Twin Towers: Poor Math Skills

[Bluegreen]

Although college professors will no longer accept Wikipedia as a reliable source of information and it has become plain as the nose on Pinocchio's face that the Bush crime family is responsible for the mayhem and murder on that day as well as the grievous lies on Wikipedia, what the heck, let's have some fun and use it and test out our embarrassingly poor math skills "for entertainment purposes only". :biggrin:

According to Wiki, there were 2,991 documented deaths from both Towers at the time (0 documented deaths at Building 7) with an additional 1,641 identified remains, making a total of 4,638. Opps, also 1,113 "unidentified remains" which now brings a grand total of 5,751 as of 2015, which has since become 5,971.

The State of New York tells us there were 50,000 workers in the Twin Towers on any any given day, but the State is not crystal clear as to when this is, or whether this is one building or both, let us presume ("never presume anything") it is both, giving us 25,000 people per building, at 110 floors each (220) and 1 solid acre per floor (!) this would give us about 227 people per floor. Okay. But wait, there were only 5,900 fatalities. What about the other 44,100, did they survive?

Opps, some hotshot National Statistics Board estimates there were 17,500 people there, once again presumably in both buildings, and Wiki tells us turnstile figures suggest 14,100 and now we have to start all over. I hate math. :( Well hm, I get it, they weren't there yet. The plane hit at 8:46 AM almost without warning. Okay, here we go, now which number to choose? Let's go with the so-called documented number of 14,100 which is 750 per building. Keep in mind this leaves us with about 36,000 expected to show up in the next 14 minutes for their 9-to-5 jobs, or about 65% of the workforce. I don't know, you would think an elevator trip to the 70th floor would take a couple minutes at least, and then there's the traffic and all. Maybe management wasn't too concerned about timeliness.

Now we have 64 people per floor with enough room in their acre-wide expanse to drink coffee and fart all they want, with 165 Last-Minute-Larrys coming through the door in the next 14 minutes, is that right? Oh wait the internet "gossips" say that Warren Buffett had them on a boat or a plane somewhere. Well, how many could fit in a boat, a couple hundred? We know that Warren is a generous philanthropist who can afford to throw a big shindig if he wants to, so let's just say 600, shall we? Or should we say 60? Or 6? And of course people get sick and have to call in. How many called in sick that day? Finding reliable figures proves difficult, but the national average for professionals is somewhere around 2.6, which equals about 1,300 who had their lucky day when they woke up and sneezed, and if anyone told them to call in they're not saying anything, unless of course they were told by God and there's a few, Splitting The Sky for one.

So we're down to 48,500 minus 5,900 deaths is 42,600 minus 14,100 accounted for in the building is 28,500, and the 64 doughnut eaters are now waiting for 130 Larry-Come-Latelys, which is still more than double their number. Now, should we add in the average number of daily visitors (140,000 divided by 24 hours equals 5,800 per hour)? No, let's not and say we did. And remember, we're still waiting for at least 32,000 Lagging Larrys who are presumably on their way to their jobs like the dedicated and hard-working Americans they are. Were. Where were these people, 1 or 2 blocks away and striding for work? In the elevators and the halls? In the bathroom? Some certainly were but the numbers suggest there should have been a higher death toll. How many did survive?

How many survivors? Turning once again to Google's #1 generated website for public information of all kinds, Wikipedia, one notices right away that while there is an entry entitled "Casualties of the September 11 Attacks" there is not one entitled "Survivors of the September 11 Attacks"; in fact there is precious little information at all about survivors. At one point, it is stated that there were only 37 survivors from both above and below the point of impact, but that presumably ("never presume anything") refers to individuals dug from the rubble. Further investigation reveals the phrase "an estimated 9,000 survivors" and that more or less jibes with the 14,100 turnstile figure but wait! Columbia University has only documented 3,271 and one thing I remember about elementary school fire drills is that afterward the teacher had to not only teach math but account for every student, and sometimes there was some bad boy who thought it funny to sneak away, hehe. Unacceptable!

Evidently the Twin Towers Corporation itself left that job to each of the 430 companies located within its premises and while these companies have released figures on casualties, good luck trying to find one who reported who was there and got out. Depending on which eye is squinting and at what particular angle, there is a remainder here of 5,279 or 14,409 or x number of survivors who have never been publicly accounted for, but it is of course entirely possible that something has been missed due to the aforementioned poor math skills.

