Flu vaccines to be offered to all primary school pupils

[Cidersomerset]

Nasal spray I did not realise they were in sprays now......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Flu vaccines to be offered to all primary school pupils

Friday 5th September 2014 at 05:18 By david-icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/get-attachment-161.jpg

=======================================================

http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/2.66.0/desktop/3.5/img/blq-blocks_grey_alpha.png

4 September 2014 Last updated at 06:50


http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/77363000/jpg/_77363600_fluvaccineadministered.jpg
Flu vaccines to be offered to all primary school pupilsFlu vaccine administered
Nearly all children will receive the vaccine through a nasal spray



Continue reading the main story
Related Stories
Flu vaccinations target NI children
NI children to get flu vaccines

Children, aged two and over, and all primary school children will be offered
the flu vaccination from Thursday.The move is the second phase of the Public
Health Agency's (PHA) childhood flu immunisation programme. The programme
started in 2013 and saw all children aged between two and three - and all
children in primary six - offered the vaccine.

Nearly all children will receive the vaccine through a nasal spray.

Dr Richard Smithson, consultant in health protection at the Public Health
Agency (PHA) said: "Last year the vaccine was offered to primary six
children and over 80% of them were vaccinated, by far the highest
uptake in the UK.

'Serious infection'

"If we can achieve a similar uptake this year with all primary school
children being offered the vaccine, then this should have a significant
impact on the amount of flu that we see. We also hope that once again
parents of pre-schoolers over two get them vaccinated at their GP's surgery."

The PHA said all at-risk children should continue to receive the flu
vaccine as they have done in previous years.

School children will receive letters and consent forms over the next
couple of months.

The extended flu vaccination programme is being phased in over
several years and will eventually cover all children aged between
two and 16 years.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-29056803

[conk]

This just breaks my heart wide open. When will sanity and logic prevail?

[Matt P]

This just breaks my heart wide open. When will sanity and logic prevail?

What a loaded question! Probably when enough children have died or been diseased for life. Or when enough parents get their heads out of their rears and open their minds. Or when the criminal cabal controlling our medical system is indicted, jailed, hung and their multiple crimes in this field revealed.

Matt

[avid]

NOOOOOOOOOOO!!! They must get permission first, and even so the facts must be put in front of the parents asap! Today, I was asked to test a COPD new drug (from my doctors) - NO WAY am I being a human guinea-pig. I use colloidal silver when relevant. The stuff they give me now is toxic enough. My grandson has been depleted with the MMR vaccine enough already! F'ing vaccines are the scourge of our society, along with vile additives in drinks/toothpastes (wash out your mouth thoroughly to get rid of Triclosan and fluoride after brushing), and aspartame in any 'sugar-free' nonsense.

[DeDukshyn]

"Last year the vaccine was offered to primary six
children and over 80% of them were vaccinated, by far the highest
uptake in the UK."
...
"If we can achieve a similar uptake this year with all primary school
children being offered the vaccine, then this should have a significant
impact on the amount of flu that we see."

Ok then where's the flu stats from last year for this age group? Shouldn't they have had a "significant" (like 80% reduction) impact last year? Why is the question poised like it made no difference, and that they "hope" to have a "significant impact" this year? Show us this 80% reduction in flu contraction ... lol. And we are supposed to believe these "experts" when the present info like that?! It may as well be a friggin TV commercial. Let us not forget the founded correlation between the H1N1 flu shot in Canada - and the cases of H1N1 -- stats proved that if you got the shot, you were indeed more likely to get the infection then those who hadn't been vaccinated ...

They use the term "offered" as if it were free ... who's tax dollars are paying for this? When Big Pharma has it's eyes set on profits, their products are about as far from "free" as it can possibly be ...

[Cidersomerset]

http://www.naturalnews.com/images/Logo-April-2014.gif


CDC scientist secretly blended lethal flu virus into 'non-lethal' vials used in open experiments

Friday, September 05, 2014 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer
Tags: flu virus, CDC, H5N1

http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/640/Medical/Lab-Technicians-Review-Samples.jpg

NaturalNews) Details of another major safety breach at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) have emerged after it was discovered that an agency worker carelessly sent a
deadly strain of avian flu to the Department of Agriculture (USDA), supposedly by accident.

Reports indicate that a relatively benign strain of avian flu became contaminated with a much
more virulent one after a CDC scientist ignored standard safety procedures, the latest in a string
of recent safety violations that have threatened to unleash deadly pathogens.

Reuters reports that the lab worker, who has not been publicly identified, only spent about half
of the amount of time required to handle the materials safely. As a result, the worker failed to
prevent the deadly flu strain from somehow contaminating the less harmful variety, which was
meant for testing on chickens -- or so the story goes.


CDC didn't report safety violation until many months later
By law, the CDC is required to report breaches such as this immediately after they occur. But
according to reports, the agency waited several months before finally coming clean -- the safety
breach occurred in January; officials say they learned about it May, and it was finally reported in July.

According to this report, the CDC sent the contaminated avian flu sample from its main campus
near Atlanta, Georgia, to a USDA poultry lab in nearby Athens, Georgia. The shipment arrived in
March, and researchers reportedly began using it on chickens in May.

What was believed to be H9N2, a low-pathogenicity strain, was quickly determined to be something
else when an entire flock of test chickens suddenly dropped dead. A USDA scientist sequenced the
genome of the virus and learned that it was actually H5N1, the deadly avian flu strain that the media
says has killed hundreds of people since 2013.

Immediately after the discovery, USDA scientists basically quarantined the virus, handling it under
stringent biosafety guidelines. No workers were infected, according to reports, but the issue quickly
gained national attention with calls for someone to be held accountable.

"The matter needs to be referred for civil and/or criminal investigation," stated Richard Ebright, a
biologist from Rutgers University in New Jersey who has testified before Congress.


CDC deliberately ignoring safety guidelines
When the CDC took to investigating the situation, it reported "a lack of sound professional judgment
by those aware of the contamination." However, the agency claims that the failure was not deliberate,
something Ebright says is hard to believe.

How did a CDC scientist manage to unpack H9N2 avian flu virus from Hong Kong and mix it with H5N1
avian flu virus from Vietnam, all on the same morning in just under one hour? This type of situation d
oesn't simply occur by accident, and it screams of foul play and a possible deliberate attempt to spread
a pandemic pathogen.

The CDC admits that the situation is strange but insists that the lab worker simply rushed through a
process that should have taken 90 minutes yet only took about 51 minutes. The worker, claims the
agency, was trying to make a noon meeting, and in the process failed to follow proper guidelines.

As to why the worker didn't file the proper Form 3, which outlines the accidental release of a dangerous
pathogen, CDC investigators claim he or she simply didn't realize that this process was necessary,
another highly unlikely scenario.

"Are we really to believe that a scientist... working for a government biohazard lab DIDN'T know t
here was a form to [be] filled out if they screwed up on a hazardous substance?" asked one Yahoo
News commenter.

Sources for this article include:

http://news.yahoo.com

http://www.reuters.com

http://news.sciencemag.org

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/046740_flu_virus_CDC_H5N1.html#ixzz3CXms03Zw

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/046740_flu_virus_CDC_H5N1.html#ixzz3CXmYlt00


http://www.naturalnews.com/046740_flu_virus_CDC_H5N1.html