PDA

View Full Version : Lancet: Fluoride OFFICIALLY classified as a neurotoxin... It's about time!!



linksplatinum
18th June 2014, 01:02
Thursday, June 12, 2014
Lancet classifies Fluoride as a neurotoxin. About bloody time.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-usuwgMuSzbs/U5oDYpv8_II/AAAAAAAAQ-U/eKFMwxgkr-s/s1600/1970686_687521011305047_1757273297_n.jpg


This is HUGE news and no one is talking about it. The Lancet, the world's oldest and most prestigious medical journal, recently published a report classifying Fluoride as a dangerous neurotoxin. The report puts Fluoride in the same category Arsenic, Lead, and Mercury.

This article is made available free of charge, as a service to our users.
Please login to access the full article, or register if you do not yet have a username and password.
PDF link~~~>
http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422%2813%2970278-3/fulltext#article_upsell

Frederick Jackson
18th June 2014, 01:56
A tremendous amount of research has shown just how bad fluoride is and how it does virtually nothing to protect teeth. In fact tooth mottling and bone damage are among the many, many deleterious effects of fluoride. The continued use of it in the water and salt (Latin America) supplies can only point to a concerted policy by the Powers That Be to reduce fertility rates as discussed by Kevin Galalae in his book Killing Us Softly http://fairdinkumradio.com/?q=node/358. I cannot think of any other reason why the government would continue poisoning the population, and especially the young despite all the evidence.

Good to see that this subject has "made it" to Lancet. Will it be enough to nudge the MSM into any kind of action? Yes, one would think this is NEWS all right, enough to make the headlines for the next six months. US GOVERNMENT KNOWINGLY POISONS POPULACE. :crazy:

onawah
18th June 2014, 03:22
This should be merged with the thread here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?4228-Fluoride-a-conversation-with-an-insider-who-knows-the-real-story&p=844354&viewfull=1#post844354

ThePythonicCow
18th June 2014, 05:30
This should be merged with the thread here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?4228-Fluoride-a-conversation-with-an-insider-who-knows-the-real-story&p=844354&viewfull=1#post844354

I'll leave the threads separate ... this new Lancet article is worth its own thread in my view. But I will post a link on Bill's older (started July 2010) Fluoride - a conversation with an insider who knows the real story (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?4228-Fluoride-a-conversation-with-an-insider-who-knows-the-real-story:) to this new thread about the Lancet article. Some good news here :)!

MorningSong
18th June 2014, 08:02
I also started this thread back in March '14...

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?69379-New-Research-Proves-Flouride-is-a-Neurotoxin

Polyamine
18th June 2014, 09:08
They also have manganese listed as a neurotoxin and it is a vital cofactor in many bodily functions.

Pam
18th June 2014, 13:06
From Frederick Jackson

"Good to see that this subject has "made it" to Lancet. Will it be enough to nudge the MSM into any kind of action? Yes, one would think this is NEWS all right, enough to make the headlines for the next six months. US GOVERNMENT KNOWINGLY POISONS POPULACE. :crazy:"






Not if Linsdey Lohan gets drunk again....... that will take top billing.

Bluegrass
18th June 2014, 14:58
... this new Lancet article is worth its own thread in my view. But I will post a link on Bill's older (started July 2010) Fluoride - a conversation with an insider who knows the real story (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?4228-Fluoride-a-conversation-with-an-insider-who-knows-the-real-story:) to this new thread about the Lancet article. Some good news here :)!

Paul, please, check the link here, it seem to be broken. Thanks.
:brushteeth:

ThePythonicCow
18th June 2014, 15:42
... this new Lancet article is worth its own thread in my view. But I will post a link on Bill's older (started July 2010) Fluoride - a conversation with an insider who knows the real story (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?4228-Fluoride-a-conversation-with-an-insider-who-knows-the-real-story:) to this new thread about the Lancet article. Some good news here :)!

Paul, please, check the link here, it seem to be broken. Thanks.
:brushteeth:
Oopsie :).

All fixed now - thanks!

Hervé
26th June 2014, 15:39
When one follows the $$... one can't help but run into industries' worst nightmare as far as PR goes: toxic waste products!

