Russell Brand: Time for a spiritual revolution

[Skyhaven]

3kkpxi6MayY

[aheb]

Well I don't need some skanky, verbose, paronising ex smackhead to tell me about spirituality. Maybe he should have told this to Andrew Sachs rather than what a great shag his granddaughter was, oh how soon people forget.
then there is nice mr sheridan's view of self publicist/ godfigure brand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q538glD8S84

[BIG CAT]

I find this man nauseating and absolutely despicable, he thinks that if he tries to sound philosophical by stringing along sentences using long words and talking about narratives etc people will consider him intelligent.
As he stated he's egotistic. he's a thicko from Grays Essex who made it big from acting the goat.
Plus he really could do with a BATH...........

[Cidersomerset]

I find this man nauseating and absolutely despicable, he thinks that if he tries to sound philosophical by stringing along sentences using long words and talking about narratives etc people will consider him intelligent.
As he stated he's egotistic. he's a thicko from Grays Essex who made it big from acting the goat.
Plus he really could do with a BATH...........

Mmmmeeeeeeee ooooooowwwwwwwwwWWWW .....or was that a ROAR !!

I like him , he is a recovering addict and annoying but he is not afraid
to have a go at the establishment. I'm not a fan of his ' comedy' though
but some of his interviews are good and he is not thick.

Nick Pope is one of the few that gets me annoyed with his
pretence on disclosure. Not everyone resonates with each
other but as a 'Greys' boy surely he is in the right field..LOL

[Wind]

Wow, nice judgments and ad hominems in this thread!

[Cardillac]

just search-engine (like start with YouTube) Larkin Rose for another viewpoint of Russell Brand

Larry

[Leena]

Why so much judgement and negativity. I'm not a fan of R. B. either but the fact that he speaks out and wants to make the planet better for all concerned is enough. I'm not often logging in to any forums etc anymore just because all the negativity and crap people are throwing on each other's faces. Just because somebody looks like this or talks like that or is from Essex or Texas or Granada - why does it matter! Isn't it the richness of human kind? We are alll different and yet all cells of the same body, isn't that just fantastic!

[donk]

as I stated as a response to a previous thread, do go to YouTube and search Larken Rose's take on Russell Brand-


Larry

I posted one over here, it was great…thanks for the suggestion:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?29286-Defense-Against-the-Psychopath&p=870133&viewfull=1#post870133

I personally find the “judgements” and “ad hominems” educational, and appreciate any thought (or emotional outburst) anyone would care to present. (I also appreciate forum rules, keeping it civil, and limiting the extreme negative personal attacks on individuals…but when it comes to public celebs, I like getting a feel for what others think of them)

[donk]

Why so much judgement and negativity. I'm not a fan of R. B. either but the fact that he speaks out and wants to make the planet better for all concerned is enough. I'm not often logging in to any forums etc anymore just because all the negativity and crap people are throwing on each other's faces. Just because somebody looks like this or talks like that or is from Essex or Texas or Granada - why does it matter! Isn't it the richness of human kind? We are alll different and yet all cells of the same body, isn't that just fantastic!

Some "cells" are cancer...and your immune system think they are just fine....until they are not

I agree there are some "negative" ways to express information....and emotional attachments don't solve problems...but may be more helpful than ignoring or sugarcoating them

[Leena]

Hey donk, ok for me. I just don't find the above emotional bursts "educational" or "civil". I don't mean we shouldn't say what we mean or keep quiet in order never to hurt anybody. I totally agree on speaking out and even showing your emotional responses to things, after all we are sentient beings. But I find the cheap comments rather childish and think that when criticism is given it ought to have a level higher than the opinions aired above.

[Skyhaven]

Hey donk, ok for me. I just don't find the above emotional bursts "educational" or "civil". I don't mean we shouldn't say what we mean or keep quiet in order never to hurt anybody. I totally agree on speaking out and even showing your emotional responses to things, after all we are sentient beings. But I find the cheap comments rather childish and think that when criticism is given it ought to have a level higher than the opinions aired above.

I agree with you Leena... although negativity is fine, but let it be with a bit more thought behind it than just some shallow statements, but then again if people choose to use this forum as a vent for built up hatred... whatever floats your boat!

[donk]

Meh, I prefer overt hostility to passive aggressiveness...to each their own...i did mispeak with "civil", but it is very educational: it tells you a lot about the poster, anyways...

[Bongo]

Russel brand to me seems like the wolf in sheeps clothing getting everybody on side by speaking the truth but then slowly leading his followers away from the correct path. At the moment he is singing the right tune addressing that we want change in our lives and a better society and if he turns out to genuinely want that for the rest of us then so be it. But until that point I will remember that he is a higher up mason, this in its self should make people sit up and take notice. If he has turned his back on it then fair enough but I really don't see it to be honest. The elites like to cover all areas from all angles and an awakening of the masses unguided will tend to be uncontrollable but with the right person leading it getting people on side would be very useful to wait till he has lots of followers on his side then totalitarian tip toe in to the elites plan.

[Bongo]

Hey donk, ok for me. I just don't find the above emotional bursts "educational" or "civil". I don't mean we shouldn't say what we mean or keep quiet in order never to hurt anybody. I totally agree on speaking out and even showing your emotional responses to things, after all we are sentient beings. But I find the cheap comments rather childish and think that when criticism is given it ought to have a level higher than the opinions aired above.

negativity is fine

The only difference between positivity and negativity is the one who reads it and judges it as so.

[aheb]

Why so much judgement and negativity. I'm not a fan of R. B. either but the fact that he speaks out and wants to make the planet better for all concerned is enough. I'm not often logging in to any forums etc anymore just because all the negativity and crap people are throwing on each other's faces. Just because somebody looks like this or talks like that or is from Essex or Texas or Granada - why does it matter! Isn't it the richness of human kind? We are alll different and yet all cells of the same body, isn't that just fantastic!

ok well look at my post

Do you think somebody who tells an ageing well liked actor that his grandaughter is great shag on national radio in front of millions of listeners is spiritual? is an ex smackhead a worthy role model?
I think the word "truther" is a little overused for people who lack any credible discernment of their fellow beings.

The point being is that brand puts himself up as some kind of messiah, talking gibberish about economics and politics which he clearly knows nothing about,he criticises the wealthy and yet he is a multi millionaire......and he is in the limelight where he wants to be, and so, as far as I am concerned he is a justifiable target. What has he done with his own time and money to help anybody else? all he is is a self publicist as mr sheridan said in his video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q538glD8S84

If you watch the video mr sheridan points out that all this spiritual malarky is a 5 year film project that little russy is involved in, which I imagine is very remunerative for our would be messiah.

[Skyhaven]

Hey donk, ok for me. I just don't find the above emotional bursts "educational" or "civil". I don't mean we shouldn't say what we mean or keep quiet in order never to hurt anybody. I totally agree on speaking out and even showing your emotional responses to things, after all we are sentient beings. But I find the cheap comments rather childish and think that when criticism is given it ought to have a level higher than the opinions aired above.

negativity is fine

The only difference between positivity and negativity is the one who reads it and judges it as so.

Yes, on that abstraction level your right... objectively everything is neutral, but we're not objects but human beings with feelings so we can kind of sense on what side of the emotional spectrum certain utterances are situated.

[Bongo]

Hey donk, ok for me. I just don't find the above emotional bursts "educational" or "civil". I don't mean we shouldn't say what we mean or keep quiet in order never to hurt anybody. I totally agree on speaking out and even showing your emotional responses to things, after all we are sentient beings. But I find the cheap comments rather childish and think that when criticism is given it ought to have a level higher than the opinions aired above.

negativity is fine

The only difference between positivity and negativity is the one who reads it and judges it as so.

Yes, on that abstraction level your right... objectively everything is neutral, but we're not objects but human beings with feelings so we can kind of sense on what side of the emotional spectrum certain utterances are situated.

The emotional spectrum it was written in is not the problem, the emotional spectrum it is received in is. It is the thing that causes us to react internally. Was it really necessary to try and counter act the perceived negativity? Generally when these reactions happen we end up just going in circles.

[Skyhaven]

ok well look at my post

Do you think somebody who tells an ageing well liked actor that his grandaughter is great shag on national radio in front of millions of listeners is spiritual? is an ex smackhead a worthy role model?
I think the word "truther" is a little overused for people who lack any credible discernment of their fellow beings.

