PDA

View Full Version : First Trailer Of Roswell ET Slides Documentary (and Jaime Maussan to present the 'smoking gun' in May)



jackovesk
6th February 2015, 06:26
Kodachrome - A Documentary

Published on Feb 4, 2015


In 1998 a box of slides was discovered near Sedona, AZ. Two of the slides show a very unusual body in a glass case. This is what we know so far...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL0MvHpieaE

PS - Published on Nov 29, 2014

One of the most enduring mysteries of the past few decades could be about to be solved, as a researcher claims to have uncovered a clear photograph of an alien from Area 51 – on film which maker Kodak has dated as authentically being from 1947, the date of the supposed crash.

UFO expert Tom Carey was sent images of ‘insect-like’ aliens from 1947, photographed after autopsy inside the secretive facility – by a woman thought to be involved in one of America’s intellligence agencies.

Carey describes his discovery as ‘the smoking gun’.

Carey has contacted official Kodak historians to certify the authenticity of the film stock – and to ensure the date is accurate. He aims to reveal his findings in full early next year.

The content of the images is explosive – showing clear images of aliens under autopsy, something the US has always denied.

Several staff at firms such as Lockheed Martin claim that not only were aliens examined at the site, their technology was reverse-engineered to make hi-tech aircraft.

Tom Carey has been researching the crash – where many believe that the U.S. government either autopsied alien bodies, or captured them alive – since 1991, and has written numerous books on the subject.

He claims that the new image has been certified by Kodak’s official historian as not being Photoshopped – with the expert having examined Kodachrome colour slides showing an ‘alien’ body lying inside a case. Carey says there is a clear contrast between his images and other common images and videos of ‘aliens’ supposedly from Area 51.


Carey says: ‘What’s interesting is, the film is dated 1947. We took it to the official historian of Kodak up in Rochester, New York, and he did his due diligence on it, and he said yes, this filmstrip, the slides are from 1947. It’s 1947 stock. And from the emulsions on the image, it’s not something that’s been Photoshopped like today. It’s original 1947 images, and it shows an alien who’s been partially dissected lying in a case.’

Carey says that the creatures are smaller than humans – around three to four feet tall. ‘The head is almost insect-like. The head has been severed, and there’s been a partial autopsy; the innards have been removed, and we believe the cadaver has been embalmed, at least at the time this picture was taken.’

Nigel Watson, author of the Haynes UFO Investigations Manual, cautions that several researchers have promised similar ‘smoking guns’ in the past: ‘Usually when people make promises that they have the smoking gun of ufology – positive evidence of their existence – they come to nothing or they produce rather underwhelming evidence.’

‘However, if aliens were retrieved it would be a world changing event and I can’t imagine they could keep the lid on such an event throughout the 50s and 60s.’
Carey was sent the slides by a couple in Texas. ‘The woman was a high-powered Midland, Texas, lawyer with a pilot’s licence. We think she was involved in intelligence in World War II, and her husband was a field geologist for an oil company,’ claims Carey.

Researcher Plans to Release Alien Photos from 1947


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-Gm5kvOFNY
References:
http://metro.co.uk/2014/11/16/new-are...

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-ne...

Citizen No2
6th February 2015, 09:58
Great find jackovesk, thank you.


Looks as if it will be an interesting documentary.




Regards.

Gaia
6th February 2015, 13:40
None of the alleged images were made ​​available for independent verification.

Richard S.
7th February 2015, 14:23
May 5th, Jaime Maussan UFO investigator to present holographic technology revealing new information.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5T9dt3nRJw

lucidity
7th February 2015, 20:48
Hey Lovespot,

good catch !

lucidity :-)

Operator
8th February 2015, 20:01
Not many responses here ... :confused:

I am wondering why this is announced many months in advance. Why not reveal it a.s.a.p. ?
This will give the cabal time to intervene. This is often done to maximize profits etc. from an
event but I don't think it's the case here.

