PDA

View Full Version : Cosmic Radiation Less Of A Risk To Astronauts Than Previously Thought



MorningSong
5th December 2014, 05:40
Promo for spce travel or another hidden truth?


December 4, 2014

Chuck Bednar for redOrbit.com – Your Universe Online

Cosmic radiation from space travel could be less harmful to astronauts than previously believed, data from experiments conducted on board and outside of the International Space Station (ISS) has revealed.

The MATROSHKA experiment, the first comprehensive measurement of long-term exposure of space travelers to cosmic radiation, brought together researchers from the European Space Agency (ESA) and colleagues from other institutions to determine precisely how much radiation astronauts are exposed to during long-term space travel.

The goal was to determine how long astronauts could remain in space without their health being threatened due to exposure to ionizing radiation. To do so, they developed a type of mannequin that was outfitted with several thousand detectors that recorded the doses of cosmic radiation from inside and outside the ISS over the course of several years. The data collected by those sensors has been analyzed, the researchers called the results surprising.

“One may say that we found open space to be a bit less hostile to humans than expected. The effective doses, related to the health risk of the astronauts and calculated from measurements with our detectors, were lower than those indicated by dosimeters worn by the astronauts,” Dr. Paweł Bilski from the Henryk Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics (IFJ PAN), said in a recent statement.

The mannequin, a legless torso described by the researchers as “a specially adapted humanoid phantom used in medical research,” contained real human bones places inside a plastic shell simulating the shapes and densities of soft tissues and lungs in an astronaut’s body. It consisted of 33 slices 2.5 cm thickness each, and each of them contained measuring equipment and sets of passive thermoluminescent detectors placed in plastic tubes.

Using a total of six thousand thermoluminescent detectors, the researchers created a three-dimensional rectangular grid of measurement points inside the phantom. The design allowed the authors to accurately determine how much radiation would be absorbed by each of the body’s organs, and to calculate “the so-called effective dose, which is considered to be an estimate of the radiation hazard to humans,” IFJ PAN explained.

“The main hazard to the astronaut’s health due to exposure to cosmic radiation is the increased probability of developing cancer in his or her body,” the institute added. “This probability however is quite dependent on the type of radiation the astronaut is exposed to. Most of the natural sources of ionizing radiation on Earth produce electromagnetic radiation of high energy – gamma rays. On the other hand, in cosmic rays, energetic protons or heavier ions dominate, which are much more effective in creating cancer cells.”

The thermoluminescent detectors used in the phantom are unable to distinguish between gamma rays or ions, meaning that it also had to be equipped with plastic track detectors in which tracks of protons or heavier ions could be measured. The mannequin was also dressed in a poncho-type outfit with additional detectors, simulating the personal dosimeters worn by members of the ISS crew and other astronauts for the sake of comparison.

“Over the years 2004-2009 the MATROSHKA mannequin underwent three exposures to cosmic radiation, each lasting a year of more,” the IFJ PAN said. “Two of these exposures occurred inside the Russian modules of the space station and for one exposure the phantom, in a container imitating the shielding properties of a spacesuit, was placed in open space outside the ISS. Such measurements have never been done before.”

“After returning the detectors to Earth, their painstaking readout and analysis of the complete data set gathered within the MATROSHKA experiment were carried out by teams of scientists at the IFJ PAN in Kraków, the German Aerospace Center (DLR) in Cologne and at the Technical University of Vienna,” it added. “Their overall conclusion was that the individual dosimeters worn by the crew inside the ISS overestimated the actual dose measured inside the phantom by about 15 percent. However, in open space this overestimation exceeded 200 percent.”

Based on the results of the experiment, the study authors conclude that traveling to the Moon or Mars could be safer than previously believed in terms of exposure to hazardous radiation. Even so, they said that the doses the space travelers are likely to receive, while lower than previously thought, would still be dangerously high.

In October, researchers from the University of New Hampshire published research that indicated that, due to a highly abnormal and extended lack of solar activity, the solar wind exhibits extremely low densities and magnetic field strengths which causes dangerous levels of hazardous radiation to spread throughout the space environment.

