View Full Version : 911: WTC1 Top Floors Dematerialized (HD raw footage)
iceni tribe
2nd February 2015, 20:09
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2BC5gd_EcY&feature=em-uploademail
if this is the real thing then all the speculation is over.......nearly.
Tesla_WTC_Solution
2nd February 2015, 20:14
Iceni, based on some sci-fi I was reading,
is it possible with existing technology to achieve near-total matter-to-energy conversion and at the same time, remotely siphon away the heat?
a couple years back, was reading about ways to transmit heat and also heat-sink with two radio dishes,
so logically a person would take that another yard and ask, can an exothermic reaction be contained electromagnetically?
A Voice from the Mountains
2nd February 2015, 21:13
No heat was apparently siphoned away. Up the air it wouldn't make much difference anyway, but just consider this:
1) Vehicles were set on fire and even melted on the adjacent streets as the dust cloud rolled around the bases of the collapsed buildings.
2) There were underground pools of molten steel/iron, and underground fires in the debris pile at least until December 2001.
Buzzie
2nd February 2015, 23:56
Anyone interested in the subject of the Twin Towers should read Where Did The Towers Go? by Dr. Judy Wood. This is a 500 page book filled with pictures and footnotes. Pictures in the book show the buildings turning to powder on their way down. She makes a good argument that the buildings were brought down by "directed free energy technology". She presents numerous pictures of the buildings "de materializing". Dr. Wood admonishes us to believe what we see, not what we are told we see.
Fellow Aspirant
3rd February 2015, 06:06
Iceni, based on some sci-fi I was reading,
is it possible with existing technology to achieve near-total matter-to-energy conversion and at the same time, remotely siphon away the heat?
a couple years back, was reading about ways to transmit heat and also heat-sink with two radio dishes,
so logically a person would take that another yard and ask, can an exothermic reaction be contained electromagnetically?
Using a Directed Energy Beam weapon, as explained by Dr. Judy Wood, there's no heating of the air space around the masses of the building. Like a microwave that heats the coffee in the mug without heating the mug, the molecular structure of the building's materials is disrupted by the energy, and the building simply "dustifies". Steel beams are melted but paper and wood does not ignite, and so does not add anything to the thermal release of the energy.
That's the horse I'm backing.
Brian
Fellow Aspirant
3rd February 2015, 06:21
If you really want to see a building "dematerialize" check out this video segment from one of Dr. Judy Wood's presentations, having to do with "The Spire". It's absolutely clear. I tried to post a link here, but for some reason Google generates it as a monstrous and unuseable string of jumble. :rolleyes:
So just go to YouTube and plug in the words
'Dr Judy Wood dematerialization the spire'
Brian
ThePythonicCow
3rd February 2015, 07:47
If you really want to see a building "dematerialize" check out this video segment from one of Dr. Judy Wood's presentations, having to do with "The Spire".Here's the key images:
http://drjudywood.com/wtc/pics/Spire2m_ss.jpg
iceni tribe
3rd February 2015, 10:06
If you really want to see a building "dematerialize" check out this video segment from one of Dr. Judy Wood's presentations, having to do with "The Spire".Here's the key images:
http://drjudywood.com/wtc/pics/Spire2m_ss.jpg
hello paul
those images and judy had me going for awhile but the 50 story part of the core column isn't being vaporised it is simply falling ,at an astonishing fast rate to give that impression.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goGGQhhTcDY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hlEzr1fBnE&feature=em-uploademail
in this video i agree with Judy that the falling debris is disintergrating ,turning to dust in fact, and as these appear to be outside steel columns this is evidence that some more exotic weaponary is being used.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxigzAHlQdI&x-yt-ts=1422579428
in this video taken 6 weeks later we can see that the pile is still 1500 degrees as claims by the fire officer , so my question is why would Judy and Andrew Johnson still refute any heat thats in the pile.
i think the answer to 9/11 is nuclear as explained here.
http://911u.org/Physics/WTCenergySurplus.html
Oouthere
3rd February 2015, 12:09
Iceni, I completely agree.
If you take into consideration the acceleration rate and speed of a fall then there is really nothing wrong with the shots so long as they are timed equally.
These buildings were probably set-up for demolition, but there was no miracle technology involved. And even the steel beams have been proven to collapse in an open air jet fuel fire.
N2TMVDYpp2Q
Do not believe every theory conspiracy, it only helps those trying to cover-up a crime.
Koyaanisqatsi
4th February 2015, 00:44
Steel can be weakened by jet fuel fire sure, but not reduced to dust mid-air. I think maybe it could lose structural integrity and bend or warp, but not reduced to particles cmon now. it didnt bend it nearly disappeared mid air
frozen alchemy
5th February 2015, 04:12
Jeff Prager solved this a long time ago now:
https://www.facebook.com/notes/jeff-prager/a-brief-summary-wtc-destruction-high-temperature-aftermath-only-nuclear-bombs-an/10150602771399838
Cidersomerset
5th February 2015, 09:09
hello paul
those images and judy had me going for awhile but the 50 story part of the core column isn't being vaporised it is simply falling ,at an astonishing fast rate to give that impression.
I'm still open to what the method of destruction was even a combination, ( Except
the NIST version )as I've said on many threads , Dr.Wood is fully aware of all
of them as well and started her doubts on day 1. Whether she is too invested in her
ideas can be argued but its there with , jet fuel , Nano - Thermite and possibly some
sort of nuke or a combination there of. This has split and made it more difficult to
find the actual cause and is why A&E for 9/11 is sticking to the more conventional
controlled demolition theory with military grade explosives.
When Dr.Niels Harrit was asked about Dr.Wood , he did not want to
comment much on it in public other than say show me the proof or words
to that effect , which is the response of most scientists both mainstream
and those more open in public anyway. He is fully behind the controlled
demolition theory.
Dr. NIELS HARRIT ~ "9/11 & The Seventh Tower" [Age Of Truth*TV] [HD]
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?79470-WTC-9-11-Building-7----Clearly-Detonated----See-Footage-of-Explosions
"Where Did The Towers Go?" - Dr Judy Wood in the UK....Sky 200 TV with Theo Chalmers.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?41614-Where-Did-The-Towers-Go-Dr-Judy-Wood-in-the-UK....Sky-200-TV-with-Theo-Chalmers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Judy Wood - "The Spire"
kyM9y2xo4RQ
Published on 11 May 2013
Steel columns disintegrate into steel dust with WTC7 in the foreground.
Please watch the whole presentation to gain a full understanding of the evidence:
Dr. Judy Wood at New Horizons - Where Did the Towers Go? - Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvFG66...
Dr. Judy Wood at New Horizons - Where Did the Towers Go? - Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eqj4h...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
iceni tribe
10th February 2015, 09:58
Donald Fox pretty much sums it up for me.
https://donaldfox.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/rainbow-in-the-dark-powerful-proof-of-911-nukes/
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.