UK Filter to Block ‘Esoteric Content'

[ponda]

Infographic: UK Filter to Block ‘Esoteric Content’ – Worldwide Implications



Can you imagine a world where access to spiritual information was blocked by the government? What if you stopped by an internet cafe, only to find your favorite website was banned by a public web filter, or your friend’s natural health website was blocked because it mentioned ‘spiritual healing’ techniques? A disturbing movement to censor perfectly legal spiritual information is growing (right now in the UK, but other countries are poised to jump on the bandwagon), and will continue unchecked unless people become aware of the problem and protest it. Find out more about the UK filter, and how it will affect you, below.


http://www.reachinglight.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/UK_Esoteric_Filter_Infographic2.jpg

Source (http://consciousreporter.com/conspiracy-against-consciousness/infographic-uk-filter-to-block-esoteric-content-worldwide-implications/)


Another interesting link with more info

Web of Deceit: The Bilderberg Group and Elite Powerbrokers Linked to the UK’s Stealth Internet Censorship Coup (http://consciousreporter.com/conspiracy-against-consciousness/web-of-deceit-the-bilderberg-group-and-elite-powerbrokers-linked-to-the-uks-stealth-internet-censorship-coup/2/)

[Verdilac]

1984......................

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52wis_sLT1I#t=13

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ox-shlDXKO4

[cursichella1]

Ya, they'd probably filter out all but MSM news, establishment 'educational' sites and commerce (God forbid we stop buying cr@p online! The big companies might lose $!).

This was supposed to be in effect at the end of 2013 according to the splash. Anyone know if this plan is still in the works?

[A Voice from the Mountains]

This kind of stuff is pure NWO evil. US politicians and other influential people have been saying for years that the Internet is a threat (to them) and that someone should do something about it. The trouble is that too many people would get too pissed.

It's been said many times before that there will never be a revolution in the US until someone cuts all the TV's off so the guys can't watch football anymore. Well the Internet is becoming the new TV, and if you start messing with that, what do you think the public response would be?

Instead of what the government is proposing, there's more support for things like Pirate Bay and the idea of free information. As in, not only are people free to say whatever they want about any subject, but they shouldn't have to pay for information either. I don't know how this would affect all industries but musicians for example could make more money from this actually, since when you buy a $20 CD the band usually has to divide up 10 cents from it and the rest goes to the record companies who are now being totally cut out. Bands make most of their money from touring, and increased online sharing increases the number of gig opportunities worldwide.

So we just have to find new ways of making money from things like books and music. Instead of banning things make all digital information totally free.

[Omni]

I signed the petition. Things like this inspire hatred in me if I am in a particularly emotional field of being and in the right mood. Part of me wants whoever does this to be punished......... Feels like millennia of slavery, spiritual anguish, and lack of respect for freedom and life in general done by these same souls is inside me and wanting some retribution at times... I keep those feelings at bay... My true nature is non-violence to the T. But if one of these schmucks doing these legislations got ran over by a truck, or ended up with diabetes I wouldn't bat an eyelash...

[BF88]

Tor browser or virtual private networks will get around this.

[Lifebringer]

They would be cutting their own advertising throat, if people just went on when they wanted to connect for a specific purpose, like revealing a hidden danger to the people. Then they can watch it go viral and the cage close around them in prosecution.

[yelik]

David Cabal Cameron, UK prime evil leader told us straight to our face at the latter end of last year that they would effectively be curbing our freedoms on the net.

There is also a move to create a two tier Internet speed, one for the corporates and a slow lane for the rest of us, so trying to watch long vids on YouTube will likely become a real pain.

This move was inevitable because the Global Elites cannot rule without they keep their secrets. Despite their disinformation campaign it isn't working, It's only a matter of time before an attack similar to 911 will be linked to terrorism and social media thus providing the appropriate problem, reaction, solution.

This is why it is important for people to come together and say no more rather than sleepwalking into a totalitarian society.

[cursichella1]

At some point I hope that someone will come up with an alternative to the internet, that doesn't depend on cables and Corporations and is unstoppable by those wanting to control peoples' communications and access.

I understand the Tor browser is considered the way to go, but I have a funny feeling about it, like at some point, users may be caught up in a Tor "roundup" based on the excuse that a percentage of users use the anonymity of Tor to hide actual criminal activity. I'm not convinced that anything is safe...the surveillance technology seems to be leaps ahead of anything we can even imagine. What we used to believe was safe or secure is just the opposite. It wouldn't shock me at all to learn there's a back door built in. My God, they hijacked laptops en route to customers so they could install absolute access devices!

