PDA

View Full Version : M 6.2 rat islands, aleutian islands



EMSC
24th June 2014, 03:30
Magnitude M 6.2Region RAT ISLANDS, ALEUTIAN ISLANDSDate time 2014-06-24 03:15:36.4 UTCLocation 52.34 N ; 176.77 EDepth 1 km



More... (http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=387115)

Fairy Friend
24th June 2014, 05:04
okay as soon as New Zealand and Alaska settle down I'm going to make another prediction of a balancing quake or two, looking at Mexico or Central America, possibly California. Or I would say the India/China border, maybe South India ocean or maybe as far as the Middle East but I don't think so. Dutchsince his targets on Japan and I believe the West Coast/Canada.

Roisin
24th June 2014, 11:58
Published yesterday....
Aleutian volcanoes are waking up


Sharply increased seismic activity and volcanic eruptions in the Aleutian Islands and the far western Brooks Range are being investigated by scientists.

The Alaska Volcano Observatory says the activity over the past few months is the most seen by the station 26 years.

On the Alaska Volcano Observatory website three volcanoes are classified with a yellow alert level—signifying signs of elevated unrest above known background levels—and three are at an orange alert level—heightened unrest with increased likelihood of eruption......



http://www.mining.com/volcanoes-are-waking-up-in-the-aleutians-73096/

Here's what a commenter says on that page.


Seems like something bigger than most realize is setting stage. Activity all along the Aleutian Islands and also, after 30 years, Mauna Loa in Hawaii is waking up. Something going on with the Pacific Plate and the Ring of Fire.

Roisin
24th June 2014, 12:25
I'm surprised the experts are saying that the coastline of Wash. State should not be affected by what happened in the Aleutian Islands yesterday.

Fairy Friend
24th June 2014, 17:23
I'm surprised the experts are saying that the coastline of Wash. State should not be affected by what happened in the Aleutian Islands yesterday.

wow I thought Dutchsinse specifically said down the lines which would mean, off the Oregon or Washington coast but I will check again.

Well imagine that.... experts don't agree. He points out pressure down the fault lines. We do have a little quake in the south India ocean. Alaska and New Zealand still seem to be dominating the stage. Pretty quiet now and I feel much better today.

Volcanoes to watch are the next on the list. On my personal list today is to get extra water supplies in the house.
Some people don't agree with the experts... imagine that. I feel much better.

ghostrider
24th June 2014, 18:01
There will be a seaquake off the coast of Oregon 9.0 lasting five minutes and creating a tidal wave that will claim thousands of lives , and a smaller quake afterwards , and smaller wave ... then in the canary Islands another seaquake , causing the Volcano to erupt and put one million tons of ash in the air and another tidal wave that will hit the east coast of the U.S. The plejaren say this is a prediction not a prophecy ,prophecy can be changed , predictions cannot , they have travelled to the future and viewed it , it is a cosmic event that cannot be stopped ... for thirty years they have warned , get off the west coast in the northern California/Oregon area ... ears to hear but they do not hear ...

Roisin
24th June 2014, 18:33
That 5.1 quake in the South Indian Ocean occurred at Midnight EDT
2014-06-24 UTC+04:00

So are you saying that you predicted that there would be an EQ there today? If so, I'm very impressed!

I don't know who Dutchsense is but will check him/her out!

Fairy Friend
24th June 2014, 18:42
Roisin;847192]That 5.1 quake in the South Indian Ocean occurred at Midnight EDT
2014-06-24 UTC+04:00

So are you saying that you predicted that there would be an EQ there today? If so, I'm very impressed!

I don't know who Dutchsinse is but will check him/her out!

the prediction is that the beginning of this very thread.I do not know how to judge my accuracy I would probably refer to a panel of judges on that.or a council of elders?... Nope going with a panel of judges. But Dutchsinse is good. and obviously Ghost Rider has pointed out others have been saying this too.
Sorry my cell phone screws up quotes sometimes.

