PDA

View Full Version : They Walk Amoung Us ....My thoughts are, they rule us



jerry
3rd August 2014, 22:58
By Paul Rosenberg

Here’s the bad news: Predators walk among us, and they are indistinguishable from normal people. These differently wired humans have a predatory advantage, and they use it. This is not a plot from a scary movie; this is real.

I am deadly serious about this, though by the end of this column, I will also explain why there is also good news.

These predators are called sociopaths (psychopaths in the clinical literature). They rather seldom damage our bodies, but they make careers out of bleeding our souls.

I’m not trying to be dramatic, by the way. I was holding this subject for the next issue of my subscription newsletter, but the more I worked on it, the more I was convinced that I should publish some key points ahead of schedule. This is important.

So, before we go any further, I’d like to give you two essential facts that will allow you to protect yourself from sociopaths. If you can remember these, you’ll avoid a lot of pain:

1 in 50 people is a predator.

At least 2% of the overall populace are sociopaths, and some estimates are double that. Perhaps 75% of them are male, though no one knows why. That means that at least every thirty-third man is a sociopath, and every hundredth woman.

Most of us have a feeling that everyone has some goodness in them. This is generally a useful feeling, but it’s only true for 49 out of 50 humans. That last one is a predator without a conscience.

I don’t like the sound of that any better than you do, but it has been proven over and over and over. We need to face the facts, and we cannot treat these people like we do everyone else.

You must pay attention to inauthentic emotions.

Sociopaths have a “tell” that gives them away: Emotions that are not quite right. They don’t have much in the way of positive emotions themselves, so they fake them. But they can never fake them completely.

Authentic expressions of emotions are very complex, involving dozens of muscles, increased or decreased blood flow and pressure, pulse rate, posture, tone of voice, and more. Normal people are deeply familiar with these complicated arrangements and innately understand their patterns.

The sociopath, on the other hand, doesn’t feel them and can’t grasp their patterns. He or she must mimic them. But because of the great complexity involved, the sociopath can never mimic them terribly well.

So, you must notice inauthentic emotions, remember them, and not ignore them in an effort to be nice.


The How and the Why

There are a lot of things to understand about sociopaths, and we can’t cover them all in one column, but I will give you the basics, which are these:
• Sociopaths have a profound lack of empathy for the feelings of others. They lack the internal feedback system by which normal people monitor themselves. (Most people call this “conscience,” which is probably as useful a term as any.) Sociopaths do not have this and don’t feel bad about abusing other people. It’s not that they feel bad and ignore it—they don’t feel it at all.
• Sociopaths understand that they are different from normal people and learn to mimic normal behavior. This mimicry has a purpose: It gets the sociopath what he or she wants.
• The sociopath hides his or her difference. After letting it show a time or two—and probably being punished by a parent as a result—the sociopath covers up the truth and keeps it covered. But the reason for hiding it is not embarrassment (the sociopath doesn’t feel embarrassment), but because it hinders him from getting what he want.
• Since sociopaths have no empathy for others, making use of normal people feels just fine to them. Likewise, they feel no remorse.
• Empathy, as viewed by the sociopath, is a weakness, and he considers himself superior, because he isn’t burdened by it.
• Because they lack an internal feedback system, sociopaths are excellent liars. For example, they can often pass lie detector tests, since those tests register the effects of our internal feedback system, which they don’t have.
• A sociopath is likely to maintain a group of people who believe whole-heartedly that he is a good, kind, honest person. He’ll work in calculated ways to create and maintain that opinion in them.

Here is what Hervey Cleckley wrote about sociopaths in his classic text on the subject, The Mask of Sanity:

Beauty and ugliness, except in a very superficial sense; goodness, evil, love, horror and humor have no actual meaning, no power to move him.

Now we come to the question of why sociopaths are this way, and we do have some answers.

Recent brain scans indicate that sociopaths have unusually small amygdalae (the part of the brain associated with emotional reactions, decisionmaking, and memory processing). A region of the brain’s frontal cortex, called the orbitofrontal cortex, seems problematic as well. This region, which communicates with the amygdala, is also involved with decision making.

So, the cause of sociopathy is almost certainly organic. Someday it should be curable with genetic engineering, but for now, there is no cure at all. That means that you have zero chance of talking a sociopath into behaving well.

Trying to repair a sociopath tells him that you’re a ripe sucker, and nothing more. He’ll play along, tell you what you want to hear, fake the emotions he thinks you’ll respond to, and bleed you dry, emotionally and physically. And he’ll never feel a moment’s remorse as you finally contemplate suicide.

Yes, I know this is dark stuff, but it’s better to be forewarned than to learn through harsh experience.


Why This Is Actually Good News

Considering that sociopaths make up 2% of the total population, and considering that a sociopath is responsible for several times more damage than the average person (I’d guess at least five to ten times as much), then… training people to recognize and avoid sociopaths would eliminate a serious percentage of human suffering.

