PDA

View Full Version : Exams are brainwashing us?



Mini Flash
30th April 2015, 17:17
Hello everyone! :)
I hope you all have a wonderfull day

My friend made me realize something about our up comming exam...

I have a french exam coming up soon. So I have to read many texts on the same subject and, after, I have to write an argumentative text based on what I read. Just letting you know that the students can't choose what they read and we are not allowed to use information that isn't provided by the texts given to us. In Quebec, the governement undirectly chooses the text we are going to read. Keep in mind that everyone, in Quebec, who takes the same french class as me at the same date will receive the same exam. That means almost every teen around my age is receiving the same texts as me.

My friend was scandalised to see that the subject chosen is ''New technology'' instead of it being about ecology or human rights. He also made me realise that there weren't anything negative about technology mentioned in the texts..

Almost nothing about over cossuming, pollution, health, etc. Almost all the texts are about how amazing it would be to create a machine that makes fake food, a car that drives themselves, etc. There is even one text that says inderectly that Big Brother is very good without mentionning the flaws of such an act.

I remind you that we are not allowed to use information that wasn't in the texts. So what if you are agaisnt over consommation, big brother, lazyness and other? You can't express that?

So... Is the governement trying to brainwash us by making us read texts that only defend one opinion and forcing us to write a text agreeing to that opinion?

I want to pass this exam so I would make too much of a big deal out of it... But I still think it's important for you guys to know this.

betoobig
30th April 2015, 17:41
The biggest point is that you are aware of the situation and thanks so much for sharing. That almost puts their manipulation down, no effect on you. For sure you will read with different eyes the text you have to read. Could it be interesting? THe other thing i love to share with you is that i believe the newest technology is us, the oldest at the same time.
I am with you, education must be one of the first things to change... this is allready happening world wide with technics like Montesory.
You should take the exams like a game, in which you´ll go for winning,nothing more than that... i hope this realive the pressure, through away the pressure. ANd only compit with yourself.
It´s been a great pleasure MIni Flash.

LOVE

Juan

Mini Flash
30th April 2015, 17:43
The biggest point is that you are aware of the situation and thanks so much for sharing. That almost puts their manipulation down, no effect on you. For sure you will read with different eyes the text you have to read. Could it be interesting? THe other thing i love to share with you is that i believe the newest technology is us, the oldest at the same time.
I am with you, education must be one of the first things to change... this is allready happening world wide with technics like Montesory.
You should take the exams like a game, in which you´ll go for winning,nothing more than that... i hope this realive the pressure, through away the pressure. ANd only compit with yourself.
It´s been a great pleasure MIni Flash.

LOVE

Juan

Thank you for your support and for replying! Don't worry! I will pass these exams and use my education to do good :)

Matt P
30th April 2015, 17:47
So... Is the governement trying to brainwash us by making us read texts that only defend one opinion and forcing us to write a text agreeing to that opinion?


Is this a rhetorical question? ;)

I think you know what you must do. If you want the passing grade you must lie and regurgitate what they want or perhaps hope that being and expressing your true self is acceptable enough. Probably depends on if it's a computerized multiple choice or an essay type test. If it's essay, perhaps talk to your professor first.

Matt

Mini Flash
30th April 2015, 17:52
So... Is the governement trying to brainwash us by making us read texts that only defend one opinion and forcing us to write a text agreeing to that opinion?


Is this a rhetorical question? ;)

I think you know what you must do. If you want the passing grade you must lie and regurgitate what they want or perhaps hope that being and expressing your true self is acceptable enough. Probably depends on if it's a computerized multiple choice or an essay type test. If it's essay, perhaps talk to your professor first.

Matt

Indeed.. You have to be smart enough to copy and paste what you hear or read but not smart enough to build opinion and curiosity. This is our education system. Oh well! :) can't do anything about that for now.. Let's hope we find a way to change that

panopticon
30th April 2015, 17:53
Hello everyone! :)
I hope you all have a wonderfull day

My friend made me realize something about our up comming exam...

I have a french exam coming up soon. So I have to read many texts on the same subject and, after, I have to write an argumentative text based on what I read. Just letting you know that the students can't choose what they read and we are not allowed to use information that isn't provided by the texts given to us. In Quebec, the governement undirectly chooses the text we are going to read. Keep in mind that everyone, in Quebec, who takes the same french class as me at the same date will receive the same exam. That means almost every teen around my age is receiving the same texts as me.

