magnum
9th February 2015, 20:01
http://sitsshow.blogspot.co.nz/2015/02/predictions-from-90s-dismantling.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed:+StillnessInTheStormBlog+(Stillness+in+the+Storm+Blog)
"Under this umbrella you can find Channelings, prophecies, creation stories (God, ETs, Big Bang etc), which have some truth in them, but do little to impart consciousness expanding skills onto their followers. By NO MEANS are we stating that everything these revealers speak of is "disinfo", not at all. To give you an example, David Wilcock has spoken about many alternative sciences and and brings forth a great deal of raw data that can be understood personally (without blind acceptance). This type of data can be verified by us personally developing true knowledge.
However, when he gives a prediction such as "we will all ascend on December 21st, 2012" and yet we are all still here, we have to start to look at the data and not be distracted by the messenger. A prediction is a theory, based on raw data, and is can only be as good as the person who interprets it. While David and his data can be very expansive, we would do well not to place absolute belief on a prediction. It's like buying a lottery ticket as a plan for raising funds, most likely you won't win. And here if on earth at this time, placing all our faith in the hands of anyone is like trying to cheat at the game. The whole point for why we are here, which is echoed in countless works (channelings, insiders, guru's etc) is to learn. Therefore, it would stand to reason that if a belief system requires no personal growth or learning; we're probably missing the mark.
"
"Under this umbrella you can find Channelings, prophecies, creation stories (God, ETs, Big Bang etc), which have some truth in them, but do little to impart consciousness expanding skills onto their followers. By NO MEANS are we stating that everything these revealers speak of is "disinfo", not at all. To give you an example, David Wilcock has spoken about many alternative sciences and and brings forth a great deal of raw data that can be understood personally (without blind acceptance). This type of data can be verified by us personally developing true knowledge.
However, when he gives a prediction such as "we will all ascend on December 21st, 2012" and yet we are all still here, we have to start to look at the data and not be distracted by the messenger. A prediction is a theory, based on raw data, and is can only be as good as the person who interprets it. While David and his data can be very expansive, we would do well not to place absolute belief on a prediction. It's like buying a lottery ticket as a plan for raising funds, most likely you won't win. And here if on earth at this time, placing all our faith in the hands of anyone is like trying to cheat at the game. The whole point for why we are here, which is echoed in countless works (channelings, insiders, guru's etc) is to learn. Therefore, it would stand to reason that if a belief system requires no personal growth or learning; we're probably missing the mark.
"