This would stop all malicious mind control for good

[Omni]

What might you wonder? Well.... Once we develop mind control technology publicly, we will be able to detect it as well. And people will be aware of it. Thus stopping the free reign of the US shadow gov and it's allies to mind control unwitting citizens to do their bidding. Until then they are having a helluva time playing god...

So, I cheer scientific discoveries in this topic. We are already reading minds, taking pictures of dreams, and much more!!!

This opens a whole pandoras box with transhumanism once we have this technology publicly. Which personally I know for sure it's the future of our world... But there is a fine line between ethical and right transhumanism, and corrupted and soulless transhumanism IMO. Replacing the soul's thought generation with an AI is just not right IMHO. But using technology to our advantage in a careful way is fine to me.

Anyway, I eagerly await progress in this department. And you can bet some scientists will be killed over this(or just mind controlled to chase dead ends). But eventually it WILL happen. :)

[DeDukshyn]

"When everyone's super, No one will be!! Mwhahahahaha!!" - Syndrome

[Omni]

Here is a link to a modern day public technology related to this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2632115/Machine-scan-brain-read-dreams-Scanner-powerful-detect-reconstruct-images-faces-people-thinking-of.html


Scientists have created a machine which can read dreams while we sleep
US researchers say it is so powerful it can extract images from the brain

The data from the brain scanner has already been used to detect and reconstruct images of faces that people are thinking of.

[mojo]

Hints of Geeorge Orwell's book 1984 and scarey, even though I could see wishing to know the truth especially where a crime is concerned but the last place to be free, our minds. Do we really want to give that freedom up? Do we want to know what the other person is thinking and what we are thinking about all the time? Can see where highly evolved beings may have chosen this path and perhaps for their greater benefit and maybe this is a necesssary step for our humanity to survive. At least their will be fewer politicians...;)

[Omni]

Hints of Geeorge Orwell's book 1984 and scarey, even though I could see wishing to know the truth especially where a crime is concerned but the last place to be free, our minds. Do we really want to give that freedom up? Do we want to know what the other person is thinking and what we are thinking about all the time? Can see where highly evolved beings may have chosen this path and perhaps for their greater benefit and maybe this is a necesssary step for our humanity to survive. At least their will be fewer politicians...;)
I'm sure there will be privacy even when we publicly are all connected to AI with mind tapping going on. My mind certainly isn't free. And neither is lots of other people's even if they do not know it. Also there is no privacy inside our own mind's at this very moment. The US gov taps minds these days, no need to tap phones and emails/texts(although of course they do that too). They already track people's thoughts and record consciousness streams covertly.

And good point about politicians. Wouldn't you love to hear what's in a politicians mind during a debate? lol That would make practically all politicians model citizens in contrast to the corrupted trash they are now. lol

[MorningSong]

Here's something:


Monday, June 30, 2014
Mind Control Scientists Using Light To Alter The Brain
Nicholas West
Activist Post

The race to decode the brain continues, and quickens by the day. The mind control of the future forgoes all pretense at indirectly altering perception through media and politics, or even mind-altering drugs and environmental toxins. The mind control of the future goes straight into direct programming and rewiring of the human brain.

These new mind control techniques are being introduced in gadgets that create a brain-computer interface, magnetic manipulation via "neural dust," high-powered lasers, and even the direct uploading of the contents of our brain. One must then consider the subsequent hacking of our minds as our brains enter the digital realm.

Until this point, much of the research has been focused on different forms of physical implants - no matter how small - to target the memory centers of the brain. Researchers at MIT (funded by DARPA) are now unveiling a next-generation remote control system which uses light from outside the skull to affect the protein responsible for neuron activity in the brain. Their news release and video, posted in full below, are titled matter-of-factly: "Non-Invasive Brain Control." Just in case this alone doesn't sound ominous enough, researchers have labeled the control mechanism "Jaws."

This MIT video offers a metaphor likening the macrocosm of brain function to a city. Similar to a modern city under technocratic surveillance, city managers are not content with seeing only larger patterns; they'd like to drill down even further to understand all of the individual components to "see the information that is being transported." Optogenetics is the term for "the ability to manipulate individual neuronal circuits..."