Roisin
24th June 2014, 18:58
You don't know how to judge your accuracy? Could you explain that more? I'm not sure what you mean.

If you say an earthquake is going to occur... and then after that, that earthquake then occurs, then that's what we call a hit.

I don't see that it's complicated at all.

Good luck with your predictions! So far, you got the Indian Ocean one right ... that was a hit! Good job! :)

Here's the time when that Indian Ocean one occurred "2014-06-24 09:55:11 UTC+04:00"

I was looking at the UTC +4:00 part of that and that's midnight EDT.

But then I went back to the EQ map that's showing that and noticed that it's got "09:55:11" after the date followed by UTC+4:00. ... so that's confusing. Not sure how to read that yet except that the +4:00, in this case probably means add 4 hrs.

At any rate, it looks like you made the prediction that an EQ would occur there before it occurred so in my book.. that's a hit. lol

Roisin
24th June 2014, 19:39
BTW, you're very good at this. You only mentioned a few area's where you think another EQ is going to occur following the N.Z and Alaskan ones so it's not like you covered the whole globe when doing that like so many others do when making predictions like this. It will be interesting to see if those other area's you mentioned have an EQ sometime within the next few days!

Wind
24th June 2014, 19:47
I remember Fairy Friend being good at remote viewing? :rolleyes:

Fairy Friend
24th June 2014, 19:51
I don't know of anyone who is a 100% at predicting earthquakes. I have put predictions on the forum in the earthquake section some of them have panned out. I am under the impression that there are some people really really good at it.
it's a learning curve I can do better.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
24th June 2014, 20:14
What I've noticed: when groups of EQ sensitives get together online, they tend to post at the same time.
For example, Yahoo! Groups EQ sensitives, before a significant quake, might exhibit more activity/physical distress beforehand.

On PA, it could be the same. Some like to watch the Ring of Fire the same way some hobbyists watch tail numbers of aircraft -- and when you're dealing with a crowd not only affected by the quakes but also interested in predicting them, it gets a bit harder to know what is "wishful thinking" and what is "warning".

In general it does seem like there is a slight correlation between earthquake talk, general upset, and the actual occurrence.

There could be any number of reasons.
Lots of people don't believe it any more, but some used to think the Earth had its own thoughts and defensive mechanisms...

It stands to reason that if this is so, that the Earth would have the ability to forewarn sensitive people -- those "connected with nature" so to speak.

Who can really unravel it?
It's a mystery with many aspects -- and of course most people would laugh if I said, war causes earthquakes.

Roisin
24th June 2014, 20:19
Yes Wind, she's very good at Remote Viewing too! :)
Finally got the right time on when that Indian Ocean one occurred, my time at EDT.
Because it occurred at 9:55 UTC, that's 5:55 AM EDT.
Here's that conversion page : http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/exo/TCT.html

As for the UTC +4:00... not entirely clear on that yet.

It could be that the USGS site automatically configures the viewers time zone/location? Because EDT is 4 hrs behind UTC time. So maybe they added that +4:00 to show that that correction had been made to adjust to my time zone?

Wind
24th June 2014, 21:00
I don't know of anyone who is a 100% at predicting earthquakes. I have put predictions on the forum in the earthquake section some of them have panned out. I am under the impression that there are some people really really good at it.
it's a learning curve I can do better.

I remember that this EQ alert guy was good at predicting earthquakes, but he neither probably is 100 % accurate. I don't know what methods he uses. http://earthquakealert.blogspot.com/

"My biggest concern today as I am writing this EQ Blog is the fact that all this movement of the Pacific Tectonic Plate could mean our West Coast just might be the next hot-spot inline for some of this major earthquake energy that is striking as big as 7.9 Richters Alaska and 6.9 Near New Zealand just hours ago!!! And Thank-You to the folks who took the time to leave nice comments for me due to having already been watching from yesterdays EQ Blog!!! Here is the entire list which will need to be updated since a lot of earthquakes are still happening in both of those regions:

http://eqalert.blogspot.com/2014/06/69-near-new-zealand-at-1219-and-79.html ALSO EXPECT that some other areas might be shaking very soon and unfortunately when the Pacific moves in this manner it is tough to guess who will be shaking next.

