Remote Viewing of 9/11 from Farsight Institute (Courtney Brown)

[sdv]

Hi everyone

It seems that Courtney has been working on remote viewing 9/11 for a while now. The sessions have been done and he will be launching the DVD 11 September 2014.

He seems, lately, to be focusing hugely on marketing. I agree that the remote viewers should be paid for their work (and he needs funds to pay them), but I think that using transparent marketing techniques on the alternative community is not going to work.

However, he usually does put the raw data on his website. I look forward to seeing it.

http://www.farsight.org/demo/Mysteries/Mysteries_10/Mysteries_Project_10_targets.html

Here are the targets:


Target #10a: The target is the cause of the collapse of Building 7 of the World Trade Center complex in New York City on 11 September 2001. The viewer should perceive the actual collapse of the building as well as the direct cause of the collapse for Building 7, including any activity prior to the collapse that may be related to the collapse.

Target #10b: The target is the cause of the vertical "pancaking" collapse of the South Tower (2 WTC) of the Twin Towers World Trade Center Buildings in New York City on 11 September 2001. The viewer should perceive the actual collapse of the building as well as the direct cause of the collapse, including any activity prior to the collapse that may be related to the collapse.

Target #10c: The target is the cause of the vertical "pancaking" collapse of the North Tower (1 WTC) of the Twin Towers World Trade Center Buildings in New York City on 11 September 2001. The viewer should perceive the actual collapse of the building as well as the direct cause of the collapse, including any activity prior to the collapse that may be related to the collapse.

Target #10d: The target is the initial airborne launch or takeoff of whatever object caused of the damage shown to the Pentagon building as shown in the image below on 11 September 2001. The viewer should also perceive and describe the object's dimensions, shape, internal characteristics, and airborne activity.

Target #10e: The target is the cause of the damage shown to the Pentagon building as shown in the image below at the moment that the damage occurred on 11 September 2001.The viewer should perceive the direct cause of the building's damage, including any activity prior to the moment when the building was damaged that may be related to the cause of the damage.

Target #10f: The target is the aircraft flown as American Airlines Flight 77 on 11 September 2001, where the target time is noon on 12 September 2001, Eastern U.S. time for that date. The viewer should perceive the aircraft, its condition, and its location at noon on 12 September 2001, Eastern U.S. time for that date.

Target #10g: The target is any preparations that would cause of the vertical "pancaking" collapse of the North Tower (1 WTC) of the Twin Towers World Trade Center Buildings in New York City on 11 September 2001. The viewer should perceive the preparations themselves, as well as the subjects involved in doing the preparations, including any activity prior to the collapse that may be related to the collapse.


So, we will have the data in about 6 weeks'time. I'm on his mailing list so I'll post any teasers he may send out before then.

[dazsmith]

whats wrong with being transparent with marketing? - before on his last campaign we made mistakes with his marketing and now he wants to be upfront, showing the product, the cost and the targets. Both Dick and myself and finding it hard to continue with our day jobs due to the economy (im a web designer and jobs/budgets are tight). I estimate I put in well over 40+ hrs of solid remote viewing and setup work on this project, courtney is only trying to help reimburse us for this effort in a small way and to support putting this type of media out there. Part of the money raised for the videos goes to help pay us to remote view and If im totally honest if he didnt do this, this last few months I would have been in a financial problem and quite possibly wouldn't be able to remote view at all.

By the way I was one of the two viewers on this project and am happy to answer any questions on this mind boggling project - of which I have to say could possibly be some of my best RV work in the seventeen years Ive been doing this.

[truth4me]

All I know is that it was an inside job.....enough said.

[Wind]

I'm just excited to see the results when they come out. However, I think that most of us here already know what happened, we might just not know all of the details... And as the saying goes, the devil is in the details.

[Elainie]

Yes, got an email from Farsight on it the other night. I do look forward to hearing what was found even though we on this forum all have some very good info already on subject.

[Snowflower]

Daz, how much would a private RV session cost?

[Redstar Kachina]

..........

[indigopete]

Daz, how much would a private RV session cost?

Sometimes I despair at the way people mop up every piece of titilating new age garbage like lapdogs with their tongues on the floor.

Why don't you make your own minds up about what happened on 9/11 instead of letting Courtney Brown make it up for you ?

