How to Opt-Out Of Forced Vaccinations in the United States.........

[Cidersomerset]

How to Opt-Out Of Forced Vaccinations


Published on 25 Aug 2014

W7rPRtXl7Jg

Well, get your book bags packed and your shoes tied tight. It’s about time to go back to school again.

Every fall, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention send out their reminders to parents to
vaccinate their children. Different states have various vaccination requirements, mostly targeting
mumps, measles, rubella, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus and polio.

For many years, especially while many of these vaccinations were still being developed, the majority
of the population relied solely on the CDC for their information about vaccines. In recent years, large
groups of people have started to question the overall benefit of vaccinations. With so many people
objecting to the mandatory shots, we turn to Dr Mayer Eisenstein. He says that kids CAN go to
school WITHOUT vaccines.

Doctor Eisenstein is a graduate of the University of Illinois Medical School and the Medical College of
Wisconsin School of Public Health. He’s been practicing medicine for 42 years, caring for over 75 thousand people.

Support Indymedia!
Donate USD: http://nnn.is/donate-dollars

[Cidersomerset]

http://thepeopleschemist.com/wp-content/themes/p2/i/logo.gif



http://thepeopleschemist.com/wp-content/themes/p2/i/shane_logo2.png




Herd Immunity: Three Reasons Why I Don’t Vaccinate My Children… And Why
Vaccine Supporters Shouldn’t Care That I Use Vaccine Exemption Forms


Parents who choose not to vaccinate their children and protect them with vaccine
exemption forms are often chastised and stereotyped for putting their own kids
at risk. But what is even stranger than this assault on individual freedom and
informed choice, is that these concerned parents are attacked for putting
vaccinated children at risk.

These attacks are based on the theory of “herd immunity.” This hypothesis was
plucked out of an old college textbook. It states that the more people are immune
to an infectious agent, the less likely an immune-compromised individual is to come
in contact with it. In other words herd immunity serves as a human shield – a type
of immunity – for “at-risk” individuals. But remember, it’s only a hypothesis.

When outbreaks arise among children, health officials are quick to state that it’s due
to a breakdown in ‘herd immunity.‘ Doctors parrot it too, without even looking at the
research. They say it’s happening more often nationwide as states make it easier for
parents to opt out of vaccinations.

Like argumentative apes, pro-vaccine parents and their physicians start pounding their
chest in favor of such statements. They use them to attack anti-vaccine parents,
accusing them of “putting vaccinated kids at risk due to a breakdown in herd immunity.”

This is fuzzy logic. And it’s borderline stupid.

After all, if vaccines truly worked, then why would vaccinated kids be at risk?

…Plus, the spread of infection isn’t limited to coming into contact with another person!
You can get sick without ever seeing another individual. Therefore, herd immunity is
nothing more than a silly catch-phrase used to scare and bully parents into vaccinating
their kids. Don’t fall for it parents, keep using the vaccine exemption forms to legally
avoid them.




https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-U0M3uNh5xNI/T-Ims-t8ibI/AAAAAAAABqQ/KfKv1416-Rw/s800/vaccineworked.png



Parents Should Question Vaccine Safety and Effectiveness by Using Vaccine Exemption

Instead of using an unproven hypothesis to question parents who have opted out,
pro-vaccine parents should be questioning the safety and effectiveness of vaccines.
With dozens of vaccines being forced on the public, some healthy skepticism could
go a long way toward raising a vibrantly healthy child.

My background as a medicinal chemist taught me to rely on proven research. I
learned to be less sensitive to emotional arguments and more sensitive to facts
supported by reproducibility. This is one of the main principles of the scientific
method. It refers to the ability of a test or experiment to be accurately reproduced.
As a parent, I have a responsibility to use my training to make decisions for my
family. Especially when it comes to potentially dangerous vaccinations.

In my own research, I have uncovered facts that every parent should be aware of.
Here are three primary reasons why I have not and will not vaccinate my own
children and why I’ve used vaccine exemption forms
for public school and more:

Reason #1: Vaccination Does Not Always Mean “Immunization”

Vaccines are purported to work by triggering the body’s natural immunity. By
injecting weak or dead infectious agents through our skin, it’s believed that the
body will create the appropriate immune defense. They are even called “immunizations.”

And while this idea is over two hundred years old, it’s not nearly as effective as
the pharmaceutical companies, doctors and government agencies want you to believe.

