Renowned UFO And Alien researcher Timothy Good In Q&A 17 / 6 / 15 ...Ritchie Allen show.

[Cidersomerset]

The Richie Allen Show on Davidicke.com: Renowned UFO And Alien researcher Timothy Good In Q&A

Wednesday 17th June 2015 at 05:12 By David Icke

mBMALiCHVA8

Published on 16 Jun 2015
Please Support The Show – http://richieallenshow.com/donate/

[mosquito]

Thanks Steve, I'm in the middle of listening to this right now.

I have to say I'm unimpressed by Mr. Good. The most obvious thing about the interview is that he isn't actually saying anything. It's all ....

"well maybe", "I don't know about that", "I can't remember", "I haven't got the information to hand right now", "yes, I've heard that too", "I must say I'm sceptical about that"; Along with single-word answers to long questions from Ritchie.

His book "Above Top Secret" was equally uniformative ......

"Here's a picture of a plane similar to the plane being flown by xxx when he saw the UFO"
"Here's a pilot similar to the pilot who reported the incident on p 100"
"Here's a picture of the sky, with some clouds, which might have looked like the clouds that capt x saw the UFO behind"
"Here's an artist's impression of what capt X might have seen"
etc etc

I'm 44 minutes through the interview and haven't learned anything at all. I'll continue listening as it's possible he might actually say something worthwhile.

[Cidersomerset]

Thanks Steve, I'm in the middle of listening to this right now.

I have to say I'm unimpressed by Mr. Good. The most obvious thing about the interview is that he isn't actually saying anything. It's all ....

"well maybe", "I don't know about that", "I can't remember", "I haven't got the information to hand right now", "yes, I've heard that too", "I must say I'm sceptical about that"; Along with single-word answers to long questions from Ritchie.


He does tend to be cautious on these Q & A shows , I think sometimes the pace
is to fast for him , and he is more relaxed quoting his own research. Near the
beginning someone asks about the Annunaki , and he does not develop. But
he does say soon after he believes the ET's were probably here before us and
may have been instrumental in our creation. ( Which does parallel the Annunaki ).

He does think the MOD is subservient to the US in UFO matters and Pyrimids
may have been used as a power source for charging UFO's. He does say
hybrid humans are living among us as far as he is concerned and gives
an example , from a conference he attended in 2006. He has seen a couple
possible UFO's and is fully signed up to the Rendlesham Forrest incident.Also
some other subjects as the interview progress's from giant 10ft alien , to
underground bases and more...........

He does not always give direct answers , but keeps saying he keeps an open mind
on many alternate views and theories about UFO's. Yes its frustrating but if he does
not know categorically about Portals and other specific topics .I cannot fault him as
I think many of the concepts and questions may be true , but I can not prove it.....LOL

[moekatz]

He better represents his take on matters in his books. I've had them in my library for quite a while and have re-read them from time to time.

[lucidity]

Hi Siblings,

Seems to me that he's behaving like an honest man.

He's refusing to elaborate on matters that he has no, or limited, knowledge of.
He's refusing to confirm things he can't prove or isn't certain of.
But... he's happy to confirm and elaborate on questions that he does have
knowledge of. I suspect he believes what's he's saying.

Compare that to, for example, Simon Parkes, who volunteers an answer
for any question asked. Remember that tripe he said about Putin shooting
down MH17 to avoid a biological attack on some Russian city.
Just utter trash!

So... i suspect...however unspectacular his testimony is. Pay attention to
what he _is_ saying, because probably, he believes it to be the truth.

be happy :-)

lucidity

[Phoenix1304]

Thanks for posting Cider. I read Mr Good’s first book many years ago, it may have been the source of numerous stories about UFO experiences that over the years I seem to have known forever. But I didn’t hold my breath for the next one or, in fact, read another of his books.

