Wynn Free: David Wilcock & I documented David as Edgar Cayce’s reincarnation

[giovonni]

From Alfred Lambremont Webre

VANCOUVER, BC - In a wide-ranging ExopoliticsTV interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre, author Wynn Free shares the multi-dimensional journey that led him to co-authoring the book The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce? Interdimensional Communication and Global Transformation with author David Wilcock ... more here (http://exopolitics.blogs.com/exopolitics/2014/05/wynn-free-how-david-wilcock-i-documented-david-as-edgar-cayces-reincarnation.html)

Published on May 28, 2014


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5mBMB2j6_Y&feature=em-uploademail

[jake gittes]

"8. Lack of desire for public acclaim" ... Hmmm, I'm not so sure about that one. DW seems to do a LOT of self-promotion, refers to his own works as "amazing" and "incredible" and recently claimed Obama landing at LAX as DW was leaving as some type of synchronicity, which to me seemed kind of like "it's all about me" syndrome.

[giovonni]

"8. Lack of desire for public acclaim" ... Hmmm, I'm not so sure about that one. DW seems to do a LOT of self-promotion, refers to his own works as "amazing" and "incredible" and recently claimed Obama landing at LAX as DW was leaving as some type of synchronicity, which to me seemed kind of like "it's all about me" syndrome.

so i guess your not a fan of David... http://www.skype-emoticons.com/images/emoticon-00136-giggle.gif

#9. friend of Kerry Cassidy and Bill Ryan

[Snookie]

"8. Lack of desire for public acclaim" ... Hmmm, I'm not so sure about that one. DW seems to do a LOT of self-promotion, refers to his own works as "amazing" and "incredible" and recently claimed Obama landing at LAX as DW was leaving as some type of synchronicity, which to me seemed kind of like "it's all about me" syndrome.

so i guess your not a fan of David... http://www.skype-emoticons.com/images/emoticon-00136-giggle.gif

#9. friend of Kerry Cassidy and Bill Ryan

Umm....so just because # 9 is true doesn't nescessarally mean #8 has to be true.

[giovonni]

"8. Lack of desire for public acclaim" ... Hmmm, I'm not so sure about that one. DW seems to do a LOT of self-promotion, refers to his own works as "amazing" and "incredible" and recently claimed Obama landing at LAX as DW was leaving as some type of synchronicity, which to me seemed kind of like "it's all about me" syndrome.

so i guess your not a fan of David... http://www.skype-emoticons.com/images/emoticon-00136-giggle.gif

#9. friend of Kerry Cassidy and Bill Ryan

Umm....so just because # 9 is true doesn't nescessarally mean #8 has to be true.


"8. Lack of desire for public acclaim: This book was written at the insistence of the author over Wilcock’s initial vehement resistance. Wilcock only permitted the book project to continue after he absolutely convinced himself of my intentions and connection with the “Law of One.” Even then, he frequently shunned involvement with the project. Wilcock was not anxious to expose himself to the kind of controversy and scrutiny this book could create. It was only at the author’s insistence that many would benefit as a result of the public release of this book that Wilcock finally gave some support to this project.

i have no problem with #8 ...

do you Snookie ?

[tnkayaker]

i got caught up in the Wilcock with DW, well i asked a simple question, i asked so if all this graduating to a 4th density happens and the chosen ones are suppose to die for this to happen and such, what happens to my animals? who takes care of them? Wilcock replied with this cartoon, so you can see what he thinks of himself, he didnt even bother to explain himself, he just said dont worry this should explain everything, WT? so full of himself, then the whole "my life is being threatened " blah blahi actually called some friends in Cali and offered Wilcock some help through some friends that wanted to help him with a safe house, NO REPLY, so there you have it, im my HUMBLE opinion he is just out to make money from his web site, and has exalted himself to a status that is above everyone else he doesnt need to communicate with....

[michaelv]

No disrespect to david wilcock? i have no respect at anything wilcock brings out? i heard a while back, a audio of him channeling,it was a Embarrassment to listen to it.http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/9907/caycewilcock2.png
xT2w_36zviI
This is just my opinion guys,it seems he feeds of other peoples work,then adds his own version ..