Others, any thoughts on this?

ceetee9
8th February 2015, 20:10
Let us hope that the "smoking gun" evidence doesn't mysteriously disappear, along with our good friend Jaime Maussan, before May 5th 2015. I've never really understood why those who claim to have "indisputable" evidence of UFOs/ETs would announce that fact weeks, or months, before they plan to reveal it. No doubt they are aware that if the evidence is really that significant that it is not in their best interest to give those who don't want the information revealed plenty of time to dispose of the evidence and/or those who plan to reveal it.

Bill Ryan
8th February 2015, 23:19
-------

Two threads merged on essentially the same [very interesting] topic.

Bill Ryan
8th February 2015, 23:39
None of the alleged images were made ​​available for independent verification.

Well, that's not quite correct!

From this excellent article on this entire topic:
http://inquisitr.com/1816875/roswell-alien-photo-slides-to-be-released-smoking-gun-evidence-of-1947-ufo-crash


Roswell Alien Photo Slides To Be Released:
‘Smoking Gun’ Evidence Of 1947 UFO Crash?

A team of UFO researchers announced at a livestreamed online press conference on Feb. 4 that it has obtained Kodachrome slide images that provide “smoking gun” evidence that aliens are real and that an alien UFO crash actually occurred in Roswell in 1947, despite government denial.

According to Anthony Bragalia, who was involved (http://www.theufochronicles.com/2015/02/roswell-alien-slides-to-be-unveiled-in.html) in investigating and authenticating the purported photographic evidence, the slides represent “stunning visual evidence of a humanoid creature that was found crashed near Roswell.”

He said the images on the slides have been examined and declared authentic by a photo specialist who had worked with Kodak for decades and had led technical project teams at the company’s headquarters in Rochester, New York, and published authoritative books in the field.

After conducting detailed and extensive tests on the slides, the specialist concluded that they were authentic slides from 1947 that had not been “tampered with or manipulated in any way.”




“What is depicted is really there, accurately reflected in the emulsion as an actual moment in time in 1947. Science has weighed in and has determined that these are real slides that are really from 1947.

Documentary Evidence is a legal term that relates to evidence that accurately reflects a moment in time.

The Only Conclusion: This humanoid is not a deformed person, mummy, dummy, simian or dead serviceman.

It is not a creature that finds its origin on Earth.”

Open Minds’ Alejandro Rojas reports (http://www.openminds.tv/roswell-ufo-alien-photo-details-revealed-videos/32066) that the team presenting the evidence first announced discovery of the “Roswell slides” last month at American University in Washington, D.C. Tom Carey, one of the UFO researchers who obtained the slides, used the livestreamed online conference held on Feb. 4 to release more information about the photos and set a date when they will be released to the public.

The conference was sponsored by a well known Mexican journalist and UFO investigator, Jaime Maussan, whose website (http://tercermilenio.tv/) and YouTube channel (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6ffFUtT43XHlccQbyWsNHA) are promoting the release of the photos on May 5, 2015, at the National Auditorium in Mexico City.

The promotion has involved interviews and videos that provide more background information about the source and nature of the photos.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNKkfHoyr-Q
According to Bragalia, the event at Mexico’s National Auditorium on May 5 will be transmitted live. Noted researchers will provide detailed information about the background and origin of the slides.

But ahead of release of the photos, a video showing a computer generated image of what the aliens look like was posted to the Tercermilenio YouTube channel (see video below — the documentary is in the Spanish language).


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXitAGsaoGg
A second video posted to the YouTube channel shows an interview with the former NASA astronaut Edgar Mitchell, a native of Roswell and the sixth man on the moon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Mitchell) in the Apollo 14 mission. In the interview, Mitchell states that he came to believe that an alien spacecraft actually crashed in Roswell in 1947 after interviewing people from Roswell, including a friend who was an Army Major.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FufK99WyNfc
Another video, which was been removed from the YouTube channel, shows an interview with a man identified as Adam Dew, who reveals the origin of the photos. According to Dew, his friend’s sister discovered the photos in 1989 while cleaning out the house of a deceased and childless American couple, Bernerd and Hilda Blair Ray, in Arizona.

