PDA

View Full Version : Wait,... What??!? -- House effort would completely dismantle Patriot Act --



TargeT
25th March 2015, 14:18
I'll have to read the entire bill, but this could be a good thing (honestly I'm so jaded at this point my first instinct is that this will go no where, or it will make things worse) .



House effort would completely dismantle Patriot Act
A pair of House lawmakers wants to completely repeal the Patriot Act and other legal provisions to dramatically rein in American spying.

Reps. Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) on Tuesday unveiled their Surveillance State Repeal Act, which would overhaul American spying powers unlike any other effort to reform the National Security Agency.
“This isn’t just tinkering around the edges,” Pocan said during a Capitol Hill briefing on the legislation. “This is a meaningful overhaul of the system, getting rid of essentially all parameters of the Patriot Act.”

The bill would completely repeal the Patriot Act, the sweeping national security law passed in the days after Sept. 11, 2001, as well as the 2008 FISA Amendments Act, another spying law that the NSA has used to justify collecting vast swaths of people's communications through the Internet.

It would also reform the secretive court that oversees the nation’s spying powers, prevent the government from forcing tech companies to create “backdoors” into their devices and create additional protections for whistleblowers.“Really, what we need are new whistleblower protections so that the next Edward Snowden doesn’t have to go to Russia or Hong Kong or whatever the case may be just for disclosing this,” Massie said.

The bill is likely to be a nonstarter for leaders in Congress, who have been worried that even much milder reforms to the nation’s spying laws would tragically handicap the nation’s ability to fight terrorists. A similar bill was introduced in 2013 but failed to gain any movement in the House.

Yet advocates might be hoping that their firm opposition to government spying will seem more attractive in coming weeks, as lawmakers race to beat a June 1 deadline for reauthorizing portions of the Patriot Act.

Reformers have eyed that deadline as their last best chance for reforming some controversial NSA programs, after an effort failed in the Senate last year.
http://thehill.com/policy/technology/236769-house-effort-would-completely-dismantle-patriot-act



Seems pretty strait forward:

SUMMARY: Introduced in House (07/24/2013)

Surveillance State Repeal Act - Repeals the USA PATRIOT Act and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (thereby restoring or reviving provisions amended or repealed by such Acts as if such Acts had not been enacted), except with respect to reports to Congress regarding court orders under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) and the acquisition of intelligence information concerning an entity not substantially composed of U.S. persons that is engaged in the international proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Extends from 7 to 10 years the maximum term of FISA judges. Makes such judges eligible for redesignation.

Permits FISA courts to appoint special masters to advise on technical issues raised during proceedings.

Requires orders approving certain electronic surveillance to direct that, upon request of the applicant, any person or entity must furnish all information, facilities, or technical assistance necessary to accomplish such surveillance in a manner to protect its secrecy and produce a minimum of interference with the services that such carrier, landlord, custodian, or other person is providing the target of such surveillance (thereby retaining the ability to conduct surveillance on such targets regardless of the type of communications methods or devices being used by the subject of the surveillance).

Prohibits information relating to a U.S. person from being acquired pursuant to FISA without a valid warrant based on probable cause.

Prohibits the federal government from requiring manufacturers of electronic devices and related software to build in mechanisms allowing the federal government to bypass encryption or privacy technology.

Directs the Comptroller General (GAO) to report annually on the federal government's compliance with FISA.

Permits an employee of or contractor to an element of the intelligence community with knowledge of FISA-authorized programs and activities to submit a covered complaint to the Comptroller General, to the House or Senate intelligence committees, or in accordance with a process under the National Security Act of 1947 with respect to reports made to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community. Defines a "covered complaint" as a complaint or information concerning FISA-authorized programs and activities that an employee or contractor reasonably believes is evidence of: (1) a violation of any law, rule, or regulation; or (2) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. Subjects an officer or employee of an element of the intelligence community to administrative sanctions, including termination, for taking retaliatory action against an employee or contractor who seeks to disclose, or who discloses, such information.
Congress.gov

Bill TEXT:
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2818

To repeal the USA PATRIOT Act and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July 24, 2013

Mr. Holt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), Financial Services, Foreign Affairs, Energy and Commerce, Education and the Workforce, Transportation and Infrastructure, and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL

To repeal the USA PATRIOT Act and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “Surveillance State Repeal Act”.

