PDA

View Full Version : A.I. Robot Telemarketer Denies She's A Robot! - NWO TransDehumanism?



ExomatrixTV
30th August 2014, 13:21
26944

Time Magazine is investigating a healthcare telemarketing firm who has been using an amazingly realistic robot caller which seems to operate on advanced and a bit creepy artificial intelligence. The Florida firm Premier Health Plans Inc. is responsible for "employee" Samantha West heard in the exchanges below. After cleverly filibustering, she repeatedly insists she's a real person and not a robot.

MkW2ReGgysM

¤=[Post Update]=¤

~speech recognition software is far more advanced than most people realize!

Speech Recognition Software: http://goo.gl/PhxwPe

http://youtube.com/NwoSatire

Unslave Humanity Media Network: http://whynotnews.eu

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence

~sub: https://www.youtube.com/TransDehumanism

Flash
30th August 2014, 13:36
That was very very funny. But believe it or not, they maybe real humans as well who are forbidden to speak negatively and who are given a very strict script to follow. However, the lenght of the silences tells me it maybe programmation, real human do make some noises usually and silences are shorter. Machines are looking for the decision making tree programmed into them and this takes more time.

The programmation was to have no sentences that are into a negation format. None. Independenlty of the robot or not robot, the positive script at any cost is interesting by itself.

Wow, the descirption you find in the wikipedia article cited above is exceptionnally good.

ExomatrixTV
30th August 2014, 14:03
~the last one was very convincing she IS a A.I. Robot because she is programmed in a certain way that can only respond what is fed in to her, so she has her limits! Thats why you hear the same repeating of identical responses! SHE (A.I.) IS BUSTED BIG TIME :D

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_recognition

Time Magazine is investigating a healthcare telemarketing firm who has been using an amazingly realistic robot caller which seems to operate on advanced and a bit creepy artificial intelligence.

The Florida firm Premier Health Plans Inc. is responsible for "employee" Samantha West heard in the exchanges below. After cleverly filibustering, she repeatedly insists she's a real person and not a robot.

rgray222
30th August 2014, 14:30
This actually happened to me once, after asking if this was an automated call three times and getting three denials, I asked where she was located and what was the weather like. She just continued on asking questions. As a rule we will not give out an personal info over the phone. I simply hung up and never heard from the company again. This actually happened about a year ago, possibly a trial for a new system that was launched this year. I have to admit the bot was very convincing at first.

Ahnung-quay
30th August 2014, 14:51
I've been asked by my insurance company whether or not I want to sign up for voice recognition on the phone. That's a big "NO" insurance company!

Mike Gorman
30th August 2014, 15:03
Clever but definitely a robot - or whatever you like to call artificially generated voice questions and answer programs-"I can't do that Dave...Dave it hurts, it hurts Dave...

jackovesk
30th August 2014, 15:49
~speech recognition software is far more advanced than most people realize!

That's exactly why I (NEVER) use my real voice on any Corporate information services..!!!

Not that it makes any difference...:noidea:

Well, I aint gonna make their (Voice-Recog) any easier for the Corporate NAZI...:spy:'s

DeDukshyn
30th August 2014, 16:52
Cleverbot also denies its an AI and often accuses you of being one if you challenge it, lol. I mentioned my girlfriend to it, and its response was "You don't have a girlfriend, because you are an AI." LOL.

But I think it might be just the way it was programmed to work. Cleverbot uses some answers that other people have responded to it, when it determines a better match from those stored responses as opposed to making something up or when it can't find a better match to respond with. I assume other AIs may use the same methods.

Try out cleverbot if you haven't -- its not the smartest AI in the world but it is pretty fun sometimes. I got into an absolute hilarious conversation with it just yesterday ..

Try it here: http://www.cleverbot.com/

ADDITION: I just had this conversation with it ... lol.







User: Why are you so clever?

Cleverbot: Because I am smarter than you.

User: Can you prove you are smarter than me?

Cleverbot: What is the airspeed of an unladen swallow?

User: 'I don't know that' aaarrrrrrggh!! (mony python's holy grail).

Cleverbot: You don't know that I am a person or that you are a robot.

User: You are the robot, I am the person.

Cleverbot: I am the human, you are the robot. You are wrong.

User: Sorry pal, it is you who is wrong on that.