The world is a subjective place. That means your present, past and future are created by you - no one else. If you want to hand that power over then you might as well not be alive. Courtney Brown's not going to tell you jack about 9/11 that you don't already know or that he didn't create.

Get a life please.

[Redstar Kachina]

..........

[truth4me]

Daz, how much would a private RV session cost?

Sometimes I despair at the way people mop up every piece of titilating new age garbage like lapdogs with their tongues on the floor.

Why don't you make your own minds up about what happened on 9/11 instead of letting Courtney Brown make it up for you ?

The world is a subjective place. That means your present, past and future are created by you - no one else. If you want to hand that power over then you might as well not be alive. Courtney Brown's not going to tell you jack about 9/11 that you don't already know or that he didn't create.

Get a life please.Avalon is a civil forum no need for "get a life " stuff here. Avalon is not godlikeproduction....

[Guest]

I'm excited to see the film. Can't wait. Thanks to all who are working on it and putting it together.

I hope it reaches a lot of people and helps to awaken them to what really happened and who was responsible.

"Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that." -Martin Luther King Jr.


Love

Nora

[noxon medem]

Interesting. Thanks for bringing it.
To me it makes more sense that its possible to remote view the past than the future.
That probably only illustrate my limitet understanding of how time and space works.
Any findings will hardly be admissable evidence in a trial, but maybe it can help focus in on a narrower field,
give some new spesifics, and maybe leading to finding some real ones in the physical world.
- What is not destroyed or definately covered up, that is...

I came across an intriguing little piece of oddity today that in some way ties into the remote viewing/prophesy theme.
A music group called "The Coup" (!) made an album "Party music" that was supposed to be released in september 2001,
but it was delayed over some controversy over their album cover photo/graphics, designed in JUNE 2001.

26655
( they were forced to change it for the later release )

Wikipedia article about it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_Music
A snip from there:

Party Music was originally scheduled to be released in early September 2001, but the release was delayed until November 2001 due to the cover art, which depicted Boots Riley and Pam the Funkstress destroying the twin towers of the World Trade Center using a Covert-Labs digital chromatic tuner as a detonator. The original cover was created in June 2001

Here is the one the album was released with.

26656

Artists are in a way remote viewers in their own way, using their intuition and
fantasy in tandem with their mind playing with random material.
The original cover could be an artistic coinsidence and no proof of direct
foreknowledge of the event, even though the accuracy of the cover depiction is uncanny.
I myself dabbled in making videomixes for music at the time, and made one
mix for a festival in may of 2001. From hundreds of possible samples I chose
a few and one of the main sequenses was of airplanes flying superimposed on
images of a big city and some heavy blitzing lighningstorms.
I know I had no idea what was to come, but it made me reflect on my choices
after the fact of 911. I am no insider, but maybe I do have an artistic side.

Back to The Coup. I give the last words in this post to Boots Riley,
speaking about his fight to keep the original album cover :

There's been a whitewash in the media over the past couple days over what the U.S.'s role in the world is, and the fact that they kill hundreds of thousands of people per year to protect profit. Now how can I get to the point where I could be saying that on the world stage, and interrupt the lies that CBS, CNN, NBC, and everyone is saying? In my view, that [would be] by keeping the cover. Not because I think by looking at the cover you get all of this message that I'm telling you, but as a way to have a platform to interrupt the stream of lies that are being told right now.

Be well, in past, present and future.
nm

[Snowflower]

Daz, how much would a private RV session cost?

Sometimes I despair at the way people mop up every piece of titilating new age garbage like lapdogs with their tongues on the floor.

Why don't you make your own minds up about what happened on 9/11 instead of letting Courtney Brown make it up for you ?

The world is a subjective place. That means your present, past and future are created by you - no one else. If you want to hand that power over then you might as well not be alive. Courtney Brown's not going to tell you jack about 9/11 that you don't already know or that he didn't create.

Get a life please.

Wow. Feeling hostile, are we? It might help you some to learn how to read, though. I didn't ask for a reading about what happened on 9/11. I read a couple of books that pretty much tied it up for me, and don't need further evidence about 9/11. I just asked how much a private reading would cost.

But, I don't need to get all hostile on you for getting all hostile on me, because I've got a life and don't need to jump on you to prove it.