[Circe]

@Michaelv +1

[jake gittes]

giovanni - I don't think he's a bad guy or have anything against him personally other than it seems his ego seems a bit out of control. (How come nobody ever claims to be the reincarnation of an ordinary Joe Blow? Why is it always someone famous?) DW seems decent enough and I learned some stuff reading his financial tyranny series. That said, I have found that since then he hasn't really broken any news despite his "incredible sources" and seems to just link certain events together with his theories instead of facts. It's like Ben Fulford or Sheldon "Events are now taking place" Nidle. Fun to read sometimes, but I don't hold my breath waiting for it to amount to anything.

[giovonni]

Well ... i do have respect for those who speak their minds (opinion) ...

though i don't for those who speak in innuendos ...

Thanks for the responses ... :)

And note ~ Yes i have heard he does have an ego at times.

[Snookie]

"8. Lack of desire for public acclaim" ... Hmmm, I'm not so sure about that one. DW seems to do a LOT of self-promotion, refers to his own works as "amazing" and "incredible" and recently claimed Obama landing at LAX as DW was leaving as some type of synchronicity, which to me seemed kind of like "it's all about me" syndrome.

so i guess your not a fan of David... http://www.skype-emoticons.com/images/emoticon-00136-giggle.gif

#9. friend of Kerry Cassidy and Bill Ryan

Umm....so just because # 9 is true doesn't nescessarally mean #8 has to be true.


"8. Lack of desire for public acclaim: This book was written at the insistence of the author over Wilcock’s initial vehement resistance. Wilcock only permitted the book project to continue after he absolutely convinced himself of my intentions and connection with the “Law of One.” Even then, he frequently shunned involvement with the project. Wilcock was not anxious to expose himself to the kind of controversy and scrutiny this book could create. It was only at the author’s insistence that many would benefit as a result of the public release of this book that Wilcock finally gave some support to this project.

i have no problem with #8 ...

do you Snookie ?

I think he is a good researcher, I even have his book The Source Field Investigations, however I agree with Jake that he doesn't often pass up an opportunity to plug himself.

[gripreaper]

Excerpts...

The Ra link between Cayce and Ra-Ta: Edgar Cayce in his own readings described his past life as high priest Ra-Ta in Egypt circa 10,500 B.C.,

Fulfillment of the Cayce prophecy: Cayce predicted that the priest (Ra-Ta) would return in 1998 and “may become a liberator of the world” along with other lightworkers,

Astrological congruities: The ties linking Wilcock’s chart to Cayce’s show such a high degree of synchrony

Cayce and Wilcock both dedicated themselves to planetary service without regard for financial gain or personal recognition.

Prophetic abilities

Lack of desire for public acclaim:

So, there you have it folks. David is the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce, and is also the pure avatar "RA" who delivered the Law of One, and is the liberator of the world without any regard for financial gain or public acclaim.

Now, you should order David's new book though, its chalk full of tips on how to ascend.

[Wind]

It is possible that Edgar is already reincarnated here again, but I don't think it's David.

[tnkayaker]

Now, you should order David's new book though, its chalk full of tips on how to ascend.[/QUOTE]

lmao so well said, listen i have no ill intent towards a guy like DW i just dont care for being mis guided and mis led at someones ill gotten gain, maybe thats not the right term(s) but what happend to that movie DW was making that was going to change the world view and consciousness??? never heard what happend to that, he just seems to try to keep baiting one to order more costly books or videos to learn more of his "special" knowledge,as if the answer to everything is just over the next hill, in his new book, please, and that whole life being threatened thing, whatever, when he stated he doesnt do readings anymore i thought to myself, its a gift to be able to do readings and its part of who one is in the life they came into in this realm, so to deny people of valuable information is a little more than i can take, it means the person is more concerned with their own needs than who they claim to be, enough said.

[giovonni]

What i have found very interesting in regards to David Wilcock in comparison to Edgar Cayce, is that both men have shared an uncanny ability to absorb information ... And then incorporate and relate it back via their teachings or readings. They both also have received much praise in compiling, writing, and publishing their first works... While later also receiving equal amounts of criticism in regards to their sources as well as diagnosing (healing) methods.