My friend was scandalised to see that the subject chosen is ''New technology'' instead of it being about ecology or human rights. He also made me realise that there weren't anything negative about technology mentioned in the texts..

Almost nothing about over cossuming, pollution, health, etc. Almost all the texts are about how amazing it would be to create a machine that makes fake food, a car that drives themselves, etc. There is even one text that says inderectly that Big Brother is very good without mentionning the flaws of such an act.

I remind you that we are not allowed to use information that wasn't in the texts. So what if you are agaisnt over consommation, big brother, lazyness and other? You can't express that?

So... Is the governement trying to brainwash us by making us read texts that only defend one opinion and forcing us to write a text agreeing to that opinion?

I want to pass this exam so I would make too much of a big deal out of it... But I still think it's important for you guys to know this.

G'day Mini Flash,

It's very hard to write an exam in the humanities when large numbers of participants are involved that isn't controversial.

Some people might get upset talking about certain topics involving ecology, human rights etc. They are "mine fields" best avoided if possible (especially with a massive exam like the one you're talking about).

Technology is seen as fairly safe territory as it's more dogma neutral (though not enough evidently lol).

Good luck with your exams!

-- Pan

araucaria
30th April 2015, 17:59
Hi Mini Flash
Good luck with those exams :)

So you are expected to summarize/analyze these writings without introducing arguments that would contradict them. There are a couple of things you can do. Make sure it is clear you are not expressing your own opinion. You can do this by starting sentences with things like “The author says” or “According to this article”. Then you can maybe add just a word of dissent here and there: “He makes the dubious/controversial/debatable claim that”. Or you could work out by way of example a crazy consequence of what he is saying; make a joke perhaps. “If this new technology was introduced, that would mean people would have more cellphones than they have ears”. Or you could work out a few numbers and multiply them. It gets scary when you work out how many gallons of soda or tons of fast food a person can consume in five years. Or calculate the cost of something in terms of the number of hours it would take an Ethiopian to earn the money. This is like using a synonym: it says the same thing, but in a more interesting way.

These are just a few ideas for what you might do. You don’t want to overdo it, but it should be enough to explain where you stand and maybe make the examiner think a little bit. And it will also show him that you can write! :)

Flash
30th April 2015, 18:15
I have no advice to give you for the exam. I am pretty sure you can handle it.

However, you hit the button! When anything is not balanced, like here the pros and cons of technologies, and if you are forced into the unbalanced, you are being brainswashed most probably.

School should be to teach how to learn, and have critical thinking, being able to analyse many facets of things.

This is definitely what it is not. You have a good mind and are used to analyse and think with your brain and your heart.

Most people, young or adults, are not used to it nor trained for it. And this is the case of the majority in your school too. Therefore, they will only take the texts as is and glorify technology later on, mostly when inputted in such young brains. No thinking, and oups, transhumanism at your steps.

Then, sorry, we did not want to become machines, and be used by those creating the machines. Sorry, but too late - you had to think with your brain and your heart before!!

The problems with technologies IMO, is the lack of heart thinking. Unbalanced!

NOW, IMAGINE

Imagine if instead of glorifying technologies and THINGS that supply ones ego, we were glorifying BEINGS, spiritual development (not religion) and things that stimulate cooperation amongst humans.

IMAGINE if we were instead talking of the importance of love and wisdom - connecting them together instead of disconnecting them through technologies egoistical usage.

IMAGINE if we were emphasing knowledge in order to help others, instead of knowledge in order to have.

JUST IMAGINE, and THINK and SEE what is and what it could be.

Love you

---------------

I think I just had my own critical thinking about technologies, and about education.

IMAGINE if everyone on earth had the right to true learning and true schooling

christian
30th April 2015, 19:34
There's a whole world of state-enforced nonsense that you're supposed to condone, uphold and engage with in order to prevent negative repercussions from the state or its agents. School, unfortunately, is a wonderful example of this. I love learning, and I found that school is among the worst environments for it. The amount of information I exposed myself to voluntarily and the excitement I felt while doing so was innumerably greater outside of school, and especially after I finished school. It's no exaggeration to say that school was rather frustrating for me, as was university. Institutions for learning, so they say, but they just don't deliver. Good thing about university was that there was more free time though, more time to learn what I wanted to learn.

