ZooLife
18th December 2014, 04:44
While reading this article.....
ISIS Attacks American Base In Iraq In First Ever Clash With U.S. Troops (http://www.inquisitr.com/1686751/isis-attacks-american-base-in-iraq-in-first-ever-clash-with-u-s-troops/)
I am reminded that the ISIS fighters are not NEW fighters. In a sense they have simply been re-branded.
It's interesting to me that when a new name comes on the scene through the MSM etc. It conveys this is a new army as if the fighter crawled under a rock one day.
I know this has been mentioned before but a percentage of the ISIS fighters were trained by USA and it's allies and are now fighting the very people that trained them.
It seems naming things is an attempt to un-blur the hell of war but ultimately those lines of war created by naming things and renaming them is but an illusion.
War, what is it good for?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czKd8YVafgU
ISIS Attacks American Base In Iraq In First Ever Clash With U.S. Troops (http://www.inquisitr.com/1686751/isis-attacks-american-base-in-iraq-in-first-ever-clash-with-u-s-troops/)
I am reminded that the ISIS fighters are not NEW fighters. In a sense they have simply been re-branded.
It's interesting to me that when a new name comes on the scene through the MSM etc. It conveys this is a new army as if the fighter crawled under a rock one day.
I know this has been mentioned before but a percentage of the ISIS fighters were trained by USA and it's allies and are now fighting the very people that trained them.
It seems naming things is an attempt to un-blur the hell of war but ultimately those lines of war created by naming things and renaming them is but an illusion.
War, what is it good for?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czKd8YVafgU