The surveillance capability was in place long before Snowden's/Binney's revelations, and certainly is already much more sophisticated than last year's revelations, so suddenly going underground seems ridiculous to me unless one is a whistleblower or planning something intense, though I guess if this proposed U.K. filter were to come about, there wouldn't be an alternative.

I wonder if that might be exactly what they want...easier to find the subversives if they're all using the same hidden web browser and encryption. Ha Imagine their panic if everyone was publicly, out in the open honest about what is going on using the obvious...Google Chrome, twitter, facebook, etc.?! Wouldn't be of much use in countries where there are filters, but would probably trip more than a few fuses at CyberCentral in Utah. Anyway, food for thought and playing 'devils advocate' and all of that...sorry if my thoughts ruffle any encryption apologists...it's late and I'm just thinking out loud here.

[MorningFox]

I find that very hard to believe. How do they possibly hope to do that... Under what pretext?

Frankly its an obvious admission to being what most people still don't believe they are, and would serve to wake the rest of the country up to their mind controlling, population dumbing ways.

I don't believe it but if they have the sheer audacity to try and do something like that it will certainly do us and not them the favour.

Not to mention people will simply leave their internet provider for one that doesn't block content.

I'm calling utter bull**** on this one.

[ponda]

I find that very hard to believe. How do they possibly hope to do that... Under what pretext?

Frankly its an obvious admission to being what most people still don't believe they are, and would serve to wake the rest of the country up to their mind controlling, population dumbing ways.

I don't believe it but if they have the sheer audacity to try and do something like that it will certainly do us and not them the favour.

Not to mention people will simply leave their internet provider for one that doesn't block content.

I'm calling utter bull**** on this one.



I'm not sure what you mean by 'utter bull****' but i assume that you mean that the filter is not real or does not already exist.

A quick search on 'startpage' (https://www.startpage.com/do/search) yielded a lot of info about the UK filter etc.


From this Wikipedia link (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_blocking_in_the_United_Kingdom)


The precise number of websites blocked in the United Kingdom is unknown. Blocking techniques vary from one Internet Service Provider (ISP) to another with some sites or specific URLs blocked by some ISPs and not others. Websites and services are blocked using a combination of data feeds from private content-control technology companies, government agencies, NGOs, court orders in conjunction with the service administrators who may or may not have the power to unblock, additionally block, appeal or recategorise blocked content.

Child pornography and obscene content has been blocked and covers 98% as of 2009
Copyright infringement site blocking covers 97% as of 2014
Default ISP filters cover 93% of NEW users ince January 2014
Mobile internet filtering covers 100% of NEW contracts since 2004
Wifi Hotspot filtering covers 90% of Public Wifi since 2013 and 49% of Wifi hotspots since 2013

ISP Default network blocking

Since the end of 2013, new Internet customers in the UK have had their Internet access filtered at the ISP level so that selected web sites are blocked by default. An ongoing program is being introduced to extend default blocking of prohibited content by ISPs to existing users. A voluntary code of practice agreed by all four major ISPs[48] means that customers have to 'opt out' of the ISP filtering to gain access to the blocked content.[49] However users cannot usually opt-out of the monitoring and re-routing of the traffic through likely exploitable equipment due to the complex nature of the active monitoring systems. The range of content blocked by ISPs can be increased over time.

My guess is that this is just the thin end of the wedge.The sort of websites that are filtered/blocked will increase over time as events unfold.The filter starts off as default on but the user can turn it off but later they will probably try to make the filter always on and not just for new users.It starts off as child pornography and copyright infringement being blocked then ends up being any sites that criticize the government or talk about conspiracy theories etc BUT if the public protests against these measures in enough numbers then it can be stopped imho.

cheers

[yelik]

The Cabal have the power and technology to do just about anything they want, so yes, they can and will censor Internet content or shut down any site they feel falls under 'their laws' relating to anything deemed not to be in the national interest.

[A Voice from the Mountains]

The Cabal have the power and technology to do just about anything they want, so yes, they can and will censor Internet content or shut down any site they feel falls under 'their laws' relating to anything deemed not to be in the national interest.

They couldn't do what they wanted in Australia with this, and US citizens have successfully pushed back against a couple similar bills that tried to sneak past Congress.

[yelik]

These people are above the law, in reality they have probably already started implementing it. As with most laws they often, unofficially, put them into practice a year or so before any law is passed. Absolutely anything can come under the national interest banner, that's why its is impossible to take legal action Against the Government to say explain what they know about free energy or existence of ET. Any case is killed off in it's tracks, that's how they keep their secrets and get away with blue murder, as it were.

Just wait for the false flag terror attack, the law will be passed easy peesey, everyone will rush to support it.

[Anchor]

The internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

-- John Gilmore (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_Gilmore)