At best, vaccines boost our defenses only temporarily. That’s because your
immune system is programmed to recognize and attack invaders that come
through the biological “front door.” That would be your nose, mouth and eyes.
It doesn’t work properly when we shove infection into our body with a needle.

The World Health Organization (WHO) underscored this fact in their report titled,
Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals. They wrote that, “Children under two
years of age do not consistently develop immunity following vaccination.”
Therefore, vaccines can fly “below the radar” of our immune system.

Not only does this weaken the immune system, it renders many vaccines ineffective.

And history proves this to be the case…

[RELATED: Nature's Immune Booster is Potent Antibiotic. See the facts here.]

The Polio Vaccine

Polio is the most feared childhood illness. It has caused paralysis and death for much
of human history. The world experienced a dramatic increase in polio around 1910.
Epidemics became regular events. They were the driving force behind a great race
toward the development of a polio vaccine. The vaccine was developed in 1953 and
an oral version came soon after.

But the vaccines came too late. Thanks to better hygiene, sanitation and nutrition,
the rates of polio infection had already plummeted as documented in my book,
Over-The-Counter Natural Cures. And it’s a good thing, because both forms were
a total failure. In fact, instead of preventing polio… they actually caused it!

Medical journals around the world have exposed this outcome. The Medical Journal
of Australia discovered “the relation of prophylactic inoculations [polio vaccines] to
the onset of poliomyelitis [polio]” as far back as 1951.

And the trend has continued…

In a 2007 article, entitled “Nigeria Fights Rare Vaccine-Derived Polio Outbreak,”
Reuters showed how the vaccine itself ignited outbreaks of polio in Nigeria,
Chad and Angola.

And according to The Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, the polio vaccine program
launched by Bill Gates paralyzed 47,500 children in 2011 alone. And those injured
by the vaccine died at twice the rate of those infected by “wild” polio!

Whooping Cough

The same scenario was repeated in the case of the whooping cough (pertussis)
vaccine. Between 1900 and 1935, mortality rates due to whooping cough
dropped by 79 percent in the United States. Yet, the vaccine (DTP and DTaP)
wasn’t introduced until 1940.

Today, those who have been “immunized” are the most susceptible to whooping cough.

Researchers with the CDC publicly stated in 2002 that, “the number of infants
dying from whooping cough is rising, despite record high vaccination levels.”
In 2009, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution recognized the trend too. In the
article titled, “Whooping Cough Vaccine not as Powerful as Thought,” the
publication highlighted a recent cluster of 18 whooping cough-infected students.
Seventeen of those students – 95% of those infected – had been immunized
with five doses of DTaP vaccine.

Measles, Mumps, Rubella

The measles vaccine is no different. In 1957, the MMR shot became widely used
in an effort to eradicate measles, mumps, and rubella. The The CDC insisted that
it would eliminate mumps in the United States by the year 2010.

But rather than preventing mumps and measles, the vaccine has actually caused
widespread epidemics. Outbreaks have become the norm. And those who have
suffered the most were “vaccinated.”

Between 1983 and 1990, there was a 423% increase in measles cases among vaccinated
individuals. Then in 2006, the largest mumps outbreak in twenty years occurred. Among
those infected, 63% were “immunized,” as shown by Neil Miller in Vaccines: Are They Safe
and Effective? Others found similar results.

In The Journal of Infectious Diseases, scientists from Vanderbilt University School of
Medicine wrote, “Vaccine failure accounted for a sustained mumps outbreak in a
highly vaccinated population.”

In his book, How to Raise a Healthy Child In Spite of Your Doctor, the late Dr. Robert
Mendlesohn, MD showed that vaccinated individuals are 14 times more likely to contract
mumps than unvaccinated.

These stunning vaccine failures led the Iowa Department of Public Health to conclude
that, “…Our most important public health tool against this disease—2 doses of MMR
vaccine—is not providing the necessary levels of protection to control mumps in the
U.S. population.”

Even the Mayo Clinic – a bastion of mainstream medicine – states that, “vaccine
failure has become increasingly apparent.”

Flu Vaccine Failure

The flu vaccine has proven just as worthless…

In 2007, the CDC reported that it had “no or low effectiveness” against influenza
or influenza-like illnesses. The data showed that the flu vaccine protected no more
than 14% of those who received it. And this wasn’t some fluke. The vaccine is rarely
any more effective than that.

