Red Ice Radio - John Lash - White Genocide & The Archontic Infection

[giovonni]

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0FBpMDcprxY/UcBy8EZ9ndI/AAAAAAAAPfs/X7Gf5IhtWcI/s1600/The-Beginning-is-Near1.jpg

Full Interview

John Lash - White Genocide & The Archontic Infection



August 4, 2014

John Lash is a self-educated free-lance scholar and author who combines studies and experimental mysticism to teach directive mythology. He is a leading exponent of the power of myth to direct individual experience and drive historical events over the long term. On metahistory.org, he presents a radical revision of Gnosticism, with original commentaries on the Nag Hammadi codices. He also presents the only complete restoration by any scholar of the Sophianic myth of the Pagan Mysteries, the sacred story of Gaia-Sophia, recounting the origin of the earth and the human species from the galactic core. Unexpectedly, John Lash returns to discuss how he recently came to the political issue of White genocide after being deeply involved within the Sophianic myth. Johns explains how he discovered that the myth itself contains details of White genocide. We’ll discuss the supernatural factor behind this plan, an archontic force at play that has infected a specific race who are serving as proxies of the Archons. Raging on the planet, this archontic infection is both neurological and ideological. John talks about Sophia’s correction, her collaborators and what can stop the archontic infection as told by the Gnostics. We’ll continue to profile the problem and discuss the taboo of stating the obvious. Lash gives two perspectives on why we didn’t see this agenda sooner. Also, he explains why the Gnostics were against procreation and how they warned it could be used as a weapon. Later, John speaks on the importance of reviving folk memory circuits and recovering important racial memory. At the end we’ll discuss Jewish liberation in 1859 and how they got the upper hand. John also talks about German genocide. When blowback falls on the sources of fraud, there will be no place to hide.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rADcsPo3usU

related additional link: Robert Sapolsky Interview: Toxoplasmosis (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3x3TMdkGdQ)

[Spiral of Light]

Thank you for this interview, Giovonni.

I found it extremely interesting and I intend to visit John Lash's websites for further research on this important topic.

[Ron Mauer Sr]

If anyone cares to post a brief summary of John's opinion of what can be done to minimize the negative archon influence, I would enjoy reading it.

[ulli]

Become an excellentist.

[Ron Mauer Sr]

Become an excellentist.

Thanks Ulli. I had to look up "excellentist (http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-edge-peak-performance-psychology/201207/being-excellentist)".

The definition reminds me of advice given to Carlos Castenada by Don Juan. Become an impeccable warrior.

Update:

My impatience is showing, asking for a summary. I read and hear so much about problems and their cause, about things where I have no influence, I get weary of the noise.

Discussions of potential solutions are what excites me. Nothing is more important than doing what feels good.

[RunningDeer]

If anyone cares to post a brief summary of John's opinion of what can be done to minimize the negative archon influence, I would enjoy reading it.

I'm listening now, but not taking notes. This is the summary posted on the site. It's one long paragraph, so I took the liberty of breaking into visual bits:

"Red Ice Radio - John Lash - White Genocide & The Archontic Infection"

John Lash is a self-educated free-lance scholar and author who combines studies and experimental mysticism to teach directive mythology. He is a leading exponent of the power of myth to direct individual experience and drive historical events over the long term.

On metahistory.org, he presents a radical revision of Gnosticism, with original commentaries on the Nag Hammadi codices. He also presents the only complete restoration by any scholar of the Sophianic myth of the Pagan Mysteries, the sacred story of Gaia-Sophia, recounting the origin of the earth and the human species from the galactic core.

Unexpectedly, John Lash returns to discuss how he recently came to the political issue of White genocide after being deeply involved within the Sophianic myth.

Johns explains how he discovered that the myth itself contains details of White genocide. We’ll discuss the supernatural factor behind this plan, an archontic force at play that has infected a specific race who are serving as proxies of the Archons.

Raging on the planet, this archontic infection is both neurological and ideological. John talks about Sophia’s correction, her collaborators and what can stop the archontic infection as told by the Gnostics. We’ll continue to profile the problem and discuss the taboo of stating the obvious.