SEC. 2. Repeal of USA PATRIOT Act.

The USA PATRIOT Act (Public Law 107–56) is repealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not been enacted.

SEC. 3. Repeal of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008.

(a) Repeal.—The FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–261; 122 Stat. 2477) is repealed, and the provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not been enacted.

(b) Exception.—Subsection (a) of this Act shall not apply to sections 103 and 110 of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–261; 122 Stat. 2477).

SEC. 4. Terms of judges on Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court; reappointment; Special Masters.

(a) Terms; reappointment.—Section 103(d) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1803(d)) is amended—

(1) by striking “maximum of seven” and inserting “maximum of ten”; and

(2) by striking “and shall not be eligible for redesignation”.

(b) Special Masters.—Section 103(f) of such Act, as amended by section 3 of this Act, is further amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:

“(4) Special Masters.—

“(A) The courts established pursuant to subsections (a) and (b) may appoint one or more Special Masters to advise the courts on technical issues raised during proceedings before the courts.

“(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘Special Master’ means an individual who has technological expertise in the subject matter of a proceeding before a court established pursuant to subsection (a) or (b).”.

SEC. 5. Electronic surveillance of specified persons without regard to specific device.

Section 105(c)(2)(B) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1805(c)(2)(B)) is amended to read as follows:

“(B) that, upon the request of the applicant, any person or entity shall furnish the applicant forthwith all information, facilities, or technical assistance necessary to accomplish the electronic surveillance in such a manner as will protect its secrecy and produce a minimum of interference with the services that such carrier, landlord, custodian, or other person is providing that target of electronic surveillance;”.

SEC. 6. Additional provisions for collections under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978.

(a) In general.—Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), as amended by section 3 of this Act, is further amended to read as follows:

“TITLE VII—Additional Provisions

“SEC. 701. Warrant requirement.

“Notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, no information relating to a United States person may be acquired pursuant to this Act without a valid warrant based on probable cause.”.

(b) Table of contents amendments.—The table of contents in the first section of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), as amended by section 3 of this Act, is further amended by striking the items relating to title VII and section 701 and inserting the following new items:
“TITLE VII—ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS”.

“701. Warrant requirement.”.

SEC. 7. Encryption and privacy technology of electronic devices and software.

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Federal Government shall not mandate that the manufacturer of an electronic device or software for an electronic device build into such device or software a mechanism that allows the Federal Government to bypass the encryption or privacy technology of such device or software.

SEC. 8. GAO compliance evaluations.

(a) In general.—The Comptroller General of the United States shall annually evaluate compliance by the Federal Government with the provisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.).

(b) Report.—The Comptroller General shall annually submit to Congress a report containing the results of the evaluation conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 9. Whistleblower complaints.

(a) Authorization To report complaints or information.—An employee of or contractor to an element of the intelligence community that has knowledge of the programs and activities authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) may submit a covered complaint—

(1) to the Comptroller General of the United States;

(2) to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives;

(3) to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; or

(4) in accordance with the process established under section 103H(k)(5) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3033(k)(5)).

(b) Investigations and reports to Congress.—The Comptroller General shall investigate a covered complaint submitted pursuant to subsection (b)(1) and shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of the investigation.

(c) Covered complaint defined.—In this section, the term “covered complaint” means a complaint or information concerning programs and activities authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) that an employee or contractor reasonably believes is evidence of—

(1) a violation of any law, rule, or regulation; or

(2) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

SEC. 10. Prohibition on interference with reporting of waste, fraud, abuse, or criminal behavior.

(a) In general.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an officer or employee of an element of the intelligence community shall be subject to administrative sanctions, up to and including termination, for taking retaliatory action against an employee of or contractor to an element of the intelligence community who seeks to disclose or discloses covered information to—

(1) the Comptroller General;

(2) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives;

(3) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; or

(4) the Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community.

