Latest SOL from Mars Curiosity finds building type structures

[mojo]

This definitely looks not natural.

U9LlJcLxUAM

[Fellow Aspirant]

While I disagree with the narrator about "tubes" and "faces", (what he calls tubes are, to my eye, jutting walls on the fronts of buildings) I find this to be a compelling photo. All of the holes are to the same scale, laid out in a very logical and organized way.

I know what cliff dwellings look like. These are cliff dwellings - on a massive scale.

[ghostrider]

In the digital age, NASA hides so many wonderful things in our own neck of the woods ... people sense of awe and wonder are held back , all over fear , fear that would release so many to the infinite universe and diverse life that creation has spent billions of years creating ... pictures of earth taken from space are crystal clear yet , pictures taken the other way have distortions , it erkks me ...

[meat suit]

come on guys... its pixelation...

[ghostrider]

come on guys... its pixelation...

exactly , there shouldn't be pixilation with the billions spent on taking photos of another planet ... they could have gotten better pics from a ground based telescope ...

[skuzzy]

come on guys... its pixelation...

exactly , there shouldn't be pixilation with the billions spent on taking photos of another planet ... they could have gotten better pics from a ground based telescope ...

lol. those public funded space missions and equipment should be listeneing to the rrequests of those who paid for it, the people. i want to see what going on up there. mysterious human like statue on the moon? zoom in on it. face on mars? drive that rover up close. its rediculous how things work now, we pay for the gear but have 0 say of what it does.

maybe il have to strap on an extra battery pack and increase the transmission range of my parot bebop drone and fly that bitch up there myself. get some hd pics of whatever i think needs looking at and let you guys see what ive found. ha, screw looking in peoples windows, im married, i know what naked girls look like, i care about non natural buildings/statues/cities and all that neat stuff.

[ghostrider]

I think that NASA is scared the public will figure out life didn't originate on Earth , hence their bible history will be all messed up ... when you see Egyptian statues , and the twelve commandments in stone found on Mars , there will be no hiding place for NASA ... people will be confronted with a cold hard truth , man came from Lyra , then the pleadies , then Sirius , then Mars , then Earth ...

[skuzzy]

mmmm, im not so sure i agree with your timeline of us humans. Indead the evidence is on the planet for us to read, it was recoreded in Sumer, some cold hard facts about human origins. to be straight to the point it seems(i believe) that man is now the product of manipulation on the genetic level, a combo of dna from primative earth humans(pre-hominoids) and annunaki dna(a male to be specific).

that being the short and sweet version, you can hear the long version from loyd pye in "everything yuo know is wrong" which he did over 10 years ago. its a great presentation, well worth the investment of time. of course we were and still are effected by natural evolutionary processes involving energies and what have you but it seems that the genetic evidence doesnt lie.

i also want to put in a side note. i listened to the most recent interview given by simon parkes and he put forth a couple tantilizing tid bits that have helped me out.

1) the idea that god created man, from nothing, is not true. they(not he) manipulated the existing earth natives into, more or less, what we are now. hence the passage "create man in our image after our likeness."

2) the whole idea that "I am your the LORD your God" is a misinterpritation. simon says(hehe) that the entity giving those commandments and claiming that title is merely a evolved being, human reptilian to be exact. the 'lord' in the bible is NOT the creator of all, but a product of the creative source, the source field as david wilcock says.

that second point is pretty key to ponder about and here is why: if you read the old testament and the new testament you will notice that there are 2 very different 'gods' being spoken about. in the Old Test the creator god is a physical being. that is easy to read. in the New Test jesus speaks of a god that cannot be seen but is always present, more like a energetic field than the stereotypical muscle bound white man sitting on a throne of gold with sandals and a long beard.

from merely a minute or two of what simon talks about has vastly helped me personaly with thinking about things. my new point of view? the old testament 'god' is proof et exists ;)