The point being is that brand puts himself up as some kind of messiah, talking gibberish about economics and politics which he clearly knows nothing about,he criticises the wealthy and yet he is a multi millionaire......and he is in the limelight where he wants to be, and so, as far as I am concerned he is a justifiable target. What has he done with his own time and money to help anybody else? all he is is a self publicist as mr sheridan said in his video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q538glD8S84

If you watch the video mr sheridan points out that all this spiritual malarky is a 5 year film project that little russy is involved in, which I imagine is very remunerative for our would be messiah.

I think you are shooting the messenger here...

[Skyhaven]

Was it really necessary to try and counter act the perceived negativity? I generally don't care much about the negativity, but I do care about how other people here feel about these kinds of reactions. In essence I was supporting Leena here...

[ghostrider]

at least he gives a voice , and takes on mainstream head on , as an insider like him or not , he can affect change in a positive direction ... as long as it gets sleepers to start thinking , I say march on with your bad self ole boy ...

[Dorjezigzag]

I will remember that he is a higher up mason, this in its self should make people sit up and take notice

Not according to him, I think the comment comes in at about 4mins

n5oM0UgoCR0

Russel Brand bashing seems to have got more prevalent once his socialist leanings have become more apparent, I understand the critiques against socialism as I do against libertarianism, but what is more important for me is that he is aware of the situation and he is trying to do something and is bringing awareness to people who otherwise would not consider these issues.

Someone who has recovered from addiction should be highly respected in my opinion, he has been to hell and has found a way out, that takes self discipline.

[Bongo]

Was it really necessary to try and counter act the perceived negativity? I generally don't care much about the negativity, but I do care about how other people here feel about these kinds of reactions. In essence I was supporting Leena here...

Basically the reason I commented about it is that given the amount of arguments on this website about negativity, when you read them back they all just sound the same regardless of the topic. It seems the people get caught up in them very easily and it would be good to see if people can stop just for a second and say is it really necessary to address someone else’s comment that is perceived as negative and get back on to the topic at hand. I am in no way advocating abusive behaviour which should not be tolerated at all. Given some of the comments that are perceived as negative, don't react to them while knowing what they are about and move on. The more you react the more they seem to affect you. Hopefully this helps people that feel the need to address the negativity head on, fighting fire with fire usually doesn't work.

This wasn't a dig at you or leena, just some thoughts on the subject that will hopefully help anyone who reads it.



I will remember that he is a higher up mason, this in its self should make people sit up and take notice

Not according to him, I think the comment comes in at about 4mins

n5oM0UgoCR0

Russel Brand bashing seems to have got more prevalent once his socialist leanings have become more apparent, I understand the critiques against socialism as I do against libertarianism, but what is more important for me is that he is aware of the situation and he is trying to do something and is bringing awareness to people who otherwise would not consider these issues.

Someone who has recovered from addiction should be highly respected in my opinion, he has been to hell and has found a way out, that takes self discipline.

Him bringing awareness to people that would otherwise not look at these subjects is a good thing, don’t get me wrong. It’s his end game that I question whether he will try to steer the movement to something that reflects the elites plans.

If anything that I have said can be disproved, I will accept it as fact.

[Dorjezigzag]

If anything that I have said can be disproved, I will accept it as fact

Should n't truth be based on evidence rather than no evidence, with that train of thinking I could say Russel Brand is actually a lizard, prove that he is not ?

O wait a minute someone probably already has said that:p

My point, if you have hard evidence that Russel Brand is a high up Mason, present it, he has gone on camera stating he is not so that would make him a liar.

If you don't have any evidence, then you're accusation is groundless.

You may have a feeling about someone but are you sure this feeling is based on reality or just a dislike because he does not share your world view.

[Daozen]

I've got mixed feelings about him. I used to like him a lot because of his intelligence and wit. Is an ex smackhead a spiritual role model? You couldn't get better. He hit rock bottom and transformed himself, you can't get more inspiring than that.

But.... with his blabbering and lack of real solutions, people are losing patience. He's coming off as a gatekeeper as time wears on.

Talking smack about smackheads won't get Earth anywhere. I'm going to write the fkr an open letter, to get him to put up or shut up.

This is the era of open letters. I'll put it on Titanpad, so anyone can pitch in...

Start thinking, what would you tell the guy?

Is he genuine? We'll know by Christmas.

[Bongo]

Should n't truth be based on evidence rather than no evidence, with that train of thinking I could say Russel Brand is actually a lizard, prove that he is not ?

O wait a minute someone probably already has said that:p

My point, if you have hard evidence that Russel Brand is a high up Mason, present it, he has gone on camera stating he is not so that would make him a liar.

If you don't have any evidence, then you're accusation is groundless.

You may have a feeling about someone but are you sure this feeling is based on reality or just a dislike because he does not share your world view.

You misinterpret me and have jumped to the conclusion that I will not look at evidence, this is not true at all.

If there is evidence that he is not then fair enough, like I said I will accept it. His word however is not quite a good example of evidence, merely words out of a humans mouth. You need only look at a politician to see this in full effect some lie so much that they actually start to believe their lies, so not a good example of evidence.

I will have to look in to where I got the masonic reference from but it is to late tonight.

And I actually agree with most of what he has been saying for change to happen, whether he actually holds true rather than steering the movement away from what will benefit the people is my concern as I outlined in two of my previous posts.

[Bongo]

Here is what made me have doubts about him.

Before the embrace of hands.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/12_01/Brand2REX0412_468x341.jpg


During the embrace of hands.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-udCnL8B72Y0/Umk87yKaCiI/AAAAAAAACMY/OPPurV-ThiE/s400/brand_queen.jpg

The thumb is on a specific knuckle as which is a trait of masonic handshakes.


Here is a picture of him shaking hands with Tom Cruise

http://metrouk2.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/article-1339403211514-13858a96000005dc-1509_466x508.jpg

Which is just a normal hand shake.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/08/08/article-2185555-147235B7000005DC-197_468x522.jpg

And another normal handshake.

I understand that this is only evidence from 2 shots of when he shook hands with the queen but it is enough to put doubt in my mind that he is actually a mason.


Also here are 2 interesting handshakes by the queen

Normal handshake

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/06/27/article-2165320-13CFF7E1000005DC-369_634x476.jpg


Masonic handshake

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2012/6/27/1340795868708/Queen-Elizabeth-shakes-ha-001.jpg


Same person, took a few seconds after and the handshake remains the same.

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02260/QUEEN-HANDSHAKE_2260213b.jpg

[Dorjezigzag]

You misinterpret me and have jumped to the conclusion that I will not look at evidence

If you reread my post you will see I have made no conclusion, I have just not seen you present any evidence, I even asked you to present it because I would be genuinely interested to hear it. Why would I ask for something if I do not consider the possibility that you may have it?

I am merely presenting the evidence that you as yet, regarding this issue, have presented no evidence regarding Russel Brand being a high degree mason. I have no ill feeling towards you and I have no opinion or conclusion, except perhaps that you are a fan of the Simpsons.;) Although appearances can be deceiving.


edit:Ok Just seen the handshake thing

Who has not had the handshake "evidence".

David Icke famously had it, I think even Bill Ryan has had it.

This is not conclusive evidence that he is a high ranking mason, you could say that you believe that he is, but it is not a statement of fact

http://kanesewart.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/ryan-webre-mas-handsahke.jpg?w=700&h=525

http://kanesewart.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/croppercapture3.png?w=700

by the way I do not believe Bill is a Mason!
but I guess I cannot prove he is not;)

[Bongo]

You misinterpret me and have jumped to the conclusion that I will not look at evidence

If you reread my post you will see I have made no conclusion, I have just not seen you present any evidence, I even asked you to present it because I would be genuinely interested to hear it. Why would I ask for something if I do not consider the possibility that you may have it?

I am merely presenting the evidence that you as yet, regarding this issue, have presented no evidence regarding Russel Brand being a high degree mason. I have no ill feeling towards you and I have no opinion or conclusion, except perhaps that you are a fan of the Simpsons.;) Although appearances can be deceiving.


edit:Ok Just seen the handshake thing

Who has not had the handshake "evidence".

David Icke famously had it, I think even Bill Ryan has had it.

This is not conclusive evidence that he is a high ranking mason, you could say I believe that he is, but it is not a statement of fact

I will take back the high ranking statement, it would be impossible to know unless I was a mason myself which I am not. Being in show business would give the idea that he is a trusted member and thus high up which is only speculation on my part. I do have speculation as to this but it is circumstantial (goes on the idea that he is a mason) so I will not mention it here, that was in my mind as I wrote the first post which is why I said high up mason. I should not have said that.

