Prince Andrew and the Left Hand of the Devil

[Cidersomerset]

In the wake of the Saville revelations especially that it involves the establishment
and only the tip of the ice berg has been exposed , another scandel has been going
on for some time.


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-71-587x366.jpg


This is as old as man/women itself the 'honey trap' , the mole, spy, political opportunist ,
blackmailer, exploited or exploiter and you could be the one instigating the various sex
crimes from male/female escorts , to prostitutes underage prostitution , sex slave, child
trafficking , paedophiles , snuff movies to satanic rituals , devil worship , summoning up
entities to the possible roots of the Babylonian bloodlines.

Sex has been at the root of the power game thru out history, but is played down in the
media and is one of the major things exposed by David Icke and others, Stories that
seem unrelated over the decades as history repeats itself over a cyclical period.

Mandy Rice-Davis friend of Christine Keeler passed just before Christmas synonamous
with The Profumo scandal,

http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/2.77.1/desktop/3.5/img/blq-blocks_grey_alpha.png

19 December 2014 Last updated at 13:39

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/79841000/jpg/_79841686_79840740.jpg

Mandy Rice-Davies and a classic Westminster scandal Mark D'Arcy
By Mark D'Arcy Parliamentary correspondent

Mandy Rice-Davies drinking a bottle of champagne in July 1963 The Profumo
scandal, involving Mandy Rice-Davies, was an explosive cocktail of sex, race and
spying

Mandy Rice-Davies, who has died aged 70, was, along with her friend Christine Keeler, at the heart of a classic political scandal.

Read more about the Perfumo affair....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30546514

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Prince Andrew story has been simmering for quite a while......


CD9dit6FSPU

Published on 2 Jan 2015

Buckingham Palace has denied "any suggestion of impropriety with underage
minors" by Prince Andrew, after he was named in US court papers.A woman named
him in documents she filed in a Florida case against financier Jeffrey Epstein, who
was convicted of sex offences in 2008.She claims that between 1999 and 2002 she
was forced to have sex with the prince when she was a minor.

The palace said it would not comment in detail on the legal proceedings.

A Buckingham Palace spokeswoman said: "This relates to long-standing and
ongoing civil proceedings in the United States, to which the Duke of York is not a
party.

"As such we would not comment on the detail. However, for the avoidance of
doubt, any suggestion of impropriety with under age minors is categorically untrue".


====================================================

Andrew and the under-age ‘sex slave’: Duke denies claim in court papers that teen was picked to sleep with him by Robert Maxwell’s daughter

Saturday 3rd January 2015 at 10:51 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-62-587x390.jpg


‘Prince Andrew abused an underage girl at an orgy where she was being used as a sex
slave, it was sensationally claimed last night.

In an extraordinary legal allegation, a woman said she was ‘forced’ to have sex with him
at parties in London, New York and the Caribbean.

Last night the prince issued a strongly-worded denial, with Buckingham Palace
saying ‘any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue’. But
his alleged victim immediately hit back by saying she would not be ‘bullied into silence
by aggressive attacks’.’

Read more: Andrew and the under-age 'sex slave': Duke denies claim in court papers
that teen was picked to sleep with him by Robert Maxwell's daughter

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


Andrew and the under-age 'sex slave': Duke denies claim in court papers that teen was
picked to sleep with him by Robert Maxwell's daughter
Woman said she was 'forced' to have sex with Prince Andrew at parties
The royal has issued a strong denial of the 'categorically untrue' claims
Alleged victim hit back by saying she would not be 'bullied into silence'
She was told to 'give the prince whatever he demanded' by Jeffrey Epstein
Claimed underage girls were ‘procured for sexual activities’ by Maxwell

By Sam Greenhill and Daniel Bates and Rebecca English for the Daily Mail

Published: 22:28, 2 January 2015 | Updated: 13:58, 3 January 2015

Prince Andrew abused an underage girl at an orgy where she was being used as a sex
slave, it was sensationally claimed last night.In an extraordinary legal allegation, a
woman said she was ‘forced’ to have sex with him at parties in London, New York and
the Caribbean.

Last night the prince issued a strongly-worded denial, with Buckingham Palace
saying ‘any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue’. But
his alleged victim immediately hit back by saying she would not be ‘bullied into silence
by aggressive attacks’.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/02/2461369500000578-2894911-image-m-2_1420236181778.jpg

'Met three times': Prince Andrew with 17-year-old Virginia Roberts, centre, and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2001

The woman – named only as Jane Doe #3 but said to be 30-year-old Virginia Roberts –
says in court documents she was told to ‘give the prince whatever he demanded’ by his
friend Jeffrey Epstein, the US billionaire paedophile who hosted the sordid parties.

She claimed she and other underage girls were ‘procured for sexual activities’ by
Ghislaine Maxwell, the socialite daughter of crooked tycoon Robert Maxwell.

Miss Maxwell is alleged to have facilitated the prince’s ‘abuse’ of the girl, after helping
Epstein to convert her ‘into what is commonly referred to as a sex slave’.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2894911/Andrew-age-sex-slave-Duke-denies-claim-court-papers-teen-picked-sleep-Robert-Maxwell-s-daughter.html#ixzz3NnDAKwM6
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

======================================================

http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/2.77.1/desktop/3.5/img/blq-blocks_grey_alpha.png


3 January 2015 Last updated at 13:25

Prince Andrew sex claims woman 'should not be believed'


http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/80033000/jpg/_80033531_80033530.jpg

Prince Andrew has been named in documents filed in a Florida court

A US lawyer alleged to have had sex with a minor has denied the claims - and said
allegations against Prince Andrew must also be "presumed" false.


2pT4UqcOj5g


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30664060

=====================================================


THE GUARDIAN....

Prince Andrew named in US lawsuit over underage sex allegations

Friday 2nd January 2015 at 14:40 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-16-587x390.jpg


‘A woman who claims that an American investment banker loaned her to rich and
powerful friends as an underage “sex slave” has alleged in a US court document
that she was repeatedly forced to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew.

The accusation against the Duke of York is contained in a motion filed in a Florida
court this week in connection with a long-running lawsuit brought by women who
say they were exploited by Jeffrey Epstein, a multi-millionaire convicted of soliciting
sex with an underage girl after a plea deal.’

Read more: Prince Andrew named in US lawsuit over underage sex allegations

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/02/prince-andrew-named-us-lawsuit-underage-sex-allegations

[Cidersomerset]

‘I will not be bullied into silence’: Woman who claims Prince Andrew abused her
while she was billionaire’s ‘underage sex slave’ says she is being ‘unjustly victimised’

Saturday 3rd January 2015 at 10:45 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/article-1361039-0D5F05D9000005DC-182_634x789.jpg


‘A woman who claims she was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew on three
separate occasions – including at an orgy – has said that she will ‘not be bullied
back into silence’ and ‘victimised’.

‘Jane Doe 3’ alleges that she was loaned out to Prince Andrew and other friends
by Jeffrey Epstein, an American billionaire who has been convicted of soliciting
underage prostitution.

She is said to have been 17 at the time of the alleged meetings, meaning she
was underage according to Florida law.

In court documents she accuses Epstein, the Prince, his friend the socialite
Ghislaine Maxwell, and – among others – the leading American defence lawyer
Alan Dershowitz of abusing her when she was underage.’

Read more: 'I will not be bullied into silence': Woman who claims Prince
Andrew abused her while she was billionaire's 'underage sex slave' says
she is being 'unjustly victimised'


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


'I will not be bullied into silence': Woman who claims Prince Andrew abused
her while she was billionaire's 'underage sex slave' says she is being 'unjustly victimised'
Court motion in U.S. brought in relation to millionaire Jeffrey Epstein
Epstein, a former friend of the Prince, was convicted of sex crime in 2008
Court papers in motion claim woman had sex with Andrew three times
They claim meetings took place in London, New York and US Virgin Islands
One meeting was 'an orgy with numerous under-aged girls' it is claimed
It is said the woman was approached by socialite Ghislaine Maxwell
She is the daughter of the late former media mogul, Robert Maxwell
Papers also allege the Prince lobbied US government over Epstein case
The royal has issued a strong denial of the 'categorically untrue' claims

By Richard Spillett and Martin Robinson and Stephanie Linning for MailOnline
and Daniel Bates For Mailonline In New York

Published: 14:18, 2 January 2015 | Updated: 07:36, 3 January 2015


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2894480/Prince-Andrew-repeatedly-slept-sex-slave-controlled-underage-prostitution-ring-U-S-court-papers-claim.html#ixzz3NnHCWXDu
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

===================================================


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-41-587x587.jpg




http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-51-587x440.jpg



http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-82-587x456.jpg

[yelik]

The whole of the Royal family is likely in up to their necks but non of it will see the light of day. They are all beyond prosecution at the moment.

[Cidersomerset]

The whole of the Royal family is likely in up to their necks but non of it will see the light of day. They are all beyond prosecution at the moment.

They have been over the centuries, the difference is with the web more is coming out
to a wider world audience. No doubt the 'Palace' experts, sycophants courtiers
and political correspondents will be working overtime to squash this latest allegation.


There was a good movie starring Jason Staham about the cover up of photo's in
the 1970's of Princesse Margeret the Queens sister. I did a thread about it which
was interesting and all part of the establishment cover up of these things, that
threaten the 'image, illusion' of Royalty. Time it was consigned to history imo
and the royals if they want to live off the state , move into appropriate accommodation.

Spitting Image: Royal Family lose fortune in recession & move to council flat

xujHlWzWW98

Published on 3 Apr 2014


Queen Elizabeth's nightmare that her family lose all their money and move into a
high-rise council block, where they have to resort to crime to survive. Prince Charles
later becomes a cabbie. Also stars Princes Philip, Edward & Andrew, Sarah Ferguson
& late Queen Mother. Cameo from EastEnders' Dot Cotton. (Series 10, 1991). For
their death of Margaret Thatcher episode go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeLA6...

[Pweeky]

Here we go... The press turns this into something that is not...in the end, the powerful retain their place, the poor will foot the bill and straight men are the worst villains of all time, not open to discussion.
No hope for the world. Alone and abandoned in this massive galaxy, for someone's pleasure..

[Cidersomerset]

How the Government could cover up a Royal scandel....'The Bank Job' London 1971


I watched this movie a while back and when they said it was based on true events
about a robbery and stolen royal photos its something I wanted to post....

kT6DlS_-_HU

=======================================================



Untold story of Baker Street bank robbery

Film uses informer's revelations on unsolved 1971 crime

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/66/Bank_job_ver2.jpg


http://www.crimeandinvestigation.co.uk/shows/britains-biggest-heists/gallery/carouselGallery/0/assetPhotos/03/image



Vanessa Thorpe, arts and media correspondent

The Observer, Sunday 11 March 2007


Thirty-six years ago, one of the most remarkable and daring bank raids shocked Britain.
The 'walkie-talkie bank job' saw £500,000 - worth £5m today - stolen from Lloyds in
London's Baker Street and the crime was never solved.
Now the film industry is to attempt to explain why the robbery and its investigation have
remained secret. The story, which will incriminate high-ranking police officers, the secret
service, politicians and a prominent member of the royal family, is to be at the centre of
The Bank Job, starring Saffron Burrows and Jason Statham as bank raiders. It was written
by Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais and results from co-operation with a 'deep throat'
informer who was involved in the original investigation.

Reports of the raid were on the front pages of newspapers for a handful of days in
September, 1971. Then, oddly, a government gagging order, or D Notice, was
imposed to prevent further coverage. The raid had already attracted national attention
because of apparent negligence by police who failed to act quickly following a fluke
tip-off from a member of the public who overheard the robbers talking on two-way radio.

'This is an amazing, untold story of murder, sex and corruption. It's going to excite and
entertain audiences everywhere, but it will also give them plenty to think about,' said
the producer of the film, Charles Raven.

A radio ham, Robert Rowlands, heard the robbers as he randomly twisted the dial of
his set before going to bed one night at his flat in Wimpole Street, central London.
Two voices argued about whether some cutting work should stop or go on all night.
The men were covertly working on a tunnel which, it turned out, led to the bank basement.

Excited and alarmed, Rowlands called the local police station in Marylebone and
told an officer the police should search all the local banks. The officer simply told
him to tape the conversation. The resulting tape, which was transcribed and
broadcast on national radio at the time, gives a rare insight into the minds of a
gang in the middle of a major crime. It also furnished Clement and La Frenais
with authentic dialogue for a screenplay.

The writers, co-creators of The Likely Lads and Porridge, as well as authors of
the recent animated Hollywood hit, Flushed Away, have been trying to bring
their discoveries about the bank raid to the screen for at least seven years.

Their film, directed by Roger Donaldson and filmed in London and Australia
over the past five months, will claim it was the contents of safety deposit
boxes in the vault that caused the government to clamp down on reporting.
Photographs and other evidence of illicit sexual encounters implicating
influential public figures were held at the bank. As well as providing a dramatic
plot, Clement and La Frenais were attracted by the picture the case outlines of
class divisions and corruption in the Seventies. But it was the conversation
recorded by Rowlands that sparked their interest.

'The gang had walkie-talkies and look-outs on the roof,' Clement explained this
weekend. 'I read about the robbery at the time and the great remark that Ian
and I remember was one of the lookouts saying: "I'm off home now, I'm cold
and hungry." A gang member said: "You can't go now, we're almost there." And
the reply was: "Money may be your god, but it's not mine and I'm ****ing off".'

When the robbery was discovered, Clement now believes MI5 moved in and issued
the D Notice. The newspapers went quiet, but not before the Daily Mail had accused
the police of ineptitude.

The public believed a police investigation was going on. In fact, the film will argue,
the case had been handed over to the intelligence services because of the sensitive
issues involved.

Mysteries remain, however: the people involved in infidelities are still unnamed and
the writers have not yet revealed the identity of their 'deep throat'.

======================================================
The full movie is a good British gangster film well worth a watch !!
Keeping to the main facts of the scandel and how the establishment
hushed it up....strong language in parts obviously some artistic licence...


These links are out of date, you may find one on u'tube ?

R-XlAheuErE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtpIfWbcvm8&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsDFJ8L1EIk&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsG2ZVAnX8U&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2zSisxcPHI&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L94WA6ujSCo&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9TUjpa28No&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RT5fK9b1ipo&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbPt6wrp2Oo&feature=relmfu

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Al-Vvym-k&feature=relmfu

=======================================================

It reminds me Why the elites are so worried about wikileaks and the web..
They were able to more or less keep the lid on the Diana murder to the mass
public by lies and dicrediting alternate theories ....But her son Harrys escapades
show that the web is the biggest threat to the elites and TNWO and thats why
they have declared cyber war on it !!


http://cdn01.cdn.justjared.com/wp-content/uploads/headlines/2012/08/prince-harry-nude-photos-las-vegas.jpg

Hi Jinks from one of the Lads...It happens everyday and is 'Nothing' imo but what if
we had the web as it is now, back in Dianas day imagine her on 'Twitter' or facebook !!
That would have had the establishment blushing ..LOL...

jTo8fbogY5Q

David has done a much larger presentation and so have others on Dianas ritual murder..


http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?48967-How-the-Government-could-cover-up-a-Royal-scandel....-The-Bank-Job-London-1971&p=543767#post543767

[lucidity]

Hello siblings,

I think we all owe a big thanks to David Icke for having the courage to publish these allegations
of paedophila at the highest levels of govt... eg: Edward Heath outted as a sadistic rapist of young boys
Senior members of the Govt and Judiciary involved in satanic sexual abuse of children.

David Icke isn't an idiot, he _must_ have known at the time that:
(1) the vast majority of people would not believe him (It took a decade before people took him seriously)
(2) he would be ridiculed and generally discredited and attacked in the media
(3) that there was a fair chance that this would endanger his safety
(eg. Jeffery Dickens died 'unexpectedly' after making similar allegations)
(4) the perpertrators would still get away with it....
(eg: Edward Heath and Jimmy Saville were never prosecuted)

Question: How did Jimmy Saville get away with his crimes for so many decades ?
He must have been protected by senior police officers, senior civil servants,
senior members of the Judiciary .... but getting such a consensus of silence across
these different branches of govt must be a like cracking the Rosetta Stone. What
could generate submission and silence across so many people for so many decades?

Protecting the royal family would do it. No one would disagree. You don't get to
high levels of the civil service, police, judiciary unless you're a card carrying mason
and/or devotely royalist. Keep your mouth shut ... demonstrate your considerable
talent for 'discretion' and keep your job; further your career and maybe
they'll give you trinket towards the end of your career ... a knighthood, an OBE, etc.

My 'bet'... is that there's a direct connection between Saville and the Royal Family.
Probably, they've been raping the peasants for decades, with complete impunity.

I would like to see Jeffery Dickens and David Icke awarded a knighthood for services
to civilised behaviour. ... or perhaps for their bravery and commitment to truth.

be happy

lucidity :-)

[jackovesk]

The whole of the Royal family is likely in up to their necks but non of it will see the light of day. They are all beyond prosecution at the moment.

This time I tend to think it's the other way round...:yes4:

Why, you may well ask...?

Because those that are acutely ((AWARE)) of the ((BIG-Picture)) as to the Statement...

:attention: Remember 1776...:confused:



The ((BRITSH-EMPIRE)) together with MI5, MI6 & MOSSAD have been behind it ((ALL)) and they want America ((BACK)) at pennies on the $Dollar...:yes4:

This ((Story)) has legs and both the ((Royal Family & Prince Andrew)) are in the firing line of those who ultimately don't want to see this happen...!!!

Somehow, Prince Andrew is not going to get away with his ((Reputation in Tact))...:nono:

More to the point, the...

http://blogs.nature.com/u5d050a25/can%20of%20worms.jpg

Has well and truly been opened and as you can plainly see 'above', just you try and put that lid back on...:)

PS - This definitely ((IS)) the ((Beginning of the END)) for the PTW...:wizard:

[Valle]

Did Stanley Kubric tell us this a long time ago?

http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/05_02/andy2505_468x661.jpg
http://www.spietati.it/public/eyeswideshut2.jpg

[Cidersomerset]

Did Stanley Kubric tell us this a long time ago?

Oh yes........

"The Eyes Wide Shut Parties Are Real" - Oliver Stone's son interview from 2012


Published on 30 Aug 2014


*Skip to 08:55 for the reference to Stanley Kubrick's "Eyes Wide Shut"


gnNbQw4VfU8

[Cidersomerset]

The first full account of the masseuse at the center of the explosive Prince Andrew ‘sex slave’ drama

new Sunday 4th January 2015 at 07:46 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-63-587x435.jpg


‘Last week it was sensationally claimed that Prince Andrew had taken part in what,
it was implied, was sex with a girl who was under the age of consent according to
the law in Florida. As the papers lodged in the Palm Beach court spell out: ‘Epstein
forced Jane Doe 3 to have sexual relations with a member of the British Royal
Family, Prince Andrew (aka Duke of York).

‘Epstein instructed Jane Doe 3 that she was to give the Prince whatever he demanded
and required Jane Doe 3 to report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse.
Maxwell facilitated Prince Andrew’s acts of sexual abuse by acting as a “madame” for Epstein.’

In response, Buckingham Palace issued a strongly worded denial.

But Miss Roberts’s account differs. She says she first encountered Epstein and later
Prince Andrew through Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of the disgraced newspaper
tycoon Robert Maxwell.’


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


WORLD EXCLUSIVE: The first full account of the masseuse at the center
of the explosive Prince Andrew 'sex slave' drama... but is she telling the truth?
Prince accused of abusing 'Jane Doe 3' at orgy where she was 'sex slave'
Jane Doe 3 is Virginia Roberts, whose story was first uncovered in 2007
She told extraordinary story of three years working for billionaire Epstein
Said that she was paid to give erotic massages to tycoon and associates
Claimed Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of Robert, acted as his 'madame'
Palace has emphatically denied Prince had relations with underage girls
Now the most complete story yet of this young woman can be published

By Sharon Churcher For The Mail On Sunday

Published: 22:30, 3 January 2015 | Updated: 04:13, 4 January 2015



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/03/246587AF00000578-2895735-Breaking_her_silence_Miss_Roberts_when_she_spoke_to_the_Mail_on_-m-1_1420326108415.jpg
Breaking her silence: Miss Roberts when she spoke to the Mail on Sunday in 2011


It is the most extraordinary story of sex, power, influence and the abuse of
young girls and it has already sent Jeffrey Epstein, one of the richest men
in America, to jail.

And today this sordid saga erupted once again with Prince Andrew sensationally
forced to deny having any sexual contact with the woman whose claims have
dogged him for years. Last week, the Prince was accused of abusing
‘Jane Doe 3’ – an anonymous name used in American court papers – at an orgy
where she was being used as a sex slave. Jane Doe 3 is Virginia Roberts, whose
story was first uncovered in 2007 by The Mail on Sunday following a painstaking
investigation by our reporter Sharon Churcher, who tracked her to Australia.

The story Miss Roberts told was extraordinary – how she spent three years as
an under-age ‘sex slave’ working for billionaire Epstein, a friend of the Prince,
and paid to give erotic massages to the tycoon and his associates. She also
claimed that Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of disgraced tycoon Robert Maxwell,
acted as Epstein’s ‘madame’.

The allegations by Miss Roberts are threatening the reputation of the Queen’s
second son. The Palace has emphatically denied that the Prince has had
relations with underage girls.

Now, thanks to the court documents Miss Roberts lodged in Florida last week,
The Mail on Sunday can publish the most complete story yet of how this young
woman was exploited by Epstein’s shuttered world of seedy sex and influence.
We spoke to Miss Roberts twice, the last time just 12 months ago. While
fragments of her testimony to us were reproduced last week, only now can
we present her comprehensive account with previously unpublished material.


Last week it was sensationally claimed that Prince Andrew had taken part in
what, it was implied, was sex with a girl who was under the age of consent
according to the law in Florida. As the papers lodged in the Palm Beach court
spell out: ‘Epstein forced Jane Doe 3 to have sexual relations with a member
of the British Royal Family, Prince Andrew (aka Duke of York).

‘Epstein instructed Jane Doe 3 that she was to give the Prince whatever he
demanded and required Jane Doe 3 to report back to him on the details of
the sexual abuse. Maxwell facilitated Prince Andrew’s acts of sexual abuse
by acting as a “madame” for Epstein.’

In response, Buckingham Palace issued a strongly worded denial.

But Miss Roberts’s account differs. She says she first encountered Epstein
and later Prince Andrew through Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of the
disgraced newspaper tycoon Robert Maxwell.




Read more: The first full account of the masseuse at the center of the explosive Prince Andrew 'sex slave' drama


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2895735/The-account-masseuse-centre-explosive-Prince-Andrew-sex-slave-drama-telling-truth.html#ixzz3Nqdn6QjI
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook




http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-132-587x390.jpg

[Cidersomerset]

Prince Andrew may have been secretly filmed with underage girl he is alleged to have abused

Sunday 4th January 2015 at 07:18 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-52-587x390.jpg


THE MIRROR.....



Prince Andrew may have been secretly filmed with underage girl he is alleged to have abused

Jan 03, 2015 23:00
By Matthew Drake

Papers filed against his pervert pal Jeffrey Epstein say he recorded VIP orgies he threw
at his luxury homes using cameras hidden in the walls

http://i2.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4915267.ece/alternates/s615/PAY-Prince-Andrew-MAIN.jpg


‘Prince Andrew’s tycoon pal may have taken compromising photos of him with the underage
girl he is alleged to have abused.

Details buried in original court papers filed against pervert Jeffrey Epstein, 61, reveal that he
recorded the sordid orgies he threw for VIPs at his luxury homes using cameras hidden in
the walls of guest bedrooms.

The woman known as Jane Doe 3 – said to be 30-year-old Virginia Roberts – claims she was
held as a sex slave and forced to sleep with the Duke of York in London, New York and the
US Virgin Islands.’

Read more: Prince Andrew may have been secretly filmed with underage girl he is alleged to have abused

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-been-secretly-filmed-4915421

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


THE MIRROR...


Prince Andrew 'underage sex slave' claims she was paid £10K after he bedded her

Jan 03, 2015 22:01
By Christopher Bucktin


Prince's furious denial as woman claims, "we got into the bath, he licked my
toes. The sex wasn't like love, more getting the business done"


http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4915238.ece/alternates/s615/17-year-old-Virginia-Roberts-with-Prince-Andrew.jpg
Prince Andrew 'underage sex slave' claims she was paid £10K after he bedded her

‘The American who alleges she had sex with Prince Andrew at an “underage” orgy today
claims he licked her toes while sharing a bath.

She also describes how the two then romped in a bedroom, saying: “It wasn’t like rape.
But it wasn’t like love either. It was more like, ‘I’m getting my business done’.”

The intimate details have emerged following the lodging of a bombshell lawsuit in Florida
in which she claims she was pimped out as a sex slave at the age of 17 to the Duke of
York by his billionaire paedophile banker friend Jeffrey Epstein.’

Read more …


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-underage-sex-slave-4915304

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-142-587x293.jpg

[Cidersomerset]

Is it just coincidence that Charles and Andrew both had very high profile paedophile 'friends' ..????



http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-oTpfpcDgjxU/U-ln-E881TI/AAAAAAAAXds/1TeDXLYq7ew/s1600/mountbatten+royal.jpg



http://i1.wp.com/royal-fans.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Prince-Charles-Jimmy-Savile.jpg


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/03/05/article-1363163-0D795B05000005DC-548_468x582.jpg


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8TDEe0xfILE/U7rCnntqnYI/AAAAAAAADH4/09RhIYeoqg8/s1600/10492302_731523416911058_4367087781716823076_n+%25281%2529.jpg


===================================================
===================================================
===================================================


THE TELEGRAPH....


Prince Andrew in new 'cash for favours' row

The Duke of York has been engulfed in a new “cash-for-favours” row after a close
friend paid off £50,000 of his ex-wife’s debts.

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01847/andrew_1847480c.jpg
(L to R) David Rowland, Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein Photo: PA/REX FEATURES

By Robert Mendick, Chief Reporter

10:03PM GMT 12 Mar 2011

David Rowland, a financier once described as “shady” in Parliament, gave the sum
to the Duchess of York’s former press spokesman Kate Waddington, whom the
Duchess owed in the region of £85,000.


In 2009, the Duke opened Mr Rowland’s bank in Luxembourg in his official capacity
as Britain’s special representative for international trade and investment, despite
the fact that the one-day visit was not officially sanctioned by the Government
department in charge of promoting British business abroad.


While the vast majority of the Duke’s overseas visits are funded by UK Trade &
Investment, Buckingham Palace admitted that the Duke had paid for the trip to
Luxembourg to open Banque Havilland personally.

The disclosure that Mr Rowland has paid off a large part of what the Duchess owed
Miss Waddington will add to concerns that the Duke is abusing his position for his
own personal benefit.

It follows The Sunday Telegraph’s disclosure last week that the Duke’s friend
Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted paedophile, had helped to settle the

Related articles

Did Prince avoid a £6m tax bill? 12 Mar 2011 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/8378172/Did-Prince-Andrew-avoid-a-6-million-tax-bill-when-he-sold-Sunninghill-to-his-Kazakh-friends.html

Epstein’s meeting with minister 12 Mar 2011 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/8378080/Mystery-over-Jeffrey-Epsteins-meeting-with-a-Labour-minister.html


the Duchess’s former personal assistant, received £15,000 from Epstein.

The Duke and Mr Rowland have been close friends for some years. In 2005 the
Duke flew to Guernsey, where he unveiled a large, bronze statue of Mr Rowland at
his palatial home. The statue is reminiscent of Winston Churchill and shows Mr
Rowland smoking a fat cigar.

At the opening of the Luxembourg bank, the Duke said: “As the UK’s special
representative for international trade and investment, I welcome the initiative of an
English family who took the risk of investing outside the borders of the United
Kingdom. Such a motivated team that is able to work beyond borders and cultural
barriers can only expect success.

“In the past I have had the pleasure to meet and work with the Rowland family in
the framework of my functions and I wish the family every success in this new
business venture.”

The Court Circular, which publishes official engagements, made no mention that
Banque Havilland is owned by the Rowland family.

Mr Rowland, who is worth £730 million, making him Britain’s 25th richest person,
was due to become Tory Party treasurer last year but quit before he took up the
post after damaging disclosures about his business affairs.

The 65 year-old was once accused of “looting” millions of dollars from a US
company he had bought and which should have been spent on an environmental
clear-up operation. Mr Rowland’s representatives said such claims were “false and
unsubstantiated”.

He was accused of being “shady” in Parliament after a deal to buy Hibernian f
ootball club in Scotland turned sour.

A Buckingham Palace spokesman said: “The Duke carried out a number of
engagements on his visit to Luxembourg in September 2009, including meetings
with the Luxembourg Finance Minister and the Grand Duke, as well as attending a
Business Lunch. He attended the opening of Banque Havilliand at the invitation of
the Bank. His visit was not connected with, or conditional on, any other
arrangement.”

UKTI says the Duke has benefited British business in regions such as the Middle
East and Caucuses, although a source accepted that Luxembourg was “not a
priority sector”. “It is not somewhere we would want to pay for him to go,” added
the source.

A report by PricewaterhouseCoopers, commissioned by the Duke but which has
never been made public, advised that he worked as trade ambassador in countries
where his status as the Queen’s second son would be most effective.

Neither UKTI nor the Foreign Office, which have funded the vast majority of the
Duke’s overseas visits since he became trade ambassador in 2001, believed the trip
should have been paid for by the taxpayer.

Miss Waddington declined to comment last night. It was understood she received
the money in recent days.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/8378703/Prince-Andrew-in-new-cash-for-favours-row.html

[Orion142]

wearechange.org/satanic-cult-global-leaders-murdering-children

¤=[Post Update]=¤

forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=264207.0

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Thank you for this thread.
Hopefully no one is beyond prosecution --

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/Tyburn_tree.jpg

Perhaps here is an image those "royals" might understand?

[Orion142]

lucas2012infos.wordpress.com/2013/02/14/hallett-report-no-6-the.

[Orion142]

And what about the 'Ninth Circle ' group that comprises of the so called elites, the untouchables, who worship Satan and sacrifice children. And it is pointless making this information public because the investigating and prosecuting persons are all generally compromised. ie, expect a whitewash. Check out the 'Hallett reports, especially number 6. Do not forgewt, ever, that children have been sacraficed and slaughtered by the elite to maintain their Satanic Dark control over us all. handed down from the Egyption Mystery school teachings.

[Orion142]

I had a Mohawk Indian friend, on facebook, who was placed in one of the orphanage schools run by the Catholic church in Canada. He said to me that they used to beat him and spit in his face and lock him up in small rooms for days without food or water. But, he knows that some of his friends disappeared during the night and he never ever saw them again, ever. Then the Queen and Prince Philip came to his place in 1967 and removed 10 children from the orphanage, all with smiles and hands on shoulders to reassure them. Not one of those children were ever heard of again, ever. They disappeared from the Earth. Ninth Circle?

[Cidersomerset]

I have posted these on other threads and are good examples of Davids research...


David Icke explains ritual murder sites

9QC8DAeb5gc


Published on 25 Aug 2012


David icke takes Vice's correspondent on a tour on isle of wight's satanic ritual site. He also talks about Stanley Kubrick's movie Eyes wide shut and its symbolism.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This is a very good interview relatively recent and covers a lot of ground relating
to the Establishment, Royalty and Saville and much more.....


David Icke: Royal Political Paedophilia

Se0UF3pE534

Published on 30 Nov 2014


David Icke - Two Hour Special on Royal/Political Paedophilia Talking on the Richie Allen Show - How the Global Pieces Fit.
Please Help Support The Richie Allen Show
https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/th

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When society calls you ‘crazy’ – you know you’re on the right track

Sunday 4th January 2015 at 08:19 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-101.jpg

[Cidersomerset]

I had a Mohawk Indian friend, on facebook, who was placed in one of the orphanage schools run by the Catholic church in Canada.
He said to me that they used to beat him and spit in his face and lock him up in small rooms for days without food or water. But, he knows
that some of his friends disappeared during the night and he never ever saw them again, ever. Then the Queen and Prince Philip came to
his place in 1967 and removed 10 children from the orphanage, all with smiles and hands on shoulders to reassure them. Not one of those
children were ever heard of again, ever. They disappeared from the Earth. Ninth Circle?



9th Circle Secret Society

laC50od6dVs

Published on 9 Jul 2014


Alex welcomes to the broadcast community minister, documentary film maker
and Nobel Peace Prize nominee Kevin Annett joins Alex to discuss evidence
linking the Vatican and others to the pervasiveness of global child trafficking
rings and ritual sacrifice.
http://itccs.org/

[Amanda]

Great thread - this subject and related ones need thorough exploration. I am a recognised Child Abuse Whistleblower and I am not shocked anymore. I can see a pattern here - can anyone else see it? Whenever there is an allegation directed at a paedophile/predator - they always say it is not true - always. Not once do they reveal that they were at the locations or that they knew the people involved....

Merely saying you are not guilty is not going to work anymore. People all over the world are learning all about paedophiles/predators and I for one am glad. We cannot fight this evil without first becoming educated and understanding the hows and whys and wheres.

