PDA

View Full Version : Putin calls out the U.S.A. for it's anti-Democratic



Kryztian
15th March 2015, 21:44
Vladimir Putin has been making news by staying out of the eye of journalists for 10 days now. He plans to re-emerge tomorrow (https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fru.reuters.com%2Farticle%2FtopNews%2FidRUKBN0M90U920150313&edit-text=), but today (March 15) a documentary came out, in which Putin accuses the U.S. of masterminding last year's coup in the Ukraine, of over throwing a Democratically elected government.

While I imagine this will be mentioned somewhere in the NY Times tomorrow, it will probably be downplayed. And yet, this is quite consequential. The U.S.A., by many accounts, has been involved in the over throw of many governments, including democratically elected ones (starting with Guatemala in 1954) and popular dictatorships (as recent as Libya 2011) but now theleader of a super power is calling out the U.S.A. on using illegal and covert operations to do so.

Only 4 days ago, Jen Psaki of the U.S. State Department stated that the U.S. had a "long standing practice" of not supporting illegal and unconstitutional coups, only to be laughed at by journalists.frO1T3vZNrA

============================================================

Putin in film on Crimea: US masterminds behind Ukraine coup, helped train radicals (http://rt.com/news/240921-us-masterminds-ukraine-putin/)
March 15, 2015 14:18 Russia Today
http://rt.com/news/240921-us-masterminds-ukraine-putin/


The Ukrainian armed coup was organized from Washington, Russian President Vladimir Putin stated in an interview for a new documentary aired Sunday. The Americans tried to hide behind the Europeans, but Moscow saw through the trick, he added.

http://cdn.rt.com/files/news/3a/d1/90/00/us-masterminds-ukraine-putin1.si.jpg

“The trick of the situation was that outwardly the [Ukrainian] opposition was supported mostly by the Europeans. But we knew for sure that the real masterminds were our American friends,”Putin said in a documentary, 'Crimea - The Way Home,' aired by Rossiya 1 news channel.

“They helped training the nationalists, their armed groups, in Western Ukraine, in Poland and to some extent in Lithuania,” he added. “They facilitated the armed coup.”

The West spared no effort to prevent Crimea’s reunification with Russia, “by any means, in any format and under any scheme," he noted.

Putin said this approach was far from being the best dealing with any country, and a post-Soviet country like Ukraine specifically. Such countries have a short record of living under a new political system and remain fragile. Violating constitutional order in such a country inevitably deal a lot of damage to its statehood, the president said.

“The law was thrown away and crashed. And the consequences were grave indeed. Part of the country agreed to it, while another part wouldn’t accept it. The country was shattered,” Putin explained.

He also accused the beneficiaries of the coup of planning an assassination of then-President Viktor Yanukovich. Russia was prepared to act to ensure his escape, Putin said.

“I invited the heads of our special services, the Defense Ministry and ordered them to protect the life of the Ukrainian president. Otherwise he would have been killed,” he said, adding that at one point Russian signal intelligence, which was tracking the president’s motorcade route, realized that he was about to be ambushed.

Yanukovich himself didn’t want to leave and rejected the offer to be evacuated from Donetsk, Putin said. Only after spending several days in Crimea and realizing that “there was no one he could negotiate with in Kiev” he asked to be taken to Russia.

The Russian president personally ordered preparation of the Crimean special operation the morning after Yanukovich fled, saying that “we cannot let the [Crimean] people be pushed under the steamroller of the nationalists.”

“I [gave them] their tasks, told them what to do and how we must do it, and stressed that we would only do it if we were absolutely sure that this is what the people living in Crimea want us to do,” Putin said. He added that an emergency public opinion poll indicated that at least 75 percent of the people wanted to join Russia.

“Our goal was not to take Crimea by annexing it. Our final goal was to allow the people express their wishes on how they want to live,” he said.

“I decided for myself: what the people want will happen. If they want greater autonomy with some extra rights within Ukraine, so be it. If they decide otherwise, we cannot fail them. You know the results of the referendum. We did what we had to do,” Putin said.

READ MORE: 95.7% of Crimeans in referendum voted to join Russia - preliminary results

He added that his personal involvement helped expedite things, because the people carrying out his decision had no reason to hesitate.

According to Putin, part of the operation was to deploy K-300P Bastion coastal defense missiles to demonstrate Russia’s willingness to protect the peninsula from military attack.

