Precursor microchipping independent city states uk

[Snoweagle]

Whilst the UK sleeps and celebrates the rise of arrest of paedophilliacs and the parliamentary cabinet reshuffle now promoting fashion conscious ladies to the fore; on top of celebrity pregnancies and relationship failures occupying most of the countries population the control of selective cities are being pushed for independence from the UK.

Latest news on the Local Government (Independence) Bill 2014-15

Here's the opening abstract, separated into parts:
Define the independence of local government;
to regulate the relationship between local and central government in England by means of a statutory Code;
to require public authorities to act in compliance with the Code;
to provide that the Code may only be amended by means of an order under the super-affirmative procedure, approved unanimously by each House of Parliament or by a majority in each House equal to or greater than two-thirds of the number of seats in each House;
to exclude any Bill to amend this Act from the provisions of the Parliament Act 1911; to make provision regarding the powers and finances of local government in England; and for connected purposes.
Whereas it is expedient to declare that central and local government are independent and equal partners and that the rights, freedoms and duties of local authorities
should be protected in law:


This Bill is expected to have its second reading debate on 5 September 2014.

This Bill was presented to Parliament on 9 July 2014. This is known as the first reading and there was no debate on the Bill at this stage.

This Bill is a Private Member’s Bill. These are often not printed until close to the second reading debate. If the text is not yet available here and you wish to know more about this bill please contact its sponsor, Mr Graham Allen.

Summary of the Local Government (Independence) Bill 2014-15
A Bill to define the independence of local government; to regulate the relationship between local and central government in England by means of a statutory Code; to require public authorities to act in compliance with the Code; to provide that the Code may only be amended by means of an Order under the super-affirmative procedure, approved unanimously by each House of Parliament or by a majority in each House equal to or greater than two-thirds of the number of seats in each House; to exclude any Bill to amend this Act from the provisions of the Parliament Act 1911; to make provision regarding the powers and finances of local government in England; and for connected purposes.

Download the seventeen (17) page pdf here:
http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/localgovernmentindependence.html

Type of Bill:
Private Members' Bill (Presentation Bill)
Sponsor:
Mr Graham Allen

This must NOT slip through without proper scrutiny.
This empowers local authorities the first step towards independent nation states.
I can confirm these cities have already installed the necessary infrastructure to enforce micro-chipping the population.
Each of these cities concerned just happen to have new bio-waste incinerators built within military bases within their boundaries.

The newspapers reported this article not by its content but by this misrepresentation of the geographic locations of the cities with no mention of the content of the document. Amazing how this has been allowed to slide.

I wish the ruddy English would wake up, this is not good news and it has every chance on creeping through.

[Realeyes]

I have downloaded the document to read later - thank you for posting. I have done a quick search within the document for the word 'microchip' but it came up with nil results. Can you please tell me what page you are reading this? I do not understand.

I thought they didn't need the microchip anymore, as the UK has been blasted with continuous chemtrails for the past 5 years filled with nano technology saturating our environment, water, food and air - apparently we are filled with these nano's.

So it doesn't make sense to me why they would now go back to old technology of microchipping. Also if one has a cell phone they know exactly where you are anyway (unless you remove the battery and I think that only works in the old phones).

I also believe there would be a large number of UK people that would refuse being microchipped - myself being one of them.

[avid]

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/2014-2015/0072/150072.pdf Can any UK lawyers make sense of this in layman's terms - please? What are the undertones, and what is obvious? Many thanks, Avid

[Xanth]

Ok Snoweagle, I've downloaded and tried to digest the bill pdf, I've done google searches on the authors names etc... What I see is a bill to give more autonomy to local councils whilst making it more difficult for central government to remove those powers.

You're going to have to explain the link to microchips and various cities (which cities) ... as I can't find any association ... what are you basing the connection on?

[Snoweagle]

I have downloaded the document to read later - thank you for posting. I have done a quick search within the document for the word 'microchip' but it came up with nil results. Can you please tell me what page you are reading this? I do not understand.

I thought they didn't need the microchip anymore, as the UK has been blasted with continuous chemtrails for the past 5 years filled with nano technology saturating our environment, water, food and air - apparently we are filled with these nano's.

So it doesn't make sense to me why they would now go back to old technology of microchipping. Also if one has a cell phone they know exactly where you are anyway (unless you remove the battery and I think that only works in the old phones).

I also believe there would be a large number of UK people that would refuse being microchipped - myself being one of them.

Am so sorry Realeyes. I apologise for sensationalising the Bill in this way. That was my extrapolation of what would happen in time once these independent city states became lawful.