Much Peace - Amanda

[Cidersomerset]

Former British Intel Operative Andrea Davison, on the run for exposing child sex abuse 19 Nov 2014
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?77197-Former-British-Intel-Operative-Andrea-Davison-on-the-run-for-exposing-child-sex-abuse-19-Nov-2014&p=903539#post903539



Former British Intel Operative Andrea Davison, on the run for exposing child sex abuse

The Richie Allen Show


xAaPXWdTXyU


Published on 19 Nov 2014


Former Intelligence agent Andrea Davison, stitched up by the system for her
VIP paedophile revelations, talks on the Richie Allen Show on Davidicke.com

No 'inquiry' into political paedophilia, historic or otherwise, has any credibility
unless Andrea is allowed back into the country, the bogus and laughable
conviction against her quashed, and her evidence presented - including her
mass of documents revealing 'elite' paedophiles stolen by the police and still
held by them years later.

A must-listen.


from larger thread.....
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?50809-How-Jimmy-was-able-to-Fix-it----&p=903529#post903529


As Andrea says power full people cover up many crimes....

EjJeQSfFhj8
Tory Whip Would Help Cover up Potential Paedophile Scandal

Published on 8 Jul 2014

1995. The late Tory Whip during the Heath years, Tim Fortescue, explains how
party whips would help cover up a potential paedophile scandal for "brownie points".



http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?77197-Former-British-Intel-Operative-Andrea-Davison-on-the-run-for-exposing-child-sex-abuse-19-Nov-2014&p=903539#post903539

[Cidersomerset]

Prince Andrew could face a Scotland Yard investigation over sex abuse claims

Monday 5th January 2015 at 10:20 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-33-587x391.jpg


THE TELEGRAPH.......

Prince Andrew could face a Scotland Yard investigation over sex abuse claims

Police sources have confirmed the Duke of York could face an investigation into
Virginia Roberts’s claims if she makes a formal complaint against him



‘The Duke of York could face a Scotland Yard investigation into Virginia Roberts’s
claims if she makes a formal complaint against him, police sources have confirmed.

Despite the fact that all criminal prosecutions are brought in the name of the Queen,
members of the Royal family are not immune from the law. The Princess Royal
became the first senior member of the Royal family to receive a criminal record when
she was fined £500 in 2002 after admitting having a dog dangerously out of control.

The Duke of York has categorically denied having any sort of relationship with Miss
Roberts, sexual or otherwise, and Miss Roberts has never made a criminal complaint against him.’

Read more: Prince Andrew could face a Scotland Yard investigation over sex abuse claims


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/theroyalfamily/11324503/Prince-Andrew-could-face-investigation-over-Virginia-Roberts-sex-abuse-claims.html

[Cidersomerset]

Prince Andrew allegations: ‘Underage sex slave’ Virginia
Roberts met the Queen, claims her dad

Monday 5th January 2015 at 10:04 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-23-587x390.jpg


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE MIRROR......


Prince Andrew allegations: 'Underage sex slave' Virginia Roberts met the Queen, claims her dad





Jan 05, 2015 01:19
By Victoria Murphy, Andy Lines


Buckingham Palace says it has no record of the meeting as
Duke of York leaves Swiss ski trip to have a summit with the Queen

Mark Large Prince Andrew

http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4919531.ece/alternates/s615/Prince-Andrew.jpg

Prince Andrew pictured leaving Verbier ski resort

‘The ‘sex slave’ who says she was forced to sleep with
Prince Andrew met the Queen, her dad has alleged.

Virginia Roberts’ father Sky said that his daughter was
introduced to the Queen in London after the Prince’s
billionaire friend Jeffrey Epstein flew her to London in 2001.

He told The Sun: “She was so excited about meeting
the Queen.’

Read more: Prince Andrew allegations: 'Underage sex
slave' Virginia Roberts met the Queen, claims her dad


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-allegations-underage-sex-4919941

[Cidersomerset]

Did legal deal protect the duke? Paedophile billionaire’s plea bargain halted police investigation

Monday 5th January 2015 at 10:27 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-43-587x440.jpg

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif

Did legal deal protect the duke? Paedophile billionaire's plea bargain halted police investigation
Highly-paid lawyers for Jeffrey Epstein 'secured controversial agreement'
It guaranteed 'potential co-conspirators' would not face criminal charges
Deal may have given Prince protection from prosecution, it is claimed
Aggressive tactics resulted in 'non-prosecution agreement' being struck
Halted any prospect of Andrew being asked to answer questions on oath
Many serious charges against Epstein and ‘co-conspirators’ were wiped
In return, billionaire plead guilty to soliciting under-age girl for prostitution

By Stephen Wright for the Daily Mail

Published: 23:04, 4 January 2015 | Updated: 07:37, 5 January 2015


‘An ‘army of legal superstars’ persuaded prosecutors to sign a controversial agreement
which may have given Prince Andrew protection from prosecution, it is claimed.

Highly-paid lawyers for Jeffrey Epstein – some of whom had links to the White House
– secured an extraordinary deal which guaranteed ‘potential co-conspirators’ would
not face criminal charges relating to his activities.

They had spent months delving into the private lives of state prosecutors to establish
if they had any ‘personal peccadilloes’, in a desperate bid to defend Epstein against
claims of abusing scores of under-age girls at his Florida mansion.’

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/04/2461C72500000578-2896589-image-m-24_1420412389687.jpg

Claims: The Duke of York, left, with Jeffrey Epstein in 2011. The billionaire's lawyers
persuaded prosecutors to sign a agreement which may have given Prince Andrew
protection from prosecution, it is claimed


Read more: Did legal deal protect the duke? Paedophile billionaire's plea bargain
halted police investigation


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2896589/Did-legal-deal-protect-duke-Paedophile-billionaire-s-plea-bargain-halted-police-investigation.html#ixzz3NxIsvQaP
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Cidersomerset]

Roberts met the Queen, claims her dad


The Royal Family are exempt from Freedom of Information requests
and can veto BBC programmes. Why do we put up with this?

Monday 5th January 2015 at 09:59 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-110-587x367.jpg


==========================================

http://www.independent.co.uk/independent.co.uk/assets/images/redesign/masthead/indy-masthead-small.png


Yasmin Alibhai Brown

Sunday 4 January 2015

The Royal Family are exempt from Freedom of Information requests and can veto BBC programmes. Why do we put up with this?



Their unchecked influence and lack of transparency defies belief


http://www.independent.co.uk/incoming/article9956717.ece/alternates/w620/Andrew-Queen.jpg


‘As you know by now, Prince Andrew has been accused by a woman
known as Jane Doe 3 of being “forced” by Jeremy Epstein to have s
ex with him when she was a teenager.

He was named in court documents in the US, although not as a party,
and the tabloids have been full of further salacious claims. Buckingham
Palace forcefully denies these allegations.

The story will not end there, but for now that is all we can say on this
particular scandal. It should, however, raise questions about our
monarchy, its role and position, the devious, secret way it operates.’

Read more: The Royal Family are exempt from Freedom of Information
requests and can veto BBC programmes. Why do we put up with this?

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/the-royal-family-are-exempt-from-freedom-of-information-requests-and-can-veto-bbc-programmes-why-do-we-put-up-with-this-9956702.html

[Cidersomerset]

Truth, Lies, Diana at the Charing Cross Theatre

Monday 5th January 2015 at 10:23 By David Icke


CPknQ1KZ1S4

[jackovesk]

:attention:

Disclaimer: Anything you haven't already learnt about this Conspiracy is in the article below...(Too Big to Post)...

~ jackovesk

Friday, 2 January 2015

'MOSSAD BLACKMAIL RING' LINKED TO PRINCE ANDREW?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-DIaqbE4pt0g/TXyGYEiDqbI/AAAAAAAARgA/en8m6PZa1WY/s200/00%2Bepstein.jpg http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-_a3k3uZyidE/UK5H4x6FzrI/AAAAAAAAmNc/x6dyyYEjS0Q/s1600/nadiamarcinkova.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-n1lsnimEEcI/TWvrdbYkN0I/AAAAAAAARXQ/5Woa1hWD2fA/s400/Tranny.bmp http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-28hl-VXr6h4/UK5JHfXv98I/AAAAAAAAmNk/Vfxfn9WJCho/s1600/model.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-vxS9hRPLaiI/UK5Js9NdEEI/AAAAAAAAmNs/EwIbKPeDPVQ/s200/epstein1.jpg http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pGdzuxzM4iM/TXkVglvqFtI/AAAAAAAARd4/bN2m3WdD4d8/s200/516BQDWGC1L__SL500_AA300_.jpg

Link to article here...
http://aanirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/mossad-blackmail-ring-linked-to-prince.html

[seeker/reader]

So to all our UK members, how is this playing out publicly there? Is it all over the T.V., internet, and printed press or is it being downplayed?

I am not aware of what the most viewed TV new shows, websites and/or printed press are for the U.K. regarding mainstream news.

Here in the U.S. most people watch CNN, FOX :yuck: or MSNBC for their up to the minute news. If a story has (or is given) legs it will be blasted on the T.V. "news" channels.

What is the status of this story in the U.K.?

Thanks for your insights.

[Maia Gabrial]

The picture of the royal family all looking up reminds me of how we're always made to look the other way when something is going on. Magician tactics.

Of course, Buckingham Palace is going to deny the allegations. They really need to stop doing these horrible, nasty things if they want to keep their reputations in tact. If they have no honor or integrity, then sooner or later they'll be exposed. What's funny is how the royals and the rich seem to think they're better than everyone else. Even most "commoners" seem to believe that. But we're seeing is that they are much worse than people realize. They go beyond depraved....

[Cidersomerset]

The girls silenced by Andrew’s friend the sex abuser: As Fergie leaps to defend the Duke, U.S.
court papers reveal efforts paedophile made to stop victims from speaking to FBI

Tuesday 6th January 2015 at 10:21 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-379-587x390.jpg


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif

The girls silenced by Andrew's friend the sex abuser: As Fergie leaps to
defend the Duke, court papers reveal efforts paedophile made to stop victims from speaking to FBI
Paedophile Jeffrey Epstein allegedly tracked down young girls he abused
Billionaire is said to have promised to 'look after' them if they kept quiet
Those who did not cooperate with him were harassed, court papers claim
Scale of the alleged cover-up was revealed as files became public
Came as Duchess of York sprang to defence of her ex-husband, Andrew
The Prince is accused of having sex with Epstein's under-age 'sex slave'
Yet vital evidence that could put Andrew in the clear is likely to stay secret
Duke of York fiercely denies all accusations made by Virginia Roberts

By Stephen Wright and Paul Bentley for the Daily Mail

Published: 23:12, 5 January 2015 | Updated: 10:57, 6 January 2015




‘The sheer scale of the alleged cover-up of under-age sex crimes by Prince
Andrew’s paedophile friend can be revealed today.Jeffrey Epstein made
extraordinary efforts to stop the young girls he abused from speaking to the FBI,
court papers claim.He is said to have tracked them down and promised to ‘look
after’ them if they kept quiet.Those who did not cooperate were apparently
harassed or warned ‘bad things’ would happen to them if they helped federal
investigators.’

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/05/246AD58800000578-2897963-image-m-2_1420498203481.jpg
'Harrassment': Jeffrey Epstein is said to have verbally abused Nadia Marcinkova
(far left), pressuring her not to cooperate with the grand jury’s investigation after
becoming concerned that the FBI would try to serve her

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2897963/The-girls-silenced-Andrew-s-friend-sex-abuser-Fergie-leaps-defend-Duke-new-shock-court-papers.html#ixzz3O3niWysk
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Read more: The girls silenced by Andrew's friend the sex abuser: As Fergie leaps to
defend the Duke, U.S. court papers reveal efforts paedophile made to stop victims
from speaking to FBI

[Cidersomerset]

Mossad Blackmail Ring Linked To Prince Andrew?

Tuesday 6th January 2015 at 10:29 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-44.jpg


‘Jane Doe 3′ claims that in 1999 she was approached by Ghislaine
Maxwell, who “procured” under-age girls for sex with Epstein.

Ghislaine Maxwell is the daughter of the late Sir Robert Maxwell,
who is said to have been a top agent of Mossad.

‘Jane Doe 3′, who was 15 at the time, claims she was “converted into a sex slave”.

The court document states:

“Epstein trafficked Jane Doe #3 for sexual purposes to many other
powerful men, including numerous prominent American politicians,
powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known
Prime Minister, and other world leaders.

“Epstein required Jane Doe 3 to describe the events that she had
with these men so that he could potentially blackmail them.”‘

Read more: Mossad Blackmail Ring Linked To Prince Andrew?

http://aanirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/mossad-blackmail-ring-linked-to-prince.html

[Cidersomerset]

Bill Clinton And The Paedophile: The Sex Scandal That Could Destroy Hillary’s Presidential Ambitions

Tuesday 6th January 2015 at 10:15 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-380-587x366.jpg

Oh, she's got Himalayas of her own stuff that would end her presidential chances in an instant – she needs no help from him.



‘Why did a convicted billionaire pedophile named Jeffrey Epstein that pimped out underage girls to
powerful men have 21 contact phone numbers for Bill Clinton? And why did Clinton fly on “multiple
occasions” to the private Caribbean island where Epstein regularly held wild sexual orgies?

Let me give you a hint: it was not to discuss politics over milk and cookies. Every once in a while,
we get a small peek into the twisted sexual world of the global elite. In this case, a Florida lawsuit
that alleges that Britain’s Prince Andrewhad sex with a 17-year-old “sex slave” provided by Epstein
is making headlines all over the planet.

But of potentially even greater importance is what this lawsuit is revealing about Bill Clinton. If it
can be proven that Bill Clinton had sex with underage girls provided by Jeffrey Epstein, that could
potentially destroy any chance that Hillary Clinton has of winning the presidency in 2016.’

Read more: Bill Clinton And The Paedophile: The Sex Scandal That Could Destroy Hillary’s Presidential Ambitions

http://investmentwatchblog.com/bill-clinton-and-the-pedophile-the-sex-scandal-that-could-destroy-hillarys-presidential-ambitions/

[Cidersomerset]

Cash-strapped Fergie took £15,000 from paedophile billionaire at
centre of claims Prince Andrew slept with under-age ‘sex slave’

Tuesday 6th January 2015 at 10:10 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-35.jpg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


Cash-strapped Fergie took £15,000 from paedophile billionaire at centre
of claims Prince Andrew slept with under-age 'sex slave'
Duchess of York struck deal with disgraced tycoon in December 2010
Came within days of Duke of York flying out to visit Epstein in New York
Fuelled speculation Andrew had smoothed path for Fergie to take the cash
She vowed to repay money after saying her judgment had been 'clouded'
Her spokesman today declined to comment when asked if it was repaid

By Simon Tomlinson for MailOnline

Published: 13:45, 5 January 2015 | Updated: 15:17, 5 January 2015


‘Sarah Ferguson was once given £15,000 from paedophile billionaire
Jeffrey Epstein to pay off her debts.

The deal was struck in December 2010 after months of negotiations
with the disgraced tycoon who insisted on helping with her financial troubles.

It came within days of the Duke of York flying out to visit Epstein in
New York, fuelling speculation he had smoothed the path for his
ex-wife to take the money just 18 months after he was released
from jail for soliciting prostitution from under-age girls.

The Duchess of York later claimed her judgment had been ‘clouded’
by her desperation to get out of her £5million debt and vowed to
repay the money.’

Read more: Cash-strapped Fergie took £15,000 from paedophile
billionaire at centre of claims Prince Andrew slept with under-age 'sex slave'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2897086/Cash-strapped-Fergie-took-15-000-paedophile-billionaire-centre-claims-Prince-Andrew-slept-age-sex-slave.html#ixzz3O3ptBzLN
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook






================================================


Andrew back to face the music: Prince flies home from skiing holiday amid
growing crisis over claims he had sex with under-age girl

Tuesday 6th January 2015 at 10:05 By David Icke



http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-24-587x390.jpg




http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif

Andrew back to face the music: Prince flies home from skiing holiday amid
growing crisis over claims he had sex with under-age girl
Prince Andrew is back in UK and will hold crisis talks at Windsor mansion
Yesterday he looked pensive as he left £22k-a-week Swiss chalet
He did not leave retreat for last two days of holiday after scandal broke
Duke of York was accused of abusing girl 'procured' for him by Epstein
Claim was made by Virginia Roberts as part of case against US billionaire
She alleges royal had sex with her when she was 17 - a minor under US law
He slept with her in New York, London and Caribbean, court papers claim
Allegations robustly denied by Buckingham Palace in three statements
Claims by woman's father she met the Queen also categorically denied

By Rebecca English and Stephen Wright and Sam Greenhill for the Daily
Mail and Martin Robinson for MailOnline

Published: 22:30, 4 January 2015 | Updated: 19:30, 5 January 2015






http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/05/246A402600000578-2897086-Solemn_Fellow_skiers_watch_as_Prince_Andrew_leaves_his_22k_a_wee-a-35_1420453480363.jpg
Solemn: Fellow skiers watch as Prince Andrew leaves his £22k-a-week Swiss
chalet yesterday, bound for Britain amid the growing furore over claims he
had sex with an under-age girl



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/04/2464F50B00000578-2896532-image-a-20_1420409607263.jpg

Lives of the rich and famous: The chalet at the Swiss ski resort of Verbier where
Prince Andrew stayed

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2896532/Andrew-face-music-Prince-flies-home-skiing-holiday-amid-growing-crisis-claims-sex-age-girl.html#ixzz3O3wH1NzA
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Cidersomerset]

So to all our UK members, how is this playing out publicly there? Is it all over the T.V., internet, and printed press or is it being downplayed?


Good point I just updated these articles from David Ickes site, I have not watched much mainstream news lately.
I have heard nothing In work where over 100 postal workers are usually talking, about events nothing about this
that I noticed.

All the BBC is saying the allagations have not been made directly at Prince Andrew and Palace deny any
wrong doing by him. Which they would say of course.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/2.82.1/desktop/3.5/img/blq-blocks_grey_alpha.png

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/80080000/jpg/_80080025_80080024.jpg



6 January 2015 Last updated at 15:42

US lawyer takes legal action in Prince Andrew sex claim case Prince Andrew
Buckingham Palace has issued two statements to deny the claims made about Prince Andrew


US lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who is accused of having sex with an underage girl in the case that also involves
Prince Andrew, has begun legal action to clear his name.

The Duke of York and Mr Dershowitz were named in US court papers relating to the handling of a case
against financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Both men deny the allegations.

Buckingham Palace says the sex claims against the duke are "without any foundation".

Mr Dershowitz filed papers at a court in Florida, where the case is being heard, to contest what he described
as "absolutely outrageous claims".

The former Harvard law professor has asked for his name to be removed from documents which accuse him
and Prince Andrew of having sexual relations with Virginia Roberts, known in court as Jane Doe #3, who was
under the age of consent in the US at the time of the alleged incidents.

read more....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30692699

[Cidersomerset]

A Second Look At The Allegations Against Alan Dershowitz

Tuesday 6th January 2015 at 10:02 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/F111212GM02-195x110.jpg


‘As a member of Epstein’s defense team, Dershowitz arranged the deal
that kept the victims from telling their tales in court, but sent Epstein to
prison on only a relatively minor charge. According to the CVRA plaintiffs,
“Dershowitz helped negotiate an agreement that provided immunity from
federal prosecution in the Southern District of Florida not only to Epstein,
but also to any potential co-conspirators of Epstein”.’

Read more: A Second Look At The Allegations Against Alan Dershowitz

http://abovethelaw.com/2015/01/a-second-look-at-the-allegations-against-alan-dershowitz/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jeffrey Epstein’s legal defender Alan Dershowitz his usual balanced self
in attack on Jimmy Carter’s criticism of Israel. Not a hint of hypocrisy anywhere

Tuesday 6th January 2015 at 09:58 By David Icke


-FscSs-_IL0

Uploaded on 24 Mar 2008


http://www.shalomtv.com

On Shalom TV, Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz describes President Jimmy Carter
as an "anti-Israel bigot," saying that he has no sympathy for the Jewish people.

"If you're an Israeli, Carter doesn't like you. If you're an Arab or a Muslim, he likes you."

Dershowitz goes on to address the injection of religion in US politics, particularly the
presidential primary races.

Shalom TV is an American Jewish cable television network carried nationwide on Comcast,
Time Warner Cable, Verizon FiOS TV, Cox, Bright House, MetroCast Cablevision, Service
Electric, and Blue Ridge systems. The free network is now available in more than 21 million
homes in the US.

Complete programming information is available online at http://www.shalomtv.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Judge ‘Erred’ In Sentencing Of Notorious Hasidic Paedophile

Tuesday 6th January 2015 at 09:57 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/aaa1_756-587x415.jpg


Alan Dershowitz – one of Baruch Lebovits’ lawyers

‘Lebovits managed to turn a 10 to 32-year sentence issued in 2010 into a 2-year sentence in
2014 – for which he got credit for good behavior, even though the judge, Mark R. Dwyer, made
him forgo it on accepting Lebovits’ plea deal – and credit for time served. And then he got an
extra month off for reasons no one other than the New York City Department of Corrections
(and perhaps Lebovits’ attorneys) know.

As Hella Winston reported in today’s Jewish Week, Judge Dwyer’s sentence was an error – convicts
cannot waive their ability to get time off for good behavior. But despite being warned about this by
the prosecution before sentencing, Dwyer ordered it anyway. The Department of Corrections ignored his ruling.

And, Lebovits walked free, having served about three months in jail, a total time in custody of about 15 months.’

Read more: Judge 'Erred' In Sentencing Of Notorious Hasidic Paedophile

http://www.survivorsforjustice.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2437:judge-erred-in-sentencing-of-notorious-hasidic-pedophile--did-da-conspire-with-the-judge-to-cover-it-up&catid=2:news&Itemid=57

[jackovesk]

Goodonya Cidersomerset...:thumb:

A fantastic and stellar job you are doing with this Thread...:yes4:

It's frustrating though isn't when this thread is not really receiving the attention it deserves...:faint:

This is the (Biggest Gotcha Story) about the ((ROYAL - SCUM)) we've had and yet no one seems to be paying attention...:noidea:

.....................................

Well instead of waiting to jump in and tell us...



HOW IS THIS GOING TO PLAY OUT..???

Ok, I'll have a crack...

Like I said its a (Massive Story), and the Royals are not going to get away with it this time...:nono:

There is way too much conjecture coming from the (Accused)
We've seen Rolf, We've seen Jimmie, now we've got Prince Andrew! All the (Pigs) are starting to line-up for the Sheeple and with their Consciousness continually lifting they are starting to (Connect-The-Dots)...:yes4:

...and let's face it, no-one ever Forgives a Pedophile...:nono:

So from what we know so far, IMHO this really is the ((Beginning of the End)) for the Royal Family because they simply can't cover this up...:nono:

...add to that ask yourself the question...


How did this get into the MSM/News in the 1st place? and Why?


Therein lies the $64million dollar question...

Do we have an ((Secret-Inside Coup)) on our hands, not to forget the MSM mentioning Epsteins ((21 Contact No's)) for ((Bill Clinton)) knowing this could cause great harm for Hitlary's 2016 Presidential Campaign...

Food for Thought...:noidea:

[sheme]

It would appear that it isn't easy to cast the first stone for one reason or another.

[Cidersomerset]

Prince Andrew allegations: Duke of York is not above the law says top Home Office committee MP

Wednesday 7th January 2015 at 11:10 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-26-587x352.jpg

‘Pressure was mounting on Prince Andrew last night over bombshell claims he slept with a teenage
“sex slave”, as a top politician insisted he “should not be above the law”.

The Duke of York emphatically denies allegations he had sex three times with Virginia Roberts, then
17, while she was working for his former close friend and convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

But veteran Labour MP Paul Flynn, who sits on the influential Home Affairs Select Committee, said
the royal still had questions to answer.’

================================================================


MIRROR......



Prince Andrew allegations: Duke of York is not above the law says top Home Office committee

Jan 06, 2015 22:43
By Nick Sommerlad, Ben Rossington, Christopher Bucktin, Jack Blanchard



After claims Prince Andrew slept with a teenage "sex slave", veteran MP who sits on Home
Office Select Committee says Duke of York is not above the law

http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4931096.ece/alternates/s615/PrinceAndrewScandalMain.jpg




Read more: Prince Andrew allegations: Duke of York is not above the law says top Home Office committee MP

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-allegations-duke-york-4931094

[Cidersomerset]

Prime Minister refuses to back scandal-hit Prince Andrew on sex claims

Wednesday 7th January 2015 at 11:06 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-1471-587x440.jpg

==================================================

http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/page/express_logo.png

Prime Minister refuses to back scandal-hit Prince Andrew on sex claims

PRIME Minister David Cameron sidestepped a chance to show support
for scandal-hit Prince Andrew yesterday.


http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/139/590x/Prince-Andrew-550572.jpg
Prince Andrew was accused in US court documents of sleeping with an underage sex slave

‘Mr Cameron refused to get involved in the controversy surrounding the
Duke of York, who was accused in US court documents of sleeping with
an underage teenage sex slave.

In an interview by radio station LBC for Heart FM Wales, Mr Cameron said:
“I’m not going to make any comment on it. Obviously, the Prince has made
his own views very, very clear, and I think I’ll leave it at that.”

His Conservative colleague Boris Johnson, the London Mayor, proved more
sympathetic, praising the Duke’s role in boosting British trade.’

“Prince Andrew, let’s be very clear, is a guy who does a huge amount of
unsung, unheralded work for this country,” he told LBC.

He added: “People, they go on and on about the air miles and so on, actually
I have seen that guy get out there and sell this country, try and help British
firms to get business around the world.

“He does a huge amount of good and a huge amount of hard work. So if you
are asking me whether I have sympathy for him, of course I do.”

Andrew, 54, has faced mounting controversy after Virginia Roberts, who worked
as a masseuse for his former friend, billionaire and convicted sex offender Jeffrey
Epstein, claimed she was forced to have sex with him on three separate occasions
when she was 17, a minor in the state of Florida, where the court papers were lodged.

Ms Roberts, now 31 and married with three children, has accused Epstein, who
served 13 months in jail for procuring a minor for prostitution, of using her as
a sex slave.

Buckingham Palace has emphatically denied the allegations, insisting Andrew
did not have any form of sexual contact or relationship with Ms Roberts.

A prominent US criminal defence lawyer who represented Epstein, 61, during
negotiations over a 2008 plea bargain that meant the billionaire avoided federal
prosecution charges, strongly denied claims that he too had sex with Ms Roberts.

Alan Dershowitz filed a sworn statement denying her claims, saying the
allegations against him were a “deliberate lie.”




Read more: Prime Minister refuses to back scandal-hit Prince Andrew on sex claims


http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/550572/David-Cameron-refuses-to-comment-on-Prince-Andrew

[silverfish]

"US lawyer in Andrew sex case sued"
this is the tiny we headline in the us and Canada section of world news on bbc web site
Like how he's just Andrew now !! nothing to see here
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-30708795

Lawyers representing a woman who has alleged Prince Andrew and law professor Alan Dershowitz had sex with her when she was a minor are suing Mr Dershowitz for defamation.

The lawyers accuse Mr Dershowitz of mounting a media assault on their reputation and character.

The development comes a day after he began legal proceedings to clear his name.

Both Buckingham Palace and Mr Dershowitz deny the claims.

On Monday, Mr Dershowitz filed papers at a court in Florida, where the case is being heard, to contest what he described as "absolutely outrageous claims".

The former Harvard law professor has asked for his name to be removed from documents which accuse him and Prince Andrew of having sexual relations with Virginia Roberts, known in court as Jane Doe #3, who was under the age of consent in the US at the time of the alleged incidents.

In media interviews, Mr Dershowitz accused Ms Roberts' lawyers, Paul Cassell and Bradley Edwards, of "unethical" behaviour warranting disbarment.

The pair said their reputations had been damaged by such comments and that they were seeking damages.

Screen grab of court documents filed by Mr Dershowitz Screen grab of court documents filed by Mr Dershowitz
Prince Andrew, photographed in 2014 Buckingham Palace has issued two statements to deny the claims made about Prince Andrew
In response, Mr Dershowitz said he was "thrilled" to be sued as it would give him an opportunity to disprove the two.

'Resilient'
The allegations against Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz emerged in evidence submitted to a US court in a case involving financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Two women, referred to as Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, are suing the US government. They argue that it failed to protect their rights when it entered a plea deal with Epstein, who spent time in jail in 2008-9 for a sex offence with a minor.

Two more - Virginia Roberts and a woman known as Jane Doe #4 - now want to join the case.

Documents filed in a Florida court last week allege that Ms Roberts was sexually trafficked by Epstein, who forced her to make herself available for sex to "politically connected and financially powerful people".

Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein Prince Andrew has been criticised for his former friendship with Jeffrey Epstein (right)
Ms Roberts claims she was forced to have sex with the prince on three occasions - in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein - between 1999 and 2002, when she was under age according to US law.

Epstein and Prince Andrew were formerly friends and the pair were photographed meeting in December 2010, after the tycoon had served his prison sentence.

The prince later had to apologise for his friendship and stepped down as the UK's special representative for trade and investment.

Buckingham Palace has said the sex claims against the duke lack "any foundation".

It is likely the 54-year-old's first public appearance will be at a reception at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland later this month.

A royal aide has said the prince will "move on and push ahead" with his work, describing him as "resilient".

BBC legal correspondent Clive Coleman says there is no constitutional bar on the prince suing and it would not be unprecedented as other members of the Royal family have done so, though generally not for libel.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[jackovesk]

"US lawyer in Andrew sex case sued"
this is the tiny we headline in the us and Canada section of world news on bbc web site
Like how he's just Andrew now !! nothing to see here
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-30708795

Lawyers representing a woman who has alleged Prince Andrew and law professor Alan Dershowitz had sex with her when she was a minor are suing Mr Dershowitz for defamation.

The lawyers accuse Mr Dershowitz of mounting a media assault on their reputation and character.

The development comes a day after he began legal proceedings to clear his name.

Both Buckingham Palace and Mr Dershowitz deny the claims.

On Monday, Mr Dershowitz filed papers at a court in Florida, where the case is being heard, to contest what he described as "absolutely outrageous claims".

The former Harvard law professor has asked for his name to be removed from documents which accuse him and Prince Andrew of having sexual relations with Virginia Roberts, known in court as Jane Doe #3, who was under the age of consent in the US at the time of the alleged incidents.

In media interviews, Mr Dershowitz accused Ms Roberts' lawyers, Paul Cassell and Bradley Edwards, of "unethical" behaviour warranting disbarment.

The pair said their reputations had been damaged by such comments and that they were seeking damages.

Screen grab of court documents filed by Mr Dershowitz Screen grab of court documents filed by Mr Dershowitz
Prince Andrew, photographed in 2014 Buckingham Palace has issued two statements to deny the claims made about Prince Andrew
In response, Mr Dershowitz said he was "thrilled" to be sued as it would give him an opportunity to disprove the two.

'Resilient'
The allegations against Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz emerged in evidence submitted to a US court in a case involving financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Two women, referred to as Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, are suing the US government. They argue that it failed to protect their rights when it entered a plea deal with Epstein, who spent time in jail in 2008-9 for a sex offence with a minor.

Two more - Virginia Roberts and a woman known as Jane Doe #4 - now want to join the case.

Documents filed in a Florida court last week allege that Ms Roberts was sexually trafficked by Epstein, who forced her to make herself available for sex to "politically connected and financially powerful people".

Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein Prince Andrew has been criticised for his former friendship with Jeffrey Epstein (right)
Ms Roberts claims she was forced to have sex with the prince on three occasions - in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island owned by Epstein - between 1999 and 2002, when she was under age according to US law.

Epstein and Prince Andrew were formerly friends and the pair were photographed meeting in December 2010, after the tycoon had served his prison sentence.

The prince later had to apologise for his friendship and stepped down as the UK's special representative for trade and investment.

Buckingham Palace has said the sex claims against the duke lack "any foundation".

It is likely the 54-year-old's first public appearance will be at a reception at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland later this month.

A royal aide has said the prince will "move on and push ahead" with his work, describing him as "resilient".

BBC legal correspondent Clive Coleman says there is no constitutional bar on the prince suing and it would not be unprecedented as other members of the Royal family have done so, though generally not for libel.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Good...:thumb:

The more exposure ((The Better))...:target:

.................................................. ..........

PS - Another sick Pedo in action...

Creepy: Little Girl Narrowly Escapes Kiss from ((Vice President Joe Biden))

January 7, 2014

Biden also made distasteful comments about the attractiveness of other senator’s daughters.


When introduced to Utah Senator Orrin Hatch’s teenage granddaughter Emily, Biden commented: ‘I hope you have a big fence around the house!’


The comment was made as Biden posed with the 80-year-old Republican senator’s large family, on the day he officially became president pro tempore of Congress.

Biden thought the joke about the girl’s good looks so funny, he whipped it out again when he met the daughter of freshman Senator Joni Ernst.

Pictures from the event show Biden with his arm around the Republican’s daughter Libby, as Senator Ernst placeh [sic] her hand on a Bible to be sworn in.