“We deployed them in a way that made them seen clearly from space,” Putin said.

The president assured that the Russian military were prepared for any developments and would have armed nuclear weapons if necessary. He personally was not sure that Western nations would not use military force against Russia, he added.

n order to demilitarize the Ukrainian troops based in Crimea, Russia sent the army's Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) forces, the president said.

“A specific set of personnel was needed to block and demilitarize 20,000 people, who were well-armed. Not only in quantity, but in quality,” Putin said, adding that he gave orders to the Defense Ministry to “deploy the special forces of the GRU, together with marine forces and paratroopers.”

However, according to Putin, the number of Russian forces did not exceed the limit of 20,000 authorized under the agreement on basing the Russian Black Sea Fleet at its military base in Crimea.

“As we didn’t exceed the number of personnel on our base in Crimea, strictly speaking, nothing was violated,” he said.

The Russian president added that the move to send additional Russian troops to secure Crimea and allow a referendum to be freely held there prevented major bloodshed on the peninsula.

“Considering the ethnic composition of the Crimean population, the violence there would have been worse [than in Kiev]. We had to act to prevent negative development, not to allow tragedies like the one that happened in Odessa, where dozens of people were burned alive,” Putin said.

READ MORE: As part of Russian territory Crimea can host nuclear weapons – Foreign Ministry

He acknowledged that there were some Crimean people, particularly members of the Crimean Tatar minority, who opposed the Russian operation.

“Some of the Crimean Tatars were under the influence of their leaders, some of whom are so to speak ‘professional’ fighters for the rights of the Tatars,” he explained.

But at the same time the “Crimean militia worked together with the Tatars. And there were Tatars among the militia members,” he stressed.

The Crimean people voted in a referendum to join Russia after rejecting a coup-imposed government that took power in Kiev in February 2014. The move sparked a major international controversy, as the new government’s foreign backers accused Russia of annexing the peninsula through military force.

Moscow insists that the move was a legitimate act of self-determination and that the Russian troops acted only to provide security and not as an occupying force. Russian officials cite the example of Kiev’s military crackdown on the dissenting eastern Donetsk and Lugansk regions, which claimed more than 6,000 lives since April 2014, as an example of bloodshed that Russia acted to prevent in Crimea.

============================================================

Here's a link to the documentary, in Russian only, and will viral pop ups.
http://rufilm.tv/tv-show/kryim-put-na-rodinu-15-03-2015-smotret-onlayn-sd.html

Kryztian
15th March 2015, 22:03
And it looks like the divisiveness is starting, with Angela Merkel siding with Putin:

http://www.mintpressnews.com/german-officials-claims-of-russian-invasion-of-ukraine-are-american-propaganda/203338/

German Officials: Claims of Russian Invasion of Ukraine Are American Propaganda
More recent claims of 50-plus Russian tanks crossing the border were similarly untrue, with European officials say the only evidence was for a handful of ramshackle armored vehicles crossing the border, and likely not military in origin.
By Jason Ditz for Antiwar.com | March 13, 2015

http://www.mintpressnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Germany-Mongolia_Muha-001.jpg

US officials regularly claim ceasefire violations in Ukraine, and Russian invasions that “no one questions.” Though such allegations have long gotten a pass in the US media, the German government is expressing increased annoyance over what it is calling “dangerous propaganda” meant to sabotage the ceasefire.

The US claims, officials say, are often wildly inaccurate or unconfirmed. When US officials were hyping “40,000” Russian troops at the border and an imminent invasion, EU intelligence showed only 20,000 troops, and that no invasion was likely.

More recent claims of 50-plus Russian tanks crossing the border were similarly untrue, with European officials say the only evidence was for a handful of ramshackle armored vehicles crossing the border, and likely not military in origin.

US officials downplayed the disagreement, saying that “precise numbers” weren’t relevant, and that there is “no doubt” Russia is supporting the rebels. This may finally be the explanation, however, for how US claims of huge Russian military presences never come with any pictures of any Russian troops.

Cidersomerset
15th March 2015, 22:17
Hi Kryzstian you must have just missed this thread , but Matts reaction to Jen psaki is very funny ..LOL

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Journalist can’t contain his laughter when White House spokesperson says the US has
a ‘Long-standing policy’ against backing coups

Friday 13th March 2015 at 09:59 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/download1-587x330.png

State Department Announces New "Long-standing" Policy Against Backing Coups

frO1T3vZNrA

Published on 11 Mar 2015


Watch the full interview on Democracy Now! here: http://owl.li/Kcowu —
After Venezuela accused the United States of plotting another coup, State
Department spokesperson Jen Psaki rejected the claim as "ludicrous." She said, "As
a matter of long-standing policy, the United States does not support political
transitions by non-constitutional means." The response from reporters may surprise you.