[dazsmith]

I'm not sure this project and final video will offer ANY new information on the 911 event. especially for those who are well informed and who dig.

What it does offer is a BLIND remote viewing (psychic) look at seven different targets within the 911 event by two consistently accurate remote viewers who were adversaries abut now who work together under the Farsight umbrella, from opposite ends of the planet, with absolutely NO communication during projects. The descriptive and sketch information from both tally in every way on each of the key targets AND in great detail.

Knowing that the viewers did this BLIND should give you some help in deciding where you want to place this evidence from us in your personal scale of evidence in assessing this event and its consequnces. It by no means means that Dick and I are accurate in what we presented, I cannot discount some kind to telepathic connection between Dick, Courtney and I - its impossible to do so. I cannot also discount that my personal beliefs may be overlaid in this and presented as data. What I can offer is that Dick and I both worked BLIND- we had no knowledge upfront nor during the project about its nature, if fact in the past Courtney went out of his way to tell us wed never do 911 as a target it was just too controversial, too big. Dick and I only had minimal (non leading emails) contact form courtney during this project. We can only hope that the remoet viewing process and its scientific blind protocol allowed for genuine 'intuitive' data to emerge. This is all we can ever ask.

So, this project may not tell you anything you dont already know - IF you are well read on this event. Our data certainly DOES NOT tow the party line on the causes and who.
What is does allow you is data from a couple of witnesses that didn't know what they were initially viewing so didn't have any pre conceived ideas nor agendas other than to report what they got. This is all we can ever offer with ANY remote viewing project - the rest is up to you guys.

All the best...
Daz

PS: OH and I believe they will regularly be adding new video teaser clips to the page until release as there is alot of video with this being 7 separate targets within the project.

[dazsmith]

@snowflower.
I am sorry I try not to do private remote viewing. The main reason is because we have to do this BLIND - i do not know who you are and what you want me to view - you could try to get me to look at something illegal (corporate spying amongst many others) or even spying/terrorism or anything. We have to know who we are viewing for, garnish an element of trust but without getting to know the targets.

the other reasons are too numerous to explain - sorry!

All the best..
Daz

[aheb]

Two things that I have noticed recently one is that people who predict things such as farsight, lindsay Williams and the webbot have all started copyrighting their product.
The other is unrelated. Somebody said that there would be a " Global Coastal event" it was a webbot hit and a RV prediction. Last Christma we had the worst storms ever in my area on the coast.

[Snowflower]

Aheb, the GCE continues at an ever accelerating pace. In a way, the two subjects (remote viewing and GCE) are not unrelated. Clif High coined the term, "Global Coastal Event" to describe what he was seeing in the data from the webbot. Until the summer of 2012, he did not put a time frame on the GCE. It was not characterized as one single event, nor by a particular date. But, during that summer, he became aware of the Farsight experiment culminating in June of 2013. The description of consequences of worldwide coastal flooding seemed to be too accurate to be coincidental. Then he had a private reading done on himself. It was all negative, and all happened (wife had a heart attack as predicted, etc.) and it seemed to put the seal on the accuracy of the Farsight predictions. So Clif joined the two together: Farsight timeline of June, 2013 with Webbot GCE.

Not much happened by June, 2013. A whole lot of people turned their backs on the webbot - including a large percentage of The Webbot Forum, which resulted in a forum of nothingness, since they became the opposite of the very purpose of the forum.

It's usually a BIG mistake to try to put a date on anything. As it turns out, the data continues to appear in the webbot that the coasts are going to flood, there will be massive evacuations from the coasts, sinkholes, earthquakes, earth ruptures, all of it, continues for generations ahead. Yes, generations. It is not an "event." it is a long process of an expanding earth, and we who are alive on the planet today will see greater and greater changes for the rest of our lives.

The Farsight remote viewers were absolutely correct in "what" they saw. They just have nothing to hold onto to be able to see "when." That is probably why past viewing is far more reliable. The "when" has already been established.

[sdv]

whats wrong with being transparent with marketing? - before on his last campaign we made mistakes with his marketing and now he wants to be upfront, showing the product, the cost and the targets. Both Dick and myself and finding it hard to continue with our day jobs due to the economy (im a web designer and jobs/budgets are tight). I estimate I put in well over 40+ hrs of solid remote viewing and setup work on this project, courtney is only trying to help reimburse us for this effort in a small way and to support putting this type of media out there. Part of the money raised for the videos goes to help pay us to remote view and If im totally honest if he didnt do this, this last few months I would have been in a financial problem and quite possibly wouldn't be able to remote view at all.