The Daily Mail speculates Biden may have felt comfortable harassing the congressmens’ families “since he spent more than three decades in the Senate.”

Biden’s cringe-worthy behavior comes on the heels of an widening pedophile scandal involving billionaire and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who it was recently revealed met with former US President Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew and a slew of other wealthy financiers and politicians on a private island on numerous occasions.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTT5dQcarl0&feature=player_embedded
http://www.prisonplanet.com/creepy-little-girl-narrowly-escapes-kiss-from-vice-president-biden.html

:mad2:

PSS - That poor little girl, couldn't get away quick enough...:scared:

[ulli]

Jacko, that video is creepy on so many levels....not only Biden's behavior, but the entire scene....

[Cidersomerset]

Paris Shooting: Queen Should Thank President Hollande For Burying the Prince Andrew Child Abuse Scandal

Thursday 8th January 2015 at 09:50 By David Icke

pqs5ISez8xo

Published on 7 Jan 2015


Big shout out to one of the KBS listeners, Wardy, for pointing out something that had passed me by..

We are being told that the Queen contacted the french president to pass on her condolences and really
in all likelyhood she was thanking of of the puppets for helping to bury the pedophilia scandal that had
taken up the news feeds over the past few days.

[Cidersomerset]

Thursday 8th January 2015 at 09:47 By David Icke


http://www.independent.co.uk/independent.co.uk/assets/images/redesign/masthead/indy-masthead-small.png

Prince Andrew sex allegations: Jeffrey Epstein’s butler Alfredo Rodriguez, who
stole tell-all ‘black book’, (conveniently) dies age 60



http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/9-JeffreyEpstein-Rex.jpg


‘Alfredo Rodriguez, the butler of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has died,
and with him the location of a ‘black book’, which allegedly details “the full scope
and the extent of Epstein’s involvement with underage girls”, and contact details
of the businessman’s celebrity friends.

Rodriguez died at the age of 60 after suffering from mesothelioma last week, his
widow Patricia Dunn told DailyMail.com.

Dunn alleges that her late husband “knew all about Prince Andrew,” who has been
named in the current sex scandal centring on Epstein. Allegations levelled at the
Prince are that he was supplied with a teenage girl who was used by Epstein as a
“sex slave”. Buckingham Palace has denied the allegation.’

Read more: Prince Andrew sex allegations: Jeffrey Epstein's butler Alfredo Rodriguez,
who stole tell-all 'black book', (conveniently) dies age 60

[Cidersomerset]

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-385-587x390.jpg

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


THE MIRROR..............


Jeffrey Epstein: Prince Andrew's paedo billionaire pal 'bullied journalist into suppressing exposé'

Jan 07, 2015 21:14
By Victoria Murphy, Nick Sommerlad

Vicky Ward said Epstein “attacked both me and my sources” and “spooked”
Vanity Fair magazine out of printing the stories told by two young sisters


Splash Jeffrey Epstein

http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4915242.ece/alternates/s615/Jeffrey-Epstein.jpg
Convicted paedophile: Jeffrey Epstein is a registered sex offender


A journalist who planned to expose the Wall Street tycoon at the centre of the Prince Andrew
“sex slave” saga says he bullied her into silence.

Vicky Ward claims that in 2002 two young sisters gave her harrowing accounts of how
convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein had molested them.

British-born Vicky said Epstein “attacked both me and my sources” and “spooked” everyone
at America’s influential Vanity Fair magazine out of printing the girls’ stories.

Her decision to speak out comes a week after it emerged that Virginia Roberts had claimed
in court papers that she was forced to sleep with Prince Andrew when she was Epstein’s
17-year-old “sex slave”.


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jeffrey-epstein-prince-andrews-paedo-4937465

[Cidersomerset]

Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum’s ‘Hookers and Pimps’ party with the New York
socialite accused of procuring underage girls for his billionaire paedophile friend

new Friday 9th January 2015 at 09:22 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/2483868500000578-2900787-image-m-4_1420730688273.jpg
Close: Ghislaine Maxwell - with a blonde wig - stands between Prince Andrew and PVC-wearing Heidi Klum


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif

EXCLUSIVE: Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party
with the New York socialite accused of procuring underage girls for his
billionaire pedophile friend
Ghislaine Maxwell is pictured with Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's
Halloween party in 2000
The New York socialite stands accused of 'procuring' girls for
Jeffrey Epstein around same time as party pictures
Maxwell, the daughter of disgraced newspaper tycoon Robert Maxwell,
is described in court papers as his 'co-conspirator' in 'sexual abuse'
Accused of 'facilitating Prince Andrew's abuse by acting as a 'madame'
'Sex slave' Virginia Roberts claims she met the royal at Maxwell's home
Maxwell has previously denied any involvement with Epstein's crimes
Her lawyers say she 'denies each and every allegation'
Friends say they cannot believe she would behave in such a way

By Sara Nathan For Dailymail.com

Published: 17:20, 8 January 2015 | Updated: 08:06, 9 January 2015


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/08/2483865600000578-2900787-image-a-5_1420730700976.jpg
Mysterious: Prince Andrew raises a slight smirk as he poses next to
a mysterious blonde clad in a feather headdress and mask

‘Standing in the dim light of New York’s trendy Hudson Hotel, Prince Andrew
made for an incongruous sight as he joined revelers at supermodel Heidi Klum’s
‘Hookers and Pimps’ themed Halloween party.

The year was 2000 and Prince Andrew was having fun. By his side, with her
arm draped around the Queen’s son, was his close friend, Ghislaine Maxwell,
dressed for the proceedings with a bleach blonde wig, midriff-baring top
and gold pants.

Despite wearing a somber black suit and sipping water from a bottle, Prince
Andrew soon seemed to loosen up, greeting hostess Klum – the model
dressed in a body-skimming black PVC catsuit with her embonpoint on
show – and posing with an attractive blonde whose face was covered up
by a feathered mask.

All the while, Maxwell remained a constant, protective presence, sandwiched
in between the prince and the supermodel, seemingly pleased with her
illustrious fellow guest.’

Read more: Prince Andrew at Heidi Klum's 'Hookers and Pimps' party with
the New York socialite accused of procuring underage girls for his billionaire
paedophile friend

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2900787/Prince-Andrew-Heidi-Klum-Hookers-Pimps-party-New-York-socialite-accused-procuring-underage-girls-billionaire-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein.html

[Cidersomerset]

These news reports from earlier in the week but gives a brief summery of whats going on......


i3u_BgdauSA

Published on 3 Jan 2015


New court documents in a U.S. case allege Prince Andrew had sex with an underaged girl. Buckingham Palace has categorically denied the claims.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prince Andrew named in US sex slave case


VUXRlpk92Qk

Published on 4 Jan 2015


It’s a scandal in any shape. Prince Andrew a member of the Royal Family has been
named in US legal documents linking him to an abuse of a minor.

[skuzzy]

what a joke this is becoming. this cant be kept under the table anymore, the uk scandal is bursting at the seams. only the truly ignorant dont know about this, but things will happen. i can feel it, there is too much going on for it to be swept under the rug again. the only reason it has gone on so long and is moving fairly slow is cuz these people are the most connected, at the top of the social class and include, at least some members of royal families.

[Cidersomerset]

The David Icke Videocast: Lifting the Stone - Prince Andrew And The Global Web



kSUR_zpIrek


Published on 9 Jan 2015


**David Icke’s Acclaimed 2014 All-Day AWAKEN!! Wembley Presentation Now Available To See On Demand** http://www.davidicke.com

[Cidersomerset]

Prince Andrew buys $19million ski lodge: Never mind the sex slave scandal – Prince and Fergie snap up snow palace

Saturday 10th January 2015 at 11:05 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-96-587x330.jpg


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


Prince Andrew buys £13million ski lodge: Never mind the sex slave
scandal - Prince and Fergie snap up snow palace
Bought seven-bedroom property in Verbier shortly before Christmas
The deeds listing them simply as Andrew York and Sarah Ferguson
It's the same property they were staying in last week when claims
that the prince had sex with an under-age girl were made
Sources say the chalet is worth between £10million and £13million

By Rebecca English and Jack Doyle In London and Arthur Martin In Verbier For The Daily Mail

Published: 22:59, 9 January 2015 | Updated: 14:36, 10 January 2015

‘Prince Andrew and his ex-wife have secretly splashed out on a Swiss ski chalet thought to be worth up to £13million.

The Duke and Duchess of York bought the seven-bedroom property in upmarket Verbier shortly before Christmas
as a ‘family investment’, with the deeds listing them simply as Andrew York and Sarah Ferguson.

It is the same property that the divorced couple were staying in last week when claims that the prince had sex with
an under-age girl were made in documents lodged at a US court. Sources in Switzerland say the chalet is worth
between £10million and £13million, although it is not clear how much the couple paid.’


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/09/2489923500000578-2904085-image-a-3_1420843824589.jpg
Lap of luxury: The seven-bedroom chalet in the exclusive Swiss alpine resort of Verbier

A source close to the duchess told the Mail that she and Andrew took out a joint mortgage on the property and did
not buy it outright. It is not known what proportion of the purchase was funded by the mortgage. The development
shows how close the pair still are even though they separated in 1992 after six years of marriage and divorced four years later.

Read more: Prince Andrew buys $19million ski lodge: Never mind the sex slave scandal – Prince and Fergie snap up snow palace

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2904085/Andrew-buys-13m-ski-lodge-Never-mind-sex-slave-scandal-Prince-Fergie-snap-snow-palace.html#ixzz3OQovkYLi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Cidersomerset]

Prince Andrew’s guards ‘turned a blind eye’: Yard officers watched as Duke partied with young girls, says Epstein’s butler

new Monday 12th January 2015 at 09:34 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-20-587x352.jpg

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


Prince Andrew's guards 'turned a blind eye': Yard officers watched as
Duke partied with young girls, says Epstein's butler
Prince Andrew's bodyguards have been accused of 'turning a blind eye'
Protection officers accompanied the royal to Jeffrey Epstein's mansion
Hundreds of under-age girls are believed to have been abused there
Epstein's butler Juan Alessi said bodyguards slept in guest bedroom
Virginia Roberts, then 17, claims she was forced to have sex with the royal

By Stephen Wright and Sam Greenhill In Florida For The Daily



‘Prince Andrew’s bodyguards were accused yesterday of turning a blind
eye during his visits to a paedophile friend’s ‘house of sin’.

Protection officers accompanied the royal to Jeffrey Epstein’s Florida
mansion where he allegedly partied with naked young women.

Juan Alessi, who was Epstein’s butler for 11 years, said: ‘Andrew was
with security. He had his two bodyguards from Scotland Yard. I can
remember their names. ’The bodyguards were off duty and they
slept in one of the guest bedrooms.’

Hundreds of under-age girls are said to have been abused at Epstein’s
mansion and one woman says she was forced by the shamed financier
to have sex with Andrew when she was 17, which is below the age of
consent in Florida.’

Read more: Prince Andrew's guards 'turned a blind eye': Yard officers
watched as Duke partied with young girls, says Epstein's butler

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/11/249B0B7300000578-0-image-a-39_1421018578738.jpg

A royalty protection source said: 'Epstein's Florida mansion (pictured)
appears to have resembled a five-star brothel. And Epstein behaved like a pimp'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2905850/Andrew-s-guards-turned-blind-eye-Yard-officers-watched-Duke-partied-young-girls-says-Epstein-s-butler.html#ixzz3OblySolA
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Scotland Yard urged to probe Prince Andrew’s bodyguards over sex scandal

new Monday 12th January 2015 at 09:30 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-3792-587x390.jpg


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE TELEGRAPH....

Scotland Yard urged to probe Prince Andrew's bodyguards over sex scandal

Calls are made for an investigation into how much Prince Andrew's bodyguards
witnessed at parties thrown by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein


http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/03160/prince_andrew_3160855b.jpg


‘Scotland Yard has come under pressure to investigate whether Prince Andrew’s
bodyguards witnessed any criminal activity during his visits to the home of a
convicted sex offender.

Protection officers who accompanied the Duke to Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion in
Florida, where he is alleged to have partied with naked young women, have
been accused of turning a blind eye.

The Duke has found himself at the centre of a sex scandal amid allegations he
had sex with a 17-year-old girl, supplied to him by Epstein. He strongly denies
the allegations.’

Read more: Scotland Yard urged to probe Prince Andrew's bodyguards over sex scandal

[jackovesk]

Virginia Roberts‘ 24-page diary details her time as alleged royal ‘sex slave’

January 14, 2015


‘He Was Caressing Every Part Of My Naked Body And Filling My Head With Endless Compliments About My Blossoming Figure': Diary Entries Of ‘Teen Sex Slave’ Detail Sordid Hook-Up With Prince Andrew — In Her Own Handwriting

http://i0.wp.com/radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/virginia-roberts-prince-andrew-PP-SL-2.jpg?zoom=4&fit=551%2C9999


The never-before-seen diary of a teenage “sex slave” spells out the “fearful” moment when she was coldly ordered to allow Britain’s Prince Andrew to have sex with her.


In a bombshell world exclusive, RadarOnline.com has exclusively obtained the secret journal of the then 17-year-old employed to have sex with billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and his rich and powerful pals — and it’s packed with scandalous claims about her illicit trysts, including with Andrew, the fifth in line to the British throne.

In 24 jaw-dropping pages, Virginia Roberts details the whirlwind 2001 sex trip she took with Epstein, and she dishes the dirt on how her master passed her off for a night of sordid sex with the British royal.

Epstein and his right-hand woman, Ghislaine Maxwell, who had allegedly fooled Roberts’ parents into believing she was training with them to become a professional masseuse, helped their underage plaything get a passport for the sick vacation.

“I was heading over to my first overseas trip to Europe, 1st stop off Paris, France,” the excited teen wrote.

Once abroad, Roberts’ daily list of chores included “massages, sex, and even dressing [Epstein].”

PHOTOS: The Royal Family Revealed: Secrets William, Kate & Harry Don’t Want You To Know

Radar can also reveal that another important duty called for Roberts to score new sex slaves for her boss, just as she was required to do in the United States. “I would offer [girls] money to come meet my gentlemen friend and tell them I’d show them how to massage,” wrote Roberts.

“I never brought back a girl that ever said no, or didn’t want to participate in an erotic massage.”

http://i1.wp.com/radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/virginia-roberts-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-docs-01.jpg?zoom=4&resize=640%2C199

From Paris, Roberts traveled to Spain, Morocco and, finally, England. That first night in London, she stayed with her “madam,” Maxwell, who had reportedly recruited her at age 15 to be the “top girl” in Epstein’s twisted harem.

“The next morning, Ghislaine, chirpy, came into my room,” Roberts chronicled in her diary.

“She sat down next to me, as I was just starting to uncover the sheets and told me told me excitedly we were going shopping because I needed a new dress I could wear to dance with a prince. ‘Wow, what?’ were the first words that popped into my head, not knowing that meant using my body as entertainment for another rich pedophile, or worst, being convinced it was exciting.”

http://i2.wp.com/radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/virginia-roberts-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-docs-02.jpg?zoom=4&resize=640%2C248

Roberts, feeling insecure, revealed that Epstein and his sick pals could make her feel special, yet terrible at the same time.

“But the way these men adored me, and many others like me, kind of made us feel like we weren’t so awkward after all. That was the nice side to these predators, the other side was learning to accept money to degrade ourselves morally [and] end up another lost girl down a chain of statutory rape victims.”

http://i1.wp.com/radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/virginia-roberts-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-docs-03.jpg?zoom=4&resize=640%2C234

But Maxwell didn’t seem to care about anything but pleasing Epstein — and Prince Andrew. So she accompanied Roberts to buy everything from expensive dresses and embroidered jeans to makeup and perfume.

After Roberts had showered and got ready in her new clothes, “Ghislaine made it very apparent I needed to be very bubbly and energetic for our special guest tonight as she told me he was expecting me and needed to be royally entertained…we were expecting his royal highness, Prince Andrew.”

Like clockwork, the guest of honor knocked at the door just after 6 p.m., and Maxwell ushered him inside.

“They spoke kindly of his daughters … [and] the conversation turned to me next, starting with Ghislaine playing the ‘guess my age’ game, which was one of her favorite’s among her morally impaired friends,” sniped Roberts.

“He guessed 17 and Ghislaine chuckled, ‘She’ll be too old soon,’ and told him I was really only 16.”

From there the group headed to dinner, where “the Prince’s attention towards me amplified… making eye contact at every given chance and concentrating at my plunging V-neck top,” Roberts recounted.

The titillated Prince later took the teen to Club Tramp, where he grabbed them both an “alcoholic cocktail,” she wrote in the diary obtained by Radar.

“He was the most incredibly hideous dancer I had ever seen and not to mention how embarrassing it was to have to be the one he was smashing pelvics with, even if he was a prince.”

http://i0.wp.com/radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/virginia-roberts-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-docs-04.jpg?zoom=4&resize=640%2C301

“We only stayed at the club for a little over an hour before his highness was dripping from sweat and ready to embark to another quieter setting, where we could get to know each other better, and from the way he was fondling me on the dance floor, I knew that was a man’s polite way of saying he wanted to intimately get acquainted.”

http://i1.wp.com/radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/virginia-roberts-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-docs-05.jpg?zoom=4&resize=640%2C227

“I was doing my best trying to put on a good show for him by slowly undressing and started to pour a bath. The room quickly filled with steam from the hot water as I turned to Andrew and began to kiss his neck and undress him.

“He was caressing every part of my naked body and filling my head with endless compliments about my blossoming figure.”

http://i1.wp.com/radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/virginia-roberts-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-docs-06.jpg?zoom=4&resize=640%2C311

In the bath, the two “continued with back and forth foreplay, touching, kissing, and him even licking my toes. ‘I love your feet,’ he whispered, ‘they are so irresistible,’” Roberts recalled the Prince saying.

“That was definitely a 1st for me, but I went with it all, fearful of letting down the Prince and in turn Jeffrey and Ghislaine.”

http://i1.wp.com/radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/virginia-roberts-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-docs-07.jpg?zoom=4&resize=640%2C198

Once the foreplay was over, the two had sex, she claimed.

“The entire affair was short-lived, when his climax was achieved he was not the same attentive guy I had know for the last few hours,” Roberts detailed. “Instead, [he] quickly got dressed, said his goodbyes and slipped out of my bedroom to the driver still waiting for him outside.”

http://i2.wp.com/radaronline.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/virginia-roberts-prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-docs-08.jpg?zoom=4&resize=640%2C201

Andrew, son of Queen Elizabeth II and a brother of Prince Charles, has labeled accusations that he slept with Roberts — claims resurfaced in a federal court filing in early January — as “categorically untrue.”

“It is emphatically denied that HRH The Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts. The allegations made are false and without any foundation,” a palace spokesman has said.

Maxwell and Epstein have also dismissed the allegations, with the investment banker declaring: “These are stale, rehashed allegations that lawyers are now attempting to repackage and spice up by adding the names of prominent people,” said Epstein’s attorney, Jack Goldberger.

“The allegations, which are outlandish on their face and discredited by the evidence, were made in a civil case in which Mr. Epstein is not a party.”

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2015/01/jeffrey-epstein-sex-slave-virginia-roberts-writes-sex-prince-andrew/

[Cidersomerset]

Virginia Roberts: ‘Sex slave diary’ published containing alleged intimate details about Prince Andrew

Thursday 15th January 2015 at 10:35 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-136-587x390.jpg


‘The allegations surrounding Prince Andrew and his purported sexual encounters with an American teenager
have taken another twist following the publication of what is claimed to be the young woman’s diary.

A US website has printed details of what it says are 24 hand-written pages belonging to a diary of Virginia
Roberts, the American woman who has claimed in court documents that she was a” teenage sex slave” of
New York financier, Jeffrey Epstein. Ms Roberts has claimed that when she was 17, Epstein forced her to
have sex with various friends of his, including Prince Andrew.’

Read more: Virginia Roberts: 'Sex slave diary' published containing alleged intimate details about Prince Andrew

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/prince-andrew-sex-claim-sex-slave-diary-published-containing-intimate-details-of-virginia-roberts-alleged-encounter-with-fifth-in-line-to-throne-9978015.html

[Cidersomerset]

Jeffrey Epstein: Prince Andrew’s alleged efforts to protect paedophile pal could be revealed in court

new Friday 16th January 2015 at 08:50 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-613-587x390.jpg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE MIRROR......


Jeffrey Epstein: Prince Andrew's alleged efforts to protect paedophile pal could be revealed in court



Jan 15, 2015 22:31
By Christopher Bucktin


A judge has ordered the disgraced tycoon’s lawyers to come up with “extraordinary circumstances”
as to why so-called 'sex papers' should be kept secret


http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4987136.ece/alternates/s615/PAYVirginiaRobertsMain.jpg

Court plea: 'Sex slave' Virginia Roberts has made bid to join lawsuit


‘Prince Andrew’s alleged bid to help paedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein get a reduced jail sentence
could be revealed in court for the first time.

A judge has ordered the disgraced tycoon’s lawyers to come up with ­“extraordinary circumstances”
as to why papers believed to contain the names of key figures, including the Duke of York, who
lobbied on his behalf in a plea bargaining case should be kept secret.

If they fail, it means Andrew’s alleged efforts to protect 61-year-old Epstein could be revealed in
full, sparking major embarrassment at ­Buckingham Palace.’

Read more: Jeffrey Epstein: Prince Andrew's alleged efforts to protect paedophile pal could be revealed in court

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jeffrey-epstein-prince-andrews-alleged-4987213

[Cidersomerset]

Elite child sex slaves "1981" forgotten documentary

_6FKEwjPmHQ

Published on 17 Jul 2012


Disturbing public access documentary from 1981 that later was proven true ... to the Franklin cover up ,
the pedo priests , the Sandusky fiasco we see today. This is a ongoing theme we see in the upper crusts
of our society pedophilia with young boys within major respectable institutions. I personally do not understand it.

[jackovesk]

Jeffrey Epstein: Judge may reveal Prince Andrew’s alleged bid to protect paedophile tycoon

January 17, 2015


A US judge says he is ready to release documents relating to the ((Duke of York’s alleged role in securing a plea deal for paedophile tycoon Jeffrey Epstein)) that potentially shaved 18 years off his sentence.

Federal judge Kenneth Marra has ordered Epstein’s legal team to produce ­“extraordinary circumstances” as to why the papers should not be made public.

The 15,000 pages of suppressed material are believed to contain the names of several powerful figures, including Prince Andrew, who allegedly lobbied on Epstein’s behalf.

http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2015/01/16/1227187/588777-e399b852-9d1c-11e4-b0c3-1d439f0b9016.jpg
Lady lover: The Duke parties with singer and interior designer Chris Von Aspen in St Tropez. This series of pictures are among many to have re-emerged after new allegations about Prince Andrew’s alleged sexual rendezvous with a minor. Source: Snapper Media

http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2015/01/16/1227187/588803-248ad8fa-9d1d-11e4-b0c3-1d439f0b9016.jpg

Prince Andrew was reportedly introduced to Ms Von Aspen after “following her round like a puppy all night”. Source: Snapper Media


If released, details of the royal’s alleged involvement in his former friend’s underage sex ring and the lengths he allegedly went to protect Epstein will be known for the first time, potentially delivering the biggest blow yet to Buckingham Palace since this sordid case came to light.

“Public policy favours judicial records beingopen to the public,” Judge Marra wrote.

SECRET DIARIES: VIRGINIA ROBERTS’ JOURNAL PUBLISHED

“In order for the court to take action inconsistent with that policy, a party seeking to seal a judicial record must provide adequate ­justification overcoming the presumption that filings in civil cases be public.”

The judge said if the defence could not convince him of “extraordinary circumstances”, he would release the explosive document.

http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2015/01/16/1227187/587891-db1a94e4-9d1c-11e4-b0c3-1d439f0b9016.jpg
Days later, Prince Andrew gets cosy with Brazilian model Ingrid. Source: Snapper Media

Epstein was jailed for 18 months in 2008 for soliciting a minor for prostitution. Had it not been for the plea deal, the 61-year-old could have been jailed for up to 20 years.

Lawyers acting for Virginia Roberts, who claims Epstein kept her as a sex slave from the age of 15, forcing her to service his coterie of rich friends, allege the billionaire used his “his powerful political and social connections to secure a favourable plea deal”.

Two of Epstein’s alleged victims, named as Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2, are suing Epstein on the grounds that they should have been made aware of the deal, which included a protective order preventing any details of the arrangement from being made public.

That order included a non-prosecution agreement ensuring immunity for Epstein’s “potential co-conspirators”, enabling key figures to avoid being forced into the witness box at his trial.

But that could all change unless Epstein’s lawyers can convince Judge Marra why the documents should remain suppressed, the Mirror reports.

Ms Roberts’ lawyers say the documents potentially include “letters of ­recommendation or similar ­communication to any [US] ­government official vouching for or providing support for Jeffrey Epstein”.

As details of the plea deal emerge, law commentators are questioning how Epstein’s team managed to pull off such a coup in the first place and whether the FBI helped keep Prince Andrew’s name out of the headlines during its 2005 investigation.

It is not clear if ­Ghislaine Maxwell, the daughter of disgraced newspaper mogul Robert Maxwell who drowned in mysterious circumstances in 1991, is covered by the deal.

DISGRACED: THE RISE AND FALL OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN

According to Ms Roberts, Ms Maxwell acted as a Epstein’s pimp, luring underage girls to properties in London, the US and the Virgin Islands for sex with the rich and famous.

The now 30-year-old moved back to the US with her Australian husband last year after living quietly on the NSW central coast for 13 years with their three children.

Ms Roberts has applied to join the lawsuit lodged by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 and is writing a book about her years as a sex slave.

Instead of ignoring the allegations levelled at Prince Andrew by Ms Roberts, as is usual practice, Buckingham Palace issued three separate denials, in an unprecedented step.

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/jeffrey-epstein-judge-may-reveal-prince-andrews-alleged-bid-to-protect-paedophile-tycoon/story-fnixwvgh-1227187589517

PS - Is Andrew’s number finally up?


A US judge says he is ready to release documents relating to the ((Duke of York’s alleged role in securing a plea deal for paedophile tycoon Jeffrey Epstein)) that potentially shaved 18 years off his sentence.

[Cidersomerset]

Prince Andrew fights back with a Davos denial: Duke’s bid to
bury underage ‘sex slave’ claims with dramatic TV appearance

Sunday 18th January 2015 at 10:07 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-361-587x390.jpg


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif



Prince Andrew fights back with a Davos denial: Duke's bid to bury underage
'sex slave' claims with dramatic TV appearance
Duke of York will speak on TV to deny claims he abused an underage girl
He is accused of having sex with then 17-year-old Virginia Roberts in 2001
The Prince's friends say he wishes to 'draw a line' under Epstein business
Convicted paedophile, Jeffrey Epstein, allegedly introduced Roberts to him
The US lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, is also accused of having sex with her
Harvard professor says he will show the charges are 'provably untrue'

By Nick Craven and Brendan Carlin for The Mail on Sunday

Published: 23:42, 17 January 2015 | Updated: 15:38, 18 January 2015



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/17/2492DC8C00000578-0-image-a-6_1421535767996.jpg

Speaking out: Prince Andrew, pictured here in 2001 with Virginia Roberts
- the underage girl he's accused of sexually abusing - will speak publicly
about the claims for the first time



‘Prince Andrew will speak publicly for the first time this week about
claims that he abused an underage girl introduced to him by his
friend, the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

In the first example of a senior Royal discussing intimate details of
their private lives since Princess Diana’s sensational Panorama
interview in 1995, the Duke of York will take the highly unusual step
of facing a TV camera to deny the allegations levelled against him.

His intervention will come in front of around 300 captains of industry
and politicians as he hosts his annual British business reception at
the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday.’

Read more: Prince Andrew fights back with a Davos denial: Duke's
bid to bury underage 'sex slave' claims with dramatic TV appearance

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/17/24CC649100000578-0-Denial_Harvard_law_professor_Alan_Dershowitz_pictured_who_s_also-m-21_1421536215849.jpg

Denial: Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz (pictured), who's
also accused of having sex with Virginia Roberts, says the charges
against him are 'provably untrue'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2915022/Prince-Andrew-fights-Davos-denial-Duke-s-bid-bury-underage-sex-slave-claims-dramatic-TV-appearance.html#ixzz3PCAEDDz7
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Cidersomerset]

Prince Andrew allegations: Is this the London house
where ‘sex slave’ says she romped with him?

Sunday 18th January 2015 at 10:06 By David Icke


THE MIRROR....

Prince Andrew allegations: Is this the London house
where 'sex slave' says she romped with him?

Jan 17, 2015 22:44
By Nicola Fifield, Matthew Drake

The upmarket property is owned by G­hislaine Maxwell,
who has been accused in legal papers of procuring young
girls for convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/London-home-and-Prince-Andrew-MAIN-587x390.jpg


‘This is the £3.7million London house believed to be
at the centre of ­explosive claims Prince Andrew used
a 17-year-old girl as a “sex slave”.

The upmarket property is owned by G­hislaine Maxwell,
who has been accused in legal papers of procuring
young girls for convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein
and his rich and powerful friends.

Virginia Roberts has alleged she was forced to have
sex with the Duke of York three times while a minor
under US law.’

Read more: Prince Andrew allegations: Is this the London house where 'sex slave' says she romped with him?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-allegations-london-house-4998080

======================================================

THE EXPRESS......

Scandal-hit Andrew ‘should quit Davos trip’

Sunday 18th January 2015 at 10:02 By David Icke



‘Prince Andrew has been accused of damaging British interests through his
plans to attend next week’s World Economic Forum in Davos.

http://images.dailyexpress.co.uk.s3.amazonaws.com/img/dynamic/106/590x/andrew-552689.jpg


Former Home Office minister Norman Baker said yesterday it would be “prudent”
if the Prince, who faces sex allegations, did not go.

The Liberal Democrat MP told BBC Radio 4′s Today programme: “He has not been
charged with anything but it needs to be quite clear why he’s there and it may
have been more prudent in these circumstances for him not to have gone. He
may have taken that decision himself.”‘

Read more: Scandal-hit Andrew 'should quit Davos trip'

http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/552689/Sex-scandal-hit-Prince-Andrew-quit-Davos-trip-risk-to-Britain-s-interests

[Cidersomerset]

Andrew hires top lawyer to fight under-age sex claims: Prince employs ‘grandfather
of the bar’ to help fight allegations as he prepares to make first public appearance

new Monday 19th January 2015 at 06:09 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-201-587x352.jpg


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


Andrew hires top lawyer to fight under-age sex claims: Prince employs 'grandfather
of the bar' to help fight allegations as he prepares to make first public appearance
Prince has enlisted help of William Clegg, a prominent defence barrister
Duke of York faces claims he had sex with a 17-year-old American girl
Andrew, who denies allegations, to make first public appearance this week
Will attend meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland

By Claire Duffin In Davos and Chris Greenwood and Rebecca English for the Daily Mail

Published: 22:53, 18 January 2015 | Updated: 06:29, 19 January 2015



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/18/24D2960B00000578-2915934-image-m-27_1421621408037.jpg

The Duke of York has enlisted the help of QC William Clegg (pictured), nicknamed the 'grandfather of the bar'


‘Prince Andrew has enlisted the help of one of Britain’s top defence barristers after
being accused of sleeping with an under-age ‘sex slave’, the Mail has learned.

The Duke of York faces extraordinary claims – which he strongly denies – that he
had sex with a 17-year-old American girl who was being paid by his friend, the
convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

This week, he will attend the meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, his
first public appearance since the allegations by Virginia Roberts in a US lawsuit.’

Read more: Andrew hires top lawyer to fight under-age sex claims: Prince employs
'grandfather of the bar' to help fight allegations as he prepares to make first public appearance

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2915934/Andrew-hires-lawyer-fight-age-sex-claims-Prince-hires-grandfather-bar-help-fight-allegations-prepares-make-public-appearance.html#ixzz3PFYhzbcv
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[jackovesk]

Prince Andrew fights back with a Davos denial: Duke’s bid to
bury underage ‘sex slave’ claims with dramatic TV appearance

Sunday 18th January 2015 at 10:07 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-361-587x390.jpg


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif



Prince Andrew fights back with a Davos denial: Duke's bid to bury underage
'sex slave' claims with dramatic TV appearance
Duke of York will speak on TV to deny claims he abused an underage girl
He is accused of having sex with then 17-year-old Virginia Roberts in 2001
The Prince's friends say he wishes to 'draw a line' under Epstein business
Convicted paedophile, Jeffrey Epstein, allegedly introduced Roberts to him
The US lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, is also accused of having sex with her
Harvard professor says he will show the charges are 'provably untrue'

By Nick Craven and Brendan Carlin for The Mail on Sunday

Published: 23:42, 17 January 2015 | Updated: 15:38, 18 January 2015



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/17/2492DC8C00000578-0-image-a-6_1421535767996.jpg

Speaking out: Prince Andrew, pictured here in 2001 with Virginia Roberts
- the underage girl he's accused of sexually abusing - will speak publicly
about the claims for the first time



‘Prince Andrew will speak publicly for the first time this week about
claims that he abused an underage girl introduced to him by his
friend, the convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

In the first example of a senior Royal discussing intimate details of
their private lives since Princess Diana’s sensational Panorama
interview in 1995, the Duke of York will take the highly unusual step
of facing a TV camera to deny the allegations levelled against him.

