 1% of the vote.
The Liberal Democrats suffered a near-total wipeout losing all but one of its 11 MEPs and placing serious pressure on Nick Clegg to justify his leadership of his party as its share of the national vote was 7 %.

Labour was predicting that when all the final results are assembled it will have polled 25.7% and the Tories 24.5%, but Labour was dependent on a very strong showing in the capital against the Conservatives to ensure it pushed the governing party into third place. The Green party will have come fourth.
Farage said the result justified the description of an earthquake because "never before in the history of British politics has a party seen to be an insurgent party ever topped the polls in a national election".
. . .
==> http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/may/26/ukip-european-elections-political-earthquake

Result : the "upstart" 4th Party wins the Most Votes !

UKIP--- : 28. %
Labour- : 25.7%
Tories-- : 24.5% (PM David Cameron is in this party)
Liberals : 07. % (Deputy PM Nick Clegg is now in trouble (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hkhtn_NtDZM))

Wouldn't it be GREAT to see in 2016 in the USA ! :

Common Party /"Richard Sands" : 38% - or another Third Party
Republicans / Jeb Bush or other- : 31%
Democrats / Hillary Cl., or other- : 30%

UKIP's possible win, and the Need for Change was discussed here

WorldView#1: Can Boris Johnson be President? etc.
eAbgIaWJpEg

[GuyFox]

THIS sort of message is what got the Votes out for UKIP:

2014 UKIP European election broadcast: - April 2014
85WMHMsJ2eI

Many in the UK want to "throw off the yolk" of European laws,
in much the same way as States in America would like to take back power
from un-accountable, and un-responsive politicians in Washington.

UKIP also argued Long and Hard against Unrestricted Immigration into the UK from Europe

"Average wages in the UK are 7X what they are in Bulgaria and Romania"
"Controlled immigration can be a big net benefit to the UK economy."
"Let's control the quantity and quality of who comes to Britain."
- Nigel Farage, May 10, 2014 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_v-3-PEWbzA)

[GuyFox]

(Whose DREAM is this "American Dream" now?):

The GOP/Jewish Coalition: Presidential Hopefuls Pander to Zionist Billionaire Sheldon Adelson

by Don Fox

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan. – Revelation 2:9

http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Sheldon-Adelson-Kingmaker-320x199.jpg
Sheldon-Adelson, Kingmaker

As the Obama administration’s days in office start to wane, the process of vetting the 2016 Republican presidential hopefuls is in full swing.

Adelson has let it be known that he is looking for a Republican to back in the 2016 Presidential election.

Right on cue Scott Walker, John Kasich, Chris Christie and Jeb Bush took turns pandering to the 80 year old hard core Zionist billionaire. Adelson and his wife spent more than $93 million on the 2012 elections so sucking up to Shelly is certainly worth the effort for a 2016 Republican presidential wannabe.

==

> http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/23/the-gopjewish-coalition-presidential-hopefuls-pander-to-zionist-billionaire-sheldon-adelson/

[GuyFox]

(Richard Sands would agree with this - seeing the danger of "Rent-seeking behavior"):

http://philosophyofmetrics.com/2014/02/10/what-are-conspiracy-theories/

Weapons of the Weak and Organized Insubordination

The key to understanding the conspiracy theory is to understand the structure of society itself. Every civilization in the history of man is made up of a small group of ruling elitists and a larger group of subordinate workers. .....

These elite interest groups practise something called rent seeking. Rent seeking is a method of wealth redistribution by spending money on political lobbying to increase ones wealth without adding any wealth to the overall pool of wealth. When no new wealth is created it is pulled from one end of society and redistributed to the small ruling elite end. There are two reasons this happens:
The small elite ruling group has the disposable wealth to spend on political lobbying.
Smaller groups of likeminded citizens are easier to organize, as opposed to the larger disorganized mass of subordinates who are kept divided and without a single purpose.
The ruling elite group accomplishes this rent seeking redistribution of wealth by strategic methods, both direct and indirect.
Direct: Allocation of Resources, Tariffs, Monopolies, and Legislation
Indirect: Restricting Imports, Limiting New Competitors, and Restricting New Technologies

.... redistribution is almost always the outcome of choice for small elitist interest groups. We also see this pattern amongst the larger subordinate group in the way of promotions at work and the lodge structure of the freemasonic system. Perhaps it’s something within our survival instinct......