Lash gives two perspectives on why we didn’t see this agenda sooner. Also, he explains why the Gnostics were against procreation and how they warned it could be used as a weapon. Later, John speaks on the importance of reviving folk memory circuits and recovering important racial memory.

At the end we’ll discuss Jewish liberation in 1859 and how they got the upper hand. John also talks about German genocide. When blowback falls on the sources of fraud, there will be no place to hide.

[giovonni]

If anyone cares to post a brief summary of John's opinion of what can be done to minimize the negative archon influence, I would enjoy reading it.

Greetings Ron ...

i don't think at this time no one can adequately do that for you , since as he states in the interview this (his) new research is currently ongoing ... Though i believe, if your willing to read this from his web page (http://www.metahistory.org/GAIA%20SOPHIA/mythos/Gaia_Sharing.php) ... It might firm up for you and others here where he's coming from in regards to this Archontic attachment and its caused human infection.

Though you being already a seasoned Avalonian, i do believe you are immune from its effect upon your life's spiritual system ... If you know what i mean ... :)

[ulli]

Become an excellentist.

Thanks Ulli. I had to look up "excellentist (http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-edge-peak-performance-psychology/201207/being-excellentist)".

The definition reminds me of advice given to Carlos Castenada by Don Juan. Become an impeccable warrior.


The word excellentist came to me when I saw your request.
I made it up on the spur of the moment.
I doubt if you will find it in any dictionary.

If excellentism becomes a movement now I will ask John Lash to give me part of the credit...;)

[RunningDeer]

At the 38 minute mark, John Lash talks of the tool, i.e., telestic method of investigation called, "Instruction by the Light". Read here (http://books.google.com/books?id=NblF1xjoeLUC&pg=PA156&lpg=PA156&dq=the+telestic+method&source=bl&ots=QC9U_wGgI-&sig=DMX2FaOkiWmelu_pzmOKMxdPTpE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=VnviU5raH6TD8AG9gIH4Aw&ved=0CD8Q6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=the%20telestic%20method&f=false) from his book, “Not in His Image: Gnostic Vision, Sacred Ecology, and the Future of Belief,” page 156.

Also so on his site @ metahistory.org (http://www.metahistory.org/Telestics/telestics%20arrogation.php)

@ 47:30 - Toxoplasmosis

Toxoplasmosis is a parasitic disease caused by the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii.[1] The parasite infects most genera of warm-blooded animals, including humans, but the primary host is the felid (cat) family. Animals are infected by eating infected meat, by ingestion of feces of a cat that has itself recently been infected, and by transmission from mother to fetus. Cats are the primary source of infection to human hosts, although contact with raw meat, especially lamb, is a more significant source of human infections in some countries. Fecal contamination of hands is a significant risk factor.[2]

Up to a third of the world's human population is estimated to carry a Toxoplasma infection.[3][4] The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention notes the overall seroprevalence in the United States as determined with specimens collected by the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1999 and 2004 was found to be 10.8%, with seroprevalence among women of childbearing age (15 to 44 years) 11%.[5] Another study placed seroprevalence in the US at 22.5%.[4] The same study claimed a seroprevalence of 75% in El Salvador.[4] Official assessment in Great Britain places the number of infections at about 350,000 a year.[6]

During the first few weeks after exposure, the infection typically causes a mild, flu-like illness or no illness. However, those with weakened immune systems, such as those with AIDS and pregnant women, may become seriously ill, and it can occasionally be fatal.[7] The parasite can cause encephalitis (inflammation of the brain) and neurological diseases, and can affect the heart, liver, inner ears, and eyes (chorioretinitis).[8] Recent research has also linked toxoplasmosis with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, and schizophrenia.[9] Numerous studies found a positive correlation between latent toxoplasmosis and suicidal behavior in humans.[10][11][12]

[Wikipedia continued (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toxoplasmosis)]


Robert Sapolsky Interview: Toxoplasmosis
m3x3TMdkGdQ

Arete=excellence of any kind

Arete (/ˈærətiː/; Greek: ἀρετή), in its basic sense, means "excellence of any kind".[1] The term may also mean "moral virtue".[1] In its earliest appearance in Greek, this notion of excellence was ultimately bound up with the notion of the fulfillment of purpose or function: the act of living up to one's full potential.

