MUST SEE, NASA Doctoring MARS images again.

[Sunny-side-up]

The recent post:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?83917-23-Jul-2015-NASA-s-Curiosity-Rover-Inspects-Unusual-Bedrock

Linked me to look at this image:
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/docs/mars-curiosity-rover-missoula-pia19829-full.jpg

Notice it!

Hint look at the background above the rock foreground rock layer.

The triangle shaped background parts of the image composite are each the same image!
Same image but very poorly imposed and blurred into the whole image!
BUT not just poorly added, you can see the intention was to make a false background by altering the added parts?
What was the real background, what have they poorly hidden!
And how stupid to use image that is so easily identified (even after poor doctoring)
DOH NASA busted here me thinks!

[MorningFox]

Please put the image tags around it image link so everyone can see it in the post.

It's a composite of five images. I may very well be wrong but the background is obviously further away so the same area probably features in more than one of the images. They are compositing the five images to show the foreground, so the background repeats. I'd love to find evidence of them doctoring images because I strongly believe they do, but I don't think this is it.

[Ewan]

I agree with you MorningFox, and yet.. when you are in a vehicle and look out to the side the foreground rushes by relative to a much slower moving background. The background in these composited images appear to be rotating away for little foreground movement. I would need to know the focal distance of the lens and how far away it was from the foreground objects to make more sense of this.

https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/docs/mars-curiosity-rover-missoula-pia19829-full.jpg

[Sunny-side-up]

Please put the image tags around it image link so everyone can see it in the post.

It's a composite of five images. I may very well be wrong but the background is obviously further away so the same area probably features in more than one of the images. They are composting the five images to show the foreground, so the background repeats. I'd love to find evidence of them doctoring images because I strongly believe they do, but I don't think this is it.

Yup, taking the picture from slightly different position, so it would be slightly different angle! yup your right.
Add them together in a composite and you will get a messed-up background, I can see that now, good call MorningFox

So what is the actual shape of this rock formation?
Is it like a wall or a curved long boulder shape?
Because if you then notice the focal point is that one small background area, where the shadows don't seem to change very much!

The rock layer is very interesting though, much to think about in relation to it's formation, good pic.

PS: yup I normally do post images so you can see them directly on page, just thought this image was off the page. I didn't have much time this morning to fine tune :)