.... this rent seeking redistribution system will feed on itself over time as the full effects of its makeup cause economic inefficiency and stifles economic growth and development. This leads to further redistribution and the eventual imbalance in the system between small elite groups and the larger disorganized subordinate group.

I propose that conspiracy theories are born within this imbalance.

when elites make decisions that serve their own interests the result is to inflict damage on the society as a whole.....It always eventually ends up as a drain on the whole system by way of redistribution and lack of wealth growth and development.

the small elite groups, through a process of social engineering, have deployed what is referred to as the weapons of the weak. They are:
Derision
Gossip
Disobedience
Petty Theft
Withdrawal
Non-Compliance
The elitists know that the subordinate class will eventually develop and use these “weapons” as the redistribution becomes greater and more noticeable. As such, they usurped the weapons of the weak for themselves and have used them against the larger disorganized class as a means of maintaining the disorganization itself.

Each weapon is controlled and managed as to disempower the working class of its greatest leverage, which is the threat of not participating in the system of balance which allows the redistribution to continue.

The history of the world proves to us that small elitist groups will continue to centralize political and economic power as a means of redistribution until such a time that the larger disorganized subordinate group takes control of the “weapons of the weak” and forces a realignment or balance to take place within the system.

We need to force into a play a system of coercive processes which will force the rent seeking interest groups into imposing self-limiting incentives upon their wealth redistribution. Rent seeking activities will have to bring a reduction in wealth to the small group as opposed to an increase.

We need leaders with real charisma to emerge from within the ranks of both organized and disorganized groups to effect methods of resource allocation which will benefit the economic growth and development of all peoples and all regions.....

[GuyFox]

Honestly, I think we can do better than THIS !

ExQcrf80OSI

[GuyFox]

Breaking the Set = Telling the Truth (thanks, Abby!)

Hilary Clinton 2016: A Recipe for Endless War

fO-jQFKyeeI

[GuyFox]

Evidence that people ARE waking up - a shocking victory of Ideas over Money

Dave Brat reacts to his shocking win over Eric Cantor
HAIAopx2jgQ


(checking the recent "shocking" news - is the public waking up?):

BRAT Beats the Cabal's Man (House Majority Leader, Eric Canton)

His huge fund-raising did not save him

http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj235/jimolsen2/EricCantor_zps866cb40b.jpg (http://s273.photobucket.com/user/jimolsen2/media/EricCantor_zps866cb40b.jpg.html)

No. 2 Republican in Congress, and a strong supporter of Israel

In a shocking political defeat guaranteed to upend Republican Party politics, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor of Virginia lost his primary election Tuesday to a tea party newcomer who hammered the No. 2 leader on immigration reform. It was the first downfall of a congressional leader in a generation.

Establishment Washington reeled from the moment the polls closed as Cantor, the ambitious leader with his sights on becoming the next House speaker, trailed Dave Brat, a local college professor who rustled for tea party support at a time when GOP leaders elsewhere have succeeded in halting the ascent of hard-right candidates.

In the end, Brat claimed an easy victory over the seven-term incumbent in the Richmond-area district.

http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj235/jimolsen2/eric-cantor-Poll_zpsba1bf6af.png (http://s273.photobucket.com/user/jimolsen2/media/eric-cantor-Poll_zpsba1bf6af.png.html)

Cantor, part of a new generation of GOP leaders who called themselves Young Guns, reacted in full force in recent weeks. The majority leader pummeled the airwaves, spending more than $5 million on the race, including a direct-mail piece that took a harder line against immigration reform than Cantor previously had advocated.

In many ways, however, the show of force gave more oxygen to the little-known Brat, who had few resources and almost no outside cash funding his underdog effort. To Cantor’s millions, Brat raised only $200,000, and spent even less, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Among those who advocate changing the nation’s immigration rules, Cantor's loss seems likely to dash all hope that the House will act on any legislation to provide a citizenship path for some immigrants -- as Cantor had once proposed.

