PDA

View Full Version : Psy-Ops, The Orchestration Of.



Hervé
29th April 2015, 13:38
The following is an article by Jon Rappoport on how psy-ops work and how they are orchestrated in social engineering schemes and which I keep referencing here and there.

So here it is in its own thread:


The disaster of manufactured consent in the Matrix (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/03/15/the-disaster-of-manufactured-consent-in-the-matrix/)
by Jon Rappoport March 15, 2013
www.nomorefakenews.com (http://www.nomorefakenews.com/)

This article may seem to be about abstract theory, but it isn’t. It’s about how populations are viewed by psychological-operations specialists.

More importantly, it’s about how people are led to accept substitutes for their own highest ideals. The substitutes look like the real thing, but they’re actually very well drawn cartoons.

The most successful long-terms psyops are aimed at getting people to accept “good things, wonderful things.” Except, it turns out that these things magically evaporate and leave populations in the lurch.

Imagine for a moment that every crisis we now find ourselves in, every form of pollution and poisoning and every war and every mass destruction of life…was preceded and precipitated by…a psyop that looked like a golden destiny of fulfillment.

Okay. Let’s begin.

At some point, every intelligent human develops their own reality.

This reality isn’t usually a clear, articulated, and overall position. It tends to be a hodge-podge of linked ideas, preferences, feelings, principles, and morals.

Nevertheless, consciously and unconsciously, the person refers to it often, and uses it as a tool with which to navigate through life.

In the Matrix, there is pressure to have people connect their realities to each other. Why? Because groups can thus be created. Groups are easier to compromise than individuals.

We get the concept of hooked ideas. A hooked idea is one which will entice people to merge their realities into One. The hooked idea can be expressed as a slogan, a so-called meme, a principle. It is introduced by people who work psyops.

A psyop is a campaign to herd people into a place where their individual realities overlap.

For the propagandist, there is the eternal search for the good, better, and best hooking idea, the one that will collect the greatest possible number of people under one roof.

This has nothing to do with true progress or honest intent. It has everything to do with control.

Therefore, the actual content and substance and meaning of the hooking idea is irrelevant. A retired propaganda operative once told me, “If I could broadcast a piece of absolute gibberish from one end of the planet to the other, and have it picked up and consented to, I would do it.”

For a psyop specialist, the jackpot is a large group of hooked ideas that, taken together, change the world, and bring a billion or more people’s realities into one overlapping space.

Here is a current ongoing group of such hooked ideas. Before you read them, remember that the aim of such ideas is collecting people under AN IMITATION OF THE REAL THING.

Whatever meaning these hooked ideas have, they are not searching out people to move them into actual individual choices. No, the objective is to rope them under a fake banner that looks real.

“Help others. Help the needy. Raise up the needy. We’re all in this together. Greatest good. Greatest good for the greatest number. Humanity as one. Peace. Let’s all cooperate. The human family…”

This is only a partial list of the group of hooked ideas.

These ideas are transmitted to the global population through every means possible: ads, public service announcements, political speeches, movies, articles, books, the news, television shows of every type, the education system. It’s a blitz, and it doesn’t stop. All the angles are played.

The psyop calculation runs this way: the majority of people who buy in and connect their realities to other people’s realities and achieve overlap—will go passive and accept “the new humane society.” All these people are complete pawns.

The sector of people who buy in and thus share realities, collectively, and then DO something about it…these people will follow a prescribed path. They’ll join the approved groups and campaign for the chosen causes. They’re dupes.

The very small fraction of people who buy into the group of hooked ideas and think of them as genuine and real, and also DO something genuine and real and good about it, will create a manageable amount of disruption to the scheme and the objective—which by the way is a completely collectivist planet. The operative word here is “manageable.”

This same retired propaganda operative, who goes by the pseudonym of Ellis Medavoy (I interview him 28 times in one section of my collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED (http://marketplace.mybigcommerce.com/the-matrix-revealed-vol-1-cd-by-jon-rappoport-mega-info/)), explained this “psyop calculation”:


“The target of a terrific psyop is yearning and longing. That’s what I looked for when I was working: what people long and yearn for. Something unformed and undefined but very powerful. That’s what I wanted to tap into.

