Diseases Caused by Vaccines: the Silent Epidemic

[heyokah]

I posted this on another thread ( http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?73261-Doctors-Change-Names-of-Diseases-When-Vaccines-Do-Not-Work), but I think it deserves a thread of its own, as it is too important.

SILENT EPIDEMIC, the Untold Story if Vaccines is a documentary film about Diseases Caused by Vaccines – Production By US Broadcaster Gary Null

In the developed world we have the sickest generations of children with many new chronic disorders and the highest levels of vaccinations and vaccines ever.
This is not coincidence.  Vaccines affect the normal functioning of your and your child’s immune system and cause chronic disorders in a significant proportion of the population.  

The medical profession remain in denial despite 98 in 100 adverse drug reactions going unreported: “Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting vs event monitoring: a comparison” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine Volume 84 June 1991 341.

And in Century 21 we do not have effective treatments for the most basic of childhood illnesses.  Millions in the third world die despite the vaccination programmes – they get disease because they do not have clean drinking water, adequate sanitation or diet and we give them vaccines instead.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJGyN3gCsBg&feature=youtube_gdata_player



If you have no time to see the original film, please watch this 34 minute trailer version:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-vkTMWLd5M&feature=youtube_gdata_player


From: http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/silent-epidemic-the-diseases-caused-by-vaccines/

[Matt P]

:high5::clap2::rockon::tea:

Matt

[heyokah]

Found this information on the Horus-Ra thread. #3081 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit/page155) posted by DNA.

Vaccine bombshell: CDC whistleblower reveals cover-up linking MMR vaccines to autism in African-Americans

Natural News is currently investigating a breaking story based on a CDC whistleblower stepping forward with shocking proof of an incredible cover-up. According to information available so far, it appears the CDC knowingly engaged in a medical conspiracy to deliberately hide from the public damning evidence about MMR vaccines causing a very large increase in autism among African-American babies.

I'm posting this update to let Natural News readers know we are actively investigating this groundbreaking story which may turn out to be a larger cover-up than the Tuskegee experiments. Much like Tuskegee, this story also involves the suffering of African-Americans at the hands of a corporate-run medical cartel that systematically sacrifices lives for profit.

If what we are hearing so far is true, it means the CDC has deliberately run a decade-long cover-up which condemned tens of thousands of African-American children to a life of autism caused by MMR vaccines. It would also mean the CDC has engaged in a shameless conspiracy to hide the truth about the damage caused by vaccines, confirming the agency's primary mission of protecting pharmaceutical profits even at the expense of human life.

This story is potentially the greatest scientific conspiracy in the history of modern medicine. Accordingly, you can expect the entire mainstream media to completely censor the story and try to pretend it never happened

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/046535_mmr_vaccines_autism_cdc_whistleblower.html# ixzz3AwvVyRqu



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhpckzxVEoc

[Bob]

Are you arguing against vaccination because of:


the preservatives, and anti-microbials in vaccines
the concept of boosting antibody response to a weakened foreign invader's proteins?


or is the complaint based on perceived capitalistic money making issues?

or is the complaint based on trying to slam big anything attempting to regulate a quagmire of snake oil alternative treatments?

[heyokah]

Are you arguing against vaccination because of:


the preservatives, and anti-microbials in vaccines
the concept of boosting antibody response to a weakened foreign invader's proteins?



or is the complaint based on perceived capitalistic money making issues?

or is the complaint based on trying to slam big anything attempting to regulate a quagmire of snake oil alternative treatments?

Bob, take your pick :evil:

[Bob]

Are you arguing against vaccination because of:


the preservatives, and anti-microbials in vaccines
the concept of boosting antibody response to a weakened foreign invader's proteins?



or is the complaint based on perceived capitalistic money making issues?

or is the complaint based on trying to slam big anything attempting to regulate a quagmire of snake oil alternative treatments?

Bob, take your pick :evil:

Please then share with us all, what it is in each of those points that you feel needs to be discussed.
Posting somebody else's video is interesting, however it doesn't explain why one believes the videos to be accurate or provide historical data citing references.

[heyokah]

Bob, I'm sure you're eager to dig-up as much pros or contras about the matter you can find on the net and give your opinion. So be my guest.
I'm very well aware that, as no native speaker, I'm no match for you, so I won't be your baseball.
Good luck.

[Bob]

It's your thread, go for it, share with the forum what we need to be concerned about. Eager to see your references and documentation.

[Flash]

Are you arguing against vaccination because of:


the preservatives, and anti-microbials in vaccines
the concept of boosting antibody response to a weakened foreign invader's proteins?


or is the complaint based on perceived capitalistic money making issues?

or is the complaint based on trying to slam big anything attempting to regulate a quagmire of snake oil alternative treatments?

I would say all of the above as well.

However, boosting the system with exposure of light variants of microbes in order to survive a dead on attack is fine with me.

What is not fine is the whole schedule of children vaccines, the adjuvants in them, the money making concerns that makes some scientists hide the truth when the stats are showing the problems of vaccination, etc etc etc.

The poor kids we have are exposed to very high levels of toxicity at a very early age and their system cannot handle it, their brain certainly cannot. I have seen my daughter becoming rigid (with spasms) at the 3 month old vaccine and I was too stupid to stop those vaccines right away, not understanding what i had seen.

Although i think her dysphasia has other origins, her system could obviously not handle the vaccines at those ages and should not have had to deal with this that early, in a clean environment as our homes and cities are. From a smaller problems to start with (most probably due to lack of oxygen at birth), it was compounded to a wide spectrum of problems ensuing vaccinationsss (plural intended) at the wrong age for their age/weight/toxics ratio.

This is crazy the way vaccines are administered.

Now, if ebola comes here, and there is a vaccine available against it, of course i will take it. But certainly not for a cold or childhood diseases if I am below 80 years of age.

[RunningDeer]

Are you arguing against vaccination because of:


the preservatives, and anti-microbials in vaccines
the concept of boosting antibody response to a weakened foreign invader's proteins?



or is the complaint based on perceived capitalistic money making issues?

or is the complaint based on trying to slam big anything attempting to regulate a quagmire of snake oil alternative treatments?

Bob, take your pick :evil:

Please then share with us all, what it is in each of those points that you feel needs to be discussed.
Posting somebody else's video is interesting, however it doesn't explain why one believes the videos to be accurate or provide historical data citing references.

If I thought I was expected to prove a video to be “accurate” and/or "provide historical data citing references”, I'd never post another video again. I take what I can use from the material and allow everyone else to do the same.

If it’s someone’s passion to comb through every nuance, then go for it. For me, there’s only so much time I can spend on it without compromising other parts of living.

RunningDeer <3

[Bob]

Are you arguing against vaccination because of:


the preservatives, and anti-microbials in vaccines
the concept of boosting antibody response to a weakened foreign invader's proteins?



or is the complaint based on perceived capitalistic money making issues?

or is the complaint based on trying to slam big anything attempting to regulate a quagmire of snake oil alternative treatments?

Bob, take your pick :evil:

Please then share with us all, what it is in each of those points that you feel needs to be discussed.
Posting somebody else's video is interesting, however it doesn't explain why one believes the videos to be accurate or provide historical data citing references.

If I thought I was expected to prove a video to be “accurate” and/or "provide historical data citing references”, I'd never post another video again. I take what I can use from the material and allow everyone else to do the same.

If it’s someone’s passion to comb through every nuance, then go for it. For me, there’s only so much time I can spend on it without compromising other parts of living.

RunningDeer <3

Who has time to watch videos or has the bandwidth?

There are people in many parts of the world who need to get data, succintly, meaning without having to try to sort through what could be hours of information and opinion.

Getting facts and without bias is essential.

[RunningDeer]

Please then share with us all, what it is in each of those points that you feel needs to be discussed.
Posting somebody else's video is interesting, however it doesn't explain why one believes the videos to be accurate or provide historical data citing references.

If I thought I was expected to prove a video to be “accurate” and/or "provide historical data citing references”, I'd never post another video again. I take what I can use from the material and allow everyone else to do the same.

If it’s someone’s passion to comb through every nuance, then go for it. For me, there’s only so much time I can spend on it without compromising other parts of living.

RunningDeer <3

Who has time to watch videos or has the bandwidth?

There are people in many parts of the world who need to get data, succintly, meaning without having to try to sort through what could be hours of information and opinion.

Getting facts and without bias is essential.

All good points, especially this one: "Getting facts and without bias." That's a hard one to come by. And there's no guarantee that after all the time put in that many will have the time to ponder.

[Flash]

Are you arguing against vaccination because of:


the preservatives, and anti-microbials in vaccines
the concept of boosting antibody response to a weakened foreign invader's proteins?



or is the complaint based on perceived capitalistic money making issues?

or is the complaint based on trying to slam big anything attempting to regulate a quagmire of snake oil alternative treatments?

Bob, take your pick :evil:

Please then share with us all, what it is in each of those points that you feel needs to be discussed.
Posting somebody else's video is interesting, however it doesn't explain why one believes the videos to be accurate or provide historical data citing references.

If I thought I was expected to prove a video to be “accurate” and/or "provide historical data citing references”, I'd never post another video again. I take what I can use from the material and allow everyone else to do the same.

If it’s someone’s passion to comb through every nuance, then go for it. For me, there’s only so much time I can spend on it without compromising other parts of living.

RunningDeer <3

Who has time to watch videos or has the bandwidth?

There are people in many parts of the world who need to get data, succintly, meaning without having to try to sort through what could be hours of information and opinion.

Getting facts and without bias is essential.

Bob, this is very demanding for the average person and the full time worker. Almost impossible. So, better something than nothing. However, i do appreciate when there is facts. But as per Running Deer, I would have to stop posting altogether if I were to detail all the facts or yet, to analyse them. No time for this (even if I am able to do it). The average reader does not have the skills to do it Bob. So at least, we want something to seep through.

However, when imminent danger is there, as in Ebola, i will be and in fact i am adamant on facts, otherwise one can kill millions with stupidities (such as bathing in turpentine to kill ebola).