But it still remains that those pictures create doubt.

The song he is singing is the right one for just now and if he holds true and sticks to it I will gladly hold my hands up and say I was wrong but until then I will continue to have doubts about him.

BTW The Simpsons is brilliant & I also like doughnuts haha

[Bongo]

I do see and realise your point it can be easy to misconstrue a picture of a handshake when it is a grasp of the fingers as in the picture of Bill. I don't think he is a mason either.

I have just watched the video and it was Alfred that went straight for Bills fingers rather than his hand, for all we know Alfred could be a mason and he was checking to see if Bill was to. That of course is only speculation. But in all honesty it does just look like a grasp of the fingers.

[aheb]

I don't think that you even need to consider whether Russy is a mason or not. You can judge him solely by what he has done. He was a drug addict, so he says and if it's true then it was his choice..he has led a hedonistic and disrespectful life, he has treated women very shallowly and he is a multi millionare.
If he hates money so much then why doesn't he give his money away and possibly to the people that he has been disrespectful to, that may be a good start.
He talks in a rather verbose manner ( I am slightly reminded of the put down to Disraeli by Gladstone " You are a sophistical reterition enebriated by the exhuberance of your own verbosity " ) now I have a feeling that if you said that to russy he wouldn't have a clue what you had said even though he talks about "Couternance of corporate power" he is basically a psuedo intellectual.........he doesn't understand politics either.
He says that he is a socialist ( a champagne socialist like blair or browne, who wants to keep his money)..and lets be honest Hitler said that he was a socialist as well..........in short, russ is a very rich, hedonistic, hypocritical, politically uneducated, self publicist.
That is the reason you shouldn't listen to him............I doubt that he could even get into the masons.

[Dorjezigzag]

Something for everyone here

Russel Brand does another deconstruction of Fox propaganda

Others may like to use the pause button and freeze any dodgy eyes and handshakes

Aheb can find a wealth of further insults of Russel Brand by the lovely, clean cut, drug free and generally all out angelic (yeah right!) presenters of Fox news to enjoy and perhaps hurl at a future date.;)

5YK-kb2LsYE

[aheb]

Aheb can find a wealth of further insults of Russel Brand by the lovely, clean cut, drug free and generally all out angelic (yeah right!) presenters of Fox news to enjoy and perhaps hurl at a future date.;)

Well seeing my name was mentioned:o
I wasn't going to say anymore about little russy, because I find him nauseating but here goes.
If you look at the thread about spotting psychopaths you will see that russ fits one of the criteria.
He likes to appear a victim. he has a disease so he says called addiction.not a proper diesase like cancer though, and we must all sympahise with him, although he shows precious little sympathy for others that I have .
mentioned, and downright venom for some others I mean how dare Jason Riley be succesfull !! doesn't he realize that he is black and he should be robbing corner stores to get cigars to make his blunts? he is a disgrace to his race.
I'm not really familiar with American news agencies, but everything they said about russ was true, so why is he playing the victim?
I do agree with russ on one thing " The deifictation and canonisation of trivia".russ needs to go.

He has also shown that he knows as little about climate change as he does about politics.
He called it " Global warming" nobody calls it that now. You may remember last year a research ship was trapped in the arctic ice when she went to prove global warming. The concept of global warming is now called "climate change" , because it doesn't really fit with the agenda 22 ideas. Basically there is a lot more going on than we realise and we may be heading for a new mini ice age. Although man has contributed to destruction of the planet with pollution etc, what we are now seeing is probaly in the most part due to star weather and the impact of our sun. The agenda 22 proponents don't want us to know that though, so russ is slipping in a few sound bites for his mates in the nwo

[Bongo]

Others may like to use the pause button and freeze any dodgy eyes and handshakes

Dodgy eyes :p I will just not bother watching, but thanks all the same.

There is something I am curious about since you follow him and I assume you watch lots of his videos... is there actually a video of him denying definitively that he is not a mason e.g. "No, I am not a mason" rather than his broken record answer "eh, I don't think you can be a mason if you have a criminal record" I have actually seen a few videos where he has the exact same response and found it curious because he makes that statement and lets the viewer decide its meaning.


Here is a masonic lodge website clearly stating that anyone with an unspent criminal record will not be accepted


He must be of good character. Men with "unspent" criminal records will not be accepted.

http://www.victorylodge4189.co.uk/becoming_a_freemason.htm


Here is a description of an unspent criminal record

http://www.ehow.co.uk/about_6566864_do-unspent-criminal-convictions-mean_.html





Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974

The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (ROA) is legislation that was passed by the Parliament of the United Kingdom which created the system of spent and unspent convictions. The act applies to offenders in England, Scotland and Wales. These laws were designed to help people avoid a permanent criminal record for minor offences and minimise ex-offender employment discrimination. This act contains all the provisions for spent and unspent convictions, including eligibility, time frames, and the specific allowances for each type of infraction.

Difference between spent and unspent convictions

Someone who was convicted of a criminal offence and given a prison sentence of not more than two and a-half years is eligible to enter a "rehabilitation period" that begins from the date of the conviction. The duration of the period depends on the sentence given by the court. Once this period is ended and all penalties--like jail sentences, fines or probation--have been complied with, the conviction becomes "spent" and the offender's record is wiped clean. Jail sentences of more than two and a-half years are not eligible for the rehabilitation period. These types of offences, known as unspent convictions, are never removed from the offender's criminal record.

Effects

There have been instances of employers dismissing an applicant solely based on any unspent convictions the prospective employee has, despite laws in the UK forbidding this practice. An ex-offender attempting to enter a university or training institution may be denied if the facility determines the unspent convictions signal the person poses a threat to others. Some arms of the military forces will not take applicants who have unspent criminal convictions, and ex-offenders who are trying to obtain legal residency are routinely denied.

Disclosure under the Police Act of 1997

According to the Police Act of 1997, ex-offenders must disclose any unspent convictions to a prospective employer when applying for a job if this information is requested or required. The employer can ask the applicant to obtain one of three types of disclosures available: Basic Disclosure, Standard Disclosure, and Enhanced Disclosure. All three certificates will list unspent criminal convictions, and Enhanced Disclosures show information from local police authorities and other public agencies. An employer has the right to terminate an employee who did not disclose unspent convictions if asked at the time of hire, and the employee can be prosecuted.

Misconceptions

The length of the ordered jail term at the time of sentencing is what is used to determine if a conviction can be spent or must remain unspent. For example, a person given three years in prison who was released on parole after one year will have an unspent conviction on record. If someone commits another offence while already in a rehabilitation period to have another conviction spent, both offences may become unspent under certain circumstances. If the new offence is tried in the Crown Court and a sentence of more than two and a-half years is given, both convictions will become unspent.

[Brakeman]

What's wrong with being a Freemason?

:cool:

A spiritual revolution?

That's cool.

I just hope it turns out better than this past Piscean religious revolution.

:p

[aheb]

Aheb can find a wealth of further insults of Russel Brand by the lovely, clean cut, drug free and generally all out angelic (yeah right!) presenters of Fox news to enjoy and perhaps hurl at a future date.;)

Well seeing my name was mentioned:o
I wasn't going to say anymore about little russy, because I find him nauseating but here goes.
If you look at the thread about spotting psychopaths you will see that russ fits one of the criteria.
He likes to appear a victim. he has a disease so he says called addiction.not a proper diesase like cancer though, and we must all sympahise with him, although he shows precious little sympathy for others that I have .
mentioned, and downright venom for some others I mean how dare Jason Riley be succesfull !! doesn't he realize that he is black and he should be robbing corner stores to get cigars to make his blunts? he is a disgrace to his race.
I'm not really familiar with American news agencies, but everything they said about russ was true, so why is he playing the victim?
I do agree with russ on one thing " The deifictation and canonisation of trivia".russ needs to go.

He has also shown that he knows as little about climate change as he does about politics.
He called it " Global warming" nobody calls it that now. You may remember last year a research ship was trapped in the arctic ice when she went to prove global warming. The concept of global warming is now called "climate change" , because it doesn't really fit with the agenda 22 ideas. Basically there is a lot more going on than we realise and we may be heading for a new mini ice age. Although man has contributed to destruction of the planet with pollution etc, what we are now seeing is probaly in the most part due to star weather and the impact of our sun. The agenda 22 proponents don't want us to know that though, so russ is slipping in a few sound bites for his mates in the nwo

That reminds me of Stevan Segal....When asked if he worked for the CIA he always says " I have always strenuosly denied that"..........he could have just said NO lol.