By the way I was one of the two viewers on this project and am happy to answer any questions on this mind boggling project - of which I have to say could possibly be some of my best RV work in the seventeen years Ive been doing this.

Apologies I cause offence with my comment on marketing. (I have just experienced the alternative community being very hostile to marketing.)
Yes, I do think that remote viewers should be paid for their time and I do understand that the Farsight Institute has to raise money to do this.

[sdv]

Daz, how much would a private RV session cost?

Sometimes I despair at the way people mop up every piece of titilating new age garbage like lapdogs with their tongues on the floor.

Why don't you make your own minds up about what happened on 9/11 instead of letting Courtney Brown make it up for you ?

The world is a subjective place. That means your present, past and future are created by you - no one else. If you want to hand that power over then you might as well not be alive. Courtney Brown's not going to tell you jack about 9/11 that you don't already know or that he didn't create.

Get a life please.

Remote viewing the events of that day gives us more information. There are people in the alternative community who have been begging or challenging Courtney Brown to do remote viewing of 9/11 for ages. He always said he wouldn't.
I am not looking for someone to give me beliefs but am keeping my mind open to all beliefs from any source.

[sdv]

Two things that I have noticed recently one is that people who predict things such as farsight, lindsay Williams and the webbot have all started copyrighting their product.
The other is unrelated. Somebody said that there would be a " Global Coastal event" it was a webbot hit and a RV prediction. Last Christma we had the worst storms ever in my area on the coast.

The Global Coastal Event was unfortunate. I studied the data very carefully for the remote viewing and came to the conclusion that what the remote viewers saw was accurate but the interpretation was not. For example, I am an African and I would not have interpreted the data from the two African targets in the same way that Courtney Brown did. What they saw was typical African scenes (Africans are loud and gathering places tend to be chaotic, plus there is a seasonal saltwater pan in the one area, which is not the result of a tidal wave but a common, seasonal aspect of the African landscape).

It is amazing how accurately these remote viewers can describe a place and a scene when they have no idea what they are being asked to view.

[dazsmith]

Im sure you will like the data this project will present. I was shocked myself when I finally found out what the actual targets were - because by the end of all the Remote viewing I had built-up a picture of what It could be, but I never thought that id ever be tasked with this as a target, so though i was going out on a limb of some kind with my sketches and data. Anyway I'm sure you will like what you get to see.

I'm also happy to answer any questions and try to help if I can, when you have them.

All the best...
Daz

[Operator]

@snowflower.
I am sorry I try not to do private remote viewing. The main reason is because we have to do this BLIND - i do not know who you are and what you want me to view - you could try to get me to look at something illegal (corporate spying amongst many others) or even spying/terrorism or anything. We have to know who we are viewing for, garnish an element of trust but without getting to know the targets.

the other reasons are too numerous to explain - sorry!

All the best..
Daz

Hi Daz,

You explained also to me before that private sessions are difficult because you don't know if you can
trust somebody etc.

http://www.farsight.org/Vic_Guiza/farsightcomicstrip26.jpg
Above comic strip is published by Courtney himself.

I've heard Courtney say before that 9/11 was too hot. I also understood that there was a rule within
Farsight to stay away from military targets and targets that could imply spying.

I can't resist to ask ... didn't this damage trusting Courtney?

I also wonder if these sessions really bring something new or spectacular to the table then publishing
this information is probably not going to be 'undisturbed'. Questioning the official storyline can be
interpreted as an act of terrorism in the US if they want to.

[sdv]

A couple more trailers on the Farsight Institute website ...

http://www.farsight.org/demo/Mysteries/Mysteries_10/Mysteries_Project_10_targets.html

[sdv]

@snowflower.
I am sorry I try not to do private remote viewing. The main reason is because we have to do this BLIND - i do not know who you are and what you want me to view - you could try to get me to look at something illegal (corporate spying amongst many others) or even spying/terrorism or anything. We have to know who we are viewing for, garnish an element of trust but without getting to know the targets.

the other reasons are too numerous to explain - sorry!