Those conditions have resulted in the highest intensities of galactic cosmic rays ever during the space age, the study authors said, and the increasing intensity has worsened the radiation hazards that could threaten future deep-space astronaut missions. While the UNH researchers said this was not necessarily “a showstopper for long-duration missions,” it remained “a significant and worsening factor” that could limit mission durations.

http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1113292628/cosmic-radiation-not-as-risky-to-astronauts-120414/

A Voice from the Mountains
5th December 2014, 06:20
I wonder if this is being publicized as damage control, since NASA accidentally brought back up the moon landing conspiracies by talking about the Van Allen belts being a big problem for space travel.

Wind
5th December 2014, 10:14
I wonder if this is being publicized as damage control, since NASA accidentally brought back up the moon landing conspiracies by talking about the Van Allen belts being a big problem for space travel.

It's interesting that the movie Interstellar promoted the idea how the Moon landings were a hoax. Nolan's movies are always big messages with smaller messages hidden in them, all packed in the neat form of "entertainment". I didn't like that movie btw, but maybe I'm biased.

betoobig
6th December 2014, 10:32
In The big picture it looks like they don´t want hu-man to be affraid to go out there, which fits with the proximity of disclousure (i mean "their disclousure" Vatican´s disclousure).
Seams like they are trying to reduce to the minimun the fear of going on a sapceship into space.
I´ll stay with Gaia, i love her.
Love

MorningSong
6th December 2014, 19:20
Now, what is this? :confused:

spaceweather.com has a whack (edit: not) at the study discussed in the OP:


GROWING PERIL FOR ASTRONAUTS? NASA's successful test flight of Orion on Dec. 5th heralds a renewed capability to send astronauts into deep space. A paper just published in the journal Space Weather, however, points out a growing peril to future deep space explorers: cosmic rays.

The title of the article, penned by Nathan Schwadron of the University of New Hampshire and colleagues from seven other institutions, asks the provocative question, "Does the worsening galactic cosmic ray environment preclude manned deep space exploration?" Using data from a cosmic ray telescope onboard NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, they conclude that while increasing fluxes of cosmic rays "are not a show stopper for long duration missions (e.g., to the Moon, an asteroid, or Mars), galactic cosmic radiation remains a significant and worsening factor that limits mission durations." This figure from their paper shows the number of days a 30 year old astronaut can spend in interplanetary space before they reach their career limit in radiation exposure:

http://spaceweather.com/images2014/06dec14/missionduration_strip.gif

According to the plot, in the year 2014, a 30 year-old male flying in a spaceship with 10 g/cm2 of aluminum shielding could spend approximately 700 days in deep space before they reach their radiation dose limit. The same astronaut in the early 1990s could have spent 1000 days in space before hitting their personal radiation limits.

What's going on? Cosmic rays are intensifying. Galactic cosmic rays are a mixture of high-energy photons and subatomic particles accelerated to near-light speed by violent events such as supernova explosions. Astronauts are protected from cosmic rays in part by the sun: solar magnetic fields and the solar wind combine to create a porous 'shield' that fends off energetic particles from deep space. The problem is, as the authors note, "The Sun and its solar wind are currently exhibiting extremely low densities and magnetic field strengths, representing states that have never been observed during the Space Age. As a result of the remarkably weak solar activity, we have also observed the highest fluxes of cosmic rays in the Space Age."

The shielding action of the sun is strongest during solar maximum and weakest during solar minimum--hence the 11-year rhythm of the mission duration plot. The current situation could become even worse if, as some researchers suspect, the sun is entering a long-term phase of the solar cycle characterized by relatively weak solar maxima and deep, extended solar minima. In such a future, feeble solar magnetic fields would do an extra-poor job keeping cosmic rays at bay, further reducing the number of days astronauts can travel far from Earth.

To learn more about this interesting research, read the complete article in the online edition of Space Weather.