PDA

View Full Version : How An American F-16 Pilot Was Given A Kamikaze Mission On Sept. 11



chancy
12th September 2014, 15:48
Hello Everyone:
This article would make anyone smile and wonder why an F-15 fighter jet would have NO WEAPONS ON BOARD when military aircraft protecting the skies would be expected to have full weapons on board at all times. This would be the nature of the F-16. They are not a pleasure craft or commercial passenger aircraft.
Please read and see the ridiculousness of this article....

chancy


Link:
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/american-f-16-pilot-given-kamikaze-mission-sept-160215167.html

Article:

How An American F-16 Pilot Was Given A Kamikaze Mission On Sept. 11

One of the first two U.S. combat pilots in the air on the morning of Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2001 took off from Andrews Air Force Base in an F-16 with a mission to bring down United Flight 93 — and without any missiles or ammunition.

“We wouldn’t be shooting it down. We’d be ramming the aircraft,” Lt. Heather “Lucky” Penney said describing her orders to The Washington Post. “I would essentially be a kamikaze pilot.”

The fourth recently identified hijacked plane appeared to be on a heading for Washington, and there was no time to arm the base’s fighter aircraft before Penney and her commanding officer took off to intercept the rogue Boeing 757 passenger plane.

“We had to protect the airspace any way we could,” Penney said.

Penney, the first female F-16 pilot of the D.C. Air National Guard’s 121st Fighter Squadron, had just completed two weeks of combat training on that historic Tuesday, and the bases’s fighters were still equipped with dummy ammunition. According to the report, there were no armed aircraft ready for immediate scramble over post-Cold War Washington in the fall of 2001.

The third plane had just struck the Pentagon and the base was at least an hour away from arming combat-ready aircraft, with the fourth already thought to have been identified.

“I’m going to go for the cockpit,” Col. Marc Sasseville told Penney as they donned their flight suits.

“I’ll take the tail,” Penney replied.

After skipping their pre-flight checks and starting down the runway with flight crews pulling out safety pins alongside, the jets took off over the smoking ruin of the Pentagon’s west side. Both pilots hoped to eject before the moment of impact, all the while doubting such a tactic would work. Even worse, Penney said, was the fear that bailing out too early would mean missing her target.

Hours later the two pilots would learn that the passengers of United 93 had already done what the pilots themselves were prepared to do. The pair flew sorties all day, and later, escorted Air Force One back to Washington.

“The real heroes are the passengers on Flight 93 who were willing to sacrifice themselves,” Penney said. “I genuinely believed that was going to be the last time I took off.”

Penney went on to fly two tours in Iraq and is now a director of the F-35 program at Lockheed Martin, who serves part-time as a National Guard pilot.

Today there are always two fully armed fighter jets stationed at Andrews, with two pilots never more than yards from their aircraft.

Carmody
12th September 2014, 16:01
Today there are always two fully armed fighter jets stationed at Andrews, with two pilots never more than yards from their aircraft.

This was the known normal situation beforehand, so why it would be announced that way ...now...... is a bit odd.

Snookie
12th September 2014, 16:08
What a load of hogwash. Who writes this crap? Like they would send a newly trained pilot out on a mission like this?

And if they think we are going to buy the idea that the planes they use to guard the capital & pentagon are not ALWAYS armed with weapons, they have another think coming!

bruno dante
12th September 2014, 16:21
So confused......:confused:

This is truly some of the silliest sh!t I've ever heard.

I sort of skimmed this article yesterday in a local newspaper. I walked away thinking: surely I have missed something here.

Nope.

F-16 combat jets were actually sent up in the air to battle ram a passenger jet out of the sky.

Wow. Just..wow.

I'd like to speak with the genius that thought up this plan. I have a few important questions. The first being: Combat training aside, how is it possible that not a single fighter jet was armed that day? After all, that's what fighter jets are for, yes? So, my tax dollars are paying for neutered f-16's? Wonderful.

I wonder: did at any point either of these pilots say something like, "Ok, let me get this straight..."

Sorry, but I don't consider this to be authentic bravery. I consider it to be profound stupidity. It doesn't do anyone any good if we kill an additional 2 pilots on top of everyone else, does it? Just so some goofy base commander can act like he did something?

Unreal.

Cardillac
12th September 2014, 19:20
am not sure if there were any physical planes involved whatsoever in 9/11; most of the first witnesses said they saw no windows on these planes (and forget the cover-story that Frenchmen were doing a documentary about NYC fire-fighters at the time; since when could the French care about NYC firemen?) so if/IF the planes were actually physical/ruling out, of course, the possibility that 3-D projections can be invented/manipulated and they may have been drones-

then read Dr. Judy Wood's "Where did the Towers Go?" for more info on this subject-

what still/continues to absolutely baffle me as a member of this forum is that so many members continue to be in the dark about so many things (by choice) and still refuse to acknowledge/question the world out there; it "ain't" what it appears to be and they will desperately hang onto their 'comfort zone' to make themselves feel better about themselves by even being on an 'alternative' website (like this one);

I could go on and on...

when will people finally realize 9/11 was was trans-nationally planned and subsequently executed by a rogue group (shades of Kennedy)?

Larry

sigma6
13th September 2014, 06:46
All part of the 9/11 Fairy Tale... it just keeps getting spinnier and spinnier... And she' now a director for the another fairy tale, the scientifically unfixable F-35. The 1,500,000,000,000 dollar flying tax turd, that single handedly sunk the US military budget?... hmm... makes perfect sense... If she can tow that line, we got a bigger pile of bull**** over here for you to shovel.. Tell you what, we even make you director :D