[Bob]

Facts help to alleviate FEAR and or GOSSIP, or HEARSAY.. three words that an enlightened group could help all with.. one additional word LOVE.. always forgotten when one sets an "EVIL" icon as a signature.. the idea on the forum is to enlighten with grace, trying to deal with issues which are scary, controversial, or extraordinarily biased with personal opinion based on he said she said..

Vaccines are one of them.. Would you want smallpox? that solution came from a vaccination.

Are they all good obviously NOT.. but trying to tell someone go watch a set of videos for 2 hours cause it is what? supportive? doing that is wasteful.

Why are they (vaccines) all not good, data would explain it, what does work, data would explain it..

[ThePythonicCow]

Are they all good obviously NOT.. but trying to tell someone go watch a set of videos for 2 hours cause it is what? supportive? doing that is wasteful.
There are a variety of ways to present material - by written word or spoken word, via research, analysis or witness, first or second hand, ...

None of us can present the material we find valuable in just the form that every potential recipient will choose to view, and none of us will choose to receive material in any available form.

I would suggest (to whomever, not in particular to Bob) that (1) we don't criticize others for not presenting material in a particular form, and that (2) we not criticize others for choosing not to receive material in a particular form.

Rather be grateful for those who receive what we have to offer, and for those who offer what we choose to receive.

There is a difference between stating one's own choices (such as "sounds interesting, but without a shorter text/video/... summary, I chose not to spend the x hours to view") and criticizing someone else for their choices (such as suggesting someone is wrong in presenting a two hour video)

[heyokah]

Are they all good obviously NOT.. but trying to tell someone go watch a set of videos for 2 hours cause it is what? supportive? doing that is wasteful.
There are a variety of ways to present material - by written word or spoken word, via research, analysis or witness, first or second hand, ...

None of us can present the material we find valuable in just the form that every potential recipient will choose to view, and none of us will choose to receive material in any available form.

I would suggest (to whomever, not in particular to Bob) that (1) we don't criticize others for not presenting material in a particular form, and that (2) we not criticize others for choosing not to receive material in a particular form.

Rather be grateful for those who receive what we have to offer, and for those who offer what we choose to receive.

There is a difference between stating one's own choices (such as "sounds interesting, but without a shorter text/video/... summary, I chose not to spend the x hours to view") and criticizing someone else for their choices (such as suggesting someone is wrong in presenting a two hour video)

Thank you Paul. Very nicely said. :thank_you2:

To be honest, I had to do some "Ho'oponopono" not to feel offended. :wink:

[DeDukshyn]

Well we do know that vaccines have been "used" for nefarious purposes, even if they were conceived with the best of intentions originally. And we do have Billy Gates promising to help reduce the population of the planet by 15% with "New vaccines and health care initiatives" - indicating that sterilization can be easily had via vaccines.

We do know that there cannot be proof of a given vaccine's effectiveness, just like snake oil. And we do know that that the pushers of this snake oil do not even have to sell to the buyer - a governmental body pays for it with the individuals money (tax dollars) on their behalf, with or without their agreement. It is THE perfect snake oil.

We also know that the flu infection statistics are grossly miscounted -- in Canada, Health Canada and their Pharma controllers routinely push this stat that "8000 people die every year from influenza in Canada" -- when in reality the number of actual confirmed cases of influenza is countable on your personal digits without counting any more than once. The models they use to determine this stat may include people dying from slipping on the ice, drug overdose, or car accidents - but they count them as flu deaths. This not much better than blatant lying or randomly guessing.

The problem is that vaccines make billions of dollars for big pharma, and there are very, very greedy heartless people that work at the tops of these companies, and if the company doesn't keep that profit increasing ... someone's head is on the block. The entire system has become horribly corrupted; fear tactics and lies have replaced science and statistics; for example, did anyone hear how many people were either hospitalized or crippled by the H1N1 shot in Canada? Of course not, because those stats get in the way of their methods of business, so we never hear about them -- probably because our governments all have skin in the game by agreeing to buy these vaccines with the clause that under no circumstance will the pharma supplier be responsible for any deaths or damages caused by the vaccines. So if a vaccine is bad and kills thousands, the snake oil producer is safe from any legal action against them and in the case of damages, your tax dollars will be used -- not pharma's profits they accrued whilst inflicting the damage. That says a lot right there, wouldn't you say?

We also have statistical evidence that the H1N1 shot (and possibly others) actually increased the rate of H1N1 infections during the last "pandemic" ... hmmm, make a vaccine that creates the disease they claim it treats! Brilliant! Not only did someone save their head from the "chopping block", they got a 10 million dollar bonus! They just made better snake oil!


Here's a few links with supporting stories to my words above ...

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/flu-de...heck-1.1127442

http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/flu-sh...year-1.1287363

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/ta...mages-1.815319

[phillipbbg]

Interestingly no one has watched the video and given their opinion or even a brief summary of the contents of it, instead it seems the shilling mechanism of veering to questioning individual posters has diverted everyone from what the actual content is within the video and an open and frank discussion specifically on the information presented in the VIDEO...

And yes Paul you are bang on, well said

And as I have not watched the video I cannot post anything constructive as yet, I can only post my observations of the psychology occurring on the thread which I am sure the Op had no intention of achieving...

with the exception of DeDukshyn who has posted whilst I was typing ... nice start DeDukshyn :cool:

[DeDukshyn]

Interestingly no one has watched the video and given their opinion or even a brief summary of the contents of it, instead it seems the shilling mechanism of veering to questioning individual posters has diverted everyone from what the actual content is within the video and an open and frank discussion specifically on the information presented in the VIDEO...

And yes Paul you are bang on, well said

And as I have not watched the video I cannot post anything constructive as yet, I can only post my observations of the psychology occurring on the thread which I am sure the Op had no intention of achieving...

with the exception of DeDukshyn who has posted whilst I was typing ... nice start DeDukshyn :cool:

For the record, I didn't watch the videos either :P

[onawah]

It's not like the subject of vaccines hasn't been discussed on Avalon exhaustively before.
There has been a wealth of information posted here about the dangers of vaccines over the years, with plenty of videos, even interviews with whistleblowers by Kerry, etc.
It's just another case, to a large extent, of preaching to the choir here on Avalon, where most of us are probably only too cognizant, not only of the dangers of vaccines, but of the general ineptitude and corruption that is rampant in mainstream medicine today.
Although if the latest whistleblower evidence is going to be strong enough to make it to the MSM and really make a difference, then we do indeed need to take notice and network the information far and wide.
And here's another whistleblower, a doctor himself, one who is a member of Avalon, in fact, who is providing more ballast with a video less than 10 minutes long of whistleblower evidence:

CDC Scientists Accused of Crimes against Humanity by Whistleblower

http://drsircus.com/medicine/cdc-scientists-accused-crimes-humanity-whistleblower#utm_source=Dr+Sircus+Newsletter&utm_campaign=69ef64304d-Article_176&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_ea98c09673-69ef64304d-10646942
8/20/2014

QUOTE]
CDC Scientists Accused of Crimes against Humanity by Whistleblower

Contemporary medicine has become a practice of pharmaceutical terrorism, with too many doctors joining in who think they know better about how other peoples’ lives should be lived or ended. “The FDA has assumed for itself Godlike power, requiring that its official approval be obtained before any substance can legally be used in the prevention and treatment of disease. The FDA’s legal-regulatory control therefore is totalitarian and Napoleonic in construct; what it does not explicitly permit as a medicine is implicitly forbidden,” writes Sayer Ji, founder of GreenMedInfo.com.
Here is a video that will bring you to tears if you still have a human heart.

dbLGZw-SciU

Obviously top officials at the CDC are heartless monsters yet that is what we have in the world of medicine—mind monsters with no hearts—as good a definition for psychopaths as any.Has your local pediatrician turned his or her back on the heavy use of antibiotics on your children? Are they still recommending you poison your kids with the yearly flu shot that contains highly toxic mercury in them? Probably not. Will they watch this video and turn against their own evil men and woman at the CDC, FDA and local medical boards that hold the whip over them? No.

Andy Wakefield certainly is vindicated as the fine doctor he is and the field of pediatrics is caught red-handed as terrorists who are no better than the Islamic monsters who are burying women and children in the sand.
How many reasons do we need not to trust them? There is not a single medical institution that openly discusses the issues and reasons why so many people are killed and seriously hurt by contemporary medicine. Police forces have internal departments to review the mistakes and abuses of power but in medicine, it is the opposite. Medical boards lock in and enforce the mistakes of medical practice. In the case of these doctors at the CDC they should be put on trial for crimes against humanity and remembered in the darkness of other mass murderers for all times.

I started out the International Medical Veritas Association (IMVA) in 2003 with my writings The Terror of Pediatric Medicine and was the one who coined the phrase pharmaceutical terrorism. In terms of my own perception I felt like I had stolen the high ground behind and above enemy lines—the CDC—and my essays have been firing down on them since. Eventually I was led away from negative confrontations and into the creation of a new form of medicine called Natural Allopathic Medicine, which is designed to bypass the pharmaceutical paradigm of terror.

Doctors in General

It almost does not matter what contemporary medical diagnoses you have—it is still the underlying inflammation, dehydration, stress and malnutrition that needs to be treated. Doctors are slowly recognizing this or at least some researchers are, but oncologists insist on using diagnostic tests, chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery—all of which increase inflammation, toxicity and malnutrition to the point of causing more cancer and death. When a doctor treats inside the pharmaceutical paradigm, he or she is treating the diagnosis, not the condition and what underlies it.

Oncologists are fools—using tests and treatments that cause cancer to treat cancer. You would think by the 21st century they would have evolved their approach but that is not about to happen. One might as well as try to reform a terrorist or psychopath, which is virtually impossible according to modern psychology.

Doctors pretend to have an inhuman ability to predict outcomes for their patients when they treat them for cancer. Doctors, when they talk to you, pretend there will not be unpredictable consequences to their treatments, little or no serious side effects, no bad mixing of chemical compounds when multiple drugs are used, no consequences to massive overuse of antibiotics etc.

