PDA

View Full Version : Suit: Man held 20 hours after asking to file TSA complaint



shadowstalker
5th February 2015, 05:07
Suit: Man held 20 hours after asking to file TSA complaint (http://news.yahoo.com/suit-man-held-20-hours-asking-file-tsa-210427933.html)

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — A traveler detained for more than 20 hours after a search of energy bars and a sports watch in his carry-on bag at an airport has sued the Transportation Security Administration and accused a TSA supervisor of lying.

Architect and runner Roger Vanderklok said he was arrested after asking TSA workers how to file a complaint. He said he spent nearly a day in a holding cell without being questioned by police or given the chance to call his wife, who was frantic.

"It's difficult to lose control of your existence. That's what it amounts to," Vanderklok said Wednesday. "I was absolutely terrified."

According to Vanderklok, the TSA supervisor lied to police and again in court when he said the 58-year-old runner had made a verbal threat during the January 2013 security check at Philadelphia International Airport. Vanderklok was on his way to Miami for a half-marathon.

The TSA said it was concerned about the gear in his bag: what turned out to be the watch and the power bars, wrapped in a small PVC pipe for protection. Electronics and "organic mass" can be used to make bombs, TSA Supervisor Charles Kieser testified at an April 2013 criminal trial.

Matt P
5th February 2015, 11:29
This is why I haven't flown since 9/11. Knowing the "security" is all conditioning and theater, and not being able to stop myself from speaking the truth, there's no doubt I'd be in jail somewhere. ;)

Matt

Carmody
5th February 2015, 12:27
Yes, but putting a watch and a pair of meal bars in a threaded (presumed threaded) pvc pipe, is pretty darned provocative, IMO.

An inexpensive method of protecting one's meal bars and watch, but the external and then scanned contents would not look innocent --but highly suggestive.

The holding aspect, it may have been initiated under the premise that external contact, by the held person, could be a problem. IF the contents were to be used for anything.

It is a paranoid position, yes, but the sealed pipe with the given goods inside, is, indeed, IMO, provocative... regardless of intent.

he's suing on the grounds of being told he was threatening them and then consequently held, held due to discourse between him and the guard-during the incident. Which he says he never did.