On Democracy Now!, we get reaction from Miguel Tinker Salas, professor at
Pomona College and author of “The Enduring Legacy: Oil, Culture, and Society in
Venezuela” and the forthcoming book, “Venezuela: What Everyone Needs to Know.”


Obama Admits US "Brokered" Coup in Ukraine

1QAXmf5_EOs

Published on 1 Feb 2015

Obama openly lied about Ukraine, Putin and Russia in the interview except during
his little "Uh" slip up where he says, "...because he (President Putin) was caught,
uh...off balance by, uh... the protests in the Maidan and, uh... Yanukovych then
fleeing after we'd brokered a deal, uh... to transition power in Ukraine"

"Obama openly admits 'brokering power transition' in Ukraine"
by Robert Bridge-"Barack Obama acknowledged that the United States
had "brokered a deal to transition power in Ukraine," thus admitting to the highest
level of democratic impropriety imaginable.Washington power brokers, desensitized
to the concept of brokering political “deals” due to their so-called democratic work
in faraway war zones like Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, are now employing the
strategy inside of sovereign states that are experiencing internal discord.

The real tragedy of such a scenario is not that it is happening, but that the United
States, and the Ukrainian people, it seems, believes that such a foreign invasion of
pure opportunists on their territory constitutes democracy or will somehow lead to
democracy.But then again, the United States expected no less from the $5 billion,
and a few cakes, it paid for Kiev’s allegiance. Now the Ukrainian people must
dutifully follow that foreign-built road wherever it may lead them. "

***READ Robert Bridge's ENTIRE ARTICLE***:
http://rt.com/op-edge/228379-obama-po...




======================================================

Obama Administration considers independent journalists to be ‘enemies of the state,’ warn reporters

Friday 13th March 2015 at 06:57 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/get-attachment-124.jpg


NATURAL NEWS................


Obama Administration considers independent journalists to be 'enemies of the state,' warn reporters

Friday, March 13, 2015 by: J. D. Heyes
Tags: Obama Administration, press freedom, independent journalists


http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/640/Misc/Newsroom-News-Studio-Television.jpg

‘Author and former CBS News investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson recently told
senators considering confirmation of President Obama’s next attorney general pick,
Loretta Lynch, that the nominee would need to “chart a new path” from the White
House’s abysmal record of essentially treating some reporters like “enemies of the state.”

Attkisson’s accusations before the Senate Judiciary Committee were akin to those
made in her 2014 book Stonewalled, in which she detailed how the Obama
Administration — and officials in her own network — worked to prevent the public
from learning more about several scandals, including Operation Fast and Furious,
Benghazi and the green energy debacle.’

Read more: Obama Administration considers independent journalists to be 'enemies of the state,' warn reporters

http://www.naturalnews.com/048981_Obama_Administration_press_freedom_independent_journalists.html

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?80684-State-Dept.-spokesperson-Jen-Psaki-US-does-not-back-Coups-Journalists-laugh-independent-journalists-to-be---enemies-of-the-state&p=942516#post942516

Cidersomerset
15th March 2015, 22:29
THE US via the CIA has a very long history in covert action leading
to coups. this has been part of US Foreign policy for decades...

Jen you are either ignorant , not to bright or a fibber ...LOL

1953 Iran Coup - CIA Finally Admits Role

GgfsgiPMqRc

Published on 19 Aug 2013

"Sixty years ago this Monday, on August 19, 1953, modern Iranian history took a critical turn when a U.S.- and
British-backed coup overthrew the country's prime minister, Mohammed Mossadegh. The event's reverberations
have haunted its orchestrators over the years, contributing to the anti-Americanism that accompanied the Shah's
ouster in early 1979, and even influencing the Iranians who seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran later that year.
But it has taken almost six decades for the U.S. intelligence community to acknowledge openly that it was behind
the controversial overthrow. Published here today -- and on the website of the National Security Archive, which
obtained the document through the Freedom of Information Act -- is a brief excerpt from The Battle for Iran, an
internal report prepared in the mid-1970s by an in-house CIA historian...".* The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down.

