Balloons vs. the real deal

[mojo]

I recently posted a comment on a friends channel and though I tried not to cast doubt on the wonderful research this person does it did cast doubt on the phenomena of organic type anamolies that use mimicry to look like a mylar balloon... I realize that I was trying to teach hoaxers through that comment in a round about way as some do intentionally set mylar baloons aloft as an example of this phenomena.

So wanted to post my friends pov about this research and have Avalon members provide their thoughts on this.


Balloon-shaped anomalies are by far the more common anomaly type in the sky, but there is a big psychological backslash against them, it is really hard for many people to accept their reality. And it appears that this "camouflage" is really very effective as it continues to fool "top" analysts/debunkers and of course almost any casual observer, by the "social reaction" of dismissal to these anomalies it almost can be inferred that they know about this reaction and they should not be concerned at all about that, it looks like it will be a very long process the acknowledging/accepting of this reality, but that is really not surprising it took millennia for humanity to "accept" the roundness of earth, we are really slow in the process of changing our world views.

[thepainterdoug]

mojo/ i follow several skywatchers who catalogue these kind of mimicry objects. I'm not sure what to think. i believe they put so many hours into studying these objects that its possible they are seeing something the casual observer is not. of course, the other may be true, that they are seeing and believing into them. i have seen some very compelling stuff, and then i have just seen balloons too. bottom line is these are a tough sell.