I got frustrated with this interview because I haven’t read his latest book and don’t feel inclined to now, although I’m sure there’s some great stories and pictures. I want answers, not more questions. He ‘just didn’t know’ the answer to so many of the questions put to him, It’s nice that he’s not a bull****ter and pontificating blusterer. But to dismiss the 666 as ‘fun’, for example, was odd to say the least. I can’t imagine he’s ignorant of the secrets in plain sight, sacred geometry, Isis worship et al.

Maybe he’s in contact and forgets, victim of a blanking device like the Men in Black have, and has a clue about that, but meanwhile happily plays his violin. Maybe his role is just to say, here look, there’s all these strange stories. What do they mean?

Why did he THREE TIMES tell us about Ben Ritch (I wondered if his brain was compromised, he didn’t seem to remember he’d already told the story twice) who said we have the ability to produce anything we can imagine tied up in black ops and it would take an act of ‘god’ to get them out to the public. He believes Ben Ritch but not Schneider or Dean. No explanation. Go figure.

It felt to me like he’s been ‘silenced’. Gagged. Or is gagging himself. He wasn’t telling us what he really thinks. Maybe he’s got all the answers now and that’s why he says over and over and over again with finality, ’I don’t know’ ; ) ! Such a conversation killer, poor old Ritchie. He did his best.

I devoured Erik von Daniken’s books as a sixteen year old and was very excited about them. He changed my world view in that I agreed unquestionably that we are not the first advanced civilisation on this planet. It has always seemed obvious that the anomalies in Peru and Egypt and Salisbury plain, in terms of ‘how did primitive man build it?”. Well obviously he didn’t. There have been advanced civilisations of all manner, for millenia, interracting with man. Although they pretty much went underground and cloaked in latter millenia.

Mosquito, I hear ya, I want to hear questions answered, although I tire of so much BS, it is nice when someone can explain it all for us eh? Give us some bloody answers! I suppose there are those that by contemplating the questions his work raises, may be transformed in some way, as I was with von Daniken. But I agree with you Above Top Secret was disappointing. As was this interview.

I wasn’t comfortable with the sense of hiding about him. But maybe he thinks, you ‘can’t say too much’ because there’s morons out there that cannot be trusted with knowledge. Then why be interviewed? It really wasn't a good interview. He mentioned 'bug' type aliens a couple of times and maybe elaboration is in the book, but if this interview was to promote the book, it failed as far as I'm concerned.

As I was writing this, Lucidity's post comes up at the bottom of the page and I have to smile as I deleted this line from my paragraph to Mosquito above 'Where's Simon? Simon Says. Simon for Prime Minister'. I deleted it because it was flippant, but he is just such a great example of someone that is not afraid to answer every question and that is just so delicious, and I would not dismiss Simon out of hand, or insult him, he too, believes what he's saying, I believe. At the very least I respect that and rather like him, I think vitriol is inappropriate and I was surprised to see you speak so harshly of a widely respected Avalon member.

BTW, Ritchie’s thought about some wars being fought to protect a secret was a zinger. We need to keep up the intention for transparency, exposure, disclosure, it’s working. Wasn’t it odd that Leon Brittain died of cancer two weeks before testifying? Shame they took so long to find a judge that wasn’t compromised like the first two.

But we won’t have been the only ones to have noticed and maybe wondered if they really can give someone cancer. Maduro pres. of Venezuela claimed they did that to Chavez and my hunch is it’s true.

Meanwhile, I’ll go see if I can find the von Daniken interview, I would love to know where he’s at now and hope he’s a more interesting interviewee than Mr Good, who, I suspect would make a rather more interesting dinner guest.

[Cidersomerset]

Maybe he’s in contact and forgets, victim of a blanking device like the Men in Black have, and has a clue about that, but meanwhile happily plays his violin. Maybe his role is just to say, here look, there’s all these strange stories. What do they mean?

Could be he is 73 yrs old and having trouble understanding some of Ritchies
questions...LOL . I understand he keeps to certain areas of the field , as do many
others if you listen to them, Bob Dean, Stanton Friedman , John Lear and many
others even Richard Dolan eventually comes to an end to his research and plants
like Nick Pope stick rigidly to couple cases. Others like Steven Greer speculate and
go into the esoteric , then you get many others with various cases and experiences.