Surgeons make their operations more dangerous simply because they do not apply magnesium before, during and after surgery. Doctors get the simplest things wrong. The intense conditioning of medical school, internship and residency leaves doctors unable to think straight because pharmaceutical medicine’s incorrect principles clouds and crowds their minds.

Even after 150 years of knowing, they cannot wash their hands sufficiently. Most of the nurses, doctors and other hospital workers filing in and out of the room caring for patients are not washing their hands. Washing hands is one of the single most effective ways to prevent the spread of dangerous infections — ranging from pneumonia to MRSA, a life-threatening staph infection — in U.S. hospitals. Nevertheless, do they wash enough to make hospitals safer?

Superbugs known as CRE — called "nightmare bacteria" by federal health officials because they are deadly and virtually untreatable — are skyrocketing in the Southeastern USA, new research shows. Experts fear a growing national problem, and some say the spread of such superbugs may portend a "post-antibiotic era."
Cases of the antibiotic-resistant CRE rose fivefold in community hospitals in the region from 2008 to 2012, researchers at Duke University Medical Center found, and they said those rates are likely underestimates.

CRE are carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, These are a family of bacteria that have over time become resistant to last-resort antibiotics. They prey mostly on vulnerable, hospitalized patients and kill nearly half who get bloodstream infections.

Contemporary medicine has nothing to do with health as millions are drugged with poisons that do not help people get better. The misinformation that the mainstream medical media puts out allows doctors and the government to advance false treatments all in the guise of protecting and healing when there is mostly hurtful deception at play.

Misinformation is used to promote poisonous drugs and more tests using harmful radiation and other procedures. People do snap out of their dreams and face the harsh reality of what doctors and western medicine in general is capable of when they suffer enough at their hands—meaning when the side effects kick in.
http://demolarewajudaily.com/wp-content/uploads/Doctors2.jpg

There are lots of things you should not let your doctors do like give you blood unnecessarily, because they have also been linked to higher death rates if blood is given when not strictly necessary. For sure do not let your doctor operate on you without giving you magnesium before, during and after surgery and do not let them operate on you on a Friday. People who have surgery on Fridays have a 44 per cent higher risk of death than those who go under the knife on Mondays.

One of the big traps of the medical system are the general check-ups. Having a regular check-up sounds like common sense but check-ups or what is otherwise known as screenings, which is looking for illness in people who have no symptoms has a nasty habit of doing more harm than good. The potential downsides of screening are that it can worry people unnecessarily, offer false reassurance, or trigger unneeded tests and treatments that create disease instead of health.
Medicine today is a symptom of a corrupt civilization. Most doctors shamelessly poison their patients. Pharmaceutical companies only manufacture poisons calling them medicines. They hide behind a 400-year-old paradigm that shamelessly says, “The dose makes the poison.” To them everything is a poison so they take full license to use them.

Dr. Mark Sircus
Dr. Mark Sircus, Ac., OMD, DM (P)
Director International Medical Veritas Association
Doctor of Oriental and Pastoral Medicine[/QUOTE]

[onawah]

Just as an addendum to the risks simply from being a patient in an American hospital that are presented by Dr. Sircus in the above article, here is one from Dr. Mercola that came out today:
Data on Serious Hospital Errors Will Now Be Withheld from the Public

By Dr. Mercola
8/20/2014
KxUfPBhipLA
Harm and death caused by medical errors are a huge problem, and a major reason why the current, fatally flawed medical paradigm is in such desperate need of transformation.

Preventable medical mistakes are actually the third leading cause of death in the US, right after heart disease and cancer, claiming the lives of 210,000 Americans each year.

When you add in diagnostic errors, errors of omission, and failure to follow guidelines, the number skyrockets to an estimated 440,000 preventable hospital deaths each year.

According to the most recent estimates published last year,1 preventable medical mistakes account for about one-sixth of all deaths that occur in the US annually. This is more than 4.5 times higher than 1999 estimates.2

When you consider instances where medical errors cause some form of harm but not necessarily death, the incidence rate may be as high as 40,000 per day!3

As a general rule, staying out of the hospital is one of your best ways to prevent dying unnecessarily, and this is one of the reasons why I’m so passionate about sharing preventive health strategies with you -- tips like eating right, exercising, and reducing stress.

Exceptions would naturally include cases of accidental trauma or surgical emergencies. This is where modern medicine can be truly lifesaving.

Federal Government Ends Public Disclosure of Medical Errors

According to Dr. Marty Makary, a surgeon at The Johns Hopkins Hospital and author of the book Unaccountable: What Hospitals Won’t Tell You and How Transparency Can Revolutionize Healthcare, eliminating medical errors must become a national priority.

But rather than tackling the issue, the US federal government has quietly decided to “solve” the problem by burying it and shielding it from scrutiny... USA Today4 recently reported that:

“The federal government this month quietly stopped publicly reporting when hospitals leave foreign objects in patients' bodies or make a host of other life-threatening mistakes.

The change, which the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) denied last year that it was making, means people are out of luck if they want to search which hospitals cause high rates of problems such as air embolisms... or giving people the wrong blood type.

CMS removed data on eight of these avoidable ‘hospital acquired conditions’ (HACs) on its hospital comparison site last summer but kept it on a public spreadsheet that could be accessed by quality researchers, patient-safety advocates and consumers savvy enough to translate it. As of this month, it's gone. Now researchers have to calculate their own rates using claims data.”

Low-Income Areas Are More Susceptible to Poor Medical Care Outcomes

Statistics show that some hospitals are far riskier than others, which is why removing data for certain avoidable hospital acquired conditions is a step in the wrong direction.

On the average, you have a 54 percent lower risk of dying in a five-star rated hospital compared to the national average. Hospitals catering primarily to Medicare patients tend to be among the worst.

For example, hospital-acquired infections affect one in 25 patients across the US,5, 6 but among Medicare patients, this statistic jumps to one in nine.7

According to HealthGrades,8 which provides quality ratings on nearly 5,000 American hospitals, more than 164,470 in hospital complications could potentially have been avoided had all Medicare recipients from 2008 through 2010 gone to top rated hospitals for their procedures.

A recent article in Endocrine Today9 notes that diabetics living in low income areas may be 10 times more likely to have their feet or legs amputated compared to diabetics living in more affluent areas.

According to Carl D. Stevens, MD, MPH, who investigated these correlations: “When you have diabetes, where you live directly relates to whether you’ll lose a limb to the disease.”

Hospital-Acquired Infections on the Rise

Hospitals have become particularly notorious for spreading lethal infections. In the United States, more than two million people are affected by hospital-acquired infections each year, and anywhere from 75,000 to 100,000 people die as a result. The most common hospital-acquired infections include:

Central line-associated bloodstream infections
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections
Surgical site infections after surgery
Clostridium difficile infections
Most of these cases could likely have been easily prevented with better infection control in hospitals—simple things such as doctors and nurses washing their hands between each patient, for example. Antibiotic overuse and inappropriate use also bears a heavy responsibility for creating this crisis. While antibiotics are certainly overprescribed in medicine, the largest source of antibiotic exposure is actually via your food.

Agriculture accounts for about 80 percent of all antibiotics used in the US. Tens of millions of pounds of antibiotics are administered to American livestock each year for purposes other than treating disease, such as making the animals grow bigger faster.

The antibiotic residues in meat and dairy, as well as the resistant bacteria, are then passed on to you in the foods you eat. As just one example, no less than 80 different antibiotics are allowed in cows’ milk. The CDC10 has previously concluded that as much as 22 percent of antibiotic-resistant illness in humans is in fact linked to food.

We’ve Shifted from Science Based Medicine to Science BIASED Medicine

How in the world did conventional medical treatments become one of the top three leading causes of death? A major part of the problem stems from the fact that we’ve made a rather dramatic shift AWAY from true science based medicine. Instead, what we have now is science biased medicine, and we’re reaping the results thereof.

John Ioannidis, author of the 2005 paper “Why Most Published Research Findings are False”11, 12 published in PLoS Medicine, is one of the world's most important experts on the credibility of medical research. He and his team of researchers have repeatedly shown that the majority of the conclusions biomedical researchers arrive at in their published studies are exaggerated or completely wrong.

Doctors use these studies—90 percent of which may be flawed or incorrect13—to prescribe drugs or recommend surgery. Is it any wonder then that American doctors kill at least 210,000 patients each year? With the odds stacked so sharply against a proper treatment, perhaps we’re lucky that the numbers aren’t even greater than that...

The Challenges of Science Bias

One of the first challenges you come across when trying to analyze the results of a study is to confirm that the study is free of any conflict of interest that would pervert the results and the meaning of the analysis. This means researching the author(s) of the study, its funders, and the motivations behind the design of the study. This is no easy task.

There’s also the problem of study findings being withheld and never published, simply because the results were not in favor of the treatment tested. The only real exception to this is researchers receiving grants from the federal government. They must register their trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, and they must publish their results regardless of the outcome.

Negative findings are just as critical as favorable findings. You may have twice as many negative findings as positive ones, but if only the positive ones (flawed or not) see the light of day, it will severely skew the overall “scientific basis” for the treatment. In essence, the treatment is based on scientific bias instead... Unfortunately, the vast majority of research is now being funded by industry, which has led to the systematic destruction of scientific integrity and validity.

Another factor that creates scientific bias is that the studies most likely to be published in the first place are those that oversell results that are considered important—results that oftentimes turn out to be false upon further investigation.14 Prestigious journals boast that they’re very selective, turning down the vast majority of submitted papers. The assumption is that they publish only the best scientific work. But Dr. Ioannidis' 2008 study, “Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science,”15 showed that out of the nearly 50 papers published in leading journals (studies that had been cited by more than 1,000 other scientists -- in other words, well-regarded research) almost a third were refuted by other studies within the span of a few years.

According to a 2013 paper published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings,16 reversals of recommendations based on new information are common across all classes of medical practice. Over the past decade alone, 146 previously established practices, treatments, and procedures have been reversed. The question is, are established treatments being replaced by seriously flawed, science biased ones? It seems likely that this is playing a very large role as to why the death toll from medical mistakes keeps climbing.

