PDA

View Full Version : Missouri teen shot dead after jaywalking; witnesses say with hands in the air



jerry
16th August 2014, 17:07
A story not yet to be found on any of the official main stream press reports



Missouri teen shot dead after jaywalking; witnesses say with hands in the air
"I saw the barrel of the gun pointed at my friend," said Mr. Johnson. "Then I saw the fire come out of the barrel."
Posted on August 13, 2014 by Site Staff in News
Michael Brown, 18, was left lying in street for 4 hours after being shot to death by Ferguson Police.
FERGUSON, MO — A teen’s death has sparked national outrage, after a dispute over jaywalking resulted in a fatal police shooting. According to witnesses, the target had his hands in the air when he was shot multiple times.
At around 2:15 p.m. on August 9th, 2014, 18-year-old Michael Brown and 22-year-old Dorian Johnson were walking down the center of Canfield Drive in a residential neighborhood close to one of their homes.
Some key parts of the story are in dispute, but everyone agrees on the following: (1) the two men were walking in the street; (2) a Ferguson Police Officer told the men to get on the sidewalk; (3) there was a brief verbal exchange; (4) the unidentified officer fatally shot Michael Brown multiple times; (5) Brown was unarmed.
Darian Johnson’s Witness Account
Dorian Johnson was Mr. Brown’s companion that afternoon and says he witnessed the confrontation and the shooting. In an interview with MSNBC, Mr. Johnson said that he and Mr. Brown had been walking in the street when an officer drove up and told them to “Get the f— onto the sidewalk.” Those were the words Mr. Johnson recalled being yelled at him and his friend.
According to the account, the pair were nearly to Mr. Johnson’s house and did not immediately exit the street as directed. “It was not but a minute to our destination and we would be off the street,” he said in an interview.
The officer, who had already passed them, put his car in reverse and almost hit them. The male cop then opened his door, hitting Mr. Brown. When the door bounced shut, the officer grew “upset” and reached out of his window and allegedly grabbed Mr. Brown by the neck, yanking him into the window.
“Mike was trying to get away from being choked,” Mr. Johnson told MSNBC. At that point, he said, the officer pulled a gun and fired, striking Mr. Brown.
“I saw the barrel of the gun pointed at my friend,” said Mr. Johnson. “Then I saw the fire come out of the barrel.”
Mr. Johnson says he was only an arm’s length away from the initial shot. “I could see so vividly what was going on because I was so close,” he said.
Both men started running, his account stated, but Mr. Johnson ducked behind a car while Mr. Brown kept running. The officer had exited his vehicle with his gun drawn.
That’s when Mr. Brown was shot a second time, Mr. Johnson said, and he turned with his hands in the air, only to be shot several more times. After witnessing Mr. Brown collapse and stop moving following multiple gunshot wounds, Mr. Johnson said that he feared for his life and took off running.
Mr. Johnson stated that Brown did not assault the police officer and that, contrary to police reports, “[Brown] did not reach for the officer’s weapon at all.”
Describing the scene, Mr. Johnson revealed the placement of the police car and Brown at the time of the shooting: “His death came behind the police car, but the initial shot, we were on the side, at the driver’s door of the police car.”
When interviewed by MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, Mr. Johnson said that it was was “sixty seconds or less” from the moment of first contact until the shooting. “It sped up so quickly, it got out of hand. It wasn’t even a minute.”
As a key witness, Mr. Johnson’s testimony has been ignored thus far by the police and has only discussed with media sources.
“What is interesting about this is that we have not [been contacted by investigators],” said attorney Freeman Bosley, Jr., who represents Mr. Johnson. He said that he and his client contacted the department to make themselves available for an interview but, as of this writing, were turned down.
Piaget Crenshaw’s Witness Account
A young woman living in the neighborhood was in an upper floor of her home when the commotion took place outside. Piaget Crenshaw, 19, said she was waiting for a ride to work when she saw a police officer confronting Mr. Brown.
“I heard gunshots fired… I look out the window, and at this moment, he’s [the officer is] running and he’s chasing after Michael, full force down the street, and gunshots were being fired repeatedly as well.”
“I went from that window to my balcony, where I saw Michael, he’s running this way. He turns his body towards this way, hands in the air, being compliant. He gets shot in the face and chest and goes down and dies.”
She complied with a request to give photos of the scene to authorities.