And it gets better. Aside from natural causes like diseases, the number-one source of pain on Earth is political systems. For today I’ll pass up the argument of whether states are necessary or not; instead, I’d like to make a simpler point: Governments, like all hierarchies, are havens for sociopaths. And governments have, over the last century, killed approximately 260 million people. (See Death by Government, by R.J. Rummel.)

So, what would happen if millions of people, because they were able to recognize sociopaths, stopped empowering and obeying them?

I’m trying to think of any single thing that would eliminate human suffering better than sociopath recognition, and I’m not coming up with much. Furthermore, it would be easy: websites, billboards, tiny radio and TV ads, flyers, handouts, and just about anything else could be used. The concepts are simple and potent, and the motivation to avoid pain is inherent in human nature.

For far less than corporate charities spend, something like this would change the world… more, better, and faster.

Something to think about.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

"Considering that sociopaths make up 2% of the total population" and 98% make up our political class

gripreaper
4th August 2014, 00:10
This is a very important point. Empaths cannot imagine an entity walking among them which cannot feel, cannot differentiate between self and other, and is predatory by stealth and utter deception, and has no qualms about murder. They do not recognize murder as a concept.

http://www.rumormillnews.com/pix7/US-vote-fraud.jpg

Until the empathic realize they empower the psychopath, it will not change.

joeecho
4th August 2014, 01:42
This is a very important point. Empaths cannot imagine an entity walking among them which cannot feel, cannot differentiate between self and other, and is predatory by stealth and utter deception, and has no qualms about murder. They do not recognize murder as a concept.

Until the empathic realize they empower the psychopath, it will not change.

Did I read your post correct. Are you saying empaths empower the psychopath in a codependent kind of way?

Tyy1907
4th August 2014, 02:59
This is a very important point. Empaths cannot imagine an entity walking among them which cannot feel, cannot differentiate between self and other, and is predatory by stealth and utter deception, and has no qualms about murder. They do not recognize murder as a concept.

http://www.rumormillnews.com/pix7/US-vote-fraud.jpg

Until the empathic realize they empower the psychopath, it will not change.

That pic is awesome by the way.

Taurean
4th August 2014, 06:19
as British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli once claimed,

"the world is run by very different people than those you might think" – and they aren’t simply some relatively lone bunch of Zionist Jews, but powerbrokers whose apparent genealogies extend way into the mists of time, far beyond even those of the twelve tribes of Israel who fled Egypt amidst a largely forgotten global calamity.

http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com.au/2009/12/king-of-world.html

Cara
4th August 2014, 06:31
Interesting topic, thank you for posting.

L.R. Hubbard and Scientology have some thinking along similar lines. They term people like this Suppressive People.

(Note, that the current incarnation of the Church of Scientology has a completely wacked out - in my opinion - application of this idea, and their behavior is itself considered suppressive by many people who have left the church. I don't think this means the theory itself is wrong, but maybe others will disagree here. This is a whole long debate and topic on its own).

Back to topic.... I did a search to see what is available online on this and found a "translated for non-scientologist" version on Stephanie Relfe's website (http://www.relfe.com/wp/money/possible-problem-producers/):



POSSIBLE PROBLEM PRODUCERS
Stop things going wrong in your life!
By Stephanie Relfe B.Sc.

Unfortunately, like it or not, a small percentage of the population are quite destructive. Consciously or unconsciously they do not want us to be free, happy, healthy and the best we can be. What they want is to control us. They want to ‘keep us under their thumb’.

They do this because they have no personal power of their own. Instead, they get their power by keeping other people under them. The people who are the extremes of this are called ‘suppressive’ people. Extreme examples are Hitler, the Catholic Inquisition, Stalin, Mao Zedong, Slavers or the Ku Klux Klan. Slightly less destructive suppressives might be con-men or rapists.

Most of us do not meet people of this extreme. However, there are varying degrees of this type of person. Further down the scale can be ordinary people who just like to keep others ‘under their thumb’. These people hate to see others doing well. They don’t want to work on themselves to improve themselves – but they don’t want to see others getting better either.

However, they may not show this side of themselves to you. It has been estimated that about 1-2% of the population are truly suppressive. One way you can recognise them is that after a while you begin to notice that you never feel especially good around them. You may be feeling good until you meet them and then they might say something that APPEARS to be okay, but which never-the-less makes you feel terrible.

Unfortunately, If another person is closely connected with a person with a high percentage of destructive tendencies, they can take on the characteristics of the suppressive person themselves. It is a contagious disease, a bit like the way a person will start to speak the dialect of the people around them if they move to a new country. The affected person is not a full-blown suppressive, but once they have increased their number of destructive tendencies they can become what I call a ‘Possible Problem Producer’.


(Note, in Scientology they call these people Potential Trouble Sources [PTS] and the organisation policies require these people to receive either an ethics handling - for simpler cases - or auditing [therapy] sessions for more complex situations. In some cases PTS people are also required to complete a study course in this).