Well, that was fun. :)

[ZooLife]

You bet that was fun! My head was spinning pretty good at the end of your post.

It felt like it was a paragraph in Freakonomics.

So much for speed reading. ;)

[Mike Gorman]

Everything about 9/11 is just extremely unlikely, far fetched, unprecedented, singular, remarkable, unusual, uncanny, dubious, unclear, and so many many words of a similar nature. Unbelievable.

[Satori]

And there's more. Go to www.journalof911studies.com and read the March 2015 peer-reviewed article about the destruction of WTC 1,2 and 7 and the admissibility into evidence, or not, of expert testimony as to the cause of the destruction of these buildings on 9/11/01.

[ghostrider]

Bush was presented information about the coming attacks by a CIA supervisor and two field agents and he chose to ignore it ...Edward gave a prediction in 1987 about the WTC attacks ...http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_215 scroll to line 221 ... http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_544 scroll to the paragraph beginning with - as we could clarify ...

[seehas]

Didnt meier also say that the oficial story is the real deal?

[Bluegreen]

And there's more. Go to www.journalof911studies.com and read the March 2015 peer-reviewed article about the destruction of WTC 1,2 and 7 and the admissibility into evidence, or not, of expert testimony as to the cause of the destruction of these buildings on 9/11/01.

Thank you for the link, Satori, an interesting essay among interesting essays
Speaking of math skills, perhaps a subpoena for current Secretary of State John Kerry is in order

rJsJjYwYOAA

Q. How long does it take to prepare a building to be demolished "in a controlled fashion"?
A. Roughly two days per story.

:sad:

[A Voice from the Mountains]

The Rockefellers had those towers built. They were even originally going to name them "David" and "Nelson" after the Rockefeller brothers, instead of WTC1 and 2.

In the 1980's, the Port Authority hired a team of consultants consisting of the buildings' original engineers, as well as experts in controlled demolition, chemical warfare, and other areas, to tell them how terrorists might conceivably go about exploiting vulnerabilities to destroy the towers or kill everyone in them. This was ostensibly so that the Port Authority could prepare for such events. The problem was that both bombs in the parking garage, and airliner impacts, were discussed at these meetings, and yet the PA did absolutely nothing to prepare for such attacks, and both of them actually occurred.

I studied into the WTC attacks for years and was a student member of the early Scholars for 9/11 Truth organization and a member of their private forum. My personal opinion is that they were built for the purpose of being destroyed at a later date. These kinds of agendas are laid out decades in advance. Once the architect finished his design, and the structural engineers finished their work, these plans went to the Port Authority for revision and then were locked up in secrecy and have never seen the light of day since. So though we have architectural drawings, we still do not have the actual structural documents showing the final design that was implementing during construction. It's entirely possible in my view that things could have even been built into the buildings, or at least things were designed in such a way so as to better facilitate a clean destruction later.

[Bluegreen]

The Rockefellers had those towers built. They were even originally going to name them "David" and "Nelson" after the Rockefeller brothers, instead of WTC1 and 2.

In the 1980's, the Port Authority hired a team of consultants consisting of the buildings' original engineers, as well as experts in controlled demolition, chemical warfare, and other areas, to tell them how terrorists might conceivably go about exploiting vulnerabilities to destroy the towers or kill everyone in them. This was ostensibly so that the Port Authority could prepare for such events. The problem was that both bombs in the parking garage, and airliner impacts, were discussed at these meetings, and yet the PA did absolutely nothing to prepare for such attacks, and both of them actually occurred.

I studied into the WTC attacks for years and was a student member of the early Scholars for 9/11 Truth organization and a member of their private forum. My personal opinion is that they were built for the purpose of being destroyed at a later date. These kinds of agendas are laid out decades in advance. Once the architect finished his design, and the structural engineers finished their work, these plans went to the Port Authority for revision and then were locked up in secrecy and have never seen the light of day since. So though we have architectural drawings, we still do not have the actual structural documents showing the final design that was implementing during construction. It's entirely possible in my view that things could have even been built into the buildings, or at least things were designed in such a way so as to better facilitate a clean destruction later.

Yikes. That scenario never occurred to me. Or I should say it occurred to me for about ten seconds before I quickly dismissed it. My thinking: Every self-respecting architect would want his or her building to stand for a thousand years. Thanks for bringing an informed perspective. I guess the question is the same regardless of the situation:
Cui bono? :wof:

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Something else to consider is that Nelson Rockefeller was the governor of New York when they were built. A joint agreement was made between New York and New Jersey that the Port Authority would have sole authority on the WTC property, meaning that neither NY nor NJ could send in inspectors during construction or otherwise interfere in day to day operations on the site once the buildings were finished. According to the engineers the buildings were designed to be redundant well beyond legal requirements, but we have still never seen the actual structural documentation.