People understand that cars are better when there are more companies and there's a free market, same for any other consumer good. But with some things, like school, a lot of people seem to be unable to imagine how a diverse and decentralized system of institutions for learning could be beneficial. They're afraid of diversity and fear that some will be left behind. They fail to understand that on average the quality would rise significantly. Those who do know about this are either the rebels, whether active or passive, or the ones who vigorously defend the centralized school system because they want to use the leverage that comes with centralized curricula.

Me personally, I got a lousy GPA cause I couldn't be bothered with the uninteresting topics at school, didn't finish university cause I embarked on an adventure around the world midway through, and now I'm freelancing with little money but a great deal of wonder, enjoyment and sense of accomplishment. It's a crazy world, and we all gotta engage with it in one way or another. I think it's wise to find somewhat of a balance between compliance and creative self-determined action. After all, you can only do so much, so choose your battles wisely.

Good luck :)

Kez
30th April 2015, 20:40
I'm still at school myself and find it annoying that we as students are required by law to not leave education until we are at the legal age of 18. I can honestly say that in the past few years I have learnt much more outside of school than I have at school, and that in its very essence is one of the reasons why I despise this age restriction and the system itself. It is clear to me that what we 'learn' is learned in order to adhere with this systematical brainwashing and anything that drifts away from this system can and will be dealt with in its own specific way assuming that it steps out of line of this Orwellian system. Infact to be brutally honest, I've recently acquired my first job as a checkout operator and have learnt much more in the past month since having this job than I have the past few years wasted at school. I happen to know that in a few weeks time I am to take a spreadsheet exam that is based on genetically modified fish (sounds like something that is produced inside a Monsanto laboratory lol). I find it best to play the game of these exams by pushing the boundaries if you expect to get a good grade (I've never revised yet and haven't done so bad thus far) as in my opinion these exams are a waste of time and don't test skill or knowledge of an individual other than being able to repeat garbage onto a piece of paper. Just remember that these so called exams don't and can't determine who you are as a person and how clever you are. The only thing that these exams prove to me are that regurgitating information is a necessity that is required in order to play these games successfully so I wish you the very best of luck in this upcoming exam of yours Mini Flash, just don't take in the disinformation that is presented to you, instead keep using websites such as Avalon because knowledge/truth can be used as a weapon. :-D

RunningDeer
30th April 2015, 21:23
I've got advanced degrees in part because it was required in my field. I played the stupid game to get the stupid paper so I could go out and make a difference in the world. Until things change, my advice is to pick your battles.

In 1986, I took an undergraduate class for fun. It was about art in the business world. Little did I know it’d be the last one. I played the game the whole semester even though it was clear he had biases between men and girls in the class. (I’m repeating his words.) He was one of those robot professors that droned on and on and couldn’t give a straight answer to any questions.

The last exam was written so vague that even the ‘men’ chimed in for clarification. I skimmed it. When I saw one of the question was to name the font used in the example, I could no longer play his game. It was only a few minutes into the exam when I decided to sign my name and turn in a blank exam.

These are snapshots of my impromptu therapy when I got home. It’s the textbook from professor robot’s class.


http://paula.avalonlibrary.net/Recovered/toss2_zpslhzetzpk.JPG

http://paula.avalonlibrary.net/Recovered/toss1_zpsls70sata.JPG


I went on to study in other ways: private classes, seminars, personal studies and other types of certification.

Knowledge rocks! Good luck with your exam.

RunningDeer <3

Mini Flash
30th April 2015, 22:50
Hi Mini Flash
Good luck with those exams :)

So you are expected to summarize/analyze these writings without introducing arguments that would contradict them. There are a couple of things you can do. Make sure it is clear you are not expressing your own opinion. You can do this by starting sentences with things like “The author says” or “According to this article”. Then you can maybe add just a word of dissent here and there: “He makes the dubious/controversial/debatable claim that”. Or you could work out by way of example a crazy consequence of what he is saying; make a joke perhaps. “If this new technology was introduced, that would mean people would have more cellphones than they have ears”. Or you could work out a few numbers and multiply them. It gets scary when you work out how many gallons of soda or tons of fast food a person can consume in five years. Or calculate the cost of something in terms of the number of hours it would take an Ethiopian to earn the money. This is like using a synonym: it says the same thing, but in a more interesting way.