All the best..
Daz

But you could do (and perhaps do) private remote viewing if it is vetted through a channel for ethics and then the remote viewer is not given any details about who has asked for the remote viewing and has no idea what the target is?

Couldn't remote viewers help in finding missing people (I have seen examples of this, with remote viewers giving a lot of detail about the abduction) or to try to understand the mindset and position of a perceived enemy in terms of seeking a way to facilitate dialogue and resolution through such dialogue?

If there is a channel vetting for ethical considerations and a contract has a relevant non-disclaimer clause, could not remote viewers help some people get information for closure and/or understanding?

Have you ever been asked to do such remote viewing and what has your experience been?

Could not Courtney Brown act as the vetting channel and a means of maintaining the blind conditions required for authentic remote viewing?

[sdv]

I am guessing here, but it seems to me that the value of buying the video is that it shows you the remote viewing process, and I assume that there are other special offerings.

I think there are a lot of people who would like to be trained as remote viewers and thus the video offering would be a great marketing tool for such training programmes.

I have had experiences where I have clearly seen events before they happened, but I did not enough information to ascertain where, when and to whom they would happen and thus was not able to prevent disasters. I couldn't live with seeing what I saw and so I shut down that sight. Any remote viewing training programme should address this issue.

So, Daz, did you or the other remote viewer see anything about the planning of the 9/11 attacks that brings new information to the debate?

[dazsmith]

SDV:

But you could do (and perhaps do) private remote viewing if it is vetted through a channel for ethics and then the remote viewer is not given any details about who has asked for the remote viewing and has no idea what the target is?
Yes, But Id rather not - im trying NOT to do as much private Rv work and prefer public projects.


Couldn't remote viewers help in finding missing people (I have seen examples of this, with remote viewers giving a lot of detail about the abduction) or to try to understand the mindset and position of a perceived enemy in terms of seeking a way to facilitate dialogue and resolution through such dialogue?

Yes and they have been doing so for years - i am part of the FINDME GROUP who has many psychics and remote viewers on its books working with Police forces on missing persons cases.


Could not Courtney Brown act as the vetting channel and a means of maintaining the blind conditions required for authentic remote viewing?
That is what he does with his projects - but he couldn't possible do that for every person that emails me with a request - it would be a hundred or so each month requested form just me alone let alone what Courtney and dick may get in their email box. You eed to also remember this isnt our real jobs its part time whilst we all TRY to earn a wage doing something else.


I think there are a lot of people who would like to be trained as remote viewers and thus the video offering would be a great marketing tool for such training programmes.

There are many ways to learn to remote view - from free to thousands of dollars for personal training - for a start there are masses of free resources on my website. DON'T spend anything until you are 120% sure as remote viewing takes years of 2-3 times a week practice to become proficient - its a massive commitment so needs some thought before spending alot of money.


I have had experiences where I have clearly seen events before they happened, but I did not enough information to ascertain where, when and to whom they would happen and thus was not able to prevent disasters. I couldn't live with seeing what I saw and so I shut down that sight. Any remote viewing training programme should address this issue.
This is not remote viewing because it was spontaneous - remote viewing has specific rules that differentiate it and make it what it is and one of these is that each project/experiment be planned in advance and NOT spontaneous.


So, Daz, did you or the other remote viewer see anything about the planning of the 9/11 attacks that brings new information to the debate?
This depends on your knowledge or suspicions of the vent and who planned it. We both clearly describe the teams of people involved, how they work, who controls and orders them to do what they do. that type of thing.

Maybe I can pre release a few of my written pages on this forum for you - i will ask courtney if this is possible.

All the best...
Daz

[Wind]

Here's Dick Allgire's commentary on the project.

19ZHOSU1_iw

[dazsmith]

The latest Preview video from Farsight:
9AXzPctRhmw

[Wind]

The document has now been released in two parts, here is the latest trailer.

V4QXlnpu29w

[dazsmith]

Courtney Brown and the Farsight institute have release the 2 part documentary today. Available from here:http://www.farsight.org/demo/Mysteries/Mysteries_10/Mysteries_Project_10_targets.html

I created a small blog post with some of my thoughts as a participant, examples of the paper remote viewing, here: http://www.remoteviewed.com/remote-viewing-911-attacks-2/

All the best...
Daz Smith

[mojo]

dazsmith,

Have you tried using this ability to find out about the Malaysia flight? Can you share any finds from your RV sessions thar convinced you that it was working?