The term from Homeric times onwards is not gender specific. Homer applies the term of both the Greek and Trojan heroes as well as major female figures, such as Penelope, the wife of the Greek hero, Odysseus. In the Homeric poems, Areté is frequently associated with bravery, but more often, with effectiveness. The man or woman of Areté is a person of the highest effectiveness; they use all their faculties: strength, bravery and wit, to achieve real results. In the Homeric world, then, Areté involves all of the abilities and potentialities available to humans. The concept implies a human-centered universe in which human actions are of paramount importance; the world is a place of conflict and difficulty, and human value and meaning is measured against individual effectiveness in the world.

In some contexts, Areté is explicitly linked with human knowledge, where the expressions "virtue is knowledge" and "Areté is knowledge" are used interchangeably. The highest human potential is knowledge and all other human abilities are derived from this central capacity. If Areté is knowledge and study, the highest human knowledge is knowledge about knowledge itself; in this light, the theoretical study of human knowledge, which Aristotle called "contemplation," is the highest human ability and happiness."[2]

[Wikipedia continued (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arete)]

[OmeyocaN777]

If anyone cares to post a brief summary of John's opinion of what can be done to minimize the negative archon influence, I would enjoy reading it.

I can tell you my opinion.........

LOVE = Understanding (comprehension)
Understanding = Knowledge
Knowledge = FREEDOM

Thomas Aquinas

Our inner light.....is the solution

[Rex]

Many thanks to John Lash and Henrik Palmgren for throwing another handful of puzzle pieces on the table. WOW

[Unicorn]

John Lash and Paul Levy, two of the greatest authors I've discovered recently. Thanks to all of you, dear Avalonians.

[waves]

The only thing I have an issue with John Lash and his puzzle pieces and any others who offer theirs is when they add "everyone is going to realize this soon, the world is on the verge of not being able to hide it much longer...".

Even if he's correct, I don't think the world is going to soon acknowledge that Jewish DNA has a built-in neurological viral infection of 'envy' as the explanation for this race that really has always defined themselves by absolute separation from the rest of humanity as 'chosen people' and really have historically always placed themselves in a supremacist and dominant position.

He explains that if you leave your hesitations at the door of being called racist and look at history intelligently, rationally and soberly, there is only one case on Earth of all the races/species that is a predatory species. I think he means that despite all races having history of violence, there's only one whose bottom line reason is envy and that makes all the difference. The other races may frequently be in conflict, but they are not trying to eliminate each other, ... just the Jews who are trying to eliminate them. He cites that Jewish literature that has clearly stated over and over an intent to deceive, dominate and destroy all other races that do not belong to their self-designated category, and says that the superiority is ultimately misplaced envy, driving them to destroy what they want that they think they don't or can't have.

I took some of his commentary as it's not like all Jews are evil, it's more like some really nice souls 'find themselves' oops born a Jew and only mildly go along with tribal expectations and parading the air of specialness, and others take it seriously, find it maddenlng, and spend their lives mindlessly living out the greedy, dominant, self important behaviors, some to the violent extreme who rise to enough power to do so.

I sure agree that considering the history, massive dominance in media and violent impact on the world both to and from them, we have to stop being intimidated about saying something racist and take a very, very hard look at this group of people and put the real puzzle of it together in full truth.

[Rex]

Anyone watch Falling Skies? Executive producer is Steven Spielberg by the way. This Toxo parasite reminds me of the alien harness parasite. Except that Toxo is completely hidden.

[jerry]

the example he used of those envious Jews , the ones who sit on the hillsides and watch the genocide happening was a powerful example I came away with in agreement, asking what else could it be? The DNA he mentioned as a condition of and not lending to all of them is how I took it.