Even The New York Times reports that, “The influenza vaccine, which has been
strongly recommended for people over 65 for more than four decades, is losing
its reputation as an effective way to ward off the virus.”

Doctors who do their homework understand that vaccines are ineffective. Dr. Ira
Goodman MD, FACS, ABHIM, a surgeon from Loyola Medical School is one of them.
Through email correspondence, he told me he is against vaccines simply because
“they don’t work!”

The failure of vaccines has finally gone mainstream. But instead of admitting that
they don’t offer protection, health officials and the pharmaceutical companies are
pushing for MORE vaccines as the solution. When you consider the number of
outright toxins contained in these experimental concoctions, the implications are chilling.

Reason #2 Vaccines Expose Kids to Toxins

According to fact sheets put out by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the
Food & Drug Administration (FDA), vaccines are brimming with toxins. These include
dozens of chemicals, heavy metals and allergens. They also include numerous
objectionable ingredients, such as monkey kidney cells and aborted fetal tissue.

Formaldehyde is just one of many chemicals found in vaccines. And according to
the FDA, “Excessive exposure to formaldehyde may cause cancer.” Another ingredient
in the cocktail is a chemical known as 2-phenoxyethanol. This comes with an FDA
warning which states that, “It can depress the central nervous system and may cause
vomiting and diarrhea, which can lead to dehydration in infants.”

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg…

In addition to mercury and aluminum, many vaccines are also spiked with antibiotics
like neomycin, polymyxin B, streptomycin and gentamicin. These drugs aren’t even
approved for uninfected children!

Despite this emerging toxic threat, Parenting Magazine and Dr. Paul Offit stated that,
“In theory, healthy infants could safely get up to 100,000 vaccines at once.” Are you
kidding me? He won’t be testing that theory on my children. I wonder if he’s willing
to stab himself that many times to prove it?

I queried numerous physicians via email and phone to find out if they shared
Dr. Offit’s ideas. They didn’t. Dr. Suzanne Humphries, MD was adamant that,
“Vaccines put children at risk for a form of kidney disease called nephrotic
syndrome. This can be caused by a common ingredient – Bovine Serum Albumin.
Doctors just give children steroids to suppress the symptoms, never knowing
what the cause was.”


http://thepeopleschemist.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/autismfinal.png

If parents need further proof of toxicity, they can read vaccine package inserts.
The insert for the DPT vaccine from Sanofi Pasteur warns that, “A review by the
Institute of Medicine (IOM) found evidence for a causal relation between tetanus
toxoid and both brachial neuritis and Guillain-Barré syndrome [pain and loss of
nerve and motor function].” Makers of the Tripedia vaccine for DTaP state that
certain outcomes are so frequent that they had to list them. These reactions include:

• Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)
• Anaphylactic reaction
• Cellulitis (a bacterial skin infection)
• Autism
• Convulsion/Seizures
• Brain dysfunction
• Low muscle tone and strength
• Nerve damage
• Hyperventilation/apnea

These are some damn good reasons to use vaccine exemption forms.

Vaccine supporters will insist that the benefits outweigh these toxicity risks.
But that would only be true if vaccination was the only road to immunization.

Reason #3 Kids Can Build Immunity Naturally

We are all at risk from various “biological nasties.” Invisible threats are
everywhere…A single gram of feces can contain more than 10 million
viruses, 1 million bacteria, 1,000 parasite cysts and 100 parasite eggs.

The goal is to minimize risk by increasing our immunity, naturally. In
Over-The-Counter Natural Cures, I showed how innate and adaptive
immunity act as our God-given protection from biological nasties.

But, you have to support these Gatekeepers of health with proper nutrition,
hygiene, sanitation and natural medicine like andrographis. Just as hand
washing saved millions from infant mortality in a hospital setting, healthy
habits minimize exposure and boost our natural defenses. The science
supporting this won the Nobel Prize in 2011!

Bruce Beutler and Jules Hoffmann discovered that we are hard-wired with
special receptors that recognize foreign invaders and activate our immune
response. Ralph Steinman then found that special cells of the immune
system possess the unique capacity to activate the immune response,
which clears biological nasties from the body. And all of this occurs
without vaccination!

[RELATED: Nature's Immune Booster is Potent Antibiotic. See the facts here.]