His intervention will come in front of around 300 captains of industry
and politicians as he hosts his annual British business reception at
the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday.’

Read more: Prince Andrew fights back with a Davos denial: Duke's
bid to bury underage 'sex slave' claims with dramatic TV appearance

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/17/24CC649100000578-0-Denial_Harvard_law_professor_Alan_Dershowitz_pictured_who_s_also-m-21_1421536215849.jpg

Denial: Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz (pictured), who's
also accused of having sex with Virginia Roberts, says the charges
against him are 'provably untrue'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2915022/Prince-Andrew-fights-Davos-denial-Duke-s-bid-bury-underage-sex-slave-claims-dramatic-TV-appearance.html#ixzz3PCAEDDz7
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Prince Andrew & The Royal Family can ((DENY)) this until the Cows come home...:yes4:


The 'Truth' is that PA is ((GUILTY)) and 'NO' amount of (Umming & Arrring) is going to somehow magically (Unwind-The-Damage) caused to the Royal Family by these accusations...:nono:


Regardless of what happens to PA, The Royals are ((Toast)) - Just a Matter of Time...:yes4:

[Cidersomerset]

Prince Andrew allegations: Flight logs back ‘sex slave’ abuse claims against royal heir

Wednesday 21st January 2015 at 18:17 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-619-587x391.jpg




THE MIRROR................

Prince Andrew allegations: Flight logs back 'sex slave' abuse claims against royal heir

Jan 21, 2015 14:53
By Steve Robson, Christopher Bucktin


Flight records confirm the Duke and alleged victim Virginia Roberts were in the same locations she says she had sex with him


http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4931096.ece/alternates/s615/PrinceAndrewScandalMain.jpg
Scrutiny: Prince Andrew may address the sex scandal in a speech at the World Economic Forum on Thursday



‘Prince Andrew’s ‘sex slave’ accuser could have her case thrown out
– as flight log details appeared to back claims she met him three times.

Lawyers acting for the Duke of York’s paedophile pal claim Virginia
Roberts she has no right to bring a case.

Attorneys for the billionaire Jeffrey Epstein have sent a stinging
rebuke to Roberts’ legal team saying she repeatedly passed up
opportunities to make a complaint.’

Read more: Prince Andrew allegations: Flight logs back 'sex slave' abuse claims against royal heir

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-allegations-flight-logs-5016477

[Cidersomerset]

Swear on oath you’re innocent, lawyers for ‘sex slave’ tell Prince:
Andrew under growing pressure to testify after rejecting letter
asking for his ‘voluntary co-operation’

new Thursday 22nd January 2015 at 10:29 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/PAYVirginiaMain-587x390.jpg


---------------------------------------------------------------------

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif



Swear on oath you're innocent, lawyers for 'sex slave' tell Prince: Andrew under
growing pressure to testify after rejecting letter asking for his 'voluntary co-operation'
Virginia Roberts's lawyers served Duke letter over allegations they had sex
They asked for Duke's 'voluntary cooperation' to be questioned over claims
But her lawyers stated: ‘The letter has been refused by the recipient’
Roberts claims guards left her alone with Prince first time they had sex
Details emerged in documents filed at the Palm Beach court house, Florida
New papers shows Miss Roberts’s determination to pursue Prince, 54
She also issued attack on Andrew's 'false and hurtful' denials of her claims
Bombshell came as Palace officials arrive in Switzerland with Andrew for
World Economic Forum

By Sam Greenhill and Stephen Wright and Rebecca English for the Daily Mail and Daniel Bates For Dailymail.com

Published: 22:24, 21 January 2015 | Updated: 08:14, 22 January 2015






‘Prince Andrew was under growing pressure last night to testify on oath
about his contacts with alleged underage ‘sex slave’ Virginia Roberts.

She lodged fresh documents at a Florida court saying her lawyers had
served an extraordinary letter on the Duke last week requesting he
answer questions – but he ‘refused’ to accept it.

Miss Roberts also issued a stinging attack on ‘false and hurtful’ denials
of her claims made by Andrew in the tumultuous past three weeks.

She claimed his police bodyguards left her alone with him the first time
he had sex with her and that she was involved in an orgy with the prince
and eight other young girls.’

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/06/2465877C00000578-0-image-m-28_1420570898706.jpg

Prince Andrew (pictured with Virginia Roberts in 2001) is under growing
pressure to testify on oath about his contacts with alleged underage
‘sex slave’ Virginia Roberts

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/21/24EBCE9500000578-0-image-a-20_1421878907664.jpg

Miss Roberts’ lawyers sent Buckingham Palace a letter (above) requesting
his ‘voluntary cooperation in answering question about his sexual interactions’ with her


Buckingham Palace has strenuously rejected claims the Duke had any ‘sexual contact
or relationship’ with Miss Roberts.

Last week, Miss Roberts’ lawyers sent by FedEx couriers an unprecedented letter addressed to
‘His Royal Highness The Duke of York’ at Buckingham Palace requesting his ‘voluntary
cooperation in answering question about his sexual interactions’ with her.


DOES ANDREW HAVE LEGAL IMMUNITY BECAUSE HE'S A ROYAL?


It is not known whether Prince Andrew is covered by legal immunity simply by being
a royal because this has never been tested in international law.

However, the prince may be entitled to diplomatic immunity against questioning in
any criminal inquiry because some of the allegations relate to when he was a
Whitehall-sanctioned business envoy. Diplomatic immunity protects foreign diplomats
from legal action in the country where they work.

Extradition lawyer Karen Todner said the prince could be formally asked to give evidence
‘only in criminal proceedings’. If he refused to co-operate, he could in theory be banned
from entering America.
.
The letter offered to interview the prince under oath ‘at a time and place of your choosing’.
But her lawyers stated: ‘Federal Express has informed us that the letter has been refused
by the recipient.’

The latest documents filed at Palm Beach court house in Florida make plain Miss Roberts’s
determination to pursue the Prince – who she said ‘I just called “Andy”.’

She alleges she was a sex slave loaned out by paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein to his
friend Andrew when she was aged 17 in 2001, claiming: ‘Whatever Prince Andrew wanted,
I was to make sure he got.’

The latest bombshell came as a shock to Buckingham Palace officials last night as they
arrived in Switzerland with Andrew to attend the World Economic Forum in Davos.

The Prince, who is today due to give a much-anticipated speech to business leaders, was
sitting down with his advisers when details of the papers began to drop last night.

In her latest court salvo, Miss Roberts states: ‘I have seen Buckingham Palace’s recent
“emphatic” denial that Prince Andrew had sexual contact with me. That denial is false
and hurtful to me. I did have sexual contact with him as I have described…under oath.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/21/24EC38F700000578-2920763-image-m-5_1421880080352.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/21/24EC38C300000578-2920763-image-m-2_1421879943778.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/21/24EC38CB00000578-2920763-Virginia_Roberts_included_four_photos_of_herself_in_the_new_cour-m-6_1421880358349.jpg

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2920763/Swear-oath-innocent-lawyers-sex-slave-tell-Prince-Andrew-growing-pressure-testify-rejecting-letter-asking-voluntary-operation.html#ixzz3PXxGLLbO
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



====================================


THE MIRROR......

Prince Andrew sex allegations: 'Slave girl' Virginia Roberts claims she had
orgy with duke and EIGHT other girls


Jan 22, 2015 07:23
By Christopher Bucktin


She claimed paedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein paid her $400 for "servicing" the prince
in New York and also says Andrew slept with her and other girls at Caribbean sex party


http://i4.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article5020531.ece/alternates/s615/PAYVirginiaMain.jpg


Prince Andrew sex allegations: 'Slave girl' Virginia Roberts claims she had orgy with
duke and EIGHT other girls

‘Prince Andrew’s “sex slave” vows to bring him to justice in a criminal court alleging he was
involved in an underage orgy with his paedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein and eight young girls.

In court papers filed yesterday, Virginia Roberts claims she was paid $400 to “service”
Prince Andrew, who she referred to as “Andy”, while under the age of consent.

She repeats her claim of having sex with him in London then gives more details of times
she says she met the Duke at Epstein’s home in New York.’

http://i4.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article5020506.ece/alternates/s615b/Virginia-Roberts-Letter-filing-claims.jpg

Read more …

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-sex-allegations-slave-5020094

[giovonni]

hmm ...

Prince Andrew Denies Having Sex With Teen
(http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/2015/01/22/prince-andrew-denies-he-had-sex-with-underage-girl/22166633/)
"Britain's Prince Andrew on Thursday publicly denied allegations he had sex
with an underage teenager." (Jan. 22)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRMMsNg_-X4

[Cidersomerset]

hmm ...

Prince Andrew Denies Having Sex With Teen

"Britain's Prince Andrew on Thursday publicly denied allegations he had sex
with an underage teenager." (Jan. 22)


Randy Andy pleads ....The Bill Clinton....... " I Did Not Have .........."


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-20-587x352.jpg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/2.83.2/desktop/3.5/img/blq-blocks_grey_alpha.png

22 January 2015 Last updated at 18:53
Prince Andrew publicly denies sexual misconduct claims



Prince Andrew: "I would like to reiterate and reaffirm the statements that have
been issued on my behalf by the palace"

The Duke of York has denied claims by a US woman that she was forced to have
sex with him when she was 17 and says he wants to focus on his work.

In his first public appearance since the claims were made, Prince Andrew said he
wanted to "reiterate" the denials issued by Buckingham Palace.

He was speaking at a World Economic Forum reception in Davos, Switzerland.

Virginia Roberts's lawyers have repeated the claims in new documents given to a
court in Florida.

Ms Roberts, who is referred to in the case as Jane Doe #3, alleges she was forced
by financier Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender, to have sex with Prince
Andrew when she was 17.

Buckingham Palace has previously said the claims against Prince Andrew
are "categorically untrue" and lack "any foundation".

'Desperate to move on'

Prince Andrew said: "Firstly I think I must, and want, for the record, to refer to
events that have taken place in the last few weeks.

"I just wish to reiterate and to reaffirm the statements that have already been
made on my behalf by Buckingham Palace.

"My focus is on my work and this evening's reception allows me to tell you about
just a couple of the initiatives that I have founded and am passionate about."

BBC royal correspondent Peter Hunt said: "We have had two unprecedented
statements from Buckingham Palace and now this, Prince Andrew on camera.

"It's a sign of how damaging these allegations are and the price he is paying for his
past friendship with a convicted sex offender.

"Prince Andrew is desperate to move on - it may not be that easy."

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/80447000/jpg/_80447314_80447310.jpg

Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts Prince Andrew is seen here with Virginia
Roberts when she was 17

The new documents, filed in Florida, mark the first time Ms Roberts has given a
statement about the allegations in her own words.Her lawyers said they had sent
Prince Andrew a letter asking him to respond under oath to the allegations.They
say the letter was sent back to them as having been refused by the recipient.

The allegations against Prince Andrew emerged in evidence submitted to a US court
in a case involving Epstein, who spent time in jail in 2008-9 for a sex offence with a minor.

Prince Andrew, 54 and fifth in line to the throne, stepped down as UK trade envoy
In July 2011 following controversy over his then friendship with Epstein.

The prince is not facing any legal proceedings over the claims made in the US case.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30943010

[Selene]

"I just wish to reiterate and to reaffirm the statements that have already been made on my behalf by Buckingham Palace…”

That’s not actually a denial. It’s what is called ‘distancing’ or 'deflecting': a liar trying to place a barrier or buffer between the deed and themselves.

He’s also attempting to invoke their higher authority – the Palace’s credibility – to reinforce his own integrity, since he’s probably pretty sure he doesn’t have a leg to stand on here. Paraphrased: ‘The Palace itself is defending me, why won’t you believe them?’

Edit to add: Here’s the reference:


No one likes to think of himself as a liar, a cheat, or a criminal – and we’ll perform all kinds of mental and linguistic gymnastics to avoid labeling ourselves as such. People who are intent on deceiving others often try to avoid referring to themselves in their lies, as if keeping themselves out of the statement means they’re not the ones who are lying.

From: “Liespotting: Proven Techniques For Detecting Deceit” by Pamela Meyer ISBN 978-0-312-60187-4

And I also note the quick lick of his lips at :11 – a stress response, could also signify “wiping away” his previous comment.

This is going to get a whole lot more interesting. :pop2:

Cheers,

Selene

[Cidersomerset]

Alan Dershowitz denies EVER being around underage women in presence of pedophile Jeffrey
Epstein … just one day after ‘sex slave’ said he would chat with the billionaire during sex acts

Friday 23rd January 2015 at 11:42 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-283-587x391.jpg

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


Alan Dershowitz denies EVER being around underage women in presence of pedophile
Jeffrey Epstein... just one day after 'sex slave' said he would chat with the billionaire
during sex acts
Alan Dershowitz was named by Virginia Roberts, who says she was just 17 when she
had sex with friends of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein
In new filings, she said Dershowitz chatted with Epstein while she performed a sex
act on him
On the Today show on Thursday, Dershowitz said he was never in the presence of
underage girls or saw anything improper around Epstein
He said Roberts' lawyers were putting 'real' victims in a 'terrible position
'Dershowitz has now made a number of legal filings to clear his name through the
court system and urged Prince Andrew to do the same
Buckingham Palace has issued strongly-worded denials of the allegations

By Lydia Warren For Dailymail.com

Published: 13:54, 22 January 2015 | Updated: 15:41, 22 January 2015

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/22/24F1684400000578-2921637-image-m-2_1421933582337.jpg

‘A Harvard law professor named with Prince Andrew in a ‘sex slave’ case today insisted that he
never saw anything improper at the home of their billionaire pedophile friend, Jeffrey Epstein.

Alan Dershowitz’s claims on Thursday came just one day after accuser Virginia Roberts said in
new court filings that the lawyer would chat with Epstein as she performed a sex act on the billionaire.

Speaking in an emphatic interview on the Today show , Dershowitz again accused Roberts of
‘making the whole thing up’ and said her lawyers are putting ‘real’ rape victims ‘in a terrible position’.

‘I was never in the presence of a single underage woman,’ he said. ‘I never saw [Epstein] doing
anything improper. I was not a witness. I was not a participant. And I will prove it.”

Read more: Alan Dershowitz denies EVER being around underage women in presence of pedophile
Jeffrey Epstein … just one day after 'sex slave' said he would chat with the billionaire during sex acts

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2921637/Alan-Dershowitz-denies-underage-women-Epstein.html

[Cidersomerset]

Prince Andrew sex scandal girl claims Royal’s friend offered her mansion to have his baby

Friday 23rd January 2015 at 11:46 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-391-587x390.jpg

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/page/express_logo.png


Prince Andrew sex scandal girl claims Royal's friend offered her mansion to have his baby





http://images.dailyexpress.co.uk.s3.amazonaws.com/img/dynamic/106/590x/Prince-Andrew-sex-claims-553302.jpg
‘The woman at the centre of the Prince Andrew sex scandal claims the Royal’s billionaire
friend offered her a mansion to have his baby.



Virginia Roberts described the alleged proposition from Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted
paedophile, as “really disgustingly sick”.

She claimed the arrangement would have seen her raise the child but sign it over to
Epstein and his close friend Ghislaine Maxwell if the pair fell out.’

The 30-year-old, now a mother-of-three, has earlier claimed her and Prince Andrew
had sex when she was 17 during an alleged incident in 2001.



Read more: Prince Andrew sex scandal girl claims Royal's friend offered her mansion
to have his baby

[Cidersomerset]

Will Andrew ever be able to visit US again? Prince risks being served with
subpoena ordering him to give evidence on oath if he goes there

Friday 23rd January 2015 at 11:51 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-1410-587x440.jpg

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif

Will Andrew ever be able to visit US again? Prince risks being served with
subpoena ordering him to give evidence on oath if he goes there
Deposition papers would oblige him to give evidence - or face jail threat
Virginia Roberts's team has tried to ambush people they wish to question
Prince has been many times to US both in official capacity and on holiday

By Sam Greenhill and Daniel Bates For The Daily Mail

Published: 01:05, 23 January 2015 | Updated: 02:09, 23 January 2015



‘Prince Andrew is now unable to visit the United States without running
the risk of being ambushed with a subpoena, a lawyer warned yesterday.

If he sets foot there, attorneys acting for Virginia Roberts could attempt
to hand him deposition papers, he said. These would oblige him to give
evidence on oath – or face the threat of jail.

The legal team representing Miss Roberts has already tried to ambush
several people they wish to question with legal papers, including
Andrew’s friend Ghislaine Maxwell.

If they succeeded in passing deposition papers to Andrew, in theory he
would be obliged to attend court.’

The unwelcome prospect is enough to make royal courtiers think carefully
before planning any visits to the US, where Andrew has been many times
both in an official capacity and on holiday.

It is also unknown if he is covered by legal immunity – either as a royal
or because he was a Whitehall-backed business envoy – because this has
never been tested in international law.

Yesterday leading New York lawyer Dan Bright said Miss Roberts’s
attorneys could try to serve papers on Andrew at an airport when
he arrived – which could create an embarrassing scene, not least
because of his royal protection officers – or could wait until he was
at a place, such as a restaurant, where it would be awkward for
him to ‘run away’.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/23/24F4EE2500000578-0-image-a-69_1421974255946.jpg

Risk: The unwelcome prospect is enough to make royal courtiers
think carefully before planning any visits to the US, where Andrew
(yesterday in Davos) has been many times both in an official
capacity and on holiday

Lawyers, or their representatives, have even pretended to be butlers
at charity galas to hand papers to a target, he added.

If the prince was handed deposition papers and then refused to
attend, he could be held in contempt of court.

‘If he doesn’t show up, lawyers can ask a judge to start a contempt
hearing so that if he came back into the country, he could be
arrested and put in jail,’ Mr Bright said.

‘It could be problematic for him if he wants to return to America.’

Read more: Will Andrew ever be able to visit US again? Prince risks
being served with subpoena ordering him to give evidence on oath if he goes there

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2922752/Will-Andrew-able-visit-Prince-risks-served-subpoena-ordering-evidence-oath-goes-there.html

[Cidersomerset]

Flight Logs Put Clinton and Dershowitz on Paedophile Billionaire’s Sex Jet

Saturday 24th January 2015 at 09:49 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/uvi9p2abfpwgxvl5znav-587x330.jpg



‘Bill Clinton took repeated trips on the ” Lolita Express”—the private passenger
jet owned by billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein—with an actress in softcore
porn movies whose name appears in Epstein’s address book under an entry for
“massages,” according to flight logbooks obtained by Gawker and published
today for the first time.

The logs also show that Clinton shared more than a dozen flights with a woman
who federal prosecutors believe procured underage girls to sexually service
Epstein and his friends and acted as a “potential co-conspirator” in his crimes.’

Read more: Flight Logs Put Clinton and Dershowitz on Paedophile Billionaire’s Sex Jet

http://gawker.com/flight-logs-put-clinton-dershowitz-on-pedophile-billio-1681039971

[Cidersomerset]

‘Sex slave’ lawyers to serve papers on Andrew at Washington embassy
after claiming he refused to accept letter asking to testify on oath

Saturday 24th January 2015 at 09:46 By David Icke

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


'Sex slave' lawyers to serve papers on Andrew at Washington embassy
after claiming he refused to accept letter asking to testify on oath
Lawyers for alleged teenage 'sex slave' are trying to serve papers on prince
Prince Andrew publicly denied underage sex allegations at Davos last night
He was seen leaving luxury chalet today after vowing to 'focus on work'
Used televised speech to repeat 'emphatic' Buckingham Palace denials
Follows weeks of sex claims from Virginia Roberts whose lawyers have
called for Prince Andrew to swear on oath

By Sam Greenhill and Claire Duffin In Davos For The Daily Mail and
Jenny Awford for MailOnline

Published: 11:25, 23 January 2015 | Updated: 00:32, 24 January 2015


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/24F8D7CE00000578-2923267-image-m-16_1422012537855.jpg

‘Lawyers for the alleged teenage ‘sex slave’ who says she slept with
Prince Andrew are trying to serve papers on him via the British Embassy.

They claim the duke last week refused to accept a letter asking him to
testify on oath about the allegations made by Virginia Roberts. In a bid
to try again, Miss Roberts’ lawyer said yesterday: ‘We are attempting
delivery through the British Embassy in Washington.’

The development came the day after Andrew spoke publicly to deny
that he had sex with Miss Roberts.’

Read more: 'Sex slave' lawyers to serve papers on Andrew at Washington
embassy after claiming he refused to accept letter asking to testify on oath

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/21/24EBCE9500000578-0-image-a-20_1421878907664.jpg

Miss Roberts's lawyers sent Buckingham Palace a letter (above) requesting his
'voluntary cooperation in answering questions about his sexual interactions'
with her - but it was not accepted

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2923267/Back-day-job-Prince-Andrew-continues-focus-work-hours-dismissing-sex-slave-claims-Davos.html#ixzz3PkOMPIxL
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Cidersomerset]

This is a side issue but normally one Royal nutjob would be sent to represent the Queen
but Andy needed a place to get away to and his Royal friend in Saudi is a perfect place...

==================================================================



Randy Andy, and Charles mourning a tyrant: Is it time to chop off the Royal Family?

Saturday 24th January 2015 at 09:45 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-239-587x351.jpg


==========================================================

http://www.pennsburymanor.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Execution-of-Charles-1.jpg

‘Next Friday it will be exactly 366 years since we chopped off the head of King Charles I.



THE MIRROROR...

Randy Andy, and Charles mourning a tyrant: Is it time to chop off the Royal Family?
Jan 23, 2015 14:09
Opinion by Fleet StreetFox


They cannot rule with only our disgust to keep them afloat


http://i4.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article5029428.ece/alternates/s615/Fleet-main.jpg


‘Next Friday it will be exactly 366 years since we chopped off the head of King Charles I.

It’s widely regarded now as the necessary execution of a man who tried to constrain Parliament
and his people, who thought he was ordained by God to oppress whomever he liked, and the net
result was that – after a short time in the Sin Bin – our Royal Family realised it ruled only with
our consent.

At the time it was seen rather differently. A group of insurgents had seized control of a kingdom
by force, publicly beheaded someone, and went about saying their God was much better than
everyone else’s.

There are plenty of similarities between the Roundheads and Islamic State, not least their mutual
dislike of Christmas which, in the case of Oliver Cromwell and his New Model Army, was their
eventual undoing.’

http://i3.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4916149.ece/alternates/s615/ANDERSON-ROUNDHEAD-03.jpg

Read more: Randy Andy, and Charles mourning a tyrant: Is it time to chop off the Royal Family?


http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/prince-andrew-king-abdullah-mourned-5029921

[jackovesk]

Bill Clinton ‘visited orgy island’ with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein

January 25, 2015

http://resources3.news.com.au/images/2015/01/24/1227195/918419-b51b40da-a3c6-11e4-8873-f66c4a6259b9.jpg
FORMER US President Bill Clinton took a romantic jaunt in 2002 to convicted paedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein’s “orgy island” with “two young girls” from New York, according to a shocking new interview.

The New York Post reports that Virginia Roberts, who’s accused Epstein of turning her into a “sex slave” at age 17 and forcing her to sleep with his powerful friends, claimed Clinton stayed in one of the many villas on Epstein’s US Virgin Islands estate — where group sex was a “regular occurrence.”

“I remember asking Jeffrey, ‘What’s Bill Clinton doing here?’ kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said, ‘Well, he owes me a favour,’ ” Roberts told her lawyers in a 2011 interview obtained by RadarOnline.com. “He never told me what favours they were.”

Clinton was accompanied by two of Epstein’s regular girlfriends and “two young girls that I could identify,” Roberts claimed.

“I never really knew them well anyway. It was just two girls from New York,” she said.

According to flight logs, Clinton flew on Epstein’s private Boeing 727, which Roberts said was outfitted with a special bed for kinky, high-altitude romps, the Web site said.

http://resources1.news.com.au/images/2015/01/24/1227195/920473-fd3526b0-a3c6-11e4-8873-f66c4a6259b9.jpg
Family ... US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (L) with her husband former president Bill Clinton and daughter Chelsea. Picture: Supplied Source: AFP

“It was a lot of the same things that went down on the ground,” she claimed.
“There would be sexual conduct; there would be foreplay.

There was a bed in there, so we could basically re-enact exactly what happened in the house. It would start off with massaging or we would start off with foreplay. Sometimes it would lead to, you know, orgies.”

Roberts denied she ever slept with Clinton and said she never witnessed him having sex with anyone else.

But on “orgy island,” the stunning blonde allegedly engaged in group sex with Epstein, Britain’s Prince Andrew and eight other girls.

Epstein pimped out Roberts and other underage girls to his prominent friends — so he could gather information on them to blackmail them later on, Roberts alleged in a new affidavit.

“Epstein required me to describe the sexual events that I had with these men, presumably so that he could potentially blackmail them,” the now 31-year-old wrote.

She added: “I also understood that Epstein thought he could get leniency if he was ever caught doing anything illegal, or more so that he could escape trouble altogether.”

Roberts has claimed to have had sex with “powerful men, including politicians and business executives” — as well as with the British prince and powerhouse attorney Alan Dershowitz, which the two men vehemently deny.

http://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/bill-clinton-visited-orgy-island-with-paedophile-jeffrey-epstein/story-fnh81jut-1227195919612

PS - Getting closer to the (Point of NO RETURN) for these SCUM...:yes4:

[Cidersomerset]

THE INDEPENDENT.......


http://www.independent.co.uk/independent.co.uk/assets/images/redesign/masthead/indy-masthead-small.png

King Abdullah dead: Prince Charles will fly to Saudi Arabia to pay respects as Queen
Elizabeth becomes world's oldest monarch

http://www.independent.co.uk/incoming/article9138345.ece/alternates/w620/charles-5.jpg

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/king-abdullah-dead-prince-charles-will-fly-to-saudi-arabia-to-pay-respects-as-queen-elizabeth-becomes-worlds-oldest-monarch-9998640.html

==================================================
Prince Charles takes part in traditional Saudi sword dance , Not a woman in sight .

PJ6CRRGbvF8

Published on 19 Feb 2014


Prince Charles, the heir to the British throne, was visiting Saudi Arabia on Tuesday
(February 18) as part of a short tour of the Middle East.

The Prince of Wales joined members of the Saudi royal family to take part in a
sword dance, known as an Ardah, in the capital Riyadh.Charles was wearing
traditional robes for the ceremony, which was celebrating the 17-day-long
Janadriya Festival.The Prince is also visiting Qatar in what will be his second visit to
the two nations in just under a year, and his 10th official trip to Saudi Arabia since
he first toured the nation in 1986.

====================================================

As the new King said nothing will change , this is an old documentary but seems
nothing has changed here either......

ABC News investigates Saudi Royal Family lavish lifestyle

mFlqVJi-0_g

ABC News investigates the lavish lifestyle of the Saudi royal family and talks to
those who say the Saudi princes at play in the Riviera, St. Tropez, Cannes, and
Monte Carlo are making a mockery of their faith and have enraged critics who seek
to overthrow the kingdom's rulers. ABC also reports on the alleged involvement of
some Saudi princes in cocaine smuggling, prostitution rings and suspected efforts
to fund terrorists. In the program, ABC News interviews Prince Al Walid Bin Talal
and investigated prostitution charges against Prince Abdel Azziz bin Fhad and drug
smuggling charges against Prince Nayef bin Fawwaz al Shaalan.
==================================================

Saudi King's death: UK politicians praise Abdullah as reformer, face storm of
criticism

o2OBgRQnm9U

Published on 23 Jan 2015

World leaders express their condolences on Saudi Arabia king death;
Some see him as a wise leader, others accuse him of double standards

=========================================

We would put the Queen in a COUNCIL HOUSE … Kate and Wills too, says Green Party

Sunday 25th January 2015 at 10:05 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-240-587x351.jpg

xujHlWzWW98

http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/page/sunday_express_logo.png


We would put the Queen in a COUNCIL HOUSE...Kate and Wills too, says Green Party

THE Queen would be given a council house if the Green Party abolished the royal
family and booted her out of Buckingham Palace.


Published: 12:33, Sat, January 24, 2015
By Helen Barratt

http://images.dailyexpress.co.uk.s3.amazonaws.com/img/dynamic/106/590x/Queen-kicked-out-554004.jpg
Natalie Bennett would abolish the monarchy if the Green Party won power

‘The plans to oust the monarchy and claim back her £429 million estate was one of
a number of proposals the Greens would try to pass if they got into power, its
leader Natalie Bennett has said.

Prince William and Kate could also be out on their ear, as the party would also plan
to tighten inheritance tax rules to prevent living parents passing on wealth to their children.

But the welfare state would be bolstered to prevent Prince George from living on the streets.’

Speaking to The Times Ms Bennett said: “I can’t see that the Queen is ever going
to be really poor but I’m sure we can find a council house for her, we’re going to
build lots more.”

The Queen and Duke of Edinburgh would have to say goodbye to their sprawling
Crown estates up and down Britain.

As well as Buckingham Palace, their weekend retreat Windsor Castle in Berkshire
could be put on the market.

The couple would also lose their Scottish Palace of Holyroodhouse and Northern
Irish Hillsborough Castle.

http://images.dailyexpress.co.uk.s3.amazonaws.com/img/dynamic/106/590x/secondary/queenhomeless-246000.jpg

Buckingham Palace

http://images.dailyexpress.co.uk.s3.amazonaws.com/img/dynamic/106/590x/secondary/queenhomeless-246001.jpg
Sandringham HouseGETTY


I can’t see that the Queen is ever going to be really poor but I’m sure we can find a
council house for her, we’re going to build lots more

Natalie Bennett


It is not known what could happen to their privately owned Sandringham House in
Norfolk, and three Aberdeenshire residences Craigowan Lodge, Balmoral Castle and
adjoining Delnadamph Lodge.

If the government stopped her annual government £38 million spending money,
she would be able to claim a £71 a week ‘citizen’s wage’. The adult benefit, which
would cost the Greens £280 billion would be funded by taxing the wealthy and
threatening them with confiscation powers if they didn’t cough up.

The Greens’ burgeoning support has seen membership reach nearly 50,000. A
YouGov poll earlier this month found the party was polling at its highest levels
before the breakthrough 1989 election year.

But they have backed away from celebrity endorsement of comedian and activist
Russell Brand, with an insider telling the paper it could “quickly turn into a
nightmare” if they had the Essex boy on side.

The Sandringham estate is privately owned by Queen Elizabeth

Read more: We would put the Queen in a COUNCIL HOUSE … Kate and Wills too, says Green Party

http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/554004/Queen-HOMELESS-Green-Party-council-house

[Cidersomerset]

Special Report: Notes on Another Clinton Scandal: Was Vince Foster Killed?

Monday 26th January 2015 at 08:26 By David Icke

S_LM-4GLsO4

Published on 24 Jan 2015


http://truthstreammedia.com/?p=11215
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/arti...
(Truthstream Media.com) Is seems as though the unfolding paedophile scandal connected to
Bill Clinton may be delaying... or even preventing... a presidential run announcement by Hillary
Clinton, which by all accounts would have been upon us.

But the Clinton's have many skeletons in the proverbial closet, and many other scandals that
could crop up during her second bid for the highest office in the land, and larger quest for power.

We encountered one of those while on a road trip through Arkansas – and stopping off in Hope.
It is not only the famed birthplace of former president Bill Clinton, as well as former governor
Mike Huckabee, it is also the hometown and burial grounds of Vince Foster, a man who was
childhood neighbors with Bill, partner at the Rose Law Firm with Hillary, and as deputy legal
council for the White House, one of the closest keepers of the Clinton Administration's most
personal secrets.

Early into the first term, when the Clinton's found themselves already embroiled in scandals
including those surrounding the Travel Staff and Whitewater financial investigations, Vince
Foster was found dead in Fort Darcy Park, officially ruled to be a suicide.

Foster's death prompted a wave of controversial as conflicting facts in the investigation of his
death suggested murder and a cover-up at the highest levels. It became fuel for what Hillary
Clinton termed a "vast rightwing conspiracy" that increasingly nested on the growing Internet,
and has remained one of the most conspicuous and shady events under the reign of the Clinton's.

In the end, with Vince Foster such as close associate and friend of the family, his is the closest
body to their front door on what has been considered a very long "trail of dead bodies" entangled
in mystery, intrigue, conspiracy and allegations that reach into the heart of the secret government.

[Cidersomerset]

Something To Hide? Jeffrey Epstein Orgy Plane Sex Logs ‘Sanitized’ To Protect Pals Like Clinton, Attorneys Claim

new Tuesday 27th January 2015 at 11:08 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/royal-sex-scandal-prince-andrew-flight-logs-pp.jpg


‘Flight logs from billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet, the “Lolita Express,” read
like a who’s who of power players: Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, and Treasury Secretary
Larry Summers are just a few passengers. But could the documents be hiding an even
darker story about Epstein’s inner circle?