A lot of people benefited. The Federal Reserve prints worthless paper money backed by the US government's promise of repaying all the debt we are accruing with it later. In order to prevent countries from dumping the dollar so easily, force is used. When force is used, the US military contractors earn billions, if not trillions of the worthless dollars that everyone is still forced to accept. The Rockefellers themselves made their fortune in the oil industry but then moved into banking and other fields. So 9/11, by instigating a lot of new wars in the Middle East, helped both the American financial sector stay afloat and continue enforcing the dollar, while also expanding military spending dramatically and giving American oil companies tighter control over oil fields in the Middle East.

There you have finances, military and big oil (enormous energy markets) all benefiting. The religious overtones are also obvious, and think of how many anti-psychotic or anti-depressant pills US soldiers are put on. So then you can add religious institutions and big pharma into the mix as also benefiting by extension. And the CIA continues to subvert nations with fascist uprising and mercenary armies, for its own purposes.

In a deeper context it continued the basic servitude we all have to a greater or lesser degree towards certain institutions. But it was a temporary fix, just a band-aid on the global situation, where there are too many nations no longer willing to cooperate and too many people waking up.

[Satori]

Many years ago, and coincidentally again just a week ago, I had read and heard of the theory that WTC 1 and 2 (but not WTC 7) were designed with explosives or to readily allow placement of explosives in them so that they could be destroyed in a controlled manner if the need to do so ever arose. The idea was that they were so huge that some sort of catastrophe may fell them or parts of them onto adjoining buildings and cause more death and destruction than just that which would occur to WTC 1 or 2 alone. However, true or not, that does not explain the manner of their pulverization on 9/11 or the high energy explosives and incendiary devices used to pulverize them. Nor does it explain why WTC 7 was destroyed. Lastly, and most importantly, it leaves unanswered and inexplicable the decision to destroy the buildings in a controlled manner with 3,000 or more people in WTC 1 and 2, not to mention the damage done to others on the ground, directly and over time due to exposure to deleterious substances, nor the destruction allowed to happen to adjoining structures. If this was designed years ago to minimize and mitigate loss of life and destruction of property, it was an unmitigated failure. I do not believe 9/11 was an unmitigated failure for those who planned and carried it out. No, indeed not.

[Satori]

By the way, I am the author of the March 2015 article mentioned above re the destruction of WTC 1, 2 and 7 and posted at www.journalof911studies.com. I thought it may be worthy of a thread, but I'm embarrassed to say that I could not determine how to start a thread. If any of you feel it is worthy of a thread and are willing to make it so, I'd be obliged if you made it so, or relieve me of my ignorance and point me in the right direction.

[Bluegreen]

By the way, I am the author of the March 2015 article mentioned above re the destruction of WTC 1, 2 and 7 and posted at www.journalof911studies.com. I thought it may be worthy of a thread, but I'm embarrassed to say that I could not determine how to start a thread. If any of you feel it is worthy of a thread and are willing to make it so, I'd be obliged if you made it so, or relieve me of my ignorance and point me in the right direction.

Thank you for your efforts. You cover some important points. Perhaps one who enjoys examining legal issues will respond on this or another thread in which you have so graciously identified yourself. An informed perspective is always appreciated. Maybe we can solve this mathematical equation which has me genuinely perplexed i.e. documented number of survivors.

Because I am naturally lazy and I thought it was funny, I limited my research to Wikipedia, which says that either 17,500 or 14,100 were in the building at the time. This tells us that more than 65% of the workforce was not in the building. I don't think I could get a loan from the bank with that kind of business plan but so what, let's take them at their word. They also say 9,000 survivors. Taking away the documented deaths from the 14,100 and 17,500 figures, we are left with 8,129 and 11,529 survivors respectively. Compare with the 9,000 figure. Wikipedia is giving us three different answers to the question, "How many survived the September 11 attacks?" (8,129-9,000-11,529) And there were 0 visitors that day, right?

The only documentation I've come across comes from a medical study conducted by Columbia University, a number that can be found on columbia.edu and oxford.edu, 3,271. Compare to the above figures. I know there is a Compensation Fund that involves a lot of lawyers. How many people proved to the court they were eligible? Is this figure available? Maybe the NYFD has a number?