Decline in Disease Not Caused by Vaccination

Further research has shown that the historical decline in infectious
diseases – that parents are now vaccinating against – were not the
result of inoculation, like doctors blindly and wrongly assert. Instead,
the decline began years before the vaccines were introduced thanks
to improved habits of hygiene, sanitation and nutrition that raised
our natural immunity.

Differences among immunity reflect the importance of healthy
habits…Ever wonder why two people (even in the same household)
can be exposed to the same virus while one of them is laid up in bed
for a week and the other doesn’t feel the slightest effect?

And why is it that while nearly 50 million people died from the
Spanish flu in 1918… the case fatality rate was from two to five
percent? That means that 95 to 98 percent of those who
contracted the flu recovered fully. And that says nothing of
the hundreds of millions of people who came into contact
with the virus, but never became ill at all.

The difference is our individual immune system.

And the bottom line is that your habits have a great deal
of control over it, as shown in Nobel winning science. Work
with it to acquire protection.

There are no Silver Bullets Against Infection, but You Have Options

There is no silver bullet, though.

Despite our best efforts at nutrition, hygiene and sanitation,
the immune system can still fail. Fortunately, in many cases,
emergency medicine can help.

With all this science and technology at our fingertips, I’m not
willing to risk my children’s health on the antiquated vaccine
theory… nor the toxic brew they contain.

That doesn’t make me a religious “nut job” or conspiracy theorist.
It simply means that I am an informed and caring parent with healthy
kids who don’t need to rely on risky medicines or “herd immunity.”
And since herd immunity is nothing more than an antiquated theory
– and not something that is actually protecting kids form infections
– pro-vaccine parents shouldn’t give a **** about my non-vaccinated
kids or my use of vaccine exemption forms.

Educate before you vaccinate.



About the Author

Shane "The People's Chemist" Ellison holds master's degree in
organic chemistry and is the author of Over-The-Counter Natural
Cures (SourceBooks). He's been quoted by USA Today, Shape,
Woman's World, US News and World Report, as well as Women's
Health and appeared on Fox and NBC as a medicine and health
expert. Start living young by signing up for his FREE Natural
Cures Watchdog below.


http://thepeopleschemist.com/reasons-dont-vaccinate-children-vaccine-supporters-shouldnt-give/

[WhiteFeather]

A timely thread indeed. Great info here. Well worth a bookmarking. Asquali.

[Cidersomerset]

ThePeoplesChemist

Flu Shots | Vaccines | Colds | Natural Alternatives


ryPWt67tY-Y

Uploaded on 14 Nov 2010


The People's Chemist and his book "Over-The-Counter Natural Cures"
are featured on FOX 31's Good Day Colorado anchored by Peggy Bunker.
Shane outlines inexpensive herbal remedies to avoid the prescription
drug onslaught and be healthy.

Shane "The People's Chemist" Ellison is an award-winning chemist with
a masters degree in organic chemistry. After working for a large
pharmaceutical company years ago, Shane became disgusted by all
the lies, deceit, and "checkbook science" secretly running the drug
industry. He quit Big Pharma and has never looked back. He now
dedicates himself to providing REAL health information and SAFE
supplements for people who want to free themselves from
dangerous prescription drugs.

The People's Chemist offers a FREE newsletter so that NOBODY IS LEFT BEHIND. To educate yourself, please subscribe at http://www.thepeopleschemist.com.

[TargeT]

I've been dodging mandatory vaccines in the military for over 15 years now, its very simple:


You are allergic to eggs and prone to eczema, if they ask you how you react to eggs tell them your chest gets really tight and its hard to breathe.

This has works for me every time, no medical professional is going to risk anaphylactic shock just for a vaccine.

[Krist]

I've been dodging mandatory vaccines in the military for over 15 years now, its very simple:


You are allergic to eggs and prone to eczema, if they ask you how you react to eggs tell them your chest gets really tight and its hard to breathe.

This has works for me every time, no medical professional is going to risk anaphylactic shock just for a vaccine.

Wish I would have known that tidbit on my second round of shots circa 1988 USMC,it sent me to balboa naval hospital.I did't know a thing,they risked it...LOL some how I survived.Funny now I know why the corpsman were so concerned as the ambulance whisked me away.

[Cidersomerset]

I've been dodging mandatory vaccines in the military for over 15 years now, its very simple:

Your a pro Targe.....Klinger tried to get out for years..LOL

jXuLzWNxUk0

[Cidersomerset]

I must admit I forgot this interview......He says among
other things we should not be relying on vaccines...