“If I could tap into that, people would buy in and surrender a significant part of whatever their personal world looks like. Because they want to believe they’re coming together with like-minded others. They’ll also believe the path laid out for them is correct and proper and wonderful. This is really a fake religion we’re talking about.

“A fake religion. It’s really for children, and most people turn out to be children. Give them a group of high-minded ideas, and they’ll grab on and think everything they’ve done up to that moment is a prelude to THIS.

“We [operatives] are playing a symphony, you see, and once they listen to the prelude, they’re hooked. They stay. They long for the climax, which doesn’t exist; not the way they imagine it. To them it’s all about ‘arrival in the promised land,’ as if that’s some kind of gift that’s wrapped up under the tree, waiting to be opened.

“We give them a fake god, a dead-end god. If they were once burning with authentic faith, we derail that and take them to another place…” In truth, there is no such thing as the sum of all personal realities. That concept is a delusion that is foisted on people.

As I stated at the beginning of this article, each person has their own reality. It may be a hodge-podge, it may be borrowed to some degree, but it IS the reality of the individual. Each person has the opportunity, if he takes it, to expand that reality and make it more profound, on his own terms.

But once he becomes mesmerized by the notion of overlapping his reality with others, he’s in a whole different pew.

Here is another very important distinction: you and I and others could, for example, decide to start a business. We could cooperate in this new enterprise. We could decide on common objectives. We could be inspired to a tremendous degree. But we are still—each of us—carrying along our individual realities. That’s what gives us our core individual strength. That’s what allows us to contribute to the group.

And we’re aware of what we’re doing. We’re choosing to do it.

That’s quite different from falling under the sway of a psyop. That’s quite different from buying into hooked ideas on a emotional level. That’s quite different from accepting the generalized idea of an emotional and spiritual merger of our personal realities.

In the latter case, what is happening is the supreme irony: people are buying the idea that their freedom actually equals their merging.

It is exactly this “merging” that obsessed technocrats are proposing. They see it in terms of humans and machines “coming together.” (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/02/16/can-you-trust-a-new-brain-with-an-iq-of-7000/) This is their envisioned promised land. The ability to instantly access trillions of pieces of information and do lightning-speed calculation and organize that information in countless ways is their version of personal revelation.

It’s their fake religion.

Humans and machines as One is, if you examine it, the sacrifice of personal reality.

Of course, technocrats don’t see it that way. But that’s what they’re doing.

Information is only one component of personal reality—and they’re blowing that up into a god.

There is a sequence at work here. First, with the development of the computer, people could search and find information. Now, they can have computers anticipate what the desired information is and provide it. Finally, people will be given—quite apart from their desires—the information they require, as adjudicated by experts.

This has less and less to do with personal reality.

Manufactured consent in the Matrix is a bit of a misnomer. Manufactured consent IS the Matrix, at the most profound level.

Whatever a person has as his personal reality is something to build on. You might say it’s the engine by which he can set sail and voyage. And during his personally navigated voyage, he enlarges and changes his personal reality. It becomes more powerful. It becomes more a matter of imagination and a life lived through and by imagination.

In this light, cooperation with others takes on a whole new meaning. The longing and obsession to overlap his reality with that of others fades in importance.

His immunity to hooked ideas becomes stronger.

The very notion of what personal reality is changes. It is no longer simply a fixed configuration set in concrete.

The psyop is aimed at disintegrating the personal voyage.

It is aimed at flattening the emotions and shortening the perspective and short-circuiting the fire in the soul.

Hooked ideas and manufacturing consent and overlapping realities and merging are the tools used to deaden life and invent the collective future.

In that future, each person becomes a mirror that reflects every other person. And it turns out that there is no substance at all in the trillions of rebounding reflections.

The endless overlapping deletes all content.

Personal reality and the personal voyage are the WAKING UP that breaks the trance.