(b) Definitions.—In this section:

(1) COVERED INFORMATION.—The term “covered information” means any information (including classified or sensitive information) that an employee or contractor reasonably believes is evidence of—

(A) a violation of any law, rule, or regulation; or

(B) gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.

(2) INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY.—The term “intelligence community” has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003).



https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/2818

Meggings
25th March 2015, 15:59
It is KEY that we hold hope, that we hold the certainty that "all will be well, and all manner of things shall be well" in our life.
This is the key that all the controller workings want to remove from us, giving instead the FALSITY that we are doomed.
We are not doomed.
We are the creators.
We create the better world, the better tomorrow, by our certainty that IT IS SO.

I have been studying the life of U.S. Grant, Civil War general and twice president of the USA.
He won the war through his CERTAINTY that it was so. He imparted this certainty to the generals under him, and took no notice whatsoever of their fears. An example of this was written of by S. Cadwallader of the New York Times Herald:

"Once he realized that Grant DID NOT SHARE HIS GLOOMY THOUGHTS, everything looked different. 'It was the greatest sunburst of my life. I had suddenly emerged from the slough of despond, to the solid bed-rock of unwavering faith.'

Grant's quiet self-confidence affected all around him, as it had General Sherman when the night before the final battle of Shiloh, Sherman came to find Grant and urge him to retreat. There was in Grant's calm certainty of victory an energy that prevented Sherman from expressing his own fears, and the only words Grant said to Sherman were, "Lick 'em tomorrow though."

So we learn from this example and take heart and KNOW that good will triumph in our world.

Calz
25th March 2015, 16:05
(honestly I'm so jaded at this point my first instinct is that this will go no where, or it will make things worse) .




Saw that .. exactly my reaction.

Remember ... oh what about a couple weeks ago now ... those same congress critters were going to defund the DHS ... you know ... the SS type that would be the ones saving said critters from the torch and pitchfork crowd after they come to grips with exactly what has been foisted upon them???

You know ... those same critters who just voted by a big margain to supply Ukraine with offensive weapons further putting the world at great risk???

... about those mandatory vaccines ... ah yes ... I guess that is more on a local level...

Madness knows no limits ... imho.

wnlight
25th March 2015, 16:39
Well, if their actions to repeal the Patriot Act are honest and true then Reps. Pocan and Massie are true Patriots.

3(C)+me
25th March 2015, 16:48
OK so this morn I curse the forum and come upon TT's thread and well, it's like, is this a joke? Really, first thought. And yes, I am so jaded at this point, I have no faith congress can do the right thing but I could be wrong. I could, let's hope so.

Calz
25th March 2015, 16:49
With the NDAA in effect is the Patriot Act even necessary???

... and since when has the legal system followed previous law???

Never forget the Bush administration critter suggesting "we create our own reality" ...



President Obama Signs Indefinite Detention Bill Into Law

December 31, 2011

WASHINGTON – President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) into law today. The statute contains a sweeping worldwide indefinite detention provision. While President Obama issued a signing statement saying he had “serious reservations” about the provisions, the statement only applies to how his administration would use the authorities granted by the NDAA, and would not affect how the law is interpreted by subsequent administrations. The White House had threatened to veto an earlier version of the NDAA, but reversed course shortly before Congress voted on the final bill.

“President Obama's action today is a blight on his legacy because he will forever be known as the president who signed indefinite detention without charge or trial into law,” said Anthony D. Romero, ACLU executive director. “The statute is particularly dangerous because it has no temporal or geographic limitations, and can be used by this and future presidents to militarily detain people captured far from any battlefield. The ACLU will fight worldwide detention authority wherever we can, be it in court, in Congress, or internationally.”

Under the Bush administration, similar claims of worldwide detention authority were used to hold even a U.S. citizen detained on U.S. soil in military custody, and many in Congress now assert that the NDAA should be used in the same way again. The ACLU believes that any military detention of American citizens or others within the United States is unconstitutional and illegal, including under the NDAA. In addition, the breadth of the NDAA’s detention authority violates international law because it is not limited to people captured in the context of an actual armed conflict as required by the laws of war.