====================================================
====================================================

List of some CIA backed coups....

GZ2grlh9KQI


===================================================

Covert United States foreign regime change actions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Covert United States foreign regime
change actions

1949 Syrian coup d'état
1953 Iranian coup d'état
1954 Guatemalan coup d'état
1959 Tibetan uprising
1961 Cuba, Bay of Pigs Invasion
1963 South Vietnamese coup
1964 Brazilian coup d'état
1973 Chilean coup d'état
1976 Argentine coup d'état
1979–89 Afghanistan, Operation Cyclone
1980 Turkish coup d'état
1981–87 Nicaragua, Contras

History of U.S.
expansion and influence

Foreign policy
Military history
Timeline of military operations
List of wars
List of bases
Manifest destiny
Non-interventionism
Overseas interventions
Pax Americana
America's Backyard
Territorial acquisitions

The United States has been involved in and assisted in the overthrow of foreign
governments (more recently termed "regime change") without the overt use of U.S.
military force. Often, such operations are tasked to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

Regime change has been attempted through direct involvement of U.S. operatives,
the funding and training of insurgency groups within these countries, anti-regime
propaganda campaigns, coups d'état, and other activities usually conducted as
operations by the CIA. These actions were sometimes accompanied by direct
military action, such as following the U.S. invasion of Panama in 1989 and the
U.S.-led military invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Some argue that non-transparent United States government agencies working in
secret sometimes mislead or do not fully implement the decisions of elected civilian
leaders and that this has been an important component of many such operations,
[1] Some contend that the U.S. has supported more coups against democracies
that it perceived as communist, becoming communist, or pro-communist.[1]

Contents
1 During the Cold War 1.1 Syria 1949
1.2 Iran 1953
1.3 Guatemala 1954
1.4 Tibet 1955–70s
1.5 Indonesia 1958
1.6 Cuba 1959
1.7 Iraq 1960–63
1.8 Democratic Republic of the Congo 1960–65
1.9 Dominican Republic 1961
1.10 South Vietnam 1963
1.11 Brazil 1964
1.12 Ghana 1966
1.13 Chile 1970–73
1.14 Argentina 1976
1.15 Afghanistan 1979–89
1.16 Turkey 1980
1.17 Poland 1980–89
1.18 Nicaragua 1981–90 1.18.1 Destablization through CIA assets
1.18.2 Arming the Contras


2 Since the end of the Cold War 2.1 Iraq 1992–96
2.2 Venezuela 2002
2.3 Iran 2005–present
2.4 Syria 2012–present


Read More....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covert_United_States_foreign_regime_change_actions

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?80684-State-Dept.-spokesperson-Jen-Psaki-US-does-not-back-Coups-Journalists-laugh-independent-journalists-to-be---enemies-of-the-state&p=942529#post942529

giovonni
15th March 2015, 22:48
THE US via the CIA has a very long history in covert action leading
to coups. this has been part of US Foreign policy for decades...


Yes ~ i guess you can call the United States the British Banker's Bitch ... :)

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Putin his hands on the button ...


hmm ...

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/81663000/jpg/_81663939_81660342.jpg

From the BBC

Ukraine conflict: Putin 'was ready for nuclear alert' (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-31899680#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa)

Inaiá
16th March 2015, 02:34
We can add to that list: 2.5 Brazil 2014 - present.

They want to put their hands on Petrobrás and put down the BRICS. They are trying hard. Today there was a manifestation in some cities. People hypnotized by the MSM chant of "If the president goes out, everything will be ok!". Roussef is investigating a lot of things that the right party kept under the carpet, but the MSM uses the crescent exposure of political thieves as a "proof" that the corruption in Brazil was born with this government. The same government that have been helping the poor as no other have. The same government that denied, once more, the exploration of our oil to the USA, in 2014. And this media is the one that is appearing in the HSBC list, what a coincidence... In the manifestation, believe me, there were people asking for a coming back of dictatorship (1964)...

A banner from today's manifestation.

https://twitter.com/ricocordeiro/status/577127897346998273

:suspicious:

Here. In Brazil. Today. Yes.

Reminded me of something...

zaC-WDrvmUQ

A north-american journalist tells what's happening in details, for the interested.

http://journal-neo.org/2014/11/18/brics-brazil-president-next-washington-target/

The USA will not stand in time. And they know it. They just don't want to surrender (to the Truth).

Humanity will keep growing.