[dazsmith]

@mojo:

Have you tried using this ability to find out about the Malaysia flight? Can you share any finds from your RV sessions thar convinced you that it was working?
Yes I have for a private client so I cant discuss the findings.
was what working?

All the best..
Daz

[MorningFox]

@mojo:
Yes I have for a private client so I cant discuss the findings.


What's stopping you sharing the information with others... ?

[dazsmith]

What's stopping you sharing the information with others... ?
Its proprietary to the client who paid me to do it.

All the best...
Daz

[MorningFox]

Well I understand what you meant but my question was why... ?

Who would want to keep that information secret? I almost feel it's a disservice to humanity, that if indeed you do possess knowledge about that event, that you or your client would choose to withhold it.

Strange.

[dazsmith]

morningfox,
Clients are clients - when I am paid by them to do a target I relinquish the right to publish the data - Now, if they want to use the data then this is their choice. What I can say on this project is that the data went up the chain to u.s. intel services. But there are many reasons why a client may want to hold back data, to capitalise on it, it may reveal sources, all kinds of things really.

All the best
Daz

[Truglivartna]

Daz:

Considering the confidential nature of your privately sponsored RV services, and considering your well-established talents as a remote viewer, it would be extremely interesting for those of us who don't have that talent to be able to read your comments about events or situations that you have remote viewed out of your own curiosity, or during your own practice periods.

There is certainly no end of situations which the public is in the dark about; and no end of speculation about them; all of which lends an air of "unprovable uncertainty" to any comments you make. I would think that fact -- together with the limited public access to this Forum -- would enable you to cover a lot of territory (short of naming personal names) that would keep you clear of censoring by those who, for one or another, do not want certain facts know publicly.

Events that occur to me quickly might be: Fukushima; Malaysian Airlines MH307 and/or MH17; what really happened to the Russian submarine KURSK;what happened to Swissair Flight 111 to cause it to crash; incidences of positive extra-terrestrial intervention protection; the nature of different races interacting with us; incidences regarding portals and stargates which demand international response, but remain unpublished in almost all media, mainstream and otherwise.

It seems to me that remote viewing is the major topic under discussion here, and the 9/11 incident a sort of sub-topic. Maybe the Mods or someone else might see it differently and start a separate thread with you being a prime contributor.

At any rate, thanks for making your presence known and contributing as you have.

Kit Cain

[dazsmith]

The problem Is I can only comment on targets I have worked - I cant choose my own targets as I work BLIND. So very few of your list I have actually worked.

Yes I viewed MH307 - yes I saw it go down/crash, it appeared to have been intended, an explosion/action event, a device was used - mechanical/electrical, and everything was planned/secretive/actioned upon.

Most of the rest of your list I have not been tasked against.

All the best...
daz

[Dennis Leahy]

Can someone comment on whether it is worth the time to view the Courtney Brown/Farsight 2-part video? Oh wait, it's just "trailers?" So we have to pay to see the findings? Sheesh...

Dennis

[Truglivartna]

I would also second Dennis's request in so far as I would be willing to pay for the information should it prove to be more in-depth than we already have i.e. perhaps some names of the organizations -- if not individuals involved -- or other details unique to remote viewing.

The link Daz posted (Post #30) is more along those lines (http://www.remoteviewed.com/remote-v...911-attacks-2/) and thanks for that, Daz

We shouldn't forget that by buying into Courtney's program, it also gets Daz paid for his work!!!

[fourty-two]

oh nutz! the url (http://www.remoteviewed.com/remote-v...911-attacks-2/) come up as the dreaded 404 error

[dazsmith]

It doesn't name anyone - although we do both describe who we feel is behind the targets: I did a blind sketch which is here: http://www.remoteviewed.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/daz-rv-sketch.jpg
I also included some of my paper sessions here:http://www.remoteviewed.com/remote-viewing-911-attacks-2/
Dick also did a sketch on one of the people involved at the top - whom some people find VERY familiar. you just have to remember that all this was done BLIND with no info what-so-ever on what this target/project was about.
The 11 trailers are here - look at these before you decide to buy: https://www.youtube.com/user/FarsightPress/videos?shelf_id=0&sort=dd&view=0

All the best..
daz

[Dennis Leahy]

...
Dick also did a sketch on one of the people involved at the top - whom some people find VERY familiar....

