awakeningmom
26th April 2015, 19:06
I guess I’m on a roll this week in terms of second guessing some of the generally accepted alternative narratives inside the Matrix. My most recent thought is that the Boston Marathon Bombing trial was a complete sham – not in the sense that Dzhokkhar Tsarnaev got a bum deal from his joke of a defense attorney Judy Clarke (who, against all rules of Attorney Ethics and Professional Responsibility, told a court her client was “guilty” when her own client opted to plead not guilty), but rather in the sense that the entire trial was completely engineered– and that perhaps Tsarnaev and his brother were and are both willing participants in this scam, rather than simple patsies.
First, please check out this link to a well-written comprehensive article about the whole Boston Bombing FF over at the Truth & Shadows blog site. I’ve been reading this site for almost a year now, and think that the journalist/blogger Craig McKee has written some very insightful articles about the various false flags (911, Boston, Sandy Hook, etc). He has also apparently earned the respect of a number of leading Truth Movement figures, many of whom have written guest articles on his blog. Most recently, as another point in his favor, Jim Marrs, one of my favorite researchers, has also given the thumbs up to McKee’s take on the BMB by reposting McKee’s article on his own website.
https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/justice-denied-examining-the-evidence-that-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-was-a-patsy-in-boston-bombing/
The article on the BMB itself is well worth reading – and suggests the patsy scenario, to which I have long subscribed. However, what really got my attention today were two of the comments following the article – both suggesting that the trial itself (along with the entire drama) was engineered from top to bottom. You can access them yourself by clicking on the link above, but I’m posting them now for your consideration:
The first one, by Lilaleo (posted on April 11, 2015 at 10:58am), suggests:
“Mr. McKee, yours is by far one of the clearest and most complete wrap ups of the Boston Bombing shenanigans. His kangaroo defense attorney is widely advertised as Ms. NoDeathRow… At the same time all the legal and propaganda groundwork has been laid for a death penalty. The question is which one is the desired outcome in the script that’s being played out.
Going through your list, we have a dead shooter with Oswald, dead hijackers on 9/11, a live one in aurora, a dead one in sandy hook, and a live one in Boston. However, I would suggest that, statistically, in all of the lone nut incidents, live capture is a rarity. So, since we all seem to agree that these are scripted events, it is highly likely that the “live capture” is also as per script, and will perform an important function in furthering some agenda or another, possibly more than a few, similar to how aurora opened the flood gates for “mental” control grid and how the Holmes trial permanently destroyed doctor patient confidentiality.
As mentioned above, the aftermath of the bombing was essentially the shut down of a major U.S. City, implementation of martial law, and automatic suspension of civil and constitutional rights of millions of U.S. Citizens. At the time, you couldn’t listen to any “authority” (from the police chief to the president) more than a minute before they mentioned how well all of the branches of homeland security were working with the local and state police and the military. That it was a huge success. That this was what they had been working for since 9/11… Which more than suggests that, just like the bombing, everything about the three day invasion of Boston was one big f’n exercise… The mother of all drills, basically. After all, They had been doing this in poorer areas of small towns in much smaller scale for years.
Here is my question. If the whole event, it’s planning, execution and outcome is scripted, would it be a terribly “tinfoil” thing to consider that these patsies are perhaps willing patsies, participating in a major war game as the red team?
Granted, they could be willing participants only until they realize they are the patsies. But still, I don’t think drill masters would risk the outcome of such a major operation by having two guys running loose even for a few hours… The brothers could have easily done one of a million possible unexpected things to spoil their plans; surrender in public, make a call, post something online… Anything really.. I find it more likely that they would have already apprehended the brothers before they announced their names as suspects. It just seems extremely risky otherwise… The Tsarnaev brothers’ reported actions are either all fictitious and are played by actors for the benefit of cameras and witnesses, or they were staged with the brothers still playing along.
Could the nephews of a high level CIA operative really be used as patsies where one gets killed and the other one gets locked up for life or gets executed? That just does not make any sense. If they are lying about everything else, why are we taking their word at it when they say Tamarlan is dead?”
The second one, by MiaRyanne, on April 12, 2105 at 12:42pm, opines:
“The courtcase was not even a real event. I doubt Tsarnaev was even there, the stand-in they used was taller and much older and spoke with a heavy Russian accent. No pics or vids will ever be seen of him because he’s either working on another CIA project, or he’s dead (if he was a patsy he’s dead). Either way, the guilty admission by Clarke (lawyer) was simply to ensure Tsarnaev never had to take the stand, and there would be no actual proceedings to bring forth the mountain of evidence which would point to innocence and a staged CIA event. It’s really not that hard to understand when you grasp the level of corruption in the court system and the government. This was 100% a False Flag operation, ZERO doubt! They may have injured some people while conducting this drill, but for the most part those involved were probably CIA assets and they were all greatly rewarded with GoFundMe money.
