WHOMADEGOD
23rd September 2014, 12:21
Hi all,
Not sure if anyone has made this link yet but I think it should be widely known.
I recall watching a documentary in which a whistle blower confirmed that one of the constituent parts of the Chemtrails consisted of a large amount of "STRONTIUM".
I often wondered why, then I was sent this information last week, it talks in brief about how Fluoride will "LOCK-IN" Strontium in our bones and therefore cause our DNA to become damaged overtime due to the increasing levels of radiation that cannot be removed:
"The Secret War and the Fluoride Conspiracy by Dr Geoffrey E Smith, LDS, RCS (Eng). (1997)
Dr Smith’s book was published posthumously in Australia in 1997. He felt
unable to publish during his lifetime because he had signed an Official
Secrets’ Act declaration many years previously when living in England. This
extract deals with the potential for fluoride to lock radioactive Strontium-90
into the bones. Due to the large number of experimental nuclear bomb tests
in the 1950’s and 1960’s, the background radiation level had increased. Dr
Smith’s experiments were carried out by a research team in the Glaxo
laboratories in 1968.
“We did a number of experiments [unpublished] exploring the Soviet claim
that fluoride could prevent the build-up of Strontium-90 in bones. Only one
needs to be described and I’ll do that simply.
There were four groups of male mice involved, 24 in each group:
3
Group A mice were given a normal diet supplemented with fluoride;
Group B mice had a normal diet supplemented with Strontium;
Group C mice had a normal diet supplemented with both fluoride and strontium;
Group D mice had a normal diet and acted as a control group.
The results of the study demonstrated convincingly that in the Group C mice, the fluoride ‘locked’ the
strontium into the bones for an appreciable length of time. In 1986, about 18 years later, a French team
of scientists1 conducted a very similar experiment which was reported in the journal Metabolism. Their
findings were the same as ours.”
Despite knowing that the risk of osteosarcoma was heightened in the 1960s and 1970s, HM Government
continued to sponsor the introduction of water fluoridation. What was going on behind the scenes in
Whitehall? Geoffrey Smith discusses the role of the British Secret Service elsewhere in the Chapter.
The mechanism whereby fluoride ‘locks’ radioactive Strontium into the bones was suggested by J.M.
Faccini2 in 1967. He refers to an earlier piece of research by M.J. Purves3 who treated patients with
Paget’s Disease with fluoride and he used radioactive calcium as a ‘bone marker’. “The experiment
showed that there was a reduction in the loss of radioactive calcium from the skeleton of patients
receiving fluoride. It seemed that the fluoride ‘locked’ the radioactive calcium into the skeleton –
presumably because the normal processes of resorption were disturbed.”
Faccini stated that “Fluoride can replace the hydroxyl radical in the apatite lattice; and the resultant
bond holding the fluoride ion is stronger; this explains the greater insolubility of fluorapatite in water,
and may also explain the greater resistance of fluorapatite-containing dental enamel to the
demineralising effect of caries. It is equally possible therefore, that fluoride, in producing more stable
(or denser) bone mineral, renders the fluoride-containing bone resistant to the normal processes of
resorption.
There is a crucial difference between developed tooth enamel and bone; in enamel, all cellular activity
has ceased. But in order to fulfil its structural and physiological roles, bone must be in a dynamic state
and there is a constant bone remodelling in both the growing and fully mature skeleton. Hence, normal
bone is in a constant state of dynamic equilibrium with both the matrix and mineral being constantly
removed and replaced. Yet Faccini and other investigators were suggesting that ‘fluoride-containing
bone’ was ‘resistant to the normal processes of resorption’.”
Is the failure of fluoridated bone to remodel a contributory factor in the incidence of fractured hips in
the elderly?
References:
Marie, P.J. and Hott, M. “Short-term effects of fluoride and strontium on bone formation and resorption
in the mouse. Metabolism, 35(6) 546-551, 1986.
Faccini, J.M. “Inhibition of Bone Resorption in the Rabbit’, Nature, 214, 1269, 1967.
Purves, M.J. “Fluoride and Bone Disorders”, Lancet ii 118, 1962."
Strontium and Fluoride as two toxins that are being dosed heavily to the Human collective now make much more sense as they work together in counter acting our genetic evolution especially at a time when the energies we are receiving are trying to repair and and advance our DNA as a species. One wonders how long this has been in the pipeline when you consider how long illegal fluoride dosing has been taking place.