When I started in this phase of looking down the rabbit hole in aprox 2006/7 and
found project Camelot and followed Bill and Kerry's adventures in commando style
interviewing , I basically really only wanted to know if ET's really existed ? and
if they were here ? But after hearing John Lear interviews it got weirder and since
then we have gone from Ancient aliens to future utopia and 'every which way
you can' in between ...LOL . I did know some of this before from Arthur C Clarke,
being a Sky -fy fan and the occasional tv doc on UFO's and the unknown. But its
been everyday more or less for the last 8 years and although I'm pretty sure
ET's and many other weird and wonderful things exist it this reality. I still have
no physical proof , though like everyone on forums like Avalon I'm enjoying
the ride even if it is frustrating at time and researchers like Timothy have only
so much to say. He did say this will probably be his last book unless something
happened.

Giovanni put up a very good interview with Joseph Farrell yesterday about
mystical teachings which covered a wide area from the ancients , Templers
to today. There are also many other researchers and new subjects coming
up related to the subject. But as John Lear said about Bill Cooper when
he started embellishing some of his stories. According to John he knew
some of what he said was wrong and said that he was suffering from
'UFO disease ' basically trying to find knew interesting subjects to shock
their audience. This is not so easy to do now a days as with the web
interviews are happening all the time in the many shows and by Skype
that this technology has brought fourth. So if you watch/listen to enough
of them you get a feel for who knows and is investigating what.

We have an appetite for information on this subject and most of it is
recycled and there is much speculation and disinfo spread all over the
net. Which brings me back to Timothy he may not be exciting but
he is consistent with his particular message , which may be outdated
for some I agree.

====================================================
====================================================
====================================================
====================================================
====================================================
====================================================


This article nothing to do with this thread just storing info for possible use elsewhere !!


While watching this I was thinking of Kenneth Arnold and the nine craft he saw
at Mount Rainier

https://theawakezone.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/kenneth-arnold-showing-an-image.jpg
https://theawakezone.wordpress.com/2014/07/19/ufos-are-real-why-the-government-denies-the-truth-about-our-alien-past/

==================================================

Northrop flying wing

With the XB-35 program seriously behind schedule by 1944, and the end of piston-
engined combat aircraft in sight, the production contract for this propeller-driven
type was cancelled in May of that year. Nevertheless, the Flying Wing design was
still sufficiently interesting to the Air Force that work was continued on testing a
single YB-35A production aircraft.[1]

Among the aircraft later completed were two airframes that the Air Force ordered
be fitted with jet propulsion and designated as YB-49s.[1] The first of these new YB-
49 jet-powered aircraft flew on 22 October 1947 (from Northrop airfield in
Hawthorne, CA,(source, Los Angeles Daily News, page 3 Oct.22 1947) and
immediately proved more promising than its piston-engined counterpart. The YB-49
set an unofficial endurance record of staying continually above 40,000 ft (12,200
m) for 6.5 hours.[2]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_YB-49


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/YB49-2_300.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_YB-49

https://johneaves.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/071204-f-9999j-041.jpg
Northrop YB-49 is photographed on the runway Dec. 23, 1948. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Northrop YB-49 "Flying Wing" - Taxing, Take Off & Flight Operations (1947)

kuIFvNA1UgU

[mosquito]

Ok, I'll relent. He did actually say some interesting stuff towards the end of the interview.
Although I stand by what I said about "Above Top Secret", I can see that he's not exactly the publicity seeking chap that we're overwhelmed with these days, and he certainly has some knowledge worth sharing.
I'd like to read the latest book, which sounds quite interesting.

[TravelerJim]

I study UFO researchers themselves because I am quite certain that the ufo truth movement is a controlled movement. So a researcher who has "accidents" or is discredited in some way could be very well be onto something. Good really hasn't seen a lot of interference I do not think...