It has also been speculated that while doing so many readings and not getting enough rest and care, contributed greatly to Edgar Cayce's suffering a stroke and causing his death at age 67... Note ... And if David is the reincarnation of Edgar, perhaps his knowing (believing) this might have given him (David) good reason to discontinue performing any more public readings in this current life ... And finally it should also be noted while living Edgar Cayce never obtained any substantial wealth during his former prophetic career ... Again perhaps David's memories of this (his) former life's path situation... Has greatly influenced his desire and drive for a better financial outcome during this current turn around the wheel ... ;)

[outerheaven]

Personally I think DW brings a lot of interesting information to the table and it's up to the reader how to investigate it further and if/how to incorporate it into their lives.

I don't understand the crowd that seems to flock with negative comments anytime his name mentioned, but then again, I don't understand the negativity about any other source that can easily be tuned out, either. I don't particularly care one way or the other -- take it or leave it, IMO.


then the whole "my life is being threatened " blah blahi actually called some friends in Cali and offered Wilcock some help through some friends that wanted to help him with a safe house, NO REPLY, so there you have it

Suppose you're a public figure, and your life is truly threatened. Then, a random internet person offers you a safe house. Actually, probably many, many random internet people offer you a safe house. Do you trust such an offer? And who says he didn't already accept such an offer? Don't you think you're being a bit hasty to judge here?

I understand you're relying on hyperbole to exaggerate / tar & feather DW here, but this still should be pointed out in the interest of fairness.

[wisehealing]

This is a very remarkable interview of Winn Free, the co-author of by the book, The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce? Interdimensional Communication and Global Transformation, by Alfred Lambremont Webre.

At about 1:52:35 of the video Webre puts the question to Winn about Wilcock declining the test which Cayce had created before he passed to verify anyone claiming to be him in the future was in fact his same soul. Interestingly Winn suggests it was the individualized soul of Cayce who created the test and not the "group soul" which spoke through Cayce and who may also speak through Wilcock. But then my question is: who are we speaking about in the reincarnation of Edgar Cayce anyway, if not the individual soul of Cayce? When we say someone was this other person in the historical past we're referring to both persons having the same soul, not that they both channeled the same entities.

i realize this all gets very spiritually complicated, in terms of Earthy understanding at least -- when considering higher dimensional beings deciding to take on Earthly incarnation -- but i think even the implication that Cayce could have been such an intentional incarnation of higher beings of the Ra Confederacy, as it is suggested Wilcock is, doesn't even work to explain Wilcock's failure with the test. If then Cayce's soul was not an individualized soul, but in fact a soul group, the same soul group that has now incarnated in Wilcock, would not the answer to the test be still available?

Actually as i was watching the interview with Winn speaking about the Ra group from whom the Law of One was channeled and which Wilcock refers to frequently, i had in the back of my mind the Elohim who i've wondered about frequently -- and who should appear next in Winn's story but the Biblical creator gods themselves, the Elohim. So it seems there is a close relationship between the Ra group and the Elohim, just that the Ra soul group have some special trouble when incarnating in which the incarnate's personality has peculiar tendencies to abuse of power -- the kind of thing which is synonymous with having created huge karma troubles out of Ancient Egypt for many of us. Could this be any key to David's megalomaniac tendencies?

But the Elohim, who do they think they are anyway (excuse my spiritual irreverence of significant spiritual powers in the Omniverse)? Isn't it bending the Prime Directive, just a tad, to come up with the explanation of "we'll, we are really them anyway," so it's not infringing on free will for them to do what they think is right for us, because it's us really. Wasn't the Quarantine Zone around the planet created to prevent just such creative interpretations of Universal Law? We, as individual souls incarnated on the Earth Plane, may in fact have simultaneous parallel existences in all kinds of dimensions, but this "free will polarity experiment," as it is sometimes termed, would have no chance of working at all if creator gods could just say, "Oh, they're certainly going to be in trouble if they go down that path, here we'll input a few helpful hints." And on top of that having the earthly Avatars of these beings, showing tendencies to develop autonomous power issues!

Interesting also about the Mormons being involved. i'm thinking too about Teal Scott/Swan being drawn to incarnate here from the Adonai soul group and choosing to experience all that Dark manipulation connected with the Mormons. "Adonai" is translated as the "word of God" from Hebrew. Is there some kind of drama of Biblical proportions being orchestrated here?