Then, industry being industry, it bolsters "think-tanks" to find ways to turn waste products into gold mines...

... and so is the story of fluoride and many other toxic products that end up being shoved down the consumer's throat: "Si, si! It's good for you and your health!" Aspartame anyone?

So, here is where it all started:

Fluorides, the Atomic bomb, and a spy (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/06/25/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-a-spy/)

Jun25 (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/06/25/fluorides-the-atomic-bomb-and-a-spy/), 2014 by theodorewesson (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/theodorewesson/)
by Jon Rappoport
www.nomorefakenews.com (http://www.nomorefakenews.com/)

In 1997, Joel Griffiths and Chris Bryson, two respected mainstream journalists, peered into an abyss. They found a story about fluorides that was so chilling it had to be told.

The Christian Science Monitor, who had assigned the story, never published it.

Their ensuing article, “Fluoride, Teeth, and the Atomic Bomb,” has been posted on websites, sometimes with distortions, deletions, or additions. I spoke with Griffiths, and he told me to be careful I was reading a correct copy of his piece. (You can find it—“Fluoride, Teeth, and the Atomic Bomb,” (http://fluoridealert.org/articles/wastenot414/) at fluoridealert.org (http://fluoridealert.org/).)

Griffiths also told me that researchers who study the effects of fluorides by homing in on communities with fluoridated drinking water, versus communities with unfluoridated water, miss a major point: fluorides are everywhere—they are used throughout the pharmaceutical industry in the manufacture of drugs, and also in many other industries (e.g., aluminum, pesticide)—because fluorine is very active and binds with all sorts of other substances. Therefore, there is extremely wide public exposure to fluorides.

I want to go over some of the major points of the Griffiths-Bryson article.

Griffiths discovered hundreds of documents from the World War 2 era. These included papers from the Manhattan Project, which was launched to build the first A-bomb.

Griffiths/Bryson write: “Fluoride was the key chemical in atomic bomb production…millions of tons…were essential for the manufacture of bomb-grade uranium and plutonium for nuclear weapons throughout the Cold War.”

The documents reveal that fluoride was the most significant health hazard in the US A-bomb program, for workers and for communities around the manufacturing facilities.

Griffiths/Bryson: “Much of the original proof that fluoride is safe for humans in low doses was generated by A-bomb program scientists, who had been secretly ordered to provide ‘evidence useful in litigation’ [against persons who had been poisoned by fluoride and would sue for damages]… The first lawsuits against the US A-bomb program were not over radiation, but over fluoride damage, the [government] documents show.”

So A-bomb scientists were told they had to do studies which would conclude that fluorides were safe.

The most wide-reaching study done was carried out in Newburgh, New York, between 1945 and 1956. This was a secret op called “Program F.” The researchers obtained blood and tissue samples from people who lived in Newburgh, through the good offices of the NY State Health Department.

Griffiths/Bryson found the original and secret version of this study. Comparing it to a different sanitized version, the reporters saw that evidence of adverse effects from fluorides had been suppressed by the US Atomic Energy Commission.

Other studies during the same period were conducted at the University of Rochester. Unwitting hospital patients were given fluorides to test out the results.

Flash forward. Enter Dr. Phyllis Mullenix (http://fluoridealert.org/content/mullenix-interview/) (see also here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9daqPRUWpMc)), the head of toxicology at Forsyth Dental Center in Boston. In the 1990s, Mullenix did a series of animal studies which showed that, as Griffiths/Bryson write: “…fluoride was a powerful central nervous system (CNS) toxin…”

Mullenix applied for further grant monies from the National Institutes of Health. She was turned down. She was also told that fluorides do not have an effect on the CNS.

But Griffiths/Bryson uncovered a 1944 Manhattan Project memo which states: “Clinical evidence suggests that uranium hexafluoride may have a rather marked central nervous system effect…it seems most likely that the F [fluoride] component rather than the T is the causative factor.”

The 1944 memo was sent to the head of the Manhattan Project Medical Section, Colonel Stafford Warren. Warren was asked to give his okay to do animal studies on fluorides’ effects on the CNS. He immediately did give his approval.

But any records of the results of this approved project are missing. Most likely classified.