Bernerd Ray was an oil exploration geologist who had worked in the fields of the Roswell area of New Mexico in the 1940s and was president of the Texas chapter of the American Institute of Petroleum Geologists in 1947.

His wife, Hilda, was a “highly respected” lawyer with “high-end clientele and possible intelligence connections.”

Bragalia pressed the claim of authenticity of the photos, based on the argument that what is known about the couple confirms that they were of “highest integrity… with no propensity to prank.”




“This is a couple who were of the highest integrity. And both had contacts and activities that could have fortuitously enabled them to obtain these slides.”

Dew said his friend’s sister found the slides while cleaning out the couple’s house. She found a chest of old Kodachrome slides in the attic, and decided to keep it in her garage. She kept them for about 10 years without bothering to look at them. But when she finally looked at them, she found that they contained photos of places from different parts of the world and famous people, including President Dwight Eisenhower and Clark Gable.

But she also discovered two Kodachrome slides carefully wrapped up in an envelope hidden in the inner lining of the chest’s lid. She found that the slides had images of strange looking beings. She showed the photos to her brother, who showed them to Dew. Dew explained that because the film looked genuine, he took them to Carey and his partner Don Schmitt, both UFO researchers.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5ylp-1zrlo
As part of their investigation to confirm the authenticity of the slides, Carey and his partner contacted a Kodak specialist who verified that the slides were Kodak slides manufactured in 1947 and that the sleeves were the type used by Kodak in the mid-1940s.

Describing the aliens, Carey said the slides show “formerly living” frail-looking humanoids about three-and-a-half to four feet in height. The creatures have big heads and a pair of spindly arms and legs. A slide shows one of the aliens headless and partly dissected.




“Professionals from a range of disciplines who have seen the slides agree that they depict a small humanoid creature –a formerly living thing- that is neither a prop nor a genetically defective human.

And importantly, the being that is shown in the slides does not correlate whatsoever to the depictions of aliens extant in the popular culture of the 1940s.”

Schmitt told the audience that the photos were an earthshaking discovery.




“It will certainly be the most important event in our lifetimes, because we are demonstrating, not only photographic evidence, but we are also demonstrating what all of these witnesses have reported to us over all of these years.”

Atlas
9th February 2015, 08:09
Here is the slide:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44908464/kodak-slide.jpg

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44908464/Kodak-slide-2.jpg

Related thread: projectavalon.net/Authentic-Alien-Images-From-Roswell...-FINALLY-FOUND (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?63938-Authentic-Alien-Images-From-Roswell...-FINALLY-FOUND)

Bluewool
9th February 2015, 10:19
I think on one of the videos it said the chest was found in 1998 and not 1989.The hidden 2 photos were then found in 2008.So we should expect at least 5 years of analysis and investigation.For that reason I am quite hopeful.

boja
9th February 2015, 10:44
Although I know that ETs are real and Roswell DID happen,

These slides (which MAY be genuine) just don't help us.

They certainly will NOT sway any of the debunkers and very few of the septics (did I spell that wrong - joke).

I do have respect for Jaime Maussan, however.

Bill Ryan
9th February 2015, 11:49
Here is the slide:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44908464/kodak-slide.jpg

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44908464/Kodak-slide-2.jpg

Related thread: projectavalon.net/Authentic-Alien-Images-From-Roswell...-FINALLY-FOUND (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?63938-Authentic-Alien-Images-From-Roswell...-FINALLY-FOUND)

Good job! I'm impressed you found that. :)

VERY interesting photo. We can expect the original to be clearer, I think. Curious body! The head is [even] larger than I'd have thought, and it looks like the torso narrows down to quite a wasp-waist. That head must be very heavy... looks like it may be half its bodyweight. If so, you'd expect more musculature round the neck... which might of course be a little hard to assess if the head is severed.