According to newly filed court documents obtained by RadarOnline.com, flight logs that have
been filed in court and released to the media were potentially “sanitized” to protect the men
who palled around with the convicted sex offender.’

Read more: Something To Hide? Jeffrey Epstein Orgy Plane Sex Logs ‘Sanitized’ To Protect Pals Like Clinton, Attorneys Claim

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2015/01/royal-sex-scandal-prince-andrew-pedophile-flight-logs/

[Cidersomerset]

What a difference a week makes! Prince Andrew enjoys getting on with royal duties
as second bid by ‘sex slave’ lawyers to make him testify on oath fails

Friday 30th January 2015 at 09:52 By David Icke


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


What a difference a week makes! Prince Andrew enjoys getting on with
royal duties as second bid by 'sex slave' lawyers to make him testify on oath fails
Prince Andrews awarded Royal Navy pilots with their Wings today
Royal praised the graduates at event at Royal Naval Air Station Yeovilton
Virginia Roberts claims she had sex three times with Andrew when 17
Lawyers for alleged teenage 'sex slave' are trying to serve papers on Prince
But letters sent to Buckingham Palace and embassy in America sent back
Latest request to testify on oath sent back because it was not 'appropriate'
Prince Andrew publicly denied underage sex allegations at Davos last week
Used televised speech to repeat 'emphatic' Buckingham Palace denials

By Rebecca English Royal Correspondent For The Daily Mail and Martin Robinson for MailOnline

Published: 13:20, 29 January 2015 | Updated: 09:00, 30 January 2015


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/29/252AEE6400000578-2931314-image-a-8_1422546165107.jpg



‘If there was a sex scandal swirling around Prince Andrew it didn’t show
yesterday as he returned to royal duties after an attempt to have him
testify about underage ‘sex slave’ Virginia Roberts failed.

He was photographed laughing heartily in front of a Union Jack as he
donned his naval uniform for a ceremony at RNAS Yeovilton in Somerset.

The prince has vehemently denied allegations in the US that he slept with
17-year-old Virginia Roberts, who alleges she was ‘procured’ for him by
his close friend, convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.’

Read more: What a difference a week makes! Prince Andrew enjoys getting
on with royal duties as second bid by 'sex slave' lawyers to make him testify
on oath fails



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2931314/Sex-slave-lawyers-make-second-bid-Prince-Andrew-testify-oath-s-returned-sender-Foreign-Office.html#ixzz3QQPUMCwy
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Cidersomerset]

Bill Clinton’s shady friendships outed by tabloids

Friday 6th February 2015 at 09:46 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/billclinton-587x391.jpg



‘As if Bill Clinton’s friendship with Jeffrey Epstein weren’t embarrassing enough,
the two flew on Epstein’s jet in 2002 to meet with the Sultan of Brunei.

Sultan Bolkiah, one of the richest men in the world, not only plans to execute
homosexuals, but his brother, Prince Jefri, has been accused of duping
American women into “white slavery.”

The National Enquirer reports flight logs reveal Epstein — before he was arrested
and jailed for soliciting teenage masseuses — picked up the former president at a
Japanese naval airport and flew with him to Brunei on May 25, 2002.’

Also onboard Epstein’s private 727 — dubbed “the orgy jet” — were Ghislaine
Maxwell and Sarah Kellen, “both alleged ‘madames’ for Epstein’s kiddie sex ring,
” the Enquirer states. Kellen was never arrested or charged with a crime and was
granted immunity in a non-prosecution agreement in 2007. Maxwell has denied
the allegations.

The Sultan later donated a sum between $1 million and $5 million to the
Clinton Presidential Library.

The Post broke the story in 1997 about Shannon Marketic, the former Miss USA
who sued Prince Jefri, claiming he had held her captive and forced her into
performing sex acts for his party guests.




Read more: Bill Clinton’s shady friendships outed by tabloids

http://pagesix.com/2015/02/04/bill-clintons-shady-friendships-outed-by-tabloids/?_ga=1.57205290.1007642859.1422927972

[Cidersomerset]

Young woman at the center of Prince Andrew scandal says the FBI have videos
of her having sex with Jeffrey Epstein and ‘powerful friends’ while she was underage

new Sunday 8th February 2015 at 09:02 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/get-attachment-46-587x330.jpg

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif

Young woman at the center of Prince Andrew scandal says the FBI have videos
of her having sex with Jeffrey Epstein and 'powerful friends' while she was underage
Virginia Roberts alleges she was 'loaned out' to friends of Jeffrey Epstein
Named Prince Andrew and lawyer Alan Dershowitz among those involved
Claimed she was forced to have sex with prince on three occasions
In sworn statement filed yesterday, she claimed FBI possess key evidence
Said Epstein had cameras in rooms where she had sex while underage
Believes that FBI now has the videos which would support her claims
Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein strongly deny allegations

By Stephanie Linning for MailOnline

Published: 20:49, 7 February 2015 | Updated: 01:13, 8 February 2015



‘The woman at the centre of the Prince Andrew ‘sex slave’ scandal has told a US
court that she believes the FBI has videos of her having sex with Jeffrey Epstein
and his ‘powerful friends’ while she was underage.

Virginia Roberts, who alleges that she was loaned out to the Duke of York and
other high-profile Epstein associates, also stated that she feared for her life
while working as Epstein’s ‘sex slave’.

It comes a week after Epstein, an American billionaire who has been convicted
of soliciting underage prostitution, hit out at ‘outlandish attacks’ by the
‘gossip media’ over the case.’

Read more: Young woman at the center of Prince Andrew scandal says the
FBI have videos of her having sex with Jeffrey Epstein and 'powerful friends'
while she was underage

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/02/07/2570FFF900000578-0-image-a-4_1423342036584.jpg
Accusations: Virginia Roberts (right) has claimed that she was forced by financier
Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender, to have sex with Prince Andrew when
she was 17, pictured together in early 2001

Miss Roberts, 31, accuses Epstein, the Prince, and – among others – the leading
American defence lawyer Alan Dershowitz of abusing her while she was underage.

Prince Andrew, Ghislaine Maxwell - also named in court documents - Mr Dershowitz
and Jeffrey Epstein have vigorously denied the accusations.

A Buckingham Palace statement said: 'It is emphatically denied that the Duke of
York had any form of sexual contact or relationship [with the woman].


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2944101/Sex-slave-centre-Prince-Andrew-case-claims-FBI-videos-associates-Jeffrey-Epstein.html#ixzz3R8xK2tC3
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Cidersomerset]

"Mummy when I grow up can I be an Admiral " ? .....

" Of Course dear , leave it to Mummy "......

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/11_02/019QueenDM_468x547.jpg


==============================================



Under-fire Prince Andrew gets some good news as the Queen promotes him to the rank of vice-admiral as a birthday present

Friday 13th February 2015 at 08:47 By David Icke


http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/get-attachment-312-587x398.jpg


===============================================

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


Under-fire Prince Andrew gets some good news as the Queen promotes
him to the rank of vice-admiral as a birthday present
Duke of York has been promoted in time for his 55th birthday next week
Prince joined Navy at 18 and fought in the Falklands before retiring at 41
Andrew still carries out official naval duties from the Armed Forces
Royal is under pressure after being engulfed in underage sex scandal

By Rebecca English for the Daily Mail

Published: 16:19, 12 February 2015 | Updated: 02:08, 13 February 2015



http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/29/252AEE6400000578-2931314-image-a-8_1422546165107.jpg


‘Prince Andrew is to be promoted to the naval rank of Vice Admiral just
weeks after he became mired in a teenage sex slave scandal.

The Queen has approved the appointment, which is timed to mark her
second son’s 55th birthday next week.

Buckingham Palace last night said the move was a ‘long-standing convention’
that enables Andrew, who served as a Sea King pilot with the Royal Navy in
the Falklands War, to be promoted in line with peers still serving in the military.’

Read more: Under-fire Prince Andrew gets some good news as the Queen
promotes him to the rank of vice-admiral as a birthday present

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2950969/Under-fire-Prince-Andrew-gets-good-news-mother-promotes-rank-vice-admiral.html#ixzz3RdvxbOfj
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Cidersomerset]

US judge strikes out Prince Andrew sex claims

eWp2M7kusLk



http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/get-attachment-20-587x352.jpg

MIRROR on line....

http://i2.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article4973558.ece/ALTERNATES/s1023/VirginiaRobertsMain.jpg

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-allegations-scotland-yard-4987354

Though it seems the Judge just said they did not need to investigate further ,
not that he did not do it......


From article below...


"The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does
engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim,"
the judge said in a ruling.

====================================================

http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/2.83.4/orb/4/img/bbc-blocks-dark.png

US and Canada

US judge strikes out Prince Andrew sex claims

1 hour ago
From the section US and Canada


The Duke of York, Prince Andrew

http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/media/images/82170000/jpg/_82170378_026628078-1.jpg

Claims that a woman was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew when she was
17 are to be struck from the record of a civil case in the US, a judge has said.

The Duke of York was named in court papers in Florida by a woman alleging
financier Jeffrey Epstein forced her to have sex with the duke three times.

But Judge Kenneth Marra said the "lurid" claims were "unnecessary" to decide the civil case.

Buckingham Palace has previously "emphatically" denied the allegations.

BBC royal correspondent Nicholas Witchell said Judge Marra had expressed
no opinion as to the "validity or veracity" of the allegations.


'Immaterial and impertinent'

The duke had been named in documents filed in a Florida court about how
prosecutors handled a case against Epstein, a former friend of the royal.

The documents concerned claims by Virginia Roberts, who alleged that Epstein
had forced her to have sex with powerful men - including the duke - when she was 17.

Two women - known as Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 - are suing the US
government, saying it failed to protect their rights when it entered into a plea
deal with Epstein, who spent time in jail in 2008-9 for a sex offence with a minor.

Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein

http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/625/media/images/80030000/jpg/_80030790_80029064.jpg

Prince Andrew is a former friend of financier Jeffrey Epstein

Ms Roberts - referred to as Jane Doe #3 in the court papers - had been attempting
to join the claim against the US government.

But the US judge denied her attempt to join the claim and said Mr Roberts' allegations
about Prince Andrew were "unnecessary to the determination" of the case.

"The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual
activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim," the judge said in a ruling.

In the court papers, Ms Roberts said she had been forced to have sexual relations with
the duke in three locations - in London, New York and on a private Caribbean island
owned by Epstein - between 1999 and 2002.

Responding to the claims - which surfaced at the start of the year - Buckingham Palace
said "any suggestion of impropriety with under-age minors is categorically untrue".

In a further statement, the palace said the claims against Prince Andrew were
"categorically untrue" and lacked "any foundation".

Speaking at a world business forum in January, Prince Andrew said he wanted to
"reiterate" the denials issued by Buckingham Palace.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/32210056

====================================================
====================================================


EXPRESS ON LINE....

Sex allegations made against Prince Andrew REMOVED from court record

SCANDALOUS sex allegations made against Prince Andrew earlier this year have
been removed from court record by a US federal judge.

By Levi Winchester

PUBLISHED: 17:56, Tue, Apr 7, 2015

http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/568927/Sex-allegations-made-against-Prince-Andrew-removed-federal-court

===================================================
===================================================

THE GUARDIAN...


Judge orders Prince Andrew sex allegations struck from court record

Virginia Roberts’s accusations about Andrew ordered to be struck from the record
as judge denied her attempt to join a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/apr/07/prince-andrew-jeffrey-epstein-florida

[Cidersomerset]

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif

Judge strikes out claims teenager was forced to have sex with Prince Andrew
from lawsuit against convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein
Allegations a 17-year-old was forced to sleep with Prince Andrew erased
Virginia Roberts had attempted to join lawsuit against the U.S. government
The women were trying to reopen a federal non-prosecution agreement
A judge today struck her and a second woman's claims from court records
He said the details had no bearing on the attempt to reopen prosecution

By Corey Charlton for MailOnline

Published: 17:04, 7 April 2015 | Updated: 20:06, 7 April 2015



Allegations that a 17-year-old was forced to have sex with Prince
Andrew have been sensationally erased after his accuser Virginia
Roberts' bid to join a lawsuit was rejected by a U.S. judge.

Roberts had claimed she was ‘loaned’ to sex offender financier
Jeffrey Epstein’s wealthy friends after being groomed over a
number of years by him.

She also claimed she had sex with Andrew on three separate
occasions, including taking part in an orgy on Epstein’s private
Caribbean island.

Today a federal judge in Miami rejected a bid by Roberts and
another unnamed woman to join a high-profile sexual abuse
lawsuit involving Epstein and ordered the scandalous sex
allegations against The Duke of York and a prominent U.S.
lawyer be struck out from the court record.

Scroll down for video


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/04/07/18/2759B49A00000578-3028977-image-a-3_1428427790659.jpg
Virginia Roberts photographed with Prince Andrew in early 2001. Her claims she
was forced to sleep with him have now been struck from the court record

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/04/07/18/274DAACF00000578-3028977-image-a-2_1428427692846.jpg
Prince Andrew pictured leaving an Easter service at Windsor Castle on Sunday. The
ruled the details of the accusations against him had no bearing on the reopening of
the lawsuit against Epstein


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3028977/Judge-rejects-womens-sex-allegations-financier-case.html#ixzz3WehAB6pY
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[Cidersomerset]

Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, His Friend Bill Clinton & A Sex Slave Island Cover-Up

ElAqnV2o1RQ

Published on 24 Jul 2015


Billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, his relationship with Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz,
Prince Andrew and other famous names, and their connection to a high-level sex scandal
is exposed by Conchita and Cristina Sarnoff. We also look at slavery and human sex
trafficking in the modern world, and more, in this uncensored Buzzsaw interview,
hosted by Sean Stone.

GUEST BIO:
Conchita Sarnoff is Executive Director at The Alliance to Rescue Victims of Trafficking
WWW.ATRVT.ORG; a Washington D.C. foundation to help rescue trafficked victims.
Ms. Sarnoff is also an author and crisis communications advisor.

Cristina Sarnoff is a director, producer, and the founder of Atila Films.

ADD’L LINKS:
http://thelip.tv/
http://thelip.tv/show/buzzsaw/

[Eric J (Viking)]

Could this be the start of the collapse of the so called 'Royal family'...

The Duke of York is to step back from public duties for the "foreseeable future."

The Queen has given permission for Prince Andrew to step back from public duties amid criticism over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, the duke said in a statement.

It follows his TV interview about his friendship with the billionaire sex offender, who killed himself in a New York jail cell in August.

In a statement Prince Andrew also said he's "willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations, if required."

https://www.lbcnews.co.uk/uk-news/prince-andrew-to-step-back-from-public-duties/

Viking

[ExomatrixTV]

Two Jeffrey Epstein investigations are underway. Prince Andrew could be subpoenaed (https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-11-20/jeffrey-epstein-prison-guards-charged-death-sex-offender/11720144) for one of them

Jeffrey E. Epstein arrested and charged with sex trafficking by fed [6th July, 2019]. (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?107734-Jeffrey-E.-Epstein-arrested-and-charged-with-sex-trafficking-by-fed-6th-July-2019-.)

[ExomatrixTV]

Prince Andrew scales back royal duties amid Epstein scandal
-Zh1LbRlLdQ
Prince Andrew's 'trainwreck' interview a 'huge mistake'
dNj3jYZaNbc

[ExomatrixTV]

Body Language: Prince Andrew Interview
l63ESqEh1RI

[pyrangello]

Watch the body language tape, love the comment about prince baby having a deer in the headlights moment. During the course of my lifetime I have been jammed enough by the takers, ( a definition of a taker is a being that walks the earth with little or no re-guard to others and will take whatever it wants along the way). As we all make mistakes in life ,it is our path of a journey that we learn and move on not to make the same mistake again. However there is a line of do not cross, murder, rape, lying, I'd say all the 10 commandments plus thou shall not abuse the innocent children of the earth. I'd say the purina prince hound dog has some problems , wouldn't be surprised if there is an out of court settlement down the road to make all of this go away. After all , laws don't apply to the privileged, famous and rich do they?

[DeDukshyn]

...
It follows his TV interview about his friendship with the billionaire sex offender, who killed himself in a New York jail cell in August.
...


You forgot the air quotes around "killed himself" ... :)

[Kano]

This interview would've never been allowed to be aired without the House of Windsor's blessing. If there's a collapse of the royal family, rest assured it has been planned and manufactured to unfold as it has; Hegelian dialectic as it were.

[Islander12]

This interview would've never been allowed to be aired without the House of Windsor's blessing. If there's a collapse of the royal family, rest assured it has been planned and manufactured to unfold as it has; Hegelian dialectic as it were.

Yes I was thinking along those lines as well....imo it was planned so he could say what he wanted too, then comes the outcry of the public , he steps back from duty then he can go hide if he wants.

[Eric J (Viking)]

More here... Looks like he's worth over 57 million so he won't be suffering too much there...

After days of “ongoing discussions” with senior members of his family – including the Queen and Prince Charles – about the fallout from the trainwreck interview, ITV reports that Prince Andrew finally conceded that the issue was not going away.

In what was an undoubtedly tense conversation with the Queen on Wednesday, the decision was made that it was in the monarchy’s best interests to remove him from the public eye until either the Epstein case was resolved or the Duke of York’s name was cleared.

According to The Sun, a friend of Andrew’s claimed he was “summoned” to Buckingham Palace by his mother.

Prince Andrew has been consulting with the Queen and his brother, Prince Charles. Picture: Chris Jackson/Getty Images Source: Getty Images
“It was a devastating moment for both of them. His reputation is in tatters,” the source told the publication.

“It’s unlikely he will ever perform royal duties again. He is disgraced.”

A separate source added that despite putting on a brave face, the Queen was “privately very disappointed” with her favourite son following his disastrous interview.

“She saw the fallout and was very unhappy. She has spent her whole life protecting the monarchy and in just one week her son’s actions threatened to tear it apart.

“Something had to be done to draw a line under all of this.”

The Sun also reports that the Queen’s extraordinary intervention came following intense lobbying from Prince Charles, who is currently on a royal tour of New Zealand.

In the statement issued by the Palace, the Duke of York wrote: “It has become clear to me over the last few days that the circumstances relating to my former association with Jeffrey Epstein has become a major disruption to my family’s work and the valuable work going on in the many organisations and charities that I am proud to support.

“Therefore, I have asked Her Majesty if I may step back from public duties for the foreseeable future, and she has given her permission.”

By taking that unprecedented step, it’s clear the Queen’s son is hoping the furore dies down. Here’s what will happen in the meantime:

ROYAL DUTIES

The Duke of York currently holds more than 200 patronages, a number of which have been under review in recent days. His announcement means his involvement will be on hold – and probably for quite some time.

Meanwhile, according to ITV, the Palace is now working out how to manage his projects, including the popular Pitch at Palace – which helps entrepreneurs connect with investors – without seeing them fold completely.

Prince Andrew himself will no longer be personally involved in any of these initiatives.

Basically, he’s suddenly got a fair bit of free time on his hands.

And while he won’t be working as a royal for the “foreseeable future”, it’s unlikely he’ll be stripped of his title or lose his place as number eight in the line of succession to the throne.

INCOME

Prince Andrew has traditionally been paid from both the Sovereign Grant, which is a pot of public money that helps fun the work the royals do on behalf of United Kingdom - and the Privy Purse, which is the Queen’s income from the Duchy of Lancaster.

As he will no longer be partaking in royal work, Prince Andrew’s access to the Sovereign Grant will now be cut off. He’ll have to fund himself from his private income and the Queen’s personal coffers.

But it’s unlikely to disrupt his lifestyle too significantly – according to The Sun, Prince Andrew has a net worth of around £57 million ($A108 million).

Meanwhile, it has not yet been made clear what will happen with his office and personal staff.

‘UNEQUIVOCAL REGRET’

One of the most surprising elements of Prince Andrew’s statement was his expression of regret over his close friendship with Epstein.

He was widely condemned in the wake of the BBC interview for failing to offer sympathy to Epstein’s victims or remorse over his links to the paedophile.

Prince Andrew addressed both matters in his statement on Wednesday.

“I continue to unequivocally regret my ill-judged association with Jeffrey Epstein. His suicide has left many unanswered questions, particularly for his victims, and I deeply sympathise with everyone who has been affected and wants some form of closure.

“I can only hope that, in time, they will be able to rebuild their lives.

“Of course, I am willing to help any appropriate law enforcement agency with their investigations, if required.”

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/what-prince-andrews-shock-decision-actually-means-for-the-royal-family/news-story/9db036699305e626e6848c1a194f24ec

Viking

[Sunny-side-up]

I wonder if he was also a friend of Jimmy Savile?

[Praxis]

This interview would've never been allowed to be aired without the House of Windsor's blessing. If there's a collapse of the royal family, rest assured it has been planned and manufactured to unfold as it has; Hegelian dialectic as it were.

I heard, but have not seen formyself the new article, that the person responsible for this gem resigned afterwards.

I think it might be easy to fall into the idea that these people are all powerful and in total control. Most times they are just better and faster at reacting to things outside of their control because they have the financial means to do so. This can appear to look like they have total control.

But if watching that JFK video that was up here about how poorly the JFK hit actually went has taught me anything, THEY are just better scramblers and are not following some meticulously devious plan for a thousand year reich or something.

Really if you think about how poorly 9-11 went, you can see how bad at this they actually are. The only problem is the public is too slow to catch on in time. WE know now of the deeds of the 50s and are appalled, but it does nothing because he has already set out timeline. But do notice how this lag time is much smaller than in the 50s. An event happens and most are instantly on it tearing it apart to see the intelligence connection.

Dont give them more power than is necessary. Dont built them up like all powerful deities. They are just humans(probably)

[Kano]

This interview would've never been allowed to be aired without the House of Windsor's blessing. If there's a collapse of the royal family, rest assured it has been planned and manufactured to unfold as it has; Hegelian dialectic as it were.

I heard, but have not seen formyself the new article, that the person responsible for this gem resigned afterwards.

I think it might be easy to fall into the idea that these people are all powerful and in total control. Most times they are just better and faster at reacting to things outside of their control because they have the financial means to do so. This can appear to look like they have total control.

But if watching that JFK video that was up here about how poorly the JFK hit actually went has taught me anything, THEY are just better scramblers and are not following some meticulously devious plan for a thousand year reich or something.

Really if you think about how poorly 9-11 went, you can see how bad at this they actually are. The only problem is the public is too slow to catch on in time. WE know now of the deeds of the 50s and are appalled, but it does nothing because he has already set out timeline. But do notice how this lag time is much smaller than in the 50s. An event happens and most are instantly on it tearing it apart to see the intelligence connection.

Dont give them more power than is necessary. Dont built them up like all powerful deities. They are just humans(probably)

I agree that they have the time, money and resources to scramble much faster than the average person. But it is common best practice in TV interviews like these to get approval of the interviewee prior to it being released publicly. This is why I believe it had the royal family's blessing prior to being aired.

[The Moss Trooper]

This interview would've never been allowed to be aired without the House of Windsor's blessing. If there's a collapse of the royal family, rest assured it has been planned and manufactured to unfold as it has; Hegelian dialectic as it were.


Humiliation ritual, anyone?

[Jayke]

LaRouchePAC’s latest vidchat has some highly significant revelations...

One of the highlights from the talk: starting after the 14 minute mark, a discussion of the recently disgraced Prince Andrew and his role as Britains international trade representative, especially his boasting of revivifying “the great game” with Russia and his role in the Al-yamamah arms and oil deal (https://cec.cecaust.com.au/releases/2016_05_05_Reopen_SFO_AUS.html) between the British oligarchs and Saudi Arabia, which became the slush fund that financed 9/11.

K1vmw90b4zM


Impeachment Coup or the Fall of the House of Windsor?

Members of the House of Representatives will be returning to their districts over this weekend. It is critical that they be deluged with constituents who understand the stakes of this impeachment march. As Attorney General William Barr said last Friday, the nation is experiencing an insurrection, which undermines and delegitimizes the President, creates a Congress akin to the British Parliament, and has a judiciary far outside its Constitutional lane and ruling arbitrarily. This result has been created from abroad, by the British oligarchy, in order to destroy the Republic which they have opposed and sought to subjugate perennially. They do that by controlling public opinion and creating synthetic political movements. So it is with the Democratic Party, which has been changed from that of FDR and John Kennedy to a rabid formation imitating the worst characteristics of the Democratic Party of Athens, the murderers of Socrates.

The House, particularly those in the 31 vulnerable districts must be told that they proceed with impeachment at their complete electoral peril. More fundamentally, they must be told to cut the crap about war with Russia. Nancy Pelosi again resurrected this as her major theme in her press conference today, the absurd lie that the President is a pawn of Russia. Yesterday, Congressman Mike Quigley the successor to Rahm Emmanuel in Chicago’s 5th District, openly asked a witness to agree with Zbigniew Brzezinski regarding the proper role for Ukraine as a marcher lord against Russia. Americans have seen, in the past week, the actual faces of those who would march this nation to a war of extinction; the parade of bureaucrats who proudly state that they have openly defied the President and whose careers demonstrate the incredible modern banality of absolute evil, all of them marching to British imperial ideas and precepts.

Join us for tonight’s discussion.

A link to the article referenced in the vidchat:
Prince Andrew: Victoria’s Dirtiest Secret (https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2011/eirv38n11-20110318/57-59_3811.pdf)

[onawah]

Very interesting, but one glaring omission in his argument towards the end about building an economy based on credit and faith in the ability to create a better future:
natural resources are only renewable up to a point, and once exhausted, there is no BASE on which to build an economy of ANY kind.
He not only fails to factor into his reasoning the current exhaustion of many of our planet's natural resources, but also the dramatic effects that climate changes generated by the Sun will be having on every economy very soon via the Solar Minimum, which credit is powerless to combat.

LaRouchePAC’s latest vidchat has some highly significant revelations...

One of the highlights from the talk: starting after the 14 minute mark, a discussion of the recently disgraced Prince Andrew and his role as Britains international trade representative, especially his boasting of revivifying “the great game” with Russia and his role in the Al-yamamah arms and oil deal (https://cec.cecaust.com.au/releases/2016_05_05_Reopen_SFO_AUS.html) between the British oligarchs and Saudi Arabia, which became the slush fund that financed 9/11.



Impeachment Coup or the Fall of the House of Windsor?

Members of the House of Representatives will be returning to their districts over this weekend. It is critical that they be deluged with constituents who understand the stakes of this impeachment march. As Attorney General William Barr said last Friday, the nation is experiencing an insurrection, which undermines and delegitimizes the President, creates a Congress akin to the British Parliament, and has a judiciary far outside its Constitutional lane and ruling arbitrarily. This result has been created from abroad, by the British oligarchy, in order to destroy the Republic which they have opposed and sought to subjugate perennially. They do that by controlling public opinion and creating synthetic political movements. So it is with the Democratic Party, which has been changed from that of FDR and John Kennedy to a rabid formation imitating the worst characteristics of the Democratic Party of Athens, the murderers of Socrates.

The House, particularly those in the 31 vulnerable districts must be told that they proceed with impeachment at their complete electoral peril. More fundamentally, they must be told to cut the crap about war with Russia. Nancy Pelosi again resurrected this as her major theme in her press conference today, the absurd lie that the President is a pawn of Russia. Yesterday, Congressman Mike Quigley the successor to Rahm Emmanuel in Chicago’s 5th District, openly asked a witness to agree with Zbigniew Brzezinski regarding the proper role for Ukraine as a marcher lord against Russia. Americans have seen, in the past week, the actual faces of those who would march this nation to a war of extinction; the parade of bureaucrats who proudly state that they have openly defied the President and whose careers demonstrate the incredible modern banality of absolute evil, all of them marching to British imperial ideas and precepts.

Join us for tonight’s discussion.

A link to the article referenced in the vidchat:
Prince Andrew: Victoria’s Dirtiest Secret (https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2011/eirv38n11-20110318/57-59_3811.pdf)

[Bill Ryan]

A link to the article referenced in the vidchat:
Prince Andrew: Victoria’s Dirtiest Secret (https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2011/eirv38n11-20110318/57-59_3811.pdf)

Here it is, embedded and easy to read. :thumbsup:

https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2011/eirv38n11-20110318/57-59_3811.pdf

[onawah]

:bump: EVERYBODY should watch and read ALL of this (including the pdf, which Bill has kindly copied and pasted a couple of posts down, just so no one will miss it).
LaRouchePAC’s latest vidchat has some highly significant revelations...

One of the highlights from the talk: starting after the 14 minute mark, a discussion of the recently disgraced Prince Andrew and his role as Britains international trade representative, especially his boasting of revivifying “the great game” with Russia and his role in the Al-yamamah arms and oil deal (https://cec.cecaust.com.au/releases/2016_05_05_Reopen_SFO_AUS.html) between the British oligarchs and Saudi Arabia, which became the slush fund that financed 9/11.

K1vmw90b4zM


Impeachment Coup or the Fall of the House of Windsor?

Members of the House of Representatives will be returning to their districts over this weekend. It is critical that they be deluged with constituents who understand the stakes of this impeachment march. As Attorney General William Barr said last Friday, the nation is experiencing an insurrection, which undermines and delegitimizes the President, creates a Congress akin to the British Parliament, and has a judiciary far outside its Constitutional lane and ruling arbitrarily. This result has been created from abroad, by the British oligarchy, in order to destroy the Republic which they have opposed and sought to subjugate perennially. They do that by controlling public opinion and creating synthetic political movements. So it is with the Democratic Party, which has been changed from that of FDR and John Kennedy to a rabid formation imitating the worst characteristics of the Democratic Party of Athens, the murderers of Socrates.

The House, particularly those in the 31 vulnerable districts must be told that they proceed with impeachment at their complete electoral peril. More fundamentally, they must be told to cut the crap about war with Russia. Nancy Pelosi again resurrected this as her major theme in her press conference today, the absurd lie that the President is a pawn of Russia. Yesterday, Congressman Mike Quigley the successor to Rahm Emmanuel in Chicago’s 5th District, openly asked a witness to agree with Zbigniew Brzezinski regarding the proper role for Ukraine as a marcher lord against Russia. Americans have seen, in the past week, the actual faces of those who would march this nation to a war of extinction; the parade of bureaucrats who proudly state that they have openly defied the President and whose careers demonstrate the incredible modern banality of absolute evil, all of them marching to British imperial ideas and precepts.

Join us for tonight’s discussion.

A link to the article referenced in the vidchat:
Prince Andrew: Victoria’s Dirtiest Secret (https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2011/eirv38n11-20110318/57-59_3811.pdf)

[Philippe]

This article "Victoria's Dirtiest Secret" dates from March 18, 2011!

"as the FBI digs deeper into the allegations that Epstein shuttled under-aged girls around the United States and the British Commonwealth, to service his friends and clients, including Prince Andrew. They are reportedly cringing at Windsor Castle over the prospect of Andrew invoking diplomatic immunity to dodge an FBI subpoena on the eve of the royal wedding."

As pointed out before something unexpected changed that made the second and surprise arrest of Epstein happen.

The British secret services for sure knew all this time how their prince got more and more compromised. They must know who is behind it and should cooperate with the justice system . But they are without doubt compromised themselves. (James Bond is a villain ).

Read their warning about chinese blackmailing on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honey_trapping

Spy craft
In 2009, the British MI5 distributed a 14-page document to hundreds of British banks, businesses, and financial institutions, titled "The Threat from Chinese Espionage". It described a wide-ranging Chinese effort to blackmail Western business people over sexual relationships. The document explicitly warns that Chinese intelligence services are trying to cultivate "long-term relationships" and have been known to "exploit vulnerabilities such as sexual relationships … to pressurise individuals to co-operate with them.

[onawah]

That is, powerless to combat unless there is a huge and rapid shift to TRULY sustainable energy sources (ie as near to "zero point technology" as we can get-- forget about wind and solar, which are far too expensive and inefficient) and an accompanying shift in consciousness to sanity and sustainability.

Very interesting, but one glaring omission in his argument towards the end about building an economy based on credit and faith in the ability to create a better future:
natural resources are only renewable up to a point, and once exhausted, there is no BASE on which to build an economy of ANY kind.
He not only fails to factor into his reasoning the current exhaustion of many of our planet's natural resources, but also the dramatic effects that climate changes generated by the Sun will be having on every economy very soon via the Solar Minimum, which credit is powerless to combat.

[Sue (Ayt)]

:bump: EVERYBODY should watch and read ALL of this (including the pdf, which Bill has kindly copied and pasted a couple of posts down, just so no one will miss it).
A link to the article referenced in the vidchat:
Prince Andrew: Victoria’s Dirtiest Secret (https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2011/eirv38n11-20110318/57-59_3811.pdf)

FWIW, network news was reporting last night that Victoria's Secret has cancelled their annual hoopla fashion show.
Lol - poor Victoria :Angel:
Victoria's Secret cancels annual fashion show (https://www.axios.com/victorias-secret-fashion-show-cancelled-2443314f-d19a-4388-932a-b6eb27651da2.html)

[onawah]

Just to be clear, the subject of that post, "Impeachment Coup or the Fall of the House of Windsor?", first referenced here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?109242-Prince-Andrew-to-step-back-from-public-duties-after-car-crash-Epstein-interview&p=1324767&viewfull=1#post1324767
...had nothing to do with the Victoria's Secret company which sells lingerie.