As easy as I wrote in yesterdays EQ Blog that there WAS a 7.6 Richters Earthquake coming, Los Angeles or San Francisco, California, or Oregon/Washington could be the next people in line for an earthquake that should not be too much bigger than a 7.9 in case anybody was worried about an 8.1 or 9.0 coming. . . hopefully not. This situation really is the very big worrisome source of possible Major Earthquake Energy that could be headed for our West Coast and it probably is time to think serious earthquake preparation in those areas. An Official Prediction is probably in order here, but will take me a lot of time to get prepared and until that time, you could consider this to be at best formal notification that there could be a Major Earthquake of as big as 7.9 Richters at any moment, but the whole entire ballgame will run at least until July 8, 2014 for now so be watching!!!

There are one or two other regions that I mentioned in yesterdays EQ Blog that today just could be looking at one of those hundred year earthquakes especially since it don't exactly look like the brunt of all this here earthquake energy has made landfall anywhere so to speak! Ecuador, Peru, Philippines, and Jakarta, Sumatra, Indonesia are all now looking at easily 8 Richters coming at them!!! A few other towns who already have something heading for them are hopefully on different paths of earthquake energy and thus might still be at just 5.5 Richters! Those are Texas, Oklahoma, New Madrid, Illinois, Chicago, and Iceland but watch our East Coast, too, and possibly now for a rare up in the range of 7 Richters Earthquake!!! So also Be Prepared in Washington, DC, New York, and Boston. . . because you DO get earthquakes and there is a whole lot going on seismically speaking!!!

Sincerely, The EQ Alert Guy"

A4Z1ZXMTsYw

Fairy Friend
24th June 2014, 21:00
Yes Wind, she's very good at Remote Viewing too! :)
Finally got the right time on when that Indian Ocean one occurred, my time at EDT.
Because it occurred at 9:55 UTC, that's 5:55 AM EDT.
Here's that conversion page : http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/exo/TCT.html

As for the UTC +4:00... not entirely clear on that yet.

It could be that the USGS site automatically configures the viewers time zone/location? Because EDT is 4 hrs behind UTC time. So maybe they added that +4:00 to show that that correction had been made to adjust to my time zone?
okay so I posted at 4 minutes after midnight or 2400 hours and this thing posted on the forum at 22:30 so an hour and a half later I put my prediction up and let me look, and I think the quakes are about to 2&a half hours apart so I think I posted about 50 minutes before the quake occurred. I guess I got confused maybe I did a math error. More like 4 hours and 50 minutes. Confused by math, not like me.Does it matter? FYI: I think there was a 4.6 in Afghanistan.

I only heard of the earthquake guy once before and I really like him. I think he's sincere.

Roisin
24th June 2014, 21:30
Good that you got that information straight on that because it comes in handy whenever one needs to state their track record. And yes, people DO request to see documented information on your predictions showing that you made the prediction before it happened.

I think you're a stronger psychic than I am but, in my case, when I'm focused only on sensing EQ's and catastrophic weather events, in my case, that's the only thing I can be working on at that time.Not all of the time but usually that's the case. But I always document my predictions either in a post on a forum or by sending myself an email with that prediction on it.

I only started to be active on this forum over the past year but in the forum I belonged to before this one, I was focusing on EQ's and weather events a lot and here's a screenshot of my track record on that. My main focus has always been on the State of California because my sister lived out there but over this past year she moved back to Ohio so for that reason I have not been focusing on EQ's like I was before.