More Recent Evidence Showing a Strong Trend Toward Bias in Medical Research

In a recent article, Dr. Robert Pearl, MD brings up even more evidence showing that scientific bias is now par the course in modern medicine:17

The 2012 report by the Cochrane Library, “Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome,”18 concluded that industry-funded studies resulted in “more favorable results and conclusions” about the sponsored product compared to studies funded by independent parties.
Earlier this year, Harvard Medical School published a study19 assessing the impact of conflicts of interest in plastic surgery. According to the authors: “Studies authored by groups with conflicts of interest are significantly associated with reporting lower surgical complications and therefore describing positive research findings.”
Another recent study20 investigating the impact of conflicts of interest in wound therapy research also found that studies funded by a manufacturer were extraordinarily likely to be in favor of the sponsored product. The study looked at 24 peer-reviewed papers published in highly respected medical journals. Nineteen of them were funded by a manufacturer of one of two devices, and 18 of those manufacturer-funded studies ended up favoring the device made by the funding manufacturer; only one study came to a “neutral” conclusion.
As noted by Dr. Pearl:21 “From a statistical perspective, this is nearly an impossible outcome. Flip a coin 19 times and there’s a 1 in 524,288 chance it comes up heads each time. We might expect that if the two alternative products were relatively equivalent and the research truly unbiased, the product sold by the non-funding company should come out on top about half the time. To have no study go against the funding company yields nearly impossible odds. And if they are not equivalent, the better product should be identified in nearly all studies, regardless of the source of the researcher’s funding. There is no way to interpret these results, except to assume the researchers themselves were biased based on who paid for their work.”

The question is, how do we prevent this kind of bias from corrupting science? One solution is to shift the burden of financing research back onto the government. As noted by Dr. Pearl, adding a small fee to the sales price of drugs and medical devices could also be used to fund independent research. Another solution suggested in Dr. Pearl’s article could be for peer-reviewed journals to refuse to publish studies funded by one single company. By forcing competitors to fund joint research projects should theoretically promote more unbiased conclusions.

Hospitals Can Be Hazardous to Your Health in Multiple Ways

From my perspective, checking yourself into a hospital should be an option of last resort, when you have exhausted all others (barring an actual life-threatening emergency) and likely facing a potential fatal outcome if you don’t go into the hospital. Medical mistakes and potentially life-threatening infections are not the only risks you take when checking yourself into the hospital. They’re also notorious for giving you the wrong solution for your problem. Drugs and surgery, for example, are both widely overused options that can cause far more problems than they solve.

If a hospital stay is necessary, you would do well to heed the advice of Dr. Andrew Saul, co-author of the book Hospitals and Health: Your Orthomolecular Guide to a Shorter Hospital Stay.22 He suggests making sure you bring a personal advocate with you—a relative or friend who can speak up for you and ensure you’re given proper care if you are too incapacitated to do so yourself.

Help for Victims of Preventable Medical Errors

If you or a loved one find yourself a victim of a preventable medical mistake, you’re advised to start out by writing a letter or calling the patient relations department, which every hospital is mandated to have. If you’re still dissatisfied, write a letter to the hospital’s general council (attorney). You can also connect with patient communities such as:

Citizens for Patient Safety23
ProPublica Patient Harm24
Basic Tenets of Optimal Health

All in all, leading a common-sense, healthy lifestyle is your best bet to avoid unnecessary hospital visits. I believe there are certain basic tenets of optimal health that remain valid no matter what science decides to come up with next. Following these healthy lifestyle guidelines can go a very long way toward keeping you well and prevent chronic disease of all kinds:

Proper Food Choices: For a comprehensive guide on which foods to eat and which to avoid, see my nutrition plan. Generally speaking, you should be looking to focus your diet on whole, ideally organic, unprocessed foods. Avoid sugar, and fructose in particular. All forms of sugar have toxic effects when consumed in excess, and drive multiple disease processes in your body, not the least of which is insulin resistance, a major cause of chronic disease and accelerated aging. I believe the two primary keys for successful weight management are severely restricting carbohydrates (sugars, fructose, and grains) in your diet, and increasing healthy fat consumption. This will optimize insulin and leptin levels, which is key for maintaining a healthy weight and optimal health.
Regular exercise: To make your exercise as effective as possible, make sure you include high-intensity activities into your rotation. High-intensity interval-type training boosts human growth hormone (HGH) production, which is essential for optimal health, strength, and vigor. HGH also helps boost weight loss.
Stress Reduction: You cannot be optimally healthy if you avoid addressing the emotional component of your health and longevity, as your emotional state plays a role in nearly every physical disease -- from heart disease and depression, to arthritis and cancer. Meditation, prayer, social support, and exercise are all viable options that can help you maintain emotional and mental equilibrium. I also strongly believe in using simple tools such as the Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) to address deeper, oftentimes hidden, emotional problems.
Drink plenty of pure water
Maintain a healthy gut: About 80 percent of your immune system resides in your gut, and research is stacking up showing that probiotics—beneficial bacteria—affect your health in a myriad of ways; it can even influence your ability to lose weight. Regularly consuming traditionally fermented foods is the easiest, most cost effective way to ensure optimal gut flora
Optimize your vitamin D levels: Research has shown that increasing your vitamin D levels can reduce your risk of death from ALL causes. Sensible sun exposure is the ideal way to optimize your level.
Avoid as many chemicals, toxins, and pollutants as possible: This includes tossing out your toxic household cleaners, soaps, personal hygiene products, air fresheners, bug sprays, lawn pesticides, and insecticides, just to name a few, and replacing them with non-toxic alternatives.
Get plenty of high-quality sleep: Regularly catching only a few hours of sleep can hinder metabolism and hormone production in a way that is similar to the effects of aging and the early stages of diabetes. Chronic sleep loss may speed the onset or increase the severity of age-related conditions such as type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, obesity, and memory loss.

[heyokah]

I can perfectly well understand that one has no time for, or doesn't want to watch a long video.
Some like reading and some like listening. They are different ways of learning.

So in my OP I did put up a 34 min. trailer of the movie as well as the original version.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-vkTMWLd5M

I am a person with a 'little' brain damage (because of a viral inflammation of the brain, called encephalitis, some 40 years ago) which has resulted in being somewhat dyslectic and having concentration problems. I also have one eye functioning for 50%.
So reading lengthy posts, or (links to) long articles take me a quite some time. (just as writing posts here on the forum).

The subject of vaccines has had my interest for a long time, because of my grandchildren (who live in the US).
When my daughter had her first child, in The Netherlands, he got a real high fever after his first shot and my daughter was very alarmed. She started to search for information about a possible connection between vaccinations and diseases and found a lot of 'cases' and even an 'association for parents' with the same questions and worries about vaccines, which were ignored by the doctors. This was 16 years ago.
In those days we had long talks about this together and shared lots of fears about possible consequences of non-vaccinating...... don't doubt about that!
To make a long story short, after a thorough 'battle between fear and wisdom', she decided not to let her son being further vaccinated, nor her next two children, of whom the last one was born in the US. They were brought-up on a macrobiotic diet from birth to give them a good immune system and are very healthy, well-balanced and happy, as my daughter has been fortunate enough to be able to give the three of them an education on the Waldorf School, were she is working as a science teacher herself.

So one can imagine my fascination for this subject.


http://i61.tinypic.com/2wd0zsp.jpg

Here's a link to the articles and papers of Viera Scheibner, Ph.D.

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/scheibner_a.html

[observer]

It would seem, there are some members who would have us blindly trust the use of pharmaceuticals simply because they are certified by the Food and Drug Administration.


It is a fact that John D. Rockefeller invested millions of dollars into the creation of the American Medical Association in the earliest days of that organization.
It is a fact that since that creation, most medical colleges have switched from homeopathic therapies to pharmaceutical therapies.
It is a fact that world wide pharmaceutical industries bring-in billions of dollars of bank deposits a year.
One must ask the question, cui bono? (Conclusions Adopted From - Source: (http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/flexner-report-rockefeller-ama-takeover/))


For the past sixty years, American Citizens have been pumping trillions of dollars into the American Cancer Society in the desperate hope researchers will find a cure.

Recently we discover the single individual most closely associated with the direction of the American Cancer Society, Dr. Alton Ochsner, was running a clandestine biological weapons laboratory in New Orleans, for the purpose of creating a biological weapon using cancer, during the time of the John F. Kennedy Assassination. We even discover many of the characters associated to the actual Kennedy Assassination were closely associated to Dr Ochsner's clandestine biological weapons laboratory. (Source: (http://www.amazon.com/dp/0977795306/?tag=googhydr-20&hvadid=34079979311&hvpos=1t1&hvexid=&hvnetw=s&hvrand=9875861502391506452&hvpone=14.16&hvptwo=&hvqmt=b&hvdev=c&ref=pd_sl_7fdrcd1cn2_b))

One must ask the question, was some portion of all those trillions of dollars somehow diverted into this weapons research program?

Further, we discover that a team of biological weapons researchers from Tulane University have been operating in Sierra Leone since the earliest days of this latest Ebola outbreak. (Source: (http://nworeport.me/2014/08/02/what-are-us-biowar-researchers-doing-in-the-ebola-zone/))

Need I even mention, Tulane University is the same location where Dr. Alton Ochsner's biological weapons research laboratory was located, and where Dr. Ochsner was director of the medical department?

So, we see from just this single trail of events, how elements of our government, working for the global banking network, has infected the world with
cancer virus (SV-40) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SV40)[Go to 'History'], and most likely the Ebola Virus as well.

How does this knowledge effect the theme of this thread, you might ask?

FDA involvement in any form of vaccination should be highly suspect.

These vaccinations, in many cases being forced upon the unsuspecting public, have been created by the same snake oil salesman responsible for the creation of the American Medical Association. (Source: (http://www.corbettreport.com/meet-william-rockefeller-snake-oil-salesman/))

These are all related through a coordinated cabal of psychopaths working in the back rooms of our political structures - the global elite. Those who control the Mass of Humanity through secret societies and covert means. Those who wish for a global reduction in population.