[gini]

GO RUSSEL BRAND - KICKING MSNBC'S FAKE NEWS BOOM BOOM--5/3/23--3 min--/MambGiKuF6EV/

[gini]

-Russell Brand and Tucker Carlson talk spirituality and fame
-- Mar 8, 2023 --4 min--
Fox News host Tucker Carlson previews his conversation with actor, comedian, and podcast host Russell Brand on 'Tucker Carlson Today'--BXY62OU8ZKg
Overtime: Sen. Bernie Sanders, Russell Brand, John Heilemann | Real Time with Bill Maher ---4/3/23//12 min-DGVe0R7uLYI

[Mark]

I like him also. His background makes him even more compelling. He's evolved exponentially in recent years. He had a pretty good appearance on HBO, Bill Maher's show. He basically took it over for a while lol

[Mari]

I just can't make up my mind about him. Apart from the fact that I find his 'delivery' irritating (my problem:hand:) I hear he's married (or was) to a Rothschild? I can't get beyond that.
Controlled Op? I don't know for sure.

[mizo]

I've never been sure about him, he can be amusing as well as somewhat annoying.

He does speak out about the vax ... but he's working in the US so he was either jabbed to be able to gain entry, or he had a placebo.
Either way that feels off.

[Mari]

I've never been sure about him, he can be amusing as well as somewhat annoying.

He does speak out about the vax ... but he's working in the US so he was either jabbed to be able to gain entry, or he had a placebo.
Either way that feels off.


Being married to a Rothschild would guarantee him entry without having to be jabbed.

[Paul D.]

No doubt that he is controlled opposition in my mind . He displays all the signs that 'they' do , including, Sign of Harpocrates , 666 ,Eye of Horus , Uttarabodhi mudra ( co opted by them) , 33 tattooed on his wrist. As mentioned his relatives & friends also raise an eyebrow. Mark Devlin even claims he was Katy Perry's handler , I don't know about that but it would not surprise me .Also f.w.i.w. having watched him over the last 15 - 20 years or so I just get a clear bad vibe from him .
I've seen numerous exposes but the only one I have to hand is posted below , I've seen less ambiguous ones ,as the devil horns is obviously a rock sign too, however it's a good starter if anyone wants to research it more .personally I can't stand to look at him to be frank.


/Cfm1mBAO4qp/

[gini]

I think RB is a pretty interesting character and an outstanding voice in both the main and alternative media ,who is succesfully building a continuing growing audience,discussing the biggest topics wiith famous and smart people ,sharing his realisations during his journey where he asks himself & others important questions,an advocate for free speech,critical thinking and calling for real debate ,challenging his opponents to be sincere and confronting them ,when needed, with their hypocrysie by being spontaniously fast straightforward,making someone sometimes feel uncomfortable,then lifts them up with a joke..
Sure he can be annoying! But what harm does he really do then ?wich dark ideas is he planting?..

[Matthew]

I've never been sure about him, he can be amusing as well as somewhat annoying.

He does speak out about the vax ... but he's working in the US so he was either jabbed to be able to gain entry, or he had a placebo.
Either way that feels off.

Me too. Last I heard him talk about it, he concluded vaccine side effects were solely caused by manufacturing injuries although he didn't use the word 'solely', it was more subtle than that. He got married to Katie Perry, which contributed towards my suspicion he is a handler in the Cathy O'Brien sense. They use marriage like that.

[Hermoor]

No doubt that he is controlled opposition in my mind.... personally I can't stand to look at him to be frank.

Bingo.

I'm glad it's not just me.

He's a Judas goat. There are so many of them out there and they are so easy to spot for those with eyes to see.

I think as a community we'd be disturbed if all of the Judas goats were known to us as names on a formal, incontrovertible list.

Normally I wouldn't waste my precious time on the diabolical piece of filth. But he's getting a lot of coverage around here recently and I feel the matter needs straightening out once and for all.

Jordan Peterson is another Judas goat. Somebody else might want to contribute their precious time to straightening that matter out.

Anyway. Brand. This is the tip of the iceberg of all the dead giveaways out there.

https://www4.pictures.livingly.com/mp/UoIas9DE_1Al.jpg

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DoWw4uzXcAA1NXL.jpg

https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/5d01ecd02400008c178b1e65.jpeg?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale

aAdJwgokZD0R/

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E7t3Y8rWYAYNGem?format=jpg&name=small

https://static.musictoday.com/store/bands/5682/images/5682.jpg

https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5bb4859977b9034f3f47cdac/1625561584117-I47AEPLX3WGYEU23NMJL/Screenshot+2021-07-06+at+09.52.11.png

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FQYm2zkXMAQBJft?format=jpg&name=small

https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/hostedimages/1443693622i/16397139._SY540_.jpg

https://www.blueblood.net/_newsimgs/BrandX_1600x1200-spread-eagle-3-650x487.jpg

[jaybee]

I think RB is a pretty interesting character and an outstanding voice in both the main and alternative media ,who is succesfully building a continuing growing audience,discussing the biggest topics wiith famous and smart people ,sharing his realisations during his journey where he asks himself & others important questions,an advocate for free speech,critical thinking and calling for real debate ,challenging his opponents to be sincere and confronting them ,when needed, with their hypocrysie by being spontaniously fast straightforward,making someone sometimes feel uncomfortable,then lifts them up with a joke..
Sure he can be annoying! But what harm does he really do then ?wich dark ideas is he planting?..


I agree and think he is generally a force for good in the political arena - he's a very intelligent and quirky character with his own style - he can be very funny as well - as you say lifting the energy with a joke -

[gini]

Jesus from Nasareth was pretending to be the son of god ,talking about forgiveness and preaching about love,but he was born in a family from powerful jewish kings (blue blooded bloodsucking vampires) he was hangin out with prostitutes and all kind of bad people in general(guilty by association!) ,selling us that god loves everybody .

Then when he was hangin on the cross ,people asked,laughing at his arrogance,so if you are god ,why cant you come of from that cross then.?

He was also making all kind of symbolic handsigns (mudras ,like the heathen from India)and was initiated in early freemasonry in Egypt and received the secret knowledge in the highest grade, so they say...
But what was his real agenda ?,hiding behind preaching unconditional love he planted the seeds for the satanic katholic church.


Moral of the story: Never trust people who put on the mask of a gooddie,preaching the need for integrity and mutual respect but meanwhile hangin with unpure people, never trust anyone who says the things wich are logically true but who is initiated in freemasonry , the idea of white hats is just a fairytale ,people who come from the wrong background will never change,nothing good comes from them and once a thief ,always a thief...

[gini]

Russell Brand tells Tucker about the harmful effects of COVID lockdowns--8/3/23--4 min-TF-U34MAFaM

[gini]

Mar 10, 2023 #foxnews #fox #gutfeld
'Gutfeld!' co-hosts react to comedian Russell Brand dumping stardom for truth and the media's use of 'algorithms to incite conflict.'--gzj6f_w8Si4

[gini]

Discussion with Russell Brand

Dr. John Campbell
10/3/23---lfFhTqqqPqk

[gini]

Banned Clip - Russel Brand Breaks Bill Mahers show / Taxes and Ukraine Shocker

They are Stealing our money through Ukraine... Mainstream media propaganda.. 12 min /4oWuuZbbCPyO/

[gini]

Mar 13, 2023.11 min.
Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” talks to Russell Brand about his controversial appearance on “Real Time with Bill Maher” where he roasted MSNBC, Pfizer, and Big Pharma to the face of MSNBC host John Heilemann; and the true differences between conservative and progressive ways of living.-LZqsRwrqLSo

[ZenBaller]

As an actor well deep into Hollywood and married to K.Perry who is blatantly a tool of the cabal agenda, has he uncovered any truths from his personal experiences? He must have witnessed and participated in countless discussions, meetings, rituals etc..

Has anyone who's been following him the past years know anything? I haven't because I find him quite annoying.

[gini]

As an actor well deep into Hollywood and married to K.Perry who is blatantly a tool of the cabal agenda, has he uncovered any truths from his personal experiences? He must have witnessed and participated in countless discussions, meetings, rituals etc..