==

> http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-na-pn-cantor-loses-to-tea-party-challenger-20140610-story.html

As Whip, Cantor was the second-ranking House Republican, behind Minority Leader John Boehner. He was charged with coordinating the votes and messages of Republican House members. Cantor became the Majority Leader when the 112th Congress took office on January 3, 2011. He is still the second-ranking Republican in the House behind Speaker Boehner, who is considered the leader of the House Republicans.

Cantor is a member of the Republican Jewish Coalition and the Republican National Committee. He is one of the Republican Party's top fundraisers, having raised over $30 million for the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC).
. . .
As of June 2014, Cantor is the only Jewish Republican in the United States Congress. He supports strong United States-Israel relations. He cosponsored legislation to cut off all U.S. taxpayer aid to the Palestinian Authority and another bill calling for an end to taxpayer aid to the Palestinians until they stop unauthorized excavations on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.[31] Responding to a claim by the State Department that the United States provides no direct aid to the Palestinian Authority, Cantor claimed that United States sends about US$75 million in aid annually to the Palestinian Authority, which is administered by the U.S. Agency for International Development. He opposed a Congressionally approved three-year package of US$400 million in aid for the Palestinian Authority in 2000 and has also introduced legislation to end aid to Palestinians.
==
> Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Cantor

[GuyFox]

All those expensive ads by Eric Cantor on Fox News did not work

He (Brat) won by "making sense":

Interview with Congressional Candidate Dave Brat

zXckln2fDt4
Q: What are you going to do to... keep working for the good of your constituents?

A: Ethics, Term Limits, how I view my job

(What if Hillary ran, and NOBODY voted for her? Would THAT be a message?)

[GuyFox]

Here Sean David Morton riffs on the importance of Eric Cantor's historic loss

JOEIO12ApNw

"The mainstream press is freaking out on this news."

Sure.
+ One guy (Cantor) spent $5 million, with most of that going to the MSM
+ The other guy (Prof. David Brat) spent only $200,000

The guy who ignored the MSM machine Won ! Hurray for that !

[GuyFox]

PressTV: People struggle to find, retain representation, by Paul Craig Roberts

June 13, 2014 by Jean

http://previous.presstv.ir/photo/20140613/366760_Dave-Brat%20.jpg
Professor Dave Brat (shown) defeated Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a prime trophy of the Israel Lobby.Professor Dave Brat (shown) defeated Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a prime trophy of the Israel Lobby.

Fri Jun 13, 2014 11:17AM GMT

Paul Craig Roberts

Dave Brat, a professor of economics at Virginia’s Randolph-Macon College, is a marked man.

Professor Brat defeated Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a prime trophy of the Israel Lobby. I doubt that Eric Cantor ever lost an opportunity to place Israel’s interests above the interests of his constituents. Under US laws, Cantor should have been required to register as a foreign agent.

The Israel Lobby is one of the six powerful interest groups that rule the US. The Israel Lobby has a perfect record of destroying any member of the House or Senate who dared to cross “The Lobby.” A number of its victims have spoken out, describing how the Lobby’s power was used against them.

Professor Brat’s victory over Cantor is not only an affront to the Israel Lobby but also an assault on its power. The Lobby will not take this lying down. Professor Brat had better not think that the attractive sexy women who suddenly are interested in him are attracted by his new status as a US Representative and a topic of conversation. The irresistible women will be on a well paid mission to cause a scandal.
==
> more: http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/06/13/presstv-people-struggle-to-find-retain-representation-by-paul-craig-roberts/

[pathaka]

Yes, how about this:

1. US is NOT World Police, but polices itself - in truthfulness, lawfulness and honesty
2. US Dollar is NOT world reserve currency, but a currency of the people of the US
3. US does not try to meddle with other countries matters, but instead fixes its own issues
4. US really stands for freedom (in all sorts), for opportunity and for liberty - and not just exploitation, corpo-fascism, MSM-propaganda and dumbing-down of education

That would be a great start. I'd vote for that!

[GuyFox]

CANTOR's LOSS - David Wilcock's Comments

Republican House Majority Leader Loses to Unknown Tea Party Challenger

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-06-10/with-eric-cantors-loss-the-republican-civil-war-is-about-to-explode

If you don’t follow politics closely, suffice it to say that House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s upset loss to a gadfly challenger in Tuesday’s GOP primary is the equivalent of a No. 16 seed beating a No. 1 seed in the NCAA basketball tournament. No sitting majority leader had ever lost in a primary. And this wasn’t a buzzer-beater. Randolph-Macon College economics professor David Brat, a Tea Party activist, beat Cantor handily, 56 percent to 44 percent. Nooooooobody saw this coming.