[Bluegreen]

Okay, this is progress. While the NYFD has plenty of statistics about death and none about life, Troy Rosasco, writing about the 9/11 Victims Compensation Fund for some hotshot law office, says that of 18,148 claimants (Huffington Post says 55,188) "9,677 have been determined eligible". This number of 9,677 may be compromised in relation to the other totals, as it includes people ten blocks away who became ill and many who may or may not show up on the other lists, but it is a number, and I think it's fair to say that a court has determined that these are "Survivors of the September 11 Attacks" so it is documented. Interesting to note that only 3,128 are getting paid (Huffpost says 1,843).

http://www.zadrogaclaimsinfo.com/topics/the-victims-compensation-fund

Our numbers are definitely starting to narrow into a particular range. :)

[Bluegreen]

Many years ago, and coincidentally again just a week ago, I had read and heard of the theory that WTC 1 and 2 (but not WTC 7) were designed with explosives or to readily allow placement of explosives in them so that they could be destroyed in a controlled manner if the need to do so ever arose. The idea was that they were so huge that some sort of catastrophe may fell them or parts of them onto adjoining buildings and cause more death and destruction than just that which would occur to WTC 1 or 2 alone. However, true or not, that does not explain the manner of their pulverization on 9/11 or the high energy explosives and incendiary devices used to pulverize them. Nor does it explain why WTC 7 was destroyed. Lastly, and most importantly, it leaves unanswered and inexplicable the decision to destroy the buildings in a controlled manner with 3,000 or more people in WTC 1 and 2, not to mention the damage done to others on the ground, directly and over time due to exposure to deleterious substances, nor the destruction allowed to happen to adjoining structures. If this was designed years ago to minimize and mitigate loss of life and destruction of property, it was an unmitigated failure. I do not believe 9/11 was an unmitigated failure for those who planned and carried it out. No, indeed not.

Hard to believe this is just part of the big wazoo just a small part

Its a giant jigsaw puzzle and its there to be figured out and if we figure it out they the 1% count on it for us to retreat on a physical level or an intellectual level or both and quite honestly it is hard to blame people for doing exactly that

The Beast is that ugly

If we don't retreat they count on us staggering for a bit and stepping back and saying
"No. That's impossible. That's too unbelievable. People would not be that cruel to each other."

And its hard to blame folks for doing that

We don't truly understand that murderous mentality
We the 99% are not killers though some are brainwashed
We may have disagreements and even altercations but we don't want the person to die at our hand
We don't want the person we can't see to die in our name
Knock on every door on your street and they'll tell you the same thing

But if we still don't retreat then they count on it for us to be ridiculed they don't have to lift a finger can sit back and drink cognac and laugh while their programmed unfortunates do it for them
Ha ha

And after all this if we are still there and standing getting our faces pelted in the driving rain
Well then they get into some nasty stuff

Its a battle not of weapons or even technology
Its a battle for consciousness fought with consciousness

Here's my plan
Look at the words of Jesus for tips and clues about dealing with our current dilemma
Mind my own business and make a few jokes
Help other people
I figure this gives me the best shot at finishing on the lead lap and if I can do that I've got a chance

Blessings
:happy::happy:

[Bluegreen]

Information continues to come in with our ongoing and ultimately pointless quest to count and document the Survivors of the September 11 Attacks. Pointless maybe, meaningless no. Ask any soldier. Ask any Fire Chief. This number should be in the public domain just as the fatalities, just as any fire and there may be reasons at best nefarious as to why this does not seem to be the case.

Let's take a moment for some cognitive dissonance as we reflect on the fact that according to Wikipedia each and every office on each and every floor was two thirds (65-71%) empty at quarter to nine on a normal business day. Believe me, I wish my office was like this. Half empty is weird, two thirds downright spooky. This is based on the State of New York's figure of 50,000 "on any given day" which refers to workers only and excludes the expected 5,800 visitors, a not insignificant number.