One can be a brilliant intellectual, learned in every science.

Possessing great knowledge cannot be compared to wisdom.

Wisdom comes with age, and experience....

[heyokah]

Some more to ponder about.

Findings of Viera Scheibner Ph.D.

Scientific evidence shows that babies can have severe adverse reactions to vaccinations at critical intervals following their shots, and that vaccination is the more likely cause of cot death and shaken baby syndrome. VACCINATION AND THE DYNAMICS OF CRITICAL DAYS by Viera Scheibner, PhD
(http://www.whale.to/v/scheibner.html)
"Vaccination procedures are a highly politically motivated non-science, whose practitioners are only interested in injecting multitudes of vaccines without much interest or care as to their effects. Data collection on reactions to vaccines is only paid lip service, and the obvious ineffectiveness of vaccines to prevent diseases is glossed over. The fact that natural infectious diseases have beneficial effect on the maturation and development of the immune system is ignored or deliberately suppressed. Consequently, parents of small children and any potential recipients of vaccines and any orthodox medications should be wary of any member of the medical establishment (which is little more than a highly politicised business system) extolling the non-existent virtues of vaccination."--Viera Scheibner (http://www.whale.to/vaccine/adjuvants.html)

"It is very likely, that the obvious improvements of her child's health was achieved by him finally developing whooping cough in its acute form. --any parents report either a marked improvement or disappearance of 'asthma' after their vaccinated children developed acute whooping cough. Medical research demonstrated that having whooping cough prevents asthma. One must wonder how much of that 'asthma' is just a chronic whooping cough as a result of the vaccinated child's immune system being deranged by vaccination and not being able to mount a proper, acute, immune response."---Viera Scheibner (http://www.whale.to/vaccines/scheibner3.html)

"Tetanus is a very rare disease in developed countries: there are only about 12 cases of tetanus per year in Australia, and half of those who got it were vaccinated. Perhaps the most interesting thing about tetanus is that those who get it do not develop immunity to it.........Far from immunising, tetanus (and other) vaccine injections make the recipients more susceptible to diseases. ......the New England Journal of Medicine published in 1984 that tetanus booster injections result in the same derangement of T4 and T8 cells as seen in AIDS patients. A 'mysterious' new syndrome emerged in the US: thousands of children are developing AIDS symptoms (with deranged T4 and T8 cells) without being HIV positive My well-considered opinion is that it comes from that T (standing for tetanus) in the DPT vaccine."---Viera Scheibner (http://www.whale.to/vaccines/scheibner3.html)

"I did not find it difficult to conclude that there is no evidence whatsoever that vaccines or any kind are effective in preventing the infectious diseases they are supposed to prevent. Further, adverse effects are amply documented and are far more significant to public health than any adverse effects of infectious diseases. Immunizations not only did not prevent any infectious diseases, they caused more suffering and more deaths than has any other human activity in the entire history of medical intervention. It will be decades before the mopping-up after the disasters caused by childhood vaccination will be completed."--- Dr. Viera Scheibner, PhD

"Amoebas are quite obviously widely spread protozoans and some of them have been established as causing serious disease in animals and humans. It is also quite well-established that amoebas are important contaminants of tissue cultures used in preparation of live biologicals, vaccines being the most important of them because they are widely injected into small babies and children."--Viera Scheibner (http://www.whale.to/vaccines/amoebas.html)

"A young Australian lady, living in England, organized one of my many seminars there and told me that her father told her "go to Viera's seminars and do not vaccinate your children. All those ear infections, and problems like glue ear, are caused by vaccination". When I asked her who is her father, she said "he is an ENT specialist in Brisbane, Australia". --Viera Scheibner. Testimony, Burton hearings (http://www.whale.to/vaccines/scheibner8.html)

"Smallpox was on the way out, indeed epidemics disappeared decades before the WHO decided to conduct the final "eradication" campaign. It is also well-documented that the largest epidemics occurred in the most highly vaccinated populations, while whose who were unvaccinated, did not have the same epidemics. "--Viera Scheibner (http://www.whale.to/vaccines/scheibner8.html)

"Provocation polio. That is the truth about those outbreaks of polio. And I offer a well considered personal opinion that polio is a man made disease."

"Our conclusion is that if vaccination were to be suspended, the cot death rate would be halved!"--Dr Viera Scheibner Cot deaths linked to vaccination by Viera Scheibner, ph.D.
(http://www.whale.to/vaccines/cot_death.html)
"It is well known that measles is an important development milestone in the life and maturing processes in children. Why would anybody want to stop or delay the maturation processes of children and of their immune systems?"

"Polio has not been eradicated by vaccination, it is lurking behind a redefinition and new diagnostic names like viral or aseptic meningitis.......According to one of the 1997 issues of the MMWR, there are some 30,000 to 50,000 cases of viral meningitis per year in the United States alone. That's where all those 30,000 - 50,000 cases of polio disappeared after the introduction of mass vaccination" (Viera Scheibner Testimony, Burton hearings)

"They started vaccinating in 1985 (in the Americas). Within 4 months they had 350 cases…They caused a substantial, huge outbreak of polio but they started ‘discarding’ most of the cases (put as flaccid paralysis).

From:
http://www.whale.to/m/scheibner9.html

[observer]

Are you arguing against vaccination because of:


the preservatives, and anti-microbials in vaccines
the concept of boosting antibody response to a weakened foreign invader's proteins?



or is the complaint based on perceived capitalistic money making issues?

or is the complaint based on trying to slam big anything attempting to regulate a quagmire of snake oil alternative treatments?

Bob, take your pick :evil:

Please then share with us all, what it is in each of those points that you feel needs to be discussed.
Posting somebody else's video is interesting, however it doesn't explain why one believes the videos to be accurate or provide historical data citing references.

Hi Bob,

English is my native language, and I have no problem debating you regarding, what appears to me, your disdain for any negative controversy concerning Big Pharma.

Allow me to begin by stating Big Pharma is nothing more than the product of a slick 'snake oil salesman' family, the lineage of which covers several generations. Since you have already expressed your unwillingness to view videos, I invite you to Google the search terms, "William Rockefeller Snake Oil Salesman" and read for yourself who the masters of all snake oil salesmanship really are.

While your at it Google the search term: "John D. Rockefeller American Medical Association".

I invite you to take your pick with any of the results. Any member with the ability to integrate concepts will be able to see the association Mr. Rockefeller had regarding the history of modern medicine and how he was most influential in combining the profits of the Medical Industry with those of the Pharmaceutical Industry.

This part of the exercise should answer your question regarding, "or is the complaint based on perceived capitalistic money making issues?"

Moving-on, I personally would caution any member to thoroughly research the ingredients before taking any of the popular vaccinations being offered by our "trusted" Big Pharma/Medical/FDA/Centralized Governmental/International Banking/Industrial Complex. Question your doctor regarding his personal understanding of each ingredient, and ask if he would give that to his child.

The history of unwanted virus contaminated vaccinations, alone, many of which have been forced on the public, is too long to document within the limits of this comment. Instead, I would ask the members to Google the search terms, "virus contamination of vaccines" and take their pick of any of the over three million results.

BTW, one should really click-on the "SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer - National ..." result, just for a solid understanding of what this thread is all about. It should be noted that although the SV40 virus was identified in mid 1959 as contaminating the polio vaccination, by Bernice Eddy, Ph.D., the use of the polio vaccination in question was not halted until after all the available doses were used-up, well into 1963 - approximately 4 million doses have been reported.

I understand this thread to not just being about the vaccines that are forced on our children, and the obvious connection to aultisum, it's about a continuing agenda of the "Soft Kill" policies incorporated by those psychopaths who control the social structure.

[heyokah]

There is another aspect to problems with vaccination:

Contrary to what you may have heard even from some of those who are calling for the discontinuation of mandatory vaccination in the United States, vaccines do not prevent diseases.
The presumed and publicised "eradication" of diseases like smallpox and Polio, or Hib meningitis is a myth not supported by even the staunchest pro-vaccinators' research.


......
Vaccines are one of them.. Would you want smallpox? that solution came from a vaccination.



Smallpox was on the way out, indeed epidemics disappeared decades before the WHO decided to conduct the final "eradication" campaign.

It is also well-documented that the largest epidemics occurred in the most highly vaccinated populations, while whose who were unvaccinated, did not have the same epidemics.
Smallpox still occurs, although on a much smaller scale, particularly in the countries suffering extreme conditions like wars or economic hardship in Africa, India and other parts of Asia (Nepal).

The same factor which did away with bubonic plague, against which mass vaccinations have never been conducted, did away with smallpox, namely a much better nutrition mainly in reference to better Vitamin C status of populations in the Old and the New Worlds.

According to some doctors Smallpox has been seen to still exist even though the world has been told that vaccines have eradicated it. According to Dr Kris Gaublomme, it has simply been renamed and is now called Monkeypox. In his article Has smallpox really disappeared from the earth (http://www.whale.to/v/gaublomme4.html)?——Dr. Kris Gaublomme he explains:-


“A new and embarrassing development was the resurgence of pox-family viruses in Africa, known as the ‘monkeypox’. This fact has been known for many years but the public was reassured that this had nothing to do with smallpox and that the human species was safe.

Not as safe as we were told, though, since in the Congo in 1970, pox viruses were isolated from humans corresponding to the pox viruses found in captive monkeys in 1958 and identified the next year. It was baptised ‘monkeypox~. The same virus was isolated from 6 humans in 1959 by Foster. In 1976, Gipsen reported on more cases in Nigeria.