Wonder if it looked anything like...

27220 <---this guy?



Dennis

[mgray]

Sorry not very knowledgable on RV, but how do you do a blind study on an event most of the globe knows about? How do the viewers not know they are viewing 9/11? And then bring their thoughts or opinions into results?

[dazsmith]

Mgary,

Sorry not very knowledgable on RV, but how do you do a blind study on an event most of the globe knows about? How do the viewers not know they are viewing 9/11? And then bring their thoughts or opinions into results? Good question.
First ALL credible remote viewing should be done BLIND. this means that the remote viewers should have no information up front, during the project nor have anyone in the vicinity of them that knows the targets. This is to stop contamination through body language and so on. Blind because if we knew upfront that the targets were WTC7 for example - then we all have preconceived knowledge and idea on this so there is no way to know what it knowledge and what is intuitive data.

With Rv we hide projects behind random numbers - for example all we were told was this is a new project - project 10, each target I had to focus upon was called: 10a, 10b, 10c, 10d, 10e, 10f, 10g - this is all thats known - now, whatever I give back as data you know cna only have come from intuition as I was BLIND.

As a further note - in nearly 17 years of RV and fourtene since 9/11 - which is hundreds of remote viewing sessions - this was my first time being tasked on these targets.

does this help?

Daz

[mgray]

I see what the definition of blind is. But how did the new project - project 10 - not make you view the building of the Panama Canal or Great Wall? What focused you to gather information on 9/11 during the session?

[dazsmith]

The tasker set these as hidden cues as to what he expected/wanted us to remote view:


Target #10a: The target is the cause of the collapse of Building 7 of the World Trade Center complex in New York City on 11 September 2001. The viewer should perceive the actual collapse of the building as well as the direct cause of the collapse for Building 7, including any activity prior to the collapse that may be related to the collapse.

Target #10b: The target is the cause of the vertical "pancaking" collapse of the South Tower (2 WTC) of the Twin Towers World Trade Center Buildings in New York City on 11 September 2001. The viewer should perceive the actual collapse of the building as well as the direct cause of the collapse, including any activity prior to the collapse that may be related to the collapse.

Target #10c: The target is the cause of the vertical "pancaking" collapse of the North Tower (1 WTC) of the Twin Towers World Trade Center Buildings in New York City on 11 September 2001. The viewer should perceive the actual collapse of the building as well as the direct cause of the collapse, including any activity prior to the collapse that may be related to the collapse.

Target #10d: The target is the initial airborne launch or takeoff of whatever object caused of the damage shown to the Pentagon building as shown in the image below on 11 September 2001. The viewer should also perceive and describe the object's dimensions, shape, internal characteristics, and airborne activity.

Target #10e: The target is the cause of the damage shown to the Pentagon building as shown in the image below at the moment that the damage occurred on 11 September 2001.The viewer should perceive the direct cause of the building's damage, including any activity prior to the moment when the building was damaged that may be related to the cause of the damage.

Target #10f: The target is the aircraft flown as American Airlines Flight 77 on 11 September 2001, where the target time is noon on 12 September 2001, Eastern U.S. time for that date. The viewer should perceive the aircraft, its condition, and its location at noon on 12 September 2001, Eastern U.S. time for that date.

Target #10g: The target is any preparations that would cause of the vertical "pancaking" collapse of the North Tower (1 WTC) of the Twin Towers World Trade Center Buildings in New York City on 11 September 2001. The viewer should perceive the preparations themselves, as well as the subjects involved in doing the preparations, including any activity prior to the collapse that may be related to the collapse.

We as viewers of course only got to know this AFTER the project was finished - but we did get the 1oa, 10b, 10c - as focal points for our attention.

Daz

[turiya]

Hey Daz,

I didn't see in any of the drawings, or heard or seen in any of the discussion if there was any sense, or feeling, on your part of whether there was a malevolent Extraterrestrial involvement (i.e. further up the food-chain) that played in any part of this event?

Care to comment in this regard?

Thank you for sharing.
turiya :cool:

[dazsmith]

We saw no influence other than very influential business-like, suited men and Possibly one woman) in power.

