Kerry Cassidy has a "go" at Rich Dolan - on Whistleblower Radio

[GuyFox]

Kerry Cassidy has a "go" at Rich Dolan

She wants him to Stop "holding back... You are very careful."

(jump to 36 minutes in)

hXt9XDWMBlA

KC:
"You have put the evidence out there...
Why don't you take off your shirt and Tie and really go for it!"
RD:
"Holly ****! ...
I don't think you have read my book very carefully."
KC:
"I haven't even started it."
RD:
"There you go."

Hey, I like them both.
And wonder if this was a bit 'stage managed.'

Richard Dolan is careful. And I think he is right to protect his hard-won reputation. He has high credibility in and outside the field. And it would be easy to blow it.

Later, He does admit:
"When I finish this next book... That is where I am going."
Moving forward, he is going to be looking more at occultism, symbology, who is behind the cover-up, and things like satanism.

[GuyFox]

I think she was "egging him on" - hoping he would reveal more with her urging.

He seems to have his own agenda, and wants to reveal more in his next book (and presentations to come.)
His careful step-by-step approach has brought him much credibility, so I has happy to hear he has more steps planned

[ghostrider]

I like Richard Dolan , very smart and plain spoken ...

[Cidersomerset]

Richard is a Researcher/scholar imo and has said many times that there could be an alternate civilisation , UFO's etc.....

Kerry is a Researcher/journalist imo and wants to blow the lid off , which pleases some and annoys others....

Nothing to get excited about a bit of frustration and we all have had those moments many times in this field.

[Tommy]

Both Kerry and myself know Richard well, and we are all friends. We talk to each-other like this all the time, and Richard does not mind at all.
He has also stated to me that he is trying to push into new directions, and through many mutual friends and contacts he has realized that there are a lot more going on behind the fold than he perhaps previously suspected, and he is indeed now pushing the envelope somewhat further, hopefully much further :) He is brilliant at wording and researching, so I think this should be an interesting progression for Richard. This should also explain some of the logic behind "pushing" Richard as Kerry is aware of this as well.

Thanks for posting GuyFox

[sirdipswitch]

WOW!! He's been around a long time!! You mean there's more, that he hasn't told us????

[GuyFox]

Friends?
Yes. I think you can hear that in the tone of voice in the exchange.
Had Kerry not known him so well, I doubt she would have "teased" him in this fashion

[Cardillac]

just to throw a monkey wrench (known as "spanner" to Brits) into the hard-drive of this interview (and I know I'll probably be chastised to no-end by some Avalonians; well, be my guest- I can take it- and can retort):

one needs to start after the ca. 8 min. point to get down to the nitty-gritty;

I certainly have respect for Kerry Cassidy but sometimes her bumblings (she's simply sometimes unconcentrated on any one aspect at any one particular time; she spreads herself too thinly at times);

as for Richard Dolan: I do have some reservations- please let me explain;

according to internet "renegade" historian Douglas Dietrich (if/IF he has credulity), he has stated Dolan has dismissed him as being nothing more than a "faggot";

if/IF/IF this is true, and IF DD has credulity (IF!), I find it to be very disheartening to believe Richard Dolan would stoop so low as to dismiss anyone for whatever by simply referring to them as a "faggot";

as I'm an opera singer by profession (I'm very attuned to the sounds of the human voice- was forced to be, whether sung or spoken; the sung voice is simply an elongated extension of the spoken voice)-

Richard Dolan's reedy (at least as recorded), not-connected-to-his-solar-plexus (diaphragm) spoken voice has always disturbed me; granted, one cannot chose one's physiology and one's natural resonances (has to do with size of rib cage + size of area behind the soft pallet/throat in one's mouth, let alone size of soft pallet...ooh, forget it)-

my point: Dolan's voice sounds like a cheaply (and I mean cheaply) generated computer voice;

am not trying to say Dolan is somehow a "robotoid" (Peter David Beter's term if one is aware of PDB www.peterdavidbeter.com) or an "alien" (convenient present term for all unexplainable entities)-

but I just feel Dolan is not at all the way he appears on the surface; I certainly don't have the answer but something is fishy here; many other whistleblowers trying to expose ET life were liquidated but Dolan gets away with three published books on the subject?-

addendum: Douglas Dietrich has always stated: any whistleblower wearing a suit is "government"-

with all respect, you go figure it out...

please stay well all-

Larry

[GuyFox]

Very interesting comments, Larry

I think it is beneath RD to call DD, a "faggot".
But I have never heard him say that. Perhaps it was a private remark somewhere.