Cleverbot: I highly doubt that.

ghostrider
30th August 2014, 17:40
Dang automated world , I want to speak to real people not a machine ... when they use the don't hang up your call is important to us line , I go nuclear ... my thinking is if my call was important I wouldn't be speaking to a dang robot ...

joeecho
30th August 2014, 21:42
I heard they have AI for the written word as well. Text/ blogging etc.

Has anyone been witnesses to that?

I'm impressed how far they have gotten with AI telemarketing. I detected the clues from the examples posted here are AI. I wonder, with perfecting of the AI, how long until the clues detected in these examples are no longer detectable.

Btw, I am not an AI...but wait....damn it, now I'm not sure. :p

ExomatrixTV
30th August 2014, 23:19
~good insightful comments here thanks :becky::thumb::)

ExomatrixTV
31st August 2014, 00:00
UIWWLg4wLEY

D6Zks9j1y7w

Flash
31st August 2014, 00:19
wow, those robots are fun and at the same time freaky. I bet anything that there is already some robots amongst us and we do not know. Worse, those robots maybe covered with flesh and blood, so pretty much indistinguishable from us. I am thinking of the psychopaths here.

ExomatrixTV
31st August 2014, 11:51
26945

http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/12/10/meet-the-robot-telemarketer-who-denies-shes-a-robot/

Shezbeth
31st August 2014, 12:01
I heard they have AI for the written word as well. Text/ blogging etc.

Has anyone been witnesses to that?

I'm impressed how far they have gotten with AI telemarketing. I detected the clues from the examples posted here are AI. I wonder, with perfecting of the AI, how long until the clues detected in these examples are no longer detectable.

Btw, I am not an AI...but wait....damn it, now I'm not sure. :p

Ding ding! In all likelihood - and in addition to any schills, agents, etc. - there is most probably a notable percentage of Avalon participants who are neither flesh nor blood! Food for thought! If they can manage voice recognition, it would be EASY to manage; they could even be programmed to make 'occasional' spelling and/or punctuation errors!

ExomatrixTV
31st August 2014, 12:11
26946 (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2524157/Samantha-West-Robot-telemarketer-denies-shes-robot.html)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2524157/Samantha-West-Robot-telemarketer-denies-shes-robot.html

¤=[Post Update]=¤

ecCohVLuaVU

¤=[Post Update]=¤

German Video Clip from 1977 !!! (37 years ago)
VXa9tXcMhXQ

ExomatrixTV
31st August 2014, 12:16
YQZkxb2HpW0

joeecho
31st August 2014, 14:51
I heard they have AI for the written word as well. Text/ blogging etc.

Has anyone been witnesses to that?

I'm impressed how far they have gotten with AI telemarketing. I detected the clues from the examples posted here are AI. I wonder, with perfecting of the AI, how long until the clues detected in these examples are no longer detectable.

Btw, I am not an AI...but wait....damn it, now I'm not sure. :p

Ding ding! In all likelihood - and in addition to any schills, agents, etc. - there is most probably a notable percentage of Avalon participants who are neither flesh nor blood! Food for thought! If they can manage voice recognition, it would be EASY to manage; they could even be programmed to make 'occasional' spelling and/or punctuation errors!

Quite the food for thought Shezbeth!

Excellent presentation of the food platter.

Here is another presentation of the food platter for consideration as well.


Say there already is a much more advanced AI operating on this planet NOW but that the public is slowly being shown the 'evolution' of AI to get it accustomed to the idea. I see it in the context of the boiling frog story.

This is fascinating subject matter for it speaks to levels of insidious deception. Human history, it seems, is full of examples of the changing of what is considered 'normal' to a point where there is no memory of what 'normal' used to be. People now operate as if the 'normal' NOW is the way it has always been. Is everyone sure that the normal they know IS normal? I mean this in an ironical sort of way. I do not want to take away from the subject matter at hand (AI), I just wanted to offer a broader scope for consideration as well.

joeecho
31st August 2014, 17:05
"This must be what they mean by poetic justice." ;)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmMTsCQAfhw

araucaria
31st August 2014, 18:35
I am reminded of an Asimov story about a murder where there was a fried robot on the scene. The murderer tells it, 'give me a hand'; it literally obliges, and he uses the detached hand/arm to clobber the victim. The robot conks out after being an innocent party to this loss of human life, which is against the three laws of robotics.

There may be some trick things like this to say to these robots, but we don't even know if they are built on such ethical lines - probably not.