[turiya]

Hey Daz,

I didn't see in any of the drawings, or heard or seen in any of the discussion if there was any sense, or feeling, on your part of whether there was a malevolent Extraterrestrial involvement (i.e. further up the food-chain) that played in any part of this event?

Care to comment in this regard?
Thank you for sharing.
turiya :cool:
We saw no influence other than very influential business-like, suited men and Possibly one woman) in power.


Thanks Daz. Your response coincides with a similar question I have asked of Chris with regarding the 911 event.

I have an ongoing Chris Thomas thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?58865-An-Update-On-Our-Evolution-by-Chris-Thomas).
Chris Thomas has said that he's been "hard-wired" from birth with the ability to read what is called the 'Akashic Record' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akasha), which is where all events that have taken place in this Universe, Solar System, on this planet, etc., are recorded within an etheric field ("unified field").

My question to Chris was as follows:

8) FOURTEENTH FACTION (ET) QUESTION:
QUESTION: Although you have not said it in any of your books, is it correct to assume that the 9/11 event (as well as the 7/7 event, war on terror) was the direct result of the affect of what you have called 14TH FACTION (ET) ENERGIES influence over those 33,000 souls traveling toward Earth? And, since the 14th FACTION is now gone from this Universe, that we are unlikely to see another horrific type event like this play out again in our near future, as we continue to move toward completion of the whole soul reintegration process?

Chris Thoms wrote:
[B]ANSWER: 9/11 was a classic "Hegelian Dialectic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic#Hegelian_dialectic)" - an act deliberately enacted to cause fear and panic leading to the introduction of legislation that nobody would have wanted until the "attack" took place.

The current state of fear replaces the "Cold War". Now that Russia and communism is no longer seen as a threat, the Cabal/Illuminati/Elite needed a new bad guy to make people afraid.

So "International Terrorism (https://www.mi5.gov.uk/home/the-threats/terrorism/international-terrorism.html)" was invented with the chief bogey-man being Bin Laden and his Al Qaeda (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda).

AQ began life in 1948 when the British realised that the newly created state of Israel had expansion plans towards Lebanon. The British recruited a band of Wahhabi Moslems and set up AQ to harass Israel. When Israel went to war with Egypt, resulting in the Suez war, Israel backed down and AQ was put into mothballs.

When Russia invaded Afghanistan in 1987, the CIA was looking for a way of harassing the Russians but without making it obvious that the USA was involved and so the British gave control of AQ to the CIA and the CIA have remained in control ever since. All atrocities attributed to AQ [Al Qaeda] have been carried out by the CIA including 9/11. (Emphasis mine.)

Bin Laden was the son of a Saudi billionaire who runs several huge transnational organisations.

The White House confirmed a few years ago that Bush senior works for a Bin Laden company since he retired from office. The White House also confirmed that half of all retired senators also work for the Bin Laden family.

Osama was flown from Afghanistan to Saudi for treatment for his kidneys by a CIA chartered jet where he had treatment in the American Hospital and he was flown back to Afghan by the same CIA jet (reported in the Paris newspaper Le Figaro). Osama died at his family home in Saudi in 2003 from kidney failure.

I watched the BBC evening news in October 2005 where there was a live statement made by MI6. The statement said (in part): "The SIS (MI6) can confirm that a rogue cell within the SIS planned recruited and carried out the London bombing".

There is no terrorist threat, just politicians creating fear to control the people.

My suspicion is that we are going to see more of these types of events, particularly in the US and Britain over the coming months as the cabal tries to get people to riot so that martial law can be imposed. This has nothing whatsoever to do with residual 14 energies."

Thanks again, Daz.
Be well.

turiya

[Redstar Kachina]

..........

[ExomatrixTV]

Remote Viewing 9/11: Part 1 - The World Trade Center Attacks:

671ziiLlBBs


Remote Viewing 9/11: Part 2 - The Pentagon Attacks and the Organization:

ZbdxXWN4DGk

¤=[Post Update]=¤


911-Conspiracy Finally Solved!: Names, Connections, Motives, 911Matrix of Details Exposed!


CdE1Cwnymzc


From one of my YT channels 911TruthAnniversary (https://www.youtube.com/user/911TruthAnniversary)