These are just a few ideas for what you might do. You don’t want to overdo it, but it should be enough to explain where you stand and maybe make the examiner think a little bit. And it will also show him that you can write! :)

Thanks for the ideas!! But I think I will be safe for now and do it the simple way.. I got accepted in college and I don't want that to be taken away because I failed an exam. But I will keep in mind your ideas :)

Mini Flash
30th April 2015, 22:55
There's a whole world of state-enforced nonsense that you're supposed to condone, uphold and engage with in order to prevent negative repercussions from the state or its agents. School, unfortunately, is a wonderful example of this. I love learning, and I found that school is among the worst environments for it. The amount of information I exposed myself to voluntarily and the excitement I felt while doing so was innumerably greater outside of school, and especially after I finished school. It's no exaggeration to say that school was rather frustrating for me, as was university. Institutions for learning, so they say, but they just don't deliver. Good thing about university was that there was more free time though, more time to learn what I wanted to learn.

People understand that cars are better when there are more companies and there's a free market, same for any other consumer good. But with some things, like school, a lot of people seem to be unable to imagine how a diverse and decentralized system of institutions for learning could be beneficial. They're afraid of diversity and fear that some will be left behind. They fail to understand that on average the quality would rise significantly. Those who do know about this are either the rebels, whether active or passive, or the ones who vigorously defend the centralized school system because they want to use the leverage that comes with centralized curricula.

Me personally, I got a lousy GPA cause I couldn't be bothered with the uninteresting topics at school, didn't finish university cause I embarked on an adventure around the world midway through, and now I'm freelancing with little money but a great deal of wonder, enjoyment and sense of accomplishment. It's a crazy world, and we all gotta engage with it in one way or another. I think it's wise to find somewhat of a balance between compliance and creative self-determined action. After all, you can only do so much, so choose your battles wisely.

Good luck :)

Thanks for your reply

Indeed it's better to learn outside of school for many people.. I think I'm more of a school person but that might change with time!

School teaches you to be smart enough to the the work... but not smart enough to think

Mini Flash
30th April 2015, 23:01
I'm still at school myself and find it annoying that we as students are required by law to not leave education until we are at the legal age of 18. I can honestly say that in the past few years I have learnt much more outside of school than I have at school, and that in its very essence is one of the reasons why I despise this age restriction and the system itself. It is clear to me that what we 'learn' is learned in order to adhere with this systematical brainwashing and anything that drifts away from this system can and will be dealt with in its own specific way assuming that it steps out of line of this Orwellian system. Infact to be brutally honest, I've recently acquired my first job as a checkout operator and have learnt much more in the past month since having this job than I have the past few years wasted at school. I happen to know that in a few weeks time I am to take a spreadsheet exam that is based on genetically modified fish (sounds like something that is produced inside a Monsanto laboratory lol). I find it best to play the game of these exams by pushing the boundaries if you expect to get a good grade (I've never revised yet and haven't done so bad thus far) as in my opinion these exams are a waste of time and don't test skill or knowledge of an individual other than being able to repeat garbage onto a piece of paper. Just remember that these so called exams don't and can't determine who you are as a person and how clever you are. The only thing that these exams prove to me are that regurgitating information is a necessity that is required in order to play these games successfully so I wish you the very best of luck in this upcoming exam of yours Mini Flash, just don't take in the disinformation that is presented to you, instead keep using websites such as Avalon because knowledge/truth can be used as a weapon. :-D

In the UK it's 18? Here in Quebec it's legal to drop out of school at the age of 16. Indeed.. Truth and knowledge is an amazing weapon!

¤=[Post Update]=¤


I've got advanced degrees in part because it was required in my field. I played the stupid game to get the stupid paper so I could go out and make a difference in the world. Until things change, my advice is to pick your battles.

In 1986, I took an undergraduate class for fun. It was about art in the business world. Little did I know it’d be the last one. I played the game the whole semester even though it was clear he had biases between men and girls in the class. (I’m repeating his words.) He was one of those robot professors that droned on and on and couldn’t give a straight answer to any questions.

The last exam was written so vague that even the ‘men’ chimed in for clarification. I skimmed it. When I saw one of the question was to name the font used in the example, I could no longer play his game. It was only a few minutes into the exam when I decided to sign my name and turn in a blank exam.

These are snapshots of my impromptu therapy when I got home. It’s the textbook from professor robot’s class.


http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Recovered/toss2_zpslhzetzpk.JPG

http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Recovered/toss1_zpsls70sata.JPG


I went on to study in other ways: private classes, seminars, personal studies and other types of certification.