Michael Brown, Sr., holds a son explaining his views on the death of his 18-year-old son at the hands of Ferguson Police.
The Official Police Narrative
The police have confirmed several aspects of the story, but have introduced several other factors in contradiction to eyewitnesses. The Ferguson Police Department asked the St. Louis Police to take over the investigation; hence, SLPD Chief Jon Belmar has appeared behind a microphone in multiple interviews following the shooting.
Chief Belmar confirmed that the officer verbally confronted the men about jaywalking. “One of the men complied, the other did not,” he said.
“As the officer decided to get out of his car to continue the conversation, he was pushed back into the car and there was a physical confrontation in that car,” said Chief Belmar. “In fact, there was a struggle over the officer’s gun.”
Belmar confirmed that one shot was fired from within the police car. All shots were fired by police. Mr. Brown was unarmed. Authorities have been reluctant to comment further on other details of the incident.
Mr. Brown died in a pool of blood in the street, days before he was scheduled to begin his first year of college. His death has caused significant grief and palpable anger in Ferguson as well as outrage across the country. It has also been exploited by criminals who have taken to rioting and looting as well as individuals who have have used it to further their racially-based political causes. The following police response has been forceful and dramatic.

Joanne Shepard
16th August 2014, 17:25
Its been reported that some one from the police department heard about this so called incident on the news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=YNkp58lWvKk&list=UUteoJICyCbxvlJnQ9cQ5zUA

jerry
16th August 2014, 17:31
This excerpt from the story on this thread underscores what is being done to keep the truth at bay, and how the media is state run and controlled

As a key witness, Mr. Johnson’s testimony has been ignored thus far by the police and has only discussed with media sources.
“What is interesting about this is that we have not [been contacted by investigators],” said attorney Freeman Bosley, Jr., who represents Mr. Johnson. He said that he and his client contacted the department to make themselves available for an interview but, as of this writing, were turned down.
Piaget Crenshaw’s Witness Account

Their agenda is for federal authority to supersede and take control over the citizenry, thereby bolstering their control. Seizing power from local jurisdictions is the very underling issue today in the majority of cities and towns across our nation.
The demonization of local law enforcement then and now underscores their agenda. When your local police are answerable to the local jurisdictions you have justice that works for the community with the communities best interest at the forefront of the issues or laws.

Then on the other hand with the federalization of the police the communities best interest is lost through bureaucratic non relevant ideologies, with them answerable not to the communities, but to the corporate elites, of whom structure our laws through powerful lobbing of the politicians in Washington, placed there by them, for them, to protect their interests, with little regard for the interest of the local jurisdictions.

turn off the TV and find the real news here on the internet where the propaganda for truth is exposed

jerry
16th August 2014, 17:45
Its been reported that some one from the police department heard about this incident on the news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=YNkp58lWvKk&list=UUteoJICyCbxvlJnQ9cQ5zUA

Very interesting video when you consider that no officer had been named in the shooting , and the suppression of all the information about the shooting .....False flag? problem - solution ???????

jerry
16th August 2014, 17:48
Their agenda is for federal authority to supersede and take control over the citizenry, thereby bolstering their control. Seizing power from local jurisdictions is the very underling issue today in the majority of cities and towns across our nation.
The demonization of local law enforcement then and now underscores their agenda. When your local police are answerable to the local jurisdictions you have justice that works for the community with the communities best interest at the forefront of the issues or laws.

Then on the other hand with the federalization of the police the communities best interest is lost through bureaucratic non relevant ideologies, with them answerable not to the communities, but to the corporate elites, of whom structure our laws through powerful lobbing of the politicians in Washington, placed there by them, for them, to protect their interests, with little regard for the interest of the local jurisdictions.

with the preceding in mind this shooting in my mind certainly lends its self to a false flag scenario

ghostrider
16th August 2014, 20:28
the media didn't show Mike Brown stealing from a local store moments before , and I heard someone with him shot at the police first , they returned fire ... yep big psy op ...