Namaste
Mark
Not sure if anyone has made this link yet but I think it should be widely known.
I recall watching a documentary in which a whistle blower confirmed that one of the constituent parts of the Chemtrails consisted of a large amount of "STRONTIUM".
I often wondered why, then I was sent this information last week, it talks in brief about how Fluoride will "LOCK-IN" Strontium in our bones and therefore cause our DNA to become damaged overtime due to the increasing levels of radiation that cannot be removed:
"The Secret War and the Fluoride Conspiracy by Dr Geoffrey E Smith, LDS, RCS (Eng). (1997)
Dr Smith’s book was published posthumously in Australia in 1997. He felt
unable to publish during his lifetime because he had signed an Official
Secrets’ Act declaration many years previously when living in England. This
extract deals with the potential for fluoride to lock radioactive Strontium-90
into the bones. Due to the large number of experimental nuclear bomb tests
in the 1950’s and 1960’s, the background radiation level had increased. Dr
Smith’s experiments were carried out by a research team in the Glaxo
laboratories in 1968.
“We did a number of experiments [unpublished] exploring the Soviet claim
that fluoride could prevent the build-up of Strontium-90 in bones. Only one
needs to be described and I’ll do that simply.
There were four groups of male mice involved, 24 in each group:
3
Group A mice were given a normal diet supplemented with fluoride;
Group B mice had a normal diet supplemented with Strontium;
Group C mice had a normal diet supplemented with both fluoride and strontium;
Group D mice had a normal diet and acted as a control group.
The results of the study demonstrated convincingly that in the Group C mice, the fluoride ‘locked’ the
strontium into the bones for an appreciable length of time. In 1986, about 18 years later, a French team
of scientists1 conducted a very similar experiment which was reported in the journal Metabolism. Their
findings were the same as ours.”
Despite knowing that the risk of osteosarcoma was heightened in the 1960s and 1970s, HM Government
continued to sponsor the introduction of water fluoridation. What was going on behind the scenes in
Whitehall? Geoffrey Smith discusses the role of the British Secret Service elsewhere in the Chapter.
The mechanism whereby fluoride ‘locks’ radioactive Strontium into the bones was suggested by J.M.
Faccini2 in 1967. He refers to an earlier piece of research by M.J. Purves3 who treated patients with
Paget’s Disease with fluoride and he used radioactive calcium as a ‘bone marker’. “The experiment
showed that there was a reduction in the loss of radioactive calcium from the skeleton of patients
receiving fluoride. It seemed that the fluoride ‘locked’ the radioactive calcium into the skeleton –
presumably because the normal processes of resorption were disturbed.”
Faccini stated that “Fluoride can replace the hydroxyl radical in the apatite lattice; and the resultant
bond holding the fluoride ion is stronger; this explains the greater insolubility of fluorapatite in water,
and may also explain the greater resistance of fluorapatite-containing dental enamel to the
demineralising effect of caries. It is equally possible therefore, that fluoride, in producing more stable
(or denser) bone mineral, renders the fluoride-containing bone resistant to the normal processes of
resorption.
There is a crucial difference between developed tooth enamel and bone; in enamel, all cellular activity
has ceased. But in order to fulfil its structural and physiological roles, bone must be in a dynamic state
and there is a constant bone remodelling in both the growing and fully mature skeleton. Hence, normal
bone is in a constant state of dynamic equilibrium with both the matrix and mineral being constantly
removed and replaced. Yet Faccini and other investigators were suggesting that ‘fluoride-containing
bone’ was ‘resistant to the normal processes of resorption’.”
Is the failure of fluoridated bone to remodel a contributory factor in the incidence of fractured hips in
the elderly?
References:
Marie, P.J. and Hott, M. “Short-term effects of fluoride and strontium on bone formation and resorption
in the mouse. Metabolism, 35(6) 546-551, 1986.
Faccini, J.M. “Inhibition of Bone Resorption in the Rabbit’, Nature, 214, 1269, 1967.
Purves, M.J. “Fluoride and Bone Disorders”, Lancet ii 118, 1962."
Strontium and Fluoride as two toxins that are being dosed heavily to the Human collective now make much more sense as they work together in counter acting our genetic evolution especially at a time when the energies we are receiving are trying to repair and and advance our DNA as a species. One wonders how long this has been in the pipeline when you consider how long illegal fluoride dosing has been taking place.
Namaste
Mark