Healing Cancer from the Inside Out - Documentary

[Akasha]

As this is my first post, I'd like to say HI to all.
Here is my reason for going vegan. There was a 1 hour documentary on the "Free Speech" channel
called "Curing cancer from within" which I taped.
A few months later, my daughter contracted colon cancer, so I told her to watch this show and follow the advice
that was given. And yes, the 4 or 5 doctors on the show all highly recommended a vegan diet for curing cancer.
Her own doctor found a large tumor and recommended surgery. Before her next appointment in 2 weeks, she closely
followed the vegan diet. After the doctor checked her over again, he was utterly amazed at how that large tumor
had shrunk down to less than half it's original size. After telling him what she was doing, he just said "Whatever
you're doing just keep it up" as surgery is now not necessary.
She is now a firm believer in this diet and said I had saved her life.

The documentary which Infonut mentioned in the above post is called Healing Cancer from the Inside Out (IMDb link here (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1646206/)). In light of its positive influence on her daughter's health I've given it it's own thread so that it will remain more visible.

It features T. Colin Campbell (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T._Colin_Campbell), author of The China Study (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_China_Study), as well as Charlotte Gerson, daughter of The Gerson Therapy creator, Max Gerson (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Gerson), and John McDougall (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_A._McDougall), author of The Starch Solution to name but a few.

I would say it is essential viewing for anyone suffering from cancer!

aKBCm3-q4Kg

[Joe Akulis]

From Wade's terrific article: http://www.ahealedplanet.net/medicine.htm

"In the 1940s, a French biologist began pursuing an independent path that ended up exploring the same territory that Béchamp and Rife did. Gaston Naessens was another gifted scientist who came upon the problems of the resolution limits of optical microscopes. After intensive work with lenses, Naessens realized that playing with the wavelength of light was the only avenue open to him in seeing life processes at higher resolutions. He experimented with magnetic fields, polarizing filters, and ultraviolet light and developed a microscope that got up to a 30,000-diameter resolution, and could resolve objects as small as 150 angstroms, far less than the 4,000-angstrom wavelength of visible light. As is the case with Rife's microscope, current optical theory cannot explain how it works, but again, one does not need optical theory to believe what one’s eyes reveal. Optical theory is due for an overhaul.

As with Rife, when Naessens began his microscopic explorations, viewing life processes that nobody else could see, he confirmed Béchamp's pleomorphic work. Unlike Rife, electron microscopes existed when Naessens developed his microscope, but electron microscopes cannot view life processes. Because electron microscopy subjects its specimens to a vacuum, electronic bombardment, and desiccation, it kills or seriously distorts any life process it might view. Thus, electron microscopes produce snapshots of dead matter, which is another variation on masculine research, terminating life in order to observe it. Because orthodox research does not use microscopes that can see it, the discoveries of Naessens are as ignored today as Béchamp's and Rife's were."


People who have been able to study our bloodstream up close have learned what pleomorphism is, and soon after that, learned that our own immune systems have what it takes to eliminate cancer, given the proper help, and soon after that, those people are run out of whatever country they were living in.

:-(

[Akasha]

Wade's site (http://www.ahealedplanet.net/home.htm) is a gold mine indeed!

If I'm not mistaken, Max Gerson endured similar treatment to Rife.

[Joe Akulis]

The story of Jimmy Keller in Ellen Brown's Forbidden Medicine book was also depressing to read about. I guess there's lots of stories like that, but you'll never hear about them unless you know where to look, and have an open mind about things. Big challenge for most people. It was for me.

Edit: Actually, here's a similar story from Jimmy Keller's own euology, given by his son:

"After despair, depression and disfigurement, and only at the insistence of his parents (who were constantly praying for his healing) he traveled to a clinic in Dallas and started on Dr. Hoxey's herbal based treatment. While he said he did not believe it would work, he took it because of his parents. After some months, and seeing the lumps in his neck go away, and feeling better, he realized he might live-and he did! Then the authorities shut down the clinic in Dallas. He no longer had access to treatment that was healing him. He couldn't believe it or understand why."

[Michael Moewes]

The truth is comming. Most people with cancer died due to chemo and radiation. It wasn't the cancer that killed them but the so called western Medicine.
These guys here are really doing a great job in educating about cancer and what really helps. For all those of you who have some relation with this issue,
I highly recommend to check it out.
http://thetruthaboutcancer.com/

Live healthy, Live Vegan

[Hip Hipnotist]

I've posted these programs before. As long as there are 'cures' for cancer ( as simple as food ) that don't include chemo and radiation that pretty much will end you up 'six feet under' I'll continue to post 'em where appropriate. Like here...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc1rtIxvkao

There are 11 episodes in all, all free on Youtube.

These are the latest and best that I've had the opportunity to view. I think you'll agree. :thumbsup:

[Hip Hipnotist]

Here's another, anyone can understand...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddADeIsXrOw

... even my cat, Lily, who's sitting on my lap purrrring like you wouldn't believe because of the delicious, nutritious, VEGAN cat food she consumes daily.

BTW: A survey was conducted with oncologists wherein they were asked if they were diagnosed with cancer would they undergo the same treatment ( chemo/radiation ) they prescribe to their patients. Guess what? Over 80% said, "NO!" Makes sense. Not only do they violate their 'hypocritical oath' but they're also hypocrites. Go figure. :confused: