UFO in China..

[Ammit]

Hi all

I hope no one minds me posting this video but, this is the first time I have seen it.
I would be very interested to know what the CGI folks think of it.

http://youtu.be/8BhJL1O7gmw

[Olam]

Major fake!
Lots of work, lots of bullcrap!
:-)

[justntime2learn]

Sure looks cool :cool:

[Atlas]

I would agree with Youtube poster Joo2oob:




The video (notice the surroundings) is shaky, yet the UFO keeps in sight for the whole video and doesn't shake at all. Nice editing brah...

Also this other comment:




ANALYSIS OF FRAME OF VIDEO

Although at first sight it would seem the video did well, however, it contains an infinite number of assembly errors. It will explain at least 5 that reveal tricks and that certify the blatant nature of fake. In the 1st photo we can see that we have tried to eliminate the actual color of the sky in order to allow the object to be more consistent and realistic environment that surrounds him. We do not exclude, however, that games (in this evaluation and in what follows we will) in this effect the quality of the movie.

In image 2 we see another element that certifies video editing: the light pole remains almost invisible, since, in our opinion, has intervened on the levels of fusion when the images are superimposed and came down the flying saucer and the alien landscape that does not really contained them. The result is that the object when it should pass behind the pole, but in reality does not disappear even seems to pass forward. A reflection: note how the object looks like a car, probably drawn in 3d.

Looking at the frame nos. 3/4/5 instead notice inconsistencies of the shadow cast by the trees and not the shadow casting object is not landed. In particular, we note that the addition of the writing covers a merger, in short, an attempt was made to standardize the object and the soil and that is the environment in which it was lowered into the way the ufo artifact in a clumsy way. The video, therefore, in our opinion is FALSE.

Let us finally point out how we have operated on a video posted on youtube because we do not have the original. In addition, we consider that the video is very choppy in the phase of "hot pursuit" all'ovni, a circumstance that could give rise to misunderstandings and blunders in the analysis.

This, however, does not change our opinion: THE VIDEO IS FALSE.