A great deal of history of the human race, littered as it is with suffering and pain and war and hunger, was produced by competing psyops.

Each side was utterly convinced that its ideals were superior. What neither side realized was that everybody, on all sides, was accepting a psyop substitute of their own personal reality. That was the big switch.

Each person on each side had bought into a hooking idea that looked so good and so right and so wonderful.

And each person was operating on a false basis. Each person had, without noticing it, misplaced his own personal reality.

You could accurately write, on many gravestones: “I died for a psyop.”

In this day and age, political leaders have entirely given up the notion of personal reality, if they even understand what it means. For them, it’s all about psyop, because they are thinking about mass and number and population. They are looking for central hooking ideas—the very best they can find—and how to express them and transmit them as convincingly as possible.

The major differences between these leaders are to be found in how well they function as mouthpieces for hooking ideas.

Freedom? Democracy? The will of the people? A better future for all? Equality? Justice? These are merely concepts in search of ways to run psyops.

Jon Rappoport

[emphases mine]

Hervé
29th April 2015, 13:47
The above is followed today with this one with some current examples as illustrations:


The operation called “engineered consensus” (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/04/28/the-operation-called-engineered-consensus/)

Apr28 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/04/28/the-operation-called-engineered-consensus/), 2015 by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/)
NoMoreFakeNews.com (http://nomorefakenews.com/)
OutsideTheRealityMachine (https://outsidetherealitymachine.wordpress.com/)

This operation has various stages. It can be applied to issues like vaccination, GMO food, climate change, fake epidemics, elections, war—and it can be applied widely across the general subject of reality itself.

It begins with some “authoritative” voice proclaiming an idea is a fact. Well, someone has to start the ball rolling.

Very quickly, according to plan, others pick up the ball and echo the original idea. This includes both “respected” individuals and groups. Media join in.

What follows is a scramble to gain public acceptance. All sorts of approaches are used in this stage of the process:


the claim that a consensus has already been reached (which is a lie);



attacks on dissidents and critics;



warnings that refusal to accept the central idea will have dire consequences “for all of us”;



cooked and slanted scientific studies;



general reminders that the idea being promoted represents the greatest good for the greatest number;



expressions of shock that there are “still people who refuse to accept the obvious”;



new laws and regulations hammered into existence;



subsequent legalized coercion;



arguments so illogical and bizarre that people accept them, thinking they themselves must be missing the point;



relegation of dissent to the margins of “wild conspiracy theory”;



the conjoining of dissent with negative images and feelings;



the marginalizing of dissent into legal cases that wind through seemingly endless corridors of a maze;



and, of course, endless repetition of the original idea.

After a suitable period has passed, most people can’t even recall a time when the original idea was seriously disputed.

And yet…none of these strategies would succeed, unless people felt a strong need for a centralized authority that defines reality.

To put it another way, people have a quite minimal tolerance for chaos, in which there are many conflicting views on a subject of key importance.

Years ago, I did interesting experiments with small groups re chaos.

In one part of the experiment, I had the people in the group spontaneously sing a note, all at once, any note. Ten people, ten different notes would emerge.

“Chaos.” Dissonance.

I asked them to listen to the overall musical effect and then voice a note they believed would add greater dissonance to the group sound.

Most of the time, if I let this go on long enough, the group would tend to retreat back into “harmony,” and end up all singing the same note.

It didn’t matter which note. Everyone wound up voicing the same pitch.

This was comfortable. This was acceptable. This was “unity.”

So it is with ideas. Most people prefer that “harmony and unity.” They seek it.

Somewhere in their minds, there is a learned program that asks for consensus, a program that prefers consent to difference.

Dissonance (disagreement) registers as a negative reality.

When I had done these group experiments on and off for a few years, I began my research on what came to be the collections, “The Matrix Revealed (http://marketplace.mybigcommerce.com/the-matrix-revealed-vol-1-mp3s-pdfs-by-jon-rappoport-mega-info/)” and “Exit From The Matrix (http://marketplace.mybigcommerce.com/exit-from-the-matrix/).”