Has anyone who's been following him the past years know anything? I haven't because I find him quite annoying. I did listen to him every now & then through the years ,saw him growing spiritually and asking the right questions,(probably the only thing celebrities can do)
Sure he is not allowed to expose certain secrets wich he might know about ,so why should he be an exception and must risc his life to expose what most already know?? or can he only be of worth when he sacrifices himself (and than he can say nothing anymore?) ,.. thats why i asked a few posts above(post 43);
"Sure he can be annoying! But what harm does he really do then ?wich dark ideas is he planting?.."

What do you think of what he saying in these recent interviews i just posted this week?Is the content what he brings into the debate not far more important then to focus on his personal experiences ?

[Paul D.]

This guy makes agood case as to why Brand shouldn't be trusted. His skepticism about chackras & so on I disagree with but his core argument is a good one I reckon . 5.18 mins

lRCc4TaQULs

[Matthew]

He must have witnessed and participated in countless discussions, meetings, rituals etc..

Has anyone who's been following him the past years know anything?

Well, ... a bit embarrassingly my point of view is jaded, I think he's a handler (or an incubus or as good bad as one). I also haven't seen his recent interviews this week.

But because of my bias I thought this (above) was a great question. I spotted the challenge against Brand here. He's always late to the hot issue. For example, previously he peddled that vaccine injuries were manufacturing errors and now he's kicked into gear, I still think he's a damage limitation handler. His superficial marriages smell like a handler (in the Cathy O'Brien sense). His children's book, the pied piper, smells funny like MKULTRA theming. He's so attractive but selectively edgy and late to the party yet again. Ack I ranted.. .sorry gini :heart:

I'll qo quiet again in a respectful puff of smoke -> :ninja:

[gini]

Thanks for these responses. But i dont find the arguments about his alleged bad intentions very convincing nor plausible.

Matthews' main point being that Brand is always late on the hot issue and that he is basically a damage control handler ,isnt true imo;He is often one of the first to ask questions when MSM is still ignoring and/or twisting the issue and if you want damage control you are not letting your audience day in day out question the narratives of the MSM and reminding them to not believe anyone without thinking for yourself!

The childrenbook "piedpiper" (i havent read it), if it only smells funny ,but there is nothing substantial to point out ,then i cant see the danger of it(as far as i know Brand has been pretty critical about woke !)
Then the video Seeclearly posted where Brand is called out for saying ;"So what is required is a new system of global governance that somehow comprises the local & the global in a way that gives us the abilty to stand up to external threats & simultaniously govern our small local communities in a meaningfull way.What is required is a NEW system of world governance"
For a person coming from the 'progressive left' who is so highly critical about too much govenrment control , lack of true democracy and the need for debate,and doing himself exactly that ,he has a right on that opinion,i see no evil in that opinion itself.

Some quotes from an interview a year ago wich illustrates his point...
So how would he fix it?

“I don’t know, is the short answer.”

The longer answer takes in fixing society in its entirety. “Decentralisation, devolution, where possible. What I mean by that is more assemblies, more juries, more control over your own workplaces, schools, hospitals and communities.

“In one word: democracy. Actual democracy, not democracy on a blade of fear and desire.

“Democracy where you look at the full gamut of possibilities of the ways that we might live. Accepting that tradition has to be observed at the same time as progressivism, where some people want to raise their children gender neutral and other people want to raise their kids double Orthodox, and both of those perspectives are going to have to be respected, otherwise we’re going to live in continual tension.

“I feel like we need to bring spirituality to the forefront of our politics. What I mean by spirituality is what I would call Sesame Street values: kindness, service, community. The values and morals our grandparents had.” ---- “I reckon just to communicate. Sometimes, like anybody, I get attached to my opinion and my view, and I can get defensive or argumentative about it. But the truth is, I don’t know anything.

“I do videos all the time, I go, ‘yeah, I said that – that weren’t right’. It’s hard enough to just be in a family and to look after the dog properly. I don’t think I know the answer to complex geopolitical issues with rich and contradictory and complex histories.

“We should communicate with one another from a position of good faith, accepting that other people might know stuff that we don’t know, and hopefully vice versa.” and “As Elon Musk kindly observed,” Brand says, “I’m being accused of being radical and dangerous. You can look into my eyes and see if you think I’m telling you the truth.”--
https://www.bigissue.com/culture/russell-brand-interview-look-into-my-eyes-and-see-if-you-think-im-telling-you-the-truth/

[jaybee]

.

Many thanks Gini for your post in defence of Russel Brand above...I share your views about him - I consider him to be authentic and honest - quirky and intelligent - a work in progress like we all are...

It bothers me when people I feel to be 'one of us' and broadly 'on our side' are not trusted by others who are in the category of 'one of us' and 'on our side' .... not just 'not trusted' but maligned - that bothers me -

We are a diverse bunch and Russell is one of the people that I see in that group of 'one of us'...the diverse bunch that is 'us' are an interesting group and from many different backgrounds and parts of the world - we probably wouldn't agree with everything they think and do but that's ok - that's real diversity - I'm just an 'ordinary' person living a private life but I feel an instinctive kinship with many different public figures like Russell Brand, Jimmy Dore, Elon Musk, Alex Jones. Tucker Carlson, Candace Owen, Dave Rubin, James O'Keefe, Kanye West, George Galloway, to name a few :)... and not to be shy about it I'll chuck some politicians in there as well... lol... Trump, Putin, David Kurten, Nigel Farage, Andrew Bridgen, to name another few as an example.... then there are all the doctors and commentators that speak about the Covid Fraud and the Ukraine conflict.... and the list could go on...

I just looked up about Russells book...

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Russell-Brands-Trickster-Tales-Hamelin/dp/1782114564

Russell Brand's Trickster Tales: The Pied Piper of Hamelin Hardcover – 6 Nov. 2014

from one of the reviews..


"He attacks his first children's book with full force, coloring the story in with humorous asides, witty turns of phrase and a few choice nuggets of sage wisdom. Illustrator Riddell is just as sharp, filling the book with eye-popping illustrations and beautiful colouring . . . More important is Brand's treatment of the buffoons and bullies that occupy Hamelin: His takes on religion, sexism, consumerism and self-esteem are just as important to the text as the classic tale it's based on. His opinions are as easy to discern as many a conservative pundit's, though very much on the other side of the political spectrum. A smart, funny, iconoclastic take on an old classic" (Kirkus Reviews)

and here Russell speaks about the book himself...

https://www.theguardian.com/childrens-books-site/2014/nov/05/russell-brand-why-i-wrote-the-pied-piper-of-hamelin


Russell Brand: why I wrote the Pied Piper of Hamelin
The comedian Russell Brand aims to make young people think and ask questions when they read his first book for children – and hopefully grow up wanting a revolution!

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2014/11/3/1415030949159/Russell-Brand-010.jpg?width=620&quality=85&dpr=1&s=none

and then there's all his work with meditation and spirituality ....

cheers again Gini, and I hope those with a negative attitude towards him can take another look at the whole man and all his contributions and give him another chance...

[jaybee]

.

a memorable 15 minute video from Russell about his cat, Morrissey, dying... about his grief and about death in general - I haven't seen all Russell's videos of which there are many but this one really stayed in my memory and came into my mind when I was writing my post above...

Russell :heart:

My Cat Died.

GtHuQItYspI


10 Apr 2020
My cat Morrissey died.
I had him for him for 16 years. This is how it has affected me.

[ZenBaller]

As an actor well deep into Hollywood and married to K.Perry who is blatantly a tool of the cabal agenda, has he uncovered any truths from his personal experiences? He must have witnessed and participated in countless discussions, meetings, rituals etc..

Has anyone who's been following him the past years know anything? I haven't because I find him quite annoying. I did listen to him every now & then through the years ,saw him growing spiritually and asking the right questions,(probably the only thing celebrities can do)
Sure he is not allowed to expose certain secrets wich he might know about ,so why should he be an exception and must risc his life to expose what most already know?? or can he only be of worth when he sacrifices himself (and than he can say nothing anymore?) ,.. thats why i asked a few posts above(post 43);
"Sure he can be annoying! But what harm does he really do then ?wich dark ideas is he planting?.."

What do you think of what he saying in these recent interviews i just posted this week?Is the content what he brings into the debate not far more important then to focus on his personal experiences ?

I can see how he's burning up inside to bring the cabal down. At least he looks like he does. It's the mentality of the person who recently woke up, the first stage. The topics he talks about are all valid, but they are just socio-philosophical discussions, nothing new. His personal experiences would be much more worthwhile and the fact that he's not opening up shows that he's either afraid or a shill. I'm not sure yet.