A9a2P30sDl4

While the press release makes the familiar plea to eradicating epilepsy, neurological disorders and restoring vision, in the video neuroscience editor for Nature, I-han Chou, cites the potential for modifying behavior and personality, taking over physical control of the target organism, or giving ourselves superhuman abilities. This opens the door to ethical breaches which can only be imagined given the direction being taken by the technocratic elite. In fact, Chou does mention ethics, but only from the standpoint of self-augmentation and "enhancement" that could see us all having implants within 10 years; something she refers to as "fun to fantasize" about. This is at best a naive view of the far-reaching ramifications; and at worst a sign of the prevailing warped mindset of those who are working on such projects.

Press Release

Optogenetics, a technology that allows scientists to control brain activity by shining light on neurons, relies on light-sensitive proteins that can suppress or stimulate electrical signals within cells. This technique requires a light source to be implanted in the brain, where it can reach the cells to be controlled.

MIT engineers have now developed the first light-sensitive molecule that enables neurons to be silenced noninvasively, using a light source outside the skull. This makes it possible to do long-term studies without an implanted light source. The protein, known as Jaws, also allows a larger volume of tissue to be influenced at once.

This noninvasive approach could pave the way to using optogenetics in human patients to treat epilepsy and other neurological disorders, the researchers say, although much more testing and development is needed. Led by Ed Boyden, an associate professor of biological engineering and brain and cognitive sciences at MIT, the researchers described the protein in the June 29 issue of Nature Neuroscience.

Optogenetics, a technique developed over the past 15 years, has become a common laboratory tool for shutting off or stimulating specific types of neurons in the brain, allowing neuroscientists to learn much more about their functions.

The neurons to be studied must be genetically engineered to produce light-sensitive proteins known as opsins, which are channels or pumps that influence electrical activity by controlling the flow of ions in or out of cells. Researchers then insert a light source, such as an optical fiber, into the brain to control the selected neurons.

Such implants can be difficult to insert, however, and can be incompatible with many kinds of experiments, such as studies of development, during which the brain changes size, or of neurodegenerative disorders, during which the implant can interact with brain physiology. In addition, it is difficult to perform long-term studies of chronic diseases with these implants.

Mining nature's diversity

To find a better alternative, Boyden, graduate student Amy Chuong, and colleagues turned to the natural world. Many microbes and other organisms use opsins to detect light and react to their environment. Most of the natural opsins now used for optogenetics respond best to blue or green light.

Boyden's team had previously identified two light-sensitive chloride ion pumps that respond to red light, which can penetrate deeper into living tissue. However, these molecules, found in the bacteria Haloarcula marismortui and Haloarcula vallismortis, did not induce a strong enough photocurrent — an electric current in response to light — to be useful in controlling neuron activity.

Chuong set out to improve the photocurrent by looking for relatives of these proteins and testing their electrical activity. She then engineered one of these relatives by making many different mutants. The result of this screen, Jaws, retained its red-light sensitivity but had a much stronger photocurrent — enough to shut down neural activity.

"This exemplifies how the genomic diversity of the natural world can yield powerful reagents that can be of use in biology and neuroscience," says Boyden, who is a member of MIT's Media Lab and the McGovern Institute for Brain Research.

Using this opsin, the researchers were able to shut down neuronal activity in the mouse brain with a light source outside the animal's head. The suppression occurred as deep as 3 millimeters in the brain, and was just as effective as that of existing silencers that rely on other colors of light delivered via conventional invasive illumination.

Restoring vision

Working with researchers at the Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research in Switzerland, the MIT team also tested Jaws's ability to restore the light sensitivity of retinal cells called cones. In people with a disease called retinitis pigmentosa, cones slowly atrophy, eventually causing blindness.

Friedrich Miescher Institute scientists Botond Roska and Volker Busskamp have previously shown that some vision can be restored in mice by engineering those cone cells to express light-sensitive proteins. In the new paper, Roska and Busskamp tested the Jaws protein in the mouse retina and found that it more closely resembled the eye's natural opsins and offered a greater range of light sensitivity, making it potentially more useful for treating retinitis pigmentosa.

This type of noninvasive approach to optogenetics could also represent a step toward developing optogenetic treatments for diseases such as epilepsy, which could be controlled by shutting off misfiring neurons that cause seizures, Boyden says. "Since these molecules come from species other than humans, many studies must be done to evaluate their safety and efficacy in the context of treatment," he says.