I stressed the power of individual unfettered imagination, and offered many exercises to expand the scope and range of imagination.

The program in favor of uniform consent fades and disintegrates in the face of imagination.

What we call reality is a hodge-podge of engineered acceptance.

The basic kernel of reality is the programmed desire for unity, which is nothing like the kind of unity that can occur when individuals who live through and by imagination concur and cooperate.

An individual living a life through and by imagination invents new and unprecedented Reality.

Engineered consensus withers.

Jon Rappoport
----------------------------------------------------------------------

... apply the above to "Whistle-blowing"...

earthdreamer
30th April 2015, 05:06
Remember THE slogan of 2008?

YES WE CAN


http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41j7MeHp9hL.jpg

Jung warned :" …every man is, in a certain sense, unconsciously a worse man when he is in society than when acting alone; for he is carried by society and to that extent relieved of his individual responsibility"

Hervé
6th May 2015, 12:49
Psy-ops main means: Propaganda...

Propaganda is the art of overwhelming logic (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/05/05/propaganda-is-the-art-of-overwhelming-logic/)

May5 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/05/05/propaganda-is-the-art-of-overwhelming-logic/), 2015 by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/)
NoMoreFakeNews.com (http://nomorefakenews.com/)

One type of mind control involves defeating logic as a method of thinking.

Modern formulations of basic logic begin with the statement: You can’t have A and not-A. Which is a way of saying contradictions are unacceptable.

So it’s no surprise that mind control attempts to introduce contradictions into rational processes.

You see this in propaganda.

For example: People who are vaccinated are in danger from those who are unvaccinated. (“Keep your unvaccinated child away from my vaccinated child.”)

There is a concealed contradiction here. You can see it by merely defining (according to conventional terms) the meaning of “vaccinated.”

It means “immune,” “protected from contracting the disease targeted by the vaccine.”

But if the vaccinated person is protected and immune, then coming into contact with an unvaccinated person will bring no danger.

Therefore, the notion that vaccinated people are A) protected but not-A) in danger is absurd, a contradiction.

The easiest way to defeat logic is through deficient education. Never teach logic. Ignore it. Instead, teach specific values. Teach anything except logic. Don’t teach children how to spot contradictions.

A deficient education plus tons of ceaseless propaganda (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/04/03/common-core-education-the-insane-bottom-line/)=mind control.

Logic is a significant problem for people who want a closed and unfree society. Teaching logic tends to produce sharp and independent minds.

Logic produces personal power.

Here is another example of non-logic: The ballot initiative passed last November by the voters of Maui County is illegal, because it set up a new law regarding commercial agriculture, when in fact commercial agriculture is regulated by state and federal laws, which trump county laws.

There are several ways of attacking this proposition, but the most basic way is:

The ballot initiative was not aimed at commercial agriculture. It called for a moratorium on all Monsanto/Dow experiments using non-commercial GMOs (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/11/05/election-bang-maui-bans-gmo-crops/).

In what has become a federal court case, the judge and the lawyers for Dow/Monsanto are proceeding from a false basic premise.

Of course, the failure in this case is a willful ignoring of the facts. The argument is: A is B. No it isn’t. A is A.

There are a number of arguments afloat these days which proceed this way:

“The science concerning ABC is settled.”

“’Settled’ means ‘true.’”

“Therefore the science concerning ABC is true.”
However, on closer inspection, “settled” means “there is a consensus among officially favored scientists.” (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/05/19/medical-liars-lying-about-medicine/)

Science doesn’t operate according to what officially favored scientists claim. It doesn’t operate according to consensus at all. It operates according to what is true and valid—and the best way to ascertain that is through the broadest possible analysis accomplished by a wide variety of independent researchers, who attempt to replicate prior experimental results.

Even then, there is always room for reasoned dissent.

There is much, much more I could write about logic. The issues I raise in this article are basic and should be addressed in every high school, in great detail, with many illustrations (http://nomorefakenews.com/logiccourseoutline.html).

For instance: what are the full tacit implications of the statement found at the end of every television drug ad—“ask your doctor if X is right for you.”

