Real global warming could be unleashed by a hidden technology most people don't even know exists

[Conehead]

Depending on whom you ask, so-called "free energy devices" are either a total hoax or a systematically suppressed technology that's being kept away from the public. There's a lot of interesting ground to cover on this subject of "over unity devices," but that's not the point of this article. Instead, let's look at an unintended side effect of free energy devices that even the free energy proponents don't usually realize exists.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/045941_global_warming_free_energy_devices_scientific_suppression.html#ixzz375El1RoE


For discussion...

[Matt P]

This was a very difficult article to read from Mike Adams. As much as I like is work, he has failed in this one in my opinion. Why? Because every single one of his ASSUMPTIONS is negative. Nobody knows how the world's population would react to free energy. There is no guarantee whatsoever we would take the lowest vibrational path. But Mike doesn't even want to give us a chance and it makes me really wonder about his motives here.

However, I do agree with part of what he says. Humanity may not be mature enough for free energy but not for the reasons he states. I'm not a science guy but it's my understanding that there is enough energy in a cubic inch of "air" that, if you could extract it, would power the entire planet for a stretch of time. It's also my understanding that a couple scientists have figured this out (don't have time to hunt down the links). It's this amount of power/energy in the hands of primitive minds that would represent the real threat to the planet. Of course, this is also a negative assumption on my part. But I tend to think that releasing the truth of free energy, and other higher truths that go along with it, would change humanity for the better and inspire more enlightened choices all around.

Matt

[yelik]

Whilst it is a discussion I would tend to focus on the benefits, its a bit like saying if we develop an instant cure for many illnesses then this would be potentially disastrous, best let the people die, which is what they do now anyway. I don'y think anyone would disagree that it is sensible to try to balance population, natural resources and the environment, although I'm sure if we do get it out of balance nature will correct it.

Not many people will agree with the elites attitude towards the mass population, who are enslaved by their/our own stupidly, and treated like cattle fodder.

As for free energy I would say it has very likely existed since the 1950's along with anti-gravity technology reversed engineered from Roswell. A number of the UFO sightings are often our own technology. Both technologies relate to the four natural forces, gravity, electro-magnetism and forces between sub atomic particles. I also believe the advanced knowledge and technology needed to develop it does not likely exist outside of the elites control which is protected and guarded with lethal force.

If the technology did get out then the people involved would be no more because no one person or country is worth the trillions of lost revenue to the oil cartels.

[onawah]

I'm no scientist, but free energy devices could replace other technologies that generate just as much heat, if not more.
Nuclear facilities generate enormous amounts of heat to name just one.
IMHO, this is one of Natural News disinfo articles. They have some good, some bad.

[Nick Matkin]

I agree up to a point with the OP, but I guess his estimation of heat from energy may be exaggerated. Fossil fuel energy hasn't significantly increased the world's temperature from heat given just BURNING the stuff (yes, CO2 is different). How much energy would we need to generate to increase the Earth's temperature in the way he suggests? The sun already provides about 1kW per square metre in all the square metres across the entire planet. Do the maths - I don't think Mike Adams has! I can't begin to imagine how we could ever come close to even 1 watt per square metre averaged out across the planet. We'd need heat-spewing machines located every few tens of metres everywhere!

It is possible that unlimited energy could do unlimited harm in the hands of humans. But we could do unlimited recycling, increase living standards across the globe and thus continue to reduce the size of families - as is the case when the living standards of a country rise. The population could eventually stabilize to a sensible level and we could use this energy undoing the damage to the natural environment we have done.

On the other hand, perhaps The Powers That Be understand that releasing this technology now (if it exists) would be like giving petrol and matches to a kindergarten class! Perhaps they know best!

Nick

[Zionbrion]

Wow, yea, very hard to read, I feel like Mike Adams is getting more and more condecending in his articles. Hes writes with a great tone of arrogoancy about a subject that I think would change the world for the better if it were implemented. I cannot possibly imagine how free energy would litterally heat up the earth more compared to our current method of production, oil gas coal etc. I can see how humanity could possibly get carried away, but I think those effects would not be greater than any of our current destruction of this planet, and it would void a lot of current problems. Im also sure it could be used to make some crazy weapons...but nonetheless dont knock it until you try it Adams!

[Zionbrion]

Mike is getting slammed for this article in the comment section, one user wrote this. I also read an article about this on another natural health site.


In 2006, Mike set up hundreds of different Internet sites providing thousands of web links back to Natural News. It reflects a practice that is used by spammers and so-called 'viral' marketers that is meant to artificially improve a site's listing position in search engine results. Internet search engines frequently judge the popularity of web sites by the number of other web sites that link to them. By creating lots of web sites with hundreds of links back to Natural News, Adams propelled his site to the top of the list in search engine results. It is a method which cheats the system, so that one's own site will be found more often on the Internet, in place of sites having better and more appropriate content.

Also his Arial Software is a spamware program that he sells to spammers in order to bypass spam filters. In fact, he is well-connected to some very powerful corporations. He should be exceedingly wealthy because Arial Software is among the most expensive e-mail marketing options available, with many of his customers paying in excess of $5,000 for a single computer license. Even if all of his clients had only purchased the most minimalistic version of his software, which is priced at $985, he would have profited $9,850,000 (nearly ten million dollars) from his 10,000 clients.

Adams was also placed on Moxxor's Product Formulation Advisory Board in exchange for his willingness to play ball.

Heres the article: http://healthwyze.org/index.php/component/content/article/616-special-report-the-legend-of-mike-adams-and-the-reality.html?start=1

[Rich]

What's the definition of free energy?

[andrewgreen]

Its funny they are doing everything they can to suppress free energy with their biggest excuse the low vibrational level of the planet. However they are also doing everything in their power to stop the expansion of consciousness.