Joanne Shepard
16th August 2014, 21:37
Its been reported that some one from the police department heard about this incident on the news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=YNkp58lWvKk&list=UUteoJICyCbxvlJnQ9cQ5zUA

Very interesting video when you consider that no officer had been named in the shooting , and the suppression of all the information about the shooting .....False flag? problem - solution ???????


These files compiled in this video contains audio of St. Louis police
Here is the link to hear it for yourself. Skip to about 11:25.... http://youtu.be/zta9FyoA7TU

seeker/reader
16th August 2014, 21:44
I heard the MO Governor declared a state of emergency in Ferguson and ordered a 12 pm curfew tonight until 5 am. I also heard on the news that the FBI are going door to door looking for witnesses to the shooting.

jerry
16th August 2014, 23:46
I heard the MO Governor declared a state of emergency in Ferguson and ordered a 12 pm curfew tonight until 5 am. I also heard on the news that the FBI are going door to door looking for witnesses to the shooting.
and they dont want to talk to Dorian the guy who was with him.... LOL..... and the FBI ? looking for witnesses ? Im sure they'll find a doozey .....Im with ghostrider can you say psy op

and another witness with photos of the scene Im assuming while it was taking place, or shortly after ,will they silence her ?

Piaget Crenshaw’s Witness Account
A young woman living in the neighborhood was in an upper floor of her home when the commotion took place outside. Piaget Crenshaw, 19, said she was waiting for a ride to work when she saw a police officer confronting Mr. Brown.
“I heard gunshots fired… I look out the window, and at this moment, he’s [the officer is] running and he’s chasing after Michael, full force down the street, and gunshots were being fired repeatedly as well.”
“I went from that window to my balcony, where I saw Michael, he’s running this way. He turns his body towards this way, hands in the air, being compliant. He gets shot in the face and chest and goes down and dies.”
She complied with a request to give photos of the scene to authorities.

I hope she was smart enough to keep copies.

jerry
17th August 2014, 01:17
Murder by Police and Other High Crimes in America

HSLzYqu5CdI

jerry
17th August 2014, 01:58
the media didn't show Mike Brown stealing from a local store moments before , and I heard someone with him shot at the police first , they returned fire ... yep big psy op ...

If it wasn't done as a psy op it will become one as they try to spin and justify the murder

jerry
17th August 2014, 02:12
Its been reported that some one from the police department heard about this incident on the news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=YNkp58lWvKk&list=UUteoJICyCbxvlJnQ9cQ5zUA

Very interesting video when you consider that no officer had been named in the shooting , and the suppression of all the information about the shooting .....False flag? problem - solution ???????
They Have now identified(targeted) him ,went as far as reporting on where he lives through CNN ? Every thing is being done under the sun to provoke and enrage the public to bring in martial law and set a precedent....... INCREDIBLE

Snowflower
17th August 2014, 03:58
I am confused. Why has a new thread on the Ferguson story been started? We are already on page 5 on the same subject. And the OP on this thread has already commented in that one.

panopticon
17th August 2014, 04:36
the media didn't show Mike Brown stealing from a local store moments before , and I heard someone with him shot at the police first , they returned fire ... yep big psy op ...

There are no reports of shots being fired at Officer Wilson.

The "robbery" is not part of the timeline of events. Jackson said that Wilson stopped Brown because of jay-walking.

Eye-witnesses said Brown was shot at multiple times (some while running away from the initial confrontation others while on the ground).

Rev-news has a good article with witness video here (http://revolution-news.com/ferguson-polices-pr-stunt-poisons-independent-impartial-investigation/).

The only reason to release the video from the store at that time was to muddy the public perception of the "incident".

An unarmed man was shot at multiple times by an armed police officer. That is it.

-- Pan

jerry
17th August 2014, 04:55
I am confused. Why has a new thread on the Ferguson story been started? We are already on page 5 on the same subject. And the OP on this thread has already commented in that one.

I started the tread as a new topic far as I was aware, you could ask a moderator to help you with your confusion and combine the treads . don't mind, don't matter , in my mind 2 threads better than one

jerry
17th August 2014, 20:22
The thread here is to key on the fact the police are federalized and discus the reasons behind that fact , and the cover up and spin that's underway

jerry
18th August 2014, 01:52
the tread needs moved to the conspiracy blog its no longer news worthy