But here's a post from that forum where I'm talking about my track record there over the few months prior to when I posted that comment. All of those predictions I cited in that post were documented via posts there where I was making those predictions.... before they occurred, of course.

http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad164/A99_x/93j284.jpg

Roisin
24th June 2014, 21:39
Sometimes weird synchronicities occur when I'm only focusing on EQ's at any given time to see if I can get any information on if one is coming up.

One night, I was sensing that a 6.0 or larger earthquake was going to occur somewhere in the world sometime over the next day or so. So at that time I did 2 things. (note: whenever I make an earthquake prediction, it's for those that are 6.0 and over)
1) First I sent myself an email about that "sensing" that I had... to timestamp it.

2) Then I decided to just go ahead and post a screenshot of that email in a forum around 11 AM the next morning. I usually don't post an earthquake prediction unless I get information about where the earthquake is going to occur but there was a reason why I was posting this one at that time that I won't go into here at this time because it's not important. Below is that screenshot and that post.

http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad164/A99_x/emailoneq1.png (http://s932.photobucket.com/user/A99_x/media/emailoneq1.png.html)

3) Then later that day, a 7.0/6.9 earthquake occurred on the border of Ecuador and Colombia. Here's the map showing where that earthquake occurred. There's a red arrow pointing at it.

http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad164/A99_x/eqmapequator.png

4) Well, I was right that a 6.0 or above EQ was going to occur but it wasn't until I looked back over that email I sent to myself to timestamp my prediction about that the night before that I noticed that that email had "Move to Ecuador" ads on that email. Below is that email again where I circled those ads in red.

http://i932.photobucket.com/albums/ad164/A99_x/emailoneq.png (http://s932.photobucket.com/user/A99_x/media/emailoneq.png.html)

So even though I didn't get any information on where that EQ was going to occur, it turns out that that email that I sent to myself and then posted on that forum saying that I sensed an earthquake was coming up but didn't know where.... had the location of that EQ on it already in the form of those 2 move/retire to Ecuador ads! So was this a synchronicity? Yes because that EQ occurred on the border of Ecuador and Colombia!

Fairy Friend
24th June 2014, 22:30
okay I tried to document by putting some earthquakes in the earthquake section. (my way of documenting without feeling like work hahaha)I usually try to predict within plus or minus .5 magnitude and Above six. I usually predict 3 locations and usually it's a 1-3 day window. I never answer my emails. It's a learning curve.

Fairy Friend
24th June 2014, 23:09
I've noticed synchronicities also with the same thing, as Tesla mentioned also, everyone runs to the same place at the same time or pick something up in the air. And it is a synchronicity, I tried to share my thoughts with several people in my life and Got an 'nobody cares attitude'. So I'm glad you posted that.

Roisin
25th June 2014, 00:28
okay I tried to document by putting some earthquakes in the earthquake section. (my way of documenting without feeling like work hahaha)I usually try to predict within plus or minus .5 magnitude and Above six. I usually predict 3 locations and usually it's a 1-3 day window. I never answer my emails. It's a learning curve.

What do you mean by "I never answer my email?

Anyway, good that you're putting everything into one place. Much easier that way!

Fairy Friend
25th June 2014, 04:43
okay I tried to document by putting some earthquakes in the earthquake section. (my way of documenting without feeling like work hahaha)I usually try to predict within plus or minus .5 magnitude and Above six. I usually predict 3 locations and usually it's a 1-3 day window. I never answer my emails. It's a learning curve.

What do you mean by "I never answer my email?

Anyway, good that you're putting everything into one place. Much easier that way!

I'm a little embarrassed to say but I don't hardly ever check my email so even if I email myself I probably wouldn't notice. & I never think that way. So the thought to email yourself is brilliant but was embarrassed, so my way of saying, not sure if I'll bother. Also I've only put things up for a couple of months shouldn't be too hard to go back and look at my previous predictions. Now it's sounding more like fun than work. It might be enlightening for me to look back and check. A bit of a mess because one predictions on the tail end of one Earth quake and so I have to check the list. I may have made a prediction Or Two in the Sun section also.