Project Camelot interviews Dr Len Horowitz

2FTWIEYAVcA

Uploaded on 31 Aug 2009


A short video interview recorded by Kerry Cassidy with
Dr Leonard Horowitz - when he spoke with Dr Masaru
Emoto at the Live H2O event at Laguna Beach on 18 June 2009.

[Bob]

So Steve, can you opt out of shots in UK? Have you had vaccines? If so what reactions did you have? I had to have vaccines cause I wasn't allowed in certain countries without for instance a Yellow Card (Yellow Fever vaccination). Absolutely HATED the side effects of the yellow fever vaccination..

The thread title is telling the US to opt out right? How about other parts of the world, where can one opt out, how to do that? What about Japan? (japan opted out of Whooping cough then ended up with a massive outbreak of it till they opted back in.. Just asking.. Why tell the US how to opt out when the rest of the world needs to know how? :)

[Cidersomerset]

So Steve, can you opt out of shots in UK?

I'm not sure, I have spent so much time on here lately I thought
Britain was the 51st state....LOL

As far as I know its not compulsory , but its heavily recommended
if not frowned on as child abuse if not given to children. Its more
the atmosphere of threat created by the various scares over the
years. Avian and swine flu and there have been localised outbreaks
of measles and other diseases. I personally don't think all vaccinations
are a problem as long as they are not abused, which seems to be
happening for excess profit and wider distribution thru doctors surgeries.

As with all these things , its hard to know for certain if vaccination were
stopped would all the Victorian diseases come back , even though there
were other factors like poor water, sanitation, living conditions etc.

Obviously penicillin worked wonders preventing infections spreading
over the body, and antibiotics and anesthetics has revolutionised
surgery. Travelling around the world to areas is certainly
safer. The problem is have a tablet , sip of medicine or injection
culture that has been promoted unnecessarily for the corporate
£ or $...

The Thalidomide disaster in the 1950's/60's showed the dangers of
a vaccination for everything .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide


We just have to be care full and not let interest groups like
Corporate pharma lobby governments to hard. But they must
be available and in a position to help when needed. This is
always portrayed and used as a scare tactic to keep the
funding coming in. Funding in all government departments
are important , but its keeping an eye on the abuses that is the
big worry imo .

The simplest way this is set up , is Problem Reaction Solution.
Create a crisis , advertise the panic in the media, and supply the
vaccine. This can work in other fields like war, economics etc.




Why tell the US how to opt out when the rest of the world needs to know how?

Have not found a article for that, though we have not got
a constitution like America. Just a lot of legal mumbo
jumbo gathered over the last 800 years interpreted
as and when by legal bodies...LOL

========================================================


We have sort of mis mashed along !!


Vaccination has been a controversial subject in the UK since the Vaccination Act of 1853
made smallpox vaccination compulsory for all infants in the first three months of life and made
defaulting parents liable to a fine or imprisonment. In 1877 author Lewis Carroll was one of the
first to question this approach to health care in his letters to the Eastbourne Chronicle. Over the
years vaccination has spawned mass criticism of a public health policy now considered by many
to be the most cost effective part of health care.





VACCINATION...UK


According to the World Health Organisation, the two public health interventions that have
had the greatest impact on the world’s health are clean water and vaccines.

Bedford and Elliman (1998) consider that the benefit of immunising is clear, fewer people
develop the disease and fewer people suffer from serious illness or die as a result. Diseases
such as measles, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus and polio are now extremely rare in
developed countries with vaccination programmes.

Mandatory vaccination programmes were introduced in the United States in the 1960s;
persuasion became obligation as vaccination was a condition of school entry. Vaccination
is not mandatory in the UK and consent should always be obtained before immunisations
are administered (Downie and Calman 1998).

The UK Department of Health (DOH) recommends that routine vaccines are given as
detailed in the immunisation schedule presented by health visitors to all newborns. The
DOH has set targets for vaccine uptake. The aim is that by the age of two, 95 per cent.
of children will be immunised against diphtheria, tetanus, polio, pertussis, Hib, measles,
mumps and rubella. Similar schedules are in operation throughout the world

Vaccination has been a controversial subject in the UK since the Vaccination Act of 1853
made smallpox vaccination compulsory for all infants in the first three months of life and
made defaulting parents liable to a fine or imprisonment. In 1877 author Lewis Carroll
was one of the first to question this approach to health care in his letters to the Eastbourne
Chronicle. Over the years vaccination has spawned mass criticism of a public health policy
now considered by many to be the most cost effective part of health care.