[giovonni]

Yes, though it must be emphasized here, that this interview was not about condemning or blaming all members of any one human tribe (group) ... We all humans (historically) have pretty much been duped from our onset on this planet.

[dianna]

One of the books John mentions is Colin Wilson's "The Mind Parasites" ... sounds like a fascinating read ...

http://img2.imagesbn.com/images/103120000/103123446.jpg

Link to PDF here:
http://selfdefinition.org/colin-wilson/Colin%20Wilson%20-%20The%20Mind%20Parasites.pdf
Interesting commentary I came across ...



THE MIND PARASITES
Comments of Bob Corbett
May 2002
http://www2.webster.edu/~corbetre/personal/reading/wilson-parasites.html


The strange and inexplicable suicide of Karel Weissman and the discovery of a gigantic city some two miles beneath earth combine to provide narrator Gilbert Austin with the beginnings of a weird tale of inner beings and some ultimate threats to human existence and advancement. Among many odd details of Weissman’s suicide is a note indicating that Austin should receive his papers immediately. Austin is justly curious as to what is there, but it ends up taking him many months to discover Weissman’s secrets. In the meantime Austin teams with Wolfgang Reich and these two archeologists add to Weissman’s work in psychology to unearth the world of the mind parasites.

Colin Wilson’s challenging and entertaining novel is both a sci-fi romp into the improbable, but a philosophical tour de force of the existentialist problem of authenticity. I was fascinated and disappointed by turns, but couldn’t stop turning pages, often amused by what was going on and at times frustrated, almost angry at Wilson for letting us humans off so easily. There is a bit of a surprise ending, so I will leave these comments somewhat incomplete and not fully rounded to Wilson’s tale. I don’t want to ruin someone else’s read.

Weissman’s journals and the world of Gilbert and Reich discover the existence of these mind parasites; beings living deep in each individual psyche and limiting the human exercise of the mind. It some way that never becomes fully clear the mind parasites sponge off human energy and were the humans to exercise full clear control over their own minds they would know the mind parasites were there and would defeat them, driving them out, which Gilbert and Reich eventually set out to do. However, as it exists now (the setting of the novel is the year 2012 and the book was written in 1967), the human is only able to use a tiny tiny fraction of the power of the mind, being inhibited by these parasites.

For those familiar with the movement of existential philosophy this is the problem which Martin Heidegger first made famous with his 1927 work BEING AND TIME and in 1942 Jean-Paul Sartre approached it from a slightly different perspective in BEING AND NOTHINGNESS. Wilson is quite aware of these works and has even written a work on “New Existentialism” a movement of which he is a self-named member. In the work of the existentialists there are no hidden beings. Rather, humans, on Heidegger’s account because of basic laziness and lack of intellectual skill, do not take hold of their own lives, examining the meaning of existence and making their own choices. Rather, the strong tendency is for humans to act out of habit, tradition, learned behaviors of our families and cultures, from religion and various other modes, all of which evade the personal human responsibility for our own choices. The existentialists generally unveil this hidden mode of what they label as “inauthentic” living and urge humans forward to take control of their own lives in an “authentic” personal responsibility. Not all thinkers are convinced that all humans can or will actually do this. Fyodor Dostoevsky the mid-19th century novelist and early existentialist has argued powerfully that the great mass of humans will never take such responsibility and the world is divided into the tiny minority of people who will take responsibility for themselves and others and in so doing will disburden the rest of the masses who much prefer to turn over this personal responsibility for security and evading the terror and hard work involved with it.

Given that Wilson and I share a common background of deep commitment to and interest in the existentialists, and both of us clearly share the notion of authenticity as a human virtue to be aimed at, I was in great measure saddened, even disgusted by his device of using the mind parasites to account for this phenomenon of humans not taking full personal responsibility for their own minds. In the contemporary literature there are a number of theories which most of us are aware of which explain this human lapse from taking full conscious responsibility for ourselves:
◾The existentialist analysis I mention above.
◾The Freudian view that the human unconscious is responsible for much of our action
◾The common view especially of our own time that we are fixed by our past and our very early learning and are virtual slaves to our upbringing, and if not fully incapable of acting freely and responsibly on our own, then we are at least deeply limited by our past.