:bump: EVERYBODY should watch and read ALL of this (including the pdf, which Bill has kindly copied and pasted a couple of posts down, just so no one will miss it).
A link to the article referenced in the vidchat:
Prince Andrew: Victoria’s Dirtiest Secret (https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2011/eirv38n11-20110318/57-59_3811.pdf)

FWIW, network news was reporting last night that Victoria's Secret has cancelled their annual hoopla fashion show.
Lol - poor Victoria :Angel:
Victoria's Secret cancels annual fashion show (https://www.axios.com/victorias-secret-fashion-show-cancelled-2443314f-d19a-4388-932a-b6eb27651da2.html)

[Sue (Ayt)]

Just to be clear, the subject of that post, "Impeachment Coup or the Fall of the House of Windsor?", first referenced here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?109242-Prince-Andrew-to-step-back-from-public-duties-after-car-crash-Epstein-interview&p=1324767&viewfull=1#post1324767
...had nothing to do with the Victoria's Secret company which sells lingerie.

But Onawah, Bill's pdf directly mentions the company:

"Who is Jeffrey Epstein? After years at Bear Stearns, Epstein was picked up by Ohio billionaire Leslie Wexner, owner of Limited Brands, more widely known for its Victoria’s Secret chain of women’s scanty linge- rie emporia, and pornographic catalogues and TV ads."

I'd read about the Wexner/Epstein connection before, and suspected that the cancellation of their big annual event possibly could possibly hold significance.
My mind also wandered to back when Trump met with the queen and walked in front of her, which was a huge no-no. Maybe all just "coincidences."

[onawah]

Yes, apologies--but Victoria's Secret was not the subject of the post. It was only mentioned briefly and as an aside, which is clear if you watch the video.


Just to be clear, the subject of that post, "Impeachment Coup or the Fall of the House of Windsor?", first referenced here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?109242-Prince-Andrew-to-step-back-from-public-duties-after-car-crash-Epstein-interview&p=1324767&viewfull=1#post1324767
...had nothing to do with the Victoria's Secret company which sells lingerie.

But Onawah, Bill's pdf directly mentions the company:

"Who is Jeffrey Epstein? After years at Bear Stearns, Epstein was picked up by Ohio billionaire Leslie Wexner, owner of Limited Brands, more widely known for its Victoria’s Secret chain of women’s scanty linge- rie emporia, and pornographic catalogues and TV ads."

I'd read about the Wexner/Epstein connection before, and suspected that the cancellation of their big annual event possibly could possibly hold significance.
My mind also wandered to back when Trump met with the queen and walked in front of her, which was a huge no-no. Maybe all just "coincidences."

[Sue (Ayt)]

You’re right, Onawah. I hadn’t watched the video, as I didn’t have time just then, but I only read Bill’s pdf, and was rather struck by that title: Prince Andrew: Victoria’s Dirtiest Secret. I think I shouldn’t have quoted your post at all, but captured that title/link from the first poster of it. Sorry - still learning here.

But I have found the Wexner connection intriguing from the start, so guess that’s where my mind went. I suspect that the whole affair goes way beyond Epstein, but of course I have no real comprehension as to how the chess game is actually designed and played, and by whom.
Here is an interesting article for speculation:American Empire Exposed (https://empireexposed.blogspot.com/2018/02/chapter-14-jeffrey-epstein-scandal.html)

[Philippe]

Here is an interesting article for speculation:American Empire Exposed (https://empireexposed.blogspot.com/2018/02/chapter-14-jeffrey-epstein-scandal.html)

"Interesting for speculation" is really an understatement . A staggering awful report of what has been happening in your country with dire consequences because of compromised leadership, no doubt Trump as well. He will have to work even harder to redeem himself.

[onawah]

That's better than OK, Ayt, since with the article at the link you provided: ( https://empireexposed.blogspot.com/2018/02/chapter-14-jeffrey-epstein-scandal.html )
...you've arrived smack dab in the middle of what is one of the foremost and most central "conspiracies" that most people take years to get to, if at all. :clapping:
But it's the basis of so much else that logically follows.

You’re right, Onawah. I hadn’t watched the video, as I didn’t have time just then, but I only read Bill’s pdf, and was rather struck by that title: Prince Andrew: Victoria’s Dirtiest Secret. I think I shouldn’t have quoted your post at all, but captured that title/link from the first poster of it. Sorry - still learning here.

But I have found the Wexner connection intriguing from the start, so guess that’s where my mind went. I suspect that the whole affair goes way beyond Epstein, but of course I have no real comprehension as to how the chess game is actually designed and played, and by whom.
Here is an interesting article for speculation:American Empire Exposed (https://empireexposed.blogspot.com/2018/02/chapter-14-jeffrey-epstein-scandal.html)

[onawah]

That article (American Empire Exposed) provides ample background about how the elite's Zionist agenda has unfolded, up to Trump's recent sanctions for Israeli's settlements in Palestinian territories shows his alignment with that agenda, much as we might all wish it just weren't so.

That's better than OK, Ayt, since with the article at the link you provided: ( https://empireexposed.blogspot.com/2018/02/chapter-14-jeffrey-epstein-scandal.html )
...you've arrived smack dab in the middle of what is one of the foremost and most central "conspiracies" that most people take years to get to, if at all. :clapping:
But it's the basis of so much else that logically follows.

You’re right, Onawah. I hadn’t watched the video, as I didn’t have time just then, but I only read Bill’s pdf, and was rather struck by that title: Prince Andrew: Victoria’s Dirtiest Secret. I think I shouldn’t have quoted your post at all, but captured that title/link from the first poster of it. Sorry - still learning here.

But I have found the Wexner connection intriguing from the start, so guess that’s where my mind went. I suspect that the whole affair goes way beyond Epstein, but of course I have no real comprehension as to how the chess game is actually designed and played, and by whom.
Here is an interesting article for speculation:American Empire Exposed (https://empireexposed.blogspot.com/2018/02/chapter-14-jeffrey-epstein-scandal.html)

[onawah]

I've started a thread devoted to American Empire Exposed. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?109289-American-Empire-Exposed&p=1324964&viewfull=1#post1324964
It's as HUGE blog, very well researched, from what I've seen so far, and I think it deserves our attention.
If it proves to be as great as the little I've seen so far, hopefully it will be added to the Avalon library, if it hasn't been already, just in case it disappears.


That article (American Empire Exposed) provides ample background about how the elite's Zionist agenda has unfolded, up to Trump's recent sanctions for Israeli's settlements in Palestinian territories shows his alignment with that agenda, much as we might all wish it just weren't so.

That's better than OK, Ayt, since with the article at the link you provided: ( https://empireexposed.blogspot.com/2018/02/chapter-14-jeffrey-epstein-scandal.html )
...you've arrived smack dab in the middle of what is one of the foremost and most central "conspiracies" that most people take years to get to, if at all. :clapping:
But it's the basis of so much else that logically follows.

You’re right, Onawah. I hadn’t watched the video, as I didn’t have time just then, but I only read Bill’s pdf, and was rather struck by that title: Prince Andrew: Victoria’s Dirtiest Secret. I think I shouldn’t have quoted your post at all, but captured that title/link from the first poster of it. Sorry - still learning here.

But I have found the Wexner connection intriguing from the start, so guess that’s where my mind went. I suspect that the whole affair goes way beyond Epstein, but of course I have no real comprehension as to how the chess game is actually designed and played, and by whom.
Here is an interesting article for speculation:American Empire Exposed (https://empireexposed.blogspot.com/2018/02/chapter-14-jeffrey-epstein-scandal.html)

[Eric J (Viking)]

Jeffrey Epstein’s ex-housekeeper for his New Mexico ranch said Prince Andrew was given a beautiful young neurosurgeon to keep him company when he visited, according to an investigative podcast.

Prince Andrew has become embroiled in controversy ever since the late alleged child sex-trafficker’s arrest in July. Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre named the Duke of York as having sex with her when she was 17 years old while he was hanging out with the disgraced millionaire. He has denied the allegations.

https://rightwingtribune.com/2019/11/23/epsteins-ex-housekeeper/

Viking

[Tintin]

I've started a thread devoted to American Empire Exposed. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?109289-American-Empire-Exposed&p=1324964&viewfull=1#post1324964
It's a HUGE blog, very well researched, from what I've seen so far, and I think it deserves our attention.
If it proves to be as great as the little I've seen so far, hopefully it will be added to the Avalon library, if it hasn't been already, just in case it disappears.



Thanks onawah for the suggestion, and it is a good one :thumbsup:

Given its size (the blog) I will be selective in which chapters are stored, and, it may take a little time. Again, thanks.

[Tintin]

Avalon Library update: Jeffrey_Epstein
Link: http://avalonlibrary.net/Jeffrey_Epstein/

In part inspired by onawah's post here (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?109242-Prince-Andrew-to-step-back-from-public-duties-after-car-crash-Epstein-interview&p=1325002&viewfull=1#post1325002), and acknowledged here (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?109242-Prince-Andrew-to-step-back-from-public-duties-after-car-crash-Epstein-interview&p=1325267&viewfull=1#post1325267) this seems to be a sensible time to remind folk a little of what we've got in the library.

The blog entry referenced by onawah is now there along with 'Victoria's Dirtiest Secret' and the [other] critical documentation for anyone wishing to research this more fully contains, at the moment, the following:

41919

[onawah]

Prince Andrew accused of exploiting taxpayer-funded role, emails reveal
Dec 1, 2019
Sky News Australia

(Royal greed knows no bounds. It was hardly a "tell-all interview that Andrew gave last week, however.)
NlALCXqrTXg

[Eric J (Viking)]

News reports out of England say that the Queen’s son Prince Andrew is to be subpoenaed for his testimony in five separate US court cases involving victims of the late child-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

Not even two weeks ago, the prince pulled a PR stunt in the form of a TV interview in an attempt to clear his name of any wrongdoing after being publicly accused by Virginia Robert’s Giuffre—a former teenage sex-slave of Epstein’s—of having sexual intercourse with her multiple times when she was 17.

That interview turned out to be nothing but a disaster. Nobody, it seems, is buying the strange and weak excuses the prince put forward. Andrew’s PR manager quit in protest of him even considering doing the interview, which he knew would do nothing to help. He was right.

Following the trainwreck interview, the Queen, at the insistence of Andrew’s brother Prince Charles, cut her once ‘favorite son’ off from his royal duties, even though officially Buckingham Palace ’emphatically’ denies Giuffre’s allegations.

Although a picture has been released of a teen Giuffre and Prince Andrew arm-in-arm—concluded by multiple experts to be genuine—the prince denies having ever met her, saying the picture is a photograph of a photograph of a photograph, with no timestamp.


In fact, though Andrew frequented and stayed at Epstein’s many properties numerous times over the years, he unbelievably denies knowing anything about the massive child-trafficking operations that Epstein and his ‘madam’—Andrew’s close friend for decades Ghislaine Maxwell—were running out of each property.

Guiffre said in a recent interview that Andrew’s excuses were ‘bs’, and stated the photo in question is definitely genuine. The original, she says, is in the possession of the FBI, with a timestamp.

She said the date on the back of the photo is 13 March 2001 – two days after she left London on [a] trip with Epstein and Ms Maxwell. Panorama also spoke to the freelance photographer Michael Thomas who first copied the picture in 2011.

He is convinced the picture is genuine because he found it in the middle of a bundle of photos that Ms Giuffre handed him from her travels with Epstein and Ms Maxwell.

He said: ‘It was nothing sophisticated. These were 5×7 photos that looked like they had come from Boots the chemist. They were typical teenage snaps.’

–BBC News, 12/02/19.
Moreover, redacted court documents show Giuffre did in fact give the FBI 20 photos, but the FEDS decided to only show 19 in the released versions, effectively covering up for the UK prince.

David Boies, the lawyer for five of Epstein’s former child sex-slaves, told reporters, ‘one of the things that we have tried is to interview Prince Andrew and to try to get what his explanation is. He was a frequent visitor. They ought to submit to an interview. They ought to talk about it.’

He says out of the five cases he’s representing, he is going to subpoena Andrew for each one based on the knowledge the prince likely has on Epstein and Maxwell’s deplorable operation.

The subpoenas – court summonses to give testimony – have been prepared for all five cases and would have to be signed off by a judge once the prince was on US soil…

The existence of subpoenas – court-backed demands for sworn testimony – makes any visit to the US by the prince vanishingly unlikely. It’s pretty extraordinary: the Queen’s second son is now effectively unable to travel to the US, unless he fancies being forced to give a deposition.

-BBC
Even after allegations were made public in 2009 through court documents of Maxwell’s role in Epstein’s operation—thought to be an intelligence blackmail operation against rich and powerful elites such as Bill Clinton—Prince Andrew continued a relationship with both Maxwell and Epstein.

In 2015, when Giuffre went public with her allegations, Prince Andrew emailed Maxwell on how to handle the situation.

In the email the prince told Ms Maxwell: “Let me know when we can talk. Got some specific questions to ask you about Virginia Roberts.”

She replied: “Have some info. Call me when you have a moment.”

Recent reports say even to this day, Maxwell, who is in hiding, and the prince are still in ‘constant contact.’

[A] source told the Sun: ‘They have remained constantly in touch by phone and email. The Duke has an unswerving loyalty to Ghislaine and she is also very loyal to him.

‘Ghislaine will do anything to protect the Duke and the feeling is mutual. They both share the same view they have done nothing wrong.’

DailyMail UK, 12/01/19.

https://dcperiodical.com/2019/12/02/prince-andrew-to-be-subpoenaed-to-testify-in-5-sexual-abuse-cases/

Viking

[mgray]

The royal family hopes Andrew is at the cliffs of Dover when he takes a step back as I lay out here (https://grayseconomy.com/2019/12/03/epsteins-ghost-will-haunt-buckingham-palace/)

[Valerie Villars]

I am wishfully thinking it would be wonderful if the "royal family" would follow Prince Andrew's step off the cliffs and disappear.

[mgray]

British intelligence had to warn Prince Andrew of Epstein's honey pot, so why did he ignore it (https://grayseconomy.com/2019/12/04/jeffery-epsteins-other-curious-ties-that-bind/)?

[Tintin]

This is related although not specifically about Epstein, Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Maxwell et al, and, tied in with my post, here (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?107734-Jeffrey-E.-Epstein-arrested-and-charged-with-sex-trafficking-by-fed-6th-July-2019-.&p=1324335&viewfull=1#post1324335)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWIqz1ogG0M

[Eric J (Viking)]

By John Vibes

Federal prosecutors in the United States have said that Prince Andrew has provided “zero” cooperation with their investigation into the crimes of the Duke’s long-time friend Jeffrey Epstein.

Andrew had initially made a public promise to help investigators in any way possible, but according to Geoffrey Berman, U.S. attorney for the southern district of New York, the Duke has not answered any of the requests that were sent to him by law enforcement about the sex trafficking allegations against Epstein.

Berman spoke to reporters on Monday during a press conference outside of Epstein’s Manhattan mansion and promised that the investigation will be “moving forward” with or without Prince Andrew’s cooperation, according to the Guardian.

Meanwhile, it appears that police in the U.K. are also making the investigation more difficult for prosecutors by withholding important information that could prove the royal’s guilt. As TMU reported earlier this month, the Scotland Yard is refusing to reveal Prince Andrew’s location on the night that he is accused of being with Virginia Giuffre, one of the many girls trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein, who was underage at the time she claims the Duke raped her.

During his disastrous BBC interview, Prince Andrew claimed that he was at a Pizza Express in Woking on the night Giuffre says the pair visited a club before the then 17 year old was made to have sex with the Duke at the London home of Ghislaine Maxwell. If the Duke is indeed telling the truth his claims could be easily corroborated by whichever guard was on duty at the time. Unfortunately, Scotland Yard has been less than willing to cooperate.

Andrew has already been caught in several lies since his appearance on BBC including a leak of private emails where he mentioned Virginia Giuffre by name despite claiming to have never heard of her during the interview.

Since his appearance on BBC, Prince Andrew has stepped down from his “royal duties”—or, in other words, he has been avoiding the media.

By John Vibes | Creative Commons | TheMindUnleashed.com

Viking

[Le Chat]

Yes, it's outrageous that he can't be subpoenaed.

[onawah]

Prince Andrew 'has rubbished the royal's reputation
Jan 28, 2020
Sky News Australia
178K subscribers

"Spiked Editor Brendan O'Neill says the scandal surrounding Prince Andrew is "rubbishing the royal's reputation," and believes the Duke of York "comes off as if he thinks he's above the law".

US prosecutors have said Prince Andrew is offering "zero cooperation" into the Jeffrey Epstein inquiry and has not responded to a request for an interview.

Police investigating Epstein's co-conspirators said the prince publicly said he would cooperate, but the attorney general said this was not the case.

The prince is understood to have had a long-standing friendship with Epstein before his death.

"The latest revelation that there has been zero cooperation is really bad for Andrew," Mr O'Neill told Sky News host Andrew Bolt.

"It looks really bad, it sounds really bad".

"It sounds like he's got something to hide". "
sei-r_UYta0

[onawah]

The Victims of Jeffrey Epstein and the Family of Harry Dunn Join Forces | Good Morning Britain
Feb 6, 2020
Good Morning Britain

"Yesterday Lisa Bloom, a lawyer acting for six women in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal and Radd Seiger, spokesman for the family of Harry Dunn, announced they have joined forces. They are calling for both Mrs Sacoolas to return to the UK and Prince Andrew to face questioning from the FBI in the US.

Radd also talks about Harry Dunn's mother, Charlotte's reaction to the recent photos of Anne Sacoolas behind the wheel again. These photos are taken five months after the fatal collision. Ms Sacoolas was charged with causing Harry Dunn’s death by dangerous driving in December but US secretary of state Mike Pompeo rejected an extradition request for the 42-year-old last month."


_isXCZZoNiY

¤=[Post Update]=¤

More revelations in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation | 7.30
Feb 6, 2020
ABC News (Australia)
888K subscribers
"The American financier Jeffrey Epstein may be dead but investigations into his crimes continue with new details about his activities as far back as 2001. But as investigators piece together the details of his horrific crimes, they're still yet to interview some of his high-profile associates, such as Prince Andrew."
5_0VH8YltNc

[WhiteFeather]

Hmmmm, So did Prince Andrew have Epstein whacked. Methinks so....Or was he secretly taken out of jail with a free get of jail card, and advised to move to another country. Kinda like being in a witness protection program.

[onawah]

Prince Andrew 'recruits extradition lawyer once used by Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet' as the FBI tries to interview him over his links to Jeffrey Epstein
Claire Montgomery QC is a top extradition lawyer at London's Matrix Chambers
Among her list of clients are Augusto Pinochet, the former dictator of Chile
Pinochet was indicted by Spain in 1998 and arrested in London while undergoing minor surgery
By RYAN FAHEY FOR MAILONLINE 3/7/20
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8086575/Prince-Andrew-recruits-extradition-lawyer-used-Chilean-dictator-Augusto-Pinochet.html

"Prince Andrew has recruited an extradition lawyer once used by Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet after the FBI demanded an interview with the royal over his links to Jeffrey Epstein, it has been revealed.

Claire Montgomery QC, known as the leading extradition lawyer in the UK, is said to be advising the 60-year-old Duke, after being instructed by Gary Bloxsome, a leading defence solicitor who has worked on similar cases in the past.

Ms Montgomery, of Matrix Chambers, is a specialist with dealing with 'cross border challenges', according to her resume.
Among her long list of defence clients are Augusto Pinochet, the former dictator of Chile who was indicted for crimes against humanity by Spain during the 90s.

General Pinochet was indicted on an international arrest warrant for human rights violations by Spain, before being arrested in a London hospital where he was undergoing minor surgery in 1998.

In 1998 Mrs Montgomery represented the dictator in his case before the House of Lords -then the highest court in the country - in a hard-fought 16-month-long legal battle.

She also represented the former Prime Minister of Thailand after he was ousted in a military coup in 2011; and Vijay Mallya, who India seeks to extradite from the UK to face financial crime charges. Mrs Montgomery charges fees up to £1,000 per hour, the Telegraph newspaper reported.

The FBI, US prosecutors and lawyers for Epstein's victims want to speak to Andrew as part of investigations into the disgraced financier's sex trafficking ring.

Ms Roberts, now known by her married name Giuffre, claims she was trafficked to London and coerced into having sex with the Prince on three occasions in London, New York and the US Virgin Islands.

The Duke has categorically and repeatedly denied her claims.

Last month, US attorney Geoffrey Berman said prosecutors and the FBI had contacted the Duke's representatives but had received no reply.

Andrew was said to be 'angry and bewildered' about the claims, saying he had not been approached to speak about the case.

Up until now, information about the Duke's legal team had been unknown, with aides at the Palace refusing to give up the information about who he had instructed."

[Icare]

Prince Adrews's infamous interview, deleted scenes

r8Gq0qPMAOo

No idea how this made it onto youtube. It's a shame it has been tampered with, I would have liked to have seen as it was, without any dramatic effects added.

[TomKat]

Prince Adrews's infamous interview, deleted scenes

r8Gq0qPMAOo

No idea how this made it onto youtube. It's a shame it has been tampered with, I would have liked to have seen as it was, without any dramatic effects added.

Has to be doctored, but funny

[Eric J (Viking)]

Found this on my travels.... Cheers Elle.

The Behavior Panel is a group made up of the world's top body language and behavior experts, Mark Bowden, Scott Rouse, Greg Hartley, and Chase Hughes. Together they analyze the body language and behavior displayed in videos in the public interest. The Behavior Panel is a non-partisan group, looking to educate and entertain the public with their interest and expertise in nonverbal communication, body language, deception detection, interrogation, and resistance to interrogation.

By looking at the gestures, facial expressions, micro-expressions, and context around what people say, this group of nonverbal behavior experts reveals the possible truth and deceptions.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HC40bgA2wKA&feature=share

Viking

[Bill Ryan]

From the London Daily Mail:


https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8584291/Met-Police-destroyed-records-Prince-Andrews-Pizza-Express-alibi.html

Met Police destroyed records for the night Prince Andrew allegedly had sex with teenager in London, says former Royal protection officer

1 August, 2020


Prince Andrew claims he spent the night of March 10, 2001 in Sunningdale Park
Virginia Roberts, who was 17 at the time, claims Prince Andrew had sex with her
The incident allegedly happened at the Belgravia home of Ghislaine Maxwell
Records from the Royal Protection officers that night have been destroyed

(article continues here (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8584291/Met-Police-destroyed-records-Prince-Andrews-Pizza-Express-alibi.html))

[Ewan]

From the London Daily Mail:


https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8584291/Met-Police-destroyed-records-Prince-Andrews-Pizza-Express-alibi.html

Met Police destroyed records for the night Prince Andrew allegedly had sex with teenager in London, says former Royal protection officer

1 August, 2020


Prince Andrew claims he spent the night of March 10, 2001 in Sunningdale Park
Virginia Roberts, who was 17 at the time, claims Prince Andrew had sex with her
The incident allegedly happened at the Belgravia home of Ghislaine Maxwell
Records from the Royal Protection officers that night have been destroyed

(article continues here (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8584291/Met-Police-destroyed-records-Prince-Andrews-Pizza-Express-alibi.html))

That raises a few questions but not the ones that might initially spring to mind for the average Mail reader. I have not been following this story at all but if the girl was 17 then no crime was commited.

So the puzzle is why would the Royal Protection officers destroy the records?

Perhaps, 'No crime was commited, ergo not relevant'. But, if not relevant, why destroy the records? Protection seems to be the key word here.

So it brings into question the honesty of PA, why would he say he was elsewhere... and there's a potential reason to destroy the records. Which of course mires the whole scenario in corruption which is what we all suspect goes on anyway.

One of the possibly few situations that could not really be presented as scandolous in the extreme but the resultant desruction of records serves to push it markedly in that direction.

Yay for protection officers.

[pueblo]

From the London Daily Mail:


https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8584291/Met-Police-destroyed-records-Prince-Andrews-Pizza-Express-alibi.html

Met Police destroyed records for the night Prince Andrew allegedly had sex with teenager in London, says former Royal protection officer

1 August, 2020


Prince Andrew claims he spent the night of March 10, 2001 in Sunningdale Park
Virginia Roberts, who was 17 at the time, claims Prince Andrew had sex with her
The incident allegedly happened at the Belgravia home of Ghislaine Maxwell
Records from the Royal Protection officers that night have been destroyed

(article continues here (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8584291/Met-Police-destroyed-records-Prince-Andrews-Pizza-Express-alibi.html))

That raises a few questions but not the ones that might initially spring to mind for the average Mail reader. I have not been following this story at all but if the girl was 17 then no crime was commited.

So the puzzle is why would the Royal Protection officers destroy the records?

Perhaps, 'No crime was commited, ergo not relevant'. But, if not relevant, why destroy the records? Protection seems to be the key word here.

So it brings into question the honesty of PA, why would he say he was elsewhere... and there's a potential reason to destroy the records. Which of course mires the whole scenario in corruption which is what we all suspect goes on anyway.

One of the possibly few situations that could not really be presented as scandolous in the extreme but the resultant desruction of records serves to push it markedly in that direction.

Yay for protection officers.

The issue is not that Roberts was underage but that she was trafficked into the UK by Maxwell to service HRH.

[Zanshin]

The cynic in me would speculate that this whole scenario is contrived so that Andy can throw himself on his sword, as the designated sacrificial royal,
for a 'much ado about nothing' level of trespass -

so as to obfuscate the depths of depravity that they are desperate to avoid coming to light.

Perhaps similar to the metoo movement for Hollywood.

[Ewan]

From the London Daily Mail:


https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8584291/Met-Police-destroyed-records-Prince-Andrews-Pizza-Express-alibi.html

Met Police destroyed records for the night Prince Andrew allegedly had sex with teenager in London, says former Royal protection officer

1 August, 2020


Prince Andrew claims he spent the night of March 10, 2001 in Sunningdale Park
Virginia Roberts, who was 17 at the time, claims Prince Andrew had sex with her
The incident allegedly happened at the Belgravia home of Ghislaine Maxwell
Records from the Royal Protection officers that night have been destroyed

(article continues here (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8584291/Met-Police-destroyed-records-Prince-Andrews-Pizza-Express-alibi.html))

That raises a few questions but not the ones that might initially spring to mind for the average Mail reader. I have not been following this story at all but if the girl was 17 then no crime was commited.

So the puzzle is why would the Royal Protection officers destroy the records?

Perhaps, 'No crime was commited, ergo not relevant'. But, if not relevant, why destroy the records? Protection seems to be the key word here.

So it brings into question the honesty of PA, why would he say he was elsewhere... and there's a potential reason to destroy the records. Which of course mires the whole scenario in corruption which is what we all suspect goes on anyway.

One of the possibly few situations that could not really be presented as scandolous in the extreme but the resultant desruction of records serves to push it markedly in that direction.

Yay for protection officers.

The issue is not that Roberts was underage but that she was trafficked into the UK by Maxwell to service HRH.

Whoops, my aopolgies. I hadn't been following the story and just picked up on the wrong aspect there.

[ExomatrixTV]

Prince Andrew served with lawsuit from Epstein sex trafficking victim, document says (https://www.infowars.com/posts/prince-andrew-served-with-lawsuit-from-epstein-sex-trafficking-victim-document-says/)

[Le Chat]

So it brings into question the honesty of PA, why would he say he was elsewhere...

Supposedly at a restaurant at the time, but even the most dim-witted of staff and management would recall PA gracing their premises with his presence...

I wonder if any of these people have been interviewed?

[ExomatrixTV]

New details emerge on Prince Andrews' alleged involvement with Epstein:

OnPJjvkbQbI

[Eric J (Viking)]

With impending information soon to be exposed Prince Andrew's military affiliations and royal patronages returned to the Queen

Prince Andrew has had all of his military titles and royal patronages taken away - and will no longer style himself "His Royal Highness".

In a statement, Buckingham Palace said: "With The Queen's approval and agreement, The Duke of York's military affiliations and Royal patronages have been returned to The Queen.

https://news.sky.com/story/prince-andrews-military-affiliations-and-royal-patronages-returned-to-the-queen-12515222

Viking

[Spiral]

Good, it's all a BS theatre anyway.

If he hadn't gone to the Falklands as part of that theatre none of those guys would have been killed or burnt.

The facts of the attack in this MSM article might be right but the scapegoating is horrific, the truth is they were hung out to dry while the prince was moved out of the danger zone with escorts that should have been protecting our soldiers.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/oct/15/revealed-full-story-behind-sinking-of-falklands-warship-hms-sheffield

[Hermoor]

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/FI7666AWYAAyWBz?format=jpg&name=small

Mountbatten and Kincora Boys' Home. And Savile.

Elizabeth and Philip and Kamloops School? And Savile.

Charles and Savile.

:evil:

[Dorjezigzag]

I used to hitchhike a lot in the 90s and one time I had a lift from this ex-navy lorry driver. He had been on the same ship as prince Andrew during the falklands war and said he was an absolute c*nt. Andrew used to act so superior and condescending and frequently areas were made non-accesable to all crew except him and a few select officer buddies of Andrew. I could tell by the passionate way he told the story that there was depth to his bitter experiences with Andrew. I wasn't surprised when details started to emerge of his Epstein connections.

[onawah]

I imagine a lot will depend on whether proof is allowed to surface during the trial that the photo of Andrew with his arm around the minor Virginia Guiffre is genuine (and not photoshopped as Andrew has claimed).
I seem to recall that photo was thoroughly scrutinized by a leading expert who said it was genuine.
Andrew probably mistakenly thought that, and his claim that he doesn't sweat (also proven to be untrue, I believe), would never come under any real scrutiny.

[Nasu]

I imagine a lot will depend on whether proof is allowed to surface during the trial that the photo of Andrew with his arm around the minor Virginia Guiffre is genuine (and not photoshopped as Andrew has claimed).
I seem to recall that photo was thoroughly scrutinized by a leading expert who said it was genuine.
Andrew probably mistakenly thought that, and his claim that he doesn't sweat (also proven to be untrue, I believe), would never come under any real scrutiny.

I think your right. There’s too much juice to squeeze out of this story for him to let this go to trial. My gut says he will pay some huge undisclosed amount and settle it out of court. Although essentially an admission of guilt it would be over with much more quickly than a trial. Then my guess would be that he will keep a low profile and keep to the east wing of some castle for at least five years, maybe more. I’d bet he’s liquidating assets as we type. I feel for the queen, not a great start to her jubilee year…..x…… N

[pueblo]

Andrew, formerly known as Prince... :bigsmile:

[Kryztian]

I feel for the queen, not a great start to her jubilee year…..x…… N

That's a common sentiment, but one I can not really relate too. The world has know about Prince Andrew raping trafficked children for many years now. I am sure Elizabeth and Philip knew about that long, long before, probably since the time he was with Giuffre. They have a security detail on him and they would have been quite aware of what goes on at Little Saint James Island. When they found this out, that would have been the appropriate time to strip him of his titles and move his bed into Windsor Castle's wine cellar.

The British Empire, like every other empire, is about raping and pillaging. Occupying other nations, removing the wealth from the nations and transferring it back to the elite of Britain, all while reducing the rights of the people of these occupied nations. Part of the mind control that has been used to accomplish this continued brutality is the crown: cultivating tender affection for the king and queen and then declaring that the world is there little oyster. Anyone who would knowingly participate in this action while knowing what is in fact really happening, is, in my opinion, a psychopath.

The empire may not have the power they once had but it is still apparent that they think the world is their oyster, or now, that young underaged trafficked girls are suitable rape material by the Prince. That the crown has waited until now to distance themselves from Andrew clearly shows that they care deeply about their image but not at all about the welfare of underaged at-risk youth.

If it is a jubilee year, then I will find much to jubilate in if these unfolding events give the world a better understand of who the people of the Royal Family really are and what their role has been in the denigration of human beings.

[lizhekb]

From now on, he is a certified, bona fide royal family member from Buckingham Palace.

[Mari]

I imagine a lot will depend on whether proof is allowed to surface during the trial that the photo of Andrew with his arm around the minor Virginia Guiffre is genuine (and not photoshopped as Andrew has claimed).
I seem to recall that photo was thoroughly scrutinized by a leading expert who said it was genuine.
Andrew probably mistakenly thought that, and his claim that he doesn't sweat (also proven to be untrue, I believe), would never come under any real scrutiny.

I think your right. There’s too much juice to squeeze out of this story for him to let this go to trial. My gut says he will pay some huge undisclosed amount and settle it out of court. Although essentially an admission of guilt it would be over with much more quickly than a trial. Then my guess would be that he will keep a low profile and keep to the east wing of some castle for at least five years, maybe more. I’d bet he’s liquidating assets as we type. I feel for the queen, not a great start to her jubilee year…..x…… N

He's tarnished goods, whatever happens. He's currently being protected somewhat by Mama, but just wait till she dies and Charlie-boy takes the throne. The Queen is hidebound by duty and tradition, but Charles will not be so forgiving. Andrew will be thrown to the wolves by the media, who will not have the same loyalty to Charles as they currently have to the Queen.