A Possible Problem Producer causes problems to themselves and those with whom they contact. Often wherever a Possible Problem Producer is, things just seem to go wrong. Accidents happen. They may happen a LOT. People might start doing things like banging their head by accident, having car accidents, losing things or losing money. They may get constant colds or flues. It has been estimated that 20% of illnesses, including mental illnesses, are due to contact with a destructive person. In extreme cases, nothing goes right.

One symptom of being a Possible Problem Producer, or of being in close contact with a suppressive person, can be that of going “up and down” emotionally. One day the person may be on top of the world. The next moment, they are ‘on the floor’ feeling very depressed. Later on, they will be as high as a kite again. If a person is free of influence of destructive people, they will be much calmer and happier most of the time. Any changes in their sense of wellbeing will go up and down like a gentle wave – but if they are in contact with a suppressive person their sense of wellbeing will go up and down like the French Alps. This is because as soon as a suppressive sees a person doing well, they like to ‘shoot them down’ to bring them to a level below that of the suppressive person.

...

The suppressive person may be the life and soul of the party. They may appear to be well dressed, popular and successful. They may even have a lot of charisma. On the other hand, they may appear as a victim of society, with poor health, little money and a bad appearance. You cannot recognise them on looks or talent. But have a listen to the WORDS that they use and you will see that they are more interested in putting people down than pulling them up.

Destructive people can have a strong hold over us. Unfortunately, sometimes they can be a “best” friend, parent or relationship partner. There can be a lot of emotion associated with this person, which makes it hard for us to act rationally.

...

By the way, destructive people can also be organisations. They often include newspapers or television.

Unfortunately, there is not a lot you can do to help a truly suppressive person. They do not want to change, and you cannot force them to.

...

Here is the evaluation criteria for helping you to evaluate how many destructive characteristics a person has:

1.
DESTRUCTIVE
Most of their conversation is negative.

CONSTRUCTIVE
They LIKE to talk about good things! They prefer not to discuss
negative things. (One disadvantage of this is that you may need
to know about some bad news and they won’t tell you).

2.
DESTRUCTIVE
They make generalisations, which are also destructive.
For example:
“You’re stupid”
“You’re always late”
“Men are bastards”
“You can’t trust women”
CONSTRUCTIVE
They are specific, especially when making negative comments.
For example, instead of the comments above they might
say:
“You made a mistake”
“You are late today”
“Philip can be nasty at times”
“I have found that I have not been able to trust some of the women
I have met much of the time”

3.
DESTRUCTIVE
They lie.
CONSTRUCTIVE
When they pass on a piece of information, they don’t change its essential
message.

4.
DESTRUCTIVE
They may not lie, but whenever they pass on news, they make the information
more negative. They seldom pass on good news.
CONSTRUCTIVE
When they pass on a piece of news they don’t change it’s essential message.
They may even draw out good things from it.

5.
DESTRUCTIVE
They do not change, no matter what happens.
CONSTRUCTIVE
They make changes for the better.

6.
DESTRUCTIVE
The people they are closely associated with are often sick, having accidents
and problems, making mistakes and generally having trouble with life.
CONSTRUCTIVE
The people around them are well, happy and generally doing well in life.

7.
DESTRUCTIVE
If they have a problem they blame and work on anything other than the
real cause of the problem.
CONSTRUCTIVE
They can find the cause of a problem and therefore can and do fix it.

8.
DESTRUCTIVE
The usually don’t finish whatever projects they start. If they make
an actual decision to stop a project before its completion, they are very
poor at tidying up the loose ends.
CONSTRUCTIVE
Projects that they start are usually completed. If they decide to
stop a project before its completion, they tie up all the loose ends.

9.
DESTRUCTIVE
They have a low or no sense of responsibility for anything they have done
that is unethical or destructive. They often cannot see that there
was anything wrong with something destructive that they did.
CONSTRUCTIVE
They have a high sense of responsibility. If they do something unethical
or destructive, they are usually ashamed of having done it.

10.
DESTRUCTIVE
They do not truly help people. Often they may APPEAR to help others.
However, the people they `help’ do not benefit from the `help’ they
receive, or get any better as a result of the `help’.
(If you truly help someone, the person you help will have an improvement
in their life).
CONSTRUCTIVE
They truly help people. What they give to, or do for another makes
a positive difference to that person’s life.

11.
DESTRUCTIVE
They do not respect others’ property.
CONSTRUCTIVE
They respect the property of others.

12.
DESTRUCTIVE
They are big on status. They judge people by how `important’ they
are, how rich they are, what kind of possessions they have etc.
CONSTRUCTIVE
Status is immaterial to them. If they judge others, they judge them
for who they are as a person. They don’t judge for how much money
and status they have.


(FYI - There is more about Suppressive and other types of behavior included in the writings of Ruth Minshell, where she discusses the emotional tone scale (another related idea from L.R. Hubbard). The book is called "How to choose your people"; free to download at http://www.whale.to/a/minshull_tones.doc )

linksplatinum
4th August 2014, 06:32
Sounds like the synopsis to that show Dexter that used to come out on Showtime to a tee.