This is a big deal on a number of levels. First, it eliminates what little chance remained that the House would pass some sort of immigration reform legislation this year. Cantor was hardly an outspoken advocate for reform. But he was a known sympathizer, which earned him the enmity of many conservatives. His loss probably also diminishes the likelihood that House Republicans will pass legislation next year, too, for reasons I’ll get to in a minute.

Second, Cantor’s loss blows a hole in the House GOP leadership team, where he was second-in-command and thought to be the Speaker-in-waiting when John Boehner retires—an event that quite a few people thought might occur at the end of this Congress….

Third, Cantor’s loss will greatly exacerbate the ongoing civil war within the Republican Party, both at the congressional and presidential level….

[End quote]

The Neocons do represent one faction of the Cabal that is more heavily tied to Israel and the Rockefellers. There has always been a direct parallel between the needs of Israel and the moves of the Neocons.

I actually love the Jewish people and I am not in any way racist. My best friend in HS was Jewish, several of my best college buddies were Jewish and one of my ex-girlfriends is Jewish — so please don’t hit me with that accusation.

It is simply a fact that we have a government in Israel that learned the Cabal “bag of tricks” and then turned against them and created their own faction, because they didn’t want to be the sacrificial lamb for the New World Order plan.

The Neocons have been bribed, blackmailed, threatened and utterly terrified by this very small group within the top echelons of Israel for quite some time. This group is utterly dependent upon oil money for its survival, and losing the House majority voting rights to the Tea Party — which is NOT on the inside — is a critical kick in the crotch. Very, very bad. They now cannot pass ANY legislation and have been effectively destroyed.

They have been behind Syria, Ukraine and now this. It’s all a mad dash to try to create a war, to bump up the price of oil, and to create opportune chaos.

If you read the comments sections in various articles about this, NO ONE wants to go back into Iraq. There are so many other areas with horrific conflicts and we’re still nursing the Iraq hangover with icepacks rubber-banded to both sides of our head and an economy that is significantly worse than GDI (that’s Great Depression I as opposed to GDII, which started in 2008 and still hasn’t resolved.)

I do believe this is all leading to a positive outcome, and I also believe this Iraq move is poorly planned, ill-advised and doomed to fail. It literally appears they took the same “dirty tricks crew” that tried to start trouble in Syria and just drove them over to Iraq.

Nothing seems to be working out for these guys right now and as they get weaker and weaker, they make bad mistakes. This is another example. They followed occult protocol by using the female aspect of Lucifer’s name, Isis, as the name of the invasion. That’s part of their religion.

Anyway, Ben obviously has people passing him disinformation. A simple reverse image search on Google could have revealed that the charred bodies photo already existed, and yet the MI5 guy passed it to him as being something else. Intel people are smart, and this was not an accident. The intel Ben got on Iraq also seems to be disinformation.

Nonetheless, the BRICS move to defeat the Cabal is real. The change is inevitable. What is up for question, still, is whether this will all culminate in some sort of mega-event and political announcement or whether it will occur in an ongoing series of unfolding events over time.

It is hard to know the answer to that. The resources are certainly in place for a mega-event, and the only thing they needed was to have an alternative financial system in place. That is now happening. So while it may seem like the ultimate pipe dream, I still do not rule out that we may get a “Moment of Truth.”

I do intend to finish up a pending article on this stuff in the coming week at divinecosmos.com.

- David

Comment by dwilcock on June 17, 2014

[Carmody]

v53UxOZbwU4

[GuyFox]

A funny little cartoon.

But as a bit of commentary, it isn't clear where it is aimed:
Wilcock? The Cantor defeat? The original video with THREE pundits? Me?

I think a spitball is most effective, when it is well- aimed.
But thanks for sharing the video

[Carmody]

It's just a funny little video from Wiley, who's daily print comics are satire, aimed squarely at the insanity of the modern western world.

I was looking for an appropriate thread to put it in. I had remembered 'obviousman', from his daily comics...went looking for it on the net.....and found this video of it.