Common Law Revocation overturns RCMP, Kinder-Morgan

[ktlight]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp6o2C0y7n8

"Published on 29 Nov 2014
Special announcement from the Republic of Kanata and Common Law courts in Canada, describing how the RCMP and B.C. Supreme Court have bowed to the common law Revocation Order nullifying "crown" authority in the Kinder-Morgan environmental dispute in Vancouver. The common law works: join our movement and reclaim our nation. Issued 29 November, 2014 on liberated territory of the Republic of Kanata. "

[sigma6]

Kevin Annette is truly on to something here if what he is saying is accurate, and there is no reason to believe otherwise (ie. this would be near impossible to fake, and or claim cause and effect from anomalies, etc... What he is doing exactly is another question, he is using common law in an apparently uncommonly powerful manner, this deserves closer scrutiny... I'd like to get more detail on his interpretation, as they say the "difference" that is making the difference... Of course one clue is the word "revocation"... Now he say he is doing it because he has the evidence, which he created himself (very methodical accumulated follow up... which is a very "equitable" approach and interpretation... Usually revocation is used often with "revocation of Power of Attorney" for example ... equity and trust go together... just guessing but most common law approaches that succeed, I end up seeing the equitable trust interpretation often as the underlying premise...