Who was the man who made that 1944 proposal for a rush-program to study the CNS effects of fluorides? [U]Dr. Harold Hodge (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Hodge), who worked at the Manhattan Project.

Who was brought in to advise Mullenix 50 years later at the Forsyth Dental Center in Boston, as she studied the CNS effects of fluorides? Dr. Harold Hodge.

Who never told Mullenix of his work on fluoride toxicity for the Manhattan Project? Dr. Harold Hodge.

Was Hodge brought in to look over Mullenix’s shoulder and report on her discoveries? It turns out that Hodge, back in the 1940s, had made suggestions to do effective PR promoting fluoride as a dental treatment. So his presence by Mullenix’s side, all those years later, was quite possibly as an agent assigned to keep track of her efforts.

Getting the idea here? Build an A-bomb. Forget the toxic fluoride consequences. Bury the fluoride studies. Twist the studies.

More on Hodge. In 1944, “a severe pollution incident” occurred in New Jersey, near the Du Pont plant in Deepwater (http://fluoridealert.org/content/deepwater/) where the company was trying to build the first A-bomb. A fluoride incident. Farmers’ peach and tomato crops were destroyed. Horses and cows became crippled. Some cows had to graze on their bellies. Tomato crops (normally sold to the Campbell company for soups) were contaminated with fluorides.

The people of the Manhattan Project were terrified of lawsuits and ensuing revelations about the toxic nature of their work. A heads-up memo was written on the subject. Its author? Harold Hodge. Among other issues, he reported on the huge fluoride content in vegetables growing in the polluted area.

Also the high fluoride levels in human blood.

The farmers began to bring lawsuits. Big PR problem.

The lawsuits were settled quietly, for pittances.

Harold Hodge wrote another memo. Get this quote:


“Would there be any use in making attempts to counteract the local fear of fluoride on the part of residents [near the A-bomb facility]…through lectures on F [fluoride] toxicology and perhaps the usefulness of F in tooth health?” Griffiths/Bryson write: “Such lectures were indeed given, not only to New Jersey citizens but to the rest of the nation throughout the Cold War.”

This was a launching pad for fluorides as “successful dental treatments.”

In the film, Dr. Strangelove, Brigadier General Jack D. Ripper rails about the destruction fluorides are wreaking on the “pure blood of pure Americans.” Of course, this character is fleshed out as some kind of far-right-wing fanatic. How odd that he and other military men in the movie are, in fact, ready and willing to start a nuclear war. Odd because, unknown to the Strangelove script writer, fluorides were, in fact, very toxic and were an integral part of the very program that created atomic bombs.

Now you know why promoting toxic fluorides as a dental treatment was so important to government officials.

Jon Rappoport

Hervé
26th June 2014, 15:56
A reminder from the earliest whistle blowers:

Quoting Einstein`s nephew, Dr. E.H. Bronner (a chemist who had also been a prisoner of war during WWII) in a letter printed in The Catholic Mirror, Springfield, MA, January 1952:


"It appears that the citizens of Massachusetts are among the 'next' on the agenda of the water poisoners.

"There is a sinister network of subversive agents, Godless 'intellectual' parasites, working in our country today whose ramifications grow more extensive, more successful and more alarming each new year and whose true objective is to demoralize, paralyze and destroy our great Republic--from within if they can, according to their plan--for their own possession.

"The tragic success they have already attained in their long siege to destroy the moral fiber of American life is now one of their most potent footholds towards their own ultimate victory over us.

"Fluoridation of our community water systems can well become their most subtle weapon for our sure physical and mental deterioration. ..

"As a research chemist of established standing, I built within the past 22 years, 3 American chemical plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based on my years of practical experience in the health-food and chemical field, let me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is criminal insanity, sure national suicide. Don`t do it.

"Even in small quantities, sodium fluoride is a deadly poison to which no effective antidote has been found. Every exterminator knows that it is the most efficient rat-killer. ... Sodium fluoride is entirely different from organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate needed by our bodies and provided by nature, in God`s great providence and love, to build and strengthen our bones and our teeth. This organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate, derived from proper foods, is an edible organic salt, insoluble in water and assimilable by the human body, whereas the non-organic sodium fluoride used in fluoridating water is instant poison to the body and fully water soluble.