Had he called DD:
"An overly nervous researcher, prone to fantasy and exaggeration" - I would agree.

I see no reason to bring in guesses about DD's sexuality into a description of his "contributions".

Even with this remark, I do find DD's comments interesting - though he comes to conclusions different from everyone else ("Japan won the war").
Do you think DD really has a familial connection with Marlene Dietrich - or does he make that claim "for theatrical" reasons?

RD makes some interesting comments here about why Disclosure will be such a shock:

xzI1YF7sv1A

(It may be a shock to some to see Rich Dolan without the suit.)

[Redstar Kachina]

..........

[Yetti]

I've notice some glitches on RD voice, may be an electronic voice or a digital workout also, I do not know why. also the girl voice has the same problem, and I cant get it when Kerry speaks!! weird!. We need to keep both eyes open and sharp our nose to smell the fish before to get to the ocean so to speak. Remember now is very difficult to get anything very true because the hi quality of the tools for making sound, photos, videos, and many other effects. but following my premise: do not kill the messenger, listen to the message, because I hear the king and the beggar equally! every body has something to say!.

[GuyFox]

Dolan has a robot voice?

That's ridiculous.
He appears at many conferences, and I am sure that people who met him Face-to-face would have noticed more than you can be listening to a podcast

[GuyFox]

Rich Dolan takes off the tie

u2-1aIesFhk
Many good questions about Disclosure, Serpo, etc

He's planning to write a book on abductions:
"I know that some other intelligence is seeding human females."

"20 Years ago, my attitude was completely conservative..."
"Tearing away the illusions, led to more and more questions."
"Is time travel possible? In theory, I do not see why not?"

[Gardener]

I have great respect for Richard Dolan, his first two books are excellent, and a third in the series has been in the works for quite a long time, then came the 'After Disclosure' book with I forget who co-authored/influenced it; something went wrong at that point. Nothing specific just off at a tangent, I think its is called co-opted and it most certainly did stop work on the third book in the series.

If only he could get back to that third book.
imho

[GuyFox]

Bryce Zabel - A.D. After Disclosure

rfqGqn2MbeA

I'm not at all sure I agree with you that Dolan went "off the rails".

He has evolved and retained his integrity, as far as I can tell

[Gardener]

'Off the rails' is not exactly what I said or meant, it would be nice if he could finish that third book wouldn't you agree?

Guyfox---->I'm not at all sure I agree with you that Dolan went "off the rails".

He has evolved and retained his integrity, as far as I can tell

[GuyFox]

Yes - I do.
And he will. But those books are hard going - for Historians

His other books seem to reach a wider audience, one he has gotten to know through his public presentations.

The Suit-and-Tie guy wrote the History books, and a new Rich Dolan has emerged

[Nick Matkin]

Are there any direct links to the MP3 versions of the talking-head videos in post #1 and #13?

These look like interesting interviews, but like many people I just don't have time to sit and watch this stuff glued to a screen for hours on end.

On the other hand I can jog, drive or do other stuff with an MP3 audio-only version playing. I doubt I'm the only one that feels like this!

So PLEASE, if anyone is going to do talking-head interviews with little if any graphical content, please consider providing them as MP3 files and then making them available where we can all find them easily.

(I've had a look on the Project Camelot/Whistle Blower/Revolution Radio/American Freedom Radio sites and maybe I'm looking in the wrong place, but the interviews and recordings appear to be all over the place, without any concise grouped listing sections.

Sorry for the whining, but it's frustrating - even though the content is free!

Thanks.

Nick

[GuyFox]

I use a Converter to turn them into MP3's.
You might use this same one:

/Strip-YouTube-audio/ http://www.listentoyoutube.com/

I am a bit careful with it (and check) the file names.
Sometimes it wants to given your computer an "extra" file

[InnoSent]

I thoroughly enjoyed this interview and I agree with what Kerry said. That Richard, though he presents much to consider, it seems like he's the guy "on the fence". He should take the leap of faith already. As far as him being a robot, I think the glitch that was referred to was an artifact of the encoding process. I noticed that too. This seems to happen more often when large files are compressed to mp3s, and that was a pretty long interview. I wonder where "Cardillac" got that idea. I seem to remember reading something like that from the words of "Maurizio Cavallo". As for video capture, I use "4k downloader". www.4kdownload.com/
http://i59.tinypic.com/alit5e.png You can choose the resolution and output format.
http://i60.tinypic.com/2mc7u5e.png As well as extract the audio from a youtube video simply with the click of a tab. ;)