What frustrated me in Wilson’s analysis with the mind parasites is that the entire notion of the mind parasites brings in outside beings who are the responsible agents and not us humans. This seems a complete caving into the notion that humans are either not capable of human freedom and responsibility, or at least drastically limited.

But, one can certainly view the fight of Austin and Reich to lead humans to defeat the mind parasites and reclaim their minds as an exercise in authenticity.

Once we get to the TOOLS to be used to fight the mind parasites I simply burst out laughing aloud. When the existentialist movement came into the intellectual world in the earliest days of the 20th century Heidegger, Sartre and other were deeply influenced by the work of Edmund Husserl, the developer of the method of inquiry called Phenomenology. So are Austin and Reich and they decide that the only “scientific” tools capable of combating the mind parasites are the principles and practices of Husserlian Phenomenology. This had me alternating between giggles and out right belly laughs as I recalled back my graduate school days of the 1960s when I struggled under the guidance of Professor Herbert Spiegelberg to grasp the extremely difficult and esoteric moves of Husserlian Phenomenology. Here we have a novelist instructing us readers in Phenomenology so we can follow the path of Austin and Reich as they begin to enlist other scientists in the up coming Phenomenological war against the mind parasites.

At least Wilson had the common sense to know he could not really instruct us readers in the details of Phenomenological analysis so we get the window dressing without the details. But after living some 36 years as a professor wedded to Phenomenology as a philosophical method, knowing it was far from being a popular or dominant school of thought in the modern American intellectual world and seeing how difficult it was over the years for me to teach even the most basic rudiments of the method to undergraduates, I felt vindicated to see Colin Wilson saving the whole of human kind with Husserl’s theories!!!

However, at this point the novel does spin off into some rather wild sci-fi fiction. Austin and Reich and another few dozen of their disciples use their Phenomenology (a form of it I never saw in Husserl!) to learn psycho-kinesis and other tools of the occult and the mind parasites are soon on the ropes.

What will not ruin anyone’s read is to realize that the humans sort of do defeat the mind parasites in the end, but even that is a bit confused. Wilson seems torn between defeating these foreign beings and in sticking to the Dostoyevskian notion that most humans are hopeless and will never embrace freedom and responsibility for their own lives with all the hard work which that implies.

I have never been a strong fan of sci-fi type novels. There are often exciting logics of alternative worlds that don’t operate by the rules of our world, and that is fun and challenging. Yet, as occurs in Wilson’s novel, there are often inconsistencies which are glossed over in the telling, but, if one has a nagging and rather compulsive sense of logic and consistency which I seem to have, then such inconsistencies are bothersome. Such inconsistency is central to this work since Wilson never fully makes up his mind if the mind parasites are actually independent beings which are tied to humans in a symbiotic necessity, or if they really don’t exist at all, but are a trick of our own minds. At times the logic of the story flows in one direction and at other times in the other, and these are flatly contradictory. Given that actual physical events of this psycho-kinetic war take place against the mind parasites in some parts of the novel, he is strongly committed to their actual independent existence. Thus, when later in the novel the author seems to switch gears to deny all this, the logic of the work is in deep question.

I’ve limited my remarks to the centrality of the battle with the mind parasites and the critical role of Husserlian Phenomenology in this battle. That is quite fair to the novel. Yet two other themes come out here and there throughout the novel, and though they aren’t developed in detail and thus leave little for me to say about them, there is enough mentioned of them to intrigue. These are Carl Jung’s notion of a collective unconsciousness which is itself something beyond the sum of individual consciousnesses of each of us, and the evolutionary work of the French Jesuit Teilhard de Chardin who also saw evolution moving beyond the individual human as the central “entity” of humanity and pointed toward a notion of cultural consciousness as an independent existence. I wish Wilson had developed those themes. They are fascinating speculations.