Knowledge rocks! Good luck with your exam.

RunningDeer <3

You seemed so relieved in this picture! lol
You gave me an idea for when I graduate :)

Matisse
1st May 2015, 00:55
It seems you are in a situation similar to a defense lawyer whose job is to give the best defence possible to your client, even if you know he is guilty...

I wish you all the best...

But you are completely right.. the education system is a source of manipulation and conditioning.. just look at the history books... etc..
now here in Spain they have made it obligatory to study religion and even creationism...

But i see you are stronger than this and not so easily manipulated... so no worries...

Tangri
1st May 2015, 01:32
Hello everyone! :)
I hope you all have a wonderfull day

My friend made me realize something about our up comming exam...

I have a french exam coming up soon. So I have to read many texts on the same subject and, after, I have to write an argumentative text based on what I read. Just letting you know that the students can't choose what they read and we are not allowed to use information that isn't provided by the texts given to us. In Quebec, the governement undirectly chooses the text we are going to read. Keep in mind that everyone, in Quebec, who takes the same french class as me at the same date will receive the same exam. That means almost every teen around my age is receiving the same texts as me.

My friend was scandalised to see that the subject chosen is ''New technology'' instead of it being about ecology or human rights. He also made me realise that there weren't anything negative about technology mentioned in the texts..

Almost nothing about over cossuming, pollution, health, etc. Almost all the texts are about how amazing it would be to create a machine that makes fake food, a car that drives themselves, etc. There is even one text that says inderectly that Big Brother is very good without mentionning the flaws of such an act.

I remind you that we are not allowed to use information that wasn't in the texts. So what if you are agaisnt over consommation, big brother, lazyness and other? You can't express that?

So... Is the governement trying to brainwash us by making us read texts that only defend one opinion and forcing us to write a text agreeing to that opinion?

I want to pass this exam so I would make too much of a big deal out of it... But I still think it's important for you guys to know this.

It came to my attention that, also Ontario education system forcing new generation to mix the idea of how technology and humanism live together. Even though teachers keep the test and assessment results in their personal file, they use their individual blogs at internet and blog servers always have a backdoor to those data.

Also there are a lot contests in that subject as a private organisational supports.

If you have your consciousness keep awake, you will figure it out and give them what they are looking for. This is their game and rules, you don't have to be believe what they are trying to impose. Accept this memorizing as a temporary storage room swallow(take) it, until regurgitate. Do not digest.

mosquito
1st May 2015, 02:55
The important thing is that you're aware of it. So, play the stupid game, knowing that's all it is; realise there's a finite amount of time you have to do it: hold on to who you are and don't get sucked in until you are part of the game. And ..... if you aren't doing it already, I suggest you start dreaming about the "you" who will step out into the world and weave your magic.
:star:

betoobig
1st May 2015, 08:47
Hi again MIni Flash. I have to appologize for talking to you as if you where really "mini", sorry for that. IS precisly that want they want you to feel with the exxams, that you are not able, not a-bull, not a god.... you are big you are able to whatever... At school they try to made us feel we are not enough and they want us to feel in a fear based mood so they can feed from our low vibes. Allways having to prove that we are worth. No need to prove anything. From what i read in your post you allready know and feel different. Thanks so much.

LOVE

Juan

Cidersomerset
1st May 2015, 11:21
Education should be FREE , FUN & FAMILY FRIENDLY imo

Not the education and debt factory it has become for many.
True innovation is part of it what I learnt in the 1970's is
outdated in todays technological society , yet the basics are
the same in any era. The two tier education has gone on for
far to long and the rich and wealthier can afford the best
education money can buy . Which is fundamentally unfair
in supposedly free and equal society , and everyone has
the right to spend their wealth as they wish if they are
lucky enough to have it. Which is fine but the two do not
go together imo, its one of many oxymorons that need to
change before we become a really fair society.

Which leads to the ridiculous article below to 'out source'
home work to cheaper labour abroad. When the solution
is less homework as we are learning all thru our adult lives.