“We are incredibly disappointed that President Obama signed this new law even though his administration had already claimed overly broad detention authority in court,” said Romero. “Any hope that the Obama administration would roll back the constitutional excesses of George Bush in the war on terror was extinguished today. Thankfully, we have three branches of government, and the final word belongs to the Supreme Court, which has yet to rule on the scope of detention authority. But Congress and the president also have a role to play in cleaning up the mess they have created because no American citizen or anyone else should live in fear of this or any future president misusing the NDAA’s detention authority.”

The bill also contains provisions making it difficult to transfer suspects out of military detention, which prompted FBI Director Robert Mueller to testify that it could jeopardize criminal investigations. It also restricts the transfers of cleared detainees from the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay to foreign countries for resettlement or repatriation, making it more difficult to close Guantanamo, as President Obama pledged to do in one of his first acts in office.


https://www.aclu.org/national-security/president-obama-signs-indefinite-detention-bill-law

Meggings
25th March 2015, 17:31
Can it be, that by staying in the mind-set of being jaded, of not expecting anything good to come of any initiative, that we CREATE that outcome?
Can it be that by lifting ourselves up above the fray, above the insane nonsense, that we enter a world where it is no more in evidence?
In short, that we enter a higher dimensional aspect of earth.
We can choose to be bound by 3D duality, or rise higher into 5D unity.
The tool to do so is by our own consciousness and where we hold it.

I say again, WHEN WE DO NOT SHARE GLOOMY THOUGHTS, everything looks different.
Move your consciousness higher, into certainty of good things, and find this: 'It was the greatest sunburst of my life. I had suddenly emerged from the slough of despond, to the solid bed-rock of unwavering faith.'

Calz
25th March 2015, 20:17
Forgive the shameless bump ... http://www.pic4ever.com/images/nudie.gif

... but at least for those living in amerika ... this is ... interesting ...


Many things happening and many things changing quite dramatically ...

We need to keep alert to discern wtf is actually going on here ... imho

Carmody
25th March 2015, 22:29
My default position is one of dealing with an unrepentant oligarchy, one that is out to screw us. Ie, the default position is one of conspiracy, and then after all possible potentials for finding conspiracy are exhausted, then look at it with other eyes.

This is just about the only position that works these days. Starting with the idea of honesty in anything have to do with government, is going to be the losing position, in the vast number of instances. So often, that it would foolish to consider it.

As in, Kurt asked, "where were you educated? (You idiot)"

d91SEEpvCzU

Flash
25th March 2015, 23:30
And make friends only with those who can render some services to you later on.

The shark eat the shark world.

3(C)+me
26th March 2015, 01:02
My default position is let's see. Neutrality with the expectations of a good outcome. Even if this falls apart the revolution continues, they can't stop that. At some point they will be shown the door. But in the meantime I will sit back and watch the show, with some popcorn, organic of course.

ghostrider
26th March 2015, 01:06
If they repeal the Patriot Act , it only means they are going full bore in micro-chipping everyone ... no need for the Patriot Act then ...

cursichella1
26th March 2015, 08:54
(honestly I'm so jaded at this point my first instinct is that this will go no where, or it will make things worse) .




Saw that .. exactly my reaction.

Remember ... oh what about a couple weeks ago now ... those same congress critters were going to defund the DHS ... you know ... the SS type that would be the ones saving said critters from the torch and pitchfork crowd after they come to grips with exactly what has been foisted upon them???

You know ... those same critters who just voted by a big margain to supply Ukraine with offensive weapons further putting the world at great risk???

... about those mandatory vaccines ... ah yes ... I guess that is more on a local level...

Madness knows no limits ... imho.

And the same critters that gave Netanyahu several standing ovations last week...

TargeT
26th March 2015, 14:24
And the same critters that gave Netanyahu several standing ovations last week...

We used to be pretty tight (friendly) with Hitler too....

http://i.imgur.com/0Ppnncd.jpg

I'm not certain who is worse between the two of them.

araucaria
26th March 2015, 14:33
My default position is one of dealing with an unrepentant oligarchy, one that is out to screw us. Ie, the default position is one of conspiracy, and then after all possible potentials for finding conspiracy are exhausted, then look at it with other eyes.

