PDA

View Full Version : Rand Paul BOMBSHELL: Foreign donations to Clinton Foundation ‘thinly veiled bribes’



jackovesk
21st March 2015, 15:00
http://www.axelspringer.de/imgs/21/184616233_8e8dd7f202.jpeg

http://images.politico.com/global/2015/03/20/150320_rand_paul_ap_1160_956x519.jpg

3/20/15 2:55 PM EDT

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) told POLITICO on Friday that foreign contributions to the Clinton Foundation are “thinly veiled bribes,” and said Hillary Clinton should return any donations from Saudi Arabia or other countries that abuse the rights of women.


“The normal Clinton response is to cover up, deny, refuse to acknowledge,” Paul said in a telephone interview as he was being driven through New Hampshire. “But the question is whether the country will rise up and respond to the unseemly nature of accepting foreign donations. “

Paul said that in addition to Saudi Arabia, the foundation should return donations from the United Arab Emirates and Brunei.

“In countries that stone people to death for adultery and imprison people for adultery, this is the kind of thing you would think someone for women’s rights would be standing up against, instead of accepting thinly veiled bribes,” the senator added.

In remarks for delivery to Republican activists Friday night at the Carroll County Lincoln Day Dinner in North Conway, N.H., Paul will say: “There has been much talk of a war on women. There is indeed a war on women — in Saudi Arabia. When Hillary Clinton claims she will support women’s rights, ask her why she accepted millions of dollars from” — and then he plans to mention specific countries.

The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday night that the Clinton Foundation received $7.3 million from Saudi Arabians from 1999 to 2014, based on contributions of more than $50,000. The Clinton Foundation says the money has gone to good projects that are “improving the lives of millions of people around the globe.”

Adrienne E. Watson, deputy communications director and director of surrogates for American Bridge's Correct the Record, a pro-Clinton group, said: “This is rich coming from Rand Paul, who defends individual liberties only when it suits him, and not when these rights extend to the pay discrimination or healthcare of women. Hillary Clinton has spent a lifetime advocating on behalf of women, children and their families. Throughout her life and through the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and programs like No Ceilings, she has helped improve the lives of millions of women throughout the world."

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/03/rand-paul-hillary-clinton-saudi-arabia-116269.html

PS - Look at all those ((911 Connections)) people...:shocked:

Is this finally the ((END)) of the Clinton's...?

Sure looks that way to me...:yes4:

PSS - :director: MSM prints story of real 'Political-Corruption' from an honest politician...:confused:

Am I missing something here...???


PS - Is this finally the ((END)) of the Clinton's...?

That's up to the (American-Sheeple) to decide...:scared:

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/004059625/2035984464_hitlery5xu_xlarge.jpeg


“There has been much talk of a war on women. There is indeed a war on women — in Saudi Arabia. When Hillary Clinton claims she will support women’s rights, ask her why she accepted millions of dollars from” — and then he plans to mention specific countries.

Flash
21st March 2015, 15:05
élections are nearing, to dirt is getting out.

I just hope as much dirt will come out on the other party so that people see through - we have nobody Worth being president / prime minister

Koyaanisqatsi
21st March 2015, 16:07
Randing strong lol. Rand your ground lol. Anyone find it strange how american media now seems to be coercing jews to vote republican? Whats the agenda behind this new ploy? So american voters will support a middle east conflagration w Israel? I hope not

GCS1103
22nd March 2015, 01:03
Good post, Jackovesk.

Carmody
22nd March 2015, 01:06
The entire political process in the west is corrupted to the point of being a wholly controlled ping pong game and straw man argument between two false choices, so the truth hiding behind illusion is never seen by the ignorant public.

So why do we bother to throw barbs, as if such barbs had meaning...at such dead and gone things?

Is it habit, that repetitive part of self that rejects fear and loss, rejects downturns in comforts and discontent, and and seeks comfort, comforts.. to set life 'right', just for a few minutes?

That part of us that does not quit smoking, taking drugs, drinking alcohol, or eating deadly foods?

You bet it is.

Shezbeth
22nd March 2015, 02:29
I had a sudden realization the other day, and this thread seems a semi-apt place to mention it.

Ever seen the movie "Undisputed" featuring Wesley Snipes, Ving Rhames, etc.? There's a line from it that I would like to share. I'm paraphrasing, since it has been years since I watched, so bear with.

There was once an organized (read: mafia) casino outside a city (somewhere). A local politician started to promote the idea of closing the casino, to the ire of those 'in charge' of the group/casino. The 'boss' told one of his main lieutenants: "You tell (the politician) that he can choose one of two things. He can be killed, or he can have a large sum of money deposited in his bank account. Either way, the casino stays open."

I would apply this ideology/mentality to any 'establishment' in general or individual in particular (whether they be in the role of the boss/organization, the politician, etc.), but it stands to reason that any particularly well-financed operation (lawful or otherwise) might have some (to quote another movie, Pulp Fiction) 'hard, pipe-hitting' (as in lead, not as in drugs) "individuals" at their disposal to 'go to work with a pair of pliers and a blowtorch'.

East Sun
22nd March 2015, 02:40
No Bs, No Cs Vote anything but......

Snowflower
22nd March 2015, 03:08
No vote. The only solution is to shun. Totally, completely shun. Voting says you buy the lie and pretend it makes a difference. I broke my own rule in the last election because GMO labeling was on the ballot. I should have known better - the machines were fixed against it. Never again. Shun: it's the only way to go.