[gini]

So I Went On Fox News And This Happened...



326,625 views Mar 15, 2023
“We have lost Russell Brand. This once-sexy communist has become an American culture wars pundit.” Thanks New Statesman. Let’s see how my recent appearances on Fox News back up that claim, shall we?----gu99k7f5y-g

[gini]

Mar 16, 2023 #TheJimmyDoreShow 8 min.
Fox News is well-known as a fount of right-wing commentary and a brick wall defending the Republican party at all costs. Yet twice recently Fox has invited on guests — specifically Kat Timpf and Russell Brand — who used the Fox airwaves to express the truth that there is very little substantive difference between the two parties and they both serve the oligarchy and serve to prevent organizing among the masses against the elites who actually run our society.

Jimmy and Americans’ Comedian Kurt Metzger wonder why this kind of commentary is allowed on Fox News but would never make the air on CNN or MSNBC. ----TXbRdcuVdjI

[gini]

Guardian's HIT PIECE On Russell Brand And His 'Descent Into CONSPIRACY THEORIES': Brie & Robby--15/3/23 --9 min.-6D8yIOk9zYU----

[jaybee]

Guardian's HIT PIECE On Russell Brand And His 'Descent Into CONSPIRACY THEORIES': Brie & Robby--15/3/23 --9 min.-----{video above}

He must be doing well and making an impression if the wokey, Deep Statey mouthpiece, The Guardian, is smearing him... :)


This one is funny... Debbie Wasserman Schultz is so awful she's like a comic baddie and Russell gives her the treatment.... lol


You’ve Gotta Be F**king Kidding Me(17:14)


RUdNhTHczvY


15 Mar 2023 #twitter #congress #censorship
Reaction House Democrats attempting to savage Matt Taibbi and Michael Shellenberger over their part in the Twitter files revelations

[gini]

--You're NOT ALLOWED To Say THIS About Jan 6th | with Dr. Cornel West--Mar 19, 2023 --17 min--
Here's my conversation with Dr. Cornel West where we discussed how people from all political and cultural persuasions can come together as one.--_wjqda1lJFk

[gini]

--Guardian Authors Pen Op-Ed ATTACKING Comedian Russell Brand For Touting ---CONSPIRACY THEORIES- 15/3/23--9 min--rJ8WvmwKwqw

[gini]

kKg7vzl32KY---3/4.23--
Russell Brand visits Club Random. Bill and Russell discuss the difference between hedonism and addiction, how they each define joy, America in pain, pondering vs. partying, religion and the curtailing of inquiry, the greatest threat to America, the concept of enlightened self-interest, Joe Rogan’s work ethic, MSNBC vs. Fox News, and their mutual admiration of Dave Rubin.

[gini]

EXUpMMde51E-Russell Brand FINALLY Opens Up: Escaping A Lifetime Of Anxiety, Addiction & Finding Love!


437,368 views Jun 29, 2023 ,1.41 min- All The Diary Of A CEO Episodes
In this new episode Steven sits down with actor, comedian, and activist Russell Brand.

0:00 Intro
02:54 Your early context
09:05 What would have made you feel more valued?
15:19 Do you feel sorry for your younger self?
16:44 What direction would you have gone in instead?
19:11 Spirituality
22:55 What was wrong with what you used to be looking for?
26:00 How can we change ourselves?
34:26 Why should you question authority?
39:50 How did the departure of your father affect you?
43:31 The struggles your mother went through
47:36 Is this the reason Andrew Tate is so popular?
52:20 Are you optimistic people can put their differences behind them?
56:40 How do we get a collective society?
01:01:40 How do you personally live?
01:07:14 Can we overcome our issues or are we just managing them?
01:11:19 Your relationship with work
01:16:49 What are you working on improving?
01:18:42 Your religion explained
01:22:44 Romantic love
01:25:39 Your journey of fatherhood
01:29:16 The main lessons you teach your children
01:31:29 Why do you speak in the way you do?
01:32:34 Your new show
01:36:30 The last guest's question

[PlasmaVortex]

]Russell brand were do we start with him.... my god...what a sad indictment on the dystopia we call reality..

[gini]

]Russell brand were do we start with him.... my god...what a sad indictment on the dystopia we call reality..

Whats wrong with his opinions ?Did you watch the interview?

[PlasmaVortex]

]Russell brand were do we start with him.... my god...what a sad indictment on the dystopia we call reality..

What's wrong with his opinions ?Did you watch the interview?

I have studied this creature for many years...he's married to a Rothschild affiliate, he's been created by the 'illuminati' controlled Fabian society that advocates/pushes/spearheads the 'communitarian' revolution here in Britain when the time comes.. Must i continue on? he has been in movies/series since he was a kid, that's not a coincidence its a bloody damning indictment. He's literally an agent of chaos and a satanic apathetic apparatchik promoting willful ignorance by mixing truth with lies and then bundling it together in a clever sophistry package. sadly my friend he's Limited hangout at best. Here in Britain he tried to be a truther then turned around and said vote labour and was thus duly attacked, thereby killing his truther career, although he trying to influence this sphere again.. strange how people just go along with it. Real problem people aren't on youtube anymore and even some of the ones that aren't are still phony aswell so it is difficult


"I think i hope for the collateral carnage, battle Avalons hardest, takeout the forums trash and garbage". -Plasma Vortex 2023

https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-brand-new-purple-pill

[ExomatrixTV]

]Russell brand were do we start with him.... my god...what a sad indictment on the dystopia we call reality..

What's wrong with his opinions ?Did you watch the interview?

I have studied this creature for many years...he's married to a Rothschild affiliate, he's been created by the 'illuminati' controlled Fabian society that advocates/pushes/spearheads the 'communitarian' revolution here in Britain when the time comes.. Must i continue on? he has been in movies/series since he was a kid, that's not a coincidence its a bloody damning indictment. He's literally an agent of chaos and a satanic apathetic apparatchik promoting willful ignorance by mixing truth with lies and then bundling it together in a clever sophistry package. sadly my friend he's Limited hangout at best. Here in Britain he tried to be a truther then turned around and said vote labour and was thus duly attacked, thereby killing his truther career, although he trying to influence this sphere again.. strange how people just go along with it. Real problem people aren't on youtube anymore and even some of the ones that aren't are still phony aswell so it is difficult


"I think i hope for the collateral carnage, battle Avalons hardest, takeout the forums trash and garbage". -Plasma Vortex 2023

https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-brand-new-purple-pill


My sense Russell Brand is not who he was now and there are so many reasons to come to that conclusion ... but to explain that to people who do not care to see how he grew out of his past is for me reason enough to let it be ... am not responsible for the quality of thinking & judging done by others!

Many who do not like him because he came from a classic liberal and/or non-Christian world will always find reasons (or excuses) not to appreciate what he has to offer! I get that ... so I let it be.


similar insights/wisdom here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118937-James-O-Keefe-Tulsi-Gabbard-Tim-Pool-Ben-Burgis-at-MINDS-Festival-of-Ideas&p=1505835&viewfull=1#post1505835)

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[PlasmaVortex]

]Russell brand were do we start with him.... my god...what a sad indictment on the dystopia we call reality..

What's wrong with his opinions ?Did you watch the interview?

I have studied this creature for many years...he's married to a Rothschild affiliate, he's been created by the 'illuminati' controlled Fabian society that advocates/pushes/spearheads the 'communitarian' revolution here in Britain when the time comes.. Must i continue on? he has been in movies/series since he was a kid, that's not a coincidence its a bloody damning indictment. He's literally an agent of chaos and a satanic apathetic apparatchik promoting willful ignorance by mixing truth with lies and then bundling it together in a clever sophistry package. sadly my friend he's Limited hangout at best. Here in Britain he tried to be a truther then turned around and said vote labour and was thus duly attacked, thereby killing his truther career, although he trying to influence this sphere again.. strange how people just go along with it. Real problem people aren't on youtube anymore and even some of the ones that aren't are still phony aswell so it is difficult


"I think i hope for the collateral carnage, battle Avalons hardest, takeout the forums trash and garbage". -Plasma Vortex 2023

https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-brand-new-purple-pill


My sense Russell Brand is not who he was now and there are so many reasons to come to that conclusion ... but to explain that to people who do not care to see how he grew out of his past is for me reason enough to let it be ... am not responsible for the quality of thinking & judging done by others!