Those innocent people injured would also be valuable for the story as they would give it credence…but the seriously injured were all planted…the bomb had a little punch, but not enough to severely hurt anyone…just some eardrums damage and noise to scare people into believing it was a real bomb. I’m not a big fan of the “actors” claim, though they are acting or playing a role, those “fake severely injured” are all CIA, and that’s how they can be trusted to never speak the truth…for they KNOW the consequences of that. No real bombs, no real deaths or limb loss, no real shootout, no real police shooting, no real carjacking, no real Tamerlan, or Dzhokhar…just a staged fake event to further erode your freedoms and invite in the military control over the people…whom the government fear the most.”
Things that make me go hmmm. When this whole event first unfolded, my gut told me these two brothers were just the patsies. And maybe they are. But the absolute ridiculousness of this “trial” has made me reconsider. Is it possible that this trial never even happened – or that all players (judge, attorneys, jury, defendant) knew they were acting the parts? I don’t see any other reason for a defense attorney to go to trial if she just planned to throw her client under the bus and tell the jury he’s guilty. Talk about Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and a violation of a defendant’s 6th Amendment rights. And with so many holes in that official story, it just makes sense to me that Clarke needed to remove any need for Tsarnaev to take the stand or for her to look like she was putting on a real defense. Instead, she moves right to the “yes, he’s guilty; please give my client leniency” stage.
In the end, why does it matter whether the trial was real or fake or whether Tsarnaev was a pasty or a willing participant? I know I’m probably just adding to the needless speculation here, and that debating these details can take our needed attention away from what really matters – i.e., figuring out a way to actually RESPOND to the false flags, erosion of rights/liberties, loss of privacy, etc. in a way that could actually make a difference. Maybe it’s because I don’t yet know of any real way to make a difference. And maybe this speculation is just my way to spend my time while I wait for the inevitable complete take-over of Planet Earth by these psychopaths. On the other hand, in my less cynical moments, sometimes I think that uncovering all the layers of deception is still possible, and that it will be Game Over for the PTB once we are able to do that, both individually and collectively.
Anyway, if anyone else wants to join me in my mindless speculation, what do others think of the Tsarneav trial in particular -- a total sham or just a travesty of justice for him?
First, please check out this link to a well-written comprehensive article about the whole Boston Bombing FF over at the Truth & Shadows blog site. I’ve been reading this site for almost a year now, and think that the journalist/blogger Craig McKee has written some very insightful articles about the various false flags (911, Boston, Sandy Hook, etc). He has also apparently earned the respect of a number of leading Truth Movement figures, many of whom have written guest articles on his blog. Most recently, as another point in his favor, Jim Marrs, one of my favorite researchers, has also given the thumbs up to McKee’s take on the BMB by reposting McKee’s article on his own website.
https://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/04/10/justice-denied-examining-the-evidence-that-dzhokhar-tsarnaev-was-a-patsy-in-boston-bombing/
The article on the BMB itself is well worth reading – and suggests the patsy scenario, to which I have long subscribed. However, what really got my attention today were two of the comments following the article – both suggesting that the trial itself (along with the entire drama) was engineered from top to bottom. You can access them yourself by clicking on the link above, but I’m posting them now for your consideration:
The first one, by Lilaleo (posted on April 11, 2015 at 10:58am), suggests:
“Mr. McKee, yours is by far one of the clearest and most complete wrap ups of the Boston Bombing shenanigans. His kangaroo defense attorney is widely advertised as Ms. NoDeathRow… At the same time all the legal and propaganda groundwork has been laid for a death penalty. The question is which one is the desired outcome in the script that’s being played out.
Going through your list, we have a dead shooter with Oswald, dead hijackers on 9/11, a live one in aurora, a dead one in sandy hook, and a live one in Boston. However, I would suggest that, statistically, in all of the lone nut incidents, live capture is a rarity. So, since we all seem to agree that these are scripted events, it is highly likely that the “live capture” is also as per script, and will perform an important function in furthering some agenda or another, possibly more than a few, similar to how aurora opened the flood gates for “mental” control grid and how the Holmes trial permanently destroyed doctor patient confidentiality.