============================================

Schools could send children’s homework abroad to be marked
for as little as £2 an hour to free up teachers’ time

Thursday 30th April 2015 at 10:27 By David Icke

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/get-attachment-386-587x440.jpg


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif



Schools could send children's homework abroad to be marked for as
little as £2 an hour to free up teachers' time
Rebecca Allen, head of school think-tank, said work could be sent to India
Said papers can be marked cheaply and feedback is 'incredibly reliable'
Added that teachers could also use new technology to mark essays
But teaching unions blasted idea, saying it would do nothing to help pupils

By Chris Pleasance for MailOnline

Published: 14:35, 29 April 2015 | Updated: 16:35, 29 April 2015



‘Schools should consider outsourcing marking to India to cut costs and
lighten teachers’ workloads, according to the head of an education think-tank.

Rebecca Allen, director of Education Datalab, said that homework could
be sent abroad and marked for as little as £2 per hour, and claimed that
the results were ‘incredibly reliable’.

Ms Allen, who is also a reader in economics at University College London,
said another alternative was to use new computer scanning technology
to help mark students’ essays.’

Read more: Schools could send children's homework abroad

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3060872/Schools-send-children-s-homework-abroad-marked-little-2-hour-free-teachers-time.html#ixzz3YsqRw8S9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

=============================================


The David Icke Videocast: Hey, Teacher, Leave Them Kids Alone!

5ILsbvETBcY


Published on 27 Feb 2015


**David Icke’s Acclaimed 2014 All-Day AWAKEN!! Wembley Presentation Now Available To See On Demand** http://www.davidicke.com

============================================

Cidersomerset
1st May 2015, 11:33
http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Untitled-33-587x440.jpg

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/10463974_10152396166208842_4757795894852806192_n-587x367.jpg

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/get-attachment21-587x354.jpg

This is not new.......


Pink Floyd - Another Brick In The Wall (HQ)

YR5ApYxkU-U

Pink Floyd - Another Brick In The Wall

Lifted from "Pink Floyd The Wall" film, this video is actually comprised of two songs:
"The Happiest Days Of Our Lives" and "Another Brick In The Wall Pt. 2" This video
became the official video of "Another Brick In The Wall Pt. 2" after the release of
the film in 1982.

This single is by far Pink Floyd's greatest ever mainstream success, instantly attaining
classic status, and is perhaps their most famous piece of work.

Mini Flash
1st May 2015, 12:14
It seems you are in a situation similar to a defense lawyer whose job is to give the best defence possible to your client, even if you know he is guilty...

I wish you all the best...

But you are completely right.. the education system is a source of manipulation and conditioning.. just look at the history books... etc..
now here in Spain they have made it obligatory to study religion and even creationism...

But i see you are stronger than this and not so easily manipulated... so no worries...

I guess being a lawer is a worst case.. I can have a different opinion in my text, I just wouldn't have any arguments to defend my opinion.

I personally know a person who studied to become a lawer. He quit when he realised he was defending money instead of justice.

Mini Flash
1st May 2015, 12:39
Hi again MIni Flash. I have to appologize for talking to you as if you where really "mini", sorry for that. IS precisly that want they want you to feel with the exxams, that you are not able, not a-bull, not a god.... you are big you are able to whatever... At school they try to made us feel we are not enough and they want us to feel in a fear based mood so they can feed from our low vibes. Allways having to prove that we are worth. No need to prove anything. From what i read in your post you allready know and feel different. Thanks so much.

LOVE

Juan

Don't worry! It's normal that same people see me as ''mini'' without knowing me well.
Thanks for your support!

Mini Flash
1st May 2015, 13:01
http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Untitled-33-587x440.jpg

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/10463974_10152396166208842_4757795894852806192_n-587x367.jpg

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/get-attachment21-587x354.jpg

This is not new.......


Pink Floyd - Another Brick In The Wall (HQ)

YR5ApYxkU-U

Pink Floyd - Another Brick In The Wall

Lifted from "Pink Floyd The Wall" film, this video is actually comprised of two songs:
"The Happiest Days Of Our Lives" and "Another Brick In The Wall Pt. 2" This video
became the official video of "Another Brick In The Wall Pt. 2" after the release of
the film in 1982.

This single is by far Pink Floyd's greatest ever mainstream success, instantly attaining
classic status, and is perhaps their most famous piece of work.

I don't think your pictures apply to my situation because education isn't very expensive from where I come from.. It can even be free! Of course you don't have a great education if it's free...

I have an americain friend who moved here to get non expensive education and to get a small dept.

Sorry for USA though... They suffer alot by the expensive price of learning