The body refuses to assimilate it. "Careful, bonafide laboratory experimentation by conscientious, patriotic research chemists, and actual medical experience, have both revealed that instead of preserving or promoting `dental health,` fluoridated drinking water destroys teeth, before adulthood and after, by the destructive mottling and other pathological conditions it actually causes in them, and also creates many other very grave pathological conditions in the internal organisms of bodies consuming it. How can it be called a "health" plan? What’s behind it?

"That any so-called "doctors" would persuade a civilized nation to add voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is unbelievable. It is the height of criminal insanity. "No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully believed and agreed from 1939 to 1941 that, quoting from both Lenin`s Last Will and Hitler`s Mein Kampf:

"America we shall demoralize, divide, and destroy from within." ...

"Are our Civil Defense organizations and agencies awake to the perils of water poisoning by fluoridation? Its use has been recorded in other countries. Sodium fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most effective rat killers known to chemists: colorless, odorless, tasteless; no antidote, no remedy, no hope: Instant and complete extermination of rats. ...

"Fluoridation of water systems can be slow national suicide, or quick national liquidation. It is criminal insanity--treason!"

Dr. E.H. Bronner, Mfg. Research Chemist, Los Angeles.

http://www.sonic.net/kryptox/history/perkins2.htm

http://www.rense.com/general79/hd3.htm


The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from Mr. Charles Perkins, a chemist:

"I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, The Truth About Water Fluoridation, to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff. "In the 1930`s, Hitler and the German Nazi`s envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. ...

"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual`s power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient light lobotomy]

"The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children`s teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty.

"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to communize the world. ...

"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great IG Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years` research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine--any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically." CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October 1954.

Pam
11th July 2014, 20:05
I wanted to share this encouraging email I received from FluorideAlert.com



Dear Pamela:

Bucks County, PA Goes Fluoride-Free

We are happy to report a major fluoride-free victory for the people of Bucks County, Pennsylvania. One of the largest water and sewer authorities in the state serving more than 78,000 accounts and 385,000 people in the southeastern Pennsylvania region has stopped supplying fluoridated water to customers. On July 1, the Bucks County Water & Sewer Authority changed their water supplier from the fluoridated City of Philadelphia to the non-fluoridated supply from Chalfont, PA.

According to the press release from the water authority, customers requested the change and the authority was “happy to announce that customers have a choice to use fluoride or not through [their] dentist instead of being mandated through [their] water supply.”

U.S. Congressman Publicly Opposes Fluoridation

Representative Dana Rohrabacher, a republican representing California’s 48th district and a member of the House Science Committee, said that he opposed fluoridation while giving a speech at a recent event on climate change. While referencing a number of scientific “facts” that he felt weren’t indeed true, he said:

“I remember as a kid, one of the big battles going on was about fluoridation of the water. Well, I don’t know whether or not fluoridating the water helps people’s teeth become better or not. I don’t know that. But, I do know that in this country, we should be the ones who should be deciding what we put into our bodies one way or the other. Not the federal government or the local government putting fluoride into our water. A lot of these things come down to freedom issues. They come down to whether or not we will control our own destiny. The fact that we will be consistent with what our founding fathers had in mind for us in controlling our own lives.”

While Congressman Rohrabacher isn’t our only ally on Capitol Hill, his public opposition to fluoridation is a big and promising step in the direction of ending the practice at the federal level. That said, we still need more allies in Congress to publicly oppose fluoridation and to call for hearings if we ultimately want to be successful. To this end, FAN will be holding our first ever fluoride lobby-day in Washington, D.C. on September 8. This will be an opportunity for fluoridation opponents from around the U.S. to urge their Senators and House members to join Rep. Rohrabacher in opposition to this outdated practice.

FAN’s lobby-day will take place following our two-day Citizen’s Conference on Fluoride held at the Hyatt Regency Hotel in Crystal City, Virginia (right outside D.C.). The conference will feature a day of presentations from scientific and medical experts, a day of presentations from campaign and grassroots experts, and plenty of opportunities to interact with the FAN staff, fluoride experts, and fellow campaigners.