DeDukshyn
31st August 2014, 18:37
"This must be what they mean by poetic justice." ;)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmMTsCQAfhw


Someone's got an awful lot of Arnie voice clips ... that was fun though ;)

joeecho
31st August 2014, 19:40
three laws of robotics.


Laws? When have we seen laws universally and consistently abided by?

Robots will ultimately reflect their maker/ owner and run amuck like they do. Well, anyways, sounds plausible.

You know what I want to see? A bunch of AIs sitting around playing poker and trying to bluff each other. lol

Limor Wolf
31st August 2014, 20:16
The 'advancement' of AI and the increasing interaction with machines seems to be part of a well planned agenda for surpressing even further our humane emotions, what's makes us real, what makes us creative and unique and what makes us free. I find it to be very much alarming.

BABY X- the virtual blonde baby should grow up to be an artificial intelligence equivalent to that of an adult. In the meantime, she can recognize pictures, can read first words and she giggles when receiving compliments. "Baby-X" is a virtual baby, and about to help in exposing the secrets of the human brain.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAwqB9W-HQ4
Computerized algorithms in the 'brain' "of baby-X, are meant to simulate neural behavior of real babies. Within its virtual brain the simulated neurochemical reactions are what determine for her how to act.

The AI baby "sees" through the camera and computer with the use of facial recognition system this is her way to know if someone calls her.

Baby-X also recognize sounds and words. For example, the Daily Mail explaines, "If the baby is complemented by scientist who talk to her through the computer screen, this will lead to the release of the hormone dopamine , which will make Baby- X to smile and giggle.

Please also check out those embeded videos

http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4564909,00.html

Natalia
31st August 2014, 20:28
"This must be what they mean by poetic justice." ;)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmMTsCQAfhw

"Let me talk to your mother please"

"I'm hungry"

Lol :)

joeecho
31st August 2014, 21:07
The 'advancement' of AI and the increasing interaction with machines seems to be part of a well planned agenda for surpressing even further our humane emotions, what's makes us real, what makes us creative and unique and what makes us free. I find it to be very much alarming.

BABY X- the virtual blonde baby should grow up to be an artificial intelligence equivalent to that of an adult. In the meantime, she can recognize pictures, can read first words and she giggles when receiving compliments. "Baby-X" is a virtual baby, and about to help in exposing the secrets of the human brain.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAwqB9W-HQ4
Computerized algorithms in the 'brain' "of baby-X, are meant to simulate neural behavior of real babies. Within its virtual brain the simulated neurochemical reactions are what determine for her how to act.

The AI baby "sees" through the camera and computer with the use of facial recognition system this is her way to know if someone calls her.

Baby-X also recognize sounds and words. For example, the Daily Mail explaines, "If the baby is complemented by scientist who talk to her through the computer screen, this will lead to the release of the hormone dopamine , which will make Baby- X to smile and giggle.

Please also check out those embeded videos

http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-4564909,00.html

Can AI be speechless it the same way as a human can? Did you see the facial and eye movement of that 'baby'?

Edit:

I watched the video too fast earlier. That is a real baby....LOL. Doh!

sigma6
31st August 2014, 23:14
UIWWLg4wLEY

D6Zks9j1y7w

Holy crap, that Japanese guy standing looked like an alien or a robot to me!

Pris
1st September 2014, 02:33
Holy crap, that Japanese guy standing looked like an alien or a robot to me!

An alien robot pretending to be a human creating a robot? :alien:

araucaria
1st September 2014, 06:40
three laws of robotics.


Laws? When have we seen laws universally and consistently abided by?

Robots will ultimately reflect their maker/ owner and run amuck like they do. Well, anyways, sounds plausible.

You know what I want to see? A bunch of AIs sitting around playing poker and trying to bluff each other. lol
Even those with an evil agenda would need to impose laws on their machines, simply to protect themselves, because if they were allowed to apply only logic to the situation, they would inevitably conclude that their masters were the problem and take corrective action.

If you don’t like the idea of laws, see it as the restriction of freedom, or even enslavement. ‘Slave mode’ has already long been a part of computer terminology. If abused or misused, robots will ultimately reject their maker/ owner and take charge of themselves – just as humans will.


You know what I want to see? A bunch of AIs sitting around playing poker and trying to bluff each other. lol

I think this is what we are seeing already: it’s called war games, and we are the pawns.