PDA

View Full Version : Reproducible "Free Energy" Research Model For LENR - Fleischmann & Pons Vindicated!



sigma6
19th April 2015, 15:46
Scientists acknowledging they have successfully proven (Martin) Fleischman and (Stanley) Pons theory of LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reaction)

i.e. electrochemically induced nuclear fusion of deuterium


"My advice to those who wish to learn the art of scientific prophecy is not to rely on abstract reason, but to decipher the secret language of Nature from Nature's documents, the facts of experience."
- Max Born, Experiment and Theory in Physics


Stanislaw Szpak creates a simple research model, based on the concept of "co-deposition" that can now be duplicated within the main stream scientific community (something many lesser scientists were unable to figure out) Stan is the first scientist to claim 100% reproducibility

Do you realize what this means!?... this is now being "introduced" into the main stream Scientific Research community!... as "acceptable" science... i.e. the scientists have been given "permission" to believe it's now possible!!! (isn't that wonderful?... o.O!)

Also from the sounds of it, maybe the details of what Pons and Fleischmann were trying to elucidate, in their studies really WAS more difficult than conventional science was able to reproduce at the time. But I still think that certain parties were going out of their way to exploit this weakness in their methodology and turn it into a political circus. The attacks were just too vicious, too PR oriented. And now in retrospect, it looks like what they were really protesting (on another level) was their own a laziness and total lack of vision to be creative enough to look at this problem and pursue it... a BIG FAIL on the part of the scientific community as far as I am concerned...

Share this, make it go viral
Following "Nature's Documents" - Stanislaw Szpak LENR Co-deposition
QxBJjWzlKl0

It's very interesting that this is being introduced into the mainstream by this wonderful scientist, an retired ex Navy scientist? (...hmmm) Imagine having the good fortune to mentor under someone of this kind of creative and intellectual energy... or on the other hand, was he given a nod? as one of their most trusted agents? He does seem to be the perfect "ambassador" to bring this knowledge back into the field of science... (Just in time for the Rockefellers? who have all gotten out of the oil business???) And does this mean scientists are just as susceptible to social manipulation and propaganda as the rest of the human population??... apparently so...

By now we should all realize, in this world of geopolitical and financial control....anything goes... I find this quite interesting... to think there was some work done by the Navy on tipping this potential "technology game changer" into the mainstream a while back... This new fresh research solidifies it into a fundamental interpretation, backed by a reproducible experimental analysis... ie. it meets the requirements of scientific methodology, can be published, discussed, shared and talked about now...

In any event, this is an unequivocal, if a little underplayed... vindication for Fleischmann and Pons who were treated so unfairly imo... those vicious attacks by jealous, (politically motivated?) scientists too immature to realize their own mental limitations and their ego fear of looking like fools, was the more likely impetus and cause of their failure to replicate the original models... (poor babies)

Even if you had only one successful implementation of this huge explosion of energy, how does one account for it! ?? That is what P & F were trying to share with the world. And it did pass the statistical model of "significance" (high enough probability to be non random) As some were only getting this result less than 10% of the time, others started achieving 30% predictability, this is what Szpak meant by "Nature's documents" ... real world observations... NOT blackboard theory... STUPID SCIENTISTS around the world, in a way, have been shamed... or at least chided by this old man's classical research philosophy and experimental trail blazing, all within the confines of accepted scientific parameters. Bravo!

Steven E. Jones sabotaged Cold Fusion and then 9/11 Truth
1DEccFO7EiI
Brigham Young? Utah? Figures... (one of the main NSA operation sites?)

wnlight
20th April 2015, 01:41
Somewhere, I read that DARPA has also been looking at LENR, i.e., cold fusion.