Many who do not like him because he came from a classic liberal and/or non-Christian world will always find reasons (or excuses) not to appreciate what he has to offer! I get that ... so I let it be.


similar insights/wisdom here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118937-James-O-Keefe-Tulsi-Gabbard-Tim-Pool-Ben-Burgis-at-MINDS-Festival-of-Ideas&p=1505835&viewfull=1#post1505835)

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

Appreciate these chaotic neutral thoughts, I can see the value he brings to himself and people other than myself but lions can't be led by donkeys and he's giving you a redacted version of reality this facilitating his gate keeping, if he gives you value as a source then the matrix has you in my opinion.

[ExomatrixTV]

]Russell brand were do we start with him.... my god...what a sad indictment on the dystopia we call reality..

What's wrong with his opinions ?Did you watch the interview?

I have studied this creature for many years...he's married to a Rothschild affiliate, he's been created by the 'illuminati' controlled Fabian society that advocates/pushes/spearheads the 'communitarian' revolution here in Britain when the time comes.. Must i continue on? he has been in movies/series since he was a kid, that's not a coincidence its a bloody damning indictment. He's literally an agent of chaos and a satanic apathetic apparatchik promoting willful ignorance by mixing truth with lies and then bundling it together in a clever sophistry package. sadly my friend he's Limited hangout at best. Here in Britain he tried to be a truther then turned around and said vote labour and was thus duly attacked, thereby killing his truther career, although he trying to influence this sphere again.. strange how people just go along with it. Real problem people aren't on youtube anymore and even some of the ones that aren't are still phony aswell so it is difficult


"I think i hope for the collateral carnage, battle Avalons hardest, takeout the forums trash and garbage". -Plasma Vortex 2023

https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-brand-new-purple-pill

My sense Russell Brand is not who he was now and there are so many reasons to come to that conclusion ... but to explain that to people who do not care to see how he grew out of his past is for me reason enough to let it be ... am not responsible for the quality of thinking & judging done by others!

Many who do not like him because he came from a classic liberal and/or non-Christian world will always find reasons (or excuses) not to appreciate what he has to offer! I get that ... so I let it be.



similar insights/wisdom here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118937-James-O-Keefe-Tulsi-Gabbard-Tim-Pool-Ben-Burgis-at-MINDS-Festival-of-Ideas&p=1505835&viewfull=1#post1505835)


cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

Appreciate these chaotic neutral thoughts, I can see the value he brings to himself and people other than myself but lions can't be led by donkeys and he's giving you a redacted version of reality this facilitating his gate keeping, if he gives you value as a source then the matrix has you in my opinion.

The whole (accusatory) "gatekeeping" assumption (which can happen!) ... is very similar with people shouting the (accusatory): "controlled opposition" assumption (which also can happen!) ... and I have discussed this issue/topic ad nauseam (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_nauseam) last decade here on Project Avalon Forum!

What I noticed is that, when people have their own reasons to dislike a certain personality in the alternative media scene, getting so much attention, they have a default assumption: "If you are allowed to say such things without dire consequences, is "evidence enough" that you're supposed to be "controlled opposition" and/or "a gatekeeper"... WITHOUT HARD PROOF ... Thus, they are still just assumptions! <<< and these type of assumptions are mostly accompanied by a list of conjectures (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjecture) jumping to conclusions.

Here you can study much more of my effort to explain my perspectives/insights on the whole issue, 100% related to the "gatekeepers" assumption:


When an Accusation like 'Controlled Opposition' Loses its Value! (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?117528-When-an-Accusation-like-Controlled-Opposition-loses-its-value-) :dog: (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?117528-When-an-Accusation-like-Controlled-Opposition-loses-its-value-)

Similar insights/wisdom here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118937-James-O-Keefe-Tulsi-Gabbard-Tim-Pool-Ben-Burgis-at-MINDS-Festival-of-Ideas&p=1505835&viewfull=1#post1505835).

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[PlasmaVortex]

]Russell brand were do we start with him.... my god...what a sad indictment on the dystopia we call reality..

What's wrong with his opinions ?Did you watch the interview?

I have studied this creature for many years...he's married to a Rothschild affiliate, he's been created by the 'illuminati' controlled Fabian society that advocates/pushes/spearheads the 'communitarian' revolution here in Britain when the time comes.. Must i continue on? he has been in movies/series since he was a kid, that's not a coincidence its a bloody damning indictment. He's literally an agent of chaos and a satanic apathetic apparatchik promoting willful ignorance by mixing truth with lies and then bundling it together in a clever sophistry package. sadly my friend he's Limited hangout at best. Here in Britain he tried to be a truther then turned around and said vote labour and was thus duly attacked, thereby killing his truther career, although he trying to influence this sphere again.. strange how people just go along with it. Real problem people aren't on youtube anymore and even some of the ones that aren't are still phony aswell so it is difficult


"I think i hope for the collateral carnage, battle Avalons hardest, takeout the forums trash and garbage". -Plasma Vortex 2023

https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-brand-new-purple-pill

My sense Russell Brand is not who he was now and there are so many reasons to come to that conclusion ... but to explain that to people who do not care to see how he grew out of his past is for me reason enough to let it be ... am not responsible for the quality of thinking & judging done by others!

Many who do not like him because he came from a classic liberal and/or non-Christian world will always find reasons (or excuses) not to appreciate what he has to offer! I get that ... so I let it be.



similar insights/wisdom here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118937-James-O-Keefe-Tulsi-Gabbard-Tim-Pool-Ben-Burgis-at-MINDS-Festival-of-Ideas&p=1505835&viewfull=1#post1505835)


cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

Appreciate these chaotic neutral thoughts, I can see the value he brings to himself and people other than myself but lions can't be led by donkeys and he's giving you a redacted version of reality this facilitating his gate keeping, if he gives you value as a source then the matrix has you in my opinion.

The whole (accusatory) "gatekeeping" assumption (which can happen!) ... is very similar with people shouting the (accusatory): "controlled opposition" assumption (which also can happen!) ... and I have discussed this issue/topic ad nauseam (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_nauseam) last decade here on Project Avalon Forum!

What I noticed is that, when people have their own reasons to dislike a certain personality in the alternative media scene, getting so much attention, they have a default assumption: "If you are allowed to say such things without dire consequences, is "evidence enough" that you're supposed to be "controlled opposition" and/or "a gatekeeper"... WITHOUT HARD PROOF ... Thus, they are still just assumptions! <<< and these type of assumptions are mostly accompanied by a list of conjectures (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjecture) jumping to conclusions.

Here you can study much more of my effort to explain my perspectives/insights on the whole issue, 100% related to the "gatekeepers" assumption:


When an Accusation like 'Controlled Opposition' Loses its Value! (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?117528-When-an-Accusation-like-Controlled-Opposition-loses-its-value-) :dog: (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?117528-When-an-Accusation-like-Controlled-Opposition-loses-its-value-)

Similar insights/wisdom here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?118937-James-O-Keefe-Tulsi-Gabbard-Tim-Pool-Ben-Burgis-at-MINDS-Festival-of-Ideas&p=1505835&viewfull=1#post1505835).

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

No John you're wrong as per usual promoting radical empiricism thinking you are the arbiter of truth. I actually don't dislike anyone but I've done enough research to see what's Infront of my eyes. I think you're trying to gaslight people by infering i'm prejudice because you have a vested interest( your ego) in promoting him when he has a track record of running literal psychological operations resulting in authorised dissident slacktivism.

What's objective about your opinion that he's changed? Are you truly so naive?

[ExomatrixTV]

What's objective about your opinion that he's changed? Are you truly so naive?

There are so many obvious falsehoods & false assumptions ... will come back at you when I have the time ... be assured!

Not because of you personally because this kind of what I call: "mental reflex defense mechanism" happens on many places many times ... and I do not mind going much deeper in to this!

Claims are easily made on any side ... does not make it valid nor suppose to be an honest representation. Am used to that.