Critics of vaccination programmes argue that there was already a major decline in the
mortality rate from infectios diseases in the United States and England in the 20 years
preceding the introduction of vaccine programes. Diseases like measels and whooping
cough were formerly prevalant, declined as causes of death even though morbidity remained high.

McKeown and Lowe (1974) proposed this was principally due to a vast improvement in
living standards in both Western Europe and the United States. Better housing, sanitation,
nutrition and health care resulted in a better state of health in the infant population.
Coulter and Fisher (1991) also pointed out that the successful use of antibiotics to
control secondary infections such as pneumonia and bronchitis gave babies a much
better chance of surviving pertussis and other serious illnesses.

Another reason proposed for the decline in morbidity was that the populations of
Europe and the United States had acquired a certain degree of natural resistance
to these diseases after so many generations of exposure (Scheibner, 2000).

The objective of most of the studies on immunisation is to assess the efficacy of
vaccines in relation to preventing the disease and safety issues. In 1974 a study
by Kulenkampff reported neurological complications related to the pertussis vaccine
that greatly damaged confidence in the apparently successful immunisation programme.
Uptake dropped dramatically from 80 per cent. coverage to 30 per cent., with the
number of cases matching the pre-vaccine era.

The question most parents would like answered is whether vaccinated children are
healthier than unvaccinated children and despite the masive uptake of vaccination
programmes no one is trying to find out

The attention paid by public health experts to the risks of, and eradication of,
childhood infectious diseases does not reflect their degree of threat compared
with other contemporary hazards, particularly in the developed world. In
comparison with cardiovascular disease, cancer, AIDs, pollution, violence and
accidents in the United Kingdom, the dangers posed by childhood infectious
diseases are quite small in comparison yet vaccination programmes retain a
privileged position in public health policy.

Politicians who were formerly preoccupied with illness have become increasingly
focused on “disease prevention” through the application of pre-symptomatic
screening and vaccination programmes which are seen as cost effective.

Nurses play a central role in ascertaining the immunisation status of children as
Governments strives to meet its target to vaccinate ninety five per cent. of the
population against these diseases.

To help people make their decision the quality of information on the procedure
is important, yet no published studies have been found in the PubMed database
assessing the quality of information available to parents in the UK contemplating
the vaccination of their children. Coulter, Entwistle and Gilbert (1998) was the
only UK study assessing the quality of patient information in GP surgeries finding
it to be extremly poor, it did not look at vaccination information.

Nevertheless the biomedicalconsensus is that the parents consenting to the
vaccination of their children are making an informed decision. The “misinformed”
opposition to immunisation are those arising from acceptance of unproven
allegation about vaccine safety or efficacy.

Health promoters involved in immunisation programmes must ensure that
parents are giving informed consent when they have their children vaccinated,
they must provide information on the nature, prevalance, risks of the disease,
the risks of side effects.

North American studies assessing the quality of information provided to parents
are not recent. According to Fitzgerald and Glotzer (1995), parents indicated
that they wanted information about many aspects of immunisations, and those
familiar with the vaccine information pamphlets reported high levels of satisfaction
with the pamphlets in the United States.

The right to choose is the reality of patient autonomy and power. Patient power
may mean that large groups of parents have the right to behave in a way that
“the authorities” think misguided (Smith, 2002). Parents may chose to ignore
the advice of authorities and not vaccinate their children and, according to
Smith (2002,) it seems likely that this will continue to happen.

Longstanding anxieties over vaccination, declining folk memory of the potential
horrors of the infections being prevented, distrust of the authorities fuelled by
Government’s mishandling of salmonella and BSE has resulted in a fall in the
number of children being vaccinated. Government rhetoric on “patient partnership”
(Coulter et al, 1998) suggests that it believes patients should be given choices.
However, in relation to the Measles, Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccination
programme the Government has responded by holding fast on its policy on t
he triple vaccine, when the vast majority of people want single vaccines given separately (Smith, 2002).


http://www.vaccination.co.uk/why.htm

[Limor Wolf]

Leading world vaccine researcher and CEO of Health Decisions, Inc. out of North Carolina was killed in a private jet airplane crash on December 8, 2014.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVuj8ShlDNY