For instance (at a more sophisticated level): when the press reports a new outbreak of disease, claiming it is caused by a particular virus…how was that assertion determined? On what grounds do scientists say they have found the virus that causes the disease?

I ran headlong into that one while writing my first book, AIDS Inc.: Scandal of the Century (http://www.amazon.com/AIDS-Inc-Scandal-Jon-Rappoport/dp/0941523039), and the further I investigated HIV as “the cause of AIDS,” the more I was stunned by the lack of logic present in the argument.

Logic is a sword.

Learning its many uses, while still young, creates formidable students and citizens.

Propaganda is the art of overwhelming logic.

It works, when the mind is unprepared.

Jon Rappoport

Hervé
6th May 2015, 12:58
Psy-ops main fertile ground: ignorance...

Matrixology 101: debates that never happen (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/05/05/matrixology-101-debates-that-never-happen/)

May5 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/05/05/matrixology-101-debates-that-never-happen/), 2015 by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/)
NoMoreFakeNews.com (http://nomorefakenews.com/)

In order to sustain gigantic false realities (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/05/05/propaganda-is-the-art-of-overwhelming-logic/), there are honest debates that must never happen. They would reveal too much. They would shine a spotlight on vast contradictions. They would expose official storytellers to withering criticism.

And by debate, I mean extended formal conversations.

The easiest way to eliminate such debates is: never equip the young with the ability and the patience to comprehend them.

That’s working out quite well.

Let me give you an example of a debate that will never happen.

In 1987-88, while I was writing my first book, AIDS Inc. (http://www.amazon.com/AIDS-Inc-Scandal-Jon-Rappoport/dp/0941523039), I discovered that the test most frequently used to diagnose HIV in a patient was the antibody test.

A positive test was taken to mean: the patient was carrying HIV; he was already sick or would become sick.

However, I queried an employee of the FDA. I asked: if an HIV vaccine is developed, it will produce antibodies to HIV, and then the patient will be called “immune,” correct?

In other words, if a routine blood test reveals antibodies to HIV, the patient will be told he either has AIDS or will get AIDS—but if those same antibodies are produced by a vaccine, the person will be said to be immune to HIV.

The anonymous FDA employee answered me by mail, on a piece of paper without the FDA letterhead. This is what he essentially said:


If an HIV vaccine is developed, people who take it will be given a letter they can carry around with them. If they are ever tested for HIV and the test comes up positive, they can show the letter to their doctor, to prove they are immune, rather than dangerously infected. Otherwise, there would be no way to distinguish between “in danger of dying” and “immune.”

Extraordinary, to say the least.

This opened up a huge can of worms about several issues, one of which was the actual meaning of antibody tests.

Until 1985, positive antibody tests were generally taken to mean: the patient’s immune system is in good working order; his immune system contacted the virus in question and warded it off.

But after 1985 (and not just in the case of AIDS, but for any virus under the sun), the same antibody test was taken to mean: the patient is already ill or he will become ill.

Millions and millions of antibody tests have been given to people around the world. Just a few of the viruses tested for: SARS, West Nile, Swine Flu, Ebola.

Think about the effects of a doctor saying: “You’re positive for a very dangerous virus.”

Think about the 180-degree turnaround in interpreting the meaning of a positive test.

It generally went from “You’re fine,” to “You’re infected.”

I can think of several independent scientists who could weigh in on a debate about these tests (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/10/06/the-ebola-test-let-the-tests-inventor-speak/), against official scientists.

It would be revealing, to say the least.

But it would only be revealing for people who could follow the logic and the illogic of the participants.

Otherwise, it would be like listening to a tape played backwards.

The ultimate backup plan for stifling all important debates is: never equip people with the ability to follow and understand them.

These days, this plan is called education (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/04/03/common-core-education-the-insane-bottom-line/).

Long ago, I was a schoolteacher. I found that, if I taught students logic in a straightforward way, step by step, with many examples (http://nomorefakenews.com/logiccourseoutline.html), they responded. They caught on. They liked catching on.