I don't feel sorry for him at all - he's spent his whole life looking down at the peasantry - as the ex-military man above here has confirmed, and countless others will be now be stepping forward to back this up. Nothing backs this opinion of him more than that infamous TV interview when his character was laid bare for the world to see.

[Spiral]

From now on, he is a certified, bona fide royal family member from Buckingham Palace.

Very true, nonce, son of nonce (& best friend of the UKs most famous peedo), son of nautical nonce.

Re some of the other remarks, I doubt very much that his mother is alive tbh, masks, "distancing" & a lack of appearances, plus Buckingham palace being closed & the royal emblem being taken down from the gates for ages is all a bit odd.

[onawah]

I'm hoping Guiffre will resist the temptation to settle and go for as much exposure of Andrew's crimes as possible.
After that and after having made the infamous Jimmy Saville a Knight (not to mention Tony Blair), whatever good reputation Queen Lizzie and the Royals still enjoy will be in tatters, at least among the discerning.
And Andrew really will be sweating!

[rgray222]

Stipping this mortal man of his titles is meaningless. He belongs in jail along with every other person who preyed on these underage children. The titles, the embarrassment and the shame are meaningless.

Finding Ghislaine Mawell guilty is comparable to finding the driver of the car that robbed the bank guilty while letting the actual bank robbers off free. They have the documents, the names and even the willing witnesses but these are powerful people and they will escape any form of punishment. Andrew may be the sacrificial lamb and is casually being thrown under the bus but he will not spend one day in jail.

[Spiral]

No one seems to be saying this, but considering the revelations Dark Journalist has brought to light about the elite looking for Atlantis in the area (aka "the Hot Zone") & the "Temples" on that island, is it not highly likely that these underage girls were used in "Crowley" type sex magick .... ie, it's probably a LOT darker than it appears ?

[Mari]

!00% agree that he will not see the inside of a cell any day soon - that's a given, as the elite look after their own kind. However, judging by his character, stripping him of his variable little adornments will be punishment enough for someone like him who bases his own sense of worth on said adornments. This is being used as yet another distraction by the msm - lets throw another, albeit royal, expendable onto the bonfire for the masses to get worked up about. Failing miserably methinks.

[Icare]

!00% agree that he will not see the inside of a cell any day soon - that's a given, as the elite look after their own kind. However, judging by his character, stripping him of his variable little adornments will be punishment enough for someone like him who bases his own sense of worth on said adornments. This is being used as yet another distraction by the msm - lets throw another, albeit royal, expendable onto the bonfire for the masses to get worked up about. Failing miserably methinks.

I agree with you, he will be livid about having his titles stripped and this is meant as a distraction.


Those who feel sorry for the poor Queen should remember who and what she is. Those 10 children (in Canada) that disappeared after she and her husband had taken them for an outing should never be forgotten.

Andrew is just an expendable individual pretty low in the pecking order. Ask Arizona Wilder and others.

And it wasn't Andrew who was best friends with Jimmy Savile, who now everybody knows about, it was Charles. And it was the Queen who knighted that psychopath. The whole family know and are part of the whole scenario.

Andrew was just stupid enough to get exposed more or less publicly, so they are just sacrificing him thinking better him than the whole family.
They will never allow him to go to trial though, even as a witness.

[Chester]

!00% agree that he will not see the inside of a cell any day soon - that's a given, as the elite look after their own kind. However, judging by his character, stripping him of his variable little adornments will be punishment enough for someone like him who bases his own sense of worth on said adornments. This is being used as yet another distraction by the msm - lets throw another, albeit royal, expendable onto the bonfire for the masses to get worked up about. Failing miserably methinks.

I agree with you, he will be livid about having his titles stripped and this is meant as a distraction.


Those who feel sorry for the poor Queen should remember who and what she is. Those 10 children (in Canada) that disappeared after she and her husband had taken them for an outing should never be forgotten.

Andrew is just an expendable individual pretty low in the pecking order. Ask Arizona Wilder and others.

And it wasn't Andrew who was best friends with Jimmy Savile, who now everybody knows about, it was Charles. And it was the Queen who knighted that psychopath. The whole family know and are part of the whole scenario.

Andrew was just stupid enough to get exposed more or less publicly, so they are just sacrificing him thinking better him than the whole family.
They will never allow him to go to trial though, even as a witness.

Yes, I put my money on "window dressing" and doing his duty to be "the scapegoat" with the agreement they protect him from a trail or even having to testify.

[Hermoor]

And it wasn't Andrew who was best friends with Jimmy Savile, who now everybody knows about, it was Charles. And it was the Queen who knighted that psychopath. The whole family know and are part of the whole scenario.

Yes and the old saying about 'the fish rots from the head down' is as relevant as it ever was.

Sir Keir Starmer took over the leadership of the UK's Labour Party in April 2020. Here's what he was doing circa 2009.

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJIP_CkWUAQv7-J?format=jpg&name=small

He was awarded a knighthood by the Queen in 2014 for 'services to law and criminal justice!!!'

Here's Charles doing the actual awarding on behalf of his mother.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/04/05/01/26819420-8188327-image-m-68_1586047933857.jpg

In recent news Lord Ahmed was convicted of the attempted rape of a girl and serious sexual assault of a boy.

https://twitter.com/GillianBateman5/status/1479388190888935424?cxt=HHwWgIC-rZbu64cpAAAA

He was awarded his title of 'Lord' in 1998 after then Prime Minister Tony Blair recommended it to the Queen for approval.

Yes, the Queen and this Tony Blair.

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/C1T4cYmViVA/mqdefault.jpg

:facepalm:

[Icare]

And now it looks like he will lose his "Duke of York" title as well.

In theory, no longer being protected by his HRH and losing everything else as well, they might actually throw him under the bus completely now:



Posted by Richard Willet - Memes and headline comments by David Icke
Posted on 15 January 2022
We don’t want him either, says city of York! Calls for Prince Andrew to lose Duke of York title after Queen stripped him of HRH and military ranks

The Duke of York should lose the title linking him to the Yorkshire city, it was claimed today after the Queen stripped him of his honorary military roles and he gave up his HRH style in a huge fallout from his civil sex case.

Darryl Smalley, a senior member of City of York Council, has begun a campaign to strip Prince Andrew of his title after a judge in New York threw out the Duke’s motion to dismiss the case two days and ruled it can go to trial.

Labour MP for York Central Rachael Maskell agreed with Mr Smalley’s idea and said it was ‘untenable for the Duke of York to cling onto his title another day longer’ as she started a Twitter hashtag saying #NotInYorksName.

Mr Smalley told MailOnline that the cross-party support for the removal of Prince Andrew’s dukedom could result in a motion asking for the removal being passed by the entire City of York Council.

Meanwhile Security Minister Damian Hinds refused to confirm whether taxpayers would still fund Andrew’s security, saying that police would ‘do what they judge is necessary to protect our country, to protect people in it’.

Andrew, who was born an HRH, will not use it any official capacity, and has also been stripped of his remaining royal patronages in a decision which represents the 61-year-old’s complete removal from official royal life.

The dramatic move is also being seen as an attempt to distance the monarchy from Andrew, who was once second in line to the throne as the spare to the heir, in the year of the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee.

Andrew was made Duke of York on the day of his wedding to Sarah, Duchess of York – July 23, 1986.

Read More: We don’t want him either, says city of York! Calls for Prince Andrew to lose Duke of York title after Queen stripped him of HRH and military ranks.

from: https://davidicke.com/2022/01/15/we-dont-want-him-either-says-city-of-york-calls-for-prince-andrew-to-lose-duke-of-york-title-after-queen-stripped-him-of-hrh-and-military-ranks/

[Ewan]

And now it looks like he will lose his "Duke of York" title as well.

In theory, no longer being protected by his HRH and losing everything else as well, they might actually throw him under the bus completely now:



Posted by Richard Willet - Memes and headline comments by David Icke
Posted on 15 January 2022
We don’t want him either, says city of York! Calls for Prince Andrew to lose Duke of York title after Queen stripped him of HRH and military ranks

The Duke of York should lose the title linking him to the Yorkshire city, it was claimed today after the Queen stripped him of his honorary military roles and he gave up his HRH style in a huge fallout from his civil sex case.

Darryl Smalley, a senior member of City of York Council, has begun a campaign to strip Prince Andrew of his title after a judge in New York threw out the Duke’s motion to dismiss the case two days and ruled it can go to trial.

Labour MP for York Central Rachael Maskell agreed with Mr Smalley’s idea and said it was ‘untenable for the Duke of York to cling onto his title another day longer’ as she started a Twitter hashtag saying #NotInYorksName.

Mr Smalley told MailOnline that the cross-party support for the removal of Prince Andrew’s dukedom could result in a motion asking for the removal being passed by the entire City of York Council.

Meanwhile Security Minister Damian Hinds refused to confirm whether taxpayers would still fund Andrew’s security, saying that police would ‘do what they judge is necessary to protect our country, to protect people in it’.

Andrew, who was born an HRH, will not use it any official capacity, and has also been stripped of his remaining royal patronages in a decision which represents the 61-year-old’s complete removal from official royal life.

The dramatic move is also being seen as an attempt to distance the monarchy from Andrew, who was once second in line to the throne as the spare to the heir, in the year of the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee.

Andrew was made Duke of York on the day of his wedding to Sarah, Duchess of York – July 23, 1986.

Read More: We don’t want him either, says city of York! Calls for Prince Andrew to lose Duke of York title after Queen stripped him of HRH and military ranks.

from: https://davidicke.com/2022/01/15/we-dont-want-him-either-says-city-of-york-calls-for-prince-andrew-to-lose-duke-of-york-title-after-queen-stripped-him-of-hrh-and-military-ranks/

Never thought I would see the like. Being mindfull of smoke & mirrors anyway, let's hope Fauci is next to be publicly eviscerated.

(Mildly less horrific than being burnt at the stake I guess but potentially almost as traumatic).

[Icare]

Seems surreal, but true.

And the story goes on. I just posted a link in the breaking news threat about the Scottish now wanting to strip him of his Earl of Inverness title too.

[onawah]

Prince Andrew Will “Disappear From Sight” After Being Stripped of His Royal Titles
The royal family has gone into damage control after a U.S. judge ruled that a lawsuit filed against Prince Andrew by Virginia Giuffre can move forward.
BY KATIE NICHOLL
JANUARY 14, 2022
https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2022/01/royal-watch-prince-andrew-titles

"Prince Andrew will “disappear from sight” and will not be present at Queen Elizabeth’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations after being stripped of his military roles and titles on Thursday.

Sources close to Andrew, who is no longer allowed to use his HRH title in any official capacity, will not be representing the queen in any way during the Platinum Jubilee celebrations, as the royal family goes into damage control in hopes of protecting the queen and ensuring her spring celebrations are not overshadowed by any more controversy.

News that Andrew is losing his HRH status comes after U.S. district judge Lewis Kaplan ruled that a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre can move forward in court despite Andrew’s hopes to have it dismissed.

He now faces the greatest gamble of his life and will either attempt to clear his name via a high-profile trial or attempt to reach an out-of-court settlement with Giuffre, which could reportedly cost him millions of dollars.

Andrew has remained close to the queen ever since he was forced to stand down from royal duties in 2019, following his disastrous Newsnight interview with Emily Maitlis, in which he claimed he could not remember meeting Giuffre and refused to apologize for his friendship with convicted sex criminal Epstein or express any remorse for Epstein’s victims.

And while Andrew remains a member of the royal family and will be welcome at royal family events and private and non-official occasions, as of 2019 he no longer represents the queen and does not have any kind of working role or official presence within the family.

According to a source close to the royal family, the queen’s decision to remove Andrew’s titles will not have been an easy one, but is part of the firm’s necessary strategy to erase Andrew from public life in order to protect the reputation of the monarchy.

“He won’t be at the Jubilee, he is going to disappear from sight,” the source told Vanity Fair. “He knows that he cannot further tarnish the queen’s reputation, and that is very much the view of the family. The way they plan to deal with this is to remove Andrew from official royal life and public view. This has been the queen’s decision, but it is supported by other senior family members.”

It is understood that Prince Charles and Prince William were consulted ahead of Buckingham Palace’s statement on Thursday and fully support the queen’s decision. “With the queen’s approval and agreement, the Duke of York’s military affiliations and royal patronages have been returned to the queen,” the statement read. “The Duke of York will continue not to undertake any public duties and is defending this case as a private citizen.”

The source added that there was concern among the family for Andrew’s well-being. “He is absolutely devastated and if I was to describe how he is, I would say very shaken. This has come as a huge blow,” the family friend says.

But it is not just Andrew who is stunned by the judge’s decision. Sources close to the queen say that the prospect of Andrew being tried in a civil case in the United States has been incredibly concerning and stressful for Her Majesty.

One aide who has worked with the queen explains, “The queen has a great ability to compartmentalize and deal with problems in a considered and pragmatic way, but this is her beloved son and the decision she has made will be a very sad one for her.”

The possibility of a civil case later this year threatens to overshadow an important year for the royals, as 2022 marks the 70th anniversary of Queen Elizabeth’s reign. During the year, celebrations will be held throughout the United Kingdom, the commonwealth, and around the world to celebrate this highly anticipated and special anniversary. Although he has indicated he wants to clear his name and is prepared to face a jury, he is facing pressure from palace aides to settle, The Telegraph reported. Giuffre’s lawsuit also suggests she may want her day in court, stating, “It is long past the time for him to be held to account.”

Also see:
From the Archive: The Trouble With Prince Andrew: https://archive.vanityfair.com/article/2011/8/the-trouble-with-andrew

[onawah]

SPECIAL REPORT: The Prince and the left hand of the devil
420,300 views Premiered Jan 20, 2022
8.7K
Sky News Australia
2.18M subscribers

"Sky News Australia investigates allegations against the British Royal embroiled in one of the biggest scandals in living memory."

kwpkOYamnjg

[scotslad]

The Prince and the Left Hand of the Devil

kwpkOYamnjg

[Hermoor]

Bearing this in mind, lo and behold a tremendously unexpected and baffling outburst happened in the UK parliament a couple of days ago.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJIP_CkWUAQv7-J?format=jpg&name=small

Prime Minister Johnson actually called out the Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer for sweeping the Savile abomination under the carpet! Live on tv in the House of Parliament!!

https://twitter.com/StarkNakedBrief/status/1488578664887422982

Since then the main media (propaganda) outlets are trying to throw Johnson under the bus whilst also going to great lengths to cover up for Starmer.

It's disgraceful, biased garbage from the propagandists, quite possibly because the Queen's mob are having kittens about it and having to cover up the cover up again just when they thought it had slunk away in to the long grass for good!

The look on Mogg's face tells us all we need to know. He knows Starmer was up to his eyebrows in this filth and a very raw nerve has just been struck.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FKgDKgHWUAAS2DB?format=jpg&name=360x360

The Johnson outburst throws up so many more questions than answers. First of all, good on him (never thought I'd ever say that).

As PM, why didn't Johnson play this card earlier, relaunch the investigation and have Starmer and associates on toast? Every decent human being would do that and the PM has the powers to do that, doesn't he?

Because the Queen's mob would have kittens about it, that's why. A proper investigation would lead to the gates of Buckingham Palace, having knocked on some of the biggest doors in the land along the way too.

So why on Earth did Boris re-open a can of worms like that, especially at a time when the Queen's favourite son is also in the headlines again for all the wrong reasons?

What is Boris supposed to say when he next meets the Queen?

"I know Andrew is in a tight paedo spot right now. And Charles and Philip were best buddies with Savile for decades, the same Savile you awarded a knighthood to. Then you knighted Starmer too for covering up all the Savile business. But really, your Maj, I simply couldn't help myself. I care about the kids so much!"

Jeez. I can't fathom it. At all. The top politician in the land is supposed to protect the heinous crimes of those at the top of the social tree, isn't he? It would appear to be a kamikaze move which makes no sense whatsoever.

He is establishment to his rotten core, yet appeared to potentially throw a lot of them to the wolves with his outburst and himself too.

So weird. Opinions anyone?

[onawah]

That's incredible Hermoor!! I would say he acted out of spontaneous desperation to save his soul, akin to Hunter Biden "losing" his laptop with all that incriminating evidence.
The danger is that he will regret it and revert to his previous criminal position, as Biden appears to have done.
But perhaps it will stick since he went so public with it, though Brits may be reeling from so much truth all at once.
Something Clif High should take note of, and see if it fits in with any of his recent predictions.

[Matthew]

I think it is a contrived show, my instinct is Boris is giving us a double-cross; nothing will escalate from this, Boris isn't telling us anything new.

I'm too suspicious of his wife, ...I bet Boris is very closely handled.

[Spiral]

Boris's outburst clearly shows he is on the ropes, that's a last cards trick if ever there was one.

As for the Queen, is she really still alive ?

I very much doubt it tbh.

As for Charles, he's always been weak and it wouldn't be that hard to push him out via his links to peedos, it would also fit the globalists plan to get the royal family out of play as anything significant too,

[jaybee]

Bearing this in mind, lo and behold a tremendously unexpected and baffling outburst happened in the UK parliament a couple of days ago.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJIP_CkWUAQv7-J?format=jpg&name=small

Prime Minister Johnson actually called out the Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer for sweeping the Savile abomination under the carpet! Live on tv in the House of Parliament!!

https://twitter.com/StarkNakedBrief/status/1488578664887422982

Since then the main media (propaganda) outlets are trying to throw Johnson under the bus whilst also going to great lengths to cover up for Starmer.

It's disgraceful, biased garbage from the propagandists, quite possibly because the Queen's mob are having kittens about it and having to cover up the cover up again just when they thought it had slunk away in to the long grass for good!

The look on Mogg's face tells us all we need to know. He knows Starmer was up to his eyebrows in this filth and a very raw nerve has just been struck.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FKgDKgHWUAAS2DB?format=jpg&name=360x360

The Johnson outburst throws up so many more questions than answers. First of all, good on him (never thought I'd ever say that).

As PM, why didn't Johnson play this card earlier, relaunch the investigation and have Starmer and associates on toast? Every decent human being would do that and the PM has the powers to do that, doesn't he?

Because the Queen's mob would have kittens about it, that's why. A proper investigation would lead to the gates of Buckingham Palace, having knocked on some of the biggest doors in the land along the way too.

So why on Earth did Boris re-open a can of worms like that, especially at a time when the Queen's favourite son is also in the headlines again for all the wrong reasons?

What is Boris supposed to say when he next meets the Queen?

"I know Andrew is in a tight paedo spot right now. And Charles and Philip were best buddies with Savile for decades, the same Savile you awarded a knighthood to. Then you knighted Starmer too for covering up all the Savile business. But really, your Maj, I simply couldn't help myself. I care about the kids so much!"

Jeez. I can't fathom it. At all. The top politician in the land is supposed to protect the heinous crimes of those at the top of the social tree, isn't he? It would appear to be a kamikaze move which makes no sense whatsoever.

He is establishment to his rotten core, yet appeared to potentially throw a lot of them to the wolves with his outburst and himself too.

So weird. Opinions anyone?


wow... I'm only just catching up with all this - thank you for this post -

My initial reaction / opinion is Boris is fighting for his political life and Starmer is done... I had not heard about his active role in helping to keep Savile from prosecution before and neither had most of the British Public, I suspect -

I have said elsewhere that Boris is a Globalist Mole (and I added albeit a half hearted, or very crafty one) but he isn't enough of one to let his political enemies destroy him - and the real deal deep Globalist Mole... Starmer has been outed... plus one has to wonder what else 'they' have on him (Starmer) - blackmail~wise...

Oh my golly gosh - Boris has opened up a can of worms and it's anyone's guess where all this will lead at the moment..

Why, for instance are his top Aids so keen to protect Starmer... are they, particularly Munira Mirza, deep state plants who have been in position for years... the others I need to look into further but one of them is said to have sent the email about bringing booze to the party during lockdown - that one could have done that deliberately to frame the PM when the time came and they launched the Partygate thing -

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60253231


But policy chief Munira Mirza quit over the PM's false claim that Labour leader Sir Keir failed to prosecute Savile when he was director of public prosecutions, and his refusal to apologise.

In a scathing resignation letter, Ms Mirza - who worked alongside the PM for 14 years - described the his comments about Savile as "scurrilous".

What the hell...she is speaking more like a Starmer supporter than a Johnson one... why the hell is she so bothered especially as Starmer could be up to his neck in the pedophile circles... at the very least he helped keep Savile's crimes under wraps and so is responsible for the abuse that followed when Savile carried on, safe in the knowledge he was protected..

The BBC and all the other Fake Media... will be scrambling around doing damage limitation - trying to protect the Globalist's chosen one.... Sir Keir Starmer... who they had earmarked for taking Britain / England right down the Authoritarian Road....

I think that no one dared let Savile be prosecuted and he had to die before it all came out for fear of what he would say... who he would expose...

[jaybee]

I think it is a contrived show, my instinct is Boris is giving us a double-cross; nothing will escalate from this, Boris isn't telling us anything new.

I'm too suspicious of his wife, ...I bet Boris is very closely handled.

I have thought this as well... that Carrie (like some other partners of high profile politicians) could be a handler...

But maybe if she is... having two children has softened her commitment to the 'cause' and strengthened it to the husband... ???

[jaybee]

Why, for instance are his top Aids so keen to protect Starmer... are they, particularly Munira Mirza, deep state plants who have been in position for years...

and here is the answer...re Munira Mirza

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60257702

Ms Mirza, sometimes known as "Boris's brain", is far from being a lifelong Conservative, having once been a communist activist.

I suspect she was given the option to resign or be fired...?
Though why they let a communist activist infiltrate so deeply is another important question...that could point to extensive infiltration of the civil service and other bureaucracies -

[Matthew]

I think it is a contrived show, my instinct is Boris is giving us a double-cross; nothing will escalate from this, Boris isn't telling us anything new.

I'm too suspicious of his wife, ...I bet Boris is very closely handled.

I have thought this as well... that Carrie (like some other partners of high profile politicians) could be a handler...

But maybe if she is... having two children has softened her commitment to the 'cause' and strengthened it to the husband... ???

That's how you and I and other decent people think ...and it could be you are right, but I'm reluctant to invest good faith and assume the best with that club. Instead I assume they are trying to win our trust to be able to double cross us again. Saville related information is not news, nothing will change, nobody learnt anything new. They are getting better at saying what we want to hear imo

[The Moss Trooper]

The person's name at the beginning of the title of this thread isn't the "main-event" of the ongoing narrative being played out in the MSM and an American courtroom.......... Or is the dead American paedophile, we all know that this went much, much, higher up the pyramid of power. This whole thing is merely interference being ran by the very powerful family of said "name".......... He is essential collateral damage to distract from an even bigger, far, far more disgusting scandal, a scandal so big that it would threaten the very existence, purpose and future of the powerful family.

The disgraced, deceased "entertainer/abuser" was also at the heart of this scandal, very, very, much so........... But it's beginnings stem back a generation to the next seat-holders childhood.


I apologise for the woolly language, but I have had to learn to be very careful around this topic because those concerned will, and do, exercise extreme prejudice to keep these things from the cold-light of day.

[onawah]

Boris Bashing & the Assange Factor
February 9, 2022
by Jonathan Cook
https://consortiumnews.com/2022/02/09/boris-bashing-the-assange-factor/?fbclid=IwAR23PsY9tZUaEtBYk5OtMH2WLDscmBLGli27Eof0Bki_k1An2jccCoqHtHE

(Twitter posts embedded in the article which were not included here)

“Why is Boris Johnson making false claims about Starmer and Savile?” runs a headline in the news pages of The Guardian. It is just one in a barrage of indignant recent stories in the British media, rushing to the defense of the opposition leader, Sir Keir Starmer.

The reason? Last week the British prime minister, Boris Johnson, blamed Starmer, now the Labour Party leader, for failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, a TV presenter and serial child abuser, when his case came under police review in 2009. Between 2008 and 2013, Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS). Savile died in 2011 before he could face justice.

Johnson accused Starmer, who at the time was director of public prosecutions, of wasting “his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile.”

The sudden chorus of outrage at Johnson impugning Starmer’s reputation is strange in many different ways. It is not as though Johnson has a record of good behavior. His whole political persona is built on the idea of his being a rascal, a clown, a chancer.

He is also a well-documented liar. Few, least of all in the media, cared much about his pattern of lying until now. Indeed, most observers have long pointed out that his popularity was based on his mischief-making and his populist guise as an anti-establishment politician. No one, apart from his political opponents, seemed too bothered.

And it is also not as though there are not lots of other, more critically important things relating to Johnson to be far more enraged about, even before we consider his catastrophic handling of the pandemic, and his raiding of the public coffers to enrich his crony friends and party donors.

Jumping Ship

Johnson is currently embroiled in the “Partygate” scandal. He attended – and his closest officials appear to have organized – several gatherings at his residence in Downing Street in 2020 and 2021 at a time when the rest of the country was under strict lockdown. For the first time the public mood has shifted against Johnson.

But it was Johnson’s criticisms of Starmer, not Partygate, that led several of his senior advisers last week to resign their posts. One can at least suspect that in their case — given how quickly the Johnson brand is sinking, and the repercussions they may face from a police investigation into the Partygate scandal — that finding an honorable pretext for jumping ship may have been the wisest move.

[Related: The Skimpy Partygate Report https://consortiumnews.com/2022/02/01/the-skimpy-partygate-report/]

But there is something deeply strange about Johnson’s own Conservative MPs and the British media lining up to express their indignation at Johnson’s attack on Starmer, a not particularly liked or likable opposition leader, and then turning it into the reason to bring down a prime minister whose other flaws are only too visible.

What makes the situation even weirder is that Johnson’s “smears” of Starmer may not actually be smears at all. They look like rare examples of Johnson alluding to — admittedly in his own clumsy and self-interested way — genuinely problematic behavior by Starmer.

One would never know this from the coverage, of course.

Here is The Guardian supposedly fact-checking Johnson’s attack on Starmer under the apparently neutral question: “Is there any evidence that Starmer was involved in any decision not to prosecute Savile?”

The Guardian’s answer is decisive:

“No. The CPS has confirmed that there is no reference to any involvement from Starmer in the decision-making within an official report examining the case.

Surrey police consulted the CPS for advice about the allegations after interviewing Savile’s victims, according to a 2013 CPS statement made by Starmer as DPP.

The official report, written by Alison Levitt QC, found that in October 2009 the CPS lawyer responsible for the cases – who was not Starmer – advised that no prosecution could be brought on the grounds that none of the complainants were ‘prepared to support any police action’.”

That’s a pretty definite “No,” then. Not “No, according to Starmer.” Or “No, according to the CPS.” Or “No, according to an official report” — and doubtless a determinedly face-saving one at that — into the Savile scandal.

Just “No.”

Here is The Guardian’s political correspondent Peter Walker echoing how cut and dried the corporate media’s assessment is: “[Starmer] had no connection to decisions over the case, and the idea he did emerged later in conspiracy theories mainly shared among the far right.”

So it’s just a far-right conspiracy theory. Case against Starmer closed.

But not so fast.

Given Savile’s tight ties to the Establishment — from royalty and prime ministers down —and the Establishment’s role in providing, however inadvertently, cover for Savile’s pedophilia for decades, it should hardly surprise us that the blame for the failure to prosecute him has been placed squarely on the shoulders of a low-level lawyer in the Crown Prosecution Service. How could it be otherwise? If we started unpicking the thorny Savile knot, who knows how the threads might unravel?

Sacrificial Victim

Former Ambassador Craig Murray has made an interesting observation about Johnson’s remark on Starmer. Murray, let us remember, has been a first-hand observer and chronicler of the dark arts of the Establishment in protecting itself from exposure, after he himself was made a sacrificial victim for revealing the British government’s illegal involvement in torture and extraordinary rendition.


As Murray notes:

“Of course the Director of Public Prosecutions does not handle the individual cases, which are assigned to lawyers under them. But the Director most certainly is then consulted on the decisions in the high profile and important cases.

That is why they are there. It is unthinkable that Starmer was not consulted on the decision to shelve the Savile case – what do they expect us to believe his role was, as head of the office, ordering the paperclips?”

And of the official inquiry into Starmer’s role that cleared him of any wrongdoing, the one that so impresses The Guardian and everyone else, Murray adds:

“When the public outcry reached a peak in 2012, Starmer played the go-to trick in the Establishment book. He commissioned an ‘independent’ lawyer he knew to write a report exonerating him. Mistakes have been made at lower levels, lessons will be learnt… you know what it says. Mishcon de Reya, money launderers to the oligarchs, provided the lawyer to do the whitewash. Once he retired from the post of DPP, Starmer went to work at, umm,…”

Yes, Mischon de Reya.


Starmer & Assange

Murray also notes that MPs and the British media have resolutely focused attention on Starmer’s alleged non-role in the Savile decision — where an “official report” provides them with cover — rather than an additional, and far more embarrassing, point made by Johnson about Starmer’s behavior as director of public prosecutions.

The prime minister mentioned Starmer using his time to “prosecute journalists.” Johnson and the media have no interest in clarifying that reference. Anyway, Johnson only made it for effect: as a contrast to the way Starmer treated Savile, as a way to highlight that, when he chose to, Starmer was quite capable of advancing a prosecution.

But this second point is potentially far more revealing both of Starmer’s misconduct as director of public prosecutions and about the services he rendered to the Establishment — the likely reason why he was knighted at a relatively young age, becoming “Sir” Keir.

The journalist referenced by Johnson was presumably Julian Assange, currently locked up in Belmarsh high-security prison in London as lawyers try to get him extradited to the United States for his exposure of U.S. war crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq.

At an early stage of Assange’s persecution, the Crown Prosecution Service under Starmer worked overtime — despite Britain’s official position of neutrality in the case — to ensure he was extradited to Sweden. Assange sought political asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London in 2012, when Starmer was still head of the Crown Prosecution Service. Assange did so because he got wind of efforts by the Americans to extradite him onwards from Sweden to the U.S. He feared the U.K. would collude in that process.

Assange, it turns out, was not wrong. With the Swedish investigation dropped long ago, the British courts are now, nearly a decade on, close to agreeing to the Biden administration’s demand that Assange be extradited to the U.S. — both to silence him and to intimidate any other journalists who might try to throw a light on U.S. war crimes.


The Italian journalist Stefania Maurizi has been pursuing a lengthy legal battle to have the CPS emails from Starmer’s time released under a Freedom of Information request. She has been opposed by the British Establishment every step of the way. We know that many of the email chains relating to Assange were destroyed by the Crown Prosecution Service — apparently illegally. Those would doubtless have shone a much clearer light on Starmer’s role in the case — possibly the reason they were destroyed.


The small number of emails that have been retrieved show that the Crown Prosecution Service under Starmer micro-managed the Swedish investigation of Assange, even bullying Swedish prosecutors to pursue the case when they had started to lose interest for lack of evidence. In one email from 2012, a CPS lawyer warned his Swedish counterpart: “Don’t you dare get cold feet!!!.” In another from 2011, the CPS lawyer writes: “Please do not think this case is being dealt with as just another extradition.”

Arm Twisting

Again, the idea that Starmer was not intimately involved in the decision to arm-twist Swedish prosecutors into persecuting a journalist — a case in which the U.K. should formally have had no direct interest, unless it was covertly advancing U.S. interests to silence Assange — beggars belief.

Despite the media’s lack of interest in Assange’s plight, the energy expended by the U.S. to get Assange behind bars in the U.S. and redefine national security journalism as espionage shows how politically and diplomatically important this case has always been to the U.S. — and by extension, the British Establishment.

There is absolutely no way the deliberations were handled by a single lawyer. Starmer would have closely overseen his staff’s dealings with Swedish prosecutors and authorized what was in practice a political decision, not legal one, to persecute Assange — or as United Nations experts defined it, “arbitrarily detain” him.


Neither Murray nor I have unique, Sherlock-type powers of deduction that allow us to join the dots in ways no one else can manage. All of this information is in the public realm, and all of it is known to the editors of the British media. They are not only choosing to avoid mentioning it in the context of the current row, but they are actively fulminating against Boris Johnson for having done so.

The prime minister’s crime isn’t that he has “smeared” Starmer. It is that — out of desperate self-preservation — he has exposed the dark underbelly of the Establishment. He has broken the elite’s omerta, its vow of silence. He has made the unpardonable sin of grassing up the Establishment to which he belongs. He has potentially given ammunition to the great unwashed to expose the Establishment’s misdeeds, to blow apart its cover story. That is why the anger is far more palpable and decisive about Johnson smearing Starmer than it ever was when Johnson smeared the rest of us by partying on through the lockdowns.

Scorched-Earth Tactic?

Look at this headline on Jonathan Freedland’s column for The Guardian, visibly aquiver with anger at the way Johnson has defamed Starmer: “Johnson’s Savile smear was the scorched-earth tactic of a desperate, dangerous man.”

A prime minister attacking the opposition leader — something we would normally think of as a largely unexceptional turn of political events, and all the more so under Johnson — has been transformed by Freedland into a dangerous, scorched-earth tactic.