Boyden's lab is working with many other research groups to further test the Jaws opsin for other applications. The team is also seeking new light-sensitive proteins and is working on high-throughput screening approaches that could speed up the development of such proteins.

The research at MIT was funded by Jerry and Marge Burnett, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the Human Frontiers Science Program, the IET A. F. Harvey Prize, the Janet and Sheldon Razin '59 Fellowship of the MIT McGovern Institute, the New York Stem Cell Foundation-Robertson Investigator Award, the National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, and the Wallace H. Coulter Foundation.

Source:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-06/miot-nbc062714.php

Hat Tip:
http://www.examiner.com/article/optogenetics-noninvasive-brain-control-using-jaws-a-light-sensitive-protein


http://www.activistpost.com/2014/06/mind-control-scientists-using-light-to.html

[Omni]

Here is another on the subject:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2403851/Brain-brain-interface-allows-researcher-control-colleagues-hand-internet.html#ixzz2dHLHhawP

Scientist sent a brain signal via the internet to control hand of colleague
This is the first ever demonstration of human-to-human brain interface
The technology could be used to help those with illnesses communicate wish for food, but some have raised ethical concerns

[amor]

Here is my experience with telepathy. My mother and I could send telepathic messages when in distress over thousands of miles. I have discovered that in the presence of some people I get unpleasant thoughts of a certain kind which I know are not mine. They are coming from the person I am near. Being ISOLATED from the minds of others is a wonderful gift which we must hold on to in order to chart our own development and peace of mind. Imagine the horror of not being able to turn off other people's thoughts, insanity must result. As for artificial telepathy, I had my mind read by the T.V. on day while watching and old movie about cars. I thought, "that is a 1966 Pontiac Lemans." It was not as the movie subsequently revealed that I know little about cars, requiring only that they move and stop and to hell with bling. Suddenly, the movie was not there and a voice said, "She is thinking that is a 1966 Pontiac Lemans." The key was then shut off and the movie resumed. Why anyone would want to read my mind when I would happily inundate them with everything in it beats me! Years ago, I discovered that an elderly man was sitting just out of my sight five feet behind me in a bank office where I was working as a temporary person. I was so bored! Visions of Porpoises leaping out of the water made me want to join them. I heard him say to the man next to him, that I was viewing porpoises jumping. It made me so angry that I started to think some not very nice things about the person for whom I was supposed to be working. By way of revenge, he called me into his office and dictated a letter at 300 words per minute. One of the reasons I feel I do not like to be near people.

[Omni]

Here is my experience with telepathy. My mother and I could send telepathic messages when in distress over thousands of miles. I have discovered that in the presence of some people I get unpleasant thoughts of a certain kind which I know are not mine. They are coming from the person I am near. Being ISOLATED from the minds of others is a wonderful gift which we must hold on to in order to chart our own development and peace of mind. Imagine the horror of not being able to turn off other people's thoughts, insanity must result. As for artificial telepathy, I had my mind read by the T.V. on day while watching and old movie about cars. I thought, "that is a 1966 Pontiac Lemans." It was not as the movie subsequently revealed that I know little about cars, requiring only that they move and stop and to hell with bling. Suddenly, the movie was not there and a voice said, "She is thinking that is a 1966 Pontiac Lemans." The key was then shut off and the movie resumed. Why anyone would want to read my mind when I would happily inundate them with everything in it beats me! Years ago, I discovered that an elderly man was sitting just out of my sight five feet behind me in a bank office where I was working as a temporary person. I was so bored! Visions of Porpoises leaping out of the water made me want to join them. I heard him say to the man next to him, that I was viewing porpoises jumping. It made me so angry that I started to think some not very nice things about the person for whom I was supposed to be working. By way of revenge, he called me into his office and dictated a letter at 300 words per minute. One of the reasons I feel I do not like to be near people.

People seeming to read your mind is a sign of being targeted with mind control technology. Maybe not what you want to hear but over my vast time reading about testimonies of targeted individuals it's a large pattern of such. Be careful! Gangstalking and discrediting the individual is the next step usually but who knows if they will do that to you (probably not). Luckily I never experienced gangstalking....