This is possibly the most interesting and accurate data so far, even more interesting is that it is wholly unsubstantiated. There is no reason to believe or doubt its provenance. It is an internet message board titled "World Trade Center Survivor Public Postings" last updated on 2001-09-14 and lists 20,963 names and their medical status as of that date.

http://elbnet.com/wtc/wtclist.html

Almost 21,000 survivors, all with access to the internet. What to make of this number? Well we can make what we want of it so let's try to make some sense. We can take it at face value as far as it goes and call it ligit and hopefully that's not the first mistake. There is no doubt that New York City was full of frantic people desperate to communicate with each other. A closer examination reveals 9 of 10 saying they were "Fine" or "Okay" as opposed to "Injured" or "Critical" so we will assume those individuals did indeed survive and our number becomes 18,866. Throw out a couple thousand as pranks and throw in a couple hundred who couldn't get to a computer and we wind up with 17,000. Inadmissible but a compelling argument that there were about 17,000 survivors of the September 11 attacks and now the numbers are all messed up! Darn it! :(

Recap Roundup of answers to the question,
"How many survived the September 11 attacks?"
So-Called Documented
8,129
9,000
11,429
Documented
3,271
9,677
Undocumented
20,963
17,000

How many claimed to be a Survivor of the September 11 Attacks by registering with The Victims Compensation Fund?
About 55,000 (Documented) ;)

[Bluegreen]

I've come up against kind of a dead end. Unable to ascertain any further numbers, I guess we'll just have to take the government's word on it that there is no official count as to the number of Survivors of the September 11 Attacks and "Don't you understand how chaotic that situation was" and "How do you expect anyone to keep track of human lives" and "Just stop asking questions!" Okay. I get it, President Obama. "Uncle." I'll stop poking around. It's like you said,

"These are facts to be dealt with, not opinions to be debated."

And I'm just trying to get some facts, there's no debate here, the only thing debatable may be what kind of food to serve in jail and isn't dealing with facts precisely your advice?

(But) just like when I put down a cup of coffee and forget where it is and I'm walking around feeling like an arm is missing, this mathematical equation is bugging my bean so let's try to get some "closure" (god I hate that word).

Being very cavalier about the whole thing and taking the largest number available for both survivors and fatalities we have 26,934 in the building(s) at 8:45 Tuesday morning which is 54% capacity (still half empty), but during the course of this investigation I did run across one survivor who said something to the effect of, "The place didn't really fill up til 10 or 11" so okay. Quite naturally, the next question becomes "How many members of an illuminati family worked at the World Trade Center?" Certainly one or two. 1,000? 25,000? Why not? Followers of this site have heard plenty of testimony from so-called illuminati family members and they almost uniformly tell us that many of their ranks work within the field of Politics, Entertainment, Business, and Finance.

From http://www.AttackOnAmerica.net and http://www.history.com :

12:45 AM: Willie Brown, mayor of San Francisco, receives a call from what he described as "Airport Security" advising him that Americans should be cautious about their air travel on September 11th. Mayor Brown was scheduled to fly from San Francisco to New York City on September 11th.
(Did anybody in the building(s) receive a similar call or email advising them to GET OUT NOW? Certainly one or two because)
6:45 AM: Two employees at the Israeli-owned instant messaging company Adigo, located two blocks away, report receiving a call warning of the imminent attack on the Twin Towers.
6:45 AM: President Bush goes for a jog around the golf course at the Colony Beach & Tennis Resort.
(What a life this guy leads. Interesting name for a tennis resort.)
8:40 AM: FAA notifies NORAD of a hijacked plane heading toward the Indian Point Nuclear Power Stations.
8:46 AM: First plane hits the North Tower.
8:46 AM: NORAD scrambles two F-15 fighter jets.
8:55 AM: South Tower building-wide PA system announces, "The building is secure. Please return to your desks."
9:02 AM: Second plane hits the South Tower.
9:03 AM: 10-14,000 people are in the process of evacuating the North Tower.
9:06 AM: As President Bush is reading "The Pet Goat" to a group of Florida elementary school children, Chief of Staff Andrew Card interrupts to whisper in his ear, "A second plane has hit the second tower. America is under attack." The President later explains that he decided to continue the lesson rather than alarm the students.
("The Decider.")
9:17 AM: FAA shuts down all New York City airports.
9:21 AM: The Port Authority close all bridges and tunnels in the New York City area.

And so:
26,934 people in the building(s) minus 5,971 fatalities make 20,963 undocumented survivors minus 9,677 documented survivors leaves a remainder of an unaccounted for 11,286 wandering around and trapped on the Island Manhattan with no place to go. Where did they go?