None of that is to imply the photo isn't genuine. All the indications right now are that it's real. Come May, it's possible this might cause quite a buzz. Intriguing is the possibility that the reason this is being allowed to happen (it would be REALLY easy for special ops guys to steal the slides) is that the US might opt to use this opportunity to piggyback its long-planned official disclosure on the back of Maussan's presentation. It might be an interesting few months ahead...

Operator
9th February 2015, 12:48
---
Intriguing is the possibility that the reason this is being allowed to happen (it would be REALLY easy for special ops guys to steal the slides) is that the US might opt to use this opportunity to piggyback its long-planned official disclosure on the back of Maussan's presentation. It might be an interesting few months ahead...

That's almost still 3 months to go. Any ideas what the reason(s) are for this delay?

I would not expect the USA to allow any other country to disclose first. Perhaps that's the reason for the delay.
The USA can come clean till then or it will be done ultimately on may 5th by Mexico ... :noidea:

KiwiElf
9th February 2015, 13:17
If genuine, it's also possible this may have been from another crash and not necessarily Roswell. There were several "alleged UFO crashes and bodies recovered" around that period, all from the general New Mexico/Aztec area. (remember the debacle the infamous Santilli Alien Autopsy video caused? Although Santilli himself never claimed that particular alien to be from Roswell, many prominent UFOlogists of the time did. The few Santilli still film cels (not the movie footage), were also verified by Kodak as genuine & being from 1947, and clearly not the species of alien described by witnesses pertaining to THE Roswell crash).

Kodak can certainly verify the age of the film stock, but not when the pictures were actually taken.

Operator
9th February 2015, 18:50
---
Intriguing is the possibility that the reason this is being allowed to happen (it would be REALLY easy for special ops guys to steal the slides) is that the US might opt to use this opportunity to piggyback its long-planned official disclosure on the back of Maussan's presentation. It might be an interesting few months ahead...

That's almost still 3 months to go. Any ideas what the reason(s) are for this delay?

I would not expect the USA to allow any other country to disclose first. Perhaps that's the reason for the delay.
The USA can come clean till then or it will be done ultimately on may 5th by Mexico ... :noidea:

Perhaps that last thought didn't popup in my mind by accident ...

Disclosure: February 2015? Stephen Bassett has a plan ... (http://blog.altpov.tv/disclosure-in-2015-stephen-bassett-has-a-plan/)

I can't remember exactly where but I've heard Steven Bassett say that the pressure would be raised by
February this year. I remember him saying that another country (than the US) might announce a
disclosure statement which would leave the US no choice.

Although the article linked above (dated December 21st 2014) is not my original source, it does predict
disclosure in February 2015 and fits what I remember from what Steven said before. This may be it ...
It would explain the move by Mexico. If not done on purpose it could at least serve the purpose of
pressuring the US government. Exciting times.

WhiteFeather
12th February 2015, 17:23
Here is the slide:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44908464/kodak-slide.jpg

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44908464/Kodak-slide-2.jpg

Related thread: projectavalon.net/Authentic-Alien-Images-From-Roswell...-FINALLY-FOUND (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?63938-Authentic-Alien-Images-From-Roswell...-FINALLY-FOUND)

Good job! I'm impressed you found that. :)

VERY interesting photo. We can expect the original to be clearer, I think. Curious body! The head is [even] larger than I'd have thought, and it looks like the torso narrows down to quite a wasp-waist. That head must be very heavy... looks like it may be half its bodyweight. If so, you'd expect more musculature round the neck... which might of course be a little hard to assess if the head is severed.

None of that is to imply the photo isn't genuine. All the indications right now are that it's real. Come May, it's possible this might cause quite a buzz. Intriguing is the possibility that the reason this is being allowed to happen (it would be REALLY easy for special ops guys to steal the slides) is that the US might opt to use this opportunity to piggyback its long-planned official disclosure on the back of Maussan's presentation. It might be an interesting few months ahead...