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[gini]

About Russell Brand being targeted to silence him -- ZGr_PVUHn2I-UK comedian Russell Brand accused of rape and sexual assault | ABC News----IflwPcWp2Qs
Sep 17, 2023 #ABCNews #ABCNewsAustralia
Three British news organisations report that comedian and social influencer Russell Brand is accused of rape, sexual assault and abuse based on allegations from four women who knew him over a seven-year period at the height of his fame.o_68D2yIjYI

[Pam]

About Russell Brand being targeted to silence him -- ZGr_PVUHn2I-UK comedian Russell Brand accused of rape and sexual assault | ABC News----IflwPcWp2Qs
Sep 17, 2023 #ABCNews #ABCNewsAustralia
Three British news organisations report that comedian and social influencer Russell Brand is accused of rape, sexual assault and abuse based on allegations from four women who knew him over a seven-year period at the height of his fame.o_68D2yIjYI

I am not the least bit surprised this has occurred. The man admits he was extremely promiscuous at one time. But he has way too much influence, he's pulling in people that would have listened to no one else.He actually asks his listeners to think and reason for themselves, which is a rarity. I am just wondering how long it will take to contrive something to discredit Jimmy Dore or it if he ends up having a car crash ect... If I was raped, assaulted or felt forced to have sexual relationships with someone I sure wouldn't be waiting 10 years to bring the information out if I was going to bring it out at all.

[mizo]

I've never been fan of Brand, though to his credit he probably has awakened many with his 'questioning of the narratives' using his unique verbosity.

Seemingly, by employing a typical malicious MSM method - by throwing enough allegations by attacking him with rumor and hearsay, whilst implying (almost declaring) he is guilty!

A contrived campaign simply devised to silence him and therefore hoping to discredit Brand, hence- tarring another messenger of the truth.

I reckon the majority of his awake followers and fans will stick by him and will see through all the BS.

He did receive a 'standing ovation' last night although he appeared 'distracted' as stated by the (disappointed?) BBC reporter at his London gig last night.

The BBC waded in with this morning with a political piece- (Laura Kuenssberg's the BBC's purveyor of truth) 'The entertainment industry has questions to answer' in light of allegations against comedian Russell Brand, Foreign Secretary James Cleverly -who was clearly jumping on the band-wagon to help discredit Brand for his political overloads!

Likely outcome: a few years later it's all ending with a half arsed 2 line apology about false allegations that'll be issued on page 7 of a tabloid...

If proven to be untrue allegations, I hope he sues 'reporters+media providers and bankrupts them.

[Icare]

I think it's all part of the plan, somehow (or he has angered someone)

The-Truth-about-Russell-Brand---The-Hidden-Hand-Freemasonry.-33-Is-the-Public-Brainwash.-360-is-the-Top:8

Very short, but interesting take on him:
@The_Daily_Lama:c/Russel-Brandsss:c

[gini]

The trend of demonizing,smearing , framing,banning , falsly accusing and ultimatelty try to silence anyone who questions the pushed narratives is real & accelerating and its not only happening to the famous ones like David icke(banned from Europe),julian Assange and Donald Trump (and to a lesser degree to people like Alex Jones,Tucker,Rogan,Candice Owen etc..)but also happening now to Dutch politician Gideon Van Meyeren & scamdemic activist Willem Engel (both falsly accused of sedition).
And these are only to name a few,in reality its happening sooner or later to EVERYONE who is publicly speaking out and has an audience .

So this is not about Russell Brand being controversial or not because like Trump,and Jones And Icke ,he is!
Thats the point .we must all waste our time endlessly discussing if Trump ,or Jones or Brand(see the dozens posts in this thread:facepalm:)is ok enough to defend their right to say what they want.Or if its controlled opposition to 'steal and steer away the discussion'

Think about it ,here we have a man with a huge following (1 of the biggest in the world!)confessing his 'sins'(sex drugs & rock'n roll ,ooh what a shame! )Telling the media and the entire system is corrupt,that one should not believe blindly but that one has to think for oneself ,that we all should love eachother because we are beautyfull divine beings and that we should die for not giving up our right for free thinking and free speech! So Yeah ,lets roast that bastard!

[Pam]

I think it's all part of the plan, somehow (or he has angered someone)

The-Truth-about-Russell-Brand---The-Hidden-Hand-Freemasonry.-33-Is-the-Public-Brainwash.-360-is-the-Top:8

Very short, but interesting take on him:
@The_Daily_Lama:c/Russel-Brandsss:c

Thank you for the broadened perspective. It is so easy to get pulled back into the story line isn't it. I tend to underestimate the intricacies of the great inversion. They really have covered their bases haven't they. Fascinating stuff.

[jaybee]

.

Clearly it has been decided by the 'Ruling Elite' to punish, destroy and silence Russell Brand or at the very least limit his influence from now on - with a huge Smear Job - they might even get him formally charged, into court and put him in prison - I see that Channel 4 are already removing all the programmes with him in - finding him guilty as (not yet) charged...

He's got a massive amount of support and I hope this limits the ambitions of those trying to destroy him -

[Losus4]

Couldn't care less about Brand. To me he's a narcissistic grifter, in it for himself. His videos are the typical clickbait crap that are self-promotion adds disguised as journalism. He stands on the shoulders of bigger and better men. If the rape accusation ends his career, whether true or not, good riddance.

[Pam]

Couldn't care less about Brand. To me he's a narcissistic grifter, in it for himself. His videos are the typical clickbait crap that are self-promotion adds disguised as journalism. He stands on the shoulders of bigger and better men. If the rape accusation ends his career, whether true or not, good riddance.

Speaking for myself. It has nothing to do with whether I like the guy or not. It has to do with the trend. Imagine someone at your workplace pops up with a story about you ten years ago, forcing her to do something against her will. Would you want a fair investigation of the facts or just have the "victim" believed?. Maybe you lose your job and the ability to get another one. Maybe you go to prison. All based on an a 10 year old accusation. It's the trend that is clearly developing. It seems to me that the name calling tactic, the concept of accusing someone of being a misogynist, racist ect.ect. is losing any meaning at all. It used to shut people up. It's been over used. It's the same with "look at me, what a victim I am". It just doesn't mean anything anymore, time for a new diversion.

It seems the new technique since logical debate can't happen is to weaponize anything and everything and throw it against the wall to see what sticks. Weaponizing the legal system seems to be pretty effective and definitely works as a big distraction. It serves 2 purposes. But this is a slippery slope. Look what has happened to Trump. This tactic made him a bigger hero to groups that previously didn't care for him. Same might be true for Branden.

I would love to know the incentives the "victims" received for their accounts of these events". The other thing to remember. I am always surprised to the levels many humans will stoop to for their 15 minutes of fame. It just never ceases to amaze me.


It's the stuff we allow or condone, the stuff that we don't challange that becomes the "new normal". We don't like what you are doing, let's find something from your past or if we have to invent something and off you go!!! Kind of scary, don't you agree.

[John Hilton]

My comment, for the record: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?121944-Russell-Brand-Trial-By-Media&p=1577636&viewfull=1#post1577636

[gini]

'I Got Baptised! THIS Is Why...'-THVhDjzup-Q-14 min--1/5/24--'I got baptised at the weekend, as we're seeing a surge in faith among young people. Why is this happening? '

Watch MY Interview with Tucker Carlson exclusively on Locals here: https://bit.ly/TuckerCarlsonLocals

[Hermoor]

^ Pass me the barf bag.

And that's Carlson binned (again) for any with eyes to see.

[Matthew]

I take every chance to slag Russell Brand off because I don't relate to him or trust him. Now he turns up speaking perfect Christianese and Baptising people all over the shop. Like, out of the blue he has the perfect armour to ride out the escalating bell-curve of P-Diddy type s***-storm. I'm being cynical but in a conflicted way because he's hiding behind Jesus. It's hard to give someone evils when they're doing that. If it's sincere good for him, otherwise the persona might rub off onto him and do him some good. All I have to do is not dissolve into a puddle of my own cynicism. There was some controversy about him Baptising people in his pants (underwear) but so what? I'm not a fan of his but I don't care about that. Better than being totally naked.

[Hermoor]

Unfortunately this is just the tip of the iceberg. He's hiding behind Jesus because the great deceiver is pulling his strings.

f7xV6xv8nTus

[Matthew]

It reminds me of pinning in chess. The King of kings isn't represented on the board. I guess He would be either a pawn sized King or a king sized Pawn? Anyway, this move of Brand's, and my passionate distrust of him, puts me at a crossroads. Either I gnash my teeth in frustration, or I let go of that anger and resentment and all sense of fairness. And what if he's a wolf in sheep's clothing? Well, it doesn't matter ...I'm still back at the same crossroads.

But my choice is clear. It's not about Brand at this point, it's about me, what's inside me, and how I relate to the world. Now that I'm stripped of being able to project my ****ty heart outwards onto Brand this whole crossroads has done me a favour. After all, in the multiverse we are reviled spiritually and yet we get mercy, while everything else that exists is at their own crossroads observing us being given grace.

[wondering]

Your words have the ring of truth to them, Matthew.