The following was quietly promoted as a "little known tale of 9/11 heroics", a heartwarming story of ordinary shlubs stepping up to the plate and doing the right thing in the face of adversity, narrated by illuminati pimp Tom "I Sold My Soul To Satan" Hanks which tells us that a spontaneous and hastily assembled group of tugboats transported over half a million (500,000) people off the island.

MDOrzF7B2Kg
Mathematical equation solved! :)

And just to remind folks that while there is plenty of information we know, there is at least that much and probably more that we don't and are not intended to:

"The Pet Goat"
KITE-KIT-PLANE-STEEL-MUST

yTjz7rfPjfQ

"And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw the plane hit the tower - the TV was obviously on, and I used to fly myself - and I said, "There's one terrible pilot." And I said, "It must have been a horrible accident." But I was whisked off from there. I didn't have much time to think about it."
- George W. Bush

Comments and/or further information quite welcome
Thank you for reading

[idiit]

What is known about 9/11 is that there are many incredible facts that continue to be ignored by the government and the mainstream media. Here are fourteen.
1.An outline of what was to become the 9/11 Commission Report was produced before the investigation began. The outline was kept secret from the Commission’s staff and appears to have determined the outcome of the investigation.
2.The 9/11 Commission claimed sixty-three (63) times in its Report that it could find “no evidence” related to important aspects of the crimes.
3.One person, Shayna Steiger, issued 12 visas to the alleged hijackers in Saudi Arabia. Steiger issued some of the visas without interviewing the applicants and fought with another employee at the embassy who tried to prevent her lax approach.
4.Before 9/11, the nation’s leading counter-terrorism expert repeatedly notified his friends in the United Arab Emirates of top-secret U.S. plans to capture Osama bin Laden. These treasonous leaks prevented Bin Laden’s capture on at least two separate occasions.
5.Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger was caught stealing documents from the National Archives that had been requested by the 9/11 Commission. The Commission had previously been denied access to the documents but the White House reluctantly agreed to turn them over just as Berger was trying to steal them..
6.The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed several times and, in the end, paradoxically exonerated the military by saying that the military had lied many times about its response. The man who was behind several of the changing accounts was a specialist in political warfare (i.e. propaganda).
7.Military exercises being conducted on the day of 9/11 mimicked the attacks as they were occurring and obstructed the response to the attacks. NORAD commander Ralph Eberhart sponsored those exercises, failed to do his job that day, and later lied to Congress about it (if the 9/11 Commission account is true).
8.A third skyscraper collapsed late in the afternoon on 9/11. This was WTC 7, a 47-story building that the government’s final report says fell into its own footprint due to office fires. The building’s tenants included U.S. intelligence agencies and a company led in part by Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Meetings were scheduled there to discuss terrorism and explosives on the morning of 9/11.
9.News agencies, including BBC and CNN, announced the destruction of WTC 7 long before it happened. One BBC reporter announced the collapse while viewers could see the still-standing building right behind her in the video. Years later, after claiming that it had lost the tapes and then found them again, BBC’s answer to this astonishing report was that everything was just “confusing and chaotic” that day. Of course, one problem with this is that the news agencies predicted the exact building, of the many damaged in the area, that would collapse. Another big problem is that no one could have possibly predicted the collapse of WTC 7 given the unprecedented and unbelievable official account for how that happened.
10.Construction of the new, 52-story WTC 7 was completed two years before the government knew what happened to the first WTC 7. In fact, when the new building was completed in 2006, the spokesman for the government investigation said, “We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.” The construction of the new building, without regard for how the first one was destroyed, indicates that building construction professionals in New York City did not believe it could ever happen again.
11.Ultimately, building construction codes were not changed as a result of the root causes cited by the National Institute for Standards and Technology for destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings. This fact shows that the international building construction community does not believe that the WTC buildings were destroyed as stated in the official account.
12.AMEC, the company that just finished rebuilding the exact spot where Flight 77 was said to hit, was put in charge of cleanup at the WTC and the Pentagon. The man who ran the company, Peter Janson, was a long-time business associate of Donald Rumsfeld.
13.The response of the U.S. Secret Service to the 9/11 attacks suggests foreknowledge of the events in that the agency failed to protect the president from the obvious danger posed by terrorists.
14.The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission notified the FBI of suspected 9/11 insider trading transactions. That evidence was ignored and the suspects were not even questioned by the FBI or the 9/11 Commission



Fourteen Incredible Facts About 9/11

Posted on August 8, 2015 by Kevin Ryan

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/08/fourteen-facts-about-911.html