This is just about the only position that works these days. Starting with the idea of honesty in anything have to do with government, is going to be the losing position, in the vast number of instances. So often, that it would foolish to consider it.

As in, Kurt asked, "where were you educated? (You idiot)"

d91SEEpvCzU
Oh I don't know, you just might to get people unscrewed the way they got screwed, by slipping useful fine print into unconnected legislation on Christmas Eve, that sort of thing.

cursichella1
27th March 2015, 02:09
And the same critters that gave Netanyahu several standing ovations last week...

We used to be pretty tight (friendly) with Hitler too....

I'm not certain who is worse between the two of them.

May be that they are equally bad. There are some that contend that the Nazi's and Zionists work closely together. They're more opportunistic than they are racist. Nothing would be surprising.

cursichella1
27th March 2015, 02:13
My default position is one of dealing with an unrepentant oligarchy, one that is out to screw us. Ie, the default position is one of conspiracy, and then after all possible potentials for finding conspiracy are exhausted, then look at it with other eyes.

This is just about the only position that works these days. Starting with the idea of honesty in anything have to do with government, is going to be the losing position, in the vast number of instances. So often, that it would foolish to consider it.

As in, Kurt asked, "where were you educated? (You idiot)"

Oh I don't know, you just might to get people unscrewed the way they got screwed, by slipping useful fine print into unconnected legislation on Christmas Eve, that sort of thing.

Very true. That kind of thing happens all of the time. A defense spending boost ends up on a Farm bill, at the 11th hour, while everyone's on vacation.

Calz
27th March 2015, 04:31
Satire ... or is it??? Sounds a helluva lot more real than anything coming from DC ...



Congress’s Approval Rating No Longer Detectable by Current Technology

By Andy Borowitz


WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report) – After a challenging week for the legislative body, the approval rating of the United States Congress has shrunk to a point where it is no longer detectable by the technology currently available, a leading pollster said on Friday.

Davis Logsdon, who heads the highly regarded Opinion Research Institute at the University of Minnesota, said that his polling unit has developed highly sensitive measurement technology in recent years to gauge Congress’s popularity as it fell into the single digits, but added that “as of this week, Congress is basically flatlining.”

“At the beginning of the week, you could still see a slight flicker of approval for Congress,” he said. “Then—bam!—the lights went out.”

Logsdon said, however, that people should resist drawing the conclusion that Congress’s approval rating now stands at zero. “They may have support in the range of .0001 per cent or, say, .0000001 per cent,” he said. “Our equipment just isn’t advanced enough to measure it.”

Logsdon said that the swift descent of Congress’s approval rating below detectable levels has surprised experts in the polling profession. “A couple of years ago, when they shut down the government, I wondered, What could they possibly do to become less popular than this?” the pollster said. “Now we know.”


http://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/congresss-approval-rating-no-longer-detectable-by-current-technology

gripreaper
27th March 2015, 04:45
President Obama Signs Indefinite Detention Bill Into Law

So, the unelected administrator of the bankrupt corporate UNITED STATES, INC. is using his executive power under the auspices of his private bankster board of directors to puppet what he is told to do, without any legal or lawful authority to do so under ANY organic constitutional basis, since the Organic Constitution of the Republic of the several States of the original Union was abandoned over 150 years ago, that gives his authority? ROFLMAOOOO!!!!!!!!

Heed this you potentate!

Marbury v. Madison : 5 US 137 (1803):

“No provision of the Constitution is designed to be without effect,” “Anything that is in conflict is null and void of law”, “Clearly, for a secondary law to come in conflict with the supreme Law was illogical, for certainly, the supreme Law would prevail over all other laws and certainly our forefathers had intended that the supreme Law would be the bases of all law and for any law to come in conflict would be null and void of law, it would bare no power to enforce, in would bare no obligation to obey, it would purport to settle as if it had never existed, for unconstitutionality would date from the enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law, no courts are bound to uphold it, and no Citizens are bound to obey it. It operates as a near nullity or a fiction of law.”