Quite how preposterous, and hypocritical, this claim is should not need underscoring. Who really needs to be reminded of how Freedland and the rest of the media class — but especially Freedland — treated Starmer’s predecessor, Jeremy Corbyn? That really was a scorched-earth approach. There was barely a day in his five years leading the Labour Party when the media did not fabricate the most outrageous lies about Corbyn and his party. He was shabby and unstatesmanlike (unlike the smartly attired Johnson!), sexist, a traitor, a threat to national security, an anti-Semite, and much more.

Anyone like Freedland who actively participated in the five-year campaign of demonization of Corbyn has no credibility whatsoever either complaining about the supposed mistreatment of Starmer (a pale shadow of what Corbyn suffered) or decrying Johnson’s lowering of standards in public life.

We have the rightwing populist Johnson in power precisely because Freedland and the rest of the media relentlessly smeared the democratic socialist alternative. In the 2017 election, let us recall, Corbyn was only 2,000 votes from winning. The concerted campaign of smears from across the entire corporate media — and the resulting manipulation of the public mood — was the difference between Corbyn winning and the Tories holding on to power.

Corbyn was destroyed — had to be destroyed — because he threatened Establishment interests. He challenged the interests of the rich, of the corporations, of the war industries, of the Israel lobby. That was why an anonymous military general warned in the pages of the Establishment’s newspaper, The Times, that there would be a mutiny if Corbyn ever reached 10 Downing Street. That was why soldiers were filmed using an image of Corbyn as target practice on a firing range in Afghanistan.

Johnson’s desperate “smears” aside, none of this will ever happen to Starmer. There will be no threats of mutiny and his image will never be used for target practice by the army. Sir Keir won’t be defamed by the billionaire-owned media. Rather, they have demonstrated that they have his back. They will even promote him over an alumnus of the Bullingdon Club, when the blokey toff’s shine starts to wear off.

And that, it should hardly need pointing out, is because Sir Keir Starmer is there to protect not the public’s interests but the interests of the Establishment, just as he did so conscientiously when he was director of public prosecutions."

Jonathan Cook is a former Guardian journalist (1994-2001) and winner of the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism. He is a freelance journalist based in Nazareth. If you appreciate his articles, please consider offering your financial support.

This article is from his blog Jonathan Cook.net.

The views expressed are solely those of the author and may or may not reflect those of Consortium News.

Tags: Boris Johnson Craig Murray Crown Prosecution Service Jeremy Corbyn Jimmy Savile Jonathan Cook Jonathan Freedland Keir Starmer Partygate smears The Guardian

[Dorjezigzag]

This has appeared in the British press.

Prince Andrew was 'creepiest massage client and asked X-rated questions', claims physio
Massage therapist Emma Gruenbaum claims she had six sessions with Prince Andrew in 2005 and he would always try to "overstep the line", including asking her inappropriate questions


Emma Gruenbaum, 50, said the Duke of York would often ask about her love life and tried to hug her at the end of sessions, held in Royal Lodge, Windsor Great Park.

She claimed she swore at the Queen's second son, 61, after he made a comment about her bum and after another remark told him: "It’s none of your f***ing business."

It comes as Andrew's legal team claimed his sex-case accuser Virginia Giuffre - who alleges he forced her to have sex when she was underage - "may suffer from false memories".

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/prince-andrew-creepiest-massage-client-26200324

[mizo]

Andrew settles out of court - shame I was hoping to see him done!

https://news.sky.com/story/prince-andrew-and-virginia-giuffre-settle-out-of-court-over-civil-sex-assault-claim-12542826

Prince Andrew and his accuser Virginia Giuffre have settled out of court over her civil sex assault claim filed in the US, according to court documents.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1493618810015916033

[Mari]

Andrew settles out of court - shame I was hoping to see him done!

https://news.sky.com/story/prince-andrew-and-virginia-giuffre-settle-out-of-court-over-civil-sex-assault-claim-12542826

Prince Andrew and his accuser Virginia Giuffre have settled out of court over her civil sex assault claim filed in the US, according to court documents.

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1493618810015916033


This is damage limitation. He was probably ordered by the senior members of the Family to settle, as it just would not be the done thing to have this sleaze hanging over him and the rest of them during the Platinum celebrations this year. It makes him look as guilty as hell, to be sure, but he's been thrown on the bonfire here, to take the spotlight away from The Firm.

[Hermoor]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FLuH2rjWQAAuUmR?format=png&name=small

[Bill Ryan]

A damning 3-minute montage from Sky News Australia, which has been critical of Prince Andrew for a very long time.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Us4pDNEd8Dg

[scotslad]

British comedian rips Prince Andrew's TV interview to bits and nice contradictiory evidence at the end that really makes andrew's statements look ridiculous...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nN9DmqQQNbw

[onawah]

Inside the court case that ended in the humiliation of Prince Andrew
1,393,174 views Feb 20, 2022
24K
60 Minutes Australia
4.17M subscribers

"Not all pictures tell a thousand words. This one tells so many more. We’ll never know for sure, but it’s also probably worth about $20 million. That’s the reported price Prince Andrew will pay Virginia Guiffre to settle a very disturbing legal case against him. She says when she was 17 she was trafficked to the Prince by the paedophile businessman Jeffrey Epstein, ably assisted by his sex-offender partner, Ghislaine Maxwell. Despite that photo, Andrew denies ever meeting, let alone having sex with Ms Guiffre, but he’s been so discredited, these days it’s difficult to believe anything the disgraced royal says."

1jaFsij5a_A

[onawah]

UNTOUCHABLE - Jimmy Savile documentary by Underground Films & Shaun Attwood Podcast 283
383,598 views Premiered May 4, 2022
6.9K
Shaun Attwood
693K subscribers
KL6nD_7aQlc

Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?114453-Overview-Establishment-Pedo-Network-Cover-Up-&p=1501569&viewfull=1#post1501569

[onawah]

Prince Harry: The 60 Minutes Interview
60 Minutes
1.87M subscribers
31K
2,007,566 views
Jan 8, 2023

"Prince Harry and Anderson Cooper speak in the royal’s first American television interview about his new memoir, “Spare.”

PCOojny1-fM

(This isn't about Andrew, obviously, but Harry comes across as surprisingly sincere, imho, and it may give some good insights into what actually has been going on within the family (irrespective of Andrew), and the price celebrity pays for constantly being a target of the paparazzi.
Camilla is certainly portrayed by Harry as the evil stepmother, which I don't doubt at all, and the disappointment he feels toward his father is apparent in one revealing moment. )

[Tintin]

New Delhi: Britain’s Prince Andrew is once again facing serious allegations of child abuse. His relationship with controversies seems to be unending. The fresh allegations against the Prince were made during his visit to Ukraine amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. He visited Ukraine in June.

The Prince was apparently part of the delegation that visited the war-ravaged country during British Foreign Minister James Cleverley’s visit. The Prince is now facing serious allegations of abusing 2 children in a high-profile club in Kyiv. These allegations were made by James Obasi, a Nigerian origin person who was entrusted with the responsibility of hosting the British delegation at the club in Kyiv.

----------------------------

One can't really add to this in any meaningful way beyond this summary. Frankly despicable :facepalm:

----------------------------

Full article here: https://www.news9live.com/world/britains-prince-andrew-accused-of-sexual-abuse-during-visit-to-ukraine-2271914

Britain’s Prince Andrew accused of sexual abuse during visit to Ukraine
An eyewitness claimed that he saw Prince Andrew misbehaving with 2 children at a club in Kyiv |
Written By: Manish Jha | Edited By: Mani Raj

Text:


BREAKING REPORT: Prince Andrew accused of sexually abusing a 12-YEAR-OLD GIRL AND 10-YEAR-OLD BOY during a visit to Ukraine earlier this year.

TV9 News India reports The Prince was apparently part of the delegation that visited the war-ravaged country during British Foreign Minister James Cleverley’s visit.

James Obasi, an official working in a club in Kyiv, says that Prince Andrew had asked him to arrange some food and drink for the two children.

When he returned with food items for the children, he saw that Prince Andrew was behaving in an objectionable manner with the children.

He kept the plate of food and went away from there. When James Obasi returned after some time, he found the children in a critical condition.

There were hardly any clothes on the children’s bodies, the children were extremely scared and were crying continuously.

According to Obasi, he tried to take care of the children, but the security personnel took them away with them.

It is alleged that two days later, the children were taken to Paris by a British delegation in a special plane.

Source: Chuck Callesto - https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1698155164459221090

https://avalonlibrary.net/Tintin/Prince_Andrew_accused_of_violating_two_children_in_Ukraine_during_Cleverly%27s_visit_earlier_in_2023 .mp4

[grapevine]

My heart is so heavy after watching that video, especially having watched the Alex Collier video yesterday. I sympathise with the eyewitness as he would probably have been killed if he hadn't gone along with it, but now he has to live with his conscience. I wonder what we would have done in the same position? If he'd told the Police/Press I doubt whether it would have made any difference at all, and they may even have been complicit - and that's the real problem isn't it? Not knowing what to do . . .

As an aside, I was returning home from shopping last week and noticed an elderly man hovering around a group of young children (aged between 8 and about 10), who seemed completely oblivious to the man's presence. As I walked past him I said, "Do you know these children?" and he nodded, although he didn't look me in the eye. I walked on a few yards then turned back and said to the children quite loudly, "Excuse me, do you know that man?" (who had sat down on a low wall at this point). The eldest boy looked a little startled, but then looked at the man and then back at me and said yes they did, and I felt a bit of an idiot as it must've been his grandfather who was keeping an eye on them. Nevertheless, I'll definitely do that again if I think something looks odd.

:focus:

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

"Excuse me, do you know that man?"

I'm glad you did that, and not just for their sake. Gives peace of mind if nothing else. Unfortunately, I wouldn't have been so brave.

As a man, you're most self-conscious of being one. It didn't used to be a thing, but it is now. I can't speak for every man, but in general, you wouldn't dare speak to a random child on the street, or approach a suspicious male guardian of one, not unless you've got back up. You're much more likely to get away with it as a woman, but us men, unfortunately, we've been put in a position where it's simply in our best interests to keep our eyes down and our gobs shut.

A thoroughly sad state of affairs.

[Kryztian]

New Delhi: Britain’s Prince Andrew is once again facing serious allegations of child abuse. His relationship with controversies seems to be unending. The fresh allegations against the Prince were made during his visit to Ukraine amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. He visited Ukraine in June.

The Prince was apparently part of the delegation that visited the war-ravaged country during British Foreign Minister James Cleverley’s visit. The Prince is now facing serious allegations of abusing 2 children in a high-profile club in Kyiv. These allegations were made by James Obasi, a Nigerian origin person who was entrusted with the responsibility of hosting the British delegation at the club in Kyiv.


Disgusting. Repulsive. Shameful.

While this is only one witness, and there is probably a lot more that can be investigated on this matter, we know we absolutely certainty that:


Andrew Windsor (sorry, I refuse to call this entity "Prince") absolutely denied that he knew who Virginia Giuffre was, and then numerous photographs surface showing that he indeed know here well, proving that Andrew is absolutely liar.


The crown paid taxpayer money (I think seven million) in hush money to Ms. Guffrie. In other words, British taxpayers had to pay lots of money to keep themselves from knowing the truth that their "prince" was a rapist of underage sex trafficking victims.


It's clear that not only is Andrew a criminal, but the British Crown is an accessory to child rape. Just as the U.S. president's family has the Secret Service, the "Royal" Family has the Royalty and Specialist Protection division of Protection Command. They would know everything about the places where Andrew was going to visit before he ever got there. They would have clearly know that Little St. James Island, VI, (Jeffrey Epstein's compound) was a place where young women were trafficked and used as sex slaves. They would have also know where Andrew was going to in Kiev (if he did go there) and what criminal activities were going on there. They were clearly guilty of accessory to rape in the Virgin Islands and, if these new allegations are true, are also guilty of the same charge in Kiev.


When I asked people why Great Britain supports a "royal" family, I was frequently given the reason that they are models to look up. Over the last few decades, that answer seemed somewhat laughable, as their family shennanigans unfolded like a bad soap opera in the British tabloid press. But with the Guiffre story and now these new allegations, this clearly show that the British "Royal" Family is much worse the mediocre - they are, in fact, the dregs of humanity, using taxpayer money to enact unspeakable crimes.

I do think the British taxpayers should continue to support the Royal family lifestyle, living on government property and being fed at taxpayer expense, but they should be living not in Buckingham Palace and Balmoral Castle eating lobster and champagne, but in Belmarsh Prison eating four dollar a day meals and cleaning prison toilets!

[Kryztian]

Andrew Lownie has written biographies, and is no stranger to royalty, having written a book on the Mountbattens. He is working on one on Prince Andrew which seems near publication (although he didn't say exactly when.) Per this interview:

YUf23TO6ln4


There are more women who were sexually abused by Andrew, and their testimony is forth coming.


How his biggest crimes are financial ones. He uses his power and position to do favors for people and businesses. He stays in 5 star hotels paid for by the taxpayers to do business deals that do not benefit the British taxpayer. His ex-wife Fergie, also seems to be involved.


His spending habits indicate that he has a lot of other income, other than his salary from the military and his annual stipend from the crown. This may also have something to do with his visits to Epstein Island.

[Kryztian]

Michael Cole, a BBC journalist, has covered the British royals for decades. He interviewed Andrew Windsor and Sarah Ferguson around the time their became engaged in the 1980s and it was considered one of the best interviews of royals ever.

Here he is to say that Andrew will never have a public life again. It seemed unlikely up until now, but the new Netflix movie Scoop has made that a definite. If he has any future, it is on the golf course.

JMjh0dhSXVM

[Kryztian]

Alleged Chinese spy linked to Prince Andrew named amid row over foreign interests register
Claims surrounding businessman Yang Tengbo put spotlight on whether to designate China as enhanced risk
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/dec/16/alleged-chinese-spy-linked-to-prince-andrew-named-as-yang-tengbo

An alleged spy who befriended Prince Andrew has been named as the businessman Yang Tengbo, amid a row at the heart of government over how to deal with influential Chinese nationals.


https://i.imgur.com/QrIu5Mj.jpeg
Yang Tengbo insisted he was not a spy and had done ‘nothing wrong or unlawful’.

The allegations surrounding Yang have cast a spotlight on the government’s plans for a foreign interests register and whether to designate China as an enhanced risk in the middle of Labour’s new charm offensive towards Beijing.

The security minister Dan Jarvis said a planned shake-up of security laws that would require those working for a foreign government to declare this or face criminal prosecution would now not be ready until summer 2025. His Tory predecessor Tom Tugendhat said MI5 had advised that the scheme would be pointless unless it designated China as the highest risk.

Yang, who split his time between the UK and China for almost two decades, ran the Duke of York’s Pitch@Palace in China – a Dragons’ Den-style project. He was also given authority to act on the prince’s behalf in Chinese business dealings, according to court documents.

He was also pictured with two former Conservative prime ministers, Theresa May and David Cameron. Yang is also known to have met a number of other politicians, including the former deputy prime minister John Prescott.

In a statement, Yang insisted he was not a spy and had done “nothing wrong or unlawful” and had asked the high court to lift the anonymity order so he could challenge “ill-founded” claims against him.

Jarvis told the Commons on Monday the government would lay the regulations for foreign influence registration scheme (Firs) in the new year with it going live in summer 2025. He said no decision had been taken on whether to designate China as an enhanced risk.

Under Firs there would be a basic level of declarations, called the political influence tier, and an enhanced tier, for countries deemed a threat to national security such as Russia.

Tugendhat told the Guardian that Yang would have been covered under the scope of Firs if it had been in place. Speaking in the Commons on Monday, the Tory MP said his officials had told him the scheme was ready and questioned why the government was delaying. “The advice from MI5 was very, very clear. If China isn’t in the enhanced tier it’s not worth having,” Tugendhat said.

A business source said there was a split between the Home Office, which wants China to be designated a threat to national security under the scheme, and the Treasury, which is relaying concerns about the burden on businesses. “That fight is under way again in Whitehall,” the source said.

A Conservative source said Rishi Sunak’s government had decided to include China in the enhanced tier after a similar debate took place internally.

“The City had some concerns that they would have to be putting on reams of paperwork for whatever deal they did,” they said. It was reported in the spring that leading banks and other financial services firms included HSBC, Standard Chartered and Prudential were lobbying ministers to tone down the plans.

However, the Conservative source said all departments including the Treasury eventually came round to the decision to include China in the enhanced scheme.

Ministers are simultaneously carrying out a cross-Whitehall audit of the UK-China relationship, which insiders now expect to conclude in March.

Yang, 50, the former chair of Hampton Group, a consultancy firm, had been in the UK for almost two decades. He was first stopped by counter-terrorism services in 2021 and ordered to surrender his devices.

In February 2023, Yang was “off-boarded” from a flight from Beijing to London and in March he was excluded from the UK. His appeal against the decision was rejected last week by the special immigration appeals tribunal (Siac).

The businessman had visited the UK regularly, attending events at a series of royal residences including Andrew’s birthday party at the prince’s Windsor home.

The hearing heard Yang was barred because he was believed to be associated with China’s United Front Work Department, which seeks to gather intelligence on influential overseas nationals. The ruling said in his witness statement Yang had “downplayed his links” with the group.

In a statement on Friday, Andrew’s office said he had stopped all contact with the man, whom he had met through “official channels” with “nothing of a sensitive nature ever discussed”. The duke is to stay away from the royal family’s traditional Christmas gathering at Sandringham this year amid the controversy.

Yang said in a statement he was devastated to have been excluded from the UK and denied he had ever acted against British interests. He said there was a “high level of speculation and misreporting in the media, and elsewhere” and he was applying to appeal against the decision to exclude him.

“The political climate has changed, and unfortunately, I have fallen victim to this. When relations are good, and Chinese investment is sought, I am welcome in the UK. When relations sour, an anti-China stance is taken, and I am excluded,” he said.

In the judgment that upheld his exclusion from the UK, the judge found Yang “won a significant degree, one could say an unusual degree, of trust from a senior member of the royal family who was prepared to enter into business activities with him”.

When the businessman’s phone was searched, officials uncovered a letter from March 2020 from Dominic Hampshire, a senior adviser to Andrew, which referred to him being invited to the prince’s birthday party that month and said: “Outside of his closest internal confidants, you sit at the very top of a tree that many, many people would like to be on.”

A document was also found on Yang’s phone that had “main talking points” for a call with Andrew, which said he was “in a ‘desperate situation and will grab on to anything’.”

Guy Vassall-Adams KC, acting for Yang, told the high court threats to name his client in parliament by MPs had been part of the reason he had decided to apply to lift the anonymity order.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/dec/16/alleged-chinese-spy-linked-to-prince-andrew-named-as-yang-tengbo

[Kryztian]

Prince Andrew Set to Flee England for Controversial Secret Palace Overseas

https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/prince-andrew-set-to-flee-england-for-controversial-secret-palace-overseas/ar-AA1wdvd4

Prince Andrew may have been frozen out of the British royal family yet again, but another royal family seems keen to adopt him.

The prince has been gifted the use of a palace in Abu Dhabi by the country’s autocratic elite, the royal historian and freedom-of-information campaigner Andrew Lownie will claim in a hotly anticipated biography of the prince to be published next year, The Daily Beast can reveal.

The Daily Beast reported this week that several of Andrew’s friends say he could “do a Harry” and flee the U.K. for the Middle East next year after feeling that he has been unfairly treated over his relationship with Yang Tengbo.

Yang is a Chinese businessman formerly based in London who has been unmasked as a suspected Chinese spy. He successfully cultivated a close personal and business relationship with Andrew after he was expelled from the royal family (for the first time) after his disastrous BBC interview about his relationship with the pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Documents found in Yang’s possession highlighting “main talking points” for a call with Andrew said he was “in a desperate situation and will grab on to anything.”

Yang ran the Chinese arm of Andrew’s Pitch@Palace initiative, and Andrew was entitled to a 2 percent cut of any investment deals made.

It is a matter of public record that Andrew freely used private palaces owned by the UAE’s ruling House of Nahyan when he was a trade ambassador for the U.K. over a decade ago. However, Lownie, who is writing a biography of the prince due out next year called Entitled: The Controversial Lives of the Duke and Duchess of York, told the Daily Beast that Andrew continues to have exclusive access to at least one fully staffed private palace in the country despite not technically owning it.

The revelation will raise yet further questions about how Andrew pays for his lavish lifestyle.

Fears that foreign powers have compromised Andrew have escalated in the wake of the stunning financial and espionage scandal roiling the U.K. establishment.

Andrew has been entirely excluded from the royal family’s Christmas celebrations as a result of the latest scandal. He seems to have exhausted the forbearance of his brother, King Charles III, which had seen him and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, slowly brought back into royal life.

Lownie, who has waged a decade-long freedom-of-information war with royal authorities over access to a laundry list of concealed documents, told the Daily Beast: “Andrew has been given the use of a palace by the Abu Dhabi authorities. It costs them nothing. He has been spending a lot of time out there in recent years and I am told by reliable sources that from next year he may divide his time between the Middle East and the U.K. He is expected to go between the two.

“It makes sense for him; there is good weather, he is treated with deference, there are a lot of golf courses, and he can conduct his business affairs however he sees fit.

“The whole family are up to their necks in it. The children, Beatrice and Eugenie, have been out in the Middle East and so has Fergie.”

Prince Andrew no longer has a spokesperson; a solicitor who has worked for him extensively and a PR executive thought to sometimes help him did not respond to requests for comment.

Lownie points out that it is well established that Andrew and his family have admitted to or been proven to have accepted money from dubious foreign individuals.

In just one recent case, a lawsuit revealed that Andrew, his ex-wife, and their daughters received a series of payments totaling £1.4 million ($1.75m) from an alleged fraudster, Selman Turk. Turk allegedly duped a Turkish heiress into sending Andrew the money. Turk, who denies the allegations, also won a “People’s Choice” award at one of Andrew’s Pitch@Palace events. Turk has been jailed for contempt of court for failing to produce documents as ordered. The case is ongoing.

In another widely publicized case, Andrew received £3 million ($3.75m) more than the asking price for his home when he sold it in 2007 to the son-in-law of the then-president of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev. The house sat empty for years, was demolished and rebuilt, and is now empty again.

It was first reported in 2010 that Andrew had free use of a “very impressive” and “gilded mini-palace” in Abu Dhabi. Andrew’s then-spokesman confirmed he was “given the use of a villa by the Abu Dhabi royal family” for both personal and professional use.

Norman Baker, a former British government minister who wrote extensively about the royals’ finances in a book entitled And What Do You Do?—which has a chapter about Prince Andrew titled “The Grand Old Duke of Sleaze”—told the Daily Beast: “While Andrew’s involvement with Epstein was pretty distasteful, the real scandal is his abuse of his position as U.K. trade envoy to enrich himself. Why was he engaged so heavily with this Chinese person, and why was the Chinese person engaged with him? The only logical explanation was he wanted money because he was, to quote the Chinese alleged spy’s email, ‘desperate.’

“Andrew suffers from a fatal combination of arrogance, stupidity, and greed, which leads him to do the things he does. But actually, the practice of taking something for nothing from an external source, the practice of dealing with unpleasant regimes across the world, the practice of being prepared to hide everything—these are traits that apply to Charles and the rest of the royal family. It’s just they’re rather more subtle about it.

“It wasn’t very long ago that Charles was captured accepting bags of cash, thousands of pounds of cash in Fortnum & Mason bags, from an overseas donor of dubious integrity. He looked like a mafia boss. So, Andrew in a sense is no different from anybody else. He’s just more clumsy and stupid about it.”

if Andrew does end up in Abu Dhabi, the capital of the United Arab Emirates, he will be able to compare notes with another disgraced royal, Spain’s King Juan Carlos, who has lived there since 2020 when he fled Spain amidst a corruption scandal.

[Bill Ryan]

Just released:

WORLD EXCLUSIVE: 'Prince Andrew Was F*ing Underage Girls' — Tape of Royal Family Advisor Exposes Prince Andrew’s Sexual Relations with Minors and Deep Ties to Jeffrey Epstein

https://x.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1920229624774033524
1920229624774033524

[onawah]

King Charles' Mentor Lord Mountbatten Exposed Andrew Lownie Podcast 780 Royal Family Prince Harry
Shaun Attwood
1.03M subscribers
8/18/25

"Andrew's new biography claims startling insight into the private lives of the Duke of York and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson. From relationships with women to Andrew’s mysterious finances, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, by the historian Andrew Lownie, also dives into the prince’s ill-advised friendship with the disgraced US financier Jeffrey Epstein."

KQj-kA2iV60

[Bill Ryan]

Copying this important update posted by onawah on the Breaking News thread:

(https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?113363-BREAKING-NEWS-Continuously-Updated&p=1690191&viewfull=1#post1690191)~~~

Andrew stripped of 'prince' title and will move out of Royal Lodge | BBC News

10/30/25

Andrew will lose his title and move out of Royal Lodge, a statement from Buckingham Palace has said.

Buckingham Palace says the King "has today initiated a formal process", and his brother will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

As well as the title, the Palace says "formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease" on Royal Lodge, and Andrew will move to the royal estate in Sandringham, Norfolk

"These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him," the Palace said.

Andrew gave up his other royal titles earlier this month after more questions about his private life. In a posthumous memoir, Virginia Giuffre repeated allegations that, as a teenager, she had sex with Prince Andrew on three separate occasions. Andrew has always denied the claims.

Also this month, emails from 2011 re-emerged, showing Andrew in contact with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein months after he claimed their friendship ended."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VB2eRwOp_Ck

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by the BBC an hour ago, clearly showing the public response.

'Question Time' audience reacts to Andrew losing 'prince' title


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6hii6PMu5I

[Mari]

Copying this important update posted by onawah on the Breaking News thread:

(https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?113363-BREAKING-NEWS-Continuously-Updated&p=1690191&viewfull=1#post1690191)~~~

Andrew stripped of 'prince' title and will move out of Royal Lodge | BBC News

10/30/25

Andrew will lose his title and move out of Royal Lodge, a statement from Buckingham Palace has said.

Buckingham Palace says the King "has today initiated a formal process", and his brother will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

As well as the title, the Palace says "formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease" on Royal Lodge, and Andrew will move to the royal estate in Sandringham, Norfolk

"These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him," the Palace said.

Andrew gave up his other royal titles earlier this month after more questions about his private life. In a posthumous memoir, Virginia Giuffre repeated allegations that, as a teenager, she had sex with Prince Andrew on three separate occasions. Andrew has always denied the claims.

Also this month, emails from 2011 re-emerged, showing Andrew in contact with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein months after he claimed their friendship ended."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VB2eRwOp_Ck


And the most impressive bit of the Palace Statement was the line: "Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse."

Hallelujah! About bloody time their Majesties coughed up this one, because it was sorely lacking in any 'statement' given out by the former prince -not that any of us expected it from him. It's good that the current holders of the Throne recognise just what needs to be voiced and acknowledged.

[onawah]

This one too: Also this month, emails from 2011 re-emerged, showing Andrew in contact with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein months after he claimed their friendship ended.
I imagine that after that reveal, the Royals couldn't continue with the pretense.


And the most impressive bit of the Palace Statement was the line: "Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse."
.

[bojancan]

Interesting talk today... now.. I was listening part of talking by Paul Former / former Royal Protection Officer with Shaun, Paula and Lauren... topic Andrew and Epstein Saga...
I was thinking while listening it all about Andrew... if he is gonna start ratting people out.... cutting deals with potential investigators... it seams to me it is not finished yet...

Nov, 02
Shaun Attwood
1.05M subscribers
PRINCE ANDREW EXPOSED by Royal Family EX COP Paul Page Pt 3 - Virginia Epstein Maxwell King Charles
i1v1tmVOvls

[Mari]

This one too: Also this month, emails from 2011 re-emerged, showing Andrew in contact with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein months after he claimed their friendship ended.
I imagine that after that reveal, the Royals couldn't continue with the pretense.


And the most impressive bit of the Palace Statement was the line: "Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse."
.

The fact was, this man was caught out in a Lie - not just one, but several, and they were pretty pathetic lies - 'I have a condition' whereas I can't sweat', was his 'alibi' for not visiting that nightclub with Virginia Guiffre. Among several others, he dragged his daughters Beatrice and Eugenie into it by stating he took them (or one of them) to Pizza Express (on a particular night) Its a mark of the sheer arrogance and stupidity of the man that, despite 'advice' from his advisors, he decided to go ahead with that Newsnight interview back in 2019, thinking his 'charisma' would carry him through. What a Twat, as we British like to say.

[happyuk]

Copying this important update posted by onawah on the Breaking News thread:

(https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?113363-BREAKING-NEWS-Continuously-Updated&p=1690191&viewfull=1#post1690191)~~~

Andrew stripped of 'prince' title and will move out of Royal Lodge | BBC News

10/30/25

Andrew will lose his title and move out of Royal Lodge, a statement from Buckingham Palace has said.

Buckingham Palace says the King "has today initiated a formal process", and his brother will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor.

As well as the title, the Palace says "formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease" on Royal Lodge, and Andrew will move to the royal estate in Sandringham, Norfolk

"These censures are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him," the Palace said.

Andrew gave up his other royal titles earlier this month after more questions about his private life. In a posthumous memoir, Virginia Giuffre repeated allegations that, as a teenager, she had sex with Prince Andrew on three separate occasions. Andrew has always denied the claims.

Also this month, emails from 2011 re-emerged, showing Andrew in contact with sex offender Jeffrey Epstein months after he claimed their friendship ended."


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VB2eRwOp_Ck


And the most impressive bit of the Palace Statement was the line: "Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse."

Hallelujah! About bloody time their Majesties coughed up this one, because it was sorely lacking in any 'statement' given out by the former prince -not that any of us expected it from him. It's good that the current holders of the Throne recognise just what needs to be voiced and acknowledged.

The swamp runs deep in the establishment. According to Lord Mountbatten’s biographer, authorities in the US destroyed FBI dossiers on Lord Mountbatten at the request of the British Government after the discovery of a wartime file accusing the royal of being a paedophile. Lord Mountbatten (Prince Andrew's great-uncle) was alleged to be a homosexual with a perversion for young boys. The FBI files reportedly span over three decades, starting during his tenure as Supreme Allied Commander, South East Asia, in 1944.

One FBI file dating from February 1944 records a statement by Elizabeth de la Poer Beresford, Baroness Decies, who said:


In these circles Lord Louis Mountbatten … and his wife are considered persons of extremely low morals. … He is known to be a homosexual with a perversion for young boys.

The files also remark (https://deprogramwiki.com/deprogramwiki-data/uploads/2nd-ed.-eyes-wide-open-book-7th-october-2019.pdf)that Mountbatten and his wife, Edwina Mountbatten, Countess Mountbatten of Burma, were judged by some sources as
persons of extremely low morals.

One theory that has done the rounds is that UK spooks found out about the IRA's genuine plan to bomb his boat and did....nothing, because they were so sick of him compromising national security they let it happen.

[Bluegreen]

The fated exclamation points that put Andrew into exile.

[Mari]

Interesting talk today... now.. I was listening part of talking by Paul Former / former Royal Protection Officer with Shaun, Paula and Lauren... topic Andrew and Epstein Saga...
I was thinking while listening it all about Andrew... if he is gonna start ratting people out.... cutting deals with potential investigators... it seams to me it is not finished yet...

Nov, 02
Shaun Attwood
1.05M subscribers
PRINCE ANDREW EXPOSED by Royal Family EX COP Paul Page Pt 3 - Virginia Epstein Maxwell King Charles
i1v1tmVOvls

I don't think he will 'rat' on his family, as no doubt his brother, as part of Andrew's 'package', will have threatened him with his daughters being stripped of their titles should he do so. Whatever you may think of him, AMW does love his daughters. Let's hope he truly does think of their welfare.

[happyuk]

JUST IN - Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, ordered by House Democrats to appear before congress in Washington, DC for questioning over his links to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

56284

[rick]

They ALL need to go into the wood chipper.

[bojancan]

Interesting talk today... now.. I was listening part of talking by Paul Former / former Royal Protection Officer with Shaun, Paula and Lauren... topic Andrew and Epstein Saga...
I was thinking while listening it all about Andrew... if he is gonna start ratting people out.... cutting deals with potential investigators... it seams to me it is not finished yet...

Nov, 02
Shaun Attwood
1.05M subscribers
PRINCE ANDREW EXPOSED by Royal Family EX COP Paul Page Pt 3 - Virginia Epstein Maxwell King Charles
i1v1tmVOvls

I don't think he will 'rat' on his family, as no doubt his brother, as part of Andrew's 'package', will have threatened him with his daughters being stripped of their titles should he do so. Whatever you may think of him, AMW does love his daughters. Let's hope he truly does think of their welfare.

With all due respect on your feed back on my few words here Mari... I didn't mean to ratting out his family... but all Epstein circle...
They were many many men and women involved in that BAD stuff... also just knowingly be there in this circle and not be encouraged to say something...
He will be telling I think so... you see... they are inviting him before congress to spill the beens...