My thoughts exactly Bill.

WhiteFeather
12th February 2015, 17:34
If genuine, it's also possible this may have been from another crash and not necessarily Roswell. There were several "alleged UFO crashes and bodies recovered" around that period, all from the general New Mexico/Aztec area. (remember the debacle the infamous Santilli Alien Autopsy video caused? Although Santilli himself never claimed that particular alien to be from Roswell, many prominent UFOlogists of the time did. The few Santilli still film cels (not the movie footage), were also verified by Kodak as genuine & being from 1947, and clearly not the species of alien described by witnesses pertaining to THE Roswell crash).

Kodak can certainly verify the age of the film stock, but not when the pictures were actually taken.

Or Perhaps the Kingman Az. crash. I just heard about this crash/sighting recently myself.
http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2012/06/the-kingman-saucer-and-a-contactee/

jackovesk
16th February 2015, 03:10
...Update...

http://mysteriousuniverse.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Depositphotos_11605769_s-585x306.jpg

Spying on the Roswell Slides

February 13, 2015

Well, the various articles I have recently written here at Mysterious Universe, on what have become known as the “Roswell Slides” (http://www.kevinrandle.blogspot.com.au/2015/02/roswell-slides-and-video-clips.html), have resulted in a lot of questions coming my way. One of them has surfaced more than any other. It basically goes like this: Do I think that the key players in the saga of the slides are “being watched”? You know: by the dreaded “them.” Or, to get straight to the point: “the government”?

It is indeed an interesting question. I should stress that I have no data – at all – suggesting that such surveillance is going on. But, I can speak of something very strange that happened in the summer of 2014, and which has at least a bearing on this matter of someone snooping around.

It goes like this: last summer one of the “Dream Team” members investigating the slides, Tony Bragalia, was hacked. The hacker was someone using a safemail account and the name of “A Glass Darkly.” It turns out that AGD got into Bragalia’s emails and god knows where else, too.

On top of that, my emails and those of Rich Reynolds – of The UFO Conjecture(s) blog – were also compromised. Whether that was because we were directly hacked, or because we had email exchanges with Tony B, and which may simply have allowed AGD to read our emails via Tony’s In-Box, I don’t know. But, what I am in a position to say is that the hacker was real (http://www.sott.net/article/289463-UFO-researchers-computers-hacked-over-mysterious-Roswell-slides), his actions were real, and he did access Tony Bragalia’s email account.

http://mysteriousuniverse.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Depositphotos_8198429_s-570x258.jpg

As a result, and hardly surprisingly, the FBI was contacted on matters relative to this. I am not sure where that all stands right now. But no matter, because another push is being made to have the world of law-enforcement (specifically those people whose work covers cyber-security) take a renewed look at this entire situation, which is filled with intrigue and high-strangeness.

It became very clear from AGD’s words (he actually inserted himself into my and Rich’s emailed conversations by replying…) that he was interested in the Roswell slides. What AGD did in his quest for the truth of the slides was to 100 percent cross the line in terms of what is acceptable or legal. He chose to voyeuristically snoop through our emails (and possibly through files and folders too), in search of anything and everything relevant to the slides. I’m sure AGD was hoping that one of us, or all of us, had copies of the slides on our laptops, tablets etc. We did not, however – none of us.

As for who AGD was/is, that’s the bigger question which requires answering. Some people have said that they suspect it’s actually all the work of the Dream Team itself. In other words, there was/is no real hacker using the alias of A Glass Darkly.

In this scenario, the Dream Team concocted and stage-managed the entire caper to add to the ever-growing interest in the slides, and to generate yet more publicity. I have to say I completely reject this theory, for the very simple fact that the FBI was contacted. No-one on the Dream Team would be so stupid as to create a non-existent hacker and then try and get the FBI involved in an investigation relevant to that same non-existent hacker.