The terminology of the disease became ever more confusing, since what were at first simply ‘monkeypox’ are now introduced into literature as’human monkeypox’. What, now, is the difference between smallpox and ‘human monkeypox’?
It is interesting to read in a recent article in the Lancet that “Human monkeypox is a systemic exanthem, resembling smallpox, that occurs as a sporadic zoonosis in rural rainforest villages of western and central Africa.
The disease is caused by an orthopoxvirus, which is transmitted to human beings by handling infected animals; serosurveys have implicated squirrels … as the probable reservoir.
Secondary human-to-human spread by aerosol or direct contact accounts for about 28% of cases…” (my emphasis)

So, let us make a simple addition. This virus is an ‘orthopox’ Â virus, which means, literally translated, a ‘real pox’ virus.
This virus spreads among humans causing an exanthem ‘resembling’ smallpox, and causing disease and death among the infected (between February and August 1996, 71 cases were notified in the Katako-Kombe area in Zaire, 6 of which 4 died from the disease”.



Polio has not been eradicated by vaccination, it is lurking behind a redefinition and new diagnostic names like viral or aseptic meningitis.
When the first, injectable, polio vaccine was tested on some 1.8 million children in the United States in 1954, within 9 days there was huge epidemic of paralytic polio in the vaccinated and some of their parents and other contacts.
The US Surgeon General discontinued the trial for 2 weeks.
The vaccinators then put their heads together and came back with a new definition of poliomyelitis. The old, classical, definition: a disease with residual paralysis which resolves within 60 days has been changed to a disease with residual paralysis which persists for more than 60 days.

Knowing the reality of polio disease, this nifty but dishonest administrative move excluded more than 90% of polio cases from the definition of polio.
Ever since then, when a polio-vaccinated person gets polio, it will not be diagnosed as polio, it will be diagnosed as viral or aseptic meningitis.

According to one of the 1997 issues of the MMWR, there are some 30,000 to 50,000 cases of viral meningitis per year in the United States alone.
That's where all those 30,000 - 50,000 cases of polio disappeared after the introduction of mass vaccination.

One must also be aware that polio is a man-made disease since those well-publicized outbreaks are misrepresented that those huge outbreaks were causally linked to intensified diphtheria and other vaccinations at the relevant time.
They even have a name for it: provocation poliomyelitis.

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/scheibner8.html

[heyokah]

Found this information on the Horus-Ra thread. #3081 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit/page155) posted by DNA.

Vaccine bombshell: CDC whistleblower reveals cover-up linking MMR vaccines to autism in African-Americans

Natural News is currently investigating a breaking story based on a CDC whistleblower stepping forward with shocking proof of an incredible cover-up. According to information available so far, it appears the CDC knowingly engaged in a medical conspiracy to deliberately hide from the public damning evidence about MMR vaccines causing a very large increase in autism among African-American babies.

I'm posting this update to let Natural News readers know we are actively investigating this groundbreaking story which may turn out to be a larger cover-up than the Tuskegee experiments. Much like Tuskegee, this story also involves the suffering of African-Americans at the hands of a corporate-run medical cartel that systematically sacrifices lives for profit.

If what we are hearing so far is true, it means the CDC has deliberately run a decade-long cover-up which condemned tens of thousands of African-American children to a life of autism caused by MMR vaccines. It would also mean the CDC has engaged in a shameless conspiracy to hide the truth about the damage caused by vaccines, confirming the agency's primary mission of protecting pharmaceutical profits even at the expense of human life.

This story is potentially the greatest scientific conspiracy in the history of modern medicine. Accordingly, you can expect the entire mainstream media to completely censor the story and try to pretend it never happened

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/046535_mmr_vaccines_autism_cdc_whistleblower.html# ixzz3AwvVyRqu



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhpckzxVEoc

I'm pointing at Amzer's thread to follow the CDC Whistleblower story.


Breaking: CDC whistleblower Thompson in grave danger now (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/08/22/breaking-cdc-whistleblower-thompson-in-grave-danger-now/)

......


and the follow up:


What CDC whistleblower William Thompson needs to do now

by Jon Rappoport

August 22, 2014

I’m putting this together from bits and pieces of information I’m getting from various sources.

William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower, who apparently can torpedo the CDC with his inside information about a falsified vaccine study, is cut off from outside help—except for his lawyer.

I hope that lawyer knows the kind of danger his client is in.

If the CDC’s position that the MMR vaccine has no connection to autism is shredded, the whole corrupt vaccine empire experiences an earthquake.

And purportedly, that is exactly what Thompson can cause.

And the CDC knows this.

The people who have gradually brought Thompson out of the shadows, trying to help him see he needs to blow the whistle—those people are out of the equation at the moment.

The situation has escalated beyond their ability to control it. This is no longer an orderly process.

So Thompson quite possibly feels he has no allies, unless he retracts everything he’s been implying about CDC corruption. Unless, perhaps, he makes some sort of statement about “personal problems,” “pressure at work,” and so on, and claims that people have taken his criticisms of the CDC in the wrong way and have misunderstood him.

If he tries, in this fashion, to rebuild his connections to the CDC and re-enlist as a good soldier, he might—if permitted—enter a realm of silence, retire soon, and hope the promise of a pension is to be trusted.

He would essentially disappear off the map of controversy about autism, vaccines, falsified studies, and CDC corruption.

On the other hand, he actually has thousands of people out there who would like to help him speak the truth and do what they can to protect him.

He should know this.

He also needs to know that suspicions will remain about him, about his motives, about his prior anonymous confessions of guilt, about his making contact with people from the truth-telling vaccine community at large.

Did he initiate this contact with the intention of trapping them and working some kind of operation?

As bizarre as this sounds, it can’t be dismissed entirely unless and until he comes clean.

His mistake was standing in half-light and half-shadow, and coming out half-way. That’s a bad, bad place to occupy.

He’ll never have a responsible job with a government agency or corporation again. All that is over. But so what? Given his specific revelations about CDC corruption, why would he want any of that?

Assuming he still has the freedom to contact people who are on the correct side of this monumental issue and scandal…do it. Do it now.

He’ll find a portal into many more people and much help.

Yes, the fantasy of an orderly process of revelation may be gone, but that doesn’t mean the battle is lost.

William Thompson is in a tough spot—but how does it compare with the position of children who have suffered the terrible brain-damaging effects of vaccines?

And if, as he has said, he contributed to that tragedy by intentionally falsifying a study that should have shown the damage the MMR vaccine has done…how much introspecting does he need to engage in, in order to know what is right?

I hope he is not yet under some form of house arrest. I hope he can do what is right.

Whether he can gain whistleblower status and subsequent protection from legal attacks is, from my understanding, a complex question. The laws are vague on certain points.

He can be sure that, when it comes to medical whistleblowing, the feds will do everything they possibly can to block him from legal sanctuary.

As I’ve already pointed out in prior articles, ops can be mounted against him that have nothing to do with the law. “He’s mentally ill. He’s in treatment.” “He committed suicide.” All the more reason for him to stand up and reach out.

As I’ve documented a number of times in these pages, Thompson’s employer, the CDC, is a group of terminally foul liars who have been deceiving the American public and causing great harm, since their inception.

They need to suffer—not simply as payback—but because they continue their criminal ways.

There are still many people who blithely believe the medical establishment is making great progress in curing the brain damage labeled “autism.” For such people, it’s all about “finding genetic factors” and “chemical imbalances.”

They discount entirely the idea that vaccine-caused trauma/damage is one major and direct cause, among others.

They believe the spoon-fed propaganda they receive on the news. They believe the outraged experts who bray about the “anti-vaccine forces.”

What about a vaccine manufacturer who admits his own product has significant dangers?


Read more:

http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/

[heyokah]

Here's a Red Ice radio interview you don't want to miss.

Jon Rappoport - CDC Fraud: Vaccine Autism Link & Ebola
(http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/09/RIR-140926.php)
September 26, 2014

Jon Rappoport is an investigative journalist, author and publisher of the website nomorefakenews.com. He has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health.
Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

He's here to give a complete run down on the recent CDC scandal.

On August 25, 2014 the CDC published a press release defending its 2004 study on autism. Two days later CDC whistleblower publicly admits he and his co-authors cooked that study and committed fraud.
The CDC was referring to the 2004 study whistleblower William Thompson co-authored, the study he admitted was fraudulent, the study he and his co-authors slanted to bury the connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.

Jon discusses the complexities behind this huge cover-up.
Actor, Rob Schneider also said he has a copy of "the original CDC report that was later suppressed and fraudulently changed."

Later, Jon talks about the striking similarity between the Thompson and Snowden stories.

In this extended interview, we’ll continue discussing the vaccine as well as the length the CDC and government will go to obscure damage they’ve created.

We’ll move on to talk about the Ebola epidemic.
We’ll hear how the CDC is getting their numbers on cases and how it is being diagnosed.
The CDC claims that there will be “1 million Ebola cases by January.”

As Ebola victims fly into Western nations, Jon discusses what possible scenarios are being planned in the near future in Western nations.

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2014/09/RIR-140926.php

Add:

They released the video on YouTube now.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etO5KiAHrks

[Natalia]

I haven't watched the video yet cause don't feel up to it at the mo, but I have seen a few videos like it (will watch it later).

I am mostly against vaccines and do believe (as other people's true experiences with them will tel you) that they cause more harm than good most of the time...I don't see them as always totally unnecessary but the whole system of what's in them and how many people (and young children and babies) are given them, forced to have them, when say even if they could successfully prevent a disease in some people, but it's too risky to take them, just seems wrong to me...

I have read that some people are more genetically prone to adverse reactions (including long term health problems) and think that people should at least be given a test for this and vaccines not given to those people who test positive. The same might be true for some other medicines...

I have a question, why do they put toxic levels of mercury in the vaccines? (they should not use it in there at all, imo).

[sigma6]

Giving vaccines to people who have no clean water or sanitation is bullsh**... and will do nothing, especially if they were "loaned the money" to be able to give them the vaccines in the first place. What a strategy, kill off their population and help yourself to their resources in exchange for their inability to pay back your fake loan.

In fact most people survive disease in spite of vaccines. But people already sick and weak from malnutrition will have ridiculous mortality rates... Anyone who "believes in vaccines" either works for the pharmaceutical agencies, has no concept of statistical analysis, was programmed by Rockefeller controlled university programs, (the same idiots that think fluoride is OK to drink... The list is endless, the issue is very clear to see, the deaths to prove all this is now in the 10s of thousands...

Which btw, why would they refuse to keep statistics for the last 80 years anyway? what the hell is that all about? That is NEVER how medical health care is done? Why the exception with vaccines? All you have to do is look close with NO preconceptions, they thought that everyone is programmed to believe their crap? Guess again...

And there is this disgusting internet commercial on YouTube right now going on about if you "LOVE" your children get them vaccinated... sickening and disgusting...

This is a statistical reality.

The last straw is the fact these companies are exempt from all liability! What possible perverse interpretation could have justified that (beside profit making corporate interests) And technically, this means they know it's bullsh** and in fact COULD be used as evidence to of PREMEDITATED HARM. They could and should be easily sued for breach of trust. Because it's evidence of premeditated harm. THEY KNOW people will die and will want to sue their sorry a**es...

[risveglio]

As a soon to be parent vaccines scare the sh1t out of me. I have no idea what to believe. I know I did not get any of the diseases I was vaccinated for so you would think they can work. Are some safe? Are they mostly safe as long as your space them out? Should they be avoided entirely? I think for most schooling you have to show proof of vaccines so can I pick and choose? Not being a biologist I really struggle on who to believe. I can watch videos and interviews, read countless papers but what is trustworthy? I know corporatism is alive and well and know we are not going to get any help from government on the issue. A video in the last decade promoted one of the biggest lies of my lifetime and no amount of evidence can convince the millions of people that fell for it. A weekly columnist promotes failed and dangerous policies that half the population appears to believe because he won an award once. It's all really confusing.

[avid]

If in doubt - leave it out! We have enough nutritional information now to ensure immune systems are bolstered as highly as possible, without the need for the Big Pharma interference. We can use alternative safe therapies/medications tried and tested for hundreds of years, and 'banned' by 'Big Pharma'. Most stuff is still available. Virgin coconut oil is one of the latest examples, banned in the late 1930's as it is so good you can't get ill, yet the 'vegetable oil' industry trashed it, for profit, and also trashed the natural health of folk digesting these vile fake fats.
It just takes a wee bit of research, and one can source suppliers. The more natural demand - the less the 'fake food' industry will permeate illness in our midst. Cook at home, grow your own. If you can't, there are suppliers in your area who will be 'natural'. Good luck - be healthy :-) Don't get vaccinated - it's an untrustworthy industry for profit in disability.

[Gatita]

I had a very bad reaction to the H1N1 vaccine a few years ago. I think the reaction is what escalated my fibromyalgia. As far as childhood vaccines, I have not personally seen them cause autism or other disorders. I do think that they could be started a bit later. Studies have shown that the infant immune system isn't capable of adequately responding to some vaccines, resulting in boosters being needed. Overall, medicine is not an exact science. It continues to be refined.

Gatita

[Sith73]

interesting post. Years ago I ate very poorly, always on the go eating fast food and just too much and was over weight. I had gotten injured at work and had to go see the doctor. Well go old me hates doctors and hadn't been in some time and I knew they would tell me all kinds of stuff. Well they did a screening and found stuff and they treated me like I was going to die and needed to have all this crap done to me and I had to visit the doctor several times to understand what doctor was telling me. I was told I had a fatty liver and needed to be on medication and I needed to come back and I stood there and told the doctor no I will not be back and will take my health into my own hands and will not be pushed into a fear state of mind. I told him if I was going to die it wouldn't be the first time and he just looked at me not knowing what to say. I said its my own fault for eating bad and I must correct my habits in my own way. My life is not in your hands but my own. I don't need your drugs to make myself better. There are other natural methods to combat my system. I told the doctor that i appreciated his diagnoses but I can cure myself. The doctor and nurse just stared at me with blank faces.

He just stared at me and said I have never met anybody like you. I said when the day comes that you understand what you truly are than you will understand many things and being a doctor you might look for many methods to cure people instead of masking symptoms and telling people you have to take these drugs. I told him you will not see me again and walked out the door.

3 years later I have lost alot of weight from running, feel healthy eat good and do natural cleanses to removed unwanted waste from my body and I won't just eat anything now.

I truly think you have good doctors and bad doctors out there. Our medical system is so screwed up and with the suppressed and hidden medical technologies out there many people could be cured over night. if your not sick or have a disease than your no good to the system that makes trillions off of sick people because its all about the money.

[heyokah]

If in doubt - leave it out! We have enough nutritional information now to ensure immune systems are bolstered as highly as possible, without the need for the Big Pharma interference. We can use alternative safe therapies/medications tried and tested for hundreds of years, and 'banned' by 'Big Pharma'. Most stuff is still available. Virgin coconut oil is one of the latest examples, banned in the late 1930's as it is so good you can't get ill, yet the 'vegetable oil' industry trashed it, for profit, and also trashed the natural health of folk digesting these vile fake fats.
It just takes a wee bit of research, and one can source suppliers. The more natural demand - the less the 'fake food' industry will permeate illness in our midst. Cook at home, grow your own. If you can't, there are suppliers in your area who will be 'natural'. Good luck - be healthy :-) Don't get vaccinated - it's an untrustworthy industry for profit in disability.

Thank you avid. I couldn't have said it better. :hug:


As a soon to be parent vaccines scare the sh1t out of me........


My daughter has 3 children and lives in the US. [see post 22] (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?73287-Diseases-Caused-by-Vaccines-the-Silent-Epidemic&p=867103&viewfull=1#post867103) The first child got so sick after his first shot that she decided not to have him vaccinated anymore.
That was 16 years ago. She never had the other two vaccinated either.

She prepares home made meals from organic ingredients, without sugar, only from fruit and vegetables (children love apple slices, shortly cooked carrots and broccoli as a snack, when you don't start with sweets)

They are 11, 15 and almost 17 and stable, healthy human beings. They are hardly ever ill, thanks to a healthy immune system.

And yes, sure, at this age they are eating and drinking some 'junk food' now and then, you don't want and you can't 'keep them in a cage' .... and that's OK.

Good luck and lots of love and pleasure with your first born risveglio !

[heyokah]

I have a question, why do they put toxic levels of mercury in the vaccines? (they should not use it in there at all, imo).

Mercury in vaccines was replaced with something even MORE toxic !

The short, eye-opening eBook (http://www.thinktwice.com/aluminum.pdf)is titled "Aluminum in Vaccines -- a Neurological Gamble", by Neil Miller, director of the Thinktwice Global Vaccine Institute.
It documents the hazards associated with aluminum-laden vaccines. Children are receiving high concentrations of aluminum in their shots. This well-documented neurotoxin may be more dangerous than mercury.

Vaccines containing high concentrations of neurotoxic aluminum were added to the child immunization schedule when several vaccines containing mercury were removed.
Two-month old babies now receive 1,225 mcg of aluminum from their vaccines -- 50 times higher than safety levels!
Although the FDA, CDC and World Health Organization are aware of the dangers, they expect parents to play Russian roulette with their children.

Scroll further down this article (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/01/27/mercury-in-vaccines-was-replaced-with-something-even-more-toxic.aspx)and inform yourself. See the comments.

Dr. Mercola's Comments:

When mercury was removed from many vaccines (except the flu vaccine) years ago, it was under the false guise that finally vaccines were now safe. What health agencies did not want you to know is that there are many other toxic additives still in vaccines, and one of them is aluminum.

Aluminum has not received the widespread media attention that mercury has, therefore many people don’t realize it’s a health risk.

“Aluminum is not perceived, I believe, by the public as a dangerous metal. Therefore, we are in a much more comfortable wicket in terms of defending its presence in vaccines,” said Dr. John Clements, WHO vaccine advisor.

Notice he said that aluminum is “not perceived” by the public as a dangerous metal … he couldn’t say simply that aluminum is safe, because this would be a lie.

Why is Aluminum Added to Vaccines?

Most vaccines have at least two components, the agent that you’re seeking to elicit an immune response to, such as a measles virus, and an immune adjuvant, which enhances the immune response and is typically made from a variety of highly toxic compounds including aluminum compounds, MSG, and mercury. The purpose of immune adjuvants is to boost your immune system, or to make it react as intensely as possible for as long as possible.

Unlike a natural immune boost that would come from, say, eating healthy and exercising, artificial immune adjuvants can be dangerous in and of themselves. Says Dr. Russell Blaylock, M.D., a board-certified neurosurgeon and author:

“Studies have shown that these adjuvants, from a single vaccine, can cause immune overactivation for as long as two years. This means that the brain microglia remain active as well, continuously pouring out destructive chemicals.

In fact, one study found that a single injection of an immune activating substance could cause brain immune overactivation for over a year. This is very destructive.”

How Aluminum Can Harm Your Brain

When you or your child is injected with a vaccine, the aluminum compounds it contains accumulate not only at the site of injection but travel to your brain and accumulate there (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/02/26/how-vaccines-can-damage-your-brain.aspx). In your brain, aluminum enters neurons and glial cells (astrocytes and microglia).

Studies have shown that aluminum can activate microglia and do so for long periods, which means that the aluminum in your vaccination is priming your microglia to overreact.

The next vaccine acts to trigger the enhanced inflammatory reaction and release of the excitotoxins, glutamate and quinolinic acid, Dr. Blaylock points out.

Meanwhile, if you come down with an infection, are exposed to more toxins, or have a stroke or head injury of any kind, this will magnify the inflammatory reaction occurring in your brain due to the vaccines. Research has shown that the more your immune system remains activated, the more likely it is you’ll suffer from a neurodegenerative disease.

The aluminum hydroxide used in many vaccines, including hepatitis A and B, and the Pentacel cocktail for diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio, and meningitis, has been clearly linked to symptoms associated with Parkinson"s, ALS (Lou Gehrig"s disease), and Alzheimer"s.

Scientists discovered the link after injecting mice with an anthrax vaccine developed for the first Gulf War. After 20 weeks, a fifth of the mice developed a skin allergy, and memory problems increased by 41 times compared to a placebo group. Also, inside the brains of mice, 35 percent of the cells that control movement were destroyed.

There is overwhelming evidence that chronic immune activation in your brain, as discussed by Dr. Blaylock above, is a major cause of damage in numerous degenerative brain disorders, from multiple sclerosis Alzheimer"s disease, Parkinson"s and ALS, which may explain the link between aluminum-containing vaccines and these diseases.

Late last year a team of scientists also found that vaccination involving aluminum-containing adjuvants could trigger the cascade of immunological events that are associated with autoimmune conditions, including chronic fatigue syndrome and macrophagic myofasciitis, a condition that causes profound weakness and multiple neurological syndromes, one of which closely resembles multiple sclerosis.

Even a study in Pediatrics (http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/97/3/413.abstract), the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, admitted that:

“Aluminum is now being implicated as interfering with a variety of cellular and metabolic processes in the nervous system and in other tissues.”

This has led some experts to suggest that aluminum in vaccines may be linked to autism.

Just How Much Aluminum Could Your Child be Exposed To?

If you are a parent of a young child I highly recommend you read the entire eBook linked above, as it spells out very clearly just how much aluminum will be injected into your child if you follow the Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) vaccine schedule.

In short, babies who follow the recommended vaccination schedule are injected with nearly 5,000 mcg (5 mg) of aluminum by the time they are just 1.5 years old.

The FDA considers levels of aluminum up to 0.85mg to be “safe,” so you do the math on the risk involved here.


As a soon to be parent vaccines scare the sh1t out of me........


For parents, the issue of what to do about these risks can be very confusing. So please do take your time to thoroughly research the risks of vaccinations before making up your mind. Dr. Blaylock’s article, The Danger of Excessive Vaccination During Brain Development: The Case for a Link to Autism Spectrum Disorders, (http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2008/04/01/the-dangers-of-excessive-childhood-vaccinations.aspx) is an excellent starting point that I highly recommend.

If you’re looking for a more sensible, “user-friendly” vaccination schedule that may present fewer risks than the CDC’s “one-size-fits-all” schedule, Dr. Donald Miller advises the following:

1. No vaccinations until your child is 2 years old.
2. No vaccines that contain thimerosal (mercury).
3. No live virus vaccines.
4. The following vaccines should be given one at a time (not as a combination vaccine), every six months, beginning at age 2:

a. Pertussis (acellular, not whole cell)
b. Diphtheria
c. Tetanus
d. Polio (the Salk vaccine, cultured in human cells)

If your pediatrician doesn’t agree, or isn’t open to discussing this issue with you, it’s high time to find a new one who will understand your concerns.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/01/27/mercury-in-vaccines-was-replaced-with-something-even-more-toxic.aspx

[Natalia]

I had a very bad reaction to the H1N1 vaccine a few years ago. I think the reaction is what escalated my fibromyalgia. As far as childhood vaccines, I have not personally seen them cause autism or other disorders. I do think that they could be started a bit later. Studies have shown that the infant immune system isn't capable of adequately responding to some vaccines, resulting in boosters being needed. Overall, medicine is not an exact science. It continues to be refined.

Gatita

I have read several stories of people coming down with illnesses such as CFS after taking Hep B and other vaccines, some of these stories are here in the comments of this article:

Hepatitis B vaccine caused chronic fatigue syndrome – US Court
http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/hepatitis-b-vaccine-caused-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-us-court/#.VF9IdMmO7FY

There have also been warnings from doctors that were ignored

HEPATITIS B VACCINATION AND CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME (CFS)
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/hyde.html

Lots more stuff on the internet...

[heyokah]

****

If, after reading the information in this thread, you still decide to vaccinate for some reason,
Ask 8 Questions!


What You Need to Know Before & After Vaccination
(http://www.nvic.org/Ask-Eight-Questions.aspx)

Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, nearly $3 billion has been awarded to children and adults for whom the risks of vaccine injury were 100%.
Vaccines are pharmaceutical products that carry risks, which can be greater for some than others.
NVIC encourages you to become fully informed about the risks and complications of diseases and vaccines and speak with one or more trusted health care professionals before making a vaccination decision.

1. Am I or my child sick right now?

2. Have I or my child had a bad reaction to a vaccination before?

3. Do I or my child have a personal or family history of vaccine reactions, neurological disorders, severe allergies or immune system problems?

4. Do I know the disease and vaccine risks for myself or my child?

5. Do I have full information about the vaccine’s side effects?

6. Do I know how to identify and report a vaccine reaction?

7. Do I know I need to keep a written record, including the vaccine manufacturer’s name and lot number, for all vaccinations?

8. Do I know I have the right to make an informed choice?

If you answered yes to questions 1, 2, and 3, or no to questions 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 and do not understand the significance of your answer, you may want to explore information on NVIC's website to better understand the importance of your answer.
These questions are designed to educate consumers about the importance of making fully informed vaccine decisions.
Click here (http://www.nvic.org/getdoc/9cb58471-1bda-4acb-b257-5cda911c4c9e/The-Moral-Right-to-Conscientious-Personal-Belief-o.aspx)to learn more about the role of informed consent in vaccination.

If you choose to vaccinate, always keep a written record of exactly which shots/vaccines you or your child have received, including the manufacturer’s name and vaccine lot number.
Write down and describe in detail any serious health problems that develop after vaccination and keep vaccination records in a file you can access easily.


Recognizing Vaccine Reaction Symptoms

If you or your child experiences any of the symptoms listed below in the hours, days or weeks following vaccination, it should be reported to VAERS.
Some vaccine reaction symptoms include:

•Pronounced swelling, redness, heat or hardness at the site of the injection;
•Body rash or hives;
•Shock/collapse;
•High pitched screaming or persistent crying for hours;
•Extreme sleepiness or long periods of unresponsiveness;
•Twitching or jerking of the body, arm, leg or head;
•Crossing of eyes;
•Weakness or paralysis of any part of the body;
•Loss of ability to roll over, sit up or stand up;
•Loss of eye contact or awareness or social withdrawal;
•Head banging or onset of repetitive movements (flapping, rubbing, rocking, spinning);
•High fever (over 103 F)
•Vision or hearing loss;
•Restlessness, hyperactivity or inability to concentrate;
•Sleep disturbances that change wake/sleep pattern;
•Joint pain or muscle weakness;
•Disabling fatigue;
•Loss of memory;
•Onset of chronic ear or respiratory infections;
•Violent or persistent diarrhea or chronic constipation;
•Breathing problems (asthma);
•Excessive bleeding (thrombocytopenia) or anemia.

There are other symptoms, which may indicate that you or your child has suffered a vaccine reaction. Not all symptoms that occur following vaccination are caused by the vaccine(s) recently received, but it cannot be automatically concluded that symptoms which do occur are NOT related to the vaccine.
Therefore, it is important for your doctor to write down all serious health problems that occur after vaccination in the permanent medical record and to report ALL serious symptoms or dramatic change in physical, mental or emotional behavior that does occur following vaccination to VAERS. (https://vaers.hhs.gov/esub/index) (The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System)
It is also important that re-vaccination does not continue until it has been determined that the serious health problem which developed after vaccination was not causally related to the vaccination(s).
Continued vaccination in the presence of serious health deterioration could lead to vaccine injury or death.


Reporting Vaccine Reactions

Although it has been the law since 1986 for doctors and other vaccine providers to report hospitalizations, injuries, deaths and serious health problems following vaccination to VAERS (https://vaers.hhs.gov/esub/index), it is estimated that less than 10 percent, perhaps less than one percent of all vaccine-related health problems are ever reported.

If your doctor will not report a serious health problem that you or child experienced after vaccination to VAERS, you have the right to make the vaccine adverse event report to VAERS yourself.

Since its’ founding in 1982, the National Vaccine Information Center has operated a Vaccine Reaction Registry which has served as a watchdog on the VAERS system.
It is important to be able to recognize an adverse reaction and seek appropriate medical attention, as well as reporting a vaccine adverse event with federal health officials at the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), who monitor vaccines after they have been licensed.
Information provided to VAERS, may also help identify high risk factors that make some individuals more vulnerable to suffering vaccine reactions.

We encourage you to also report any suspected vaccine reaction you or your child has experienced to NVIC’s Vaccine Reaction Registry (http://www.nvic.org/reportreaction.aspx). By filing a report with NVIC we are able to provide resource referral and counseling so that you can get the answers to any questions you may have about vaccines.


http://www.nvic.org/Ask-Eight-Questions.aspx

[heyokah]

I had a very bad reaction to the H1N1 vaccine a few years ago. I think the reaction is what escalated my fibromyalgia. As far as childhood vaccines, I have not personally seen them cause autism or other disorders. I do think that they could be started a bit later. Studies have shown that the infant immune system isn't capable of adequately responding to some vaccines, resulting in boosters being needed. Overall, medicine is not an exact science. It continues to be refined.

Gatita

I have read several stories of people coming down with illnesses such as CFS after taking Hep B and other vaccines, some of these stories are here in the comments of this article:

Hepatitis B vaccine caused chronic fatigue syndrome – US Court
http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/hepatitis-b-vaccine-caused-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-us-court/#.VF9IdMmO7FY

There have also been warnings from doctors that were ignored

HEPATITIS B VACCINATION AND CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME (CFS)
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/hyde.html

Lots more stuff on the internet...

This vaccine is even given to virtually every newborn in the hospital and many times without parents' consent shortly after the child is born.
If the parent chooses not to have their 12-hour-old newborn vaccinated, it takes enormous effort on the parent's part to make sure this vaccine is not given without their informed consent before the baby leaves the hospital.

[Gatita]

In the United States, vaccinating a child without parental consent is assault.

Gatita

[Natalia]

Can Vaccines Cause Immune Dysfunction Resulting in Allergies, Asthma and Anaphylaxis?
http://vran.org/health-risks/anaphylaxis-allergies-and-asthma/can-vaccines-cause-immune-dysfunction-resulting-in-allergies-asthma-and-anaphylaxis/

Vaccines Cause Allergies – Dr. Dave Mihalovic
http://therefusers.com/refusers-newsroom/vaccines-cause-allergies-dr-dave-mihalovic/#.VGB4lcmO7FY