Colin Wilson is a learned man and fills this novel with references to various philosophers, psychologists and natural scientists in such a way that one can’t help but be impressed with the breadth of his knowledge. The Mind Parasites is a very fun book to read and philosophically challenging to boot. I recommend the book to all serious readers.

[aviators]

This was a very interesting discussion. Bump bump... Thanks for posting this.
John shares some of his research and views on the "infected "ruling class.
Well worth a listen and uplifting to know there could be a cure.

Henrik wants to have a part 2 interview in a few weeks.
Hope he shares this full interview as well. :thumb:

Best Regards......

[Delight]

This was a very interesting discussion. Bump bump... Thanks for posting this.
John shares some of his research and views on the "infected "ruling class.
Well worth a listen and uplifting to know there could be a cure.

Henrik wants to have a part 2 interview in a few weeks.
Hope he shares this full interview as well. :thumb:

Best Regards......

I would love it if someone who listened can say what the cure he proposes IS?

I glean fromthe comments that he suggests that a particular racial group carries an envy parasite that makes that race an archon tool?
But this is absurd to me. And I also have concern that he is is using projective identification because I know too much about him personally from the way he has responded to me and the way he he has reacted in the past.

I was born a woman with a genetic lineage that includes Irish, German, Creek (does that make me non-caucasion), Creole (very mixed up "racial" group...must mean I am non-caucasion) and I have CATS. I may be toxoplasmodic. Does that make me envious of John Lash that he is a white male?

Should he stop talking his brand of meta-history? IMO he has every right to do that. I don't like him anymore and I have that right.

If a megalomaniacal personality type has an opinion, IMO that opinion will be filtered and will present a buttress to that person's world view.

Edit:

I said "I" a bunch of times in this post. Does saying "I" too much invalidate what was said because it is "egocentric"? I may be infected with a genetic tendency to be opinionated. Does that make me a tool of archons/ I say NO as long as "I" support everyone's right to be egocentric and hold opinions that I have no agreement in, from my own ego self..... I would never suggest that BEING STRONG IN ONE'S BELIEFS is Bad. But do the beliefs serve is a great question i ask me all the time....

Maybe some opinions might lead us to feel really "wrong" about ourselves and THAT feeling is of being shamed to the core...very valuable tool of dis-emepowerment IMO.

[giovonni]

Thanks Delight (Maggie)

It's a sensitive topic ... Though i believe the interview title is a bit misleading ...

i didn't come away with the feeling John or Henrik were intentionally targeting any race of people ...

Perhaps your response is to be expected noting you already hold biases towards John ...

In the end it's all good ... It's all about sharing ... :)

give it a listen

[Delight]

One more point as a particular racial grouping was identified and from what I have observed in personal study is a defined CULTURAL group that is held together by a sense of threat to an integrity held to be valuable. Pogroms, fear of death because of one's culture, fear of annihilation strngthened with fight to survive has generationally strengthened a separation and a value system that is NOT genetic but perhaps is epigenetic in that it favors particular actions that support continuation.

One might state that other culture groupings like the Amish have persisted with integrity through separation?

Here is a great man talking of programming and of his perspective on deprogramming.

6BpUFpncXFM

Being "proud" of one's beliefs in family, culture and race and the sense that I will support "my kind" is remodeled and supported and is perpetual war. Being identified by these attributes seems to make sense. But DOES IT MAKE SENSE??
I was struck at one time with a poignant parable of the ultimate threat from the ongoing human struggle to "survive" as any belief system and an exclusionary tactic (of any race, creed or etc.). Us against them is such a tool.


First They Came - Pastor Martin Niemoller .

"First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me"
First They Came (http://hmd.org.uk/resources/poetry/first-they-came-pastor-martin-niemoller#sthash.nPbSkagk.dpuf)

I also suggest Shoah as a documentary experience because there is a human self defeating and pervasive block that expressed in a focus on genetics and a tragedy that is greater than any ONE expression of this Achilles heel. WE ALL are the sufferers.

50-3gQI1hJQ

[Delight]

Thanks Delight (Maggie)

It's a sensitive topic ... Though i believe the interview title is a bit misleading ...

i didn't come away with the feeling John or Henrik were intentionally targeting any race of people ...