It made them smarter and thus happier. It made them feel more powerful, because they were.

Every student deserves to earn that experience. It’s a tragedy and crime that so few are given the opportunity.

The antibody test is just one of a number of enormous issues in modern medicine that, if opened to real debate, would cause a seismic shift in society…assuming there were enough listeners who could track the lines of reasoning.

A true home-schooling movement should take notice of all this.

Teaching logic is work. Good work. It pays off in brighter students. (http://nomorefakenews.com/logiccourseoutline.html) It opens doors that would otherwise remain closed. It adds real substance to the idea that home schooling stands for individual independence and power, rather than State control.

Jon Rappoport

earthdreamer
7th May 2015, 06:57
JC Collins has a blistering piece related to this issue:

http://philosophyofmetrics.com/2014/04/19/the-great-cattle-collective/


The Great Cattle Collective

April 19, 2014 JC Collins

“The Earth is a farm. We are someone else’s property.”
– Charles Fort

"It is common knowledge amongst researchers of the logical history, as opposed to the propagated and accepted history, that countries and groupings of countries will manufacture an external enemy.



The purpose of this externalization of internal fears is to rally the citizenry around a common goal or collective purpose. Then the people become distracted from the true intention and design of the sociological engineering which defines their religious, economic, and ideological prison.

Man’s triune nature consists of the physical, spiritual, and mental.

The corresponding relationship to sociological engineering is as follows:

Spiritual – Religion

Physical – Economics

Mental – Ideologies

From this triune pairing comes the mass manipulation which has directed mankind from virtually the beginning of consciousness. As some of my readers know, it is my contention that this dialectic begins within the human mind and is externalized. Same as countries externalize manufactured enemies to control internal division. Also the same as the human mind externalizing manufactured enemies for similar purposes.

More of the micro and macro patterns which we so often discuss.

So the question arises when thinking on a multilateral financial system, if all countries are a part of the same structured process of economic engineering, who will be the external enemy from which the people can be rallied around?

At this point we will safely assume a mirror process of consolidation and centralization within the other two triune categories, ideological and religious. One only need study the practices and speeches of the new pope and other religious leaders, as well as the international collective laws which emerge from the global institutions promoting a one world, to recognized the forest from the trees.

The obvious answer to the above question is that we will define and partition enemies from within the collective instead of outside the collective.

Already we can see a consolidation of social thought and association. Slogans and memes litter the manufactured media which is blasted from the virtual village loud speakers.

Our social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, etc.., are all uniquely designed to rob us of our natural social order and isolate us from one another. As is usually the case in our modern world, what is advertised is the opposite in realization upon the human mind. Social media promises grand socialization but in essence feeds on our internal selfish divisions to provide us with real world isolation and loneliness.

The language being promoted by social media is ensuring a level of decreased communication and intelligence. The modern smart phone jargon and jingles have left us stupefied. George Orwell explained the effect best in his novel 1984:

“It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn’t only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take “good”, for instance. If you have a word like “good”, what need is there for a word like “bad”? “Ungood” will do just as well — better, because it’s an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of “good”, what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like “excellent” and “splendid” and all the rest of them? “Plusgood” covers the meaning, or “doubleplusgood” if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already. but in the final version of Newspeak there’ll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words — in reality, only one word. Don’t you see the beauty of that, Winston?”

Now of course George Orwell could never have predicted the usage of words and phrases which pepper our everyday lives, but the intended expression of a process where a reduction in language will lead to lower intelligence is obvious. More from 1984:

“Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thought-crime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. . . . The process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there’s no reason or excuse for committing thought-crime. It’s merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won’t be any need even for that. . . . Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?”

This is exactly what has been happening. People are refusing to read books because the pain of attempting to focus and comprehend what is on the page is becoming more difficult with each passing generation. But our social acronyms and emoticons are creating a verbal wasteland of dullness and drudgery.

Such a disillusioned mass of people can be easily herded one way or the other at the direction of the manufactured media propaganda. As such, defining and expanding awareness of an internal enemy can be accomplished with frightening speed.