I also rule out the idea that this was the work of “the government.” The idea that any agency – of any government in the world – would need to create a safemail account to access the emails of three people (me, Reynolds, and Bragalia) is ridiculous. Such hacking could have been achieved quite easily, and without the need to hide behind a safemail account – or behind any email account.

http://mysteriousuniverse.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/blurry-alien-570x570.jpg

I predict the real Roswell slide will be at least as blurry as this artist rendition. ~ Ed

My personal opinion? The hacking was done by someone in the UFO research community; someone who was overly eager to be the first with the most. Of course, now, and as of a couple of days ago, you can see one of the images right here (http://ufocon.blogspot.com.au/2015/02/the-best-image-of-kodachrome-alien-so.html).

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-pNdz_su0V8c/VNgD7rwTZgI/AAAAAAAAHq0/raEHTkyAr48/s1600/Kodak-Alien.jpg

What it shows, I don’t know. Many who have looked at it are underwhelmed. From what I see too, I can’t say I’m particularly excited either.

In a couple of months from now, we may have more answers regarding what the slides show. I doubt those revelations will have a bearing on who A Glass Darkly was, however. But, I’m hoping that certain things which are in motion – right now – may provide us with the real identity of AGD. Stay tuned. Whatever the Roswell slides show (or don’t show) the story – and the curious, behind-the-scenes things, like the AGD-hacking saga – is going to run and run.

http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2015/02/spying-on-the-roswell-slides/

thepainterdoug
19th February 2015, 18:44
hello friends at Avalon. this video from Jamie Maussan is in Spanish . i don't speak Spanish very well but could glean from it that a so called Major Announcement regarding Roswell will be announced on may 5th in Mexico city.

It seems that a box of old kodak slides were recenty found in Arizona with photos of Pres Eisenhower and associated info from that timeframe.
Two slides were found that according to MR Maussan , will be displayed in a holographic manner to clearly show the aliens found at Roswell.
this pretty much begins at the 22.50 mark

Then a great interview with DR Edgar Mitchell begins at the 30.50 mark

Dr Mitchell says, three separate credible witnesses he knows told their story to him which he believes. a traffic coordinator , an undertakers granddaughter and a high official, all verifying what really happened.

he then says " i thought it was a government coverup, it really isn't, its bigger than that"

http://tercermilenio.tv/default.aspx?s=2&PK=5a5b8c3f-b937-4f0a-adc2-3f1b847cb71e

Carmody
20th February 2015, 02:36
If genuine, it's also possible this may have been from another crash and not necessarily Roswell. There were several "alleged UFO crashes and bodies recovered" around that period, all from the general New Mexico/Aztec area. (remember the debacle the infamous Santilli Alien Autopsy video caused? Although Santilli himself never claimed that particular alien to be from Roswell, many prominent UFOlogists of the time did. The few Santilli still film cels (not the movie footage), were also verified by Kodak as genuine & being from 1947, and clearly not the species of alien described by witnesses pertaining to THE Roswell crash).

Kodak can certainly verify the age of the film stock, but not when the pictures were actually taken.

The emulsions age as time goes by, and no method of storage will change that. So, in effect, the film stock has to be used (exposed), processed, and then becomes a finished 'negative'. That negative will age, but not anything like unused film stock does. The negative is largely devoid (very much so) of catalytic photosensitive chemical emulsions.

An expert can tell, to some degree, how old a film stock was, when it was initially exposed and processed. Exposing the film stock (taking a picture) and then not processing it also causes issues, over time. In all seriousness, a film stock needs be used in a certain amount of time, or it will not work properly. I'm thinking the 'stability'/lifespan of unused film stock from 1947, ie, standard 35mm film stock --that it was not designed to have a long shelf life. A similar situation (but not exactly the same) occurs when you find old 'Polaroid' stock in old Polaroid cameras, and try to take images with it. You get mis-colored bad looking junk.