The document does not in itself state microchipping or incinerators, that was my inference once I had read the Bill.

The Bill has explanatory notes on the website too which detailed the rights to tax and pretty much run the cities as if they were little countries. In my opinion, giant prison camps.

[Snoweagle]

Ok Snoweagle, I've downloaded and tried to digest the bill pdf, I've done google searches on the authors names etc... What I see is a bill to give more autonomy to local councils whilst making it more difficult for central government to remove those powers.

You're going to have to explain the link to microchips and various cities (which cities) ... as I can't find any association ... what are you basing the connection on?

I live in one of those cities and the city has an rigorously spaced xy grid of antennaes erected spanning the entire city to the boundaries. These antennaes were installed to support "4G" apparently though the mobile phone network still runs alongside them on separate towers, those we have all seen across the world. There are two systems. The randomly spaced mobile network and the grid layout, equally spaced xy grid.

The only reason an equally spaced aerial system would be used anywhere would be to facilitate location, location, location.

[scanner]

Most of these members bills fail and never get through the second reading . Don't be concerned , I believe most Brits would tell them where to stick their microchips and it wouldn't be in us . This bill is to give local government more powers , so they don't have to go asking Parliament for permission to allow local acts to come into force . This has been on the table since the Labour party was in power .

[Snoweagle]

Apology for the inferred extrapolation of this thread.

I am of the strong opinion these independent states, one established, will introduce microchipping.

Once they have autonomy they have clearly stated they want no interference from national government. Yes the Bill in itself is vague on provisions for the population yet it is strong on claiming authority over the population.

Furthermore, do any of you actually think that they will publish a Bill directly discussing marking the population in such a way. This is the modus operandi of the contollers, take the authority quietly and then do whatever they like afterwards.

Yes I am guilty of sensationalising my fear. I would have thought by now a little discernment for the implications of such authority being handed down to a local body would be of concern to everybody.

[Snoweagle]

Most of these members bills fail and never get through the second reading . Don't be concerned , I believe most Brits would tell them where to stick their microchips and it wouldn't be in us . This bill is to give local government more powers , so they don't have to go asking Parliament for permission to allow local acts to come into force . This has been on the table since the Labour party was in power .

Absolutely, thank you scanner.
However if that decision only affected a population of quarter of a million of an independent state rather than 60 million of national state, do you think the majority would care?

[Realeyes]

Thanks for replying back and explaining. I am guessing you are reading/seeing inbetween the lines and future agendas such as 'human poulations zones' what 'they' are gently calling cities. Yes, this is why the HS2 is being pushed through regardless of so many of the UK populace not wanting it - it is all part of the same agenda. David Icke has been speaking about Agenda 21 as have others.... people are slowly waking up, they need time to catch up and breathe all this new astonishing information that blows many paradigms of beliefs society has trusted. Having said that, yes I do hear and understand your concerns that time/timing is getting extremely 'tight'.

(I am juggling taxi driving my family around while cooking dinner inbetween, so I write this post in quick speed.)







I have downloaded the document to read later - thank you for posting. I have done a quick search within the document for the word 'microchip' but it came up with nil results. Can you please tell me what page you are reading this? I do not understand.

I thought they didn't need the microchip anymore, as the UK has been blasted with continuous chemtrails for the past 5 years filled with nano technology saturating our environment, water, food and air - apparently we are filled with these nano's.

So it doesn't make sense to me why they would now go back to old technology of microchipping. Also if one has a cell phone they know exactly where you are anyway (unless you remove the battery and I think that only works in the old phones).

I also believe there would be a large number of UK people that would refuse being microchipped - myself being one of them.

Am so sorry Realeyes. I apologise for sensationalising the Bill in this way. That was my extrapolation of what would happen in time once these independent city states became lawful.

The document does not in itself state microchipping or incinerators, that was my inference once I had read the Bill.

The Bill has explanatory notes on the website too which detailed the rights to tax and pretty much run the cities as if they were little countries. In my opinion, giant prison camps.

[scanner]

Most of these members bills fail and never get through the second reading . Don't be concerned , I believe most Brits would tell them where to stick their microchips and it wouldn't be in us . This bill is to give local government more powers , so they don't have to go asking Parliament for permission to allow local acts to come into force . This has been on the table since the Labour party was in power .

Absolutely, thank you scanner.
However if that decision only affected a population of quarter of a million of an independent state rather than 60 million of national state, do you think the majority would care?You are correct the majority wouldn't care a jot. But, tptw like to divide and conquer , so it would be a softly softly some here some there . They know any kind of mass microchipping would cause an outcry . So, as David Icke would say " the totalitarian tiptoe " could happen .