As mentioned above, the aftermath of the bombing was essentially the shut down of a major U.S. City, implementation of martial law, and automatic suspension of civil and constitutional rights of millions of U.S. Citizens. At the time, you couldn’t listen to any “authority” (from the police chief to the president) more than a minute before they mentioned how well all of the branches of homeland security were working with the local and state police and the military. That it was a huge success. That this was what they had been working for since 9/11… Which more than suggests that, just like the bombing, everything about the three day invasion of Boston was one big f’n exercise… The mother of all drills, basically. After all, They had been doing this in poorer areas of small towns in much smaller scale for years.
Here is my question. If the whole event, it’s planning, execution and outcome is scripted, would it be a terribly “tinfoil” thing to consider that these patsies are perhaps willing patsies, participating in a major war game as the red team?
Granted, they could be willing participants only until they realize they are the patsies. But still, I don’t think drill masters would risk the outcome of such a major operation by having two guys running loose even for a few hours… The brothers could have easily done one of a million possible unexpected things to spoil their plans; surrender in public, make a call, post something online… Anything really.. I find it more likely that they would have already apprehended the brothers before they announced their names as suspects. It just seems extremely risky otherwise… The Tsarnaev brothers’ reported actions are either all fictitious and are played by actors for the benefit of cameras and witnesses, or they were staged with the brothers still playing along.
Could the nephews of a high level CIA operative really be used as patsies where one gets killed and the other one gets locked up for life or gets executed? That just does not make any sense. If they are lying about everything else, why are we taking their word at it when they say Tamarlan is dead?”
The second one, by MiaRyanne, on April 12, 2105 at 12:42pm, opines:
“The courtcase was not even a real event. I doubt Tsarnaev was even there, the stand-in they used was taller and much older and spoke with a heavy Russian accent. No pics or vids will ever be seen of him because he’s either working on another CIA project, or he’s dead (if he was a patsy he’s dead). Either way, the guilty admission by Clarke (lawyer) was simply to ensure Tsarnaev never had to take the stand, and there would be no actual proceedings to bring forth the mountain of evidence which would point to innocence and a staged CIA event. It’s really not that hard to understand when you grasp the level of corruption in the court system and the government. This was 100% a False Flag operation, ZERO doubt! They may have injured some people while conducting this drill, but for the most part those involved were probably CIA assets and they were all greatly rewarded with GoFundMe money.
Those innocent people injured would also be valuable for the story as they would give it credence…but the seriously injured were all planted…the bomb had a little punch, but not enough to severely hurt anyone…just some eardrums damage and noise to scare people into believing it was a real bomb. I’m not a big fan of the “actors” claim, though they are acting or playing a role, those “fake severely injured” are all CIA, and that’s how they can be trusted to never speak the truth…for they KNOW the consequences of that. No real bombs, no real deaths or limb loss, no real shootout, no real police shooting, no real carjacking, no real Tamerlan, or Dzhokhar…just a staged fake event to further erode your freedoms and invite in the military control over the people…whom the government fear the most.”
Things that make me go hmmm. When this whole event first unfolded, my gut told me these two brothers were just the patsies. And maybe they are. But the absolute ridiculousness of this “trial” has made me reconsider. Is it possible that this trial never even happened – or that all players (judge, attorneys, jury, defendant) knew they were acting the parts? I don’t see any other reason for a defense attorney to go to trial if she just planned to throw her client under the bus and tell the jury he’s guilty. Talk about Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and a violation of a defendant’s 6th Amendment rights. And with so many holes in that official story, it just makes sense to me that Clarke needed to remove any need for Tsarnaev to take the stand or for her to look like she was putting on a real defense. Instead, she moves right to the “yes, he’s guilty; please give my client leniency” stage.
In the end, why does it matter whether the trial was real or fake or whether Tsarnaev was a pasty or a willing participant? I know I’m probably just adding to the needless speculation here, and that debating these details can take our needed attention away from what really matters – i.e., figuring out a way to actually RESPOND to the false flags, erosion of rights/liberties, loss of privacy, etc. in a way that could actually make a difference. Maybe it’s because I don’t yet know of any real way to make a difference. And maybe this speculation is just my way to spend my time while I wait for the inevitable complete take-over of Planet Earth by these psychopaths. On the other hand, in my less cynical moments, sometimes I think that uncovering all the layers of deception is still possible, and that it will be Game Over for the PTB once we are able to do that, both individually and collectively.
Anyway, if anyone else wants to join me in my mindless speculation, what do others think of the Tsarneav trial in particular -- a total sham or just a travesty of justice for him?