Raw Rosetta Images of Alien Buildings on Comet 67P

[Matt P]

This is from Forbidden Knowledge TV. I personally believe this is a little bit of disinfo in that I believe we have technology to check out such things without it taking 12 years to get there. But it's still interesting for what is being disclosed...

Matt


On August 11, 2014 the YouTube
publisher called "secureteam10"
claims to have received an email
sent through an anonymizing proxy
server, from a spoofed email address,
claiming to be from a current
employee at the European Space
Agency (ESA), which secureteam10
describes as a "Monumental find."

Per the description, the emailed
attachments were un-doctored, raw
images recently taken by the Rosetta
space craft of Comet 67P, revealing
the true nature of the "space rock".

Namely, that an outbuilding and a
disk-shaped object appear on the
unretouched version sent of this photo,
differing from the images officially
released.

These are compared with one another,
along with the alleged, decades-long,
"true" back story that motivated this
mission to capture images of this specific
"space rock" out of so many others, out
there.

The publishers of secureteam10 say,
"Stay tuned for updates as soon as we
get them!"

Video (6 and a half mins):

8/11/2014 LEAKED! Raw Rosetta Images of
Alien Buildings on Comet 67P

http://www.ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com/page/26602.html


mlXoLwvzhzc

[TelosianEmbrace]

It is wise at this time to remember the interview between Dr. Ken Johnson and Jeff Rense. NASA has been airbrushing images for decades, and there is no reason why the modus operandi for the ESA would be any different.


"In 1969 Ken was responsible for controlling all the data and photographic information generated from the lunar missions."

aYkvO0WNQ80

The use of archaic technology to obtain these images at some time and cost when we know they have a Space Command is, indeed, intriguing. If we take the assumption that this evidence is not disinfo, then for the sake of discussion I am going to make one suggestion. The photos were obtained in this way and entered into public record so that, at some time in the future, they could be brought forward as evidence that at the time of photographing it, Comet 67P was devoid any signs of life. This would suggest that Comet 67P has something to do with some type of engineered future event.

Or, maybe, I'm an avid conspiracy theorist with an overactive imagination! :cool:

[Nick Matkin]

Unfortunately I'm no digital image expert. But all I can suggest is that the 'structures' on the 'original' images seem to have sharper, better defined edges than the edges of other features of the comet.

So to my untrained eye, this looks like an elaborate hoax to me. But why? Just to see who takes it up and where it gets repeated I guess.

Nick

[kemo]

It does seem implausible and why would ET want to build a substantial complex on an unstable lump of rock and ice? As to why hoaxers do it, I don't know. As a person who would not dream of such a thing it is hard to understand the mindset, but then I know one person in particular (who I avoid) who makes up the most amazing stories about playing football with Rod Stewart, and Oliver Reed, Madonna, Sting all get woven into a rich tapestry of lies. Well maybe not 'lies' a such as I think fantasists come to believe their own fantasies. I don't understand why someone should make up BS like that but the fact is that they do. And I have to say, I suspect one or two PA members of similar.

[Matt P]

It does seem implausible and why would ET want to build a substantial complex on an unstable lump of rock and ice? As to why hoaxers do it, I don't know. As a person who would not dream of such a thing it is hard to understand the mindset, but then I know one person in particular (who I avoid) who makes up the most amazing stories about playing football with Rod Stewart, and Oliver Reed, Madonna, Sting all get woven into a rich tapestry of lies. Well maybe not 'lies' a such as I think fantasists come to believe their own fantasies. I don't understand why someone should make up BS like that but the fact is that they do. And I have to say, I suspect one or two PA members of similar.

Or perhaps, kemo, the object is a structure that was made to look like a comet to avoid suspicion. Not something we might understand but far more advanced civilizations might commonly do this to avoid detection by lesser evolved worlds. Who knows. That's why we share these things for folks to collaborate and try to figure it out.

[Selene]

Just to take the other side of the question for a moment, if this were a hoax: qui bono? What’s the upside for the hoaxer?

A well-crafted hoax, it seems to me, has to have properties that will allow debunkers to take it down with some ease, usually in order to embarrass its erstwhile proponents. That’s the trap. And perhaps someone wants to discredit secureteam10. Possible.

But let’s suppose this one is a really, really well-crafted hoax, one that’s harder to debunk. Why? Where might it want to lead us?

The obvious inference – if this rock “isn’t a rock but an intelligently controlled craft of some kind” – would be that “they” are coming...

Who, exactly? And why?

We already know that most ET visitors can move between dimensions, use wormholes and hardly need to spend light-years travelling physically in the slow lane. So:

a) this might be intended to suggest some “new type” alien visitors. Heh heh, designed by Hollywood.

And - gimme a break –

b) they’re on a nerdy space rock and not a sleek piece of titanium techno-marvel? (‘Sure, CB, that way we avoid unnecessarily having to disclose any secret technology...’)

No, the plan could be to do a dummy landing of some debris in a desert somewhere (disclosure at last, folks!), nicely salted with a few bits of stealth earth-based technology (“We come bearing gifts for your people...”) – a remake of “The Day The Earth Stood Still.”

In this version, the ET’s are played by holograms, the precursors of “The Invasion From Outer Space” so long predicted by Werner Von Braun.

Sending a satellite into space for no apparent reason other than to schmooze around an average asteroid is indeed unlikely.

But launching a satellite could be a relatively inexpensive way to kick off “The Great Planetary Invasion” false flag, if one is intended.

I’d say at this point that such a scenario cannot be excluded here.

Stay tuned, friends. There will be more to come, I’m sure.

Cheers,

Selene

[kemo]

Look - it's no good asking quo bono and all that - it's all irrelevant. The "why" may be deeply hidden in someone's unconscious but frankly I'm not that interested. I just know some people do lie and some hoax. Some people hunt foxes. I don't understand that either - well maybe I understand that slightly better than hoaxers. The fact is some people do such things. They get their kicks out of it somehow.

As to hiding a complex on a comet becuase no-one would dream of looking there. Hidden from who? It wouldn't be hidden from other ETs. From us? Why bother? If you wanted to hide something like that an asteriod is more stable or there's the other side of the moon. That comet will start giving off gas and dust as it approaches the sun. What was the one that broke up? Forgot the name. At any rate I shalln't be buying any real estate on Rosetta. I suppose you might want an observation post to see how comets behave but I'd have thought ET would be well beyond that. Since we don't know the provenance of this vid I'm inclined to the hoax theory.

[kemo]

PS Think I may slightly have misread your post Selene. Agree with what you say.