Perhaps your response is to be expected noting you already hold biases towards John ...

In the end it's all good ... It's all about sharing ... :)

give it a listen

A person identifies with what makes "sense". JLL has little compassion IMO for the historic paranoia that occurs when humans are hurt by others. I also love the earth and humans and I dislike John Lash and where he takes the meta myth. Yes, sharing is fairing when anyone has opinions.....

I will bow out from the thread but I listened to this one before and JLL does say Jewmanity...... and he says he does not hate the Jewish race which I consider a precious obfuscation of the "issue". The fact is he says the agenda is Jewish. NO. It is that humans are likely to self identify based on what they learn and we learn as white people TOO that we are "needing to prevent white genocide" because we are seemingly all defining from race.

Ultimately we just create larger boxes of "special" paranoia.

CeDfEHD_0G4

[giovonni]

I will bow out from the thread

I believe not... I think you made yourself quite clear on the thread and matter ... http://www.skype-emoticons.com/images/emoticon-00136-giggle.gif

[aviators]

Yes, though it must be emphasized here, that this interview was not about condemning or blaming all members of any one human tribe (group) ... We all humans (historically) have pretty much been duped from our onset on this planet.
Yes I agree completely.
It seems the human races have been duped for a long time and perhaps set up
to do dastardly things against each other.

Just getting to the truth is huge.
Not long ago we thought blowing smoke up ones a$$ or blood letting would cure
you of anything. We know this is not true now. The truth is coming to the surface at epic speeds now.
More truth and pieces of the puzzle will free humanity soooon. Amen.


.

[ulli]

Thank you, Delight.
I believe I see what you see here...namely that even the identifying of "the enemy" as an external group,
and even pinning a label on them as victims of deceitful myth makers ...none of this can ever lead us to promised land.
The transformation of humanity happens at the level of the individual, and when a certain critical mass has been reached then perhaps enlightenment will spread like wild fire, and the whole human race can wake up and be transformed.
I believe this is going to happen quite soon and when it does John Lash and a whole host of speculators, writers, thinkers, and even Aalonians will be forgotten forever.

What will then remain is the discovery that our future depends on us, on our level of consciousness, and on our ability to contribute to the greater whole that which is of benefit to all, and not just stuff that begins and ends with mere words.

Still, I enjoy listening to the musings of John Lash, when I have nothing better to do, but several times I felt like interjecting: "Man, you are barking up the wrong tree...in fact, there is no cat!"

[giovonni]

Though i sense that was Mr. Lash's intent ...
To interrupt the musing and political correctness of this contrived world.

[Gardener]

He has initially made some strange leaps of asumption, which may be comming from the way he is filtering through his own previous research to make the connections he has made. I don't disagree with a lot of what he says and his previous work on the archons was imho good, and am convinced the 'light process' the still magnetic light, (Walter Russel) on an individual level is the way to go but he has simplyfied it very much. Still listening but it has lit a few connections which I find interesting.

[Lcam88]

I would love it if someone who listened can say what the cure he proposes IS?

When we love someone, we want to know of everything about them. We want to empathize with them and become a pillar of support so they may overcome their difficulties. That is how we love our husbands, wives, parents and children.

His suggestion is to get to know and love our creator, we must know her story and empathize (truly feel and be able to relive her story in our imagination). We must seek to become closer to her and exchange ideas with her and even to develop intimacy between your mind and hers. How you choose to participate in her experience and help her in her plight does not need to follow other suggestions Mr Lash may make, they only need to follow what is true and right for you.

The recordings you listen to are of Mr John Lash doing these very things; it is his path of falling in love with Gaia/Sophia. I find he is very very angry for what humans have done and what they are doing to themselves he shares that from time to time.

If you don't like the man or have issues with detail of some of his experiences, then so be it. But maybe allowing that to interfere with the possibility of developing a closer relationship with Gaia/Sophia is something you should think about separately.

PS He gave this suggestion given in a different interview, I believe.