But we have already progressed past the point where home grown terrorists blow up federal buildings. We are now foraging in the thick weeds of self doubt and subconscious damnation. The sociological engineering across all three triune categories now have us questioning our own motives and incriminating ourselves internally.

The police state which is being established in all countries around the world has shocking patterns of familiarity to one another. Can we not see the emerging sameness in the systems of population control and incarceration?

http://philosophyofmetrics.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/610x554656.jpg

Police forces around the world are becoming more militarized with many of the industry products being provided by the same manufacturing companies.

This week we had the so-called whistleblower Edward Snowden on Russian television asking Putin questions. The obvious design of this production is evident.

The world is being conditioned and prepared for a full on surveillance police state to ensure the global centrifugal center mass is never set of balance. Any wobble will be eliminated before it has chance to rise to the surface of the sphere and escape.

Snowden has made “revelations” which weren’t really anything new to the logical thinker. Everything he told the world was old information and you can be assured that the methods of surveillance which are being utilized today are well advanced from the archaic methods promoted by this psychological operation.

http://philosophyofmetrics.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/the-us-air-force-unveiled-insect-sized-surveillance-drones.jpg

People are being prepared in small increments by a revelation of the method. This is how social acceptance is attained. If you’re not doing anything wrong than you have nothing to hide or worry about.

Thus we turn the corner on social conditioning and herd mentality.

Distracted driving laws are emerging in all developed countries from the US and Canada, to Europe and Australia. This is not a coincidence as it is a product of the centralized sociological engineering which will accompany the emerging centralized and multilateral financial system.

The enemy will be all of us, questioning each other and questioning ourselves, always wondering if we will be the next threat.

Facial recognition technology is already being utilized around the world. We can already see the emergence of this herd tool in the tag feature on Facebook. Further signs of consolidation between the triune categories.

Let’s revisit some of the fundamental components of the financial system. The US dollar was the worlds reserve currency since the end of WW2. It was imperative that all countries use dollars for the balance of international trade accounts.

There are two important factors which took place before the events of 911. One was that Iraq priced its oil in gold and other currencies. This was a huge threat to the petrodollar scheme and needed to be corrected. With 911 as the pretext, the dollar system invaded Iraq and took control of its oil resources.

The Taliban in Afghanistan, who after the failure of the pipeline deal with Unicol Corporation out of Texas, burned all the opium fields in the country. They were the first target after 911 since the world opium trade was of vital importance and also helped to support the dollar debt based system.

So the US military was sent into Afghanistan to overthrow their once potential business partners and replant the opium fields. One of the major responsibilities of both the Canadian and US militaries was to protect the opium fields. A picture speaks a thousand words.

http://philosophyofmetrics.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/1452504_739192556109297_1745239036_n.jpg

Sticking with the cattle theme of this post, the US military used depleted uranium shells on both Iraq and Afghanistan. These shells were developed with depleted uranium for the purpose of hardening the shells to penetrate armor and bunkers. The radioactive dust which was dispersed settled in the ground and water and has lead to major birth defects.

The following pictures are graphic and emotionally disturbing. It is a shock to the western mind to see what has been done in the name of maintaining dollar hegemony.

What horrors can manifest from the minds of man.

(see webpage for horribly deformed infants, shockingly horrific, shameful what poisons our military unleashed)

With the police forces of the world becoming militarized and surveillance state technology being implemented, how long will it be until all populations are subjected to the same level of dehumanization.

With the great consolidation and centralization of all aspects of the human triune, physical, mental, and spiritual, being the economic, ideological, and religious engineering of civilization, it is becoming more important for humanity to wake from its self induced conflicts of divisionary distractions.

The self-limiting of the rent seeking elite must be effected by an inner awareness by the individual. We are cattle because we enslave our own minds first before externalizing that inner conflict. Our own subconscious damnation will ensure the cattle collective. – JC"



Orwell's classic "1984" gets a good send-up here. I have a battered old paperback and I would re-read it every other decade, sadly it never loses relevance.